Upload
vishalkingsing
View
235
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
HISTORY OF THE ORGANIZATION & OBJECTIVE
Housing Development Finance Corporation Limited, more popularly known as HDFC Bank Ltd,
was established in the year 1994, as a part of the liberalization of the Indian Banking Industry by
Reserve Bank of India (RBI). It was one of the first banks to receive an 'in principle' approval
from RBI, for setting up a bank in the private sector. The bank was incorporated with the name
'HDFC Bank Limited', with its registered office in Mumbai. The following year, it started its
operations as a Scheduled Commercial Bank. Today, the bank boasts of as many as 1412
branches and over 3275 ATMs across India.
Amalgamations
In 2002, HDFC Bank witnessed its merger with Times Bank Limited (a private sector bank
promoted by Bennett, Coleman & Co. / Times Group). With this, HDFC and Times became the
first two private banks in the New Generation Private Sector Banks to have gone through a
merger. In 2008, RBI approved the amalgamation of Centurion Bank of Punjab with HDFC
Bank. With this, the Deposits of the merged entity became Rs. 1,22,000 crore, while the
Advances were Rs. 89,000 crore and Balance Sheet size was Rs. 1,63,000 crore.
Tech-Savvy
HDFC Bank has always prided itself on a highly automated environment, be it in terms of
information technology or communication systems. All the braches of the bank boast of online
connectivity with the other, ensuring speedy funds transfer for the clients. At the same time, the
bank's branch network and Automated Teller Machines (ATMs) allow multi-branch access to
retail clients. The bank makes use of its up-to-date technology, along with market position and
expertise, to create a competitive advantage and build market share.
Capital Structure
At present, HDFC Bank boasts of an authorized capital of Rs 550 crore (Rs5.5 billion), of this
the paid-up amount is Rs 424.6 crore (Rs.4.2 billion). In terms of equity share, the HDFC Group
holds 19.4%. Foreign Institutional Investors (FIIs) have around 28% of the equity and about
17.6% is held by the ADS Depository (in respect of the bank's American Depository Shares
(ADS) Issue). The bank has about 570,000 shareholders. Its shares find a listing on the Stock
1
Exchange, Mumbai and National Stock Exchange, while its American Depository Shares are
listed on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE), under the symbol 'HDB'.
Our Vision
'The most successful and admired life insurance company, which means that we are the most
trusted company, the easiest to deal with, offer the best value for money, and set the standards in
the industry'.
'The most obvious choice for all'.
Our Values
Values that we observe while we work:
Integrity
Innovation
Customer centric
People Care “One for all and all for one”
Team work
Joy and Simplicity
2
3
ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE
Brief Profile of The Board of Directors
Mr. Deepak S. Parekh is the Chairman of the Company. He is also the Chairman and Director
of Housing Development Finance Corporation Limited (HDFC Limited). He joined HDFC
Limited in a senior management position in 1978. He was inducted as a whole-time director of
HDFC Limited in 1985 and was appointed as its Chairman in 1993. Mr. Parekh is a Fellow of the
Institute of Chartered Accountants (England & Wales).
Mr. Keki M. Mistry joined the Board of Directors of the Company in December, 2000. He is
currently the Vice Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of HDFC Limited. He joined HDFC
Limited in 1981 and became an Executive Director in 1993. He was appointed as its Managing
Director in 2000. Mr. Mistry is a Fellow of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India and a
member of the Michigan Association of Certified Public Accountants.
Ms. Renu S. Karnad is the Managing Director of HDFC Limited. She is a graduate in Law and
holds a Master's degree in Economics from Delhi University. She has been employed with
4
HDFC Limited since 1978 and was appointed as the Executive Director in 2000 and Deputy
Managing Director in 2007. She is responsible for overseeing all aspects of lending operations of
HDFC Limited.
Mr. David Nish joined Standard Life on 1 November 2006 as Group Finance Director and
remained in that position until December 2009. He is appointed as the Executive Europe on 1st
January 2010. In 2000 he was awarded the Scottish Business Awards Finance Director of the
Year and from 2004 to 2005 he served on the Government Employers Pension Task Force. He is
a member of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of Scotland. He joined the Board of
Directors in February 2010.
Mr. Nathan Parnaby is appointed as the Chief Executive, Europe & Asia of Standard Life in
the year 2010. Nathan joined Standard Life in 1982 as Investment Manager, responsible for all
UK net funds. He was appointed a Director of the Standard Life Investments’ board. He is a
Mathematics graduate from Oxford University and the Member of the Securities Institute. He
joined the Board of Directors in December 2009.
Mr. Norman K. Skeoch is currently the Chief Executive in Standard Life Investments Limited
and is responsible for overseeing Investment Process & Chief Executive Officer Function. Prior
5
to this, Mr. Skeoch was working with M/s. James Capel & Co. holding the positions of UK
Economist, Chief Economist, Executive Director, Director of Controls and Strategy HSBS
Securities and Managing Director International Equities. He was also responsible for Economic
and Investment Strategy research produced on a worldwide basis. Mr. Skeoch joined the Board
of Directors in November 2005.
