39
HERVE BARON © 2013 – Hervé Baron The evolution of EPC contracting Welcome to this presentation. It shows the evolution that took place in EPC contrcting schemes over the last 30 years. Comments are most welcome ([email protected]), which I will incorporate for the benefit of all. Hervé

Evolution of EPC Contracting

  • Upload
    syafiq

  • View
    245

  • Download
    5

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Evolution of EPC Contracting

Citation preview

Page 1: Evolution of EPC Contracting

HERVE BARON

© 2013 – Hervé Baron

The evolution of EPC contracting

Welcome to this presentation.

It shows the evolution that took place in EPC contrcting schemes over the last 30 years.

Comments are most welcome ([email protected]), which I will incorporate for the benefit of all.

Hervé

Page 2: Evolution of EPC Contracting

HERVE BARON

© 2013 – Hervé Baron

Contracting schemes EPC Contracts

Clients contracting strategy

Phase 1

Page 3: Evolution of EPC Contracting

HERVE BARON

© 2013 – Hervé Baron

Contracting schemes

Clients contracting strategy

Phase 1 • EPCM • Re-imbursable

Page 4: Evolution of EPC Contracting

HERVE BARON

© 2013 – Hervé Baron

Contracting schemes

Clients contracting strategy

Phase 1 • EPCM • Re-imbursable

Pro’s and Cont’s

Page 5: Evolution of EPC Contracting

HERVE BARON

© 2013 – Hervé Baron

Contracting schemes EPC Contracts

Clients contracting strategy

Phase 1 • EPCM • Re-imbursable

Pro’s and Cont’s

Phase 1 • All risks with Client • Budget and schedule slippage • Extensive supervision staff

Page 6: Evolution of EPC Contracting

HERVE BARON

© 2013 – Hervé Baron

Contracting schemes

Clients contracting strategy

Phase 1 • EPCM • Re-imbursable

Phase 2

Pro’s and Cont’s

Phase 1 • All risks with Client • Slippage budget and schedule • Extensive supervision staff

Page 7: Evolution of EPC Contracting

HERVE BARON

© 2013 – Hervé Baron

Contracting schemes

Clients contracting strategy

Phase 1 • EPCM • Re-imbursable

Phase 2 • EPCM • LS E&P

Pro’s and Cont’s

Phase 1 • All risks with Client • Slippage budget and schedule • Extensive supervision staff

Page 8: Evolution of EPC Contracting

HERVE BARON

© 2013 – Hervé Baron

Contracting schemes EPC Contracts

Clients contracting strategy

Phase 1 • EPCM • Re-imbursable

Phase 2 • EPCM • LS E&P

Pro’s and Cont’s

Phase 1 • All risks with Client • Slippage budget and schedule • Extensive supervision staff

Page 9: Evolution of EPC Contracting

HERVE BARON

© 2013 – Hervé Baron

Contracting schemes

Clients contracting strategy

Phase 1 • EPCM • Re-imbursable

Phase 2 • EPCM • LS E&P

Pro’s and Cont’s

Phase 1 • All risks with Client • Slippage budget and schedule • Extensive supervision staff

Phase 2 • Improvement over Phase 1 on

schedule and budget • Extensive supervision staff

Page 10: Evolution of EPC Contracting

HERVE BARON

© 2013 – Hervé Baron

Contracting schemes

Clients contracting strategy

Phase 1 • EPCM • Re-imbursable

Phase 2 • EPCM • LS E&P

Pro’s and Cont’s

Phase 1 • All risks with Client • Slippage budget and schedule • Extensive supervision staff

Phase 2 • Improvement over Phase 1 on

schedule and budget • Extensive supervision staff

What difference did Phase 2 bring compared to Phase 1 for Engineering development?

Page 11: Evolution of EPC Contracting

HERVE BARON

© 2013 – Hervé Baron

Contracting schemes

Clients contracting strategy

Phase 1 • EPCM • Re-imbursable

Phase 2 • EPCM • LS E&P

Pro’s and Cont’s

Phase 1 • All risks with Client • Slippage budget and schedule • Extensive supervision staff

Phase 2 • Improvement over Phase 1 on

schedule and budget • Extensive supervision staff

Engineering continuum

FEED then CFT for EPC

Page 12: Evolution of EPC Contracting

HERVE BARON

© 2013 – Hervé Baron

Contracting schemes

Clients contracting strategy

Phase 1 • EPCM • Re-imbursable

Phase 2 • EPCM • LS E&P

Phase 3

Pro’s and Cont’s

Phase 1 • All risks with Client • Slippage budget and schedule • Extensive supervision staff

Phase 2 • Improvement over Phase 1 on

schedule and budget • Extensive supervision staff

Page 13: Evolution of EPC Contracting

HERVE BARON

© 2013 – Hervé Baron

Contracting schemes

Clients contracting strategy

Phase 1 • EPCM • Re-imbursable

Phase 2 • EPCM • LS E&P

Phase 3 • LSTK

Pro’s and Cont’s

Phase 1 • All risks with Client • Slippage budget and schedule • Extensive supervision staff

