125

Geotech Report Nandannagar 2nd time · The present report the analysis of test results and recommendations regarding type of foundation, allowable bearing capacity. Also, for the

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    0

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Geotech Report Nandannagar 2nd time · The present report the analysis of test results and recommendations regarding type of foundation, allowable bearing capacity. Also, for the
Page 2: Geotech Report Nandannagar 2nd time · The present report the analysis of test results and recommendations regarding type of foundation, allowable bearing capacity. Also, for the

Nand

dannag

Urban

BP

Soil I

ar site,

n Develo

PC Cons

DOC

VERIF

nvesti

F

, near D

Volu

Annex

Prepa

opment

Prepa

sultant Inwww.b

CUMENT/DR

FICATION AN

gation

For

Don Bos

ume-2

xure: C

ared for

t Depar

ared by:

ndia Pri

bpcipl.co

RAWING TEC

ND REVISION

n Repo

sco Sc

C1

:

rtment,

:

vate Limm

CHNICAL 

N RECORD 

rt

hool, A

, Tripu

mited,

Agartala

ura

a

Page 3: Geotech Report Nandannagar 2nd time · The present report the analysis of test results and recommendations regarding type of foundation, allowable bearing capacity. Also, for the

Project

 

Project

Document N

GIR/Nand

Quality i

Prepared by

 

 

Mr. Goutam B

Mr. Subhadip

Mr. Manas D

 

Revision

Revision 

 

Informatio

Consultancytopographicalong  with Proposed To

No. 

 dannagar/R0

information

y   

 

Barik 

p Chandra 

as 

 

n History

Revisio

on

y  Services  forcal  survey,  colldetailed  priceownship at Vive

Revis

30/0

n

Checked by

 

Mr. Hrik Cha

on date  D

r  preparation ection of  hydre/cost  estimatekananda Mar

ion Date 

 

9/2019  

audhury 

Details 

of  detailed rological data, e  and  other  rket site near K

 

Old PineaRehabilitaNandann

Verified by 

 

Mr. Subhrajit 

Authorized

project  repodetailed geotrelevant  alliedaman Chowmu

Docu

apple Garden, Bation, near Don

nagar, Agartala

Chakravorty 

Name

 

rt  (DPR)  baseechnical  sub‐sd  works.  of  thuhani,Agartala

ument Title 

Behind Fernann Bosco School

a

  Approved b

   

  Mr. Sourav D

Po

 

ed  on  detailesoil  investigatiohe  project  for a. 

ndo ,

by 

Dasgupta 

osition 

 

ed on ‐‐ 

 

Page 4: Geotech Report Nandannagar 2nd time · The present report the analysis of test results and recommendations regarding type of foundation, allowable bearing capacity. Also, for the

Table of Contents 

1.  INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................................. 1 

1.1  GENERAL ........................................................................................................................................................... 1 

1.2  PROJECT DESCRIPTION ...................................................................................................................................... 1 

2.  SITE DESCRIPTION........................................................................................................................................... 2 

2.1  LOCATION ............................................................................................................................................................. 2 

2.2  GEOLOGY ............................................................................................................................................................. 2 

2.3  PHYSIOGRAPHY ................................................................................................................................................. 5 

2.3.1  GEOMORGRAPHY .............................................................................................................................................. 5 

2.3.2  DRAINAGE  ........................................................................................................................................................... 6 

2.3.3  RAINFALL AND CLIMATE ........................................................................................................................................... 7 

2.3.3  SEISMICITY ......................................................................................................................................................... 7 

3.  SCOPE OF WORK ............................................................................................................................................. 8 

4.  GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION ..................................................................................................................... 8 

4.1  SOIL EXPLORATION PROGRAME ......................................................................................................................... 8 

4.2  DETAILS OF FIELD INVESTIGATION .............................................................................................................................. 9 

4.3  BORING ............................................................................................................................................................. 10 

4.3.1  STANDARD PENETRATION TEST ....................................................................................................................... 12 

4.3.2  SAMPLING OF SOIL .......................................................................................................................................... 12 

4.4  Logs of borings  & Drilling ............................................................................................................................... 13 

4.5  Standing Water Table ..................................................................................................................................... 14 

5.  LABORATORY TESTING ................................................................................................................................. 14 

5.1  LABORATORY TESTING PROGRAM ............................................................................................................................ 14 

5.1.1  Soli Testing ..................................................................................................................................................... 14 

a)  Moisture Content and Density ........................................................................................................................ 15 

b)  Specific Gravity ............................................................................................................................................... 15 

c)  Sieve analysis .................................................................................................................................................. 15 

d)  Hydrometer Analysis ....................................................................................................................................... 15 

e)  Atterberg Limits .............................................................................................................................................. 15 

f)  Direct Shear Test............................................................................................................................................. 15 

g)  Triaxial Test .................................................................................................................................................... 15 

h)  Consolidation Test .......................................................................................................................................... 15 

6.  STANDARD ADOPTED ................................................................................................................................... 16 

7.  SUBSURFACE CONDITION ............................................................................................................................. 16 

8.  ANALYSIS OF RESULTS AND DESIGN OF FOUNDATION…………………………………………………………………………………..21 

9.  ASSESSMENT OF LIQUEFACTION POTENTIAL ………………………………………………………………………………………………..23 

Page 5: Geotech Report Nandannagar 2nd time · The present report the analysis of test results and recommendations regarding type of foundation, allowable bearing capacity. Also, for the

10.  FOUNDATION RECOMMENDATION……………………………………………………………………………………………………………..27 

ANNEXURE‐A

 CALCULATION ......................................................................................................................................................... 35 

ANNEXURE‐B

B1

 BORE LOG & LAB. TEST RESULTS BH‐1 (HIG) ............................................................................................................. 50 

B2

 BORE LOG & LAB. TEST RESULTS BH‐2 (HIG) ............................................................................................................. 61 

B3

 BORE LOG & LAB. TEST RESULTS BH‐3 (LIG) ............................................................................................................. 74 

B4

 BORE LOG & LAB. TEST RESULTS BH‐4 (MIG) ............................................................................................................ 90 

ANNEXURE‐C

CHEMICAL ANALYSIS .............................................................................................................................................. 107 

ANNEXURE‐D

 WORKING PICTURE ............................................................................................................................................... 108 

Page 6: Geotech Report Nandannagar 2nd time · The present report the analysis of test results and recommendations regarding type of foundation, allowable bearing capacity. Also, for the

GeotechnicalInvestigationReport

BPCConsultantIndiaPvt.Ltd.

UrbanDevelopmentDepartment,Tripura

1. Introduction

1.1 General

Agartala is the capital city of Tripura. Being the seat of administrative power, it is the center of administrative, economic and political activities. The City Development Plan (CDP) for Agartala city has been initiated by Government of Tripura under the Jawaharlal Nehru National Urban Renewal Mission (JNNURM), a scheme1 of Government of India. The objective of the JNNURM scheme is to improve the economic and physical infrastructure for the rapidly increasing urban population and also to provide essential facilities and services across the fast growing cities using public private partnership. The projects that qualify under this scheme include sub-sectors of water supply, sewerage and sanitation, drainage, solid waste management, roads and street lighting, energy and housing. The major areas of weaknesses for the city include infrastructure, urban growth, conservation, environment, slums, and institutional capacity.

As a part of this program “Tripura Urban Planning and Development Authority” has been recently created under the Chairmanship of the Hon’ble Chief Minister of Tripura as per the Tripura Urban Planning and Development Act-2018. The purpose is to ensure planned and sustainable development of urban and semi urban areas in the State. The mission of the project is to ensure planned development of urban areas, sub-urban areas and semi urban areas in Tripura, also to fulfill need of affordable, housing for Economically Weaker Sections (EWS) & Slum Dwellers, Lower Income Group (LIG), Middle Income Group (MIG) and Higher Income Group (HIG) families in systematic manner.

1.2 Project Description

The city has several aspects that are potential opportunities for the city. The three of new townships as mentioned below has been approved by the Hon’ble Chairman TUDA.

