Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism
Flood Damage Statistics in Japan - What is required for mainstreaming DM?
Yusuke AMANO
Director, International Affairs Office
Water and Disaster Management Bureau
Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism, Japan
30 September 2013
Outline 1. Background
2. Methodology for Flood Damage Statistics Survey in Japan
3. Utilization of the Flood Damage Statistics
2
Official Statistics in Japan
Official Statistics is defined in the Statistics Act in Japan as “critical information for the citizens in their reasonable decision making”. In accordance with the Statistics Act, the Basic Plan concerning the development of official statistics is established, in which the Basic Policy and implementation measures are set.
Basic Policy
The role of official statistics To serve as the information bases for the country, enterprises, and individuals in their reasonable decision making.
Fundamental viewpoints for the policy implementation To secure the “effectiveness” of the official statistics; 1. Develop statistics systematically 2. Respond to changes to economical and social environment 3. Promote effective use of the statistical data 4. Prepare statistical data efficiently, secure statistical resources
and utilize them effectively
Flood Damage Statistics is designated as “Official Statistics”.
Survey and Statistics on Flood Damages in Japan
Flood Damage Statistics Survey has been carried out every year since 1961 to estimate the actual damage caused by water-related disasters such as floods, landslides, storm surges, tsunamis, etc. to various general assets owned by individuals or corporate bodies (housings, household commodities, machineries for businesses, agricultural products), public infrastructure such as rivers, roads, etc. and assets for public services such as transportation, communication, etc. The survey provides basic data to present the need for and effectiveness of flood control measures.
Flood Damage Statistics Survey
Post-Disaster Survey determines the number of people and housings (totally damaged, half-damaged, partially-damaged, inundation above/below floor level etc.) damaged by natural disasters including flood, earthquake and tsunami. The survey is conducted and the results are published immediately after the disaster occurrence and are updated as needed.
Post-Disaster Survey in accordance with the Disaster Countermeasure Basic Act
Focusing on determination of economic damage
Focusing on announcement and securing budget for urgent recover
White Paper on Disaster Management
Flood Damage Statistics Survey
Post-Disaster Survey in accordance with the Disaster Countermeasure Basic Act
Survey results are utilized as data source
White Paper on Disaster Management Based on Disaster Countermeasures Basic Act, White Paper has been issued every
year since 1963. It includes the overview of the disaster management measures implemented in the second preceding fiscal year, and the plan for disaster management measures for the current year. (Major disasters in the previous year is also described.)
1. Background
2. Methodology for Flood Damage Statistics Survey in Japan
3. Utilization of the Flood Damage Statistics
Outline
6
Overview of Flood Damage Statistics Survey
1. Overview of Flood Damage Statistics Survey Flood Damage Statistics Survey has been carried out every year since 1961 to estimate the actual damage caused by water-related disasters such as floods, landslides, storm surges, tsunamis, etc. to various general assets owned by individuals or corporate bodies (housings, household commodities, machineries for businesses, agricultural products), public infrastructure such as rivers, roads, etc. and assets for public services such as transportation, communication, etc. The survey provides basic data for presenting the need for and effectiveness of flood control measures.
2. Disasters subject to Flood Damage Statistics Survey
Following water-related disasters that occurred in a given year from January 1 to December 31
1) Floods and inundation caused by river discharge
2) Coastal inundation caused by storm surges and tsunamis
3) Mudflow, landslide, and slope failure caused by heavy rainfall
Types of Flood Damage Statistics Survey
Flood Damage Statistics Survey includes following surveys and are conducted by making consigning contracts with Prefectures.
1) General Asset Flood Damage Statistics Survey Number of houses damaged (according to inundation depth), affected
households, etc are surveyed in order to determine damages to general assets (housings, household commodities, business assets, agricultural products, etc).
Damages to General Asset
・Number of damaged houses according to inundation depth and gradient, number of affected households, etc
Type of Flood Damage Statistics Survey
Damages to Infrastructure
・Cost for emergency rehabilitation, etc
2) Public Infrastructure Flood Damage Statistics Survey Affected facilities and rehabilitation costs are surveyed in order to
determine damages to public infrastructure (rivers, coastal, sediment, roads, ports, sewerage, parks, etc).