Mr. Gautam R. Divan is a practising Chartered Accountant and is a Fellow of the Institute of
Chartered Accountants of India. Mr. Divan was the Former Chairman and Managing Committee
Member of Midsnell Group International, an International Association of Independent
Accounting Firms and has authored several papers of professional interest. Mr. Divan has wide
experience in auditing accounts of large public limited companies and nationalised banks,
financial and taxation planning of individuals and limited companies and also has substantial
experience in structuring overseas investments to and from India.
Mr. Ranjan Pant is a global Management Consultant advising CEO/Boards on Strategy and
Change Management. Mr. Pant, until 2002 was a Partner & Vice-President at Bain & Company,
Inc., Boston, where he led the worldwide Utility Practice. He was also Director, Corporate
Business Development at General Electric headquarters in Fairfield, USA. Mr. Pant has an MBA
from The Wharton School and BE (Honours) from Birla Institute of Technology and Sciences.
6
Mr. Ravi Narain is the Managing Director & CEO of National Stock Exchange of India
Limited. Mr. Ravi Narain was a member of the core team to set-up the Securities & Exchange
Board of India (SEBI) and is also associated with various committees of SEBI and the Reserve
Bank of India (RBI).
Mr. A. K.T. Chari has joined HDFC Standard Life as a Director on March 10, 2010. Mr. Chari
has completed his Electrical Engineering from Madras University in 1962. He is associated with
Infrastructure Development Finance Company Ltd. (IDFC) for last 11 years. Currently he is
handling project finance for infrastructure projects at IDFC. Prior to this he was associated with
Infrastructure Development Bank of India (IDBI) from 1975 to 1999.
Mr. Gerald E. Grimstone was appointed Chairman of Standard Life in May 2007, having been
Deputy Chairman since March 2006. He became a director of the Standard Life Assurance
Company in July 2003. He is also Chairman of Candover Investments plc and was appointed as
one of the UK’s Business Ambassadors by the Prime Minister in January 2009. Gerry held senior
positions within the Department of Health and Social Security and HM Treasury until 1986. He
then spent 13 years with Schroders in London, Hong Kong and New York, and was Vice
7
Chairman of Schroders’ worldwide investment banking activities from 1998 to 1999. He is the
Alternate Director to Mr. David Nish.
Mr. Michael G Connarty is responsible for Standard Life's investments in life assurance Joint
Ventures in India and China. He holds a degree in Law and MBA. He has worked with Standard
Life for 33 years in managerial positions covering a number of fields such as Pensions law,
International Marketing, Operational Management, Strategy, Risk, Compliance, Company
Secretarial and Banking. He has acted as Project Manager for the start-up project of the
Company in 2000. He is the Alternate Director to Mr. Norman K. Skeoch.
Mr. Amitabh Chaudhry is the MD and CEO of HDFC Standard Life. Before joining HDFC
Standard Life, he was the MD and CEO of Infosys BPO and was also heading an Independent
Validation Services unit in Infosys Technologies. He started his career with Bank of America
delivering diverse roles ranging from Head of Technology Investment Banking for Asia,
Regional Finance Head for Wholesale Banking and Global Markets and Chief Finance Officer of
Bank of America (India). He moved to Credit Lyonnais Securities in 2001 in Singapore where he
headed their investment banking franchise for South East Asia and structured finance practice for
Asia before joining Infosys BPO in 2005. Mr. Chaudhry completed his Engineering in 1985 from
Birla Institute of Technology and Science, Pilani and MBA in 1987 from IIM, Ahmedabad.
8
Mr. Paresh Parasnis is the Executive Director and Chief Operating Officer of the company. A
fellow of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India, he has been associated with the HDFC
Group since 1984. During his 16-year tenure at HDFC Limited, he was responsible for driving
and spearheading several key initiatives. As one of the founding members of HDFC Standard
life, Mr. Parasnis has been responsible for setting up branches, driving sales and servicing
strategy, leading recruitment, contributing to product launches and performance management
system, overseeing new business and claims settlement, customer interactions etc.
9
FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE
10
11
12
13
MATERIAL COST CONTROL
Materials control is the system that ensures the provision of the required quantity and quality at
the required time with in the minimum of investment. It covers the following functions:
1. Stock control
2. Scheduling of requirements
3. Purchasing
4. Receiving and inspecting
5. Storing and issuing
Need for Materials Control:
One of the first step in the installation of cost and management accounting system is planning the
proper control of materials and supplies from the time orders are placed with supplier until they
have been consumed in the plant and office operation or have been sold as merchandise.
Requirements of a System of Materials control:
There are many requirements to implement an adequate satisfactory system of materials control.
Stock Control:
The materials purchased by a concern may be classified as stock items which are taken into store
and held until required, or as direct deliveries to the point of consumption. The control of those
materials which are stock items is known as stock control.
