Upload
luis-howell
View
219
Download
3
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Evidence into Practice: how to read a paper
Rob Sneyd(with help from...Andrew F. Smith, Lancaster, UK)
Outline
• Evidence-based medicine• Appraisal of published trials• The anatomy of a journal
Four steps to evidence-based practice
1. Ask a clinical question2. Search for evidence3. Critically appraise the evidence4. Integrate the evidence into practice
Levels of evidence
I Systematic review of RCT’sII Single RCTIII Cohort studiesIVCase seriesV Single case report
Appraisal of published studies
‘Is this paper any good?’
1. Validity2. Applicability3. Logical flow
Validity: bias and distortion
Bias in clinical trials
• Recruitment• Selection• Allocation • Performance• Observer• Inference• Reviewer
Bias in clinical trials
• Recruitment• Selection• Allocation Randomisation• Performance Blinding• Observer Blinding• Inference• Reviewer
Introduction
Method
Introduction
Method
• Meaningful outcomes• Inclusion and exclusion• Detail - replicability• Measurement tools• Allocation concealment• Blinding and control groups• Follow-up and dropouts• Power calculation and significance
Method
Results
Introduction
Method
Discussion
Results
Introduction
Discussion
• Summary of main findings• Comment on strengths and weaknesses• Comparison with other studies – similarities
and differences• Mechanisms and implications• Unanswered questions and future work
Method
Conclusion
Discussion
Results
Introduction
Method
Conclusion
Discussion
ResultsAbstract
Introduction
Anatomy of the anaesthesia journal
Editorials
• ‘Rarely contain primary data’• Help interpret research and promote its use in
practice• Promote discussion • Offer ‘authoritative’ opinion
What are review articles for?
• Answering clinical questions• Keeping up to date• Starting-point for future research• Assimilating primary research
Systematic review
‘A review in which evidence on a topic has been systematically identified, appraised and summarised according to predetermined criteria’
Systematic review
1. Decide scope and purpose2. Exhaustive search for material3. Inclusion on pre-defined criteria4. Quality assessment of relevant studies5. Data extraction6. Synthesis and integration7. Interpretation
Case reports
• Focus on individuals rather than populations• Narrative power• Archive of collective experience• Sensitive to novelty: new benefits,
complications, the unknown and unrecognised
Correspondence
• ‘The proper dialogue of science’• Extend journals’ peer review by readers’
comments, corrections and interpretation• Not usually peer reviewed• Under-rated and poorly indexed
Conclusion
• Simple non-statistical principles can help make sense of research
• Evidence and opinion both have their place but should not be confused
• Bias is everywhere and must be taken into account
• Critical appraisal helps us identify good evidence