Upload
p-p-gatta
View
212
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Effects of dietary organic chromium on gilthead
seabream (Sparus aurata L.) performances and liver
microsomal metabolism
P P Gatta1, A Piva1, M Paolini2, S Testi1, A Bonaldo1, A Antelli2 & A Mordenti1
1Dipartimento di Morfo®siologia Veterinaria e Produzioni Animali, UniversitaÁ degli Studi di Bologna, Via Tolara di
Sopra, 50-40064 Ozzano Emilia, Bologna, Italy2Dipartimento di Farmacologia, UniversitaÁ degli Studi di Bologna, Via Irnerio, 48-40126 Bologna, Italy
Correspondence: P P Gatta, Dipartimento di Morfo®siologia Veterinaria e Produzioni Animali, UniversitaÁ degli Studi di Bologna, Via Tolara
di Sopra, 50-40064 Ozzano Emilia, Bologna, Italy. Tel: (+39) 051792995, Fax: (+39) 051792869, e-mail: [email protected]
Abstract
The effect of yeast and chromium yeast on gilthead
seabream (Sparus auratus L) performance, carcass
indices and body composition was studied. Whether
supplementation affected liver microsomal mixed
function oxidases using either multibioprobes (test-
osterone) or highly speci®c substrates to cytochrome
P450 (CYP) isoforms was also investigated.
Seabream juveniles (35±37 g initial weight) were
allocated into 12 800 L tanks of 50 ®sh each for
87 days and fed pelleted experimental diets, i.e.
control, yeast supplemented (1.6%) and chromium
yeast supplemented at both low (800 p.p.b.) and
high chromium level (53 810 p.p.b.). At the end of
the experiment, growth, feed conversion ratio,
thermal-unit growth coef®cient, carcass yield,
hepatosomatic index, and carcass and ®llet
proximate compositions were similar among
treatments and only condition factor was statistic-
ally different. Organic chromium at both doses
affected CYP-catalysed drug reactions slightly, as
shown by the modest effect on the regio- and
stereoselective hydroxylations of testosterone, as
well as the metabolism of the selected probes.
Overall, we found that chromium yeast did not
change performance substantially, nor carcass
indices, carcass and ®llet chemical compositions,
or hepatic xenobiotic metabolizing enzymes of
gilthead seabream.
Keywords: chromium, gilthead seabream,
nutrition, toxicology
Introduction
Over the last few decades, chromium has been
recognized as a new and important micronutrient,
essential in human (Jeejebhoy et al. 1977) and
animal nutrition (Shwartz & Mertz 1959), in¯uenc-
ing many aspects of metabolism (Mordenti, Piva &
Piva 1997). In particular, it has been shown to have
a positive in¯uence on the growth, reproductive
ef®ciency and carcass composition of pigs and cattle.
Furthermore, there is evidence that dietary chro-
mium supplementation can exert some bene®cial
effects on both the nonspeci®c and speci®c immune
systems of cattle (Mallard & Borgs 1997).
So far, several studies dealing with the effect of
chromium in ®sh have been related to its role in
carbohydrate utilization. Shiau & Lin (1993) found
a signi®cant improvement in weight gain, energy
deposition and liver glycogen content when tilapia
(Oreochromis niloticus L. 3 O. aureus L) juveniles
were fed a glucose-based diet supplemented with
chromium chloride. In the same experiment, no
differences were recorded when diets contained
starch instead of glucose as a carbohydrate source.
Another study (Shiau & Chen 1993), designed to
60 ã 2001 Blackwell Science Ltd
Aquaculture Research, 2001, 32 (Suppl. 1), 60±69
compare the in¯uence of different chromium
sources on tilapia (O. niloticus 3 O. aureus) carbo-
hydrate utilization, demonstrated a greater weight
gain in ®sh fed glucose diets supplemented with
chromium than those with an unsupplemented diet.
Hertz et al. (1989) were able to demonstrate that
chromium salts improved glucose utilization and
inhibited gluconeogenesis in common carp
(Cyprinus carpio L) juveniles. The ef®cacy of chro-
mium as a growth enhancer at certain dosages was
also reported by Tacon & Beveridge (1982) in trout
(Oncorhynchus mykiss Walbaum) and by Jain et al.
(1994) in Indian major carp (Labeo rohita
Hamilton).
On the other hand, con¯icting results have been
found when dietary chromium added as chromic
oxide was tested in ®sh. On the basis of an
experiment in tilapia (O. niloticus 3 O. aureus),
Shiau & Liang (1995) concluded that chromic
oxide alters glucose utilization and nutrient digest-
ibility in this ®sh, while Ng & Wilson (1997)
reported the opposite response in channel cat®sh
(Ictalurus punctatus Ra®nesque) fed diets containing
graded levels of supplemental chromic oxide.
Fernandez et al. (1999) came to the same conclu-
sion in their study of gilthead seabream (Sparus
aurata), but only about the in¯uence of chromic
oxide on organic compound utilization.
Most of the experiments carried out so far have
provided clear evidence that chromium exerts some
effect on the metabolism of ®sh, even though feeding
doses, regimes, chromium forms and ®sh species
differed among trials, and hence direct comparisons
among studies is dif®cult.
The form of the trace mineral used for dietary
supplementation is of particular concern. Recently,
Paripatananont & Lovell (1997) compared some
dietary trace elements fed both as organic and
inorganic forms, and found the former to be
absorbed more readily than the latter. Usually, the
source of trace mineral for feed supplementation is
the mineral salt and rarely as organic form where a
speci®c mineral is bound to an organic compound.
