21
GeoExplo Ltda. Geophysical Airborne Survey ElectroMagnetic Methods (EM) Santiago Chile Back to Home Page Tel(562)3265116 Email: [email protected] Dr. W.E.S.(Ted) Urquhart ElectroMagnetic Airborne Surveys Abstract This paper on airborne Electromagnetic (AEM) techniques deals with a number of topics relating to airborne EM survey systems and methods. These AEM topics include: Basic Principles, Transient Airborne Electromagnetics, Frequency Domain Airborne Electromagnetics, Airborne VLF Electromagnetics, Factors Affecting Detectability, Combined AEM/Magnetometer Surveys, Survey Data Presentation and Interpretation. Other Useful Links The Berkeley Course in Applied Geophysics (EM) The Berkeley Course in Applied Geophysics (EM) Table of Contents 3. AIRBORNE ELECTROMAGNETIC SURVEYS 3.1 Basic Principles 3.1a Transient Airborne Electromagnetics 3.1b Frequency Domain Airborne Electromagnetics 3.1c Airborne VLF Electromagnetics 3.2 Factors Affecting Detectability 3.3 Combined AEM/Magnetometer Surveys 3.4 Survey Data Presentation 3.5 Interpretation 3.5a Other Interpretation Methods Appendix 1. Typical Electrical Properties Selected Bibliography Return to Table of Contents 3. Airborne Electromagnetic Surveys The general objective of AEM (Airborne ElectroMagnetic) SURVEYS is to conduct a rapid and relatively lowcost search for metallic conductors, e.g. massive sulphides, located in bedrock and often under a cover of overburden and/or fresh water. This method can be applied in most geological environments except where the country rock is highly conductive or where overburden is both thick and conductive. It is equally well suited and applied to general geologic mapping, as well as to a variety of engineering problems (e.g., fresh water exploration.) Semiarid areas, particularly with internal drainage, are usually poor AEM environments. Tidal coasts

ElectroMagnetic Airborne Surveys

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

This paper on airborne Electromagnetic(AEM) techniques deals with a number oftopics relating to airborne EM surveysystems and methods. These AEM topicsinclude: Basic Principles, TransientAirborne Electromagnetics,FrequencyDomain Airborne Electromagnetics,Airborne VLF Electromagnetics,FactorsAffecting Detectability, CombinedAEM/Magnetometer Surveys, Survey DataPresentation and Interpretation.

Citation preview

  • 6/18/2015 ConsultingPotentialFieldGeophysics,AirborneElectroMagneticSurveysWorkshop

    http://www.geoexplo.com/airborne_survey_workshop_EM.html 1/21

    GeoExploLtda. GeophysicalAirborneSurveyElectroMagneticMethods(EM)SantiagoChile BacktoHomePageTel(562)3265116Email:[email protected] Dr.W.E.S.(Ted)Urquhart

    ElectroMagneticAirborneSurveys

    Abstract

    ThispaperonairborneElectromagnetic(AEM)techniquesdealswithanumberoftopicsrelatingtoairborneEMsurveysystemsandmethods.TheseAEMtopicsinclude:BasicPrinciples,TransientAirborneElectromagnetics,FrequencyDomainAirborneElectromagnetics,AirborneVLFElectromagnetics,FactorsAffectingDetectability,CombinedAEM/MagnetometerSurveys,SurveyDataPresentationandInterpretation.

    OtherUsefulLinksTheBerkeleyCourseinAppliedGeophysics(EM)

    TheBerkeleyCourseinAppliedGeophysics(EM)

    TableofContents

    3.AIRBORNEELECTROMAGNETICSURVEYS

    3.1BasicPrinciples3.1aTransientAirborneElectromagnetics

    3.1bFrequencyDomainAirborneElectromagnetics

    3.1cAirborneVLFElectromagnetics3.2FactorsAffectingDetectability

    3.3CombinedAEM/MagnetometerSurveys3.4SurveyDataPresentation

    3.5Interpretation

    3.5aOtherInterpretationMethodsAppendix1.TypicalElectricalProperties

    SelectedBibliography

    ReturntoTableofContents

    3.AirborneElectromagneticSurveysThegeneralobjectiveofAEM(AirborneElectroMagnetic) SURVEYS istoconductarapidandrelativelylowcostsearchformetallicconductors,e.g.massivesulphides,locatedinbedrockandoftenunderacoverofoverburdenand/orfreshwater.Thismethodcanbeappliedinmostgeologicalenvironmentsexceptwherethecountryrockishighlyconductiveorwhereoverburdenisboththickandconductive.Itisequallywellsuitedandappliedtogeneralgeologicmapping,aswellastoavarietyofengineeringproblems(e.g.,freshwaterexploration.)

    Semiaridareas,particularlywithinternaldrainage,areusuallypoorAEMenvironments.Tidalcoasts

  • 6/18/2015 ConsultingPotentialFieldGeophysics,AirborneElectroMagneticSurveysWorkshop

    http://www.geoexplo.com/airborne_survey_workshop_EM.html 2/21

    andestuariesshouldbeavoided.Weatheredmaificflowscanprovidestronglyconductivebackgrounds,particularlyflowsofTertiaryorQuaternaryage.