Inventory Quantity Standards:
Ordering Level or Ordering Point or Re-order Level:
This is that level of materials at which a new order for supply of materials is to be placed. In
other words, at this level a purchase requisition is made out.
Minimum Level or Minimum Limit:
The minimum level or minimum stock is that level of stock below which stock should not be
allowed to fall.
Maximum Level or Maximum Limit:
The maximum stock limit is upper level of the inventory and the quantity that must not be
exceeded without specific authority from management
14
MARKETING
HDFC Standard Life seeks to further fortify ‘Sar Utha Ke Jiyo’ platform
Pallavi Goorha Kashyup
HDFC Standard Life over the years has used marketing as a strategy to differentiate itself in the
cluttered category of life insurance and create relevance to the target customer segment through a
series of innovative and strategic marketing campaigns and initiatives based on customer insight.
Over the last five years, the company has rolled out several marketing campaigns across diverse
platforms – television, print, radio, OOH, Internet, mobile – and experiential marketing
initiatives and has successfully built the ‘Sar Utha Ke Jiyo’ brand positioning across all the
campaigns.
Sanjay Tripathy, Executive Vice President and Head of Marketing, HDFC Standard Life, said,
“Our future plan includes building the brand equity further by integrating changing customer
needs and connect in all our future initiatives that we launch for the customer; be it for our new
products, new services, etc., through the ‘Sar Utha Ke Jiyo’ platform.” Tripathy further said,
“The advertising plan is to integrate service excellence in every activity that we do for the
customer. Going forward, the insurance category will be more commoditised as seen in mature
markets and the brand that creates differentiation and relevance for the customer will be the one
that emerges successful.” “The Indian insurance market is marked by stiff competition, hence the
challenge is to create a brand identity, along with enabling customers to identify the best
insurance product/ solution that meets their needs. In a nutshell, earning the trust of the
consumer, building a distinct brand in a market, ensuring consistent service, and offering the best
advice based on customer needs, are the biggest challenges for any brand,” he added. “We
believe that the need for life insurance – either protection or saving – is universal, irrespective of
market conditions. Everyone has a need, be it protection of income from unforeseen events,
protection from loan liability, planning for future savings requirements, pension requirement, or
cover for medical exigencies. Our need based communication has helped build this positioning.
Though we may be noticing that customers are deferring their plans to buy policies, they have
surely not cut off insurance from this list of purchases as they are well aware of the growing need
for insurance in their lives,” Tripathy pointed out.
15
STRENGTH & WEAKNESS OF THE ORGANIZATION
Life insurance, to many, is a necessary evil. Many policyholders swear by it to protect their
families from loss of income and hefty debt obligations in the event of their untimely death. With
several types of life insurance on the market, generally speaking, two varieties still remain the
most popular: term and whole life, or "cash value" life insurance. Both varieties have pros and
cons.
Identification
1. Cash value life insurance are policies where in which premiums are used to pay for the cost of
insurance, while a portion is placed into attached investment vehicles that grow over time. Some
popular cash value life insurance products include variable life, whole life, universal life and
paid-up insurance. Despite minor differences, these insurance plans are essentially the same. All
cash value life insurance policies contain a death benefit and a cash account that's added to when
a client makes a premium payment.
2. Term life insurance is significantly different than its cash value counterpart. Term life insurance
does not contain a cash value account. Premiums are used solely to pay for the cost of coverage.
These premiums maintain the level of coverage for a specific "term." At the end of a policy's
term, a new policy must be purchased.
Benefits
3. Both cash value life and term life insurance have their benefits. The most significant benefit of
cash value life insurance is its ability to offer coverage for the entire life of the policyholder.
Many people take advantage of buying this type of insurance when they are young when they
need it most. Cash value accounts may also be borrowed against or drawn from during the life of
the policy. Policyholders are also not required to pay taxes on any interest or earnings attached to
cash value accounts.
Individuals and corporations also benefit from term life insurance. The biggest advantage of term
life is the often very cheap premiums, especially when a person is young and healthy. It is
possible, in many situations, to purchase significantly large face value amounts for monthly costs
of $20 to $30. Term life is good for covering obligations that will eventually end, such as
mortgages, automobile loans and educational needs.
16
Warning
With the benefits of both cash value and term life insurance come a few disadvantages. The most
significant disadvantage of cash value life insurance is the often inconsistency in premiums.
Most cash value policies contain required premiums that can increase over time. This can make
the policy quite expensive for someone on a budget who wishes to purchase enough coverage to
benefit his family in the event of his death.
Although many policies contain riders in which dividends from cash accounts can be used to pay
premiums, such an instance almost always results in taking funds away from the cash value or
investment account. There is also never a guarantee that sufficient funds will be available to
cover missed premiums in the event a policyholder falls short.
There are also several disadvantages of term insurance, the first being that it is not permanent.