A typical group of organically bound is the yeast-
trace mineral. Because the yeast alone is considered
an ingredient with several nutritional effects in ®sh
(Rumsey et al. 1991; Sanderson & Jolly 1994;
Gatesoupe 1999), this is a further variable to
consider in conducting studies with yeast-trace
mineral.
Chromium can be found in several oxidation
states, some of them (exavalent chromium) with
possible toxic implications and hence any toxico-
logical effect in ®sh as a consequence of dietary
supplementation shall be ruled out. Recent studies
considered this heavy metal as a water pollutant
(Calamari & Solbe 1994) instead of a dangerous
nutrient when overdosed.
As no data are currently available in the literature
about the in¯uence of organic chromium on the
metabolism in marine ®sh, the aim of the present
study was to assess whether dietary supplementation
with chromium yeast could modify performance,
carcass and ®llet composition, as well as some
biochemical markers related to liver microsomal
metabolism in juvenile gilthead seabream.
Materials and methods
Fish
Seabream juveniles (Table 1) supplied by Novagriter
Farm (Campomarino, Campobasso, Italy) were
allocated into 12 tanks of 50 ®sh each. A sample
of 35 ®sh from the initial group was anaesthetized,
killed and refrigerated for body measurements and
carcass proximate composition. Every group was
assigned randomly to a 800-L quadrangular tank
supplied with sea water in a ¯ow-through system
having a ¯ow rate of 60 L min±1. Water tempera-
ture (Fig. 1) ranged from 22.0 to 27.4 °C, except
the last week before the end of the experiment it
decreased to 18.8 °C. Dissolved oxygen ranged from
5.5 to 6.5 p.p.m. and water salinity from 35% to
36%. Water parameters, such as temperature and
dissolved oxygen, were monitored daily while
salinity was measured weekly. Each tank was
cleaned twice a week. After 1 week of adaptation,
®sh were fed experimental diets until the end of the
trial, which lasted 87 days. Each group of ®sh was
weighed three times during the experiment: at the
beginning, after 5 weeks and at the end. Each
treatment was fed to triplicate tanks of ®sh.
Diets and feeding regime
Experimental diets (Table 2) were produced using a
pelletizer machine (General Dies, Colognola ai Colli,
Verona, Italy) at the facilities of Dipartimento di
Morfo®siologia Veterinaria e Produzioni Animali
(DIMORFIPA, University of Bologna). Pellet dia-
meter was 3.0 mm. Except for control, experimental
diets were supplemented with 1.6% of yeast-based
products, such as Diamond XP (Y) supplied by
ã 2001 Blackwell Science Ltd, Aquaculture Research, 32 (Suppl. 1), 60±69 61
Aquaculture Research, 2001, 32 (Suppl. 1), 60±69 Dietary organic chromium and gilthead seabream P P Gatta et al.
Diamond V Mills (Cedar Rapids, Iowa, USA) or
chromium yeast supplied by Diamond V Mills and
Alltech to provide two dietary chromium levels, i.e.
800 mg kg±1 (low chromium yeast) and
53 810 mg kg±1 (high chromium yeast). Five
weeks after the beginning of the experiment, diet
formula was changed to slightly reduce protein
percentage (Table 1). Feeds were fed by hand four
times a day at a rate of 3 and 2.2% of biomass for
the ®rst (5 weeks) and the second period (7 weeks),
respectively. In case of ®sh satiation in one or more
tanks, the feeder stopped feeding ®sh and the
remaining feed was weighed in order to record
only the amount of eaten feed per tank.
Sampling and storage conditions
At the middle (5 weeks from the beginning) and the
end of the experiment, all ®sh per tank were
anaesthetized, caught and immediately weighed.
Fish observed 24 h of starvation before weighing. At
the end of the experiment, 20 ®sh per tank were
sampled randomly, packed into a polystyrene box
with a ¯ake-ice and transported to the DIMORFIPA,
where they were put into a refrigerator (1 °C). The
next day, each ®sh was handled to measure total
length, body weight, viscera weight and liver
weight. Five ®sh per tank were cut into small
pieces, pooled and homogenized with a La
Moulinette food processor (Moulinex, Milan, Italy)
twice for 10 s, while other ®ve ®sh per tank were
®lleted, skinned and the muscle from the right and
left sides of each ®sh were homogenized together.
All homogenized samples were stored at ±20 °C
until chemical analyses. Only whole-body pooled
samples were freeze-dried before analysis. Livers
from six ®sh per treatment were removed rapidly
and processed separately and the S9 fraction
Watertemperature
(¡C)
16.0
18.0
20.0
22.0
24.0
26.0
28.0
30.0
1 5 9 13 17 21 25 29 33 37 41 45 49 53 57 61 65 69 73 77 81 85
Day
Figure 1 Water temperature (°C) during the feeding trial.
Table 1 Performance and carcass indices of gilthead seabream fed the experimental diets for 87 days (mean 6 SD)
Control Yeast only
Low
chromium yeast
High
chromium yeast
Initial weight (g) 35.4 6 2.05 36.8 6 1.51 36.8 6 1.51 37.1 6 0.61
Final weight (g) 148.3 6 6.66 147.7 6 8.50 144.5 6 2.12 152.0 6 2.65
Intermediate growth (g)1 38.5 6 2.78 38.4 6 3.14 38.1 6 2.00 37.7 6 160
Final growth (g) 112.9 6 5.04 110.9 6 8.24 107.7 6 0.83 114.9 6 3.10
Intermediate FCR1 1.09 6 0.04 1.14 6 0.06 1.14 6 0.06 1.13 6 002
Final FCR 1.40 6 0.05 1.47 6 0.05 1.40 6 0.02 1.38 6 0.02
Intermediate TGC1 0.099 6 0.003 0.097 6 0.005 0.097 6 0.004 0.095 6 0.003
Final TGC 0.097 6 0.001 0.095 6 0.004 0.092 6 0001 0.097 6 0.002
CF (%) 1.81a 6 0.04 1.81a 6 0.03 1.74b 6 0.00 1.83a 6 0.02
CY (%) 92.86 6 0.84 92.84 6 1.07 92.66 6 0.76 92.90 6 0.67
HSI (%) 2.16 6 0.29 2.09 6 0.22 2.21 6 0.31 2.28 6 0.24
1Data obtained after 5 weeks.
