Environmental Monitoring Report · 2016-06-30 · Environmental Monitoring Report Semi-Annual Report December 2012 Mongolia: Urban Development Sector Project – Water supply, Sewerage

Environmental Monitoring Report

Semi-Annual Report December 2012

Mongolia: Urban Development Sector Project –

Water supply, Sewerage System and Wastewater

Treatment Plant Improvement Sub-Projects in

Bayankhongor and Govi-Altai Aimag

Prepared by Project Management Unit for the Government of Mongolia and the Asian

Development Bank.

CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS

(as of December 14, 2014)

Currency Unit – Tugrug (MNT)

MNT 1.00 = $ 0.00071

$ 1.00 = MNT 1395.47

ABBREVIATIONS

ADB Asian Development Bank

DEIA Detailed Environmental Impact Assessment Report

EAO Environmental Administration and Organization

EEM External Environmental Monitoring

EIA Environment Impact Assessment

EMaP Environmental Management Report

EMM Environmental Mitigation Measure

EMoP Environmental Monitoring Report

EP Environmental Protection

LSS Labor Safety and Security

LGOSSE Local government owned, self-sustained enterprise

MEGD Ministry of Environment and Green Development

PIU Project Implementation Unit

PMU Project Management Unit

UB Ulaanbaatar

i. The fiscal year of the Government of Mongolia coincides with the calendar year. ii. In this report, “T” refers to MNT.

This environmental monitoring report is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or

reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does

not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area.

Third report on external environmental monitoring

2

CONTENT

INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................................4

THE EXTERNAL MONITORING .........................................................................................................4

WATER SUPPLY, SEWAGE SYSTEM AND WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT

IMPROVEMENT IN BAYANHONGOR AIMAG .................................................................................6

Results of monitoring the implementation of the environmental management plan ............................8

Results of monitoring the budget expenditure of the environmental monitoring plan .......................12

The result of environmental pollution monitoring .............................................................................15

Conclusion..........................................................................................................................................19


IMPROVEMENT IN GOVI-ALTAI AIMAG.......................................................................................20

Results of monitoring the implementation of the environmental management plan ..........................22

Results of monitoring the budget expenditure of the environmental monitoring plan .......................26

The result of environmental pollution monitoring .............................................................................29

Conclusion..........................................................................................................................................32

RECOMMENDATION .........................................................................................................................33


3

FIGURES

Figure 1. EEM program ...........................................................................................................................5

FiРurО 2. EEM scСОНulО of an “BayanСonРor” watОr supply improvОmОnt sub-project .........................6

Figure 3. The working schedule of the EEM ...........................................................................................6

Figure 4. Location of the water reservoir, source and the treatment plan ................................................7

Figure 5. Numerical and percentile expressions of the result ................................................................11

Figure 6. Numerical expression of the EMoP monitoring result............................................................14

Figure 7. Sampling points of environmОntal pollution monitorinР “BayanСonРor” ..............................15

Figure 8. Air quality monitoring station .................................................................................................16

Figure 9. Soil quality sampling ..............................................................................................................17

Figure 10. Water quality sampling .........................................................................................................18

FiРurО 11. EEM scСОНulО of an “Govi-Altai” watОr supply improvОmОnt sub-project .........................20

Figure 12. The working schedule of the EEM .......................................................................................20

Figure 13. Location of the water source, hydro-kiosk and the treatment plan .......................................21

Figure 14. Numerical and percentile expressions of the result ..............................................................25

Figure 15. Numerical expression of the EMoP monitoring result..........................................................28

FiРurО 16. SamplinР points of ОnvironmОntal pollution monitorinР “Govi-Altai” ................................29

Figure 17. Air quality monitoring station ...............................................................................................29

Figure 18. Water quality sampling .........................................................................................................30

TABLES

Table 1. The overall evaluation of environmental mitigation measures ..................................................5

Table 2. Location of the water reservoir, source and the treatment plan .................................................7

TablО 3. “BayanСonРor” EMaP monitorinР – 2nd

phase ..........................................................................8

Table 4. Results of the EMaP monitoring ..............................................................................................11

TablО 5. “BayanСonРor” EMoP monitorinР – 2nd

phase ........................................................................12

Table 6. Breakdown of the planned cost and its expenditure .................................................................14

Table 7. SamplinР points of ОnvironmОntal pollution monitorinР “BayanСonРor" ...............................15

Table 8. Results of air quality measurement ..........................................................................................16

Table 9. Results of air quality index ......................................................................................................16

Table 10. Results of soil quality analysis – Chlorination place .............................................................17

Table 1. Results of soil quality analysis – Treatment plant ....................................................................17

Table 2. Results of water quality analysis ..............................................................................................18

Table 3. Location of the water source, hydro-kiosk and the treatment plan ..........................................21

TablО 4. “Govi-Altai” EMaP monitorinР – 2nd

phase .............................................................................22

Table 5. Results of the EMaP monitoring ..............................................................................................25

TablО 6. “Govi-Altai” EMoP monitorinР – 2nd

phase ............................................................................26

Table 7. Breakdown of the planned cost and its expenditure .................................................................28

TablО 8. SamplinР points of ОnvironmОntal pollution monitorinР “Govi-Altai"....................................29

Table 9. Results of air quality measurement - А4 ................................................................................30

Table 10. Results of air quality index - А4 ..........................................................................................30

Table 12. Results of water quality analysis – Hydro-kiosk ....................................................................31

Table 13. Results of water quality analysis – Well ................................................................................31


4

INTRODUCTION

According to contract number 03/2011 of the “Urban Development SОctor” projОct for consultancy

service, which was made on the 1st of September 2011, the external environmental monitoring of

EMaP and EMoP, these are annexes of DEIAR, on eight sub-projects is being executed by Dr. Ochir

Altansukh and his assistant S.Munhnaran. The sub-projects are:

1. “UB-Hailaast” roaН improvement sub-project

2. “UB-Orbit-Tahilt” roaН improvement sub-project

3. “UB-Baruun salaa” roaН improvement sub-project

4. “UB-Botanic-Sharhad” roaН improvement sub-project

5. Water supply, sewage system and wastewater treatment plant improvement in Erdenet city,

Orhon aimag

6. Water supply, sewage system and wastewater treatment plant improvement in Altai city,

Govi-Altai aimag

7. Water supply, sewage system and wastewater treatment plant improvement in Bayanhongor

aimag

8. Water supply, sewage system and wastewater treatment plant improvement in Arvaiheer city,

Ovorhangai aimag

THE EXTERNAL MONITORING

The following two courses have been taken:

- Monitoring the implementation of the environmental management plan

- Monitoring the budget expenditure of the environmental monitoring plan

According to the agreement with PMU, EMaP and EMoP monitoring and environmental pollution

monitoring shall be executed three times on each sub-project.

1. Monitoring the implementation of EMaP and EMoP – 1 at the beginning of the project

2. Monitoring the implementation of EMaP and EMoP – 2 at the mid of the project

3. Monitoring the implementation of EMaP and EMoP – 3 at the end of the project

In this report, the second phase of the monitoring on two sub-project of water supply improvement is

included. The EEM on the water-supply sub-projects in Orhon and Ovorhangai aimags were not

executed due to the project delay.

The EEM on the water-supply sub-project followed the below-mentioned sequence. The entire process

of monitoring is divided into three main stages, and the following figure shown the activities in each

stage.


5

Fie

ld p

hase

Desk

ph

ase

Pre

para

tio

n p

hase

EIA report reading and work planning based on EMaP, EMoP

Documentation collecting

Site visitation and monitoring the implementation of EMaP and EMoP

Data processing and report writing in Mongolian

Report writing in English and delivery of the report

Undertake lab analysis, if necessary

Questionnaire conducting, if necessary

By vocational organization and expert

Figure 1. EEM program

The following assessment is used for the overall evaluation of EEM on sub-projects.

Table 1. The overall evaluation of environmental mitigation measures

№ Percentage assessed

as satisfactory Evaluation Definition Consideration

1 90-100 А – very good Mitigation measures are

implemented well.

Implementation of a few

measures should be improved.

2 80-89 – good

EMMs are implemented well,

but some of them are

deficient.

Implementation of deficient


3 70-79 – average Some of the measures are

implemented are deficient.

Implementation of deficient


4 60-69 D – poor Most of the measures do not

meet requirements.

Implementation of the EMM

must be drastically improved.

5 0-59 F – very poor

Poor implementation of a

majority of the mitigation

measures.

PMU should pay attention to

sub-project, and implementation

of the EMM must improve

drastically.

Third report on external environmental monitoring – “Bayanhongor” water supply sub-project

6


IMPROVEMENT IN BAYANHONGOR AIMAG

According to the proposed plan, this project was started in May, 2012 and has to be completed in

October, 2012. Due to additional work, which was not mentioned in the contract, the sub-project was

extended until July, 2013. Therefore, the EEM is executed in three stages as mentioned below.

ID Task Name Start Finish2012

Jun NovJul OctSepMay Aug

1

2

3

4

7/1/

2013

5/2/

2011The project duration

5/21/

2012

5/17/

2012

Monitoring the implementation of

EMaP and EMoP – 1

10/31/

2012

10/29/

2012


EMaP and EMoP – 2

6/20/

2013

6/17/

2013


EMaP and EMoP – 3

2013

Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun

Figure 2. EEM schedule of an “Bayanhongor” water supply improvement sub-project

A working plan, a schedule and a monitoring program had been agreed upon with PMU in advance.