Although a policyholder may enjoy extremely cheap premiums when she is young, term products
expire after a certain number of years, or when the insured reaches a certain age. When a policy
expires, a new one must be purchased. This means that a person must qualify for a new program
based on her current age and health in order for coverage to continue. This almost always results
in much higher premiums or uninsurability. Some term insurance does, however, contain "re-up"
or "renewal" options that may not require proof of that the customer is insurable to continue
coverage.
Misconceptions
When we think of life insurance, we think of a death benefit being paid to a beneficiary upon the
death of a policyholder. Although this is true, it is important to know that with some insurance,
especially many cash value policies, it's often not that simple. With many cash value life policies,
only a single payout is made upon a policyholder's death, regardless of what the cash value
account is worth when he dies. For example, if an individual owns a whole life policy with a
death benefit of $100,000 and a cash value account worth $25,000, it is common for
beneficiaries to expect a payout of $125,000. This is commonly not the case. In this example, a
beneficiary would commonly only receive a total of $100,000.
17
CHAPTER I
Introduction
HDFC Standard Life, one of India’s leading private life insurance companies, offers a range of
individual and group insurance solutions. It is a joint venture between Housing Development
Finance Corporation Limited (HDFC), India’s leading housing finance institution and Standard
Life plc, the leading provider of financial services in the United Kingdom.
HDFC Ltd. holds 72.43% and Standard Life (Mauritius Holding) Ltd. holds 26.00% of equity in
the joint venture, while the rest is held by others.
HDFC Standard Life’s product portfolio comprises solutions, which meet various customer
needs such as Protection, Pension, Savings, Investment and Health. Customers have the added
advantage of customizing the plans, by adding optional benefits called riders, at a nominal price.
The company currently has 32 retail and 4 group products in its portfolio, along with five
optional rider benefits catering to the savings, investment, protection and retirement needs of
customers.
HDFC Standard Life continues to have one of the widest reaches among new insurance
companies with 568 branches servicing customer needs in over 700 cities and towns. The
company has a strong presence in its existing markets with a base of 2,00,000 Financial
Consultants.
Strong Promoter
HDFC Standard Life is a strong, financially secure business supported by two strong and secure
promoters – HDFC Ltd and Standard Life. HDFC Ltd’s excellent brand strength emerges from
its unrelenting focus on corporate governance, high standards of ethics and clarity of vision.
Standard Life is a strong, financially secure business and a market leader in the UK Life &
Pensions sector.
Preferred and Trusted Brand
Our brand has managed to set a new standard in the Indian life insurance communication space.
We were the first private life insurer to break the ice using the idea of self-respect instead of
‘death’ to convey our brand proposition (Sar Utha Ke Jiyo). Today, we are one of the few brands
18
that customers recognize, like and prefer to do business. Moreover, our brand thought, Sar Utha
Ke Jiyo, is the most recalled campaign in its category.
Investment Philosophy
We follow a conservative investment management philosophy to ensure that our customer’s
money is looked after well. The investment policies and actions are regularly monitored by a
formal Investment Committee comprising non-executive directors and the Principal Officer &
Executive Director.
As a life insurance company, we understand that customers have invested their savings with us
for the long term, with specific objectives in mind. Thus, our investment focus is based on the
primary objective of protecting and generating good, consistent, and stable investment returns to
match the investor’s long-term objective and return expectations, irrespective of the market
condition.
Need-Based Selling Approach
Despite the criticality of life insurance, sales in the industry have been characterized by over
reliance on tax benefits and limited advice-based selling. Our eight-step structured sales process
‘Disha’ however, helps customers understand their latent needs at the first instance itself without
focusing on product features or tax benefits. Need-based selling process, 'Disha', the first of its
kinds in the industry, looks at the whole financial picture. Customers see a plan not piecemeal
product selling.
Risk Control Framework
HDFC Standard Life has fully implemented a risk control framework to ensure that all types of
risks (not just financial) are identified and measured. These are regularly reported to the board
and this ensures that the company management and board members are fully aware of any risks
and the actions taken to ensure they are mitigated
Focus on Training
Training is an integral part of our business strategy. Almost all employees have undergone
training to enhance their technical skills or the softer behavioural skills to be able to deliver the
19
service standards that our company has set for itself. Besides the mandatory training that
Financial Consultants have to undergo prior to being licensed, we have developed and
implemented various training modules covering various aspects including product knowledge,
selling skills, objection handling skills and so on.
Focus on Long-Term Value
HDFC Standard Life do not focus in the business of ramping up the topline only, but to create
maximisation of stakeholder's value. Today, we are extremely satisfied with the base that we
have created for the long-term success of this company.
Transparent Dealing
We are one of the few companies whose product details, pricing, clauses are clearly
communicated to help customers take the right decision.
Strict Compliance with Regulations
We have initiated and implemented many new processes, some of which were found useful by
the IRDA and later made mandatory for the entire industry.The agents who successfully
completed this training only, were authorized by the company to sell ULIPs. This has now been
made compulsory by IRDA for all insurance companies under the new Unit Linked Guidelines.
