9
1Interactive Advertising Bureau. (2012). Digital Attribution Comes Of Age [Pdf file]. Retrieved from http://www.iab.net/digitalattribution 2Webmarketing123. (2014). 2015 State of digital marketing [Pdf file]. Retrieved from http://www.webmarketing123.com/news/ webmarketing123-unveils-results-4th-annual-state-digital-marketing-report/**CMO.com DIGITAL MARKETING ATTRIBUTION Introduction Marketing attribution has been around for as long as diligent marketers have been trying to measure and track the impact of their activities. The Interactive Advertising Bureau defines digital marketing attribution as “the measurement of the value of each digital marketing contact that contributed to a desired outcome.”1 In other words, this is the process of defining how customers prefer to engage, and what drives the outcome you are attempting to measure. Earlier this year, a Deloitte Digital study on the importance of the CMO-CIO relationship identified one large factor driving this collaboration is the drive to focus on the customer. Together these executives will lead the definition of what it means to build a 360-degree view of the customer, and how to use that understanding to build a customized, meaningful customer experience across multiple touch points. This move toward personalization is where attribution comes into play. The increase in advertising on digital media channels, along with the importance placed on the customer journey has resulted in demand for more accurate methods of measuring ad performance and ROI. The concept of digital attribution is not new and some early methods included offer codes or designated telephone extensions. However, the increase in data from social, mobile and other digital channels has given rise to more interest in, and the adoption of cross-channel marketing attribution projects. A recent survey2 of more than 600 marketing professionals in the U.S. showed that this year nearly 10% more marketers are investing in revenue INTRODUCTION 01 Myth vs. Reality reporting, compared to last year. The same study showed 38% of those who increased their revenue reporting still did not have an attribution model in place, and nearly one third had no idea which digital channels made the biggest impact on their bottom line. The inability to attribute revenue to activities in digital channels is likely not due to a lack of information on the subject, as a simple online search for “digital marketing attribution” yields more than 100 million results.

DIGITAL MARKETING ATTRIBUTION - Deloitte marketing attribution as “the ... experience across multiple touch points. ... new technology is driving the rise of

  • Upload
    lequynh

  • View
    224

  • Download
    1

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

1Interactive Advertising Bureau. (2012). Digital Attribution Comes Of Age [Pdf file]. Retrieved from http://www.iab.net/digitalattribution2Webmarketing123. (2014). 2015 State of digital marketing [Pdf file]. Retrieved from http://www.webmarketing123.com/news/webmarketing123-unveils-results-4th-annual-state-digital-marketing-report/**CMO.com

DIGITAL MARKETING ATTRIBUTION

IntroductionMarketing attribution has been around for as long as diligent marketers have been trying to measure and track the impact of their activities. The Interactive Advertising Bureau defines digital marketing attribution as “the measurement of the value of each digital marketing contact that contributed to a desired outcome.”1 In other words, this is the process of defining how customers prefer to engage, and what drives the outcome you are attempting to measure.

Earlier this year, a Deloitte Digital study on the importance of the CMO-CIO relationship identified one large factor driving this collaboration is the drive to focus on the customer. Together these executives will lead the definition of what it means to build a 360-degree view of the customer, and how to use that understanding to build a customized, meaningful customer experience across multiple touch points. This move toward personalization is where attribution comes into play.

The increase in advertising on digital media channels, along with the importance placed on the customer journey has resulted in demand for more accurate methods of measuring ad performance and ROI. The concept of digital attribution is not new and some early methods included offer codes or designated telephone extensions. However, the increase in data from social, mobile and other digital channels has given rise to more interest in, and the adoption of cross-channel marketing attribution projects.

A recent survey2 of more than 600 marketing professionals in the U.S. showed that this year nearly 10% more marketers are investing in revenue

INTRODUCTION 01

Myth vs. Reality

reporting, compared to last year. The same study showed 38% of those who increased their revenue reporting still did not have an attribution model in place, and nearly one third had no idea which digital channels made the biggest impact on their bottom line. The inability to attribute revenue to activities in digital channels is likely not due to a lack of information on the subject, as a simple online search for “digital marketing attribution” yields more than 100 million results.

