Upload
monita
View
37
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Fourth CLEAR Global Forum in Mexico City THEME 1: The role of civil society in the accountability of public policies and the institutionalization of Evaluation systems Influence, Monitoring and Evaluation Programme November 17th, 2013. Agenda. About CIPPEC - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Fourth CLEAR Global Forum in Mexico City
THEME 1: The role of civil society in the accountability
of public policies and the institutionalization ofEvaluation systems
Influence, Monitoring and Evaluation ProgrammeNovember 17th, 2013
► About CIPPEC► About Argentina’s evaluation context► CIPPEC’s evaluation strategy
► Fostering institutionalization► Strengthening public policies evaluation► Improving CIPPEC’s own approach to evaluation
► What we learnt so far?
Agenda
About CIPPEC
About CIPPEC
► Since 2000, CIPPPEC is a bridge that links high quality independent research in different public policies areas with public policies implementation at national, provincial and local levels.
► CIPPEC “understands the politics behind policies”.
Programmatic approach
Social Development
Education Health Social Protection
Economic Development
Fiscal Policy
Global Integration
and Productive Develop-
ment
Institutional Strenghtening
Justice and Transpar-
ency
Gov Manage-
ment
Influence, M&E
Local Develop-
ment
The national evaluation contextFragmented and non systematic approach depending more
on actors’ will rather than in government enforcement for evaluation
Exec
utive
Pow
erEfforts since the `80 towards program and plan evaluations specially in Education and Labor sectors
Legi
slativ
e Po
werRuns the National
Audit Agency with responsibility in the field of operational evaluation
Judi
cial
Pow
erDesigns and develops some public policies but without evaluation criteria yet Pr
ovin
ciesHeterogeneous
scenarios among the 24 jurisdictions with some relevant leaders aiming to reach the next level
CIPPEC’s contribution: mainstreaming evaluation approach
Fostering institutionalization
Strengthening Public Policies
evaluation
Improving CIPPEC’s own approach to
evaluation
PROGRAMA DE INCIDENCIA, MONITOREO Y EVALUACIÓN
Fostering institutionalizatio
n
Contributing to the local debate
Influencing decision makers
Networking with Cabinet`s Chief Ministry
Empowering civil society
CIPPEC’s contribution: mainstreaming evaluation approach
Fostering institutionalization
Strengthening Public Policies
evaluation
Improving CIPPEC’s own approach to
evaluation
Strengthening public policies evaluation at regional and national
levels
Evaluability assessments
Institutional evaluations
Impact and outcome
evaluations
PROGRAMA DE INCIDENCIA, MONITOREO Y EVALUACIÓN
Strengthening public policies evaluation at regional and national
levels
Eurosocial
Evaluating impact evaluations policy
impact and uptake
Under what circumstances and how can IEs best contribute to effective development policy and practice?
Impact evaluations will be more influential if they are carried out in an enable environment for knowledge to policy interface
Cohesion
Promotes wide policy dialogue on cohesion
Tool
Institutional cooperationSharing experiencesTechnical assistance
Focus
Knowledge from social policiesSupport to evaluation institutions (Chile, Guatemala, Uruguay)
Data visualization: social protection witness indicators
http://cippec.org/data/
CIPPEC’s contribution: mainstreaming evaluation approach
Fostering institutionaliz
ation
Strengthening Public Policies
evaluation
Improving CIPPEC’s own approach to evaluation
Improving CIPPEC’s own approach to evaluation
Think tanks’ evaluation
Influence M&E
Impact Sectoral evaluations
ActorsI,M&E | Evaluabilidad de planes y programas
Actores
Organismos internacionales
IIP, OSC y Agencias estatales
Provincias Argentinas
CIPPEC
Products ActivitiesImpact ResultsLevels
People’s performance
Organizational performance
Sectoral impact
InstitutionalImpact inPublic Policies External evaluation as
per Board’s strategic orientation
Self + management individualevaluation
Prorammes’self + ManagementEvaluation
ObjectivesCompetenci
es
Challenges and
opportinities
Addressing programs
contribution to CIPPEC’s mission
Projects’ Monitoring PEAP CG de
inicio
CG de seguimient
o
CG de cierre
Achievements
Relevance and influence Quantitative and financial
indicatorsQuality
Planning
CIPPEC’s own M&E system
I,M&E | Evaluabilidad de planes y programas
What we learnt so far?
About the context:Polarized political scenarios is about the government taking leading role in all frontsDevelopment context sets a limit to evaluation development
About our role: Think tanks are perceived as knowledge brokers or institutionalization advocates but not necessarily as independent evaluatorsNo financing for our own evaluation
About evaluation itself: consensus is slowly arising within civil society but resistance to measurement remains active
About who evaluates?:universities are being positioned as independent evaluators
Evaluation culture in Argentina is still
a challenge
Natalia Aquilino
Influence, Monitoring and Evaluation Programme
Director
Thank you
www.cippec.org | @cippec
www.cippec.org/vippal | @vippalcippec
Programa de Incidencia, Monitoreo & Evaluación