The second phase of EEM was performed between 29th and 31

st of October, 2012 collaboration with

the PIU and the contractor “ChMM” Co., LtН. The external environmental monitoring specialist, Ochir Altansukh, and an assistant S.Munhnaran

were executing the EEM. An engineer, Nyamsambuu and workers were involved in the monitoring. It

has been completed without any outside influence and by following the below-mentioned schedule.

Working schedule of the EEM

Duration: 10 days in October, 2012

ID Task Name Start Duration FinishOct 2012

128 23127 529

1

2

3

4

5

6

10/27/20121d10/27/2012EIA report reading and work

planning based on EMaP, EMoP

10/28/20121d10/28/2012Documentation collecting

10/31/20123d10/29/2012Site visit and environmental

monitoring

11/2/20122d11/1/2012Data processing and report writing

in Mongolian

11/5/20123d11/3/2012Report writing in English and the

reports delivering

11/5/201210d10/27/2012Total days

4330

Nov 2012

Figure 3. The working schedule of the EEM

As shown in table 3, the monitoring has been executed using 32 measures, which are divided into

eight groups. 17 out of the 32 measures were mentioned in EMaP, EMoP and EAO. The remaining 15

measures were stated in the DEIAR.

1. Minimization and mitigation of adverse impact on air and its control

2. Minimization and mitigation of adverse impact on soil and its control

3. Minimization and mitigation of adverse impact on water and its control

4. Minimization and mitigation of adverse impact from waste on the environment and its control

5. Minimization and mitigation of adverse impact from natural risks on the environment and its

control

6. Minimization and mitigation of adverse impact on the socio-economy and public, its control


7

7. Minimization and mitigation of labor safety and security risk and its control

8. Minimization and mitigation of environmental delict and its control

The implementation period of the mitigation measures has been divided into three different phases:

1. Beginning of the project 6 measures

2. End of the project 4 measures

3. During the project 22 measures

Six measures out of 32 need to be implemented at the beginning of the project. 4 and 22 measures

should be performed at the project end, and during the project, respectively. That means 69% of the

EMMs have to be conducted during the project implementation, which requires good EAO of the

contractor.

This monitoring was the 2nd phase of EEM. Therefore, 5 measures, which have to be implemented at

the end of the project, and belong to the specialist, were not monitored. According to the EEM

schedule, these 5 measures will be monitored in the 3rd phase of EEM that is shown in figure 2.

Therefore, the implementation of the EMaP of the contractor was evaluated by 27 measures, which

had to be implemented until now. Hand-held GPS units were used for spatial referencing of the water

reservoir, water source and treatment plan of “Bayanhongor” sub-project.

Table 2. Location of the water reservoir, source and the treatment plan

№ Measured points Longitude Latitude Altitude

1 Water reservoir 46°11'47,2"N 100°42'30,0"E 1918 m

2 Water source 46°13'21,4"N 100°44'11,0"E 1891 m

3 Treatment plan 46°09'44,1"N 100°42'38,2"E 1849 m

Figure 4. Location of the water reservoir, source and the treatment plan

TСО workОr’s camp sСoulН be surrounded by a fence, according to the DEIAR. This was accomplished

in practice. A table, showing the results of monitoring the implementation of EMaP for this sub-

project is presented on the next page.


8

RESULTS OF MONITORING THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN

FOR “BAYANHONGOR” WATER SUPPLY IMPROVEMENT SUB-PROJECT

Table 3. “Bayanhongor” EMaP monitoring – 2nd

phase

* According to the DIEAR

** 1, 2, 3, 4, 5th

columns of the table belong to the PIU and the contractor

Table key words:

1. Planned measure The following measures have to be done solely or with collaboration between the PIU and the contractor.

2. The report Referencing in which section of the DIEAR and EMaP, EMoP, sub-reports the following measures are mentioned.

3. Duration Indicating when the following measures have to be completed. During refers to the whole period of the project implementation.

4. Monitoring Showing how the implementation of the measure has been monitored.

5. Fact Presenting what evidence forms the basis of the conclusion of the measure implementation.

6. Implementation The execution of the following measures was evaluated using three different grades, indicated below, based on the collected facts.

7. Explanation Background information on the assessment of the measure implementation is written in this column.

satisfactory incomplete unsatisfactory

№ Planned measures

1

The report

2

Duration

3

Monitoring

4

Fact

5

Implementation

6

Explanation

7

Minimization and mitigation of adverse impact on air, its control

1.

Surroundings of construction site, water and

moisturize soil were used to reduce dust. EMAP-6.1.3

DEIAR-2.2.3 During

Whether or not soil was moisturized to reduce

dust. - Photo picture

- Irrigation machinery

- Interview

- Bill

Unsatisfactory

Not proved by facts.

2. Controlling the emission of exhaust fumes from

motor vehicles. EMAP-6.1.3 During

Whether or not the emission of exhaust fume was

controlled. - Car sign

- Bill Satisfactory

Proven by the financial documents.

Х2-1-BX2-6

3. During dusty period, provide muzzle for

prОvОntinР workОr’s respiratory organs. DEIAR-2.2.3 During

Whether it was provided or not. - Photo picture

- Interview Satisfactory


Х2-17-BX2-22

Minimization and mitigation of adverse impact on soil, its control

4. Supply raw materials from nearest licensed

mines. DEIAR-2.3.4 During Whether the raw materials are supplied by

licensed mines or not. - Photo picture


The raw materials were bought

from the licensed mine. BX1-1, 1-2

5.

Controlling the movement of vehicles, preventing

the creation of unnecessary roadways, and

posting road signs where necessary.

EMAP-6.2.3

DEIAR-2.4.4 Beginning

Whether or not road signs were posted, and a new

earth road was created. - Photo picture

- Road sign Unsatisfactory

Signs were not posted.

6.

Technically, and biologically rehabilitate the

degraded land during the project implementation. EMAP-6.2.3

DEIAR.2.4.4 Ending

Whether or not the degraded land was

rehabilitated. - Photo picture

- Work plan

- Contract

- Bill

Irrelevant to 2nd

phase

7.

Do not open a new quarry for supply of raw

materials for construction. If not, rehabilitate it

after the project. DEIAR.2.3.4

During and

ending

Whether or not a new quarry was opened and

rehabilitated it. - Photo picture

- Work plan

- License

Satisfactory

A new quarry was not opened, and

raw materials were bought from the

authorized places. BX1-1, 1-2, 1-3,

1-4


9

8. Use soil from earth work in necessary places or

flatten it. DEIAR.2.3.4 During

Whether it was used or flattened or not. - Photo picture

- Interview

Irrelevant to 2nd

phase

The earth work was not finalized.

BX2-35

9. According to the technology, soil should be

compressed during the earth work. DEIAR.2.3.4 During

Whether soil was compressed or not. - Photo picture Satisfactory

Soil was compressed by its

technology. BX2-26, 27

10. Rehabilitate the degraded land during the project

implementation. DEIAR.2.4.4 Ending



- Bill

Irrelevant to 2nd

phase

11. Fence the worker camp and locate temporary

building, dump site, parking and repair places

inside of the fence.

DEIAR.2.6.4 Beginning

Whether the camp was fenced, and the places were

located inside the fence or not. - Photo picture Satisfactory

They are rented a house.

Minimization and mitigation of adverse impact on water, its control

12. Make the external borehole for monitoring

ground water level and install the instrument. DEIAR-2.5.4

EMAP-6.3.3 Ending

Whether the borehole was made or not. - Contract

- Photo picture

Irrelevant to 2nd

phase

13. Estimate the ground water resource by vocational

organization. DEIAR-2.5.4

EMAP-6.3.3 Beginning

Whether the ground water resource was estimated

or not. - Contract

- Report Satisfactory

Based on scientific research, the

new boreholes have been drilled.

BX2-28, 29

14. Execute quality monitoring of the ground water.

EMAP-6.3.3 Ending Whether the monitoring was executed or not. - Contract

- Result

Impossible to

assess

This measure will be executed by

the specialist, not the contractor.

Minimization and mitigation of adverse impact from waste on environment, its control

15. Waste keeping and removing should be

controlled by inspection organization. EMAP-6.5.3 During Whether the external control was made or not.

- Interview Unsatisfactory Not proved by facts.

16.

Classifying solid waste; building a temporary

dump site and monitoring, whether the waste is

delivered to the authorized site, or if necessary,

transporting of waste to the recycling place.

EMAP-6.5.3 During

Whether or not it was collected, classified and

delivered. - Photo picture

- Interview Unsatisfactory

All kinds of wastes are mixed in

one dumping site. BX1-9, BX2-30

17. Build a temporary dump site for solid waste. EMAP-6.2.3 During Whether a temporary dump site was built or not. - Photo picture Unsatisfactory Traditional way of removing waste

was used and no specific container

existed. BX1-7, 1-8, 1-9, 1-10 18.

Pour the domestic liquid waste into pit, and after

project implementation, it should decontaminate

and fill. EMAP-6.2.3 During

Whether the liquid waste was poured into the pit,

disinfected, and filled or not. - Photo picture Unsatisfactory

Minimization and mitigation of adverse impact from natural risks on environment, its control

19. Constructing drainage channels in flood-prone

areas. DEIAR-4.2.2 During

Whether or not drainage channels were

constructed. - Photo picture Satisfactory

The lands that might be flooded are

raised up. BX2-31, 32

20.

Developing a regulation of fire safety, providing

a complete set of firefighting equipment and

checking the expiry date of fire extinguishers and

training workers to use the equipment.

