Upload
ywonne-peterson
View
216
Download
4
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Family therapy treatment: Working with obese children and theirfamilies with small steps and realistic goals
YWONNE PETERSON
TMK Konsult AB, Blentarp, Sweden
AbstractChildhood obesity treatment can be discussed from several points of view, and there are many forms of treatment. Solution-focused brief therapy (SFBT) and systemic family therapy can be useful in a wide range of contexts and settings such as socialcare, education and healthcare. They can also be used wherever practitioners sometimes feel that they have very little impacton the patient and where the patient seems to be resistant to acknowledging his/her problem. Health professionals need toassist by starting to explain main goals and medical information in terms of a single, small, concrete and important goal,described as the beginning of a new behaviour, not as the end of something. This report focuses on some useful tools andmethods taken from casework examples from multidisciplinary obesity team meetings with more than 300 families during a3-y project approximately between 2002 and 2003 at the Childhood Obesity Unit at University Hospital, Malmo. Othercasework examples are taken from supervision and training professionals who are currently working with or are going to workwith childhood obesity using a solution-focused model. The main aim of this report is to discuss and think about the differencebetween problem-solving and solution-building interview questions when it comes to treatment regarding how best to helpchildren and parents with serious obesity health problems.
Conclusion: There is a great need for treatment models and the prevention of childhood obesity now and in future, whichpresents an interesting and urgent challenge for open-minded thinking and new fields of research.
KeyWords:Childhood obesity,multidisciplinary team, interviewing skills, salutogenic, solution-focused brief therapy, small steps
Introduction
Childhood obesity is an increasing problem in most
developed countries, and many different kinds of treat-
ment for obesity have been investigated, mostly by
medical studies including genetic influences, medica-
tion, surgery, diet, exercise and some studies from
behavioural cognitive therapy [1]. The multifactorial
causes of obesity probably require more than one treat-
ment. One frequently asked question by professionals/
parents when it comes to practical work is: How do we
work with clients/patients that are not motivated?
Multidisciplinary obesity teams with a solution-
focused approach can be one way that gives the child/
teenager and their family some ideas about what they
need to know in order to make lifestyle changes.
Solution-focused brief therapy (SFBT):
A working model
Solution-focused brief therapy (SFBT) is based on
some of the same interactions, individuals in the
context of environmental ideas, as family therapy. The
SFBT view is based on the idea that stability is nothing
but an illusion based on memory, and it views human
life as a continuously changing process. It is not possible
to put life on hold. The philosophical belief in SFBT is
that the best way to provide services and treatment to a
child is by strengthening and empowering the family as
a unit. SFBT uses more time thinking about how to get
out of the problem than how the problem began [2–5].
The solution-focused approach builds upon the client’s
resources. It helps clients to achieve their preferred
outcomes by evoking and constructing solutions to
their problems [6]. When working with this approach,
focus is on what Antovnovsky [7] called salutogentic
aspects rather than pathogenetic ones. Health profes-
sionals like doctors, nurses and trainers work in
different contexts to professionals in a psychodynamic
context. The aim and context is different when you
work with long-term treatment than it is in a short
meeting with a doctor in a hospital, but long-term
treatment does not have to be more effective compared
to brief treatment [8,9]. In the first meeting at a
hospital, it can be very helpful to use a context that
Correspondence: Ywonne Peterson, TMK Konsult AB, SE-270 35 Blentarp, Sweden. Tel: +46 416 24396. Mobile: +46 70 370 60 40. E-mail:
Acta Pædiatrica, 2005; 94(Suppl 448): 42–44
ISSN 0803-5326 print/ISSN 1651-2227 online # 2005 Taylor & Francis Group Ltd
DOI: 10.1080/08035320510035573
takes us into a conversation that gives the obese child
and his/her family the feeling of being involved in the
treatment. Merely making a correct diagnosis of the
illness and knowing the correct method of treatment is
not enough. It is also important that the child/teenager
and his/her family are receptive to the treatment and
cooperative in regard to it.