Means within a row with different letters differ (P < 0.05). FCR, feed conversion ratio; TGC, thermal-unit growth
coef®cient; CF, condition factor; CY, carcass yield; HSI, hepatosomatic index. See Statistical analyses and calculations for
formulae.
62 ã 2001 Blackwell Science Ltd, Aquaculture Research, 32 (Suppl. 1), 60±69
Dietary organic chromium and gilthead seabream P P Gatta et al. Aquaculture Research, 2001, 32 (Suppl. 1), 60±69
(9000 g) was then prepared (Paolini et al. 1999a).
The postmitochondrial supernatant was then centri-
fuged for 60 min at 105 000 g, pellet resuspended
in 0.1 M K2P2O7, 1 mM EDTA (pH 7.4) and
centrifuged again for 60 min at 105 000 g to give
the ®nal fraction. Washed microsomes were then
resuspended with a hand-driven Potter Elvehjem
homogenizer in a 10-mM Tris-HCl buffer (pH 7.4)
containing 1 mM EDTA and 20% (v/v) glycerol;
fractions were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen
and stored at ±80 °C prior to use.
Chemical analyses
Moisture, protein and ash were determined accord-
ing to AOAC methods (1990).
Total lipids were extracted by means of a solution
of chloroform/methanol 2 : 1 (v/v) (Folch, Lees &
Stanley 1957). Brie¯y, »5 g of sample was weighed
in a 300-mL Erlenmeyer conical ¯ask containing
100 mL of a chloroform/methanol solution and left
in a stirrer for 30 min. The content was then ®ltered
through a paper ®lter and the sample placed into
the ¯ask with 70 mL of a chloroform/methanol
solution and the procedure described previously was
followed. This operation was repeated once more
and the total amount of solvent was collected into a
spherical separator funnel. After the addition of
80 mL of a 2% NaCl water solution and the
separation into two phases, the lower phase was
collected into a glass ¯ask and evaporated in a
rotatory evaporator. Lipid content was determined
gravimetrically.
Crude ®bre was measured according to Martillotti
et al. (1987). Starch was determined spectro-
photometrically after enzymatic digestion into
glucose.
The concentration of total chromium in feed
samples was determined by inductively coupled
plasma atomic emission spectrometry after wet
digestion with nitric acid.
Gross energy of diets was determined using a
bomb calorimeter (Parr Instrument, Moline, IL,
USA).
Table 2 Diet chemical composition and chromium yeast content (I, ®rst period; II, second period)
Control Yeast only
Low
chromium yeast
High
chromium yeast
I II I II I II I II
Ingredients
Fish meal (%) 52.0 50.0 52.0 50.0 52.0 50.0 52.0 50.0
Soybean meal (%) 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0
Fish oil (%) 13.0 13.0 13.0 13.0 13.0 13.0 13.0 13.0
Gelatinized starch (%) 11.9 13.9 10.3 12.3 10.3 12.3 10.3 12.3
Starch (%) 4.0 4.0 4.0 40 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Yeast or chromium yeast (%) 0 0 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6
Vitamin and mineral premix1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1
Analysed composition (dry matter basis)
Moisture (%) 3.26 5.49 4.96 6.00 2.53 6.33 2.40 5.51
Crude protein (%) 51.00 48.71 50.83 49.33 50.93 48.91 51.39 49.68
Crude lipid (%) 17.63 17.55 17.57 18.41 16.83 18.67 17.13 18.10
Crude ®bre (%) 1.61 ND 1.79 ND 1.82 ND 1.67 ND
Starch (%) 13.23 ND 13.44 ND 12.47 ND 12.28 ND
Ash (%) 8.37 7.89 8.35 8.15 8.61 8.06 7.77 8.05
Gross energy2 (kJ g±1) 22 447 ND 22 846 ND 22 534 ND 22 553 ND
Cr from Cr-yeast (mg kg±1) 0 ND 0 ND 800 ND 53 810 ND
1Provides per kg of premix: vitamin A, 1 600 000 IU; vitamin D3, 160 000 IU; vitamin E, 22 000 mg; vitamin K3,
368 mg; vitamin B1, 1280 mg; vitamin B2, 1280 mg; vitamin B6, 2450 mg; vitamin B12, 1.2 mg; ascorbic acid, 30 g;
vitamin PP, 7850 mg; inositol, 6000 mg; D-calcium pantothenate, 13720 mg; folic acid, 368 mg; biotin, 20 mg; zinc
sulphate, 11 375 mg; manganese sulphate, 4800 mg; copper sulphate, 500 mg; potassium iodide, 272 mg.
ND, not determined.2Value obtained using a bomb calorimeter.
ã 2001 Blackwell Science Ltd, Aquaculture Research, 32 (Suppl. 1), 60±69 63
Aquaculture Research, 2001, 32 (Suppl. 1), 60±69 Dietary organic chromium and gilthead seabream P P Gatta et al.
