8
Procedia Engineering 33 (2012) 6 – 13 1877-7058 © 2012 Published by Elsevier Ltd. doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2012.01.1171 Available online at www.sciencedirect.com ISWEE’11 Environmental management and sustainable development Mattheus F. A. Goosen Alfaisal University, Riyadh, 11533, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia Abstract Coordinated approaches are necessary for solving the major environmental and sustainability problems facing the developing as well as developed regions of the world. There is therefore a need to have a better understanding of the multidisciplinary interrelationships between sustainable development, human health and the environment. Specific emphasis was placed on globalization and sustainable growth, bioethics and poverty, organizational performance and sustainability, environmental management and individual progress, human and ecosystem health, and water resources and recycling. © 2012 Published by Elsevier Ltd. Selection and peer-review under responsibility of ISWEE’11 Keywords: sustainable development; environment; human health; multidisciplinary interrelationship 1. Introduction The interrelationship between economic progress, environmental management and individual wellbeing is a complicated process, affecting both the quality and sustainability of the society in which we live [1-4]. There is a growing realization by the general public as well as practicing engineers, decision makers, environmentalists, and medical researchers, that these three areas are interconnected. In the past, the world’s ecosystems were able to absorb the ecological damage resulting from extensive industrialization and development. However, with the rapid increases in global population and industrialization, as well as enhanced demands on natural resources such as fresh water supplies, the earth is no longer able to sustain a healthy and balanced ecosystem [5-8]. A coordinated approach is required to solve environmental problems. Sustainable development is now considered by many organizations and their stakeholders as being the model to follow. For instance, an increasing number of companies currently act and communicate based on their triple performance in economic, environmental and social areas [5, 9-11]. As educators and scientists, there is a need to follow this example by keeping in mind the larger view to help improve the overall health of the society in which we live. * Corresponding author. E-mail address: [email protected].

Environmental management and sustainable development

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Environmental management and sustainable development

Procedia Engineering 33 (2012) 6 – 13

1877-7058 © 2012 Published by Elsevier Ltd.doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2012.01.1171

Available online at www.sciencedirect.comAvailable online at www.sciencedirect.com Procedia

Engineering Procedia Engineering 00 (2012) 000–000

www.elsevier.com/locate/procedia

ISWEE’11

Environmental management and sustainable development

Mattheus F. A. Goosen

Alfaisal University, Riyadh, 11533, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

Abstract

Coordinated approaches are necessary for solving the major environmental and sustainability problems facing the developing as well as developed regions of the world. There is therefore a need to have a better understanding of the multidisciplinary interrelationships between sustainable development, human health and the environment. Specific emphasis was placed on globalization and sustainable growth, bioethics and poverty, organizational performance and sustainability, environmental management and individual progress, human and ecosystem health, and water resources and recycling.

© 2012 Published by Elsevier Ltd. Selection and peer-review under responsibility of ISWEE’11

Keywords: sustainable development; environment; human health; multidisciplinary interrelationship

1. Introduction

The interrelationship between economic progress, environmental management and individual wellbeing is a complicated process, affecting both the quality and sustainability of the society in which we live [1-4]. There is a growing realization by the general public as well as practicing engineers, decision makers, environmentalists, and medical researchers, that these three areas are interconnected. In the past, the world’s ecosystems were able to absorb the ecological damage resulting from extensive industrialization and development. However, with the rapid increases in global population and industrialization, as well as enhanced demands on natural resources such as fresh water supplies, the earth is no longer able to sustain a healthy and balanced ecosystem [5-8].

A coordinated approach is required to solve environmental problems. Sustainable development is now considered by many organizations and their stakeholders as being the model to follow. For instance, an increasing number of companies currently act and communicate based on their triple performance in economic, environmental and social areas [5, 9-11]. As educators and scientists, there is a need to follow this example by keeping in mind the larger view to help improve the overall health of the society in which we live.

* Corresponding author. E-mail address: [email protected].

Page 2: Environmental management and sustainable development

7Mattheus F.A. Goosen / Procedia Engineering 33 (2012) 6 – 132 Mattheus F. A. Goosen / Procedia Engineering 00 (2011) 000–000

The aim of this paper was to provide an overview of how sustainable development, environmental management and human health are interconnected, with an emphasis on globalization, bioethics and poverty, organizational performance and sustainability, environmental management and human progress, ecosystem health, and water resources and recycling.