    Conductivitiesofgeologicalmaterialsrangeoversevenordersofmagnitude,withthestrongestEMresponsescomingfrommassivesulphides,followedindecreasingorderofintensitybygraphite,unconsolidatedsediments(clay,tills,andgravel/sand),andigneousandmetamorphicrocks.Consolidatedsedimentaryrockscanrangeinconductivityfromthelevelofgraphite(e.g.shales)downtolessthanthemostresistiveigneousmaterials(e.g.dolomitesandlimestones).Freshwaterishighlyresistive.However,whencontaminatedbydecaymaterial,suchlakebottomsediments,swamps,etc.,itmaydisplayconductivityroughlyequivalenttoclayandsaltwatertographiteandsulphides.

    Typically,graphite,pyriteandorpyrrhotiteareresponsiblefortheobservedbedrockAEMresponses.ThefollowingexamplessuggestpossibletargettypesandwehaveindicatethegradeoftheAEMresponsethatcanbeexpectedfromthesetargets.

    MassivevolcanosedimentarystrataboundsulphideoresofCu,Pb,Zn,(andpreciousmetals),usuallywithpyriteand/orpyrrhotite.FairtogoodAEMtargetsACCOUNTING forthemajorityofAEMsurveys.CarbonatehostedPbZn,oftenwithmarcasite,pyrite,orpyrrhotite,andsometimesassociatedwithgraphitichorizons.FairtopoorAEMtargets.MassivepyrrhotitepentlanditebodiescontainingNiandsometimesCuandpreciousmetalsassociatedwithnoriticorothermafic/ultramaficintrusiverocks.FairtogoodAEMtargets.VeinDEPOSITS ofAg,oftenwithSb,Cu,Co,Ni,andpyriteinvolcanicandsedimentaryrocks.GenerallypoorAEMtargets.QuartzveinscontainingAuwithpyrite,sometimesalsowithSb,Ag,Bi,etc.,involcanicorsedimentary(andpossiblyintrusive)rocks.PoorAEMtargets.SkarnDEPOSITS ofCu,Zn,Pb,andpreciousmetals,usuallywithpyriteandmagnetite,aroundigneousintrusions.FairtopoorAEMtargets.

    Conductivetargetscanbeconcealedbyothergeologicalconductors,"geologicalnoise",suchas:

    Lateralvariationsinconductiveoverburden.Graphiticbandsinmetamorphosedcountryrock.Altered(toclayfacies)maficultramaificrocks.Faultsandshearzonescarryingappreciablegroundwaterand/orclaygouge.Magnetitebandsinserpentinizedultramafics.

    ReturntoTableofContents

    3.1BasicPrinciplesElectromagneticinductionprospectingmethods,bothairborneand(most)groundtechniques,makeuseofmanmadeprimaryelectromagneticfieldsin,roughly,thefollowingway:Analternatingmagneticfieldisestablishedbypassingacurrentthroughacoil,(oralongalongwire).Thefieldismeasuredwithareceiverconsistingofasensitiveelectronicamplifierandmeterorpotentiometerbridge.Thefrequencyofthealternatingcurrentischosensuchthataninsignificanteddycurrentfieldisinducedinthegroundifithasanaverageelectricalconductivity,

    Ifthesourceandreceiverarebroughtnearamoreconductivezone,strongereddycurrentsmaybecausedtocirculatewithinitandanappreciablesecondarymagneticfieldwilltherebybecreated.Closeto

  • 6/18/2015 ConsultingPotentialFieldGeophysics,AirborneElectroMagneticSurveysWorkshop

    http://www.geoexplo.com/airborne_survey_workshop_EM.html 3/21

    theconductor,thissecondaryoranomalousfieldmaybecomparedinmagnitudetothe PRIMARY ornormalfield(whichprevailsintheabsenceofconductors),inwhichcaseitcanbedetectedbythereceiver.Thesecondaryfieldstrength,Hs,isusuallymeasuredasaproportionoftheprimaryfieldstrength,Hp,atthereceiverinpercentorppm(partspermillion).

    Anomaly=Hs/Hp.

    Increasingtheprimaryfieldstrengthincreasesthesecondaryfieldstrengthproportionallybutthe"anomaly"measuredinppmorpercentremainsthesame.

    Figure3.11,fromGRANT andWest,illustratesthegeneralprincipleofelectromagneticprospecting.

    Figure3.11:Ageneralizedpictureofelectromagneticinductionprospecting.

    Prospectingforanomalouszonesiscarriedoutbysystematicallytraversingthegroundeitherwiththereceiveraloneorwiththesourceandreceiverincombination,dependingonthesysteminuse.Inthecaseofairbornesystems,thereceivercoilsareusuallyinatowedbirdandthetransmittermaybealargecoilencirclingafixedwingaircraft,e.g.INPUTsystems,oroneormoresmallcoilsinthesamebirdthathousesthetransmittingcoils,e.g.mostHEM(HelicopterEM)systems.