New Township on UD Dept. Land behind Bahagatsingh Hostel, Kunjaban, Agartala. New Township on Vivekananda Market site, near Kaman Chowmuhani, Agartala. New Township at Govt. Land (Old Pineapple Garden) Behind Fernondo Rehabilitation, near Don

Bosco School, Nandannagar, Agartala.

Name of Township Land Belongs to

Total Number of Floors permissible as per

Building Rules(tentative)

Total Number of Flats (tentative)

UD Land Behind Bahagatsingh Hostel, Kunjaban

UD Department (1.20 acres)

B+G+12 216

Vivekananda Market site, near Kaman Chowmuhani

AMC (1.00 acre approx)

G+5 60

Govt. Land (Old Pineapple Garden) Behind Fernondo Rehabilitation, near Don BoscoSchool, Nandannagar,

Khas Land (5.8 acres)

G+14

560

So, as a part of this program BPC Consultant India Pvt. Ltd. was entrusted by Urban Development Department, Tripurato conduct Consultancy services for preparation of detailed project Report (DPR) based on detailed topographical survey, collection of hydrological data, detailed geo-technical Sub-Soil investigation along with detailed price/cost estimate and other relevant allied works of the project for Proposed Township

page:-1 of 102

Annexure C1

Annexure C1

Page 7: Geotech Report Nandannagar 2nd time · The present report the analysis of test results and recommendations regarding type of foundation, allowable bearing capacity. Also, for the

GeotechnicalInvestigationReport

BPCConsultantIndiaPvt.Ltd.

UrbanDevelopmentDepartment,Tripura

at Govt. Land(Old Pineapple Garden) Behind Fernondo Rehabilitation, near Don Bosco School, Nandannagar Agartala.

The present report the analysis of test results and recommendations regarding type of foundation, allowable bearing capacity. Also, for the structures, wherever pile foundation is envisaged, pile length, its dia & capacity is analyzed and presented in the report. Observed data of field investigations and laboratory tests are presented and used to assess the nature of subsoil strata and to evaluate the soil parameters required for the design of foundations for different structures.

2. Site Appreciation

2.1 Location

The proposed project site for new Township located is Agartala in the state of Tripura at UD Dept. Land behind Don Bosco School, Nandannagar.Nandannagaris a locality in Agartala block in west Tripura District of Tripura State. The location co-ordinate of the Site is 327439.091E, 2641326.146 N ZONE 46Q.The locations of the exploratory Borehole as carried out for the foundation design are shown in location plan and summary of the details test location describe as Table No. 1.

Figure 1: Map showing the project location

2.2 Geology

The rock formations in Tripura are none or less like those of Assam comprising Tertiary succession. The succession has been studied extensively by several workers. The continuity of sedimentary succession from Assam, has allowed adoption of Assam Tertiary classification and nomenclature for Tripura, as proposed by Evans, (1932), with minor modifications. The major units are Surma Group, Tipam Group and Dupitila Formation (Table1).

page:-2 of 102

Annexure C1

Annexure C1

Page 8: Geotech Report Nandannagar 2nd time · The present report the analysis of test results and recommendations regarding type of foundation, allowable bearing capacity. Also, for the

GeotechnicalInvestigationReport

BPCConsultantIndiaPvt.Ltd.

UrbanDevelopmentDepartment,Tripura

Table 1 : Generalized Stratigraphic Succession in Tripura

Age Group Formation Litho-assemblage

Holocene

Khowai Formation Ghilatoli Formation Teliamura Formation

Alluvium deposits of recent or subrecent rivers comprising silica Sand, silt and clay and vegetation debris Unconsolidated, pale yellow to dirty sand, silt, clay with organic and decomposed vegetable matter; massive, coarse grained, gritty poorly cemented sandstone with current bedding

Quaternary Pliocene to Early Quaternary

Kalyanpur Formation Dupitila Formation

Unconsolidated, pale yellow to dirty grey sand, silt, clay with organic and decomposed vegetation matter; massive, coarse grained, gritty poorly cemented sandstone with current bedding Pockets of clay and silica sand common. Fossil wood occurs frequently; thin sand pebble conglomerate

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Unconformity~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

Pliocene Tipam Group

Upper Tipam Formation Lower Tipam Formation

Thick unit of massive grey to buff coloured medium to coarse grained sandstone showing ribbed structure in the lower portion; contains boulders and calcareous concretion and coal streaks Thick unit of fine to medium grain Sandsotne, Subarkosic Sandstone, Siltstone and Sandy mudstone of brakish to fresh water shallow marine facies.

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Conformable ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

Lower Miocene to Pliocene

Surma Group

Bokabil Formation Mainly argillaceous facies represented by huge thickness of laminated siltstone, silty shale with narrow bands of sandstone; occasionally lenticular zone of medium to coarse micaceous ferruginous sandstone with mudstone

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Unconformity ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

Upper Oligocene to Lower Miocene (?)

Bhuban Formation Calcareous sandstone, calcareous siltstone, yellow to buff coloured fine grained, thinly laminated sandstone and interbanded shell limestone

Tripura forms part of the Tertiary Naga-Arakan- Yoma basin and is located to the southwest of Palaeogene fold belt of Naga Hills. Neogene belt is broadly confined by Haflong-Dawki Fault to north and Barisal Chandpur High to west and northwest. Post Barail upheaval of Palaeogene sediments shallowed distal southwestern part of the basin wherein Neogene sediments of Tripura (Cachar-Mizoram) were deposited. Relationship between Palaeogene and Neogene sediments in Tripura have not been established as Barail Group is not exposed in Tripura. It is likely that Neogene sediments were deposited on the folded, but not uplifted, Palaeogene sediments and were subsequently co-folded with the latter. Unconformity between Tipam Group and Dupitila Formation in Cachar area clearly indicates Tipam upheaval, during which the Upper Tertiary sediments were folded into a series of linear anticlines and synclines. The tectonic cycle ended with a weak deformation of Dupitila sediments. Recent mapping in the state together with integrated study of the surface and subsurface data alongwith interpretation of aerial photography and satellite imagery has provided certain clues to stratigraphic sub-divisions and correlation of Neogene sediments. A brief description of the stratigraphic subdivisions is given below.

page:-3 of 102

Annexure C1

Annexure C1

Page 9: Geotech Report Nandannagar 2nd time · The present report the analysis of test results and recommendations regarding type of foundation, allowable bearing capacity. Also, for the

GeotechnicalInvestigationReport

BPCConsultantIndiaPvt.Ltd.

UrbanDevelopmentDepartment,Tripura

Figure 2 :- The Geological Map of Tripura State

Surma Group:-

This group is further subdivided into the lower, Bhuban Formation (arenaceous assemblag) and the upper, Bokabil Formation (argillaceous assemblage). Surma Group fossil assemblage has been studied in some details and is given in Table 1.

Bhuban Formation:-

The standard three fold classification of Bhuban Formation, (Evans, 1932) is not completely exposed in Tripura. While Lower Bhuban Formation is totally unexposed, Middle Bhuban Formation is exposed as isolated small patches in the two eastern ridges of Tripura and Upper Bhuban Formation forms the bulk of Lower Surma Group.

Bokabil Formation:-

Bhuban Formation is overlain by Bokabil Formation with a gradational contact. This formation consists of siltstone with small interbanded sandstone and has a typical geomorphic expression manifested by linear, low lying sharp hills with a topographic break at its contact with Bhuban Formation.

page:-4 of 102

Annexure C1

Annexure C1

Page 10: Geotech Report Nandannagar 2nd time · The present report the analysis of test results and recommendations regarding type of foundation, allowable bearing capacity. Also, for the

GeotechnicalInvestigationReport

BPCConsultantIndiaPvt.Ltd.

UrbanDevelopmentDepartment,Tripura

Tipam Group:-

Tipam Group conformably overlies Surma Group and the gradational contact is marked by a ribbed sandstone unit with minor thin siltstone bands. The transitional Bokabil-Tipam boundary often poses problem for its demarcation. It is observed that sandstone unit towards the top of Bokabil Formation commonly shows a ribbing pattern. The occurrence of ‘ribbed sandstone unit’ could define changes in depositional parameters and thereby the base of Tipam Group.

