808
The University of Texas / Texas Tribune Poll Cross Tabulations The Texas Politics Project at The University of Texas at Austin in Conjunction with the Texas Tribune June 11, 2014

dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    15

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

The University of Texas / Texas Tribune Poll Cross Tabulations

The Texas Politics Project at The University of Texas at Austin in Conjunction with the Texas Tribune

June 11, 2014

Page 2: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Contents

Political Habits 2Q2. Political Interest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2Q3. Voting Habit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13

Texas Political Mood 25Q4. MIP Country . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25Q5. MIP State . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61Q6. Obama Approval . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 98Q7. Congress Approval . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 110Q8. Rick Perry Approval . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 122Q9. Right Direction/Wrong Track, Country . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 134Q10. National Economy: Better o↵/Worse O↵ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 143Q11. Right Direction/Wrong Track, Texas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 155Q12. Personal Economy: Better o↵/Worse o↵ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 164

Elections 176Q13. 2014 Senate Vote Choice . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 176Q14. 2014 Governor Vote Choice . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 187Q15. 2014 Lieutenant Governor Vote Choice . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 200Q16. 2014 Attorney General Vote Choice . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 212Q17. 2014 Comptroller Vote Choice . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 223Q18. 2014 Land Commissioner Vote Choice . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 234Q19. 2014 Commissioner of Agriculture Vote Choice . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 245Q20. 2014 Railroad Commission Vote Choice . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 256Q21. 2014 Generic Texas Legislature Vote Choice . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 267Q22. Tea Party Support . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 276Q23. Tea Party Influence . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 286Q25. 2016 Republican Presidential Primary Vote Choice . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 296Q26. 2016 Democratic Presidential Primary Vote Choice . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 315

Political Figure Favorability Ratings 328Q27. Ted Cruz Favorability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 328Q28. John Cornyn Favorability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 340Q29. David Alameel Favorability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 352

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

1

Page 3: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q30. Rick Perry Favorability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 364Q31. Greg Abbott Favorability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 376Q32. Wendy Davis Favorability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 388Q33. Leticia Van de Putte Favorability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 400Q34. Dan Patrick Favorability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 412Q35A. Gubernatorial Candidate Issue Trust: Public Education . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 424Q35B. Gubernatorial Candidate Issue Trust: The State Economy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 433Q35C. Gubernatorial Candidate Issue Trust: Immigration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 442Q35D. Gubernatorial Candidate Issue Trust: The State Budget . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 451Q35E. Gubernatorial Candidate Issue Trust: Taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 460Q35F. Gubernatorial Candidate Issue Trust: Ethics in Government . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 469Q35G. Gubernatorial Candidate Issue Trust: Transportation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 478Q35H. Gubernatorial Candidate Issue Trust: Higher Education . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 487

Policy Questions 496Q36A. Education Policy E↵ectiveness: Creating a School Voucher Program . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 496Q36B. Education Policy E↵ectiveness: Expanding the Number of Charter Schools . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 507Q36C. Education Policy E↵ectiveness: Increasing the Pay of Public School Teachers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 518Q36D. Education Policy E↵ectiveness: Increasing Funding for the Public School System . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 529Q36E. Education Policy E↵ectiveness: Providing more incentives for individuals to choose teaching as a profession . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 540Q36F. Education Policy E↵ectiveness: Reducing the number of standardized tests students must take . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 551Q36G. Education Policy E↵ectiveness: Increasing opportunities for online learning . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 562Q36H. Education Policy E↵ectiveness: Establishing a state-wide pre-kindergarten program . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 573Q36I. Education Policy E↵ectiveness: Allowing more localized control over curriculum and standards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 584Q37. MOST E↵ective Education Policy Proposal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 595Q38. Perceived Existence of Gender Gap in Pay . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 610Q39. State’s Role in Addressing Gender Equality in the Workplace . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 620Q40. Death Penalty Support . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 630Q41. Death Penalty Alternative . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 641Q42. Life Sustaining Treatment for Pregnant Women . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 650Q43. A↵ordable Care Act Favorability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 658Q44. A↵ordable Care Act Preference . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 670Q45. In-State Tuition for Illegal Immigrants . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 681Q46A. Agree/Disagree: Most immigrants pay their fair share of taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 690Q46B. Agree/Disagree: We should restrict and control people coming to live in the U.S. more than we do now . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 701Q46C. Agree/Disagree: Newcomers from other countries enrich Texas with their hard work and values . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 712

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

2

Page 4: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q46D. Agree/Disagree: Undocumented immigrants currently living in the United States should be deported immediately . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 723Q47A. Abortion Exceptions: The woman’s own health is seriously endangered . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 734Q47B. Abortion Exceptions: She became pregnant as a result of rape . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 743Q47C. Abortion Exceptions: She became pregnant as a result of incest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 752Q47D. Abortion Exceptions: There is a strong chance of a serious defect in the baby . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 761Q47E. Abortion Exceptions: The family has very low income and cannot a↵ord any more children . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 770Q47F. Abortion Exceptions: She is not married and does not want to marry the man . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 779Q47G. Abortion Exceptions: She is married and does not want any more children . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 788Q48. College Education and Success . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 797

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

3

Page 5: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Political Habits

Q2. Political Interest

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely interested 51 51 47 130 60 150 156 645

82.26 49.04 48.45 36.01 48.39 64.66 71.23-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat interested 9 35 37 152 53 69 46 401

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

4

Page 6: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

14.52 33.65 38.14 42.11 42.74 29.74 21.00-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very interested 1 14 12 41 8 11 11 98

1.61 13.46 12.37 11.36 6.45 4.74 5.02-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all interested 1 4 1 34 3 2 4 49

1.61 3.85 1.03 9.42 2.42 0.86 1.83-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 0 0 0 4 0 0 2 6

0.00 0.00 0.00 1.11 0.00 0.00 0.91-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 62 104 97 361 124 232 219 1199

5.17 8.67 8.09 30.11 10.34 19.35 18.27===================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=====================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total---------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely interested 149 130 366 645

56.87 36.01 63.87---------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat interested 81 152 167 400

30.92 42.11 29.14---------------------------------------------------------------------Not very interested 27 41 29 97

10.31 11.36 5.06---------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all interested 5 34 9 48

1.91 9.42 1.57---------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

5

Page 7: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Don't know 0 4 2 60.00 1.11 0.35

---------------------------------------------------------------------Total 262 361 573 1196

21.91 30.18 47.91=====================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

================================================================================================PID7

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely interested 145 33 66 34 89 57 201 625

56.64 29.20 55.46 30.09 73.55 46.34 67.45------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat interested 85 60 39 46 24 44 82 380

33.20 53.10 32.77 40.71 19.83 35.77 27.52------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very interested 12 12 11 27 7 13 12 94

4.69 10.62 9.24 23.89 5.79 10.57 4.03------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all interested 12 7 3 5 1 9 2 39

4.69 6.19 2.52 4.42 0.83 7.32 0.67------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 2 1 0 1 0 0 1 5

0.78 0.88 0.00 0.88 0.00 0.00 0.34------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 256 113 119 113 121 123 298 1143

22.40 9.89 10.41 9.89 10.59 10.76 26.07================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

6

Page 8: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=======================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely interested 244 34 348 626

49.80 30.09 64.09-----------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat interested 184 46 149 379

37.55 40.71 27.44-----------------------------------------------------------------------Not very interested 36 27 32 95

7.35 23.89 5.89-----------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all interested 23 5 12 40

4.69 4.42 2.21-----------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 3 1 2 6

0.61 0.88 0.37-----------------------------------------------------------------------Total 490 113 543 1146

42.76 9.86 47.38=======================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===============================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

7

Page 9: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Extremely interested 122 250 204 71 64750.62 54.95 76.69 29.83

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat interested 83 165 57 95 400

34.44 36.26 21.43 39.92---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very interested 28 26 4 41 99

11.62 5.71 1.50 17.23---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all interested 8 11 1 27 47

3.32 2.42 0.38 11.34---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 0 3 0 4 7

0.00 0.66 0.00 1.68---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 241 455 266 238 1200

20.08 37.92 22.17 19.83===============================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==========================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely interested 18 136 179 63 167 84 647

43.90 38.53 53.92 55.26 67.61 73.68----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat interested 10 158 110 42 58 23 401

24.39 44.76 33.13 36.84 23.48 20.18----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very interested 4 38 32 5 17 3 99

9.76 10.76 9.64 4.39 6.88 2.63

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

8

Page 10: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all interested 7 20 8 4 4 4 47

17.07 5.67 2.41 3.51 1.62 3.51----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 2 1 3 0 1 0 7

4.88 0.28 0.90 0.00 0.40 0.00----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 41 353 332 114 247 114 1201

3.41 29.39 27.64 9.49 20.57 9.49==========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely interested 112 141 66 151 172 642

59.57 53.21 50.00 53.55 52.28-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat interested 56 85 49 105 105 400

29.79 32.08 37.12 37.23 31.91-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very interested 10 25 11 20 33 99

5.32 9.43 8.33 7.09 10.03-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all interested 9 13 4 5 18 49

4.79 4.91 3.03 1.77 5.47-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 1 1 2 1 1 6

0.53 0.38 1.52 0.35 0.30-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 188 265 132 282 329 1196

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

9

Page 11: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

15.72 22.16 11.04 23.58 27.51=========================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==========================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA gena ~ACAs nati Mixed Other Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely interested 439 62 111 13 2 8 11 646

61.14 40.00 40.66 59.09 50.00 61.54 78.57------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat interested 206 69 108 9 1 4 3 400

28.69 44.52 39.56 40.91 25.00 30.77 21.43------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very interested 52 12 34 0 0 1 0 99

7.24 7.74 12.45 0.00 0.00 7.69 0.00------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all interested 17 10 19 0 1 0 0 47

2.37 6.45 6.96 0.00 25.00 0.00 0.00------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 4 2 1 0 0 0 0 7

0.56 1.29 0.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 718 155 273 22 4 13 14 1199

59.88 12.93 22.77 1.83 0.33 1.08 1.17==========================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

10

Page 12: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

=========================================================================================================marital

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely interested 378 12 79 30 125 22 646

58.15 50.00 51.97 46.15 49.02 38.60---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat interested 201 9 53 27 90 22 402

30.92 37.50 34.87 41.54 35.29 38.60---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very interested 46 1 12 6 23 11 99

7.08 4.17 7.89 9.23 9.02 19.30---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all interested 21 2 8 2 14 2 49

3.23 8.33 5.26 3.08 5.49 3.51---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 4 0 0 0 3 0 7

0.62 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.18 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 650 24 152 65 255 57 1203

54.03 2.00 12.64 5.40 21.20 4.74=========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===============================================gender

Q Male Female Total-----------------------------------------------Extremely interested 347 300 647

61.74 46.95-----------------------------------------------Somewhat interested 176 225 401

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

11

Page 13: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

31.32 35.21-----------------------------------------------Not very interested 22 76 98

3.91 11.89-----------------------------------------------Not at all interested 14 34 48

2.49 5.32-----------------------------------------------Don't know 3 4 7

0.53 0.63-----------------------------------------------Total 562 639 1201

46.79 53.21===============================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total---------------------------------------------------------Extremely interested 188 334 122 644

52.51 56.51 49.19---------------------------------------------------------Somewhat interested 124 184 92 400

34.64 31.13 37.10---------------------------------------------------------Not very interested 23 54 22 99

6.42 9.14 8.87---------------------------------------------------------Not at all interested 20 17 11 48

5.59 2.88 4.44---------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

12

Page 14: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Don't know 3 2 1 60.84 0.34 0.40

---------------------------------------------------------Total 358 591 248 1197

29.91 49.37 20.72=========================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely interested 136 212 61 62 175 646

54.18 57.45 50.00 57.94 49.86----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat interested 93 108 50 29 121 401

37.05 29.27 40.98 27.10 34.47----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very interested 16 33 5 9 35 98

6.37 8.94 4.10 8.41 9.97----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all interested 5 14 6 7 16 48

1.99 3.79 4.92 6.54 4.56----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 1 2 0 0 4 7

0.40 0.54 0.00 0.00 1.14----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 251 369 122 107 351 1200

20.92 30.75 10.17 8.92 29.25============================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

13

Page 15: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==============================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total--------------------------------------------------------------Extremely interested 91 143 285 128 647

45.96 45.54 61.82 56.39--------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat interested 73 110 137 80 400

36.87 35.03 29.72 35.24--------------------------------------------------------------Not very interested 21 42 21 14 98

10.61 13.38 4.56 6.17--------------------------------------------------------------Not at all interested 11 17 16 5 49

5.56 5.41 3.47 2.20--------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 2 2 2 0 6

1.01 0.64 0.43 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------Total 198 314 461 227 1200

16.50 26.17 38.42 18.92==============================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

14

Page 16: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q3. Voting Habit

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Every election 28 25 21 60 30 93 97 354

45.16 24.04 21.88 16.62 24.19 40.26 44.70-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Almost every election 27 47 47 144 48 104 81 498

43.55 45.19 48.96 39.89 38.71 45.02 37.33-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

15

Page 17: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

About half 3 15 11 48 23 17 18 1354.84 14.42 11.46 13.30 18.55 7.36 8.29

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------One or two 3 8 11 61 13 13 10 119

4.84 7.69 11.46 16.90 10.48 5.63 4.61-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------None 1 9 6 42 10 3 8 79

1.61 8.65 6.25 11.63 8.06 1.30 3.69-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 0 0 0 6 0 1 3 10

0.00 0.00 0.00 1.66 0.00 0.43 1.38-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 62 104 96 361 124 231 217 1195

5.19 8.70 8.03 30.21 10.38 19.33 18.16===================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=====================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total---------------------------------------------------------------------Every election 73 60 219 352

27.97 16.62 38.35---------------------------------------------------------------------Almost every election 121 144 233 498

46.36 39.89 40.81---------------------------------------------------------------------About half 29 48 58 135

11.11 13.30 10.16---------------------------------------------------------------------One or two 22 61 36 119

8.43 16.90 6.30

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

16

Page 18: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

---------------------------------------------------------------------None 16 42 21 79

6.13 11.63 3.68---------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 0 6 4 10

0.00 1.66 0.70---------------------------------------------------------------------Total 261 361 571 1193

21.88 30.26 47.86=====================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

================================================================================================PID7

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Every election 88 16 19 18 44 36 123 344

34.65 14.16 15.83 15.93 36.67 29.03 41.55------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Almost every election 108 42 59 44 56 43 130 482

42.52 37.17 49.17 38.94 46.67 34.68 43.92------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------About half 26 18 20 15 10 18 23 130

10.24 15.93 16.67 13.27 8.33 14.52 7.77------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------One or two 20 28 10 19 7 17 11 112

7.87 24.78 8.33 16.81 5.83 13.71 3.72------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------None 9 9 11 15 2 9 9 64

3.54 7.96 9.17 13.27 1.67 7.26 3.04------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 3 0 1 2 1 1 0 8

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

17

Page 19: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

1.18 0.00 0.83 1.77 0.83 0.81 0.00------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 254 113 120 113 120 124 296 1140

22.28 9.91 10.53 9.91 10.53 10.88 25.96================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=======================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------Every election 123 18 203 344

25.31 15.93 37.38-----------------------------------------------------------------------Almost every election 210 44 230 484

43.21 38.94 42.36-----------------------------------------------------------------------About half 64 15 52 131

13.17 13.27 9.58-----------------------------------------------------------------------One or two 57 19 35 111

11.73 16.81 6.45-----------------------------------------------------------------------None 28 15 21 64

5.76 13.27 3.87-----------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 4 2 2 8

0.82 1.77 0.37-----------------------------------------------------------------------Total 486 113 543 1142

42.56 9.89 47.55=======================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

18

Page 20: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===============================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Every election 82 116 115 39 352

34.17 25.61 43.07 16.32---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Almost every election 92 206 116 86 500

38.33 45.47 43.45 35.98---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------About half 30 60 17 29 136

12.50 13.25 6.37 12.13---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------One or two 20 51 15 35 121

8.33 11.26 5.62 14.64---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------None 16 17 3 44 80

6.67 3.75 1.12 18.41---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 0 3 1 6 10

0.00 0.66 0.37 2.51---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 240 453 267 239 1199

20.02 37.78 22.27 19.93===============================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

19

Page 21: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

==========================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Every election 5 88 90 35 89 45 352

12.50 25.00 27.19 31.25 36.03 39.13----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Almost every election 18 133 142 42 115 49 499

45.00 37.78 42.90 37.50 46.56 42.61----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------About half 4 45 38 17 21 10 135

10.00 12.78 11.48 15.18 8.50 8.70----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------One or two 4 43 37 13 16 8 121

10.00 12.22 11.18 11.61 6.48 6.96----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------None 8 41 18 5 4 3 79

20.00 11.65 5.44 4.46 1.62 2.61----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 1 2 6 0 2 0 11

2.50 0.57 1.81 0.00 0.81 0.00----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 40 352 331 112 247 115 1197

3.34 29.41 27.65 9.36 20.63 9.61==========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

20

Page 22: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Every election 70 94 40 64 84 35237.43 35.61 30.30 22.86 25.69

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Almost every election 70 118 53 122 132 495

37.43 44.70 40.15 43.57 40.37-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------About half 18 21 20 42 34 135

9.63 7.95 15.15 15.00 10.40-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------One or two 19 14 15 31 41 120

10.16 5.30 11.36 11.07 12.54-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------None 10 16 3 19 31 79

5.35 6.06 2.27 6.79 9.48-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 0 1 1 2 5 9

0.00 0.38 0.76 0.71 1.53-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 187 264 132 280 327 1190

15.71 22.18 11.09 23.53 27.48=========================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==========================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA gena ~ACAs nati Mixed Other Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Every election 233 39 61 3 3 4 10 353

32.50 25.49 22.43 13.64 75.00 28.57 71.43------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Almost every election 319 60 96 15 0 6 4 500

44.49 39.22 35.29 68.18 0.00 42.86 28.57

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

21

Page 23: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------About half 74 19 37 3 0 1 0 134

10.32 12.42 13.60 13.64 0.00 7.14 0.00------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------One or two 57 20 40 1 0 2 0 120

7.95 13.07 14.71 4.55 0.00 14.29 0.00------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------None 27 12 38 0 1 1 0 79

3.77 7.84 13.97 0.00 25.00 7.14 0.00------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 7 3 0 0 0 0 0 10

0.98 1.96 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 717 153 272 22 4 14 14 1196

59.95 12.79 22.74 1.84 0.33 1.17 1.17==========================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================================================================================marital

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Every election 213 2 30 22 77 8 352

32.82 8.33 19.87 33.85 30.43 13.79---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Almost every election 281 11 69 33 84 22 500

43.30 45.83 45.70 50.77 33.20 37.93---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------About half 71 1 20 4 34 7 137

10.94 4.17 13.25 6.15 13.44 12.07---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------One or two 52 8 21 3 27 10 121

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

22

Page 24: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

8.01 33.33 13.91 4.62 10.67 17.24---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------None 29 1 10 3 27 10 80

4.47 4.17 6.62 4.62 10.67 17.24---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 3 1 1 0 4 1 10

0.46 4.17 0.66 0.00 1.58 1.72---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 649 24 151 65 253 58 1200

54.08 2.00 12.58 5.42 21.08 4.83=========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===============================================gender

Q Male Female Total-----------------------------------------------Every election 192 161 353

34.22 25.31-----------------------------------------------Almost every election 244 255 499

43.49 40.09-----------------------------------------------About half 57 79 136

10.16 12.42-----------------------------------------------One or two 37 83 120

6.60 13.05-----------------------------------------------None 25 54 79

4.46 8.49-----------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

23

Page 25: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Don't know 6 4 101.07 0.63

-----------------------------------------------Total 561 636 1197

46.87 53.13===============================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total---------------------------------------------------------Every election 98 176 79 353

27.37 29.98 31.85---------------------------------------------------------Almost every election 145 254 99 498

40.50 43.27 39.92---------------------------------------------------------About half 41 67 27 135

11.45 11.41 10.89---------------------------------------------------------One or two 45 50 25 120

12.57 8.52 10.08---------------------------------------------------------None 25 36 16 77

6.98 6.13 6.45---------------------------------------------------------Don't know 4 4 2 10

1.12 0.68 0.81---------------------------------------------------------Total 358 587 248 1193

30.01 49.20 20.79

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

24

Page 26: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

=========================================================Cell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Every election 76 101 39 40 97 353

30.28 27.45 31.97 37.04 27.71----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Almost every election 122 148 47 39 143 499

48.61 40.22 38.52 36.11 40.86----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------About half 20 52 10 8 46 136

7.97 14.13 8.20 7.41 13.14----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------One or two 24 35 13 13 36 121

9.56 9.51 10.66 12.04 10.29----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------None 9 29 13 8 21 80

3.59 7.88 10.66 7.41 6.00----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 0 3 0 0 7 10

0.00 0.82 0.00 0.00 2.00----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 251 368 122 108 350 1199

20.93 30.69 10.18 9.01 29.19============================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

25

Page 27: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

==============================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total--------------------------------------------------------------Every election 42 81 137 93 353

21.32 25.80 29.72 41.15--------------------------------------------------------------Almost every election 70 110 216 103 499

35.53 35.03 46.85 45.58--------------------------------------------------------------About half 25 44 57 11 137

12.69 14.01 12.36 4.87--------------------------------------------------------------One or two 29 44 35 12 120

14.72 14.01 7.59 5.31--------------------------------------------------------------None 27 31 14 7 79

13.71 9.87 3.04 3.10--------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 4 4 2 0 10

2.03 1.27 0.43 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------Total 197 314 461 226 1198

16.44 26.21 38.48 18.86==============================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

26

Page 28: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Texas Political Mood

Q4. MIP Country

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The economy 10 17 12 77 24 33 37 210

15.87 15.89 12.50 21.45 19.67 14.29 17.13--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Federal spending/national debt 0 3 5 31 25 53 50 167

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

27

Page 29: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

0.00 2.80 5.21 8.64 20.49 22.94 23.15--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Political corruption/leadershi 3 5 11 32 25 41 41 158

4.76 4.67 11.46 8.91 20.49 17.75 18.98--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Unemployment/jobs 7 9 8 44 3 11 4 86

11.11 8.41 8.33 12.26 2.46 4.76 1.85--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Health care 2 6 6 32 3 7 10 66

3.17 5.61 6.25 8.91 2.46 3.03 4.63--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Partisan gridlock 6 14 11 11 2 2 0 46

9.52 13.08 11.46 3.06 1.64 0.87 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Income inequality 10 21 20 11 5 0 0 67

15.87 19.63 20.83 3.06 4.10 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Moral decline 1 0 0 15 9 24 22 71

1.59 0.00 0.00 4.18 7.38 10.39 10.19--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Education 0 5 7 6 2 3 1 24

0.00 4.67 7.29 1.67 1.64 1.30 0.46--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Social welfare programs 1 0 2 11 1 8 1 24

1.59 0.00 2.08 3.06 0.82 3.46 0.46--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Immigration 1 5 0 6 9 9 9 39

1.59 4.67 0.00 1.67 7.38 3.90 4.17--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Taxes 0 0 0 12 3 4 4 23

0.00 0.00 0.00 3.34 2.46 1.73 1.85--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------National security/terrorism 2 3 5 12 1 10 1 34

3.17 2.80 5.21 3.34 0.82 4.33 0.46--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Energy 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 4

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

28

Page 30: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

0.00 0.93 2.08 0.28 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gay marriage 5 2 0 5 0 7 4 23

7.94 1.87 0.00 1.39 0.00 3.03 1.85--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Environment 9 6 2 6 0 0 1 24

14.29 5.61 2.08 1.67 0.00 0.00 0.46--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The media 0 0 0 2 0 1 1 4

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.56 0.00 0.43 0.46--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Housing 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 2

1.59 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.46--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Border security 2 0 0 2 0 8 15 27

3.17 0.00 0.00 0.56 0.00 3.46 6.94--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gun control/gun violence 0 4 4 12 2 0 0 22

0.00 3.74 4.17 3.34 1.64 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Government data collection 1 1 0 2 0 1 0 5

1.59 0.93 0.00 0.56 0.00 0.43 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Crime and drugs 0 1 0 11 4 4 4 24

0.00 0.93 0.00 3.06 3.28 1.73 1.85--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gas prices 0 1 1 14 3 3 6 28

0.00 0.93 1.04 3.90 2.46 1.30 2.78--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Abortion 0 0 0 3 1 2 4 10

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.84 0.82 0.87 1.85--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Afghanistan/Pakistan 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 2

1.59 0.00 0.00 0.28 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Syria 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

29

Page 31: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Foreign trade 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

1.59 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Voting system 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3

0.00 2.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 63 107 96 359 122 231 216 1194

5.28 8.96 8.04 30.07 10.22 19.35 18.09============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=================================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------The economy 39 77 94 210

14.77 21.45 16.52---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Federal spending/national debt 8 31 127 166

3.03 8.64 22.32---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Political corruption/leadership 19 32 107 158

7.20 8.91 18.80---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Unemployment/jobs 24 44 18 86

9.09 12.26 3.16---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Health care 13 32 20 65

4.92 8.91 3.51---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

30

Page 32: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Partisan gridlock 30 11 3 4411.36 3.06 0.53

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Income inequality 51 11 5 67

19.32 3.06 0.88---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Moral decline 1 15 56 72

0.38 4.18 9.84---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Education 12 6 6 24

4.55 1.67 1.05---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Social welfare programs 3 11 10 24

1.14 3.06 1.76---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Immigration 6 6 28 40

2.27 1.67 4.92---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Taxes 0 12 12 24

0.00 3.34 2.11---------------------------------------------------------------------------------National security/terrorism 9 12 12 33

3.41 3.34 2.11---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Energy 3 1 0 4

1.14 0.28 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gay marriage 7 5 11 23

2.65 1.39 1.93---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Environment 17 6 1 24

6.44 1.67 0.18---------------------------------------------------------------------------------The media 0 2 2 4

0.00 0.56 0.35---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

31

Page 33: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Housing 1 0 1 20.38 0.00 0.18

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Border security 2 2 23 27

0.76 0.56 4.04---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gun control/gun violence 9 12 2 23

3.41 3.34 0.35---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Government data collection 2 2 1 5

0.76 0.56 0.18---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Crime and drugs 1 11 12 24

0.38 3.06 2.11---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gas prices 2 14 11 27

0.76 3.90 1.93---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Abortion 0 3 7 10

0.00 0.84 1.23---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Afghanistan/Pakistan 1 1 0 2

0.38 0.28 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Syria 0 0 0 0

0.00 0.00 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Foreign trade 1 0 0 1

0.38 0.00 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Voting system 3 0 0 3

1.14 0.00 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 264 359 569 1192

22.15 30.12 47.73=================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

32

Page 34: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================PID7

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The economy 45 13 19 25 19 25 54 200

17.58 11.40 15.97 22.12 15.70 20.16 18.18------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Federal spending/national debt 10 4 4 17 31 25 66 157

3.91 3.51 3.36 15.04 25.62 20.16 22.22------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Political corruption/leadership 10 7 23 16 29 20 54 159

3.91 6.14 19.33 14.16 23.97 16.13 18.18------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Unemployment/jobs 36 10 6 12 4 7 10 85

14.06 8.77 5.04 10.62 3.31 5.65 3.37------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Health care 15 10 6 4 2 9 12 58

5.86 8.77 5.04 3.54 1.65 7.26 4.04------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Partisan gridlock 14 10 13 3 0 2 2 44

5.47 8.77 10.92 2.65 0.00 1.61 0.67------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Income inequality 35 12 15 2 1 1 0 66

13.67 10.53 12.61 1.77 0.83 0.81 0.00------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Moral decline 3 6 2 4 13 7 34 69

1.17 5.26 1.68 3.54 10.74 5.65 11.45------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Education 8 7 3 0 0 3 2 23

3.12 6.14 2.52 0.00 0.00 2.42 0.67

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

33

Page 35: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Social welfare programs 4 3 2 3 2 3 5 22

1.56 2.63 1.68 2.65 1.65 2.42 1.68------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Immigration 7 4 1 3 8 6 9 38

2.73 3.51 0.84 2.65 6.61 4.84 3.03------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Taxes 4 3 0 2 2 4 7 22

1.56 2.63 0.00 1.77 1.65 3.23 2.36------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------National security/terrorism 8 4 4 5 3 2 7 33

3.12 3.51 3.36 4.42 2.48 1.61 2.36------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Energy 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 4

0.00 0.88 1.68 0.88 0.00 0.00 0.00------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gay marriage 9 2 1 5 1 2 4 24

3.52 1.75 0.84 4.42 0.83 1.61 1.35------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Environment 11 1 6 4 1 0 0 23

4.30 0.88 5.04 3.54 0.83 0.00 0.00------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The media 1 0 0 0 1 2 1 5

0.39 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.83 1.61 0.34------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Housing 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 2

0.39 0.88 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Border security 0 1 2 1 3 1 18 26

0.00 0.88 1.68 0.88 2.48 0.81 6.06------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gun control/gun violence 14 4 3 0 0 0 0 21

5.47 3.51 2.52 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Government data collection 2 1 2 1 0 0 0 6

0.78 0.88 1.68 0.88 0.00 0.00 0.00

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

34

Page 36: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Crime and drugs 4 5 5 1 0 3 6 24

1.56 4.39 4.20 0.88 0.00 2.42 2.02------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gas prices 9 4 0 2 1 0 3 19

3.52 3.51 0.00 1.77 0.83 0.00 1.01------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Abortion 1 0 0 2 0 2 3 8

0.39 0.00 0.00 1.77 0.00 1.61 1.01------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Afghanistan/Pakistan 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 2

0.39 0.88 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Syria 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Foreign trade 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

0.39 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Voting system 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3

1.17 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 256 114 119 113 121 124 297 1144

22.38 9.97 10.40 9.88 10.58 10.84 25.96============================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===================================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------The economy 76 25 98 199

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

35

Page 37: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

15.57 22.12 18.15-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Federal spending/national debt 18 17 122 157

3.69 15.04 22.59-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Political corruption/leadership 40 16 103 159

8.20 14.16 19.07-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Unemployment/jobs 51 12 20 83

10.45 10.62 3.70-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Health care 31 4 23 58

6.35 3.54 4.26-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Partisan gridlock 37 3 3 43

7.58 2.65 0.56-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Income inequality 62 2 2 66

12.70 1.77 0.37-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Moral decline 11 4 54 69

2.25 3.54 10.00-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Education 18 0 5 23

3.69 0.00 0.93-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Social welfare programs 10 3 9 22

2.05 2.65 1.67-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Immigration 12 3 23 38

2.46 2.65 4.26-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Taxes 7 2 14 23

1.43 1.77 2.59-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------National security/terrorism 16 5 12 33

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

36

Page 38: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

3.28 4.42 2.22-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Energy 3 1 0 4

0.61 0.88 0.00-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gay marriage 11 5 6 22

2.25 4.42 1.11-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Environment 18 4 1 23

3.69 3.54 0.19-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------The media 1 0 4 5

0.20 0.00 0.74-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Housing 2 0 0 2

0.41 0.00 0.00-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Border security 4 1 23 28

0.82 0.88 4.26-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gun control/gun violence 22 0 0 22

4.51 0.00 0.00-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Government data collection 4 1 0 5

0.82 0.88 0.00-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Crime and drugs 14 1 9 24

2.87 0.88 1.67-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gas prices 13 2 4 19

2.66 1.77 0.74-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Abortion 1 2 5 8

0.20 1.77 0.93-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Afghanistan/Pakistan 2 0 0 2

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

37

Page 39: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

0.41 0.00 0.00-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Syria 0 0 0 0

0.00 0.00 0.00-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Foreign trade 1 0 0 1

0.20 0.00 0.00-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Voting system 3 0 0 3

0.61 0.00 0.00-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 488 113 540 1141

42.77 9.90 47.33===================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===========================================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The economy 55 68 43 44 210

22.82 15.08 16.23 18.72---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Federal spending/national debt 49 13 71 32 165

20.33 2.88 26.79 13.62---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Political corruption/leadership 24 40 66 30 160

9.96 8.87 24.91 12.77---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Unemployment/jobs 10 48 5 23 86

4.15 10.64 1.89 9.79---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

38

Page 40: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Health care 14 38 5 8 655.81 8.43 1.89 3.40

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Partisan gridlock 3 38 0 4 45

1.24 8.43 0.00 1.70---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Income inequality 1 61 0 4 66

0.41 13.53 0.00 1.70---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Moral decline 12 7 24 28 71

4.98 1.55 9.06 11.91---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Education 6 17 0 1 24

2.49 3.77 0.00 0.43---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Social welfare programs 5 8 5 5 23

2.07 1.77 1.89 2.13---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Immigration 10 9 12 8 39

4.15 2.00 4.53 3.40---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Taxes 8 6 6 5 25

3.32 1.33 2.26 2.13---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------National security/terrorism 8 16 4 5 33

3.32 3.55 1.51 2.13---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Energy 1 2 0 1 4

0.41 0.44 0.00 0.43---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gay marriage 9 9 2 4 24

3.73 2.00 0.75 1.70---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Environment 0 17 3 3 23

0.00 3.77 1.13 1.28---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

39

Page 41: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

The media 3 0 1 1 51.24 0.00 0.38 0.43

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Housing 0 2 0 0 2

0.00 0.44 0.00 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Border security 8 3 12 4 27

3.32 0.67 4.53 1.70---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gun control/gun violence 0 20 0 3 23

0.00 4.43 0.00 1.28---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Government data collection 1 4 0 0 5

0.41 0.89 0.00 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Crime and drugs 7 8 2 7 24

2.90 1.77 0.75 2.98---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gas prices 5 11 0 10 26

2.07 2.44 0.00 4.26---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Abortion 2 1 4 4 11

0.83 0.22 1.51 1.70---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Afghanistan/Pakistan 0 1 0 1 2

0.00 0.22 0.00 0.43---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Syria 0 0 0 0 0

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Foreign trade 0 1 0 0 1

0.00 0.22 0.00 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Voting system 0 3 0 0 3

0.00 0.67 0.00 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

40

Page 42: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Total 241 451 265 235 119220.22 37.84 22.23 19.71

===========================================================================================================================Cell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The economy 3 63 66 19 42 17 210

6.98 17.80 20.31 16.52 16.94 14.78----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Federal spending/national debt 4 52 48 16 27 19 166

9.30 14.69 14.77 13.91 10.89 16.52----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Political corruption/leadership 6 48 37 15 32 22 160

13.95 13.56 11.38 13.04 12.90 19.13----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Unemployment/jobs 3 30 23 4 15 11 86

6.98 8.47 7.08 3.48 6.05 9.57----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Health care 3 21 20 7 13 0 64

6.98 5.93 6.15 6.09 5.24 0.00----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Partisan gridlock 1 6 14 6 8 11 46

2.33 1.69 4.31 5.22 3.23 9.57----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Income inequality 0 9 16 3 29 9 66

0.00 2.54 4.92 2.61 11.69 7.83----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Moral decline 2 18 22 4 20 5 71

4.65 5.08 6.77 3.48 8.06 4.35

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

41

Page 43: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Education 0 4 7 3 7 3 24

0.00 1.13 2.15 2.61 2.82 2.61----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Social welfare programs 1 10 3 0 6 4 24

2.33 2.82 0.92 0.00 2.42 3.48----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Immigration 2 13 6 7 11 1 40

4.65 3.67 1.85 6.09 4.44 0.87----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Taxes 2 3 7 0 8 5 25

4.65 0.85 2.15 0.00 3.23 4.35----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------National security/terrorism 0 15 15 4 0 0 34

0.00 4.24 4.62 3.48 0.00 0.00----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Energy 1 1 0 0 2 0 4

2.33 0.28 0.00 0.00 0.81 0.00----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gay marriage 0 12 6 4 2 0 24

0.00 3.39 1.85 3.48 0.81 0.00----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Environment 0 5 5 4 5 5 24

0.00 1.41 1.54 3.48 2.02 4.35----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The media 0 1 2 0 2 0 5

0.00 0.28 0.62 0.00 0.81 0.00----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Housing 1 0 0 1 0 0 2

2.33 0.00 0.00 0.87 0.00 0.00----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Border security 2 10 6 6 3 1 28

4.65 2.82 1.85 5.22 1.21 0.87----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gun control/gun violence 4 7 3 4 5 0 23

9.30 1.98 0.92 3.48 2.02 0.00

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

42

Page 44: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Government data collection 0 0 2 2 1 0 5

0.00 0.00 0.62 1.74 0.40 0.00----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Crime and drugs 2 11 7 3 1 0 24

4.65 3.11 2.15 2.61 0.40 0.00----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gas prices 3 12 7 2 3 1 28

6.98 3.39 2.15 1.74 1.21 0.87----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Abortion 3 2 1 1 4 0 11

6.98 0.56 0.31 0.87 1.61 0.00----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Afghanistan/Pakistan 0 1 1 0 0 0 2

0.00 0.28 0.31 0.00 0.00 0.00----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Syria 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Foreign trade 0 0 0 0 1 0 1

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.40 0.00----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Voting system 0 0 1 0 1 1 3

0.00 0.00 0.31 0.00 0.40 0.87----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 43 354 325 115 248 115 1200

3.58 29.50 27.08 9.58 20.67 9.58======================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=====================================================================================================================================attend

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

43

Page 45: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The economy 30 40 22 58 55 205

16.39 15.15 16.67 20.64 16.77-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Federal spending/national debt 34 40 19 37 36 166

18.58 15.15 14.39 13.17 10.98-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Political corruption/leadership 20 34 18 36 52 160

10.93 12.88 13.64 12.81 15.85-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Unemployment/jobs 5 26 7 26 24 88

2.73 9.85 5.30 9.25 7.32-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Health care 4 12 14 17 18 65

2.19 4.55 10.61 6.05 5.49-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Partisan gridlock 1 3 3 20 19 46

0.55 1.14 2.27 7.12 5.79-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Income inequality 4 7 7 21 28 67

2.19 2.65 5.30 7.47 8.54-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Moral decline 30 20 10 4 7 71

16.39 7.58 7.58 1.42 2.13-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Education 5 0 4 7 8 24

2.73 0.00 3.03 2.49 2.44-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Social welfare programs 2 12 1 6 3 24

1.09 4.55 0.76 2.14 0.91-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Immigration 8 9 3 9 9 38

4.37 3.41 2.27 3.20 2.74-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Taxes 2 7 3 2 9 23

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

44

Page 46: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

1.09 2.65 2.27 0.71 2.74-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------National security/terrorism 6 8 6 4 9 33

3.28 3.03 4.55 1.42 2.74-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Energy 0 1 0 2 1 4

0.00 0.38 0.00 0.71 0.30-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gay marriage 5 10 1 1 6 23

2.73 3.79 0.76 0.36 1.83-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Environment 1 5 0 3 14 23

0.55 1.89 0.00 1.07 4.27-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The media 0 2 2 0 1 5

0.00 0.76 1.52 0.00 0.30-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Housing 0 1 0 1 0 2

0.00 0.38 0.00 0.36 0.00-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Border security 6 7 0 5 9 27

3.28 2.65 0.00 1.78 2.74-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gun control/gun violence 2 3 5 7 6 23

1.09 1.14 3.79 2.49 1.83-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Government data collection 2 1 0 1 1 5

1.09 0.38 0.00 0.36 0.30-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Crime and drugs 5 5 3 5 5 23

2.73 1.89 2.27 1.78 1.52-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gas prices 5 8 4 8 2 27

2.73 3.03 3.03 2.85 0.61-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Abortion 6 3 0 1 0 10

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

45

Page 47: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

3.28 1.14 0.00 0.36 0.00-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Afghanistan/Pakistan 0 0 0 0 2 2

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.61-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Syria 0 0 0 0 0 0

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Foreign trade 0 0 0 0 1 1

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.30-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Voting system 0 0 0 0 3 3

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.91-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 183 264 132 281 328 1188

15.40 22.22 11.11 23.65 27.61=====================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA ge Mixed Other Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The economy 111 30 61 1 0 5 1 209

15.50 19.74 22.43 4.55 0.00 41.67 7.14--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Federal spending/national debt 115 8 34 2 2 1 3 165

16.06 5.26 12.50 9.09 66.67 8.33 21.43--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Political corruption/leadership 119 8 23 3 0 3 5 161

16.62 5.26 8.46 13.64 0.00 25.00 35.71--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

46

Page 48: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Unemployment/jobs 36 20 19 8 0 0 3 865.03 13.16 6.99 36.36 0.00 0.00 21.43

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Health care 31 14 19 0 0 1 0 65

4.33 9.21 6.99 0.00 0.00 8.33 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Partisan gridlock 33 3 7 2 0 0 0 45

4.61 1.97 2.57 9.09 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Income inequality 42 5 19 1 0 0 0 67

5.87 3.29 6.99 4.55 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Moral decline 53 6 10 0 0 0 1 70

7.40 3.95 3.68 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.14--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Education 10 6 7 1 0 0 0 24

1.40 3.95 2.57 4.55 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Social welfare programs 14 2 7 0 0 0 0 23

1.96 1.32 2.57 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Immigration 24 7 7 1 0 1 0 40

3.35 4.61 2.57 4.55 0.00 8.33 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Taxes 14 6 5 0 0 0 0 25

1.96 3.95 1.84 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------National security/terrorism 16 4 13 0 0 0 0 33

2.23 2.63 4.78 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Energy 3 0 0 0 0 1 0 4

0.42 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.33 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gay marriage 11 6 5 0 1 0 0 23

1.54 3.95 1.84 0.00 33.33 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

47

Page 49: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Environment 16 0 8 0 0 0 0 242.23 0.00 2.94 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The media 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 5

0.56 0.00 0.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Housing 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 2

0.00 0.66 0.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Border security 24 0 3 0 0 0 0 27

3.35 0.00 1.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gun control/gun violence 11 8 4 0 0 0 0 23

1.54 5.26 1.47 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Government data collection 1 2 1 1 0 0 0 5

0.14 1.32 0.37 4.55 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Crime and drugs 12 5 6 0 0 0 0 23

1.68 3.29 2.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gas prices 4 9 12 1 0 0 0 26

0.56 5.92 4.41 4.55 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Abortion 8 1 0 0 0 0 1 10

1.12 0.66 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.14--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Afghanistan/Pakistan 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 2

0.00 0.66 0.00 4.55 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Syria 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Foreign trade 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

0.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

48

Page 50: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Voting system 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 30.42 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 716 152 272 22 3 12 14 1191

60.12 12.76 22.84 1.85 0.25 1.01 1.18============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=====================================================================================================================marital

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The economy 112 3 24 10 45 16 210

17.36 13.64 15.79 14.71 17.86 27.59---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Federal spending/national debt 103 6 19 9 28 1 166

15.97 27.27 12.50 13.24 11.11 1.72---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Political corruption/leadership 86 3 25 8 33 3 158

13.33 13.64 16.45 11.76 13.10 5.17---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Unemployment/jobs 38 1 5 9 26 8 87

5.89 4.55 3.29 13.24 10.32 13.79---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Health care 38 1 10 1 13 3 66

5.89 4.55 6.58 1.47 5.16 5.17---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Partisan gridlock 22 0 11 2 8 2 45

3.41 0.00 7.24 2.94 3.17 3.45---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Income inequality 28 0 14 3 14 7 66

4.34 0.00 9.21 4.41 5.56 12.07

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

49

Page 51: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Moral decline 43 0 6 7 9 6 71

6.67 0.00 3.95 10.29 3.57 10.34---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Education 12 1 3 0 8 1 25

1.86 4.55 1.97 0.00 3.17 1.72---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Social welfare programs 18 1 1 1 3 0 24

2.79 4.55 0.66 1.47 1.19 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Immigration 26 1 3 5 4 1 40

4.03 4.55 1.97 7.35 1.59 1.72---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Taxes 14 2 0 0 4 4 24

2.17 9.09 0.00 0.00 1.59 6.90---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------National security/terrorism 15 1 3 2 11 2 34

2.33 4.55 1.97 2.94 4.37 3.45---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Energy 1 0 0 1 2 0 4

0.16 0.00 0.00 1.47 0.79 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gay marriage 3 1 7 1 10 2 24

0.47 4.55 4.61 1.47 3.97 3.45---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Environment 13 0 4 0 6 0 23

2.02 0.00 2.63 0.00 2.38 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The media 3 0 0 0 1 0 4

0.47 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.40 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Housing 0 0 0 1 0 1 2

0.00 0.00 0.00 1.47 0.00 1.72---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Border security 22 0 3 3 0 0 28

3.41 0.00 1.97 4.41 0.00 0.00

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

50

Page 52: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gun control/gun violence 10 0 7 1 4 0 22

1.55 0.00 4.61 1.47 1.59 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Government data collection 3 0 2 0 0 0 5

0.47 0.00 1.32 0.00 0.00 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Crime and drugs 7 0 5 2 9 1 24

1.09 0.00 3.29 2.94 3.57 1.72---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gas prices 18 0 0 1 9 0 28

2.79 0.00 0.00 1.47 3.57 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Abortion 6 1 0 1 3 0 11

0.93 4.55 0.00 1.47 1.19 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Afghanistan/Pakistan 2 0 0 0 0 0 2

0.31 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Syria 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Foreign trade 0 0 0 0 1 0 1

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.40 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Voting system 2 0 0 0 1 0 3

0.31 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.40 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 645 22 152 68 252 58 1197

53.88 1.84 12.70 5.68 21.05 4.85=====================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

51

Page 53: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

===========================================================gender

Q Male Female Total-----------------------------------------------------------The economy 97 113 210

17.38 17.80-----------------------------------------------------------Federal spending/national debt 90 76 166

16.13 11.97-----------------------------------------------------------Political corruption/leadership 76 84 160

13.62 13.23-----------------------------------------------------------Unemployment/jobs 40 46 86

7.17 7.24-----------------------------------------------------------Health care 23 42 65

4.12 6.61-----------------------------------------------------------Partisan gridlock 22 23 45

3.94 3.62-----------------------------------------------------------Income inequality 36 31 67

6.45 4.88-----------------------------------------------------------Moral decline 31 40 71

5.56 6.30-----------------------------------------------------------Education 7 18 25

1.25 2.83-----------------------------------------------------------Social welfare programs 7 16 23

1.25 2.52-----------------------------------------------------------Immigration 18 21 39

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

52

Page 54: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

3.23 3.31-----------------------------------------------------------Taxes 11 13 24

1.97 2.05-----------------------------------------------------------National security/terrorism 13 21 34

2.33 3.31-----------------------------------------------------------Energy 3 1 4

0.54 0.16-----------------------------------------------------------Gay marriage 17 6 23

3.05 0.94-----------------------------------------------------------Environment 11 13 24

1.97 2.05-----------------------------------------------------------The media 3 2 5

0.54 0.31-----------------------------------------------------------Housing 0 2 2

0.00 0.31-----------------------------------------------------------Border security 16 11 27

2.87 1.73-----------------------------------------------------------Gun control/gun violence 7 15 22

1.25 2.36-----------------------------------------------------------Government data collection 3 1 4

0.54 0.16-----------------------------------------------------------Crime and drugs 11 13 24

1.97 2.05-----------------------------------------------------------Gas prices 10 17 27

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

53

Page 55: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

1.79 2.68-----------------------------------------------------------Abortion 4 6 10

0.72 0.94-----------------------------------------------------------Afghanistan/Pakistan 1 1 2

0.18 0.16-----------------------------------------------------------Syria 0 0 0

0.00 0.00-----------------------------------------------------------Foreign trade 1 0 1

0.18 0.00-----------------------------------------------------------Voting system 0 3 3

0.00 0.47-----------------------------------------------------------Total 558 635 1193

46.77 53.23===========================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=====================================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total---------------------------------------------------------------------The economy 65 112 33 210

18.21 19.02 13.20---------------------------------------------------------------------Federal spending/national debt 42 87 36 165

11.76 14.77 14.40---------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

54

Page 56: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Political corruption/leadership 38 80 42 16010.64 13.58 16.80

---------------------------------------------------------------------Unemployment/jobs 24 51 12 87

6.72 8.66 4.80---------------------------------------------------------------------Health care 28 22 15 65

7.84 3.74 6.00---------------------------------------------------------------------Partisan gridlock 15 28 2 45

4.20 4.75 0.80---------------------------------------------------------------------Income inequality 28 34 4 66

7.84 5.77 1.60---------------------------------------------------------------------Moral decline 17 27 27 71

4.76 4.58 10.80---------------------------------------------------------------------Education 6 16 3 25

1.68 2.72 1.20---------------------------------------------------------------------Social welfare programs 4 11 9 24

1.12 1.87 3.60---------------------------------------------------------------------Immigration 9 12 19 40

2.52 2.04 7.60---------------------------------------------------------------------Taxes 5 17 3 25

1.40 2.89 1.20---------------------------------------------------------------------National security/terrorism 12 13 8 33

3.36 2.21 3.20---------------------------------------------------------------------Energy 3 1 0 4

0.84 0.17 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

55

Page 57: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Gay marriage 9 9 5 232.52 1.53 2.00

---------------------------------------------------------------------Environment 7 14 2 23

1.96 2.38 0.80---------------------------------------------------------------------The media 1 3 1 5

0.28 0.51 0.40---------------------------------------------------------------------Housing 2 0 0 2

0.56 0.00 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------Border security 3 15 9 27

0.84 2.55 3.60---------------------------------------------------------------------Gun control/gun violence 10 8 5 23

2.80 1.36 2.00---------------------------------------------------------------------Government data collection 3 1 1 5

0.84 0.17 0.40---------------------------------------------------------------------Crime and drugs 11 8 5 24

3.08 1.36 2.00---------------------------------------------------------------------Gas prices 9 13 5 27

2.52 2.21 2.00---------------------------------------------------------------------Abortion 2 5 4 11

0.56 0.85 1.60---------------------------------------------------------------------Afghanistan/Pakistan 1 1 0 2

0.28 0.17 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------Syria 0 0 0 0

0.00 0.00 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

56

Page 58: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Foreign trade 0 1 0 10.00 0.17 0.00

---------------------------------------------------------------------Voting system 3 0 0 3

0.84 0.00 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------Total 357 589 250 1196

29.85 49.25 20.90=====================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

========================================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The economy 44 60 25 16 65 210

17.46 16.35 21.01 14.95 18.68----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Federal spending/national debt 38 49 19 10 50 166

15.08 13.35 15.97 9.35 14.37----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Political corruption/leadership 33 43 14 16 53 159

13.10 11.72 11.76 14.95 15.23----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Unemployment/jobs 19 31 7 8 22 87

7.54 8.45 5.88 7.48 6.32----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Health care 16 16 8 7 19 66

6.35 4.36 6.72 6.54 5.46----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Partisan gridlock 15 14 4 9 4 46

5.95 3.81 3.36 8.41 1.15

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

57

Page 59: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Income inequality 14 24 5 11 12 66

5.56 6.54 4.20 10.28 3.45----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Moral decline 10 17 4 2 38 71

3.97 4.63 3.36 1.87 10.92----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Education 6 11 0 2 5 24

2.38 3.00 0.00 1.87 1.44----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Social welfare programs 5 7 2 0 9 23

1.98 1.91 1.68 0.00 2.59----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Immigration 7 12 3 8 10 40

2.78 3.27 2.52 7.48 2.87----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Taxes 10 6 1 0 7 24

3.97 1.63 0.84 0.00 2.01----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------National security/terrorism 4 10 6 0 14 34

1.59 2.72 5.04 0.00 4.02----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Energy 1 0 1 0 2 4

0.40 0.00 0.84 0.00 0.57----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gay marriage 2 11 1 3 5 22

0.79 3.00 0.84 2.80 1.44----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Environment 6 8 1 6 1 22

2.38 2.18 0.84 5.61 0.29----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The media 0 3 1 0 1 5

0.00 0.82 0.84 0.00 0.29----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Housing 0 0 0 1 1 2

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.93 0.29

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

58

Page 60: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Border security 5 11 5 0 6 27

1.98 3.00 4.20 0.00 1.72----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gun control/gun violence 4 5 3 4 7 23

1.59 1.36 2.52 3.74 2.01----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Government data collection 0 2 1 0 2 5

0.00 0.54 0.84 0.00 0.57----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Crime and drugs 7 8 4 2 3 24

2.78 2.18 3.36 1.87 0.86----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gas prices 5 14 3 0 5 27

1.98 3.81 2.52 0.00 1.44----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Abortion 1 3 0 1 5 10

0.40 0.82 0.00 0.93 1.44----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Afghanistan/Pakistan 0 1 1 0 0 2

0.00 0.27 0.84 0.00 0.00----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Syria 0 0 0 0 0 0

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Foreign trade 0 0 0 0 1 1

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.29----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Voting system 0 1 0 1 1 3

0.00 0.27 0.00 0.93 0.29----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 252 367 119 107 348 1193

21.12 30.76 9.97 8.97 29.17========================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

59

Page 61: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==========================================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------The economy 36 71 78 25 210

18.85 22.68 16.88 10.87--------------------------------------------------------------------------Federal spending/national debt 13 38 68 47 166

6.81 12.14 14.72 20.43--------------------------------------------------------------------------Political corruption/leadership 14 40 66 40 160

7.33 12.78 14.29 17.39--------------------------------------------------------------------------Unemployment/jobs 18 20 35 14 87

9.42 6.39 7.58 6.09--------------------------------------------------------------------------Health care 11 23 22 9 65

5.76 7.35 4.76 3.91--------------------------------------------------------------------------Partisan gridlock 3 9 27 7 46

1.57 2.88 5.84 3.04--------------------------------------------------------------------------Income inequality 12 16 30 8 66

6.28 5.11 6.49 3.48--------------------------------------------------------------------------Moral decline 12 17 24 19 72

6.28 5.43 5.19 8.26--------------------------------------------------------------------------Education 6 10 9 0 25

3.14 3.19 1.95 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------Social welfare programs 3 4 7 9 23

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

60

Page 62: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

1.57 1.28 1.52 3.91--------------------------------------------------------------------------Immigration 5 6 17 12 40

2.62 1.92 3.68 5.22--------------------------------------------------------------------------Taxes 4 13 7 0 24

2.09 4.15 1.52 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------National security/terrorism 9 6 10 8 33

4.71 1.92 2.16 3.48--------------------------------------------------------------------------Energy 0 2 0 2 4

0.00 0.64 0.00 0.87--------------------------------------------------------------------------Gay marriage 12 7 4 0 23

6.28 2.24 0.87 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------Environment 5 6 7 6 24

2.62 1.92 1.52 2.61--------------------------------------------------------------------------The media 2 0 2 1 5

1.05 0.00 0.43 0.43--------------------------------------------------------------------------Housing 0 0 2 0 2

0.00 0.00 0.43 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------Border security 3 4 11 9 27

1.57 1.28 2.38 3.91--------------------------------------------------------------------------Gun control/gun violence 1 3 13 5 22

0.52 0.96 2.81 2.17--------------------------------------------------------------------------Government data collection 0 2 2 0 4

0.00 0.64 0.43 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------Crime and drugs 8 6 8 2 24

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

61

Page 63: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

4.19 1.92 1.73 0.87--------------------------------------------------------------------------Gas prices 9 9 6 3 27

4.71 2.88 1.30 1.30--------------------------------------------------------------------------Abortion 4 1 3 2 10

2.09 0.32 0.65 0.87--------------------------------------------------------------------------Afghanistan/Pakistan 1 0 1 0 2

0.52 0.00 0.22 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------Syria 0 0 0 0 0

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------Foreign trade 0 0 0 1 1

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.43--------------------------------------------------------------------------Voting system 0 0 3 1 4

0.00 0.00 0.65 0.43--------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 191 313 462 230 1196

15.97 26.17 38.63 19.23==========================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

62

Page 64: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q5. MIP State

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Immigration 3 5 5 39 25 61 42 180

4.69 4.90 5.10 10.92 20.66 26.64 19.27--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Border security 3 2 1 21 19 58 72 176

4.69 1.96 1.02 5.88 15.70 25.33 33.03--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

63

Page 65: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Unemployment/jobs 6 2 10 43 3 13 8 859.38 1.96 10.20 12.04 2.48 5.68 3.67

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Political corruption/leadershi 13 30 30 34 4 4 3 118

20.31 29.41 30.61 9.52 3.31 1.75 1.38--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Education 4 13 10 19 5 6 3 60

6.25 12.75 10.20 5.32 4.13 2.62 1.38--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The economy 3 10 2 25 13 10 2 65

4.69 9.80 2.04 7.00 10.74 4.37 0.92--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Health care 5 14 2 25 2 4 4 56

7.81 13.73 2.04 7.00 1.65 1.75 1.83--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Water supply 7 3 8 30 16 17 11 92

10.94 2.94 8.16 8.40 13.22 7.42 5.05--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Crime and drugs 2 4 1 19 4 4 3 37

3.12 3.92 1.02 5.32 3.31 1.75 1.38--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Moral decline 1 0 0 6 1 12 21 41

1.56 0.00 0.00 1.68 0.83 5.24 9.63--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Social welfare programs 1 3 1 7 2 9 7 30

1.56 2.94 1.02 1.96 1.65 3.93 3.21--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Redistricting 1 5 4 4 2 0 0 16

1.56 4.90 4.08 1.12 1.65 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------State budget cuts 3 1 1 14 3 0 0 22

4.69 0.98 1.02 3.92 2.48 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gas prices 0 1 5 16 6 4 11 43

0.00 0.98 5.10 4.48 4.96 1.75 5.05--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

64

Page 66: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

State government spending 0 0 2 12 3 2 3 220.00 0.00 2.04 3.36 2.48 0.87 1.38

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Taxes 0 1 0 7 2 8 2 20

0.00 0.98 0.00 1.96 1.65 3.49 0.92--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gay marriage 0 3 0 4 1 0 3 11

0.00 2.94 0.00 1.12 0.83 0.00 1.38--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Energy 2 0 0 0 2 2 1 7

3.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.65 0.87 0.46--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Environment 6 1 5 3 1 0 3 19

9.38 0.98 5.10 0.84 0.83 0.00 1.38--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Transportation/roads/traffic 0 0 2 12 4 4 3 25

0.00 0.00 2.04 3.36 3.31 1.75 1.38--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Abortion 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 3

0.00 0.00 1.02 0.00 0.83 0.00 0.46--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Housing 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 3

0.00 0.00 1.02 0.28 0.00 0.00 0.46--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Insurance rates 0 0 0 1 0 0 4 5

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.28 0.00 0.00 1.83--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Voting system 0 1 3 1 1 0 0 6

0.00 0.98 3.06 0.28 0.83 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Electoral fraud 0 1 0 1 0 4 9 15

0.00 0.98 0.00 0.28 0.00 1.75 4.13--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gun control/gun violence 4 2 3 6 0 2 0 17

6.25 1.96 3.06 1.68 0.00 0.87 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

65

Page 67: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

The media 0 0 1 2 0 3 1 70.00 0.00 1.02 0.56 0.00 1.31 0.46

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------State courts 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.44 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Utility rates 0 0 0 5 1 1 0 7

0.00 0.00 0.00 1.40 0.83 0.44 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 64 102 98 357 121 229 218 1189

5.38 8.58 8.24 30.03 10.18 19.26 18.33============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=================================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Immigration 13 39 129 181

4.96 10.92 22.67---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Border security 6 21 149 176

2.29 5.88 26.19---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Unemployment/jobs 18 43 25 86

6.87 12.04 4.39---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Political corruption/leadership 73 34 11 118

27.86 9.52 1.93---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Education 27 19 15 61

10.31 5.32 2.64

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

66

Page 68: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------The economy 14 25 25 64

5.34 7.00 4.39---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Health care 22 25 9 56

8.40 7.00 1.58---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Water supply 18 30 45 93

6.87 8.40 7.91---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Crime and drugs 7 19 11 37

2.67 5.32 1.93---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Moral decline 1 6 33 40

0.38 1.68 5.80---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Social welfare programs 5 7 18 30

1.91 1.96 3.16---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Redistricting 9 4 2 15

3.44 1.12 0.35---------------------------------------------------------------------------------State budget cuts 4 14 3 21

1.53 3.92 0.53---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gas prices 5 16 21 42

1.91 4.48 3.69---------------------------------------------------------------------------------State government spending 2 12 9 23

0.76 3.36 1.58---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Taxes 2 7 11 20

0.76 1.96 1.93---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gay marriage 3 4 4 11

1.15 1.12 0.70

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

67

Page 69: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Energy 2 0 5 7

0.76 0.00 0.88---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Environment 12 3 4 19

4.58 0.84 0.70---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Transportation/roads/traffic 2 12 10 24

0.76 3.36 1.76---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Abortion 1 0 2 3

0.38 0.00 0.35---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Housing 1 1 1 3

0.38 0.28 0.18---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Insurance rates 0 1 4 5

0.00 0.28 0.70---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Voting system 4 1 1 6

1.53 0.28 0.18---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Electoral fraud 1 1 13 15

0.38 0.28 2.28---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gun control/gun violence 9 6 2 17

3.44 1.68 0.35---------------------------------------------------------------------------------The media 1 2 4 7

0.38 0.56 0.70---------------------------------------------------------------------------------State courts 0 0 1 1

0.00 0.00 0.18---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Utility rates 0 5 2 7

0.00 1.40 0.35

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

68

Page 70: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 262 357 569 1188

22.05 30.05 47.90=================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================PID7

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Immigration 11 13 7 16 39 25 65 176

4.33 11.40 5.83 14.16 31.97 20.49 21.81------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Border security 7 3 3 14 39 24 84 174

2.76 2.63 2.50 12.39 31.97 19.67 28.19------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Unemployment/jobs 37 11 4 10 2 5 10 79

14.57 9.65 3.33 8.85 1.64 4.10 3.36------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Political corruption/leadership 34 15 49 5 7 2 2 114

13.39 13.16 40.83 4.42 5.74 1.64 0.67------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Education 22 10 7 4 2 8 7 60

8.66 8.77 5.83 3.54 1.64 6.56 2.35------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The economy 11 5 7 8 2 13 13 59

4.33 4.39 5.83 7.08 1.64 10.66 4.36------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Health care 29 7 4 6 3 2 3 54

11.42 6.14 3.33 5.31 2.46 1.64 1.01------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Water supply 12 9 13 14 14 12 17 91

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

69

Page 71: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

4.72 7.89 10.83 12.39 11.48 9.84 5.70------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Crime and drugs 7 11 5 2 1 4 3 33

2.76 9.65 4.17 1.77 0.82 3.28 1.01------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Moral decline 1 1 0 4 5 0 26 37

0.39 0.88 0.00 3.54 4.10 0.00 8.72------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Social welfare programs 6 6 3 1 1 2 10 29

2.36 5.26 2.50 0.88 0.82 1.64 3.36------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Redistricting 8 3 2 1 1 0 0 15

3.15 2.63 1.67 0.88 0.82 0.00 0.00------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------State budget cuts 8 1 4 6 0 1 0 20

3.15 0.88 3.33 5.31 0.00 0.82 0.00------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gas prices 14 4 2 2 3 1 10 36

5.51 3.51 1.67 1.77 2.46 0.82 3.36------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------State government spending 6 2 1 3 0 7 4 23

2.36 1.75 0.83 2.65 0.00 5.74 1.34------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Taxes 3 2 1 3 1 6 5 21

1.18 1.75 0.83 2.65 0.82 4.92 1.68------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gay marriage 3 1 1 1 1 0 4 11

1.18 0.88 0.83 0.88 0.82 0.00 1.34------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Energy 2 0 2 0 0 0 3 7

0.79 0.00 1.67 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.01------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Environment 11 1 4 2 0 1 0 19

4.33 0.88 3.33 1.77 0.00 0.82 0.00------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Transportation/roads/traffic 4 1 0 6 1 5 6 23

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

70

Page 72: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

1.57 0.88 0.00 5.31 0.82 4.10 2.01------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Abortion 1 1 0 0 0 0 2 4

0.39 0.88 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.67------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Housing 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 3

0.00 0.00 0.83 0.88 0.00 0.00 0.34------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Insurance rates 1 0 0 1 0 0 3 5

0.39 0.00 0.00 0.88 0.00 0.00 1.01------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Voting system 4 1 0 1 0 0 0 6

1.57 0.88 0.00 0.88 0.00 0.00 0.00------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Electoral fraud 3 0 0 0 0 0 11 14

1.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.69------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gun control/gun violence 7 5 0 1 0 2 2 17

2.76 4.39 0.00 0.88 0.00 1.64 0.67------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The media 0 0 0 0 0 2 5 7

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.64 1.68------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------State courts 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.34------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Utility rates 2 1 0 1 0 0 1 5

0.79 0.88 0.00 0.88 0.00 0.00 0.34------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 254 114 120 113 122 122 298 1143

22.22 9.97 10.50 9.89 10.67 10.67 26.07============================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

71

Page 73: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

===================================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Immigration 30 16 129 175

6.19 14.16 23.89-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Border security 12 14 146 172

2.47 12.39 27.04-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Unemployment/jobs 51 10 17 78

10.52 8.85 3.15-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Political corruption/leadership 98 5 11 114

20.21 4.42 2.04-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Education 39 4 17 60

8.04 3.54 3.15-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------The economy 23 8 28 59

4.74 7.08 5.19-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Health care 40 6 8 54

8.25 5.31 1.48-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Water supply 34 14 43 91

7.01 12.39 7.96-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Crime and drugs 23 2 7 32

4.74 1.77 1.30-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Moral decline 3 4 31 38

0.62 3.54 5.74-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

72

Page 74: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Social welfare programs 15 1 12 283.09 0.88 2.22

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Redistricting 13 1 1 15

2.68 0.88 0.19-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------State budget cuts 13 6 1 20

2.68 5.31 0.19-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gas prices 20 2 14 36

4.12 1.77 2.59-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------State government spending 9 3 11 23

1.86 2.65 2.04-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Taxes 5 3 12 20

1.03 2.65 2.22-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gay marriage 4 1 5 10

0.82 0.88 0.93-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Energy 4 0 3 7

0.82 0.00 0.56-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Environment 17 2 1 20

3.51 1.77 0.19-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Transportation/roads/traffic 5 6 13 24

1.03 5.31 2.41-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Abortion 2 0 2 4

0.41 0.00 0.37-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Housing 1 1 1 3

0.21 0.88 0.19-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

73

Page 75: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Insurance rates 1 1 3 50.21 0.88 0.56

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Voting system 5 1 0 6

1.03 0.88 0.00-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Electoral fraud 3 0 11 14

0.62 0.00 2.04-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gun control/gun violence 11 1 4 16

2.27 0.88 0.74-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------The media 0 0 6 6

0.00 0.00 1.11-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------State courts 0 0 1 1

0.00 0.00 0.19-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Utility rates 4 1 2 7

0.82 0.88 0.37-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 485 113 540 1138

42.62 9.93 47.45===================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===========================================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Immigration 42 26 84 30 182

17.50 5.74 31.34 13.10

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

74

Page 76: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Border security 35 11 86 44 176

14.58 2.43 32.09 19.21---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Unemployment/jobs 21 43 3 19 86

8.75 9.49 1.12 8.30---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Political corruption/leadership 1 100 7 10 118

0.42 22.08 2.61 4.37---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Education 8 42 7 4 61

3.33 9.27 2.61 1.75---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The economy 20 22 5 18 65

8.33 4.86 1.87 7.86---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Health care 6 38 1 11 56

2.50 8.39 0.37 4.80---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Water supply 20 33 22 19 94

8.33 7.28 8.21 8.30---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Crime and drugs 5 17 2 13 37

2.08 3.75 0.75 5.68---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Moral decline 9 2 13 16 40

3.75 0.44 4.85 6.99---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Social welfare programs 8 13 2 7 30

3.33 2.87 0.75 3.06---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Redistricting 1 13 0 2 16

0.42 2.87 0.00 0.87---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------State budget cuts 4 14 0 3 21

1.67 3.09 0.00 1.31

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

75

Page 77: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gas prices 12 13 6 10 41

5.00 2.87 2.24 4.37---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------State government spending 5 11 6 2 24

2.08 2.43 2.24 0.87---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Taxes 6 3 8 2 19

2.50 0.66 2.99 0.87---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gay marriage 4 4 1 2 11

1.67 0.88 0.37 0.87---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Energy 1 2 2 2 7

0.42 0.44 0.75 0.87---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Environment 0 16 1 2 19

0.00 3.53 0.37 0.87---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Transportation/roads/traffic 10 6 6 2 24

4.17 1.32 2.24 0.87---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Abortion 1 1 0 1 3

0.42 0.22 0.00 0.44---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Housing 1 1 0 1 3

0.42 0.22 0.00 0.44---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Insurance rates 3 1 0 1 5

1.25 0.22 0.00 0.44---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Voting system 0 6 0 0 6

0.00 1.32 0.00 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Electoral fraud 9 2 4 1 16

3.75 0.44 1.49 0.44

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

76

Page 78: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gun control/gun violence 2 9 0 6 17

0.83 1.99 0.00 2.62---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The media 5 0 1 0 6

2.08 0.00 0.37 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------State courts 0 0 1 0 1

0.00 0.00 0.37 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Utility rates 1 4 0 1 6

0.42 0.88 0.00 0.44---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 240 453 268 229 1190

20.17 38.07 22.52 19.24===========================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Immigration 5 53 48 15 42 19 182

12.50 15.06 14.68 13.16 17.14 16.81----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Border security 7 58 47 18 33 13 176

17.50 16.48 14.37 15.79 13.47 11.50----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Unemployment/jobs 3 39 19 12 9 4 86

7.50 11.08 5.81 10.53 3.67 3.54----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Political corruption/leadership 2 25 36 9 34 13 119

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

77

Page 79: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

5.00 7.10 11.01 7.89 13.88 11.50----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Education 1 9 15 4 19 12 60

2.50 2.56 4.59 3.51 7.76 10.62----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The economy 1 22 24 4 10 4 65

2.50 6.25 7.34 3.51 4.08 3.54----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Health care 0 16 21 6 9 3 55

0.00 4.55 6.42 5.26 3.67 2.65----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Water supply 5 21 22 11 22 12 93

12.50 5.97 6.73 9.65 8.98 10.62----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Crime and drugs 2 11 14 3 7 0 37

