Upload
swain
View
57
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
MK. EKONOMI SUMBERDAYA ALAM DAN LINGKUNGAN. INTRODUCTION TO ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS Greentax Sep. 7, 2004 Gary Flomenhoft-Gund Institute. Diunduh dari : smno.psdl.ppsub.2013. DIAGRAM LINGKAR MODEL EKONOMI. “EXTERNALITIES” SOCIETY. ?. ECONOMY. ?. ENVIRONMENT. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Diunduh dari: smno.psdl.ppsub.2013
MK. EKONOMI SUMBERDAYA ALAM DAN LINGKUNGAN
INTRODUCTION TO ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS
GreentaxSep. 7, 2004
Gary Flomenhoft-Gund Institute
DIAGRAM LINGKAR MODEL EKONOMI
ECONOMY
“EXTERNALITIES” SOCIETY
ENVIRONMENT
? ?
LINGKUNGAN sbg ‘SUBSET’ dari EKONOMI
EKONOMI
EKOSISTEM
=
EKONOMI NEO-KLASIK 1890-No Ingredients, only labor and capital
P = f(L,K)= ALa . BKb (Cobb-Douglas multiplication)
Labor (Chef )
Kapital (Mixing bowl)
xROTI?Kapital (oven)X
=
INFINITE SUBSTITUT-ABILITY:2P = f(L,K)= 2ALa . 2BKb
More Chefs
or Bigger Mixing bowl
x
More Bread?
EKONOMI NEO-KLASIK 1890-
Quotable Quotes• “There is no reason we can’t have a perfectly healthy
economy with virtually no resources whatsoever” Robert Solow
• “We can do without agriculture because it’s only 2% of the economy.” Norgaard?
• “neo-classical economics is a form of brain damage” -- Hazel Henderson
EKONOMI - EKOLOGISNO “EXTERNALITIES”
EKONOMI - EKOLOGISSietem Terbuka
Hukum I : Konservasi Massa
ECONOMY (waste)
(some)
ECONOMY
(waste)
(some)
SourcesSub-surface Resources
SitesSurface locations: ie:
land
SinksAbsorbtion
of waste
3 Ss:
PAJAK HIJAU = GREEN TAX
Entropi = disorder, randomnessHukum II: Entropi selalu meningkat
ECONOMY
(waste)
LOW ENTROPY HIGH ENTROPY
(dissipated)
EKONOMI - EKOLOGIS
WHAT IS ANTI-ENTROPIC? (SYNTROPIC)
ECONOMY
(waste)
LOW ENTROPY HIGH ENTROPY
EKONOMI - EKOLOGIS
SISTEM TERTUTUP
ECONOMY
earth
EKONOMI - EKOLOGIS
SCALE-Full World or Empty World?
Source:Ecological Economics
Principles & Applications,
Farley and Daly
DIS-UTILITAS MARGINAL
PERBEDAAN-PERBEDAAN
ECONOMY
(waste)
(some)
SumberdayaSub-surface Resources
MODEL SKY-TRUST
Ke Hulu…….!
Sky-Trust modelAppendix : Key Features of U.S. Sky Trust
Here are the key features of the proposed U.S. Sky Trust.
o Carbon emissions cap set initially at 1.346 billion tons, the 1990 level
o Tradable carbon emission permits sold annually to energy companies at the top of the carbon chain.
o All revenue from permit sales goes into a nationwide trust.
o Trust pays equal annual dividends to all U.S. citizens (like the Alaska Permanent Fund).
o Dividends can be placed tax-free in Individual Retirement Accounts or Individual Development Accounts for children.
o Initial price ceiling on carbon emission permits of $25 a ton; ceiling rises 7 percent a year for four years.
o Transition Fund to help those most adversely affected by higher carbon prices. Fund starts at 25 percent of permit revenue, declines
2.5 percent per year.