2.3 Physiography

2.3.1 Geomorphology

The topography is immature. The major geomorphic elements observed in the area are both structural and topographic ‘highs’ and ‘depressions’, ‘flats’ and ‘slopes’, sculptured on the topographic surface in a linear and areal fashion. In Tripura the topographic highs and lows are in accordance with the normal first order structural elements. The state is dissected by a number of broad and long valleys, viz.,Agartala-Udaipur-Sabrum, Khowai-TelimuraAmarpur-Silachari, Kamalpur-Ambasa-Candachara, Kailashar-Kumarghat, Dharmanagar-Panisagar, etc. located between the N-S trending parallel to sub-parallel antiformal hill ranges (topographic highs), such as the Baramura-Deotamura Ranges, the Atharamura Ranges, the Langtarai Ranges, the Shakan Ranges, and the anticlinal ranges. There are a few disconnected open and shallow anticlinal ridges, viz. Gazalia-Mamunbhagna anticline, Sonamura anticline, Agartala dome, etc. Besides, small-scale elements like the spurs, keels, and the moderate gorges are the other geomorphic elements formed. According to the Geological Survey of India, there are ten physiographic units in the state.

Steeping slopping and slightly dissected high relief structural hills and ridges exemplified by areas like Kailashahar, Panisagar, Baramura, Teliamura, etc.

Moderately slopping with moderately dissected medium relief parallel ridges present in north and northeastern part of Tripura.

Moderately slopping and highly dissected, low relief structural hills and ridges found in the northwest and southern part of the state.

Moderately to gently sloping and moderately dissected flat topped denuded hill occurring in western, central and southern part of Tripura.

Low lying residual hill with valley represented by Gandachhara area of southeastern part of Tripura. Undulating plain with low mounds and gently sloping valley situated mostly in the western and

southern part of Tripura. Flood plain constitutes an important area formed by the rivers of Tripura.

[Source: Mukherjee, Bhatacharrya and Sribastav, GSI, 1997-98]

2.3.2 Drainage

Generally, the valleys are broad and flat with low to moderate Bed Relief Index (BRI), which are separated from the adjacent highs with domes and conical peaks. Some of the peaks of the hills are also flat. The R. L. differences between the elevations of the peaks and valleys increases eastwards constantly. The general altitude of the state varies between 16 m to 600 m above m.s.l. The drainage patterns are of ‘dendritic’, ‘parallel’ to ‘sub-parallel’ and ‘rectangular’ types. The stream channel patterns lie mainly within the ‘piedmont’, ‘straight’ and ‘meandering’ reaches. The ‘braided reach’ is, however, not noticed along the course of the stream channels. The drainage flows down along north by the Khowai, Dolai, Manu, Juri and Langai Rivers ; west by the Gumti River and southwest by the Fenny and Muhari Rivers.

2.3.3 Climate&Rainfall

The climate of the Tripura is characterized by humid sub-tropical climate with three distinct seasons such as summer, monsoon and winter and is under the influence of south-west monsoon, for which extreme climatic conditions prevails. The study area falls under the tropical monsoon climate, which indicates hot and humid

page:-5 of 102

Annexure C1

Annexure C1

Page 11: Geotech Report Nandannagar 2nd time · The present report the analysis of test results and recommendations regarding type of foundation, allowable bearing capacity. Also, for the

GeotechnicalInvestigationReport

BPCConsultantIndiaPvt.Ltd.

UrbanDevelopmentDepartment,Tripura

condition in summer and cold in winter seasons only. Humidity is generally high throughout the year. In summer season the relative humidity is between 50%-75% while in rainy season it is over 80%. The climate is generally hot and humid, the average maximum temperature being 35°C and the average minimum 10.5°C. The state has a fairly good annual rainfall (around 230 cm. per annum). The monsoon generally starts in the middle of April and continues up to September. Heavy rainfall causes severe floods almost every year, disconnecting the state to the rest of the country.

2.4 Seismicity

Northeast India is one of the most highly seismically active regions in the world with more than seven earthquakes on an average per year of magnitude 5.0 and above. Reliable seismic hazard assessment could provide the necessary design inputs for earthquake resistant design of structures in this region. Geotechnical properties of the subsurface horizons can provide valuable insight in understanding the influence of earthquake generated ground motions on manmade structures. In a most generalized term, site response is the process of estimating the response of soil layers under earthquake excitations and thus the variations of earthquake characteristics on the ground surface. The North East India is seismically very active, and Agartala the state capital of Tripura as well as one of the populated and fast growing cities in NE India has experienced several mild to severe earthquakes during the recent past. The city of Agartala (23.750 – 23.900N and 91.250 – 91.350 E) lies within the Tripura sub-basin located to the western frontal part of Assam - Arakan Fold Belt. The city has an uneven topography with small hillocks ranging from 2 - 50 mt. It is bounded by Sylhet Depression (Surma Basin) in the north, Chittagong Hill ranges toward south, Bengal basin to the west and Tripura Fold belt to the east.

Figure 3 : Seismic Zoning Map of India

According to the seismic hazard map of India (2000) by the Bureau of Indian standards (BIS), the state of Tripura and its surrounding region falls in zone V of the Seismic zoning map of India.

page:-6 of 102

Annexure C1

Annexure C1

Page 12: Geotech Report Nandannagar 2nd time · The present report the analysis of test results and recommendations regarding type of foundation, allowable bearing capacity. Also, for the

GeotechnicalInvestigationReport

BPCConsultantIndiaPvt.Ltd.

UrbanDevelopmentDepartment,Tripura

3. Scope of Work

The main objectives of this project are to carry out details Project Report (DPR) based on topographical survey, collection of hydrological data, details geo-technical sub-soil investigation along with details price/cost estimate and other relevant allied works of the project for Proposed Township at Govt. Land, near Don Bosco School, Nandannagar. The scope of the present studies, as laid down of this investigation work, is as under: -

Preparation of Details Project Report (DPR) based on details topographical Survey Collection of Hydrological Data Details Geo-technical sub-Soil investigation along with detailed price/cost estimate and other

relevant allied works, Soil and land suitability studies Hydrological analysis including water availability studies Detailed prepared of cost Estimate Feasibility study and submission of preliminary report along with site plan giving schematic proposal

as regards the site condition, feasibility of taking up the project. Preparation of Site plan showing the project and adjoining area of the embankment, roads, physical

features, built-up areas, underground and overhead services & others.

This report is based on a Geotechnical study was proposed to be carried out for understanding the sub-surface strata for the proposed construction of new Township at Govt. Land, near Don Bosco School, Nandannagar.

4. Geotechnical Investigation

A Geotechnical study was proposed to be carried out for understanding the subsurface strata for the proposed construction of New Township at Govt. Land, near Don Bosco School, Nandannagar. The scope of the present studies, as laid down of this investigation work, is as under:

4.1 Soil Exploration Program

Based on nature of the project, the geotechnical investigations shall include the following activities:

Mobilization of drilling rigs, water pumps, power packs, testing tools and accessories etc. for drilling, sampling, carrying out various other field tests.

Exploration of surface material and subsoil conditions of the site and provision of general Data relating to the project site.

Field identification of soil and rock types, if present, with depth, records of their occurrence and location of their structural discontinuities.

Field Standard Penetration Tests to determine the natural bearing resistance of the subsoil for design.

Collecting disturbed and undisturbed soil samples for visual examination and for carrying out laboratory tests on selected samples to determine the natural, physical and relevant engineering properties of the soil.

The boreholes termination on reaching the requisite depths as per the termination criteria mention in the TOR.

Evaluation of ground water levels in the borings.

Documentation and evaluation of all results in a Geotechnical investigation report after the completion of field work and laboratory test.

page:-7 of 102

Annexure C1

Annexure C1

Page 13: Geotech Report Nandannagar 2nd time · The present report the analysis of test results and recommendations regarding type of foundation, allowable bearing capacity. Also, for the

GeotechnicalInvestigationReport

BPCConsultantIndiaPvt.Ltd.