2. Sustainable Growth and Globalization

Extreme poverty still affects the lives of one out of every five persons in the developing world [12]. Soil degradation from erosion and poor irrigation practices continue to harm agricultural lands, jeopardizing production. Sharma [12] noted that without a transition to more resource-efficient and less polluting farming methods, it will be difficult to meet world food needs without increasing the environmental burden that stems from intensive agriculture.

Alamar and Murali [13] noted that for sustainable development to be meaningful, over- consumption has to be brought under control. In addition, in a free market economy, the private-sector may not bother to conserve nature. For the sake of profit, it may destroy forests, overuse mineral resources, or pollute air and water. The private-sector may not take into account social costs or benefits [5]. Today there is an obsession with economic expansion. Growth should be defined not only in terms of the financial side but also in terms of societal and cultural parameters. The application of technology for the pursuit of profit has resulted in the overexploitation and the excessive utilization of natural resources.

The expansion of industries and domestic markets has drastically altered, for example, the atmospheric concentrations of numerous trace gases [12]. This has distorted nature’s auto-balancing mechanism. As a result, the world is now faced with several environmental problems including acid rain, melting of glacial ice, large scale evaporation of water in the tropics, and an increase in cloudiness at higher altitudes. Developing countries, and notably the least developed, are expected to be the most vulnerable to the impacts of global climate change, although their current contribution to the problem is minimal. Sustainable development has three components: social, economic and ecological [5]. Nevertheless these are not always compatible. Sustainability requires a rare balance between these three sets of goals. Once ecological sustainability has been achieved, then it is possible to attain economic sustainability. If this condition is maintained then social stability can be attained. Links between resources and productivity as well as indicators for sustainable consumption and production have been reported by Omer [14] (Table 1, Figure 1).

Table 1. The basket of indicators for sustainable consumption and production [14]

Economy-wide decoupling indicators 1. Greenhouse gas emissions 2. Air pollution 3. Water pollution (river water quality) 4. Commercial and industrial waste arisings and household waste not cycled

Resource use indicators 5. Material use 6. Water abstraction 7. Homes built on land not previously developed, and number of households

Decoupling indicators for specific sectors 8. Emissions from electricity generation 9. Motor vehicle kilometres and related emissions 10. Agricultural output, fertiliser use, methane emissions and farmland bird populations 11. Manufacturing output, energy consumption and related emissions 12. Household consumption, expenditure energy, water consumption and waste generated

Baver [15] focused on the emerging global concept of democratic environmental governance using Mexico as the case study area. The goal of the research was to examine how several of the country’s new national institutions, procedures, and capacities were affecting environmental performance as well as public perceptions of governmental legitimacy.

Page 3: Environmental management and sustainable development

8 Mattheus F.A. Goosen / Procedia Engineering 33 (2012) 6 – 13 Mattheus F. A. Goosen / Procedia Engineering 00 (2011) 000–000 3

It was reported that Mexico’s position as a leader in environmental governance in the developing world was derived from a combination of pressures from civil society activists and international organizations and institutions[16]. Baver [15] noted that struggle for democratic governance in this policy area may have contributed to a more accountable and transparent political system. However, only a highly mobilized movement can monitor these reforms and force them to function effectively.

Fig 1. Link between resources and productivity [14]

Three pillars are integral to the concept of democratic environmental governance: citizen access to environmental information held by public authorities; public participation in environmental decision-making; and citizens’ effective access to justice. The United States was a global leader in these three pillars through the mid-1980s, having legislation addressing all three issues.

However, by the 1990s, various regional and international governmental and non-governmental organizations have bundled the three ideas into one reform package and have promoted it around the world [17].

3. Environmental Pollution, Bioethics and Poverty

Gabaldón and Aguilera [18] noted that bioethics is an interdisciplinary development resulting from philosophy, the health sciences, law and social sciences. Any discipline that deals with the study of human beings has had something to contribute to the ethics of life. Its scope also includes the public and sanitary policies, the tasks of all professions, and especially any research on humans or the flora and fauna that constitute ecosystems. This wider view of bioethics goes hand in hand with the concepts of sustainable development.