DEIAR-4.2.5

Beginning

Whether or not a regulation was developed, the

equipment was provided and workers were

trained. - Photo picture Satisfactory


BX2-8

Minimization and mitigation of adverse impact on the socio-economy and public, its control

21. Notify people in the impact zone for preventing

risk before construction and post caution sign. EMAP-6.6.3 Beginning

Whether notified people and posted or not. - Photo picture Satisfactory

Caution sign was posted.

BX1-5, 1-6

22. During the construction work, positively solve

the public complaint. EMAP-6.7 During

Whether there is any complaint and solved or not. - Interview Satisfactory

Close cooperation with local

people.

Minimization and mitigation of labor safety and security risk, its control

23.

Providing labor safety equipment such as

earplugs, eyeglasses and work clothes for

workers and train them.

DEIAR-4.2.5 During

Whether or not labor safety equipment was

provided and trained. - Interview

- Photo picture

- Bill

Satisfactory

Provided and trained. BX1-11, 1-

12, 1-13, 1-14


10

24. Examine workОr’s СОaltС in ОvОry yОar.

DEIAR-4.2.5 Beginning Whether or not the health was examined. - Document

- Contract Satisfactory

Employee health has been

examined by the doctor. BX2-23

25. Instructing a regulation of labor safety to

workers, every day. DEIAR-4.2.5 During

Whether or not a regulation of LS was instructed. - Note Satisfactory

Instruction regularly given. BX2-

12-22

26. Placing a first-aid kit in the worker camp. DEIAR-4.2.5 During Whether or not the kit was placed. - Photo picture Incomplete Not complete.

27. Prohibit to work during night time in settlement

area. DEIAR-2.9.4 During Whether they work in settlement area during night

time or not. - Photo picture


Working only daytime.

28. During the construction, post the caution sign and

line the places, where necessary. DEIAR-2.9.4 During

Whether signs and lines are posted or not. - Photo picture Satisfactory

Posted. Х1-15, BX2-33, 34

Minimization and mitigation of environmental delict, its control

29. Assign environmental responsibility to one of the

managerial staffs. EMAP-6.7 During

Whether it was assigned or not.

- Document Satisfactory

Environmental responsibility has

been assigned to Ms.Ariuntuya.

BX2-24

30. Posting a caution board and making a

presentation on environmental protection and

prevention of natural hazard.

EMAP-6.7 During

Whether or not a board was posted, and a

presentation was introduced. - Photo picture


Environmental manager regularly

works at the construction site.

BX2-24-25

31. Include the budget for environmental protection

in total investment. EMAP-6.7 During

Whether it was included or not. - Budget plan Satisfactory

Included.

32.

Continually implementing the EMaP and EMoP,

reporting implementation of the environmental

mitigation measures to the MNET and

environmental specialist of the aimag, and

consulting with environmental experts.

EMAP-6.7 During

Whether or not it was implemented and reported

to the organization. - Observation

- Report

- Document

Unsatisfactory

Lack of information and no report.

17 out of aforesaid 32 measures were mentioned in the EMaP, EMoP and EAO. The remaining 15 measures were stated in the DEIAR.

The monitoring results in the table are read as below.

Planned measure 1:

The requirement in row 1 of this table is stated in 2.2.3 section of the DEIAR. It has to be done for the whole period of the project implementation. It was assessed as “unsatisfactory” by the monitoring of an external environmental specialist based on aforesaid facts. The facts are enclosed in this report.


11

One measure for water monitoring out of all 32 measures of tСО EEM on “Bayanhongor” water supply

improvement sub-project will be executed by the external environmental monitoring specialist, who

was chosen by the PMU. The remaining 31 measures should be implemented in the project time.

Another 4 measures out of 31 were irrelevant to the 2nd phase. Nineteen out of 27 measures were

assessed as satisfactory. One of them was evaluated as incomplete and 7 were valued as unsatisfactory.

Table 4. Results of the EMaP monitoring

№ Assessment Count Percent

Air

So

il

Wat

er

Was

te

Nat

ura

l ri

sk

So

cio-e

con

om

y

and

pu

bli

c

Lab

or

safe

ty

Del

ict

1. Satisfactory 19 70 2 4 1 0 2 2 5 3

2. Incomplete 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0

3. Unsatisfactory 7 26 1 1 0 4 0 0 0 1

Result of 2nd

phase 27 100 3 5 1 4 2 2 6 4

Irrelevant to the 2nd

phase 4 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 0

Impossible to assess 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0

Overall 32 3 8 3 4 2 2 6 4

70% of 27 measures were assessed as satisfactory, 4% as incomplete, 26% evaluated as unsatisfactory.

There are shown in numerical and percentile expressions of the result. As shown in table 4, for

minimization and mitigation of adverse impact on air, 2 were assessed as satisfactory, and one was as

unsatisfactory out of three measures. The results of other measures are shown in tables 3 and 4.

Figure 5. Numerical and percentile expressions of the result

19

1 7 5 0

5

10

15

20

Sat

isfa

cto

ry

Inco

mp

lete

Un

sati

sfac

tor

y

Impo

ssib

le t

o

asse

ss

Num

ber

Numerical expression of the the

result

70%

4%

26%

Percentile expression of the result

Satisfactory

Incomplete

Unsatisfactory


12

RESULTS OF MONITORING THE BUDGET EXPENDITURE OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PLAN

FOR THE “BAYANHONGOR” WATER SUPPLY IMPROVEMENT SUB-PROJECT

Table 5. “Bayanhongor” EMoP monitoring – 2nd

phase

* According to the report on DIEA

** 1, 2, 3, 4, 5th

columns of the table belong to the PIU and IA

Table reading:

1. Planned action The following actions have to be done by solely or collaboration between PIU and IA.

2. The report It tells you that which section of EMaP and EMoP, those are annexes of the report, mentioned the following actions.

3. Respondent Showing that who is responsible for the action.

4. Duration Indicating that when the following actions have to be done. During means the whole period of the project implementation.

5. Planned cost Amount of money, which was planned to spend for the action before the project.

6. Implementation Execution of the following actions concluded by three different marks, beneath, based on collected facts.

7. Actual cost Amount of money, which is spent for the action during the project.

8. Fact Presenting what evidence was the base of the conclusion of the action implementation.

9. Explanation Background information on assessment of the action implementation was written in this column.



1

The report

2

Respondent

3

Duration

4

Planned cost, T

5

Implementation

6

Actual cost, T

7

Fact

8

Explanation

9


1. Controlling the emission of exhaust fumes from motor

vehicles. EMAP-6.1.3 Contractor During 200 000 Satisfactory Х1-0

Х2-283500 Х2-1-6

See 2nd row of the table on

the action monitoring results.

2. Surroundings of construction site, water and moisturize

soil were used to reduce dust. EMAP-6.1.3 Contractor During 2 000 000 Unsatisfactory Х1-0

Х2-0 no

See 1st row of the table on the

action monitoring results.

Total 2 200 000


3. Execute quality monitoring of the ground water. EMAP-6.3.3

EMoP Contractor During 330 000

Impossible to

assess no no

This action executes by the

specialist, not the IA.

4. Make the external borehole for monitoring ground water

level and install the instrument. EMAP-6.3.3 Contractor During 6 000 000 Irrelevant to 2nd

phase

Total 6 330 000


5. Prepare a solid waste container for temporary keeping. EMAP-6.2.3 Contractor Beginning 150 000 Unsatisfactory Х1-0

Х2-0 no

See 17th row of the table on


6. Controlling the movement of vehicles, preventing the

creation of unnecessary roadways, and posting road signs

where necessary.

EMAP-6.2.3 Contractor During 200 000 Unsatisfactory Х1-0

Х2-0 no

See 5th row of the table on the

action monitoring results.


13

7. Pour the domestic liquid waste into pit, and after project

implementation, it should decontaminate and fill. EMAP-6.2.3 Contractor During 500 000 Unsatisfactory

Х1-0

Х2-0 no



8.

Rehabilitate the degraded land during the project

implementation. EMAP-6.4.3 Contractor During 15 500 000 Satisfactory Х1-0

Х2-1000000 Х2-7

See 6 and 10th row of the

table on the action monitoring

results.

Total 16 350 000


9.

Classifying solid waste; building a temporary dump site

and monitoring, whether the waste is delivered to the

authorized site, or if necessary, transporting of waste to the

recycling place.

EMAP-6.5.3 Contractor During 1 000 000 Unsatisfactory Х1-0

Х2-0 no

See 15 and 16th row of the


results.

Total 1 000 000


10. Organize the training for people in the impact zone for

preventing risk before construction. EMAP-6.6.3 Contractor During 150 000 Satisfactory

Х1-0

Х2-120100 Х2-9-11

See 23, 25 and 30th row of the


results.

11. Building a temporary protection fence and placing caution

sign during construction work.

EMAP-6.6.3 Contractor During 250 000 Satisfactory

Х1-0

Х2-70000 Х2-8



Total 400 000


12. During the project, assign environmental responsibility to

one of the managerial staffs.

EMAP-6.7 Contractor During 2 500 000 Satisfactory

Х1-0

Х2-4500000 Х2-24-25



13. Organize training on environmental protection and labor

safety for workers.

EMAP-6.7 Contractor During 2 times

400 000 Satisfactory

Х1-0

Х2-1969250 Х2-12-23



14. Reporting implementation of the environmental mitigation

measures to the MNET and environmental specialist.