5.00 3.12 4.28 2.63 2.86 0.00----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Moral decline 1 14 7 2 10 6 40

2.50 3.98 2.14 1.75 4.08 5.31----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Social welfare programs 1 15 8 5 1 0 30

2.50 4.26 2.45 4.39 0.41 0.00----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Redistricting 1 1 0 1 7 6 16

2.50 0.28 0.00 0.88 2.86 5.31----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------State budget cuts 0 5 2 3 5 6 21

0.00 1.42 0.61 2.63 2.04 5.31----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gas prices 4 16 13 3 4 1 41

10.00 4.55 3.98 2.63 1.63 0.88----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------State government spending 4 7 10 0 2 1 24

10.00 1.99 3.06 0.00 0.82 0.88----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Taxes 0 6 6 5 2 0 19

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

78

Page 80: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

0.00 1.70 1.83 4.39 0.82 0.00----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gay marriage 2 3 4 1 1 0 11

5.00 0.85 1.22 0.88 0.41 0.00----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Energy 0 0 3 0 2 2 7

0.00 0.00 0.92 0.00 0.82 1.77----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Environment 1 2 3 3 8 3 20

2.50 0.57 0.92 2.63 3.27 2.65----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Transportation/roads/traffic 0 8 6 3 4 4 25

0.00 2.27 1.83 2.63 1.63 3.54----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Abortion 0 1 2 0 0 1 4

0.00 0.28 0.61 0.00 0.00 0.88----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Housing 0 1 2 0 0 0 3

0.00 0.28 0.61 0.00 0.00 0.00----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Insurance rates 0 3 1 0 1 0 5

0.00 0.85 0.31 0.00 0.41 0.00----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Voting system 0 0 2 1 1 1 5

0.00 0.00 0.61 0.88 0.41 0.88----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Electoral fraud 0 8 2 0 5 1 16

0.00 2.27 0.61 0.00 2.04 0.88----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gun control/gun violence 0 5 3 2 5 1 16

0.00 1.42 0.92 1.75 2.04 0.88----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The media 0 1 4 0 2 0 7

0.00 0.28 1.22 0.00 0.82 0.00----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------State courts 0 1 0 0 0 0 1

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

79

Page 81: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

0.00 0.28 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Utility rates 0 1 3 3 0 0 7

0.00 0.28 0.92 2.63 0.00 0.00----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 40 352 327 114 245 113 1191

3.36 29.55 27.46 9.57 20.57 9.49======================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=====================================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Immigration 24 52 21 41 41 179

13.04 19.62 15.79 14.64 12.54-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Border security 30 51 16 42 37 176

16.30 19.25 12.03 15.00 11.31-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Unemployment/jobs 8 20 10 29 20 87

4.35 7.55 7.52 10.36 6.12-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Political corruption/leadership 10 7 9 42 50 118

5.43 2.64 6.77 15.00 15.29-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Education 4 17 8 17 15 61

2.17 6.42 6.02 6.07 4.59-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The economy 10 7 7 20 21 65

5.43 2.64 5.26 7.14 6.42-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

80

Page 82: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Health care 6 16 5 9 20 563.26 6.04 3.76 3.21 6.12

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Water supply 13 23 2 26 29 93

7.07 8.68 1.50 9.29 8.87-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Crime and drugs 8 11 5 7 7 38

4.35 4.15 3.76 2.50 2.14-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Moral decline 21 7 4 4 4 40

11.41 2.64 3.01 1.43 1.22-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Social welfare programs 9 6 5 2 8 30

4.89 2.26 3.76 0.71 2.45-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Redistricting 2 2 4 2 6 16

1.09 0.75 3.01 0.71 1.83-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------State budget cuts 5 1 3 3 9 21

2.72 0.38 2.26 1.07 2.75-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gas prices 11 13 6 8 4 42

5.98 4.91 4.51 2.86 1.22-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------State government spending 3 6 5 6 4 24

1.63 2.26 3.76 2.14 1.22-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Taxes 1 6 4 1 8 20

0.54 2.26 3.01 0.36 2.45-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gay marriage 3 1 0 1 4 9

1.63 0.38 0.00 0.36 1.22-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Energy 0 1 2 2 3 8

0.00 0.38 1.50 0.71 0.92-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

81

Page 83: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Environment 1 2 1 3 12 190.54 0.75 0.75 1.07 3.67

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Transportation/roads/traffic 4 4 5 3 8 24

2.17 1.51 3.76 1.07 2.45-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Abortion 1 1 0 1 0 3

0.54 0.38 0.00 0.36 0.00-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Housing 1 0 0 0 2 3

0.54 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.61-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Insurance rates 1 1 0 3 0 5

0.54 0.38 0.00 1.07 0.00-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Voting system 0 2 1 2 1 6

0.00 0.75 0.75 0.71 0.31-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Electoral fraud 4 6 2 1 2 15

2.17 2.26 1.50 0.36 0.61-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gun control/gun violence 2 2 1 4 8 17

1.09 0.75 0.75 1.43 2.45-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The media 0 0 5 1 1 7

0.00 0.00 3.76 0.36 0.31-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------State courts 0 0 1 0 0 1

0.00 0.00 0.75 0.00 0.00-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Utility rates 2 0 1 0 3 6

1.09 0.00 0.75 0.00 0.92-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 184 265 133 280 327 1189

15.48 22.29 11.19 23.55 27.50=====================================================================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

82

Page 84: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA ge Mixed Other Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Immigration 125 13 29 7 1 4 3 182

17.53 8.44 10.82 31.82 25.00 30.77 21.43--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Border security 144 4 21 0 2 1 5 177

20.20 2.60 7.84 0.00 50.00 7.69 35.71--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Unemployment/jobs 22 33 25 7 0 0 0 87

3.09 21.43 9.33 31.82 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Political corruption/leadership 69 15 26 3 0 2 3 118

9.68 9.74 9.70 13.64 0.00 15.38 21.43--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Education 34 4 20 1 0 1 0 60

4.77 2.60 7.46 4.55 0.00 7.69 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The economy 29 9 25 1 0 0 0 64

4.07 5.84 9.33 4.55 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Health care 27 17 12 0 0 0 0 56

3.79 11.04 4.48 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Water supply 70 8 13 1 0 1 1 94

9.82 5.19 4.85 4.55 0.00 7.69 7.14--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Crime and drugs 14 5 15 1 0 2 0 37

1.96 3.25 5.60 4.55 0.00 15.38 0.00

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

83

Page 85: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Moral decline 32 2 3 0 0 0 2 39

4.49 1.30 1.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 14.29--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Social welfare programs 11 4 15 0 0 0 0 30

1.54 2.60 5.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Redistricting 10 2 3 0 0 1 0 16

1.40 1.30 1.12 0.00 0.00 7.69 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------State budget cuts 11 6 4 0 0 0 0 21

1.54 3.90 1.49 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gas prices 13 9 17 1 0 1 0 41

1.82 5.84 6.34 4.55 0.00 7.69 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------State government spending 9 3 11 0 0 0 0 23

1.26 1.95 4.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Taxes 14 5 1 0 0 0 0 20

1.96 3.25 0.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gay marriage 6 1 2 0 1 0 0 10

0.84 0.65 0.75 0.00 25.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Energy 6 2 0 0 0 0 0 8

0.84 1.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Environment 16 2 1 0 0 0 0 19

2.24 1.30 0.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Transportation/roads/traffic 11 0 12 0 0 0 0 23

1.54 0.00 4.48 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Abortion 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 4

0.28 0.65 0.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

84

Page 86: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Housing 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2

0.28 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Insurance rates 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 4

0.00 0.65 1.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Voting system 3 2 2 0 0 0 0 7

0.42 1.30 0.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Electoral fraud 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 15

2.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gun control/gun violence 7 4 6 0 0 0 0 17

0.98 2.60 2.24 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The media 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 6

0.84 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------State courts 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

0.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Utility rates 4 2 1 0 0 0 0 7

0.56 1.30 0.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 713 154 268 22 4 13 14 1188

60.02 12.96 22.56 1.85 0.34 1.09 1.18============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=====================================================================================================================marital

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

85

Page 87: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Immigration 117 3 23 8 21 9 181

18.28 13.04 15.44 12.12 8.40 15.79---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Border security 106 2 15 19 28 5 175

16.56 8.70 10.07 28.79 11.20 8.77---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Unemployment/jobs 31 3 9 2 38 4 87

4.84 13.04 6.04 3.03 15.20 7.02---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Political corruption/leadership 45 1 34 5 24 8 117

7.03 4.35 22.82 7.58 9.60 14.04---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Education 32 0 10 5 10 3 60

5.00 0.00 6.71 7.58 4.00 5.26---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The economy 32 3 3 3 14 9 64

5.00 13.04 2.01 4.55 5.60 15.79---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Health care 26 1 9 4 13 3 56

4.06 4.35 6.04 6.06 5.20 5.26---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Water supply 55 3 4 3 25 3 93

8.59 13.04 2.68 4.55 10.00 5.26---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Crime and drugs 20 1 7 3 4 4 39

3.12 4.35 4.70 4.55 1.60 7.02---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Moral decline 29 0 6 2 3 0 40

4.53 0.00 4.03 3.03 1.20 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Social welfare programs 16 0 3 2 8 0 29

2.50 0.00 2.01 3.03 3.20 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Redistricting 8 0 2 0 5 0 15

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

86

Page 88: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

1.25 0.00 1.34 0.00 2.00 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------State budget cuts 14 0 3 0 4 0 21

2.19 0.00 2.01 0.00 1.60 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gas prices 21 3 5 1 12 0 42

3.28 13.04 3.36 1.52 4.80 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------State government spending 15 1 3 1 2 1 23

2.34 4.35 2.01 1.52 0.80 1.75---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Taxes 12 0 4 0 2 2 20

1.88 0.00 2.68 0.00 0.80 3.51---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gay marriage 4 1 0 0 5 0 10

0.62 4.35 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Energy 4 0 0 0 3 0 7

0.62 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.20 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Environment 9 0 2 0 7 1 19

1.41 0.00 1.34 0.00 2.80 1.75---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Transportation/roads/traffic 8 0 1 4 9 3 25

1.25 0.00 0.67 6.06 3.60 5.26---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Abortion 3 0 0 1 0 0 4

0.47 0.00 0.00 1.52 0.00 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Housing 1 0 0 0 1 0 2

0.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.40 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Insurance rates 4 0 0 0 1 0 5

0.62 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.40 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Voting system 5 0 0 0 0 1 6

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

87

Page 89: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

0.78 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.75---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Electoral fraud 6 0 0 0 9 0 15

0.94 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.60 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gun control/gun violence 9 1 4 2 1 0 17

1.41 4.35 2.68 3.03 0.40 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The media 3 0 2 1 0 0 6

0.47 0.00 1.34 1.52 0.00 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------State courts 1 0 0 0 0 0 1

0.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Utility rates 4 0 0 0 1 1 6

0.62 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.40 1.75---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 640 23 149 66 250 57 1185

54.01 1.94 12.57 5.57 21.10 4.81=====================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===========================================================gender

Q Male Female Total-----------------------------------------------------------Immigration 95 87 182

17.03 13.77-----------------------------------------------------------Border security 85 91 176

15.23 14.40-----------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

88

Page 90: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Unemployment/jobs 38 48 866.81 7.59

-----------------------------------------------------------Political corruption/leadership 72 46 118

12.90 7.28-----------------------------------------------------------Education 16 45 61

2.87 7.12-----------------------------------------------------------The economy 22 43 65

3.94 6.80-----------------------------------------------------------Health care 21 34 55

3.76 5.38-----------------------------------------------------------Water supply 51 43 94

9.14 6.80-----------------------------------------------------------Crime and drugs 9 28 37

1.61 4.43-----------------------------------------------------------Moral decline 14 26 40

2.51 4.11-----------------------------------------------------------Social welfare programs 10 20 30

1.79 3.16-----------------------------------------------------------Redistricting 9 7 16

1.61 1.11-----------------------------------------------------------State budget cuts 9 12 21

1.61 1.90-----------------------------------------------------------Gas prices 21 21 42

3.76 3.32-----------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

89

Page 91: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

State government spending 11 13 241.97 2.06

-----------------------------------------------------------Taxes 12 8 20

2.15 1.27-----------------------------------------------------------Gay marriage 4 6 10

0.72 0.95-----------------------------------------------------------Energy 5 3 8

0.90 0.47-----------------------------------------------------------Environment 10 9 19

1.79 1.42-----------------------------------------------------------Transportation/roads/traffic 14 10 24

2.51 1.58-----------------------------------------------------------Abortion 1 2 3

0.18 0.32-----------------------------------------------------------Housing 2 1 3

0.36 0.16-----------------------------------------------------------Insurance rates 4 1 5

0.72 0.16-----------------------------------------------------------Voting system 1 5 6

0.18 0.79-----------------------------------------------------------Electoral fraud 9 6 15

1.61 0.95-----------------------------------------------------------Gun control/gun violence 4 12 16

0.72 1.90-----------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

90

Page 92: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

The media 3 3 60.54 0.47

-----------------------------------------------------------State courts 1 0 1

0.18 0.00-----------------------------------------------------------Utility rates 5 2 7

0.90 0.32-----------------------------------------------------------Total 558 632 1190

46.89 53.11===========================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=====================================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total---------------------------------------------------------------------Immigration 44 95 43 182

12.46 16.13 17.34---------------------------------------------------------------------Border security 32 104 40 176

9.07 17.66 16.13---------------------------------------------------------------------Unemployment/jobs 28 46 12 86

7.93 7.81 4.84---------------------------------------------------------------------Political corruption/leadership 44 60 15 119

12.46 10.19 6.05---------------------------------------------------------------------Education 21 33 7 61

5.95 5.60 2.82

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

91

Page 93: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

---------------------------------------------------------------------The economy 16 34 15 65

4.53 5.77 6.05---------------------------------------------------------------------Health care 26 18 11 55

7.37 3.06 4.44---------------------------------------------------------------------Water supply 22 40 32 94

6.23 6.79 12.90---------------------------------------------------------------------Crime and drugs 17 16 4 37

4.82 2.72 1.61---------------------------------------------------------------------Moral decline 8 21 10 39

2.27 3.57 4.03---------------------------------------------------------------------Social welfare programs 9 19 3 31

2.55 3.23 1.21---------------------------------------------------------------------Redistricting 8 7 1 16

2.27 1.19 0.40---------------------------------------------------------------------State budget cuts 2 11 8 21

0.57 1.87 3.23---------------------------------------------------------------------Gas prices 14 16 11 41

3.97 2.72 4.44---------------------------------------------------------------------State government spending 9 7 7 23

2.55 1.19 2.82---------------------------------------------------------------------Taxes 7 9 4 20

1.98 1.53 1.61---------------------------------------------------------------------Gay marriage 7 3 1 11

1.98 0.51 0.40

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

92

Page 94: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

---------------------------------------------------------------------Energy 0 7 0 7

0.00 1.19 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------Environment 9 8 2 19

2.55 1.36 0.81---------------------------------------------------------------------Transportation/roads/traffic 10 11 3 24

2.83 1.87 1.21---------------------------------------------------------------------Abortion 1 2 1 4

0.28 0.34 0.40---------------------------------------------------------------------Housing 1 0 1 2

0.28 0.00 0.40---------------------------------------------------------------------Insurance rates 4 0 1 5

1.13 0.00 0.40---------------------------------------------------------------------Voting system 3 2 2 7

0.85 0.34 0.81---------------------------------------------------------------------Electoral fraud 1 4 10 15

0.28 0.68 4.03---------------------------------------------------------------------Gun control/gun violence 5 9 2 16

1.42 1.53 0.81---------------------------------------------------------------------The media 2 4 0 6

0.57 0.68 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------State courts 0 0 1 1

0.00 0.00 0.40---------------------------------------------------------------------Utility rates 3 3 1 7

0.85 0.51 0.40

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

93

Page 95: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

---------------------------------------------------------------------Total 353 589 248 1190

29.66 49.50 20.84=====================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

========================================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Immigration 37 54 24 13 54 182

14.68 14.67 20.51 12.15 15.56----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Border security 37 55 19 8 58 177

14.68 14.95 16.24 7.48 16.71----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Unemployment/jobs 13 27 2 9 35 86

5.16 7.34 1.71 8.41 10.09----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Political corruption/leadership 28 42 9 13 26 118

11.11 11.41 7.69 12.15 7.49----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Education 12 25 7 7 11 62

4.76 6.79 5.98 6.54 3.17----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The economy 11 32 4 4 14 65

4.37 8.70 3.42 3.74 4.03----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Health care 15 9 4 9 18 55

5.95 2.45 3.42 8.41 5.19----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Water supply 4 28 5 15 41 93

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

94

Page 96: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

1.59 7.61 4.27 14.02 11.82----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Crime and drugs 14 8 7 2 6 37

5.56 2.17 5.98 1.87 1.73----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Moral decline 4 12 1 3 19 39

1.59 3.26 0.85 2.80 5.48----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Social welfare programs 6 11 7 1 6 31

2.38 2.99 5.98 0.93 1.73----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Redistricting 3 5 3 2 3 16

1.19 1.36 2.56 1.87 0.86----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------State budget cuts 10 1 3 2 5 21

3.97 0.27 2.56 1.87 1.44----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gas prices 10 9 6 0 15 40

3.97 2.45 5.13 0.00 4.32----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------State government spending 8 4 2 4 6 24

3.17 1.09 1.71 3.74 1.73----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Taxes 11 1 2 2 4 20

4.37 0.27 1.71 1.87 1.15----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gay marriage 5 5 0 0 1 11

1.98 1.36 0.00 0.00 0.29----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Energy 2 5 0 0 0 7

0.79 1.36 0.00 0.00 0.00----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Environment 3 6 0 5 5 19

1.19 1.63 0.00 4.67 1.44----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Transportation/roads/traffic 12 3 4 2 4 25

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

95

Page 97: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

4.76 0.82 3.42 1.87 1.15----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Abortion 1 2 0 0 1 4

0.40 0.54 0.00 0.00 0.29----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Housing 0 0 0 1 1 2

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.93 0.29----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Insurance rates 0 1 3 0 1 5

0.00 0.27 2.56 0.00 0.29----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Voting system 1 0 1 1 3 6

0.40 0.00 0.85 0.93 0.86----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Electoral fraud 2 7 0 1 6 16

0.79 1.90 0.00 0.93 1.73----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Gun control/gun violence 3 8 2 1 2 16

1.19 2.17 1.71 0.93 0.58----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The media 0 6 0 0 0 6

0.00 1.63 0.00 0.00 0.00----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------State courts 0 0 0 0 1 1

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.29----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Utility rates 0 2 2 2 1 7

0.00 0.54 1.71 1.87 0.29----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 252 368 117 107 347 1191

21.16 30.90 9.82 8.98 29.14========================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

96

Page 98: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

==========================================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------Immigration 23 34 97 27 181

11.86 10.97 21.09 11.84--------------------------------------------------------------------------Border security 11 34 81 52 178

5.67 10.97 17.61 22.81--------------------------------------------------------------------------Unemployment/jobs 28 28 25 5 86

14.43 9.03 5.43 2.19--------------------------------------------------------------------------Political corruption/leadership 10 28 59 22 119

5.15 9.03 12.83 9.65--------------------------------------------------------------------------Education 17 13 22 9 61

8.76 4.19 4.78 3.95--------------------------------------------------------------------------The economy 17 21 19 8 65

8.76 6.77 4.13 3.51--------------------------------------------------------------------------Health care 7 17 21 12 57

3.61 5.48 4.57 5.26--------------------------------------------------------------------------Water supply 18 24 26 25 93

9.28 7.74 5.65 10.96--------------------------------------------------------------------------Crime and drugs 9 11 12 5 37

4.64 3.55 2.61 2.19--------------------------------------------------------------------------Moral decline 3 11 11 14 39

1.55 3.55 2.39 6.14--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

97

Page 99: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Social welfare programs 6 8 4 11 293.09 2.58 0.87 4.82

--------------------------------------------------------------------------Redistricting 1 7 7 1 16

0.52 2.26 1.52 0.44--------------------------------------------------------------------------State budget cuts 0 5 8 8 21

0.00 1.61 1.74 3.51--------------------------------------------------------------------------Gas prices 10 17 12 2 41

5.15 5.48 2.61 0.88--------------------------------------------------------------------------State government spending 1 11 8 3 23

0.52 3.55 1.74 1.32--------------------------------------------------------------------------Taxes 3 3 14 0 20

1.55 0.97 3.04 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------Gay marriage 6 1 3 1 11

3.09 0.32 0.65 0.44--------------------------------------------------------------------------Energy 4 2 2 0 8

2.06 0.65 0.43 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------Environment 3 2 10 4 19

1.55 0.65 2.17 1.75--------------------------------------------------------------------------Transportation/roads/traffic 6 9 4 5 24

3.09 2.90 0.87 2.19--------------------------------------------------------------------------Abortion 1 0 2 1 4

0.52 0.00 0.43 0.44--------------------------------------------------------------------------Housing 2 0 0 1 3

1.03 0.00 0.00 0.44--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

98

Page 100: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Insurance rates 0 2 0 3 50.00 0.65 0.00 1.32

--------------------------------------------------------------------------Voting system 0 2 2 2 6

0.00 0.65 0.43 0.88--------------------------------------------------------------------------Electoral fraud 4 7 4 1 16

2.06 2.26 0.87 0.44--------------------------------------------------------------------------Gun control/gun violence 3 7 3 3 16

1.55 2.26 0.65 1.32--------------------------------------------------------------------------The media 0 3 2 1 6

0.00 0.97 0.43 0.44--------------------------------------------------------------------------State courts 0 0 0 1 1

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.44--------------------------------------------------------------------------Utility rates 1 3 2 1 7

0.52 0.97 0.43 0.44--------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 194 310 460 228 1192

16.28 26.01 38.59 19.13==========================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

99

Page 101: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q6. Obama Approval

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve strongly 27 54 27 68 7 6 11 200

43.55 51.43 28.12 18.89 5.60 2.59 5.05--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 25 43 43 105 15 5 6 242

40.32 40.95 44.79 29.17 12.00 2.16 2.75--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

100

Page 102: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Neither approve nor disapprove 5 4 5 42 4 2 6 688.06 3.81 5.21 11.67 3.20 0.86 2.75

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 2 3 13 42 12 19 6 97

3.23 2.86 13.54 11.67 9.60 8.19 2.75--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 2 1 8 95 82 199 189 576

3.23 0.95 8.33 26.39 65.60 85.78 86.70--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 1 0 0 8 5 1 0 15

1.61 0.00 0.00 2.22 4.00 0.43 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 62 105 96 360 125 232 218 1198

5.18 8.76 8.01 30.05 10.43 19.37 18.20============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==============================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve strongly 108 68 24 200

41.22 18.89 4.17------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 110 105 26 241

41.98 29.17 4.52------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither approve nor disapprove 15 42 12 69

5.73 11.67 2.09------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 18 42 37 97

6.87 11.67 6.43

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

101

Page 103: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 10 95 470 575

3.82 26.39 81.74------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 1 8 6 15

0.38 2.22 1.04------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 262 360 575 1197

21.89 30.08 48.04==============================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================================================================================PID7

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve strongly 126 25 32 14 0 3 0 200

49.22 21.93 26.67 12.17 0.00 2.42 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 91 49 60 11 3 9 6 229

35.55 42.98 50.00 9.57 2.48 7.26 2.02---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither approve nor disapprove 13 14 7 13 1 6 6 60

5.08 12.28 5.83 11.30 0.83 4.84 2.02---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 20 12 9 14 9 15 15 94

7.81 10.53 7.50 12.17 7.44 12.10 5.05---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 1 14 12 61 108 89 270 555

0.39 12.28 10.00 53.04 89.26 71.77 90.91---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 5 0 0 2 0 2 0 9

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

102

Page 104: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

1.95 0.00 0.00 1.74 0.00 1.61 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 256 114 120 115 121 124 297 1147

22.32 9.94 10.46 10.03 10.55 10.81 25.89=========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

================================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve strongly 183 14 3 200

37.50 12.17 0.55--------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 199 11 18 228

40.78 9.57 3.32--------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither approve nor disapprove 34 13 13 60

6.97 11.30 2.40--------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 40 14 39 93

8.20 12.17 7.20--------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 27 61 467 555

5.53 53.04 86.16--------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 5 2 2 9

1.02 1.74 0.37--------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 488 115 542 1145

42.62 10.04 47.34================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

103

Page 105: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

========================================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve strongly 2 176 0 22 200

0.84 38.77 0.00 9.24------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 11 198 4 28 241

4.60 43.61 1.50 11.76------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither approve nor disapprove 16 26 1 24 67

6.69 5.73 0.38 10.08------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 34 35 6 24 99

14.23 7.71 2.26 10.08------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 176 15 255 129 575

73.64 3.30 95.86 54.20------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 0 4 0 11 15

0.00 0.88 0.00 4.62------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 239 454 266 238 1197

19.97 37.93 22.22 19.88========================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

104

Page 106: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

===================================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve strongly 1 45 66 19 42 28 201

2.50 12.82 19.82 16.52 17.07 24.35-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 11 68 50 27 64 22 242

27.50 19.37 15.02 23.48 26.02 19.13-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither approve nor disapprove 2 26 19 6 10 5 68

5.00 7.41 5.71 5.22 4.07 4.35-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 4 38 35 8 9 4 98

10.00 10.83 10.51 6.96 3.66 3.48-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 18 171 156 54 121 56 576

45.00 48.72 46.85 46.96 49.19 48.70-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 4 3 7 1 0 0 15

10.00 0.85 2.10 0.87 0.00 0.00-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 40 351 333 115 246 115 1200

3.33 29.25 27.75 9.58 20.50 9.58===================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==================================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

105

Page 107: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Approve strongly 27 27 16 56 74 20014.44 10.19 12.21 19.93 22.56

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 20 34 32 55 101 242

10.70 12.83 24.43 19.57 30.79----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither approve nor disapprove 6 18 9 17 18 68

3.21 6.79 6.87 6.05 5.49----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 19 22 9 27 20 97

10.16 8.30 6.87 9.61 6.10----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 111 163 62 125 110 571

59.36 61.51 47.33 44.48 33.54----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 4 1 3 1 5 14

2.14 0.38 2.29 0.36 1.52----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 187 265 131 281 328 1192

15.69 22.23 10.99 23.57 27.52==================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA gena Mixed Other Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve strongly 80 70 48 2 0 1 0 201

11.16 44.87 17.71 9.09 0.00 7.14 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 114 47 71 3 0 3 3 241

15.90 30.13 26.20 13.64 0.00 21.43 21.43

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

106

Page 108: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither approve nor disapprove 28 17 19 3 0 1 0 68

3.91 10.90 7.01 13.64 0.00 7.14 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 45 11 31 9 0 2 0 98

6.28 7.05 11.44 40.91 0.00 14.29 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 447 6 95 5 4 7 11 575

62.34 3.85 35.06 22.73 100.00 50.00 78.57--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 3 5 7 0 0 0 0 15

0.42 3.21 2.58 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 717 156 271 22 4 14 14 1198

59.85 13.02 22.62 1.84 0.33 1.17 1.17============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==================================================================================================================marital

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve strongly 87 3 30 10 56 15 201

13.43 13.04 19.87 15.38 21.96 25.86------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 108 3 38 9 66 18 242

16.67 13.04 25.17 13.85 25.88 31.03------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither approve nor disapprove 27 3 12 2 17 7 68

4.17 13.04 7.95 3.08 6.67 12.07------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 42 1 14 4 34 3 98

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

107

Page 109: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

6.48 4.35 9.27 6.15 13.33 5.17------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 374 12 57 40 77 15 575

57.72 52.17 37.75 61.54 30.20 25.86------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 10 1 0 0 5 0 16

1.54 4.35 0.00 0.00 1.96 0.00------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 648 23 151 65 255 58 1200

54.00 1.92 12.58 5.42 21.25 4.83==================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

========================================================gender

Q Male Female Total--------------------------------------------------------Approve strongly 88 113 201

15.69 17.71--------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 112 130 242

19.96 20.38--------------------------------------------------------Neither approve nor disapprove 23 45 68

4.10 7.05--------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 40 58 98

7.13 9.09--------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 292 283 575

52.05 44.36--------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

108

Page 110: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Don't know 6 9 151.07 1.41

--------------------------------------------------------Total 561 638 1199

46.79 53.21========================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==================================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total------------------------------------------------------------------Approve strongly 85 93 22 200

23.88 15.76 8.87------------------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 94 122 26 242

26.40 20.68 10.48------------------------------------------------------------------Neither approve nor disapprove 27 27 14 68

7.58 4.58 5.65------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 33 43 22 98

9.27 7.29 8.87------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 113 299 162 574

31.74 50.68 65.32------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 4 6 2 12

1.12 1.02 0.81------------------------------------------------------------------Total 356 590 248 1194

29.82 49.41 20.77

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

109

Page 111: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

==================================================================Cell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=====================================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve strongly 54 64 15 26 42 201

21.60 17.39 12.20 24.30 11.97-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 46 90 19 33 53 241

18.40 24.46 15.45 30.84 15.10-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither approve nor disapprove 14 19 14 7 14 68

5.60 5.16 11.38 6.54 3.99-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 21 25 10 7 35 98

8.40 6.79 8.13 6.54 9.97-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 114 166 62 33 201 576

45.60 45.11 50.41 30.84 57.26-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 1 4 3 1 6 15

0.40 1.09 2.44 0.93 1.71-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 250 368 123 107 351 1199

20.85 30.69 10.26 8.92 29.27=====================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

110

Page 112: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

=======================================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------Approve strongly 29 61 80 30 200

14.57 19.37 17.43 13.27-----------------------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 44 66 99 33 242

22.11 20.95 21.57 14.60-----------------------------------------------------------------------Neither approve nor disapprove 19 28 17 4 68

9.55 8.89 3.70 1.77-----------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 32 31 26 9 98

16.08 9.84 5.66 3.98-----------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 67 127 232 150 576

33.67 40.32 50.54 66.37-----------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 8 2 5 0 15

4.02 0.63 1.09 0.00-----------------------------------------------------------------------Total 199 315 459 226 1199

16.60 26.27 38.28 18.85=======================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

111

Page 113: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q7. Congress Approval

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve strongly 7 1 0 6 2 5 13 34

11.11 0.98 0.00 1.67 1.63 2.19 5.99--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 2 6 7 41 12 13 13 94

3.17 5.88 7.29 11.39 9.76 5.70 5.99--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

112

Page 114: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Neither approve nor disapprove 3 15 16 74 11 31 25 1754.76 14.71 16.67 20.56 8.94 13.60 11.52

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 10 18 11 68 35 75 60 277

15.87 17.65 11.46 18.89 28.46 32.89 27.65--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 40 61 60 152 58 102 104 577

63.49 59.80 62.50 42.22 47.15 44.74 47.93--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 1 1 2 19 5 2 2 32

1.59 0.98 2.08 5.28 4.07 0.88 0.92--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 63 102 96 360 123 228 217 1189

5.30 8.58 8.07 30.28 10.34 19.18 18.25============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==============================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve strongly 8 6 20 34

3.07 1.67 3.51------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 15 41 38 94

5.75 11.39 6.67------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither approve nor disapprove 34 74 68 176

13.03 20.56 11.93------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 39 68 171 278

14.94 18.89 30.00

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

113

Page 115: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 162 152 264 578

62.07 42.22 46.32------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 3 19 9 31

1.15 5.28 1.58------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 261 360 570 1191

21.91 30.23 47.86==============================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================================================================================PID7

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve strongly 23 1 1 1 0 1 6 33

9.20 0.88 0.85 0.89 0.00 0.80 2.02---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 30 18 5 7 5 6 19 90

12.00 15.79 4.27 6.25 4.17 4.80 6.40---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither approve nor disapprove 41 20 11 16 13 22 35 158

16.40 17.54 9.40 14.29 10.83 17.60 11.78---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 35 23 15 23 32 40 99 267

14.00 20.18 12.82 20.54 26.67 32.00 33.33---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 114 45 85 63 70 54 135 566

45.60 39.47 72.65 56.25 58.33 43.20 45.45---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 7 7 0 2 0 2 3 21

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

114

Page 116: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

2.80 6.14 0.00 1.79 0.00 1.60 1.01---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 250 114 117 112 120 125 297 1135

22.03 10.04 10.31 9.87 10.57 11.01 26.17=========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

================================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve strongly 26 1 8 35

5.39 0.89 1.47--------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 52 7 30 89

10.79 6.25 5.52--------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither approve nor disapprove 72 16 70 158

14.94 14.29 12.89--------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 74 23 171 268

15.35 20.54 31.49--------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 244 63 258 565

50.62 56.25 47.51--------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 14 2 6 22

2.90 1.79 1.10--------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 482 112 543 1137

42.39 9.85 47.76================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

115

Page 117: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

========================================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve strongly 5 23 2 5 35

2.07 5.12 0.75 2.11------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 21 49 15 11 96

8.71 10.91 5.64 4.64------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither approve nor disapprove 43 57 22 53 175

17.84 12.69 8.27 22.36------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 74 67 80 59 280

30.71 14.92 30.08 24.89------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 96 247 147 87 577

39.83 55.01 55.26 36.71------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 2 6 0 22 30

0.83 1.34 0.00 9.28------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 241 449 266 237 1193

20.20 37.64 22.30 19.87========================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

116

Page 118: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

===================================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve strongly 0 16 15 2 1 0 34

0.00 4.55 4.56 1.82 0.40 0.00-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 3 25 28 8 25 6 95

7.32 7.10 8.51 7.27 10.12 5.26-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither approve nor disapprove 5 69 44 17 33 8 176

12.20 19.60 13.37 15.45 13.36 7.02-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 13 64 91 35 50 28 281

31.71 18.18 27.66 31.82 20.24 24.56-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 16 166 142 46 135 71 576

39.02 47.16 43.16 41.82 54.66 62.28-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 4 12 9 2 3 1 31

9.76 3.41 2.74 1.82 1.21 0.88-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 41 352 329 110 247 114 1193

3.44 29.51 27.58 9.22 20.70 9.56===================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==================================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

117

Page 119: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Approve strongly 7 6 2 6 13 343.80 2.26 1.54 2.13 3.98

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 16 24 18 21 16 95

8.70 9.06 13.85 7.45 4.89----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither approve nor disapprove 28 42 30 34 40 174

15.22 15.85 23.08 12.06 12.23----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 57 82 21 60 60 280

30.98 30.94 16.15 21.28 18.35----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 69 107 55 159 184 574

37.50 40.38 42.31 56.38 56.27----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 7 4 4 2 14 31

3.80 1.51 3.08 0.71 4.28----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 184 265 130 282 327 1188

15.49 22.31 10.94 23.74 27.53==================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA gena Mixed Other Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve strongly 14 9 8 2 0 0 1 34

1.95 6.08 2.94 9.09 0.00 0.00 7.69--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 33 25 28 7 0 1 1 95

4.60 16.89 10.29 31.82 0.00 7.69 7.69

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

118

Page 120: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither approve nor disapprove 78 34 59 2 1 1 0 175

10.86 22.97 21.69 9.09 25.00 7.69 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 191 22 54 6 2 4 1 280

26.60 14.86 19.85 27.27 50.00 30.77 7.69--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 390 51 113 5 1 7 10 577

54.32 34.46 41.54 22.73 25.00 53.85 76.92--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 12 7 10 0 0 0 0 29

1.67 4.73 3.68 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 718 148 272 22 4 13 13 1190

60.34 12.44 22.86 1.85 0.34 1.09 1.09============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==================================================================================================================marital

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve strongly 9 1 0 0 24 0 34

1.39 4.35 0.00 0.00 9.64 0.00------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 38 2 10 4 38 4 96

5.87 8.70 6.71 6.15 15.26 6.90------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither approve nor disapprove 84 8 22 6 47 7 174

12.98 34.78 14.77 9.23 18.88 12.07------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 173 4 35 20 38 11 281

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

119

Page 121: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

26.74 17.39 23.49 30.77 15.26 18.97------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 326 8 79 33 96 34 576

50.39 34.78 53.02 50.77 38.55 58.62------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 17 0 3 2 6 2 30

2.63 0.00 2.01 3.08 2.41 3.45------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 647 23 149 65 249 58 1191

54.32 1.93 12.51 5.46 20.91 4.87==================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

========================================================gender

Q Male Female Total--------------------------------------------------------Approve strongly 22 12 34

3.96 1.89--------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 41 54 95

7.39 8.49--------------------------------------------------------Neither approve nor disapprove 62 113 175

11.17 17.77--------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 117 163 280

21.08 25.63--------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 305 272 577

54.95 42.77--------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

120

Page 122: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Don't know 8 22 301.44 3.46

--------------------------------------------------------Total 555 636 1191

46.60 53.40========================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==================================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total------------------------------------------------------------------Approve strongly 17 10 7 34

4.75 1.71 2.86------------------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 32 46 16 94

8.94 7.86 6.53------------------------------------------------------------------Neither approve nor disapprove 67 59 50 176

18.72 10.09 20.41------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 78 140 62 280

21.79 23.93 25.31------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 152 319 106 577

42.46 54.53 43.27------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 12 11 4 27

3.35 1.88 1.63------------------------------------------------------------------Total 358 585 245 1188

30.13 49.24 20.62

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

121

Page 123: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

==================================================================Cell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=====================================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve strongly 5 13 0 5 12 35

1.99 3.58 0.00 4.59 3.43-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 29 22 5 4 34 94

11.55 6.06 4.10 3.67 9.71-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither approve nor disapprove 38 47 28 12 51 176

15.14 12.95 22.95 11.01 14.57-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 55 83 26 26 91 281

21.91 22.87 21.31 23.85 26.00-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 121 189 56 57 155 578

48.21 52.07 45.90 52.29 44.29-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 3 9 7 5 7 31

1.20 2.48 5.74 4.59 2.00-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 251 363 122 109 350 1195

21.00 30.38 10.21 9.12 29.29=====================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

122

Page 124: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

=======================================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------Approve strongly 16 11 6 1 34

8.21 3.55 1.30 0.44-----------------------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 33 25 30 7 95

16.92 8.06 6.52 3.08-----------------------------------------------------------------------Neither approve nor disapprove 41 65 49 21 176

21.03 20.97 10.65 9.25-----------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 44 70 114 52 280

22.56 22.58 24.78 22.91-----------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 53 126 255 143 577

27.18 40.65 55.43 63.00-----------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 8 13 6 3 30

4.10 4.19 1.30 1.32-----------------------------------------------------------------------Total 195 310 460 227 1192

16.36 26.01 38.59 19.04=======================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

123

Page 125: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q8. Rick Perry Approval

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve strongly 8 3 2 25 22 81 99 240

12.70 2.91 2.08 6.93 17.60 35.06 45.21--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 1 8 5 71 42 101 71 299

1.59 7.77 5.21 19.67 33.60 43.72 32.42--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

124

Page 126: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Neither approve nor disapprove 6 4 18 92 28 27 22 1979.52 3.88 18.75 25.48 22.40 11.69 10.05

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 3 13 12 52 13 10 16 119

4.76 12.62 12.50 14.40 10.40 4.33 7.31--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 45 68 54 94 15 11 10 297

71.43 66.02 56.25 26.04 12.00 4.76 4.57--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 0 7 5 27 5 1 1 46

0.00 6.80 5.21 7.48 4.00 0.43 0.46--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 63 103 96 361 125 231 219 1198

5.26 8.60 8.01 30.13 10.43 19.28 18.28============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==============================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve strongly 13 25 202 240

4.96 6.93 35.19------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 14 71 214 299

5.34 19.67 37.28------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither approve nor disapprove 27 92 77 196

10.31 25.48 13.41------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 28 52 39 119

10.69 14.40 6.79

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

125

Page 127: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 167 94 35 296

63.74 26.04 6.10------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 13 27 7 47

4.96 7.48 1.22------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 262 361 574 1197

21.89 30.16 47.95==============================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================================================================================PID7

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve strongly 24 5 3 13 36 23 129 233

9.38 4.42 2.52 11.61 29.75 18.55 43.43---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 25 11 11 18 53 50 116 284

9.77 9.73 9.24 16.07 43.80 40.32 39.06---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither approve nor disapprove 30 32 17 34 14 29 28 184

11.72 28.32 14.29 30.36 11.57 23.39 9.43---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 28 20 14 17 11 12 14 116

10.94 17.70 11.76 15.18 9.09 9.68 4.71---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 141 40 74 16 4 8 9 292

55.08 35.40 62.18 14.29 3.31 6.45 3.03---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 8 5 0 14 3 2 1 33

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

126

Page 128: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

3.12 4.42 0.00 12.50 2.48 1.61 0.34---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 256 113 119 112 121 124 297 1142

22.42 9.89 10.42 9.81 10.60 10.86 26.01=========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

================================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve strongly 32 13 188 233

6.54 11.61 34.69--------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 47 18 219 284

9.61 16.07 40.41--------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither approve nor disapprove 80 34 71 185

16.36 30.36 13.10--------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 62 17 37 116

12.68 15.18 6.83--------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 255 16 21 292

52.15 14.29 3.87--------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 13 14 6 33

2.66 12.50 1.11--------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 489 112 542 1143

42.78 9.80 47.42================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

127

Page 129: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

========================================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve strongly 69 27 98 45 239

28.87 5.93 36.84 18.91------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 81 43 117 59 300

33.89 9.45 43.98 24.79------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither approve nor disapprove 49 63 24 60 196

20.50 13.85 9.02 25.21------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 21 60 17 22 120

8.79 13.19 6.39 9.24------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 13 254 8 22 297

5.44 55.82 3.01 9.24------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 6 8 2 30 46

2.51 1.76 0.75 12.61------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 239 455 266 238 1198

19.95 37.98 22.20 19.87========================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

128

Page 130: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

===================================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve strongly 7 75 66 21 51 20 240

17.07 21.37 19.88 18.42 20.73 17.39-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 13 94 76 31 58 27 299

31.71 26.78 22.89 27.19 23.58 23.48-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither approve nor disapprove 4 75 51 16 33 17 196

9.76 21.37 15.36 14.04 13.41 14.78-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 1 30 38 17 23 11 120

2.44 8.55 11.45 14.91 9.35 9.57-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 12 57 85 26 77 40 297

29.27 16.24 25.60 22.81 31.30 34.78-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 4 20 16 3 4 0 47

9.76 5.70 4.82 2.63 1.63 0.00-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 41 351 332 114 246 115 1199

3.42 29.27 27.69 9.51 20.52 9.59===================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==================================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

129

Page 131: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Approve strongly 67 60 28 39 44 23835.83 22.64 21.21 13.88 13.54

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 45 89 30 83 51 298

24.06 33.58 22.73 29.54 15.69----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither approve nor disapprove 24 51 34 40 47 196

12.83 19.25 25.76 14.23 14.46----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 19 25 12 24 36 116

10.16 9.43 9.09 8.54 11.08----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 24 30 24 90 128 296

12.83 11.32 18.18 32.03 39.38----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 8 10 4 5 19 46

4.28 3.77 3.03 1.78 5.85----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 187 265 132 281 325 1190

15.71 22.27 11.09 23.61 27.31==================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA gena Mixed Other Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve strongly 174 11 42 4 2 2 5 240

24.34 7.05 15.44 17.39 50.00 16.67 35.71--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 201 16 62 11 0 5 4 299

28.11 10.26 22.79 47.83 0.00 41.67 28.57

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

130

Page 132: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither approve nor disapprove 95 39 57 3 2 0 1 197

13.29 25.00 20.96 13.04 50.00 0.00 7.14--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 57 24 33 3 0 0 1 118

7.97 15.38 12.13 13.04 0.00 0.00 7.14--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 175 54 57 2 0 5 3 296

24.48 34.62 20.96 8.70 0.00 41.67 21.43--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 13 12 21 0 0 0 0 46

1.82 7.69 7.72 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 715 156 272 23 4 12 14 1196

59.78 13.04 22.74 1.92 0.33 1.00 1.17============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==================================================================================================================marital

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve strongly 148 3 16 14 51 6 238

22.95 13.04 10.67 21.54 20.08 10.53------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 180 6 29 23 48 12 298

27.91 26.09 19.33 35.38 18.90 21.05------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither approve nor disapprove 101 4 27 9 46 9 196

15.66 17.39 18.00 13.85 18.11 15.79------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 65 1 21 6 22 4 119

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

131

Page 133: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

10.08 4.35 14.00 9.23 8.66 7.02------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 134 4 57 13 71 18 297

20.78 17.39 38.00 20.00 27.95 31.58------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 17 5 0 0 16 8 46

2.64 21.74 0.00 0.00 6.30 14.04------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 645 23 150 65 254 57 1194

54.02 1.93 12.56 5.44 21.27 4.77==================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

========================================================gender

Q Male Female Total--------------------------------------------------------Approve strongly 127 113 240

22.64 17.74--------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 135 164 299

24.06 25.75--------------------------------------------------------Neither approve nor disapprove 89 107 196

15.86 16.80--------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 55 65 120

9.80 10.20--------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 139 158 297

24.78 24.80--------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

132

Page 134: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Don't know 16 30 462.85 4.71

--------------------------------------------------------Total 561 637 1198

46.83 53.17========================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==================================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total------------------------------------------------------------------Approve strongly 66 113 61 240

18.59 19.19 24.60------------------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 63 148 87 298

17.75 25.13 35.08------------------------------------------------------------------Neither approve nor disapprove 56 100 39 195

15.77 16.98 15.73------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 50 58 12 120

14.08 9.85 4.84------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 107 150 39 296

30.14 25.47 15.73------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 13 20 10 43

3.66 3.40 4.03------------------------------------------------------------------Total 355 589 248 1192

29.78 49.41 20.81

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

133

Page 135: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

==================================================================Cell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=====================================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve strongly 44 72 29 13 81 239

17.67 19.62 23.77 12.15 23.14-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 58 85 32 16 107 298

23.29 23.16 26.23 14.95 30.57-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither approve nor disapprove 44 60 18 15 58 195

17.67 16.35 14.75 14.02 16.57-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 30 38 11 18 23 120

12.05 10.35 9.02 16.82 6.57-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 65 98 28 43 63 297

26.10 26.70 22.95 40.19 18.00-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 8 14 4 2 18 46

3.21 3.81 3.28 1.87 5.14-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 249 367 122 107 350 1195

20.84 30.71 10.21 8.95 29.29=====================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

134

Page 136: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

=======================================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------Approve strongly 24 56 105 54 239

12.12 17.95 22.88 24.00-----------------------------------------------------------------------Approve somewhat 46 73 109 70 298

23.23 23.40 23.75 31.11-----------------------------------------------------------------------Neither approve nor disapprove 50 60 62 24 196

25.25 19.23 13.51 10.67-----------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove somewhat 29 26 44 20 119

14.65 8.33 9.59 8.89-----------------------------------------------------------------------Disapprove strongly 30 77 134 55 296

15.15 24.68 29.19 24.44-----------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 19 20 5 2 46

9.60 6.41 1.09 0.89-----------------------------------------------------------------------Total 198 312 459 225 1194

16.58 26.13 38.44 18.84=======================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

135

Page 137: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q9. Right Direction/Wrong Track, Country

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=============================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Right direction 24 66 37 108 18 9 10 272

39.34 64.08 38.54 30.17 14.52 3.91 4.61-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wrong track 23 21 40 173 93 216 202 768

37.70 20.39 41.67 48.32 75.00 93.91 93.09-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

136

Page 138: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Don't know 14 16 19 77 13 5 5 14922.95 15.53 19.79 21.51 10.48 2.17 2.30

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 61 103 96 358 124 230 217 1189

5.13 8.66 8.07 30.11 10.43 19.34 18.25=============================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===============================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total---------------------------------------------------------------Right direction 127 108 38 273

49.03 30.17 6.64---------------------------------------------------------------Wrong track 83 173 511 767

32.05 48.32 89.34---------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 49 77 23 149

18.92 21.51 4.02---------------------------------------------------------------Total 259 358 572 1189

21.78 30.11 48.11===============================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==========================================================================================PID7

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

137

Page 139: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Right direction 135 40 54 17 5 7 8 266

52.94 35.40 45.76 15.18 4.10 5.65 2.72------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wrong track 69 48 45 81 113 104 281 741

27.06 42.48 38.14 72.32 92.62 83.87 95.58------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 51 25 19 14 4 13 5 131

20.00 22.12 16.10 12.50 3.28 10.48 1.70------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 255 113 118 112 122 124 294 1138

22.41 9.93 10.37 9.84 10.72 10.90 25.83==========================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total-----------------------------------------------------------------Right direction 230 17 20 267

47.23 15.18 3.70-----------------------------------------------------------------Wrong track 162 81 498 741

33.26 72.32 92.22-----------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 95 14 22 131

19.51 12.50 4.07-----------------------------------------------------------------Total 487 112 540 1139

42.76 9.83 47.41=================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

138

Page 140: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Right direction 17 227 4 26 274

7.20 50.11 1.50 10.92---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wrong track 204 142 261 163 770

86.44 31.35 98.12 68.49---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 15 84 1 49 149

6.36 18.54 0.38 20.59---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 236 453 266 238 1193

19.78 37.97 22.30 19.95=========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

====================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Right direction 8 79 74 25 65 23 274

19.51 22.51 22.42 21.93 26.42 20.35----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wrong track 23 234 209 74 153 78 771

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

139

Page 141: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

56.10 66.67 63.33 64.91 62.20 69.03----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 10 38 47 15 28 12 150

24.39 10.83 14.24 13.16 11.38 10.62----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 41 351 330 114 246 113 1195

3.43 29.37 27.62 9.54 20.59 9.46====================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Right direction 34 43 27 76 94 274

18.18 16.17 20.61 27.34 28.75-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wrong track 142 198 82 169 175 766

75.94 74.44 62.60 60.79 53.52-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 11 25 22 33 58 149

5.88 9.40 16.79 11.87 17.74-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 187 266 131 278 327 1189

15.73 22.37 11.02 23.38 27.50===================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

140

Page 142: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

=====================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA gena ~ACAs nati Mixed Other Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Right direction 104 69 92 6 0 2 0 273

14.53 44.23 34.20 27.27 0.00 14.29 0.00-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wrong track 542 47 140 16 4 8 14 771

75.70 30.13 52.04 72.73 100.00 57.14 100.00-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 70 40 37 0 0 4 0 151

9.78 25.64 13.75 0.00 0.00 28.57 0.00-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 716 156 269 22 4 14 14 1195

59.92 13.05 22.51 1.84 0.33 1.17 1.17=====================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===================================================================================================marital

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Right direction 123 2 37 13 78 21 274

18.98 8.70 24.50 20.00 31.20 36.84---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wrong track 462 19 90 43 132 23 769

71.30 82.61 59.60 66.15 52.80 40.35---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 63 2 24 9 40 13 151

9.72 8.70 15.89 13.85 16.00 22.81---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 648 23 151 65 250 57 1194

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

141

Page 143: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

54.27 1.93 12.65 5.44 20.94 4.77===================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================gender

Q Male Female Total-----------------------------------------Right direction 133 141 274

23.79 22.17-----------------------------------------Wrong track 379 392 771

67.80 61.64-----------------------------------------Don't know 47 103 150

8.41 16.19-----------------------------------------Total 559 636 1195

46.78 53.22=========================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total---------------------------------------------------Right direction 116 126 32 274

32.49 21.58 12.90

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

142

Page 144: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

---------------------------------------------------Wrong track 182 396 191 769

50.98 67.81 77.02---------------------------------------------------Don't know 59 62 25 146

16.53 10.62 10.08---------------------------------------------------Total 357 584 248 1189

30.03 49.12 20.86===================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Right direction 66 96 20 35 57 274

26.29 26.16 16.39 33.02 16.38----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wrong track 161 217 91 49 252 770

64.14 59.13 74.59 46.23 72.41----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 24 54 11 22 39 150

9.56 14.71 9.02 20.75 11.21----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 251 367 122 106 348 1194

21.02 30.74 10.22 8.88 29.15======================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

143

Page 145: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

========================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total--------------------------------------------------------Right direction 51 71 110 41 273

25.76 22.61 24.12 18.22--------------------------------------------------------Wrong track 110 202 287 171 770

55.56 64.33 62.94 76.00--------------------------------------------------------Don't know 37 41 59 13 150

18.69 13.06 12.94 5.78--------------------------------------------------------Total 198 314 456 225 1193

16.60 26.32 38.22 18.86========================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

144

Page 146: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q10. National Economy: Better o↵/Worse O↵

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==========================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------A lot better off 15 10 9 32 5 4 9 84

24.19 9.71 9.28 8.91 4.03 1.72 4.13------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat better off 24 64 54 84 24 26 7 283

38.71 62.14 55.67 23.40 19.35 11.21 3.21------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

145

Page 147: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

About the same 13 21 22 126 25 51 50 30820.97 20.39 22.68 35.10 20.16 21.98 22.94

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat worse off 4 8 6 77 46 86 71 298

6.45 7.77 6.19 21.45 37.10 37.07 32.57------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------A lot worse off 6 0 5 28 21 62 74 196

9.68 0.00 5.15 7.80 16.94 26.72 33.94------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 0 0 1 12 3 3 7 26

0.00 0.00 1.03 3.34 2.42 1.29 3.21------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 62 103 97 359 124 232 218 1195

5.19 8.62 8.12 30.04 10.38 19.41 18.24==========================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------A lot better off 34 32 18 84

12.88 8.91 3.14----------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat better off 142 84 57 283

53.79 23.40 9.93----------------------------------------------------------------------------About the same 56 126 126 308

21.21 35.10 21.95----------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat worse off 19 77 203 299

7.20 21.45 35.37

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

146

Page 148: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

----------------------------------------------------------------------------A lot worse off 11 28 157 196

4.17 7.80 27.35----------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 2 12 13 27

0.76 3.34 2.26----------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 264 359 574 1197

22.06 29.99 47.95============================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=======================================================================================================PID7

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------A lot better off 54 7 16 2 2 0 1 82

21.18 6.14 13.33 1.79 1.67 0.00 0.34-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat better off 109 42 64 19 9 12 23 278

42.75 36.84 53.33 16.96 7.50 9.76 7.72-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------About the same 43 45 23 41 25 40 71 288

16.86 39.47 19.17 36.61 20.83 32.52 23.83-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat worse off 33 16 16 31 50 40 99 285

12.94 14.04 13.33 27.68 41.67 32.52 33.22-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------A lot worse off 8 3 1 18 34 26 99 189

3.14 2.63 0.83 16.07 28.33 21.14 33.22-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 8 1 0 1 0 5 5 20

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

147

Page 149: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

3.14 0.88 0.00 0.89 0.00 4.07 1.68-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 255 114 120 112 120 123 298 1142

22.33 9.98 10.51 9.81 10.51 10.77 26.09=======================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==============================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------A lot better off 77 2 3 82

15.75 1.79 0.55------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat better off 214 19 44 277

43.76 16.96 8.12------------------------------------------------------------------------------About the same 111 41 137 289

22.70 36.61 25.28------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat worse off 65 31 189 285

13.29 27.68 34.87------------------------------------------------------------------------------A lot worse off 13 18 159 190

2.66 16.07 29.34------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 9 1 10 20

1.84 0.89 1.85------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 489 112 542 1143

42.78 9.80 47.42==============================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

148

Page 150: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------A lot better off 5 72 0 6 83

2.07 15.93 0.00 2.53----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat better off 32 217 10 24 283

13.28 48.01 3.75 10.13----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------About the same 79 94 56 78 307

32.78 20.80 20.97 32.91----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat worse off 70 51 100 79 300

29.05 11.28 37.45 33.33----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------A lot worse off 52 11 98 35 196

21.58 2.43 36.70 14.77----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 3 7 3 15 28

1.24 1.55 1.12 6.33----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 241 452 267 237 1197

20.13 37.76 22.31 19.80======================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

149

Page 151: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

=================================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------A lot better off 4 23 24 9 14 9 83

9.52 6.50 7.25 7.89 5.69 7.83-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat better off 1 66 84 25 71 36 283

2.38 18.64 25.38 21.93 28.86 31.30-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------About the same 15 105 84 32 47 25 308

35.71 29.66 25.38 28.07 19.11 21.74-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat worse off 14 97 73 26 70 23 303

33.33 27.40 22.05 22.81 28.46 20.00-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------A lot worse off 4 58 52 20 42 21 197

9.52 16.38 15.71 17.54 17.07 18.26-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 4 5 14 2 2 1 28

9.52 1.41 4.23 1.75 0.81 0.87-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 42 354 331 114 246 115 1202

3.49 29.45 27.54 9.48 20.47 9.57=================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

================================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

150

Page 152: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

A lot better off 17 8 3 20 35 839.04 3.01 2.31 7.07 10.67

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat better off 35 41 30 84 93 283

18.62 15.41 23.08 29.68 28.35--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------About the same 37 75 47 54 93 306

19.68 28.20 36.15 19.08 28.35--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat worse off 42 83 33 73 67 298

22.34 31.20 25.38 25.80 20.43--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------A lot worse off 51 56 12 50 28 197

27.13 21.05 9.23 17.67 8.54--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 6 3 5 2 12 28

3.19 1.13 3.85 0.71 3.66--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 188 266 130 283 328 1195

15.73 22.26 10.88 23.68 27.45================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA gena ~ACAs Mixed Other Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------A lot better off 38 22 22 1 0 0 0 83

5.29 14.29 8.12 4.55 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat better off 140 60 72 5 0 4 0 281

19.50 38.96 26.57 22.73 0.00 30.77 0.00

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

151

Page 153: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------About the same 179 41 76 5 0 4 3 308

24.93 26.62 28.04 22.73 0.00 30.77 21.43--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat worse off 203 18 62 9 2 4 2 300

28.27 11.69 22.88 40.91 66.67 30.77 14.29--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------A lot worse off 144 6 33 2 1 1 9 196

20.06 3.90 12.18 9.09 33.33 7.69 64.29--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 14 7 6 0 0 0 0 27

1.95 4.55 2.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 718 154 271 22 3 13 14 1195

60.08 12.89 22.68 1.84 0.25 1.09 1.17============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

================================================================================================================marital

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------A lot better off 31 2 4 3 39 5 84

4.78 8.33 2.65 4.69 15.35 8.77----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat better off 134 4 52 14 65 14 283

20.65 16.67 34.44 21.88 25.59 24.56----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------About the same 168 10 34 16 56 23 307

25.89 41.67 22.52 25.00 22.05 40.35----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat worse off 167 3 39 20 61 11 301

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

152

Page 154: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

25.73 12.50 25.83 31.25 24.02 19.30----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------A lot worse off 138 5 18 10 24 2 197

21.26 20.83 11.92 15.62 9.45 3.51----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 11 0 4 1 9 2 27

1.69 0.00 2.65 1.56 3.54 3.51----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 649 24 151 64 254 57 1199

54.13 2.00 12.59 5.34 21.18 4.75================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================gender

Q Male Female Total------------------------------------------------------A lot better off 48 36 84

8.56 5.64------------------------------------------------------Somewhat better off 140 143 283

24.96 22.41------------------------------------------------------About the same 112 196 308

19.96 30.72------------------------------------------------------Somewhat worse off 156 145 301

27.81 22.73------------------------------------------------------A lot worse off 93 103 196

16.58 16.14------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

153

Page 155: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Don't know 12 15 272.14 2.35

------------------------------------------------------Total 561 638 1199

46.79 53.21======================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

================================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total----------------------------------------------------------------A lot better off 37 33 14 84

10.36 5.58 5.65----------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat better off 109 146 28 283

30.53 24.70 11.29----------------------------------------------------------------About the same 84 153 71 308

23.53 25.89 28.63----------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat worse off 80 146 74 300

22.41 24.70 29.84----------------------------------------------------------------A lot worse off 36 102 59 197

10.08 17.26 23.79----------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 11 11 2 24

3.08 1.86 0.81----------------------------------------------------------------Total 357 591 248 1196

29.85 49.41 20.74

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

154

Page 156: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

================================================================Cell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===================================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------A lot better off 16 29 6 15 18 84

6.43 7.88 4.96 14.02 5.13-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat better off 65 104 21 39 53 282

26.10 28.26 17.36 36.45 15.10-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------About the same 69 87 36 22 93 307

27.71 23.64 29.75 20.56 26.50-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat worse off 41 97 38 19 106 301

16.47 26.36 31.40 17.76 30.20-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------A lot worse off 53 47 17 10 68 195

21.29 12.77 14.05 9.35 19.37-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 5 4 3 2 13 27

2.01 1.09 2.48 1.87 3.70-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 249 368 121 107 351 1196

20.82 30.77 10.12 8.95 29.35===================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

155

Page 157: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

=====================================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total---------------------------------------------------------------------A lot better off 17 22 38 6 83

8.63 7.03 8.23 2.65---------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat better off 46 74 111 51 282

23.35 23.64 24.03 22.57---------------------------------------------------------------------About the same 64 92 114 37 307

32.49 29.39 24.68 16.37---------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat worse off 50 72 106 73 301

25.38 23.00 22.94 32.30---------------------------------------------------------------------A lot worse off 11 41 86 59 197

5.58 13.10 18.61 26.11---------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 9 12 7 0 28

4.57 3.83 1.52 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------Total 197 313 462 226 1198

16.44 26.13 38.56 18.86=====================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

156

Page 158: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q11. Right Direction/Wrong Track, Texas

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=============================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Right direction 10 26 21 131 73 173 152 586

16.13 25.24 21.65 36.49 58.87 74.57 70.70-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wrong track 39 57 58 133 30 41 41 399

62.90 55.34 59.79 37.05 24.19 17.67 19.07-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

157

Page 159: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Don't know 13 20 18 95 21 18 22 20720.97 19.42 18.56 26.46 16.94 7.76 10.23

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 62 103 97 359 124 232 215 1192

5.20 8.64 8.14 30.12 10.40 19.46 18.04=============================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===============================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total---------------------------------------------------------------Right direction 58 131 398 587

22.05 36.49 69.70---------------------------------------------------------------Wrong track 154 133 112 399

58.56 37.05 19.61---------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 51 95 61 207

19.39 26.46 10.68---------------------------------------------------------------Total 263 359 571 1193

22.05 30.09 47.86===============================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==========================================================================================PID7

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

158

Page 160: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Right direction 73 44 22 51 86 72 230 578

28.63 38.60 18.49 45.95 71.07 57.60 77.44------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wrong track 131 47 72 31 17 34 52 384

51.37 41.23 60.50 27.93 14.05 27.20 17.51------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 51 23 25 29 18 19 15 180

20.00 20.18 21.01 26.13 14.88 15.20 5.05------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 255 114 119 111 121 125 297 1142

22.33 9.98 10.42 9.72 10.60 10.95 26.01==========================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total-----------------------------------------------------------------Right direction 139 51 387 577

28.43 45.95 71.53-----------------------------------------------------------------Wrong track 250 31 103 384

51.12 27.93 19.04-----------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 100 29 51 180

20.45 26.13 9.43-----------------------------------------------------------------Total 489 111 541 1141

42.86 9.73 47.41=================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

159

Page 161: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Right direction 147 126 217 99 589

61.00 27.69 81.89 41.95---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wrong track 70 239 33 58 400

29.05 52.53 12.45 24.58---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 24 90 15 79 208

9.96 19.78 5.66 33.47---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 241 455 265 236 1197

20.13 38.01 22.14 19.72=========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

====================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Right direction 16 188 141 49 128 66 588

39.02 53.41 42.60 43.36 52.24 57.89----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wrong track 15 93 123 40 90 39 400

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

160

Page 162: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

36.59 26.42 37.16 35.40 36.73 34.21----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 10 71 67 24 27 9 208

24.39 20.17 20.24 21.24 11.02 7.89----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 41 352 331 113 245 114 1196

3.43 29.43 27.68 9.45 20.48 9.53====================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Right direction 107 146 66 132 133 584

56.91 55.30 50.38 47.14 40.43-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wrong track 48 70 38 110 133 399

25.53 26.52 29.01 39.29 40.43-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 33 48 27 38 63 209

17.55 18.18 20.61 13.57 19.15-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 188 264 131 280 329 1192

15.77 22.15 10.99 23.49 27.60===================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

161

Page 163: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

====================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA gena ~ACAs nati Mixed Other Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Right direction 365 52 133 17 3 7 10 587

51.05 33.33 49.08 77.27 75.00 53.85 71.43------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wrong track 246 60 82 4 0 4 4 400

34.41 38.46 30.26 18.18 0.00 30.77 28.57------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 104 44 56 1 1 2 0 208

14.55 28.21 20.66 4.55 25.00 15.38 0.00------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 715 156 271 22 4 13 14 1195

59.83 13.05 22.68 1.84 0.33 1.09 1.17====================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===================================================================================================marital

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Right direction 361 12 47 35 108 24 587

55.80 52.17 31.33 53.85 42.52 42.11---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wrong track 190 6 75 20 91 19 401

29.37 26.09 50.00 30.77 35.83 33.33---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 96 5 28 10 55 14 208

14.84 21.74 18.67 15.38 21.65 24.56---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 647 23 150 65 254 57 1196

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

162

Page 164: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

54.10 1.92 12.54 5.43 21.24 4.77===================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================gender

Q Male Female Total-----------------------------------------Right direction 303 284 587

54.01 44.79-----------------------------------------Wrong track 179 221 400

31.91 34.86-----------------------------------------Don't know 79 129 208

14.08 20.35-----------------------------------------Total 561 634 1195

46.95 53.05=========================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total---------------------------------------------------Right direction 159 305 123 587

44.92 51.69 49.60

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

163

Page 165: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

---------------------------------------------------Wrong track 133 196 71 400

37.57 33.22 28.63---------------------------------------------------Don't know 62 89 54 205

17.51 15.08 21.77---------------------------------------------------Total 354 590 248 1192

29.70 49.50 20.81===================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Right direction 124 171 71 39 182 587

50.00 46.47 57.72 36.45 51.85----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wrong track 87 136 34 50 94 401

35.08 36.96 27.64 46.73 26.78----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 37 61 18 18 75 209

14.92 16.58 14.63 16.82 21.37----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 248 368 123 107 351 1197

20.72 30.74 10.28 8.94 29.32======================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

164

Page 166: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

========================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total--------------------------------------------------------Right direction 82 140 241 125 588

41.62 44.59 52.39 55.31--------------------------------------------------------Wrong track 56 118 159 68 401

28.43 37.58 34.57 30.09--------------------------------------------------------Don't know 59 56 60 33 208

29.95 17.83 13.04 14.60--------------------------------------------------------Total 197 314 460 226 1197

16.46 26.23 38.43 18.88========================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

165

Page 167: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q12. Personal Economy: Better o↵/Worse o↵

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==========================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------A lot better off 6 5 6 23 7 10 15 72

9.52 4.85 6.19 6.37 5.69 4.31 6.88------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat better off 23 31 27 73 22 50 26 252

36.51 30.10 27.84 20.22 17.89 21.55 11.93------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

166

Page 168: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

About the same 16 50 45 152 52 97 97 50925.40 48.54 46.39 42.11 42.28 41.81 44.50

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat worse off 7 14 16 72 35 57 53 254

11.11 13.59 16.49 19.94 28.46 24.57 24.31------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------A lot worse off 6 3 3 26 4 18 27 87

9.52 2.91 3.09 7.20 3.25 7.76 12.39------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 5 0 0 15 3 0 0 23

7.94 0.00 0.00 4.16 2.44 0.00 0.00------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 63 103 97 361 123 232 218 1197

5.26 8.60 8.10 30.16 10.28 19.38 18.21==========================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------A lot better off 16 23 32 71

6.11 6.37 5.58----------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat better off 81 73 97 251

30.92 20.22 16.93----------------------------------------------------------------------------About the same 110 152 245 507

41.98 42.11 42.76----------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat worse off 38 72 145 255

14.50 19.94 25.31

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

167

Page 169: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

----------------------------------------------------------------------------A lot worse off 12 26 50 88

4.58 7.20 8.73----------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 5 15 4 24

1.91 4.16 0.70----------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 262 361 573 1196

21.91 30.18 47.91============================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=======================================================================================================PID7

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------A lot better off 34 7 10 4 7 3 4 69

13.28 6.19 8.40 3.57 5.79 2.42 1.34-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat better off 68 25 38 16 21 22 56 246

26.56 22.12 31.93 14.29 17.36 17.74 18.79-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------About the same 95 52 53 50 49 64 126 489

37.11 46.02 44.54 44.64 40.50 51.61 42.28-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat worse off 38 21 15 32 34 27 73 240

14.84 18.58 12.61 28.57 28.10 21.77 24.50-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------A lot worse off 14 7 3 9 10 7 38 88

5.47 6.19 2.52 8.04 8.26 5.65 12.75-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 7 1 0 1 0 1 1 11

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

168

Page 170: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

2.73 0.88 0.00 0.89 0.00 0.81 0.34-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 256 113 119 112 121 124 298 1143

22.40 9.89 10.41 9.80 10.59 10.85 26.07=======================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==============================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------A lot better off 51 4 14 69

10.45 3.57 2.57------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat better off 131 16 100 247

26.84 14.29 18.38------------------------------------------------------------------------------About the same 200 50 239 489

40.98 44.64 43.93------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat worse off 74 32 134 240

15.16 28.57 24.63------------------------------------------------------------------------------A lot worse off 24 9 55 88

4.92 8.04 10.11------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 8 1 2 11

1.64 0.89 0.37------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 488 112 544 1144

42.66 9.79 47.55==============================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

169

Page 171: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------A lot better off 12 49 7 4 72

4.98 10.79 2.64 1.67----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat better off 40 138 46 27 251

16.60 30.40 17.36 11.30----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------About the same 112 177 109 109 507

46.47 38.99 41.13 45.61----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat worse off 46 71 79 60 256

19.09 15.64 29.81 25.10----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------A lot worse off 31 15 24 19 89

12.86 3.30 9.06 7.95----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 0 4 0 20 24

0.00 0.88 0.00 8.37----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 241 454 265 239 1199

20.10 37.86 22.10 19.93======================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

170

Page 172: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

=================================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------A lot better off 0 19 18 9 22 4 72