Over the past decade, Mindshare has seen an explosion of marketing touch points that have put placed increased scrutiny on the value perception of media mix modeling. Ultimately, Mindshare applied a top-down approach with media mix modeling, alongside digital attribution modeling as a bottom-up modeling approach.

“Historically agencies didn’t necessarily look at data as a real asset. Digital has really been the massive driver of that.”

“If you integrate a data and analytics framework with the strengths of a media agency, then you significantly increase your ability to deliver a tangible impact for your clients.”- Rolf Olsen, CDO – Mindshare*

3Webmarketing123. (2014). 2015 State of digital marketing [Pdf file]. Retrieved from http://www.webmarketing123.com/news/webmarketing123-unveils-results-4th-annual-state-digital-marketing-report/**CMO.com MYTHS VS REALITY 02

Digital attribution is not one of the easier analytics concepts to grasp, let alone implement, especially when applied to multichannel or omnichannel marketing scenarios. Most marketers and consultants express their opinions in the form of tips, tricks, or how-to guides that assume an organization is inevitably heading down the attribution path. Make no mistake, marketing attribution is a worthy endeavor. For those new to the concept, however, it can be intimidating to wade through vast amounts of detailed information, feeling as though you are playing catch-up with your peers.

This article aims to dispel some common misconceptions, provide foundational knowledge about how attribution works, and empower brands to develop and deploy their own attribution programs.

Misconception #1: Digital attribution is only for B2CMarketers often typecast digital attribution as appropriate for only programs and campaigns aimed at consumers—after all, those are what draw attention. But attribution can be a useful metric for a variety of businesses, regardless of customer type, because of the increase in data being collected indicating how customers engage. Companies typically utilize CRM systems to glean relevant information about customers and prospects. Being able to access, understand, and utilize that data is often a precursor to attribution modeling. In fact, two of the primary components to venturing down the attribution path include the ability to collect data on customer touch points and the ability to define something to measure (a “conversion”).

B2B companies have been slower to incorporate digital attribution

into their marketing strategies and revenue reporting models. This slower adoption rate is largely due to fundamental differences in revenue cycles, according to BrightFunnel, a B2B-focused attribution and revenue forecasting company. They explain that, “B2B companies have to navigate their marketing and sales efforts to and through multiple decision makers and evaluators.” Because of their differences in revenue cycles “consumer marketers have been quicker to solve attribution for their efforts than B2B marketers.”3

Although B2B companies may face

greater challenges than consumer-driven companies, their decision makers are placing no less importance on attribution. In fact, proving ROI was the number-one digital marketing challenge that B2B marketers reported for 2015, according to one study. In the face of growing emphasis on attribution, B2B marketers are becoming more uncertain about which digital channel drives the most revenue. This uncertainty was up 6 percent from last year.3

4Deloitte Digital. The CMO-CIO Relationship (2015, January 16) MYTHS VS REALITY 03

MYTH#1

Digital attribution is only for B2C.

21%

B2B marketers

use content

marketing, who

are effective at

tracking ROIB2B marketers

use content marketing

86%

working onthis now

working on this within 12 months

say it’s not a priority

provided no answer

B2B Marketers Working on Gaining a Better Understanding of What Content is Effective (and what isn’t)

The almost continual introduction of new technology is driving the rise of digital attribution strategies within all types of organizations. B2B companies are taking advantage of digital marketing tools that are designed to help companies to focus their cross-channel marketing efforts and become more efficient.

While these new marketing tools can empower all types of organizations and will undoubtedly aid the

Misconception #2: Digital attribution sits only with marketingAttribution is about more than accountability and effective allocation of marketing resources, and the real value is in its ability to drive a unified

attribution process, they can’t overcome every challenge. Organizational silos that inhibit the sharing of information are a significant obstacle to undertaking a digital attribution project.

customer experience by providing a more transparent view of how customers engage with the brand. In order to realize this value, the digital attribution endeavor requires alignment and integration across a number of functions to be successful: the CMO and marketing team, the CIO and IT team, the CFO and finance team, the CEO, and third-party vendors.

It is crucial that these C-suite roles take

what some call a closed-loop approach to marketing: working collaboratively to define objectives, deciding on an approach, sharing information, analyzing data, and creating short- and long-term strategies.