EMAP-6.7 Contractor During 200 000 Unsatisfactory

Х1-0

Х2-0 no



15. Examine and control the annual EMP by the environmental

specialist of aimag.

EMAP-6.7 Contractor During 150 000 Unsatisfactory

Х1-0

Х2-0 no



Total 3 250 000 6 469 250

Grand total 29 530 000 7 942 850

From this, for the environmental monitoring 330 000

From this, for IA 29 200 000 7 942 850

15 actions with the cost were mentioned in EMaP, and EMoP, were written in this table. The remaining actions without the cost not belonged to this auditing.


Planned measure 1:

The requirement in row 1 of this table is stated in 6.1.3 section of EMaP. It has to be done for the whole period of the project implementation. The aforesaid cost was planned to spend for the

action before the project, and the actual cost was calculated based on bills. It assessed as “Satisfactory” by the auditing of an environmental external specialist based on the actual costs. This

assessment is only for cost auditing, not for implementation of environmental action. The facts are enclosed in this report and explanation of assessment was written in a last column of the report.


14

15 measures with the cost were written in the EMaP of the sub-project, and a total of 29530000 T was

planned to be spent. From that amount of money, 330000 T had to be spent for water monitoring

research, as mentioned in EMoP. The pollution monitoring will be executed by the specialist, who was

chosen by the PMU. The EMoP says that the remaining 29200000 T has to be spent for the rest of the

measures, which should be implemented by the contractor. The following table shows a breakdown of

the planned costs that belong to the contractor.

Table 6. Breakdown of the planned cost and its expenditure

№ Groups The cost

Planned Expenditure Difference

1 Minimization and mitigation of adverse impact on air, its

control 2 200 000 283 500 1 916 500

2 Minimization and mitigation of adverse impact on water, its

control 6 000 000 0 6 000 000

3 Minimization and mitigation of adverse impact on soil, its

control 16 350 000 1000 000 15 350 000

4 Minimization and mitigation of adverse impact from waste

on the environment, its control 1 000 000 0 1 000 000

5 Minimization and mitigation of labor safety and security

risk, its control 400 000 190 100 209 900

6 Minimization and mitigation of environmental delict, its

control 3 250 000 6 469 250 -3 219 250

Total 29 200 000 7 942 850 21 257 150

Figure 6. Numerical expression of the EMoP monitoring result

As shown in the aforesaid table and figure, the contractor is spent the planned cost in progress. For the

following reasons, it was impossible to evaluate the implementation of the EMM of the contractor

based on the EMoP monitoring result. i) the planned cost was too general and unclear, ii) the cost was

different than the recent market price (maybe it is related to the time that the DEIA was made) and iii)

in some cases; it was not necessary to spend. For instance:

1. In the first row of the EMoP monitoring result, 200000 T was planned to spend for controlling

the emission of exhaust fumes from motor vehicles. However, 283500 T was spent for that. It

0

2000000

4000000

6000000

8000000

10000000

12000000

14000000

16000000

18000000

1 2 3 4 5 6

The

amo

unt

of

mo

ney

Groups

The cost of EPA

Planned Expense


15

means the contractor overspent the budget before the accomplishment of the project. Maybe, it

is related to the inflation.

2. In the third row of the EMoP monitoring result, the measure was impossible to assess, since

this measure should be implemented by the specialist, not the contractor.

Thus, it is impossible to evaluate the implementation of the EMM of the contractor based on the

EMoP monitoring result. Also, we should consider the results of monitoring the implementation of

EMaP.

The result of environmental pollution monitoring

The environmental pollution monitoring has been executed in the area where the “Bayanhongor”

water-supply sub-project is implemented. The aim of this monitoring was to examine the impact of the

sub-project on the environment. The monitoring was conducted in the following three environs and

ОxОcutОН by tСО “Us-OrcСin” Co LtН., unНОr tСО РuiНancО of the specialist. Based on EMaP and

EMoP, a work task has been developed as follows:

1. Water quality

2. Air quality

3. Soil quality

Table 7. Sampling points of environmental pollution monitoring “Bayanhongor"

№ Sampling points Measurement Longitude Latitude Altitude Legend

1 Aimag center Air 100°43'7.02"E 46°11'15.65"N 1872 m Cloud

2 Hydro-kiosk Water 100°42'12.58"E 46°11'4.03"N 1876 m Water

3 Chlorination place Soil - 1 100°44'1.01"E 46°13'14.94"N 1896 m Flag

4 Treatment plant Soil - 2 100°42'38.01"E 46° 9'43.47"N 1851 m Flag

Figure 7. Sampling points of environmental pollution monitoring “Bayanhongor”


16

Air quality monitoring:

Using the data from air quality station, the monitoring has been done on the 29th of October, 2012.

Figure 8. Air quality monitoring station

All parameters which were measured at the station have been compared with MNS 4585:2007. In

addition to this, the air-quality index was calculated.

Table 8. Results of air quality measurement

№ Measured parameters Unit Average Standard Difference Explanation

1 Sulfur dioxide SO2 µg/m3 11 450 0,024 unpolluted

2 Nitrogen dioxide NO2 µg/m3 38 85 0.44 unpolluted

3 Particulate matter PM10 µg/m3 65 100 0,65 unpolluted

Air quality measurement has been calculated with the air-quality index.

Table 9. Results of air quality index

Conclusion:

1. Based on a comparison with MNS 4585:2007, all air-quality parameters at the center of the

Bayanhongor aimag were assОssОН as “unpollutОН," mОaning they did not exceed the

permissible level. According to the index assessment, it was evaluated as “РooН”. 2. In fact, the monitoring period was in cold season. Therefore, air pollution sources were

operated and due to the open wind, the pollutant elements were easily dispersed.

Soil quality:

The monitoring has been done at the 2 places where the chlorination place and treatment plant are

situated, on 29th of October, 2012. 1 m

2 area on each site, that might have been polluted, was selected

for soil quality sampling. Five samples from each site were taken by the grid method and then mixed

them into one sample.

№ Measured parameters Unit Average Standard Index Explanation

1 SO2 µg/m3 11 450 2,4 Very good

2 NO2 µg/m3 38 85 44,7 Very good

3 PM10 µg/m3 65 100 65 Good

Overall assessment - Good


17

Figure 9. Soil quality sampling

In total, 14 parameters, including variables in the work task, were analyzed in the laboratory, and the

results compared to the MNS 5850:2008.

Table 10. Results of soil quality analysis – Chlorination place

Table 1. Results of soil quality analysis – Treatment plant

Conclusion:

1. The soil has moderately eroded by human activity. However, the fertile soil has not

disappeared. The texture of soil is a sandy.

№ Analyzed parameters Unit Result Standard Difference Explanation

1 Sand % 52,8 - - not mentioned in standard

2 Dirt % 39,5 - - not mentioned in standard

3 Clay % 7,7 - - not mentioned in standard

4 р 1:2,5 7,71 - - not mentioned in standard

5 а 3 % 1,18 - - not mentioned in standard

6 Humus % 0,863 - - not mentioned in standard

7 Е 2,5 dS/m 0,089 - - not mentioned in standard

8 2 5 mg/100g 0,48 - - not mentioned in standard

9 К2 mg/100g 8,4 - - not mentioned in standard

10 Chromium, Cr mg/kg 5,5 150 0,03 Unpolluted

11 Lead, Pb mg/kg 35,0 100 0,35 Unpolluted

12 Cadmium, Cd mg/kg 0,03 3 0,01 Unpolluted

13 Nickel, Ni mg/kg 5,5 150 0,03 Unpolluted

14 Zinc, Zn mg/kg 231,3 300 0,77 Unpolluted

№ Analyzed parameters Unit Result Standard Difference Explanation

1 Sand % 54,2 - - not mentioned in standard

2 Dirt % 37,8 - - not mentioned in standard

3 Clay % 8,0 - - not mentioned in standard

4 р 1:2,5 8,35 - - not mentioned in standard

5 а 3 % 4,0 - - not mentioned in standard

6 Humus % 0,322 - - not mentioned in standard

7 Е 2,5 dS/m 0,072 - - not mentioned in standard

8 2 5 mg/100g 0,69 - - not mentioned in standard

9 К2 mg/100g 6,9 - - not mentioned in standard

10 Chromium, Cr mg/kg 16,3 150 0,11 Unpolluted

11 Lead, Pb mg/kg 17,5 100 0,18 Unpolluted

12 Cadmium, Cd mg/kg 0,18 3 0,06 Unpolluted

13 Nickel, Ni mg/kg 12,5 150 0,08 Unpolluted

14 Zinc, Zn mg/kg 209,0 300 0,69 Unpolluted


18

2. Texture and humus were not involved in the evaluation of quality, since these parameters can

be different in variety of places due to natural conditions.

3. The aim of soil sampling and analyzing was to determine the impact of the sub-project on the

environment. Therefore, heavy-metal analysis was done. Based on the laboratory analysis, it

can conclude that soil is unpolluted.

Water quality:

The monitoring has been done on 29th of October, 2012. According to the standard method, 1 l water

sample has been taken from hydro-kiosk and transported to the capital and analyzed the laboratory.

Figure 10. Water quality sampling



Table 2. Results of water quality analysis

Conclusion:

1. Aiming for determination of water quality for population of Bayanhongor aimag, water

sample has been taken, analyzed, and compared to the MNS 900:2005.