    Therearetwodifferentbasicsystemscommonlyusedtogenerateandreceivetheelectromagneticfield:

  • 6/18/2015 ConsultingPotentialFieldGeophysics,AirborneElectroMagneticSurveysWorkshop

    http://www.geoexplo.com/airborne_survey_workshop_EM.html 4/21

    transientor"timedomain"systemslikeINPUT,GEOTEMandMEGATEManda/c."frequencydomain"systemslikemostHEMsystems.

    ReturntoTableofContents

    TransientAirborneElectromagneticsHistorically,themostcommonlyencounteredsystemofthistypewastheINPUTsystem.ThenewersystemsGEOTEMandMEGATEM(FugroAirborneSurveys)functioninasimilarwaytoINPUT,ThusforsymplicitywewillexamineonlytheINPUTsystem.ForthosewhowouldliketoknowmoreaboutthenewersystemspleaselinktoGEOTEM,MEGATEM,orTEMPESTofFugroAirborneSurveys.

    IntheINPUTsystemthetransmittingcoil,usuallyencirclingafixedwingaircraft,isenergizedbywhatis,essentially,astepcurrent.Intheabsenceofconductors,asharptransientpulseproportionaltothetimederivativeofthemagneticfieldisinducedinthereceiver.Whenaconductorispresent,however,asuddenchangeinmagneticfieldintensitywillinduceinitaflowofcurrentintheconductorwhichwilltendtoslowthedecayofthefield.Figure3.12illustratesthissituation.Theswitchingisrepeatedseveraltimesasecondastheaircraftfollowsitsflightline,sothatthesignalisvirtuallyCONTINUOUS .

    Thereceiver"listens"onlywhilethetransmitteris"quiet"sothatproblemsarisingoutofrelativemotionbetweentransmitterandreceiver,becausethereceiveristowedinabirdbehindtheaircraft,arevirtuallyeliminated.Moreover,iftheentiredecayofthesecondaryfieldcouldbeobserved,theresponsewouldbeequivalenttoACmeasurementsmadeoverthewholeofthefrequencyspectrum.Itisimportanttonoteinthisconnection,however,thatnotthedecayfunctionitselfbutonlyitstimederivativecanberecordedifacoilisusedasthedetector.Thismeansthattheanomalousfieldswhichdecayveryslowlyaresuppressedinamplitudemorethantheothers,andsincethesearetheveryonesgenerallyassociatedwithgoodconductors,therewouldseemtobeaninherentweaknessinthissystem.Becauseitisdifficulttopreciselysynchronizetheinstantwhenthetransmitterbecomes"quiet"withtheinstantthatthereceiverBEGINS to"listen",itisnearlyimpossibletorecordtheentirefunction.Thisisequivalenttobeingunabletorecordmanyofthelowerfrequenciesintheacspectrum.Thshouldbenoted,however,thatinthepastseveralyears,significantprogresshasbeenmadeinmeasuringtheearlytimeresponse.

  • 6/18/2015 ConsultingPotentialFieldGeophysics,AirborneElectroMagneticSurveysWorkshop

    http://www.geoexplo.com/airborne_survey_workshop_EM.html 5/21

    Figure3.12:AsketchoftheINPUTtransientairborneEM SYSTEM operation.Theprimaryfieldisastepfunctionandthereceiverrecordsthedecayofthefieldafterthetransmitterstopstransmitting.

    (GrantandWest1965)

    Typically,thetimederivativeofthedecayfunctionismeasuredusingfromsixtotwelvedifferenttimedelaysfromtheinstantthattransmitterstopstransmittingbeforerecordingthesignalreceived.

    ReturntoTableofContents

    3.1bFrequencyDomainAirborneElectromagneticsHistorically,allhelicopterborneelectromagnetic(HEM)systems,whereofthistype.ThereareanumberofnewersystemsthatemploythetransienttechniquesimilartotheINPUTsystembutthesewillnotbe

  • 6/18/2015 ConsultingPotentialFieldGeophysics,AirborneElectroMagneticSurveysWorkshop

    http://www.geoexplo.com/airborne_survey_workshop_EM.html 6/21

    discussedhereastheyareasyetnotwidelyused.

    InthetypicalfrequencydomainhelicopterEM SYSTEM (HEM)boththetransmittingcoilsetandthereceivercoilsetarehousedinarigidboomor"bird"thatistowedbeneaththehelicopter.Commonly,thisboomisfromthreetofivemeterslongandcontainsfromtwotosixcoilpairs.Usually,halfofthecoilsineachofthetransmittersetandthereceiversetare"coaxial",i.e.anaxisnormaltotheplaneofthecoilspassesthroughthecentreofbothcoils.Thesecondhalfofthecoilsetsarenormally"coplanar",beingequivalenttoboththetransmittingandreceivingcoillyingflatontheground.Othercoplanarorientationshavebeenusedoccasionally.Adiagramofthissystemisshowninfigure3.13.Forclarity,theboomisshownoversizedinthisdiagram.Notethestabilizingairfoilattachedtooneendofthebird.

    Figure3.13:SketchofatypicalHEM SYSTEM configuration.