3) Public Services Flood Damage Statistics Survey
Costs of physical damage and business interruption are surveyed in order to determine damages to public services (railway, water supply, power supply, communication, etc).
Damages to Public Services
・Physical damage, etc
Query and view the survey data
Methodology of the Flood Damage Statistics Survey
Flood Damage Statistics Survey is a general statistics survey in accordance with the article 19 of the Statistics Act (approved by Minister for Internal Affairs and Communications). It is carried out by MLIT’s Water and Disaster Management Bureau in collaboration with prefectures and municipalities.
National Government (MLIT)
Occurrence of water-related
disaster
-Aggregate the survey data -Calculate the economic damage
-Compile and publish Flood Damage Statistics
-Upload the data to the DB server of Flood Damage Statistics
Develop the guideline of flood damage statistics survey
(coverage and procedure of the survey, survey format, fill-
in guideline, etc.)
Access to Flood Damage Statistics DB National Government
(Regional Offices, etc.)
Aggregate, organize, and screen the survey data
Prefectures
General assets Public infrastructures Public Services
Municipalities Municipalities
Prefectures
Prefectures
Public Services Offices
Submit
Submit within 45 days of disaster
occurrence
Submit
Submit
Outline of Disaster Risk Management System in Japan
1
Various organizations take different roles in disaster risk management in Japan.
Preparedness Response Recovery/Reconstruction
Rescue Team
Fire Fighters Private Sectors
NGOs
Red Cross
Disaster
Infrastructure Managers
The Minister, the Governors of prefectures and the Mayor of municipalities are designated
as Infrastructure Manager in accordance with the management laws on respective
infrastructures such as roads, ports, rivers and so on.
Structural measures for DRM are mostly taken by Infrastructure Managers.
Infrastructure Managers
Municipalities
•Construction
of facilities
•Damage assessment
of the facilities
• Temporary repair
works
•Rehabilitation of facilities
• Instruction,
advisory and
order of
evacuation
•Damage assessment
for affected people
•Assistance to affected
people (temporary
housing etc.)
Police
Coordination among
various stakeholders
is essential.
Semi-Private Public Sectors
・ railway, bus ・ electricity, gas, telecom
・ broadcast
Characteristics of Flood Damage Statistics Survey
The Survey is conducted by municipalities and prefectures based on the nationally uniform survey format. The surveys conducted are not subject to the scale/impact of disasters. Information reported by municipalities and prefectures are facts such as inundation area, inundated households, etc. Determination of economic damages is carried out by MLIT. Survey results are published on MLIT website and are accessible by anyone.
Systematic survey allows accumulation of high-quality statistics data on a continuous basis
Outline 1. Background
2. Methodology for Flood Damage Statistics Survey in Japan
3. Utilization of the Flood Damage Statistics
13
Disaster data for effective management for each country can be utilized - to recognize characteristics of disasters - to review outcomes of disaster management - to identify priority actions to be taken - to encourage continuous efforts and investments for international community - to monitor progress of international cooperation - to help setting internationally common targets (Post MDGs, Review of HFA)
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
1
10
100
1,000
10,000
1946
1951
1956
1961
1966
1971
1976
1981
1986
1991
1996
2001
2006
Flood Management Cost (2000 price)
GDP (2000 price)
Number of Fatalities
Number of Fatalities (people) Flood Management Cost (2000 price)
(hundred of million yen) GDP(2000 price) <billion yen>
<600,000>
<500,000>
<400,000>
<300,000>
<200,000>
<100,000>
<0>
Effect of Flood Management in Japan
*Number of fatalities exclude those who dead by tsunami *GDP : 1980-2011(2000 price), 1946-1979(1990 price)
