25
Dyadic Analysis: Using HLM David A. Kenny University of Connecticut http://davidakenny.net/ke nny.htm http://davidakenny.net/

Dyadic Analysis: Using HLM David A. Kenny University of Connecticut

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Dyadic Analysis: Using HLM David A. Kenny University of Connecticut

Dyadic Analysis: Using HLM

David A. Kenny

University of Connecticut

http://davidakenny.net/kenny.htm

http://davidakenny.net/hlmdyad

/

Page 2: Dyadic Analysis: Using HLM David A. Kenny University of Connecticut

Types of DyadsDefinitions

Distinguishable

Dyads with a categorical within-dyads variables that makes a difference

e. g., parent-child

Indistinguishable

Ordering of the two members is arbitrary

e.g. roommates

Whether dyads are distinguishable or not is matter of theoretical and statistical considerations.

Page 3: Dyadic Analysis: Using HLM David A. Kenny University of Connecticut

Nonindependence:Definition

Degree of greater similarity (or dissimilarity) between linked observations versus unlinked observations

Nonindependence as the correlation between linked observations.

Page 4: Dyadic Analysis: Using HLM David A. Kenny University of Connecticut

Negative Nonindependence

Two scores from the same dyad are more dissimilar than two scores from different groups.

How?

Page 5: Dyadic Analysis: Using HLM David A. Kenny University of Connecticut

Compensation: If one person has a large score, the other person lowers his or her score. For example, if one person acts very friendly, the partner may distance him or herself,

Social comparison: The members of the dyad use the relative difference on some measure to determine some other variable. For instance, satisfaction after a tennis match is determined by the score of that match.

Zero-sum: The sum of two scores is the same for each dyad. For instance, the two members divide a reward that is the same for all dyads.

Division of labor: Dyad members assign one member to do one task and the other member to do another. For instance, the amount of housework done in the household may be negatively correlated.

Page 6: Dyadic Analysis: Using HLM David A. Kenny University of Connecticut

Dyadic Designs Standard

Each person has one partner Social Relations Model (SRM) Designs

Each person has many partners, and each partner paired with many persons

One-with-Many Each person has many partners, but each

partner is paired with only one person

Page 7: Dyadic Analysis: Using HLM David A. Kenny University of Connecticut

Standard Design

Page 8: Dyadic Analysis: Using HLM David A. Kenny University of Connecticut

One-with-Many Design

Page 9: Dyadic Analysis: Using HLM David A. Kenny University of Connecticut

SRM Designs

Page 10: Dyadic Analysis: Using HLM David A. Kenny University of Connecticut

Remaining part of the presentation focuses on the

standard design which is used in most dyadic studies.

Page 11: Dyadic Analysis: Using HLM David A. Kenny University of Connecticut

Dyadic Data Organization Individual

One record for each individual Only that individual’s data on the record

Dyad (useful for distinguishable dyads) Each record one dyad Different variables for each person

Pairwise (useful for distinguishable dyads) One record for each person The person’s data and partner data included

(each data point included twice)

Page 12: Dyadic Analysis: Using HLM David A. Kenny University of Connecticut

Pairwise Data Organization

Dyad Number Member Number The Person’s Data Partner’s Data Acitelli Example

Page 13: Dyadic Analysis: Using HLM David A. Kenny University of Connecticut

Types of Variables

Between Dyads – Level TwoBoth members have the same score

X = X′

Within DyadsSum of two scores a constant

X + X′ = c for all dyads

Page 14: Dyadic Analysis: Using HLM David A. Kenny University of Connecticut
Page 15: Dyadic Analysis: Using HLM David A. Kenny University of Connecticut
Page 16: Dyadic Analysis: Using HLM David A. Kenny University of Connecticut

Mixed Variables Variables that vary within and

between groups Examples

• Most outcomes (and mediators)

• Individual differences (e.g., personality)

Page 17: Dyadic Analysis: Using HLM David A. Kenny University of Connecticut
Page 18: Dyadic Analysis: Using HLM David A. Kenny University of Connecticut

Gender and the Three TypesBetween

Gay and Lesbian Couples

Within

Heterosexual Married Couples

Mixed

Friends

Page 19: Dyadic Analysis: Using HLM David A. Kenny University of Connecticut

Actor-Partner Interdependence Model

Page 20: Dyadic Analysis: Using HLM David A. Kenny University of Connecticut

Types of APIM Modelsactor only

a > 0; p = 0partner only

p > 0; a = 0couple model

a = psocial comparison model

a + p = 0

Page 21: Dyadic Analysis: Using HLM David A. Kenny University of Connecticut

Actor-Partner Interaction

•Partner effect depends on the level of the actor effect•More than one way to test•A Level 2 Variable

Page 22: Dyadic Analysis: Using HLM David A. Kenny University of Connecticut

Measurement of the Actor-Partner Interaction

•Standard Product Approach (XX’) – make sure variables centered•Discrepancy Score (│X – X′│) (Absolute Difference)

•Similarity – Negative Coefficient•Dissimilarity – Positive Coefficient

•Higher Score of the Two [Max(X,X′)] – “It Takes Two” •Lower Score [Min(X,X′)] – “One of Us Can Drag Us Both Down”

Page 23: Dyadic Analysis: Using HLM David A. Kenny University of Connecticut

EstimationIndistinguishable Members

Multilevel ModelingPairwise Data FileIllustrate with HLM

Distinguishable MembersStructural Equation ModelingDyad Data File

Page 24: Dyadic Analysis: Using HLM David A. Kenny University of Connecticut

Approaches Illustrated

Conventional Multilevel Model with Random InterceptsTwo-Intercept Model

Page 25: Dyadic Analysis: Using HLM David A. Kenny University of Connecticut

Briefly DiscussedOne-with-many designStandard design studied longitudinally