1
J Physiol 566.2 (2005) p 641 641 LETTERS ‘Dynamic clamp’ in cardiac electrophysiology In the recent study ‘Role of the transient outward current (I to ) in shaping canine ventricular action potential – a dynamic clamp study’ by Sun & Wang (2005), the authors used the ‘dynamic clamp’ technique to inject a computer-calculated current into an isolated ventricular myo- cyte under current-clamp conditions, thus simulating an ion channel conductance in real time. This technique enabled them to nicely demonstrate how I to modulates the ventricular action potential. The ‘dynamic clamp’ technique was introduced in neuro- biology by Sharp et al. (1992, 1993a,b) to create an artificial electrical synapse between two isolated neurones or insert an artificial membrane conductance in a single isolated neurone. Similar techniques were independently developed by Robinson & Kawai (1993) and Hutcheon et al. (1996), presented as ‘conductance injection’ and ‘reactive current clamp’, respectively. The ‘dynamic clamp’ has become a widely used tool for the study of neural systems at the cellular and circuit levels, inserting artificial conductances in individual neurones (Sharp et al. 1993a; Hutcheon et al. 1996), coupling biological neurones (Sharp et al. 1992; Elson et al. 1998), and coupling model and biological neurones (Le Masson et al. 1995; Manor & Nadim, 2001). In their paper, Sun & Wang (2005) state that ‘the dynamic clamp was first developed as a neurobiological tool over a decade ago’ and that ‘the dynamic clamp is a new and effective tool to study the ionic basis of the electrical properties of cardiac cells’. I would like to place these statements in the proper historical context. The dynamic clamp is certainly an effective but not a new tool in cardiac electrophysiology. Actually, the technique was first developed over 25 years ago by Scott (1979) who used it as a tool to study the mutual synchronization of two small clusters of spontaneously beating embryonic chick ventricular cells. He created an ‘Ersatz Nexus’ by injecting an ionic current into each cluster corresponding to the current that would have flown if the clusters would have been physically coupled by gap junctions. One decade later, a related technique was independently developed by Joyner and coworkers to study the electrical interactions of isolated cardiomyocytes through an artificial gap junction (Tan & Joyner, 1990; Joyner et al. 1991). Initially, this ‘coupling clamp’ technique, which has been adopted by other groups (e.g. Watanabe et al. 1995; Huelsing et al. 2001), was implemented by an analog circuit, but in subsequent studies a computer-based system was used, which allowed one of the myocytes to be replaced with a real-time simulation of such cell (Wilders et al. 1996a,b). The system has also been modified to insert a simulated conductance in an isolated cardiomyocyte (e.g. Wagner et al. 2004), as in the study by Sun & Wang (2005). Recently, Berecki et al. (2005) extended this technique by effectively replacing a native ionic current of a ventricular myocyte with wild-type or mutant current recorded from a HEK-293 cell that is voltage-clamped by the free-running action potential of the ventricular myocyte (‘dynamic action potential clamp’). In summary, the dynamic clamp started its life in cardiac electro- physiology as early as 1979 and has proven to be an effective tool since then. Ronald Wilders Department of Physiology Academic Medical Center University of Amsterdam Amsterdam, the Netherlands Meibergdreef 15, 1105 AZ Amsterdam the Netherlands Email: [email protected] References Berecki G, Zegers JG, Verkerk AO, Bhuiyan ZA, de Jonge B, Veldkamp MW, Wilders R & van Ginneken ACG (2005). HERG channel (dys) function revealed by dynamic action potential clamp technique. Biophys J 88, 566–578. Elson RC, Selverston AI, Huerta R, Rulkov NF, Rabinovich MI & Abarbanel HDI (1998). Synchronous behavior of two coupled biological neurons. Phys Rev Lett 81, 5692–5695. Huelsing DJ, Pollard AE & Spitzer KW (2001). Transient outward current modulates discontinuous conduction in rabbit ventricular cell pairs. Cardiovasc Res 49, 779–789. Hutcheon B, Miura RM & Puil E (1996). Models of subthreshold membrane resonance in neocortical neurons. J Neurophysiol 76, 698–714. Joyner RW, Sugiura H & Tan RC (1991). Unidirectional block between isolated rabbit ventricular cells coupled by a variable resistance. Biophys J 60, 1038–1045. Le Masson G, Le Masson S & Moulins M (1995). From conductances to neural network properties: analysis of simple circuits using the hybrid network method. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 64, 201–220. Manor Y & Nadim F (2001). Frequency regulation demonstrated by coupling a model and a biological neuron. Neurocomputing 3840, 269–278. Robinson HP & Kawai N (1993). Injection of digitally synthesized synaptic conductance transients to measure the integrative properties of neurons. J Neurosci Meth 49, 157–165. Scott S (1979). Stimulation Simulations of Young Yet Cultured Beating Hearts. PhD Thesis, State University of New York at Buffalo. Sharp AA, Abbott LF & Marder E (1992). Artificial electrical synapses in oscillatory networks. J Neurophysiol 67, 1691–1694. Sharp AA, O’Neil MB, Abbott LF & Marder E (1993a). Dynamic clamp: computer- generated conductances in real neurons. J Neurophysiol 69, 992–995. Sharp AA, O’Neil MB, Abbott LF & Marder E (1993b). The dynamic clamp: artificial conductances in biological neurons. Trends Neurosci 16, 389–394. Sun X & Wang H-S (2005). Role of the transient outward current (I to ) in shaping canine ventricular action potential – a dynamic clamp study. J Physiol 564, 411–419. Tan RC & Joyner RW (1990). Electrotonic influences on action potentials from isolated ventricular cells. Circ Res 67, 1071–1081. Wagner MB, Kumar R, Joyner RW & Wang Y (2004). Induced automaticity in isolated rat atrial cells by incorporation of a stretch-activated conductance. Pflugers Arch 447, 819–829. Watanabe EI, Honjo H, Anno T, Boyett MR, Kodama I & Toyama J (1995). Modulation of pacemaker activity of sinoatrial node cells by electrical load imposed by an atrial cell model. Am J Physiol 269, H1735–H1742. Wilders R, Kumar R, Joyner RW, Jongsma HJ, Verheijck EE, Golod D, van Ginneken ACG & Goolsby WN (1996a). Action potential conduction between a ventricular cell model and an isolated ventricular cell. Biophys J 70, 281–295. Wilders R, Verheijck EE, Kumar R, Goolsby WN, van Ginneken ACG, Joyner RW & Jongsma HJ (1996b). Model clamp and its application to synchronization of rabbit sinoatrial node cells. Am J Physiol 271, H2168–H2182. C The Physiological Society 2005 DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2005.566101