2. Based on a comparison with MNS 900:2005, all water-quality parameters were assessed as

“unpollutОН," meaning they did not exceed the permissible level. Therefore, we can conclude

that the water can be used for drinking purpose.


1 р - 8,03 6,5-8,5 0,94 unpolluted

2 Е µS/cm 178,0 - - not mentioned in standard

3 а mg/l 25,0 100,0 0,25 unpolluted

4 Mg mg/l 4,5 30,0 0,15 unpolluted

5 Na+K mg/l 2,8 - - not mentioned in standard

6 SO4 mg/l 10,9 500,0 0,02 unpolluted

7 CI2 mg/l 2,8 350,0 0,008 unpolluted

8 HCO3 mg/l 86,6 - - not mentioned in standard

9 Mineral mg/l 133,0 - - not mentioned in standard

10 Hardness mg-eq/l 1,62 7,0 0,23 unpolluted

11 SS mg/l 49,6 - - not mentioned in standard

12 COD mg/l 0,1 - - not mentioned in standard

13 NH4 mg/l 0,11 1,5 0,07 unpolluted

14 NO2 mg/l n.a 1,0 0,0 unpolluted

15 NO3 mg/l 0,38 50,0 0,007 unpolluted

16 P mg/l 0,011 3,5 0,003 unpolluted

17 F mg/l n.a 0,7-1,5 0,0 unpolluted

18 Fe mg/l n.a 0,3 0,0 unpolluted


19

CONCLUSION

The following conclusions have been drawn for the EMM regarding the “Bayanhongor” water supply

improvement sub-project based on the 1st phase of monitoring of EMaP and EMoP. Herein:

1. In total, 32 EMMs of the sub-project has been monitored. Thirty one out of the 32 measures

should be implemented by the contractor. Four out of 31 actions were irrelevant to the 2nd

phase. Therefore, these were not monitored. The remaining 27 measures have to be

implemented until now. 19 out of 27 measures were assessed as satisfactory, 1 of them was

evaluated as incomplete and 7 were valued as unsatisfactory. Therefore, we can conclude that

70% of the measures were implemented.

2. The environmental responsibility was assigned to Ms. Kh.Ariuntuya, “ChMM” Co LtН., anН she has been done several actions according to the report on the previous monitoring.

Therefore, the overall evaluation of EMM of the contractor was ОvaluatОН as “C-average". In

further, the activities which assessed as incomplete and unsatisfactory, should improve.

3. According to the overall evaluation of EMM, the PMU can require the contractor to improve

environmental responsibility and implement EMM of the project.

4. Seven measures, these assessed as unsatisfactory, were related to the waste management, road

sign, soil moisturizing and environmental management. Old ways of removing various kinds

of waste, such as the use of landfills, runoff, burning and blowing, should be replaced by more

modern-mobile ways. It will drastically improve the evaluation of EMM of the contractor.

5. The unassessable one measure for the monitoring research was not reflected in the overall

evaluation. These will be implemented by the specialist, who was selected by the PMU.

6. One measure, this assessed as unsatisfactory, was related to the environmental delict. Thence,

we can conclude that information about environmental management; finance is inadequate and

EAO of the contractor is weak.

7. The contractor should pay attention to permanent use of safety clothes and instruments of the

workers.

8. The measures, those assessed as incomplete and unsatisfactory, can be improved by an

initiative of the contractor and collaboration between the PIU and the contractor.

9. Based on the results of monitoring the budget expenditure of the environmental monitoring

plan, total used money is lower than the planned. It is related to the sub-project extension.

10. According to the results of the environmental pollution monitoring, the project has a positive

impact on surrounding environment.

11. The contractor has been spent more than the planned budget on some environmental

mitiРation mОasurОs. TСО Оxtra cost for tСО EMM won’t bО rОimbursОН. Recommendations, which were based on the conclusions and observations during the monitoring, are

written at the end of this report.

Third report on external environmental monitoring – “Govi-Altai” water supply sub-project

20


IMPROVEMENT IN GOVI-ALTAI AIMAG

According to the proposed plan, this project was started in May, 2012 and has to be completed in

October, 2012. Due to additional work, which was not mentioned in the contract, the sub-project was

extended until July, 2013. Therefore, the EEM is executed in three stages as mentioned below.

ID Task Name Start Finish2012

Jun NovJul OctSepMay Aug

1

2

3

4

7/1/

2013

5/2/

2011The project duration

6/26/

2012

6/22/

2012


EMaP and EMoP – 1

11/1/

2012

10/30/

2012


EMaP and EMoP – 2

6/20/

2013

6/17/

2013


EMaP and EMoP – 3

2013

Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun

Figure 11. EEM schedule of an “Govi-Altai” water supply improvement sub-project

A working plan, a schedule and a monitoring program had been agreed upon with PMU in advance.

The second phase of EEM was performed between 30nd

of October and 1st of November, 2012

collaboration with the PIU and the contractor.

The external environmental monitoring specialist Ochir Altansukh, and an assistant S.Munhnaran

were executing the EEM. An engineer, Munhjargal and workers were involved in the monitoring. It

has been completed without any outside influence and by following the below-mentioned schedule.

Working schedule of the EEM

Duration: 10 days in October, 2012

ID Task Name Start Duration FinishOct 2012

28

1

2

3

4

5

6

10/28/20121d10/28/2012EIA report reading and work

planning based on EMaP, EMoP

10/29/20121d10/29/2012Documentation collecting

11/1/20123d10/30/2012Site visit and environmental

monitoring

11/3/20122d11/2/2012Data processing and report writing

in Mongolian

11/6/20123d11/4/2012Report writing in English and the

reports delivering

11/6/201210d10/28/2012Total days

Nov 2012

29 30 31 1 2 3 4 5 6

Figure 12. The working schedule of the EEM

As shown in table 14, the monitoring has been executed using 34 measures, which are divided into

eight groups. 19 out of the 34 measures were mentioned in EMaP, EMoP and EAO. The remaining 15

measures were stated in the DEIAR.

1. Minimization and mitigation of adverse impact on air and its control

2. Minimization and mitigation of adverse impact on soil and its control

3. Minimization and mitigation of adverse impact on water and its control

4. Minimization and mitigation of adverse impact from waste on the environment and its control

5. Minimization and mitigation of adverse impact from natural risks on the environment and its

control

6. Minimization and mitigation of adverse impact on the socio-economy and public, its control


21

7. Minimization and mitigation of labor safety and security risk and its control

8. Minimization and mitigation of environmental delict and its control

The implementation period of the mitigation measures has been divided into three different phases:

1. Beginning of the project 6 measures

2. End of the project 10 measures

3. During the project 18 measures

Six measures out of 34 need to be implemented at the beginning of the project. 10 and 18 measures

should be performed at the project end, and during the project, respectively. That means 53% of the

EMMs have to be conducted during the project implementation, which requires good EAO of the

contractor.

This monitoring was the 2nd phase of EEM. Therefore, 5 measures, which have to be implemented at

the end of the project, and belong to the specialist, were not monitored. According to the EEM

schedule, these 5 measures will be monitored in the 3rd phase of EEM that is shown in figure 11.

Therefore, the implementation of the EMaP of the contractor was evaluated by 29 measures, which

had to be implemented until now. Hand-held GPS units were used for spatial referencing of the water

source, hydro-kiosk and treatment plan of “Govi-Altai” sub-project.

Table 3. Location of the water source, hydro-kiosk and the treatment plan

№ Measured points Longitude Latitude Altitude

1 Water source 46°19'08,6"N 96°20'44,5"E 2197 m

2 Hydro-kiosk 46°22'37,4"N 96°15'05,1"E 2158 m

3 Treatment plan 46°22'25,7"N 96°16'19,5"E 2134 m

Figure 13. Location of the water source, hydro-kiosk and the treatment plan

WorkОr’s РОrs (СousОs) wОrО not locatОН in one place. There were separately placed near to the

construction sites. Therefore, negative impact on the environment from the worker was low. A table,

showing the results of monitoring the implementation of EMaP for this sub-project is presented on the

next page.


22

RESULTS OF MONITORING THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN

FOR “GOVI-ALTAI” WATER SUPPLY IMPROVEMENT SUB-PROJECT

Table 4. “Govi-Altai” EMaP monitoring – 2nd

phase

* According to the DIEAR

** 1, 2, 3, 4, 5th

columns of the table belong to the PIU and the contractor

Table key words:

1. Planned measure The following measures have to be done solely or with collaboration between the PIU and the contractor.

2. The report Referencing in which section of the DIEAR and EMaP, EMoP, sub-reports the following measures are mentioned.

3. Duration Indicating when the following measures have to be completed. During refers to the whole period of the project implementation.

4. Monitoring Showing how the implementation of the measure has been monitored.

5. Fact Presenting what evidence forms the basis of the conclusion of the measure implementation.

6. Implementation The execution of the following measures was evaluated using three different grades, indicated below, based on the collected facts.

7. Explanation Background information on the assessment of the measure implementation is written in this column.



1

The report

2

Duration

3

Monitoring

4

Fact

5

Implementation

6

Explanation

7


1. Use eco-fuel for heating and cooking in the workers'

camp. DEIAR-3.2 During

Whether the eco-fuel was used or not. - Photo picture Satisfactory

Electricity was supplied from

central station.

2. Controlling the emission of exhaust fumes from

motor vehicles.

DEIAR-2.2.3

EMAP-6.1.3 During

Whether or not the emission of exhaust fume

was controlled. - Car sign

- Bill Unsatisfactory

No facts found.

3.