Phase 2 • Improvement over Phase 1 on

schedule and budget • Extensive supervision staff

Page 14: Evolution of EPC Contracting

HERVE BARON

© 2013 – Hervé Baron

Contracting schemes

Clients contracting strategy

Phase 1 • EPCM • Re-imbursable

Phase 2 • EPCM • LS E&P

Phase 3 • LSTK

Pro’s and Cont’s

Phase 1 • All risks with Client • Slippage budget and schedule • Extensive supervision staff

Phase 2 • Improvement over Phase 1 on

schedule and budget • Extensive supervision staff

Page 15: Evolution of EPC Contracting

HERVE BARON

© 2013 – Hervé Baron

Contracting schemes

Clients contracting strategy

Phase 1 • EPCM • Re-imbursable

Phase 2 • EPCM • LS E&P

Phase 3 • LSTK

Pro’s and Cont’s

Phase 1 • All risks with Client • Slippage budget and schedule • Extensive supervision staff

Phase 2 • Improvement over Phase 1 on

schedule and budget • Extensive supervision staff

Phase 3 • All risks with Contractor

Page 16: Evolution of EPC Contracting

HERVE BARON

© 2013 – Hervé Baron

Contracting schemes

Clients contracting strategy

Phase 1 • EPCM • Re-imbursable

Phase 2 • EPCM • LS E&P

Phase 3 • LSTK

Pro’s and Cont’s

Phase 1 • All risks with Client • Slippage budget and schedule • Extensive supervision staff

Phase 2 • Improvement over Phase 1 on

schedule and budget • Extensive supervision staff

Phase 3 • All risks with Contractor

Less and less need for a PMC

Page 17: Evolution of EPC Contracting

HERVE BARON

© 2013 – Hervé Baron

Contracting schemes EPC Contracts

Contractor’s strategy

Phase 3 • LSTK

How does the Contractor mitigate risks?