UrbanDevelopmentDepartment,Tripura

4.2 Details of Field Investigation

Investigation of the underground conditions at a site is prerequisite to the economical design of the substructure elements. In the present report, details geotechnical investigations have been carried out at Govt. Land, near Don Bosco School, Nandannagar. The Exploratory soil boring works were carried out by deploying Wash Boring method of boring. The boreholes were terminated on reaching the requisite depths as per the termination criteria. The details of borehole investigation location have been presented below.

Table 2 : Summery of borehole Investigation Details

Location Borehole No. Ground Elevation

(m)

Co-ordinate Depth of Borehole (m) Easting Northing

Nandannagar

BH-1 (HIG) 31.886 327439.091 2641326.146 30.45

BH-2 (HIG) 31.615 327428.332 2641408.970 30.30

BH-3 (LIG) 31.272 327385.686 2641424.912 30.45

BH-4 (MIG) 28.510 327387.749 2641350.121 30.45

4.3 Boring

The boring was done in accordance with IS: 1892 – 1979. For Geotechnical investigation work, Geo. Machine was installed at the specified borehole location. Stability of rig was ensuring by making level ground. Boring through the soil was carried out by Wash Boring method. SPT tests were conducted at suitable intervals and all recording data has been provided in corresponding annexure. In all boreholes, disturbed soil and undisturbed soil samples were taken at specified interval and at significant change of stratum (or as per specified). Disturbed soil collected in the SPT sampler is to be preserved in polythene covers. All field work photographs are presented in corresponding Annexure.

Table 3 : Summary of Field Work

BH No. Depth of Borehole

(M)

Starting Date

Ending Date

No. of UDS

No. of SPT

No. of DS

GWT below EGL

BH-1(HIG) 30.45 327439.0910 2641326.1460 1 19 21 16.05m

BH-2(HIG) 30.45 327428.3320 2641408.9700 3 18 20 15.56m

BH-3(LIG) 30.45 327385.6860 2641424.9120 4 17 19 15.23m

BH-4(MIG) 30.45 327387.7490 2641350.1210 4 17 19 12.50m

page:-8 of 102

Annexure C1

Annexure C1

Page 14: Geotech Report Nandannagar 2nd time · The present report the analysis of test results and recommendations regarding type of foundation, allowable bearing capacity. Also, for the
Page 15: Geotech Report Nandannagar 2nd time · The present report the analysis of test results and recommendations regarding type of foundation, allowable bearing capacity. Also, for the

4

SsfftintWNrwAf1

2s

C

4

Isbuts

4.3.1 Stand

Standard Pensampler of stafalling from 7freely on the ahe SPT blownvolving “N”he blow coun

When the numN is regardedrecord of penwas no penetrAll the SPT vafollowing two1. Due to Ove

2. Due to Dilstratum consis

Corrected SPT

4.3.2 Sampl

n all the borsignificant chabeen collectedundisturbed. ests such as

shall be collec

dardPenetr

netration Testandard dime

75 cm height. anvil with the

ws is expected” values. Blownts for 30 cmmber of blowd as more tha

netration of thration of the salues are giveo methods: rburden-The

latancy - Thests of fine san

T N” values a

linginSoil

reholes, distuange of stratud for reliableThe Disturbesieve analys

cted to estima

rationTest

ts (SPT) wasensions was d The SPT weie use of cat-hed to be 65% w counts for t

m penetrationws exceeded 5

an 100 as dehe sampler unsampler at anen in Bore log

N value for c

Figure 5

e value obtainnd and silt bel

are given in Bo

urbed soil anum (or as per e estimation oed soil sampleis, index pro

ate physical, s

s conducted driven into thight was mechead winch wito 75% in ththe penetratio

n of the samp0 to penetratescribed in ISnder 50 blow

ny stage and wgs at correspo

cohesion less

: SPT “N” Cor

ned in Overblow water tab

N” =15 +ore logs at co

nd undisturbe specified), asof soil properes shall be co

operties, spectrength and s

in accordanche soil from hanically lifteith one to one

his system anon of every 15pler leaving te the first or : 2131-1981. Ts or more is m

when a rebounonding Annex

soil shall be c

rrections Due t

burden correble for values + 0.5 (N’ - 15)rresponding

ed soil samps per IS: 2131 rties. The sam

ollected for fieific gravity, c

settlement pro

ce with the the borehole ed to the spece and half turnnd can be dir5 cm were recthe first 15 cmsecond 15 cmThe test was made. SPT rend of the sounxure. Field SP

corrected for o

to Overburden

ection shall b of N’ greater) Annexure.

ples were tak - 1981. Sufficmples collecteld identificachemical anaoperties of the

GeoteInves

IS: 2131-1981 bottom usincified height n of the drumrectly used incorded and thm penetration

m length of th terminated iefusal was recnding system

PT N’ value fu

overburden a

e corrected fr than 15, as u

ken at specificient number ted shall be eation and conalysis etc. Une soil.

echnicalstigationRepo

1. SPT split ng 63.5 kg haand allowed

m. The efficienn most of anhe N is reporn as seating

he sampler, thin such case corded when

m was recordeurther correct

as per Fig. 8 (N

for dilatancy under (N”).

ed interval a of soil sampleither disturb

nducting laborndisturbed sa

ort

spoon ammer

to fall ncy of alyses

rted as drive.

he SPT and a

n there ed. ted by

N’).

if the

and at es has

bed or ratory mples

page:-9 of 102

Annexure C1

Annexure C1

Page 16: Geotech Report Nandannagar 2nd time · The present report the analysis of test results and recommendations regarding type of foundation, allowable bearing capacity. Also, for the

GeotechnicalInvestigationReport

BPCConsultantIndiaPvt.Ltd.

UrbanDevelopmentDepartment,Tripura

Disturbed Sampling

Disturbed soil samples have been collected from cuttings and from split spoon sampler in boreholes at regular intervals to provide complete description of soil profile and its variation. The samples have been immediately stored in airtight polythene bags and labeled with borehole number and depth.

Undisturbed Sampling

In each borehole undisturbed sample (UDS) has been collected at regular intervals and as directed by the engineer-in-charge. Undisturbed samples have been 100mm diameter and 450mm length. Samples shall be collected in such a manner that the structure of soil and its moisture content do not get altered. The specification for the accessories required for sampling and the sampling procedure shall conform to IS: 1892 and IS: 2132.Undisturbed soil sample are used to determine the shear parameters, natural moisture content and unit weight.

4.4 Logs of borings & Drilling

Bore log Records are enclosed separately as the corresponding Annexure, the following necessary information

is included.

a) Project Name and Location Details

b) Ground surface elevation at test location (referenced to MSL Datum)

c) Boring Method, size of hole

d) Description and thickness of each stratum encountered

e) Standard penetration test, ‘N’ values

f) Water level after 24 hours of borehole completion

4.5 Standing Water Table

Ground water level when struck with is recorded. It also measured and recorded after 24 hours after completion of the fieldwork and is designated as Standing Water Level. Fluctuations may occur in measured water levels due to seasonal variation in rainfall and surface evaporation rates as well as flow of water in the drain. The water tables as measured in the boreholes are summarized in Table 4below.

Table 4 : Ground Water Table Variation

Borehole No. Ground Water Table Below

Ground Level (m)

BH-1(HIG) 16.05

BH-2(HIG) 15.56

BH-3(MIG) 15.23

BH-4(LIG) 12.50

5. Laboratory Testing

5.1 Laboratory Testing Program

Our laboratory tests programmed was directed primarily towards the determination of Engineering and Index properties of soil & rock encountered at site. All the tests were performed as per the contract specification and in accordance with relevant Indian Standards. Laboratory tests are conducted on soil samples, which are as follows:

Index properties of Soil: Natural Moisture Content, specific gravity Gradation characteristics (gravel, sand and fines content–the silt & clay fractions)

page:-10 of 102

Annexure C1

Annexure C1

Page 17: Geotech Report Nandannagar 2nd time · The present report the analysis of test results and recommendations regarding type of foundation, allowable bearing capacity. Also, for the

GeotechnicalInvestigationReport

BPCConsultantIndiaPvt.Ltd.