Education for sustainable development should be obligatory for all young people, as this represents the primary vehicle available for catalyzing the cultural changes required for survival [19]. Bioethics ought to serve as a platform for education about sustainability. Gabaldón and Aguilera [18] reported that it is essential to apply a framework of values and principles to guide the conduct of decision-makers, scientists, and technologists. Furthermore, the advances of international environmental jurisprudence also lend a valuable arsenal of bioethical principles to the guidance of world development.

In its development, bioethics, seen as a branch of philosophy concerned with the study of the morality of human works [20], incorporated principles that belonged to medical practice, to jurisprudence and to political tradition, as well as to the precepts of human rights, the development of professional ethics, and from religion [21, 22].

In a related work, Hammond and Somevi [23] reported on poverty, urban land, and sustainable development using Africa as a case study. This continent is unique when it comes to poverty and sustainable growth. Some 41 per cent of inhabitants of African countries are extremely poor and are surviving on less than one dollar per day [24]. At one extreme are the international requirements on governments to rehabilitate their economies in keeping with the United Nations Millennium Development Goals (MDGs). The MDGs set such targets, for example, as halving the proportion of people living on less than US $1 per day by 2015.

Sustainable production polices primarily

targeted at producers

Structural change and innovation polices

designed to changemarket conditions

Sustainableconsumption

policiesprimarily

targeted atconsumers

Page 4: Environmental management and sustainable development

9Mattheus F.A. Goosen / Procedia Engineering 33 (2012) 6 – 134 Mattheus F. A. Goosen / Procedia Engineering 00 (2011) 000–000

The sources of poverty are due to inefficient allocation of natural resources, capital, labour and time, underutilization of resources, and inequitable distribution of incomes [23]. Liberal and moderate economists argued that as individuals and economic entities seek to maximise their own self interest and profits, they unwittingly promote the efficient allocation as well as optimal use of resources.

Sustainable development has economic, social, environmental and ethical dimensions. From an economic perspective, a resource is efficiently allocated and optimally utilized if it is put to the use that generates the highest possible returns [23].

Socially, equitable distribution of the incomes on the other hand may be achieved through mechanisms and social benefits like income supports, unemployment benefits and housing, free or discounted education, health and transportation services. From an environmental perspective, economic and social goals have to be pursued in ways that will cause the least damage to the quality of the environment and limit the exhaustion of irreplaceable resources [24].

4. Organizational Performance and Sustainability

As more businesses around the globe incorporate ecological activities and performance in their financial statements and reports; and as more stakeholders require new and better ways to communicate green issues; top management will become more aware that environmental concerns need to be addressed and tackled within their organizations [25]. However, environmental reporting should not be the end of the story. The Balanced Scorecard (BSC) can help by identifying environmental problems, by targeting key areas for top management attention and reaction, by providing support for needed improvements in current systems, and by formulating an applicable and attainable environmental performance.

Ajlouni [26] considered the environment as a fifth component of the Balanced Scorecard (BSC) for improving the performance of an organization. The BSC was first proposed by Kaplan and Norton [25] as a means for deriving the performance of a system. It was then developed as a managerial mechanism for translating and implementing corporate strategy [25]. The BSC was originally a framework of organizational performance measures across four perspectives or aspects: financial, customer, internal business processes, and learning and growth (FCIL).

In a related study to that of Ajlouni [26], Lyroudi and Angelidis [27] examined banking productivity. Financial institutions can be considered as the corner stone of any economic system. Banking institutions are of special interest, for example, to the European Union. The second banking co-ordination directive, which was adopted in 1989, created a regime for regulating all functions of such institutions in the European Union [28; 29]. This new framework forced banks to adopt new products such as loan commitments, letters of credit, securities underwriting, insurance and derivatives. These are also known as off-balance sheet (OBS) activities. Stable economics systems will help to produce stable societies.

In contrast to the work of Lyroudi and Angelidis [27], Maila [30] considered environmentally sustainable economies. Some scholars perceive sustainable development as a North-South; South-South and North-North environmental discourse [31]. Often, institutions find themselves in the wrong corner or part of the globe, especially when they defend sustainable development positions that compromise the lives of poor and marginalized communities, and unsustainable economic policies in developing countries regarding the utilization and care of natural resources. Maila [2] noted that development and sustainability must be anchored in action processes that allow participants to have choices in the how and why of doing things. Sen [32] argued that development has gone from the growth of output per capita to the expansion of human values. He saw development as a process that expands the real freedoms that people enjoy.

