Text of DR.DALEEP PARIMOO Trait Theories of Personality
Slide 1
Slide 2
DR.DALEEP PARIMOO Trait Theories of Personality
Slide 3
Slide 4
Trait Theory Assumptions P eople are born with inherited
traits. Some traits are particularly suited to leadership. People
who make good leaders have the right (or sufficient) combination of
traits.
Slide 5
Personality Traits Traits are relatively stable and consistent
personal characteristics Trait personality theories suggest that a
person can be described on the basis of some number of personality
traits Allport identified some 4,500 traits Cattel used factor
analysis to identify 30-35 basic traits Eysenck argued there are 3
distinct traits in personality Extraversion/introversion
Neuroticism (a personality trait characterized by instability,
anxiety, aggression, etc). Psychotocism (Psychoticism refers to a
personality pattern typified by aggressiveness and interpersonal
hostility)
Slide 6
One of the earliest trait theories was introduced by Carl Jung.
one aspect of the theory concerned traits that Jung felt were
inborn. These inborn, genetically determined traits are usually
called temperaments Later, two students of Jung's theory named
Myers and Briggs - mother and daughter - developed a personality
test based on Jung's temperaments called the Myers-Briggs Type
Inventory, or MBTI. It has gone on the become the most famous
personality test of all time.
Slide 7
The First Trait Theory Two Factor Trait Theory of Personality
UNSTABLE STABLE choleric melancholic phlegmaticsanguine INTROVERTED
EXTRAVERTED Moody Anxious Rigid Sober Pessimistic Reserved
Unsociable Quiet Sociable Outgoing Talkative Responsive Easygoing
Lively Carefree Leadership Passive Careful Thoughtful Peaceful
Controlled Reliable Even-tempered Calm Touchy Restless Aggressive
Excitable Changeable Impulsive Optimistic Active
Slide 8
Melancholic: Sadness or depression; Pensive Choleric: Bad
tempered Phlegmatic: Having an unemotional and stolidly calm
disposition. Sanguine: Cheerfully optimistic
Slide 9
The traits are seen as opposites, and the first set is
introversion and extraversion. Introversion refers to a tendency to
prefer the world inside oneself. The more obvious aspects of
introversion are shyness, distaste for social functions, and a love
of privacy. Extraversion is the tendency to look to the outside
world, especially people, for one's pleasures. Extraverts are
usually outgoing and they enjoy social activities, but they don't
like to be alone. Jung believed that introversion-extraversion was
either-or. You are born one or the other and remain that way for
the rest of your life. Now you could, as an introvert, learn to
behave more like an extravert, or, as an extravert, learn to behave
more like an introvert. But you can't really switch. Nevertheless,
it seems that introversion-extraversion is a very significant and
fairly stable trait.
Slide 10
Next, we have the contrast between sensing people and intuiting
people. Sensing types, as the name implies, get all their
information about life from their senses. They tend to be
realistic, down-to-earth people, but they tend to see everything in
rather simplistic, concrete, black-or-white terms. Intuiting people
tend to get their information from intuition. This means that they
tend to be a little out of touch with the more solid aspects of
reality - a little "flakey", you might say - but may see "the big
picture" behind the details better. Intuiting people are often
artistic and can be rather philosophical. Next, there's the
contrast between thinkers and feelers. Thinking people make their
decisions on the basis of thinking - reasoning, logic, step-by-step
problem solving. This works very well for physical problems, but
can leave something to be desired when dealing with something as
complex as people. Feeling people make their decisions based on
their feelings. While this doesn't work so well when trying to fix
you car or your computer, feelings are a kind of intuition that
works very well when dealing with people.
Slide 11
The last contrast is judging versus perceiving. Judging people
tend to be more like Freud's anal retentive types - neat, orderly,
hardworking, always on time, scheduling things very carefully.
College professors tend to be judging! Perceiving people are more
spontaneous. They prefer to do things as the spirit moves them.
They are probably more fun than the judging types but, as you can
imagine, they tend not to get things done. It often seems to us
college professors that college students are all perceiving.
Slide 12
Slide 13
Overview of the Big 5
Slide 14
The Big Five personality Dimensions Extraversionoutgoing,
sociable, assertiveExtraversionoutgoing, sociable, assertive
Agreeablenessgood-natured, trusting,
cooperativeAgreeablenessgood-natured, trusting, cooperative
Conscientiousnessresponsible, dependable,
persistentConscientiousnessresponsible, dependable, persistent
Emotional stabilityunworried, secure, relaxedEmotional
stabilityunworried, secure, relaxed Openness to
experienceimaginative, curious, broad-mindedOpenness to
experienceimaginative, curious, broad-minded OVERVIEW
Slide 15
The first Dimension is extraversion-introversion. The second
Dimension is usually called emotional stability The third is called
agreeableness. A high score means that you tend to be friendly and
accommodating - a nice person. You don't need to be extraverted: If
you are an introvert, but may score high on agreeableness. If you
score low, you are likely to be more idiosyncratic and have trouble
getting along with people. This is not entirely negative: Agreeable
people often get their nice reputation by conforming and
compromising on their principles, while non-agreeable people are
more likely to stick to what they think is right even if it's
unpopular. Then again, some are just plain disagreeable! The fourth
is conscientiousness. This parallels closely with Jung's judging-
perceiving. People who score high on conscientiousness are orderly,
get their work done, Score low on conscientiousness and that
probably means you tend to slack off on your work, rarely worry
about deadlines or neatness, and are more interested in taking it
easy. The fifth has come with several different labels, such as
culture, openness to experience, or just openness. If you score
high on openness, you are more likely to enjoy cultural pursuits
such as art, music, dance. If you score low, you are more likely to
seek out the known places, even when you are in Paris or Bangkok.
