18
A REVIEW OF: THE MADRID NEIGHBOURHOOD REMODELING OPERATION THE IMPACT OF DEPRIVED AREAS REGENERATION IN CITIES TRANSFORMATIONDYNAMICS C i ti G ll G [ i ti ll @ l ] Palomeras 1986 C r i s ti na G a ll ego G amazo [ cr i s ti na.ga ll ego.gamazo @ a l umnos.upm.es ] Architect and Urban Planner. PhD student and researcher. Urban and Regional Planning Unit, DUyOT - E.T.S. Arquitectura - Universidad Politécnica de Madrid. Member of the Association: Otro Hábitat Madrid. Cristina Martínez Aransay [[email protected]] Architect and Urban Planner. PhD student and researcher Urban and Regional Planning Unit DUyOT E T S Arquitectura Universidad Politécnica de Madrid PhD student and researcher . Urban and Regional Planning Unit, DUyOT - E.T .S. Arquitectura - Universidad Politécnica de Madrid. Member of the Association: Otro Hábitat Madrid. EURA 2011: THE CITY WITHOUT LIMITS

Eura 2011: Cities without Limits

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Presentation: A review of the Remodeling Operation of Peripherical Neighbourhoods of Madrid. Authors: Cristina Gallego Gamazo; Cristina Martínez Aransay.

Citation preview

Page 1: Eura 2011: Cities without Limits

A REVIEW OF: THE MADRID NEIGHBOURHOOD REMODELING OPERATIONTHE IMPACT OF DEPRIVED AREAS REGENERATION IN CITIES TRANSFORMATION DYNAMICS

C i t i G l l G [ i t i l l @ l ]

P a l o m e r a s 1 9 8 6

C r i s t i n a G a l l e g o G a m a z o [ c r i s t i n a . g a l l e g o . g a m a z o @ a l u m n o s . u p m . e s ]Architect and Urban Planner. PhD student and researcher. Urban and Regional Planning Unit, DUyOT - E.T.S. Arquitectura - Universidad Politécnica de Madrid. Member of the Association: Otro Hábitat Madrid.

C r i s t i n a M a r t í n e z A r a n s a y [ c . m a r a n s a y @ a l u m n o s . u p m . e s ]Architect and Urban Planner. PhD student and researcher Urban and Regional Planning Unit DUyOT E T S Arquitectura Universidad Politécnica de Madrid PhD student and researcher. Urban and Regional Planning Unit, DUyOT - E.T.S. Arquitectura - Universidad Politécnica de Madrid. Member of the Association: Otro Hábitat Madrid.

EURA 2011: THE CITY WITHOUT LIMITS

Page 2: Eura 2011: Cities without Limits

A REVIEW OF: THE MADRID NEIGHBOURHOODS REMODELING OPERATIONTHE IMPACT OF DEPRIVED AREAS REGENERATION IN CITIES TRANSFORMATION DYNAMICS

The great challenge: recover consolidated urban areas

The Madrid Neighbourhoods Remodeling Operation:

Main features of the Operation- Main features of the Operation

- Cases classification by differential aspects

- Impact of the Transformation Strategies of Madrid in the Remodeling Neighborhoods

Final reflectionsFinal reflections

EURA 2011: THE CITY WITHOUT LIMITS

Page 3: Eura 2011: Cities without Limits

The great challenge: recover consolidated urban areas

F u e n c a r r a l A 2 0 0 6

"When we think in terms of trees we are trading the humanity and richness of the living city for a

F u e n c a r r a l A 2 0 0 6

conceptual simplicity which benefits only designers, planners, administrators and developers. Every

time a piece of a city is torn out, and a tree made to replace the semi-lattice that was there before,

the city takes a further step toward dissociation"

C h r i s t o p h e r A l e x a n d e r . A c i t y i s n o t a t r e e . 1 9 6 5 .

EURA 2011: THE CITY WITHOUT LIMITS

Page 4: Eura 2011: Cities without Limits

The Madrid Neighbourhoods Remodeling Operation: MAIN FEATURES OF THE OPERATION

COMPREHENSIVE STRATEGYFormal “social resettlement” of residents in theplaces where they had previously been “selfplaces where they had previously been self-settled”.

F d h i h i l di iFocused on the peripherical districtsconcentrated in south-east arc:- Palomeras- Vallecas- Usera-Villaverde- Carabanchel- San Blas- Tetuán-Fuencarral

EURA 2011: THE CITY WITHOUT LIMITS

Page 5: Eura 2011: Cities without Limits

The Madrid Neighbourhoods Remodeling Operation: MAIN FEATURES OF THE OPERATION

1979 / 1989 First programme: 28 units / Legal support: Order 1979 and Royal Decree 1133/841986 / tl E t d d 8 it / L l t R l D 100/1986

GENERAL DATA1986 / currently Extended programme: 8 units / Legal support: Royal Decree 100/1986

POLITICAL: transition to the democracy, poor political stability and low experience of institutions.CONTEXTURBAN: residual areas without urban interest that gain speculative interests.SOCIAL: strength citizen mobilization and weak capacity of the institutions.