5. Human Progress and Environmental Management

How do we make sustainability a commitment rather than just a compliance cost? Building sustainable firms and organisations requires a commitment to people’s development. Staff development programs can only be successful if organisations have a clear sense of their place in [33].

El-Khafafi [34] assessed the sustainable management tool known as Triple Bottom Line Reporting (TBL). This instrument has become more important and widespread in recent years.

Page 5: Environmental management and sustainable development

10 Mattheus F.A. Goosen / Procedia Engineering 33 (2012) 6 – 13 Mattheus F. A. Goosen / Procedia Engineering 00 (2011) 000–000 5

Organisations have been evaluated not only for their performances on the bottom line, but also for their behaviour as worldwide corporate citizens. Global corporate scandals of high profile organisations like Enron Corp., WorldCom Inc. and Arthur Anderson LLP rocked stakeholder confidence, shamed business leaders and led to a higher scrutiny of organisations’ integrity.

Accordingly, a movement towards corporate responsibility reporting arose to drive transparency in the environment and social arena. In 2004, 1700 corporations filed responsibility reports, up from virtually none in the early 1990s. Some of those corporations are using these reports as a way to push their sustainability commitments further [33]. However, the success of these techniques depends on the commitment, skill and character of the people implementing them.

Emotions are an essential part of human life. They influence how we think, adapt, learn, behave, and communicate with each other. As El-Nasr et al., [35, 36] noted that the question is not whether intelligent machines can have any emotions, but whether machines can be intelligent without emotions.

In El-Nasr’s et al. work [36] neurological evidence was provided which proved that emotions do in fact play an important and active role in the human decision-making process. The interaction between the emotional process and the cognitive process may explain why humans excel at making decisions based on incomplete information; acting on our gut-feelings. Maria and Zitar [37] also performed a study on modelling of artificial emotions.

6. Ecosystems and Environmental Health

Mankind is living in ecosystems that can be recognized at many different levels, ranging from, for example, a small forest to the entire globe [1, 38]. Natural ecological systems are dynamically stabilized based on balanced inputs and outputs.

The work of Abdulla et al. [1] assessed atmospheric pollution, its consequences on humans and the environment, and perspectives toward its control. They also assessed pesticides, their persistence in the environment, the direct effects on human health, and the toxicological aspects of water pollution; and food borne diseases. Understanding of these issues may help scientists, decision makers and the public to make positive modifications in their behaviour that may add to the development of a sustainable environment.

In related studies, Laboy-Nieves [6] and Cruz-Báez and Boswell [39] reported that for centuries, peripheral urban developments have affected the evolution of estuaries (i.e. intertidal terrestrial zones) to a point that today some ecosystems exhibit a mosaic of areas that remain almost pristine while others are degraded. The aquatic and terrestrial zones and the populations that inhabit them are tightly linked, showing complex interactions. Laboy-Nieves [40] emphasized man made factors such as high demographic density, urban sprawling, poor waste management and social indolence with respect to the environment. In his case study area of Jobos Bay, Puerto Rico, Laboy-Nieves [6] reported that the Bay is a very dynamic ecosystem, where its natural history had been sculpted by physical, biological and anthropological factors.

A related aquatic environmental health study was presented by Emmanuel et al., [41]. The continual discharge of chemical substances in aquatic ecosystems can bring about changes in the structure and functioning of the biotic community, (i.e. on biotic integrity) [41, 42]. As a function of their bioavailability, the pollutants present in effluents cause a large number of harmful effects on the biodiversity of aquatic environments [43].

The main substances involved in chemical pollution phenomena are heavy metals, organic compounds, especially organo-halogenated substances, detergents-surfactants, pesticides, Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) and Polychlorobiphenyls (PCBs), nitrates and phosphates and drug residues [41]. Among the main effects of pollutants on aquatic organisms, are severe pathologies, behavioural problems, and species migration and disappearance. Given that the toxicity of a substance depends on its available concentration, Emmanuel et al. [44] not only confirmed the existence of dangerous substances in urban effluents, but also explained the contribution of these pollutant matrices to the loss of genetic, specific and ecosystem biodiversity of aquatic organisms

7. Water Treatment and Materials Recycling

The field of waste disposal is relatively new [45]. It was only in 1965 in the USA, for example, that the first federal legislation was enacted to directly approach the waste problem [46]. As such, the country is only now starting to come to terms with the amount of waste it produces.