0.00 5.38 5.42 7.89 8.94 3.48-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat better off 6 56 64 25 66 34 251

15.38 15.86 19.28 21.93 26.83 29.57-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------About the same 9 156 146 46 97 52 506

23.08 44.19 43.98 40.35 39.43 45.22-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat worse off 19 78 74 19 49 17 256

48.72 22.10 22.29 16.67 19.92 14.78-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------A lot worse off 1 40 18 12 11 8 90

2.56 11.33 5.42 10.53 4.47 6.96-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 4 4 12 3 1 0 24

10.26 1.13 3.61 2.63 0.41 0.00-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 39 353 332 114 246 115 1199

3.25 29.44 27.69 9.51 20.52 9.59=================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

================================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

171

Page 173: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

A lot better off 17 17 6 14 17 719.09 6.39 4.55 4.95 5.17

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat better off 38 54 23 63 74 252

20.32 20.30 17.42 22.26 22.49--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------About the same 61 121 74 106 145 507

32.62 45.49 56.06 37.46 44.07--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat worse off 35 55 22 75 66 253

18.72 20.68 16.67 26.50 20.06--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------A lot worse off 29 14 6 24 18 91

15.51 5.26 4.55 8.48 5.47--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 7 5 1 1 9 23

3.74 1.88 0.76 0.35 2.74--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 187 266 132 283 329 1197

15.62 22.22 11.03 23.64 27.49================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA gena ~ACAs Mixed Other Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------A lot better off 24 27 19 1 0 0 0 71

3.33 17.31 6.99 4.55 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat better off 159 28 52 5 1 4 2 251

22.08 17.95 19.12 22.73 33.33 28.57 14.29

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

172

Page 174: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------About the same 305 60 119 15 0 6 3 508

42.36 38.46 43.75 68.18 0.00 42.86 21.43--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat worse off 167 29 47 1 1 4 7 256

23.19 18.59 17.28 4.55 33.33 28.57 50.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------A lot worse off 52 8 28 0 1 0 2 91

7.22 5.13 10.29 0.00 33.33 0.00 14.29--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 13 4 7 0 0 0 0 24

1.81 2.56 2.57 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 720 156 272 22 3 14 14 1201

59.95 12.99 22.65 1.83 0.25 1.17 1.17============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

================================================================================================================marital

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------A lot better off 34 3 2 2 30 0 71

5.24 13.04 1.32 3.12 11.81 0.00----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat better off 129 3 32 5 70 12 251

19.88 13.04 21.05 7.81 27.56 21.05----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------About the same 285 5 66 30 87 33 506

43.91 21.74 43.42 46.88 34.25 57.89----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat worse off 142 6 40 19 40 10 257

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

173

Page 175: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

21.88 26.09 26.32 29.69 15.75 17.54----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------A lot worse off 53 3 12 7 14 1 90

8.17 13.04 7.89 10.94 5.51 1.75----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 6 3 0 1 13 1 24

0.92 13.04 0.00 1.56 5.12 1.75----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 649 23 152 64 254 57 1199

54.13 1.92 12.68 5.34 21.18 4.75================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================gender

Q Male Female Total------------------------------------------------------A lot better off 39 32 71

6.94 5.02------------------------------------------------------Somewhat better off 128 123 251

22.78 19.28------------------------------------------------------About the same 245 263 508

43.59 41.22------------------------------------------------------Somewhat worse off 101 155 256

17.97 24.29------------------------------------------------------A lot worse off 40 50 90

7.12 7.84------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

174

Page 176: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Don't know 9 15 241.60 2.35

------------------------------------------------------Total 562 638 1200

46.83 53.17======================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

================================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total----------------------------------------------------------------A lot better off 30 31 10 71

8.40 5.25 4.02----------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat better off 93 123 35 251

26.05 20.85 14.06----------------------------------------------------------------About the same 142 259 106 507

39.78 43.90 42.57----------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat worse off 61 130 65 256

17.09 22.03 26.10----------------------------------------------------------------A lot worse off 28 36 26 90

7.84 6.10 10.44----------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 3 11 7 21

0.84 1.86 2.81----------------------------------------------------------------Total 357 590 249 1196

29.85 49.33 20.82

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

175

Page 177: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

================================================================Cell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===================================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------A lot better off 13 31 2 14 12 72

5.18 8.42 1.64 12.96 3.42-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat better off 55 79 27 22 68 251

21.91 21.47 22.13 20.37 19.37-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------About the same 105 144 47 49 163 508

41.83 39.13 38.52 45.37 46.44-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat worse off 49 87 29 14 77 256

19.52 23.64 23.77 12.96 21.94-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------A lot worse off 23 21 14 8 24 90

9.16 5.71 11.48 7.41 6.84-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 6 6 3 1 7 23

2.39 1.63 2.46 0.93 1.99-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 251 368 122 108 351 1200

20.92 30.67 10.17 9.00 29.25===================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

176

Page 178: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

=====================================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total---------------------------------------------------------------------A lot better off 15 35 19 2 71

7.65 11.15 4.11 0.88---------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat better off 55 66 105 26 252

28.06 21.02 22.73 11.45---------------------------------------------------------------------About the same 71 134 192 110 507

36.22 42.68 41.56 48.46---------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat worse off 29 48 111 67 255

14.80 15.29 24.03 29.52---------------------------------------------------------------------A lot worse off 9 25 34 22 90

4.59 7.96 7.36 9.69---------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 17 6 1 0 24

8.67 1.91 0.22 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------Total 196 314 462 227 1199

16.35 26.19 38.53 18.93=====================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

177

Page 179: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Elections

Q13. 2014 Senate Vote Choice

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------John Cornyn 3 1 6 49 64 164 141 428

4.76 0.97 6.25 13.61 52.03 70.69 64.98--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------David Alameel 38 71 53 112 8 8 9 299

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

178

Page 180: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

60.32 68.93 55.21 31.11 6.50 3.45 4.15--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rebecca Paddock 2 4 0 19 14 12 11 62

3.17 3.88 0.00 5.28 11.38 5.17 5.07--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Emily Sanchez 3 3 7 8 2 1 6 30

4.76 2.91 7.29 2.22 1.63 0.43 2.76--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Someone else 2 0 4 10 8 22 18 64

3.17 0.00 4.17 2.78 6.50 9.48 8.29--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enoug 15 24 26 162 27 25 32 311

23.81 23.30 27.08 45.00 21.95 10.78 14.75--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 63 103 96 360 123 232 217 1194

5.28 8.63 8.04 30.15 10.30 19.43 18.17============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==================================================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------John Cornyn 10 49 368 427

3.80 13.61 64.22--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------David Alameel 162 112 26 300

61.60 31.11 4.54--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rebecca Paddock 6 19 38 63

2.28 5.28 6.63--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

179

Page 181: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Emily Sanchez 13 8 9 304.94 2.22 1.57

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Someone else 7 10 48 65

2.66 2.78 8.38--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 65 162 84 311

24.71 45.00 14.66--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 263 360 573 1196

21.99 30.10 47.91==================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=============================================================================================================================PID7

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------John Cornyn 7 6 4 15 70 64 248 414

2.75 5.22 3.36 13.51 58.33 51.61 83.22-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------David Alameel 172 46 67 5 2 2 1 295

67.45 40.00 56.30 4.50 1.67 1.61 0.34-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rebecca Paddock 2 5 5 15 19 14 2 62

0.78 4.35 4.20 13.51 15.83 11.29 0.67-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Emily Sanchez 3 8 10 4 2 0 3 30

1.18 6.96 8.40 3.60 1.67 0.00 1.01-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Someone else 5 1 2 12 13 13 16 62

1.96 0.87 1.68 10.81 10.83 10.48 5.37

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

180

Page 182: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 66 49 31 60 14 31 28 279

25.88 42.61 26.05 54.05 11.67 25.00 9.40-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 255 115 119 111 120 124 298 1142

22.33 10.07 10.42 9.72 10.51 10.86 26.09=============================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

====================================================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------John Cornyn 17 15 382 414

3.48 13.51 70.48----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------David Alameel 285 5 5 295

58.40 4.50 0.92----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rebecca Paddock 12 15 35 62

2.46 13.51 6.46----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Emily Sanchez 21 4 4 29

4.30 3.60 0.74----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Someone else 7 12 43 62

1.43 10.81 7.93----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 146 60 73 279

29.92 54.05 13.47----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 488 111 542 1141

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

181

Page 183: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

42.77 9.73 47.50====================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------John Cornyn 161 12 173 83 429

67.08 2.64 65.28 34.73--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------David Alameel 3 289 0 8 300

1.25 63.52 0.00 3.35--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rebecca Paddock 7 13 34 9 63

2.92 2.86 12.83 3.77--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Emily Sanchez 4 21 3 3 31

1.67 4.62 1.13 1.26--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Someone else 12 10 33 10 65

5.00 2.20 12.45 4.18--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 53 110 22 126 311

22.08 24.18 8.30 52.72--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 240 455 265 239 1199

20.02 37.95 22.10 19.93============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

182

Page 184: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

| Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=======================================================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------John Cornyn 11 125 118 45 81 49 429

26.83 35.41 35.65 39.82 32.79 42.98---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------David Alameel 2 71 79 28 78 42 300

4.88 20.11 23.87 24.78 31.58 36.84---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rebecca Paddock 6 10 19 1 20 8 64

14.63 2.83 5.74 0.88 8.10 7.02---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Emily Sanchez 2 9 6 5 9 1 32

4.88 2.55 1.81 4.42 3.64 0.88---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Someone else 2 21 18 7 13 3 64

4.88 5.95 5.44 6.19 5.26 2.63---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 18 117 91 27 46 11 310

43.90 33.14 27.49 23.89 18.62 9.65---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 41 353 331 113 247 114 1199

3.42 29.44 27.61 9.42 20.60 9.51=======================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================attend

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

183

Page 185: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------John Cornyn 91 127 44 85 80 427

48.66 47.92 33.59 30.04 24.32--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------David Alameel 31 35 32 86 116 300

16.58 13.21 24.43 30.39 35.26--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rebecca Paddock 5 13 10 15 18 61

2.67 4.91 7.63 5.30 5.47--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Emily Sanchez 3 1 7 8 12 31

1.60 0.38 5.34 2.83 3.65--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Someone else 20 18 4 10 12 64

10.70 6.79 3.05 3.53 3.65--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have 37 71 34 79 91 312

19.79 26.79 25.95 27.92 27.66--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 187 265 131 283 329 1195

15.65 22.18 10.96 23.68 27.53============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA g Mixed Other Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------John Cornyn 346 7 56 4 3 7 5 428

48.19 4.55 20.59 18.18 75.00 53.85 33.33--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

184

Page 186: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

David Alameel 151 67 68 9 0 1 3 29921.03 43.51 25.00 40.91 0.00 7.69 20.00

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rebecca Paddock 44 4 13 1 0 0 2 64

6.13 2.60 4.78 4.55 0.00 0.00 13.33--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Emily Sanchez 10 2 14 1 0 3 0 30

1.39 1.30 5.15 4.55 0.00 23.08 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Someone else 39 5 13 2 1 0 5 65

5.43 3.25 4.78 9.09 25.00 0.00 33.33--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to 128 69 108 5 0 2 0 312

17.83 44.81 39.71 22.73 0.00 15.38 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 718 154 272 22 4 13 15 1198

59.93 12.85 22.70 1.84 0.33 1.09 1.25============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================================================================================marital

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------John Cornyn 281 4 38 36 56 14 429

43.36 16.67 25.17 55.38 22.05 24.56--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------David Alameel 137 1 57 10 75 19 299

21.14 4.17 37.75 15.38 29.53 33.33--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rebecca Paddock 44 0 5 2 11 1 63

6.79 0.00 3.31 3.08 4.33 1.75

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

185

Page 187: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Emily Sanchez 15 0 1 0 13 2 31

2.31 0.00 0.66 0.00 5.12 3.51--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Someone else 36 1 6 5 17 0 65

5.56 4.17 3.97 7.69 6.69 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 135 18 44 12 82 21 312

20.83 75.00 29.14 18.46 32.28 36.84--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 648 24 151 65 254 57 1199

54.05 2.00 12.59 5.42 21.18 4.75======================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================gender

Q Male Female Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------John Cornyn 216 213 429

38.50 33.33----------------------------------------------------------------------------David Alameel 149 151 300

26.56 23.63----------------------------------------------------------------------------Rebecca Paddock 39 25 64

6.95 3.91----------------------------------------------------------------------------Emily Sanchez 17 13 30

3.03 2.03----------------------------------------------------------------------------Someone else 27 38 65

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

186

Page 188: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

4.81 5.95----------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 113 199 312

20.14 31.14----------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 561 639 1200

46.75 53.25============================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------John Cornyn 95 208 124 427

26.54 35.31 50.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------David Alameel 125 149 26 300

34.92 25.30 10.48--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rebecca Paddock 12 36 15 63

3.35 6.11 6.05--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Emily Sanchez 18 13 0 31

5.03 2.21 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Someone else 10 42 13 65

2.79 7.13 5.24--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 98 141 70 309

27.37 23.94 28.23--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

187

Page 189: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Total 358 589 248 119529.96 49.29 20.75

======================================================================================Cell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------John Cornyn 86 131 45 20 147 429

34.26 35.60 37.19 18.52 41.76--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------David Alameel 66 98 22 43 71 300

26.29 26.63 18.18 39.81 20.17--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rebecca Paddock 14 16 5 5 24 64

5.58 4.35 4.13 4.63 6.82--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Emily Sanchez 10 9 4 4 3 30

3.98 2.45 3.31 3.70 0.85--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Someone else 15 17 6 7 20 65

5.98 4.62 4.96 6.48 5.68--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to ha 60 97 39 29 87 312

23.90 26.36 32.23 26.85 24.72--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 251 368 121 108 352 1200

20.92 30.67 10.08 9.00 29.33============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

188

Page 190: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===========================================================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------John Cornyn 30 95 182 122 429

15.15 30.35 39.48 53.51-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------David Alameel 38 86 124 52 300

19.19 27.48 26.90 22.81-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rebecca Paddock 14 21 27 2 64

7.07 6.71 5.86 0.88-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Emily Sanchez 14 7 6 4 31

7.07 2.24 1.30 1.75-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Someone else 13 12 26 13 64

6.57 3.83 5.64 5.70-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 89 92 96 35 312

44.95 29.39 20.82 15.35-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 198 313 461 228 1200

16.50 26.08 38.42 19.00===========================================================================================

Q14. 2014 Governor Vote Choice

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

189

Page 191: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 47 83 73 141 20 10 8 382

75.81 80.58 76.04 39.61 16.13 4.33 3.69--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 2 5 5 64 71 195 179 521

3.23 4.85 5.21 17.98 57.26 84.42 82.49--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Kathy Glass 1 1 1 8 9 9 6 35

1.61 0.97 1.04 2.25 7.26 3.90 2.76--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Brandon Parmer 1 0 3 5 0 1 4 14

1.61 0.00 3.12 1.40 0.00 0.43 1.84--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

190

Page 192: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Someone else 1 1 2 14 6 2 5 311.61 0.97 2.08 3.93 4.84 0.87 2.30

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enoug 10 13 12 124 18 14 15 206

16.13 12.62 12.50 34.83 14.52 6.06 6.91--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 62 103 96 356 124 231 217 1189

5.21 8.66 8.07 29.94 10.43 19.43 18.25============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==================================================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 204 141 38 383

77.86 39.61 6.64--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 12 64 445 521

4.58 17.98 77.80--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Kathy Glass 2 8 25 35

0.76 2.25 4.37--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Brandon Parmer 5 5 5 15

1.91 1.40 0.87--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Someone else 4 14 12 30

1.53 3.93 2.10--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 35 124 47 206

13.36 34.83 8.22

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

191

Page 193: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 262 356 572 1190

22.02 29.92 48.07==================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=============================================================================================================================PID7

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 189 69 87 12 4 8 5 374

74.41 60.53 73.73 10.62 3.28 6.45 1.68-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 11 15 5 28 101 86 268 514

4.33 13.16 4.24 24.78 82.79 69.35 89.93-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Kathy Glass 4 4 2 12 7 4 3 36

1.57 3.51 1.69 10.62 5.74 3.23 1.01-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Brandon Parmer 5 1 1 4 2 0 2 15

1.97 0.88 0.85 3.54 1.64 0.00 0.67-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Someone else 5 1 9 5 2 2 6 30

1.97 0.88 7.63 4.42 1.64 1.61 2.01-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 40 24 14 52 6 24 14 174

15.75 21.05 11.86 46.02 4.92 19.35 4.70-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 254 114 118 113 122 124 298 1143

22.22 9.97 10.32 9.89 10.67 10.85 26.07=============================================================================================================================

Cell Contents

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

192

Page 194: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

====================================================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 345 12 16 373

71.13 10.62 2.96----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 30 28 454 512

6.19 24.78 83.92----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Kathy Glass 10 12 13 35

2.06 10.62 2.40----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Brandon Parmer 7 4 4 15

1.44 3.54 0.74----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Someone else 14 5 10 29

2.89 4.42 1.85----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 79 52 44 175

16.29 46.02 8.13----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 485 113 541 1139

42.58 9.92 47.50====================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

193

Page 195: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

============================================================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 18 345 2 18 383

7.44 76.50 0.75 7.63--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 171 24 237 92 524

70.66 5.32 89.10 38.98--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Kathy Glass 8 8 10 10 36

3.31 1.77 3.76 4.24--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Brandon Parmer 1 9 3 2 15

0.41 2.00 1.13 0.85--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Someone else 8 14 4 6 32

3.31 3.10 1.50 2.54--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 36 51 10 108 205

14.88 11.31 3.76 45.76--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 242 451 266 236 1195

20.25 37.74 22.26 19.75============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=======================================================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 6 98 89 45 94 51 383

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

194

Page 196: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

15.00 27.92 26.81 39.82 38.37 44.74---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 18 145 154 43 115 49 524

45.00 41.31 46.39 38.05 46.94 42.98---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Kathy Glass 2 8 9 4 4 7 34

5.00 2.28 2.71 3.54 1.63 6.14---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Brandon Parmer 0 6 7 1 1 1 16

0.00 1.71 2.11 0.88 0.41 0.88---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Someone else 2 17 2 6 4 0 31

5.00 4.84 0.60 5.31 1.63 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 12 77 71 14 27 6 207

30.00 21.94 21.39 12.39 11.02 5.26---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 40 351 332 113 245 114 1195

3.35 29.37 27.78 9.46 20.50 9.54=======================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 42 47 37 110 148 384

22.22 17.74 28.68 39.01 45.12--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 105 155 58 106 95 519

55.56 58.49 44.96 37.59 28.96--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

195

Page 197: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Kathy Glass 7 6 6 9 9 373.70 2.26 4.65 3.19 2.74

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Brandon Parmer 1 4 3 0 7 15

0.53 1.51 2.33 0.00 2.13--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Someone else 5 8 3 15 1 32

2.65 3.02 2.33 5.32 0.30--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have 29 45 22 42 68 206

15.34 16.98 17.05 14.89 20.73--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 189 265 129 282 328 1193

15.84 22.21 10.81 23.64 27.49============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA g Mixed Other Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 185 83 95 11 0 6 3 383

25.87 54.25 35.06 50.00 0.00 46.15 21.43--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 410 8 80 5 4 6 10 523

57.34 5.23 29.52 22.73 100.00 46.15 71.43--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Kathy Glass 20 7 6 1 0 0 1 35

2.80 4.58 2.21 4.55 0.00 0.00 7.14--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Brandon Parmer 7 4 2 1 0 0 0 14

0.98 2.61 0.74 4.55 0.00 0.00 0.00

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

196

Page 198: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Someone else 13 2 14 2 0 0 0 31

1.82 1.31 5.17 9.09 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to 80 49 74 2 0 1 0 206

11.19 32.03 27.31 9.09 0.00 7.69 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 715 153 271 22 4 13 14 1192

59.98 12.84 22.73 1.85 0.34 1.09 1.17============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================================================================================marital

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 178 7 68 14 90 25 382

27.51 30.43 45.95 21.88 35.57 44.64--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 340 7 52 43 71 11 524

52.55 30.43 35.14 67.19 28.06 19.64--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Kathy Glass 20 0 2 0 12 2 36

3.09 0.00 1.35 0.00 4.74 3.57--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Brandon Parmer 6 0 1 0 4 3 14

0.93 0.00 0.68 0.00 1.58 5.36--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Someone else 16 0 0 1 13 0 30

2.47 0.00 0.00 1.56 5.14 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 87 9 25 6 63 15 205

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

197

Page 199: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

13.45 39.13 16.89 9.38 24.90 26.79--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 647 23 148 64 253 56 1191

54.32 1.93 12.43 5.37 21.24 4.70======================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================gender

Q Male Female Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 181 202 383

32.26 31.86----------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 259 265 524

46.17 41.80----------------------------------------------------------------------------Kathy Glass 22 13 35

3.92 2.05----------------------------------------------------------------------------Brandon Parmer 8 7 15

1.43 1.10----------------------------------------------------------------------------Someone else 17 15 32

3.03 2.37----------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 74 132 206

13.19 20.82----------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 561 634 1195

46.95 53.05============================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

198

Page 200: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 153 190 40 383

42.86 32.15 16.39--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 109 272 142 523

30.53 46.02 58.20--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Kathy Glass 9 20 7 36

2.52 3.38 2.87--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Brandon Parmer 6 8 1 15

1.68 1.35 0.41--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Someone else 11 6 14 31

3.08 1.02 5.74--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 69 95 40 204

19.33 16.07 16.39--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 357 591 244 1192

29.95 49.58 20.47======================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

199

Page 201: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

============================================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 82 128 33 62 78 383

32.67 34.97 27.27 57.94 22.22--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 112 149 59 29 176 525

44.62 40.71 48.76 27.10 50.14--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Kathy Glass 5 10 3 7 11 36

1.99 2.73 2.48 6.54 3.13--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Brandon Parmer 2 8 0 0 5 15

0.80 2.19 0.00 0.00 1.42--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Someone else 7 5 4 0 15 31

2.79 1.37 3.31 0.00 4.27--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to ha 43 66 22 9 66 206

17.13 18.03 18.18 8.41 18.80--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 251 366 121 107 351 1196

20.99 30.60 10.12 8.95 29.35============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===========================================================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

200

Page 202: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Wendy Davis 49 116 156 62 38324.62 36.94 34.06 27.56

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 57 113 222 133 525

28.64 35.99 48.47 59.11-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Kathy Glass 11 12 11 2 36

5.53 3.82 2.40 0.89-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Brandon Parmer 7 4 3 1 15

3.52 1.27 0.66 0.44-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Someone else 7 7 14 4 32

3.52 2.23 3.06 1.78-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 68 62 52 23 205

34.17 19.75 11.35 10.22-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 199 314 458 225 1196

16.64 26.25 38.29 18.81===========================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

201

Page 203: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q15. 2014 Lieutenant Governor Vote Choice

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Leticia Van de Putte 45 69 60 112 15 8 5 314

71.43 66.99 61.86 31.20 12.00 3.45 2.31--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Dan Patrick 1 1 6 57 63 191 170 489

1.59 0.97 6.19 15.88 50.40 82.33 78.70--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

202

Page 204: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Robert Butler 0 2 3 8 15 5 13 460.00 1.94 3.09 2.23 12.00 2.16 6.02

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Chandrakantha Courtney 1 4 4 6 2 0 1 18

1.59 3.88 4.12 1.67 1.60 0.00 0.46--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Someone else 3 1 3 21 6 13 6 53

4.76 0.97 3.09 5.85 4.80 5.60 2.78--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enoug 13 26 21 155 24 15 21 275

20.63 25.24 21.65 43.18 19.20 6.47 9.72--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 63 103 97 359 125 232 216 1195

5.27 8.62 8.12 30.04 10.46 19.41 18.08============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==================================================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Leticia Van de Putte 174 112 28 314

66.41 31.20 4.90--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Dan Patrick 8 57 424 489

3.05 15.88 74.13--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Robert Butler 5 8 33 46

1.91 2.23 5.77--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Chandrakantha Courtney 9 6 2 17

3.44 1.67 0.35

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

203

Page 205: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Someone else 6 21 25 52

2.29 5.85 4.37--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 60 155 60 275

22.90 43.18 10.49--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 262 359 572 1193

21.96 30.09 47.95==================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=============================================================================================================================PID7

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Leticia Van de Putte 169 44 77 3 4 7 6 310

66.27 38.94 65.25 2.65 3.33 5.65 2.01-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Dan Patrick 11 9 7 30 93 79 250 479

4.31 7.96 5.93 26.55 77.50 63.71 83.89-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Robert Butler 6 7 4 4 12 3 10 46

2.35 6.19 3.39 3.54 10.00 2.42 3.36-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Chandrakantha Courtney 4 5 4 3 0 1 0 17

1.57 4.42 3.39 2.65 0.00 0.81 0.00-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Someone else 6 7 2 13 1 6 14 49

2.35 6.19 1.69 11.50 0.83 4.84 4.70-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 59 41 24 60 10 28 18 240

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

204

Page 206: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

23.14 36.28 20.34 53.10 8.33 22.58 6.04-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 255 113 118 113 120 124 298 1141

22.35 9.90 10.34 9.90 10.52 10.87 26.12=============================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

====================================================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Leticia Van de Putte 290 3 17 310

59.92 2.65 3.13----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Dan Patrick 27 30 422 479

5.58 26.55 77.72----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Robert Butler 16 4 25 45

3.31 3.54 4.60----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Chandrakantha Courtney 13 3 1 17

2.69 2.65 0.18----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Someone else 14 13 22 49

2.89 11.50 4.05----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 124 60 56 240

25.62 53.10 10.31----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 484 113 543 1140

42.46 9.91 47.63====================================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

205

Page 207: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Leticia Van de Putte 14 288 2 10 314

5.86 63.72 0.75 4.20--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Dan Patrick 142 26 237 87 492

59.41 5.75 88.76 36.55--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Robert Butler 16 16 9 5 46

6.69 3.54 3.37 2.10--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Chandrakantha Courtney 1 13 2 1 17

0.42 2.88 0.75 0.42--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Someone else 23 17 3 8 51

9.62 3.76 1.12 3.36--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 43 92 14 127 276

17.99 20.35 5.24 53.36--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 239 452 267 238 1196

19.98 37.79 22.32 19.90============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

206

Page 208: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

=======================================================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Leticia Van de Putte 5 74 70 36 88 41 314

12.50 21.02 21.21 31.86 35.77 35.96---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Dan Patrick 17 132 137 42 111 51 490

42.50 37.50 41.52 37.17 45.12 44.74---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Robert Butler 1 10 16 7 6 6 46

2.50 2.84 4.85 6.19 2.44 5.26---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Chandrakantha Courtney 2 5 8 1 2 0 18

5.00 1.42 2.42 0.88 0.81 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Someone else 0 21 14 5 6 5 51

0.00 5.97 4.24 4.42 2.44 4.39---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 15 110 85 22 33 11 276

37.50 31.25 25.76 19.47 13.41 9.65---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 40 352 330 113 246 114 1195

3.35 29.46 27.62 9.46 20.59 9.54=======================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

207

Page 209: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Leticia Van de Putte 28 35 31 98 122 31414.81 13.16 23.48 35.00 37.20

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Dan Patrick 96 148 62 98 83 487

50.79 55.64 46.97 35.00 25.30--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Robert Butler 9 8 9 8 12 46

4.76 3.01 6.82 2.86 3.66--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Chandrakantha Courtney 5 1 3 1 8 18

2.65 0.38 2.27 0.36 2.44--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Someone else 18 13 4 10 8 53

9.52 4.89 3.03 3.57 2.44--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have 33 61 23 65 95 277

17.46 22.93 17.42 23.21 28.96--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 189 266 132 280 328 1195

15.82 22.26 11.05 23.43 27.45============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA g Mixed Other Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Leticia Van de Putte 159 57 84 9 0 4 0 313

22.18 37.01 31.00 42.86 0.00 28.57 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Dan Patrick 386 18 61 6 3 6 11 491

53.84 11.69 22.51 28.57 75.00 42.86 78.57

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

208

Page 210: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Robert Butler 32 4 8 1 0 1 0 46

4.46 2.60 2.95 4.76 0.00 7.14 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Chandrakantha Courtney 6 4 5 1 0 0 0 16

0.84 2.60 1.85 4.76 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Someone else 24 12 15 0 1 0 0 52

3.35 7.79 5.54 0.00 25.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to 110 59 98 4 0 3 3 277

15.34 38.31 36.16 19.05 0.00 21.43 21.43--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 717 154 271 21 4 14 14 1195

60.00 12.89 22.68 1.76 0.33 1.17 1.17============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================================================================================marital

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Leticia Van de Putte 151 3 60 14 69 17 314

23.37 13.04 40.00 21.88 27.17 28.81--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Dan Patrick 324 9 50 35 57 15 490

50.15 39.13 33.33 54.69 22.44 25.42--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Robert Butler 25 0 2 1 14 4 46

3.87 0.00 1.33 1.56 5.51 6.78--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Chandrakantha Courtney 6 0 1 0 9 2 18

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

209

Page 211: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

0.93 0.00 0.67 0.00 3.54 3.39--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Someone else 26 0 4 3 16 3 52

4.02 0.00 2.67 4.69 6.30 5.08--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 114 11 33 11 89 18 276

17.65 47.83 22.00 17.19 35.04 30.51--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 646 23 150 64 254 59 1196

54.01 1.92 12.54 5.35 21.24 4.93======================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================gender

Q Male Female Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------Leticia Van de Putte 151 163 314

26.92 25.67----------------------------------------------------------------------------Dan Patrick 254 237 491

45.28 37.32----------------------------------------------------------------------------Robert Butler 22 23 45

3.92 3.62----------------------------------------------------------------------------Chandrakantha Courtney 9 8 17

1.60 1.26----------------------------------------------------------------------------Someone else 20 32 52

3.57 5.04----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

210

Page 212: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 105 172 27718.72 27.09

----------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 561 635 1196

46.91 53.09============================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Leticia Van de Putte 138 143 33 314

38.66 24.28 13.47--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Dan Patrick 100 257 133 490

28.01 43.63 54.29--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Robert Butler 14 20 11 45

3.92 3.40 4.49--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Chandrakantha Courtney 3 14 0 17

0.84 2.38 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Someone else 19 19 14 52

5.32 3.23 5.71--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 83 136 54 273

23.25 23.09 22.04--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 357 589 245 1191

29.97 49.45 20.57

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

211

Page 213: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

======================================================================================Cell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Leticia Van de Putte 69 100 31 47 67 314

27.60 27.17 25.83 43.52 19.14--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Dan Patrick 96 152 49 28 166 491

38.40 41.30 40.83 25.93 47.43--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Robert Butler 7 19 2 7 10 45

2.80 5.16 1.67 6.48 2.86--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Chandrakantha Courtney 4 8 2 1 3 18

1.60 2.17 1.67 0.93 0.86--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Someone else 19 5 9 5 14 52

7.60 1.36 7.50 4.63 4.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to ha 55 84 27 20 90 276

22.00 22.83 22.50 18.52 25.71--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 250 368 120 108 350 1196

20.90 30.77 10.03 9.03 29.26============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

212

Page 214: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

===========================================================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Leticia Van de Putte 32 94 132 56 314

16.16 29.94 28.76 24.67-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Dan Patrick 48 99 218 126 491

24.24 31.53 47.49 55.51-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Robert Butler 9 16 17 4 46

4.55 5.10 3.70 1.76-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Chandrakantha Courtney 11 4 1 1 17

5.56 1.27 0.22 0.44-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Someone else 9 15 21 7 52

4.55 4.78 4.58 3.08-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 89 86 70 33 278

44.95 27.39 15.25 14.54-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 198 314 459 227 1198

16.53 26.21 38.31 18.95===========================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

213

Page 215: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q16. 2014 Attorney General Vote Choice

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Sam Houston 40 67 55 117 15 15 15 324

63.49 65.05 57.29 32.59 12.10 6.52 6.91--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ken Paxton 2 1 8 55 59 193 163 481

3.17 0.97 8.33 15.32 47.58 83.91 75.12--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

214

Page 216: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Jamie Balagia 0 5 4 7 9 1 4 300.00 4.85 4.17 1.95 7.26 0.43 1.84

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jamar Osborne 6 3 2 11 5 0 7 34

9.52 2.91 2.08 3.06 4.03 0.00 3.23--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enoug 15 27 27 169 36 21 28 323

23.81 26.21 28.12 47.08 29.03 9.13 12.90--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 63 103 96 359 124 230 217 1192

5.29 8.64 8.05 30.12 10.40 19.30 18.20============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==================================================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Sam Houston 162 117 45 324

61.60 32.59 7.87--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ken Paxton 11 55 415 481

4.18 15.32 72.55--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jamie Balagia 10 7 15 32

3.80 1.95 2.62--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jamar Osborne 11 11 12 34

4.18 3.06 2.10--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 69 169 85 323

26.24 47.08 14.86

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

215

Page 217: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 263 359 572 1194

22.03 30.07 47.91==================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=============================================================================================================================PID7

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Sam Houston 165 54 69 13 7 3 10 321

64.45 47.79 57.50 11.71 5.83 2.42 3.36-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ken Paxton 6 7 6 28 96 77 250 470

2.34 6.19 5.00 25.23 80.00 62.10 83.89-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jamie Balagia 7 3 3 7 6 4 1 31

2.73 2.65 2.50 6.31 5.00 3.23 0.34-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jamar Osborne 8 4 7 4 0 2 9 34

3.12 3.54 5.83 3.60 0.00 1.61 3.02-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 70 45 35 59 11 38 28 286

27.34 39.82 29.17 53.15 9.17 30.65 9.40-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 256 113 120 111 120 124 298 1142

22.42 9.89 10.51 9.72 10.51 10.86 26.09=============================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

216

Page 218: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

====================================================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Sam Houston 287 13 20 320

58.81 11.71 3.70----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ken Paxton 19 28 423 470

3.89 25.23 78.19----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jamie Balagia 13 7 11 31

2.66 6.31 2.03----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jamar Osborne 19 4 10 33

3.89 3.60 1.85----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 150 59 77 286

30.74 53.15 14.23----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 488 111 541 1140

42.81 9.74 47.46====================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Sam Houston 20 289 7 10 326

8.26 63.80 2.64 4.18

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

217

Page 219: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ken Paxton 146 16 232 89 483

60.33 3.53 87.55 37.24--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jamie Balagia 4 12 9 7 32

1.65 2.65 3.40 2.93--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jamar Osborne 10 21 2 0 33

4.13 4.64 0.75 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 62 115 15 133 325

25.62 25.39 5.66 55.65--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 242 453 265 239 1199

20.18 37.78 22.10 19.93============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=======================================================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Sam Houston 5 84 71 40 84 41 325

12.20 23.86 21.32 35.40 34.15 36.61---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ken Paxton 14 137 129 43 110 50 483

34.15 38.92 38.74 38.05 44.72 44.64---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jamie Balagia 2 4 13 2 6 4 31

4.88 1.14 3.90 1.77 2.44 3.57---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jamar Osborne 0 11 13 1 5 3 33

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

218

Page 220: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

0.00 3.12 3.90 0.88 2.03 2.68---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 20 116 107 27 41 14 325

48.78 32.95 32.13 23.89 16.67 12.50---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 41 352 333 113 246 112 1197

3.43 29.41 27.82 9.44 20.55 9.36=======================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Sam Houston 39 44 34 83 124 324

20.97 16.60 25.56 29.54 37.92--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ken Paxton 98 143 56 97 84 478

52.69 53.96 42.11 34.52 25.69--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jamie Balagia 1 2 8 7 13 31

0.54 0.75 6.02 2.49 3.98--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jamar Osborne 8 2 5 12 7 34

4.30 0.75 3.76 4.27 2.14--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have 40 74 30 82 99 325

21.51 27.92 22.56 29.18 30.28--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 186 265 133 281 327 1192

15.60 22.23 11.16 23.57 27.43============================================================================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

219

Page 221: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA g Mixed Other Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Sam Houston 163 68 73 12 0 4 4 324

22.73 44.16 26.84 52.17 0.00 30.77 28.57--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ken Paxton 377 5 76 5 4 6 10 483

52.58 3.25 27.94 21.74 100.00 46.15 71.43--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jamie Balagia 22 3 6 1 0 0 0 32

3.07 1.95 2.21 4.35 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jamar Osborne 14 9 10 0 0 0 0 33

1.95 5.84 3.68 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to 141 69 107 5 0 3 0 325

19.67 44.81 39.34 21.74 0.00 23.08 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 717 154 272 23 4 13 14 1197

59.90 12.87 22.72 1.92 0.33 1.09 1.17============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================================================================================marital

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

220

Page 222: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Sam Houston 152 2 51 13 91 17 326

23.53 8.33 33.77 20.00 35.69 29.82--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ken Paxton 324 5 48 36 59 11 483

50.15 20.83 31.79 55.38 23.14 19.30--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jamie Balagia 23 0 2 0 6 1 32

3.56 0.00 1.32 0.00 2.35 1.75--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jamar Osborne 13 1 2 0 12 5 33

2.01 4.17 1.32 0.00 4.71 8.77--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 134 16 48 16 87 23 324

20.74 66.67 31.79 24.62 34.12 40.35--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 646 24 151 65 255 57 1198

53.92 2.00 12.60 5.43 21.29 4.76======================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================gender

Q Male Female Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------Sam Houston 159 165 324

28.39 25.90----------------------------------------------------------------------------Ken Paxton 258 225 483

46.07 35.32----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

221

Page 223: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Jamie Balagia 14 17 312.50 2.67

----------------------------------------------------------------------------Jamar Osborne 21 13 34

3.75 2.04----------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 108 217 325

19.29 34.07----------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 560 637 1197

46.78 53.22============================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Sam Houston 123 157 45 325

34.45 26.61 18.29--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ken Paxton 101 251 130 482

28.29 42.54 52.85--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jamie Balagia 11 17 4 32

3.08 2.88 1.63--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jamar Osborne 17 10 6 33

4.76 1.69 2.44--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 105 155 61 321

29.41 26.27 24.80

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

222

Page 224: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 357 590 246 1193

29.92 49.46 20.62======================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Sam Houston 69 102 28 41 84 324

27.60 27.87 22.95 38.32 24.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ken Paxton 100 139 56 24 163 482

40.00 37.98 45.90 22.43 46.57--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jamie Balagia 4 14 3 4 7 32

1.60 3.83 2.46 3.74 2.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jamar Osborne 6 19 1 6 1 33

2.40 5.19 0.82 5.61 0.29--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to ha 71 92 34 32 95 324

28.40 25.14 27.87 29.91 27.14--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 250 366 122 107 350 1195

20.92 30.63 10.21 8.95 29.29============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

223

Page 225: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

===========================================================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Sam Houston 52 90 126 57 325

26.26 28.75 27.45 25.22-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ken Paxton 44 102 205 131 482

22.22 32.59 44.66 57.96-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jamie Balagia 6 8 17 0 31

3.03 2.56 3.70 0.00-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jamar Osborne 5 16 13 0 34

2.53 5.11 2.83 0.00-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 91 97 98 38 324

45.96 30.99 21.35 16.81-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 198 313 459 226 1196

16.56 26.17 38.38 18.90===========================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

224

Page 226: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q17. 2014 Comptroller Vote Choice

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mike Collier 42 60 57 109 10 8 10 296

70.00 58.82 58.16 30.36 8.00 3.48 4.59--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Glenn Hegar 0 0 6 38 43 153 140 380

0.00 0.00 6.12 10.58 34.40 66.52 64.22--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

225

Page 227: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Ben Sanders 2 3 1 13 10 13 16 583.33 2.94 1.02 3.62 8.00 5.65 7.34

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Deb Shafto 4 2 4 8 1 0 2 21

6.67 1.96 4.08 2.23 0.80 0.00 0.92--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enoug 12 37 30 191 61 56 50 437

20.00 36.27 30.61 53.20 48.80 24.35 22.94--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 60 102 98 359 125 230 218 1192

5.03 8.56 8.22 30.12 10.49 19.30 18.29============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==================================================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mike Collier 159 109 27 295

60.92 30.36 4.72--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Glenn Hegar 6 38 336 380

2.30 10.58 58.74--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ben Sanders 6 13 39 58

2.30 3.62 6.82--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Deb Shafto 11 8 3 22

4.21 2.23 0.52--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 79 191 167 437

30.27 53.20 29.20

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

226

Page 228: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 261 359 572 1192

21.90 30.12 47.99==================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=============================================================================================================================PID7

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mike Collier 169 43 59 4 4 4 8 291

66.27 37.72 50.43 3.57 3.28 3.23 2.70-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Glenn Hegar 4 3 4 19 63 59 223 375

1.57 2.63 3.42 16.96 51.64 47.58 75.34-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ben Sanders 7 9 7 10 10 8 4 55

2.75 7.89 5.98 8.93 8.20 6.45 1.35-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Deb Shafto 4 2 5 5 2 3 0 21

1.57 1.75 4.27 4.46 1.64 2.42 0.00-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 71 57 42 74 43 50 61 398

27.84 50.00 35.90 66.07 35.25 40.32 20.61-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 255 114 117 112 122 124 296 1140

22.37 10.00 10.26 9.82 10.70 10.88 25.96=============================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

227

Page 229: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

====================================================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mike Collier 271 4 16 291

55.76 3.57 2.95----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Glenn Hegar 11 19 345 375

2.26 16.96 63.65----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ben Sanders 23 10 23 56

4.73 8.93 4.24----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Deb Shafto 11 5 5 21

2.26 4.46 0.92----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 170 74 153 397

34.98 66.07 28.23----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 486 112 542 1140

42.63 9.82 47.54====================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mike Collier 10 275 5 6 296

4.13 60.84 1.89 2.53

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

228

Page 230: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Glenn Hegar 144 8 175 55 382

59.50 1.77 66.29 23.21--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ben Sanders 6 20 22 10 58

2.48 4.42 8.33 4.22--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Deb Shafto 4 14 3 1 22

1.65 3.10 1.14 0.42--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 78 135 59 165 437

32.23 29.87 22.35 69.62--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 242 452 264 237 1195

20.25 37.82 22.09 19.83============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=======================================================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mike Collier 3 73 74 35 73 38 296

7.32 20.68 22.42 30.97 29.80 33.33---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Glenn Hegar 8 114 103 31 83 44 383

19.51 32.29 31.21 27.43 33.88 38.60---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ben Sanders 4 8 15 7 16 7 57

9.76 2.27 4.55 6.19 6.53 6.14---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Deb Shafto 0 5 6 3 4 4 22

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

229

Page 231: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

0.00 1.42 1.82 2.65 1.63 3.51---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 26 153 132 37 69 21 438

63.41 43.34 40.00 32.74 28.16 18.42---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 41 353 330 113 245 114 1196

3.43 29.52 27.59 9.45 20.48 9.53=======================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mike Collier 29 43 34 82 107 295

15.51 16.35 25.95 29.29 32.62--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Glenn Hegar 85 131 34 70 62 382

45.45 49.81 25.95 25.00 18.90--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ben Sanders 9 9 12 12 15 57

4.81 3.42 9.16 4.29 4.57--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Deb Shafto 4 6 2 3 7 22

2.14 2.28 1.53 1.07 2.13--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have 60 74 49 113 137 433

32.09 28.14 37.40 40.36 41.77--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 187 263 131 280 328 1189

15.73 22.12 11.02 23.55 27.59============================================================================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

230

Page 232: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA g Mixed Other Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mike Collier 141 68 71 10 0 4 1 295

19.72 44.16 26.10 45.45 0.00 30.77 7.69--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Glenn Hegar 318 2 50 3 2 1 6 382

44.48 1.30 18.38 13.64 50.00 7.69 46.15--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ben Sanders 33 11 8 2 0 2 1 57

4.62 7.14 2.94 9.09 0.00 15.38 7.69--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Deb Shafto 13 5 3 0 0 0 0 21

1.82 3.25 1.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to 210 68 140 7 2 6 5 438

29.37 44.16 51.47 31.82 50.00 46.15 38.46--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 715 154 272 22 4 13 13 1193

59.93 12.91 22.80 1.84 0.34 1.09 1.09============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================================================================================marital

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

231

Page 233: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mike Collier 142 2 57 9 73 12 295

21.98 8.70 37.75 13.85 28.85 21.05--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Glenn Hegar 253 9 35 33 46 8 384

39.16 39.13 23.18 50.77 18.18 14.04--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ben Sanders 40 0 2 2 11 3 58

6.19 0.00 1.32 3.08 4.35 5.26--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Deb Shafto 8 0 3 0 8 3 22

1.24 0.00 1.99 0.00 3.16 5.26--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 203 12 54 21 115 31 436

31.42 52.17 35.76 32.31 45.45 54.39--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 646 23 151 65 253 57 1195

54.06 1.92 12.64 5.44 21.17 4.77======================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================gender

Q Male Female Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------Mike Collier 142 153 295

25.45 24.06----------------------------------------------------------------------------Glenn Hegar 194 189 383

34.77 29.72----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

232

Page 234: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Ben Sanders 34 24 586.09 3.77

----------------------------------------------------------------------------Deb Shafto 11 10 21

1.97 1.57----------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 177 260 437

31.72 40.88----------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 558 636 1194

46.73 53.27============================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mike Collier 120 143 32 295

33.52 24.32 12.96--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Glenn Hegar 68 201 113 382

18.99 34.18 45.75--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ben Sanders 22 28 8 58

6.15 4.76 3.24--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Deb Shafto 11 10 2 23

3.07 1.70 0.81--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 137 206 92 435

38.27 35.03 37.25

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

233

Page 235: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 358 588 247 1193

30.01 49.29 20.70======================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mike Collier 64 95 21 45 70 295

25.70 25.82 17.21 42.45 19.94--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Glenn Hegar 76 108 35 28 136 383

30.52 29.35 28.69 26.42 38.75--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ben Sanders 10 27 7 4 10 58

4.02 7.34 5.74 3.77 2.85--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Deb Shafto 5 9 1 1 6 22

2.01 2.45 0.82 0.94 1.71--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to ha 94 129 58 28 129 438

37.75 35.05 47.54 26.42 36.75--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 249 368 122 106 351 1196

20.82 30.77 10.20 8.86 29.35============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

234

Page 236: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

===========================================================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mike Collier 43 80 122 50 295

21.72 25.48 26.64 22.22-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Glenn Hegar 38 75 165 105 383

19.19 23.89 36.03 46.67-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ben Sanders 10 25 19 3 57

5.05 7.96 4.15 1.33-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Deb Shafto 6 9 7 0 22

3.03 2.87 1.53 0.00-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 101 125 145 67 438

51.01 39.81 31.66 29.78-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 198 314 458 225 1195

16.57 26.28 38.33 18.83===========================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

235

Page 237: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q18. 2014 Land Commissioner Vote Choice

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------John Cook 40 64 49 107 13 11 12 296

63.49 62.14 51.04 29.72 10.40 4.76 5.50--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------George P. Bush 2 1 10 63 59 151 147 433

3.17 0.97 10.42 17.50 47.20 65.37 67.43--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

236

Page 238: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Justin Knight 3 1 7 15 15 18 17 764.76 0.97 7.29 4.17 12.00 7.79 7.80

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Valerie Alessi 5 7 6 11 1 1 5 36

7.94 6.80 6.25 3.06 0.80 0.43 2.29--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enoug 13 30 24 164 37 50 37 355

20.63 29.13 25.00 45.56 29.60 21.65 16.97--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 63 103 96 360 125 231 218 1196

5.27 8.61 8.03 30.10 10.45 19.31 18.23============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==================================================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------John Cook 153 107 35 295

58.62 29.72 6.11--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------George P. Bush 13 63 358 434

4.98 17.50 62.48--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Justin Knight 11 15 49 75

4.21 4.17 8.55--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Valerie Alessi 17 11 7 35

6.51 3.06 1.22--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 67 164 124 355

25.67 45.56 21.64

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

237

Page 239: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 261 360 573 1194

21.86 30.15 47.99==================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=============================================================================================================================PID7

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------John Cook 172 48 63 3 6 2 0 294

67.72 42.11 52.50 2.68 4.96 1.61 0.00-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------George P. Bush 5 13 4 30 65 74 232 423

1.97 11.40 3.33 26.79 53.72 59.68 78.11-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Justin Knight 7 7 5 15 16 12 10 72

2.76 6.14 4.17 13.39 13.22 9.68 3.37-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Valerie Alessi 8 4 12 3 4 0 4 35

3.15 3.51 10.00 2.68 3.31 0.00 1.35-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 62 42 36 61 30 36 51 318

24.41 36.84 30.00 54.46 24.79 29.03 17.17-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 254 114 120 112 121 124 297 1142

22.24 9.98 10.51 9.81 10.60 10.86 26.01=============================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

238

Page 240: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

====================================================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------John Cook 283 3 8 294

57.99 2.68 1.47----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------George P. Bush 22 30 372 424

4.51 26.79 68.51----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Justin Knight 19 15 38 72

3.89 13.39 7.00----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Valerie Alessi 24 3 8 35

4.92 2.68 1.47----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 140 61 117 318

28.69 54.46 21.55----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 488 112 543 1143

42.69 9.80 47.51====================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------John Cook 8 278 1 8 295

3.32 61.37 0.38 3.38

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

239

Page 241: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------George P. Bush 162 23 177 73 435

67.22 5.08 66.79 30.80--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Justin Knight 16 17 34 8 75

6.64 3.75 12.83 3.38--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Valerie Alessi 2 25 3 5 35

0.83 5.52 1.13 2.11--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 53 110 50 143 356

21.99 24.28 18.87 60.34--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 241 453 265 237 1196

20.15 37.88 22.16 19.82============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=======================================================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------John Cook 6 75 67 39 70 38 295

15.00 21.25 20.18 34.21 28.46 33.63---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------George P. Bush 15 128 132 34 88 39 436

37.50 36.26 39.76 29.82 35.77 34.51---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Justin Knight 2 16 21 3 20 12 74

5.00 4.53 6.33 2.63 8.13 10.62---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Valerie Alessi 0 5 7 8 9 6 35

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

240

Page 242: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

0.00 1.42 2.11 7.02 3.66 5.31---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 17 129 105 30 59 18 358

42.50 36.54 31.63 26.32 23.98 15.93---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 40 353 332 114 246 113 1198

3.34 29.47 27.71 9.52 20.53 9.43=======================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------John Cook 39 38 32 79 108 296

20.86 14.29 24.43 28.11 32.93--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------George P. Bush 85 128 51 87 84 435

45.45 48.12 38.93 30.96 25.61--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Justin Knight 12 18 15 13 12 70

6.42 6.77 11.45 4.63 3.66--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Valerie Alessi 6 6 2 7 14 35

3.21 2.26 1.53 2.49 4.27--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have 45 76 31 95 110 357

24.06 28.57 23.66 33.81 33.54--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 187 266 131 281 328 1193

15.67 22.30 10.98 23.55 27.49============================================================================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

241

Page 243: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA g Mixed Other Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------John Cook 137 70 78 9 0 0 1 295

19.08 45.16 28.57 39.13 0.00 0.00 7.14--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------George P. Bush 342 10 67 6 4 4 3 436

47.63 6.45 24.54 26.09 100.00 33.33 21.43--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Justin Knight 43 6 19 2 0 0 5 75

5.99 3.87 6.96 8.70 0.00 0.00 35.71--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Valerie Alessi 24 4 4 1 0 2 0 35

3.34 2.58 1.47 4.35 0.00 16.67 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to 172 65 105 5 0 6 5 358

23.96 41.94 38.46 21.74 0.00 50.00 35.71--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 718 155 273 23 4 12 14 1199

59.88 12.93 22.77 1.92 0.33 1.00 1.17============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================================================================================marital

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

242

Page 244: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------John Cook 129 4 53 15 76 19 296

19.97 17.39 34.87 23.08 29.80 32.76--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------George P. Bush 290 5 48 38 45 10 436

44.89 21.74 31.58 58.46 17.65 17.24--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Justin Knight 49 1 2 1 19 3 75

7.59 4.35 1.32 1.54 7.45 5.17--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Valerie Alessi 18 0 6 0 10 2 36

2.79 0.00 3.95 0.00 3.92 3.45--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 160 13 43 11 105 24 356

24.77 56.52 28.29 16.92 41.18 41.38--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 646 23 152 65 255 58 1199

53.88 1.92 12.68 5.42 21.27 4.84======================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================gender

Q Male Female Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------John Cook 134 161 295

23.89 25.27----------------------------------------------------------------------------George P. Bush 215 221 436

38.32 34.69----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

243

Page 245: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Justin Knight 49 26 758.73 4.08

----------------------------------------------------------------------------Valerie Alessi 18 17 35

3.21 2.67----------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 145 212 357

25.85 33.28----------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 561 637 1198

46.83 53.17============================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------John Cook 130 131 34 295

36.41 22.24 13.71--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------George P. Bush 95 225 115 435

26.61 38.20 46.37--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Justin Knight 17 44 14 75

4.76 7.47 5.65--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Valerie Alessi 7 22 6 35

1.96 3.74 2.42--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 108 167 79 354

30.25 28.35 31.85

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

244

Page 246: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 357 589 248 1194

29.90 49.33 20.77======================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------John Cook 65 90 23 44 72 294

26.00 24.52 18.70 40.74 20.57--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------George P. Bush 96 128 45 20 147 436

38.40 34.88 36.59 18.52 42.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Justin Knight 17 23 11 8 16 75

6.80 6.27 8.94 7.41 4.57--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Valerie Alessi 1 18 1 5 10 35

0.40 4.90 0.81 4.63 2.86--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to ha 71 108 43 31 105 358

28.40 29.43 34.96 28.70 30.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 250 367 123 108 350 1198

20.87 30.63 10.27 9.02 29.22============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

245

Page 247: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

===========================================================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------John Cook 37 80 131 49 297

18.69 25.56 28.42 21.59-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------George P. Bush 45 84 181 126 436

22.73 26.84 39.26 55.51-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Justin Knight 17 30 22 5 74

8.59 9.58 4.77 2.20-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Valerie Alessi 9 12 12 2 35

4.55 3.83 2.60 0.88-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 90 107 115 45 357

45.45 34.19 24.95 19.82-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 198 313 461 227 1199

16.51 26.11 38.45 18.93===========================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

246

Page 248: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q19. 2014 Commissioner of Agriculture Vote Choice

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jim Hogan 36 61 51 103 13 8 9 281

59.02 58.65 53.68 28.77 10.57 3.48 4.13--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Sid Miller 1 3 4 38 44 154 140 384

1.64 2.88 4.21 10.61 35.77 66.96 64.22--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

247

Page 249: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Rocky Palmquist 0 2 3 14 9 10 14 520.00 1.92 3.16 3.91 7.32 4.35 6.42

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Kenneth Kendrick 11 6 8 20 2 10 8 65

18.03 5.77 8.42 5.59 1.63 4.35 3.67--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enoug 13 32 29 183 55 48 47 407

21.31 30.77 30.53 51.12 44.72 20.87 21.56--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 61 104 95 358 123 230 218 1189

5.13 8.75 7.99 30.11 10.34 19.34 18.33============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==================================================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jim Hogan 147 103 30 280

56.76 28.77 5.26--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Sid Miller 8 38 338 384

3.09 10.61 59.30--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rocky Palmquist 5 14 33 52

1.93 3.91 5.79--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Kenneth Kendrick 25 20 20 65

9.65 5.59 3.51--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 74 183 149 406

28.57 51.12 26.14

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

248

Page 250: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 259 358 570 1187

21.82 30.16 48.02==================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=============================================================================================================================PID7

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jim Hogan 151 41 66 4 7 5 5 279

59.45 36.94 55.46 3.60 5.79 4.03 1.69-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Sid Miller 9 1 2 17 64 64 217 374

3.54 0.90 1.68 15.32 52.89 51.61 73.31-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rocky Palmquist 2 7 3 12 12 9 6 51

0.79 6.31 2.52 10.81 9.92 7.26 2.03-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Kenneth Kendrick 17 7 14 10 6 4 7 65

6.69 6.31 11.76 9.01 4.96 3.23 2.36-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 75 55 34 68 32 42 61 367

29.53 49.55 28.57 61.26 26.45 33.87 20.61-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 254 111 119 111 121 124 296 1136

22.36 9.77 10.48 9.77 10.65 10.92 26.06=============================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

249

Page 251: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

====================================================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jim Hogan 258 4 16 278

53.09 3.60 2.96----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Sid Miller 12 17 345 374

2.47 15.32 63.89----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rocky Palmquist 13 12 27 52

2.67 10.81 5.00----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Kenneth Kendrick 38 10 17 65

7.82 9.01 3.15----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 165 68 135 368

33.95 61.26 25.00----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 486 111 540 1137

42.74 9.76 47.49====================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jim Hogan 12 256 3 9 280

5.00 56.89 1.13 3.80

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

250

Page 252: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Sid Miller 127 10 184 65 386

52.92 2.22 69.43 27.43--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rocky Palmquist 5 14 27 6 52

2.08 3.11 10.19 2.53--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Kenneth Kendrick 20 37 7 2 66

8.33 8.22 2.64 0.84--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 76 133 44 155 408

31.67 29.56 16.60 65.40--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 240 450 265 237 1192

20.13 37.75 22.23 19.88============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=======================================================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jim Hogan 8 68 69 28 73 35 281

20.00 19.32 20.85 25.69 29.92 30.70---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Sid Miller 9 108 111 34 86 39 387

22.50 30.68 33.53 31.19 35.25 34.21---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rocky Palmquist 4 12 11 1 15 8 51

10.00 3.41 3.32 0.92 6.15 7.02---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Kenneth Kendrick 0 14 14 16 13 8 65

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

251

Page 253: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

0.00 3.98 4.23 14.68 5.33 7.02---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 19 150 126 30 57 24 406

47.50 42.61 38.07 27.52 23.36 21.05---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 40 352 331 109 244 114 1190

3.36 29.58 27.82 9.16 20.50 9.58=======================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jim Hogan 30 37 26 83 104 280

16.30 14.02 19.85 29.75 31.80--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Sid Miller 84 119 37 77 68 385

45.65 45.08 28.24 27.60 20.80--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rocky Palmquist 3 6 11 12 16 48

1.63 2.27 8.40 4.30 4.89--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Kenneth Kendrick 9 20 12 7 17 65

4.89 7.58 9.16 2.51 5.20--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have 58 82 45 100 122 407

31.52 31.06 34.35 35.84 37.31--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 184 264 131 279 327 1185

15.53 22.28 11.05 23.54 27.59============================================================================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

252

Page 254: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA g Mixed Other Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jim Hogan 134 58 71 10 0 4 4 281

18.77 37.91 26.10 50.00 0.00 30.77 26.67--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Sid Miller 326 9 43 1 3 1 4 387

45.66 5.88 15.81 5.00 75.00 7.69 26.67--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rocky Palmquist 25 3 16 1 1 0 5 51

3.50 1.96 5.88 5.00 25.00 0.00 33.33--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Kenneth Kendrick 39 11 15 0 0 0 0 65

5.46 7.19 5.51 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to 190 72 127 8 0 8 2 407

26.61 47.06 46.69 40.00 0.00 61.54 13.33--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 714 153 272 20 4 13 15 1191

59.95 12.85 22.84 1.68 0.34 1.09 1.26============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================================================================================marital

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

253

Page 255: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jim Hogan 127 2 53 14 67 18 281

19.84 8.33 34.87 21.54 26.59 31.58--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Sid Miller 257 5 41 32 42 8 385

40.16 20.83 26.97 49.23 16.67 14.04--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rocky Palmquist 39 0 3 0 8 1 51

6.09 0.00 1.97 0.00 3.17 1.75--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Kenneth Kendrick 33 3 6 2 16 6 66

5.16 12.50 3.95 3.08 6.35 10.53--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 184 14 49 17 119 24 407

28.75 58.33 32.24 26.15 47.22 42.11--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 640 24 152 65 252 57 1190

53.78 2.02 12.77 5.46 21.18 4.79======================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================gender

Q Male Female Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------Jim Hogan 134 146 280

24.06 23.06----------------------------------------------------------------------------Sid Miller 195 191 386

35.01 30.17----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

254

Page 256: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Rocky Palmquist 33 19 525.92 3.00

----------------------------------------------------------------------------Kenneth Kendrick 34 31 65

6.10 4.90----------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 161 246 407

28.90 38.86----------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 557 633 1190

46.81 53.19============================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jim Hogan 113 130 37 280

31.83 22.11 15.16--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Sid Miller 75 202 109 386

21.13 34.35 44.67--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rocky Palmquist 16 28 8 52

4.51 4.76 3.28--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Kenneth Kendrick 22 37 6 65

6.20 6.29 2.46--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 129 191 84 404

36.34 32.48 34.43

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

255

Page 257: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 355 588 244 1187

29.91 49.54 20.56======================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jim Hogan 64 86 18 46 66 280

26.02 23.37 14.75 42.99 19.02--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Sid Miller 68 114 39 16 149 386

27.64 30.98 31.97 14.95 42.94--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rocky Palmquist 11 12 11 5 13 52

4.47 3.26 9.02 4.67 3.75--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Kenneth Kendrick 14 26 4 10 11 65

5.69 7.07 3.28 9.35 3.17--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to ha 89 130 50 30 108 407

36.18 35.33 40.98 28.04 31.12--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 246 368 122 107 347 1190

20.67 30.92 10.25 8.99 29.16============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

256

Page 258: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

===========================================================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jim Hogan 30 85 124 41 280

15.31 27.33 27.02 18.22-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Sid Miller 38 66 169 113 386

19.39 21.22 36.82 50.22-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rocky Palmquist 11 15 22 4 52

5.61 4.82 4.79 1.78-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Kenneth Kendrick 22 17 15 12 66

11.22 5.47 3.27 5.33-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 95 128 129 55 407

48.47 41.16 28.10 24.44-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 196 311 459 225 1191

16.46 26.11 38.54 18.89===========================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

257

Page 259: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q20. 2014 Railroad Commission Vote Choice

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ryan Sitton 0 1 6 42 43 139 145 376

0.00 0.96 6.32 11.80 34.68 61.23 67.13--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Steve Brown 38 67 54 101 8 9 10 287

62.30 64.42 56.84 28.37 6.45 3.96 4.63--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

258

Page 260: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Mark Miller 2 3 3 18 15 19 14 743.28 2.88 3.16 5.06 12.10 8.37 6.48

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Martina Salinas 8 7 6 19 3 1 6 50

13.11 6.73 6.32 5.34 2.42 0.44 2.78--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enoug 13 26 26 176 55 59 41 396

21.31 25.00 27.37 49.44 44.35 25.99 18.98--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 61 104 95 356 124 227 216 1183

5.16 8.79 8.03 30.09 10.48 19.19 18.26============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==================================================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ryan Sitton 7 42 327 376

2.71 11.80 57.57--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Steve Brown 158 101 27 286

61.24 28.37 4.75--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mark Miller 8 18 48 74

3.10 5.06 8.45--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Martina Salinas 21 19 11 51

8.14 5.34 1.94--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 64 176 155 395

24.81 49.44 27.29

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

259

Page 261: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 258 356 568 1182

21.83 30.12 48.05==================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=============================================================================================================================PID7

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ryan Sitton 3 4 4 18 64 59 215 367

1.18 3.60 3.45 16.22 53.78 47.97 72.64-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Steve Brown 166 47 55 6 5 4 2 285

65.35 42.34 47.41 5.41 4.20 3.25 0.68-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mark Miller 8 5 5 14 12 11 15 70

3.15 4.50 4.31 12.61 10.08 8.94 5.07-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Martina Salinas 9 5 13 5 4 4 5 45

3.54 4.50 11.21 4.50 3.36 3.25 1.69-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 68 50 39 68 34 45 59 363

26.77 45.05 33.62 61.26 28.57 36.59 19.93-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 254 111 116 111 119 123 296 1130

22.48 9.82 10.27 9.82 10.53 10.88 26.19=============================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

260

Page 262: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

====================================================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ryan Sitton 11 18 339 368

2.29 16.22 62.89----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Steve Brown 268 6 11 285

55.72 5.41 2.04----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mark Miller 18 14 38 70

3.74 12.61 7.05----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Martina Salinas 27 5 14 46

5.61 4.50 2.60----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 157 68 137 362

32.64 61.26 25.42----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 481 111 539 1131

42.53 9.81 47.66====================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ryan Sitton 123 7 184 65 379

51.90 1.56 69.96 27.66

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

261

Page 263: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Steve Brown 7 268 5 7 287

2.95 59.82 1.90 2.98--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mark Miller 21 17 24 11 73

8.86 3.79 9.13 4.68--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Martina Salinas 9 29 4 8 50

3.80 6.47 1.52 3.40--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 77 127 46 144 394

32.49 28.35 17.49 61.28--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 237 448 263 235 1183

20.03 37.87 22.23 19.86============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=======================================================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ryan Sitton 9 103 109 30 88 40 379

21.95 29.51 33.44 26.55 35.63 36.04---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Steve Brown 3 75 70 30 67 42 287

7.32 21.49 21.47 26.55 27.13 37.84---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mark Miller 5 18 18 7 15 11 74

12.20 5.16 5.52 6.19 6.07 9.91---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Martina Salinas 3 16 11 11 8 2 51

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

262

Page 264: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

7.32 4.58 3.37 9.73 3.24 1.80---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 21 137 118 35 69 16 396

51.22 39.26 36.20 30.97 27.94 14.41---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 41 349 326 113 247 111 1187

3.45 29.40 27.46 9.52 20.81 9.35=======================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ryan Sitton 79 124 39 68 67 377

42.93 47.33 30.00 24.29 20.62--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Steve Brown 33 35 33 85 102 288

17.93 13.36 25.38 30.36 31.38--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mark Miller 9 16 11 21 14 71

4.89 6.11 8.46 7.50 4.31--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Martina Salinas 2 12 9 11 16 50

1.09 4.58 6.92 3.93 4.92--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have 61 75 38 95 126 395

33.15 28.63 29.23 33.93 38.77--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 184 262 130 280 325 1181

15.58 22.18 11.01 23.71 27.52============================================================================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

263

Page 265: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA g Mixed Other Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ryan Sitton 320 2 44 2 4 2 5 379

44.94 1.31 16.48 9.09 100.00 16.67 35.71--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Steve Brown 142 63 69 9 0 1 4 288

19.94 41.18 25.84 40.91 0.00 8.33 28.57--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mark Miller 40 10 17 2 0 0 3 72

5.62 6.54 6.37 9.09 0.00 0.00 21.43--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Martina Salinas 17 8 22 1 0 2 0 50

2.39 5.23 8.24 4.55 0.00 16.67 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to 193 70 115 8 0 7 2 395

27.11 45.75 43.07 36.36 0.00 58.33 14.29--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 712 153 267 22 4 12 14 1184

60.14 12.92 22.55 1.86 0.34 1.01 1.18============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================================================================================marital

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

264

Page 266: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ryan Sitton 262 3 36 31 39 7 378

40.81 15.00 23.84 47.69 15.54 12.28--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Steve Brown 125 2 61 8 77 15 288

19.47 10.00 40.40 12.31 30.68 26.32--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mark Miller 46 0 5 2 18 3 74

7.17 0.00 3.31 3.08 7.17 5.26--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Martina Salinas 31 0 4 4 7 5 51

4.83 0.00 2.65 6.15 2.79 8.77--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 178 15 45 20 110 27 395

27.73 75.00 29.80 30.77 43.82 47.37--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 642 20 151 65 251 57 1186

54.13 1.69 12.73 5.48 21.16 4.81======================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================gender

Q Male Female Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------Ryan Sitton 195 184 379

35.14 29.16----------------------------------------------------------------------------Steve Brown 144 143 287

25.95 22.66----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

265

Page 267: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Mark Miller 46 28 748.29 4.44

----------------------------------------------------------------------------Martina Salinas 19 31 50

3.42 4.91----------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 151 245 396

27.21 38.83----------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 555 631 1186

46.80 53.20============================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ryan Sitton 72 202 104 378

20.34 34.59 42.62--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Steve Brown 129 131 28 288

36.44 22.43 11.48--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mark Miller 19 43 12 74

5.37 7.36 4.92--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Martina Salinas 13 28 8 49

3.67 4.79 3.28--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 121 180 92 393

34.18 30.82 37.70

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

266

Page 268: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 354 584 244 1182

29.95 49.41 20.64======================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ryan Sitton 69 105 42 20 142 378

27.94 28.69 35.29 18.87 40.92--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Steve Brown 63 84 25 42 74 288

25.51 22.95 21.01 39.62 21.33--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mark Miller 12 33 7 8 14 74

4.86 9.02 5.88 7.55 4.03--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Martina Salinas 8 20 6 9 7 50

3.24 5.46 5.04 8.49 2.02--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to ha 95 124 39 27 110 395

38.46 33.88 32.77 25.47 31.70--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 247 366 119 106 347 1185

20.84 30.89 10.04 8.95 29.28============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

267

Page 269: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

===========================================================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ryan Sitton 33 70 166 110 379

16.67 22.80 36.32 49.33-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Steve Brown 39 82 118 48 287

19.70 26.71 25.82 21.52-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mark Miller 21 20 28 5 74

10.61 6.51 6.13 2.24-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Martina Salinas 13 10 19 8 50

6.57 3.26 4.16 3.59-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 92 125 126 52 395

46.46 40.72 27.57 23.32-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 198 307 457 223 1185

16.71 25.91 38.57 18.82===========================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

268

Page 270: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q21. 2014 Generic Texas Legislature Vote Choice

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Democratic candidate 55 91 77 181 17 17 21 459

88.71 88.35 79.38 50.28 13.71 7.33 9.72--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Republican candidate 2 0 11 78 73 200 184 548

3.23 0.00 11.34 21.67 58.87 86.21 85.19--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

269

Page 271: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Haven't thought about it enoug 5 12 9 101 34 15 11 1878.06 11.65 9.28 28.06 27.42 6.47 5.09

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 62 103 97 360 124 232 216 1194

5.19 8.63 8.12 30.15 10.39 19.43 18.09============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==================================================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Democratic candidate 223 181 55 459

84.79 50.28 9.62--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Republican candidate 14 78 457 549