←
Typ
ho
on
Kat
hle
en
←
Typ
ho
on
Ion
←Ty
ph
oo
n K
itty
←
Typ
ho
on
Jan
e
←Ty
ph
oo
n R
uth
←W
est-
Jap
an F
loo
d
←
Typ
ho
on
To
yam
aru
←Is
ahay
a Fl
oo
d
←Ty
ph
oo
n K
arin
oga
wa
←Ty
ph
oo
n Is
e-B
ay
←Se
con
d T
yph
oo
n M
uro
to
←To
kai F
loo
d
←
Typ
ho
on
No
.24
, No
.26
←W
est-
Jap
an W
ater
Dis
aste
r
←
Typ
ho
on
No
.6, N
o.7
, No
.9
←Ty
ph
oo
n N
o.1
7
←
Nag
asak
i Wat
er D
isas
ter
←W
este
rn-S
anin
Wat
er D
isas
ter
←Ty
ph
oo
n N
o.6
, Lan
dsl
ide
in N
agan
o
←
Wes
t-Ja
pan
Wat
er D
isas
ter
←
Typ
ho
on
No
.17
, No
.18
, No
.19
Pyr
ocl
asti
c fl
ow
of
Un
zen
-Fu
gen
-Dak
e ←
Au
gust
Flo
od
in K
yusy
u
←
Deb
ris
Flo
w in
Kag
osh
ima
Har
ihar
a ←
Fuku
shim
a To
chig
i Flo
od
, Ko
chi F
loo
d
←D
ebri
s Fl
ow
in H
iro
shim
a
Ku
mam
oto
Flo
od
Number of Fatalities by Floods , GDP and Budget for Flood Management (2000 price)
Water-related Disasters Statistics in Japan
Inundated Area by Floods
0
10000
20000
30000
40000
50000
60000
70000
19
62
19
67
19
72
19
77
19
82
19
87
19
92
19
97
20
02
20
07
Total Inundated Area (10,000ha)
Area of Inundated (Residential & Other Property) (10,000ha)
Inundated area (10,000 ha)
20
10
0
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
0
10000
20000
30000
40000
50000
60000
70000
19
62
19
67
19
72
19
77
19
82
19
87
19
92
19
97
20
02
20
07
Damage to General Assets (10 billion yen)
Area of Inundated (Residential & Other Property) (10,000ha)
Damage to General Assets (2000 Price)
Economic Losses to General Assets
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
Flood Management Cost (2000 price)
GDP (2000 price)
Flood Management Cost (2000 price) (hundred of million yen)
GDP(2000 price) <billion yen>
<600,000>
<500,000>
<400,000>
<300,000>
<200,000>
<100,000>
<0>
Flood Damage Density (Economic Losses per Area), GDP and Budget for Flood Management (2000 price)
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
0
10000
20000
30000
40000
50000
60000
70000
19
62
19
67
19
72
19
77
19
82
19
87
19
92
19
97
20
02
20
07
Damage to General Assets (10 billion yen)
Density of Damage Cost (thousand yen / ha)
Total Inundated Area (10,000ha)
Area of Inundated (Residential & Other Property) (10,000ha)
Density of Flood Damage to General Assets
Damage to General Assets (2000 Price)
Inundated area (10,000 ha)
20
10
0
Water-related Disasters Statistics in Japan
Number of Fatalities (per Million People per Year)
19
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
19
70
19
71
19
72
19
73
19
74
19
75
19
76
19
77
19
78
19
79
19
80
19
81
19
82
19
83
19
84
19
85
19
86
19
87
19
88
19
89
19
90
19
91
19
92
19
93
19
94
19
95
19
96
19
97
19
98
19
99
20
00
20
01
20
02
20
03
20
04
20
05
20
06
20
07
20
08
20
09
20
10
20
11
中国 韓国 日本 ベトナム フィリピン インドネシア バングラデシュ スリランカ アメリカ イギリス オランダ
1991
Philippines 82persons/year
1974
Bangladesh 412 persons/year
1975 Floods in Henan Province, China
Vietnam
China 2004
Philippines 2007
Bangladesh
1995
Philippines
China Korea Japan Viet Nam Philippines Indonesia Bangladesh Sri Lanka The US UK The Netherlands
Korea
Number of Fatalities by floods (person/1 million residents)
Economic Losses by Floods (5 years average)/GDP(%)
20
0.00%
0.50%
1.00%
1.50%
2.00%
2.50%
3.00%
19
70
19
71
19
72
19
73
19
74
19
75
19
76
19
77
19
78
19
79
19
80
19
81
19
82
19
83
19
84
19
85
19
86
19
87
19
88
19
89
19
90
19
91
19
92
19
93
19
94
19
95
19
96
19
97
19
98
19
99
20
00
20
01
20
02
20
03
20
04
20
05
20
06
20
07
20
08
20
09
20
10
20
11
Flood Damage/GDP (%) 中国 韓国 日本 ベトナム フィリピン インドネシア バングラデシュ スリランカ アメリカ イギリス オランダ
Maximum Line of The US, UK, and The Netherlands (0.2%)
Maximum Line of Japan, China, and Korea (0.5%)
China
Vietnam
Philippines
・US, UK and the Netherlands already have high standard of safety against floods, and their flood losses are kept under 0.2% since 1970. ・Japan with a high level of GDP also has kept flood losses under 0.2%. ・Korea’s flood losses have risen to approx. 0.5% of GDP due to floods of 2001 and 2002. ・Flood losses of the Philippines, Vietnam and China have significantly reduced from 1990 to 2004.
