9
Detecting or Falsifying the Multiverse David Spergel Daan Meerburg

Detecting or Falsifying the Multiverse David Spergel Daan Meerburg

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Detecting or Falsifying the Multiverse David Spergel Daan Meerburg

Detecting or Falsifying the Multiverse

David Spergel

Daan Meerburg

Page 2: Detecting or Falsifying the Multiverse David Spergel Daan Meerburg

Is our observational Universe unique or is it part of a much larger multiverse?

Page 3: Detecting or Falsifying the Multiverse David Spergel Daan Meerburg

What are the possible signatures in our observable Universe and how should the signatures be optimally extracted from the data?

Page 4: Detecting or Falsifying the Multiverse David Spergel Daan Meerburg

*Negative Curvature

*Bubble collisions

*Vacuum from the Multiverse

We can measure the multiverse if:

Page 5: Detecting or Falsifying the Multiverse David Spergel Daan Meerburg

*Negative Curvature

De Sitter Parent Universe

Emerging Universe needs to be Negatively curved

Improve constraints using multiple data sets: e.g. redshift-space distortions andCMB-lensing galaxy correlations

Page 6: Detecting or Falsifying the Multiverse David Spergel Daan Meerburg

*Bubble Collisions

Stephen Feeney et al.

See e.g. Matthew Kleban’s group and talk

Page 7: Detecting or Falsifying the Multiverse David Spergel Daan Meerburg

*Vacuum from the Multiverse

What determines the state ? This will depend on the ground state of the parent Universe (inaccessible spacetime)

Question?

Is there an observational difference between our Universe just being de Sitter or being a de Sitter bubble nucleated in a motherde Sitter space (aka the Multiverse)?

Page 8: Detecting or Falsifying the Multiverse David Spergel Daan Meerburg

vs

Page 9: Detecting or Falsifying the Multiverse David Spergel Daan Meerburg

*Vacuum from the MultiversePotential signatures

Requires development of new observational strategies/ estimators

Use CMB, LSS to constrain potential signatures

??