Diversified Product Portfolio
20
CHAPTER – II
Objective of the Study:
To check the level of employee satisfaction among job work assignees.
To analyze the work related stress.
To study the attitude of employees toward their work and job security.
To find motivational factors of employees.
To find out how much employees are participation in dicision-making.
To find out how much employees are satisfied with their salary level.
21
Another approach to the issue of loyalty is to consider the value of the five "I's":
Interesting work. No one wants to do the same boring job over and over, day after day.
Although any job will require some repetitive tasks, all jobs should include at least some parts
that are of high interest to employees.
Information. Information is power and employees want to have the information they need to
know to do their jobs better and more effectively. And, more than ever, employees want to know
how they are doing in their jobs and how the company is performing overall. It is vitally
important to open the channels of communication in an organization to allow employees to be
informed, ask questions, and share information and to inspire them to share the vision of the
company.
Involvement. Managers today are faced with an incredible number of opportunities and
problems and, as the speed of business continues to increase, the amount of time that they have
to make decisions continues to decrease. Involving employees in decision-making, especially
when the decisions affect them directly, is both respectful and practical. Not only do those
closest to the problem typically have the best insight as to what to do, involving them in
decision-making will increase their commitment and improve the success of implementing new
ideas or change. Similarly, management needs to follow through on promises and live the values
they preach.
Independence. Few employees want their every action to be closely monitored. Most employees
appreciate having the flexibility to do their jobs as they see fit. Giving employees latitude
increases the chance that they will perform as desired, as well as bringing additional initiative,
ideas, and energy to their jobs. Employees also need to be encouraged to achieve their best
potential.
22
THEORIES OF EMPLOYEE SATISFACTION ARE:
1) NEED FULFILLMENT THEORY:
According to this theory a person is satisfied when he gets training from his Job what he
wants. The more he wants something or the more important it is to him, the more satisfied he is
when he received it. In other words, “Job Satisfaction will vary directly with the extend to which
those needs of an individual which can be satisfied are actually satisfied. Vroom views
satisfaction in terms of the positively valued outcomes that a job provides to a person. Thus, job
satisfaction is positively related to the degree to which one’s needs are fulfilled. The fulfillment
theory suffers from a major drawback. Satisfaction is a function of not only what a person
receives but what he feels he should receive.
2) EQUITY THEORY:
Under this theory, it is believed that a person’s job satisfaction depends upon his perceived
equity as determined by his input- output balance in comparison with the input-output balance of
others. Every individual compares his rewards with those of a ‘reference group’. If he feels his
rewards are equitable in comparison with others doing similar work, he feels satisfied. Job
Satisfaction is thus a function of the degree to which job characteristics meet the desires of the
reference group. For example, one study of the effects of community features on job satisfaction
revealed that workers living in a well to a neighbourhood felt less satisfied than those living in
poor neighbourhood.
3) TWO FACTOR THEORY:
Frederick Herzberg and his colleagues developed the Two factor theory satisfaction.
According to this theory satisfaction and dissatisfaction are interdependent of each other and
exist on a separate continuum. One set of factors known as hygiene factors (Company policy,
administration, supervision, pay, working conditions and interpersonal relations) act as
dissatisfiers. Their absence cause dissatisfaction but their present does not result in positive
satisfaction. The other set of factors known as satisfiers (achievements, advancement,
recognition, work itself and responsibility) lead to satisfaction.
23
Several studies designed to test the two factor theory provide little support to this theory.
The same factor may serve as a satisfier for one but a dissatisfier for another. It appears from this
theory that a person can be satisfied and dissatisfied at the same time.
4) DISCREPANCY THEORY:
According to this theory job satisfaction depends upon what a person actually receives from
his job and what he expects to receive. When the reward actually received are less than the
expected rewards it causes dissatisfaction. In the words of Locke, “Job Satisfaction and
dissatisfaction are function of perceived relationship between what one wants from one’s job and
what one perceive it is actually offering. In other words, satisfaction is the difference between
what one actually received and what he feels he should receive. This theory fails to reveal
whether over-satisfaction is or is not a dimension of dissatisfaction and if so , how does it
dissatisfaction arising out of the situation when received outcomes are less than the outcomes
one feels he should receive.
5) EQUITY DISCREPANCY THEORY:
This is a combination of equity and discrepancy theories. Lawlers hs adopted the difference
approach of discrepancy theory rather than the ratio approach of equity theory. From equity
theory the concept of comparision has been selected to serve as an intervening variable. Under
this theory satisfaction is defined as the difference between the outcomes that one perceives he
actually received and outcomes that one feels he should receives in comparision with others.
when the individual feels that what he actually received is equal what he perceives he should
receive there is satisfaction. Thus an individual’s reception of his reward is influenced by more
than just the objective amount of that factor. Because of this psychological influence the same
amount of reward aften can be seen quite differently by two people, to one it can be a large
amount , while to another person it can be a small amount.