UrbanDevelopmentDepartment,Tripura

Consistency limit (LL & PL) Natural Density Direct Shear Test Consolidation Test Tri-axial Test (UU) Conducting Chemical Analysis of Soil Sample

5.1.1 SoilTesting

The index tests were performed to determine the soil moisture content, unit weight, specific gravity, gradation characteristics (gravel, sand and fines content – the silt & clay fractions), consistency limit and strength properties of soil.

a) MoistureContent&Density

Moisture content for soil samples was determined, in accordance with the procedures of IS: 2720 (Part 2). The results are has given in corresponding Annexure.

b) SpecificGravity

The specific gravity test has been carried out for soil samples in accordance with the small pycnometer method described in IS: 2720 (Part 3). The results have been given in corresponding Annexure.

c) SieveAnalysis

The grain size distribution analysis has been carried out for soil samples in accordance with the method described in IS: 2720 (Part 4). Compliance with the Standard, with respect to minimum sample quantity is dependent on the maximum significant grain size and the method of sampling. The results are has given in corresponding Annexure.

d) HydrometerAnalysis

Sedimentation/ Hydrometer analysis has been performed for soil samples in accordance with the method described in IS: 2720 (Part 4). The analysis provides an estimate of the particle size distribution for the fine fraction (<75µm) of a soil sample. The analysis is performed by monitoring the rate of settlement of soil particles initially suspended uniformly in distilled water. The rate of settlement, which is monitored by observing the change in fluid density with the hydrometer device, is theoretically related to the size of particles setting out of suspension. The results are has given in corresponding Annexure.

e) AtterbergLimits

The Atterberg Limits comprising liquid limit, plastic limit and plasticity index were determined for soil samples in accordance with the methods described in IS: 2720 (Part 5). The liquid limit has been determined using the Casagrande apparatus. The soil sample preparation, in accordance with the code of practice, included removal of soil particles retained on the 0.425mm sieve. Accordingly, where a significant quantity of coarser particles was present, it is imperative that the Atterberg Limits results are representative of the relatively fine soil fraction, and not of the complete soil sample. The results are has given in Annexure.

f) DirectShearTest

The direct shear test was carried as per IS 2720 part-13. This standard covers the methods for determination of shear strength of soil with a maximum particle size of 4.75 mm in undrained, consolidated undrained and consolidated drained conditions. Depending upon the application of shear load, the direct shear test is of two types, controlled stress and controlled strain. The controlled strain test is simpler and provides accurate results. The test results are given at corresponding Annexure.

page:-11 of 102

Annexure C1

Annexure C1

Page 18: Geotech Report Nandannagar 2nd time · The present report the analysis of test results and recommendations regarding type of foundation, allowable bearing capacity. Also, for the

GeotechnicalInvestigationReport

BPCConsultantIndiaPvt.Ltd.

UrbanDevelopmentDepartment,Tripura

g) TriaxialTest

The triaxial test was carried as per IS 2720 part-11 respectively. This test is limited to specimens in the form of right cylinders of nominal diameter 38mm and of height approximately equal to twice the nominal diameter. In case of remolded samples; ratio of diameter of specimen to maximum size of particle in the soil should not be less than 5. The test results are given in corresponding Annexure.

h) ConsolidationTest

The One dimensional consolidation test was carried as per IS 2720 part-15. The main purpose of the consolidation test is to obtain soil data which is used in predicting the rate and the amount of settlement of structures. The two most important soil properties furnished by a consolidation test are the coefficient of compressibility (av), through which one can determine the magnitude of compression, and the coefficient of consolidation (Cc) which enables the determination of the rate of compression under a load increment. The data from laboratory consolidation test also gives useful information about the stress history of the soil.The test results are given in corresponding Annexure. All these tests were conducted as per relevant I.S. Codes and the test results are given in test results enclosed herewith in corresponding Annexure.

6. Standards adopted

Classification and identification of soils for general engineering purposes IS: 1498 Code of practice for subsurface Investigation for foundation IS: 1892 Code of practice for design and construction of foundations in soils: General requirements IS: 1904

Method of standard penetration test for soils IS: 2131 Code of practice for thin walled tube sampling of soils IS: 2132 Code of practice for design and construction of pile foundations (Relevant parts) IS: 2911 Methods of sampling and testing (Physical and chemical) for water used in Industry IS: 3025 Code of practice for determination of allowable bearing pressure on shallow foundation IS: 6403 Method of determination of water level in a bore hole IS: 6935 Natural moisture content (Soil) IS - 2720 (Part –2) Grain size analysis of soil IS - 2720 (Part –4) Atterberg Limit of soil IS - 2720 (Part –5) Specific Gravity of soil IS - 2720 (Part –3) Direct Shear Test IS - 2720 (Part–13) Triaxial Test (UU) IS - 2720 (Part–11) Consolidation Test IS - 2720 (Part–15)

The details Results are furnished in corresponding Annexure.

7. Subsurface Condition

The boring records showing the various type of soil met with are enclosed in the corresponding Annexure. These are prepared from field logs after proper modifications in the laboratory test results and observation of disturbed soil samples. The results of the Standard Penetration Tests are given as 'N' values in these boring records. The sub-soil profile (as obtained from field and Laboratory test results) across the boreholes is shown under Fig. 9 giving description, consistency and colour of each stratum. The "N" values are shown in the profile as well as presented in Annexure. The laboratory test results are presented in the corresponding Annexure.

page:-12 of 102

Annexure C1

Annexure C1

Page 19: Geotech Report Nandannagar 2nd time · The present report the analysis of test results and recommendations regarding type of foundation, allowable bearing capacity. Also, for the

GeotechnicalInvestigationReport

BPCConsultantIndiaPvt.Ltd.

UrbanDevelopmentDepartment,Tripura

7.1 Sub-soil profile stratification

Consistent with established Geo-technical practices, longitudinal/cross sections covering group of boreholes were drawn and sub-soil profile established. Based on extensive sub-soil profile analysis following major four layered profile is noticed in this Project site

Soil Layers

Stratum –I: Medium stiff to Stiff, Brownish grey / yellowish grey / yellowish brown, clayey silt/ silty clay

Stratum –II: Very stiff to Hard, brownish yellow / yellowish brown, clayey silt

Stratum -III: Medium dense to dense, yellowish grey / yellowish brown, silty fine grained sand

Stratum-IV: Dense to Very dense, yellowish brown / whitish grey / yellowish grey, silty fine grained Sand

The Brief description of each stratum is provided below.

Stratum-I:

First layer observed in all the four explored boreholes and this generalized surface stratum describe Medium stiff to Stiff, Brownish grey / yellowish grey / yellowish brown, clayey silt/ silty clay with some sand mixture & traces of mica, kankars & gravels. The stratum was continuing from existing ground surface to 4.5m,3m and 7.50m respectively in borehole 1, 2, 3 and 4. Disturbed and Undisturbed sample were collected at several depths in this stratum. The physical and strength properties of this layer are presented as below.

Table 5 : Sub-Soil Properties of Stratum-I

Soil Properties Average Minimum Maximum

PH

YS

ICA

L P

RO

PE

RT

IES

N-value 11 7 14

Natural Moisture Content (%) 18 14 30

Bulk Density, gm/cc 1.93 1.90 1.98

Dry Density, gm/cc 1.66 1.60 1.74

Specific gravity 2.64 2.59 2.72

Atterberg’s Limits

Liquid Limit (%) 42.57 37.00 57.00

Plastic Limit (%) 21.71 19.00 28.00

Plasticity Index (%) 20.86 16.00 19.00

Grain Size

Gravel % 1 0 10

Sand % 39 25 48

Silt % 40 32 48

Clay % 19 15 24

page:-13 of 102

Annexure C1

Annexure C1

Page 20: Geotech Report Nandannagar 2nd time · The present report the analysis of test results and recommendations regarding type of foundation, allowable bearing capacity. Also, for the

GeotechnicalInvestigationReport

BPCConsultantIndiaPvt.Ltd.

