59
Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) Theory and Political Risk

Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) Theory and Political Risk

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • Slide 1
  • Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) Theory and Political Risk
  • Slide 2
  • Chapter Outline Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) Global Trends in FDI Why Do Firms Invest Overseas? FDI Sequence and Entry Mode Political Risk Firm-specific risk Country-specific risk Global-specific risk 2
  • Slide 3
  • FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT 3
  • Slide 4
  • Global Trends in FDI Several developed nations are the sources of FDI outflows. Most world-wide FDI comes from the developed world. This implies that MNCs domiciled in these countries should have certain comparative advantages in undertaking overseas investment projects. Both developing and developed nations are the recipient of inflows of FDI. Some developing countries, like China and Mexico, have begun to undertake FDI, albeit on a modest scale. 4
  • Slide 5
  • Average Annual FDI (in US$ billion) 2004-2008 5
  • Slide 6
  • Foreign Direct Investment as a Percentage of GDP 6
  • Slide 7
  • Cross- Border Mergers and Acquisitions, 1990 2009 (in millions of dollars) 18-7
  • Slide 8
  • Why Do Firms Invest Overseas? Trade barriers Labor market imperfections Intangible assets Vertical integration Product life cycle Shareholder diversification 8
  • Slide 9
  • Why Do Firms Invest Overseas? Trade Barriers Government action leads to market imperfections. Tariffs, quotas, and other restrictions on the free flow of goods, services, and people. The Commerce Department of U.S., in its finding over illegal subsidies, said solar panels imported from China now dominating the U.S. market would face a duty of 2.9% to 4.73%. (March 12, 2012, LA Times) Trade restrictions on Honda-made cars. France imposes on Lockheed missiles to protect its own defense industry. Trade barriers are pro-producers but anti-consumers. 9
  • Slide 10
  • Why Do Firms Invest Overseas? Trade Barriers - Purposes To protect domestic employment Auto industry in Detroit, Steel industry To protect consumers Mad cow diseases To enhance national security Defense-related industries To retaliate Trade wars 10
  • Slide 11
  • Why Do Firms Invest Overseas? Labor Market Imperfections Among all factor markets, the labor market is the least perfect. Recall that the factors of production are land, labor, capital, and entrepreneurial ability. Example: Outsourcing in India for technicians and engineers, Nike factory in China, Apple assembly line in China If there exist restrictions on the flow of workers across borders, then labor services can be underpriced relative to productivity. The restrictions may be immigration barriers or simply social preferences. 11
  • Slide 12
  • Labor Costs around the Globe (2008) Country Average Hourly Cost ($)Country Average Hourly Cost ($) Germany$41.46Spain$23.61 Belgium$39.22Korea$13.82 Sweden$38.08Israel$13.91 U.K.$28.22Taiwan$6.95 Australia$31.51Hong Kong$5.78 Canada$29.72Brazil$5.96 Italy$31.11Mexico$2.93 France$31.60Philippines$1.10 U.S.$25.33China$0.81 Japan $22.90 12
  • Slide 13
  • Hourly Compensation Costs in Manufacturing Selected Countries, in U.S. dollars, 2009 13
  • Slide 14
  • Why Do Firms Invest Overseas? Intangible Assets Coca-Cola has a very valuable asset in its closely guarded secret formula. To protect that proprietary information, Coca-Cola has chosen FDI over licensing. Licensing may facilitate technologies leakages to foreign competitors. Since intangible assets are difficult to package and sell to foreigners, MNCs often enjoy a comparative advantage with FDI. Patents, inventions, formulas, designs, copyrights, and trademarks 14
  • Slide 15
  • Why Do Firms Invest Overseas? Vertical Integration MNCs may undertake FDI in countries where inputs are available in order to secure the supply of inputs at a stable accounting price. Vertical integration may be backward or forward: Backward: e.g., a furniture maker buying a logging company. Forward: e.g., a U.S. auto maker buying a Japanese auto dealership. 15
  • Slide 16
  • Why Do Firms Invest Overseas? Product Life Cycle In the early stage, the pioneering U.S. firm produces domestically. FDI takes place when product maturity hits and cost becomes an increasingly important consideration for the MNC. U.S. firms develop new products in the developed world for the domestic market, and then markets expand overseas. 16
  • Slide 17
