Upload
pules
View
57
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Evaluating Stormwater BMPs. Frank Henning Region IV Land Grant Universities Liaison. What Low Impact Development Is and Is Not. Stormpond Design Volumes. Georgia Stormwater Management Manual, Vol. 2 ARC 2001. Water Quality. Volume. Knoxville, TN Development Manual. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Evaluating Stormwater BMPs
Frank HenningRegion IV Land Grant Universities Liaison
Insert University Logo here
Insert Unit # and Title
What Low Impact DevelopmentIs and Is Not
LID Is: LID Is Not:
Volume control for small storms Major flood control
Better stormwater management for new & existing development
Anti-development
Requires complementary approaches for large storms
A stand-alone solution for all wet weather management
Scale site specific solution One size fits all
Mimics natural hydrology Dry up all the streams
Cost competitive to traditional stormwater management
Free
Georgia Stormwater Management Manual, Vol. 2ARC 2001
StormpondDesignVolumes
Water Quality
Volume
Knoxville, TN Development Manual
6
Reducing Runoff Volume
Flow Volume
Green Infrastructure/LID
– Preserves natural environments– Retains stormwater volume for infiltration,
evapotranspiration, or use– Removes the volume from the stream– Mimics natural hydrology, often enhances groundwater
recharge and base flow – Removes pollutant load associated with the volume
retained– Does not transfer pollution to ground water– May need additional storage to address stream
protection and flood prevention requirements
Natural Area Preservation
Storage volume = predevelopment conditions Natural areas generally are counted as net zero Can they store, infiltrate, evapotranspirate more than the design volume?
Soils and vegetation – already present = free Inlet/Outlet control – direct inflow/overland flow = free
Wetlands Franklin, TN Maryville TN Buffers Maryville TN Springhead
Soil Enhancement Program• Cost – usually minimal or low• Storage – enhance void space and infiltration
rate of soil • Soil – amended soil and native soil infiltration
rate• Vegetation – selection based on site• Inlet/Outlet – direct inflow, overland or directed
Vegetative Cover
- Proper fertilizer and pesticide use - Maintain vegetative cover - BMP is a nutrient sink, not a nutrient source (how green is green?)- Stormwater contains nutrients
Reduce Pollutant Loads
Disconnection Programs
• Storage – based voids, and infiltration rate of soil, impervious area disconnected (capture area)
• Soils – amended or uncompacted native soil• Vegetation – selection based on the site• Inlet/Outlet – downspouts, sheet flow over vegetated
areas to swales, sewers, waterbodies
Tree Canopy Programs
• Storage volume - based on pool volume, void space of amended soil, native soil infiltration rate, evapotranspiration rate, capture area
• Soil – structural or amended for storage/pollutant uptake
• Vegetation - trees for largest amount of evapotranspiration, other benefits
• Inlet /Outlet Controls – must provide!
Rainwater Harvesting & Use• Storage volume – • Water Use – irrigation or other use • Soils - infiltration• Vegetation – evapotranspiration• Inlet/Outlet - must be provided• Outlet protection – reduce erosion
Green Parking – Permeable Pavement
Green Roofs
• Storage – soil depth/voids• Soils – amended, structured• Vegetation – intensive (shallow soil-
sedums or drought tolerant species)or extensive (deep soil-small tree, shrubs)
• Inlet /Outlet – direct capture/roof drains• Structural – must perform analysis
Raingardens/Bioretention
• Storage Volume – based on pool design, amended soil void space, capture area
• Soils - native soils are removed and replaced with amended soil
• Vegetation - herbaceous (low evapotranspiration)• Inlet/ Outlet controls - direct inflow and
provide for bypassing larger events
Volume Comparison
Burnsville, MNNeighborhoodRain GardenStudyBarr Engineering
Other GI/LID Benefits
• Air quality improvement• Community beautification• Energy savings• Health benefits• Heat island reduction• Property value improvement• Recreation and wildlife
AcknowledgementsModule contributors:
Material for this module was adapted from presentations and publications byRegion IV EPA Watershed Protection Division
Module editors:[Insert names and affiliations here for at least 2 peer-reviewers]
Southern Region Landscape Team:Amy Shober (UF/IFAS); Lucy Bradley (NCSU); Eve Brantley (Auburn); Wendi Hartup (NCSU); Barbara Fair (NCSU); Frank Henning (USEPA/UGA); Esen Momol (UF/IFAS); Kerry Smith (Auburn); Dotty Woodson (Texas Agrilife); Sheryl Wells (UGA)
Funding for this module provided by: USDA-NIFA National Water Program, Southern Regional Water Program special project funds
Graphic design:Emily Eubanks - UF/IFAS Center for Landscape Conservation and Ecology; Amy L. Shober – UF/IFAS Gulf Coast Research and Education Center
21