1
SUBJECT INDEX OF ORIGINAL PAPERS 2011 Tharparkar Breed secretions, skin, 917 U LTRACENTRIFUGATION protein separation, 1349 VIRUSES milk products, 933 ~ Vitamins E activity, 531 WHEY beverages, 932 ~, 1299, 1909 calcium, ionic, 1008 decolorization, 471 fractionation, 1155 inhibitor action, 503 protein aggregation, 1349 bands, 946 ~ utilization, 931 ~ water sorption, 1339 ZINC deficiency, 82, 205, 977 ~ secretion, 731 ERRATA" Volumes 50 and 51 S. L. Spahr, Volume 50 : 847. Page 848, Col- unto 2, ParagTaph 3 should read: A blend price of $5.63 per hundred kilograms for milk con- taining 0.0% milk fat with a 15.4¢ differential for each - - -. A blend price more typical of nfilk pl-iees paid dairymen in the Chicago, Illinois, milk market in recent years, $3.43 per hundred kilograms for milk containing 0.0% milk fat with a 15.4¢ differential - - -. Page 854, Colunm 2, Paragraph 1 should read: This effect is due to a 77.2¢ per---. Fig. 1 the blend prices should be $11.02, 9.92, 8.82, and 7.72 for A, B, C, and D, respectively. The differential should be 15.4¢. Fig. 2 the milk fat differentials should be 11.0, 13.2, and 15.4¢ for A, B, and C, respectively. The blend price should be $11.02. Fig. 3 and 4 the blend price should be 11.02, and the milk fat differential should be 15.4¢. Tables 1-4, Footnote ~ should be: Log income ---- log ($3.43 + 1.54 fat %) + log (milk). A. R. Quartermain, ¥olume 50:1959. Page 1960, Column 2, Line 4, and qii, should be qij. Page 1960, Column 2, Line 33, --2,294 should be --2,994. Page 1961, Column 2, Line 33, (tL) should be (tl). M. Y. Pack et al., Volume 51:511. Fig. 1 should not have been printed. Description un- der Fig. 1 should be printed under Fig. 2 which should be Fig. 1. Description under Fig. 2 should be under the printed Fig. 3 which should be Fig. 2. Description under Fig. 3 should be under printed Fig. 4 which should be Fig. 3. Description under Fig. 4 should have appeared under a figure that was not printed. E. R. Vedamuthu, Volume 51: 505. The cap- tion for Plate 10, Fig. 2 on Page 506 should read: BC; CSW1; CSW1 held at 45 C for 60 rain; sterile Pronase solution. P. F. Fox, Volume 51:826. Fig. 5 should be rotated 180 degrees on the plane of the paper and moved to the left. The frame now marked zero minutes should be 32 minutes, then 16, 9, and 0 minutes. J. DAIRY SCIENCE VOL. 51, NO. 12

ERRATA: Volumes 50 and 51

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: ERRATA: Volumes 50 and 51

S U B J E C T I N D E X OF O R I G I N A L P A P E R S 2011

Tharparkar Breed secretions, skin, 917

U LTRACENTRIFUGATION protein separation, 1349

VI RUSES milk products, 933 ~

Vitamins E activity, 531

W H E Y beverages, 932 ~, 1299, 1909 calcium, ionic, 1008 decolorization, 471 fractionation, 1155 inhibitor action, 503

protein aggregation, 1349 bands, 946 ~

utilization, 931 ~ water sorption, 1339

Z I N C deficiency, 82, 205, 977 ~ secretion, 731

ERRATA" Volumes 50 and 51 S. L. Spahr, Volume 50 : 847. Page 848, Col-

unto 2, ParagTaph 3 should read: A blend price of $5.63 per hundred kilograms for milk con- taining 0.0% milk fa t with a 15.4¢ differential for each - - - . A blend price more typical of nfilk pl-iees paid dairymen in the Chicago, Illinois, milk market in recent years, $3.43 per hundred kilograms for milk containing 0.0% milk fat with a 15.4¢ differential - - - . Page 854, Colunm 2, Paragraph 1 should read: This effect is due to a 77.2¢ p e r - - - . Fig. 1 the blend prices should be $11.02, 9.92, 8.82, and 7.72 for A, B, C, and D, respectively. The differential should be 15.4¢. Fig. 2 the milk fa t differentials should be 11.0, 13.2, and 15.4¢ for A, B, and C, respectively. The blend price should be $11.02. Fig. 3 and 4 the blend price should be 11.02, and the milk fa t differential should be 15.4¢. Tables 1-4, Footnote ~ should be: Log income ---- log ($3.43 + 1.54 fa t %) + log (milk).

A. R. Quartermain, ¥olume 50:1959. Page

1960, Column 2, Line 4, and qii, should be qij. Page 1960, Column 2, Line 33, --2,294 should be --2,994. Page 1961, Column 2, Line 33, (tL) should be (tl).

M. Y. Pack et al., Volume 51:511. Fig. 1 should not have been printed. Description un- der Fig. 1 should be printed under Fig. 2 which should be Fig. 1. Description under Fig. 2 should be under the printed Fig. 3 which should be Fig. 2. Description under Fig. 3 should be under printed Fig. 4 which should be Fig. 3. Description under Fig. 4 should have appeared under a figure that was not printed.

E. R. Vedamuthu, Volume 51: 505. The cap- tion for Plate 10, Fig. 2 on Page 506 should read: BC; CSW1; CSW1 held at 45 C for 60 rain; sterile Pronase solution.

P. F. Fox, Volume 51:826. Fig. 5 should be rotated 180 degrees on the plane of the paper and moved to the left. The frame now marked zero minutes should be 32 minutes, then 16, 9, and 0 minutes.

J . DAIRY SCIENCE VOL. 51, NO. 12