  • Why Do Firms Invest Overseas? Product Life Cycle Quantity The U.S. Less advanced countries production New product Maturing product Standardized product exports consumption imports production imports exports 17
  • Slide 18
  • Why Do Firms Invest Overseas? Shareholder Diversification Firms may be able to provide indirect diversification to their shareholders through FDI if there exists significant barriers to the cross-border flow of capital for individual investors. When a firm holds assets in many countries through FDI, cash flows are internationally diversified. Thus, shareholders indirectly benefit from international diversification However, capital markets across countries are increasingly integrated and market imperfections are less severe now. Managers, therefore, probably cannot add value by diversifying for their shareholders, if the shareholders can do so themselves at lower cost. 18
  • Slide 19
  • Competitive Advantage In deciding whether to invest abroad, management must first determine whether the firm has a sustainable competitive advantage. The competitive advantage must be firm-specific, transferable, and powerful enough to compensate the firm for the potential disadvantages of operating abroad (foreign exchange risks, political risks, and increased agency costs). There are several competitive advantages enjoyed by MNEs. Economies of scale and scope Managerial and marketing expertise Advanced technology / Differentiated products Financial strength 19
  • Slide 20
  • Competitive Advantage Economies of scale and scope: Large size is a major contributing factor Managerial and marketing expertise: Includes skill in managing large industrial organizations (human capital and technology) Advanced technology / Differentiated products: Includes both scientific and engineering skills Such products originate from research-based innovations or heavy marketing expenditures to gain brand identification Financial strength: Demonstrated financial strength by achieving and maintaining a global cost and availability of capital in order to fund FDI and other foreign activities 20
  • Slide 21
  • Global 100 by CNNMoney 21
  • Slide 22
  • The FDI Sequence 22
  • Slide 23
  • How to Invest Abroad: Modes of Foreign Investment Exporting versus production abroad: Several advantages to limiting a firms activities to exports It has none of the unique risks facing FDI, joint ventures, strategic alliances and licensing with minimal political risks The amount of front-end investment (i.e., starting costs) is typically lower than other modes of foreign involvement Firms facing highly uncertain demand abroad typically being by exporting rather than producing abroad Some disadvantages of exports include The inability to realize the full sales potential of a product The risks of losing markets to imitators and global competitors Losing the opportunity to show a greater commitment to the local market A high transportation cost and tariffs 23
  • Slide 24
  • How to Invest Abroad: Modes of Foreign Investment Licensing contracts versus control of assets abroad: Licensing is a popular method for domestic firms to profit from foreign markets without the need to commit sizeable funds Example: The beer, brewed in U.S. license by Miller Brewing Company, is a brand owned by the German firm. Example: Calvin Klein brand names used by local producer in Thailand However, there are disadvantages which include: License fees are lower than FDI profits Possible loss of quality control Risk that technology will be stolen by potential competitor in the local market 24
  • Slide 25
  • TOP 100 Licensors 1 Disney Consumer Products 2 Phillips-Van Heusen 3 Warner Bros. Consumer Products 7 Major League Baseball 9 Cherokee Group 11 General Motors 13 Westinghouse 16 Mattel Brands Consumer Products 18 Sony Pictures Consumer Products 25 Sunkist Growers 27 BBC Worldwide 28 Liz Claiborne 29 Perry Ellis International Inc. Source: licensemag.com 25
  • Slide 26
  • How to Invest Abroad: Modes of Foreign Investment Joint venture versus wholly owned subsidiary: A joint venture is here defined as shared ownership in a foreign business Some advantages of a MNE working with a local joint venture partner are: Better understanding of local customs, mores and institutions of government Some countries do not allow 100% foreign ownership Local partners have their own contacts and reputation which aids in business Example: Sony-Ericsson on electronics, GE-Toshiba on nuclear energy 26
  • Slide 27
  • How to Invest Abroad: Modes of Foreign Investment Joint venture versus wholly owned subsidiary: Some disadvantages of joint venture partner are: Political risk is increased if the wrong partner is chosen. Control of financing is another problem. Often, local and foreign partners may have divergent views about all strategic decision, operation, and distributing profits. 27