Aminopyrine N-demethylase activity
Activity was determined by quanti®cation of CH2O
release, according to Mazel (1971). The total
incubation volume was 3 mL, composed of 0.5 mL
of a water solution of 50 mM aminopyrine and
25 mM MgCl2, 1.48 mL of a 0.60-mM NADP+,
3.33 mM G6P in 50 mM Tris-HCl buffer (pH 7.4),
0.02 mL G6PDH (0.93 U mL±1) and 0.125 mL of
sample (0.5 mg of protein). After 5 min of incuba-
tion at 37 °C, the yellow colour developed by the
reaction of the released CH2O with the Nash reagent
was read at 412 nm, and the molar absorption of
8000 used for calculation (Nash 1953).
p-Nitrophenol hydroxylase activity
Activity was determined in a ®nal volume of
2 mL : 2 mM p-nitrophenol in 50 mM Tris-HCl
buffer (pH 7.4), 5 mM MgCl2 and a NADPH-
generating system consisting of 0.4 mM NADP+,
30 mM isocitrate, 0.2 U of isocitrate dehydrogenase
and 1.5 mg of proteins. After 10 min at 37 °C, the
reaction was terminated by addition 0.5 mL of a
0.6 N perchloric acid. Precipitated proteins were
removed by centrifugation and 1 mL of resultant
supernatant mixed with 1 mL 10 N NaOH.
Absorbance at 546 nm was immediately measured
and 4-nitrocatechol determined (e = 10.28 mM±1
cm±1) (Reinke & Mayer 1985).
Pentoxyresoru®n O-dealkylase,
ethoxyresoru®n O-deethylase
Reaction mixture consisted of 0.025 mM MgCl2,
200 mM pentoxyresoru®n, 0.32 mg of proteins and
130 mM NADPH in 2.0 mL 0.05 M Tris-HCl buffer
(pH 7.4). Resoru®n formation at 37 °C was calcu-
lated by comparing the rate of increase in relative
¯uorescence to the ¯uorescence of known amounts
of resoru®n (excitation at 562 nm, emission at
586 nm) (Lubet et al. 1985). Ethoxyresoru®n O-
deethylase was measured in the same manner
described for the pentoxyresoru®n assay, except
that substrate concentration was 1.7 mM ethoxyr-
esoru®n (Burke et al. 1985).
Ethoxycoumarin O-deethylase activity
Activity was determined by quanti®cation of
umbelliferone formation, according to Aitio
(1978). Incubation mixture consisted of 2.6 mL,
composed of 1 mM ethoxycoumarin, 5 mM MgCl2,
NADPH-generating system (see aminopyrine assay)
and 25 mL of sample (0.1 mg of proteins). After
5 min of incubation at 37 °C, reaction was stopped
with 85 mL of 0.31-M Trichloroacetic acid (TCA).
The pH of the mixture was brought to about 10 by
adding 0.65 mL of 1.6 M NaOH-glycine buffer
(pH 10.3). The amount of umbelliferone was
measured ¯uorimetrically (excitation at 390 nm;
emission at 440 nm).
Testosterone hydroxylase activity
Incubations contained liver microsomes (equivalent
to 1±2 mg protein), 0.6 mM NADP+, 8 mM glucose
6-phosphate, 1.4 U glucose 6-phosphate dehydro-
genase and 1 mM MgCl2, in a ®nal volume of 2 mL
of 0.1-M phosphate Na+/K+ buffer (pH 7.4). The
mixture was preincubated for 5 min at 37 °C. The
reaction was performed at 37 °C by shaking and
started by the addition of 80 mM testosterone
(dissolved in methanol). After 10 min, the reaction
was stopped with 5 mL ice-cold dichloromethane
and 12 nmol corticosterone (internal standard) in
methanol. After 1 min of vortexing, phases were
separated by centrifugation at 2000 g for 10 min
and the aqueous phase was extracted once more
with 2 mL dichloromethane. The organic phase was
extracted with 2 mL 0.02 M NaOH to remove lipid
constituents, dried over anhydrous sodium sulphate
and transferred to a small tube. Dichloromethane
was evaporated at 37 °C under nitrogen and the
dried samples stored at ±20 °C. The samples were
dissolved in 100 mL methanol and analysed by
HPLC (Platt et al. 1989).
HPLC chromatographic separations were per-
formed using a system consisting of a high-pressure
pump (model 600E, multisolvent delivery system;
Waters, Milford, MA, USA), a sample injection valve
(Rheodyne Model 7121, Cotati, CA, USA) with a 20-
mL sample loop and an ultraviolet detector (254 nm;
model 486, tunable absorbance detector, Waters)
connected to an integrator (chromatography man-
ager; Millennium 2010, Milford, MA, USA). For
reversed-phase separation of metabolites, a NOVA-
PAK C18 analytical column (60 AÊ , 4 mm,
3.9 3 150 mm, Waters) was used as stationary
phase. The mobile phase consisted of a mixture of
solvent A (7.5% v/v tetrahydrofuran in water) and
solvent B (7.5% v/v tetrahydrofuran and 60% v/v
methanol in water) at a 1-mL min±1 ¯ow rate.
Metabolite separation was performed by a gradient
64 ã 2001 Blackwell Science Ltd, Aquaculture Research, 32 (Suppl. 1), 60±69
Dietary organic chromium and gilthead seabream P P Gatta et al. Aquaculture Research, 2001, 32 (Suppl. 1), 60±69
from 30 to 100% (v/v) of solvent B over 30 min The
eluent was monitored at 254 nm and the area under
the absorption band was integrated. The concentra-
tion of metabolites was determined by the ratio
between respective metabolite peak areas and
corticosterone (internal standard), and the calibra-
tion curves obtained with synthetic testosterone
derivatives (van Der Hoeven 1984; Paolini et al.