‘Dynamic clamp’ in cardiac electrophysiology

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: ‘Dynamic clamp’ in cardiac electrophysiology

J Physiol 566.2 (2005) p 641 641

LETTERS

‘Dynamic clamp’ in cardiacelectrophysiology

In the recent study ‘Role of the transientoutward current (I to) in shaping canineventricular action potential – a dynamicclamp study’ by Sun & Wang (2005),the authors used the ‘dynamic clamp’technique to inject a computer-calculatedcurrent into an isolated ventricular myo-cyte under current-clamp conditions, thussimulating an ion channel conductance inreal time. This technique enabled them tonicely demonstrate how I to modulates theventricular action potential. The ‘dynamicclamp’ technique was introduced in neuro-biology by Sharp et al. (1992, 1993a,b)to create an artificial electrical synapsebetween two isolated neurones or insert anartificial membrane conductance in a singleisolated neurone. Similar techniques wereindependently developed by Robinson &Kawai (1993) and Hutcheon et al. (1996),presented as ‘conductance injection’ and‘reactive current clamp’, respectively. The‘dynamic clamp’ has become a widely usedtool for the study of neural systems at thecellular and circuit levels, inserting artificialconductances in individual neurones (Sharpet al. 1993a; Hutcheon et al. 1996), couplingbiological neurones (Sharp et al. 1992;Elson et al. 1998), and coupling model andbiological neurones (Le Masson et al. 1995;Manor & Nadim, 2001).

In their paper, Sun & Wang (2005) statethat ‘the dynamic clamp was first developedas a neurobiological tool over a decadeago’ and that ‘the dynamic clamp is a newand effective tool to study the ionic basisof the electrical properties of cardiac cells’.I would like to place these statements inthe proper historical context. The dynamicclamp is certainly an effective but nota new tool in cardiac electrophysiology.Actually, the technique was first developedover 25 years ago by Scott (1979) whoused it as a tool to study the mutualsynchronization of two small clusters ofspontaneously beating embryonic chickventricular cells. He created an ‘ErsatzNexus’ by injecting an ionic current intoeach cluster corresponding to the currentthat would have flown if the clusterswould have been physically coupled bygap junctions. One decade later, a related