“The entire organization has the opportunity to focus on and be held accountable for the customers’ brand experience. The CMO and CIO can better collaborate toward a broader vision by leading with the customer experience and their company’s business goals.”4

5Forrester Research Inc., Organize for Marketing Measurement. December 4, 2014.

Sets overall business objectives

Ensures that measurement strategyis in alignment

Interested in the impact of marketing measurement on the bottom line

Primary advocate, owner, and driverof the attribution initiative

Must understand how attribution will

integrate with business objectives

Must make strategic measurement

decisions

CEO

CFO

CMO

CIO

MYTHS VS REALITY 04

Executives in most organizations generally see marketing as owning the attribution initiative. In a recent Forrester survey5, 68 percent of respondents identified marketing as the department responsible for the strategy. While the marketing team usually aligns and drives the strategies, as well as executes on creative objectives, if these teams cannot easily interface with IT-generated customer data, it will be difficult for them to drive an attribution strategy.

More importantly, the whole process will gain little traction without alignment across the C-suite. The CEO, CMO, CIO, and CFO must be in agreement that digital attribution is a worthy undertaking because progress depends on their teams working together. There will be bumps in the road while marketing customizes, tests, and refines attribution models to determine the most accurate channel contributions, and the implementation process will be more manageable if the proper alignment and communication channels are established across functional teams at the outset.

This alignment can also help dispel the notion that attribution modeling is an exact science and can remain static once an optimal mix has been determined.

MYTH#2

Digital attribution sits only with marketing.

6Duke Fuqua School of Business. (2015). The CMO survey [Pdf file]. Retrieved from http://www.fuqua.duke.edu/news_events/news-releases/cmo-survey-feb-2015/#.VWYElM9VhuA7Avinash Kaushik. (2013, August 12). Multi-Channel Attribution Modeling: The Good, Bad and Ugly Models [Blog post]. Retrieved from http://www.kaushik.net/avinash/multi-channel-attribution-modeling-good-bad-ugly-models MYTHS VS REALITY 05

Misconception #3:Digital attribution models areexact and staticIt is well known that attribution modeling can be complex and confusing for those of us who do not hold statistical analysis or data science degrees. There are a wide variety of models available, but perhaps none of them align with your goals and tactics. Finding the attribution mix

every day, but at least do an operational review every two weeks and a strategic review (with recommendation for changes) every month.” – Avinash Kaushik, cofounder and CEO of Market Motive7

Popular software solutions offer a variety of out-of-the-box models to get marketers started on a attribution project. These models include last

that is most accurate for tracking your customers’ journey will surely require customization.

Continual monitoring and refinement is also a must. A recent Duke Fuqua School of Business survey asked leading CMOs about the factors preventing their organizations from furthering their marketing analytics initiatives, and the top answer was that current analytics

interaction, last non-direct interaction, first interaction, linear attribution, and time decay, but this article will not delve into a critique of specific attribution models, as it is a lengthy topic worthy of its own discussion. However, most marketers would probably agree that first interaction and last interaction models are a bit antiquated in today’s world of digital, cross-channel marketing because they do not account for the many steps in a customer journey. Attribution modeling also has

“do not offer sufficient insights”. This suggests an environment where additional spending on measurement could be a tough sell without an understanding that customization is essential for increased accuracy in attribution modeling.6

“Multi-channel attribution modeling and analysis is not a one-time effort, it is something you’ll do all the time. Not

difficulty accounting for certain offline touch points like billboards, magazine, newspaper, and bus advertisements.

An organization should regularly examine its digital ad spend and compare it to overall spend because diversifying the digital media mix, and ensuring an optimal mix of placements is an important element of both attribution and customer

“Multi-channel attribution modeling and analysis is not a one-time effort, it is something you’ll do all the time. Not every day, but at least do an operational review every two weeks and a strategic review (with recommendation for changes) every month.” – Avinash Kaushik, cofounder and CEO of Market Motive

MYTH#3

Digital attribution models are exact & static.Types of attribution models

8Measure the Impact of Cross-Channel Attribution, Forrester Research Inc., June 4, 2014 MYTHS VS REALITY 06

experience. This can be based on a number of factors including the stage of the customer journey, engagement platform, message, or call to action. No matter how simple or arduous the process of establishing an attribution system, marketers should continue refining their modeling and measure a shifting range of channels, based on how channels are performing, how customers are engaging with the brand, and any changes to ad placements. Sticking with a standard or static model may lock in incorrect assumptions about the customer path—and everything else.