UrbanDevelopmentDepartment,Tripura

STR

EN

GT

H

PR

OP

ER

TI

ES

Tri-axial UU Shear Strength

Cohesion (kg/cm2) 0.61 0.50 0.70

Friction angle (°) 4 2 6 C

ON

SO

LID

AT

ION

PR

PP

ER

TO

ES

Consolidation Test

Initial void ratio 0.68 0.61 0.78

Compression Index (Cc) 0.11 0.05 0.14

SOIL CLASSIFICATION “CI”

Stratum-II:

This layer was observed in all the explored boreholes below Stratum-Iand the soil in this layer is characterized by Very stiff to Hard, brownish yellow / yellowish brown, clayey silt with some sand mixture & traces of kankars, gravels. The starting depth for this stratum was 4.5m,3m, 7.50m for Borehole-1,Borehole-2 and Borehole-3, Borehole-4 respectively and continued up to 12m, 8.5m, 8m, 10.50m. In Borehole–2 Yellowish grey, clayey murrum was observed around 4.60 to 5.60m. The average, maximum and minimum soil properties of this layer are presented below.

Table 6 : Sub-Soil Properties of Stratum-II

Soil Properties Average Minimum Maximum

PH

YS

ICA

L P

RO

PE

RT

IES

N-value 24 11 40

Natural Moisture Content (%) 20 14 30

Bulk Density, gm/cc 1.97 1.93 2.00

Dry Density, gm/cc 1.71 1.68 1.74

Specific gravity 2.64 2.60 2.68

Atterberg’s Limits

Liquid Limit (%) 44 36 54

Plastic Limit (%) 22 18 38

Plasticity Index (%) 22 16 31

Grain Size

Gravel % 1 0 4

Sand % 41 12 49

Silt % 39 34 56

Clay % 19 14 30

page:-14 of 102

Annexure C1

Annexure C1

Page 21: Geotech Report Nandannagar 2nd time · The present report the analysis of test results and recommendations regarding type of foundation, allowable bearing capacity. Also, for the

GeotechnicalInvestigationReport

BPCConsultantIndiaPvt.Ltd.

UrbanDevelopmentDepartment,Tripura

STR

EN

GT

H

PR

OP

ER

TIE

S

Tri-axial UU Shear Strength

Cohesion (kg/cm2) 0.78 0.67 0.67

Friction angle (°) 4 3 4

CO

NS

OL

IDA

TIO

N

PR

PP

ER

TO

ES

Consolidation Test

Compression Index (Cc) 0.09 0.04 0.07

Initial void ratio 0.61 0.58 0.65

SOIL CLASSIFICATION “CI”

Stratum-III:

This layer was observed in all the explored boreholes below Stratum-II and the soil in this layer is characterized by yellowish grey / yellowish brown, silty fine grained sand with traces of clay binders & mica. The starting depth for this stratum was 12.00m, 8.50m, 11.00m and 14.20m for Borehole-1, Borehole-2 and Borehole-3, Borehole-4 respectively. The SPT N value of these layers varies between 27 to 60, which was indicate medium dense to dense relative density of this cohesion less stratum. Particular in Borehole-3, there is a pocket layer found from depth 8.00m and end 11.00m and characterized by Medium dense, yellowish brown, clayey silty sand / silty fine grained with little percentage of clay binder. The average, maximum and minimum soil properties of this layer are presented below.

Table 7: Sub-Soil Properties of Stratum-III

Soil Properties Average Minimum Maximum

PH

YS

ICA

L P

RO

PE

RT

IES

N-value 38 27 60

Natural Moisture Content (%) 19 12 22

Bulk Density, gm/cc 1.92 1.91 1.93

Dry Density, gm/cc 1.58 1.61 1.64

Specific gravity 2.68 2.65 2.70

Atterberg’s Limits

Liquid Limit (%)

Non Plastic Plastic Limit (%)

Plasticity Index (%)

Grain Size

Gravel % 0 0 1

Sand % 70 54 80

Silt % 30 20 35

page:-15 of 102

Annexure C1

Annexure C1

Page 22: Geotech Report Nandannagar 2nd time · The present report the analysis of test results and recommendations regarding type of foundation, allowable bearing capacity. Also, for the

GeotechnicalInvestigationReport

BPCConsultantIndiaPvt.Ltd.

UrbanDevelopmentDepartment,Tripura

Soil Properties Average Minimum Maximum

Clay % ST

RE

NG

TH

P

RO

PE

RT

IES Tri-axial UU Shear Strength

Cohesion (kg/cm2) 0.08 0.05 0.10

Friction angle (°) 30.33 30 31

SOIL CLASSIFICATION “SM”

Stratum-IV:

This layer was observed in all the explored boreholes and this happened to be the last layer and the soil in this layer is characterized by Dense to Very dense, yellowish brown / whitish grey / yellowish grey, silty fine grained sand with traces of clay binder, mica and traces of clay binders (Murrum). The starting depth for this stratum was 13.50m, 22.50 m, for Borehole-1, Borehole-2 and Borehole-3respectively. In Borehole 4 it continued from 7.50 and ended at 10.50 m. Then again it starts from 14.20 m and terminates at termination depth. The average, maximum and minimum soil properties of this layer are presented below.

Table 8: Sub-Soil Properties of Stratum-IV

Soil Properties Average Minimum Maximum

PH

YSI

CA

L P

RO

PE

RT

IES

N-value 90 51 113

Natural Moisture Content (%) 19 15 22

Bulk Density, gm/cc 1.92 1.90 1.93

Dry Density, gm/cc 1.62 1.60 1.64

Specific gravity 2.68 2.63 2.71

Atterberg’s Limits

Liquid Limit (%)

Non Plastic Plastic Limit (%)

Plasticity Index (%)

Grain Size

Gravel % 2 0 11

Sand % 70 60 80

Silt % 27 18 37

Clay %

STR

EN

GT

H

PR

OP

ER

TIE

S Tri-axial UU Shear Strength

Cohesion (kg/cm2) 0.07 0.05 0.08

Friction angle (°) 31 29 32

SOIL CLASSIFICATION “SM”

page:-16 of 102

Annexure C1

Annexure C1

Page 23: Geotech Report Nandannagar 2nd time · The present report the analysis of test results and recommendations regarding type of foundation, allowable bearing capacity. Also, for the
Page 24: Geotech Report Nandannagar 2nd time · The present report the analysis of test results and recommendations regarding type of foundation, allowable bearing capacity. Also, for the

GeotechnicalInvestigationReport

BPCConsultantIndiaPvt.Ltd.

UrbanDevelopmentDepartment,Tripura

Pocket Stratum: There was direct shear test conducted on this stratum and the details are given below.

Soil Properties Average Minimum Maximum P

HY

SIC

AL

PR

OP

ER

TIE

S

N-value 12 12 12

Natural Moisture Content (%) 22.09 22.09 22.09

Bulk Density, gm/cc 1.90 1.90 1.90

Dry Density, gm/cc 1.56 1.56 1.56

Specific gravity 2.66 2.66 2.66

Atterberg’s Limits

Liquid Limit (%) 30 30 30

Plastic Limit (%) 21 21 21

Plasticity Index (%) 9 9 9

Grain Size

Gravel % 1 1 1

Sand % 62 62 62

Silt % 27 27 27

Clay % 10 10 10

STR

EN

GT

H

PR

OP

ER

TIE

S Direct Shear test

Cohesion (kg/cm2) 0.11 0.11 0.11

Friction angle (°) 28 28 28

SOIL CLASSIFICATION “SC”

8. Analysis of Results and Design of Foundation

Based on the soil exploration results, further analysis is carried out in this chapter to determine the suitable foundation along with proposal of depth and allowable bearing capacity of the foundation for the proposed Township at near Don Bosco School, Nandannagar Agartala. Considering the nature of sub-surface condition (from field borehole data, field data and laboratory test results) & type of proposed structure, it is suggested for Deep foundation. In this context, it is important to make a rational consideration of design parameters of soil for each layer of this borehole explored. Table No. 9 presents the design parameters of subsoil based on average soil properties. However, selection of design parameters involves conservative judgment on the available parameters or standard correlation available in the literature. The site exhibits uniformity of sub-soil layers as observed from subsoil properties and stratification of layers encountered in this explored borehole.

page:-17 of 102

Annexure C1

Annexure C1

Page 25: Geotech Report Nandannagar 2nd time · The present report the analysis of test results and recommendations regarding type of foundation, allowable bearing capacity. Also, for the

GeotechnicalInvestigationReport

BPCConsultantIndiaPvt.Ltd.

