1National Center on Educational

Outcomes

Developing Accommodations Aligned to Internationally

Benchmarked Standards and Assessments

Sheryl Lazarus and Martha ThurlowOSEP Project Directors’ Conference

July 15-17, 2013

2National Center on Educational

Outcomes

Overview• The Consortia and their accommodations policies• Results of an analysis of states’ accommodations

policies• Conclusions• Discussion

3

Status of States Adoption

4

Smarter Balanced States

5National Center on Educational

Outcomes

PARRCPARCC Accommodations Manual http://ca539dfd55636c55e922-fd4c048d1c793e15a27f954b34a49d25.r49.cf1.rackcdn.com/PARCCDraftAccommodationsManualforSWDEL.pdf

Smarter BalancedAccessibility and Accommodations Guidelines

Draft Consortia Manuals

6National Center on Educational

Outcomes

2012 State Policies for Accommodations Used to Deliver Assessments Orally

(NCEO Synthesis Report)

Available at www.nceo.info

NCEO Accommodations Snapshots

7National Center on Educational

Outcomes

Accommodations:• Human Reader• Text to Speech• Audio Recording

Content Areas: • ELA/reading• Math

Accommodations for: • Directions• Items• Passages

Data Summarized for:

8National Center on Educational

Outcomes

• Most states allowed directions to be read aloud by a Human Reader on reading/English language arts (ELA) (n=36) and math assessments (n=36); some states also had policies that allowed directions to be delivered orally by Text to Speech or Pre-recorded Audio.

• For reading/ELA assessments, many states’ policies only allowed the delivery of assessment items or passages orally in certain circumstances or with implications for scoring.

Key Findings

9National Center on Educational

Outcomes

• Some state policies addressed who could deliver the accommodation and what test security measures needed to be in place.

• The policies of a few states indicated that Text to Speech was preferred over Human Reader due to test security issues and to help ensure standardized delivery.

Key Findings, Cont.

10National Center on Educational

Outcomes

• The policies of a few states also indicated how accessibility tools that were different from those in the test platform, but which were normally used for instruction, could be used.

Key Findings, Cont.

11National Center on Educational

Outcomes

The policies for accommodations used to deliver assessments orally being developed by the consortia may differ substantially from the policies currently in place in some states. States and the consortia will need to figure out how to successfully transition to the new policies. For example, teachers may need training on how to select, implement, and evaluate accommodations used to deliver an assessment orally. The evolving assessment system provides a wonderful opportunity to thoughtfully develop a plan for transitioning to new policies that will result in improved accommodations decision-making.

Conclusions

12National Center on Educational

Outcomes

Available soon at www.nceo.info

2013 State Accommodations Polices for:

• Scribe• Speech-to-text• Spell checker• Calculator

Other NCEO Accommodations Snapshots

13National Center on Educational

Outcomes

Discussion Questions for Session Participants

• How can states successfully transition to new accommodations policies aligned to internationally benchmarked assessments?

• What else needs to happen at the consortia, state, and local levels to help ensure that students with disabilities can meaningfully access instruction and assessments?

• What data need to be collected to evaluate how accommodations are working?