All of these specifics around attribution modeling might have you wondering if it is worth the effort. The short answer is maybe. This leads us to the final misconception on our list. Misconception #4: Digital attribution is a mustThe benefits of establishing an attribution effort within an organization can be far-reaching. Digital methodologies, paired with new marketing technologies, can track and account for consumer activity in ways not previously possible. The ability to analyze and understand the available data points, as well as translate them into a tangible understanding of ROI, is where the real value lies. Forrester Research analyst Tina Moffett writes that attribution is “the most effective approach to marketing measurement.”8

However, marketers should take a pragmatic approach to introducing digital attribution and launching a campaign to get the entire C-suite on board. Not every organization will find the results worth the considerable effort of a major initiative. Approached strategically, attribution is a long-term investment of both time and resources

and, as Moffett explains, “Adoption is low because it is a difficult task.”8 She points to the fact that many organizations view attribution not as a strategic initiative, but as a side project most appropriately headed by mid-level managers. Moffett also says that customer purchase paths are often convoluted and that the vast amounts of available customer data make it difficult to integrate and correlate patterns. Many companies simply cannot afford the large price tag that accompanies full investment. Implementing an attribution-measurement strategy can cost hundreds of thousands of dollars, if not millions, depending on how many systems or platforms are being integrated. These high costs are often associated with factors such as campaign volumes and the customization of models as well as the dedicated resources needed to manage the software platform. Stakeholders may balk at the steep learning curve for standing up an attribution effort, since the customization and refinement require managers who are well-versed in the modeling principles.

In addition, attribution may not be right for you if: your digital ad spends are only a small portion of your budget, your digital media mix is not diversified across a wide range of channels, or your planned digital spend is not part of a long-term strategy.

Attribution modeling strategy often takes time to yield insights and benefits. As a platform is activated and data is fed into the model, insights are typically only gleaned going forward; there is limited ability to analyze past customer interactions. Naturally, once the platform is turned on, the insights and benefits begin to build incrementally

MYTH#4

Digitalattributionis a must.

9

9

9

9

LAGGARDMeasurement

Measurement

DABBLERImplements more

structured campaign testing processes and has dedicated internal and external resources

to conduct analysis.

MEASUREMENT

PRODemonstrates

sufficient skill to establish cross-channel marketing

performance measurement frameworks and activate

insights.

Measurement

EXPERTMeasures complex

customer interaction in real time and leverages multiple measurement approaches, including

attribution.

MYTHS VS REALITY 07

over time, with each refinement ofthe model.

Ahead of deploying a full-fledged attribution strategy, organizations can and should leverage existing assets to measure the impact of marketing mix by using internal analytics and current reporting methods. Basic marketing

channel or campaign assessment is something every marketer should be doing. There will undoubtedly be limitations on how much can be uncovered regarding cross-channel mix, customer journey mapping, or real-time analytics based on this type of analysis.

Enrichment in these areas is what investing in attribution platforms can help enable.

Planning for the FutureMarketers – not to mention CEOs – must consider a number of variables when evaluating whether an attribution strategy is appropriate. The decision is only complicated by the increasing speed of digital marketing and the pressure on marketers to act fast and keep up. The challenge for executives is factoring the level of understanding and buy-in needed across the entire organization to make an informed decision about how to move forward.

At Deloitte, we work with clients on a wide variety of projects, and digital marketing attribution is just one of the

ways we can help a business plan for its future. Realizing business impact starts with understanding our client’s goals so we can ask the types of questions needed to develop the right approach. Our experience has shown that what an organization needs is a partner who understands its business and its industry, and brings a clearly defined set of methods for solving business-critical challenges.