UrbanDevelopmentDepartment,Tripura

Table 9: Average design Sub-soil Parameters for BH-1 & BH4 S

trat

a N

o.

Generalized Subsurface Profile

Type of Soil

R.L of Stratum

Th

ick

ness

(

m )

Rep

rese

nta

tive

N

Cor

rect

ed N

’ Design Parameter

γsub T/m3

From To cu

T/m2 Φu

I

Stiff, Brownish grey / yellowish grey / yellowish brown, clayey silt with some sand mixture & traces of mica & gravels. (CI)

Cohesive 31.886 27.386 4.50 9 - 5.70 4 0.940

II

Very stiff to Hard, Brownish grey / yellowish grey / yellowish brown, clayey silt with some sand mixture & traces of mica & gravels. (CI)

Cohesive 27.386 19.886 7.50 35 - 10.0 0.00 0.950

III

Dense, yellowish brown / whitish grey / yellowish grey, silty fine grained sand with traces of clay binders & mica. (SM)

Cohesionless 19.886 18.386 1.50 49 26 0.0 31.3 0.930

IV

Very dense, yellowish brown / whitish grey / yellowish grey, silty fine grained sand with traces of clay binders & mica. (SM)

Cohesionless 18.386 1.426 16.96 78 30 0.0 32 0.930

Stra

ta N

o.

Generalized Subsurface Profile

Type of Soil

R.L of Stratum

Thi

ckne

ss

( m

)

Rep

rese

nta

tive

N

Cor

rect

ed N

’ Design Parameter

γsub T/m3

From To cu

T/m2 Φu

I Medium to stiff, yellowish

brown / yellowish grey, silty clay / clayey silt(CI)

Cohesive Stratum

28.51 21.01 7.50 11 - 6.00 4 0.920

II Very stiff, Yellowish grey / brownish, silty clay / clayey

silt(CI)

Cohesive Stratum

21.01 18.01 3.00 21 - 7.4 4.00 0.960

III Very dense, yellowish brown,

silty sand (SM) Cohesionless

Stratum 18.01 14.31 3.70 >100 >100 0.8 29 0.900

IV Medium dense to dense,

brownish yellow / yellowish, silty fine grained sand(SM)

Cohesionless Stratum

14.31 3.010 11.30 35 19 0.5 31 0.930

page:-18 of 102

Annexure C1

Annexure C1

Page 26: Geotech Report Nandannagar 2nd time · The present report the analysis of test results and recommendations regarding type of foundation, allowable bearing capacity. Also, for the

GeotechnicalInvestigationReport

BPCConsultantIndiaPvt.Ltd.

UrbanDevelopmentDepartment,Tripura

Stra

ta N

o.

Generalized Subsurface Profile

Type of Soil

R.L of Stratum

Th

ickn

ess

( m

)

Rep

rese

nta

tive

N

Cor

rect

ed N

’ Design Parameter

γsub T/m3

From To cu

T/m2 Φu

5 Very dense, brownish yellow /

yellowish, silty fine grained sand (SM)

Cohesionless Stratum

3.010 -1.940 4.95 62 22 0.0 32.00 0.940

9. Assessment of liquefaction potential

9.1 General

Condition of decrease in the shear strength and/or stiffness caused by the increase in pore water pressures in saturated cohesion less materials during earthquake ground motion is referred to as liquefaction. It gives rise to significant permanent deformations or even to a condition of near-zero effective stress in the soil.

9.2 Seismicity in Tripura

Northeastern Region, including Tripura is prone to natural disasters like earthquake, floods, landslides, cyclone and occasional draught. Wedge between two plate collision boundaries, the Himalayan in the north and the Indburman in the east, the Northeastern region is one of the seismically most active regions of the world. With complex tectonic and geology set up of the region and intense continental convergence of the northward moving Indian plate at the rate of 20+03mm/year can produce very severe earthquakes in every few hundred years. There were very severe earth quake occurred in the Tripura. The activity in the Tripura area may be related to the plate boundary activity (Kayal, 1998). A damaging earthquake (Mw 5.8) [Known as Cachar Earthquake] occurred in 1984 at a depth of 32 km in the Tripura area (Mishra, 2004).

9.3 Consideration

Following information has been considered in the Liquefaction calculation using

Assam lie in = Zone V[ IS-1893 Part-1: 2016 / Fig. 1]

Peak Ground Acceleration = 0.36 [IS-1893 Part-1: 2016 / table: 3]

Magnitude of Earthquake = 7.5[IS-1893 Part-1: 2016 / Annex: 1]

9.4 Methodology

Liquefaction potential shall be evaluated by well-established methods of geotechnical engineering, based on field correlations between in situ measurements and the critical cyclic shear stresses known to have caused liquefaction during past earthquakes. Liquefaction potential may be estimated by calculating the factor of safety (FOS), which is given as,

𝑭𝑶𝑺 𝑪𝑹𝑹𝑪𝑺𝑹

page:-19 of 102

Annexure C1

Annexure C1

Page 27: Geotech Report Nandannagar 2nd time · The present report the analysis of test results and recommendations regarding type of foundation, allowable bearing capacity. Also, for the

GeotechnicalInvestigationReport

BPCConsultantIndiaPvt.Ltd.

UrbanDevelopmentDepartment,Tripura

Where, CRR = Cyclic resistance Ratio CSR = Cyclic Stress Ratio

The soil shall be considered as liquefiable if, FOS < 1

9.5 Cyclic resistance Ratio [CRR]

The cyclic resistance is to be calculated from measured blow count values of Standard Penetration Testing (SPT), suitably modified with different correction factors. The corrected SPT blow count is represented by N1(60) for hammer efficiency of 60 percent and is evaluated from expression below

N1(60) = N C60 CN

Where, N = field SPT count C60 = CE x CBD x CRL x CSS = Correction factors for SPT configuration CN = Correction for Overburden pressure limited to 1.70

CN = (Pa/) 0.5 Pa = 1 Atmospheric pressure = 10t/sqm = Vertical effective stress at the depth of SPT CE = For SPT conducted as per IS 2131-1981, the energy delivered to the drill rod is about 60 percent may be assumed as 1.

The effect of borehole diameter is taken into account using factor CBD

Borehole Diameter Term Correction Factor 65 CBD 1

115 CBD 1

150 CBD 1.05 200 CBD 1.15

For different rod lengths, the rod length correction factor CRL

Rod length (m) Correction Factor (CRL) <3 0.75

3-4 0.80 4-6 0.85

6-10 0.95 >10 1.00

The correction factor CSS for different sampling method is taken 1.1 for Sampler without liners.

Presence of Fines Content (FC) in percent can also result in increase of cyclic resistance of soils. For presence of fines, the SPT value is to be modified to N1(60)cs as follows –

N1(60)cs =+*(N1(60) ) For Fine Content<=5, =0 and =1 For (Fine Content>5 and <35), = EXP ((1.76-(190/FC2)) and = (0.99+ (FC1.5/1000) For Fine Content>35, =5 and =1.2 Where, Fc = fineness content percentage

page:-20 of 102

Annexure C1

Annexure C1

Page 28: Geotech Report Nandannagar 2nd time · The present report the analysis of test results and recommendations regarding type of foundation, allowable bearing capacity. Also, for the

GeotechnicalInvestigationReport

BPCConsultantIndiaPvt.Ltd.

