Upload
bianca-clark
View
40
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Framework for Evaluation. Framework for Evaluation. Other Factors. Timeline To decision To funding To RFP To collection / processing / QC Useful product to stakeholders To operational efficiencies or payback (C/B) Partnerships State only Add Federal Partners. Other Factors. Funding - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Framework for EvaluationAgency/Org Use case Features mapped Requirements
DOD, FAA Public Safety, Airports, man made featuers, hydrography, navigation features
Scale:
Bands:
Revisit
USFWS Environmental
Land Cover
Land cover, wetlands S: B: R:
NPS Land Cover
Land Management
Hydrography, man made featues, land cover
S: B: R:
BLM Land mgmt,, Environmental, Land Cover
Landforms, land cover, parcels, man made features, hydrography
S: B: R:
USFS Forest inventory, Environmental
Forest stands, hydrography, land cover,
S: B: R:
SOA Land mgmt, habitat, regulatory, resource inventory, transport.
Hydrography, forestry, geology, parcels
S: B: R:
Native corps. Land mgmt, resource inventory
Hydrography,, land cover, roads, parcels
S: B: R:
Local govt. Land mgmt, watershed analysis, coastal zone mgmt, parcels,transportation
Parcels, roads, hydrography, watersheds,
S: B: R:
Framework for Evaluation
AREA SQ KM % OF STATE % 5+m % 2.5 - 5m % 0.5-1m IFSAR dted-2
Bureau of Land Management 209,758 14%
Fish and Wildlife Service 290,343 19%
Forest Service 85,942 6%
Melakatla Indian Res 353 0%
Military 8,498 1%
National Park Service 203,342 14%
Native Patent or IC 174,298 12%
Native Selected 75,180 5%
Private 821 0%
State Patent or TA 403,702 27%
State Selected 57,695 4%
Buffered Populated Places (10km) 114 0%
Buffered Roads (5km) 0%
Buffered Trans Alaskan Pipeline (10km) 25,307 2%
Other Factors
• Timeline– To decision– To funding– To RFP– To collection / processing / QC– Useful product to stakeholders– To operational efficiencies or payback (C/B)
• Partnerships– State only– Add Federal Partners
Other Factors
• Funding– Single shot– Multi-cases
• Spin-off benefits– Control– Education– Employment
Straw-man Proposal
• Create 1-3 scenarios based on above
• Have stakeholders input to decision
• Go forward with unified proposal, multi-stage for funding
• Have backup plan if funding doesn’t happen
Straw-man Proposal #1– Fund clean-up of ASTER DEM– Acquire part of state via Rapideye– Repeat inventory w/ pressure from stakeholders &
uplift as necessary existing content & try to leverage NGA collects
• Use as ground control and for applications– Request funding for IFSAR DEM– Include X sq. mi. 2.5m in request– Include Y sq. mi. 0.5 – 1m in request– Have SDMI act as clearing-house for 0.5 – 2.5m
requests to get bulk pricing
Straw-man Proposal 2– Fund clean-up of ASTER DEM– Acquire part of state w/ 2.5m from SPOT or ALOS– Repeat inventory w/ pressure from stakeholders &
uplift as necessary existing content & try to leverage NGA collects
• Use as ground control and for applications– Procure telemetry contract from SPOT– Build processing capability in state to process– Request funding for IFSAR DEM