In an increasingly digital world, generating and analyzing data is the driving force behind digital attribution, marketing optimization, and delivering a compelling customer experience. We help our clients identify the strengths in their existing customer data to start the

9Build Capabilities For Measurement Success, Forrester Research Inc., February 17, 2015

process of building the systems that will allow them to recognize their customers and provide them with a meaningful experience no matter their level of interaction with the organization. By developing a holistic understanding of an organization’s internal systems and what they know about their customers, an initial attribution solution can be built on a foundation that will scale up as markets acquire new data sources, and fill in gaps that have been identified in project planning.

Digital attribution is a complex and moving target that often changes faster than the business cycle. While not every company will – or should - invest in a full-scale program, many have moved in that direction, keeping up with changing technologies, customer behaviors, and markets. Our cross-functional teams know the questions to

MYTHS VS REALITY 07

ask to elicit the information needed to build capacity and realize the benefits in being able to attribute customer actions to financial outcomes.

Companies that are ready and take the necessary steps to prepare for an attribution strategy often turn the benefits of attribution – digital or traditional – into their own competitive advantage.

We help you articulate a clearfuture state

We develop the questions to illuminate a path forward

We implement the best solution based on our experience

The Deloitte Digital Approach

Goals

Questions

Method

As used in this document, “Deloitte” means Deloitte Consulting LLP and its subsidiaries, which provide business consulting and advisory services as well as technology design and implementation services; and Deloitte Tax LLP, which provides Audit and Tax advisory capabilities. These entities are separate subsidiaries of Deloitte LLP. Please see www.deloitte.com/us/about for a detailed description of the legal structure of Deloitte LLP and its subsidiaries. Certain services may not be available to attest clients under the rules and regulations of public accounting.

This publication contains general information only and is based on the experiences and research of Deloitte practitioners. Deloitte is not, by means of this publication, rendering business, financial, investment, or other professional advice or services. This publication is not a substitute for such professional advice or services, nor should it be used as a basis for any decision or action that may affect your business. Before making any decision or taking any action that may affect your business, you should consult a qualified professional advisor. Deloitte, its affiliates, and related entities shall not be responsible for any loss sustained by any person who relies on this publication.

Copyright © 2015 Deloitte Development LLC.All rights reserved.

Member of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited

AUTHORSEdward See PrincipalDeloitte Consulting LLP

Aaron LavinSenior ManagerDeloitte Digital, Deloitte Consulting LLP

Sources

James Aitken. (2015, May 10). Attribution Modeling – Cause for concern or for the cause? [Blog post]. Retrieved from http://www.mandmglobal.com/community/blog/15-05-10/Attribution-modelling-%E2%80%93-Cause-for-concern-or-for-the-cause.aspx

Nadia Cameron. Data-driven attribution delivers dividends for TransUnion CMO. (2015, April 29). Retrieved from http://www.cmo.com.au/article/573775/data-driven-attribution-provides-dividends-transunion-cmo

Mat Zucker. (2015, April 27). Transforming your business with digital creativity [Blog post]. Retrieved from http://www.forbes.com/sites/matzucker/2015/04/27/transforming-your-business-with-digital-creativity

Q3 2014 Global Cross-Channel Attribution Wave Report, Gartner, April 13, 2015Ian McKee. (2015, April 7). Can marketing attribution models save PR measurement [Blog post]. Retrieved from https://econsultancy.com/blog/66280-can-marketing-attribution-models-save-pr-measurement

Evaluate Your Marketing Performance Measurement Maturity, Forrester Research Inc., March 31, 2015

Kate Kay. (2015, March 31). Mindshare’s New Data Chief: Media Mix Modeling is Not Dead: A Q&A with Former Carat Exec Rolf Olsen [Blog post]. Retrieved from http://adage.com/article/datadriven-marketing/mindshare-s-data-chief-media-mix-modeling-dead/297822/

Derek Handova. (2015, March 16). What no one is telling you (until now) about marketing attribution technology [Blog post]. Retrieved from http://www.b2bnn.com/2015/03/what-no-one-is-telling-you-until-now-about-marketing-attribution-technology

The State of Cross-Channel Attribution Technologies 2015, Forrester Research Inc., March 9, 2015

Mike Scafidi. (2015, February 25). PepsiCo’s Biggest Digital Marketing Challenge [Blog post]. Retrieved from http://www.imediaconnection.com/content/38212.asp