5.32 21.67 79.90--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 26 101 60 187

9.89 28.06 10.49--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 263 360 572 1195

22.01 30.13 47.87==================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=============================================================================================================================PID7

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

270

Page 272: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Democratic candidate 236 94 101 16 3 3 0 453

92.55 82.46 84.87 14.16 2.48 2.42 0.00-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Republican candidate 3 3 5 34 103 100 289 537

1.18 2.63 4.20 30.09 85.12 80.65 96.98-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 16 17 13 63 15 21 9 154

6.27 14.91 10.92 55.75 12.40 16.94 3.02-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 255 114 119 113 121 124 298 1144

22.29 9.97 10.40 9.88 10.58 10.84 26.05=============================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

====================================================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Democratic candidate 431 16 7 454

88.32 14.16 1.29----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Republican candidate 11 34 492 537

2.25 30.09 90.44----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 46 63 45 154

9.43 55.75 8.27----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 488 113 544 1145

42.62 9.87 47.51====================================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

271

Page 273: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Democratic candidate 8 429 4 17 458

3.32 94.91 1.50 7.14--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Republican candidate 214 5 242 90 551

88.80 1.11 90.98 37.82--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 19 18 20 131 188

7.88 3.98 7.52 55.04--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 241 452 266 238 1197

20.13 37.76 22.22 19.88============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=======================================================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Democratic candidate 10 122 121 52 103 51 459

25.00 34.66 36.45 46.02 42.04 44.74---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Republican candidate 25 156 147 48 116 58 550

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

272

Page 274: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

62.50 44.32 44.28 42.48 47.35 50.88---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 5 74 64 13 26 5 187

12.50 21.02 19.28 11.50 10.61 4.39---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 40 352 332 113 245 114 1196

3.34 29.43 27.76 9.45 20.48 9.53=======================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Democratic candidate 54 68 53 125 159 459

29.03 25.56 40.15 44.33 48.48--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Republican candidate 106 165 62 112 101 546

56.99 62.03 46.97 39.72 30.79--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have 26 33 17 45 68 189

13.98 12.41 12.88 15.96 20.73--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 186 266 132 282 328 1194

15.58 22.28 11.06 23.62 27.47============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

273

Page 275: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

============================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA g Mixed Other Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Democratic candidate 188 130 118 14 0 6 3 459

26.15 84.42 43.38 63.64 0.00 46.15 21.43--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Republican candidate 434 4 87 7 4 4 11 551

60.36 2.60 31.99 31.82 100.00 30.77 78.57--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to 97 20 67 1 0 3 0 188

13.49 12.99 24.63 4.55 0.00 23.08 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 719 154 272 22 4 13 14 1198

60.02 12.85 22.70 1.84 0.33 1.09 1.17============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================================================================================marital

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Democratic candidate 204 6 73 15 133 29 460

31.48 26.09 48.34 23.08 52.36 50.88--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Republican candidate 355 11 56 38 81 9 550

54.78 47.83 37.09 58.46 31.89 15.79--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 89 6 22 12 40 19 188

13.73 26.09 14.57 18.46 15.75 33.33--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 648 23 151 65 254 57 1198

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

274

Page 276: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

54.09 1.92 12.60 5.43 21.20 4.76======================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================gender

Q Male Female Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------Democratic candidate 215 244 459

38.26 38.30----------------------------------------------------------------------------Republican candidate 272 279 551

48.40 43.80----------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 75 114 189

13.35 17.90----------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 562 637 1199

46.87 53.13============================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Democratic candidate 189 219 51 459

52.94 37.18 20.56

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

275

Page 277: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Republican candidate 112 282 156 550

31.37 47.88 62.90--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 56 88 41 185

15.69 14.94 16.53--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 357 589 248 1194

29.90 49.33 20.77======================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Democratic candidate 99 149 40 70 102 460

39.76 40.49 32.52 64.81 29.06--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Republican candidate 114 155 59 23 200 551

45.78 42.12 47.97 21.30 56.98--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to ha 36 64 24 15 49 188

14.46 17.39 19.51 13.89 13.96--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 249 368 123 108 351 1199

20.77 30.69 10.26 9.01 29.27============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

276

Page 278: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

===========================================================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Democratic candidate 91 125 183 61 460

45.96 39.81 39.70 26.99-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Republican candidate 67 124 220 140 551

33.84 39.49 47.72 61.95-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought about it enough to have an opinion 40 65 58 25 188

20.20 20.70 12.58 11.06-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 198 314 461 226 1199

16.51 26.19 38.45 18.85===========================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

277

Page 279: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q22. Tea Party Support

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Republican candidate 2 0 10 53 46 76 52 239

3.23 0.00 10.31 14.72 37.10 32.76 23.96----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Democratic candidate 56 91 80 173 19 14 21 454

90.32 88.35 82.47 48.06 15.32 6.03 9.68----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

278

Page 280: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Tea Party candidate 0 1 0 24 24 104 112 2650.00 0.97 0.00 6.67 19.35 44.83 51.61

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 4 11 7 110 35 38 32 237

6.45 10.68 7.22 30.56 28.23 16.38 14.75----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 62 103 97 360 124 232 217 1195

5.19 8.62 8.12 30.13 10.38 19.41 18.16==================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

====================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total--------------------------------------------------------------------Republican candidate 12 53 174 239

4.58 14.72 30.37--------------------------------------------------------------------Democratic candidate 227 173 54 454

86.64 48.06 9.42--------------------------------------------------------------------Tea Party candidate 1 24 240 265

0.38 6.67 41.88--------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 22 110 105 237

8.40 30.56 18.32--------------------------------------------------------------------Total 262 360 573 1195

21.92 30.13 47.95====================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

279

Page 281: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===============================================================================================PID7

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Republican candidate 4 7 1 15 19 56 131 233

1.56 6.09 0.85 13.27 15.70 45.16 43.96-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Democratic candidate 237 88 103 12 3 5 0 448

92.58 76.52 87.29 10.62 2.48 4.03 0.00-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Tea Party candidate 0 1 0 32 67 37 124 261

0.00 0.87 0.00 28.32 55.37 29.84 41.61-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 15 19 14 54 32 26 43 203

5.86 16.52 11.86 47.79 26.45 20.97 14.43-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 256 115 118 113 121 124 298 1145

22.36 10.04 10.31 9.87 10.57 10.83 26.03===============================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total----------------------------------------------------------------------Republican candidate 12 15 206 233

2.45 13.27 37.94----------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

280

Page 282: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Democratic candidate 428 12 8 44887.53 10.62 1.47

----------------------------------------------------------------------Tea Party candidate 1 32 229 262

0.20 28.32 42.17----------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 48 54 100 202

9.82 47.79 18.42----------------------------------------------------------------------Total 489 113 543 1145

42.71 9.87 47.42======================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==============================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Republican candidate 241 0 0 0 241

100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Democratic candidate 0 454 0 0 454

0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Tea Party candidate 0 0 266 0 266

0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 0 0 0 238 238

0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 241 454 266 238 1199

20.10 37.86 22.19 19.85

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

281

Page 283: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

==============================================================================================================Cell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Republican candidate 8 90 67 16 33 28 242

19.51 25.50 20.18 14.04 13.41 24.35---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Democratic candidate 14 118 119 53 103 47 454

34.15 33.43 35.84 46.49 41.87 40.87---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Tea Party candidate 10 68 70 22 72 25 267

24.39 19.26 21.08 19.30 29.27 21.74---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 9 77 76 23 38 15 238

21.95 21.81 22.89 20.18 15.45 13.04---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 41 353 332 114 246 115 1201

3.41 29.39 27.64 9.49 20.48 9.58=========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

========================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

282

Page 284: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Republican candidate 48 68 27 55 42 24025.53 25.66 20.45 19.50 12.80

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Democratic candidate 55 57 54 128 161 455

29.26 21.51 40.91 45.39 49.09------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Tea Party candidate 44 86 30 45 58 263

23.40 32.45 22.73 15.96 17.68------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 41 54 21 54 67 237

21.81 20.38 15.91 19.15 20.43------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 188 265 132 282 328 1195

15.73 22.18 11.05 23.60 27.45========================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA gena ~ACAs nati Mixed Other Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Republican candidate 165 3 65 5 0 2 0 240

22.98 1.92 23.90 23.81 0.00 14.29 0.00-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Democratic candidate 195 126 114 12 0 5 3 455

27.16 80.77 41.91 57.14 0.00 35.71 21.43-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Tea Party candidate 208 4 35 2 3 3 10 265

28.97 2.56 12.87 9.52 100.00 21.43 71.43-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 150 23 58 2 0 4 1 238

20.89 14.74 21.32 9.52 0.00 28.57 7.14

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

283

Page 285: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 718 156 272 21 3 14 14 1198

59.93 13.02 22.70 1.75 0.25 1.17 1.17=========================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

========================================================================================================marital

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Republican candidate 135 10 27 18 46 4 240

20.83 43.48 17.88 27.69 18.04 7.02--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Democratic candidate 200 6 79 13 131 26 455

30.86 26.09 52.32 20.00 51.37 45.61--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Tea Party candidate 189 2 22 12 33 9 267

29.17 8.70 14.57 18.46 12.94 15.79--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 124 5 23 22 45 18 237

19.14 21.74 15.23 33.85 17.65 31.58--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 648 23 151 65 255 57 1199

54.05 1.92 12.59 5.42 21.27 4.75========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==============================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

284

Page 286: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

genderQ Male Female Total----------------------------------------------Republican candidate 98 143 241

17.47 22.38----------------------------------------------Democratic candidate 207 248 455

36.90 38.81----------------------------------------------Tea Party candidate 181 85 266

32.26 13.30----------------------------------------------Don't know 75 163 238

13.37 25.51----------------------------------------------Total 561 639 1200

46.75 53.25==============================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

========================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total--------------------------------------------------------Republican candidate 62 111 67 240

17.42 18.81 27.02--------------------------------------------------------Democratic candidate 180 222 52 454

50.56 37.63 20.97--------------------------------------------------------Tea Party candidate 53 150 62 265

14.89 25.42 25.00

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

285

Page 287: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------Don't know 61 107 67 235

17.13 18.14 27.02--------------------------------------------------------Total 356 590 248 1194

29.82 49.41 20.77========================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===========================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Republican candidate 56 66 29 17 73 241

22.31 17.98 23.77 15.89 20.80---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Democratic candidate 100 156 35 60 103 454

39.84 42.51 28.69 56.07 29.34---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Tea Party candidate 50 77 27 18 94 266

19.92 20.98 22.13 16.82 26.78---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 45 68 31 12 81 237

17.93 18.53 25.41 11.21 23.08---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 251 367 122 107 351 1198

20.95 30.63 10.18 8.93 29.30===========================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

286

Page 288: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

=============================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total-------------------------------------------------------------Republican candidate 43 65 81 52 241

21.83 20.70 17.57 22.91-------------------------------------------------------------Democratic candidate 86 126 180 63 455

43.65 40.13 39.05 27.75-------------------------------------------------------------Tea Party candidate 23 55 127 60 265

11.68 17.52 27.55 26.43-------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 45 68 73 52 238

22.84 21.66 15.84 22.91-------------------------------------------------------------Total 197 314 461 227 1199

16.43 26.19 38.45 18.93=============================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

287

Page 289: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q23. Tea Party Influence

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===========================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Too much influence 44 78 63 135 29 19 16 384

69.84 75.00 64.95 37.40 23.39 8.23 7.44-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Too little influence 6 6 10 43 34 122 110 331

9.52 5.77 10.31 11.91 27.42 52.81 51.16-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

288

Page 290: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

The right amount of influence 5 5 11 78 35 67 54 2557.94 4.81 11.34 21.61 28.23 29.00 25.12

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 8 15 13 105 26 23 35 225

12.70 14.42 13.40 29.09 20.97 9.96 16.28-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 63 104 97 361 124 231 215 1195

5.27 8.70 8.12 30.21 10.38 19.33 17.99===========================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=============================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------Too much influence 185 135 64 384

70.34 37.40 11.21-----------------------------------------------------------------------------Too little influence 21 43 267 331

7.98 11.91 46.76-----------------------------------------------------------------------------The right amount of influence 21 78 156 255

7.98 21.61 27.32-----------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 36 105 84 225

13.69 29.09 14.71-----------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 263 361 571 1195

22.01 30.21 47.78=============================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

289

Page 291: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

========================================================================================================PID7

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Too much influence 161 56 93 20 9 23 15 377

62.89 49.56 78.15 17.86 7.44 18.55 5.05--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Too little influence 17 15 9 27 64 51 143 326

6.64 13.27 7.56 24.11 52.89 41.13 48.15--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The right amount of influence 31 16 9 29 36 28 96 245

12.11 14.16 7.56 25.89 29.75 22.58 32.32--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 47 26 8 36 12 22 43 194

18.36 23.01 6.72 32.14 9.92 17.74 14.48--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 256 113 119 112 121 124 297 1142

22.42 9.89 10.42 9.81 10.60 10.86 26.01========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===============================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------Too much influence 310 20 47 377

63.39 17.86 8.67-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

290

Page 292: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Too little influence 41 27 258 3268.38 24.11 47.60

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------The right amount of influence 56 29 160 245

11.45 25.89 29.52-------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 82 36 77 195

16.77 32.14 14.21-------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 489 112 542 1143

42.78 9.80 47.42===============================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=======================================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Too much influence 48 314 0 22 384

19.92 69.16 0.00 9.24-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Too little influence 45 38 208 42 333

18.67 8.37 78.49 17.65-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The right amount of influence 89 50 55 61 255

36.93 11.01 20.75 25.63-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 59 52 2 113 226

24.48 11.45 0.75 47.48-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 241 454 265 238 1198

20.12 37.90 22.12 19.87

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

291

Page 293: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

=======================================================================================================================Cell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==================================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Too much influence 6 84 97 42 94 61 384

15.00 23.93 29.22 36.84 38.06 53.98------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Too little influence 16 82 95 36 72 31 332

40.00 23.36 28.61 31.58 29.15 27.43------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The right amount of influence 7 93 60 23 54 18 255

17.50 26.50 18.07 20.18 21.86 15.93------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 11 92 80 13 27 3 226

27.50 26.21 24.10 11.40 10.93 2.65------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 40 351 332 114 247 113 1197

3.34 29.32 27.74 9.52 20.63 9.44==================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=================================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

292

Page 294: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Too much influence 38 60 37 113 137 38520.11 22.64 28.03 40.21 41.64

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Too little influence 56 99 36 62 76 329

29.63 37.36 27.27 22.06 23.10---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The right amount of influence 48 59 36 65 47 255

25.40 22.26 27.27 23.13 14.29---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 47 47 23 41 69 227

24.87 17.74 17.42 14.59 20.97---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 189 265 132 281 329 1196

15.80 22.16 11.04 23.49 27.51=================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA gena ~AC Mixed Other Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Too much influence 212 76 79 7 0 7 3 384

29.57 49.03 29.04 33.33 0.00 53.85 21.43--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Too little influence 240 14 60 4 3 3 9 333

33.47 9.03 22.06 19.05 75.00 23.08 64.29--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The right amount of influence 148 25 67 10 1 2 1 254

20.64 16.13 24.63 47.62 25.00 15.38 7.14--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 117 40 66 0 0 1 1 225

16.32 25.81 24.26 0.00 0.00 7.69 7.14

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

293

Page 295: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 717 155 272 21 4 13 14 1196

59.95 12.96 22.74 1.76 0.33 1.09 1.17============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=================================================================================================================marital

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Too much influence 184 3 66 13 94 24 384

28.40 12.50 44.00 20.00 37.01 42.11-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Too little influence 222 6 31 20 43 10 332

34.26 25.00 20.67 30.77 16.93 17.54-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The right amount of influence 141 4 21 19 61 9 255

21.76 16.67 14.00 29.23 24.02 15.79-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 101 11 32 13 56 14 227

15.59 45.83 21.33 20.00 22.05 24.56-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 648 24 150 65 254 57 1198

54.09 2.00 12.52 5.43 21.20 4.76=================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=======================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

294

Page 296: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

genderQ Male Female Total-------------------------------------------------------Too much influence 183 201 384

32.62 31.60-------------------------------------------------------Too little influence 183 149 332

32.62 23.43-------------------------------------------------------The right amount of influence 135 120 255

24.06 18.87-------------------------------------------------------Don't know 60 166 226

10.70 26.10-------------------------------------------------------Total 561 636 1197

46.87 53.13=======================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=================================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total-----------------------------------------------------------------Too much influence 139 193 51 383

39.04 32.71 20.65-----------------------------------------------------------------Too little influence 78 173 81 332

21.91 29.32 32.79-----------------------------------------------------------------The right amount of influence 61 136 58 255

17.13 23.05 23.48

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

295

Page 297: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

-----------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 78 88 57 223

21.91 14.92 23.08-----------------------------------------------------------------Total 356 590 247 1193

29.84 49.46 20.70=================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

====================================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Too much influence 89 125 30 56 83 383

35.60 34.06 24.59 52.34 23.71------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Too little influence 68 97 36 13 117 331

27.20 26.43 29.51 12.15 33.43------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The right amount of influence 51 73 30 22 81 257

20.40 19.89 24.59 20.56 23.14------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 42 72 26 16 69 225

16.80 19.62 21.31 14.95 19.71------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 250 367 122 107 350 1196

20.90 30.69 10.20 8.95 29.26====================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

296

Page 298: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

======================================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total----------------------------------------------------------------------Too much influence 51 98 168 67 384

25.76 31.21 36.52 29.52----------------------------------------------------------------------Too little influence 44 65 150 73 332

22.22 20.70 32.61 32.16----------------------------------------------------------------------The right amount of influence 43 71 87 55 256

21.72 22.61 18.91 24.23----------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 60 80 55 32 227

30.30 25.48 11.96 14.10----------------------------------------------------------------------Total 198 314 460 227 1199

16.51 26.19 38.37 18.93======================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

297

Page 299: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q25. 2016 Republican Presidential Primary Vote Choice

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ted Cruz 0 0 2 12 11 66 84 175

0.00 0.00 18.18 20.34 14.10 32.84 46.15--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rick Perry 1 0 0 5 4 17 13 40

33.33 0.00 0.00 8.47 5.13 8.46 7.14--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

298

Page 300: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Rand Paul 0 0 0 6 7 22 13 480.00 0.00 0.00 10.17 8.97 10.95 7.14

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Paul Ryan 0 1 0 6 10 9 10 36

0.00 100.00 0.00 10.17 12.82 4.48 5.49--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jeb Bush 0 0 0 8 12 11 6 37

0.00 0.00 0.00 13.56 15.38 5.47 3.30--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Bobby Jindal 0 0 0 3 2 2 4 11

0.00 0.00 0.00 5.08 2.56 1.00 2.20--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Scott Walker 0 0 0 0 3 10 8 21

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.85 4.98 4.40--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Marco Rubio 0 0 0 1 3 22 3 29

0.00 0.00 0.00 1.69 3.85 10.95 1.65--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Chris Christie 0 0 2 3 2 10 0 17

0.00 0.00 18.18 5.08 2.56 4.98 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rick Santorum 2 0 0 1 1 1 3 8

66.67 0.00 0.00 1.69 1.28 0.50 1.65--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mike Huckabee 0 0 7 2 7 10 19 45

0.00 0.00 63.64 3.39 8.97 4.98 10.44--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought enough about i 0 0 0 12 16 21 19 68

0.00 0.00 0.00 20.34 20.51 10.45 10.44--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 3 1 11 59 78 201 182 535

0.56 0.19 2.06 11.03 14.58 37.57 34.02============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

299

Page 301: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

| Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==================================================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ted Cruz 2 12 160 174

13.33 20.34 34.78--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rick Perry 1 5 34 40

6.67 8.47 7.39--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rand Paul 0 6 42 48

0.00 10.17 9.13--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Paul Ryan 1 6 28 35

6.67 10.17 6.09--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jeb Bush 0 8 29 37

0.00 13.56 6.30--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Bobby Jindal 0 3 9 12

0.00 5.08 1.96--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Scott Walker 0 0 21 21

0.00 0.00 4.57--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Marco Rubio 0 1 29 30

0.00 1.69 6.30--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Chris Christie 2 3 11 16

13.33 5.08 2.39--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rick Santorum 2 1 5 8

13.33 1.69 1.09

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

300

Page 302: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mike Huckabee 7 2 36 45

46.67 3.39 7.83--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought enough about it to have an opinion 0 12 56 68

0.00 20.34 12.17--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 15 59 460 534

2.81 11.05 86.14==================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=============================================================================================================================PID7

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ted Cruz 0 0 1 6 43 25 96 171

0.00 0.00 20.00 21.43 43.43 24.51 33.57-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rick Perry 0 1 0 0 5 8 26 40

0.00 50.00 0.00 0.00 5.05 7.84 9.09-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rand Paul 0 0 0 8 16 7 16 47

0.00 0.00 0.00 28.57 16.16 6.86 5.59-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Paul Ryan 1 1 0 2 4 7 19 34

25.00 50.00 0.00 7.14 4.04 6.86 6.64-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jeb Bush 0 0 0 0 4 13 20 37

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.04 12.75 6.99-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Bobby Jindal 0 0 0 0 2 0 9 11

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

301

Page 303: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.02 0.00 3.15-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Scott Walker 1 0 0 0 3 7 11 22

25.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.03 6.86 3.85-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Marco Rubio 0 0 1 0 2 3 24 30

0.00 0.00 20.00 0.00 2.02 2.94 8.39-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Chris Christie 0 0 1 1 0 5 7 14

0.00 0.00 20.00 3.57 0.00 4.90 2.45-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rick Santorum 0 0 0 2 0 4 2 8

0.00 0.00 0.00 7.14 0.00 3.92 0.70-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mike Huckabee 2 0 0 3 8 6 25 44

50.00 0.00 0.00 10.71 8.08 5.88 8.74-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought enough about it to have an opinion 0 0 2 6 12 17 31 68

0.00 0.00 40.00 21.43 12.12 16.67 10.84-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 4 2 5 28 99 102 286 526

0.76 0.38 0.95 5.32 18.82 19.39 54.37=============================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

====================================================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ted Cruz 1 6 164 171

9.09 21.43 33.74----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

302

Page 304: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Rick Perry 1 0 39 409.09 0.00 8.02

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rand Paul 0 8 39 47

0.00 28.57 8.02----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Paul Ryan 2 2 30 34

18.18 7.14 6.17----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jeb Bush 0 0 37 37

0.00 0.00 7.61----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Bobby Jindal 0 0 12 12

0.00 0.00 2.47----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Scott Walker 1 0 21 22

9.09 0.00 4.32----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Marco Rubio 1 0 28 29

9.09 0.00 5.76----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Chris Christie 1 1 13 15

9.09 3.57 2.67----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rick Santorum 0 2 5 7

0.00 7.14 1.03----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mike Huckabee 2 3 39 44

18.18 10.71 8.02----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought enough about it to have an opinion 2 6 59 67

18.18 21.43 12.14----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 11 28 486 525

2.10 5.33 92.57====================================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

303

Page 305: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ted Cruz 35 0 119 22 176

17.33 0.00 50.00 24.72--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rick Perry 28 0 3 9 40

13.86 0.00 1.26 10.11--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rand Paul 7 0 36 5 48

3.47 0.00 15.13 5.62--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Paul Ryan 18 1 11 5 35

8.91 12.50 4.62 5.62--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jeb Bush 26 2 3 7 38

12.87 25.00 1.26 7.87--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Bobby Jindal 5 0 7 0 12

2.48 0.00 2.94 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Scott Walker 4 0 14 3 21

1.98 0.00 5.88 3.37--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Marco Rubio 17 0 10 2 29

8.42 0.00 4.20 2.25--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Chris Christie 15 1 0 0 16

7.43 12.50 0.00 0.00

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

304

Page 306: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rick Santorum 4 0 1 2 7

1.98 0.00 0.42 2.25--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mike Huckabee 17 2 20 7 46

8.42 25.00 8.40 7.87--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought enough about it to have an opinion 26 2 14 27 69

12.87 25.00 5.88 30.34--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 202 8 238 89 537

37.62 1.49 44.32 16.57============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=======================================================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ted Cruz 5 43 49 21 44 15 177

38.46 27.74 31.61 47.73 37.93 28.30---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rick Perry 2 11 14 3 7 2 39

15.38 7.10 9.03 6.82 6.03 3.77---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rand Paul 1 8 11 6 15 7 48

7.69 5.16 7.10 13.64 12.93 13.21---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Paul Ryan 0 7 14 2 6 4 33

0.00 4.52 9.03 4.55 5.17 7.55---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jeb Bush 1 12 12 3 9 1 38

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

305

Page 307: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

7.69 7.74 7.74 6.82 7.76 1.89---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Bobby Jindal 0 5 3 1 1 2 12

0.00 3.23 1.94 2.27 0.86 3.77---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Scott Walker 1 9 5 1 4 0 20

7.69 5.81 3.23 2.27 3.45 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Marco Rubio 1 10 4 0 6 8 29

7.69 6.45 2.58 0.00 5.17 15.09---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Chris Christie 0 8 2 0 1 6 17

0.00 5.16 1.29 0.00 0.86 11.32---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rick Santorum 0 3 1 2 2 0 8

0.00 1.94 0.65 4.55 1.72 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mike Huckabee 1 17 14 2 8 4 46

7.69 10.97 9.03 4.55 6.90 7.55---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought enough about it to have an opinion 1 22 26 3 13 4 69

7.69 14.19 16.77 6.82 11.21 7.55---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 13 155 155 44 116 53 536

2.43 28.92 28.92 8.21 21.64 9.89=======================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

306

Page 308: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Ted Cruz 31 56 18 37 35 17729.52 34.78 30.00 33.33 35.71

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rick Perry 6 13 5 11 4 39

5.71 8.07 8.33 9.91 4.08--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rand Paul 11 9 6 10 9 45

10.48 5.59 10.00 9.01 9.18--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Paul Ryan 4 10 6 4 12 36

3.81 6.21 10.00 3.60 12.24--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jeb Bush 3 8 6 11 9 37

2.86 4.97 10.00 9.91 9.18--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Bobby Jindal 3 2 0 5 1 11

2.86 1.24 0.00 4.50 1.02--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Scott Walker 5 7 3 2 5 22

4.76 4.35 5.00 1.80 5.10--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Marco Rubio 6 13 1 9 0 29

5.71 8.07 1.67 8.11 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Chris Christie 6 7 0 0 4 17

5.71 4.35 0.00 0.00 4.08--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rick Santorum 2 4 0 1 1 8

1.90 2.48 0.00 0.90 1.02--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mike Huckabee 11 19 2 6 7 45

10.48 11.80 3.33 5.41 7.14--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought enough about it to have 17 13 13 15 11 69

16.19 8.07 21.67 13.51 11.22--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

307

Page 309: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Total 105 161 60 111 98 53519.63 30.09 11.21 20.75 18.32

============================================================================================================================================Cell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA g Mixed Other Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ted Cruz 141 0 23 2 3 2 6 177

32.64 NaN 27.38 50.00 75.00 66.67 60.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rick Perry 32 0 8 0 0 0 0 40

7.41 NaN 9.52 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rand Paul 39 0 5 0 1 1 3 49

9.03 NaN 5.95 0.00 25.00 33.33 30.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Paul Ryan 29 0 5 0 0 0 0 34

6.71 NaN 5.95 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jeb Bush 31 0 7 0 0 0 0 38

7.18 NaN 8.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Bobby Jindal 6 0 6 0 0 0 0 12

1.39 NaN 7.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Scott Walker 19 0 2 0 0 0 0 21

4.40 NaN 2.38 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Marco Rubio 27 0 2 0 0 0 0 29

6.25 NaN 2.38 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

308

Page 310: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Chris Christie 7 0 9 0 0 0 0 16

1.62 NaN 10.71 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rick Santorum 4 0 4 0 0 0 0 8

0.93 NaN 4.76 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mike Huckabee 40 0 4 1 0 0 0 45

9.26 NaN 4.76 25.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought enough about it to 57 0 9 1 0 0 1 68

13.19 NaN 10.71 25.00 0.00 0.00 10.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 432 0 84 4 4 3 10 537

80.45 0.00 15.64 0.74 0.74 0.56 1.86============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================================================================================marital

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ted Cruz 121 0 21 7 22 5 176

33.80 0.00 38.18 20.59 29.73 55.56--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rick Perry 23 1 5 4 7 0 40

6.42 12.50 9.09 11.76 9.46 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rand Paul 37 1 4 1 5 0 48

10.34 12.50 7.27 2.94 6.76 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Paul Ryan 19 0 6 5 3 1 34

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

309

Page 311: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

5.31 0.00 10.91 14.71 4.05 11.11--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jeb Bush 25 3 3 5 2 1 39

6.98 37.50 5.45 14.71 2.70 11.11--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Bobby Jindal 7 0 0 0 5 0 12

1.96 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.76 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Scott Walker 12 0 1 1 5 2 21

3.35 0.00 1.82 2.94 6.76 22.22--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Marco Rubio 20 0 2 4 4 0 30

5.59 0.00 3.64 11.76 5.41 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Chris Christie 9 0 0 0 8 0 17

2.51 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.81 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rick Santorum 5 0 2 1 0 0 8

1.40 0.00 3.64 2.94 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mike Huckabee 28 2 5 4 6 0 45

7.82 25.00 9.09 11.76 8.11 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought enough about it to have an opinion 52 1 6 2 7 0 68

14.53 12.50 10.91 5.88 9.46 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 358 8 55 34 74 9 538

66.54 1.49 10.22 6.32 13.75 1.67======================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

310

Page 312: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

genderQ Male Female Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------Ted Cruz 103 73 176

37.73 27.65----------------------------------------------------------------------------Rick Perry 13 27 40

4.76 10.23----------------------------------------------------------------------------Rand Paul 33 15 48

12.09 5.68----------------------------------------------------------------------------Paul Ryan 18 17 35

6.59 6.44----------------------------------------------------------------------------Jeb Bush 9 29 38

3.30 10.98----------------------------------------------------------------------------Bobby Jindal 7 4 11

2.56 1.52----------------------------------------------------------------------------Scott Walker 15 6 21

5.49 2.27----------------------------------------------------------------------------Marco Rubio 14 16 30

5.13 6.06----------------------------------------------------------------------------Chris Christie 12 5 17

4.40 1.89----------------------------------------------------------------------------Rick Santorum 2 5 7

0.73 1.89----------------------------------------------------------------------------Mike Huckabee 23 22 45

8.42 8.33----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

311

Page 313: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Haven't thought enough about it to have an opinion 24 45 698.79 17.05

----------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 273 264 537

50.84 49.16============================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ted Cruz 34 98 45 177

31.78 34.15 31.25--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rick Perry 10 17 12 39

9.35 5.92 8.33--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rand Paul 5 30 13 48

4.67 10.45 9.03--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Paul Ryan 11 19 4 34

10.28 6.62 2.78--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jeb Bush 7 21 10 38

6.54 7.32 6.94--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Bobby Jindal 2 8 2 12

1.87 2.79 1.39--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Scott Walker 5 11 5 21

4.67 3.83 3.47

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

312

Page 314: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Marco Rubio 7 10 13 30

6.54 3.48 9.03--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Chris Christie 8 8 0 16

7.48 2.79 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rick Santorum 2 4 2 8

1.87 1.39 1.39--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mike Huckabee 4 22 20 46

3.74 7.67 13.89--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought enough about it to have an opinion 12 39 18 69

11.21 13.59 12.50--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 107 287 144 538

19.89 53.35 26.77======================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ted Cruz 35 55 20 1 65 176

33.98 34.16 32.26 3.70 34.95--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rick Perry 10 12 6 1 11 40

9.71 7.45 9.68 3.70 5.91--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rand Paul 6 8 9 8 17 48

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

313

Page 315: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

5.83 4.97 14.52 29.63 9.14--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Paul Ryan 8 12 5 4 7 36

7.77 7.45 8.06 14.81 3.76--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jeb Bush 9 11 5 1 11 37

8.74 6.83 8.06 3.70 5.91--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Bobby Jindal 1 3 3 0 5 12

0.97 1.86 4.84 0.00 2.69--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Scott Walker 4 7 1 3 6 21

3.88 4.35 1.61 11.11 3.23--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Marco Rubio 10 6 2 0 12 30

9.71 3.73 3.23 0.00 6.45--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Chris Christie 3 2 6 3 2 16

2.91 1.24 9.68 11.11 1.08--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rick Santorum 0 4 0 2 2 8

0.00 2.48 0.00 7.41 1.08--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mike Huckabee 3 15 0 2 26 46

2.91 9.32 0.00 7.41 13.98--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought enough about it to ha 14 26 5 2 22 69

13.59 16.15 8.06 7.41 11.83--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 103 161 62 27 186 539

19.11 29.87 11.50 5.01 34.51============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

314

Page 316: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

===========================================================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ted Cruz 14 44 77 41 176

22.58 36.07 35.32 30.15-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rick Perry 9 9 14 8 40

14.52 7.38 6.42 5.88-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rand Paul 8 7 26 7 48

12.90 5.74 11.93 5.15-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Paul Ryan 5 7 7 16 35

8.06 5.74 3.21 11.76-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jeb Bush 0 5 16 17 38

0.00 4.10 7.34 12.50-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Bobby Jindal 1 2 6 2 11

1.61 1.64 2.75 1.47-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Scott Walker 1 5 9 6 21

1.61 4.10 4.13 4.41-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Marco Rubio 5 8 10 7 30

8.06 6.56 4.59 5.15-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Chris Christie 1 8 8 0 17

1.61 6.56 3.67 0.00-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rick Santorum 0 3 1 4 8

0.00 2.46 0.46 2.94-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

315

Page 317: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Mike Huckabee 11 8 16 11 4617.74 6.56 7.34 8.09

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought enough about it to have an opinion 7 16 28 17 68

11.29 13.11 12.84 12.50-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 62 122 218 136 538

11.52 22.68 40.52 25.28===========================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

316

Page 318: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q26. 2016 Democratic Presidential Primary Vote Choice

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Hillary Clinton 24 65 41 116 9 8 8 271

46.15 78.31 67.21 65.54 60.00 53.33 47.06--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Joe Biden 3 2 4 19 0 4 1 33

5.77 2.41 6.56 10.73 0.00 26.67 5.88--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

317

Page 319: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Elizabeth Warren 22 12 10 17 1 0 2 6442.31 14.46 16.39 9.60 6.67 0.00 11.76

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Martin O'Malley 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Andrew Cuomo 0 1 0 4 0 3 0 8

0.00 1.20 0.00 2.26 0.00 20.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Brian Schweitzer 0 0 0 3 1 0 0 4

0.00 0.00 0.00 1.69 6.67 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought enough about i 3 3 6 18 4 0 6 40

5.77 3.61 9.84 10.17 26.67 0.00 35.29--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 52 83 61 177 15 15 17 420

12.38 19.76 14.52 42.14 3.57 3.57 4.05============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==================================================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Hillary Clinton 129 116 26 271

66.15 65.54 50.98--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Joe Biden 9 19 6 34

4.62 10.73 11.76--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Elizabeth Warren 44 17 4 65

22.56 9.60 7.84

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

318

Page 320: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Martin O'Malley 0 0 0 0

0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Andrew Cuomo 1 4 3 8

0.51 2.26 5.88--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Brian Schweitzer 0 3 1 4

0.00 1.69 1.96--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought enough about it to have an opinion 12 18 11 41

6.15 10.17 21.57--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 195 177 51 423

46.10 41.84 12.06==================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=============================================================================================================================PID7

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Hillary Clinton 156 54 47 2 2 4 1 266

66.38 62.79 64.38 20.00 50.00 100.00 33.33-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Joe Biden 17 9 4 3 0 0 1 34

7.23 10.47 5.48 30.00 0.00 0.00 33.33-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Elizabeth Warren 37 10 16 0 1 0 0 64

15.74 11.63 21.92 0.00 25.00 0.00 0.00-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Martin O'Malley 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

319

Page 321: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Andrew Cuomo 5 2 0 1 0 0 0 8

2.13 2.33 0.00 10.00 0.00 0.00 0.00-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Brian Schweitzer 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 4

1.28 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 33.33-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought enough about it to have an opinion 17 11 6 4 1 0 0 39

7.23 12.79 8.22 40.00 25.00 0.00 0.00-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 235 86 73 10 4 4 3 415

56.63 20.72 17.59 2.41 0.96 0.96 0.72=============================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

====================================================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Hillary Clinton 257 2 7 266

65.23 20.00 63.64----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Joe Biden 30 3 1 34

7.61 30.00 9.09----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Elizabeth Warren 63 0 1 64

15.99 0.00 9.09----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Martin O'Malley 0 0 0 0

0.00 0.00 0.00----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

320

Page 322: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Andrew Cuomo 7 1 0 81.78 10.00 0.00

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Brian Schweitzer 3 0 1 4

0.76 0.00 9.09----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought enough about it to have an opinion 34 4 1 39

8.63 40.00 9.09----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 394 10 11 415

94.94 2.41 2.65====================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Hillary Clinton 5 253 2 12 272

31.25 65.89 66.67 57.14--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Joe Biden 4 29 0 2 35

25.00 7.55 0.00 9.52--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Elizabeth Warren 1 63 0 0 64

6.25 16.41 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Martin O'Malley 0 0 0 0 0

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Andrew Cuomo 0 7 0 1 8

0.00 1.82 0.00 4.76

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

321

Page 323: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Brian Schweitzer 4 0 0 0 4

25.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought enough about it to have an opinion 2 32 1 6 41

12.50 8.33 33.33 28.57--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 16 384 3 21 424

3.77 90.57 0.71 4.95============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=======================================================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Hillary Clinton 10 76 70 34 59 23 272

66.67 64.41 63.06 75.56 63.44 52.27---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Joe Biden 1 8 10 2 6 7 34

6.67 6.78 9.01 4.44 6.45 15.91---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Elizabeth Warren 0 21 15 1 20 7 64

0.00 17.80 13.51 2.22 21.51 15.91---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Martin O'Malley 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Andrew Cuomo 0 2 1 3 0 3 9

0.00 1.69 0.90 6.67 0.00 6.82---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Brian Schweitzer 0 3 0 0 2 0 5

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

322

Page 324: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

0.00 2.54 0.00 0.00 2.15 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought enough about it to have an opinion 4 8 15 5 6 4 42

26.67 6.78 13.51 11.11 6.45 9.09---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 15 118 111 45 93 44 426

3.52 27.70 26.06 10.56 21.83 10.33=======================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Hillary Clinton 33 41 35 76 88 273

67.35 62.12 72.92 66.09 60.27--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Joe Biden 7 6 5 5 11 34

14.29 9.09 10.42 4.35 7.53--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Elizabeth Warren 4 6 2 22 30 64

8.16 9.09 4.17 19.13 20.55--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Martin O'Malley 0 0 0 0 0 0

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Andrew Cuomo 3 3 1 1 0 8

6.12 4.55 2.08 0.87 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Brian Schweitzer 0 4 0 0 0 4

0.00 6.06 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

323

Page 325: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Haven't thought enough about it to have 2 6 5 11 17 414.08 9.09 10.42 9.57 11.64

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 49 66 48 115 146 424

11.56 15.57 11.32 27.12 34.43============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA g Mixed Other Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Hillary Clinton 103 85 79 3 0 3 0 273

60.59 65.89 73.83 27.27 NaN 42.86 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Joe Biden 9 20 6 0 0 0 0 35

5.29 15.50 5.61 0.00 NaN 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Elizabeth Warren 42 3 9 7 0 1 3 65

24.71 2.33 8.41 63.64 NaN 14.29 100.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Martin O'Malley 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 NaN 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Andrew Cuomo 3 3 2 0 0 0 0 8

1.76 2.33 1.87 0.00 NaN 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Brian Schweitzer 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 4

0.00 0.00 2.80 9.09 NaN 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought enough about it t 13 18 8 0 0 3 0 42

7.65 13.95 7.48 0.00 NaN 42.86 0.00

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

324

Page 326: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 170 129 107 11 0 7 3 427

39.81 30.21 25.06 2.58 0.00 1.64 0.70============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================================================================================marital

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Hillary Clinton 120 7 55 14 66 11 273

65.93 70.00 77.46 82.35 55.00 45.83--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Joe Biden 16 0 3 0 13 2 34

8.79 0.00 4.23 0.00 10.83 8.33--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Elizabeth Warren 31 0 7 0 20 5 63

17.03 0.00 9.86 0.00 16.67 20.83--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Martin O'Malley 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Andrew Cuomo 1 0 4 1 3 0 9

0.55 0.00 5.63 5.88 2.50 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Brian Schweitzer 2 3 0 0 0 0 5

1.10 30.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought enough about it to have an opinion 12 0 2 2 18 6 40

6.59 0.00 2.82 11.76 15.00 25.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 182 10 71 17 120 24 424

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

325

Page 327: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

42.92 2.36 16.75 4.01 28.30 5.66======================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================gender

Q Male Female Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------Hillary Clinton 118 154 272

60.51 67.54----------------------------------------------------------------------------Joe Biden 12 22 34

6.15 9.65----------------------------------------------------------------------------Elizabeth Warren 38 26 64

19.49 11.40----------------------------------------------------------------------------Martin O'Malley 0 0 0

0.00 0.00----------------------------------------------------------------------------Andrew Cuomo 5 3 8

2.56 1.32----------------------------------------------------------------------------Brian Schweitzer 0 4 4

0.00 1.75----------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought enough about it to have an opinion 22 19 41

11.28 8.33----------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 195 228 423

46.10 53.90============================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

326

Page 328: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Hillary Clinton 117 127 29 273

66.86 63.82 58.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Joe Biden 11 19 4 34

6.29 9.55 8.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Elizabeth Warren 23 31 10 64

13.14 15.58 20.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Martin O'Malley 0 0 0 0

0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Andrew Cuomo 1 6 1 8

0.57 3.02 2.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Brian Schweitzer 3 0 1 4

1.71 0.00 2.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought enough about it to have an opinion 20 16 5 41

11.43 8.04 10.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 175 199 50 424

41.27 46.93 11.79======================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

327

Page 329: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Hillary Clinton 61 90 25 36 60 272

58.65 72.58 69.44 59.02 60.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Joe Biden 12 9 2 6 6 35

11.54 7.26 5.56 9.84 6.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Elizabeth Warren 14 13 8 12 18 65

13.46 10.48 22.22 19.67 18.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Martin O'Malley 0 0 0 0 0 0

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Andrew Cuomo 3 3 0 0 2 8

2.88 2.42 0.00 0.00 2.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Brian Schweitzer 3 0 0 0 1 4

2.88 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought enough about it to ha 11 9 1 7 13 41

10.58 7.26 2.78 11.48 13.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 104 124 36 61 100 425

24.47 29.18 8.47 14.35 23.53============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

328

Page 330: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

===========================================================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Hillary Clinton 34 67 122 49 272

47.89 56.78 70.52 77.78-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Joe Biden 12 9 11 2 34

16.90 7.63 6.36 3.17-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Elizabeth Warren 11 20 27 7 65

15.49 16.95 15.61 11.11-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Martin O'Malley 0 0 0 0 0

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Andrew Cuomo 0 3 2 3 8

0.00 2.54 1.16 4.76-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Brian Schweitzer 0 5 0 0 5

0.00 4.24 0.00 0.00-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Haven't thought enough about it to have an opinion 14 14 11 2 41

19.72 11.86 6.36 3.17-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 71 118 173 63 425

16.71 27.76 40.71 14.82===========================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

329

Page 331: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Political Figure Favorability Ratings

Q27. Ted Cruz Favorability

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 3 1 2 30 28 131 149 344

4.84 0.97 2.08 8.33 22.58 56.71 68.98--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 3 7 8 43 40 64 33 198

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

330

Page 332: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

4.84 6.80 8.33 11.94 32.26 27.71 15.28--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavora 2 2 4 61 15 16 13 113

3.23 1.94 4.17 16.94 12.10 6.93 6.02--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 3 4 7 40 10 6 5 75

4.84 3.88 7.29 11.11 8.06 2.60 2.31--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 43 76 65 118 20 8 5 335

69.35 73.79 67.71 32.78 16.13 3.46 2.31--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 8 13 10 68 11 6 11 127

12.90 12.62 10.42 18.89 8.87 2.60 5.09--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 62 103 96 360 124 231 216 1192

5.20 8.64 8.05 30.20 10.40 19.38 18.12============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=================================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 6 30 308 344

2.28 8.33 54.04---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 18 43 137 198

6.84 11.94 24.04---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 9 61 44 114

3.42 16.94 7.72---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

331

Page 333: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Somewhat unfavorable 14 40 21 755.32 11.11 3.68

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 185 118 33 336

70.34 32.78 5.79---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 31 68 27 126

11.79 18.89 4.74---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 263 360 570 1193

22.05 30.18 47.78=================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================PID7

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 8 2 0 21 74 40 194 339

3.16 1.75 0.00 18.75 62.18 32.26 65.32------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 19 19 4 21 26 37 61 187

7.51 16.67 3.36 18.75 21.85 29.84 20.54------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 24 15 7 25 6 12 17 106

9.49 13.16 5.88 22.32 5.04 9.68 5.72------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 19 18 8 4 3 14 8 74

7.51 15.79 6.72 3.57 2.52 11.29 2.69------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 152 48 92 18 5 6 8 329

60.08 42.11 77.31 16.07 4.20 4.84 2.69

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

332

Page 334: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 31 12 8 23 5 15 9 103

12.25 10.53 6.72 20.54 4.20 12.10 3.03------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 253 114 119 112 119 124 297 1138

22.23 10.02 10.46 9.84 10.46 10.90 26.10============================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===================================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 10 21 309 340

2.06 18.75 56.91-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 42 21 125 188

8.64 18.75 23.02-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 46 25 36 107

9.47 22.32 6.63-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 45 4 25 74

9.26 3.57 4.60-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 292 18 19 329

60.08 16.07 3.50-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 51 23 29 103

10.49 20.54 5.34-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 486 112 543 1141

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

333

Page 335: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

42.59 9.82 47.59===================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===========================================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 76 9 209 52 346

31.54 2.00 78.57 21.94---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 74 38 38 47 197

30.71 8.44 14.29 19.83---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 31 35 13 34 113

12.86 7.78 4.89 14.35---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 24 37 4 10 75

9.96 8.22 1.50 4.22---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 15 299 1 22 337

6.22 66.44 0.38 9.28---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 21 32 1 72 126

8.71 7.11 0.38 30.38---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 241 450 266 237 1194

20.18 37.69 22.28 19.85===========================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

334

Page 336: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

| Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 11 98 86 34 84 34 347

27.50 27.84 26.22 30.09 34.01 29.57----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 7 63 62 20 30 15 197

17.50 17.90 18.90 17.70 12.15 13.04----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 3 41 33 11 21 4 113

7.50 11.65 10.06 9.73 8.50 3.48----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 1 24 19 6 10 15 75

2.50 6.82 5.79 5.31 4.05 13.04----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 7 77 86 33 89 45 337

17.50 21.88 26.22 29.20 36.03 39.13----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 11 49 42 9 13 2 126

27.50 13.92 12.80 7.96 5.26 1.74----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 40 352 328 113 247 115 1195

3.35 29.46 27.45 9.46 20.67 9.62======================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=====================================================================================================================================attend

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

335

Page 337: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 77 104 33 67 62 343

40.74 39.25 25.19 23.67 19.08-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 32 48 38 47 32 197

16.93 18.11 29.01 16.61 9.85-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 17 26 12 34 25 114

8.99 9.81 9.16 12.01 7.69-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 12 19 9 19 16 75

6.35 7.17 6.87 6.71 4.92-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 29 40 28 93 147 337

15.34 15.09 21.37 32.86 45.23-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 22 28 11 23 43 127

11.64 10.57 8.40 8.13 13.23-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 189 265 131 283 325 1193

15.84 22.21 10.98 23.72 27.24=====================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA ge Mixed Other Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 276 7 46 4 3 2 9 347

38.44 4.61 16.85 18.18 100.00 15.38 60.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

336

Page 338: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Somewhat favorable 118 15 56 4 0 1 3 19716.43 9.87 20.51 18.18 0.00 7.69 20.00

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 51 22 28 8 0 4 0 113

7.10 14.47 10.26 36.36 0.00 30.77 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 35 19 16 3 0 2 0 75

4.87 12.50 5.86 13.64 0.00 15.38 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 189 61 78 2 0 4 3 337

26.32 40.13 28.57 9.09 0.00 30.77 20.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 49 28 49 1 0 0 0 127

6.82 18.42 17.95 4.55 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 718 152 273 22 3 13 15 1196

60.03 12.71 22.83 1.84 0.25 1.09 1.25============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=====================================================================================================================marital

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 236 1 31 22 49 6 345

36.42 4.35 20.26 33.85 19.52 10.53---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 114 5 20 11 42 6 198

17.59 21.74 13.07 16.92 16.73 10.53---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 52 4 10 9 31 8 114

8.02 17.39 6.54 13.85 12.35 14.04

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

337

Page 339: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 37 3 10 6 16 3 75

5.71 13.04 6.54 9.23 6.37 5.26---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 156 3 74 16 66 23 338

24.07 13.04 48.37 24.62 26.29 40.35---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 53 7 8 1 47 11 127

8.18 30.43 5.23 1.54 18.73 19.30---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 648 23 153 65 251 57 1197

54.14 1.92 12.78 5.43 20.97 4.76=====================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===========================================================gender

Q Male Female Total-----------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 202 144 346

36.14 22.64-----------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 98 99 197

17.53 15.57-----------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 35 78 113

6.26 12.26-----------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 24 51 75

4.29 8.02-----------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 167 170 337

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

338

Page 340: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

29.87 26.73-----------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 33 94 127

5.90 14.78-----------------------------------------------------------Total 559 636 1195

46.78 53.22===========================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=====================================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total---------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 70 183 93 346

19.83 31.02 37.65---------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 52 92 53 197

14.73 15.59 21.46---------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 38 56 18 112

10.76 9.49 7.29---------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 23 40 11 74

6.52 6.78 4.45---------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 135 163 40 338

38.24 27.63 16.19---------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 35 56 32 123

9.92 9.49 12.96---------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

339

Page 341: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Total 353 590 247 119029.66 49.58 20.76

=====================================================================Cell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

========================================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 63 103 37 14 129 346

25.20 28.07 30.33 12.96 37.07----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 43 47 30 20 58 198

17.20 12.81 24.59 18.52 16.67----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 30 31 7 6 39 113

12.00 8.45 5.74 5.56 11.21----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 23 20 6 14 11 74

9.20 5.45 4.92 12.96 3.16----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 71 121 31 48 66 337

28.40 32.97 25.41 44.44 18.97----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 20 45 11 6 45 127

8.00 12.26 9.02 5.56 12.93----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 250 367 122 108 348 1195

20.92 30.71 10.21 9.04 29.12========================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

340

Page 342: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==========================================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 34 65 153 94 346

17.44 20.83 33.19 41.59--------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 35 56 68 37 196

17.95 17.95 14.75 16.37--------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 32 36 29 16 113

16.41 11.54 6.29 7.08--------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 16 19 28 12 75

8.21 6.09 6.07 5.31--------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 29 89 160 59 337

14.87 28.53 34.71 26.11--------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 49 47 23 8 127

25.13 15.06 4.99 3.54--------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 195 312 461 226 1194

16.33 26.13 38.61 18.93==========================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

341

Page 343: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q28. John Cornyn Favorability

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 5 2 2 16 17 53 55 150

7.94 1.94 2.06 4.47 13.71 22.84 25.46--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 3 8 6 58 43 85 70 273

4.76 7.77 6.19 16.20 34.68 36.64 32.41--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

342

Page 344: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Neither favorable nor unfavora 3 12 13 84 24 40 27 2034.76 11.65 13.40 23.46 19.35 17.24 12.50

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 7 17 16 33 9 31 32 145

11.11 16.50 16.49 9.22 7.26 13.36 14.81--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 35 49 43 63 15 10 12 227

55.56 47.57 44.33 17.60 12.10 4.31 5.56--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 10 15 17 104 16 13 20 195

15.87 14.56 17.53 29.05 12.90 5.60 9.26--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 63 103 97 358 124 232 216 1193

5.28 8.63 8.13 30.01 10.39 19.45 18.11============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=================================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 9 16 125 150

3.42 4.47 21.93---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 17 58 197 272

6.46 16.20 34.56---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 28 84 90 202

10.65 23.46 15.79---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 40 33 72 145

15.21 9.22 12.63

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

343

Page 345: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 127 63 37 227

48.29 17.60 6.49---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 42 104 49 195

15.97 29.05 8.60---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 263 358 570 1191

22.08 30.06 47.86=================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================PID7

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 12 3 0 4 20 13 90 142

4.76 2.63 0.00 3.57 16.67 10.57 30.20------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 28 17 12 19 33 44 115 268

11.11 14.91 10.08 16.96 27.50 35.77 38.59------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 35 35 13 33 20 20 39 195

13.89 30.70 10.92 29.46 16.67 16.26 13.09------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 31 15 16 13 23 20 25 143

12.30 13.16 13.45 11.61 19.17 16.26 8.39------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 100 18 56 16 17 3 10 220

39.68 15.79 47.06 14.29 14.17 2.44 3.36------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 46 26 22 27 7 23 19 170

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

344

Page 346: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

18.25 22.81 18.49 24.11 5.83 18.70 6.38------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 252 114 119 112 120 123 298 1138

22.14 10.02 10.46 9.84 10.54 10.81 26.19============================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===================================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 15 4 123 142

3.09 3.57 22.65-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 58 19 192 269

11.93 16.96 35.36-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 83 33 80 196

17.08 29.46 14.73-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 63 13 68 144

12.96 11.61 12.52-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 174 16 31 221

35.80 14.29 5.71-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 93 27 49 169

19.14 24.11 9.02-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 486 112 543 1141

42.59 9.82 47.59===================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

345

Page 347: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===========================================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 68 13 42 29 152

28.33 2.89 15.79 12.24---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 75 50 96 50 271

31.25 11.11 36.09 21.10---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 44 72 40 46 202

18.33 16.00 15.04 19.41---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 10 67 54 15 146

4.17 14.89 20.30 6.33---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 5 177 25 20 227

2.08 39.33 9.40 8.44---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 38 71 9 77 195

15.83 15.78 3.38 32.49---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 240 450 266 237 1193

20.12 37.72 22.30 19.87===========================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

346

Page 348: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

======================================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 5 58 41 15 20 14 153

12.20 16.48 12.54 13.39 8.16 12.28----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 11 75 74 30 54 28 272

26.83 21.31 22.63 26.79 22.04 24.56----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 2 72 57 15 45 10 201

4.88 20.45 17.43 13.39 18.37 8.77----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 7 23 38 17 42 18 145

17.07 6.53 11.62 15.18 17.14 15.79----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 6 42 58 21 62 36 225

14.63 11.93 17.74 18.75 25.31 31.58----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 10 82 59 14 22 8 195

24.39 23.30 18.04 12.50 8.98 7.02----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 41 352 327 112 245 114 1191

3.44 29.55 27.46 9.40 20.57 9.57======================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=====================================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

347

Page 349: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Very favorable 39 52 8 28 23 15020.86 19.55 6.06 9.96 7.08

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 49 69 42 63 48 271

26.20 25.94 31.82 22.42 14.77-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 38 52 27 45 41 203

20.32 19.55 20.45 16.01 12.62-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 22 33 12 33 46 146

11.76 12.41 9.09 11.74 14.15-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 14 22 23 62 103 224

7.49 8.27 17.42 22.06 31.69-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 25 38 20 50 64 197

13.37 14.29 15.15 17.79 19.69-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 187 266 132 281 325 1191

15.70 22.33 11.08 23.59 27.29=====================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA ge Mixed Other Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 116 9 21 3 1 1 1 152

16.16 5.92 7.72 13.04 25.00 7.14 7.14--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 185 18 58 3 0 6 2 272

25.77 11.84 21.32 13.04 0.00 42.86 14.29

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

348

Page 350: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 100 35 53 11 1 2 1 203

13.93 23.03 19.49 47.83 25.00 14.29 7.14--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 96 16 21 4 2 1 6 146

13.37 10.53 7.72 17.39 50.00 7.14 42.86--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 141 30 49 0 0 3 4 227

19.64 19.74 18.01 0.00 0.00 21.43 28.57--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 80 44 70 2 0 1 0 197

11.14 28.95 25.74 8.70 0.00 7.14 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 718 152 272 23 4 14 14 1197

59.98 12.70 22.72 1.92 0.33 1.17 1.17============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=====================================================================================================================marital

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 90 2 8 21 24 6 151

13.89 8.00 5.37 32.31 9.68 10.53---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 176 5 27 15 39 9 271

27.16 20.00 18.12 23.08 15.73 15.79---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 112 2 24 8 51 6 203

17.28 8.00 16.11 12.31 20.56 10.53---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 77 1 22 9 26 10 145

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

349

Page 351: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

11.88 4.00 14.77 13.85 10.48 17.54---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 119 1 44 8 43 11 226

18.36 4.00 29.53 12.31 17.34 19.30---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 74 14 24 4 65 15 196

11.42 56.00 16.11 6.15 26.21 26.32---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 648 25 149 65 248 57 1192

54.36 2.10 12.50 5.45 20.81 4.78=====================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===========================================================gender

Q Male Female Total-----------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 73 78 151

13.11 12.26-----------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 132 139 271

23.70 21.86-----------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 90 112 202

16.16 17.61-----------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 69 77 146

12.39 12.11-----------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 128 99 227

22.98 15.57-----------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

350

Page 352: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Don't know/No Opinion 65 131 19611.67 20.60

-----------------------------------------------------------Total 557 636 1193

46.69 53.31===========================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=====================================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total---------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 44 60 47 151

12.54 10.17 19.03---------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 78 124 68 270

22.22 21.02 27.53---------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 53 111 38 202

15.10 18.81 15.38---------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 34 92 19 145

9.69 15.59 7.69---------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 80 117 30 227

22.79 19.83 12.15---------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 62 86 45 193

17.66 14.58 18.22---------------------------------------------------------------------Total 351 590 247 1188

29.55 49.66 20.79

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

351

Page 353: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

=====================================================================Cell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

========================================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 24 47 17 3 60 151

9.52 12.81 13.93 2.80 17.24----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 67 80 28 22 75 272

26.59 21.80 22.95 20.56 21.55----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 44 57 20 20 61 202

17.46 15.53 16.39 18.69 17.53----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 31 44 19 11 41 146

12.30 11.99 15.57 10.28 11.78----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 51 81 14 38 44 228

20.24 22.07 11.48 35.51 12.64----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 35 58 24 13 67 197

13.89 15.80 19.67 12.15 19.25----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 252 367 122 107 348 1196

21.07 30.69 10.20 8.95 29.10========================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

352

Page 354: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

==========================================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 13 27 61 50 151

6.74 8.65 13.26 22.03--------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 28 60 115 69 272

14.51 19.23 25.00 30.40--------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 44 59 66 32 201

22.80 18.91 14.35 14.10--------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 18 38 63 26 145

9.33 12.18 13.70 11.45--------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 20 60 109 38 227

10.36 19.23 23.70 16.74--------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 70 68 46 12 196

36.27 21.79 10.00 5.29--------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 193 312 460 227 1192

16.19 26.17 38.59 19.04==========================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

353

Page 355: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q29. David Alameel Favorability

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 14 17 9 20 7 5 2 74

23.33 16.35 9.38 5.60 5.60 2.16 0.92--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 21 43 32 69 10 8 8 191

35.00 41.35 33.33 19.33 8.00 3.46 3.67--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

354

Page 356: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Neither favorable nor unfavora 10 20 24 99 36 55 39 28316.67 19.23 25.00 27.73 28.80 23.81 17.89

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 0 0 11 6 8 33 18 76

0.00 0.00 11.46 1.68 6.40 14.29 8.26--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 2 1 0 11 13 26 47 100

3.33 0.96 0.00 3.08 10.40 11.26 21.56--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 13 23 20 152 51 104 104 467

21.67 22.12 20.83 42.58 40.80 45.02 47.71--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 60 104 96 357 125 231 218 1191

5.04 8.73 8.06 29.97 10.50 19.40 18.30============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=================================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 40 20 13 73

15.38 5.60 2.27---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 96 69 26 191

36.92 19.33 4.54---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 54 99 130 283

20.77 27.73 22.69---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 11 6 59 76

4.23 1.68 10.30

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

355

Page 357: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 2 11 86 99

0.77 3.08 15.01---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 57 152 259 468

21.92 42.58 45.20---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 260 357 573 1190

21.85 30.00 48.15=================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================PID7

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 56 6 7 0 0 3 0 72

22.05 5.31 5.88 0.00 0.00 2.42 0.00------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 87 23 46 5 6 8 9 184

34.25 20.35 38.66 4.55 4.96 6.45 3.03------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 48 36 29 36 24 33 67 273

18.90 31.86 24.37 32.73 19.83 26.61 22.56------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 3 7 2 8 12 8 35 75

1.18 6.19 1.68 7.27 9.92 6.45 11.78------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 3 3 1 12 14 15 45 93

1.18 2.65 0.84 10.91 11.57 12.10 15.15------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 57 38 34 49 65 57 141 441

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

356

Page 358: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

22.44 33.63 28.57 44.55 53.72 45.97 47.47------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 254 113 119 110 121 124 297 1138

22.32 9.93 10.46 9.67 10.63 10.90 26.10============================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===================================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 69 0 3 72

14.20 0.00 0.55-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 155 5 22 182

31.89 4.55 4.05-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 114 36 125 275

23.46 32.73 23.02-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 12 8 56 76

2.47 7.27 10.31-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 7 12 74 93

1.44 10.91 13.63-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 129 49 263 441

26.54 44.55 48.43-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 486 110 543 1139

42.67 9.66 47.67===================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

357

Page 359: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===========================================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 4 67 0 2 73

1.67 14.76 0.00 0.85---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 18 162 2 9 191

7.50 35.68 0.76 3.81---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 71 105 63 45 284

29.58 23.13 23.86 19.07---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 29 9 31 8 77

12.08 1.98 11.74 3.39---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 17 7 58 18 100

7.08 1.54 21.97 7.63---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 101 104 110 154 469

42.08 22.91 41.67 65.25---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 240 454 264 236 1194

20.10 38.02 22.11 19.77===========================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

358

Page 360: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

======================================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 2 17 19 13 15 7 73

4.88 4.87 5.76 11.40 6.07 6.14----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 5 31 52 21 51 31 191

12.20 8.88 15.76 18.42 20.65 27.19----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 5 87 80 29 59 25 285

12.20 24.93 24.24 25.44 23.89 21.93----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 5 27 19 10 11 6 78

12.20 7.74 5.76 8.77 4.45 5.26----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 4 21 31 11 28 4 99

9.76 6.02 9.39 9.65 11.34 3.51----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 20 166 129 30 83 41 469

48.78 47.56 39.09 26.32 33.60 35.96----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 41 349 330 114 247 114 1195

3.43 29.21 27.62 9.54 20.67 9.54======================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=====================================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

359

Page 361: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Very favorable 12 11 9 11 29 726.52 4.14 6.82 3.91 8.95

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 23 24 27 55 61 190

12.50 9.02 20.45 19.57 18.83-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 26 78 37 73 69 283

14.13 29.32 28.03 25.98 21.30-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 15 25 5 17 15 77

8.15 9.40 3.79 6.05 4.63-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 22 27 9 14 24 96

11.96 10.15 6.82 4.98 7.41-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 86 101 45 111 126 469

46.74 37.97 34.09 39.50 38.89-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 184 266 132 281 324 1187

15.50 22.41 11.12 23.67 27.30=====================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA ge Mixed Other Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 31 21 19 2 0 0 0 73

4.33 13.46 7.09 9.09 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 111 39 35 1 0 1 3 190

15.50 25.00 13.06 4.55 0.00 7.14 20.00

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

360

Page 362: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 163 32 76 11 0 4 0 286

22.77 20.51 28.36 50.00 0.00 28.57 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 54 3 13 2 1 2 2 77

7.54 1.92 4.85 9.09 33.33 14.29 13.33--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 72 2 18 1 2 1 3 99

10.06 1.28 6.72 4.55 66.67 7.14 20.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 285 59 107 5 0 6 7 469

39.80 37.82 39.93 22.73 0.00 42.86 46.67--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 716 156 268 22 3 14 15 1194

59.97 13.07 22.45 1.84 0.25 1.17 1.26============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=====================================================================================================================marital

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 41 0 10 3 18 0 72

6.37 0.00 6.62 4.69 7.14 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 88 2 42 7 44 8 191

13.66 8.33 27.81 10.94 17.46 13.79---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 158 5 23 16 62 21 285

24.53 20.83 15.23 25.00 24.60 36.21---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 45 0 12 5 12 3 77

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

361

Page 363: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

6.99 0.00 7.95 7.81 4.76 5.17---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 55 4 9 11 17 3 99

8.54 16.67 5.96 17.19 6.75 5.17---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 257 13 55 22 99 23 469

39.91 54.17 36.42 34.38 39.29 39.66---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 644 24 151 64 252 58 1193

53.98 2.01 12.66 5.36 21.12 4.86=====================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===========================================================gender

Q Male Female Total-----------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 35 38 73

6.31 5.96-----------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 85 106 191

15.32 16.61-----------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 148 136 284

26.67 21.32-----------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 38 39 77

6.85 6.11-----------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 60 39 99

10.81 6.11-----------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

362

Page 364: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Don't know/No Opinion 189 280 46934.05 43.89

-----------------------------------------------------------Total 555 638 1193

46.52 53.48===========================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=====================================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total---------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 27 39 7 73

7.56 6.67 2.82---------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 73 100 17 190

20.45 17.09 6.85---------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 79 144 62 285

22.13 24.62 25.00---------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 21 31 24 76

5.88 5.30 9.68---------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 19 47 33 99

5.32 8.03 13.31---------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 138 224 105 467

38.66 38.29 42.34---------------------------------------------------------------------Total 357 585 248 1190

30.00 49.16 20.84

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

363

Page 365: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

=====================================================================Cell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

========================================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 18 29 6 5 15 73

7.17 7.95 4.88 4.81 4.27----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 46 62 12 29 42 191

18.33 16.99 9.76 27.88 11.97----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 74 66 35 32 77 284

29.48 18.08 28.46 30.77 21.94----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 11 23 3 5 34 76

4.38 6.30 2.44 4.81 9.69----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 16 35 8 6 35 100

6.37 9.59 6.50 5.77 9.97----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 86 150 59 27 148 470

34.26 41.10 47.97 25.96 42.17----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 251 365 123 104 351 1194

21.02 30.57 10.30 8.71 29.40========================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

364

Page 366: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

==========================================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 9 25 28 11 73

4.59 7.94 6.11 4.89--------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 21 53 77 40 191

10.71 16.83 16.81 17.78--------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 61 67 100 56 284

31.12 21.27 21.83 24.89--------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 16 13 31 17 77

8.16 4.13 6.77 7.56--------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 11 15 53 20 99

5.61 4.76 11.57 8.89--------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 78 142 169 81 470

39.80 45.08 36.90 36.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 196 315 458 225 1194

16.42 26.38 38.36 18.84==========================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

365

Page 367: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q30. Rick Perry Favorability

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 4 1 1 35 22 94 94 251

6.45 0.99 1.04 9.75 17.74 40.52 43.12--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 1 9 13 54 47 90 74 288

1.61 8.91 13.54 15.04 37.90 38.79 33.94--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

366

Page 368: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Neither favorable nor unfavora 3 4 2 56 18 28 17 1284.84 3.96 2.08 15.60 14.52 12.07 7.80

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 3 9 12 51 17 6 9 107

4.84 8.91 12.50 14.21 13.71 2.59 4.13--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 46 71 61 117 15 11 17 338

74.19 70.30 63.54 32.59 12.10 4.74 7.80--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 5 7 7 46 5 3 7 80

8.06 6.93 7.29 12.81 4.03 1.29 3.21--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 62 101 96 359 124 232 218 1192

5.20 8.47 8.05 30.12 10.40 19.46 18.29============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=================================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 6 35 209 250

2.32 9.75 36.60---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 23 54 210 287

8.88 15.04 36.78---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 8 56 63 127

3.09 15.60 11.03---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 24 51 32 107

9.27 14.21 5.60

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

367

Page 369: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 179 117 43 339

69.11 32.59 7.53---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 19 46 14 79

7.34 12.81 2.45---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 259 359 571 1189

21.78 30.19 48.02=================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================PID7

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 14 8 2 16 35 31 138 244

5.58 6.96 1.68 14.16 28.93 25.00 46.15------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 25 15 13 18 51 34 119 275

9.96 13.04 10.92 15.93 42.15 27.42 39.80------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 18 15 9 25 16 27 14 124

7.17 13.04 7.56 22.12 13.22 21.77 4.68------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 19 17 9 18 7 20 13 103

7.57 14.78 7.56 15.93 5.79 16.13 4.35------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 152 55 81 20 9 7 11 335

60.56 47.83 68.07 17.70 7.44 5.65 3.68------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 23 5 5 16 3 5 4 61

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

368

Page 370: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

9.16 4.35 4.20 14.16 2.48 4.03 1.34------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 251 115 119 113 121 124 299 1142

21.98 10.07 10.42 9.89 10.60 10.86 26.18============================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===================================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 23 16 204 243

4.75 14.16 37.64-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 53 18 204 275

10.95 15.93 37.64-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 42 25 56 123

8.68 22.12 10.33-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 45 18 39 102

9.30 15.93 7.20-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 288 20 27 335

59.50 17.70 4.98-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 33 16 12 61

6.82 14.16 2.21-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 484 113 542 1139

42.49 9.92 47.59===================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

369

Page 371: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===========================================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 91 20 92 49 252

37.60 4.43 34.59 20.68---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 75 48 109 56 288

30.99 10.64 40.98 23.63---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 28 36 36 28 128

11.57 7.98 13.53 11.81---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 25 42 15 26 108

10.33 9.31 5.64 10.97---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 12 286 14 28 340

4.96 63.41 5.26 11.81---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 11 19 0 50 80

4.55 4.21 0.00 21.10---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 242 451 266 237 1196