Page 6: Environmental management and sustainable development

11Mattheus F.A. Goosen / Procedia Engineering 33 (2012) 6 – 136 Mattheus F. A. Goosen / Procedia Engineering 00 (2011) 000–000

In their feasibility study on the use of waste materials in highway production, Amirkhanian and Manugian [47] identified the following waste materials with specific applications for the highway construction industry: bottom ash, compost, construction debris, fly ash, plastics, reclaimed asphalt pavement, shingle scarps, slag, sludge and tires. Recycled products have thus emerged as a viable alternative to virgin materials in the highway construction sector.

As natural resources start to dwindle and landfill space gets filled up, the importance of proper waste reduction and management systems increases. The use of waste by-products as a replacement for virgin materials could provide relief for some of the burden associated with disposal and may provide a cost effective construction product exhibiting all the properties of virgin products. The concept of utilizing reclaimed materials as a source for construction is particularly relevant in developing countries. Economical and ecological solutions are particularly important in situations where growing populations are coupled with finite economic and natural resources.

Sustainable fresh water resources are also a critical area. Goosen et al., [9-11] explained that fiscal development and population growth has put increasing pressure on the world’s limited fresh water resources. In order to lessen this problem, desalination processes have been developed to obtain fresh water from the earth’s vast supply of seawater. A major concern, however, is the location of a significant fraction of the world’s desalination capacity in coastal areas of oil producing countries, such as in the Arabian Gulf [48].

The two most successful commercial water desalination techniques involve thermal and membrane separation methods [49]. Gaining a better understanding, for example, of membrane desalination of oil contaminated seawater is a major challenge facing both scientists as well as plant operators in many parts of the world. Improvement of living conditions, development of agriculture, tourism and many other important economic activities, are strongly dependent on the sustainability of water resources [50].

In developed countries, diseases related to poor water quality and inappropriate wastewater disposal account for illness and loss of productivity equivalent to 2% of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) [51]. Inversely, poor countries which invest in having better access to water and supply and sanitation, have a better economy. Perez Duran [50] reported that problems and concerns of water resources in the Dominican Republic consisted of microbial contamination of river and coastal water, overexploitation of aquifers, poor quality of water for aquatic life in rivers passing through cities, and fast paced reservoir sedimentation. This study also noted health problems due to the lack of sanitation services, insufficient wastewater infrastructure and irresponsible industrial and municipal discharge of solid and liquid wastes into rivers. Furthermore in a study from Mexico, it has been shown that environmental policymaking is often connected to political change [52].

8. Concluding Remarks

While development opens up and advances economies, creates new wealth, and ushers many people to a richer lifestyle, millions are forced to struggle to make meaning of the darker side of development that is not environmentally sustainable. Poverty continues to be a major challenge facing mankind in many parts of the globe. This has been attributed to inefficient allocation of natural resources, capital, labour and time; underutilization of resources and inequitable distribution of incomes. Education for sustainable growth should be obligatory for all young people, as this represents the primary vehicle available for catalyzing the cultural changes necessary for continued subsistence. Bioethics in particular should to serve as the main stage for instruction about sustainability. Adequate and dependable water resources are also a major issue facing many people. In developed countries, diseases related to poor water quality and inappropriate wastewater disposal account for illness and loss of productivity.

In closing, in business and economics, an increasing number of companies have started to act and to communicate based on their triple performance in the areas of economics, and environmental and social factors. Building sustainable firms and organisations also requires a commitment to people’s development. In addition, decisions should be made collectively, through negotiations. The relationship between economic development, environmental management and human health is a complicated process, affecting both the quality and sustainability of the society in which we live. There is a rising comprehension that a synchronized approach is necessary to solving the major environmental and sustainability problems facing the developing as well as developed regions of the world.

Page 7: Environmental management and sustainable development

12 Mattheus F.A. Goosen / Procedia Engineering 33 (2012) 6 – 13 Mattheus F. A. Goosen / Procedia Engineering 00 (2011) 000–000 7

References

[1] Abdulla, F. A., Abu-Dieyeh, M. H., and Qnais, E. 2009. Human Activities and Ecosystem Health. in: E.N. Laboy-Nieves, F. Schaffner, A. Abdelhadi and M.F.A. Goosen eds. Environmental Management, Sustainable Development and Human Health, Taylor & Frances Publ, London, Chapter 28.