The solution-focused approach, based on respect for
and collaboration with the client, concentrates on
success, exceptions and solutions. How can we be
helpful to families affected by obesity who need lifestyle
changes? Therapists develop goals together with the
patient rather than imposing ideas and assumptions
about what the client needs to do. How can we learn
about what they need in order to move to realistic
goals? How can we focus on the development of con-
fidence and competence of parents/caregivers and
children in moving towards their preferred futures and
goals? What needs to happen in a meeting that tells the
family that it was worth coming? [10]. What kind of
questions do they want to know more about? One way
to find out is to ask them how we can be helpful. Clients
sometimes describe their goals in an idealistic, trouble-
free way and sometimes they do not find the goal
achievable and therefore turn it into a statement where
the locus of control of the situation is too far away from
where they stand. A central belief in SFBT is that clients
have most or all the resources and strengths they need
to solve their problems [3,11]. Obese children/teen-
agers and their parents need to emphasize the growing
awarenessofplayingapart in theirown lifestyle changes.
A sense of coherence including comprehensibility,
manageability and meaningfulness is important when
health professionals try to find a way to promote health-
related messages to patients and their families [7]. It
is very difficult to force people to make lifestyle
changes; and if we try to do this, they will probably not
come back. Health professionals need to assist by
starting to explain main goals and medical information
in terms of a single, small, concrete and important goal,
described as the beginning of a new behaviour, not
as the end of something. It does not help if the
doctor, nurse and psychologists are experts if clients/
families do not understand or feel included in the
treatment [10].
Motivated/unmotivated clients
Health professionals want to do their best to give
treatment that helps the obese child/teenager to obtain
a better health situation. In order to understand how
they can be helpful, they sometimes try to find a reason
for different kinds of “eating disorders” in disturbed
communication between parents and their child or
their environment. Different ideas about what causes
obesity are described by professionals and families alike:
“bad experience in childhood”, “school problems”,
“parents’ divorce” or “unmotivated personality”, etc.
Another common question asked by professionals and
parents/caregivers is how to motivate the child/teen-
ager. Human motivation is a complex question that
leads us into new and interesting fields including
linguistic research and construction: What do we mean
by the word “motivated”? What do we mean by resis-
tance? [4,5,12]. Sometimes this thinking assumes that
the patient’s motivation is something that either he/she
has or has not. One way to change from being problem
focused is to think about mandated clients/patients/
families as they have multiple goals, different desires
and ideas about what might be helpful and realistic
goals for them in order to make lifestyle changes.
Clients’ goals are central to solution-focused therapy
[3,10]. If we assume that families affected by obesity
have good reasons for doing what they do, then we as
professionals must have good reasons for being helpful
and creating a cooperative relationship to change
things.
Conclusions
Medical and other health professionals need to be open
to psychosocial factors and other disciplines in order to
provide opportunities for practising interviewing skills
and guidelines for goal setting in professional practice.
One aim is to recognize the difference between
problem-solving and solution-building interview
questions when it comes to treatment regarding how
best to help children and parents with serious obesity
health problems. Methods for reducing childhood
obesity, including a consensus about framework,
interventions and priorities, seem to be important in
avoiding contradictory messages that families affected
by obesity sometimes find confusing. Highlighting
individual and family resources can be helpful in
providing the incentive for a change in behaviour
towards a healthier lifestyle.
We need to know more about the effects of doctor–
patient relationships on the potential and limits of the
doctor’s involvement with the patient and how these
partners respond to each other.
References
[1] Burniat W, Cole T, Lissau I. Child and adolescent obesity.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2002.
[2] O’Hanlon W, Weiner-Davis M. In search of solutions. New
York: W. W. Norton; 1989.
[3] Berg KI. Family preservation: A brief therapy workbook.
London: BT Press; 1992. p 24–32.
[4] de Shazer S. Keys to solution in brief therapy. New York:
W. W. Norton; 1985.
[5] de Shazer S. Clues; investigating solutions in brief therapy.
New York: W. W. Norton; 1988.
[6] O’Connell B. Solution-focused stress counselling. London:
Continuum; 2001. p 1.
Family therapy treatment 43
[7] Antonovsky A. Unraveling the mystery of health. Jossey-Bass
Inc, Publishers; 1987. p 15–32.
[8] Miller SD, Duncan BL, Hubble MA. Escape from Babel. New
York: W. W. Norton; 1997.
[9] Hubble MA, Duncan BL, Miller SD. The heart and soul of
change. What works in therapy. Washington, DC: American
Psychological Association; 2000.
[10] Berg KI, Miller S. Working with the problem drinker.
A solution-focused approach. New York: W. W. Norton; 1992.
p 18–31, 94–128.
[11] Rhodes J, Ajmal Y. Solution-focused thinking in school.
London: PT Press; 1995.
[12] de Shazer S. The death of resistance. Family Process
1984;23:30–40.
44 Y. Peterson