    Thissystemoperatesinpreciselythemannerdescribedinsection3.1.Thereceivermeasurestheinphaseandoutofphase,orquadrature,ofthesecondaryfield,expressedinppmoftheprimaryfield.Aswewilldiscussintheinterpretationsection,thetwodifferentcoilorientationsprovidedatathatisusefulindiscriminatingbetweendikelikeconductorsthathaveconsiderableverticalextentandmaybeorebodies,andhorizontalsheetlikeconductorsthataresimplyconductiveoverburden.Thetwocoilorientationsalsoprovideadditionalinformationaboutthegeometryofthetargetbody.Asisillustratedinthediagram,thesystemincludesasecondbirdcarryingamagnetometer.Themagneticdataisoftenusefulindiscriminatingbetweenmetallicandnonmetallicconductorsandtoassistininterpretingthe

  • 6/18/2015 ConsultingPotentialFieldGeophysics,AirborneElectroMagneticSurveysWorkshop

    http://www.geoexplo.com/airborne_survey_workshop_EM.html 7/21

    geologicalsettingoftheconductor.SometimesaVLFreceiverisalsoincluded.

    Figure3.14showsaphotographofoneofatypicalHEMsystemsbeinglaunchedfor SURVEYoperations.Thissystemincludescoaxialandcoplanarcoilpairstomeasuretheelectromagneticfieldatfourfrequenciessimultaneously."Clicking"themouseoverthepicturewillenlargethepicture(27kb).

    Figure3.14:ThetypicalHEMbirdconfigurationbeinglaunchedfor SURVEY operations.NotethatthissystemalsoincludesamagnetometerbirdbetweenthehelicopterandtheEMbird.

    ReturntoTableofContents

    3.1cAirborneVLFElectromagneticsWithVLFsystemstheprimaryfieldissuppliedbypowerfulradiotransmittersusedformilitarycommunicationsandnavigation.Thereceiverusuallyconsistsofacoilandsupportingelectronicstowedinabird.Figure3.15showsthepositionsofcurrentVLFEMtransmittersandapproximaterangesofreception.

  • 6/18/2015 ConsultingPotentialFieldGeophysics,AirborneElectroMagneticSurveysWorkshop

    http://www.geoexplo.com/airborne_survey_workshop_EM.html 8/21

    Figure3.15:ThelocationsandrangesofVLFEMtransmittingstations.

    Becausetheavailablefrequenciesarehigh(1522Khz)thesystemsareparticularlysusceptibletogeologicnoise.Also,becausethetransmittersarecontrolledbythemilitary,theymaynotalwaysbeoperatingfortheentireperiodthata SURVEY isinprogress.Theyarealsolimitedintermsofavailableprimaryfielddirectionswhichwillnotalwaysbewellcoupledwiththefavorablegeologicstrike.

    Note:Anumberofthestationsshownintheabovepicturearenolongeroperating.

    ReturntoTableofContents

    3.2FactorsAffectingDetectabilityThereareatleastsixfactorsthatdeterminewhetherornotaparticularconductorwillbedetectablewithanyEMsystem.

    1.Signaltonoiseratio:

    Inpractice,becauseof"systemnoise"(Ns)and"geologicalnoise"(Ng),theabilityofasystemtorecognizeandmeasureananomalyislimitedbythe"signaltonoise"ratio:

    Signaltonoise=Hs/(Ns+Ng)

    BecauseHsandNgareproportionaltotheprimaryfieldstrengthHp,andNs,infrequencydomainsystems,usuallycontainselementsproportionaltoHp,thereislittletobegainedbyincreasingthe

  • 6/18/2015 ConsultingPotentialFieldGeophysics,AirborneElectroMagneticSurveysWorkshop

    http://www.geoexplo.com/airborne_survey_workshop_EM.html 9/21

    primaryfieldpower.IntimedomainsystemsNsisnotgreatlyaffectedbyHp,soextrapowerdoesresultinincreasedsignaltonoise.Attemptstoincreasethesignaltonoisearesometimesmadebyincreasingthedistancebetweenthetransmitterandreceiver.ThisresultsinroughlythesameHsandNgbutoftenalowersystemnoiseNs.Howeverthelongerbirdrequiredtoachievethisismorepronetoflex,andthusmayactuallydisplayincreasedsystemnoiseNs.Inaddition,thelargerbirdisheavierandmoredifficulttohandleandthusmayreducesurveyproductivity,increasingcost.InconductiveareasNgmaybehigher,therebyoffsettinganyadvantageoflowerNs.

    2.Penetration

    ThepenetrationofanAEMsystemisitseffectivedepthofexploration.Commonly,thisistakentoincludetheelevationofthesystemaboveground,asthisisalsoaffectedbylocalenvironmentandflyingconditions.

    Ingeneral,systemswithlargetransmitterreceivercoilseparation,usuallyreferredtoasTxRx,havegreaterpenetrationthanthosewithsmallseparations.Penetrationiscloselyrelatedtosignaltonoise,asthesystemthatproducesalargeranomalyfromagivenconductorcan,ofCOURSE ,lookfurtherintotheground.Penetrationisusuallydefinedasthemaximumdepthatwhichalargeverticalsheetwillproducearecognizableanomalyofatleasttwicetheamplitudeofthesystemnoise.