[2] Maila, M. W. 2006. Grounding Sustainable Development in Praxis-Furthering Accountability and Collaboration. A. Ahmad ed World Sustainable Development Outlook 2006: A Global and Local Resources in Achieving Sustainable Development. Switzerland: Inderscience. pp 1-11.

[3] Laboy, E., Emmanuel, E, Thiery & Goosen, M.F.A. (Eds), 2010. “Environmental and Human Health: Risk Management in Developing Countries” Taylor & Frances (Balkema NDL) London. 25 Chapts, (est 2010/2011)

[4] Gottinger, H. and Goosen, M. F. A, (eds) 2010. “Strategies of Economic Growth and Catch-up: Industrial Policies and Management”, Nova Science Publ Inc, Hauppauge, NY (10 Chapters). (in press).

[5] Misra, B. 2000. New Economic Policy and Economic Development, IASSI Quarterly, Vol. 18, No.4, June , p. 20.

[6] Laboy-Nieves, E. N. 2009. Environmental Profile & Management Issues in an Estuarine Ecosystem: A Case Study from Jobos Bay, Puerto Rico. in: E.N. Laboy-Nieves, F. Schaffner, A. Abdelhadi and M.F.A. Goosen eds. Environmental Management, Sustainable Development and Human Health, Taylor & Frances Publ, London, Chapter 29.

[7] Mahmoudi, H., Spahis, Abdul-Wahab, Sablani, S., and Goosen, M.F.A 2010a. Improving the performance of a Seawater Greenhouse desalination system by assessment of simulation models for different condensers, JRSER,(accepted 11 March 2010).

[8] Mahmoudi, H., Spahis, N., Goosen, M.F.A., Ghaffour, N., Drouiche N., and Ouagued, A., 2010b. Application of geothermal energy for heating and fresh water production in a brackish water greenhouse desalination unit: A case study from Algeria, JRSER, Vol. 14 (1), 512-517.

[9] Goosen M. F. A., Sablani S. S., Al-Hinai H., Al-Obeidani S., Al-Belushi R. and Jackson D. 2004. Fouling of Reverse Osmosis and Ultrafiltration Membranes: A Critical Review. Separation Science and Technology, 39 (10) 2261-2298.

[10] Goosen, M. F. A., Laboy-Nieves, E.N., Schaffner, F., and Abdelhadi A. 2009a. The Environment, Sustainable Development and Human Wellbeing: An Overview. in: E.N. Laboy-Nieves, F. Schaffner, A. Abdelhadi and M.F.A. Goosen eds. Environmental Management, Sustainable Development and Human Health, Taylor & Frances Publ, London, Chapter 1, pp 3-12.

[11] Goosen, M. F. A., Al-Obeidani,. S. K. S., Al-Hinai,. H., Sablani, S., Taniguchi, Y. and Okamura, H. 2009b. Membrane Fouling and Cleaning in Treatment of Contaminated Water. in: E.N. Laboy-Nieves, F. Schaffner, A. Abdelhadi and M.F.A. Goosen eds. Environmental Management, Sustainable Development and Human Health, Taylor & Frances Publ, London, Chapter 36.

[12] Sharma, S. N. 2007. Climate Proofing, The Economic Times, Chennai, December, 30, p.13.

[13] Alamar, K and Murali, N. 2009. Globalization, the Environment and Sustainable Development. in: E.N. Laboy-Nieves, F. Schaffner, A. Abdelhadi and M.F.A. Goosen eds. Environmental Management, Sustainable Development and Human Health, Taylor & Frances Publ, London, Chapter 2.

[14] Omer , A. M 2007. Energy, Water and Sustainable Development. in: B. Larson ed. Sustainable Development Research Advances, Nova Science Publ, New York, pp.189-205.

[15] Baver, S. L. 2009 Path to Democratic Environmental Governance in Latin America: A Case Study from Mexico. in: E.N. Laboy-Nieves, F. Schaffner, A. Abdelhadi and M.F.A.Goosen eds. Environmental Management, Sustainable Development and Human Health, Taylor & Frances Publ, London, Chapter 4.