PENGELOLAAN = GOVERNANCE
PENGELOLAAN = GOVERNANCE
“Maximization of Shareholder Value”
“Golden Rule of Publicly held companies:
Rational behavior:
Externalize costs
Influence politics to
Seek subsidies and favors
“Altruism is evil and selfishness is a virtue.”-Ayn Rand
QUOTABLE QUOTES
“Few trends could so thoroughly undermine the very foundations of our free society as the acceptance by
corporate officials of a social responsibility other than to make as much money for their stockholders as possible.” -Milton Friedman 1962
BIAYA REGULASIAnnual Cost: $37-43 billion
EPA conservative approach, Consistently overestimates costs, not considering least cost
approach and technical innovation
Annual Benefits: $121-193
EPA consistently underestimates benefits
USING ACTUAL NOT THEORETICAL CASES BENEFITS OUTWEIGH COSTS 5:1
CONSILIENCE
“~Resources are infinite and the economy can grow forever”
(Julian Simon)
“Anyone who thinks you can have infinite growth on a finite planet is either a madman or
an economist”
(Kenneth Boulding)
Growth DevelopmentGrowth = increase in throughput-quantitative
Development = qualitative improvement
EKONOMI – EKOLOGIS: Human Development
Growth DevelopmentDemographic transition Theory
EKONOMI – EKOLOGIS: POPULASI
EKONOMI – EKOLOGIS: POPULASI
Growth Development
Reorganization Aggredation Transition Steady-state (mature)
EKONOMI – EKOLOGIS: SUKSESI HUTAN
We hear:
“There is no conflict between economic
growth and environmental
protection!”
World GDP and CO2
$1
$10
$100
$1,000
$10,000
$100,000
Wor
ld G
DP B
illio
ns U
S$$
250
270
290
310
330
350
370
ATM
OSP
HER
IC C
O2
World GDPCO2 level
270
290
310
330
350
370
$1 $10 $100 $1,000 $10,000 $100,000
ATM
CO
2 CO
NCE
NTR
ATIO
N p
arts
per
mill
ion(
ppm
)
WORLD GDP Billions of 1990 Intl $$ Log scale (source: De Long)
CO2 vs WORLD GDP
GDP 1825: ~$200 BILLION 2000: $41,000 B ILLION OR $41 TRILLION
=205X 1825 level.
KERUSAKAN IKLIM
Sebab-sebab Bencana Lingkungan
UrbanizationAgriculture Water diversions (e.g., reservoirs)Recreation, tourism development PollutionDomestic livestock, ranching
247205160148143136
Czech et al. 2000. Bioscience 50(7):593-601.
Mineral, gas, oil extractionNon-native species HarvestModified fire regimesRoad construction/maintenanceIndustrial development
134115101
838381
Czech et al. 2000. Bioscience 50(7):593-601.
Sebab-sebab Bencana Lingkungan
K
SKENARIO DAYA DUKUNG
Indi
vidu
als
Time
r-selection
K-selection
Time
GN
PK
Natural capital allocated to
human economy
Natural capital allocated to wildlife
Czech, B. 2000. Economic growth as the limiting factor for wildlife conservation. Wildlife Society Bulletin 28(1):4-14.
KAPITAL SUMBERDAYA ALAM
“We treat the earth like a business in liquidation.”
Herman Daly
Opportunity cost. Loss is not counted.
K
DAYA DUKUNG EKONOMI(“Plimsoll line”)
GN
P
Time
r-selection
K-selection
GG
PK
Human economy
Economy of nature
We Might Ask
KT
GN
P
Natural capital allocated to human economy
Natural capital allocated to non-human economy
X natural capital allocable
Time
KU
ALOKASI SUMBERDAYA ALAM
Distribution-Grow out of poverty?
8%
10%
12%
14%
16%
18%
20%
$10,000
$15,000
$20,000
$25,000
$30,000
$35,000
Poverty rate vs. GDP per Capita (1996$)
per capita GDP (1996$)
• rival– My use leaves less for you to use
• Excludable (property rights)– One person can keep another from using
the good– Consumer must pay, market will supply
Must have a price to work in the free market!
Rivalness and Excludability
Rivalness and Excludability
• Non-rival– My use does not leave less for you to use– Market sells for a price, discouraging use, but social
cost of use = 0, therefore market should not supply• Non-excludable
– One person can’t keep another from using the good– Consumer will not pay, market will not supply
Must have a price to work in the free market!
Rival}
Non-rival}
ExcludableNon-Excludable
Market Good: Food, clothes, cars, land,
timber, fish once captured, farmed fish, regulated
pollution
Potential market good(Tragedy of the “non-
commons”)but inefficient: patented information,
Pond, roads (congestible),streetlights
Pure Public Good:climate stability, ozone layer,
clean air/water/land, Biodiversity, information,
habitat, life support functions, etc.
Open Access Regime: (misnamed: Tragedy of the commons)Oceanic fisheries, timberetc. from unprotected forests, air pollution, waste absorption capacity
Non-rival,congestible
Private beaches, private gardens, toll roads, zoos, movies
Public beaches, gardens, roads, etc.
Diunduh dari: ….. 30/9/2012
Diunduh dari: ….. 30/9/2012
Diunduh dari: ….. 30/9/2012
Diunduh dari: ….. 30/9/2012