of 23 /23
Evaluating Center Evaluating Center Pivots in Missouri Pivots in Missouri Joe Henggeler Joe Henggeler University of Missouri University of Missouri 38th ANNUAL MISSOURI IRRIGATION CONFERENCE 38th ANNUAL MISSOURI IRRIGATION CONFERENCE Wednesday, Feb. 2, 2004 Wednesday, Feb. 2, 2004 309 Hearnes Center, Columbia, MO 309 Hearnes Center, Columbia, MO

Evaluating Center Pivots in Missouri Joe Henggeler University of Missouri University of Missouri 38th ANNUAL MISSOURI IRRIGATION CONFERENCE Wednesday,

  • View
    212

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Text of Evaluating Center Pivots in Missouri Joe Henggeler University of Missouri University of Missouri...

  • Slide 1
  • Evaluating Center Pivots in Missouri Joe Henggeler University of Missouri University of Missouri 38th ANNUAL MISSOURI IRRIGATION CONFERENCE Wednesday, Feb. 2, 2004 309 Hearnes Center, Columbia, MO
  • Slide 2
  • Team Up! Irrigation Scheduling Irrigation Scheduling Proper fertigation (corn) Proper fertigation (corn) Testing center pivots Testing center pivots
  • Slide 3
  • Conducting a Test
  • Slide 4
  • Slide 5
  • Slide 6
  • Other Data Collected Pivot age / total hours of operation Pivot age / total hours of operation Pressure at beginning & end Pressure at beginning & end
  • Slide 7
  • Other Data Collected, cont. Type of sprinkler Type of sprinkler Weather conditions during the test Weather conditions during the test
  • Slide 8
  • Distribution Uniformity Average catch of Low Quarter Average catch DU = x 100
  • Slide 9
  • Irrigation Distribution Uniformity (DU) Average catch = 1.1 Average Low Quarter catch = 0.8
  • Slide 10
  • Irrigation Distribution Uniformity (DU) Average catch = 1.1 Average Low Quarter catch = 0.8 DU = (0.8 1.1) x 100 = 72%
  • Slide 11
  • Evaluating Catch Amounts 10 ft
  • Slide 12
  • Evaluating Catch Amounts 0.8 1.2 0.3 1.0 0.7 10 ft
  • Slide 13
  • Evaluating Catch Amounts 0.8 1.2 0.3 1.0 0.7 (0.8 + 1.2 + 0.3) 3 = 0.7 10 ft (0.3 + 1.0 + 0.7) 3 = 0.7 (1.2 + 0.3 + 1.0) 3 = 0.8
  • Slide 14
  • Lots of data !
  • Slide 15
  • Problems with Systems
  • Slide 16
  • DU Value Rating > 75% Excellent 65 74 % Good 50 64 % Fair < 49 % Poor
  • Slide 17
  • Results
  • Slide 18
  • Results, cont.
  • Slide 19
  • Slide 20
  • Straight Value Averaging Catch 50 % 67 % 82 % 86 % 30 % 45 % Average Maximum Minimum
  • Slide 21
  • Slide 22
  • Locations of Pivots Tested 2004 Tested 2003 Tested < 2003
  • Slide 23
  • The End Joe Henggeler Delta Center Research Center [email protected]