GOVERNMENT AND INVESTORS: interested in the speculative value of the areas, plan to resettle theresidents in new suburbs.ORGANIZED NEIGHBORS: stop the relocations and get the government commitment to improve their

OBJECTIVES

O G G O S stop t e e ocat o s a d get t e go e e t co t e t to p o e t eneighbourhoods.TECHNICIANS: confident with the potential of urban planning to overcome the marginal status.

Community and local agents participationImprove urban quality conditions by creating city

APPROACH

EURA 2011: THE CITY WITHOUT LIMITS

Page 6: Eura 2011: Cities without Limits

The Madrid Neighbourhoods Remodeling Operation: MAIN FEATURES OF THE OPERATION

DRIVERS: more or less organized citizen-base.TECHNICIANS: planners, executors and assessors.

ACTORS

MANAGEMENT: shared responsibility between government, residents and technicians.

EURA 2011: THE CITY WITHOUT LIMITS

Page 7: Eura 2011: Cities without Limits

The Madrid Neighbourhoods Remodeling Operation: CLASSIFICATION BY DIFFERENTIAL ASPECTS

Slums and informal settlements Fontarrón, Palomeras Sureste, Cornisa de Orcasitas, Pozo del Tío Raimundo, Meseta de Orcasitas, Marquesa de Ambogae, San Pascual La Alegría Pinar de Chamartín El Carmen Santa Petronila Las Carolinas and Roger de FlorLa Alegría, Pinar de Chamartín, El Carmen, Santa Petronila, Las Carolinas and Roger de Flor.

Public promotion colonies or formal settlements built in the 50 and 60 decadesSan Blas I, San Fermín, Zofio, San Blas II, Orcasitas, Almendrales, Los Cármenes de Caño Roto, Pan Bendito, Vallecas, Orcasur, Pan B dit V ll Vill d C ill j d S t A d F l

ORIGINAL SETTLEMENTSCONDITIONS Bendito, Vallecas, Villaverde, Canillejas and Santa Ana de Fuencarral.

Extended Operation to 8 Absorption UnitsCanillas, Caño Roto, Comillas, Fuencarral A and B, General Ricardos, Villaverde Cruce and Viña de Entrevías

CONDITIONS

Social Cohesion Social Cohesion Meseta de Orcasitas and Pozo del Tío Raimundo.

Metropolitan integration FORMS OFCITIZEN Marquesa de Amboage, San Blas I, San Pascual and PM Vallecas.

Poverty and marginalization San Fermín, Canillejas, UVA de Vallecas, Orcasur, Pan Bendito, Santa Ana, Pinar de Chamartín, UVA de Villaverde, Cañorroto, Cornisa

CITIZEN PARTICIPATION

EURA 2011: THE CITY WITHOUT LIMITS

San Fermín, Canillejas, UVA de Vallecas, Orcasur, Pan Bendito, Santa Ana, Pinar de Chamartín, UVA de Villaverde, Cañorroto, Cornisade Orcasitas and Zofio.

Page 8: Eura 2011: Cities without Limits

The Madrid Neighbourhoods Remodeling Operation: CLASSIFICATION BY DIFFERENTIAL ASPECTS

Modern urbanism morphologiesOPEN BLOCK URBAN SCHEMES

Zofio, Orcasur, Palomeras North, San Fermín, UVA Vallecas, Pan Bendito, Los Cármenes de Caño Roto, Santa Ana, Villaverde Cruce, San Blas y Canillejas.

Classical urban morphologies

URBAN MORPHOLOGY Classical urban morphologies

COMPACTED CLOSED BLOCK URBAN SCHEMESCornisa de Orcasitas, PD Orcasitas, Meseta de Orcasitas, Palomeras Southeast, El Pozo del Tío Raimundo, Las Carolinas, San Pascualy Roger de Flor.

MORPHOLOGY

y Roger de Flor.

Integrated UnitsIntegrated UnitsMarquesa de Ambogae, San Blas I, PD Orcasitas and San Pascual.

Marginal UnitsURBAN INTEGRATION

PM Vallecas, Cornisa de Orcasitas, Zofio, UVA Villaverde, Caño Roto, Santa Ana, Pan Bendito, Orcasur and Pinar de Chamartín.

Greater local empowerment UnitsCanillejas, UVA Vallecas, San Fermín, Pozo del Tío Raimundo and Meseta de Orcasitas.

LEVEL

EURA 2011: THE CITY WITHOUT LIMITS

Canillejas, UVA Vallecas, San Fermín, Pozo del Tío Raimundo and Meseta de Orcasitas.

Page 9: Eura 2011: Cities without Limits

The impact of the transformation strategies of Madrid in remodeling neighborhoods

The historical review shows us that the recovery of these areas was never considered as a potential :

50’s / 60’s High inmigrantion that leads to a discontinuous belt of substandar settlements around the city.