1997).
Protein concentration
Protein concentration was determined according to
the method described by Lowry et al. (1951) and
revised by Bailey (1967), using bovine serum
albumin as a standard and diluting samples 200
times to provide a suitable protein concentration.
Statistical analyses and calculations
All results on growth performance, body and carcass
measurement and proximate analyses were analysed
statistically using ANOVA, while toxicological effects
were assessed by means of Wilcoxon's rank methods,
as reported by Box & Hunter (1967). The software
used was Sigma Plot 5.0 (London, UK). Signi®cance
level was P < 0.05.
The following formulae were used:
FCR (feed conversion ratio) = feed per ®sh/
weight gain per ®sh
CF (condition factor) = (body weight/
total length3) 3 100
CY (carcass yield) = degutted ®sh 3 100/
body weight
HSI (hepatosomatic index) = liver weight 3
100/body weight
Thermal-unit growth coef®cient (TGC) =
100 3 (®nal body weight1/3 ± initial body
weight1/3)/S(temperature [°C] 3 days)
Results
Regardless of the source and dose of dietary
chromium as well as of yeast supplementation, no
differences were detected among treatments on
seabream growth, FCR and TGC (Table 1). The
same pattern resulted for carcass indices, i.e. carcass
yield and hepatosomatic index, while only condition
factor was statistically different among treatments
(Table 1), suggesting differences in the chemical
composition of ®sh. However, carcass and ®llet
proximate composition (Tables 3 and 4) did not
con®rm this hypothesis and were very similar
between groups without statistical differences.
Table 5 shows the effect of 800 or 53 810 p.p.b.
chromium yeast in the feed on liver microsomal
cytochrome P450 (CYP) machinery of gilthead
seabream. Yeast alone did not affect at any of the
selected monooxygenases. While the N-demethyl-
ation of aminopyrine and the hydroxylation of
p-nitrophenol were unchanged by dietary treat-
ment, a slight decrease (21 to 36%, at higher and
lower doses, respectively) in the deethylation of
ethoxycoumarin was seen at both doses tested. A
signi®cant (P < 0.01) but modest increase in the
dealkylation of pentoxyresoru®n (up to 45%) and a
decrease (up to 63%) in the deethylation of
ethoxyresoru®n were measured.
In Table 6, the effects of chromium yeast on
testosterone metabolism in gilthead seabream hepa-
tic subcellular preparations is shown. No differences
between the control (untreated) and yeast-treated
groups were seen. On the contrary, with the
exception of testosterone 7a- and 6b-hydroxylase
activities, which were substantially unaffected by
either lower or higher organic chromium dose,
some appreciable differences in the hydroxylation of
the other testosterone positions were observed
among various experimental conditions. For
example, an inactivating effect was recorded for
the testosterone 6a- (up to 31% loss, lower dose),
16a- (29 and 26% loss, lower and higher doses,
Table 3 Fillet proximate composition (mean 6 SD)
Control Yeast only
Low
chromium yeast
High
chromium yeast
Moisture (%) 70.13 6 1.20 70.08 6 0.82 69.59 6 1.35 70.04 6 0.95
Protein (%) 20.17 6 0.46 20.55 6 0.64 20.60 6 0.37 19.74 6 0.56
Lipid (%) 6.80 6 1.16 6.38 6 1.09 7.16 6 1.27 7.28 6 0.99
Ash (%) 1.54 6 0.06 1.59 6 0.05 1.53 6 0.10 1.54 6 0.07
ã 2001 Blackwell Science Ltd, Aquaculture Research, 32 (Suppl. 1), 60±69 65
Aquaculture Research, 2001, 32 (Suppl. 1), 60±69 Dietary organic chromium and gilthead seabream P P Gatta et al.
Table 5 Effect of dietary treatments on gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata L) liver in microsomal mixed function
monooxygenase. Each value represents the mean 6 SD of six independent experiments
Control Yeast only
Low
chromium yeast
High
chromium yeast
Monooxygenases
Aminopyrine N-demethylase (nmol mg±1 min±1) 1.28 6 0.13 1.36 6 0.18 1.04 6 0.27c 0.90 6 0.08d
p-Nitrophenol hydroxylase (nmol mg±1 min±1) 0.16 6 0.02 0.14 6 0.01 0.11 6 0.01 0.16 6 002c
Ethoxycoumarin O-deethylase (nmol mg±1 min±1) 0.14 6 0.02 0.15 6 0.03 0.09 6 0.01b,d 0.11 6 0.01a,c
Ethoxyresoru®n O-deethylase (pmol mg±1 min±1) 1.00 6 0.11 1.03 6 0.09 0.37 6 0.03b,d 0.37 6 0.02b,d
Pentoxyresoru®n O-dealkylase (pmol mg±1 min±1) 0.22 6 0.02 0.21 6 0.03 0.32 6 0.02b 0.47 6 0.05b,d
1Signi®cant differences between treated groups and their respected controls (untreated) using Wilcoxon's rank method
(P < 0.05).2Signi®cant differences between treated groups and their respected controls (untreated) using Wilcoxon's rank method
(P < 0.01).3Signi®cant differences between treated groups and their respected controls (yeast) using Wilcoxon's rank method
(P < 0.05).4Signi®cant differences between treated groups and their respected controls (yeast) using Wilcoxon's rank method
(P < 0.01).