6) SOCIAL REFERENCE GROUP THEORY:
Reference group defines the way an individual looks at the world. According to this theory job
satisfaction occurs when the job meet the interest , desires and requirements of a person’s
24
reference group. In other words, job satisfaction is a function of the degree to which the job
meets the approval of the group to which the individual looks for guidance in evaluating the
world and defining social reality.
The social reference group theory is similar to the need fulfillment theory except than it takes
into account not the desires, needs and interests of the given individual but rather the point of
view and the opinion of the groups to whom the individual looks for guidance.
Sectorial Comparison of Factors Influencing Job Satisfaction in
Indian Banking Sector
It has been observed that degree of job satisfaction of private sector banks was found to be
significantly lower than in public sector banks. At least two reasons were found to be responsible
for the low job satisfaction level of employees of private sector banks. When data were analysed,
surprising results were found. In the study, job satisfaction was measured by a tool developed by
Sinha (1990). Job satisfaction was measured on the basis of five variables. These are (i) pay, (ii)
work condition (for example, safety, heat, noise, and dust), (iii) service conditions (for example,
security, promotion, and welfare), (iv) relation with superiors, peers, and workers, and (v)
company as a whole. Among four variables, the degree of difference is not noticeable. But low
scores of the third variable, service conditions, were found to be responsible for overall low
degree job satisfaction in private sector banks.
Employees of private sector banks perceive that their jobs are not secure. In fact, the effect of an
open economy, globalisation, and privatisation can be seen more easily in private sector banks
than in public sector banks. In private sector banks, the environment in highly competitive and
job security is based on performance and various other factors. Though it is true that this
environment provides a challenging job profile, it also creates a less secure environment.
Industriousness, dedication, devotion, and commitment are not enough to secure a job. The high
level of performance of an individual is also based on various factors. These may be market
situation, existence of competitor, and government policies. Where these factors are adverse in
nature, performance automatically suffers. During this period, employees feel insecure, which
reduces overall job satisfaction.
25
In public sector banks, welfare policies are clearly defined and legally enforced. Retirement,
pensions, gratuity, and other related welfare policies are effectively executed. So there is no
problem with social security. In private sector banks, welfare activities are neither well planned
nor well executed. Employee turnover is very high and job security is very low. Most employees
are from middle class Indian families. These employees have seen the golden period of public
sectors and government jobs during their growing stages. So the effect of welfare schemes of
government jobs and public sectors cannot be easily eradicated from their psyche. Private sector
employees are ready to work hard but they demand pensions, security, and sometimes an easy
lifestyle.
These findings in the banking sectors could be extended to explain the job situation in other
service sectors. In terms of security, promotion, and welfare policy, there is a clear difference
between public and private sector employees. It was stated earlier that when we compare the job
satisfaction of employees in public and private sector banks or in other service sectors, the public
and private sectors become the main factor of comparison. In India, the public or private sector
factors neutralise all other factors of comparison. For example, in India, a public sector insurance
company like LIC will always be preferred by a new entrant, if he has a choice.
26
INCREASE EMPLOYEE SATISFACTION AND PRODUCTIVITY
By providing amenities that make your building a healthier and more comfortable place to work,
you can reduce employee absenteeism and turnover while increasing productivity. Even small
workplace improvements, such as installing individual temperature and ventilation controls,
improving the flow of natural light and providing access to a roof garden, can have a big impact
on your company's bottom line.
The EPA estimates that building-related illnesses account for $60 billion in annual productivity
lost nationwide. And according to a University of Wisconsin study, tangible costs of hiring and
retaining a new employee typically range between $10,000 and $50,000 -- plus less quantifiable,
but no less real, productivity costs as employees adapt to the new work environment and
cultivate relationships with clients, coworkers, contractors, etc. With less absenteeism and
greater employee retention, your investments in green building features will quickly pay for
themselves.
In a 2004 survey of 719 building owners, developers, architects, engineers and
consultants, Turner Construction found that 91 percent of executives involved with green
buildings believed that the health and well-being of their building occupants was greater.
By installing skylights, fluorescent light fixtures and additional insulation to improve
lighting and temperature control, Verifone's credit card verification facility in Costa
Mesa, California, decreased its energy consumption 59 percent, reduced employee
absenteeism by 47 percent and boosted productivity by 5 percent to 7 percent.
At the headquarters of the West Bend Mutual Insurance Company in West Bend,
Wisconsin, green features including individual workstation controls for temperature,
airflow, lighting and noise contributed to a 15 percent increase in claims processing per
employee.
27
CHAPTER – III
Data Analysis
Respondent by Gender
Male 29
Female 11
Total 40
TABLE 1- SHOWS RESPONDENTS BY GENDER
FIG-1 SHOWS RESPONDENTS BY GENDER
Here we can see maximum number of respondent is male that is 72% and female are only 28%.