20.23 37.71 22.24 19.82===========================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

370

Page 372: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

======================================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 6 91 60 25 48 22 252

15.00 25.78 18.13 22.94 19.59 19.13----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 10 95 73 29 59 22 288

25.00 26.91 22.05 26.61 24.08 19.13----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 5 35 36 11 24 16 127

12.50 9.92 10.88 10.09 9.80 13.91----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 3 29 38 7 25 6 108

7.50 8.22 11.48 6.42 10.20 5.22----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 9 72 96 32 82 48 339

22.50 20.40 29.00 29.36 33.47 41.74----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 7 31 28 5 7 1 79

17.50 8.78 8.46 4.59 2.86 0.87----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 40 353 331 109 245 115 1193

3.35 29.59 27.75 9.14 20.54 9.64======================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=====================================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

371

Page 373: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Very favorable 66 78 24 47 36 25135.29 29.66 18.32 16.73 10.98

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 48 74 37 80 48 287

25.67 28.14 28.24 28.47 14.63-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 15 36 22 19 34 126

8.02 13.69 16.79 6.76 10.37-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 11 17 9 30 39 106

5.88 6.46 6.87 10.68 11.89-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 36 41 32 92 139 340

19.25 15.59 24.43 32.74 42.38-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 11 17 7 13 32 80

5.88 6.46 5.34 4.63 9.76-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 187 263 131 281 328 1190

15.71 22.10 11.01 23.61 27.56=====================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA ge Mixed Other Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 182 8 49 5 1 2 5 252

25.38 5.30 18.01 22.73 33.33 15.38 35.71--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 192 13 61 11 2 3 5 287

26.78 8.61 22.43 50.00 66.67 23.08 35.71

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

372

Page 374: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 64 24 35 1 0 2 1 127

8.93 15.89 12.87 4.55 0.00 15.38 7.14--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 63 15 26 3 0 0 0 107

8.79 9.93 9.56 13.64 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 186 69 73 2 0 6 3 339

25.94 45.70 26.84 9.09 0.00 46.15 21.43--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 30 22 28 0 0 0 0 80

4.18 14.57 10.29 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 717 151 272 22 3 13 14 1192

60.15 12.67 22.82 1.85 0.25 1.09 1.17============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=====================================================================================================================marital

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 156 2 16 25 45 7 251

24.22 9.09 10.60 38.46 17.79 12.28---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 181 4 32 15 46 9 287

28.11 18.18 21.19 23.08 18.18 15.79---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 70 6 13 4 27 8 128

10.87 27.27 8.61 6.15 10.67 14.04---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 61 1 12 4 22 6 106

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

373

Page 375: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

9.47 4.55 7.95 6.15 8.70 10.53---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 147 5 74 16 79 18 339

22.83 22.73 49.01 24.62 31.23 31.58---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 29 4 4 1 34 9 81

4.50 18.18 2.65 1.54 13.44 15.79---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 644 22 151 65 253 57 1192

54.03 1.85 12.67 5.45 21.22 4.78=====================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===========================================================gender

Q Male Female Total-----------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 118 134 252

21.15 21.07-----------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 144 144 288

25.81 22.64-----------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 64 63 127

11.47 9.91-----------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 49 59 108

8.78 9.28-----------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 156 183 339

27.96 28.77-----------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

374

Page 376: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Don't know/No Opinion 27 53 804.84 8.33

-----------------------------------------------------------Total 558 636 1194

46.73 53.27===========================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=====================================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total---------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 65 114 73 252

18.26 19.45 29.44---------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 60 149 79 288

16.85 25.43 31.85---------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 45 64 18 127

12.64 10.92 7.26---------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 38 58 12 108

10.67 9.90 4.84---------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 128 168 43 339

35.96 28.67 17.34---------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 20 33 23 76

5.62 5.63 9.27---------------------------------------------------------------------Total 356 586 248 1190

29.92 49.24 20.84

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

375

Page 377: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

=====================================================================Cell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

========================================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 54 71 28 13 86 252

21.51 19.40 23.14 12.38 24.50----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 42 85 29 25 108 289

16.73 23.22 23.97 23.81 30.77----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 40 31 10 8 38 127

15.94 8.47 8.26 7.62 10.83----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 28 31 16 10 23 108

11.16 8.47 13.22 9.52 6.55----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 77 118 29 46 69 339

30.68 32.24 23.97 43.81 19.66----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 10 30 9 3 27 79

3.98 8.20 7.44 2.86 7.69----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 251 366 121 105 351 1194

21.02 30.65 10.13 8.79 29.40========================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

376

Page 378: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

==========================================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 21 62 108 60 251

10.66 19.75 23.43 26.67--------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 50 64 109 66 289

25.38 20.38 23.64 29.33--------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 27 37 45 19 128

13.71 11.78 9.76 8.44--------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 24 30 38 17 109

12.18 9.55 8.24 7.56--------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 40 90 148 62 340

20.30 28.66 32.10 27.56--------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 35 31 13 1 80

17.77 9.87 2.82 0.44--------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 197 314 461 225 1197

16.46 26.23 38.51 18.80==========================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

377

Page 379: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q31. Greg Abbott Favorability

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 4 4 3 35 33 102 120 301

6.45 3.88 3.12 9.75 26.61 44.16 55.30--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 2 8 5 58 36 77 51 237

3.23 7.77 5.21 16.16 29.03 33.33 23.50--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

378

Page 380: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Neither favorable nor unfavora 6 7 12 83 23 29 22 1829.68 6.80 12.50 23.12 18.55 12.55 10.14

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 2 11 14 37 4 5 5 78

3.23 10.68 14.58 10.31 3.23 2.16 2.30--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 41 52 47 50 16 3 2 211

66.13 50.49 48.96 13.93 12.90 1.30 0.92--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 7 21 15 96 12 15 17 183

11.29 20.39 15.62 26.74 9.68 6.49 7.83--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 62 103 96 359 124 231 217 1192

5.20 8.64 8.05 30.12 10.40 19.38 18.20============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=================================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 12 35 255 302

4.58 9.75 44.66---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 15 58 163 236

5.73 16.16 28.55---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 25 83 74 182

9.54 23.12 12.96---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 27 37 13 77

10.31 10.31 2.28

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

379

Page 381: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 140 50 21 211

53.44 13.93 3.68---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 43 96 45 184

16.41 26.74 7.88---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 262 359 571 1192

21.98 30.12 47.90=================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================PID7

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 15 9 5 13 52 39 158 291

5.88 7.96 4.17 11.61 43.33 31.20 53.38------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 29 17 7 21 39 34 87 234

11.37 15.04 5.83 18.75 32.50 27.20 29.39------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 34 27 14 28 13 27 29 172

13.33 23.89 11.67 25.00 10.83 21.60 9.80------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 15 14 19 13 4 6 5 76

5.88 12.39 15.83 11.61 3.33 4.80 1.69------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 111 20 56 9 4 2 4 206

43.53 17.70 46.67 8.04 3.33 1.60 1.35------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 51 26 19 28 8 17 13 162

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

380

Page 382: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

20.00 23.01 15.83 25.00 6.67 13.60 4.39------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 255 113 120 112 120 125 296 1141

22.35 9.90 10.52 9.82 10.52 10.96 25.94============================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===================================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 30 13 249 292

6.15 11.61 45.94-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 53 21 160 234

10.86 18.75 29.52-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 75 28 70 173

15.37 25.00 12.92-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 47 13 15 75

9.63 11.61 2.77-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 187 9 10 206

38.32 8.04 1.85-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 96 28 38 162

19.67 25.00 7.01-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 488 112 542 1142

42.73 9.81 47.46===================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

381

Page 383: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===========================================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 78 26 141 57 302

32.77 5.73 53.01 24.05---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 67 55 80 36 238

28.15 12.11 30.08 15.19---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 43 65 33 42 183

18.07 14.32 12.41 17.72---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 16 46 4 12 78

6.72 10.13 1.50 5.06---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 5 188 2 15 210

2.10 41.41 0.75 6.33---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 29 74 6 75 184

12.18 16.30 2.26 31.65---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 238 454 266 237 1195

19.92 37.99 22.26 19.83===========================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

382

Page 384: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

======================================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 8 81 82 35 65 30 301

20.00 23.08 24.85 30.70 26.53 26.32----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 11 73 67 17 46 24 238

27.50 20.80 20.30 14.91 18.78 21.05----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 0 68 52 19 36 7 182

0.00 19.37 15.76 16.67 14.69 6.14----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 3 21 22 8 16 8 78

7.50 5.98 6.67 7.02 6.53 7.02----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 6 36 54 17 62 36 211

15.00 10.26 16.36 14.91 25.31 31.58----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 12 72 53 18 20 9 184

30.00 20.51 16.06 15.79 8.16 7.89----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 40 351 330 114 245 114 1194

3.35 29.40 27.64 9.55 20.52 9.55======================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=====================================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

383

Page 385: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Very favorable 63 87 35 58 55 29833.69 32.83 26.72 20.71 16.82

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 38 67 29 62 41 237

20.32 25.28 22.14 22.14 12.54-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 31 41 28 36 46 182

16.58 15.47 21.37 12.86 14.07-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 11 12 7 22 25 77

5.88 4.53 5.34 7.86 7.65-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 16 15 17 63 100 211

8.56 5.66 12.98 22.50 30.58-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 28 43 15 39 60 185

14.97 16.23 11.45 13.93 18.35-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 187 265 131 280 327 1190

15.71 22.27 11.01 23.53 27.48=====================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA ge Mixed Other Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 226 12 50 5 3 2 3 301

31.61 7.79 18.38 21.74 100.00 14.29 21.43--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 157 17 44 10 0 4 5 237

21.96 11.04 16.18 43.48 0.00 28.57 35.71

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

384

Page 386: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 88 31 58 3 0 1 2 183

12.31 20.13 21.32 13.04 0.00 7.14 14.29--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 40 10 23 2 0 2 1 78

5.59 6.49 8.46 8.70 0.00 14.29 7.14--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 135 34 34 1 0 5 3 212

18.88 22.08 12.50 4.35 0.00 35.71 21.43--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 69 50 63 2 0 0 0 184

9.65 32.47 23.16 8.70 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 715 154 272 23 3 14 14 1195

59.83 12.89 22.76 1.92 0.25 1.17 1.17============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=====================================================================================================================marital

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 197 2 32 22 41 8 302

30.45 8.70 21.19 33.85 16.21 14.04---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 140 2 30 15 44 7 238

21.64 8.70 19.87 23.08 17.39 12.28---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 89 7 16 11 51 9 183

13.76 30.43 10.60 16.92 20.16 15.79---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 42 2 8 3 18 5 78

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

385

Page 387: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

6.49 8.70 5.30 4.62 7.11 8.77---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 104 0 45 7 41 14 211

16.07 0.00 29.80 10.77 16.21 24.56---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 75 10 20 7 58 14 184

11.59 43.48 13.25 10.77 22.92 24.56---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 647 23 151 65 253 57 1196

54.10 1.92 12.63 5.43 21.15 4.77=====================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===========================================================gender

Q Male Female Total-----------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 148 154 302

26.43 24.18-----------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 114 124 238

20.36 19.47-----------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 78 105 183

13.93 16.48-----------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 42 36 78

7.50 5.65-----------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 113 98 211

20.18 15.38-----------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

386

Page 388: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Don't know/No Opinion 65 120 18511.61 18.84

-----------------------------------------------------------Total 560 637 1197

46.78 53.22===========================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=====================================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total---------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 75 143 84 302

21.07 24.28 33.87---------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 55 131 52 238

15.45 22.24 20.97---------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 56 89 37 182

15.73 15.11 14.92---------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 27 38 13 78

7.58 6.45 5.24---------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 80 106 26 212

22.47 18.00 10.48---------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 63 82 36 181

17.70 13.92 14.52---------------------------------------------------------------------Total 356 589 248 1193

29.84 49.37 20.79

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

387

Page 389: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

=====================================================================Cell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

========================================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 59 90 27 12 114 302

23.51 24.59 21.95 11.21 32.57----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 56 66 29 19 68 238

22.31 18.03 23.58 17.76 19.43----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 45 46 20 18 54 183

17.93 12.57 16.26 16.82 15.43----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 17 26 10 7 18 78

6.77 7.10 8.13 6.54 5.14----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 47 76 13 38 37 211

18.73 20.77 10.57 35.51 10.57----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 27 62 24 13 59 185

10.76 16.94 19.51 12.15 16.86----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 251 366 123 107 350 1197

20.97 30.58 10.28 8.94 29.24========================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

388

Page 390: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

==========================================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 33 63 134 72 302

16.67 20.13 29.13 31.86--------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 43 53 90 53 239

21.72 16.93 19.57 23.45--------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 43 57 55 28 183

21.72 18.21 11.96 12.39--------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 11 21 34 12 78

5.56 6.71 7.39 5.31--------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 16 57 104 34 211

8.08 18.21 22.61 15.04--------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 52 62 43 27 184

26.26 19.81 9.35 11.95--------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 198 313 460 226 1197

16.54 26.15 38.43 18.88==========================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

389

Page 391: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q32. Wendy Davis Favorability

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 48 64 45 77 6 11 8 259

77.42 60.95 46.88 21.51 4.84 4.78 3.70--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 2 23 27 54 21 9 1 137

3.23 21.90 28.12 15.08 16.94 3.91 0.46--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

390

Page 392: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Neither favorable nor unfavora 5 5 8 61 15 21 18 1338.06 4.76 8.33 17.04 12.10 9.13 8.33

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 1 0 3 24 20 26 11 85

1.61 0.00 3.12 6.70 16.13 11.30 5.09--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 1 1 0 35 49 149 156 391

1.61 0.95 0.00 9.78 39.52 64.78 72.22--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 5 12 13 107 13 14 22 186

8.06 11.43 13.54 29.89 10.48 6.09 10.19--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 62 105 96 358 124 230 216 1191

5.21 8.82 8.06 30.06 10.41 19.31 18.14============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=================================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 157 77 25 259

59.92 21.51 4.39---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 52 54 32 138

19.85 15.08 5.61---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 18 61 54 133

6.87 17.04 9.47---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 4 24 57 85

1.53 6.70 10.00

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

391

Page 393: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 2 35 354 391

0.76 9.78 62.11---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 29 107 48 184

11.07 29.89 8.42---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 262 358 570 1190

22.02 30.08 47.90=================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================PID7

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 150 33 57 8 2 5 0 255

58.82 28.95 47.50 7.08 1.67 4.17 0.00------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 38 31 31 12 4 9 11 136

14.90 27.19 25.83 10.62 3.33 7.50 3.70------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 18 23 7 25 6 14 30 123

7.06 20.18 5.83 22.12 5.00 11.67 10.10------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 2 7 3 9 13 14 33 81

0.78 6.14 2.50 7.96 10.83 11.67 11.11------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 5 2 2 33 85 56 200 383

1.96 1.75 1.67 29.20 70.83 46.67 67.34------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 42 18 20 26 10 22 23 161

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

392

Page 394: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

16.47 15.79 16.67 23.01 8.33 18.33 7.74------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 255 114 120 113 120 120 297 1139

22.39 10.01 10.54 9.92 10.54 10.54 26.08============================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===================================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 241 8 7 256

49.39 7.08 1.30-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 100 12 24 136

20.49 10.62 4.46-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 47 25 51 123

9.63 22.12 9.48-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 12 9 60 81

2.46 7.96 11.15-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 9 33 341 383

1.84 29.20 63.38-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 79 26 55 160

16.19 23.01 10.22-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 488 113 538 1139

42.84 9.92 47.23===================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

393

Page 395: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===========================================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 6 246 1 7 260

2.48 54.30 0.38 2.98---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 21 97 4 17 139

8.68 21.41 1.52 7.23---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 42 44 12 34 132

17.36 9.71 4.56 14.47---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 34 9 18 23 84

14.05 1.99 6.84 9.79---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 97 3 218 74 392

40.08 0.66 82.89 31.49---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 42 54 10 80 186

17.36 11.92 3.80 34.04---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 242 453 263 235 1193

20.28 37.97 22.05 19.70===========================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

394

Page 396: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

======================================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 3 50 68 31 73 34 259

7.50 14.33 20.67 27.43 29.67 29.82----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 7 48 27 12 25 19 138

17.50 13.75 8.21 10.62 10.16 16.67----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 1 41 51 17 20 2 132

2.50 11.75 15.50 15.04 8.13 1.75----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 4 23 26 10 14 7 84

10.00 6.59 7.90 8.85 5.69 6.14----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 13 103 104 30 98 44 392

32.50 29.51 31.61 26.55 39.84 38.60----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 12 84 53 13 16 8 186

30.00 24.07 16.11 11.50 6.50 7.02----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 40 349 329 113 246 114 1191

3.36 29.30 27.62 9.49 20.65 9.57======================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=====================================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

395

Page 397: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Very favorable 28 33 22 70 106 25915.05 12.45 16.79 24.82 32.82

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 15 20 19 45 39 138

8.06 7.55 14.50 15.96 12.07-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 20 38 22 23 29 132

10.75 14.34 16.79 8.16 8.98-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 14 17 11 28 15 85

7.53 6.42 8.40 9.93 4.64-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 81 114 42 74 77 388

43.55 43.02 32.06 26.24 23.84-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 28 43 15 42 57 185

15.05 16.23 11.45 14.89 17.65-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 186 265 131 282 323 1187

15.67 22.33 11.04 23.76 27.21=====================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA ge Mixed Other Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 140 65 51 2 0 2 0 260

19.55 41.94 19.03 9.09 0.00 15.38 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 56 25 40 10 0 4 3 138

7.82 16.13 14.93 45.45 0.00 30.77 21.43

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

396

Page 398: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 71 16 42 3 0 1 0 133

9.92 10.32 15.67 13.64 0.00 7.69 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 67 5 8 1 0 3 0 84

9.36 3.23 2.99 4.55 0.00 23.08 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 304 6 59 5 3 3 11 391

42.46 3.87 22.01 22.73 100.00 23.08 78.57--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 78 38 68 1 0 0 0 185

10.89 24.52 25.37 4.55 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 716 155 268 22 3 13 14 1191

60.12 13.01 22.50 1.85 0.25 1.09 1.18============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=====================================================================================================================marital

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 125 2 53 10 56 14 260

19.38 8.70 35.10 15.38 22.22 25.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 70 3 13 6 35 12 139

10.85 13.04 8.61 9.23 13.89 21.43---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 62 2 17 6 41 4 132

9.61 8.70 11.26 9.23 16.27 7.14---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 53 0 8 8 9 6 84

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

397

Page 399: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

8.22 0.00 5.30 12.31 3.57 10.71---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 267 8 35 27 46 10 393

41.40 34.78 23.18 41.54 18.25 17.86---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 68 8 25 8 65 10 184

10.54 34.78 16.56 12.31 25.79 17.86---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 645 23 151 65 252 56 1192

54.11 1.93 12.67 5.45 21.14 4.70=====================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===========================================================gender

Q Male Female Total-----------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 121 139 260

21.61 21.92-----------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 67 71 138

11.96 11.20-----------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 51 82 133

9.11 12.93-----------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 37 48 85

6.61 7.57-----------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 214 179 393

38.21 28.23-----------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

398

Page 400: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Don't know/No Opinion 70 115 18512.50 18.14

-----------------------------------------------------------Total 560 634 1194

46.90 53.10===========================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=====================================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total---------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 103 132 25 260

29.10 22.37 10.20---------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 48 75 15 138

13.56 12.71 6.12---------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 41 67 25 133

11.58 11.36 10.20---------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 16 38 30 84

4.52 6.44 12.24---------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 82 212 99 393

23.16 35.93 40.41---------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 64 66 51 181

18.08 11.19 20.82---------------------------------------------------------------------Total 354 590 245 1189

29.77 49.62 20.61

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

399

Page 401: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

=====================================================================Cell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

========================================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 49 98 25 48 40 260

19.60 26.70 20.33 44.44 11.56----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 39 44 8 17 31 139

15.60 11.99 6.50 15.74 8.96----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 40 45 9 5 34 133

16.00 12.26 7.32 4.63 9.83----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 23 18 13 3 27 84

9.20 4.90 10.57 2.78 7.80----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 71 110 48 26 137 392

28.40 29.97 39.02 24.07 39.60----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 28 52 20 9 77 186

11.20 14.17 16.26 8.33 22.25----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 250 367 123 108 346 1194

20.94 30.74 10.30 9.05 28.98========================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

400

Page 402: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

==========================================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 25 68 113 54 260

12.63 21.66 24.67 24.11--------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 36 35 52 16 139

18.18 11.15 11.35 7.14--------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 42 45 34 12 133

21.21 14.33 7.42 5.36--------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 8 22 29 25 84

4.04 7.01 6.33 11.16--------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 30 82 180 101 393

15.15 26.11 39.30 45.09--------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 57 62 50 16 185

28.79 19.75 10.92 7.14--------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 198 314 458 224 1194

16.58 26.30 38.36 18.76==========================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

401

Page 403: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q33. Leticia Van de Putte Favorability

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 25 31 25 23 3 8 4 119

39.06 30.10 26.04 6.48 2.42 3.45 1.84--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 17 31 28 48 8 5 10 147

26.56 30.10 29.17 13.52 6.45 2.16 4.61--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

402

Page 404: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Neither favorable nor unfavora 9 14 21 87 28 42 29 23014.06 13.59 21.88 24.51 22.58 18.10 13.36

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 0 2 0 17 12 33 20 84

0.00 1.94 0.00 4.79 9.68 14.22 9.22--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 1 1 2 6 14 41 64 129

1.56 0.97 2.08 1.69 11.29 17.67 29.49--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 12 24 20 174 59 103 90 482

18.75 23.30 20.83 49.01 47.58 44.40 41.47--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 64 103 96 355 124 232 217 1191

5.37 8.65 8.06 29.81 10.41 19.48 18.22============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=================================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 81 23 15 119

30.92 6.48 2.62---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 76 48 24 148

29.01 13.52 4.20---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 44 87 99 230

16.79 24.51 17.31---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 2 17 64 83

0.76 4.79 11.19

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

403

Page 405: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 3 6 118 127

1.15 1.69 20.63---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 56 174 252 482

21.37 49.01 44.06---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 262 355 572 1189

22.04 29.86 48.11=================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================PID7

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 78 13 20 2 1 3 1 118

30.59 11.50 16.95 1.75 0.83 2.48 0.34------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 68 23 35 6 3 4 8 147

26.67 20.35 29.66 5.26 2.50 3.31 2.69------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 43 29 20 31 22 28 48 221

16.86 25.66 16.95 27.19 18.33 23.14 16.16------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 5 5 0 12 14 14 34 84

1.96 4.42 0.00 10.53 11.67 11.57 11.45------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 2 2 2 3 23 13 73 118

0.78 1.77 1.69 2.63 19.17 10.74 24.58------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 59 41 41 60 57 59 133 450

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

404

Page 406: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

23.14 36.28 34.75 52.63 47.50 48.76 44.78------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 255 113 118 114 120 121 297 1138

22.41 9.93 10.37 10.02 10.54 10.63 26.10============================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===================================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 112 2 5 119

23.05 1.75 0.92-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 126 6 15 147

25.93 5.26 2.77-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 91 31 99 221

18.72 27.19 18.30-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 10 12 63 85

2.06 10.53 11.65-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 6 3 110 119

1.23 2.63 20.33-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 141 60 249 450

29.01 52.63 46.03-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 486 114 541 1141

42.59 9.99 47.41===================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

405

Page 407: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===========================================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 3 110 1 4 118

1.27 24.34 0.37 1.69---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 13 125 1 9 148

5.49 27.65 0.37 3.80---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 57 93 39 41 230

24.05 20.58 14.61 17.30---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 31 6 25 24 86

13.08 1.33 9.36 10.13---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 37 4 71 16 128

15.61 0.88 26.59 6.75---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 96 114 130 143 483

40.51 25.22 48.69 60.34---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 237 452 267 237 1193

19.87 37.89 22.38 19.87===========================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

406

Page 408: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

======================================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 0 18 26 16 37 21 118

0.00 5.13 7.85 14.29 15.10 18.92----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 1 37 44 12 39 15 148

2.50 10.54 13.29 10.71 15.92 13.51----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 8 66 75 23 38 21 231

20.00 18.80 22.66 20.54 15.51 18.92----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 2 26 17 10 18 11 84

5.00 7.41 5.14 8.93 7.35 9.91----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 7 35 31 19 28 7 127

17.50 9.97 9.37 16.96 11.43 6.31----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 22 169 138 32 85 36 482

55.00 48.15 41.69 28.57 34.69 32.43----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 40 351 331 112 245 111 1190

3.36 29.50 27.82 9.41 20.59 9.33======================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=====================================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

407

Page 409: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Very favorable 16 11 11 28 53 1198.65 4.18 8.33 9.93 16.26

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 19 22 19 38 49 147

10.27 8.37 14.39 13.48 15.03-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 23 59 27 60 62 231

12.43 22.43 20.45 21.28 19.02-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 12 27 11 18 18 86

6.49 10.27 8.33 6.38 5.52-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 30 42 13 19 23 127

16.22 15.97 9.85 6.74 7.06-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 85 102 51 119 121 478

45.95 38.78 38.64 42.20 37.12-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 185 263 132 282 326 1188

15.57 22.14 11.11 23.74 27.44=====================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA ge Mixed Other Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 65 19 31 1 0 3 0 119

9.08 12.26 11.57 4.55 0.00 21.43 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 74 32 36 4 0 2 0 148

10.34 20.65 13.43 18.18 0.00 14.29 0.00

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

408

Page 410: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 136 35 43 10 1 3 3 231

18.99 22.58 16.04 45.45 25.00 21.43 21.43--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 62 2 19 1 0 0 1 85

8.66 1.29 7.09 4.55 0.00 0.00 7.14--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 91 2 28 0 1 1 5 128

12.71 1.29 10.45 0.00 25.00 7.14 35.71--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 288 65 111 6 2 5 5 482

40.22 41.94 41.42 27.27 50.00 35.71 35.71--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 716 155 268 22 4 14 14 1193

60.02 12.99 22.46 1.84 0.34 1.17 1.17============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=====================================================================================================================marital

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 60 1 18 3 28 8 118

9.32 4.17 12.08 4.76 11.02 13.79---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 74 0 29 5 33 6 147

11.49 0.00 19.46 7.94 12.99 10.34---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 117 1 22 13 60 18 231

18.17 4.17 14.77 20.63 23.62 31.03---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 58 3 9 3 12 1 86

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

409

Page 411: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

9.01 12.50 6.04 4.76 4.72 1.72---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 70 4 12 15 23 4 128

10.87 16.67 8.05 23.81 9.06 6.90---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 265 15 59 24 98 21 482

41.15 62.50 39.60 38.10 38.58 36.21---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 644 24 149 63 254 58 1192

54.03 2.01 12.50 5.29 21.31 4.87=====================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===========================================================gender

Q Male Female Total-----------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 52 66 118

9.27 10.46-----------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 73 74 147

13.01 11.73-----------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 120 111 231

21.39 17.59-----------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 40 46 86

7.13 7.29-----------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 79 49 128

14.08 7.77-----------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

410

Page 412: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Don't know/No Opinion 197 285 48235.12 45.17

-----------------------------------------------------------Total 561 631 1192

47.06 52.94===========================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=====================================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total---------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 47 58 14 119

13.17 9.90 5.69---------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 65 67 16 148

18.21 11.43 6.50---------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 59 124 47 230

16.53 21.16 19.11---------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 25 41 19 85

7.00 7.00 7.72---------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 24 62 42 128

6.72 10.58 17.07---------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 137 234 108 479

38.38 39.93 43.90---------------------------------------------------------------------Total 357 586 246 1189

30.03 49.29 20.69

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

411

Page 413: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

=====================================================================Cell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

========================================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 17 39 18 25 20 119

6.80 10.60 14.75 23.81 5.70----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 41 57 10 15 25 148

16.40 15.49 8.20 14.29 7.12----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 61 60 22 16 72 231

24.40 16.30 18.03 15.24 20.51----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 22 19 15 8 23 87

8.80 5.16 12.30 7.62 6.55----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 18 38 29 9 34 128

7.20 10.33 23.77 8.57 9.69----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 91 155 28 32 177 483

36.40 42.12 22.95 30.48 50.43----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 250 368 122 105 351 1196

20.90 30.77 10.20 8.78 29.35========================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

412

Page 414: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

==========================================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 17 31 51 20 119

8.59 9.90 11.21 8.89--------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 23 45 57 22 147

11.62 14.38 12.53 9.78--------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 52 61 75 42 230

26.26 19.49 16.48 18.67--------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 8 15 35 28 86

4.04 4.79 7.69 12.44--------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 13 26 62 26 127

6.57 8.31 13.63 11.56--------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 85 135 175 87 482

42.93 43.13 38.46 38.67--------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 198 313 455 225 1191

16.62 26.28 38.20 18.89==========================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

413

Page 415: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q34. Dan Patrick Favorability

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 5 1 1 11 13 65 76 172

8.06 0.97 1.03 3.10 10.48 28.02 34.86--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 1 8 6 58 40 90 76 279

1.61 7.77 6.19 16.34 32.26 38.79 34.86--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

414

Page 416: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Neither favorable nor unfavora 6 15 18 78 24 35 22 1989.68 14.56 18.56 21.97 19.35 15.09 10.09

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 11 7 9 34 12 10 15 98

17.74 6.80 9.28 9.58 9.68 4.31 6.88--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 25 46 40 47 17 11 3 189

40.32 44.66 41.24 13.24 13.71 4.74 1.38--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 14 26 23 127 18 21 26 255

22.58 25.24 23.71 35.77 14.52 9.05 11.93--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 62 103 97 355 124 232 218 1191

5.21 8.65 8.14 29.81 10.41 19.48 18.30============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=================================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 8 11 153 172

3.04 3.10 26.75---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 15 58 205 278

5.70 16.34 35.84---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 39 78 81 198

14.83 21.97 14.16---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 27 34 37 98

10.27 9.58 6.47

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

415

Page 417: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 111 47 31 189

42.21 13.24 5.42---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 63 127 65 255

23.95 35.77 11.36---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 263 355 572 1190

22.10 29.83 48.07=================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================PID7

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 14 4 2 6 37 17 88 168

5.53 3.54 1.69 5.45 30.33 13.71 29.43------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 28 12 7 20 41 46 120 274

11.07 10.62 5.93 18.18 33.61 37.10 40.13------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 38 26 14 35 20 24 29 186

15.02 23.01 11.86 31.82 16.39 19.35 9.70------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 21 22 11 10 8 5 20 97

8.30 19.47 9.32 9.09 6.56 4.03 6.69------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 88 22 44 4 5 11 11 185

34.78 19.47 37.29 3.64 4.10 8.87 3.68------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 64 27 40 35 11 21 31 229

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

416

Page 418: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

25.30 23.89 33.90 31.82 9.02 16.94 10.37------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 253 113 118 110 122 124 299 1139

22.21 9.92 10.36 9.66 10.71 10.89 26.25============================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===================================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 20 6 141 167

4.14 5.45 25.97-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 47 20 207 274

9.73 18.18 38.12-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 78 35 72 185

16.15 31.82 13.26-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 54 10 32 96

11.18 9.09 5.89-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 153 4 27 184

31.68 3.64 4.97-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 131 35 64 230

27.12 31.82 11.79-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 483 110 543 1136

42.52 9.68 47.80===================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

417

Page 419: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===========================================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 44 20 86 23 173

18.33 4.44 32.21 9.75---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 72 47 118 41 278

30.00 10.44 44.19 17.37---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 42 70 32 55 199

17.50 15.56 11.99 23.31---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 27 51 5 16 99

11.25 11.33 1.87 6.78---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 17 154 5 13 189

7.08 34.22 1.87 5.51---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 38 108 21 88 255

15.83 24.00 7.87 37.29---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 240 450 267 236 1193

20.12 37.72 22.38 19.78===========================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

418

Page 420: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

======================================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 5 45 47 24 32 21 174

12.20 12.86 14.29 21.05 13.06 18.26----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 9 83 74 25 70 18 279

21.95 23.71 22.49 21.93 28.57 15.65----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 4 70 55 15 34 22 200

9.76 20.00 16.72 13.16 13.88 19.13----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 5 29 31 13 14 5 97

12.20 8.29 9.42 11.40 5.71 4.35----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 5 30 49 13 57 35 189

12.20 8.57 14.89 11.40 23.27 30.43----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 13 93 73 24 38 14 255

31.71 26.57 22.19 21.05 15.51 12.17----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 41 350 329 114 245 115 1194

3.43 29.31 27.55 9.55 20.52 9.63======================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=====================================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

419

Page 421: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Very favorable 40 57 11 30 35 17321.62 21.59 8.46 10.60 10.70

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 48 72 48 64 43 275

25.95 27.27 36.92 22.61 13.15-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 29 43 13 50 63 198

15.68 16.29 10.00 17.67 19.27-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 17 17 13 28 23 98

9.19 6.44 10.00 9.89 7.03-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 13 25 20 52 79 189

7.03 9.47 15.38 18.37 24.16-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 38 50 25 59 84 256

20.54 18.94 19.23 20.85 25.69-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 185 264 130 283 327 1189

15.56 22.20 10.93 23.80 27.50=====================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA ge Mixed Other Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 136 12 20 2 0 0 3 173

18.92 7.89 7.38 9.09 0.00 0.00 21.43--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 190 15 50 11 2 5 6 279

26.43 9.87 18.45 50.00 66.67 38.46 42.86

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

420

Page 422: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 109 23 53 7 1 1 5 199

15.16 15.13 19.56 31.82 33.33 7.69 35.71--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 50 16 31 0 0 1 0 98

6.95 10.53 11.44 0.00 0.00 7.69 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 125 21 39 1 0 4 0 190

17.39 13.82 14.39 4.55 0.00 30.77 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 109 65 78 1 0 2 0 255

15.16 42.76 28.78 4.55 0.00 15.38 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 719 152 271 22 3 13 14 1194

60.22 12.73 22.70 1.84 0.25 1.09 1.17============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=====================================================================================================================marital

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 107 1 14 19 30 0 171

16.61 4.35 9.52 29.23 11.90 0.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 186 1 29 14 38 9 277

28.88 4.35 19.73 21.54 15.08 15.79---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 105 8 19 9 45 12 198

16.30 34.78 12.93 13.85 17.86 21.05---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 45 0 14 5 27 7 98

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

421

Page 423: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

6.99 0.00 9.52 7.69 10.71 12.28---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 98 1 39 8 29 15 190

15.22 4.35 26.53 12.31 11.51 26.32---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 103 12 32 10 83 14 254

15.99 52.17 21.77 15.38 32.94 24.56---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 644 23 147 65 252 57 1188

54.21 1.94 12.37 5.47 21.21 4.80=====================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===========================================================gender

Q Male Female Total-----------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 84 90 174

14.97 14.26-----------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 148 130 278

26.38 20.60-----------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 82 116 198

14.62 18.38-----------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 50 48 98

8.91 7.61-----------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 98 91 189

17.47 14.42-----------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

422

Page 424: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Don't know/No Opinion 99 156 25517.65 24.72

-----------------------------------------------------------Total 561 631 1192

47.06 52.94===========================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=====================================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total---------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 45 83 45 173

12.75 14.07 18.29---------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 58 151 69 278

16.43 25.59 28.05---------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 51 105 43 199

14.45 17.80 17.48---------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 38 46 15 99

10.76 7.80 6.10---------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 84 85 20 189

23.80 14.41 8.13---------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 77 120 54 251

21.81 20.34 21.95---------------------------------------------------------------------Total 353 590 246 1189

29.69 49.62 20.69

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

423

Page 425: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

=====================================================================Cell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

========================================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 41 60 17 12 43 173

16.60 16.35 13.93 11.11 12.36----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 51 74 28 21 104 278

20.65 20.16 22.95 19.44 29.89----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 46 56 18 16 63 199

18.62 15.26 14.75 14.81 18.10----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 18 35 21 9 16 99

7.29 9.54 17.21 8.33 4.60----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 53 65 13 31 27 189

21.46 17.71 10.66 28.70 7.76----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 38 77 25 19 95 254

15.38 20.98 20.49 17.59 27.30----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 247 367 122 108 348 1192

20.72 30.79 10.23 9.06 29.19========================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

424

Page 426: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

==========================================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 17 27 82 47 173

8.63 8.65 17.86 21.08--------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 39 61 113 65 278

19.80 19.55 24.62 29.15--------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 36 68 65 29 198

18.27 21.79 14.16 13.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 19 31 34 14 98

9.64 9.94 7.41 6.28--------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 16 39 90 44 189

8.12 12.50 19.61 19.73--------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 70 86 75 24 255

35.53 27.56 16.34 10.76--------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 197 312 459 223 1191

16.54 26.20 38.54 18.72==========================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

425

Page 427: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q35A. Gubernatorial Candidate Issue Trust: Public Education

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 50 83 75 162 27 21 11 429

83.33 80.58 78.12 45.25 22.13 9.01 5.14-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 1 6 4 56 65 177 177 486

1.67 5.83 4.17 15.64 53.28 75.97 82.71-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

426

Page 428: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Don't Know/No Opinion 9 14 17 140 30 35 26 27115.00 13.59 17.71 39.11 24.59 15.02 12.15

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 60 103 96 358 122 233 214 1186

5.06 8.68 8.09 30.19 10.29 19.65 18.04===================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=====================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total---------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 209 162 59 430

80.08 45.25 10.39---------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 12 56 419 487

4.60 15.64 73.77---------------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 40 140 90 270

15.33 39.11 15.85---------------------------------------------------------------------Total 261 358 568 1187

21.99 30.16 47.85=====================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

================================================================================================PID7

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

427

Page 429: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 178 69 94 31 11 21 14 418

69.53 62.16 78.99 27.68 9.09 16.94 4.76------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 24 12 4 29 89 74 245 477

9.38 10.81 3.36 25.89 73.55 59.68 83.33------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 54 30 21 52 21 29 35 242

21.09 27.03 17.65 46.43 17.36 23.39 11.90------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 256 111 119 112 121 124 294 1137

22.52 9.76 10.47 9.85 10.64 10.91 25.86================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=======================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 341 31 46 418

70.31 27.68 8.52-----------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 39 29 408 476

8.04 25.89 75.56-----------------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 105 52 86 243

21.65 46.43 15.93-----------------------------------------------------------------------Total 485 112 540 1137

42.66 9.85 47.49=======================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

428

Page 430: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===============================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 42 341 10 39 432

17.72 75.61 3.76 16.39---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 140 33 229 87 489

59.07 7.32 86.09 36.55---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 55 77 27 112 271

23.21 17.07 10.15 47.06---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 237 451 266 238 1192

19.88 37.84 22.32 19.97===============================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==========================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 6 110 108 47 104 56 431

15.00 31.25 33.03 42.34 42.11 49.12----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 17 137 141 41 108 45 489

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

429

Page 431: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

42.50 38.92 43.12 36.94 43.72 39.47----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 17 105 78 23 35 13 271

42.50 29.83 23.85 20.72 14.17 11.40----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 40 352 327 111 247 114 1191

3.36 29.55 27.46 9.32 20.74 9.57==========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 42 55 47 136 151 431

22.34 20.83 37.01 48.57 46.18-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 110 137 57 88 92 484

58.51 51.89 44.88 31.43 28.13-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 36 72 23 56 84 271

19.15 27.27 18.11 20.00 25.69-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 188 264 127 280 327 1186

15.85 22.26 10.71 23.61 27.57=========================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

430

Page 432: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

==========================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA gena ~ACAs nati Mixed Other Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 218 81 109 12 0 8 3 431

30.49 52.26 40.82 54.55 0.00 57.14 20.00------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 363 18 84 6 3 4 10 488

50.77 11.61 31.46 27.27 100.00 28.57 66.67------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 134 56 74 4 0 2 2 272

18.74 36.13 27.72 18.18 0.00 14.29 13.33------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 715 155 267 22 3 14 15 1191

60.03 13.01 22.42 1.85 0.25 1.18 1.26==========================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================================================================================marital

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 212 2 69 17 100 30 430

33.07 8.70 46.00 26.15 39.53 52.63---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 314 7 52 36 68 11 488

48.99 30.43 34.67 55.38 26.88 19.30---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 115 14 29 12 85 16 271

17.94 60.87 19.33 18.46 33.60 28.07---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 641 23 150 65 253 57 1189

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

431

Page 433: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

53.91 1.93 12.62 5.47 21.28 4.79=========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===============================================gender

Q Male Female Total-----------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 211 220 431

37.88 34.70-----------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 243 245 488

43.63 38.64-----------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 103 169 272

18.49 26.66-----------------------------------------------Total 557 634 1191

46.77 53.23===============================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total---------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 154 218 59 431

43.50 37.20 23.79

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

432

Page 434: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

---------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 102 259 128 489

28.81 44.20 51.61---------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 98 109 61 268

27.68 18.60 24.60---------------------------------------------------------Total 354 586 248 1188

29.80 49.33 20.88=========================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 101 140 41 60 88 430

40.40 38.46 33.88 56.07 25.21----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 96 142 56 26 169 489

38.40 39.01 46.28 24.30 48.42----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 53 82 24 21 92 272

21.20 22.53 19.83 19.63 26.36----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 250 364 121 107 349 1191

20.99 30.56 10.16 8.98 29.30============================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

433

Page 435: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

==============================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total--------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 67 122 167 74 430

34.90 39.10 36.23 32.89--------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 56 99 211 122 488

29.17 31.73 45.77 54.22--------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 69 91 83 29 272

35.94 29.17 18.00 12.89--------------------------------------------------------------Total 192 312 461 225 1190

16.13 26.22 38.74 18.91==============================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

434

Page 436: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q35B. Gubernatorial Candidate Issue Trust: The State Economy

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 47 83 56 112 15 12 11 336

77.05 79.81 58.33 31.37 12.00 5.19 5.16-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 2 4 14 98 82 192 184 576

3.28 3.85 14.58 27.45 65.60 83.12 86.38-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

435

Page 437: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Don't Know/No Opinion 12 17 26 147 28 27 18 27519.67 16.35 27.08 41.18 22.40 11.69 8.45

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 61 104 96 357 125 231 213 1187

5.14 8.76 8.09 30.08 10.53 19.46 17.94===================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=====================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total---------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 186 112 39 337

71.26 31.37 6.84---------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 20 98 458 576

7.66 27.45 80.35---------------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 55 147 73 275

21.07 41.18 12.81---------------------------------------------------------------------Total 261 357 570 1188

21.97 30.05 47.98=====================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

================================================================================================PID7

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

436

Page 438: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 176 53 73 13 3 8 2 328

69.02 47.75 61.86 11.50 2.48 6.45 0.68------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 18 26 15 44 105 87 267 562

7.06 23.42 12.71 38.94 86.78 70.16 90.20------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 61 32 30 56 13 29 27 248

23.92 28.83 25.42 49.56 10.74 23.39 9.12------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 255 111 118 113 121 124 296 1138

22.41 9.75 10.37 9.93 10.63 10.90 26.01================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=======================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 302 13 13 328

62.27 11.50 2.40-----------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 60 44 459 563

12.37 38.94 84.84-----------------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 123 56 69 248

25.36 49.56 12.75-----------------------------------------------------------------------Total 485 113 541 1139

42.58 9.92 47.50=======================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

437

Page 439: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===============================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 13 300 5 19 337

5.44 66.67 1.88 7.98---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 177 51 241 111 580

74.06 11.33 90.60 46.64---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 49 99 20 108 276

20.50 22.00 7.52 45.38---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 239 450 266 238 1193

20.03 37.72 22.30 19.95===============================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==========================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 9 78 91 37 84 38 337

21.95 22.16 27.58 33.33 34.01 33.63----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 15 175 160 51 119 59 579

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

438

Page 440: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

36.59 49.72 48.48 45.95 48.18 52.21----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 17 99 79 23 44 16 278

41.46 28.12 23.94 20.72 17.81 14.16----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 41 352 330 111 247 113 1194

3.43 29.48 27.64 9.30 20.69 9.46==========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 39 40 40 85 134 338

20.86 15.09 31.01 30.04 40.98-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 109 157 66 140 103 575

58.29 59.25 51.16 49.47 31.50-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 39 68 23 58 90 278

20.86 25.66 17.83 20.49 27.52-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 187 265 129 283 327 1191

15.70 22.25 10.83 23.76 27.46=========================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

439

Page 441: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

==========================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA gena ~ACAs nati Mixed Other Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 159 78 87 4 0 6 3 337

22.21 50.32 32.46 18.18 0.00 46.15 21.43------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 419 17 109 14 3 6 10 578

58.52 10.97 40.67 63.64 100.00 46.15 71.43------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 138 60 72 4 0 1 1 276

19.27 38.71 26.87 18.18 0.00 7.69 7.14------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 716 155 268 22 3 13 14 1191

60.12 13.01 22.50 1.85 0.25 1.09 1.18==========================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================================================================================marital

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 161 5 65 13 67 26 337

25.00 20.83 43.33 20.00 26.48 45.61---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 366 7 57 38 96 15 579

56.83 29.17 38.00 58.46 37.94 26.32---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 117 12 28 14 90 16 277

18.17 50.00 18.67 21.54 35.57 28.07---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 644 24 150 65 253 57 1193

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

440

Page 442: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

53.98 2.01 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.78=========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===============================================gender

Q Male Female Total-----------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 150 187 337

26.83 29.45-----------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 309 271 580

55.28 42.68-----------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 100 177 277

17.89 27.87-----------------------------------------------Total 559 635 1194

46.82 53.18===============================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total---------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 136 156 44 336

38.42 26.58 17.74

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

441

Page 443: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

---------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 124 307 148 579

35.03 52.30 59.68---------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 94 124 56 274

26.55 21.12 22.58---------------------------------------------------------Total 354 587 248 1189

29.77 49.37 20.86=========================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 81 111 28 49 68 337

32.40 30.41 23.14 45.79 19.43----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 115 163 71 36 194 579

46.00 44.66 58.68 33.64 55.43----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 54 91 22 22 88 277

21.60 24.93 18.18 20.56 25.14----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 250 365 121 107 350 1193

20.96 30.60 10.14 8.97 29.34============================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

442

Page 444: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

==============================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total--------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 42 98 140 57 337

21.76 31.31 30.37 25.11--------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 76 129 233 142 580

39.38 41.21 50.54 62.56--------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 75 86 88 28 277

38.86 27.48 19.09 12.33--------------------------------------------------------------Total 193 313 461 227 1194

16.16 26.21 38.61 19.01==============================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

443

Page 445: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q35C. Gubernatorial Candidate Issue Trust: Immigration

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 49 81 70 134 20 13 10 377

80.33 77.88 72.92 37.54 16.13 5.60 4.69-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 1 4 5 76 71 186 184 527

1.64 3.85 5.21 21.29 57.26 80.17 86.38-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

444

Page 446: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Don't Know/No Opinion 11 19 21 147 33 33 19 28318.03 18.27 21.88 41.18 26.61 14.22 8.92

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 61 104 96 357 124 232 213 1187

5.14 8.76 8.09 30.08 10.45 19.55 17.94===================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=====================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total---------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 200 134 43 377

76.63 37.54 7.56---------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 10 76 441 527

3.83 21.29 77.50---------------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 51 147 85 283

19.54 41.18 14.94---------------------------------------------------------------------Total 261 357 569 1187

21.99 30.08 47.94=====================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

================================================================================================PID7

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

445

Page 447: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 175 58 83 20 5 14 10 365

68.36 53.21 70.34 17.86 4.13 11.29 3.38------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 17 17 12 35 97 81 256 515

6.64 15.60 10.17 31.25 80.17 65.32 86.49------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 64 34 23 57 19 29 30 256

25.00 31.19 19.49 50.89 15.70 23.39 10.14------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 256 109 118 112 121 124 296 1136

22.54 9.60 10.39 9.86 10.65 10.92 26.06================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=======================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 316 20 29 365

65.29 17.86 5.36-----------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 47 35 434 516

9.71 31.25 80.22-----------------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 121 57 78 256

25.00 50.89 14.42-----------------------------------------------------------------------Total 484 112 541 1137

42.57 9.85 47.58=======================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

446

Page 448: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===============================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 27 316 6 28 377

11.30 70.07 2.27 11.86---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 158 37 237 98 530

66.11 8.20 89.77 41.53---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 54 98 21 110 283

22.59 21.73 7.95 46.61---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 239 451 264 236 1190

20.08 37.90 22.18 19.83===============================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==========================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 8 92 96 38 91 52 377

19.51 26.14 29.27 33.93 36.99 46.43----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 15 156 151 46 115 47 530

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

447

Page 449: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

36.59 44.32 46.04 41.07 46.75 41.96----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 18 104 81 28 40 13 284

43.90 29.55 24.70 25.00 16.26 11.61----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 41 352 328 112 246 112 1191

3.44 29.55 27.54 9.40 20.65 9.40==========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 43 52 39 104 139 377

22.99 19.70 30.47 37.01 42.64-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 106 141 62 117 99 525

56.68 53.41 48.44 41.64 30.37-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 38 71 27 60 88 284

20.32 26.89 21.09 21.35 26.99-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 187 264 128 281 326 1186

15.77 22.26 10.79 23.69 27.49=========================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

448

Page 450: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

==========================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA gena ~ACAs nati Mixed Other Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 184 73 100 12 0 4 3 376

25.73 47.10 37.31 57.14 0.00 30.77 20.00------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 396 17 91 7 3 6 10 530

55.38 10.97 33.96 33.33 100.00 46.15 66.67------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 135 65 77 2 0 3 2 284

18.88 41.94 28.73 9.52 0.00 23.08 13.33------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 715 155 268 21 3 13 15 1190

60.08 13.03 22.52 1.76 0.25 1.09 1.26==========================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================================================================================marital

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 186 6 63 15 79 28 377

28.93 26.09 42.28 23.44 31.23 48.28---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 342 6 52 36 80 13 529

53.19 26.09 34.90 56.25 31.62 22.41---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 115 11 34 13 94 17 284

17.88 47.83 22.82 20.31 37.15 29.31---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 643 23 149 64 253 58 1190

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

449

Page 451: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

54.03 1.93 12.52 5.38 21.26 4.87=========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===============================================gender

Q Male Female Total-----------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 178 199 377

31.90 31.44-----------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 271 259 530

48.57 40.92-----------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 109 175 284

19.53 27.65-----------------------------------------------Total 558 633 1191

46.85 53.15===============================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total---------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 144 192 40 376

40.79 32.82 16.19

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

450

Page 452: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

---------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 116 266 147 529

32.86 45.47 59.51---------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 93 127 60 280

26.35 21.71 24.29---------------------------------------------------------Total 353 585 247 1185

29.79 49.37 20.84=========================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 88 127 32 55 74 376

35.34 34.89 26.67 50.93 21.20----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 101 150 63 29 187 530

40.56 41.21 52.50 26.85 53.58----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 60 87 25 24 88 284

24.10 23.90 20.83 22.22 25.21----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 249 364 120 108 349 1190

20.92 30.59 10.08 9.08 29.33============================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

451

Page 453: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

==============================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total--------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 53 115 145 63 376

27.60 36.74 31.59 28.00--------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 61 111 224 133 529

31.77 35.46 48.80 59.11--------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 78 87 90 29 284

40.62 27.80 19.61 12.89--------------------------------------------------------------Total 192 313 459 225 1189

16.15 26.32 38.60 18.92==============================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

452

Page 454: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q35D. Gubernatorial Candidate Issue Trust: The State Budget

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 49 81 53 120 18 14 8 343

79.03 78.64 56.38 33.71 14.40 6.03 3.76-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 3 3 17 95 79 190 185 572

4.84 2.91 18.09 26.69 63.20 81.90 86.85-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

453

Page 455: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Don't Know/No Opinion 10 19 24 141 28 28 20 27016.13 18.45 25.53 39.61 22.40 12.07 9.39

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 62 103 94 356 125 232 213 1185

5.23 8.69 7.93 30.04 10.55 19.58 17.97===================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=====================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total---------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 183 120 39 342

70.38 33.71 6.85---------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 23 95 454 572

8.85 26.69 79.79---------------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 54 141 76 271

20.77 39.61 13.36---------------------------------------------------------------------Total 260 356 569 1185

21.94 30.04 48.02=====================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

================================================================================================PID7

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

454

Page 456: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 170 55 72 17 3 9 5 331

67.19 49.55 61.54 15.18 2.48 7.26 1.69------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 22 24 17 41 103 88 262 557

8.70 21.62 14.53 36.61 85.12 70.97 88.51------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 61 32 28 54 15 27 29 246

24.11 28.83 23.93 48.21 12.40 21.77 9.80------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 253 111 117 112 121 124 296 1134

22.31 9.79 10.32 9.88 10.67 10.93 26.10================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=======================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 297 17 16 330

61.62 15.18 2.96-----------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 64 41 453 558

13.28 36.61 83.89-----------------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 121 54 71 246

25.10 48.21 13.15-----------------------------------------------------------------------Total 482 112 540 1134

42.50 9.88 47.62=======================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

455

Page 457: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===============================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 14 301 6 21 342

5.88 67.34 2.26 8.86---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 172 50 241 111 574

72.27 11.19 90.94 46.84---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 52 96 18 105 271

21.85 21.48 6.79 44.30---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 238 447 265 237 1187

20.05 37.66 22.33 19.97===============================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==========================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 9 85 92 32 86 38 342

21.95 24.15 27.96 29.36 35.10 33.93----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 14 169 159 52 121 60 575

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

456

Page 458: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

34.15 48.01 48.33 47.71 49.39 53.57----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 18 98 78 25 38 14 271

43.90 27.84 23.71 22.94 15.51 12.50----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 41 352 329 109 245 112 1188

3.45 29.63 27.69 9.18 20.62 9.43==========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 44 38 38 92 131 343

23.91 14.29 29.69 32.51 40.43-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 104 161 67 132 106 570

56.52 60.53 52.34 46.64 32.72-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 36 67 23 59 87 272

19.57 25.19 17.97 20.85 26.85-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 184 266 128 283 324 1185

15.53 22.45 10.80 23.88 27.34=========================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

457

Page 459: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

==========================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA gena ~ACAs nati Mixed Other Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 163 78 83 10 0 6 3 343

22.83 50.65 30.86 47.62 0.00 46.15 21.43------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 421 13 114 7 3 6 10 574

58.96 8.44 42.38 33.33 100.00 46.15 71.43------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 130 63 72 4 0 1 1 271

18.21 40.91 26.77 19.05 0.00 7.69 7.14------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 714 154 269 21 3 13 14 1188

60.10 12.96 22.64 1.77 0.25 1.09 1.18==========================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================================================================================marital

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 156 2 62 12 84 26 342

24.26 8.70 41.89 18.75 33.60 45.61---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 375 9 57 38 80 15 574

58.32 39.13 38.51 59.38 32.00 26.32---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 112 12 29 14 86 16 269

17.42 52.17 19.59 21.88 34.40 28.07---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 643 23 148 64 250 57 1185

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

458

Page 460: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

54.26 1.94 12.49 5.40 21.10 4.81=========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===============================================gender

Q Male Female Total-----------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 163 179 342

29.16 28.50-----------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 291 283 574

52.06 45.06-----------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 105 166 271

18.78 26.43-----------------------------------------------Total 559 628 1187

47.09 52.91===============================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total---------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 131 167 44 342

37.11 28.69 17.67

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

459

Page 461: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

---------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 129 297 148 574

36.54 51.03 59.44---------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 93 118 57 268

26.35 20.27 22.89---------------------------------------------------------Total 353 582 249 1184

29.81 49.16 21.03=========================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 77 121 27 48 69 342

30.80 33.33 22.69 44.44 19.83----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 121 158 70 33 193 575

48.40 43.53 58.82 30.56 55.46----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 52 84 22 27 86 271

20.80 23.14 18.49 25.00 24.71----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 250 363 119 108 348 1188

21.04 30.56 10.02 9.09 29.29============================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

460

Page 462: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

==============================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total--------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 55 96 141 51 343

28.65 30.57 30.65 22.87--------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 66 133 232 143 574

34.38 42.36 50.43 64.13--------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 71 85 87 29 272

36.98 27.07 18.91 13.00--------------------------------------------------------------Total 192 314 460 223 1189

16.15 26.41 38.69 18.76==============================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

461

Page 463: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q35E. Gubernatorial Candidate Issue Trust: Taxes

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 47 83 57 106 18 11 10 332

77.05 79.81 58.76 29.69 14.52 4.78 4.65-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 1 3 13 91 75 190 183 556

1.64 2.88 13.40 25.49 60.48 82.61 85.12-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

462

Page 464: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Don't Know/No Opinion 13 18 27 160 31 29 22 30021.31 17.31 27.84 44.82 25.00 12.61 10.23

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 61 104 97 357 124 230 215 1188

5.13 8.75 8.16 30.05 10.44 19.36 18.10===================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=====================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total---------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 187 106 39 332

71.37 29.69 6.85---------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 17 91 448 556

6.49 25.49 78.73---------------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 58 160 82 300

22.14 44.82 14.41---------------------------------------------------------------------Total 262 357 569 1188

22.05 30.05 47.90=====================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

================================================================================================PID7

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

463

Page 465: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 167 55 67 17 3 3 11 323

65.49 50.00 55.83 15.04 2.50 2.44 3.70------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 22 18 19 39 101 84 258 541

8.63 16.36 15.83 34.51 84.17 68.29 86.87------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 66 37 34 57 16 36 28 274

25.88 33.64 28.33 50.44 13.33 29.27 9.43------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 255 110 120 113 120 123 297 1138

22.41 9.67 10.54 9.93 10.54 10.81 26.10================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=======================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 290 17 17 324

59.67 15.04 3.15-----------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 59 39 444 542

12.14 34.51 82.22-----------------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 137 57 79 273

28.19 50.44 14.63-----------------------------------------------------------------------Total 486 113 540 1139

42.67 9.92 47.41=======================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

464

Page 466: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===============================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 20 290 4 19 333

8.44 64.16 1.50 8.02---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 159 51 242 107 559

67.09 11.28 90.64 45.15---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 58 111 21 111 301

24.47 24.56 7.87 46.84---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 237 452 267 237 1193

19.87 37.89 22.38 19.87===============================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==========================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 8 80 89 35 82 38 332

19.51 22.79 27.13 31.53 33.33 33.63----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 16 157 151 54 122 59 559

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

465

Page 467: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

39.02 44.73 46.04 48.65 49.59 52.21----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 17 114 88 22 42 16 299

41.46 32.48 26.83 19.82 17.07 14.16----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 41 351 328 111 246 113 1190

3.45 29.50 27.56 9.33 20.67 9.50==========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 34 43 37 85 134 333

18.18 16.23 28.91 30.14 41.10-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 112 149 62 132 100 555

59.89 56.23 48.44 46.81 30.67-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 41 73 29 65 92 300

21.93 27.55 22.66 23.05 28.22-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 187 265 128 282 326 1188

15.74 22.31 10.77 23.74 27.44=========================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

466

Page 468: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

==========================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA gena ~ACAs nati Mixed Other Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 168 76 76 4 0 6 3 333

23.50 48.72 28.15 19.05 0.00 42.86 21.43------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 406 18 102 13 3 6 10 558

56.78 11.54 37.78 61.90 100.00 42.86 71.43------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 141 62 92 4 0 2 1 302

19.72 39.74 34.07 19.05 0.00 14.29 7.14------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 715 156 270 21 3 14 14 1193

59.93 13.08 22.63 1.76 0.25 1.17 1.17==========================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================================================================================marital

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 154 4 60 14 76 25 333

23.99 16.67 40.00 22.22 29.92 43.10---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 358 6 55 36 87 16 558

55.76 25.00 36.67 57.14 34.25 27.59---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 130 14 35 13 91 17 300

20.25 58.33 23.33 20.63 35.83 29.31---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 642 24 150 63 254 58 1191

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

467

Page 469: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

53.90 2.02 12.59 5.29 21.33 4.87=========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===============================================gender

Q Male Female Total-----------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 161 172 333

28.80 27.13-----------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 290 269 559

51.88 42.43-----------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 108 193 301

19.32 30.44-----------------------------------------------Total 559 634 1193

46.86 53.14===============================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total---------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 130 153 49 332

36.72 26.02 19.92

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

468

Page 470: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

---------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 126 296 136 558

35.59 50.34 55.28---------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 98 139 61 298

27.68 23.64 24.80---------------------------------------------------------Total 354 588 246 1188

29.80 49.49 20.71=========================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 73 116 26 48 71 334

29.20 31.87 21.49 44.44 20.29----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 109 156 73 36 184 558

43.60 42.86 60.33 33.33 52.57----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 68 92 22 24 95 301

27.20 25.27 18.18 22.22 27.14----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 250 364 121 108 350 1193

20.96 30.51 10.14 9.05 29.34============================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

469

Page 471: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

==============================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total--------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 45 99 135 54 333

23.32 31.63 29.28 24.00--------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 71 123 229 135 558

36.79 39.30 49.67 60.00--------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 77 91 97 36 301

39.90 29.07 21.04 16.00--------------------------------------------------------------Total 193 313 461 225 1192

16.19 26.26 38.67 18.88==============================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

470

Page 472: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q35F. Gubernatorial Candidate Issue Trust: Ethics in Government

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 49 79 75 137 20 11 12 383

79.03 76.70 77.32 38.48 16.00 4.74 5.58-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 3 7 5 79 73 186 182 535

4.84 6.80 5.15 22.19 58.40 80.17 84.65-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

471

Page 473: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Don't Know/No Opinion 10 17 17 140 32 35 21 27216.13 16.50 17.53 39.33 25.60 15.09 9.77

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 62 103 97 356 125 232 215 1190

5.21 8.66 8.15 29.92 10.50 19.50 18.07===================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=====================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total---------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 203 137 42 382

77.48 38.48 7.36---------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 15 79 441 535

5.73 22.19 77.23---------------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 44 140 88 272

16.79 39.33 15.41---------------------------------------------------------------------Total 262 356 571 1189

22.04 29.94 48.02=====================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

================================================================================================PID7

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

472

Page 474: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 172 57 88 26 9 14 8 374

67.19 51.82 73.95 23.42 7.44 11.29 2.69------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 30 20 7 29 95 83 255 519

11.72 18.18 5.88 26.13 78.51 66.94 85.86------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 54 33 24 56 17 27 34 245

21.09 30.00 20.17 50.45 14.05 21.77 11.45------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 256 110 119 111 121 124 297 1138

22.50 9.67 10.46 9.75 10.63 10.90 26.10================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=======================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 316 26 31 373

65.29 23.42 5.72-----------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 58 29 433 520

11.98 26.13 79.89-----------------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 110 56 78 244

22.73 50.45 14.39-----------------------------------------------------------------------Total 484 111 542 1137

42.57 9.76 47.67=======================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

473

Page 475: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===============================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 29 322 4 27 382

12.18 71.40 1.50 11.39---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 156 46 239 97 538

65.55 10.20 89.85 40.93---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 53 83 23 113 272

22.27 18.40 8.65 47.68---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 238 451 266 237 1192

19.97 37.84 22.32 19.88===============================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==========================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 11 93 95 39 94 50 382

26.83 26.35 29.05 35.14 38.21 43.86----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 15 158 149 52 115 49 538

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

474

Page 476: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

36.59 44.76 45.57 46.85 46.75 42.98----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 15 102 83 20 37 15 272

36.59 28.90 25.38 18.02 15.04 13.16----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 41 353 327 111 246 114 1192

3.44 29.61 27.43 9.31 20.64 9.56==========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 41 47 44 107 144 383

21.81 17.67 34.65 37.94 44.31-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 109 149 61 117 96 532

57.98 56.02 48.03 41.49 29.54-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 38 70 22 58 85 273

20.21 26.32 17.32 20.57 26.15-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 188 266 127 282 325 1188

15.82 22.39 10.69 23.74 27.36=========================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

475

Page 477: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

==========================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA gena ~ACAs nati Mixed Other Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 194 76 98 5 0 6 3 382

27.09 48.72 36.57 23.81 0.00 42.86 21.43------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 387 19 98 14 3 7 10 538

54.05 12.18 36.57 66.67 100.00 50.00 71.43------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 135 61 72 2 0 1 1 272

18.85 39.10 26.87 9.52 0.00 7.14 7.14------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 716 156 268 21 3 14 14 1192

60.07 13.09 22.48 1.76 0.25 1.17 1.17==========================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================================================================================marital

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 184 4 69 17 81 28 383

28.57 17.39 46.00 26.15 32.02 48.28---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 340 8 51 37 87 14 537

52.80 34.78 34.00 56.92 34.39 24.14---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 120 11 30 11 85 16 273

18.63 47.83 20.00 16.92 33.60 27.59---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 644 23 150 65 253 58 1193

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

476

Page 478: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86=========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===============================================gender

Q Male Female Total-----------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 174 208 382

31.13 32.81-----------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 285 253 538

50.98 39.91-----------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 100 173 273

17.89 27.29-----------------------------------------------Total 559 634 1193

46.86 53.14===============================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total---------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 143 192 47 382

40.51 32.71 18.95

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

477

Page 479: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

---------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 117 275 145 537

33.14 46.85 58.47---------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 93 120 56 269

26.35 20.44 22.58---------------------------------------------------------Total 353 587 248 1188

29.71 49.41 20.88=========================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 84 136 33 58 71 382

33.60 37.57 27.50 54.21 20.23----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 110 144 63 28 191 536

44.00 39.78 52.50 26.17 54.42----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 56 82 24 21 89 272

22.40 22.65 20.00 19.63 25.36----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 250 362 120 107 351 1190

21.01 30.42 10.08 8.99 29.50============================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

478

Page 480: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

==============================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total--------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 52 106 158 66 382

27.08 33.97 34.27 29.07--------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 68 120 216 133 537

35.42 38.46 46.85 58.59--------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 72 86 87 28 273

37.50 27.56 18.87 12.33--------------------------------------------------------------Total 192 312 461 227 1192

16.11 26.17 38.67 19.04==============================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

479

Page 481: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q35G. Gubernatorial Candidate Issue Trust: Transportation

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 49 80 62 126 18 9 8 352

79.03 77.67 65.26 35.59 14.52 3.88 3.74-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 2 5 11 74 66 181 179 518

3.23 4.85 11.58 20.90 53.23 78.02 83.64-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

480

Page 482: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Don't Know/No Opinion 11 18 22 154 40 42 27 31417.74 17.48 23.16 43.50 32.26 18.10 12.62

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 62 103 95 354 124 232 214 1184

5.24 8.70 8.02 29.90 10.47 19.59 18.07===================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=====================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total---------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 192 126 36 354

73.28 35.59 6.32---------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 19 74 426 519

7.25 20.90 74.74---------------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 51 154 108 313

19.47 43.50 18.95---------------------------------------------------------------------Total 262 354 570 1186

22.09 29.85 48.06=====================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

================================================================================================PID7

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

481

Page 483: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 170 50 85 17 6 8 9 345

66.93 45.45 70.83 15.18 4.96 6.45 3.04------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 21 26 3 35 89 86 245 505

8.27 23.64 2.50 31.25 73.55 69.35 82.77------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 63 34 32 60 26 30 42 287

24.80 30.91 26.67 53.57 21.49 24.19 14.19------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 254 110 120 112 121 124 296 1137

22.34 9.67 10.55 9.85 10.64 10.91 26.03================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=======================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 304 17 23 344

62.94 15.18 4.25-----------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 50 35 420 505

10.35 31.25 77.63-----------------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 129 60 98 287

26.71 53.57 18.11-----------------------------------------------------------------------Total 483 112 541 1136

42.52 9.86 47.62=======================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

482

Page 484: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===============================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 21 302 6 24 353

8.86 67.26 2.26 10.17---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 161 46 227 87 521

67.93 10.24 85.34 36.86---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 55 101 33 125 314

23.21 22.49 12.41 52.97---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 237 449 266 236 1188

19.95 37.79 22.39 19.87===============================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==========================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 11 88 88 38 85 43 353

26.83 25.00 26.83 35.19 34.55 37.72----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 15 148 151 46 110 52 522

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

483

Page 485: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

36.59 42.05 46.04 42.59 44.72 45.61----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 15 116 89 24 51 19 314

36.59 32.95 27.13 22.22 20.73 16.67----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 41 352 328 108 246 114 1189

3.45 29.60 27.59 9.08 20.69 9.59==========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 35 46 34 102 138 355

18.82 17.36 26.77 36.17 42.33-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 99 143 62 113 99 516

53.23 53.96 48.82 40.07 30.37-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 52 76 31 67 89 315

27.96 28.68 24.41 23.76 27.30-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 186 265 127 282 326 1186

15.68 22.34 10.71 23.78 27.49=========================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

484

Page 486: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

==========================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA gena ~ACAs nati Mixed Other Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 171 74 89 11 0 5 3 353

23.92 48.68 33.21 52.38 0.00 38.46 20.00------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 381 17 98 6 3 5 10 520

53.29 11.18 36.57 28.57 100.00 38.46 66.67------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 163 61 81 4 0 3 2 314

22.80 40.13 30.22 19.05 0.00 23.08 13.33------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 715 152 268 21 3 13 15 1187

60.24 12.81 22.58 1.77 0.25 1.10 1.26==========================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================================================================================marital

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 167 5 61 13 83 24 353

25.97 21.74 40.40 20.31 33.20 42.11---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 335 7 50 35 80 13 520

52.10 30.43 33.11 54.69 32.00 22.81---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 141 11 40 16 87 20 315

21.93 47.83 26.49 25.00 34.80 35.09---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 643 23 151 64 250 57 1188

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

485

Page 487: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

54.12 1.94 12.71 5.39 21.04 4.80=========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===============================================gender

Q Male Female Total-----------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 170 183 353

30.41 29.05-----------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 272 249 521

48.66 39.52-----------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 117 198 315

20.93 31.43-----------------------------------------------Total 559 630 1189

47.01 52.99===============================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total---------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 138 168 47 353

39.09 28.82 18.88

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

486

Page 488: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

---------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 111 272 137 520

31.44 46.66 55.02---------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 104 143 65 312

29.46 24.53 26.10---------------------------------------------------------Total 353 583 249 1185

29.79 49.20 21.01=========================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 87 121 26 48 72 354