Table 4 Carcass proximate composition (percentage dry weight) (mean 6 SD)
Control Yeast only
Low
chromium yeast
High
chromium yeast
Protein (%) 45.87 6 0.97 46.54 6 2.07 46.03 6 1.87 46.55 6 0.80
Lipid (%) 38.77 6 1.00 37.81 6 2.07 38.36 6 1.35 38.29 6 0.89
Ash (%) 9.67 6 0.46 9.88 6 0.71 9.81 6 0.82 9.40 6 0.40
Table 6 Testosterone hydroxlase in gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata) liver microsomes). Each value represents the
mean 6 SD of six independent experiments
Control Yeast only
Low
chromium yeast
High
chromium yeast
Linked monooxygenases
6a-Hydroxytestosterone (pmol mg±1 min±1) 5.92 6 0.24 5.13 6 0.56 4.10 6 0.482,3 4.31 6 0.512,3
7a-Hydroxytestosterone (pmol mg±1 min±1) 2.07 6 0.12 1.97 6 0.08 1.73 6 0.154 2.06 6 0.20
6b-Hydroxytestosterone (pmol mg±1 min±1) 13.47 6 0.77 14.39 6 1.68 10.47 6 1.711,2 13.27 6 089
16a-Hydroxytestosterone (pmol mg±1 min±1) 4.06 6 0.21 4.24 6 0.53 2.87 6 0.292,4 3.02 6 0.522,4
16b-Hydroxytestosterone (pmol mg±1 min±1) 1.71 6 0.21 1.58 6 0.14 1.01 6 0.172,3 0.86 6 0.092,4
2a-Hydroxytestosterone (pmol mg±1 min±1) 0.96 6 0.05 0.99 6 0.07 0.34 6 0.052,4 0.49 6 0.062,4
2b-Hydroxytestosterone (pmol mg±1 min±1) 17.33 6 2.11 15.25 6 0.94 152 6 0.092,4 1.27 6 0.052
Androst-4-ene-3,17-dione (nmol mg±1 min±1) 1.19 6 0.03 1.09 6 0.14 0.79 6 0.042,4 0.89 6 0.083
1Signi®cant differences between treated groups and their respected controls using Wilcoxon's rank method (P < 0.05).2Signi®cant differences between treated groups and their respected controls using Wilcoxon's rank method (P < 0.01).3Signi®cant differences between treated groups and their respected controls using Wilcoxon's rank method (P < 0.05).4Signi®cant differences between treated groups and their respected controls using Wilcoxon's rank method (P < 0.01).
66 ã 2001 Blackwell Science Ltd, Aquaculture Research, 32 (Suppl. 1), 60±69
Dietary organic chromium and gilthead seabream P P Gatta et al. Aquaculture Research, 2001, 32 (Suppl. 1), 60±69
respectively), 16b- (41 and 50% loss, lower and
higher doses, respectively), 2a- (65% loss, lower
dose) and 2b- (93 and 91% loss, higher and lower
doses, respectively) -hydroxylase activities. Androst-
4-ene-3,17-dione-linked monooxygenase activity
was also reduced by chromium (25 and 34% loss,
higher and lower doses, respectively).
Discussion
Growth, feed conversion ratio and thermal-unit
growth coef®cient exhibited good responses to diets,
despite the fact that they contained a considerable
amount of plant protein and a medium lipid level
(17±18%). Gilthead seabream is a marine species
well suited to utilize dietary plant proteins, at least
to a certain level without any remarkable reduction
in performance (Robaina et al. 1995).
The inclusion of yeast in the diets yielded little
effect on feed performance. A previous study
reported a positive in¯uence on growth and feed
conversion ratio in trout fed semipuri®ed diets
containing brewer's dried yeast (Rumsey et al.
1991) at the rate of 25% of the diet, a level well
beyond the 1.6% used in this experiment. Therefore
higher yeast inclusion into the diet may be
necessary to affect gilthead seabream performance.
Assuming that chromium is a component of the
glucose tolerance factors increasing insulin activity
as in mammals (Mordenti et al. 1997), its role in ®sh
nutrition could be related to the actions of this
hormone. Duguay & Mommsen (1994) describe
insulin as the major anabolic hormone in ®sh,
which stimulates the uptake of glucose and amino
acids by skeletal muscle and liver, and increases the
rate of protein synthesis in these tissues. Jobling
(1994) differentiates the insulin activity in mam-
mals and in ®sh where it appears to be more
important in protein than in carbohydrate metabo-
lism. Those ®ndings could explain the growth-
promoting effect found in ®sh fed diets supplemen-
ted with chromium, even though little is known on
how it acts on ®sh metabolism. Most of the
experiments showing an effect of dietary chromium
involved herbivorous or omnivorous ®sh species
where carbohydrate digestion is more important
than in carnivorous ®sh. Tacon & Beveridge (1982)
studied dietary trivalent chromium (chromium
chloride) in trout feeds, but those data should be
used carefully because a single group of ®sh per
dietary treatment was employed and also they fed
semipuri®ed diets containing a low lipid level (12%).
A slightly but not signi®cant increase in growth and
a reduced feed conversion ratio was achieved in ®sh
fed 1 mg chromium kg diet±1. Only Fernandez et al.
(1999) reported an experiment carried out in
gilthead seabream; they supplemented experimental
diets with chromic oxide and found this form to be
neutral in relation to the utilization of organic
compounds, but able to modify the utilization of
mineral salts. In this case it should be noted that
dietary lipid level was quite low and hence the
protein/lipid ratio and the whole energy content
were not as high as usually found in commercial
diets. Chromic oxide was shown to be ineffective, as
it was not absorbed from the gut. When other
chromium forms are included in diets, assuming
their higher availability, the ef®cacy of chromium
on ®sh performances may be related to the dietary
nutrient concentration, having a greater effect
when higher protein and lipid contents are present.
In this scenario, we could speculate that all diets
tested in the present study may not be concentrated
suf®ciently for chromium to have measurable effect.