Bangladesh
China Korea Japan Indonesia Bangladesh Sri Lanka The US UK The Netherlands Viet Nam Philippines
Budget for Flood Management/GDP(%)
21
0.00%
0.20%
0.40%
0.60%
0.80%
1.00%
197
0
197
1
197
2
197
3
197
4
197
5
197
6
197
7
197
8
197
9
198
0
198
1
198
2
198
3
198
4
198
5
198
6
198
7
198
8
198
9
199
0
199
1
199
2
199
3
199
4
199
5
199
6
199
7
199
8
199
9
200
0
200
1
200
2
200
3
200
4
200
5
200
6
200
7
200
8
200
9
201
0
201
1
Budget for flood control /GDP(%)
中国:治水予算/GDP
韓国:治水予算/GDP
日本:治水予算/GDP
フィリピン:治水予算/GDP
バングラデシュ:治水予算/GDP
・Flood losses in the Philippines have been decreasing since 1995. It is probably due to the fact that flood control investment of 0.2 to 0.4% of GDP has been secured every year since late 1980s. ・Flood losses in China have been decreasing since 2004. Although no data is available on flood control investment since 2004, it is probability due to continuous investment into flood control. ・Bangladesh has been experiencing disruptive flood events with severe damages even in recent years.
Philippines
Japan
China
Korea
Bangladesh
China: Budget for flood control/GDP
Korea: Budget for flood control/GDP
Japan: Budget for flood control/GDP
Philippines: Budget for flood control/GDP
Bangladesh: Budget for flood control/GDP
○ Levee construction, channel excavation and development of detention basins were carried out in Igarashi River and Kariyata River of Shinano River System after the flood of July 2004 in order to prevent damages from future flooding.
○ In July 2011, heavy rain with precipitation higher than that of 2004 by 40% was recorded, however damages were significantly reduced.
Straightening of channel
Curved channel section is straightened to safely discharge flood water and prevent flooding.
Detention basin straightening of channel levee construction channel excavation, etc
Levee construction, channel excavation, straightening of channel, etc
▽ 17.72 平成23年7月30日洪水
▽ 20.38 平成16年7月13日洪水
刈谷田大堰地点
▽ 21.10堤防高
7.13水害では越水
Kariyata Weir
×Failure location ■Inundation area
Heavy Rain in Niigata and Fukushima in July 2004 Levees failed in Igarashi River and Kariyata River due to 13 days of heavy rains that started from the midnight of July 12 2004. Inundation occurred in a large extent.
Inundation due to levee failure in Igarashi River (Sanjo City, Niigata Pref.)
Kariyata River Nakanoshima Ohashi Bridge
E basin F basin
A basin B basin
C basin
Detention Basin (July 30 14:00)
Detention basins and upstream dam played effective roles in reducing downstream water levels and prevented inundation.