  • Slide 28
  • How to Invest Abroad: Modes of Foreign Investment Greenfield investment versus acquisition: A greenfield investment is defined as establishing a production or service facility starting from the ground up A cross-border acquisition is clearly much quicker and can also be a cost effective way to obtain technology and/or brand names - Purchase of existing business. Represents 40-50% of FDI flows. Cross-border acquisitions are however, not without pitfalls, as firms often pay too high a price or utilize expensive financing to complete a transaction Cross-border acquisitions are a politically sensitive issue: Greenfield investment is usually welcome. Cross-border acquisition is often unwelcome. 28
  • Slide 29
  • Top 10 Cross-Border M&A Deals 1998-2009 Year($ b)AcquirerHomeTargetHost 2000202.8Vodafone AirTouch PLCU.K.Mannesmann AGGermany 200798.2RFS Holdings BVU.K.ABN-AMRO Holdings NV Netherlands 199974.3Royal Dutch PetroleumNetherlandsShell Transport & Trading U.K. 199860.3Vodafone Group PLCU.K.AirTouchU.S. 200852.2InBev NVBelgiumAnheuser-BuschU.S. 200048.2British Petroleum Co.U.K.AmocoU.S. 200946.7Roche Holding AGSwitzerlandGenentech, IncU.S. 199846.0France Telecom SAFranceOrange PLCU.K. 200040.5Daimler-Benz AGGermanyChrysler Corp.U.S. 199940.4Vivendi SAFranceSeagram Co. LTDCanada 29
  • Slide 30
  • POLITICAL RISK 30
  • Slide 31
  • Country Risk Analysis The assessment of the potential risks and rewards associated with making investments and doing a business in a country. It involves with measuring Political stability Frequency of changes of government, the level of violence in the country, corruption Economic factors Inflation, BOP deficits, GDP growth Subjective factors A general perception of the countrys attitude toward private enterprise Political risk and uncertain property rights Government expropriation Capital flight The export of savings by a nations citizens because of fears about the safety of their capital 31
  • Slide 32
  • 32 Country Risk Ratings Across Countries Source: Transparency International is a global civil society organization that has developed a Corruption Perceptions Index, which represents the perception of corruption in a countrys public sector. The index relies on assessments and business surveys by institutions.
  • Slide 33
  • Corruption Index Ratings for Selected Countries (Maximum rating = 10. High ratings indicate low corruption.) 33
  • Slide 34
  • Corruption Perceptions Index The index, which is published by Transparency International, reflects the degree to which corruption is perceived to exist among public officials and politicians. In 2001, 91 countries are ranked on a clean score of 10. Rank Country Score 1Finland9.9 3New Zealand9.4 4Singapore9.2 7Canada8.9 13U.K.8.3 14Hong Kong7.9 16Israel7.6 16U.S.A.7.6 18Chile7.5 20Germany7.4 21Japan7.1 Rank Country Score 23France6.7 26Botswana6.0 27Taiwan5.9 38South Africa 4.8 42South Korea4.2 46Brazil4.0 51Mexico3.7 57Argentina3.5 57China3.5 79Russia2.3 88Indonesia1.9 34
  • Slide 35
  • Legal System Quality 35
  • Slide 36
  • Sovereign Credit Ratings by Standard & Poors 36
  • Slide 37
  • Country Rating Moodys (2013) CountryRatingCountryRatingCountryRatingCountryRating ArgentinaB3 Hong Kong Aa1NetherlandAaaSpainBaa3 AustraliaAaaIndiaBaa3 New Zealand AaaSwitzerlandAaa AustriaAaaIndonesiaBaa3NorwayAaaSwedenAaa BelgiumAa3IrelandBa1PortugalBa3TaiwanAa3 CanadaAaaItalyBaa2PhilippineBa1ThailandBaa1 DenmarkAaaJapanAa3S. AfricaBaa1TurkeyBa1 FinlandAaaMalaysiaA3S. KoreaAa3U.S.Aaa FranceAa1MexicoBaa1SingaporeAaaU.K.Aa1 GermanyAaa 37
  • Slide 38
  • Classification of Political Risks 38
  • Slide 39
  • Defining Political Risk Political risk The risk of loss when investing in a given country caused by changes in a country's political structure or policies, such as tax laws, tariffs, credit risk, legal protection, expropriation of assets, or restriction in repatriation of profits. Classifications Firm-specific risks Country-specific risks Global-specific risks 39
  • Slide 40
  • Firm-Specific Risks: Governance Risks Governance risk is the ability to exercise effective control over an MNEs operations within a host countrys legal and political environment Examples: Price controls by the local government, Limited access to host-country capital market, Discriminatory taxation on foreign company Expropriation 40
  • Slide 41