Concerning the in¯uence of chromium on hepatic
microsomal CYP biochemistry, here we show that
chromium treatments did not substantially change
CYP-linked monooxygenases in gilthead seabream
hepatic subcellular preparations. Indeed, with the
exception of the androst-4-ene-3,17-dione-asso-
ciated mixed function oxidases, which were reduced
to about 34% at the lower dose tested, the selected
CYP-dependent oxidases were affected only slightly
by chromium yeast. This is particularly true if we
remember that the observed changes were indepen-
dent of the dose employed. More precisely, even
though some alterations in CYP-catalysed drug
reactions found in the present investigation were
statistically signi®cant, they should not be of great
biological relevance. It should be taken into account
that the difference of the microsomal monooxygen-
ase units would be considered in evaluating the
biological outcomes linked to CYP modulation by
xenobiotics; while a twofold induction, for example,
in the N-demethylation of aminopyrine from 5 to
10 nmol mg±1 min±1 represents a `net' increase of
5000 pmol mg protein±1 and time unit, the
corresponding (twofold) induction of activities,
such as the O-deethylation of ethoxyresoru®n from
5 to 10 pmol mg±1 min±1, represents instead a net
increase of 5 pmol mg±1 min±1 only (Paolini et al.
1999b).
Taken as a whole, dietary yeast or chromium
yeast did not improve gilthead seabream perform-
ã 2001 Blackwell Science Ltd, Aquaculture Research, 32 (Suppl. 1), 60±69 67
Aquaculture Research, 2001, 32 (Suppl. 1), 60±69 Dietary organic chromium and gilthead seabream P P Gatta et al.
ance, carcass indices, or carcass and ®llet chemical
compositions, at least at the levels used in this
study. Some hepatic xenobiotic metabolizing
enzymes were modi®ed slightly by chromium
treatments regardless of dose supplemented.
Further studies are necessary to clarify if different
dosages and longer-term feeding could affect gilt-
head seabream performances and microsomal
metabolism.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Giorgia Bignami,
Margherita Drudi and the DIMORFIPA laboratory
staff for their work, as well as Signor Agostino De
Fenza (Novagriter Fish Farm). The study was
supported by a joint grant from Ministero
dell'UniversitaÁ e Ricerca Scienti®ca e Tecnologica
(providing 40% and 60% of funds) and the
University of Bologna.
References
Aitio A. (1978) A simple and sensitive assay of 7-
ethoxycoumarin deethylation. Analytical Biochemistry
85, 488.
AOAC (1990) Of®cial Methods of Analysis, (ed. by K.
Helrich). Association of Of®cial Analytical Chemists,
Arlington, VA.
Bailey Y.L. (1967) Techniques in Protein Chemistry. Elsevier,
Amsterdam, 340±341.
Box G.E.P. & Hunter W.G. (1967) Statistics for Experiments.
Wiley, New York, NY.
Burke M.D., Thompson S., Elcombe C.R., Halpert J.,
Haaparant T. & Meyer R.T. (1985) Ethoxy-, pentoxy-
and benzyloxyphenoxazones and homologues: a series of
substrates to distinguish between different induced
cytochromes P450. Biochemical Pharmacology 34,
3337±3345.
Calamari D. & Solbe J.F. (1994) Report on chromium and
freshwater ®sh. In: Water Quality for Freshwater Fish (ed.
by G. Howells), 1±30. Gordon and Breach Science
Publishers, Yverdon, Switzerland, 1±30.
van Der Hoeven T.H. (1984) Assay of hepatic microsomal
testosterone hydroxylases by high-performance liquid
chromatography. Analytical Biochemistry 138, 57±65.
Duguay S.J. & Mommsen T.P. (1994) Molecular aspects of
pancreatic peptides. In: Fish Physiology, Vol. XIII.
Molecular Endocrinology of Fish (Ed. by N.M.
Sherwood & C.L. Hew), 225±271. Academic Press, San
Diego, CA.
Fernandez F., Miquel A.G., Martinez R., Serra E., Guinea J.,
Narbaiza F.J., Caseras A. & Baanante I.V. (1999) Dietary
chromium oxide does not affect the utilization of organic
compounds but can alter the utilization of mineral salts
in gilthead sea bream Sparus aurata. Journal of Nutrition
129 (5), 1053±1059.
Folch J., Lees M. & Stanley S.G.H. (1957) A simple method
for the isolation and puri®cation of total lipids from
animal tissues. Journal of Biological Chemistry 226, 497±
509.
Gatesoupe F.J. (1999) The use of probiotics in aquaculture.
Aquaculture 180, 147±165.
Hertz Y., Madar Z., Hepher B. & Gertler A. (1989) Glucose
metabolism in the common carp (Cyprinus carpio L.): the
effects of cobalt and chromium. Aquaculture 76, 255±
267.
Jain K.K., Sinha A., Srivastava P.P. & Berendra D.K.
(1994) Chromium: an ef®cient growth enhancer in
indian major carp, Labeo rohita. Journal of Aquaculture in
the Tropics 9, 49±54.
Jeejebhoy K.N., Chu R.C., Marliss E.B., Greenberg G.R. &
Bruce-Robertson A. (1977) Chromium de®ciency,
glucose intolerance and neuropathy reversed by
chromium supplementation in a patient receiving
long-term total parenteral nutrition. American Journal
of Clinical Nutrition 30, 531±538.
Jobling M. (1994) Biotic factors and growth performance.
In: Fish Bioenergetics (ed. by M. Jobling), 169±206.
Chapman & Hall, London.
Lowry O.H., Rosenbrough H.J., Farr A.L. & Randall R.J.