60’s The State plans relocations in autonomous satellite areas.

EURA 2011: THE CITY WITHOUT LIMITS Scheme based on an illustration of Pedro Muguruza, General Director of Architecture, in: “El futuro de Madrid”, 1945.

Page 10: Eura 2011: Cities without Limits

The impact of the transformation strategies of Madrid in remodeling neighborhoods

Last 70’s / 80 ‘s The formal and informal settlements gain a better central position.

Sucession of Special Plans intended to relocated the original residents in new suburbs.

Pressure and demand of residents to improve the conditions of the neighborhoods.

Finally, was recognize the right of the original residents to stay and upgrade their

neighborhoodsneighborhoods.

f90’s / onwards New urban developments in the periphery, most of them residential areas.

Current operations to provide services to new residential areas on the periphery.

Current restructuring operations to define, connect or recover new opportunity areas.

EURA 2011: THE CITY WITHOUT LIMITS

Page 11: Eura 2011: Cities without Limits

The impact of the transformation strategies of Madrid in remodeling neighborhoods

These areas have changed their position in the city to better central conditions. Neighbor of Fuencarral Unit:"We were displaced outside the city and now we are standing over gold” .

EURA 2011: THE CITY WITHOUT LIMITS

Original situationPeripheral settlements’ locations - Border areas

Current SituationBetter central location - Areas within the urban continuum

Page 12: Eura 2011: Cities without Limits

The impact of the transformation strategies of Madrid in remodeling neighborhoods

The position scheme

in some representative cases:p

Palomeras

OrcasitasOrcasitas

PA Fuencarral A y B

PA Canillas

EURA 2011: THE CITY WITHOUT LIMITS

Page 13: Eura 2011: Cities without Limits

The impact of the transformation strategies of Madrid in remodeling neighborhoods

P A L O M E R A S E X P E R I E N C EOverall, this is a quality renewed wide area that since thebeginning has been perceived as a safe area but with littlebeginning has been perceived as a safe area but with littleactivity. The relations are more intense with city central areasthan with its nearby urban areas.y

Remodeled area: renovationOriginal Settlement in transformation

EURA 2011: THE CITY WITHOUT LIMITS

Page 14: Eura 2011: Cities without Limits

The impact of the transformation strategies of Madrid in remodeling neighborhoods

O R C A S I T A S E X P E R I E N C EIn brief, despite of public transport deficits, urbanintegration and social interactions with nearby areas areintegration and social interactions with nearby areas arecorrect.

Remodeled area: renovationRemodeled area: renovation

Original Settlement in transformationg

EURA 2011: THE CITY WITHOUT LIMITS

Page 15: Eura 2011: Cities without Limits

The impact of the transformation strategies of Madrid in remodeling neighborhoods

P A F U E N C A R R A L A a n d B E X P E R I E N C ETo sum up, there are still physical barriers to correct and field workto be done to improve the exchange of relations with thesurrounding urban environment.

A

BOriginal Settlement in transformation

EURA 2011: THE CITY WITHOUT LIMITS

Page 16: Eura 2011: Cities without Limits

The impact of the transformation strategies of Madrid in remodeling neighborhoods

P A C A N I L L A S E X P E R I E N C EIn conclusion, the Remodeling Program isdd d l i l t b i b t h taddressed exclusively to urban issues, but has not

even correct accessibility problems or elevationdifferences. Nor is prepared any plan to respond top p y p pthe conflicts arising throughout the process.

Original Settlement in transformation

EURA 2011: THE CITY WITHOUT LIMITS

Page 17: Eura 2011: Cities without Limits

Final Reflections: integral and participatory regeneration processes as mechanism to recover distressed neighborhoods

Main lessons learned regarding the strategy approach:

Coordinated global strategy

Integral and inclusive approach value Integral and inclusive approach value

Collaborative value

P i l li i i Potentials versus limitations

Ownership and identification sense

Creative and dynamic solutions and mechanisms value

Respond to location’s determinants p

Adequate relation between built and free spaces generated

EURA 2011: THE CITY WITHOUT LIMITS

Page 18: Eura 2011: Cities without Limits

Final Reflections: integral and participatory regeneration processes as mechanism to recover distressed neighborhoods

In conclusion, it was demonstrated the value of the residents involvement in various stages of the process

to add support, skills, resources and knowledge.

However, it would have been desirable as well:

Collectively identification of: resources, attractiveness and capacity of each actor involved.

Define the role and capacity of action of each type of urban actor.

Establish a clear structure to encourage involvement, commitment and interaction of all actors.Establish a clear structure to encourage involvement, commitment and interaction of all actors.

“Th t i th d i f h l l f f bili d b di i lThe power to organize the space derives from a whole complex of forces mobilized by diverse social

agents, within urban government and administration have only a facilitative and coordinating role to play"

EURA 2011: THE CITY WITHOUT LIMITS

D a v i d H a r v e y . S p a c e s o f C a p i t a l . 2 0 0 1 .