  • Examples The WSJ reports in December 23, 2009 Hanoi Weighs Price Controls, Tightens Grip Foreign Investors Grow Concerned as Conservative Factions in Vietnam Reverse Liberalization Trend Amid Downturn In December 2004, the U.S. Department of Commerce published the report of Pharmaceutical Price Controls in OECD Countries: Implications for U.S. Consumers, Pricing, Research and Development, and Innovation In January 2010 the government of Pakistan threatened to cancel the $3 billion Reko Diq copper and gold project led by Canadian investor Barrick Gold 41
  • Slide 42
  • Country-Specific Risk Country-specific risks affect all firms, domestic and foreign, that are resident in a host country The main country-specific political risks transfer risk and cultural and institutional risks 42
  • Slide 43
  • Country-Specific Risk: Transfer Risk Transfer risk is defined as limitations on the MNEs ability to transfer funds into and out of a host country without restrictions That is, it involves uncertainty regarding cross-border flows of capital. When a government runs short of foreign exchange and cannot obtain additional funds through borrowing or attracting new foreign investment, it usually limits transfers of foreign exchange out of the country, a restriction known as blocked funds 43
  • Slide 44
  • Country-Specific Risk: Cultural and Institutional Risks Examples Differences in allowable ownership structures Japan, Korea, Mexico, and China require majority local ownership U.S. protection over defense-related firms such as Boeing. Differences in human resource norms Female employees in Middle Eastern countries Differences in religious heritage Nepotism and corruption in the host country Indonesia under Suharto government, U.S defense industry Protection of intellectual property rights Music copyright infringement in China and Korea Protectionism Defense and Agricultural industries 44
  • Slide 45
  • Differences in Religious Heritage 45
  • Slide 46
  • Intellectual Property Infringement In China, Fake louis vuitton in Korea, Replica Rolex in ebay 46
  • Slide 47
  • Global-Specific Risks Global specific risks faced by MNEs have come to the forefront in recent years The most visible recent risk was, of course, the attack by terrorists on the twin towers of the World Trade Center in New York on September 11, 2001. In addition to terrorism, other global-specific risks include antiglobalization movement, environmental concerns, poverty in emerging markets and cyber attacks on computer information systems 47
  • Slide 48
  • Antiglobalization Movement 48
  • Slide 49
  • Global-Specific Risk 49
  • Slide 50
  • Variables used in PRSs Political Risk Score 50
  • Slide 51
  • Political Risk Points by Component 51
  • Slide 52
  • Current Risk Ratings and Composite Risk Forecasts 52
  • Slide 53
  • The ICRG Risk Components 53
  • Slide 54
  • Country and Political Risk Ratings for Selected Countries 54
  • Slide 55
  • Measuring Political Risk The host countrys political and government system A country with too many political parties and frequent changes of government is risky. The track records of political parties and their relative strength If the socialist party is likely to win the next election, watch out. 55
  • Slide 56
  • Measuring Political Risk Integration into the world system North Korea and Iran are examples of isolationist countries unlikely to observe the rules of the game. Ethnic and religious stability Look at recent genocides around the world. Regional security Kuwait is a nice enough country, but its in a rough neighborhood. 56
  • Slide 57
  • Measuring Political Risk Key economic indicators Political risk is not entirely independent of economic risk. Severe income inequality and deteriorating living standards can cause major political disruptions. In 2002, Argentinas protracted economic recession led to the freezing of bank deposits, street riots, and three changes of the countrys presidency in as many months. 57
  • Slide 58
  • Hedging Political Risk Geographic diversification Simply put, dont put all your eggs in one basket. Minimize exposure Form joint ventures with local companies. Local government may be less inclined to expropriate assets from their own citizens. Join a consortium of international companies to undertake FDI. Local government may be less inclined to expropriate assets from a variety of countries all at once. Finance projects with local borrowing. 58
  • Slide 59
  • Hedging Political Risk Insurance The Overseas Private Investment Corporation (OPIC), a U.S. government federally-owned organization, offers insurance against: 1.The inconvertibility of foreign currencies. 2.Expropriation of U.S.-owned assets. 3.Destruction of U.S.-owned physical properties due to war, revolution, and other violent political events in foreign countries. 4.Loss of business income due to political violence. 59