    3.Discrimination

    ThediscriminationofanAEMsystemistheabilityofthesystemtodifferentiatebetweenconductorsofdifferentphysicalpropertiesorgeometricshapes.Discrimination,particularlybetweenflatlyingsurficialconductorsandsteeplydippingconductors,isvitallyimportant.GooddiscriminationcanbeachievedinHEMsystemsbyusingseveralfrequenciesandbothcoaxialandcoplanarcoilpairs.

    4.Resolution

    ResolutionreferstotheabilityofanAEMsystemtorecognizeandseparatetheinterferingeffectsofnearbyconductors.Asystemthatdoesthiswellalsoproducessharpanomaliesoverisolatedordiscreteconductors.Resolutiongenerallyincreaseswithdecreasingflightelevationandcoilseparation.TypicallytheHEMsystemshavebetterresolutionthanthefixedwingtimedomainsystems.

    5.ConductivityWidthAperture

    AllAEMsystemsare,tosomeextent,aperturelimited.Belowacertain"responsefactor",whichincludestheconductivityanddimensionsoftheconductor,theanomalyproducedbythesystemwillbebelowtherecognitionlevel.Attheupperendoftheresponsefactor,somesystemsarelimitedandothersarenot.Theonesthatarenotlimitedsometimesceasetobemultichannelsystemsandlosetheirdiscrimination.TimedomainsystemslikeINPUTareaperturelimited.

    6.LateralCoverage

    Inadditiontopenetration,thelateralcoverageofanAEMsystemisimportantbecauseitdictates,tosomeextent,themaximumdistancebetweensurveylines,whichinturnaffectsthecostofexploration.Alternatively,atagivensurveylinespacing,asystemwithgoodlateralcoveragewillhaveabetterchanceofdetectingaconductorthatliesbetweentwosurveylines.Likepenetration,lateralcoveragegenerallyincreaseswithincreasingcoilseparation.

  • 6/18/2015 ConsultingPotentialFieldGeophysics,AirborneElectroMagneticSurveysWorkshop

    http://www.geoexplo.com/airborne_survey_workshop_EM.html 10/21

    ReturntoTableofContents

    3.3CombinedAEM/MagnetometerSurveysIngeneraltherearethreestepsinvolvedinplanningasurveyofthistype.WewilloutlinethesestepsandthengiveafewexamplesofhowtoplanTHESURVEY .

    Step1.DefinetheTargetandGeologicalEnvironment

    Target Definingparameters

    Largemassivesulphidelens Type,attitude,strikeandcomposition.Smallmassivesulphidelens Type,shape,attitudeandcompositionVeinsorotherdiscontinuous

    mineralizationType,extent,strikeandmineral

    assemblage.Shearzoneorfracturehostednon

    conductors Type,strike,alteration,watercontent

    Geologicalenvironmentcriteria.

    Depthandconductivityoftheoverburden.Considertheunderlyingbedrockgeology,residualortransportedsoil,andtheQuaternaryhistoryofthearea.Theconductivityofthebedrockandthepresenceofbedrockconductors.Thestrikeanddipoftheformations.Thepossiblepresenceofmagneticbodies.Thedepthrangetotheconductorsof INTEREST .

    Step2.DetermineFactorsAffecting SURVEY Performance

    Thetopographyandphysiographyofthearea:

    Istheareaflatorhilly?Onlyahelicoptercanmaintainrequiredgroundclearancesafelyinhillyterrain.Theextentandheightoftreecoverwilleffectflightelevation.Presenceofculturalfeatureslikepipelinesorotherconductorsandorinterferencefrompowerlinesmaybeimportant.Determineaccesstotheareaandtherequiredlogistics.Thesefactorswillaffect SURVEYproductionandthereforecost.Mobilizationtoandfromthearea:howfarandhowlong?FerrydistancefrombasecamptoTHESURVEY area(s).Theshapeandsizeof SURVEY block(s).Linelength,spacingandthetotalkilometeragewillaffectsurveyproductionandthereforecost.Presenceofobstructionssuchaspowerlinesortowersthatmycauseasafetyriskforlowflyingaircraftand/orbirdandcableassembly

    Step3. SELECT theAEMSYSTEM

    ThefollowingareexamplesofdifferenttargetsinthreeareasinCanada(SeminarpresentedbyDr.N.

  • 6/18/2015 ConsultingPotentialFieldGeophysics,AirborneElectroMagneticSurveysWorkshop

    http://www.geoexplo.com/airborne_survey_workshop_EM.html 11/21

    Paterson).Thetarget,andtopographic/physiographicconditionsalsodifferbetweentheseareas.

    Target1:

    AlargestrataboundvolcanogenicCuZnsulphidebodysomewhereina1000km2areainnorthwestQuebec.Thick(30to60meter),partlyconductiveoverburdencoversacountryrockthatisamixtureoffelsicandintermediatemetavolcanics,greywacke,quartzite,bandedironformation,intrusivegraniteandminorgabbro.TheareaisflatandswampyandtheonlyaccessisfromMattagami,150km.away.Theareaistobeflowninsummer.