Surroundings of construction site, water and

moisturize soil were used to reduce dust. DEIAR-2.2.3

EMAP-6.1.3 During

Whether or not soil was moisturized to reduce

dust. - Photo picture

- Irrigation machinery

- Interview

- Bill

Satisfactory

Due to frequent precipitation, it was

not necessary to moisturize.


4. During the construction, topsoil should specially

remove, keep, and reuse the soil in rehabilitation

activities.

DEIAR-2.4.4 Beginning

and ending

Whether topsoil was removed, kept, and reused

in rehabilitation or not. - Photo picture

- Work plan Unsatisfactory

All layers of soil were mixed.

GA1-1, 1-2, GA2-1, 2-2

5.

Technically, and biologically rehabilitate the

degraded land during the project implementation. DEIAR-2.4.4

EMAP-6.4.3 Ending



- Contract

- Bill

Satisfactory

Some degraded lands are

rehabilitated. GA2-3, 2-4, 2-5

6. Controlling the movement of vehicles, preventing

the creation of unnecessary roadways, and posting

road signs where necessary.

DEIAR-2.4.4

EMAP-6.2.3 Beginning

Whether or not road signs were posted. - Photo picture

- Road sign Satisfactory

A new earth road was not created.

7.

Filling and rehabilitating the places that dug by

earth work. DEIAR-2.3.4 Ending

Whether or not it was filled and rehabilitated. - Photo picture

- Work plan

- Bill

Irrelevant to 2nd

phase


23


8. Estimate the ground water resource.

EMAP-6.3.3 Beginning Whether the ground water resource was

estimated or not. - The report

- Contract Satisfactory

Based on the research, the project

was launched.


EMAP-6.3.3 Ending Whether the monitoring was executed or not. - Contract

- Result Impossible to

assess

This measure will be executed by

the specialist, not the contractor.

10. Make the external borehole for monitoring ground

water level and install the instrument. EMAP-6.3.3 Ending Whether the borehole was made or not. - Contract

- Bill

- Photo picture

Irrelevant to 2nd

phase


11. Plant green zone between treatment plant and aimag

center and irrigate it by the treated water from plant. DEIAR-1.3 Ending Whether green zone was planted or not. - Photo picture

- Observation Satisfactory

The green zone has been planted.

GA2-3, 2-4, 2-5

12.

Classifying solid waste; building a temporary dump

site and monitoring, whether the waste is delivered

to the authorized site, or if necessary, transporting of

waste to the recycling place.

DEIAR-1.4.5

EMAP-6.2.3 During

Whether or not it was collected, classified and

delivered. - Photo picture

- Contract

- Bill

Satisfactory

WorkОr’s РОrs (houses) were not

located in one place. There were

separately placed near to the

construction sites. Therefore,

wastes were not accumulated.

GA1-3 13. Pour the domestic liquid waste into pit, and after

project implementation, it should decontaminate and

fill.

DEIAR-1.4.5

EMAP-6.2.3

During and

ending

Whether the liquid waste was poured into the pit,

disinfected, and filled or not. - Photo picture

- Observation Satisfactory

14. Waste keeping and removing should be controlled

by inspection organization. EMAP-6.5.3 During

Whether the external control was made or not. - Interview Satisfactory

They were collaborating with

inspection agency of the aimag.

Minimization and mitigation of adverse impact from natural risks on environment, its control

15.

Earth work should do in places where might be

flooded in fewer rainy periods. DEIAR-4.2.2

EMAP-6.1.3 During

Whether this natural factor was considered in

work plan or not. - Photo picture

- Work plan Incomplete

It was not considered,

appropriately. GA1-1, 1-2, 1-4, 1-5

Miscalculation of the land slope

that flowing spring water. GA2-6,

2-7, 2-8

16. Constructing drainage channels in flood-prone

areas. DEIAR-4.2.4 Ending

Whether or not drainage channels were

constructed. - Photo picture

- Work plan Irrelevant to 2nd

phase

Minimization and mitigation of adverse impact on the socio-economy and public, its control

17. Notify people in the impact zone for preventing risk

before construction. EMAP-6.6.3 During

Whether notified people or not. - Photo picture


No facts found.

18. Make a contract with an electric company and

supply electricity from the central station. DEIAR-1.4.2 During

Whether electricity was supplied from the central

station or not. - Contract

- Bill Satisfactory

Electricity was supplied from

central station.

19. Make public contribution in rehabilitation. EMAP-6.7 Ending Whether public were participated or not. - Interview Irrelevant to 2nd phase

20. Prohibit to work during night time in settlement

area. DEIAR-2.9.4 During

Whether they work in settlement area during

night time or not. - Interview

- Work schedule Satisfactory

Working hour is 800-1800.


21. Train the workers for labor safety. DEIAR-4.2.5 Beginning

Whether workers were trained or not. - Bill


They were trained. GA1-6, 1-7

22. Providing labor safety equipment such as earplugs,

eyeglasses and work clothes for workers. DEIAR-3.2 During Whether or not labor safety equipment was

provided. - Observation

- Photo picture

- Bill

Unsatisfactory Not provided. GA2-9


24

23.

Developing a regulation of fire safety, providing a

complete set of firefighting equipment and checking

the expiry date of fire extinguishers and training

workers to use the equipment.

DEIAR-4.2.4 During

Whether or not a regulation was developed, the

equipment was provided and workers were

trained.

- Photo picture

- Contract

- Bill

Unsatisfactory

There was not the fire-safety

equipment.

24.

Examine workОr’s СОaltС in ОvОry yОar. DEIAR-4.2.5 Beginning

Whether or not the health was examined. - Document

- Contract

- Bill

Unsatisfactory

No facts found.

25. Reserving the fuel in a special container such as an

oil tank. EMAP-6.2.3 During Whether or not fuel was stored in an oil tank.

- Photo picture Satisfactory Fuel was not reserved.

26. Placing a first-aid kit in the worker camp. DEIAR-4.2.4 During Whether or not the kit was placed. - Photo picture Unsatisfactory Not placed.

27. Building a temporary protection fence and placing

caution sign during construction work. EMAP-6.6.3 During

Whether or not a temporary fence was built, and

the sign was placed. - Photo picture Unsatisfactory

Not built and placed. GA1-1, 1-2,

1-8

28. Instructing a regulation of labor safety to workers,

every day. DEIAR-2.9.4 During

Whether or not a regulation of LS was

instructed. - Note


A regulation of LS was instructed

in every day. GA1-6, 1-7


29. Supply raw materials from nearest licensed mines.

DEIAR-1.4.1 During Whether the raw materials are supplied by

licensed mines or not. - Contract

- Bill Satisfactory

The raw materials are supplied by

licensed mines.

30.

If not, supply raw materials from places where

authorized by local administration and rehabilitate it

after the project. DEIAR-1.4.1

During and

ending

Whether the raw materials are supplied from the

authorized place or not. - Work plan

- Rehabilitation

- License

Satisfactory

The raw materials are supplied by

licensed mines.

31. Posting a caution board and making a presentation

on environmental protection and prevention of

natural hazard.

EMAP-6.7 Beginning Whether or not a board was posted, and a

presentation was introduced. - Photo picture


Nothing done.

32.

Implementing the environmental management plan,

making a regulation for environmental protection,

assigning environmental responsibility to one of the

managerial staffs, so he/she controls the

implementation of the EMaP and EMoP.

EMAP-6.7 During

Whether or not the EMaP was implemented, a

regulation was made and environmental

responsibility was assigned.

- Work plan

- Interview

- Decision

Unsatisfactory

Nothing done.

33.

Continually implementing the EMaP and EMoP,

reporting implementation of the environmental

mitigation measures to the MNET and

environmental specialist of the aimag, and

consulting with environmental experts.

EMAP-6.7 During

Whether or not it was implemented and reported

to the organization. - Observation

- Report

- Official document

Unsatisfactory

Nothing done.

34. Include the budget for environmental protection in

total investment. EMAP-6.7 Beginning Whether it was included or not.

- Budget plan Satisfactory It was included.

19 out of aforesaid 34 measures were mentioned in the EMaP, EMoP and EAO. The remaining 15 measures were stated in the DEIAR.


Planned measure 1:

The requirement in row 1 of this table is stated in 3.2 section of the DEIAR. It has to be done for the whole period of the project implementation. It was assessed as “satisfactory” by the monitoring of an external environmental specialist based on aforesaid facts. The facts are enclosed in this report.


25

One measure for water monitoring out of all 34 measures of tСО EEM on “Govi-Altai” water supply

improvement sub-project will be executed by the external environmental monitoring specialist, who

was chosen by the PMU. Another 4 measures out of 33 were irrelevant to the 2nd

phase. The remaining

29 measures have to be implemented until now. Seventeen out of 29 measures were assessed as

satisfactory. One of them was evaluated as incomplete and 11 were valued as unsatisfactory.

Table 5. Results of the EMaP monitoring

№ Assessment Count Percent

Air

So

il

Wat

er

Was

te

Nat

ura

l ri

sk

So

cio-e

con

om

y

and

pu

bli

c

Lab

or

safe

ty

Del

ict

1. Satisfactory 17 59 2 2 1 4 0 2 3 3

2. Incomplete 1 3 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0

3. Unsatisfactory 11 38 1 1 0 0 0 1 5 3

Result of 1st phase 29 100 3 3 1 4 1 3 8 6

Irrelevant to the 1st phase 4 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0

Impossible to assess 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0

Overall 34 3 4 3 4 2 4 8 6

59% of 29 measures were assessed as satisfactory, 3% as incomplete, 38% evaluated as unsatisfactory.