Build Capabilities For Measurement Success, Forrester Research Inc., February 17, 2015

Deloitte Digital. The CMO-CIO Relationship (2015, January 16)

Duke Fuqua School of Business. (2015). The CMO survey [Pdf file]. Retrieved from http://www.fuqua.duke.edu/news_events/news-releases/cmo-survey-feb-2015/#.VWYElM9VhuA

Robert Glazer. (2014, December 29). 5 Digital Marketing Trends for Smarter Customer Acquisition in 2015 [Blog post]. Retrieved from http://www.steamfeed.com/5-digital-marketing-trends-smarter-customer-acquisition-2015/

Allison Schiff. Marketing Mixed Opinions On The Future Of Attribution (2014, December 19). Retrieved from http://adexchanger.com/analytics/marketing-mixed-opinions-on-the-future-of-attribution/Use Cross-Channel Attribution to Understand Marketing Effectiveness, Forrester Research Inc., December 18, 2014

Organize for Marketing Measurement, Forrester Research Inc., December 4, 2014

Daniel Kehrer. (2014, December 2). The Truth about Cross-Channel Attribution in Marketing [Blog post]. Retrieved from http://www.forbes.com/sites/forbesinsights/2014/12/02/cross-channel-attribution

Steven Hofmans. (2014, November 18). Marketing Analytics for Attribution Modeling [Blog post]. Retrieved from http://loyalty360.org/loyalty-today/article/marketing-analytics-for-attribution-modeling

Adam Parikh. (2014, October 9). Marketing Attribution in a Digital World [Blog post]. Retrieved from http://www.exactdrive.com/news/marketing-attribution-in-a-digital-world

Kohki Yamaguchi. (2014, September 25). 3 Challenges of Attribution Modeling: The Bad, The Bad, and the Ugly [Blog post]. Retrieved from http://marketingland.com/3-challenges-attribution-modeling-bad-bad-ugly-101257

Danny Dalton. (2014, September 11). Extending The Shelf Life Of The CMO [Blog post]. Retrieved from http://blogs.adobe.com/digitalmarketing/digital-marketing/extending-shelf-life-cmo/

Innovate to become an Attribution Master, Forrester Research Inc., September 2, 2014

Randall Beard. (2014, June 19). Are We Entering a Singularity in Advertising? [Blog post]. Retrieved from http://www.business2community.com/marketing/entering-singularity-advertising-0912846

Measure the Impact of Cross-Channel Attribution, Forrester Research Inc., June 4, 2014

Martin Kihn. (2014, May 12). Why most marketers won’t miss stand-alone attribution platforms (but probably should) [Blog post]. Retrieved from http://blogs.gartner.com/martin-kihn/why-most-marketers-wont-miss-stand-alone-attribution-platforms-but-probably-should/

Extract Business Value From Your Mix Model, Forrester Research Inc., March 27, 2014

BrightFunnel. (2014, January 14). What Is Multi-Channel Attribution? [Blog post]. Retrieved from http://www.brightfunnel.com/all/what-is-multi-channel-attribution/

Webmarketing123. (2014). 2015 State of digital marketing [Pdf file]. Retrieved from http://www.webmarketing123.com/news/webmarketing123-unveils-results-4th-annual-state-digital-marketing-report/

Avinash Kaushik. (2013, August 12). Multi-Channel Attribution Modeling: The Good, Bad and Ugly Models [Blog post]. Retrieved from http://www.kaushik.net/avinash/multi-channel-attribution-modeling-good-bad-ugly-models

Anto Chittilappilly. (2013, July 30). Three Prerequisites To Successful Cross-Channel Optimization [Blog post]. Retrieved from http://www.mediapost.com/publications/article/205632/three-prerequisites-to-successful-cross-channel-op.html

Daniel Kehrer. (2013, July 29). 8 Trends Driving Marketing Attribution Now [Blog post]. Retrieved from http://www.forbes.com/sites/forbesinsights/2013/07/29/8-trends-driving-marketing-attribution-now/

James Green. Which Ad Attribution Model Should You Use? (2012, July 26). Retrieved from http://mashable.com/2012/07/26/ad-attribution-model/