    AEMsystemrequirements:

    Goodpenetration.Tolerancetoconductiveoverburden.Gooddiscriminationbecausegeologicconductorssuchasgraphite,sulphideandironformationarelikely.Goodlateralcoverageandaperturearedesirable.Lowflyingcostifpossible.

    Appropriatesystems:

    HelicopterEM:willrequireaflycampandgasolinedump.Mayberelativelyexpensive,especiallyifthelinespacingmustbereducedbecauseoflimitedlateralcoverageofthesystem.Thissystemwillproducethebestdiscriminationbetweengraphiticandsulphideconductorsandhasgoodsurficialtobedrockdiscrimination.INPUT:hasthenecessarycharacteristicsbutcouldhaveaproblemwithatmosphericnoiseinthesummermonths.A400meterlinespacingwouldbeappropriatesocostwouldberelativelylowbutdoesnothaveasgooddiscriminationastheHEMsystem.

    Target2:

    AlargestrataboundmassivePbZnbodyin150km2areaintheYukon.Verysteeptopography.Littleoverburdenexceptinvalleys.Hightreecover.Countryrockisphyllite,argillite,shist,intermediatevolcanicsandgranite.Theareais130km.fromRossRiver,Yukonand25kmfromaprivateairstripatAnvil.Theareaistobesurveyedinsummer.

    AEMsystemrequirements:

    Gooddiscriminationandresolutionbecausetheexpectedgraphiticconductorsareimportantmarkers.Goodsensitivitytopoorconductors.Thisrequiresthathighfrequenciesbeavailable.Goodperformanceinsteepterrain.Adequatepenetrationofatleast75meters.Flightlinesareshortsotheaircraftmusthavegoodturnaroundcapability.Becausethe PROGRAM issmall,mobilizationcostsmustbelow.

    Appropriatesystems:

    MulticoilHelicopterEMwithatleastonefrequencyover3000Hzhasallofthenecessarycharacteristics.Thistypeofsystemcanbe INSTALLED inalocalhelicopterarepreferableinordertoreducemobilizationcosts.150mlinespacingisappropriate.

  • 6/18/2015 ConsultingPotentialFieldGeophysics,AirborneElectroMagneticSurveysWorkshop

    http://www.geoexplo.com/airborne_survey_workshop_EM.html 12/21

    Target3:

    SmallCuZnsulphidelensessomewhereina500km2kilometreareaofnorthwestNewfoundland.Thebedrockisintermediatemaficmetavolcanicswithsomeultramaficintrusivesandminormetasediments.Theterrainismoderatelyhillycoveredby1020meterhightrees.Thereislittleoverburdenandwhatthereis,isvirtuallynonconductive.Thereisgoodaccesstovillagesintheareabyroadandthenearestairstrip,Cornerbrook,is120km.away.Theareaistobeflowninwinter.

    AEMsystemrequirements:

    Goodresolutionbecausethemineralizationis,typically,insmallpods,ofteningraphitichostrockandsometimesassteeplydippingpipes.Goodresponsetopoorconductors.Typicalmassivesulphideconductanceintheareais13mhos.Thehostrockandtheoverburdenarerelativelynonconductive.Goodlateralcoverageisrequiredbecausetheconductorsareofirregularstrikeanddip.Adepthofpenetrationofabout75metersisadequate.

    Appropriatesystems:

    AmulticoilhelicopterEM SYSTEM withatleastonefrequencyover3000hzand,perhaps,withVLF.InthiscasetheVLFmayaddaperture,lateralcoverageandpenetration,andhelptodiscriminatebetweenlong(formational)andshort(lenstype)conductorsatverylowadditionalcost.Thesystemcanbebasedinavillageinthearea.

    ReturntoTableofContents

    3.4SurveyDataPresentationInadditiontoadigitaldatafile,theresultsofanAEMsurvey,thedata,ispresentedinavarietyofformats.SomecontractorsonlypresenttheEManomalylocationsplottedontheflightpathmaps,togetherwithacodingindicatinganomalystrengthsandcertainparametersderivedbycomputermodelingtheanomalysourcesasverticalsheets.Beforetheadventofpersonalcomputerswiththeirinteractivedisplaycapabilities,stackedprofilesoftheEM,altimeter,magnetic,andsometimes,sphericnoisedatausedtobeacommonformofdatapresentation.However,becausehandlingthelargeamountofpaperinvolvedwasalwaysanoneroustaskandmostexplorationistscannowdisplayprofiles,usingtheircomputer,directlyfromthedigitaldatabase,itisnolongercommontoproducehardcopyprofiledisplays.