There are shown in numerical and percentile expressions of the result. As shown in table 15, for

minimization and mitigation of adverse impact on air, 2 of them assessed as satisfactory and one is

unsatisfactory. The results of other measures are shown in tables 14 and 15.

Figure 14. Numerical and percentile expressions of the result

17

1 11

5 0

5

10

15

20

Sat

isfa

cto

ry

Inco

mp

lete

Un

sati

sfac

tor

y

Impo

ssib

le t

o

asse

ss

Num

ber

Numerical expression of the the

result

59%

3%

38%

Percentile expression of the result

Satisfactory

Incomplete

Unsatisfactory


26

RESULTS OF MONITORING THE BUDGET EXPENDITURE OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PLAN

FOR THE “GOVI-ALTAI” WATER SUPPLY IMPROVEMENT SUB-PROJECT

Table 6. “Govi-Altai” EMoP monitoring – 2nd

phase

* According to the report on DIEA

** 1, 2, 3, 4, 5th

columns of the table belong to the PIU and IA

Table reading:

1. Planned action The following actions have to be done by solely or collaboration between PIU and IA.

2. The report It tells you that which section of EMaP and EMoP, those are annexes of the report, mentioned the following actions.

3. Respondent Showing that who is responsible for the action.

4. Duration Indicating that when the following actions have to be done. During means the whole period of the project implementation.

5. Planned cost Amount of money, which was planned to spend for the action before the project.

6. Implementation Execution of the following actions concluded by three different marks, beneath, based on collected facts.

7. Actual cost Amount of money, which is spent for the action during the project.

8. Fact Presenting what evidence was the base of the conclusion of the action implementation.

9. Explanation Background information on assessment of the action implementation was written in this column.



1

The report

2

Respondent

3

Duration

4

Planned cost, T

5

Implementation

6

Actual cost, T

7

Fact

8

Explanation

9


1. Surroundings of construction site, water and moisturize soil were used to

reduce dust. EMAP-6.1 Contractor During 1 100 000

2. Controlling the emission of exhaust fumes from motor vehicles. EMAP-6.1 Contractor Beginning 100 000

Total 1 200 000


3. Make the external borehole for monitoring ground water level and install

the instrument. EMAP-6.3 Contractor Ending 15 000 000


EMAP-6.3 Contractor Ending 440 000 Impossible to

assess no no

This action executes by

the specialist, not the IA.

Total 15 440 000


5. Prepare a solid waste container for temporary keeping. EMAP-6.2 Contractor Beginning 100 000

6. Pour the domestic liquid waste into pit, and after project implementation,

it should decontaminate and fill. EMAP-6.2 Contractor Beginning 500 000

7. Controlling the movement of vehicles, preventing the creation of

unnecessary roadways, and posting road signs where necessary.

EMAP-6.2

EMAP-6.4 Contractor Beginning 200 000

Total 800 000


27

Minimization and mitigation of adverse impact on the vegetation cover, its control

8. Rehabilitating the degraded land during the project implementation. EMAP-6.4 Contractor Ending 13 750 000 Irrelevant to

1st phase

Total 13 750 000


9. Waste keeping and removing should be controlled by inspection

organization. EMAP-6.5 Contractor During 500 000

10. Keep solid waste in the container and deliver it to the authorized site. EMAP-6.5 Contractor During 500 000

Total 1 000 000


11. Building a temporary protection fence and placing caution sign during

construction work. EMAP-6.6 Contractor During 500 000

Total 500 000


12. During the project, assign environmental responsibility to one of the

managerial staffs. EMAP-6.7 Contractor Beginning 2 400 000

13. Organize training on environmental protection and labor safety for

workers. EMAP-6.7 Contractor During 400 000

14. Reporting implementation of the environmental mitigation measures to the

MNET and environmental specialist. EMAP-6.7 Contractor During 200 000

15. Examine and control the annual EMP by the environmental specialist of

aimag. EMAP-6.7 Contractor During 100 000

Total 3 100 000

Grand total 35 790 000

From this, for the environmental monitoring 440 000

From this, for IA 35 350 000

15 actions with the cost were mentioned in EMaP, and EMoP, were written in this table. The remaining actions without the cost not belonged to this auditing.


Planned measure 1:

The requirement in row 1 of this table is stated in 6,1 section of EMaP. It has to be done for the whole period of the project implementation. The aforesaid cost was planned to be spend for the

measure before the project, and the actual cost was not calculated. Because of, receipts were not provided by the contractor. Therefore, the implementation was not assessed. This assessment is

only for EMoP monitoring, not for EMaP monitoring. The explanation of assessment was written in a last column of the report.


28

Fifteen measures with the cost were written in the EMaP of the sub-project, and a total of 35790000 T

was planned to be spent. From that amount of money, 440000 T had to be spent for water monitoring

research, as mentioned in EMoP. The pollution monitoring will be executed by the specialist, who was

chosen by the PMU. The EMoP says that the remaining 35350000 T has to be spent for the rest of the

measures, which should be implemented by the contractor. The following table shows a breakdown of

the planned costs that belong to the contractor.

Table 7. Breakdown of the planned cost and its expenditure

№ Groups The cost

Planned Expenditure Difference

1 Minimization and mitigation of adverse impact on air, its

control 1 200 000 - 1 200 000

2 Minimization and mitigation of adverse impact on water, its

control 15 000 000 - 15 000 000

3 Minimization and mitigation of adverse impact on soil, its

control 800 000 - 800 000

4 Minimization and mitigation of adverse impact on the

vegetation cover, its control 13 750 000 - 13 750 000

5 Minimization and mitigation of adverse impact from waste

on the environment, its control 1 000 000 - 1 000 000

6 Minimization and mitigation of labor safety and security

risk, its control 500 000 - 500 000

7 Minimization and mitigation of environmental delict, its

control 3 100 000 - 3 100 000

Total 35 350 000 35 350 000

Figure 15. Numerical expression of the EMoP monitoring result

The contractor, Khurd LLC, did not provide the financial bills within the fixed time. Thus, it is

impossible to evaluate the implementation of the EMM of the contractor based on the EMoP

monitoring result. Also, we should consider the results of monitoring the implementation of EMaP.

0

2000000

4000000

6000000

8000000

10000000

12000000

14000000

16000000

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

The

amo

unt

of

mo

ney

Groups

The cost of EPA

Planned Expense


29

The result of environmental pollution monitoring

The environmental pollution monitoring has been executed in the area where the “Govi-Altai” water-

supply sub-project is implemented. The aim of this monitoring was to examine the impact of the sub-

project on the environment. The monitoring was conducted in the following two environs and

ОxОcutОН by tСО “Us-OrcСin” Co LtН., unНОr tСО РuiНancО of the specialist. Based on EMaP and

EMoP, a work task has been developed as follows:

1. Water quality

2. Air quality

Table 8. Sampling points of environmental pollution monitoring “Govi-Altai"

№ Sampling points Measurement Longitude Latitude Altitude Legend

1 Aimag center Air 96°15'39.16"E 46°22'13.62"N 2156 m Cloud

2 Hydro-kiosk Water - 1 96°15'7.84"E 46°21'42.56"N 2180 m Water

3 Well Water - 2 96°19'1.69"E 46°20'23.25"N 2175 m Water

Figure 16. Sampling points of environmental pollution monitoring “Govi-Altai”

Air quality monitoring:

Using the data from air quality station, the monitoring has been done on the 1st of November, 2012.

Figure 17. Air quality monitoring station


30

All parameters which were measured at the station have been compared with MNS 4585:2007. In

addition to this, the air-quality index was calculated.

Table 9. Results of air quality measurement - ГА4


1 Sulfur dioxide SO2 µg/m3 15 450 0,03 unpolluted

2 Nitrogen dioxide NO2 µg/m3 30 85 0.35 unpolluted

Air quality measurement has been calculated with the air-quality index.

Table 10. Results of air quality index - ГА4

Conclusion:

1. Based on a comparison with MNS 4585:2007, all air-quality parameters at the center of the

Govi-Altai aimag were assОssОН as “unpollutОН," mОaning they did not exceed the permissible

level. According to the index assessment, it was evaluated as “very РooН”. 2. In fact, the monitoring period was in cold season. Therefore, air pollution sources were

operated and due to the open wind, the pollutant elements were easily dispersed.

Water quality:

The monitoring has been done on 1st of November, 2012. According to the standard method, 1 l water

sample has been taken from a new well and hydro-kiosk and transported to the capital and analyzed

the laboratory.

Figure 18. Water quality sampling



№ Measured parameters Unit Average Standard Index Explanation

1 SO2 µg/m3 15 450 3.3 Very good

2 NO2 µg/m3 30 85 35.3 Very good

Overall assessment – Very good


31

Table 12. Results of water quality analysis – Hydro-kiosk

Table 13. Results of water quality analysis – Well

Conclusion:

1. Aiming for determination of water quality for population of Govi-Altai aimag, water sample

has been taken from a new will in Olon Lake, and hydro-kiosk. The samples were analyzed,

and compared to the MNS 900:2005.

2. Based on a comparison with MNS 900:2005, all water-quality parameters except magnesium

were assОssОН as “unpollutОН," mОaning they did not exceed the permissible level. But, the

concentration of magnesium was exceeded by 1.6-1.8 than the permissible level, and it might

me related to the characteristics of the aquifer.