This helps us to know that mostly male employees are working in HDFC Standard life
Mal
e72
%
Fem
ale
28%
28
Departments of Respondent
Departments No. of employees
Marketing 22
Human resource 8
Finance 5
operation 5
TABLE 2-SHOWS DEPARTEMENTS OF RESPONDENTS
No. of employees
0
5
10
15
20
25
Marketing Humanresource
Finance operation
No. of employees
FIG-2 SHOWS DEPARTEMENTS OF RESPONDENTS
Here we can see maximum number of respondent are for marketing department that are 22 out of 40 respondent
29
Work Experience of Respondent
S.no Experience in years No. of Respondents
1 less then 1 year 15
2 more then 1 year 10
3 less then 2 year 8
4 more then 2 year 7
TABLE 3-SHOWS WORK EXPERINCE OF RESPONDENT
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
less then 1year
more then 1year
less then 2year
more then 2year
1 2 3 4
No. of Respondents
FIG-3 SHOWS WORK EXPERINCE OF RESPONDENT
Here we can see that employees are not experienced.15 employees are having the experience of
less than 1 year and 13 of less then 2 year.
30
Satisfaction level with the job
S. NO. Satisfaction Level No. of Respondents
1 Like very much 25
2 Like some what 10
3 Neutral 4
4 Dislike some what 1
5 Dislike very much Nil
TABLE 4 SHOWS SATISFACTION LEVEL WITH THE JOB
Employee satisfaction
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
1 2 3 4 5
Series2
FIG-4 SHOWS SATISFACTION LEVEL WITH THE JOB
The data in the above table reveals that majority of respondents (25) were highly satisfied wih
their job and 10 of respondents are satisfied with their job.
This show that employees are satisfied with their job.
31
Satisfy with the behavior of management and other employees
S.noSatisfaction Level
No. of Respondents
1Highly Satisfied 22
2 Satisfied 10
3 Moderate 5
4 Unsatisfied 2
5Highly Unsatisfied 1
TABLE 5 Shows Satisfaction level with the behavior of management and other employees
No. of Respondents
0
5
10
15
20
25
Highly Satisfied Satisfied Moderate Unsatisfied HighlyUnsatisfied
No. of Respondents
Fig 5 -Shows Satisfaction level with the behavior of management and other employees
The data in the above table reveals that majority of respondents (22) were highly satisfied
wih the behaviour of other employees and 10 of respondents are satisfied and 5 are moderate.
32
Career and growth opportunities
S.no Preferences No. of Respondents
1 Yes 36
2 No 4
Table6 –Shows Career and growth opportunities for emloyees.
No. of Respondents
Yes90%
No10%
Fig-6 Shows Career and growth opportunities for emloyees.
Here we can see maximum number of respondent are think that there career and growth
opportunities offered by the job is that is 90% .
This shows that in HDFC Standard life career and growth opportunities offered by the job.
Participation in Decision making
33
S.no Participation No. of Respondents
1 20%-30% 12
2 30%-40% 10
3 40%-50% 8
4 50%-60% 4
5 Above 60% 6
Table 7-Shows Participation of emloyees in Decision making
No. of Respondents
12
10
8
4
6
20%-30%
30%-40%
40%-50%
50%-60%
Above 60%
12
34
5
No. of Respondents
Fig-7 Shows Participation of emloyees in Decision making
Here we can see less number of respondent are participating in the Decision making
That is only 6 respondent are participating in the above60% decisions and 12 are participating in
20%-30%.
Satisfaction Level of Employees
34
S.NO. Satisfaction Level No. of Respondents
1. Highly Satisfied 9
2. Satisfied 15
3. Moderate 5
4. Unsatisfied 10
5. Highly Unsatisfied 1
Table8-Shows Satisfaction Level of Employees with the salary
No. of Respondents
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
HighlySatisfied
Satisfied Moderate Unsatisfied HighlyUnsatisfied
No. of Respondents
FIG8- Shows Satisfaction Level of Employees with the salary
The data in the above table tells us that majority of respondents (15) are satisfied with the level
of salary which they are getting and only (9) of respondents are highly satisfied with this
statement and (10) respondent are not satisfied with the salary which they are getting.
35
Management is flexible and understands the importance of balancing my work and personal life.
S. NO. Satisfaction Level No. of Respondents
1 Strongly agree 18
2 Agree 10
3 Undecided 8
4 Disagree 2
5 Strongly disagree 2
TABLE 9-Shows Management is flexible and understands the importance of balancing my work and personal life.
No. of Respondents
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
Stronglyagree
Agree Undecided Disagree Stronglydisagree
No. of Respondents
FIG-9 Shows Management is flexible and understands the importance of balancing my work and personal life.
The data in the above table tells us that majority of respondents (18) are satified with the
management flexible and understands the importance of balancing my work and personal life.