    TypicallycontractorspresentEMdataintwoprincipleformats:

    Asprofilemapsshowingtheinphaseandquadraturecomponentsofcomplimentarycoaxialandcoplanarfrequencypairsplottedascolouredprofilesontheflightpath.ThismapalsoshowsthelocationsofsignificantEManomaliesdisplayedusinganiconcodeto INDICATE theCALCULATED conductivitythicknessproductofthesourceassumingthatitisaverticalsheet.Theprocessof"picking"andmodelingtheseanomalieswillbedescribedinmoredetailintheinterpretationsection.AsacolouredmapoftheapparentresistivitywithembeddedcontourscalculatedfromthecoplanarorcoaxialEMdata.Thismapshowstheapparentgroundresistivityassumingthegroundtobeofuniformconductivitybothlaterallyandvertically.Thesemapsarehelpfulinoutliningconductiveoverburdenandshowingdiscretebedrockconductors.Actualvaluesofresistivitybearlittle

  • 6/18/2015 ConsultingPotentialFieldGeophysics,AirborneElectroMagneticSurveysWorkshop

    http://www.geoexplo.com/airborne_survey_workshop_EM.html 13/21

    relationtothetrueresistivitiesoftheoverburdenorbedrockfeatures.

    Figure3.41illustratesatypicalsuiteoffinalmapsofboththemagneticdataandtheEMdata,includingtheinterpretationmap,thatsurveycontractorwoulddeliveraftertheCOMPLETION ofa

    combinationMagneticHEMsurveyoperationsandtherequiredcompilationandinterpretationphasesofdataanalysis.Movingthemouseoverthepictureswillallowyoutoseedifferentpresentations.

    "Clicking"onthevisibleversionwillproduceanenlargement.

    Figure3.41:AtypicalInterpretationmapthatresultcombinedHEMandmagnetic SURVEY .

  • 6/18/2015 ConsultingPotentialFieldGeophysics,AirborneElectroMagneticSurveysWorkshop

    http://www.geoexplo.com/airborne_survey_workshop_EM.html 14/21

    ReturntoTableofContents

    3.5InterpretationMostsurveycontractorslimittheirinterpretationtoasystematicanalysisofthemorepromisinganomaliesusingaverticalsheetastheconductormodel.Thisisnormallydone,usingaCOMPUTERPROGRAM ,afterthelocalbaselevelforestimatinganomalyamplitudeshasbeencarefullydetermined.Anomalyselectionisdoneby,judiciously,usingtheshapeofcalculatedmodelsofvariousconductors,verticalsheets,flatlyingsurficialsheets,etc.similartotheonesshowninfigure3.51.

    Figure3.51:AsketchillustratingthetheoreticalHEManomaliescausedbysimpleconductorshapes.Whenmultipleconductorsare PRESENT ,theshapesillustratedwillbemodifiedbyneighbouring

    anomalies.

    Nomogramsexist,suchastheoneillustratedinfigure3.52bywhichsimilaranalysiscanbemadefromprofiledata.Bothproceduresproduceestimatesofconductance,calledtheconductivitythicknessproduct(whichistheproductoftheconductivityofthetabularsourceanditsthickness),andthedepthtothesourcefromthesensor.Thesensorheight,asrecordedbytheradaraltimeter,isthensubtractedfromthedepthtogiveanapparentdepthbelowground.

  • 6/18/2015 ConsultingPotentialFieldGeophysics,AirborneElectroMagneticSurveysWorkshop

    http://www.geoexplo.com/airborne_survey_workshop_EM.html 15/21

    Somecontractorshavedevelopedinteractivecomputerprogramsthatallowstheinterpreterto"pick"theanomaliesdirectlyfromadisplayonthecomputerscreenandimmediatelyseetheresultsoftheconductance/depthcalculation.Thispermitstheinterpretertoalterboththemapscaleandtheprofiledatascalequicklyto INSURE thatallfeatures,regardlessofamplitude,arefullyassessed.

    Figure3.52:Anomogramusedtoestimatetheconductivitythickness PRODUCT anddepthtothesource.

  • 6/18/2015 ConsultingPotentialFieldGeophysics,AirborneElectroMagneticSurveysWorkshop

    http://www.geoexplo.com/airborne_survey_workshop_EM.html 16/21

    Figure3.53:Thisprofilemap SHOWS atypicalbedrockconductoranomaly.

    Infigure3.53,notethattheanomalyhasacharacteristicsignature.Thepositivecoaxialresponse(theredlinefortheinphasecomponentandtheblueforthequadrature)ismirroredbyalowinthecoplanarresponse(maroonforinphaseandtealforquadrature).

    Figures3.54and3.55illustratethesignaturesofasurficialconductorandofaconductorwhichcontainssignificantmagnetitecontent.Notethatthesurficialconductorisbroadandlacksthehigh

    coaxial/lowcoplanarresponseoftheverticalsheetanomalyinfigure3.53.Themagnetiteresponseisnegativeintheinphasecomponent.

  • 6/18/2015 ConsultingPotentialFieldGeophysics,AirborneElectroMagneticSurveysWorkshop

    http://www.geoexplo.com/airborne_survey_workshop_EM.html 17/21

    Figure3.54:TypicalsignatureofanHEManomaliesduetonearsurface"surficial"material.Notethatthequadratureresponseofthecoaxial,(blue),andcoplanar,(teal),profilesarenearlyidenticalwhile

    thereisnoinphaseresponseforeithercoilpairs.