technique was independently developed byJoyner and coworkers to study the electricalinteractions of isolated cardiomyocytesthrough an artificial gap junction (Tan &Joyner, 1990; Joyner et al. 1991). Initially, this‘coupling clamp’ technique, which has beenadopted by other groups (e.g. Watanabeet al. 1995; Huelsing et al. 2001), wasimplemented by an analog circuit, butin subsequent studies a computer-basedsystem was used, which allowed one of themyocytes to be replaced with a real-timesimulation of such cell (Wilders et al.1996a,b). The system has also been modifiedto insert a simulated conductance in anisolated cardiomyocyte (e.g. Wagner et al.2004), as in the study by Sun & Wang (2005).Recently, Berecki et al. (2005) extended thistechnique by effectively replacing a nativeionic current of a ventricular myocyte withwild-type or mutant current recorded froma HEK-293 cell that is voltage-clampedby the free-running action potential ofthe ventricular myocyte (‘dynamic actionpotential clamp’). In summary, the dynamicclamp started its life in cardiac electro-physiology as early as 1979 and has provento be an effective tool since then.

Ronald WildersDepartment of PhysiologyAcademic Medical CenterUniversity of Amsterdam

Amsterdam, the NetherlandsMeibergdreef 15, 1105 AZ Amsterdam

the NetherlandsEmail: [email protected]

References

Berecki G, Zegers JG, Verkerk AO, Bhuiyan ZA,de Jonge B, Veldkamp MW, Wilders R & vanGinneken ACG (2005). HERG channel (dys)function revealed by dynamic action potentialclamp technique. Biophys J 88, 566–578.

Elson RC, Selverston AI, Huerta R, Rulkov NF,Rabinovich MI & Abarbanel HDI (1998).Synchronous behavior of two coupledbiological neurons. Phys Rev Lett 81,5692–5695.

Huelsing DJ, Pollard AE & Spitzer KW (2001).Transient outward current modulatesdiscontinuous conduction in rabbitventricular cell pairs. Cardiovasc Res 49,779–789.

Hutcheon B, Miura RM & Puil E (1996). Modelsof subthreshold membrane resonance inneocortical neurons. J Neurophysiol 76,698–714.

Joyner RW, Sugiura H & Tan RC (1991).Unidirectional block between isolated rabbitventricular cells coupled by a variableresistance. Biophys J 60, 1038–1045.

Le Masson G, Le Masson S & Moulins M (1995).From conductances to neural networkproperties: analysis of simple circuits usingthe hybrid network method. Prog Biophys MolBiol 64, 201–220.

Manor Y & Nadim F (2001). Frequencyregulation demonstrated by coupling a modeland a biological neuron. Neurocomputing38–40, 269–278.

Robinson HP & Kawai N (1993). Injection ofdigitally synthesized synaptic conductancetransients to measure the integrativeproperties of neurons. J Neurosci Meth 49,157–165.

Scott S (1979). Stimulation Simulations of YoungYet Cultured Beating Hearts. PhD Thesis, StateUniversity of New York at Buffalo.

Sharp AA, Abbott LF & Marder E (1992).Artificial electrical synapses in oscillatorynetworks. J Neurophysiol 67, 1691–1694.

Sharp AA, O’Neil MB, Abbott LF & Marder E(1993a). Dynamic clamp: computer-generated conductances in real neurons.J Neurophysiol 69, 992–995.

Sharp AA, O’Neil MB, Abbott LF & Marder E(1993b). The dynamic clamp: artificialconductances in biological neurons. TrendsNeurosci 16, 389–394.

Sun X & Wang H-S (2005). Role of the transientoutward current (I to) in shaping canineventricular action potential – a dynamicclamp study. J Physiol 564,411–419.

Tan RC & Joyner RW (1990). Electrotonicinfluences on action potentials from isolatedventricular cells. Circ Res 67,1071–1081.

Wagner MB, Kumar R, Joyner RW & Wang Y(2004). Induced automaticity in isolated ratatrial cells by incorporation of astretch-activated conductance. Pflugers Arch447, 819–829.

Watanabe EI, Honjo H, Anno T, Boyett MR,Kodama I & Toyama J (1995). Modulation ofpacemaker activity of sinoatrial node cells byelectrical load imposed by an atrial cell model.Am J Physiol 269, H1735–H1742.

Wilders R, Kumar R, Joyner RW, Jongsma HJ,Verheijck EE, Golod D, van Ginneken ACG &Goolsby WN (1996a). Action potentialconduction between a ventricular cell modeland an isolated ventricular cell. Biophys J 70,281–295.

Wilders R, Verheijck EE, Kumar R, Goolsby WN,van Ginneken ACG, Joyner RW & Jongsma HJ(1996b). Model clamp and its application tosynchronization of rabbit sinoatrial node cells.Am J Physiol 271, H2168–H2182.

C© The Physiological Society 2005 DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2005.566101