17
Fourth CLEAR Global Forum in Mexico City THEME 1: The role of civil society in the accountability of public policies and the institutionalization of Evaluation systems Influence, Monitoring and Evaluation Programme November 17th, 2013

Fourth CLEAR Global Forum in Mexico City THEME 1:

  • Upload
    monita

  • View
    37

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Fourth CLEAR Global Forum in Mexico City THEME 1: The role of civil society in the accountability of public policies and the institutionalization of Evaluation systems Influence, Monitoring and Evaluation Programme November 17th, 2013. Agenda. About CIPPEC - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Fourth CLEAR Global Forum in  Mexico City  THEME 1:

Fourth CLEAR Global Forum in Mexico City

THEME 1: The role of civil society in the accountability

of public policies and the institutionalization ofEvaluation systems

Influence, Monitoring and Evaluation ProgrammeNovember 17th, 2013

Page 2: Fourth CLEAR Global Forum in  Mexico City  THEME 1:

► About CIPPEC► About Argentina’s evaluation context► CIPPEC’s evaluation strategy

► Fostering institutionalization► Strengthening public policies evaluation► Improving CIPPEC’s own approach to evaluation

► What we learnt so far?

Agenda

Page 3: Fourth CLEAR Global Forum in  Mexico City  THEME 1:

About CIPPEC

Page 4: Fourth CLEAR Global Forum in  Mexico City  THEME 1:

About CIPPEC

► Since 2000, CIPPPEC is a bridge that links high quality independent research in different public policies areas with public policies implementation at national, provincial and local levels.

► CIPPEC “understands the politics behind policies”.

Programmatic approach

Social Development

Education Health Social Protection

Economic Development

Fiscal Policy

Global Integration

and Productive Develop-

ment

Institutional Strenghtening

Justice and Transpar-

ency

Gov Manage-

ment

Influence, M&E

Local Develop-

ment

Page 5: Fourth CLEAR Global Forum in  Mexico City  THEME 1:

The national evaluation contextFragmented and non systematic approach depending more

on actors’ will rather than in government enforcement for evaluation

Exec

utive

Pow

erEfforts since the `80 towards program and plan evaluations specially in Education and Labor sectors

Legi

slativ

e Po

werRuns the National

Audit Agency with responsibility in the field of operational evaluation

Judi

cial

Pow

erDesigns and develops some public policies but without evaluation criteria yet Pr

ovin

ciesHeterogeneous

scenarios among the 24 jurisdictions with some relevant leaders aiming to reach the next level

Page 6: Fourth CLEAR Global Forum in  Mexico City  THEME 1:

CIPPEC’s contribution: mainstreaming evaluation approach

Fostering institutionalization

Strengthening Public Policies

evaluation

Improving CIPPEC’s own approach to

evaluation

Page 7: Fourth CLEAR Global Forum in  Mexico City  THEME 1:

PROGRAMA DE INCIDENCIA, MONITOREO Y EVALUACIÓN

Fostering institutionalizatio

n

Contributing to the local debate

Influencing decision makers

Networking with Cabinet`s Chief Ministry

Empowering civil society

Page 8: Fourth CLEAR Global Forum in  Mexico City  THEME 1:

CIPPEC’s contribution: mainstreaming evaluation approach

Fostering institutionalization

Strengthening Public Policies

evaluation

Improving CIPPEC’s own approach to

evaluation

Page 9: Fourth CLEAR Global Forum in  Mexico City  THEME 1:

Strengthening public policies evaluation at regional and national

levels

Evaluability assessments

Institutional evaluations

Impact and outcome

evaluations

Page 10: Fourth CLEAR Global Forum in  Mexico City  THEME 1:

PROGRAMA DE INCIDENCIA, MONITOREO Y EVALUACIÓN

Strengthening public policies evaluation at regional and national

levels

Eurosocial

Evaluating impact evaluations policy

impact and uptake

Under what circumstances and how can IEs best contribute to effective development policy and practice?

Impact evaluations will be more influential if they are carried out in an enable environment for knowledge to policy interface

Cohesion

Promotes wide policy dialogue on cohesion

Tool

Institutional cooperationSharing experiencesTechnical assistance

Focus

Knowledge from social policiesSupport to evaluation institutions (Chile, Guatemala, Uruguay)

Page 11: Fourth CLEAR Global Forum in  Mexico City  THEME 1:

Data visualization: social protection witness indicators

http://cippec.org/data/

Page 12: Fourth CLEAR Global Forum in  Mexico City  THEME 1:

CIPPEC’s contribution: mainstreaming evaluation approach

Fostering institutionaliz

ation

Strengthening Public Policies

evaluation

Improving CIPPEC’s own approach to evaluation

Page 13: Fourth CLEAR Global Forum in  Mexico City  THEME 1:

Improving CIPPEC’s own approach to evaluation

Think tanks’ evaluation

Influence M&E

Impact Sectoral evaluations

Page 14: Fourth CLEAR Global Forum in  Mexico City  THEME 1:

ActorsI,M&E | Evaluabilidad de planes y programas

Actores

Organismos internacionales

IIP, OSC y Agencias estatales

Provincias Argentinas

CIPPEC

Page 15: Fourth CLEAR Global Forum in  Mexico City  THEME 1:

Products ActivitiesImpact ResultsLevels

People’s performance

Organizational performance

Sectoral impact

InstitutionalImpact inPublic Policies External evaluation as

per Board’s strategic orientation

Self + management individualevaluation

Prorammes’self + ManagementEvaluation

ObjectivesCompetenci

es

Challenges and

opportinities

Addressing programs

contribution to CIPPEC’s mission

Projects’ Monitoring PEAP CG de

inicio

CG de seguimient

o

CG de cierre

Achievements

Relevance and influence Quantitative and financial

indicatorsQuality

Planning

CIPPEC’s own M&E system

Page 16: Fourth CLEAR Global Forum in  Mexico City  THEME 1:

I,M&E | Evaluabilidad de planes y programas

What we learnt so far?

About the context:Polarized political scenarios is about the government taking leading role in all frontsDevelopment context sets a limit to evaluation development

About our role: Think tanks are perceived as knowledge brokers or institutionalization advocates but not necessarily as independent evaluatorsNo financing for our own evaluation

About evaluation itself: consensus is slowly arising within civil society but resistance to measurement remains active

About who evaluates?:universities are being positioned as independent evaluators

Evaluation culture in Argentina is still

a challenge

Page 17: Fourth CLEAR Global Forum in  Mexico City  THEME 1:

Natalia Aquilino

Influence, Monitoring and Evaluation Programme

Director

Thank you

www.cippec.org | @cippec

www.cippec.org/vippal | @vippalcippec

Programa de Incidencia, Monitoreo & Evaluación