  • 6/18/2015 ConsultingPotentialFieldGeophysics,AirborneElectroMagneticSurveysWorkshop

    http://www.geoexplo.com/airborne_survey_workshop_EM.html 18/21

    Figure3.55:TypicalHEMresponseofaconductorthatcontainsasignificantAMOUNT ofmagnetite.

    Infigure3.55:Notethatboththecoaxialandcoplanarinphaseresponseisstronglynegativewhilethereislittleornoquadratureresponsefromeithercoilpair.

    Whiletheprocessdescribedabovedoesproduceveryuseful INFORMATION abouttherelativeimportanceofvariousanomaliesintheEMdata,ithasseverelimitationsincluding:

    Theassumptionofverticaldip:Iftheconductorisnonvertical,itsapparentdepthwillbeunderestimatedbuttheconductanceestimatewillnotbegreatlyaffected.Theassumptionofsemiinfinitesize:Thedepthestimatetendstobetoogreatandtheconductancetoolow.Theassumptionofnonconductivehostrockandoverburden:Iftheconductorisincontactwithaconductivehostrockoroverburden,thequadratureanomalywillbeenhancedandthedepthandtheconductancewillbothbeunderestimated.Iftheconductorunderlies,butdoesnotcontactthe

  • 6/18/2015 ConsultingPotentialFieldGeophysics,AirborneElectroMagneticSurveysWorkshop

    http://www.geoexplo.com/airborne_survey_workshop_EM.html 19/21

    conductiveoverburdenthedepthandconductancewillbothbeoverestimated.FailuretocorrectlyremovelocalEMbackground:IftheresidualeffectoflocalEMbackgroundhasshiftedtheassumedEMbaselevelusedintheCALCULATION ,thedepthestimateswillbetoolowandtheconductanceunderestimated.Presenceofmagnetite:suppressionoftheinphaseanomalybymagneticsusceptibilityinthecaseofconductorsinmagneticenvironmentswillleadtounderestimatingconductanceandwildlinetolinevariationsintheestimate.

    ReturntoTableofContents

    3.5aOtherInterpretationMethodsForreasonssimilartothosesuggestedinthesectiononmagneticinterpretation,detailedinterpretationofspecificanomaliesonamapisalmostalwaysdonebytheexplorationmanagerspersonnel.Manyofthesemethodsrelyontheapplicationofsophisticatedmodelingalgorithms.Figure3.56showsanexampleofanHEMmodeloftwoconductiveplatesinonesuchmodelingprogram.

    Figure3.56:ACALCULATED theoreticalcoaxialinphaseelectromagneticresponseoftwodippingconductivedikes.

    ReturntoTableofContents

    Appendix1:TypicalElectrical PROPERTIES ofEarthMaterials.

  • 6/18/2015 ConsultingPotentialFieldGeophysics,AirborneElectroMagneticSurveysWorkshop

    http://www.geoexplo.com/airborne_survey_workshop_EM.html 20/21

    Rock,Mineral,etc. Conductivity(mohs/meter)Resistivity(ohmmeters)

    Bornite 330 3x103Chalcocite 104 104Chalcopyrite 250 4x103Galena 500 2x103Graphite 103 103Marcasite 20 5x102Magnetite 17x1042x104 5x1056x103Pyrite 3 0.3Phrrhotite 104 104Sphalerite 102 102IgneousandMetamorphicRocks 107102 100107

    Sediments 1055x102 20105Soils 1030.5 2103FreshWater 5x1030.1 10200SalineOverburden 0.15 0.21SaltWater 520 0.052SulphideOres 10210 0.1100GraniteBedsandSlates 1021 1100AlteredUltramafics 1030.8 1.25103Waterfilledfaults/shears 1031 1103

    ReturntoTableofContents

    SelectedBibliographyAirborneElectroMagneticSurveysGRANT F.S.andWest,G.F.,1965,InterpretationTheoryinAPPLIED Geophysics,McGrawHillBookCompany.

    Fraser,DouglasC.,1976,ResistivityMappingwithanAirborneMulticoilElectromagnetic SYSTEM:Geophysics,vol.41,no.1(Fedbruary1976).

    Fraser,DouglasC.,1979,TheMulticoilIIAirborneElectromagnetic SYSTEM :Geophysics,vol.44,no.8(August1979).

    Paterson,NormanR.,1982,UseofAirborneE.M.(AEM)inExplorationforBedrockConductors,inMiningGeophysicsWorkshop.,PatersonGRANT andWatsonLimited.

    Paterson,NormanR.,1982,ProspectingbyCombinedAEM/Magnetometer SURVEYS ,inMiningGeophysicsWorkshop.,PatersonGrantandWatsonLimited.

  • 6/18/2015 ConsultingPotentialFieldGeophysics,AirborneElectroMagneticSurveysWorkshop

    http://www.geoexplo.com/airborne_survey_workshop_EM.html 21/21

    ReturntoTableofContents

    BacktoHomePage