34.80 33.33 21.85 44.44 20.51----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 96 142 65 35 184 522

38.40 39.12 54.62 32.41 52.42----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 67 100 28 25 95 315

26.80 27.55 23.53 23.15 27.07----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 250 363 119 108 351 1191

20.99 30.48 9.99 9.07 29.47============================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

487

Page 489: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

==============================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total--------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 50 105 143 55 353

26.18 33.76 31.02 24.55--------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 72 106 214 129 521

37.70 34.08 46.42 57.59--------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 69 100 104 40 313

36.13 32.15 22.56 17.86--------------------------------------------------------------Total 191 311 461 224 1187

16.09 26.20 38.84 18.87==============================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

488

Page 490: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q35H. Gubernatorial Candidate Issue Trust: Higher Education

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 49 82 74 155 26 12 14 412

80.33 79.61 76.29 43.66 20.97 5.19 6.51-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 3 5 5 63 61 183 178 498

4.92 4.85 5.15 17.75 49.19 79.22 82.79-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

489

Page 491: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Don't Know/No Opinion 9 16 18 137 37 36 23 27614.75 15.53 18.56 38.59 29.84 15.58 10.70

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 61 103 97 355 124 231 215 1186

5.14 8.68 8.18 29.93 10.46 19.48 18.13===================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=====================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total---------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 205 155 52 412

78.24 43.66 9.14---------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 14 63 422 499

5.34 17.75 74.17---------------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 43 137 95 275

16.41 38.59 16.70---------------------------------------------------------------------Total 262 355 569 1186

22.09 29.93 47.98=====================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

================================================================================================PID7

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

490

Page 492: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 180 69 91 26 10 17 10 403

70.31 62.73 77.12 23.21 8.26 13.82 3.37------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 23 13 0 30 91 79 248 484

8.98 11.82 0.00 26.79 75.21 64.23 83.50------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 53 28 27 56 20 27 39 250

20.70 25.45 22.88 50.00 16.53 21.95 13.13------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 256 110 118 112 121 123 297 1137

22.52 9.67 10.38 9.85 10.64 10.82 26.12================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=======================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 340 26 37 403

70.10 23.21 6.84-----------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 36 30 418 484

7.42 26.79 77.26-----------------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 109 56 86 251

22.47 50.00 15.90-----------------------------------------------------------------------Total 485 112 541 1138

42.62 9.84 47.54=======================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

491

Page 493: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===============================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 36 339 6 32 413

15.00 75.17 2.26 13.68---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 147 32 232 90 501

61.25 7.10 87.55 38.46---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 57 80 27 112 276

23.75 17.74 10.19 47.86---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 240 451 265 234 1190

20.17 37.90 22.27 19.66===============================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==========================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 8 107 104 48 97 48 412

19.51 30.66 31.52 43.24 39.43 42.48----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 16 136 144 42 112 51 501

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

492

Page 494: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

39.02 38.97 43.64 37.84 45.53 45.13----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 17 106 82 21 37 14 277

41.46 30.37 24.85 18.92 15.04 12.39----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 41 349 330 111 246 113 1190

3.45 29.33 27.73 9.33 20.67 9.50==========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 42 51 43 129 147 412

22.34 19.54 33.33 45.91 44.95-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 104 148 56 94 95 497

55.32 56.70 43.41 33.45 29.05-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 42 62 30 58 85 277

22.34 23.75 23.26 20.64 25.99-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 188 261 129 281 327 1186

15.85 22.01 10.88 23.69 27.57=========================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

493

Page 495: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

==========================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA gena ~ACAs nati Mixed Other Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 205 82 102 13 0 8 3 413

28.59 52.56 38.20 61.90 0.00 61.54 20.00------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 372 18 89 6 3 4 10 502

51.88 11.54 33.33 28.57 100.00 30.77 66.67------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 140 56 76 2 0 1 2 277

19.53 35.90 28.46 9.52 0.00 7.69 13.33------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 717 156 267 21 3 13 15 1192

60.15 13.09 22.40 1.76 0.25 1.09 1.26==========================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================================================================================marital

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 200 5 67 15 97 29 413

31.30 20.83 44.67 23.08 38.19 50.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 326 7 52 36 68 11 500

51.02 29.17 34.67 55.38 26.77 18.97---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 113 12 31 14 89 18 277

17.68 50.00 20.67 21.54 35.04 31.03---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 639 24 150 65 254 58 1190

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

494

Page 496: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

53.70 2.02 12.61 5.46 21.34 4.87=========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===============================================gender

Q Male Female Total-----------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 202 210 412

36.01 33.39-----------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 250 251 501

44.56 39.90-----------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 109 168 277

19.43 26.71-----------------------------------------------Total 561 629 1190

47.14 52.86===============================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total---------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 150 202 60 412

42.37 34.47 24.29

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

495

Page 497: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

---------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 103 270 128 501

29.10 46.08 51.82---------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 101 114 59 274

28.53 19.45 23.89---------------------------------------------------------Total 354 586 247 1187

29.82 49.37 20.81=========================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 96 136 36 53 92 413

38.40 37.57 29.75 49.53 26.29----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 104 139 58 32 168 501

41.60 38.40 47.93 29.91 48.00----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 50 87 27 22 90 276

20.00 24.03 22.31 20.56 25.71----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 250 362 121 107 350 1190

21.01 30.42 10.17 8.99 29.41============================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

496

Page 498: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

==============================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total--------------------------------------------------------------Wendy Davis 62 120 161 70 413

32.12 38.71 35.00 30.84--------------------------------------------------------------Greg Abbott 58 99 216 127 500

30.05 31.94 46.96 55.95--------------------------------------------------------------Don't Know/No Opinion 73 91 83 30 277

37.82 29.35 18.04 13.22--------------------------------------------------------------Total 193 310 460 227 1190

16.22 26.05 38.66 19.08==============================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

497

Page 499: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Policy Questions

Q36A. Education Policy E↵ectiveness: Creating a School Voucher Program

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 7 8 13 60 31 98 91 308

11.67 7.77 13.54 16.85 25.20 42.24 41.94----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 5 13 20 102 44 66 51 301

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

498

Page 500: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

8.33 12.62 20.83 28.65 35.77 28.45 23.50----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 12 13 15 62 15 32 15 164

20.00 12.62 15.62 17.42 12.20 13.79 6.91----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 27 41 35 48 13 12 24 200

45.00 39.81 36.46 13.48 10.57 5.17 11.06----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 9 28 13 84 20 24 36 214

15.00 27.18 13.54 23.60 16.26 10.34 16.59----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 60 103 96 356 123 232 217 1187

5.05 8.68 8.09 29.99 10.36 19.55 18.28==================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

====================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total--------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 28 60 220 308

10.77 16.85 38.46--------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 39 102 161 302

15.00 28.65 28.15--------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 40 62 62 164

15.38 17.42 10.84--------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 103 48 49 200

39.62 13.48 8.57--------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

499

Page 501: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Don't know 50 84 80 21419.23 23.60 13.99

--------------------------------------------------------------------Total 260 356 572 1188

21.89 29.97 48.15====================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===============================================================================================PID7

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 40 22 13 23 46 35 116 295

15.75 19.47 11.21 20.54 38.66 28.00 39.32-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 53 31 22 30 39 28 80 283

20.87 27.43 18.97 26.79 32.77 22.40 27.12-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 36 19 25 17 13 17 31 158

14.17 16.81 21.55 15.18 10.92 13.60 10.51-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 79 16 37 11 8 22 28 201

31.10 14.16 31.90 9.82 6.72 17.60 9.49-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 46 25 19 31 13 23 40 197

18.11 22.12 16.38 27.68 10.92 18.40 13.56-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 254 113 116 112 119 125 295 1134

22.40 9.96 10.23 9.88 10.49 11.02 26.01===============================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

500

Page 502: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total----------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 75 23 197 295

15.56 20.54 36.41----------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 106 30 148 284

21.99 26.79 27.36----------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 80 17 61 158

16.60 15.18 11.28----------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 132 11 58 201

27.39 9.82 10.72----------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 89 31 77 197

18.46 27.68 14.23----------------------------------------------------------------------Total 482 112 541 1135

42.47 9.87 47.67======================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==============================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

501

Page 503: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Extremely effective 58 67 129 54 30824.27 14.92 48.50 22.88

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 82 95 69 58 304

34.31 21.16 25.94 24.58--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 37 76 23 27 163

15.48 16.93 8.65 11.44--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 29 139 20 13 201

12.13 30.96 7.52 5.51--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 33 72 25 84 214

13.81 16.04 9.40 35.59--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 239 449 266 236 1190

20.08 37.73 22.35 19.83==============================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 10 86 79 39 66 29 309

25.00 24.50 24.31 34.51 26.83 25.22---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 9 105 86 28 51 23 302

22.50 29.91 26.46 24.78 20.73 20.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 12 37 40 12 42 19 162

30.00 10.54 12.31 10.62 17.07 16.52

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

502

Page 504: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 2 31 57 21 54 36 201

5.00 8.83 17.54 18.58 21.95 31.30---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 7 92 63 13 33 8 216

17.50 26.21 19.38 11.50 13.41 6.96---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 40 351 325 113 246 115 1190

3.36 29.50 27.31 9.50 20.67 9.66=========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

========================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 74 66 38 50 78 306

39.78 25.00 28.79 18.05 23.93------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 48 93 31 86 43 301

25.81 35.23 23.48 31.05 13.19------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 22 39 22 38 42 163

11.83 14.77 16.67 13.72 12.88------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 17 26 20 49 89 201

9.14 9.85 15.15 17.69 27.30------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 25 40 21 54 74 214

13.44 15.15 15.91 19.49 22.70------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 186 264 132 277 326 1185

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

503

Page 505: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

15.70 22.28 11.14 23.38 27.51========================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA gena ~ACAs nati Mixed Other Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 192 39 64 4 2 0 8 309

26.89 25.32 23.62 18.18 66.67 0.00 53.33-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 162 36 80 14 1 6 4 303

22.69 23.38 29.52 63.64 33.33 50.00 26.67-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 100 20 38 1 0 4 0 163

14.01 12.99 14.02 4.55 0.00 33.33 0.00-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 144 19 33 2 0 1 3 202

20.17 12.34 12.18 9.09 0.00 8.33 20.00-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 116 40 56 1 0 1 0 214

16.25 25.97 20.66 4.55 0.00 8.33 0.00-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 714 154 271 22 3 12 15 1191

59.95 12.93 22.75 1.85 0.25 1.01 1.26=========================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

504

Page 506: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

========================================================================================================marital

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 190 5 27 17 60 11 310

29.28 20.83 18.37 25.76 23.90 18.97--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 164 10 31 15 72 11 303

25.27 41.67 21.09 22.73 28.69 18.97--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 88 1 25 14 28 9 165

13.56 4.17 17.01 21.21 11.16 15.52--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 107 1 38 8 38 10 202

16.49 4.17 25.85 12.12 15.14 17.24--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 100 7 26 12 53 17 215

15.41 29.17 17.69 18.18 21.12 29.31--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 649 24 147 66 251 58 1195

54.31 2.01 12.30 5.52 21.00 4.85========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==============================================gender

Q Male Female Total----------------------------------------------Extremely effective 158 150 308

28.37 23.70----------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 139 165 304

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

505

Page 507: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

24.96 26.07----------------------------------------------Not very effective 68 95 163

12.21 15.01----------------------------------------------Not at all effective 94 107 201

16.88 16.90----------------------------------------------Don't know 98 116 214

17.59 18.33----------------------------------------------Total 557 633 1190

46.81 53.19==============================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

========================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total--------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 95 152 62 309

26.84 25.89 25.20--------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 87 139 73 299

24.58 23.68 29.67--------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 59 65 40 164

16.67 11.07 16.26--------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 53 120 28 201

14.97 20.44 11.38--------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

506

Page 508: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Don't know 60 111 43 21416.95 18.91 17.48

--------------------------------------------------------Total 354 587 246 1187

29.82 49.45 20.72========================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===========================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 62 99 42 18 88 309

24.80 27.05 35.29 17.14 25.07---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 62 86 40 27 88 303

24.80 23.50 33.61 25.71 25.07---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 47 37 9 14 56 163

18.80 10.11 7.56 13.33 15.95---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 44 71 15 31 42 203

17.60 19.40 12.61 29.52 11.97---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 35 73 13 15 77 213

14.00 19.95 10.92 14.29 21.94---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 250 366 119 105 351 1191

20.99 30.73 9.99 8.82 29.47===========================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

507

Page 509: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=============================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total-------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 47 82 123 56 308

23.86 26.45 26.97 24.67-------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 54 80 113 56 303

27.41 25.81 24.78 24.67-------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 33 34 62 34 163

16.75 10.97 13.60 14.98-------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 19 49 96 37 201

9.64 15.81 21.05 16.30-------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 44 65 62 44 215

22.34 20.97 13.60 19.38-------------------------------------------------------------Total 197 310 456 227 1190

16.55 26.05 38.32 19.08=============================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

508

Page 510: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q36B. Education Policy E↵ectiveness: Expanding the Number of Charter Schools

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 6 6 9 61 24 73 75 254

9.68 5.77 9.38 17.04 19.35 31.47 34.40----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 6 22 21 103 46 96 65 359

9.68 21.15 21.88 28.77 37.10 41.38 29.82----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

509

Page 511: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Not very effective 14 26 24 64 19 34 28 20922.58 25.00 25.00 17.88 15.32 14.66 12.84

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 20 24 24 46 12 11 11 148

32.26 23.08 25.00 12.85 9.68 4.74 5.05----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 16 26 18 84 23 18 39 224

25.81 25.00 18.75 23.46 18.55 7.76 17.89----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 62 104 96 358 124 232 218 1194

5.19 8.71 8.04 29.98 10.39 19.43 18.26==================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

====================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total--------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 20 61 172 253

7.60 17.04 30.02--------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 49 103 207 359

18.63 28.77 36.13--------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 65 64 82 211

24.71 17.88 14.31--------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 69 46 33 148

26.24 12.85 5.76--------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 60 84 79 223

22.81 23.46 13.79

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

510

Page 512: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------Total 263 358 573 1194

22.03 29.98 47.99====================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===============================================================================================PID7

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 38 22 13 20 39 27 88 247

14.90 19.30 10.92 17.86 32.23 21.95 29.53-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 64 30 24 32 50 37 108 345

25.10 26.32 20.17 28.57 41.32 30.08 36.24-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 42 19 33 30 13 22 45 204

16.47 16.67 27.73 26.79 10.74 17.89 15.10-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 55 17 27 11 9 14 14 147

21.57 14.91 22.69 9.82 7.44 11.38 4.70-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 56 26 22 19 10 23 43 199

21.96 22.81 18.49 16.96 8.26 18.70 14.43-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 255 114 119 112 121 123 298 1142

22.33 9.98 10.42 9.81 10.60 10.77 26.09===============================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

511

Page 513: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

======================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total----------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 72 20 154 246

14.78 17.86 28.31----------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 118 32 196 346

24.23 28.57 36.03----------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 94 30 80 204

19.30 26.79 14.71----------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 99 11 38 148

20.33 9.82 6.99----------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 104 19 76 199

21.36 16.96 13.97----------------------------------------------------------------------Total 487 112 544 1143

42.61 9.80 47.59======================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==============================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 53 63 99 39 254

22.08 13.91 37.22 16.46

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

512

Page 514: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 80 118 99 62 359

33.33 26.05 37.22 26.16--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 51 85 32 44 212

21.25 18.76 12.03 18.57--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 19 102 14 13 148

7.92 22.52 5.26 5.49--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 37 85 22 79 223

15.42 18.76 8.27 33.33--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 240 453 266 237 1196

20.07 37.88 22.24 19.82==============================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 7 78 64 33 53 20 255

17.07 22.10 19.34 28.95 21.54 17.54---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 13 111 100 29 71 36 360

31.71 31.44 30.21 25.44 28.86 31.58---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 5 63 59 19 40 26 212

12.20 17.85 17.82 16.67 16.26 22.81---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 8 30 34 16 39 22 149

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

513

Page 515: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

19.51 8.50 10.27 14.04 15.85 19.30---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 8 71 74 17 43 10 223

19.51 20.11 22.36 14.91 17.48 8.77---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 41 353 331 114 246 114 1199

3.42 29.44 27.61 9.51 20.52 9.51=========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

========================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 52 62 31 52 55 252

27.81 23.31 23.66 18.44 16.82------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 56 94 44 90 75 359

29.95 35.34 33.59 31.91 22.94------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 24 46 24 53 64 211

12.83 17.29 18.32 18.79 19.57------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 19 18 10 39 62 148

10.16 6.77 7.63 13.83 18.96------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 36 46 22 48 71 223

19.25 17.29 16.79 17.02 21.71------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 187 266 131 282 327 1193

15.67 22.30 10.98 23.64 27.41========================================================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

514

Page 516: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA gena ~ACAs nati Mixed Other Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 154 35 55 2 2 2 5 255

21.42 22.73 20.15 8.70 66.67 13.33 33.33-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 214 42 81 13 1 5 4 360

29.76 27.27 29.67 56.52 33.33 33.33 26.67-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 132 16 57 3 0 5 0 213

18.36 10.39 20.88 13.04 0.00 33.33 0.00-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 91 18 34 2 0 1 3 149

12.66 11.69 12.45 8.70 0.00 6.67 20.00-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 128 43 46 3 0 2 3 225

17.80 27.92 16.85 13.04 0.00 13.33 20.00-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 719 154 273 23 3 15 15 1202

59.82 12.81 22.71 1.91 0.25 1.25 1.25=========================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

========================================================================================================marital

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

515

Page 517: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 153 5 23 15 52 6 254

23.61 22.73 15.23 23.44 20.47 10.71--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 195 3 42 19 84 16 359

30.09 13.64 27.81 29.69 33.07 28.57--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 112 4 31 15 36 13 211

17.28 18.18 20.53 23.44 14.17 23.21--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 79 0 26 5 28 10 148

12.19 0.00 17.22 7.81 11.02 17.86--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 109 10 29 10 54 11 223

16.82 45.45 19.21 15.62 21.26 19.64--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 648 22 151 64 254 56 1195

54.23 1.84 12.64 5.36 21.26 4.69========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==============================================gender

Q Male Female Total----------------------------------------------Extremely effective 126 129 255

22.50 20.25----------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 181 178 359

32.32 27.94----------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

516

Page 518: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Not very effective 96 115 21117.14 18.05

----------------------------------------------Not at all effective 63 86 149

11.25 13.50----------------------------------------------Don't know 94 129 223

16.79 20.25----------------------------------------------Total 560 637 1197

46.78 53.22==============================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

========================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total--------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 73 136 44 253

20.56 23.05 17.74--------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 113 168 78 359

31.83 28.47 31.45--------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 66 95 51 212

18.59 16.10 20.56--------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 41 80 27 148

11.55 13.56 10.89--------------------------------------------------------Don't know 62 111 48 221

17.46 18.81 19.35

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

517

Page 519: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------Total 355 590 248 1193

29.76 49.46 20.79========================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===========================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 52 84 31 16 71 254

20.80 22.89 25.41 15.09 20.23---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 72 109 43 26 109 359

28.80 29.70 35.25 24.53 31.05---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 54 54 20 21 63 212

21.60 14.71 16.39 19.81 17.95---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 30 43 11 24 40 148

12.00 11.72 9.02 22.64 11.40---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 42 77 17 19 68 223

16.80 20.98 13.93 17.92 19.37---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 250 367 122 106 351 1196

20.90 30.69 10.20 8.86 29.35===========================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

518

Page 520: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

=============================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total-------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 37 58 112 47 254

18.69 18.53 24.24 20.80-------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 63 90 138 68 359

31.82 28.75 29.87 30.09-------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 34 53 76 50 213

17.17 16.93 16.45 22.12-------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 9 43 72 25 149

4.55 13.74 15.58 11.06-------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 55 69 64 36 224

27.78 22.04 13.85 15.93-------------------------------------------------------------Total 198 313 462 226 1199

16.51 26.11 38.53 18.85=============================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

519

Page 521: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q36C. Education Policy E↵ectiveness: Increasing the Pay of Public School Teachers

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 39 55 43 158 30 40 54 419

61.90 52.88 44.79 44.38 24.19 17.32 24.88----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 15 35 38 102 38 90 65 383

23.81 33.65 39.58 28.65 30.65 38.96 29.95----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

520

Page 522: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Not very effective 0 5 9 27 31 56 36 1640.00 4.81 9.38 7.58 25.00 24.24 16.59

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 2 2 2 16 15 34 42 113

3.17 1.92 2.08 4.49 12.10 14.72 19.35----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 7 7 4 53 10 11 20 112

11.11 6.73 4.17 14.89 8.06 4.76 9.22----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 63 104 96 356 124 231 217 1191

5.29 8.73 8.06 29.89 10.41 19.40 18.22==================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

====================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total--------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 137 158 124 419

52.29 44.38 21.60--------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 88 102 194 384

33.59 28.65 33.80--------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 13 27 124 164

4.96 7.58 21.60--------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 6 16 92 114

2.29 4.49 16.03--------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 18 53 40 111

6.87 14.89 6.97

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

521

Page 523: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------Total 262 356 574 1192

21.98 29.87 48.15====================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===============================================================================================PID7

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 141 55 55 39 17 30 67 404

55.29 48.67 46.61 35.78 14.05 24.19 22.56-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 70 34 41 37 38 47 103 370

27.45 30.09 34.75 33.94 31.40 37.90 34.68-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 10 7 9 12 38 23 60 159

3.92 6.19 7.63 11.01 31.40 18.55 20.20-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 8 4 5 13 25 12 45 112

3.14 3.54 4.24 11.93 20.66 9.68 15.15-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 26 13 8 8 3 12 22 92

10.20 11.50 6.78 7.34 2.48 9.68 7.41-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 255 113 118 109 121 124 297 1137

22.43 9.94 10.38 9.59 10.64 10.91 26.12===============================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

522

Page 524: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

======================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total----------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 252 39 114 405

51.64 35.78 20.99----------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 145 37 188 370

29.71 33.94 34.62----------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 26 12 121 159

5.33 11.01 22.28----------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 18 13 82 113

3.69 11.93 15.10----------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 47 8 38 93

9.63 7.34 7.00----------------------------------------------------------------------Total 488 109 543 1140

42.81 9.56 47.63======================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==============================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 72 243 43 62 420

30.00 53.52 16.35 26.05

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

523

Page 525: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 87 138 87 72 384

36.25 30.40 33.08 30.25--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 40 23 62 40 165

16.67 5.07 23.57 16.81--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 24 16 59 15 114

10.00 3.52 22.43 6.30--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 17 34 12 49 112

7.08 7.49 4.56 20.59--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 240 454 263 238 1195

20.08 37.99 22.01 19.92==============================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 11 128 129 36 77 41 422

26.83 36.57 38.86 31.58 31.30 35.96---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 11 111 86 45 91 40 384

26.83 31.71 25.90 39.47 36.99 35.09---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 6 36 56 15 32 21 166

14.63 10.29 16.87 13.16 13.01 18.42---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 6 34 21 14 29 10 114

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

524

Page 526: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

14.63 9.71 6.33 12.28 11.79 8.77---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 7 41 40 4 17 2 111

17.07 11.71 12.05 3.51 6.91 1.75---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 41 350 332 114 246 114 1197

3.43 29.24 27.74 9.52 20.55 9.52=========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

========================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 77 77 47 96 119 416

41.85 28.95 35.61 33.92 36.39------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 55 103 39 96 90 383

29.89 38.72 29.55 33.92 27.52------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 25 46 22 37 36 166

13.59 17.29 16.67 13.07 11.01------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 18 17 13 31 36 115

9.78 6.39 9.85 10.95 11.01------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 9 23 11 23 46 112

4.89 8.65 8.33 8.13 14.07------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 184 266 132 283 327 1192

15.44 22.32 11.07 23.74 27.43========================================================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

525

Page 527: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA gena ~ACAs nati Mixed Other Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 223 72 104 8 0 9 4 420

31.06 46.15 38.66 36.36 0.00 75.00 28.57-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 240 39 90 8 2 1 3 383

33.43 25.00 33.46 36.36 66.67 8.33 21.43-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 125 10 24 4 1 0 2 166

17.41 6.41 8.92 18.18 33.33 0.00 14.29-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 68 9 29 0 0 2 5 113

9.47 5.77 10.78 0.00 0.00 16.67 35.71-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 62 26 22 2 0 0 0 112

8.64 16.67 8.18 9.09 0.00 0.00 0.00-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 718 156 269 22 3 12 14 1194

60.13 13.07 22.53 1.84 0.25 1.01 1.17=========================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

========================================================================================================marital

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

526

Page 528: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 221 7 49 22 96 24 419

34.32 30.43 32.45 33.85 37.80 42.11--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 214 7 62 17 65 19 384

33.23 30.43 41.06 26.15 25.59 33.33--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 97 2 19 12 33 2 165

15.06 8.70 12.58 18.46 12.99 3.51--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 66 0 4 7 30 7 114

10.25 0.00 2.65 10.77 11.81 12.28--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 46 7 17 7 30 5 112

7.14 30.43 11.26 10.77 11.81 8.77--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 644 23 151 65 254 57 1194

53.94 1.93 12.65 5.44 21.27 4.77========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==============================================gender

Q Male Female Total----------------------------------------------Extremely effective 179 241 420

32.08 37.77----------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 172 212 384

30.82 33.23----------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

527

Page 529: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Not very effective 90 76 16616.13 11.91

----------------------------------------------Not at all effective 69 45 114

12.37 7.05----------------------------------------------Don't know 48 64 112

8.60 10.03----------------------------------------------Total 558 638 1196

46.66 53.34==============================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

========================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total--------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 138 202 80 420

38.66 34.41 32.26--------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 109 192 78 379

30.53 32.71 31.45--------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 41 81 44 166

11.48 13.80 17.74--------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 33 57 25 115

9.24 9.71 10.08--------------------------------------------------------Don't know 36 55 21 112

10.08 9.37 8.47

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

528

Page 530: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------Total 357 587 248 1192

29.95 49.24 20.81========================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===========================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 71 138 38 52 120 419

28.51 37.60 31.40 50.00 34.09---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 99 111 30 27 116 383

39.76 30.25 24.79 25.96 32.95---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 35 52 18 11 50 166

14.06 14.17 14.88 10.58 14.20---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 24 33 23 5 28 113

9.64 8.99 19.01 4.81 7.95---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 20 33 12 9 38 112

8.03 8.99 9.92 8.65 10.80---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 249 367 121 104 352 1193

20.87 30.76 10.14 8.72 29.51===========================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

529

Page 531: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

=============================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total-------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 84 133 125 78 420

42.42 42.36 27.35 34.36-------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 59 77 175 72 383

29.80 24.52 38.29 31.72-------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 23 35 69 40 167

11.62 11.15 15.10 17.62-------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 7 34 50 23 114

3.54 10.83 10.94 10.13-------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 25 35 38 14 112

12.63 11.15 8.32 6.17-------------------------------------------------------------Total 198 314 457 227 1196

16.56 26.25 38.21 18.98=============================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

530

Page 532: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q36D. Education Policy E↵ectiveness: Increasing Funding for the Public School System

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 42 67 56 149 34 34 42 424

67.74 64.42 58.33 41.85 27.20 14.72 19.72----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 9 27 21 99 35 58 44 293

14.52 25.96 21.88 27.81 28.00 25.11 20.66----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

531

Page 533: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Not very effective 2 2 13 36 27 78 42 2003.23 1.92 13.54 10.11 21.60 33.77 19.72

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 1 1 2 26 19 55 58 162

1.61 0.96 2.08 7.30 15.20 23.81 27.23----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 8 7 4 46 10 6 27 108

12.90 6.73 4.17 12.92 8.00 2.60 12.68----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 62 104 96 356 125 231 213 1187

5.22 8.76 8.09 29.99 10.53 19.46 17.94==================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

====================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total--------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 165 149 110 424

63.22 41.85 19.33--------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 56 99 137 292

21.46 27.81 24.08--------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 17 36 147 200

6.51 10.11 25.83--------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 4 26 132 162

1.53 7.30 23.20--------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 19 46 43 108

7.28 12.92 7.56

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

532

Page 534: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------Total 261 356 569 1186

22.01 30.02 47.98====================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===============================================================================================PID7

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 142 70 70 36 8 34 50 410

55.47 61.95 59.32 32.14 6.61 27.64 17.06-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 68 21 28 32 31 27 74 281

26.56 18.58 23.73 28.57 25.62 21.95 25.26-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 10 7 12 18 43 25 80 195

3.91 6.19 10.17 16.07 35.54 20.33 27.30-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 8 2 2 20 37 29 58 156

3.12 1.77 1.69 17.86 30.58 23.58 19.80-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 28 13 6 6 2 8 31 94

10.94 11.50 5.08 5.36 1.65 6.50 10.58-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 256 113 118 112 121 123 293 1136

22.54 9.95 10.39 9.86 10.65 10.83 25.79===============================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

533

Page 535: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

======================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total----------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 282 36 92 410

57.67 32.14 17.10----------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 117 32 133 282

23.93 28.57 24.72----------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 30 18 148 196

6.13 16.07 27.51----------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 12 20 125 157

2.45 17.86 23.23----------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 48 6 40 94

9.82 5.36 7.43----------------------------------------------------------------------Total 489 112 538 1139

42.93 9.83 47.23======================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==============================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 68 272 19 65 424

28.81 60.18 7.22 27.31

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

534

Page 536: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 70 109 56 57 292

29.66 24.12 21.29 23.95--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 54 29 77 40 200

22.88 6.42 29.28 16.81--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 24 9 99 32 164

10.17 1.99 37.64 13.45--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 20 33 12 44 109

8.47 7.30 4.56 18.49--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 236 452 263 238 1189

19.85 38.02 22.12 20.02==============================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 9 135 114 49 84 33 424

23.08 38.57 34.76 43.36 34.15 29.20---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 9 86 88 27 53 30 293

23.08 24.57 26.83 23.89 21.54 26.55---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 8 54 56 11 43 28 200

20.51 15.43 17.07 9.73 17.48 24.78---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 6 36 35 19 47 20 163

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

535

Page 537: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

15.38 10.29 10.67 16.81 19.11 17.70---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 7 39 35 7 19 2 109

17.95 11.14 10.67 6.19 7.72 1.77---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 39 350 328 113 246 113 1189

3.28 29.44 27.59 9.50 20.69 9.50=========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

========================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 56 67 43 124 133 423

29.95 25.38 32.82 44.93 40.67------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 52 79 34 69 58 292

27.81 29.92 25.95 25.00 17.74------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 38 61 28 33 39 199

20.32 23.11 21.37 11.96 11.93------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 26 35 15 33 52 161

13.90 13.26 11.45 11.96 15.90------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 15 22 11 17 45 110

8.02 8.33 8.40 6.16 13.76------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 187 264 131 276 327 1185

15.78 22.28 11.05 23.29 27.59========================================================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

536

Page 538: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA gena ~ACAs nati Mixed Other Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 211 69 128 6 0 7 3 424

29.51 44.52 47.76 27.27 0.00 63.64 21.43-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 179 41 59 9 1 1 2 292

25.03 26.45 22.01 40.91 33.33 9.09 14.29-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 151 9 35 5 0 0 0 200

21.12 5.81 13.06 22.73 0.00 0.00 0.00-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 115 8 27 0 2 2 9 163

16.08 5.16 10.07 0.00 66.67 18.18 64.29-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 59 28 19 2 0 1 0 109

8.25 18.06 7.09 9.09 0.00 9.09 0.00-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 715 155 268 22 3 11 14 1188

60.19 13.05 22.56 1.85 0.25 0.93 1.18=========================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

========================================================================================================marital

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

537

Page 539: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 217 8 53 14 109 23 424

33.70 34.78 34.87 22.22 43.43 40.35--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 153 7 46 17 52 19 294

23.76 30.43 30.26 26.98 20.72 33.33--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 117 1 30 15 34 3 200

18.17 4.35 19.74 23.81 13.55 5.26--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 106 0 6 11 32 8 163

16.46 0.00 3.95 17.46 12.75 14.04--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 51 7 17 6 24 4 109

7.92 30.43 11.18 9.52 9.56 7.02--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 644 23 152 63 251 57 1190

54.12 1.93 12.77 5.29 21.09 4.79========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==============================================gender

Q Male Female Total----------------------------------------------Extremely effective 183 241 424

32.74 38.25----------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 124 169 293

22.18 26.83----------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

538

Page 540: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Not very effective 110 90 20019.68 14.29

----------------------------------------------Not at all effective 94 69 163

16.82 10.95----------------------------------------------Don't know 48 61 109

8.59 9.68----------------------------------------------Total 559 630 1189

47.01 52.99==============================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

========================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total--------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 162 186 76 424

45.38 31.96 30.89--------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 85 143 61 289

23.81 24.57 24.80--------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 40 105 54 199

11.20 18.04 21.95--------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 36 91 37 164

10.08 15.64 15.04--------------------------------------------------------Don't know 34 57 18 109

9.52 9.79 7.32

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

539

Page 541: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------Total 357 582 246 1185

30.13 49.11 20.76========================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===========================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 86 139 35 50 114 424

34.26 38.29 28.93 46.73 32.95---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 61 84 30 24 94 293

24.30 23.14 24.79 22.43 27.17---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 44 60 23 12 61 200

17.53 16.53 19.01 11.21 17.63---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 36 47 22 12 46 163

14.34 12.95 18.18 11.21 13.29---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 24 33 11 9 31 108

9.56 9.09 9.09 8.41 8.96---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 251 363 121 107 346 1188

21.13 30.56 10.19 9.01 29.12===========================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

540

Page 542: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

=============================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total-------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 83 138 140 63 424

42.13 44.23 30.84 27.75-------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 55 63 108 67 293

27.92 20.19 23.79 29.52-------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 25 40 85 50 200

12.69 12.82 18.72 22.03-------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 12 38 82 31 163

6.09 12.18 18.06 13.66-------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 22 33 39 16 110

11.17 10.58 8.59 7.05-------------------------------------------------------------Total 197 312 454 227 1190

16.55 26.22 38.15 19.08=============================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

541

Page 543: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q36E. Education Policy E↵ectiveness: Providing more incentives for individuals to choose teaching as a profession

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 32 41 41 128 35 54 50 381

51.61 39.42 42.71 35.75 28.00 23.28 22.94----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 20 50 37 104 53 102 77 443

32.26 48.08 38.54 29.05 42.40 43.97 35.32----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

542

Page 544: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Not very effective 0 4 7 56 15 46 45 1730.00 3.85 7.29 15.64 12.00 19.83 20.64

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 2 1 3 13 11 14 20 64

3.23 0.96 3.12 3.63 8.80 6.03 9.17----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 8 8 8 57 11 16 26 134

12.90 7.69 8.33 15.92 8.80 6.90 11.93----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 62 104 96 358 125 232 218 1195

5.19 8.70 8.03 29.96 10.46 19.41 18.24==================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

====================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total--------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 114 128 138 380

43.35 35.75 24.08--------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 108 104 231 443

41.06 29.05 40.31--------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 11 56 106 173

4.18 15.64 18.50--------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 6 13 45 64

2.28 3.63 7.85--------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 24 57 53 134

9.13 15.92 9.25

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

543

Page 545: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------Total 263 358 573 1194

22.03 29.98 47.99====================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===============================================================================================PID7

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 114 49 53 29 19 34 64 362

44.53 42.98 45.30 25.66 15.70 27.42 21.40-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 86 37 42 40 55 48 127 435

33.59 32.46 35.90 35.40 45.45 38.71 42.47-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 17 9 12 19 30 25 59 171

6.64 7.89 10.26 16.81 24.79 20.16 19.73-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 8 5 7 11 10 3 19 63

3.12 4.39 5.98 9.73 8.26 2.42 6.35-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 31 14 3 14 7 14 30 113

12.11 12.28 2.56 12.39 5.79 11.29 10.03-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 256 114 117 113 121 124 299 1144

22.38 9.97 10.23 9.88 10.58 10.84 26.14===============================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

544

Page 546: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

======================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total----------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 216 29 117 362

44.35 25.66 21.59----------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 164 40 230 434

33.68 35.40 42.44----------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 38 19 113 170

7.80 16.81 20.85----------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 21 11 31 63

4.31 9.73 5.72----------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 48 14 51 113

9.86 12.39 9.41----------------------------------------------------------------------Total 487 113 542 1142

42.64 9.89 47.46======================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==============================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 62 209 56 53 380

25.62 46.24 21.13 22.27

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

545

Page 547: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 103 154 104 82 443

42.56 34.07 39.25 34.45--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 41 36 57 41 175

16.94 7.96 21.51 17.23--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 12 19 29 5 65

4.96 4.20 10.94 2.10--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 24 34 19 57 134

9.92 7.52 7.17 23.95--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 242 452 265 238 1197

20.22 37.76 22.14 19.88==============================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 11 99 121 34 82 33 380

27.50 28.05 36.56 30.09 33.20 29.20---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 7 127 113 51 96 50 444

17.50 35.98 34.14 45.13 38.87 44.25---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 8 62 46 12 30 17 175

20.00 17.56 13.90 10.62 12.15 15.04---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 6 15 13 7 14 9 64

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

546

Page 548: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

15.00 4.25 3.93 6.19 5.67 7.96---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 8 50 38 9 25 4 134

20.00 14.16 11.48 7.96 10.12 3.54---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 40 353 331 113 247 113 1197

3.34 29.49 27.65 9.44 20.63 9.44=========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

========================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 85 76 35 94 87 377

45.21 28.68 26.52 33.45 26.61------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 53 110 57 88 135 443

28.19 41.51 43.18 31.32 41.28------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 24 42 19 54 35 174

12.77 15.85 14.39 19.22 10.70------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 8 10 8 19 20 65

4.26 3.77 6.06 6.76 6.12------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 18 27 13 26 50 134

9.57 10.19 9.85 9.25 15.29------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 188 265 132 281 327 1193

15.76 22.21 11.06 23.55 27.41========================================================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

547

Page 549: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA gena ~ACAs nati Mixed Other Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 200 69 99 4 1 6 1 380

27.93 44.23 36.40 18.18 33.33 50.00 7.14-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 291 44 94 4 1 2 8 444

40.64 28.21 34.56 18.18 33.33 16.67 57.14-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 119 6 35 10 0 2 2 174

16.62 3.85 12.87 45.45 0.00 16.67 14.29-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 31 10 18 1 0 2 1 63

4.33 6.41 6.62 4.55 0.00 16.67 7.14-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 75 27 26 3 1 0 2 134

10.47 17.31 9.56 13.64 33.33 0.00 14.29-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 716 156 272 22 3 12 14 1195

59.92 13.05 22.76 1.84 0.25 1.00 1.17=========================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

========================================================================================================marital

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

548

Page 550: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 209 5 55 17 80 16 382

32.30 20.83 36.18 26.15 31.37 28.07--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 247 9 62 28 70 29 445

38.18 37.50 40.79 43.08 27.45 50.88--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 93 3 16 12 46 5 175

14.37 12.50 10.53 18.46 18.04 8.77--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 39 0 2 1 20 2 64

6.03 0.00 1.32 1.54 7.84 3.51--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 59 7 17 7 39 5 134

9.12 29.17 11.18 10.77 15.29 8.77--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 647 24 152 65 255 57 1200

53.92 2.00 12.67 5.42 21.25 4.75========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==============================================gender

Q Male Female Total----------------------------------------------Extremely effective 169 212 381

30.23 33.23----------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 215 228 443

38.46 35.74----------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

549

Page 551: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Not very effective 80 95 17514.31 14.89

----------------------------------------------Not at all effective 36 28 64

6.44 4.39----------------------------------------------Don't know 59 75 134

10.55 11.76----------------------------------------------Total 559 638 1197

46.70 53.30==============================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

========================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total--------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 125 178 74 377

35.11 30.22 29.72--------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 127 230 86 443

35.67 39.05 34.54--------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 48 78 50 176

13.48 13.24 20.08--------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 17 37 10 64

4.78 6.28 4.02--------------------------------------------------------Don't know 39 66 29 134

10.96 11.21 11.65

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

550

Page 552: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------Total 356 589 249 1194

29.82 49.33 20.85========================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===========================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 79 113 36 45 107 380

31.47 30.79 29.51 42.45 30.40---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 94 157 38 33 121 443

37.45 42.78 31.15 31.13 34.38---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 37 36 25 16 61 175

14.74 9.81 20.49 15.09 17.33---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 12 26 9 3 14 64

4.78 7.08 7.38 2.83 3.98---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 29 35 14 9 49 136

11.55 9.54 11.48 8.49 13.92---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 251 367 122 106 352 1198

20.95 30.63 10.18 8.85 29.38===========================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

551

Page 553: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

=============================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total-------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 68 106 148 58 380

34.34 33.97 32.17 25.55-------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 58 102 175 109 444

29.29 32.69 38.04 48.02-------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 35 43 65 32 175

17.68 13.78 14.13 14.10-------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 8 21 25 10 64

4.04 6.73 5.43 4.41-------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 29 40 47 18 134

14.65 12.82 10.22 7.93-------------------------------------------------------------Total 198 312 460 227 1197

16.54 26.07 38.43 18.96=============================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

552

Page 554: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q36F. Education Policy E↵ectiveness: Reducing the number of standardized tests students must take

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 28 39 33 114 33 64 78 389

45.16 37.86 34.38 31.93 26.83 27.59 36.28----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 18 34 41 94 39 89 74 389

29.03 33.01 42.71 26.33 31.71 38.36 34.42----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

553

Page 555: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Not very effective 6 13 7 54 28 44 21 1739.68 12.62 7.29 15.13 22.76 18.97 9.77

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 2 4 7 37 11 26 18 105

3.23 3.88 7.29 10.36 8.94 11.21 8.37----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 8 13 8 58 12 9 24 132

12.90 12.62 8.33 16.25 9.76 3.88 11.16----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 62 103 96 357 123 232 215 1188

5.22 8.67 8.08 30.05 10.35 19.53 18.10==================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

====================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total--------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 100 114 176 390

38.17 31.93 30.88--------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 93 94 202 389

35.50 26.33 35.44--------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 27 54 93 174

10.31 15.13 16.32--------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 13 37 54 104

4.96 10.36 9.47--------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 29 58 45 132

11.07 16.25 7.89

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

554

Page 556: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------Total 262 357 570 1189

22.04 30.03 47.94====================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===============================================================================================PID7

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 101 40 57 33 26 36 89 382

39.45 35.40 48.31 29.20 21.85 28.80 29.87-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 78 34 39 33 48 46 105 383

30.47 30.09 33.05 29.20 40.34 36.80 35.23-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 23 16 9 21 26 24 42 161

8.98 14.16 7.63 18.58 21.85 19.20 14.09-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 24 6 4 15 10 9 34 102

9.38 5.31 3.39 13.27 8.40 7.20 11.41-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 30 17 9 11 9 10 28 114

11.72 15.04 7.63 9.73 7.56 8.00 9.40-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 256 113 118 113 119 125 298 1142

22.42 9.89 10.33 9.89 10.42 10.95 26.09===============================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

555

Page 557: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

======================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total----------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 198 33 151 382

40.74 29.20 27.91----------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 150 33 199 382

30.86 29.20 36.78----------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 48 21 91 160

9.88 18.58 16.82----------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 34 15 53 102

7.00 13.27 9.80----------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 56 11 47 114

11.52 9.73 8.69----------------------------------------------------------------------Total 486 113 541 1140

42.63 9.91 47.46======================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==============================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 66 184 77 66 393

27.39 40.71 29.17 27.85

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

556

Page 558: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 85 149 98 57 389

35.27 32.96 37.12 24.05--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 42 48 47 39 176

17.43 10.62 17.80 16.46--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 26 32 26 20 104

10.79 7.08 9.85 8.44--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 22 39 16 55 132

9.13 8.63 6.06 23.21--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 241 452 264 237 1194

20.18 37.86 22.11 19.85==============================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 17 113 99 40 83 41 393

41.46 31.92 30.28 35.09 33.74 35.65---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 6 117 113 39 78 37 390

14.63 33.05 34.56 34.21 31.71 32.17---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 7 49 40 18 42 19 175

17.07 13.84 12.23 15.79 17.07 16.52---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 3 32 31 6 21 12 105

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

557

Page 559: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

7.32 9.04 9.48 5.26 8.54 10.43---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 8 43 44 11 22 6 134

19.51 12.15 13.46 9.65 8.94 5.22---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 41 354 327 114 246 115 1197

3.43 29.57 27.32 9.52 20.55 9.61=========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

========================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 75 84 39 97 93 388

39.68 31.70 30.23 34.52 28.53------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 62 100 39 86 102 389

32.80 37.74 30.23 30.60 31.29------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 21 36 28 44 46 175

11.11 13.58 21.71 15.66 14.11------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 16 21 12 28 28 105

8.47 7.92 9.30 9.96 8.59------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 15 24 11 26 57 133

7.94 9.06 8.53 9.25 17.48------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 189 265 129 281 326 1190

15.88 22.27 10.84 23.61 27.39========================================================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

558

Page 560: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA gena ~ACAs nati Mixed Other Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 220 62 88 3 2 8 10 393

30.86 40.00 32.35 13.64 50.00 66.67 71.43-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 253 35 90 4 2 3 1 388

35.48 22.58 33.09 18.18 50.00 25.00 7.14-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 95 19 54 3 0 1 2 174

13.32 12.26 19.85 13.64 0.00 8.33 14.29-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 71 14 10 9 0 0 0 104

9.96 9.03 3.68 40.91 0.00 0.00 0.00-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 74 25 30 3 0 0 1 133

10.38 16.13 11.03 13.64 0.00 0.00 7.14-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 713 155 272 22 4 12 14 1192

59.82 13.00 22.82 1.85 0.34 1.01 1.17=========================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

========================================================================================================marital

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

559

Page 561: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 211 6 47 20 89 20 393

32.66 25.00 31.13 31.25 35.18 35.09--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 227 6 50 20 76 11 390

35.14 25.00 33.11 31.25 30.04 19.30--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 94 5 22 12 34 9 176

14.55 20.83 14.57 18.75 13.44 15.79--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 55 0 12 5 23 8 103

8.51 0.00 7.95 7.81 9.09 14.04--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 59 7 20 7 31 9 133

9.13 29.17 13.25 10.94 12.25 15.79--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 646 24 151 64 253 57 1195

54.06 2.01 12.64 5.36 21.17 4.77========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==============================================gender

Q Male Female Total----------------------------------------------Extremely effective 148 244 392

26.52 38.30----------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 211 179 390

37.81 28.10----------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

560

Page 562: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Not very effective 87 88 17515.59 13.81

----------------------------------------------Not at all effective 47 58 105

8.42 9.11----------------------------------------------Don't know 65 68 133

11.65 10.68----------------------------------------------Total 558 637 1195

46.69 53.31==============================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

========================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total--------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 118 181 94 393

33.24 30.73 37.90--------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 107 212 70 389

30.14 35.99 28.23--------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 59 81 35 175

16.62 13.75 14.11--------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 33 47 25 105

9.30 7.98 10.08--------------------------------------------------------Don't know 38 68 24 130

10.70 11.54 9.68

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

561

Page 563: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------Total 355 589 248 1192

29.78 49.41 20.81========================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===========================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 73 129 31 32 128 393

29.20 35.25 25.41 29.91 36.47---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 79 114 38 48 111 390

31.60 31.15 31.15 44.86 31.62---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 46 52 31 10 36 175

18.40 14.21 25.41 9.35 10.26---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 29 26 7 5 38 105

11.60 7.10 5.74 4.67 10.83---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 23 45 15 12 38 133

9.20 12.30 12.30 11.21 10.83---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 250 366 122 107 351 1196

20.90 30.60 10.20 8.95 29.35===========================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

562

Page 564: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

=============================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total-------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 59 120 159 54 392

29.95 38.46 34.64 24.11-------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 61 90 152 86 389

30.96 28.85 33.12 38.39-------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 29 35 69 42 175

14.72 11.22 15.03 18.75-------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 20 27 36 20 103

10.15 8.65 7.84 8.93-------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 28 40 43 22 133

14.21 12.82 9.37 9.82-------------------------------------------------------------Total 197 312 459 224 1192

16.53 26.17 38.51 18.79=============================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

563

Page 565: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q36G. Education Policy E↵ectiveness: Increasing opportunities for online learning

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 19 21 23 95 30 41 39 268

30.16 20.39 23.96 26.39 24.00 17.67 17.89----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 13 50 48 126 53 113 84 487

20.63 48.54 50.00 35.00 42.40 48.71 38.53----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

564

Page 566: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Not very effective 18 15 14 47 23 47 39 20328.57 14.56 14.58 13.06 18.40 20.26 17.89

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 5 9 4 31 10 14 21 94

7.94 8.74 4.17 8.61 8.00 6.03 9.63----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 8 8 7 61 9 17 35 145

12.70 7.77 7.29 16.94 7.20 7.33 16.06----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 63 103 96 360 125 232 218 1197

5.26 8.60 8.02 30.08 10.44 19.38 18.21==================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

====================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total--------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 63 95 110 268

24.14 26.39 19.23--------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 111 126 249 486

42.53 35.00 43.53--------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 47 47 108 202

18.01 13.06 18.88--------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 17 31 45 93

6.51 8.61 7.87--------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 23 61 60 144

8.81 16.94 10.49

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

565

Page 567: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------Total 261 360 572 1193

21.88 30.18 47.95====================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===============================================================================================PID7

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 71 27 39 28 24 24 39 252

27.95 23.68 33.05 24.78 20.00 19.35 13.09-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 101 39 51 33 52 58 142 476

39.76 34.21 43.22 29.20 43.33 46.77 47.65-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 38 21 9 26 26 22 55 197

14.96 18.42 7.63 23.01 21.67 17.74 18.46-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 12 10 12 13 10 9 21 87

4.72 8.77 10.17 11.50 8.33 7.26 7.05-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 32 17 7 13 8 11 41 129

12.60 14.91 5.93 11.50 6.67 8.87 13.76-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 254 114 118 113 120 124 298 1141

22.26 9.99 10.34 9.90 10.52 10.87 26.12===============================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

566

Page 568: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

======================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total----------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 137 28 87 252

28.31 24.78 16.02----------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 190 33 253 476

39.26 29.20 46.59----------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 67 26 103 196

13.84 23.01 18.97----------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 34 13 41 88

7.02 11.50 7.55----------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 56 13 59 128

11.57 11.50 10.87----------------------------------------------------------------------Total 484 113 543 1140

42.46 9.91 47.63======================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==============================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 48 127 45 48 268

19.92 28.16 16.92 20.25

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

567

Page 569: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 104 187 117 79 487

43.15 41.46 43.98 33.33--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 44 62 50 48 204

18.26 13.75 18.80 20.25--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 13 34 35 10 92

5.39 7.54 13.16 4.22--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 32 41 19 52 144

13.28 9.09 7.14 21.94--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 241 451 266 237 1195

20.17 37.74 22.26 19.83==============================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 4 85 75 28 56 19 267

10.00 24.15 22.66 25.00 22.76 16.81---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 18 132 140 47 105 45 487

45.00 37.50 42.30 41.96 42.68 39.82---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 7 69 48 13 43 23 203

17.50 19.60 14.50 11.61 17.48 20.35---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 3 18 27 13 15 17 93

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

568

Page 570: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

7.50 5.11 8.16 11.61 6.10 15.04---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 8 48 41 11 27 9 144

20.00 13.64 12.39 9.82 10.98 7.96---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 40 352 331 112 246 113 1194

3.35 29.48 27.72 9.38 20.60 9.46=========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

========================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 44 46 33 68 73 264

23.66 17.36 25.19 24.29 22.32------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 75 117 52 121 121 486

40.32 44.15 39.69 43.21 37.00------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 29 52 23 50 48 202

15.59 19.62 17.56 17.86 14.68------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 19 21 7 16 30 93

10.22 7.92 5.34 5.71 9.17------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 19 29 16 25 55 144

10.22 10.94 12.21 8.93 16.82------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 186 265 131 280 327 1189

15.64 22.29 11.02 23.55 27.50========================================================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

569

Page 571: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA gena ~ACAs nati Mixed Other Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 138 53 69 3 0 3 2 268

19.22 34.19 25.46 13.04 0.00 23.08 14.29-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 311 49 102 9 2 8 7 488

43.31 31.61 37.64 39.13 50.00 61.54 50.00-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 132 15 45 7 0 1 4 204

18.38 9.68 16.61 30.43 0.00 7.69 28.57-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 55 8 26 1 2 1 1 94

7.66 5.16 9.59 4.35 50.00 7.69 7.14-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 82 30 29 3 0 0 0 144

11.42 19.35 10.70 13.04 0.00 0.00 0.00-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 718 155 271 23 4 13 14 1198

59.93 12.94 22.62 1.92 0.33 1.09 1.17=========================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

========================================================================================================marital

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

570

Page 572: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 141 2 31 13 71 11 269

21.79 8.70 20.53 20.00 27.95 19.30--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 260 5 71 30 99 22 487

40.19 21.74 47.02 46.15 38.98 38.60--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 124 6 18 9 37 10 204

19.17 26.09 11.92 13.85 14.57 17.54--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 54 3 8 4 17 6 92

8.35 13.04 5.30 6.15 6.69 10.53--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 68 7 23 9 30 8 145

10.51 30.43 15.23 13.85 11.81 14.04--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 647 23 151 65 254 57 1197

54.05 1.92 12.61 5.43 21.22 4.76========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==============================================gender

Q Male Female Total----------------------------------------------Extremely effective 112 156 268

20.04 24.49----------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 239 248 487

42.75 38.93----------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

571

Page 573: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Not very effective 100 104 20417.89 16.33

----------------------------------------------Not at all effective 44 49 93

7.87 7.69----------------------------------------------Don't know 64 80 144

11.45 12.56----------------------------------------------Total 559 637 1196

46.74 53.26==============================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

========================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total--------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 104 113 47 264

29.38 19.19 18.95--------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 130 250 106 486

36.72 42.44 42.74--------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 56 101 47 204

15.82 17.15 18.95--------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 23 52 18 93

6.50 8.83 7.26--------------------------------------------------------Don't know 41 73 30 144

11.58 12.39 12.10

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

572

Page 574: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------Total 354 589 248 1191

29.72 49.45 20.82========================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===========================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 54 84 19 27 84 268

21.51 22.95 15.70 25.23 23.93---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 101 151 59 42 135 488

40.24 41.26 48.76 39.25 38.46---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 46 49 17 17 74 203

18.33 13.39 14.05 15.89 21.08---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 21 37 7 8 19 92

8.37 10.11 5.79 7.48 5.41---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 29 45 19 13 39 145

11.55 12.30 15.70 12.15 11.11---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 251 366 121 107 351 1196

20.99 30.60 10.12 8.95 29.35===========================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

573

Page 575: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

=============================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total-------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 52 81 98 37 268

26.40 25.88 21.40 16.30-------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 76 103 192 115 486

38.58 32.91 41.92 50.66-------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 32 53 74 45 204

16.24 16.93 16.16 19.82-------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 12 32 35 14 93

6.09 10.22 7.64 6.17-------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 25 44 59 16 144

12.69 14.06 12.88 7.05-------------------------------------------------------------Total 197 313 458 227 1195

16.49 26.19 38.33 19.00=============================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

574

Page 576: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q36H. Education Policy E↵ectiveness: Establishing a state-wide pre-kindergarten program

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 45 52 39 125 24 28 34 347

72.58 50.49 40.62 34.82 19.35 12.17 15.96----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 6 24 38 103 39 61 37 308

9.68 23.30 39.58 28.69 31.45 26.52 17.37----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

575

Page 577: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Not very effective 3 12 9 31 24 62 35 1764.84 11.65 9.38 8.64 19.35 26.96 16.43

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 0 3 3 37 25 65 72 205

0.00 2.91 3.12 10.31 20.16 28.26 33.80----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 8 12 7 63 12 14 35 151

12.90 11.65 7.29 17.55 9.68 6.09 16.43----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 62 103 96 359 124 230 213 1187

5.22 8.68 8.09 30.24 10.45 19.38 17.94==================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

====================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total--------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 136 125 86 347

51.71 34.82 15.17--------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 68 103 137 308

25.86 28.69 24.16--------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 25 31 122 178

9.51 8.64 21.52--------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 6 37 162 205

2.28 10.31 28.57--------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 28 63 60 151

10.65 17.55 10.58

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

576

Page 578: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------Total 263 359 567 1189

22.12 30.19 47.69====================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===============================================================================================PID7

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 141 46 54 29 9 22 29 330

55.29 40.71 45.76 25.89 7.50 17.60 9.90-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 51 36 40 30 32 24 84 297

20.00 31.86 33.90 26.79 26.67 19.20 28.67-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 16 10 6 16 32 27 69 176

6.27 8.85 5.08 14.29 26.67 21.60 23.55-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 13 5 3 22 41 37 80 201

5.10 4.42 2.54 19.64 34.17 29.60 27.30-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 34 16 15 15 6 15 31 132

13.33 14.16 12.71 13.39 5.00 12.00 10.58-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 255 113 118 112 120 125 293 1136

22.45 9.95 10.39 9.86 10.56 11.00 25.79===============================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

577

Page 579: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

======================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total----------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 241 29 60 330

49.39 25.89 11.15----------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 127 30 140 297

26.02 26.79 26.02----------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 33 16 128 177

6.76 14.29 23.79----------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 22 22 158 202

4.51 19.64 29.37----------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 65 15 52 132

13.32 13.39 9.67----------------------------------------------------------------------Total 488 112 538 1138

42.88 9.84 47.28======================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==============================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 46 236 16 50 348

19.09 52.10 6.11 21.10

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

578

Page 580: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 86 117 54 51 308

35.68 25.83 20.61 21.52--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 43 30 76 30 179

17.84 6.62 29.01 12.66--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 43 25 100 39 207

17.84 5.52 38.17 16.46--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 23 45 16 67 151

9.54 9.93 6.11 28.27--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 241 453 262 237 1193

20.20 37.97 21.96 19.87==============================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 8 110 90 33 75 32 348

20.51 31.34 27.11 29.20 30.61 27.83---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 12 86 88 31 55 37 309

30.77 24.50 26.51 27.43 22.45 32.17---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 3 48 62 15 30 22 180

7.69 13.68 18.67 13.27 12.24 19.13---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 8 48 50 20 58 22 206

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

579

Page 581: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

20.51 13.68 15.06 17.70 23.67 19.13---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 8 59 42 14 27 2 152

20.51 16.81 12.65 12.39 11.02 1.74---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 39 351 332 113 245 115 1195

3.26 29.37 27.78 9.46 20.50 9.62=========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

========================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 57 50 36 102 104 349

30.32 19.08 27.69 36.17 31.90------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 51 70 41 70 74 306

27.13 26.72 31.54 24.82 22.70------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 25 53 16 30 56 180

13.30 20.23 12.31 10.64 17.18------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 37 53 22 48 42 202

19.68 20.23 16.92 17.02 12.88------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 18 36 15 32 50 151

9.57 13.74 11.54 11.35 15.34------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 188 262 130 282 326 1188

15.82 22.05 10.94 23.74 27.44========================================================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

580

Page 582: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA gena ~ACAs nati Mixed Other Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 172 59 102 9 1 2 3 348

24.12 37.58 37.50 40.91 33.33 14.29 23.08-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 178 40 69 9 0 9 3 308

24.96 25.48 25.37 40.91 0.00 64.29 23.08-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 136 9 29 1 1 2 1 179

19.07 5.73 10.66 4.55 33.33 14.29 7.69-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 148 15 37 0 1 0 5 206

20.76 9.55 13.60 0.00 33.33 0.00 38.46-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 79 34 35 3 0 1 1 153

11.08 21.66 12.87 13.64 0.00 7.14 7.69-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 713 157 272 22 3 14 13 1194

59.72 13.15 22.78 1.84 0.25 1.17 1.09=========================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

========================================================================================================marital

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

581

Page 583: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 170 10 50 16 84 18 348

26.48 43.48 32.89 24.62 33.07 31.58--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 159 4 49 16 59 21 308

24.77 17.39 32.24 24.62 23.23 36.84--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 107 1 16 17 33 5 179

16.67 4.35 10.53 26.15 12.99 8.77--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 137 1 20 7 35 6 206

21.34 4.35 13.16 10.77 13.78 10.53--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 69 7 17 9 43 7 152

10.75 30.43 11.18 13.85 16.93 12.28--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 642 23 152 65 254 57 1193

53.81 1.93 12.74 5.45 21.29 4.78========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==============================================gender

Q Male Female Total----------------------------------------------Extremely effective 135 213 348

24.24 33.65----------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 134 173 307

24.06 27.33----------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

582

Page 584: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Not very effective 107 72 17919.21 11.37

----------------------------------------------Not at all effective 100 105 205

17.95 16.59----------------------------------------------Don't know 81 70 151

14.54 11.06----------------------------------------------Total 557 633 1190

46.81 53.19==============================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

========================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total--------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 118 157 70 345

33.24 26.57 28.69--------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 105 150 52 307

29.58 25.38 21.31--------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 53 82 45 180

14.93 13.87 18.44--------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 32 127 47 206

9.01 21.49 19.26--------------------------------------------------------Don't know 47 75 30 152

13.24 12.69 12.30

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

583

Page 585: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------Total 355 591 244 1190

29.83 49.66 20.50========================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===========================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 77 106 30 47 89 349

30.92 28.96 24.59 43.52 25.43---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 62 109 32 20 85 308

24.90 29.78 26.23 18.52 24.29---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 36 51 19 11 63 180

14.46 13.93 15.57 10.19 18.00---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 49 50 32 15 59 205

19.68 13.66 26.23 13.89 16.86---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 25 50 9 15 54 153

10.04 13.66 7.38 13.89 15.43---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 249 366 122 108 350 1195

20.84 30.63 10.21 9.04 29.29===========================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

584

Page 586: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

=============================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total-------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 66 110 129 44 349

33.33 35.03 27.98 19.82-------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 53 73 104 79 309

26.77 23.25 22.56 35.59-------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 30 38 71 40 179

15.15 12.10 15.40 18.02-------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 16 55 102 33 206

8.08 17.52 22.13 14.86-------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 33 38 55 26 152

16.67 12.10 11.93 11.71-------------------------------------------------------------Total 198 314 461 222 1195

16.57 26.28 38.58 18.58=============================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

585

Page 587: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q36I. Education Policy E↵ectiveness: Allowing more localized control over curriculum and standards

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 9 16 13 90 32 115 102 377

14.75 15.38 13.40 25.14 25.81 49.57 47.00----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 16 36 34 112 49 87 61 395

26.23 34.62 35.05 31.28 39.52 37.50 28.11----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

586

Page 588: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Not very effective 16 26 22 54 22 12 12 16426.23 25.00 22.68 15.08 17.74 5.17 5.53

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 8 17 21 41 7 8 13 115

13.11 16.35 21.65 11.45 5.65 3.45 5.99----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 12 9 7 61 14 10 29 142

19.67 8.65 7.22 17.04 11.29 4.31 13.36----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 61 104 97 358 124 232 217 1193

5.11 8.72 8.13 30.01 10.39 19.45 18.19==================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

====================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total--------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 38 90 248 376

14.62 25.14 43.36--------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 86 112 197 395

33.08 31.28 34.44--------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 63 54 46 163

24.23 15.08 8.04--------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 45 41 28 114

17.31 11.45 4.90--------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 28 61 53 142

10.77 17.04 9.27

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

587

Page 589: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------Total 260 358 572 1190

21.85 30.08 48.07====================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===============================================================================================PID7

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 58 24 18 26 44 56 138 364

22.66 21.24 15.52 23.21 36.36 44.80 46.62-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 75 42 32 39 45 41 108 382

29.30 37.17 27.59 34.82 37.19 32.80 36.49-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 44 21 34 20 21 10 10 160

17.19 18.58 29.31 17.86 17.36 8.00 3.38-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 38 8 21 12 7 6 14 106

14.84 7.08 18.10 10.71 5.79 4.80 4.73-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 41 18 11 15 4 12 26 127

16.02 15.93 9.48 13.39 3.31 9.60 8.78-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 256 113 116 112 121 125 296 1139

22.48 9.92 10.18 9.83 10.62 10.97 25.99===============================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

588

Page 590: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

======================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total----------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 100 26 239 365

20.62 23.21 44.01----------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 149 39 193 381

30.72 34.82 35.54----------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 99 20 41 160

20.41 17.86 7.55----------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 67 12 27 106

13.81 10.71 4.97----------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 70 15 43 128

14.43 13.39 7.92----------------------------------------------------------------------Total 485 112 543 1140

42.54 9.82 47.63======================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==============================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 76 93 151 58 378

31.54 20.71 56.77 24.37

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

589

Page 591: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 93 137 85 81 396

38.59 30.51 31.95 34.03--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 30 95 11 26 162

12.45 21.16 4.14 10.92--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 19 71 10 15 115

7.88 15.81 3.76 6.30--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 23 53 9 58 143

9.54 11.80 3.38 24.37--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 241 449 266 238 1194

20.18 37.60 22.28 19.93==============================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 11 110 94 48 75 40 378

26.83 31.25 28.40 43.24 30.36 34.78---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 15 116 124 24 78 39 396

36.59 32.95 37.46 21.62 31.58 33.91---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 3 51 40 25 34 11 164

7.32 14.49 12.08 22.52 13.77 9.57---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 4 23 30 6 33 20 116

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

590

Page 592: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

9.76 6.53 9.06 5.41 13.36 17.39---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 8 52 43 8 27 5 143

19.51 14.77 12.99 7.21 10.93 4.35---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 41 352 331 111 247 115 1197

3.43 29.41 27.65 9.27 20.63 9.61=========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

========================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 83 108 47 67 73 378

44.39 40.60 35.88 23.93 22.46------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 65 92 39 100 98 394

34.76 34.59 29.77 35.71 30.15------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 12 24 18 45 63 162

6.42 9.02 13.74 16.07 19.38------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 8 15 13 41 34 111

4.28 5.64 9.92 14.64 10.46------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 19 27 14 27 57 144

10.16 10.15 10.69 9.64 17.54------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 187 266 131 280 325 1189

15.73 22.37 11.02 23.55 27.33========================================================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

591

Page 593: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA gena ~ACAs nati Mixed Other Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 249 47 68 1 3 3 6 377

34.87 30.13 25.19 4.55 75.00 21.43 42.86-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 241 41 82 15 1 8 8 396

33.75 26.28 30.37 68.18 25.00 57.14 57.14-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 90 15 54 2 0 2 0 163

12.61 9.62 20.00 9.09 0.00 14.29 0.00-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 56 20 36 2 0 0 0 114

7.84 12.82 13.33 9.09 0.00 0.00 0.00-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 78 33 30 2 0 1 0 144

10.92 21.15 11.11 9.09 0.00 7.14 0.00-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 714 156 270 22 4 14 14 1194

59.80 13.07 22.61 1.84 0.34 1.17 1.17=========================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

========================================================================================================marital

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

592

Page 594: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 231 5 30 22 77 12 377

35.87 21.74 19.87 34.38 30.43 20.69--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 210 5 62 25 78 15 395

32.61 21.74 41.06 39.06 30.83 25.86--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 70 6 20 8 43 16 163

10.87 26.09 13.25 12.50 17.00 27.59--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 63 0 18 2 23 8 114

9.78 0.00 11.92 3.12 9.09 13.79--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 70 7 21 7 32 7 144

10.87 30.43 13.91 10.94 12.65 12.07--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 644 23 151 64 253 58 1193

53.98 1.93 12.66 5.36 21.21 4.86========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==============================================gender

Q Male Female Total----------------------------------------------Extremely effective 185 192 377

33.04 30.28----------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 177 219 396

31.61 34.54----------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

593

Page 595: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Not very effective 75 88 16313.39 13.88

----------------------------------------------Not at all effective 61 53 114

10.89 8.36----------------------------------------------Don't know 62 82 144

11.07 12.93----------------------------------------------Total 560 634 1194

46.90 53.10==============================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

========================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total--------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 109 180 88 377

30.62 30.66 35.48--------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 108 201 83 392

30.34 34.24 33.47--------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 51 76 36 163

14.33 12.95 14.52--------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 39 61 15 115

10.96 10.39 6.05--------------------------------------------------------Don't know 49 69 26 144

13.76 11.75 10.48

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

594

Page 596: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------Total 356 587 248 1191

29.89 49.29 20.82========================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===========================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 77 108 43 31 119 378

31.05 29.51 35.25 28.97 33.81---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 77 123 40 34 121 395

31.05 33.61 32.79 31.78 34.38---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 33 60 14 19 37 163

13.31 16.39 11.48 17.76 10.51---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 32 31 12 10 30 115

12.90 8.47 9.84 9.35 8.52---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 29 44 13 13 45 144

11.69 12.02 10.66 12.15 12.78---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 248 366 122 107 352 1195

20.75 30.63 10.21 8.95 29.46===========================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

595

Page 597: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

=============================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total-------------------------------------------------------------Extremely effective 49 93 156 81 379

24.75 29.90 34.06 35.53-------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat effective 68 101 138 89 396

34.34 32.48 30.13 39.04-------------------------------------------------------------Not very effective 42 40 62 19 163

21.21 12.86 13.54 8.33-------------------------------------------------------------Not at all effective 15 27 54 18 114

7.58 8.68 11.79 7.89-------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 24 50 48 21 143

12.12 16.08 10.48 9.21-------------------------------------------------------------Total 198 311 458 228 1195

16.57 26.03 38.33 19.08=============================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

596

Page 598: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q37. MOST E↵ective Education Policy Proposal

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Creating a school voucher prog 1 1 1 29 22 56 54 164

1.61 0.96 1.06 8.08 17.89 24.35 25.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Expanding the number of charte 0 2 1 12 9 29 21 74

0.00 1.92 1.06 3.34 7.32 12.61 9.72--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

597

Page 599: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Increasing the pay of public s 5 26 9 51 6 13 21 1318.06 25.00 9.57 14.21 4.88 5.65 9.72

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Increasing funding for the pub 28 24 32 88 21 19 26 238

45.16 23.08 34.04 24.51 17.07 8.26 12.04--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Providing more incentives for 6 6 4 22 9 9 2 58