6 basins developed as emergency measures after 2004 flood
Kariyata River Detention Basin
[Dimensions of Kariyata River Detention Basin] Detention Area Design Capacity 912,000 m2 2,347,000 m3
Levee construction and channel excavation in Igarashi River
277.0
388.4
0.0
100.0
200.0
300.0
400.0
500.0
平成16年7月洪水 平成23年7月洪水
150230
3426 0
40000
80000
120000
160000
平成16年7月洪水 平成23年7月洪水
14439
1062 0
4000
8000
12000
16000
平成16年7月洪水 平成23年7月洪水
2-day precipitation (Upstream of Teiseki-bashi) Damages to General Asset
(mm) (million yen) Damaged Buildings
(number)
40% increase 98% reduction 93% reduction
2004.7 2011.7 2004.7 2011.7 2004.7 2011.7
277.0
388.4
150,230
3,426
14,439
1,062
Effectiveness of Flood Control Projects (damage reduction due to levee construction, river channel excavation, etc)
Effectiveness of Flood Control Measures
土石流捕捉量 約11,000m3
堰堤本体
保全された集落
2)USACE journal “River Side” September-October 2004
※The need for improvements against category
5 hurricanes (same as Katrina) had been
called for before the Katrina (stressing that
investment into prevention is more efficient) 2)
Overview of damages (New Orleans) Deaths : 1,322 people Inundation area : 80% of land area Inundated houses : 160,000 people Total losses : 125 billion dollars
Inundated city center
Hurricane Katrina (2005.8)
Inundation in Nishibiwajima Town
Heavy Rain in Tokai (2000.9)
23
名古屋市
庄内川
新川愛知県
しょうない
東海豪雨(H12.9)【愛知県 庄内川・新川】
事業実施後:想定被害額
約1,200億円
事業実施後の想定被害額
再度災害防止費用
東海豪雨の被害額
被害額約6,700億円
事業費:計716億円
激特事業の効果:
約5,500億円相当 716億円の事前投資で
約5,500億円の被害軽減
ハリケーン・カトリーナ(H17.8)
約20億ドル1)
(約2,200億円)
堤防整備の効果:
最大約1,250億ドル(約14兆円)相当
約20億ドルの事前投資で約1250億ドルの被害軽減
被害額約1,250億ドル(約14兆円)
事前予防実施時の想定被害額
「カテゴリー5」対応費用
ハリケーン・カトリーナによる被害総額
2)
1)
1)米軍海洋大気庁(NOAA) Hurricane Katrina A Climatological Perspective(2006.8)
①ハリケーン・カトリーナ(H17.8)
約20億ドル1)
(約2,200億円)
堤防整備の効果:
最大約1,250億ドル(約14兆円)相当
約20億ドルの事前投資で約1250億ドルの被害軽減
被害額約1,250億ドル(約14兆円)
事前予防実施時の想定被害額
「カテゴリー5」対応費用
ハリケーン・カトリーナによる被害総額
①ハリケーン・カトリーナ(H17.8)
約20億ドル1)
(約2,200億円)
堤防整備の効果:
最大約1,250億ドル(約14兆円)相当
約20億ドルの事前投資で約1250億ドルの被害軽減
被害額約1,250億ドル(約14兆円)
被害額約1,250億ドル(約14兆円)
事前予防実施時の想定被害額
「カテゴリー5」対応費用
ハリケーン・カトリーナによる被害総額
①ハリケーン・カトリーナ(H17.8)
約20億ドル1)
(約2,200億円)
堤防整備の効果:
最大約1,250億ドル(約14兆円)相当
約20億ドルの事前投資で約1250億ドルの被害軽減
被害額約1,250億ドル(約14兆円)
事前予防実施時の想定被害額
「カテゴリー5」対応費用
ハリケーン・カトリーナによる被害総額
①ハリケーン・カトリーナ(H17.8)
約20億ドル1)
(約2,200億円)
堤防整備の効果:
最大約1,250億ドル(約14兆円)相当
約20億ドルの事前投資で約1250億ドルの被害軽減
被害額約1,250億ドル(約14兆円)
被害額約1,250億ドル(約14兆円)
事前予防実施時の想定被害額
「カテゴリー5」対応費用
ハリケーン・カトリーナによる被害総額
Hurricane Katrina (2005.8)
125 billion USD
Heavy Rain in Tokai (2000.9) (Shonai & Shin Rivers)
670 billion yen
Total losses Estimated losses with prevention measures
Total losses Estimated losses with prevention measures
Cost of “Category 5” measures
Cost of Prevention Measures
2 billion USD of investment could reduce 125 billion USD of damages
Approx. 2 billion USD 2)
Effectiveness of prevention
Max. 125 billion USD
120 billion yen
Effectiveness of prevention
550 billion yen 71.6 billion yen of investment could reduce 550 billion yen of damages
Thank you very much for your attention.