(1951) Protein measurement with Folin phenol reagent.
Journal of Biological Chemistry 193, 265±275.
Lubet R.A., Mayer M.J., Cameron J.W., Raymond W.N.,
Burke M., Wolf T. & Guengerich F.P. (1985)
Dealkylation of pentoxyresoru®n. A rapid and sensitive
assay for measuring induction of cytochrome (s) P450
by phenobarbital and other xenobiotics in rat. Archives
of Biochemistry and Biophysics 238, 43±48.
Mallard B.A. & Borgs P. (1997) Effects on supplemental
trivalent chromium on hormone and immune responses
of cattle. In: Biotechnology in the Feed Industry,
Proceedings of Alltech's Thirteenth Annual Symposium,
241±250. Nottingham University Press, Nottingham.
Martillotti F., Antongiovanni M., Rizzi L., Santi E. &
Bittante G. (1987) Metodi di analisi per la valutazione degli
alimenti di impiego zootecnico ± Quad. met. n.8, IPRA±
CNR, Rome.
Mazel P. (1971) Experiments illustrating drug metabolism
in vitro. In: Fundamentals of Drug Metabolism and Drug
Disposition (ed. by B.N. LaDu, H.G. Mandel & E.L. Way),
546±550. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, MD.
Mordenti A., Piva A. & Piva G. (1997) Chromium in
animal nutrition and possible effects in human health.
In: Biotechnology in the Feed Industry, Proceedings of
Alltech's Thirteenth Annual Symposium, 227±240.
Nottingham University Press, Nottingham.
Nash T. (1953) Colorimetric estimation of formaldehyde
by means of Hantzsch reaction. Biochemical Journal 55,
416±421.
68 ã 2001 Blackwell Science Ltd, Aquaculture Research, 32 (Suppl. 1), 60±69
Dietary organic chromium and gilthead seabream P P Gatta et al. Aquaculture Research, 2001, 32 (Suppl. 1), 60±69
Ng W. & Wilson R.P. (1997) Chromic oxide inclusion in
the diet does not affect glucose utilization or chromium
retention by channel cat®sh, Ictalurus punctatus. Journal
of Nutrition 127, 2357±2362.
Paolini M., Barillari J., Broccoli M., Pozzetti L., Perocco P. &
Cantelli-Forti G. (1999b) Effect of liquorice and
glycyrrhizin on rat liver carcinogen metabolizing
enzymes. Cancer Letters 145, 35±42.
Paolini M., Pozzetti L., Piazza F., Cantelli-Forti G. & Roda A.
(1999a) Bile acid structure and selective modulation of
murine hepatic cytochrome P450-linked enzymes.
Hepatology 30, 730±739.
Paolini M., Pozzetti L., Sapone A., Biagi G.L. & Cantelli-
Forti G. (1997) Development of basal and induced
testosterone hydroxylase activity in the chicken embryo
in ovo. British Journal of Pharmacology 123, 344±350.
Paripatananont T. & Lovell R.T. (1997) Comparative net
absorption of chelated and inorganic trace minerals in
channel cat®sh Ictalurus punctatus diets. Journal of the
World Aquaculture Society 28 (1), 62±67.
Platt J., Molitor E., Doehmer J., Dogra S. & Oesch F. (1989)
Genetically engineered V79 Chinese hamster cell.
Expression of puri®ed cytochrome P450 2B1
monooxygenase activity. Biochemical Toxicology 4, 1±5.
Reinke L.A. & Mayer M.J. (1985) p-Nitrophenol
hydroxylation. A microsomal oxidation which is
highly inducible by ethanol. Drugs Metabolism and
Disposition 13, 548±552.
Robaina L., Izquierdo M.S., Moyano F.J., Socorro J.,
Vergara J.M., Montero D. & Fernandez-Palacios H.
(1995) Soybean and lupin seed meals as protein
sources in diets for gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata):
nutritional and histological implications. Aquaculture
130, 219±233.
Rumsey G.L., Kinsella J.E., Shetty K.J. & Hughes S.G.
(1991) Effect of high dietary concentration of brewer's
dried yeast on growth performance and liver uricase in
rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Animal Feed
Science and Technology 33, 1777±1183.
Sanderson G.W. & Jolly S.O. (1994) The value of Phaf®a
yeast as a feed ingredient for salmonid ®sh. Aquaculture
124 (1±4), 193±200.
Shiau S.Y. & Chen M.J. (1993) Carbohydrate utilization by
tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus 3 O. aureus) as in¯uenced
by different chromium sources. Journal of Nutrition 123,
1747±1753.
Shiau S.Y. & Liang H.S. (1995) Carbohydrate utilisation
and digestibility by tilapia Oreochromis niloticus 3 O.
aureus, are affected by chromic oxide inclusion in the
diet. Journal of Nutrition 125, 976±982.
Shiau S.Y. & Lin S.F. (1993) Effect of supplemental dietary
chromium and vanadium on the utilization of different
carbohydrates in tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus 3 O.
aureus. Aquaculture 110, 321±362.
Shwartz K. & Mertz W. (1959) Chromium (III) and the
glucose tolerance factor. Archives Biochemistry and
Biophysiology 85, 292±295.
Tacon A.G.J. & Beveridge M.M. (1982) Effects of dietary
trivalent chromium on rainbow trout. Nutrition Reports
International 25 (1), 49±56.
ã 2001 Blackwell Science Ltd, Aquaculture Research, 32 (Suppl. 1), 60±69 69
Aquaculture Research, 2001, 32 (Suppl. 1), 60±69 Dietary organic chromium and gilthead seabream P P Gatta et al.