9.68 5.77 4.26 6.13 7.32 3.91 0.93--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Reducing the number of standar 5 30 12 60 13 22 28 170

8.06 28.85 12.77 16.71 10.57 9.57 12.96--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Increasing opportunities for o 5 1 8 34 12 17 8 85

8.06 0.96 8.51 9.47 9.76 7.39 3.70--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Establishing a state-wide pre- 12 10 24 40 12 6 4 108

19.35 9.62 25.53 11.14 9.76 2.61 1.85--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Allowing more localized contro 0 4 3 23 19 59 52 160

0.00 3.85 3.19 6.41 15.45 25.65 24.07--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 62 104 94 359 123 230 216 1188

5.22 8.75 7.91 30.22 10.35 19.36 18.18============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Creating a school voucher program 3 29 131 163

1.15 8.08 22.98

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

598

Page 600: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Expanding the number of charter schools 3 12 60 75

1.15 3.34 10.53----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Increasing the pay of public school teachers 41 51 40 132

15.71 14.21 7.02----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Increasing funding for the public school system 84 88 66 238

32.18 24.51 11.58----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Providing more incentives for individuals to choose teaching as a profession 16 22 21 59

6.13 6.13 3.68----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Reducing the number of standardized tests students must take 46 60 63 169

17.62 16.71 11.05----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Increasing opportunities for online learning 14 34 37 85

5.36 9.47 6.49----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Establishing a state-wide pre-kindergarten program 47 40 22 109

18.01 11.14 3.86----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Allowing more localized control over curriculum and standards 7 23 130 160

2.68 6.41 22.81----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 261 359 570 1190

21.93 30.17 47.90============================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================PID7

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

599

Page 601: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Creating a school voucher program 8 3 4 16 39 18 69 157

3.15 2.65 3.48 14.04 31.97 14.52 23.39--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Expanding the number of charter schools 4 3 2 8 16 12 28 73

1.57 2.65 1.74 7.02 13.11 9.68 9.49--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Increasing the pay of public school teachers 38 23 14 19 6 11 20 131

14.96 20.35 12.17 16.67 4.92 8.87 6.78--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Increasing funding for the public school system 75 29 34 21 7 17 41 224

29.53 25.66 29.57 18.42 5.74 13.71 13.90--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Providing more incentives for individuals to choose teaching as a 18 9 5 6 6 5 5 54

7.09 7.96 4.35 5.26 4.92 4.03 1.69--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Reducing the number of standardized tests students must take 43 19 22 10 13 22 32 161

16.93 16.81 19.13 8.77 10.66 17.74 10.85--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Increasing opportunities for online learning 25 4 2 14 11 11 11 78

9.84 3.54 1.74 12.28 9.02 8.87 3.73--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Establishing a state-wide pre-kindergarten program 36 13 29 5 2 6 14 105

14.17 11.50 25.22 4.39 1.64 4.84 4.75--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Allowing more localized control over curriculum and standards 7 10 3 15 22 22 75 154

2.76 8.85 2.61 13.16 18.03 17.74 25.42--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 254 113 115 114 122 124 295 1137

22.34 9.94 10.11 10.03 10.73 10.91 25.95============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

600

Page 602: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

==============================================================================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Creating a school voucher program 16 16 127 159

3.29 14.04 23.43------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Expanding the number of charter schools 10 8 56 74

2.05 7.02 10.33------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Increasing the pay of public school teachers 75 19 36 130

15.40 16.67 6.64------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Increasing funding for the public school system 138 21 65 224

28.34 18.42 11.99------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Providing more incentives for individuals to choose teaching as a profession 33 6 16 55

6.78 5.26 2.95------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Reducing the number of standardized tests students must take 85 10 67 162

17.45 8.77 12.36------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Increasing opportunities for online learning 32 14 33 79

6.57 12.28 6.09------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Establishing a state-wide pre-kindergarten program 77 5 22 104

15.81 4.39 4.06------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Allowing more localized control over curriculum and standards 21 15 120 156

4.31 13.16 22.14------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 487 114 542 1143

42.61 9.97 47.42==============================================================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

601

Page 603: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Creating a school voucher program 32 13 84 35 164

13.28 2.88 31.82 14.89--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Expanding the number of charter schools 18 5 38 12 73

7.47 1.11 14.39 5.11--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Increasing the pay of public school teachers 24 64 14 29 131

9.96 14.19 5.30 12.34--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Increasing funding for the public school system 43 139 19 37 238

17.84 30.82 7.20 15.74--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Providing more incentives for individuals to choos 9 33 7 10 59

3.73 7.32 2.65 4.26--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Reducing the number of standardized tests students 28 80 23 38 169

11.62 17.74 8.71 16.17--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Increasing opportunities for online learning 26 27 5 27 85

10.79 5.99 1.89 11.49--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Establishing a state-wide pre-kindergarten program 20 75 2 13 110

8.30 16.63 0.76 5.53--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Allowing more localized control over curriculum an 41 15 72 34 162

17.01 3.33 27.27 14.47

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

602

Page 604: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 241 451 264 235 1191

20.24 37.87 22.17 19.73============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Creating a school voucher program 8 44 34 15 40 22 163

20.00 12.54 10.27 13.39 16.53 19.30--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Expanding the number of charter schools 4 25 20 8 14 2 73

10.00 7.12 6.04 7.14 5.79 1.75--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Increasing the pay of public school teachers 3 41 49 13 18 6 130

7.50 11.68 14.80 11.61 7.44 5.26--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Increasing funding for the public school system 8 77 69 20 37 27 238

20.00 21.94 20.85 17.86 15.29 23.68--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Providing more incentives for individuals to choose tea 2 17 13 6 16 5 59

5.00 4.84 3.93 5.36 6.61 4.39--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Reducing the number of standardized tests students must 3 55 49 15 29 19 170

7.50 15.67 14.80 13.39 11.98 16.67--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Increasing opportunities for online learning 2 30 30 9 14 1 86

5.00 8.55 9.06 8.04 5.79 0.88--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Establishing a state-wide pre-kindergarten program 7 27 23 12 27 13 109

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

603

Page 605: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

17.50 7.69 6.95 10.71 11.16 11.40--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Allowing more localized control over curriculum and sta 3 35 44 14 47 19 162

7.50 9.97 13.29 12.50 19.42 16.67--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 40 351 331 112 242 114 1190

3.36 29.50 27.82 9.41 20.34 9.58============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Creating a school voucher program 37 40 18 26 40 161

19.79 15.15 13.85 9.29 12.27--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Expanding the number of charter schools 9 27 7 13 17 73

4.81 10.23 5.38 4.64 5.21--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Increasing the pay of public school teac 25 23 7 28 49 132

13.37 8.71 5.38 10.00 15.03--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Increasing funding for the public school 23 46 26 65 78 238

12.30 17.42 20.00 23.21 23.93--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Providing more incentives for individual 9 8 11 13 18 59

4.81 3.03 8.46 4.64 5.52--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Reducing the number of standardized test 19 36 25 48 41 169

10.16 13.64 19.23 17.14 12.58--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

604

Page 606: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Increasing opportunities for online lear 16 23 4 20 23 868.56 8.71 3.08 7.14 7.06

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Establishing a state-wide pre-kindergart 12 18 15 39 25 109

6.42 6.82 11.54 13.93 7.67--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Allowing more localized control over cur 37 43 17 28 35 160

19.79 16.29 13.08 10.00 10.74--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 187 264 130 280 326 1187

15.75 22.24 10.95 23.59 27.46============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA g Mixed Other Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Creating a school voucher program 112 11 29 3 2 0 8 165

15.69 7.05 10.70 14.29 50.00 0.00 57.14--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Expanding the number of charter sc 49 2 17 2 1 2 0 73

6.86 1.28 6.27 9.52 25.00 14.29 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Increasing the pay of public schoo 63 26 40 0 0 1 1 131

8.82 16.67 14.76 0.00 0.00 7.14 7.14--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Increasing funding for the public 135 30 63 9 0 1 0 238

18.91 19.23 23.25 42.86 0.00 7.14 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Providing more incentives for indi 29 15 14 0 0 1 0 59

4.06 9.62 5.17 0.00 0.00 7.14 0.00

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

605

Page 607: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Reducing the number of standardize 93 22 48 1 1 1 3 169

13.03 14.10 17.71 4.76 25.00 7.14 21.43--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Increasing opportunities for onlin 36 23 23 2 0 2 0 86

5.04 14.74 8.49 9.52 0.00 14.29 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Establishing a state-wide pre-kind 61 17 27 2 0 3 0 110

8.54 10.90 9.96 9.52 0.00 21.43 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Allowing more localized control ov 136 10 10 2 0 3 2 163

19.05 6.41 3.69 9.52 0.00 21.43 14.29--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 714 156 271 21 4 14 14 1194

59.80 13.07 22.70 1.76 0.34 1.17 1.17============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================marital

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Creating a school voucher program 113 0 11 7 27 7 165

17.55 0.00 7.24 10.77 10.76 12.50--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Expanding the number of charter schools 45 3 8 5 14 0 75

6.99 12.50 5.26 7.69 5.58 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Increasing the pay of public school teachers 70 2 19 10 19 10 130

10.87 8.33 12.50 15.38 7.57 17.86--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Increasing funding for the public school system 101 11 33 12 67 15 239

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

606

Page 608: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

15.68 45.83 21.71 18.46 26.69 26.79--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Providing more incentives for individuals to choose teac 28 0 9 4 11 6 58

4.35 0.00 5.92 6.15 4.38 10.71--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Reducing the number of standardized tests students must 86 4 31 4 38 7 170

13.35 16.67 20.39 6.15 15.14 12.50--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Increasing opportunities for online learning 34 0 7 5 32 7 85

5.28 0.00 4.61 7.69 12.75 12.50--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Establishing a state-wide pre-kindergarten program 55 1 20 5 26 2 109

8.54 4.17 13.16 7.69 10.36 3.57--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Allowing more localized control over curriculum and stan 112 3 14 13 17 2 161

17.39 12.50 9.21 20.00 6.77 3.57--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 644 24 152 65 251 56 1192

54.03 2.01 12.75 5.45 21.06 4.70============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================================================gender

Q Male Female Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Creating a school voucher program 98 66 164

17.59 10.38------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Expanding the number of charter schools 37 37 74

6.64 5.82------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

607

Page 609: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Increasing the pay of public school teachers 55 77 1329.87 12.11

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Increasing funding for the public school system 112 126 238

20.11 19.81------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Providing more incentives for individuals to choose teaching as a profession 28 31 59

5.03 4.87------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Reducing the number of standardized tests students must take 49 120 169

8.80 18.87------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Increasing opportunities for online learning 40 45 85

7.18 7.08------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Establishing a state-wide pre-kindergarten program 57 53 110

10.23 8.33------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Allowing more localized control over curriculum and standards 81 81 162

14.54 12.74------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 557 636 1193

46.69 53.31======================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

================================================================================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Creating a school voucher program 38 91 35 164

10.64 15.56 14.17

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

608

Page 610: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Expanding the number of charter schools 21 37 16 74

5.88 6.32 6.48----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Increasing the pay of public school teachers 44 64 24 132

12.32 10.94 9.72----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Increasing funding for the public school system 90 112 35 237

25.21 19.15 14.17----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Providing more incentives for individuals to choose teaching as a profession 19 33 8 60

5.32 5.64 3.24----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Reducing the number of standardized tests students must take 49 76 44 169

13.73 12.99 17.81----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Increasing opportunities for online learning 21 44 17 82

5.88 7.52 6.88----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Establishing a state-wide pre-kindergarten program 35 50 24 109

9.80 8.55 9.72----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Allowing more localized control over curriculum and standards 40 78 44 162

11.20 13.33 17.81----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 357 585 247 1189

30.03 49.20 20.77================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================METRO

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

609

Page 611: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Creating a school voucher program 34 51 28 11 40 164

13.82 13.90 23.14 10.19 11.46--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Expanding the number of charter schoo 14 24 8 7 20 73

5.69 6.54 6.61 6.48 5.73--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Increasing the pay of public school t 16 45 15 15 41 132

6.50 12.26 12.40 13.89 11.75--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Increasing funding for the public sch 60 71 15 26 65 237

24.39 19.35 12.40 24.07 18.62--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Providing more incentives for individ 12 24 9 5 10 60

4.88 6.54 7.44 4.63 2.87--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Reducing the number of standardized t 32 49 13 14 62 170

13.01 13.35 10.74 12.96 17.77--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Increasing opportunities for online l 15 23 9 9 29 85

6.10 6.27 7.44 8.33 8.31--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Establishing a state-wide pre-kinderg 28 34 12 15 19 108

11.38 9.26 9.92 13.89 5.44--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Allowing more localized control over 35 46 12 6 63 162

14.23 12.53 9.92 5.56 18.05--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 246 367 121 108 349 1191

20.65 30.81 10.16 9.07 29.30============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

610

Page 612: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

=====================================================================================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Creating a school voucher program 12 44 75 34 165

6.09 14.15 16.27 15.04---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Expanding the number of charter schools 6 20 32 16 74

3.05 6.43 6.94 7.08---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Increasing the pay of public school teachers 21 34 43 34 132

10.66 10.93 9.33 15.04---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Increasing funding for the public school system 60 78 69 32 239

30.46 25.08 14.97 14.16---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Providing more incentives for individuals to choose teaching as a profession 5 11 30 14 60

2.54 3.54 6.51 6.19---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Reducing the number of standardized tests students must take 30 50 71 18 169

15.23 16.08 15.40 7.96---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Increasing opportunities for online learning 28 24 24 9 85

14.21 7.72 5.21 3.98---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Establishing a state-wide pre-kindergarten program 22 21 48 19 110

11.17 6.75 10.41 8.41---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Allowing more localized control over curriculum and standards 13 29 69 50 161

6.60 9.32 14.97 22.12---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 197 311 461 226 1195

16.49 26.03 38.58 18.91=====================================================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

611

Page 613: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q38. Perceived Existence of Gender Gap in Pay

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The man generally earns more 51 91 68 226 65 106 93 700

80.95 88.35 70.83 62.78 52.00 45.49 42.86--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The woman generally earns more 0 0 1 8 4 6 6 25

0.00 0.00 1.04 2.22 3.20 2.58 2.76--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

612

Page 614: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Both earn about the same amoun 6 10 22 102 47 115 104 4069.52 9.71 22.92 28.33 37.60 49.36 47.93

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 6 2 5 24 9 6 14 66

9.52 1.94 5.21 6.67 7.20 2.58 6.45--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 63 103 96 360 125 233 217 1197

5.26 8.60 8.02 30.08 10.44 19.47 18.13============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===============================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------The man generally earns more 210 226 264 700

79.85 62.78 46.07-------------------------------------------------------------------------------The woman generally earns more 1 8 15 24

0.38 2.22 2.62-------------------------------------------------------------------------------Both earn about the same amount 39 102 266 407

14.83 28.33 46.42-------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 13 24 28 65

4.94 6.67 4.89-------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 263 360 573 1196

21.99 30.10 47.91===============================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

613

Page 615: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==========================================================================================================PID7

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The man generally earns more 202 76 92 57 54 64 139 684

78.91 66.67 76.03 50.44 44.26 51.61 46.64----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The woman generally earns more 4 2 5 2 0 1 11 25

1.56 1.75 4.13 1.77 0.00 0.81 3.69----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Both earn about the same amount 38 31 18 44 65 55 134 385

14.84 27.19 14.88 38.94 53.28 44.35 44.97----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 12 5 6 10 3 4 14 54

4.69 4.39 4.96 8.85 2.46 3.23 4.70----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 256 114 121 113 122 124 298 1148

22.30 9.93 10.54 9.84 10.63 10.80 25.96==========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=================================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------The man generally earns more 370 57 256 683

75.66 50.44 47.15---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

614

Page 616: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

The woman generally earns more 10 2 12 242.04 1.77 2.21

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Both earn about the same amount 86 44 254 384

17.59 38.94 46.78---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 23 10 21 54

4.70 8.85 3.87---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 489 113 543 1145

42.71 9.87 47.42=================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The man generally earns more 133 349 95 124 701

55.19 76.70 35.71 52.10-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The woman generally earns more 9 7 8 1 25

3.73 1.54 3.01 0.42-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Both earn about the same amount 90 80 153 86 409

37.34 17.58 57.52 36.13-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 9 19 10 27 65

3.73 4.18 3.76 11.34-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 241 455 266 238 1200

20.08 37.92 22.17 19.83

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

615

Page 617: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

=========================================================================================================================Cell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

====================================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The man generally earns more 18 194 195 65 159 72 703

43.90 54.96 58.73 57.52 64.37 62.61--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The woman generally earns more 2 10 8 1 1 2 24

4.88 2.83 2.41 0.88 0.40 1.74--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Both earn about the same amount 16 131 111 43 70 38 409

39.02 37.11 33.43 38.05 28.34 33.04--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 5 18 18 4 17 3 65

12.20 5.10 5.42 3.54 6.88 2.61--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 41 353 332 113 247 115 1201

3.41 29.39 27.64 9.41 20.57 9.58====================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===================================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

616

Page 618: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

The man generally earns more 104 139 77 164 218 70255.61 52.45 58.33 58.16 66.26

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The woman generally earns more 3 13 2 2 3 23

1.60 4.91 1.52 0.71 0.91-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Both earn about the same amount 69 101 49 101 88 408

36.90 38.11 37.12 35.82 26.75-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 11 12 4 15 20 62

5.88 4.53 3.03 5.32 6.08-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 187 265 132 282 329 1195

15.65 22.18 11.05 23.60 27.53===================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA gena Mixed Other Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The man generally earns more 421 98 162 7 0 9 4 701

58.64 63.23 59.56 33.33 0.00 69.23 30.77--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The woman generally earns more 11 3 7 2 0 0 1 24

1.53 1.94 2.57 9.52 0.00 0.00 7.69--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Both earn about the same amount 254 39 88 11 4 4 7 407

35.38 25.16 32.35 52.38 100.00 30.77 53.85--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 32 15 15 1 0 0 1 64

4.46 9.68 5.51 4.76 0.00 0.00 7.69

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

617

Page 619: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 718 155 272 21 4 13 13 1196

60.03 12.96 22.74 1.76 0.33 1.09 1.09============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===================================================================================================================marital

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The man generally earns more 362 13 96 50 141 41 703

55.86 54.17 63.58 76.92 55.51 71.93-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The woman generally earns more 12 4 2 0 7 0 25

1.85 16.67 1.32 0.00 2.76 0.00-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Both earn about the same amount 239 6 42 15 92 14 408

36.88 25.00 27.81 23.08 36.22 24.56-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 35 1 11 0 14 2 63

5.40 4.17 7.28 0.00 5.51 3.51-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 648 24 151 65 254 57 1199

54.05 2.00 12.59 5.42 21.18 4.75===================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

618

Page 620: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

genderQ Male Female Total---------------------------------------------------------The man generally earns more 263 439 702

46.80 68.70---------------------------------------------------------The woman generally earns more 14 11 25

2.49 1.72---------------------------------------------------------Both earn about the same amount 247 162 409

43.95 25.35---------------------------------------------------------Don't know 38 27 65

6.76 4.23---------------------------------------------------------Total 562 639 1201

46.79 53.21=========================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===================================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total-------------------------------------------------------------------The man generally earns more 228 346 127 701

63.87 58.54 51.21-------------------------------------------------------------------The woman generally earns more 7 9 8 24

1.96 1.52 3.23-------------------------------------------------------------------Both earn about the same amount 106 200 103 409

29.69 33.84 41.53

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

619

Page 621: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

-------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 16 36 10 62

4.48 6.09 4.03-------------------------------------------------------------------Total 357 591 248 1196

29.85 49.41 20.74===================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The man generally earns more 159 228 72 78 165 702

63.60 61.79 59.50 72.90 46.88--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The woman generally earns more 8 5 1 1 9 24

3.20 1.36 0.83 0.93 2.56--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Both earn about the same amount 71 117 42 25 153 408

28.40 31.71 34.71 23.36 43.47--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 12 19 6 3 25 65

4.80 5.15 4.96 2.80 7.10--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 250 369 121 107 352 1199

20.85 30.78 10.09 8.92 29.36======================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

620

Page 622: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

========================================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total------------------------------------------------------------------------The man generally earns more 89 186 281 146 702

44.95 59.24 60.82 64.32------------------------------------------------------------------------The woman generally earns more 10 8 6 1 25

5.05 2.55 1.30 0.44------------------------------------------------------------------------Both earn about the same amount 79 102 155 72 408

39.90 32.48 33.55 31.72------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 20 18 20 8 66

10.10 5.73 4.33 3.52------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 198 314 462 227 1201

16.49 26.14 38.47 18.90========================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

621

Page 623: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q39. State’s Role in Addressing Gender Equality in the Workplace

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=====================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------State should do more 55 97 79 213 43 55 46 588

87.30 94.17 81.44 59.17 34.68 23.71 21.10-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------State is doing enough 1 4 12 91 53 140 102 403

1.59 3.88 12.37 25.28 42.74 60.34 46.79-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

622

Page 624: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

State is doing too much 0 0 0 12 12 15 42 810.00 0.00 0.00 3.33 9.68 6.47 19.27

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 7 2 6 44 16 22 28 125

11.11 1.94 6.19 12.22 12.90 9.48 12.84-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 63 103 97 360 124 232 218 1197

5.26 8.60 8.10 30.08 10.36 19.38 18.21=====================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=======================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------State should do more 231 213 144 588

88.17 59.17 25.13-----------------------------------------------------------------------State is doing enough 16 91 294 401

6.11 25.28 51.31-----------------------------------------------------------------------State is doing too much 0 12 69 81

0.00 3.33 12.04-----------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 15 44 66 125

5.73 12.22 11.52-----------------------------------------------------------------------Total 262 360 573 1195

21.92 30.13 47.95=======================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

623

Page 625: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==================================================================================================PID7

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------State should do more 208 77 97 56 22 40 63 563

81.57 67.54 80.83 50.00 18.33 32.00 21.14--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------State is doing enough 23 22 16 30 72 61 167 391

9.02 19.30 13.33 26.79 60.00 48.80 56.04--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------State is doing too much 0 2 2 15 17 8 34 78

0.00 1.75 1.67 13.39 14.17 6.40 11.41--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 24 13 5 11 9 16 34 112

9.41 11.40 4.17 9.82 7.50 12.80 11.41--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 255 114 120 112 120 125 298 1144

22.29 9.97 10.49 9.79 10.49 10.93 26.05==================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------State should do more 383 56 125 564

78.48 50.00 22.98-------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

624

Page 626: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

State is doing enough 60 30 300 39012.30 26.79 55.15

-------------------------------------------------------------------------State is doing too much 3 15 59 77

0.61 13.39 10.85-------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 42 11 60 113

8.61 9.82 11.03-------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 488 112 544 1144

42.66 9.79 47.55=========================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=================================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------State should do more 96 378 25 89 588

40.00 83.26 9.40 37.39-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------State is doing enough 109 48 168 78 403

45.42 10.57 63.16 32.77-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------State is doing too much 13 3 54 11 81

5.42 0.66 20.30 4.62-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 22 25 19 60 126

9.17 5.51 7.14 25.21-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 240 454 266 238 1198

20.03 37.90 22.20 19.87

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

625

Page 627: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

=================================================================================================================Cell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------State should do more 16 182 157 63 111 59 588

38.10 51.70 47.43 55.75 45.12 51.75------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------State is doing enough 20 115 113 28 83 44 403

47.62 32.67 34.14 24.78 33.74 38.60------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------State is doing too much 1 16 21 8 28 8 82

2.38 4.55 6.34 7.08 11.38 7.02------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 5 39 40 14 24 3 125

11.90 11.08 12.08 12.39 9.76 2.63------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 42 352 331 113 246 114 1198

3.51 29.38 27.63 9.43 20.53 9.52============================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===========================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

626

Page 628: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

State should do more 82 107 55 155 189 58843.62 40.23 41.98 54.96 57.62

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------State is doing enough 73 103 52 86 88 402

38.83 38.72 39.69 30.50 26.83---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------State is doing too much 16 23 10 17 13 79

8.51 8.65 7.63 6.03 3.96---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 17 33 14 24 38 126

9.04 12.41 10.69 8.51 11.59---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 188 266 131 282 328 1195

15.73 22.26 10.96 23.60 27.45===========================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA gena ~ACAs nati Mixed Other Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------State should do more 299 116 155 9 2 5 3 589

41.59 74.84 57.20 39.13 50.00 38.46 21.43--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------State is doing enough 280 15 82 11 2 7 6 403

38.94 9.68 30.26 47.83 50.00 53.85 42.86--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------State is doing too much 59 2 15 1 0 1 4 82

8.21 1.29 5.54 4.35 0.00 7.69 28.57--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 81 22 19 2 0 0 1 125

11.27 14.19 7.01 8.70 0.00 0.00 7.14

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

627

Page 629: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 719 155 271 23 4 13 14 1199

59.97 12.93 22.60 1.92 0.33 1.08 1.17============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===========================================================================================================marital

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------State should do more 276 15 100 28 135 35 589

42.59 62.50 66.23 43.08 53.15 60.34-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------State is doing enough 235 5 30 30 85 18 403

36.27 20.83 19.87 46.15 33.46 31.03-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------State is doing too much 61 1 6 3 9 2 82

9.41 4.17 3.97 4.62 3.54 3.45-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 76 3 15 4 25 3 126

11.73 12.50 9.93 6.15 9.84 5.17-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 648 24 151 65 254 58 1200

54.00 2.00 12.58 5.42 21.17 4.83===========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

628

Page 630: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

genderQ Male Female Total-------------------------------------------------State should do more 231 358 589

41.10 56.11-------------------------------------------------State is doing enough 226 177 403

40.21 27.74-------------------------------------------------State is doing too much 57 25 82

10.14 3.92-------------------------------------------------Don't know 48 78 126

8.54 12.23-------------------------------------------------Total 562 638 1200

46.83 53.17=================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===========================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total-----------------------------------------------------------State should do more 216 271 102 589

60.34 45.93 40.96-----------------------------------------------------------State is doing enough 96 202 105 403

26.82 34.24 42.17-----------------------------------------------------------State is doing too much 8 59 15 82

2.23 10.00 6.02

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

629

Page 631: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

-----------------------------------------------------------Don't know 38 58 27 123

10.61 9.83 10.84-----------------------------------------------------------Total 358 590 249 1197

29.91 49.29 20.80===========================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==============================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------State should do more 123 197 50 70 149 589

49.00 53.53 40.65 65.42 42.45------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------State is doing enough 88 113 51 15 136 403

35.06 30.71 41.46 14.02 38.75------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------State is doing too much 17 19 5 15 26 82

6.77 5.16 4.07 14.02 7.41------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 23 39 17 7 40 126

9.16 10.60 13.82 6.54 11.40------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 251 368 123 107 351 1200

20.92 30.67 10.25 8.92 29.25==============================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

630

Page 632: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

================================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total----------------------------------------------------------------State should do more 99 156 227 108 590

50.00 49.68 49.24 47.58----------------------------------------------------------------State is doing enough 64 94 156 89 403

32.32 29.94 33.84 39.21----------------------------------------------------------------State is doing too much 11 25 34 11 81

5.56 7.96 7.38 4.85----------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 24 39 44 19 126

12.12 12.42 9.54 8.37----------------------------------------------------------------Total 198 314 461 227 1200

16.50 26.17 38.42 18.92================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

631

Page 633: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q40. Death Penalty Support

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==============================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly support 19 15 16 163 62 135 165 575

30.16 14.85 16.67 45.15 49.60 58.70 75.69------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat support 5 22 31 93 37 54 28 270

7.94 21.78 32.29 25.76 29.60 23.48 12.84------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

632

Page 634: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Somewhat oppose 13 17 30 47 10 28 5 15020.63 16.83 31.25 13.02 8.00 12.17 2.29

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly oppose 19 45 17 31 13 6 10 141

30.16 44.55 17.71 8.59 10.40 2.61 4.59------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 7 2 2 27 3 7 10 58

11.11 1.98 2.08 7.48 2.40 3.04 4.59------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 63 101 96 361 125 230 218 1194

5.28 8.46 8.04 30.23 10.47 19.26 18.26==============================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total----------------------------------------------------------------Strongly support 50 163 362 575

19.16 45.15 63.18----------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat support 59 93 119 271

22.61 25.76 20.77----------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat oppose 60 47 43 150

22.99 13.02 7.50----------------------------------------------------------------Strongly oppose 81 31 29 141

31.03 8.59 5.06----------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 11 27 20 58

4.21 7.48 3.49

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

633

Page 635: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

----------------------------------------------------------------Total 261 361 573 1195

21.84 30.21 47.95================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===========================================================================================PID7

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly support 61 42 38 52 77 66 215 551

24.02 36.52 31.93 46.02 63.64 53.23 72.39-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat support 64 31 21 28 30 33 50 257

25.20 26.96 17.65 24.78 24.79 26.61 16.84-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat oppose 45 19 34 10 7 14 18 147

17.72 16.52 28.57 8.85 5.79 11.29 6.06-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly oppose 64 14 25 17 3 6 8 137

25.20 12.17 21.01 15.04 2.48 4.84 2.69-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 20 9 1 6 4 5 6 51

7.87 7.83 0.84 5.31 3.31 4.03 2.02-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 254 115 119 113 121 124 297 1143

22.22 10.06 10.41 9.89 10.59 10.85 25.98===========================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

634

Page 636: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

==================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly support 141 52 358 551

28.95 46.02 66.05------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat support 117 28 113 258

24.02 24.78 20.85------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat oppose 97 10 39 146

19.92 8.85 7.20------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly oppose 103 17 17 137

21.15 15.04 3.14------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 29 6 15 50

5.95 5.31 2.77------------------------------------------------------------------Total 487 113 542 1142

42.64 9.89 47.46==================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==========================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly support 134 129 200 114 577

55.60 28.48 74.91 47.90

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

635

Page 637: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat support 65 110 44 53 272

26.97 24.28 16.48 22.27----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat oppose 25 93 13 20 151

10.37 20.53 4.87 8.40----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly oppose 10 100 5 26 141

4.15 22.08 1.87 10.92----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 7 21 5 25 58

2.90 4.64 1.87 10.50----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 241 453 267 238 1199

20.10 37.78 22.27 19.85==========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=====================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly support 21 184 163 57 114 39 578

51.22 52.27 49.24 50.44 46.15 34.21-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat support 6 84 76 22 48 36 272

14.63 23.86 22.96 19.47 19.43 31.58-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat oppose 8 36 38 19 34 15 150

19.51 10.23 11.48 16.81 13.77 13.16-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly oppose 2 31 34 10 41 23 141

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

636

Page 638: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

4.88 8.81 10.27 8.85 16.60 20.18-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 4 17 20 5 10 1 57

9.76 4.83 6.04 4.42 4.05 0.88-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 41 352 331 113 247 114 1198

3.42 29.38 27.63 9.43 20.62 9.52=====================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

====================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly support 97 138 58 143 139 575

51.60 51.69 44.27 50.71 42.38--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat support 37 75 41 67 52 272

19.68 28.09 31.30 23.76 15.85--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat oppose 22 27 16 36 49 150

11.70 10.11 12.21 12.77 14.94--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly oppose 22 15 11 29 64 141

11.70 5.62 8.40 10.28 19.51--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 10 12 5 7 24 58

5.32 4.49 3.82 2.48 7.32--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 188 267 131 282 328 1196

15.72 22.32 10.95 23.58 27.42====================================================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

637

Page 639: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=====================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA gena ~ACAs nati Mixed Other Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly support 370 46 134 10 4 6 7 577

51.46 29.68 49.26 45.45 100.00 46.15 50.00-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat support 156 39 60 11 0 4 3 273

21.70 25.16 22.06 50.00 0.00 30.77 21.43-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat oppose 83 35 29 0 0 3 0 150

11.54 22.58 10.66 0.00 0.00 23.08 0.00-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly oppose 82 17 39 0 0 0 3 141

11.40 10.97 14.34 0.00 0.00 0.00 21.43-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 28 18 10 1 0 0 1 58

3.89 11.61 3.68 4.55 0.00 0.00 7.14-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 719 155 272 22 4 13 14 1199

59.97 12.93 22.69 1.83 0.33 1.08 1.17=====================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

====================================================================================================marital

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

638

Page 640: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly support 353 12 62 33 94 23 577

54.48 52.17 40.79 50.00 37.15 40.35----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat support 136 5 38 17 66 10 272

20.99 21.74 25.00 25.76 26.09 17.54----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat oppose 60 4 27 7 45 8 151

9.26 17.39 17.76 10.61 17.79 14.04----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly oppose 65 1 22 5 33 15 141

10.03 4.35 14.47 7.58 13.04 26.32----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 34 1 3 4 15 1 58

5.25 4.35 1.97 6.06 5.93 1.75----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 648 23 152 66 253 57 1199

54.05 1.92 12.68 5.50 21.10 4.75====================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==========================================gender

Q Male Female Total------------------------------------------Strongly support 304 273 577

54.09 42.86------------------------------------------Somewhat support 108 164 272

19.22 25.75------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

639

Page 641: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Somewhat oppose 75 76 15113.35 11.93

------------------------------------------Strongly oppose 55 86 141

9.79 13.50------------------------------------------Don't know 20 38 58

3.56 5.97------------------------------------------Total 562 637 1199

46.87 53.13==========================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

====================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total----------------------------------------------------Strongly support 166 270 141 577

46.63 45.84 56.85----------------------------------------------------Somewhat support 67 148 56 271

18.82 25.13 22.58----------------------------------------------------Somewhat oppose 53 75 22 150

14.89 12.73 8.87----------------------------------------------------Strongly oppose 53 65 19 137

14.89 11.04 7.66----------------------------------------------------Don't know 17 31 10 58

4.78 5.26 4.03

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

640

Page 642: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

----------------------------------------------------Total 356 589 248 1193

29.84 49.37 20.79====================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=======================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly support 113 163 69 36 196 577

45.02 44.54 56.56 33.64 55.84-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat support 57 88 21 32 73 271

22.71 24.04 17.21 29.91 20.80-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat oppose 37 52 16 17 29 151

14.74 14.21 13.11 15.89 8.26-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly oppose 31 44 12 20 34 141

12.35 12.02 9.84 18.69 9.69-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 13 19 4 2 19 57

5.18 5.19 3.28 1.87 5.41-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 251 366 122 107 351 1197

20.97 30.58 10.19 8.94 29.32=======================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

641

Page 643: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

=========================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total---------------------------------------------------------Strongly support 67 135 242 134 578

33.84 42.99 52.61 58.77---------------------------------------------------------Somewhat support 57 64 113 37 271

28.79 20.38 24.57 16.23---------------------------------------------------------Somewhat oppose 34 44 45 28 151

17.17 14.01 9.78 12.28---------------------------------------------------------Strongly oppose 25 50 46 21 142

12.63 15.92 10.00 9.21---------------------------------------------------------Don't know 15 21 14 8 58

7.58 6.69 3.04 3.51---------------------------------------------------------Total 198 314 460 228 1200

16.50 26.17 38.33 19.00=========================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

642

Page 644: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q41. Death Penalty Alternative

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The death penalty 20 20 26 209 76 152 171 674

31.75 19.23 26.80 58.06 61.79 65.52 78.80--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Life imprisonment with absolut 34 79 64 113 37 71 33 431

53.97 75.96 65.98 31.39 30.08 30.60 15.21--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

643

Page 645: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Don't know 9 5 7 38 10 9 13 9114.29 4.81 7.22 10.56 8.13 3.88 5.99

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 63 104 97 360 123 232 217 1196

5.27 8.70 8.11 30.10 10.28 19.40 18.14============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===========================================================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The death penalty 65 209 399 673

24.81 58.06 69.76-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Life imprisonment with absolutely no possibility for parole 176 113 141 430

67.18 31.39 24.65-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 21 38 32 91

8.02 10.56 5.59-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 262 360 572 1194

21.94 30.15 47.91===========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================================================================================PID7

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

644

Page 646: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The death penalty 84 59 43 60 84 89 228 647

32.94 51.30 36.13 53.10 69.42 71.20 76.51--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Life imprisonment with absolutely no possibility for parole 137 45 70 38 29 32 60 411

53.73 39.13 58.82 33.63 23.97 25.60 20.13--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 34 11 6 15 8 4 10 88

13.33 9.57 5.04 13.27 6.61 3.20 3.36--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 255 115 119 113 121 125 298 1146

22.25 10.03 10.38 9.86 10.56 10.91 26.00======================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=============================================================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The death penalty 185 60 400 645

37.91 53.10 73.66-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Life imprisonment with absolutely no possibility for parole 252 38 121 411

51.64 33.63 22.28-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 51 15 22 88

10.45 13.27 4.05-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 488 113 543 1144

42.66 9.88 47.47=============================================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

645

Page 647: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The death penalty 163 167 212 133 675

67.36 36.87 79.40 56.12--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Life imprisonment with absolutely no possibility f 71 243 50 69 433

29.34 53.64 18.73 29.11--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 8 43 5 35 91

3.31 9.49 1.87 14.77--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 242 453 267 237 1199

20.18 37.78 22.27 19.77============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The death penalty 25 219 171 66 140 54 675

60.98 61.86 51.66 58.41 56.91 47.37--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Life imprisonment with absolutely no possibility for pa 13 106 133 39 92 49 432

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

646

Page 648: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

31.71 29.94 40.18 34.51 37.40 42.98--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 3 29 27 8 14 11 92

7.32 8.19 8.16 7.08 5.69 9.65--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 41 354 331 113 246 114 1199

3.42 29.52 27.61 9.42 20.52 9.51============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The death penalty 98 172 76 173 153 672

52.13 64.91 58.46 61.57 46.50--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Life imprisonment with absolutely no pos 73 80 43 87 147 430

38.83 30.19 33.08 30.96 44.68--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 17 13 11 21 29 91

9.04 4.91 8.46 7.47 8.81--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 188 265 130 281 329 1193

15.76 22.21 10.90 23.55 27.58============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

647

Page 649: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

============================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA g Mixed Other Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The death penalty 427 49 160 19 4 9 7 675

59.47 31.61 58.82 86.36 100.00 64.29 50.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Life imprisonment with absolutely 241 77 101 3 0 4 7 433

33.57 49.68 37.13 13.64 0.00 28.57 50.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 50 29 11 0 0 1 0 91

6.96 18.71 4.04 0.00 0.00 7.14 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 718 155 272 22 4 14 14 1199

59.88 12.93 22.69 1.83 0.33 1.17 1.17============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================marital

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The death penalty 408 14 71 35 122 26 676

62.96 58.33 46.71 53.85 48.22 45.61--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Life imprisonment with absolutely no possibility for par 200 9 70 23 104 26 432

30.86 37.50 46.05 35.38 41.11 45.61--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 40 1 11 7 27 5 91

6.17 4.17 7.24 10.77 10.67 8.77--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 648 24 152 65 253 57 1199

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

648

Page 650: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

54.05 2.00 12.68 5.42 21.10 4.75============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=====================================================================================gender

Q Male Female Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The death penalty 340 335 675

60.50 52.59-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Life imprisonment with absolutely no possibility for parole 180 252 432

32.03 39.56-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 42 50 92

7.47 7.85-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 562 637 1199

46.87 53.13=====================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===============================================================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The death penalty 184 332 159 675

51.54 56.27 64.11

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

649

Page 651: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Life imprisonment with absolutely no possibility for parole 148 209 72 429

41.46 35.42 29.03-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 25 49 17 91

7.00 8.31 6.85-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 357 590 248 1195

29.87 49.37 20.75===============================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The death penalty 132 187 75 51 230 675

52.59 50.95 61.48 47.22 65.53--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Life imprisonment with absolutely no 100 154 39 49 91 433

39.84 41.96 31.97 45.37 25.93--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 19 26 8 8 30 91

7.57 7.08 6.56 7.41 8.55--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 251 367 122 108 351 1199

20.93 30.61 10.18 9.01 29.27============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

650

Page 652: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

====================================================================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The death penalty 86 159 290 140 675

43.22 50.80 63.04 61.95----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Life imprisonment with absolutely no possibility for parole 95 120 138 79 432

47.74 38.34 30.00 34.96----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 18 34 32 7 91

9.05 10.86 6.96 3.10----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 199 313 460 226 1198

16.61 26.13 38.40 18.86====================================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

651

Page 653: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q42. Life Sustaining Treatment for Pregnant Women

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------the state should have the righ 3 4 12 81 36 81 90 307

5.00 3.88 12.37 22.50 29.03 35.06 42.45--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------the family should have the rig 57 99 85 279 88 150 122 880

95.00 96.12 87.63 77.50 70.97 64.94 57.55--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

652

Page 654: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Total 60 103 97 360 124 231 212 11875.05 8.68 8.17 30.33 10.45 19.46 17.86

============================================================================================================================================Cell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=====================================================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------the state should have the right to protect the fetus 19 81 207 307

7.31 22.50 36.51-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------the family should have the right to make the decision 241 279 360 880

92.69 77.50 63.49-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 260 360 567 1187

21.90 30.33 47.77=====================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

================================================================================================================================PID7

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------the state should have the right to protect the fetus 48 20 15 19 34 39 115 290

18.75 17.54 12.82 16.96 28.57 31.45 39.12--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------the family should have the right to make the decision 208 94 102 93 85 85 179 846

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

653

Page 655: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

81.25 82.46 87.18 83.04 71.43 68.55 60.88--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 256 114 117 112 119 124 294 1136

22.54 10.04 10.30 9.86 10.48 10.92 25.88================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=======================================================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------the state should have the right to protect the fetus 83 19 188 290

17.04 16.96 35.01-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------the family should have the right to make the decision 404 93 349 846

82.96 83.04 64.99-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 487 112 537 1136

42.87 9.86 47.27=======================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------the state should have the right to protect the fet 81 77 89 62 309

33.75 17.00 33.84 26.38

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

654

Page 656: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------the family should have the right to make the decis 159 376 174 173 882

66.25 83.00 66.16 73.62--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 240 453 263 235 1191

20.15 38.04 22.08 19.73============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==========================================================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------the state should have the right to protect the fetus 11 79 101 26 59 32 308

26.83 22.51 30.98 22.81 24.18 28.07------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------the family should have the right to make the decision 30 272 225 88 185 82 882

73.17 77.49 69.02 77.19 75.82 71.93------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 41 351 326 114 244 114 1190

3.45 29.50 27.39 9.58 20.50 9.58==========================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

655

Page 657: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

the state should have the right to prote 87 73 39 60 46 30546.52 27.76 29.77 21.58 14.07

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------the family should have the right to make 100 190 92 218 281 881

53.48 72.24 70.23 78.42 85.93--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 187 263 131 278 327 1186

15.77 22.18 11.05 23.44 27.57============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA g Mixed Other Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------the state should have the right to 178 41 71 14 1 1 2 308

25.07 26.45 26.10 60.87 25.00 7.69 14.29--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------the family should have the right t 532 114 201 9 3 12 12 883

74.93 73.55 73.90 39.13 75.00 92.31 85.71--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 710 155 272 23 4 13 14 1191

59.61 13.01 22.84 1.93 0.34 1.09 1.18============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================================================================================================================marital

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

656

Page 658: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------the state should have the right to protect the fetus 173 1 34 13 77 10 308

26.91 4.35 22.52 20.31 30.68 17.54-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------the family should have the right to make the decision 470 22 117 51 174 47 881

73.09 95.65 77.48 79.69 69.32 82.46-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 643 23 151 64 251 57 1189

54.08 1.93 12.70 5.38 21.11 4.79=========================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===============================================================================gender

Q Male Female Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------the state should have the right to protect the fetus 133 175 308

23.96 27.56-------------------------------------------------------------------------------the family should have the right to make the decision 422 460 882

76.04 72.44-------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 555 635 1190

46.64 53.36===============================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

657

Page 659: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

=========================================================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------the state should have the right to protect the fetus 92 154 59 305

25.77 26.42 23.89-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------the family should have the right to make the decision 265 429 188 882

74.23 73.58 76.11-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 357 583 247 1187

30.08 49.12 20.81=========================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------the state should have the right to pr 71 73 29 23 112 308

28.63 20.05 23.77 21.90 32.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------the family should have the right to m 177 291 93 82 238 881

71.37 79.95 76.23 78.10 68.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 248 364 122 105 350 1189

20.86 30.61 10.26 8.83 29.44============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

658

Page 660: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

==============================================================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------the state should have the right to protect the fetus 75 84 95 54 308

37.88 26.84 20.88 24.11----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------the family should have the right to make the decision 123 229 360 170 882

62.12 73.16 79.12 75.89----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 198 313 455 224 1190

16.64 26.30 38.24 18.82==============================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

659

Page 661: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q43. A↵ordable Care Act Favorability

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 21 49 31 69 5 12 6 193

33.87 47.57 31.96 19.11 4.00 5.15 2.76--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 24 38 34 58 17 4 3 178

38.71 36.89 35.05 16.07 13.60 1.72 1.38--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

660

Page 662: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Neither favorable nor unfavora 4 6 6 63 7 4 4 946.45 5.83 6.19 17.45 5.60 1.72 1.84

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 0 6 17 40 10 21 6 100

0.00 5.83 17.53 11.08 8.00 9.01 2.76--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 7 3 8 110 84 191 193 596

11.29 2.91 8.25 30.47 67.20 81.97 88.94--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 6 1 1 21 2 1 5 37

9.68 0.97 1.03 5.82 1.60 0.43 2.30--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 62 103 97 361 125 233 217 1198

5.18 8.60 8.10 30.13 10.43 19.45 18.11============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===================================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 101 69 23 193

38.55 19.11 4.01-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 96 58 24 178

36.64 16.07 4.18-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 16 63 15 94

6.11 17.45 2.61-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 23 40 37 100

8.78 11.08 6.45

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

661

Page 663: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 18 110 468 596

6.87 30.47 81.53-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 8 21 7 36

3.05 5.82 1.22-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 262 361 574 1197

21.89 30.16 47.95===================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==============================================================================================================PID7

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 117 16 43 6 2 2 2 188

45.70 14.04 35.83 5.36 1.65 1.61 0.67--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 68 40 38 15 2 5 6 174

26.56 35.09 31.67 13.39 1.65 4.03 2.01--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 19 15 16 14 2 13 3 82

7.42 13.16 13.33 12.50 1.65 10.48 1.01--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 10 18 10 11 11 14 20 94

3.91 15.79 8.33 9.82 9.09 11.29 6.71--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 24 18 12 62 104 89 266 575

9.38 15.79 10.00 55.36 85.95 71.77 89.26--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 18 7 1 4 0 1 1 32

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

662

Page 664: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

7.03 6.14 0.83 3.57 0.00 0.81 0.34--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 256 114 120 112 121 124 298 1145

22.36 9.96 10.48 9.78 10.57 10.83 26.03==============================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=====================================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 177 6 6 189

36.20 5.36 1.10-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 146 15 14 175

29.86 13.39 2.57-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 49 14 18 81

10.02 12.50 3.31-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 39 11 45 95

7.98 9.82 8.27-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 53 62 459 574

10.84 55.36 84.38-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 25 4 2 31

5.11 3.57 0.37-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 489 112 544 1145

42.71 9.78 47.51=====================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

663

Page 665: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=============================================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 6 182 0 5 193

2.49 40.00 0.00 2.11-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 12 142 2 22 178

4.98 31.21 0.75 9.28-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 15 43 5 29 92

6.22 9.45 1.89 12.24-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 33 30 10 26 99

13.69 6.59 3.77 10.97-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 172 44 247 136 599

71.37 9.67 93.21 57.38-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 3 14 1 19 37

1.24 3.08 0.38 8.02-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 241 455 265 237 1198

20.12 37.98 22.12 19.78=============================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

664

Page 666: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

========================================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 3 34 60 20 47 29 193

7.14 9.69 18.07 17.70 18.95 25.22------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 8 44 36 21 53 17 179

19.05 12.54 10.84 18.58 21.37 14.78------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 7 41 25 3 11 7 94

16.67 11.68 7.53 2.65 4.44 6.09------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 1 42 28 9 15 4 99

2.38 11.97 8.43 7.96 6.05 3.48------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 19 179 168 54 121 58 599

45.24 51.00 50.60 47.79 48.79 50.43------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 4 11 15 6 1 0 37

9.52 3.13 4.52 5.31 0.40 0.00------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 42 351 332 113 248 115 1201

3.50 29.23 27.64 9.41 20.65 9.58========================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=======================================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

665

Page 667: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Very favorable 24 25 18 52 73 19212.83 9.40 13.53 18.51 22.19

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 23 23 20 44 68 178

12.30 8.65 15.04 15.66 20.67---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 5 24 13 20 32 94

2.67 9.02 9.77 7.12 9.73---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 17 17 15 28 23 100

9.09 6.39 11.28 9.96 6.99---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 113 173 64 130 115 595

60.43 65.04 48.12 46.26 34.95---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 5 4 3 7 18 37

2.67 1.50 2.26 2.49 5.47---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 187 266 133 281 329 1196

15.64 22.24 11.12 23.49 27.51=======================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA g Mixed Other Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 89 60 39 4 0 1 0 193

12.38 38.22 14.34 18.18 0.00 8.33 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 89 37 45 5 0 1 0 177

12.38 23.57 16.54 22.73 0.00 8.33 0.00

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

666

Page 668: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 29 16 44 2 0 3 0 94

4.03 10.19 16.18 9.09 0.00 25.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 54 13 22 7 0 0 3 99

7.51 8.28 8.09 31.82 0.00 0.00 21.43--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 444 16 113 4 3 7 11 598

61.75 10.19 41.54 18.18 100.00 58.33 78.57--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 14 15 9 0 0 0 0 38

1.95 9.55 3.31 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 719 157 272 22 3 12 14 1199

59.97 13.09 22.69 1.83 0.25 1.00 1.17============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=======================================================================================================================marital

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 97 1 30 7 47 11 193

14.97 4.55 20.00 10.77 18.43 19.30-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 83 5 30 9 31 19 177

12.81 22.73 20.00 13.85 12.16 33.33-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 37 3 12 2 35 5 94

5.71 13.64 8.00 3.08 13.73 8.77-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 38 2 14 7 35 3 99

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

667

Page 669: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

5.86 9.09 9.33 10.77 13.73 5.26-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 380 11 61 38 91 17 598

58.64 50.00 40.67 58.46 35.69 29.82-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 13 0 3 2 16 2 36

2.01 0.00 2.00 3.08 6.27 3.51-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 648 22 150 65 255 57 1197

54.14 1.84 12.53 5.43 21.30 4.76=======================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=============================================================gender

Q Male Female Total-------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 89 104 193

15.81 16.30-------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 73 105 178

12.97 16.46-------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 44 49 93

7.82 7.68-------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 47 53 100

8.35 8.31-------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 294 305 599

52.22 47.81-------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

668

Page 670: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Don't know/No Opinion 16 22 382.84 3.45

-------------------------------------------------------------Total 563 638 1201

46.88 53.12=============================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=======================================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 72 95 27 194

20.11 16.05 10.84-----------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 71 92 15 178

19.83 15.54 6.02-----------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 37 39 18 94

10.34 6.59 7.23-----------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 29 52 18 99

8.10 8.78 7.23-----------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 133 297 166 596

37.15 50.17 66.67-----------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 16 17 5 38

4.47 2.87 2.01-----------------------------------------------------------------------Total 358 592 249 1199

29.86 49.37 20.77

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

669

Page 671: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

=======================================================================Cell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==========================================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 48 66 15 30 34 193

19.20 17.89 12.40 28.04 9.66------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 42 65 16 24 31 178

16.80 17.62 13.22 22.43 8.81------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 17 28 11 10 27 93

6.80 7.59 9.09 9.35 7.67------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 20 26 11 2 40 99

8.00 7.05 9.09 1.87 11.36------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 118 171 66 38 206 599

47.20 46.34 54.55 35.51 58.52------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 5 13 2 3 14 37

2.00 3.52 1.65 2.80 3.98------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 250 369 121 107 352 1199

20.85 30.78 10.09 8.92 29.36==========================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

670

Page 672: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

============================================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------Very favorable 21 55 87 31 194

10.61 17.52 18.83 13.66----------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat favorable 30 44 75 28 177

15.15 14.01 16.23 12.33----------------------------------------------------------------------------Neither favorable nor unfavorable 29 29 29 7 94

14.65 9.24 6.28 3.08----------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat unfavorable 26 37 24 13 100

13.13 11.78 5.19 5.73----------------------------------------------------------------------------Very unfavorable 76 144 236 143 599

38.38 45.86 51.08 63.00----------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/No Opinion 16 5 11 5 37

8.08 1.59 2.38 2.20----------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 198 314 462 227 1201

16.49 26.14 38.47 18.90============================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

671

Page 673: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q44. A↵ordable Care Act Preference

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Leave the law as is 13 14 14 32 4 9 6 92

20.97 13.46 14.58 8.94 3.28 3.90 2.75--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Work to improve the law 38 82 60 153 18 23 7 381

61.29 78.85 62.50 42.74 14.75 9.96 3.21--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

672

Page 674: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Work to repeal the law 1 2 14 56 42 89 104 3081.61 1.92 14.58 15.64 34.43 38.53 47.71

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Work to repeal the law and rep 3 4 7 76 49 106 89 334

4.84 3.85 7.29 21.23 40.16 45.89 40.83--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/no opinion 7 2 1 41 9 4 12 76

11.29 1.92 1.04 11.45 7.38 1.73 5.50--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 62 104 96 358 122 231 218 1191

5.21 8.73 8.06 30.06 10.24 19.40 18.30============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Leave the law as is 41 32 19 92

15.59 8.94 3.33---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Work to improve the law 180 153 48 381

68.44 42.74 8.41---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Work to repeal the law 17 56 235 308

6.46 15.64 41.16---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Work to repeal the law and replace it with something else 15 76 244 335

5.70 21.23 42.73---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/no opinion 10 41 25 76

3.80 11.45 4.38

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

673

Page 675: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 263 358 571 1192

22.06 30.03 47.90=========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

====================================================================================================================================PID7

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Leave the law as is 60 6 12 5 1 1 2 87

23.62 5.31 10.08 4.42 0.83 0.81 0.68------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Work to improve the law 135 71 90 32 5 18 22 373

53.15 62.83 75.63 28.32 4.13 14.52 7.43------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Work to repeal the law 11 10 8 33 51 42 141 296

4.33 8.85 6.72 29.20 42.15 33.87 47.64------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Work to repeal the law and replace it with something else 24 15 8 33 63 55 120 318

9.45 13.27 6.72 29.20 52.07 44.35 40.54------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/no opinion 24 11 1 10 1 8 11 66

9.45 9.73 0.84 8.85 0.83 6.45 3.72------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 254 113 119 113 121 124 296 1140

22.28 9.91 10.44 9.91 10.61 10.88 25.96====================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

674

Page 676: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

===========================================================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Leave the law as is 78 5 4 87

16.05 4.42 0.74-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Work to improve the law 296 32 45 373

60.91 28.32 8.30-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Work to repeal the law 29 33 234 296

5.97 29.20 43.17-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Work to repeal the law and replace it with something else 47 33 239 319

9.67 29.20 44.10-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/no opinion 36 10 20 66

7.41 8.85 3.69-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 486 113 542 1141

42.59 9.90 47.50===========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Leave the law as is 7 79 0 5 91

2.92 17.36 0.00 2.13

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

675

Page 677: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Work to improve the law 37 288 9 48 382

15.42 63.30 3.37 20.43--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Work to repeal the law 91 28 129 62 310

37.92 6.15 48.31 26.38--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Work to repeal the law and replace it with somethi 91 36 128 82 337

37.92 7.91 47.94 34.89--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/no opinion 14 24 1 38 77

5.83 5.27 0.37 16.17--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 240 455 267 235 1197

20.05 38.01 22.31 19.63============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Leave the law as is 2 16 22 10 26 15 91

4.88 4.55 6.61 8.85 10.61 13.16--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Work to improve the law 11 105 104 38 81 44 383

26.83 29.83 31.23 33.63 33.06 38.60--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Work to repeal the law 13 104 80 30 60 23 310

31.71 29.55 24.02 26.55 24.49 20.18--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Work to repeal the law and replace it with something el 11 97 96 30 72 31 337

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

676

Page 678: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

26.83 27.56 28.83 26.55 29.39 27.19--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/no opinion 4 30 31 5 6 1 77

9.76 8.52 9.31 4.42 2.45 0.88--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 41 352 333 113 245 114 1198

3.42 29.38 27.80 9.43 20.45 9.52============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Leave the law as is 13 23 10 23 22 91

6.99 8.71 7.63 8.16 6.73--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Work to improve the law 39 49 46 99 148 381

20.97 18.56 35.11 35.11 45.26--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Work to repeal the law 60 81 34 82 52 309

32.26 30.68 25.95 29.08 15.90--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Work to repeal the law and replace it wi 61 100 34 62 76 333

32.80 37.88 25.95 21.99 23.24--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/no opinion 13 11 7 16 29 76

6.99 4.17 5.34 5.67 8.87--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 186 264 131 282 327 1190

15.63 22.18 11.01 23.70 27.48============================================================================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

677

Page 679: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA g Mixed Other Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Leave the law as is 34 38 18 0 0 0 0 90

4.74 24.52 6.69 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Work to improve the law 194 67 107 8 0 4 0 380

27.02 43.23 39.78 40.00 0.00 33.33 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Work to repeal the law 232 12 55 3 1 4 3 310

32.31 7.74 20.45 15.00 33.33 33.33 21.43--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Work to repeal the law and replace 227 14 68 9 2 4 11 335

31.62 9.03 25.28 45.00 66.67 33.33 78.57--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/no opinion 31 24 21 0 0 0 0 76

4.32 15.48 7.81 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 718 155 269 20 3 12 14 1191

60.29 13.01 22.59 1.68 0.25 1.01 1.18============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================marital

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

678

Page 680: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Leave the law as is 37 0 14 6 29 4 90

5.72 0.00 9.21 9.38 11.51 7.14--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Work to improve the law 179 6 66 15 84 31 381

27.67 26.09 43.42 23.44 33.33 55.36--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Work to repeal the law 190 4 23 19 64 10 310

29.37 17.39 15.13 29.69 25.40 17.86--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Work to repeal the law and replace it with something els 204 11 40 21 52 9 337

31.53 47.83 26.32 32.81 20.63 16.07--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/no opinion 37 2 9 3 23 2 76

5.72 8.70 5.92 4.69 9.13 3.57--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 647 23 152 64 252 56 1194

54.19 1.93 12.73 5.36 21.11 4.69============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===================================================================================gender

Q Male Female Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Leave the law as is 34 57 91

6.08 8.95-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Work to improve the law 174 208 382

31.13 32.65-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

679

Page 681: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Work to repeal the law 160 150 31028.62 23.55

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Work to repeal the law and replace it with something else 164 173 337

29.34 27.16-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/no opinion 27 49 76

4.83 7.69-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 559 637 1196

46.74 53.26===================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=============================================================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Leave the law as is 32 50 9 91

8.99 8.47 3.67---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Work to improve the law 152 178 52 382

42.70 30.17 21.22---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Work to repeal the law 52 165 93 310

14.61 27.97 37.96---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Work to repeal the law and replace it with something else 90 163 79 332

25.28 27.63 32.24---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/no opinion 30 34 12 76

8.43 5.76 4.90

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

680

Page 682: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 356 590 245 1191

29.89 49.54 20.57=============================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Leave the law as is 23 36 6 11 16 92

9.16 9.78 4.92 10.48 4.60--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Work to improve the law 82 125 42 52 81 382

32.67 33.97 34.43 49.52 23.28--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Work to repeal the law 69 75 29 18 118 309

27.49 20.38 23.77 17.14 33.91--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Work to repeal the law and replace it 61 107 36 23 109 336

24.30 29.08 29.51 21.90 31.32--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/no opinion 16 25 9 1 24 75

6.37 6.79 7.38 0.95 6.90--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 251 368 122 105 348 1194

21.02 30.82 10.22 8.79 29.15============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

681

Page 683: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

==================================================================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Leave the law as is 13 24 38 16 91

6.57 7.74 8.24 7.05--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Work to improve the law 58 107 160 57 382

29.29 34.52 34.71 25.11--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Work to repeal the law 58 77 112 64 311

29.29 24.84 24.30 28.19--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Work to repeal the law and replace it with something else 45 81 132 78 336

22.73 26.13 28.63 34.36--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/no opinion 24 21 19 12 76

12.12 6.77 4.12 5.29--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 198 310 461 227 1196

16.56 25.92 38.55 18.98==================================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

682

Page 684: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q45. In-State Tuition for Illegal Immigrants

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------In-state tuition 35 70 55 133 37 36 37 403

56.45 67.31 56.70 36.94 29.60 15.52 16.97--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Out-of-state-tuition 11 19 29 143 75 160 151 588

17.74 18.27 29.90 39.72 60.00 68.97 69.27--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

683

Page 685: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Don't know/no opinion 16 15 13 84 13 36 30 20725.81 14.42 13.40 23.33 10.40 15.52 13.76

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 62 104 97 360 125 232 218 1198

5.18 8.68 8.10 30.05 10.43 19.37 18.20============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===============================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------In-state tuition 160 133 109 402

60.84 36.94 19.02-------------------------------------------------------------------------------Out-of-state-tuition 59 143 386 588

22.43 39.72 67.36-------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/no opinion 44 84 78 206

16.73 23.33 13.61-------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 263 360 573 1196

21.99 30.10 47.91===============================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==========================================================================================================PID7

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

684

Page 686: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------In-state tuition 137 58 64 33 19 28 47 386

53.52 50.88 53.78 29.46 15.70 22.58 15.77----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Out-of-state-tuition 55 40 36 56 90 77 214 568

21.48 35.09 30.25 50.00 74.38 62.10 71.81----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/no opinion 64 16 19 23 12 19 37 190

25.00 14.04 15.97 20.54 9.92 15.32 12.42----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 256 114 119 112 121 124 298 1144

22.38 9.97 10.40 9.79 10.58 10.84 26.05==========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=================================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------In-state tuition 259 33 94 386

53.07 29.46 17.28---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Out-of-state-tuition 131 56 381 568

26.84 50.00 70.04---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/no opinion 98 23 69 190

20.08 20.54 12.68---------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 488 112 544 1144

42.66 9.79 47.55=================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

685

Page 687: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------In-state tuition 66 244 27 66 403

27.39 53.63 10.15 27.62-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Out-of-state-tuition 140 125 219 107 591

58.09 27.47 82.33 44.77-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/no opinion 35 86 20 66 207

14.52 18.90 7.52 27.62-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 241 455 266 239 1201

20.07 37.89 22.15 19.90=========================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

====================================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------In-state tuition 11 108 104 39 92 50 404

26.83 30.59 31.33 34.21 37.25 43.48--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Out-of-state-tuition 23 178 157 54 125 55 592

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

686

Page 688: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

56.10 50.42 47.29 47.37 50.61 47.83--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/no opinion 7 67 71 21 30 10 206

17.07 18.98 21.39 18.42 12.15 8.70--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 41 353 332 114 247 115 1202

3.41 29.37 27.62 9.48 20.55 9.57====================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===================================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------In-state tuition 51 78 47 110 117 403

27.13 29.32 35.61 39.01 35.56-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Out-of-state-tuition 109 141 61 134 142 587

57.98 53.01 46.21 47.52 43.16-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/no opinion 28 47 24 38 70 207

14.89 17.67 18.18 13.48 21.28-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 188 266 132 282 329 1197

15.71 22.22 11.03 23.56 27.49===================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

687

Page 689: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

============================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA gena Mixed Other Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------In-state tuition 197 52 130 12 0 8 4 403

27.44 33.55 47.79 54.55 0.00 57.14 30.77--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Out-of-state-tuition 405 55 102 10 4 5 9 590

56.41 35.48 37.50 45.45 100.00 35.71 69.23--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/no opinion 116 48 40 0 0 1 0 205

16.16 30.97 14.71 0.00 0.00 7.14 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 718 155 272 22 4 14 13 1198

59.93 12.94 22.70 1.84 0.33 1.17 1.09============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===================================================================================================================marital

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------In-state tuition 186 7 59 18 99 34 403

28.75 30.43 39.07 28.12 38.98 59.65-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Out-of-state-tuition 354 12 65 30 113 15 589

54.71 52.17 43.05 46.88 44.49 26.32-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/no opinion 107 4 27 16 42 8 204

16.54 17.39 17.88 25.00 16.54 14.04-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 647 23 151 64 254 57 1196

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

688

Page 690: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

54.10 1.92 12.63 5.35 21.24 4.77===================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=========================================================gender

Q Male Female Total---------------------------------------------------------In-state tuition 189 214 403

33.69 33.54---------------------------------------------------------Out-of-state-tuition 289 301 590

51.52 47.18---------------------------------------------------------Don't know/no opinion 83 123 206

14.80 19.28---------------------------------------------------------Total 561 638 1199

46.79 53.21=========================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===================================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total-------------------------------------------------------------------In-state tuition 157 176 66 399

43.98 29.83 26.51

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

689

Page 691: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

-------------------------------------------------------------------Out-of-state-tuition 132 312 146 590

36.97 52.88 58.63-------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/no opinion 68 102 37 207

19.05 17.29 14.86-------------------------------------------------------------------Total 357 590 249 1196

29.85 49.33 20.82===================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------In-state tuition 86 119 42 57 100 404

34.26 32.34 34.43 52.78 28.49--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Out-of-state-tuition 131 168 60 34 197 590

52.19 45.65 49.18 31.48 56.13--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/no opinion 34 81 20 17 54 206

13.55 22.01 16.39 15.74 15.38--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 251 368 122 108 351 1200

20.92 30.67 10.17 9.00 29.25======================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

690

Page 692: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

========================================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total------------------------------------------------------------------------In-state tuition 82 126 133 62 403

41.41 40.13 28.79 27.31------------------------------------------------------------------------Out-of-state-tuition 82 127 255 127 591

41.41 40.45 55.19 55.95------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know/no opinion 34 61 74 38 207

17.17 19.43 16.02 16.74------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 198 314 462 227 1201

16.49 26.14 38.47 18.90========================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

691

Page 693: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q46A. Agree/Disagree: Most immigrants pay their fair share of taxes

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===============================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly agree 20 44 26 37 14 14 17 172

31.75 42.31 26.80 10.51 11.20 6.03 7.87-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat agree 22 35 28 78 22 33 25 243

34.92 33.65 28.87 22.16 17.60 14.22 11.57-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

692

Page 694: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Somewhat disagree 4 11 19 72 20 47 20 1936.35 10.58 19.59 20.45 16.00 20.26 9.26

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly disagree 8 11 14 116 60 132 132 473

12.70 10.58 14.43 32.95 48.00 56.90 61.11-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 9 3 10 49 9 6 22 108

14.29 2.88 10.31 13.92 7.20 2.59 10.19-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 63 104 97 352 125 232 216 1189

5.30 8.75 8.16 29.60 10.51 19.51 18.17===============================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total-----------------------------------------------------------------Strongly agree 90 37 45 172

34.22 10.51 7.84-----------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat agree 85 78 80 243

32.32 22.16 13.94-----------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat disagree 33 72 87 192

12.55 20.45 15.16-----------------------------------------------------------------Strongly disagree 33 116 324 473

12.55 32.95 56.45-----------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 22 49 38 109

8.37 13.92 6.62

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

693

Page 695: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

-----------------------------------------------------------------Total 263 352 574 1189

22.12 29.60 48.28=================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================PID7

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly agree 81 18 26 16 5 4 17 167

31.64 15.79 23.01 14.29 4.13 3.23 5.72--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat agree 78 27 40 20 16 18 39 238

30.47 23.68 35.40 17.86 13.22 14.52 13.13--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat disagree 36 22 22 13 17 27 48 185

14.06 19.30 19.47 11.61 14.05 21.77 16.16--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly disagree 36 32 21 48 73 65 177 452

14.06 28.07 18.58 42.86 60.33 52.42 59.60--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 25 15 4 15 10 10 16 95

9.77 13.16 3.54 13.39 8.26 8.06 5.39--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 256 114 113 112 121 124 297 1137

22.52 10.03 9.94 9.85 10.64 10.91 26.12============================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

694

Page 696: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

===================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total-------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly agree 125 16 26 167

25.99 14.29 4.80-------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat agree 144 20 73 237

29.94 17.86 13.47-------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat disagree 80 13 91 184

16.63 11.61 16.79-------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly disagree 89 48 316 453

18.50 42.86 58.30-------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 43 15 36 94

8.94 13.39 6.64-------------------------------------------------------------------Total 481 112 542 1135

42.38 9.87 47.75===================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===========================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly agree 21 119 8 24 172

8.75 26.50 3.00 10.13

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

695

Page 697: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat agree 48 141 25 29 243

20.00 31.40 9.36 12.24-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat disagree 34 79 41 39 193

14.17 17.59 15.36 16.46-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly disagree 116 81 182 97 476

48.33 18.04 68.16 40.93-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 21 29 11 48 109

8.75 6.46 4.12 20.25-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 240 449 267 237 1193

20.12 37.64 22.38 19.87===========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly agree 6 55 38 18 36 18 171

14.63 15.80 11.52 15.93 14.63 15.79------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat agree 4 67 63 28 52 29 243

9.76 19.25 19.09 24.78 21.14 25.44------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat disagree 7 56 58 12 48 12 193

17.07 16.09 17.58 10.62 19.51 10.53------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly disagree 18 138 134 43 93 50 476

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

696

Page 698: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

43.90 39.66 40.61 38.05 37.80 43.86------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 6 32 37 12 17 5 109

14.63 9.20 11.21 10.62 6.91 4.39------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 41 348 330 113 246 114 1192

3.44 29.19 27.68 9.48 20.64 9.56======================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=====================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly agree 22 42 19 33 56 172

11.70 15.79 14.39 11.91 17.18---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat agree 26 46 29 63 79 243

13.83 17.29 21.97 22.74 24.23---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat disagree 28 36 25 65 40 194

14.89 13.53 18.94 23.47 12.27---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly disagree 96 118 48 95 115 472

51.06 44.36 36.36 34.30 35.28---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 16 24 11 21 36 108