[16] Rodríguez Bribiesca, P. 2007. Access to Environmental Information. In: J. Fox (Ed.), Mexico’s Right- to- Know Reforms: Civil Society Perspectives. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center. 260-266.

[17] Speth, J. G. and Haas, P. 2006. Global Environmental Governance. Washington, DC: Island Press.

[18] Gabaldón, A. J. and Aguilera M. 2009. Bioethical Dimensions of Sustainable Development. in: E.N. Laboy-Nieves, F. Schaffner, A. Abdelhadi and M.F.A. Goosen eds. Environmental Management, Sustainable Development and Human Health, Taylor & Frances Publ, London, Chapter 6.

[19] Ferrer, J.J. and Álvarez, J.C. 2003. Para Fundamentar la Bioética. Universidad Pontificia Comillas y Editorial Desclée De Brouwer, S. A. Bilbao, España.

[20] Andorno, R. 1998. Bioética y Dignidad de la Persona. Editorial Tecnoc (Grupo Abaya, S. A.). Madrid. España.

[21] Gracia G., D. 1989. Fundamentos de Bioética. Eudema, Madrid, España

[22] Abellán Salort, J.C. 2006. Bioética, Autonomía y Libertad. Fundación Universitaria Española, Madrid, España.

[23] Hammond, F. N. and Somevi, J. 2009. Poverty, Urban Land and Africa’s Sustainable Development Controversy. in: E.N. Laboy-Nieves, F. Schaffner, A. Abdelhadi and M.F.A. Goosen eds. Environmental Management, Sustainable Development and Human Health, Taylor & Frances Publ, London, Chapter 9.

[24] Stern, N. 2006. The Economics of Climate Change: the Stern Review. UK Government Report, October.

[25] Kaplan, R.S. and Norton, D. P. 2001. The Strategy-Focused Organization. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

[26] Ajlouni, M. M. 2009. The Environment as a Fifth Component of a Balanced Scorecard for Improving Organizational Performance. in: E.N. Laboy-Nieves, F. Schaffner, A. Abdelhadi and M.F.A. Goosen eds. Environmental Management, Sustainable Development and Human Health, Taylor & Frances Publ, London, Chapter 10.

[27] Lyroudi, K. and Angelidis, D. 2009. Examining Banking Productivity Across Countries Considering Off-Balance Sheet Activities. in: E.N. Laboy-Nieves, F. Schaffner, A. Abdelhadi and M.F.A. Goosen eds. Environmental Management, Sustainable Development and Human Health, Taylor & Frances Publ, London, Chapter 13.

Page 8: Environmental management and sustainable development

13Mattheus F.A. Goosen / Procedia Engineering 33 (2012) 6 – 138 Mattheus F. A. Goosen / Procedia Engineering 00 (2011) 000–000

[28] Siems, T.F. and Clark, T.A. 1997. Rethinking Bank Efficiency and Regulation: How Off-Balance Sheet Activities Make a Difference. Financial Industry Studies, Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas: pp. 1-11.

[29] Rogers, K. and Sinkey, J. 1999. An Analysis of Non-traditional Activities at U.S. Commercial Banks. Review of Financial Economics, 8: pp. 25-39.

[30] Maila, M. W. 2009. Environmentally Sustainable Economies: A Panacea for Sound Development. in: E.N. Laboy-Nieves, F. Schaffner, A. Abdelhadi and M.F.A. Goosen eds. Environmental Management, Sustainable Development and Human Health, Taylor & Frances Publ, London, Chapter 13.

[31] Ndlovu-Gatsheni, S. 2006. Gods of Development, Demons of Underdevelopment and Western Salvation: A Critique of Development Discourse as a Sequel of CODESRIA and OSSREA, in OSSREA. A Bulletin, June, Vol. 2: 1-19

[32] Sen, A. 1999. Development as Freedom. Harvard: Belknap Press.

[33] Assadourian, E. (March-April 2006). Next Steps for the Business Community. World Watch: Vision for a Sustainable World. 19:2, pp16-20

[34] El-Kafafi, S. 2009. Building a Sustainable Mindset. in: E.N. Laboy-Nieves, F. Schaffner, A. Abdelhadi and M.F.A. Goosen eds. Environmental Management, Sustainable Development and Human Health, Taylor & Frances Publ, London, Chapter 18.