BIG FIVE
Slide 16
Standardized personality tests determine how positively or
negatively an individual scores on each of these dimensions. For
Example, A person scoring high on openness to experience tends to
ask lots of questions and to think in new and unusual ways. Not
surprisingly, extraversion predicts performance for sales and
managerial positions.
Slide 17
Evaluating Trait Theory Trait theory, especially the Big 5
model, is able to describe personality Cross-cultural human studies
find good agreement for the Big 5 model in many cultures Appear to
be highly correlated not only in adulthood, but also in childhood
and even late preschoolers Three dimensions (extraversion,
neuroticism and agreeableness) have cross-species generality
Problems with trait theory include: Lack of explanation as to WHY
traits develop Issue of explaining transient versus long-lasting
traits
Slide 18
Gordon Allports Trait Theory In 1936, psychologist Gordon
Allport found that one English-language dictionary alone contained
more than 4,000 words describing different personality traits. He
categorized these traits into three levels: Cardinal Traits: Traits
that dominate an individuals whole life, often to the point that
the person becomes known specifically for these traits. People with
such personalities often become so known for these traits that
their names are often synonymous with these qualities. Consider the
origin and meaning of the following descriptive terms: Freudian,
Machiavellian, narcissism, Don Juan, Christ-like, etc. Allport
suggested that cardinal traits are rare and tend to develop later
in life. Central Traits: These are the general characteristics that
form the basic foundations of personality. These central traits,
while not as dominating as cardinal traits, are the major
characteristics you might use to describe another person. Terms
such as intelligent, honest, shy and anxious are considered central
traits. Secondary Traits: These are the traits that are sometimes
related to attitudes or preferences and often appear only in
certain situations or under specific circumstances. Some examples
would be getting anxious when speaking to a group or impatient
while waiting in line.
Slide 19
Eysencks Three Dimensions of Personality British psychologist
Hans Eysenck developed a model of personality based upon just three
universal trails: Introversion/Extraversion: Introversion involves
directing attention on inner experiences, while extraversion
relates to focusing attention outward on other people and the
environment. So, a person high in introversion might be quiet and
reserved, while an individual high in extraversion might be
sociable and outgoing. Neuroticism/Emotional Stability This
dimension of Eysencks trait theory is related to moodiness versus
even- temperedness. Neuroticism refers to an individuals tendency
to become upset or emotional, while stability refers to the
tendency to remain emotionally constant. Psychoticism: Later, after
studying individuals suffering from mental illness, Eysenck added a
personality dimension he called psychoticism to his trait theory.
Individuals who are high on this trait tend to have difficulty
dealing with reality and may be antisocial, hostile, non-empathetic
and manipulative.
Slide 20
Raymond Cattells Sixteen Personality Factor Questionnaire Trait
theorist Raymond Cattell reduced the number of main personality
traits from Allports initial list of over 4,000 down to 171, mostly
by eliminating uncommon traits and combining common
characteristics. Cattell then rated a large sample of individuals
for these 171 different traits. Then, using a statistical technique
known as factor analysis, he identified closely related terms and
eventually reduced his list to just 16 key personality traits.
According to Cattell, these 16 traits are the source of all human
personality. He also developed one of the most widely used
personality assessments known as the Sixteen Personality Factor
Questionnaire (16PF).
Slide 21
Slide 22
Slide 23
Slide 24
Assessing the Trait Approach to Personality While most agree
that people can be described based upon their personality traits,
theorists continue to debate the number of basic traits that make
up human personality. While trait theory has objectivity that some
personality theories lack (such as Freuds psychoanalytic theory),
it also has weaknesses. Some of the most common criticisms of trait
theory center on the fact that traits are often poor predictors of
behavior. While an individual may score high on assessments of a
specific trait, he or she may not always behave that way in every
situation. Another problem is that trait theories do not address
how or why individual differences in personality develop or
emerge.
Slide 25
TraitsSkills Adaptable to situations Alert to social
environment Ambitious and achievement-orientated Assertive
Cooperative Decisive Dependable Dominant (desire to influence
others) Energetic (high activity level) Persistent Self-confident
Tolerant of stress Willing to assume responsibility Clever
(intelligent) Conceptually skilled Creative Diplomatic and tactful
Fluent in speaking Knowledgeable about group task Organised
(administrative ability) Persuasive Socially skilled Description
Early research on leadership was based on the psychological focus
of the day, which was of people having inherited characteristics or
traits. Attention was thus put on discovering these traits, often
by studying successful leaders, but with the underlying assumption
that if other people could also be found with these traits, then
they, too, could also become great leaders. Stogdill (1974)
identified the following traits and skills as critical to
leaders.