3. Therefore, we can conclude that the concentration of magnesium should reduce until the

permissible level using appropriate technology before the consumption of drinking purpose.


1 р - 8,09 6,5-8,5 0,95 unpolluted



4 Mg mg/l 48,6 30,0 1,62 polluted







11 SS mg/l n.a - - not mentioned in standard

12 COD mg/l n.a - - not mentioned in standard




16 P mg/l 0,004 3,5 0,001 unpolluted

17 F mg/l 0,69 0,7-1,5 0,46 unpolluted

18 Fe mg/l 0,04 0,3 0,13 unpolluted


1 р - 7,91 6,5-8,5 0,93 unpolluted



4 Mg mg/l 52,5 30,0 1,75 polluted







11 SS mg/l 2,6 - - not mentioned in standard

12 COD mg/l 0,6 - - not mentioned in standard




16 P mg/l 0,002 3,5 0,0006 unpolluted

17 F mg/l 0,68 0,7-1,5 0,45 unpolluted

18 Fe mg/l 0,07 0,3 0,23 unpolluted


32

CONCLUSION

The following conclusions have been drawn for the EMM regarding the “Govi-Altai” water supply

improvement sub-project based on the 2nd

phase of monitoring of EMaP and EMoP. Herein:

1. In total, 34 EMMs of the sub-project has been monitored. Thirty three out of the 34 measures

should be implemented by the contractor. Four out of 33 actions were irrelevant to the 2nd

phase. Therefore, these were not monitored. The remaining 29 measures have to be

implemented until now. 17 out of 29 measures were assessed as satisfactory, 1 of them was

evaluated as incomplete and 11 were valued as unsatisfactory. Therefore, we can conclude that

60% of the measures were implemented.

2. The overall evaluation of EMM of the contractor was evaluated as “D – poor" since the

environmental responsibility was assigned to no one, and an environmental expert was not

hired. The overall evaluation of EMM was same at 1st phase. Therefore, the contractor has to

take strong action on EAO to improve this overall evaluation of EMM.

3. According to the overall evaluation of EMM, it is reasonable that PMU should pay attention to

this contractor, and strongly require the contractor to improve environmental

responsibility and implement EMM of the project.

4. The unassessable one measure for the monitoring research was not reflected in the overall

evaluation. These will be implemented by the specialist, who was selected by the PMU.

5. Five measures, related to the LSS were assessed as unsatisfactory. Therefore, the contractor

should pay attention to this.

6. Three measures, these assessed as unsatisfactory, were related to the environmental delict.

Thence, we can conclude that information about environmental management; finance is

inadequate and EAO of the contractor is weak.

7. The measures, those assessed as incomplete and unsatisfactory, can be improved by an

initiative of the contractor and collaboration between the PIU and the contractor.

8. It is necessary to collaborate with local administration for minimization and mitigation of

adverse impact on the socio-economy and public.

9. According to the results of the environmental pollution monitoring, the project has not a

negative impact on surrounding environment.

10. It was impossible to execute the monitoring the budget expenditure of the environmental

monitoring plan due to lack of information. The fixed time to accomplish the financial facts is

extended three times until 15th November, 30

th November and 10

th December, 2012.

Recommendations, which were based on the conclusions and observations during the monitoring, are

written at the end of this report.


33

RECOMMENDATION

The following recommendations have been drawn for the ADB, PMU, PIU and the contractors based

on the results of external environmental monitoring on the water-supply improvement sub-projects.

Considering these recommendations, it is possibly to mitigate adverse impacts of the project on the

environment, socio-economy and public in the near future. In addition, it is possible to avoid legal

liability for the environmental delict, which might be incurred in the future. Herein:

ADB:

1. According to Mongolian law, the DEIA of sub-projects was done before the project

implementation. So, the planned cost in the EMaP and EMoP can either coordinate with the

state inflation during the year of project implementation or balance it with the actual market

price.

2. An environmental specialist and an external monitoring specialist should work on all projects

that will be implemented in the future. Their work would be a main indicator of the ecological

oriented policy of ADB.

3. Before the project began, the environmental quality of the project territory was studied by the

DEIA Company, and its result reflected in the DEIAR. It is true that mitigation of the adverse

impact on the environment was done by the PIU and the contractor, according to the EMaP

and EMoP, and its external monitoring was executed by the environmental specialist.

Furthermore, it is necessary to do environmental quality monitoring research after the project

implementation. This is a good opportunity to compare environmental quality at three

different times “past-present-futurО”, and assess the actual impact of the project on the

environment. In addition, the local people mostly have a negative impression during the

project, but their impression positively changes after the project. Therefore, if environmental

quality assessment such as air, soil, water, rehabilitation, is executed within a short time after

the project closure, then the actual impact of the project on the environment can be assessed.

4. All projects, funded by ADB, should implement the standard MNS ISO 14064-2:2011 “GrООn house gases-Part 2: Specification with guidance at the project level for quantification,

monitoring and reporting of green house gas emission reductions or removal enhancements."

This will be an indicator of the world political-Оconomic “РrООn” policy implОmОntation anН will give a good opportunity for minimization of the adverse contributions to earth climate

change.

5. New laws on nature and environment, approved in June, 2012 by the Government, have to

implement in practice.

6. According to the 10th clause of the law on environmental protection, ADB can require the

contractors to implement environmental auditing. Besides of this, the company that

implemented environmental auditing can have the privilege when put in the tender. This

policy can suit the environmental policy of the country.

PMU and PIU

1. The rights and duties of the external environmental monitoring specialist need to be officially

introduced by the PMU to the PIU and the contractor at the beginning of the work. This will

help to avoid misunderstandings between the specialist and the PIU and the contractor during

the monitoring.

2. There needs to be a review checking, whether or not the planned cost of EMaP and EMoP is

enough for the implementation of EMMs and reflects the actual market price.

3. The contractor must be required to hire an environmental specialist or to assign environmental

responsibility to one of the managerial staffs.


34

4. It is proper to carry out environmental quality monitoring such as air, soil, water and

rehabilitation by the environmental specialist, instead of by the PIU and the contractor. This

will give us an opportunity to assess the actual impact of the project on the environment.

5. In some cases, the planned cost, which was proven by Ministry of Nature, Environment and

Tourism is lower than the recent market price. Depends on that, the contractors were spend

more than the budgeted cost. According to the contract and based on the collected bills, it is

necessary to decide whether overspend money can reimburse or not, if necessary.

6. When evaluating the EMM of the contractor, we should consider not only the EMoP

monitoring results but also the monitoring result of EMaP.


implement in practice.

8. According to the 10th clause of the law on environmental protection, PIU and PMU can

require the contractors to implement environmental auditing. Besides of this, the company that

implemented environmental auditing can have the privilege when put in the tender. This

policy can suit the environmental policy of the country.

9. It might be necessary to organize the meeting and to ask for environmental responsibility of

the contractor, who was not implemented EMaP and EMoP several times.

Contractor

1. When beginning the project, it is best to hire an environmental specialist or to assign

environmental responsibility to one of the managerial staffs, so that he/she controls the

implementation of the EMaP and EMoP.

2. There should be a schedule of EMM, control of its implementation, collection of financial

bills and a financial plan made for EMM execution.

3. A close reading of the DEIAR and understanding of it will help to avoid a potential accidents

and loss and amenability, which may happen in the future.

4. Executing the environmental quality monitoring such as air, water, soil and rehabilitation by a

vocational organization or expert, as well as understand these results will help prevent

compensation required by environmental degradation.

5. Old ways of removing various kinds of waste, such as the use of landfills, runoff, burning and

blowing, should be replaced by more modern ways. These include mobile bio-toilet and

mobile containers for solid and liquid waste collection, which can drastically improve the

evaluation of EMM of the contractor. Such mobile containers can be reused many times.

Therefore, it is necessary to invest in proper waste disposal. This will increase the contractor’s reputation; as well encourage the environmental-economic policy of the state.

6. It is necessary to implement the standard MNS ISO 14064-1:2011 “GrООn СousО gases-Part 1:

Specification with guidance at the organization level for quantification and reporting of green

house gas emission reductions or removal enhancements." This will be an indicator of the

contractor’s “РrООn” policy implОmОntation anН will РivО a good opportunity for minimization

of the adverse contributions to earth climate change.

7. According to the law on environmental protection, annual EMaP should make within 15th of

February and an implementation report of the plan has to write in December based on a

conclusion of Agency for Specialized Inspection of the local administration. The report should

deliver to State Inspection Agency afterward examined and approved by MEGD. Based on

DEIAR, an annual EMaP has to make.


implement in practice. It will help you to avoid legal liability for the environmental delict in

future.


35

9. Generally, environmental information and knowledge of contractors is inadequate. Therefore,

they can collaborate with environmental vocational organization.

10. According to the 10th clause of the law on environmental protection, the contractor should

implement environmental auditing. More importantly, they should understand that it helps you

to prevent from legal, socio-economic and environmental risks.

11. According to the law on environmental protection, all contractors have a responsibility to

protect and implement the environmental mitigation measures that did not execute. They can

collaborate with the vocational organization and person on environmental protection, if

necessary.

By the implementation of the aforesaid recommendations, we will achieve “Environmentally

friendly economic policy and social development."

Reported by: Associate professor, Doctor O.Altansukh

Documents

Environmental Monitoring Report · 2016-06-30 · Environmental Monitoring Report Semi-Annual Report December 2012 Mongolia: Urban Development Sector Project – Water supply, Sewerage