Page 18: Evolution of EPC Contracting

HERVE BARON

© 2013 – Hervé Baron

Contracting schemes EPC Contracts

Contractor’s strategy

Phase 3 • LSTK • Construction sub-contract

Page 19: Evolution of EPC Contracting

HERVE BARON

© 2013 – Hervé Baron

Contracting schemes EPC Contracts

Contractor’s strategy

Phase 3 • LSTK • Construction sub-contract

Pro’s and Cont’s

Page 20: Evolution of EPC Contracting

HERVE BARON

© 2013 – Hervé Baron

Contracting schemes EPC Contracts

Contractor’s strategy

Phase 3 • LSTK • Construction sub-contract

Pro’s and Cont’s

Phase 3 • Partial risk sharing

Page 21: Evolution of EPC Contracting

HERVE BARON

© 2013 – Hervé Baron

Contracting schemes EPC Contracts

Contractor’s strategy

Phase 3 • LSTK • Construction sub-contract

Pro’s and Cont’s

Phase 3 • Partial risk sharing

2 different schemes: 3a and 3b

Page 22: Evolution of EPC Contracting

HERVE BARON

© 2013 – Hervé Baron

Contracting schemes EPC Contracts

Contractor’s strategy

Phase 3 • LSTK • Construction sub-contract

• Phase 3a

− General Construction Contractor

Pro’s and Cont’s

Phase 3 • Partial risk sharing

Page 23: Evolution of EPC Contracting

HERVE BARON

© 2013 – Hervé Baron

Contracting schemes EPC Contracts

Contractor’s strategy

Phase 3 • LSTK • Construction sub-contract

• Phase 3a

− General Construction Contractor

Pro’s and Cont’s

Phase 3 • Partial risk sharing

Page 24: Evolution of EPC Contracting

HERVE BARON

© 2013 – Hervé Baron

Contracting schemes EPC Contracts

Contractor’s strategy

Phase 3 • LSTK • Construction sub-contract

• Phase 3a

− General Construction Contractor

Pro’s and Cont’s

Phase 3 • Partial risk sharing

• Phase 3a

− Reduced risk and supervision

Page 25: Evolution of EPC Contracting

HERVE BARON

© 2013 – Hervé Baron

Contracting schemes EPC Contracts

Contractor’s strategy

Phase 3 • LSTK • Construction sub-contract

• Phase 3a

− General Construction Contractor

• Phase 3b – intense cost pressure

Pro’s and Cont’s

Phase 3 • Partial risk sharing

• Phase 3a − Reduced risk and supervision

Page 26: Evolution of EPC Contracting

HERVE BARON

© 2013 – Hervé Baron

Contracting schemes EPC Contracts

Contractor’s strategy

Phase 3 • LSTK • Construction sub-contract

• Phase 3a

− General Construction Contractor

• Phase 3b – intense cost pressure − Multiple Construction Sub-

Contractors

Pro’s and Cont’s

Phase 3 • Partial risk sharing

• Phase 3a − Reduced risk and supervision

Page 27: Evolution of EPC Contracting

HERVE BARON

© 2013 – Hervé Baron

Contracting schemes EPC Contracts

Contractor’s strategy

Phase 3 • LSTK • Construction sub-contract

• Phase 3a

− General Construction Contractor

• Phase 3b – intense cost pressure − Multiple Construction Sub-

Contractors

Pro’s and Cont’s

Phase 3 • Partial risk sharing

• Phase 3a − Reduced risk and supervision

Page 28: Evolution of EPC Contracting

HERVE BARON

© 2013 – Hervé Baron

Contracting schemes EPC Contracts

Contractor’s strategy

Phase 3 • LSTK • Construction sub-contract

• Phase 3a

− General Construction Contractor

• Phase 3b – intense cost pressure − Multiple Construction Sub-

Contractors

Pro’s and Cont’s

Phase 3 • Partial risk sharing

• Phase 3a − Reduced risk and supervision

• Phase 3b

− Increased competition − Extensive coordination

Page 29: Evolution of EPC Contracting

HERVE BARON

© 2013 – Hervé Baron

Contracting schemes EPC Contracts

Contractor’s strategy

Phase 3 • LSTK • Construction sub-contract

Pro’s and Cont’s

Phase 3 • Partial risk sharing

Page 30: Evolution of EPC Contracting

HERVE BARON

© 2013 – Hervé Baron

Contracting schemes EPC Contracts

Contractor’s strategy

Phase 3 • LSTK • Construction sub-contract

Pro’s and Cont’s

Phase 3 • Partial risk sharing

What usually happened?

Page 31: Evolution of EPC Contracting

HERVE BARON

© 2013 – Hervé Baron

Contracting schemes EPC Contracts

Contractor’s strategy

Phase 3 • LSTK • Construction sub-contract

Pro’s and Cont’s

Phase 3 • Partial risk sharing • E&P delays => Sub-contractor has

to accelerate hence claims

Page 32: Evolution of EPC Contracting

HERVE BARON

© 2013 – Hervé Baron

Contracting schemes EPC Contracts

Contractor’s strategy

Phase 3 • LSTK • Construction sub-contract

Pro’s and Cont’s

Phase 3 • Partial risk sharing • E&P delays => Sub-contractor has

to accelerate hence claims

What new scheme was introduced to mitigate?

Page 33: Evolution of EPC Contracting

HERVE BARON

© 2013 – Hervé Baron

Contracting schemes EPC Contracts

Contractor’s strategy

Phase 3 • LSTK • Construction sub-contract

Phase 4

Pro’s and Cont’s

Phase 3 • Partial risk sharing • E&P delays => Sub-contractor has

to accelerate hence claims

Page 34: Evolution of EPC Contracting

HERVE BARON

© 2013 – Hervé Baron

Contracting schemes EPC Contracts Contractor’s strategy

Phase 3 • LSTK • Construction sub-contract

Phase 4 • EP / C in Consortium or JV

Pro’s and Cont’s

Phase 3 • Partial risk sharing • E&P delays => Sub-contractor has

to accelerate hence claims

Page 35: Evolution of EPC Contracting

HERVE BARON

© 2013 – Hervé Baron

Contracting schemes EPC Contracts Contractor’s strategy

Phase 3 • LSTK • Construction sub-contract

Phase 4 • EP / C in Consortium or JV

Pro’s and Cont’s

Phase 3 • Partial risk sharing • E&P delays => Sub-contractor has

to accelerate hence claims

Page 36: Evolution of EPC Contracting

HERVE BARON

© 2013 – Hervé Baron

Contracting schemes EPC Contracts Contractor’s strategy

Phase 3 • LSTK • Construction sub-contract

Phase 4 • EP / C in Consortium or JV

Pro’s and Cont’s

Phase 3 • Partial risk sharing • E&P delays => Sub-contractor has

to accelerate hence claims

Phase 4 − Improved risk sharing − No claims − Less competitive

Présentateur
Commentaires de présentation
Rk Improved risk sharing since no risk of claim JV: hard for the EP to control C manhours. C can play its own interest. Therefore Consortium becomes the norm.
Page 37: Evolution of EPC Contracting

HERVE BARON

© 2013 – Hervé Baron

Contracting schemes EPC Contracts Contractor’s strategy

Phase 3 • LSTK • Construction sub-contract

Phase 4 • EP / C in Consortium or JV

Pro’s and Cont’s

Phase 3 • Partial risk sharing • E&P delays => Sub-contractor has

to accelerate hence claims

Phase 4 − Improved risk sharing − No claims − Less competitive

Which scheme is better for COMPANY: 3 or 4? Why?

Présentateur
Commentaires de présentation
3b is better as risk is shared by 2 CTRs instead of one Also CPY has direct control over C resp. EP But more expensive as both partners include their risk
Page 38: Evolution of EPC Contracting

HERVE BARON

© 2013 – Hervé Baron

Typical EPC associations

Page 39: Evolution of EPC Contracting

HERVE BARON

© 2013 – Hervé Baron

http://www.toblog.fr/en/baron.html

You enjoyed this presentation? Share my experience on other topics: Engineering Contract Management Project Control

Attend my classroom training The list and schedule of coming sessions is on my blog at:

Going further