[35] El-Nasr, M. S., Ioerger, T. R. and Yen, J. 1998. Learning and Emotional Intelligence in Agents. Proceedings of AAAI Fall Symposium.

[36] El-Nasr, M. S., Yen, J. and Ioerger, T. R. 2000. FLAME - A Fuzzy Logic Adaptive Model of Emotions. Autonomous Agents and Multi-agent Systems. 3, 219-257.

[37] Maria, K. A. and Zitar, R. A. 2009. Modeling of Artificial Emotions and its Application Towards a Healthy Environment. in: E.N. Laboy-Nieves, F. Schaffner, A. Abdelhadi and M.F.A.. Goosen eds. Environmental Management, Sustainable Development and Human Health, Taylor & Frances Publ, London, Chapter 20.

[38] Townsend, C.R., Begon, M. and Harper, J.L. 2003. Essentials of Ecology. Blackwell Publishing. MA, USA. 530 pp.

[39] Cruz-Báez, A. D., and Boswell, T. D. 1997. Atlas of Puerto Rico. The Cuban American National Council. Miami, Florida.

[40] Laboy-Nieves, E.N. 2008. Ética y Sustentabilidad Ambiental en Puerto Rico. Memorias del Primer Foro Nacional del Agua. INAPA. Dominican Republic. ISBN 978-9945-406-80-1: 63-76.

[41] Emmanuel, E., Balthazard-Accou, K. and Joseph, O. 2009. Impact of Urban Wastewater on Biodiversity of Aquatic Ecosystems. in: E.N. Laboy-Nieves, F. Schaffner, A. Abdelhadi and M.F.A. Goosen eds. Environmental Management, Sustainable Development and Human Health, Taylor & Frances Publ, London, Chapter 30.

[42] Karr J. R. 1991. Biological Integrity: A Long-Neglected Aspect of Water Resource Management. Ecol. Appl., 1:66-84.

[43] Forbes V.E. and Forbes T.L. 1994. Ecotoxicology in Theory and Practice. New York: Chapman and Hall, 220 p.

[44] Emmanuel E., Perrodin Y., Keck G., Blanchard J.-M., Vermande P. 2002. Effects of Hospital Wastewater on Aquatic Ecosystem. Proceedings of the XXVIII Congreso Interamericano de Ingenieria Sanitaria y Ambiental. Cancun, México, 27-31 de octubre. CDROM

[45] Amirkhanian, S. N., & Manugian, D. M. 1994. A Feasibility Study of the Use of Waste Materials in Highway Conctruction. Columbia, SC: South Carolina Department of Transportation/Federal Highway Administration

[46] Ruiz, J. 1993. Recycling Overview and Growth. in H. Lund, The McGraw-Hill Recycling Handbook. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Inc.

[47] Amirkhanian, S., Thodesen, C. and Shatanawi, K. 2009. Utilization of Solid Waste Materials in Highway Construction. in: E.N. Laboy-Nieves, F. Schaffner, A. Abdelhadi and M.F.A. Goosen eds. Environmental Management, Sustainable Development and Human Health, Taylor & Frances Publ, London, Chapter 32.

[48] Al-Sajwani, T. M. 1998. The Desalination Plants of Oman: Past, Present and Future. Desalination, 120, 53-59

[49] Al Obeidani, S, Al Hinai, H., Goosen, M. F. A., Sablani, S., Taniguchi, Y. and Okamura, H. 2008. Membrane Fouling and Cleaning in Treatment of Contaminated Water: A Critical Review. Desalination, (revised paper submitted July 2007)

[50] Perez Duran, J. R. 2009. Assessment of Sustainability in Water Resources Management: A Case Study from the Dominican Republic. in: E.N. Laboy-Nieves, F. Schaffner, A. Abdelhadi and M.F.A. Goosen eds. Environmental Management, Sustainable Development and Human Health, Taylor & Frances Publ, London, Chapter 37.

[51] United Nations Development Program (UNDP) 2006. Report on Human Development, 2006, Beyond Scarcity, Power, Poverty and the World Water Crisis, Summary pp. 5-41.

[52] Diez, J. 2006. Political Change and Environmental Policymaking in Mexico. New York: Routledge.