36
Agree with the company bonus plans
S.no Satisfaction Level No. of Respondents
1 Strongly agree 8
2 Agree 12
3 Undecided 11
4 Disagree 6
5 Strongly disagree 3
TABLE-10 Shows how many employees agree with the company bonus plans
No. of Respondents
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
Stronglyagree
Agree Undecided Disagree Stronglydisagree
No. of Respondents
Fig-10 Shows how many employees agree with the company bonus plans
The data in the above table tells us that majority of respondents (12) are argee with the bones
plan which they are getting and (8) of respondents are strongly agree with this statement and (11)
respondent are undicided and (6) are disagree.
37
Is any change is require to improve the working condition
S.no Preferences No. of Respondents
1 Yes 32
2 No 8
TABLE-11 Shows how many employees feel to have improvement in working conditions
No. of Respondents
32
8
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
Yes
No
No. of Respondents
Fig-11 Shows how many employees agree with the company pay scale and bonus plans
Here we can see maximum number of respondent are think that change is require to improve
the working condition of the compony opportunities is that is 80% .
38
CHAPTER – IV
Suggestion
To increase satisfaction and retention of employees.
It will help in reducing the factors leading to absenteeism and staff turnover.
It will help in generating factors which can defuse tension and improve working condition
Which will ultimately lead to job satisfaction.
The method of recruitment should be improved.
Select the right person for the right job.
Promotion policy should be improved
Management should check the performance of their employees time to time.
Overall work environment should also be improved.
39
CHAPTER – IV
Conclusion
An extensive review of the topic "Study of the level of job satisfaction among job work
assignees" it was found that the most important factors conducive to job satisfaction are the
motivational factors: -
It was also found that the primary source of job satisfaction among Job Work assignees was the
sense of achievement experienced by them while on the job.
However, in the same study feelings of dissatisfaction were found to be stemming from the work
itself. The same and the work that was repetitive in nature and not apt according to the
qualification of some of the employees were seen also some of the major factors leading to
dissatisfaction were:-
" Low payment
• Job tenure (3 months) leading to job insecurity among the Job Work Assignees mind the
various factors leading to the job satisfaction and by enhancing the profile of job.
Employees tend to prefer jobs that give them opportunities to use their skills and abilities and
offers freedom and feedback. They want pay system and promotion policies that they perceive as
being just and ambiguous and in line with their expectations. When pay is seen as fair that is
based on job and individual skills, satisfaction is likely to result.
Employees are also concerned with their work environment for both personal as well as
professional life.
So finally it is concluded that the level of job satisfaction is there but need to be increased and
maintained.
40
BIBLIOGRAPHY
BOOK S
Rbbins Stephen P , Organizational behaviour .
Beri. G C, Statistics for management, Tata McGraw Hill
Cooper donal R, Schindler Pamela S, Business Research Method.
Kothari C R, Research Methodology
INTERNET LINKS
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa5321/is_200407/ai_n21351846/pg_5
http://humanresources.about.com/od/glossarye/a/employee_inv.htm
http://job satisfaction\job satisfaction3.htm
http:// satisfaction\job satisfaction\herzberg – motivation-hygiene theory.htm
http://www.nrdc.org/buildinggreen/bizcase/own_productivity.asp
http://www.nhpcindia.com/English/Scripts/Aboutus_Objectives.aspx http://wiki.answers.com/Q/Why_to_study_about_employee_satisfaction
http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_is_the_importance_of_employee_satisfaction_in_an_organisation
41
QUESTIONNAIRE
SURVEY ON EMPLOYEE’S SATISFACTION OF HDFC STANDARD LIFE
INSURANCE COMPANY
Questions:
Q.1 What is your gender.
l Male ● Female
Q.2 What department do you work in?
● ……………………..
Q.3 How long have you worked for this company?
●……………………..
Q.4 How do you like this job?
Like very Like some Neutral Dislike some Dislike very
Much what what Much
Q.5 I am treated with respect by management and the people I work with.
● Strongly Disagree
● Disagree
● Undecided
● Agree
● Strongly Agree
Q.6 Is there any career enhancement opportunities and growth in this job ?
42
● Yes ● No
Q.7 How much do you participate in decision making ?
o20%-30% o 30%-40% o 40%-50%
o 50%-60% o above 60%
Q.8 Are you satisfied with you salary level?
Highly Unsatisfied Moderate Satisfied Highly
Unsatisfied Satisfied
Q.9 Management is flexible and understands the importance of balancing my work and personal
life.
● Strongly Disagree
● Disagree
● Undecided
● Agree
● Strongly Agree
Q.10 Are you agree with the company pay scale and bonus plans ?
Strongly Agree Undecided Disagree Strongly
Agree Disagree
Q.11 Do you feel there is change require in your department
to improve working conditions?
● YES ● NO
Q.12 Rank the following motivational factor according to you :-
43
FACTOR RANK(1 to 4 )1 is highest
● Promotion …… ● Reward and
Recognition ……
● Achievemant …… ● Higher authority and
responsibility ……
PERSONAL DETAIL :
NAME :- ………………………….
MOBILE NO:- ………………………….
ADDRESS OF COMMUNICATION:- ……………………………
………………………….
44