8.51 9.02 8.33 7.58 11.04---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 188 266 132 277 326 1189

15.81 22.37 11.10 23.30 27.42=====================================================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

697

Page 699: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA gena ~ACAs nati Mixed Other Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly agree 62 35 65 5 0 2 3 172

8.66 22.58 24.25 22.73 0.00 14.29 21.43--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat agree 139 32 66 1 0 4 1 243

19.41 20.65 24.63 4.55 0.00 28.57 7.14--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat disagree 107 21 49 13 0 3 0 193

14.94 13.55 18.28 59.09 0.00 21.43 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly disagree 344 44 70 2 3 5 7 475

48.04 28.39 26.12 9.09 100.00 35.71 50.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 64 23 18 1 0 0 3 109

8.94 14.84 6.72 4.55 0.00 0.00 21.43--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 716 155 268 22 3 14 14 1192

60.07 13.00 22.48 1.85 0.25 1.17 1.17======================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=====================================================================================================marital

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

698

Page 700: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly agree 76 4 24 2 50 16 172

11.71 16.67 15.89 3.03 20.24 28.07-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat agree 113 7 37 14 62 10 243

17.41 29.17 24.50 21.21 25.10 17.54-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat disagree 110 3 17 14 46 4 194

16.95 12.50 11.26 21.21 18.62 7.02-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly disagree 299 8 62 31 58 19 477

46.07 33.33 41.06 46.97 23.48 33.33-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 51 2 11 5 31 8 108

7.86 8.33 7.28 7.58 12.55 14.04-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 649 24 151 66 247 57 1194

54.36 2.01 12.65 5.53 20.69 4.77=====================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===========================================gender

Q Male Female Total-------------------------------------------Strongly agree 98 74 172

17.69 11.60-------------------------------------------Somewhat agree 104 139 243

18.77 21.79-------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

699

Page 701: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Somewhat disagree 80 113 19314.44 17.71

-------------------------------------------Strongly disagree 222 253 475

40.07 39.66-------------------------------------------Don't know 50 59 109

9.03 9.25-------------------------------------------Total 554 638 1192

46.48 53.52===========================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=====================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total-----------------------------------------------------Strongly agree 67 85 20 172

19.09 14.41 8.10-----------------------------------------------------Somewhat agree 93 112 39 244

26.50 18.98 15.79-----------------------------------------------------Somewhat disagree 48 107 38 193

13.68 18.14 15.38-----------------------------------------------------Strongly disagree 113 236 125 474

32.19 40.00 50.61-----------------------------------------------------Don't know 30 50 25 105

8.55 8.47 10.12

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

700

Page 702: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

-----------------------------------------------------Total 351 590 247 1188

29.55 49.66 20.79=====================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

========================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly agree 36 62 18 23 33 172

14.34 16.94 14.75 21.50 9.54------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat agree 58 76 17 35 57 243

23.11 20.77 13.93 32.71 16.47------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat disagree 40 63 10 16 64 193

15.94 17.21 8.20 14.95 18.50------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly disagree 98 136 65 25 152 476

39.04 37.16 53.28 23.36 43.93------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 19 29 12 8 40 108

7.57 7.92 9.84 7.48 11.56------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 251 366 122 107 346 1192

21.06 30.70 10.23 8.98 29.03========================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

701

Page 703: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

==========================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total----------------------------------------------------------Strongly agree 35 53 64 19 171

17.68 17.04 14.04 8.44----------------------------------------------------------Somewhat agree 44 68 92 39 243

22.22 21.86 20.18 17.33----------------------------------------------------------Somewhat disagree 36 52 65 40 193

18.18 16.72 14.25 17.78----------------------------------------------------------Strongly disagree 47 108 206 113 474

23.74 34.73 45.18 50.22----------------------------------------------------------Don't know 36 30 29 14 109

18.18 9.65 6.36 6.22----------------------------------------------------------Total 198 311 456 225 1190

16.64 26.13 38.32 18.91==========================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

702

Page 704: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q46B. Agree/Disagree: We should restrict and control people coming to live in the U.S. more than we do now

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===============================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly agree 17 16 17 156 67 154 167 594

27.42 15.38 17.53 44.32 53.60 66.67 76.61-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat agree 13 29 37 86 30 48 28 271

20.97 27.88 38.14 24.43 24.00 20.78 12.84-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

703

Page 705: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Somewhat disagree 11 36 36 52 7 15 5 16217.74 34.62 37.11 14.77 5.60 6.49 2.29

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly disagree 14 19 6 23 14 8 6 90

22.58 18.27 6.19 6.53 11.20 3.46 2.75-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 7 4 1 35 7 6 12 72

11.29 3.85 1.03 9.94 5.60 2.60 5.50-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 62 104 97 352 125 231 218 1189

5.21 8.75 8.16 29.60 10.51 19.43 18.33===============================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total-----------------------------------------------------------------Strongly agree 50 156 388 594

18.94 44.32 67.71-----------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat agree 79 86 107 272

29.92 24.43 18.67-----------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat disagree 83 52 27 162

31.44 14.77 4.71-----------------------------------------------------------------Strongly disagree 40 23 27 90

15.15 6.53 4.71-----------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 12 35 24 71

4.55 9.94 4.19

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

704

Page 706: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

-----------------------------------------------------------------Total 264 352 573 1189

22.20 29.60 48.19=================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================PID7

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly agree 67 36 29 52 87 85 213 569

26.27 31.86 25.66 46.02 71.90 68.55 71.96--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat agree 72 30 30 34 22 24 53 265

28.24 26.55 26.55 30.09 18.18 19.35 17.91--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat disagree 58 22 43 13 7 5 12 160

22.75 19.47 38.05 11.50 5.79 4.03 4.05--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly disagree 37 14 9 7 4 2 8 81

14.51 12.39 7.96 6.19 3.31 1.61 2.70--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 21 11 2 7 1 8 10 60

8.24 9.73 1.77 6.19 0.83 6.45 3.38--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 255 113 113 113 121 124 296 1135

22.47 9.96 9.96 9.96 10.66 10.93 26.08============================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

705

Page 707: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

===================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total-------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly agree 133 52 385 570

27.59 46.02 71.16-------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat agree 133 34 99 266

27.59 30.09 18.30-------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat disagree 123 13 23 159

25.52 11.50 4.25-------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly disagree 60 7 15 82

12.45 6.19 2.77-------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 33 7 19 59

6.85 6.19 3.51-------------------------------------------------------------------Total 482 113 541 1136

42.43 9.95 47.62===================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===========================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly agree 143 122 211 120 596

59.83 27.11 79.62 50.63

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

706

Page 708: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat agree 62 125 42 44 273

25.94 27.78 15.85 18.57-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat disagree 12 118 8 24 162

5.02 26.22 3.02 10.13-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly disagree 10 60 3 16 89

4.18 13.33 1.13 6.75-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 12 25 1 33 71

5.02 5.56 0.38 13.92-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 239 450 265 237 1191

20.07 37.78 22.25 19.90===========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly agree 29 192 153 61 117 44 596

70.73 55.49 46.08 53.98 47.56 38.26------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat agree 2 79 81 21 59 32 274

4.88 22.83 24.40 18.58 23.98 27.83------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat disagree 1 31 46 18 49 18 163

2.44 8.96 13.86 15.93 19.92 15.65------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly disagree 5 19 25 7 15 18 89

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

707

Page 709: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

12.20 5.49 7.53 6.19 6.10 15.65------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 4 25 27 6 6 3 71

9.76 7.23 8.13 5.31 2.44 2.61------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 41 346 332 113 246 115 1193

3.44 29.00 27.83 9.47 20.62 9.64======================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=====================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly agree 105 142 71 135 140 593

55.85 53.79 53.79 48.56 43.08---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat agree 41 76 26 67 63 273

21.81 28.79 19.70 24.10 19.38---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat disagree 22 19 16 44 61 162

11.70 7.20 12.12 15.83 18.77---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly disagree 13 11 9 21 34 88

6.91 4.17 6.82 7.55 10.46---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 7 16 10 11 27 71

3.72 6.06 7.58 3.96 8.31---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 188 264 132 278 325 1187

15.84 22.24 11.12 23.42 27.38=====================================================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

708

Page 710: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA gena ~ACAs nati Mixed Other Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly agree 397 60 114 5 3 6 11 596

55.60 38.71 42.54 23.81 75.00 46.15 73.33--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat agree 149 43 64 13 0 4 1 274

20.87 27.74 23.88 61.90 0.00 30.77 6.67--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat disagree 82 29 43 2 0 3 3 162

11.48 18.71 16.04 9.52 0.00 23.08 20.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly disagree 50 8 29 0 1 0 0 88

7.00 5.16 10.82 0.00 25.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 36 15 18 1 0 0 0 70

5.04 9.68 6.72 4.76 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 714 155 268 21 4 13 15 1190

60.00 13.03 22.52 1.76 0.34 1.09 1.26======================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=====================================================================================================marital

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

709

Page 711: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly agree 344 13 70 49 100 20 596

53.17 56.52 46.36 74.24 40.32 35.09-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat agree 146 7 32 7 68 13 273

22.57 30.43 21.19 10.61 27.42 22.81-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat disagree 74 1 30 6 37 14 162

11.44 4.35 19.87 9.09 14.92 24.56-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly disagree 49 2 12 1 21 4 89

7.57 8.70 7.95 1.52 8.47 7.02-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 34 0 7 3 22 6 72

5.26 0.00 4.64 4.55 8.87 10.53-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 647 23 151 66 248 57 1192

54.28 1.93 12.67 5.54 20.81 4.78=====================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===========================================gender

Q Male Female Total-------------------------------------------Strongly agree 284 312 596

51.26 48.98-------------------------------------------Somewhat agree 133 140 273

24.01 21.98-------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

710

Page 712: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Somewhat disagree 64 98 16211.55 15.38

-------------------------------------------Strongly disagree 44 45 89

7.94 7.06-------------------------------------------Don't know 29 42 71

5.23 6.59-------------------------------------------Total 554 637 1191

46.52 53.48===========================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=====================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total-----------------------------------------------------Strongly agree 162 288 146 596

46.15 48.90 59.11-----------------------------------------------------Somewhat agree 71 154 47 272

20.23 26.15 19.03-----------------------------------------------------Somewhat disagree 59 80 24 163

16.81 13.58 9.72-----------------------------------------------------Strongly disagree 40 34 11 85

11.40 5.77 4.45-----------------------------------------------------Don't know 19 33 19 71

5.41 5.60 7.69

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

711

Page 713: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

-----------------------------------------------------Total 351 589 247 1187

29.57 49.62 20.81=====================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

========================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly agree 132 185 64 35 180 596

52.80 50.55 52.46 32.41 52.17------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat agree 56 82 25 37 72 272

22.40 22.40 20.49 34.26 20.87------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat disagree 35 49 14 23 41 162

14.00 13.39 11.48 21.30 11.88------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly disagree 16 27 14 10 23 90

6.40 7.38 11.48 9.26 6.67------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 11 23 5 3 29 71

4.40 6.28 4.10 2.78 8.41------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 250 366 122 108 345 1191

20.99 30.73 10.24 9.07 28.97========================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

712

Page 714: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

==========================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total----------------------------------------------------------Strongly agree 61 126 257 153 597

30.96 40.26 56.36 67.70----------------------------------------------------------Somewhat agree 65 75 95 38 273

32.99 23.96 20.83 16.81----------------------------------------------------------Somewhat disagree 28 56 59 19 162

14.21 17.89 12.94 8.41----------------------------------------------------------Strongly disagree 19 29 33 8 89

9.64 9.27 7.24 3.54----------------------------------------------------------Don't know 24 27 12 8 71

12.18 8.63 2.63 3.54----------------------------------------------------------Total 197 313 456 226 1192

16.53 26.26 38.26 18.96==========================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

713

Page 715: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q46C. Agree/Disagree: Newcomers from other countries enrich Texas with their hard work and values

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===============================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly agree 30 37 36 78 22 21 29 253

48.39 35.92 37.50 22.03 17.74 9.05 13.36-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat agree 19 52 39 121 56 109 74 470

30.65 50.49 40.62 34.18 45.16 46.98 34.10-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

714

Page 716: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Somewhat disagree 4 6 14 60 20 54 45 2036.45 5.83 14.58 16.95 16.13 23.28 20.74

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly disagree 3 3 5 54 20 40 45 170

4.84 2.91 5.21 15.25 16.13 17.24 20.74-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 6 5 2 41 6 8 24 92

9.68 4.85 2.08 11.58 4.84 3.45 11.06-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 62 103 96 354 124 232 217 1188

5.22 8.67 8.08 29.80 10.44 19.53 18.27===============================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total-----------------------------------------------------------------Strongly agree 103 78 72 253

39.46 22.03 12.52-----------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat agree 110 121 239 470

42.15 34.18 41.57-----------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat disagree 24 60 120 204

9.20 16.95 20.87-----------------------------------------------------------------Strongly disagree 11 54 105 170

4.21 15.25 18.26-----------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 13 41 39 93

4.98 11.58 6.78

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

715

Page 717: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

-----------------------------------------------------------------Total 261 354 575 1190

21.93 29.75 48.32=================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================PID7

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly agree 92 26 54 14 9 16 34 245

36.22 23.01 46.96 12.50 7.44 12.80 11.45--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat agree 101 52 37 40 53 52 118 453

39.76 46.02 32.17 35.71 43.80 41.60 39.73--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat disagree 20 13 14 26 33 33 59 198

7.87 11.50 12.17 23.21 27.27 26.40 19.87--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly disagree 17 11 8 22 20 14 66 158

6.69 9.73 6.96 19.64 16.53 11.20 22.22--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 24 11 2 10 6 10 20 83

9.45 9.73 1.74 8.93 4.96 8.00 6.73--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 254 113 115 112 121 125 297 1137

22.34 9.94 10.11 9.85 10.64 10.99 26.12============================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

716

Page 718: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

===================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total-------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly agree 172 14 59 245

35.68 12.50 10.87-------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat agree 190 40 223 453

39.42 35.71 41.07-------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat disagree 47 26 124 197

9.75 23.21 22.84-------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly disagree 36 22 101 159

7.47 19.64 18.60-------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 37 10 36 83

7.68 8.93 6.63-------------------------------------------------------------------Total 482 112 543 1137

42.39 9.85 47.76===================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===========================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly agree 32 165 22 35 254

13.33 36.83 8.27 14.71

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

717

Page 719: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat agree 94 188 102 87 471

39.17 41.96 38.35 36.55-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat disagree 52 40 70 43 205

21.67 8.93 26.32 18.07-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly disagree 42 32 62 34 170

17.50 7.14 23.31 14.29-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 20 23 10 39 92

8.33 5.13 3.76 16.39-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 240 448 266 238 1192

20.13 37.58 22.32 19.97===========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly agree 5 57 68 22 61 41 254

12.50 16.38 20.48 19.47 24.70 35.96------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat agree 14 130 125 49 107 46 471

35.00 37.36 37.65 43.36 43.32 40.35------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat disagree 6 71 51 17 43 18 206

15.00 20.40 15.36 15.04 17.41 15.79------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly disagree 10 61 52 16 26 6 171

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

718

Page 720: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

25.00 17.53 15.66 14.16 10.53 5.26------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 5 29 36 9 10 3 92

12.50 8.33 10.84 7.96 4.05 2.63------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 40 348 332 113 247 114 1194

3.35 29.15 27.81 9.46 20.69 9.55======================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=====================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly agree 30 59 28 65 73 255

16.04 22.26 21.37 23.55 22.32---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat agree 71 106 52 109 131 469

37.97 40.00 39.69 39.49 40.06---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat disagree 31 58 25 45 45 204

16.58 21.89 19.08 16.30 13.76---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly disagree 41 22 19 38 46 166

21.93 8.30 14.50 13.77 14.07---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 14 20 7 19 32 92

7.49 7.55 5.34 6.88 9.79---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 187 265 131 276 327 1186

15.77 22.34 11.05 23.27 27.57=====================================================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

719

Page 721: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA gena ~ACAs nati Mixed Other Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly agree 126 33 80 3 2 5 5 254

17.55 21.29 29.85 13.04 50.00 35.71 35.71--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat agree 290 62 98 14 0 5 3 472

40.39 40.00 36.57 60.87 0.00 35.71 21.43--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat disagree 139 20 37 4 1 3 2 206

19.36 12.90 13.81 17.39 25.00 21.43 14.29--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly disagree 109 21 37 0 1 1 1 170

15.18 13.55 13.81 0.00 25.00 7.14 7.14--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 54 19 16 2 0 0 3 94

7.52 12.26 5.97 8.70 0.00 0.00 21.43--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 718 155 268 23 4 14 14 1196

60.03 12.96 22.41 1.92 0.33 1.17 1.17======================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=====================================================================================================marital

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

720

Page 722: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly agree 117 6 42 11 69 9 254

18.06 25.00 28.00 17.19 27.82 15.79-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat agree 276 9 48 20 90 28 471

42.59 37.50 32.00 31.25 36.29 49.12-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat disagree 130 1 22 12 31 8 204

20.06 4.17 14.67 18.75 12.50 14.04-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly disagree 86 7 26 12 31 8 170

13.27 29.17 17.33 18.75 12.50 14.04-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 39 1 12 9 27 4 92

6.02 4.17 8.00 14.06 10.89 7.02-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 648 24 150 64 248 57 1191

54.41 2.02 12.59 5.37 20.82 4.79=====================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===========================================gender

Q Male Female Total-------------------------------------------Strongly agree 126 127 253

22.74 19.94-------------------------------------------Somewhat agree 207 264 471

37.36 41.44-------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

721

Page 723: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Somewhat disagree 102 103 20518.41 16.17

-------------------------------------------Strongly disagree 78 92 170

14.08 14.44-------------------------------------------Don't know 41 51 92

7.40 8.01-------------------------------------------Total 554 637 1191

46.52 53.48===========================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=====================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total-----------------------------------------------------Strongly agree 106 109 36 251

30.11 18.51 14.57-----------------------------------------------------Somewhat agree 120 257 93 470

34.09 43.63 37.65-----------------------------------------------------Somewhat disagree 55 99 51 205

15.62 16.81 20.65-----------------------------------------------------Strongly disagree 45 78 46 169

12.78 13.24 18.62-----------------------------------------------------Don't know 26 46 21 93

7.39 7.81 8.50

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

722

Page 724: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

-----------------------------------------------------Total 352 589 247 1188

29.63 49.58 20.79=====================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

========================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly agree 51 71 23 42 66 253

20.32 19.35 19.01 39.25 19.08------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat agree 106 155 45 35 130 471

42.23 42.23 37.19 32.71 37.57------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat disagree 41 64 23 14 63 205

16.33 17.44 19.01 13.08 18.21------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly disagree 37 52 21 10 51 171

14.74 14.17 17.36 9.35 14.74------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 16 25 9 6 36 92

6.37 6.81 7.44 5.61 10.40------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 251 367 121 107 346 1192

21.06 30.79 10.15 8.98 29.03========================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

723

Page 725: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

==========================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total----------------------------------------------------------Strongly agree 51 72 93 38 254

25.76 23.00 20.35 16.81----------------------------------------------------------Somewhat agree 71 119 186 95 471

35.86 38.02 40.70 42.04----------------------------------------------------------Somewhat disagree 23 60 79 43 205

11.62 19.17 17.29 19.03----------------------------------------------------------Strongly disagree 29 34 77 31 171

14.65 10.86 16.85 13.72----------------------------------------------------------Don't know 24 28 22 19 93

12.12 8.95 4.81 8.41----------------------------------------------------------Total 198 313 457 226 1194

16.58 26.21 38.27 18.93==========================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

724

Page 726: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q46D. Agree/Disagree: Undocumented immigrants currently living in the United States should be deported immediately

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===============================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly agree 11 7 12 104 34 90 122 380

17.46 6.80 12.50 29.05 27.20 39.13 55.96-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat agree 3 8 15 73 34 88 45 266

4.76 7.77 15.62 20.39 27.20 38.26 20.64-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

725

Page 727: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Somewhat disagree 9 18 24 66 35 32 25 20914.29 17.48 25.00 18.44 28.00 13.91 11.47

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly disagree 31 66 43 76 19 17 13 265

49.21 64.08 44.79 21.23 15.20 7.39 5.96-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 9 4 2 39 3 3 13 73

14.29 3.88 2.08 10.89 2.40 1.30 5.96-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 63 103 96 358 125 230 218 1193

5.28 8.63 8.05 30.01 10.48 19.28 18.27===============================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total-----------------------------------------------------------------Strongly agree 29 104 246 379

11.07 29.05 43.01-----------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat agree 27 73 166 266

10.31 20.39 29.02-----------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat disagree 51 66 92 209

19.47 18.44 16.08-----------------------------------------------------------------Strongly disagree 140 76 50 266

53.44 21.23 8.74-----------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 15 39 18 72

5.73 10.89 3.15

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

726

Page 728: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

-----------------------------------------------------------------Total 262 358 572 1192

21.98 30.03 47.99=================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================PID7

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly agree 46 23 19 40 56 38 141 363

18.04 20.54 15.97 35.40 46.28 30.65 47.64--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat agree 41 14 14 24 38 34 90 255

16.08 12.50 11.76 21.24 31.40 27.42 30.41--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat disagree 47 25 21 20 19 35 32 199

18.43 22.32 17.65 17.70 15.70 28.23 10.81--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly disagree 97 41 61 22 6 10 23 260

38.04 36.61 51.26 19.47 4.96 8.06 7.77--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 24 9 4 7 2 7 10 63

9.41 8.04 3.36 6.19 1.65 5.65 3.38--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 255 112 119 113 121 124 296 1140

22.37 9.82 10.44 9.91 10.61 10.88 25.96============================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

727

Page 729: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

===================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total-------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly agree 89 40 236 365

18.28 35.40 43.62-------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat agree 70 24 162 256

14.37 21.24 29.94-------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat disagree 92 20 86 198

18.89 17.70 15.90-------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly disagree 198 22 39 259

40.66 19.47 7.21-------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 38 7 18 63

7.80 6.19 3.33-------------------------------------------------------------------Total 487 113 541 1141

42.68 9.90 47.41===================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===========================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly agree 88 73 142 79 382

36.82 16.15 53.58 33.19

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

728

Page 730: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat agree 67 65 82 52 266

28.03 14.38 30.94 21.85-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat disagree 46 88 28 46 208

19.25 19.47 10.57 19.33-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly disagree 27 199 12 28 266

11.30 44.03 4.53 11.76-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 11 27 1 33 72

4.60 5.97 0.38 13.87-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 239 452 265 238 1194

20.02 37.86 22.19 19.93===========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly agree 12 135 106 35 61 34 383

28.57 38.24 32.22 30.97 24.90 29.82------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat agree 13 81 66 27 62 17 266

30.95 22.95 20.06 23.89 25.31 14.91------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat disagree 6 47 67 20 42 26 208

14.29 13.31 20.36 17.70 17.14 22.81------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly disagree 5 67 62 27 70 35 266

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

729

Page 731: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

11.90 18.98 18.84 23.89 28.57 30.70------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 6 23 28 4 10 2 73

14.29 6.52 8.51 3.54 4.08 1.75------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 42 353 329 113 245 114 1196

3.51 29.52 27.51 9.45 20.48 9.53======================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=====================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly agree 84 94 36 84 84 382

44.68 35.34 27.69 29.89 25.61---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat agree 47 70 32 61 55 265

25.00 26.32 24.62 21.71 16.77---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat disagree 20 49 29 46 62 206

10.64 18.42 22.31 16.37 18.90---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly disagree 27 42 23 80 94 266

14.36 15.79 17.69 28.47 28.66---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 10 11 10 10 33 74

5.32 4.14 7.69 3.56 10.06---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 188 266 130 281 328 1193

15.76 22.30 10.90 23.55 27.49=====================================================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

730

Page 732: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA gena ~ACAs nati Mixed Other Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly agree 251 50 59 9 3 3 7 382

34.96 32.47 21.69 40.91 75.00 23.08 50.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat agree 180 27 44 9 1 3 2 266

25.07 17.53 16.18 40.91 25.00 23.08 14.29--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat disagree 107 26 68 1 0 5 2 209

14.90 16.88 25.00 4.55 0.00 38.46 14.29--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly disagree 141 29 90 2 0 2 3 267

19.64 18.83 33.09 9.09 0.00 15.38 21.43--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 39 22 11 1 0 0 0 73

5.43 14.29 4.04 4.55 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 718 154 272 22 4 13 14 1197

59.98 12.87 22.72 1.84 0.33 1.09 1.17======================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=====================================================================================================marital

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

731

Page 733: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly agree 216 10 49 24 73 10 382

33.28 43.48 33.11 37.50 28.85 17.54-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat agree 146 4 24 18 64 10 266

22.50 17.39 16.22 28.12 25.30 17.54-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat disagree 128 5 21 11 38 6 209

19.72 21.74 14.19 17.19 15.02 10.53-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly disagree 127 4 47 7 56 24 265

19.57 17.39 31.76 10.94 22.13 42.11-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 32 0 7 4 22 7 72

4.93 0.00 4.73 6.25 8.70 12.28-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 649 23 148 64 253 57 1194

54.36 1.93 12.40 5.36 21.19 4.77=====================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===========================================gender

Q Male Female Total-------------------------------------------Strongly agree 179 203 382

31.91 31.92-------------------------------------------Somewhat agree 136 130 266

24.24 20.44-------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

732

Page 734: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Somewhat disagree 82 128 21014.62 20.13

-------------------------------------------Strongly disagree 132 134 266

23.53 21.07-------------------------------------------Don't know 32 41 73

5.70 6.45-------------------------------------------Total 561 636 1197

46.87 53.13===========================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=====================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total-----------------------------------------------------Strongly agree 85 203 92 380

24.08 34.52 37.25-----------------------------------------------------Somewhat agree 69 123 73 265

19.55 20.92 29.55-----------------------------------------------------Somewhat disagree 72 103 31 206

20.40 17.52 12.55-----------------------------------------------------Strongly disagree 105 128 32 265

29.75 21.77 12.96-----------------------------------------------------Don't know 22 31 19 72

6.23 5.27 7.69

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

733

Page 735: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

-----------------------------------------------------Total 353 588 247 1188

29.71 49.49 20.79=====================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

========================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly agree 92 120 30 23 117 382

36.80 32.97 24.59 21.70 33.24------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat agree 58 73 28 17 89 265

23.20 20.05 22.95 16.04 25.28------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Somewhat disagree 47 54 26 27 56 210

18.80 14.84 21.31 25.47 15.91------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Strongly disagree 44 95 33 34 59 265

17.60 26.10 27.05 32.08 16.76------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 9 22 5 5 31 72

3.60 6.04 4.10 4.72 8.81------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 250 364 122 106 352 1194

20.94 30.49 10.22 8.88 29.48========================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

734

Page 736: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

==========================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total----------------------------------------------------------Strongly agree 53 84 171 73 381

26.90 27.18 37.01 32.30----------------------------------------------------------Somewhat agree 45 61 96 64 266

22.84 19.74 20.78 28.32----------------------------------------------------------Somewhat disagree 42 59 78 30 209

21.32 19.09 16.88 13.27----------------------------------------------------------Strongly disagree 33 82 102 49 266

16.75 26.54 22.08 21.68----------------------------------------------------------Don't know 24 23 15 10 72

12.18 7.44 3.25 4.42----------------------------------------------------------Total 197 309 462 226 1194

16.50 25.88 38.69 18.93==========================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

735

Page 737: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q47A. Abortion Exceptions: The woman’s own health is seriously endangered

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

====================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 55 101 87 279 97 165 120 904

87.30 98.06 90.62 78.15 79.51 71.12 55.30------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 3 1 6 33 15 45 53 156

4.76 0.97 6.25 9.24 12.30 19.40 24.42------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

736

Page 738: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Don't know 5 1 3 45 10 22 44 1307.94 0.97 3.12 12.61 8.20 9.48 20.28

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 63 103 96 357 122 232 217 1190

5.29 8.66 8.07 30.00 10.25 19.50 18.24====================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total----------------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 243 279 382 904

92.40 78.15 67.02----------------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 11 33 113 157

4.18 9.24 19.82----------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 9 45 75 129

3.42 12.61 13.16----------------------------------------------------------------------Total 263 357 570 1190

22.10 30.00 47.90======================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=================================================================================================PID7

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

737

Page 739: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 212 90 111 85 96 93 187 874

82.49 78.95 94.07 76.58 80.67 75.00 63.39-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 25 15 6 10 13 14 67 150

9.73 13.16 5.08 9.01 10.92 11.29 22.71-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 20 9 1 16 10 17 41 114

7.78 7.89 0.85 14.41 8.40 13.71 13.90-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 257 114 118 111 119 124 295 1138

22.58 10.02 10.37 9.75 10.46 10.90 25.92=================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

========================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total------------------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 413 85 377 875

84.63 76.58 69.94------------------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 46 10 94 150

9.43 9.01 17.44------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 29 16 68 113

5.94 14.41 12.62------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 488 111 539 1138

42.88 9.75 47.36========================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

738

Page 740: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

================================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 168 395 184 159 906

70.59 87.20 69.17 67.66----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 47 39 45 26 157

19.75 8.61 16.92 11.06----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 23 19 37 50 129

9.66 4.19 13.91 21.28----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 238 453 266 235 1192

19.97 38.00 22.32 19.71================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===========================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 24 271 242 89 190 90 906

60.00 77.43 72.89 78.76 77.87 78.95-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 6 44 45 15 29 18 157

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

739

Page 741: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

15.00 12.57 13.55 13.27 11.89 15.79-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 10 35 45 9 25 6 130

25.00 10.00 13.55 7.96 10.25 5.26-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 40 350 332 113 244 114 1193

3.35 29.34 27.83 9.47 20.45 9.56===========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==========================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 89 182 94 253 284 902

47.85 68.68 72.31 90.04 86.59--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 70 44 21 11 11 157

37.63 16.60 16.15 3.91 3.35--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 27 39 15 17 33 131

14.52 14.72 11.54 6.05 10.06--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 186 265 130 281 328 1190

15.63 22.27 10.92 23.61 27.56==========================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

740

Page 742: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

============================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA gena ~ACAs nati Mixed Other Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 551 106 205 19 2 13 10 906

76.96 68.39 75.65 95.00 66.67 100.00 76.92--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 87 29 38 0 1 0 2 157

12.15 18.71 14.02 0.00 33.33 0.00 15.38--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 78 20 28 1 0 0 1 128

10.89 12.90 10.33 5.00 0.00 0.00 7.69--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 716 155 271 20 3 13 13 1191

60.12 13.01 22.75 1.68 0.25 1.09 1.09============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==========================================================================================================marital

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 477 15 128 50 190 47 907

74.07 65.22 84.77 76.92 75.10 82.46----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 89 6 12 5 39 5 156

13.82 26.09 7.95 7.69 15.42 8.77----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 78 2 11 10 24 5 130

12.11 8.70 7.28 15.38 9.49 8.77----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 644 23 151 65 253 57 1193

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

741

Page 743: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

53.98 1.93 12.66 5.45 21.21 4.78==========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

================================================gender

Q Male Female Total------------------------------------------------Should be possible 432 475 907

77.28 74.80------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 68 89 157

12.16 14.02------------------------------------------------Don't know 59 71 130

10.55 11.18------------------------------------------------Total 559 635 1194

46.82 53.18================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==========================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total----------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 275 453 179 907

77.03 76.91 73.06

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

742

Page 744: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

----------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 45 68 41 154

12.61 11.54 16.73----------------------------------------------------------Don't know 37 68 25 130

10.36 11.54 10.20----------------------------------------------------------Total 357 589 245 1191

29.97 49.45 20.57==========================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=============================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 190 281 91 91 253 906

76.31 76.99 73.98 85.05 72.49-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 31 42 22 11 51 157

12.45 11.51 17.89 10.28 14.61-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 28 42 10 5 45 130

11.24 11.51 8.13 4.67 12.89-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 249 365 123 107 349 1193

20.87 30.60 10.31 8.97 29.25=============================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

743

Page 745: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

===============================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total---------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 141 213 376 177 907

71.57 68.27 82.10 77.97---------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 28 55 47 27 157

14.21 17.63 10.26 11.89---------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 28 44 35 23 130

14.21 14.10 7.64 10.13---------------------------------------------------------------Total 197 312 458 227 1194

16.50 26.13 38.36 19.01===============================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

744

Page 746: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q47B. Abortion Exceptions: She became pregnant as a result of rape

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

====================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 57 100 90 280 85 146 95 853

90.48 96.15 92.78 78.21 70.25 63.48 43.58------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 1 3 2 37 26 53 90 212

1.59 2.88 2.06 10.34 21.49 23.04 41.28------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

745

Page 747: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Don't know 5 1 5 41 10 31 33 1267.94 0.96 5.15 11.45 8.26 13.48 15.14

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 63 104 97 358 121 230 218 1191

5.29 8.73 8.14 30.06 10.16 19.31 18.30====================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total----------------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 247 280 326 853

94.27 78.21 57.39----------------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 5 37 169 211

1.91 10.34 29.75----------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 10 41 73 124

3.82 11.45 12.85----------------------------------------------------------------------Total 262 358 568 1188

22.05 30.13 47.81======================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=================================================================================================PID7

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

746

Page 748: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 211 95 111 85 80 90 157 829

82.75 83.33 93.28 76.58 65.57 74.38 53.22-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 20 13 4 14 29 18 100 198

7.84 11.40 3.36 12.61 23.77 14.88 33.90-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 24 6 4 12 13 13 38 110

9.41 5.26 3.36 10.81 10.66 10.74 12.88-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 255 114 119 111 122 121 295 1137

22.43 10.03 10.47 9.76 10.73 10.64 25.95=================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

========================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total------------------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 417 85 327 829

85.28 76.58 60.89------------------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 38 14 147 199

7.77 12.61 27.37------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 34 12 63 109

6.95 10.81 11.73------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 489 111 537 1137

43.01 9.76 47.23========================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

747

Page 749: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

================================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 161 396 155 144 856

68.22 87.22 58.27 61.28----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 50 34 80 47 211

21.19 7.49 30.08 20.00----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 25 24 31 44 124

10.59 5.29 11.65 18.72----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 236 454 266 235 1191

19.82 38.12 22.33 19.73================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===========================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 19 263 227 93 168 86 856

46.34 74.72 68.58 81.58 69.71 76.11-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 10 54 61 15 51 21 212

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

748

Page 750: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

24.39 15.34 18.43 13.16 21.16 18.58-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 12 35 43 6 22 6 124

29.27 9.94 12.99 5.26 9.13 5.31-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 41 352 331 114 241 113 1192

3.44 29.53 27.77 9.56 20.22 9.48===========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==========================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 80 152 95 244 282 853

42.55 58.02 71.97 87.14 86.50--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 92 62 24 15 18 211

48.94 23.66 18.18 5.36 5.52--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 16 48 13 21 26 124

8.51 18.32 9.85 7.50 7.98--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 188 262 132 280 326 1188

15.82 22.05 11.11 23.57 27.44==========================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

749

Page 751: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

============================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA gena ~ACAs nati Mixed Other Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 500 116 197 18 3 12 9 855

69.83 74.84 72.96 90.00 75.00 100.00 69.23--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 140 19 46 2 1 0 4 212

19.55 12.26 17.04 10.00 25.00 0.00 30.77--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 76 20 27 0 0 0 0 123

10.61 12.90 10.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 716 155 270 20 4 12 13 1190

60.17 13.03 22.69 1.68 0.34 1.01 1.09============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==========================================================================================================marital

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 438 15 120 46 191 46 856

68.01 65.22 80.00 71.88 76.10 80.70----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 136 3 16 9 42 4 210

21.12 13.04 10.67 14.06 16.73 7.02----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 70 5 14 9 18 7 123

10.87 21.74 9.33 14.06 7.17 12.28----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 644 23 150 64 251 57 1189

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

750

Page 752: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

54.16 1.93 12.62 5.38 21.11 4.79==========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

================================================gender

Q Male Female Total------------------------------------------------Should be possible 417 439 856

74.60 69.24------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 89 123 212

15.92 19.40------------------------------------------------Don't know 53 72 125

9.48 11.36------------------------------------------------Total 559 634 1193

46.86 53.14================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==========================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total----------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 266 420 170 856

74.30 71.92 68.83

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

751

Page 753: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

----------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 58 96 55 209

16.20 16.44 22.27----------------------------------------------------------Don't know 34 68 22 124

9.50 11.64 8.91----------------------------------------------------------Total 358 584 247 1189

30.11 49.12 20.77==========================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=============================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 190 250 92 85 238 855

76.92 68.49 75.41 79.44 68.00-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 36 66 22 12 75 211

14.57 18.08 18.03 11.21 21.43-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 21 49 8 10 37 125

8.50 13.42 6.56 9.35 10.57-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 247 365 122 107 350 1191

20.74 30.65 10.24 8.98 29.39=============================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

752

Page 754: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

===============================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total---------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 134 202 355 164 855

68.37 65.16 77.34 72.57---------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 38 65 68 41 212

19.39 20.97 14.81 18.14---------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 24 43 36 21 124

12.24 13.87 7.84 9.29---------------------------------------------------------------Total 196 310 459 226 1191

16.46 26.03 38.54 18.98===============================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

753

Page 755: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q47C. Abortion Exceptions: She became pregnant as a result of incest

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

====================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 57 97 85 270 81 147 92 829

90.48 93.27 88.54 75.42 65.85 63.36 42.40------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 1 6 9 46 28 55 89 234

1.59 5.77 9.38 12.85 22.76 23.71 41.01------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

754

Page 756: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Don't know 5 1 2 42 14 30 36 1307.94 0.96 2.08 11.73 11.38 12.93 16.59

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 63 104 96 358 123 232 217 1193

5.28 8.72 8.05 30.01 10.31 19.45 18.19====================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total----------------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 239 270 320 829

91.22 75.42 55.85----------------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 15 46 173 234

5.73 12.85 30.19----------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 8 42 80 130

3.05 11.73 13.96----------------------------------------------------------------------Total 262 358 573 1193

21.96 30.01 48.03======================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=================================================================================================PID7

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

755

Page 757: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 209 88 108 81 75 88 154 803

81.64 77.88 91.53 72.32 62.50 70.97 52.03-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 27 16 5 20 31 20 102 221

10.55 14.16 4.24 17.86 25.83 16.13 34.46-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 20 9 5 11 14 16 40 115

7.81 7.96 4.24 9.82 11.67 12.90 13.51-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 256 113 118 112 120 124 296 1139

22.48 9.92 10.36 9.83 10.54 10.89 25.99=================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

========================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total------------------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 405 81 317 803

82.99 72.32 58.60------------------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 49 20 154 223

10.04 17.86 28.47------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 34 11 70 115

6.97 9.82 12.94------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 488 112 541 1141

42.77 9.82 47.41========================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

756

Page 758: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

================================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 152 386 152 142 832

63.87 85.02 57.14 59.92----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 60 44 80 50 234

25.21 9.69 30.08 21.10----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 26 24 34 45 129

10.92 5.29 12.78 18.99----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 238 454 266 237 1195

19.92 37.99 22.26 19.83================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===========================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 20 250 225 89 164 84 832

48.78 70.82 67.77 78.76 67.21 74.34-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 9 64 67 20 53 21 234

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

757

Page 759: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

21.95 18.13 20.18 17.70 21.72 18.58-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 12 39 40 4 27 8 130

29.27 11.05 12.05 3.54 11.07 7.08-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 41 353 332 113 244 113 1196

3.43 29.52 27.76 9.45 20.40 9.45===========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==========================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 76 140 95 239 277 827

40.64 52.83 71.97 85.05 84.71--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 92 76 24 24 18 234

49.20 28.68 18.18 8.54 5.50--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 19 49 13 18 32 131

10.16 18.49 9.85 6.41 9.79--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 187 265 132 281 327 1192

15.69 22.23 11.07 23.57 27.43==========================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

758

Page 760: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

============================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA gena ~ACAs nati Mixed Other Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 492 109 188 18 3 12 9 831

68.62 70.78 69.12 85.71 75.00 100.00 69.23--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 147 26 54 2 1 0 4 234

20.50 16.88 19.85 9.52 25.00 0.00 30.77--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 78 19 30 1 0 0 0 128

10.88 12.34 11.03 4.76 0.00 0.00 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 717 154 272 21 4 12 13 1193

60.10 12.91 22.80 1.76 0.34 1.01 1.09============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==========================================================================================================marital

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 429 17 119 42 178 46 831

66.41 73.91 78.81 64.62 70.08 80.70----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 140 4 20 12 54 5 235

21.67 17.39 13.25 18.46 21.26 8.77----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 77 2 12 11 22 6 130

11.92 8.70 7.95 16.92 8.66 10.53----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 646 23 151 65 254 57 1196

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

759

Page 761: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

54.01 1.92 12.63 5.43 21.24 4.77==========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

================================================gender

Q Male Female Total------------------------------------------------Should be possible 397 435 832

71.02 68.29------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 104 131 235

18.60 20.57------------------------------------------------Don't know 58 71 129

10.38 11.15------------------------------------------------Total 559 637 1196

46.74 53.26================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==========================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total----------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 264 407 161 832

73.95 69.10 65.45

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

760

Page 762: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

----------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 64 106 62 232

17.93 18.00 25.20----------------------------------------------------------Don't know 29 76 23 128

8.12 12.90 9.35----------------------------------------------------------Total 357 589 246 1192

29.95 49.41 20.64==========================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=============================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 182 249 91 82 227 831

72.80 67.85 74.59 76.64 65.04-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 45 74 21 13 81 234

18.00 20.16 17.21 12.15 23.21-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 23 44 10 12 41 130

9.20 11.99 8.20 11.21 11.75-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 250 367 122 107 349 1195

20.92 30.71 10.21 8.95 29.21=============================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

761

Page 763: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

===============================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total---------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 117 207 350 158 832

59.09 66.56 76.09 70.22---------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 56 63 73 42 234

28.28 20.26 15.87 18.67---------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 25 41 37 25 128

12.63 13.18 8.04 11.11---------------------------------------------------------------Total 198 311 460 225 1194

16.58 26.05 38.53 18.84===============================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

762

Page 764: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q47D. Abortion Exceptions: There is a strong chance of a serious defect in the baby

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

====================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 53 97 79 234 67 98 55 683

88.33 94.17 82.29 65.36 54.47 42.24 25.35------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 2 4 8 67 33 93 123 330

3.33 3.88 8.33 18.72 26.83 40.09 56.68------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

763

Page 765: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Don't know 5 2 9 57 23 41 39 1768.33 1.94 9.38 15.92 18.70 17.67 17.97

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 60 103 96 358 123 232 217 1189

5.05 8.66 8.07 30.11 10.34 19.51 18.25====================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total----------------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 229 234 220 683

87.74 65.36 38.46----------------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 15 67 248 330

5.75 18.72 43.36----------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 17 57 104 178

6.51 15.92 18.18----------------------------------------------------------------------Total 261 358 572 1191

21.91 30.06 48.03======================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=================================================================================================PID7

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

764

Page 766: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 194 79 101 62 56 63 104 659

76.08 69.30 87.07 55.36 46.28 50.40 35.14-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 36 21 3 33 42 33 148 316

14.12 18.42 2.59 29.46 34.71 26.40 50.00-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 25 14 12 17 23 29 44 164

9.80 12.28 10.34 15.18 19.01 23.20 14.86-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 255 114 116 112 121 125 296 1139

22.39 10.01 10.18 9.83 10.62 10.97 25.99=================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

========================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total------------------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 374 62 223 659

76.95 55.36 41.22------------------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 60 33 222 315

12.35 29.46 41.04------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 52 17 96 165

10.70 15.18 17.74------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 486 112 541 1139

42.67 9.83 47.50========================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

765

Page 767: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

================================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 113 361 99 111 684

47.48 80.22 37.36 46.84----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 92 49 115 73 329

38.66 10.89 43.40 30.80----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 33 40 51 53 177

13.87 8.89 19.25 22.36----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 238 450 265 237 1190

20.00 37.82 22.27 19.92================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===========================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 17 210 178 66 142 72 685

40.48 59.66 53.78 57.89 58.44 63.72-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 12 81 100 34 69 35 331

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

766

Page 768: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

28.57 23.01 30.21 29.82 28.40 30.97-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 13 61 53 14 32 6 179

30.95 17.33 16.01 12.28 13.17 5.31-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 42 352 331 114 243 113 1195

3.51 29.46 27.70 9.54 20.33 9.46===========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==========================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 44 111 74 209 247 685

23.53 42.05 56.49 74.64 75.30--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 119 100 35 32 40 326

63.64 37.88 26.72 11.43 12.20--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 24 53 22 39 41 179

12.83 20.08 16.79 13.93 12.50--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 187 264 131 280 328 1190

15.71 22.18 11.01 23.53 27.56==========================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

767

Page 769: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

===========================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA gena ~ACAs nati Mixed Other Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 402 93 153 15 3 11 8 685

56.22 60.39 56.04 71.43 75.00 84.62 61.54-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 216 29 74 4 1 0 5 329

30.21 18.83 27.11 19.05 25.00 0.00 38.46-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 97 32 46 2 0 2 0 179

13.57 20.78 16.85 9.52 0.00 15.38 0.00-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 715 154 273 21 4 13 13 1193

59.93 12.91 22.88 1.76 0.34 1.09 1.09===========================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==========================================================================================================marital

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 342 12 99 41 150 42 686

52.94 52.17 65.56 64.06 59.76 72.41----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 205 9 35 8 62 10 329

31.73 39.13 23.18 12.50 24.70 17.24----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 99 2 17 15 39 6 178

15.33 8.70 11.26 23.44 15.54 10.34----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 646 23 151 64 251 58 1193

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

768

Page 770: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

54.15 1.93 12.66 5.36 21.04 4.86==========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

================================================gender

Q Male Female Total------------------------------------------------Should be possible 314 370 684

56.47 58.08------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 143 187 330

25.72 29.36------------------------------------------------Don't know 99 80 179

17.81 12.56------------------------------------------------Total 556 637 1193

46.61 53.39================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==========================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total----------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 216 345 124 685

60.50 58.77 50.41

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

769

Page 771: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

----------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 89 163 75 327

24.93 27.77 30.49----------------------------------------------------------Don't know 52 79 47 178

14.57 13.46 19.11----------------------------------------------------------Total 357 587 246 1190

30.00 49.33 20.67==========================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=============================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 155 210 68 67 183 683

62.25 57.22 55.74 63.81 52.44-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 66 101 39 21 103 330

26.51 27.52 31.97 20.00 29.51-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 28 56 15 17 63 179

11.24 15.26 12.30 16.19 18.05-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 249 367 122 105 349 1192

20.89 30.79 10.23 8.81 29.28=============================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

770

Page 772: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

===============================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total---------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 93 158 293 140 684

47.21 50.64 63.97 61.95---------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 67 92 112 59 330

34.01 29.49 24.45 26.11---------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 37 62 53 27 179

18.78 19.87 11.57 11.95---------------------------------------------------------------Total 197 312 458 226 1193

16.51 26.15 38.39 18.94===============================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

771

Page 773: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q47E. Abortion Exceptions: The family has very low income and cannot a↵ord any more children

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

====================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 52 86 69 139 41 48 28 463

82.54 85.15 71.13 39.04 33.33 20.78 12.90------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 4 9 17 153 68 150 166 567

6.35 8.91 17.53 42.98 55.28 64.94 76.50------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

772

Page 774: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Don't know 7 6 11 64 14 33 23 15811.11 5.94 11.34 17.98 11.38 14.29 10.60

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 63 101 97 356 123 231 217 1188

5.30 8.50 8.16 29.97 10.35 19.44 18.27====================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total----------------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 206 139 117 462

79.23 39.04 20.45----------------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 30 153 385 568

11.54 42.98 67.31----------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 24 64 70 158

9.23 17.98 12.24----------------------------------------------------------------------Total 260 356 572 1188

21.89 29.97 48.15======================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=================================================================================================PID7

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

773

Page 775: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 158 54 89 41 32 36 43 453

62.20 48.65 74.79 36.94 26.45 29.03 14.58-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 62 39 19 53 74 67 226 540

24.41 35.14 15.97 47.75 61.16 54.03 76.61-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 34 18 11 17 15 21 26 142

13.39 16.22 9.24 15.32 12.40 16.94 8.81-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 254 111 119 111 121 124 295 1135

22.38 9.78 10.48 9.78 10.66 10.93 25.99=================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

========================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total------------------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 301 41 111 453

62.19 36.94 20.52------------------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 120 53 367 540

24.79 47.75 67.84------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 63 17 63 143

13.02 15.32 11.65------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 484 111 541 1136

42.61 9.77 47.62========================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

774

Page 776: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

================================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 61 294 51 57 463

25.52 65.62 19.17 23.95----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 148 105 187 130 570

61.92 23.44 70.30 54.62----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 30 49 28 51 158

12.55 10.94 10.53 21.43----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 239 448 266 238 1191

20.07 37.62 22.33 19.98================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===========================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 13 130 123 37 97 63 463

31.71 37.04 37.16 32.74 39.92 55.75-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 16 175 156 65 121 37 570

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

775

Page 777: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

39.02 49.86 47.13 57.52 49.79 32.74-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 12 46 52 11 25 13 159

29.27 13.11 15.71 9.73 10.29 11.50-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 41 351 331 113 243 113 1192

3.44 29.45 27.77 9.48 20.39 9.48===========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==========================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 22 50 41 148 201 462

11.89 18.94 31.30 53.05 61.47--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 151 170 64 98 82 565

81.62 64.39 48.85 35.13 25.08--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 12 44 26 33 44 159

6.49 16.67 19.85 11.83 13.46--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 185 264 131 279 327 1186

15.60 22.26 11.05 23.52 27.57==========================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

776

Page 778: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

===========================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA gena ~ACAs nati Mixed Other Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 284 57 93 13 1 8 7 463

39.61 37.50 34.32 61.90 25.00 57.14 50.00-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 356 58 136 6 3 4 7 570

49.65 38.16 50.18 28.57 75.00 28.57 50.00-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 77 37 42 2 0 2 0 160

10.74 24.34 15.50 9.52 0.00 14.29 0.00-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 717 152 271 21 4 14 14 1193

60.10 12.74 22.72 1.76 0.34 1.17 1.17===========================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==========================================================================================================marital

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 213 7 69 22 115 38 464

33.18 30.43 45.70 33.85 45.45 66.67----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 356 12 56 33 98 13 568

55.45 52.17 37.09 50.77 38.74 22.81----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 73 4 26 10 40 6 159

11.37 17.39 17.22 15.38 15.81 10.53----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 642 23 151 65 253 57 1191

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

777

Page 779: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

53.90 1.93 12.68 5.46 21.24 4.79==========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

================================================gender

Q Male Female Total------------------------------------------------Should be possible 215 247 462

38.46 39.08------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 262 308 570

46.87 48.73------------------------------------------------Don't know 82 77 159

14.67 12.18------------------------------------------------Total 559 632 1191

46.94 53.06================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==========================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total----------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 159 228 75 462

44.92 38.91 30.49

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

778

Page 780: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

----------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 154 267 144 565

43.50 45.56 58.54----------------------------------------------------------Don't know 41 91 27 159

11.58 15.53 10.98----------------------------------------------------------Total 354 586 246 1186

29.85 49.41 20.74==========================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=============================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 96 158 46 56 107 463

38.55 43.29 38.33 51.85 30.57-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 124 159 59 35 193 570

49.80 43.56 49.17 32.41 55.14-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 29 48 15 17 50 159

11.65 13.15 12.50 15.74 14.29-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 249 365 120 108 350 1192

20.89 30.62 10.07 9.06 29.36=============================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

779

Page 781: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

===============================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total---------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 68 122 206 67 463

34.34 39.10 44.88 29.91---------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 96 140 209 125 570

48.48 44.87 45.53 55.80---------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 34 50 44 32 160

17.17 16.03 9.59 14.29---------------------------------------------------------------Total 198 312 459 224 1193

16.60 26.15 38.47 18.78===============================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

780

Page 782: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q47F. Abortion Exceptions: She is not married and does not want to marry the man

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

====================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 50 86 61 133 38 39 24 431

81.97 82.69 63.54 37.15 31.15 16.88 11.06------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 6 11 25 162 68 168 173 613

9.84 10.58 26.04 45.25 55.74 72.73 79.72------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

781

Page 783: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Don't know 5 7 10 63 16 24 20 1458.20 6.73 10.42 17.60 13.11 10.39 9.22

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 61 104 96 358 122 231 217 1189

5.13 8.75 8.07 30.11 10.26 19.43 18.25====================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total----------------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 197 133 101 431

75.48 37.15 17.72----------------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 41 162 409 612

15.71 45.25 71.75----------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 23 63 60 146

8.81 17.60 10.53----------------------------------------------------------------------Total 261 358 570 1189

21.95 30.11 47.94======================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=================================================================================================PID7

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

782

Page 784: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 162 46 76 42 27 29 39 421

63.53 40.35 65.52 37.50 22.31 23.39 13.18-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 61 49 29 56 85 73 234 587

23.92 42.98 25.00 50.00 70.25 58.87 79.05-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 32 19 11 14 9 22 23 130

12.55 16.67 9.48 12.50 7.44 17.74 7.77-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 255 114 116 112 121 124 296 1138

22.41 10.02 10.19 9.84 10.63 10.90 26.01=================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

========================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total------------------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 283 42 95 420

58.35 37.50 17.56------------------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 140 56 391 587

28.87 50.00 72.27------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 62 14 55 131

12.78 12.50 10.17------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 485 112 541 1138

42.62 9.84 47.54========================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

783

Page 785: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

================================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 62 279 43 47 431

25.94 62.00 16.23 19.83----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 153 123 200 138 614

64.02 27.33 75.47 58.23----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 24 48 22 52 146

10.04 10.67 8.30 21.94----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 239 450 265 237 1191

20.07 37.78 22.25 19.90================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===========================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 12 129 106 32 91 63 433

30.00 36.65 31.93 28.57 37.14 55.75-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 17 181 177 71 131 38 615

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

784

Page 786: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

42.50 51.42 53.31 63.39 53.47 33.63-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 11 42 49 9 23 12 146

27.50 11.93 14.76 8.04 9.39 10.62-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 40 352 332 112 245 113 1194

3.35 29.48 27.81 9.38 20.52 9.46===========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==========================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 21 53 37 127 193 431

11.29 20.15 28.03 45.20 59.02--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 155 177 74 112 93 611

83.33 67.30 56.06 39.86 28.44--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 10 33 21 42 41 147

5.38 12.55 15.91 14.95 12.54--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 186 263 132 281 327 1189

15.64 22.12 11.10 23.63 27.50==========================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

785

Page 787: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

===========================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA gena ~ACAs nati Mixed Other Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 260 52 92 12 0 8 7 431

36.31 33.77 33.95 57.14 0.00 57.14 50.00-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 387 65 141 7 4 4 7 615

54.05 42.21 52.03 33.33 100.00 28.57 50.00-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 69 37 38 2 0 2 0 148

9.64 24.03 14.02 9.52 0.00 14.29 0.00-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 716 154 271 21 4 14 14 1194

59.97 12.90 22.70 1.76 0.34 1.17 1.17===========================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==========================================================================================================marital

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 199 8 55 19 114 36 431

30.85 34.78 36.42 29.69 45.42 63.16----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 377 12 72 36 99 17 613

58.45 52.17 47.68 56.25 39.44 29.82----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 69 3 24 9 38 4 147

10.70 13.04 15.89 14.06 15.14 7.02----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 645 23 151 64 251 57 1191

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

786

Page 788: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

54.16 1.93 12.68 5.37 21.07 4.79==========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

================================================gender

Q Male Female Total------------------------------------------------Should be possible 202 229 431

36.14 36.12------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 286 329 615

51.16 51.89------------------------------------------------Don't know 71 76 147

12.70 11.99------------------------------------------------Total 559 634 1193

46.86 53.14================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==========================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total----------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 146 220 66 432

41.01 37.48 26.72

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

787

Page 789: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

----------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 169 282 160 611

47.47 48.04 64.78----------------------------------------------------------Don't know 41 85 21 147

11.52 14.48 8.50----------------------------------------------------------Total 356 587 247 1190

29.92 49.33 20.76==========================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=============================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 91 152 42 58 89 432

36.69 41.42 34.15 53.70 25.50-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 130 167 69 37 213 616

52.42 45.50 56.10 34.26 61.03-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 27 48 12 13 47 147

10.89 13.08 9.76 12.04 13.47-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 248 367 123 108 349 1195

20.75 30.71 10.29 9.04 29.21=============================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

788

Page 790: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

===============================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total---------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 66 123 179 63 431

33.67 39.55 39.00 27.88---------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 100 142 239 133 614

51.02 45.66 52.07 58.85---------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 30 46 41 30 147

15.31 14.79 8.93 13.27---------------------------------------------------------------Total 196 311 459 226 1192

16.44 26.09 38.51 18.96===============================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

789

Page 791: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q47G. Abortion Exceptions: She is married and does not want any more children

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

====================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 49 89 61 136 37 33 22 427

79.03 86.41 63.54 37.99 30.08 14.35 10.09------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 7 10 20 162 70 171 179 619

11.29 9.71 20.83 45.25 56.91 74.35 82.11------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

790

Page 792: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Don't know 6 4 15 60 16 26 17 1449.68 3.88 15.62 16.76 13.01 11.30 7.80

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 62 103 96 358 123 230 218 1190

5.21 8.66 8.07 30.08 10.34 19.33 18.32====================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

======================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total----------------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 199 136 92 427

75.67 37.99 16.08----------------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 38 162 421 621

14.45 45.25 73.60----------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 26 60 59 145

9.89 16.76 10.31----------------------------------------------------------------------Total 263 358 572 1193

22.05 30.01 47.95======================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=================================================================================================PID7

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

791

Page 793: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 159 49 80 44 30 28 32 422

62.35 42.98 67.23 39.29 24.79 22.58 10.81-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 64 44 25 54 83 75 244 589

25.10 38.60 21.01 48.21 68.60 60.48 82.43-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 32 21 14 14 8 21 20 130

12.55 18.42 11.76 12.50 6.61 16.94 6.76-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 255 114 119 112 121 124 296 1141

22.35 9.99 10.43 9.82 10.60 10.87 25.94=================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

========================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total------------------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 288 44 90 422

59.02 39.29 16.67------------------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 132 54 401 587

27.05 48.21 74.26------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 68 14 49 131

13.93 12.50 9.07------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 488 112 540 1140

42.81 9.82 47.37========================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

792

Page 794: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

================================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 53 283 39 52 427

22.36 62.47 14.66 21.94----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 164 117 202 139 622

69.20 25.83 75.94 58.65----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 20 53 25 46 144

8.44 11.70 9.40 19.41----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 237 453 266 237 1193

19.87 37.97 22.30 19.87================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

===========================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 13 126 112 33 84 60 428

31.71 35.90 33.73 29.20 34.29 53.10-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 17 185 170 74 133 43 622

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

793

Page 795: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

41.46 52.71 51.20 65.49 54.29 38.05-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 11 40 50 6 28 10 145

26.83 11.40 15.06 5.31 11.43 8.85-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 41 351 332 113 245 113 1195

3.43 29.37 27.78 9.46 20.50 9.46===========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==========================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 25 48 38 125 191 427

13.37 18.25 28.79 44.48 58.41--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 152 181 68 122 94 617

81.28 68.82 51.52 43.42 28.75--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 10 34 26 34 42 146

5.35 12.93 19.70 12.10 12.84--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 187 263 132 281 327 1190

15.71 22.10 11.09 23.61 27.48==========================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

794

Page 796: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

===========================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA gena ~ACAs nati Mixed Other Total-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 258 57 85 13 0 8 7 428

36.03 36.77 31.25 61.90 0.00 61.54 50.00-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 391 59 152 6 4 3 7 622

54.61 38.06 55.88 28.57 100.00 23.08 50.00-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 67 39 35 2 0 2 0 145

9.36 25.16 12.87 9.52 0.00 15.38 0.00-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 716 155 272 21 4 13 14 1195

59.92 12.97 22.76 1.76 0.33 1.09 1.17===========================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==========================================================================================================marital

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 199 5 57 19 116 33 429

30.85 20.83 37.50 29.23 45.85 57.89----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 380 15 69 37 101 20 622

58.91 62.50 45.39 56.92 39.92 35.09----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 66 4 26 9 36 4 145

10.23 16.67 17.11 13.85 14.23 7.02----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 645 24 152 65 253 57 1196

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

795

Page 797: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

53.93 2.01 12.71 5.43 21.15 4.77==========================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

================================================gender

Q Male Female Total------------------------------------------------Should be possible 200 228 428

35.84 35.79------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 288 334 622

51.61 52.43------------------------------------------------Don't know 70 75 145

12.54 11.77------------------------------------------------Total 558 637 1195

46.69 53.31================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==========================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total----------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 140 221 66 427

39.22 37.59 26.83

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

796

Page 798: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

----------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 172 289 158 619

48.18 49.15 64.23----------------------------------------------------------Don't know 45 78 22 145

12.61 13.27 8.94----------------------------------------------------------Total 357 588 246 1191

29.97 49.37 20.65==========================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

=============================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 90 153 36 61 87 427

36.00 41.69 29.51 57.01 25.00-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 132 157 75 39 219 622

52.80 42.78 61.48 36.45 62.93-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 28 57 11 7 42 145

11.20 15.53 9.02 6.54 12.07-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 250 367 122 107 348 1194

20.94 30.74 10.22 8.96 29.15=============================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

797

Page 799: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

===============================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total---------------------------------------------------------------Should be possible 66 119 178 65 428

33.33 38.14 38.78 28.76---------------------------------------------------------------Should not be possible 101 146 235 140 622

51.01 46.79 51.20 61.95---------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 31 47 46 21 145

15.66 15.06 10.02 9.29---------------------------------------------------------------Total 198 312 459 226 1195

16.57 26.11 38.41 18.91===============================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

798

Page 800: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q48. College Education and Success

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 3):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, METRO, MOVE, native1, native2,ONEDU, pid3, PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25,Q26, Q27, Q28, Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B,Q36.C, Q36.D, Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A,Q46B, Q46C, Q46D, Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2,race.t, race2, relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcode

The following objects are masked from UTCT (position 4):

AGE, AGEG, attend, birthyr, caseid, child, educ, endtime, evang, faminc, gender, hispanic, home, IDEOL, import, info1,info2, info3, info4, langpref, libcon, LIBCON7, literal, locate, LV, marital, metro, MOVE, native1, native2, ONEDU, pid3,PID3, pid7, PID7, Q1, Q10, Q11, Q12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q19, Q2, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23, Q24, Q25, Q26, Q27, Q28,Q29, Q3, Q30, Q31, Q32, Q33, Q34a, Q35.A, Q35.B, Q35.C, Q35.D, Q35.E, Q35.F, Q35.G, Q35.H, Q36.A, Q36.B, Q36.C, Q36.D,Q36.E, Q36.F, Q36.G, Q36.H, Q36.I, Q37, Q38, Q39, Q4, Q40, Q41, Q42A, Q42B, Q42F, Q43, Q44, Q45, Q46A, Q46B, Q46C, Q46D,Q47.A, Q47.B, Q47.C, Q47.D, Q47.E, Q47.F, Q47.G, Q48, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, race, RACE.0, RACE.1, RACE.2, race.t, race2,relig, schoolm.1, schoolm.2, schoolm.3, schoolm.4, starttime, STATEFROM, weight, YEAR, zipcodeCell Contents

|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================LIBCON7

Q Extremely lib. Somewhat lib. Lean lib. Moderate Lean con. Somewhat con. Extremely con. Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------College education is necessary 21 39 50 107 34 35 44 330

33.87 37.50 52.08 29.72 27.42 15.09 20.28--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------There are many ways to succeed 33 59 45 232 87 194 166 816

53.23 56.73 46.88 64.44 70.16 83.62 76.50--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

799

Page 801: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Don't know 8 6 1 21 3 3 7 4912.90 5.77 1.04 5.83 2.42 1.29 3.23

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 62 104 96 360 124 232 217 1195

5.19 8.70 8.03 30.13 10.38 19.41 18.16============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

========================================================================================================================IDEOL

Q Liberals Moderates Conservatives Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------College education is necessary 111 107 114 332

42.21 29.72 19.86------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------There are many ways to succeed in today's world without a college degree 137 232 446 815

52.09 64.44 77.70------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 15 21 14 50

5.70 5.83 2.44------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 263 360 574 1197

21.97 30.08 47.95========================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================PID7

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

800

Page 802: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Q StrDem WeakDem LeanDem Ind LeanRep WeakRep StrRep Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------College education is necessary 97 50 39 30 18 30 52 316

38.04 44.25 32.50 26.55 14.88 24.00 17.51--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------There are many ways to succeed in today's world without a college 142 54 78 79 102 92 239 786

55.69 47.79 65.00 69.91 84.30 73.60 80.47--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 16 9 3 4 1 3 6 42

6.27 7.96 2.50 3.54 0.83 2.40 2.02--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 255 113 120 113 121 125 297 1144

22.29 9.88 10.49 9.88 10.58 10.93 25.96============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==========================================================================================================================PID3

Q Democrats Independents Republicans Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------College education is necessary 186 30 100 316

38.04 26.55 18.42--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------There are many ways to succeed in today's world without a college degree 274 79 433 786

56.03 69.91 79.74--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 29 4 10 43

5.93 3.54 1.84--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 489 113 543 1145

42.71 9.87 47.42==========================================================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

801

Page 803: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================Q22

Q Republican candidate Democratic candidate Tea Party candidate Don't know Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------College education is necessary 79 178 19 57 333

32.78 39.21 7.12 23.95--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------There are many ways to succeed in today's world wi 156 256 246 159 817

64.73 56.39 92.13 66.81--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 6 20 2 22 50

2.49 4.41 0.75 9.24--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 241 454 267 238 1200

20.08 37.83 22.25 19.83============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================educ

Q No HS High school graduate Some college 2-year 4-year Post-grad Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------College education is necessary 7 85 89 42 63 46 332

17.07 24.08 26.81 37.17 25.61 40.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------There are many ways to succeed in today's world without 33 245 227 69 177 67 818

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

802

Page 804: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

80.49 69.41 68.37 61.06 71.95 58.26--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 1 23 16 2 6 2 50

2.44 6.52 4.82 1.77 2.44 1.74--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 41 353 332 113 246 115 1200

3.42 29.42 27.67 9.42 20.50 9.58============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================attend

Q More than once a week Once a week A few times a month Once or twice a year Never Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------College education is necessary 52 72 38 81 90 333

27.66 27.07 28.79 28.83 27.44--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------There are many ways to succeed in today' 131 184 90 192 215 812

69.68 69.17 68.18 68.33 65.55--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 5 10 4 8 23 50

2.66 3.76 3.03 2.85 7.01--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 188 266 132 281 328 1195

15.73 22.26 11.05 23.51 27.45============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

803

Page 805: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

============================================================================================================================================race

Q White / Blanco Black Hispanic Asian Native American / Americano ind~ACA g Mixed Other Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------College education is necessary 171 57 99 4 0 2 0 333

23.78 36.54 36.40 18.18 0.00 14.29 0.00--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------There are many ways to succeed in 524 84 165 17 4 12 11 817

72.88 53.85 60.66 77.27 100.00 85.71 78.57--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 24 15 8 1 0 0 3 51

3.34 9.62 2.94 4.55 0.00 0.00 21.43--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 719 156 272 22 4 14 14 1201

59.87 12.99 22.65 1.83 0.33 1.17 1.17============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================marital

Q Married Separated Divorced Widowed Single Domestic Partnership Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------College education is necessary 167 9 52 16 80 10 334

25.73 37.50 34.44 24.62 31.37 17.24--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------There are many ways to succeed in today's world without 459 13 96 48 156 45 817

70.72 54.17 63.58 73.85 61.18 77.59--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 23 2 3 1 19 3 51

3.54 8.33 1.99 1.54 7.45 5.17--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 649 24 151 65 255 58 1202

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

804

Page 806: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

53.99 2.00 12.56 5.41 21.21 4.83============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

==================================================================================================gender

Q Male Female Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------College education is necessary 125 208 333

22.24 32.55--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------There are many ways to succeed in today's world without a college degree 412 406 818

73.31 63.54--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 25 25 50

4.45 3.91--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 562 639 1201

46.79 53.21==================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================locate

Q Urban Suburban Rural Total------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------College education is necessary 113 150 66 329

31.74 25.38 26.51

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

805

Page 807: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------There are many ways to succeed in today's world without a college degree 232 408 177 817

65.17 69.04 71.08------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 11 33 6 50

3.09 5.58 2.41------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 356 591 249 1196

29.77 49.41 20.82============================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent ||-------------------------|

============================================================================================================================================METRO

Q Houston Area Dallas-Fort Worth Area San Antonio Area Austin Area Another Part of TX Total--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------College education is necessary 72 108 27 32 94 333

28.69 29.35 22.13 29.91 26.70--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------There are many ways to succeed in tod 166 242 94 74 241 817

66.14 65.76 77.05 69.16 68.47--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 13 18 1 1 17 50

5.18 4.89 0.82 0.93 4.83--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 251 368 122 107 352 1200

20.92 30.67 10.17 8.92 29.33============================================================================================================================================

Cell Contents|-------------------------|| Count || Column Percent |

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

806

Page 808: dev.texaspolitics.utexas.edu...53.98 1.93 12.57 5.45 21.21 4.86 ========================================================================================================= Cell …

|-------------------------|

=================================================================================================================AGEG

Q 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ Total-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------College education is necessary 67 97 126 43 333

33.84 30.89 27.33 18.94-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------There are many ways to succeed in today's world without a college degree 118 196 321 182 817

59.60 62.42 69.63 80.18-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Don't know 13 21 14 2 50

6.57 6.69 3.04 0.88-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total 198 314 461 227 1200

16.50 26.17 38.42 18.92=================================================================================================================

Field Dates: May 30 to June 8, 2014N=1200 Registered VotersMargin of Error: +/- 2.83% (3.28% adjusted for weighting) for full sample

807