UrbanDevelopmentDepartment,Tripura

CRR, for 7.5 magnitude earthquake, is to be evaluated from N1(60) cs using the following Expression:

The above expression is valid only for earthquakes with magnitude of 7.5. For earthquakes with Different magnitudes, the calculated CRR 7.5 is to be corrected by

CRR = (CRR7.5). (MSF). K. KWhere, Magnitude scaling Factor (MSF) = 10 2.24 / Mw2.56

The correction for high overburden stresses K is required when overburden pressure is high (depth>15m) and using following equation: 

K’vo/Pa )(f – 1) Where ’vo effective overburden pressure and Pa atmospheric pressure are measured in the Same units and f is an exponent and its value depends on the relative density Dr. for Dr =40%- 60%, f=0.8-0.7 and for Dr =60%-80%, f=0.7-0.6. The correction for static shear stresses K is required only for sloping ground and shall be assumed 1.0 otherwise.

9.6 Cyclic Stress Ratio (CSR)

The cyclic stress ratio at a particular depth can be calculated as

𝜏av =Average equivalent uniform shear stress generated by earthquake assumed to be 0.65 of the maximum induced stress, a max = Peak ground acceleration (PGA), in terms of g ’vo= Initial effective vertical (overburden) stress at the depth vo = Total overburden stress at the same depth, g = Acceleration due to gravity

rd– Shear stress reduction coefficient to adjust for flexibility of the soil profile

As per IRC2017: Sp-114 The factor rd can be evaluated for any depth z from following expression

rd = 1.0 - .00765z for z ≤ 9.15 m rd= 1.174 – 0.0267z for 9.15m < z ≤ 20.00 m Where, z = depth below the ground surface in meters

*N.B: From the above equation it’s clear that there is a depth limitation of 20.00m. In the main section the total average terminating depth of the borehole is 80.00m; so there is an ambiguity of calculating the Shear stress reduction coefficient rdvalue beyond 20.00m as per the IRC-2017: SP-114. To Evict the Depth limitation of 20.00m, we have calculated the Shear stress reduction coefficient rd As per – T. F. Blake (1996) approximated the value by the following equation-

Where,

page:-21 of 102

Annexure C1

Annexure C1

Page 29: Geotech Report Nandannagar 2nd time · The present report the analysis of test results and recommendations regarding type of foundation, allowable bearing capacity. Also, for the

GeotechnicalInvestigationReport

BPCConsultantIndiaPvt.Ltd.

UrbanDevelopmentDepartment,Tripura

z = depth beneath ground surface in meters.

[Ref. -SUMMARY REPORT FROM THE 1996 NCEER AND 1998 NCEER/NSF WORKSHOPS ON EVALUATION OF LIQUEFACTION RESISTANCE OF SOILS By T. L. Youd,1 Member, ASCE, and I. M. Idriss,2 Fellow, ASCEJournal of

Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, Vol. 127, No. 4, April, 2001. @ASCE, ISS

The liquefaction hazards may be neglected when at least one of the following conditions is fulfilled- a) The sands have a clay content greater than 25% with Plasticity Index PI>10 b) The sands have silt contents greater than 35% and corrected N value more than 20 c) The sands are clean with corrected N value more than 30

[Ref. IRC-2017-SP-114_ Cl. No.-8.4.4]

Precautions

Considering that Project site comes under zone V which is considered ‘vulnerable’ it shall be ensured that construction shall comply with guidelines laid down by Bureau of Indian Standards for seismically vulnerable areas. Liquefaction calculation is provided in the annexure.

10. Foundations Recommendation

Type of foundations depends essentially on configuration and nature of facility, magnitude of load transfer envisaged and sub-soil data. In this report, both shallow & deep foundations are considered. Recommendations are based on shear failure & 50mm settlement criteria.

10.1 Shallow Foundation – Approach Methodology

Estimation of Safe Bearing Capacity as per IS-6403:1981

The bearing capacity as well as settlement of shallow foundation may be analyzed by using IS: 6403-1981, Clause No. 5.1.2- Net ultimate Bearing capacity of open foundation of different sizes is calculated using bearing capacity formula given in IS 6403-1981, Clause No. 5.1.2: qd= C Nc Sc dc ic +q (Nq -1) Sqdqiq+ 0.5 B Y Ny Sy dyiyw’

Net Safe bearing capacity of open foundation; qs = qd / F.S Where; F.S = Factor of safety = 2.5 - 3.0 q = effective overburden pressure. B = width of foundation. C = cohesive strength of soil.

Weighted average cohesion can be computed as: C = (C1H1 + C2H2 + - - - -CnHn)/Hi and average angle of internal friction can be evaluated as : = Arc Tan [(H1 tan1 + H2 tan2 +- - - -- - - - - - Hntann) / HI]

Reduction factors

Type of Factors Descriptions

Bearing capacity factor

(Table-1 of IS-6403-1981)

Nc whose value varied from 5.14 to 266.89 depending upon the angle of internal friction ()

Nq whose value varied from 1.00 to 319.07 depending upon the angle of internal friction ()

Ny whose value varied from 0.00 to 762.89 depending upon the angle of internal friction ()

page:-22 of 102

Annexure C1

Annexure C1

Page 30: Geotech Report Nandannagar 2nd time · The present report the analysis of test results and recommendations regarding type of foundation, allowable bearing capacity. Also, for the

GeotechnicalInvestigationReport

BPCConsultantIndiaPvt.Ltd.

UrbanDevelopmentDepartment,Tripura

Type of Factors Descriptions

Note :- In case of local shear failure obtaining values of N’c , N’q , N’y calculate ’=tan-1(0.67 tan) read Nc , Nq , Ny from the table-1/ IS-6403:1981/clause 5.1.1 to the value of ’ instead of which are values of N’c , N’q , N’y respectively.

Shape factor

(Table-2 of IS-6403-1981)

Sc for continuous strip Footing

(1+ 0.2 x B/L) for rectangular footing

1.30 for square/circular footing

Sq 1.00 for continuous strip Footing

(1+ 0.2 x B/L) for rectangular footing

1.20 for square/circular footing

Sy

1.00 for continuous strip footings

0.4 x B/L) for rectangular footing

0.80 for square footing

0.60 for circular footing

Depth factor

(Clause 5.1.2.2 of IS 6403-1981)

dc 1+ 0.2 (Df / B) x N

dq = dy 1 for 100

dq = dy 1+ 0.1 (Df / B) x N for > 100 {N = tan2 (45 + /2)}

Note: -The Depth factor correction is to be applied only when back filling is done with proper compaction.

Inclination factor

(Clause 5.1.2.3 of IS 6403-1981)

ic=iq (1 – α/90)2

iҮ (1-α/)2

Effect of water Table

a) If the water table is likely to permanently remain at or below a depth of (Df + B) beneath the ground level surrounding the footing then W’= 1

b) If the water table is located at a depth Df or likely to rise to the base of the footing or above then the value of W' shall be taken as 0.5.

c) If the water table is likely to permanently got located at depth DF<Dw<(Df + B) then the value of W'be obtained by linear interpolation.

[Note: - we are assuming the water table is located at EGL and the factor W'= 0.5 considering the worst condition for safety purpose.

Settlement

page:-23 of 102

Annexure C1

Annexure C1

Page 31: Geotech Report Nandannagar 2nd time · The present report the analysis of test results and recommendations regarding type of foundation, allowable bearing capacity. Also, for the

GeotechnicalInvestigationReport

BPCConsultantIndiaPvt.Ltd.

UrbanDevelopmentDepartment,Tripura

Settlement analysis has been performed as per IS-8009 (Part-1)-1976 and ‘FOUNDATION ANALYSIS & DESIGN’ 5th Edition of Joseph E. Bowles. Estimation of total settlement of foundation on cohesive soil estimated as - Total settlement= [(Immediate Settlement +Consolidation settlement) x depth factor x rigidity factor] And total settlement of foundation on cohesionless soil estimated as- Total settlement= [Immediate Settlement x depth factor x rigidity factor]

Consolidation settlement

Consolidation settlement of cohesive Stratum for open foundation can be computed by using IS: 8009 (Part-I) – 1976 as follows:

Sf = p x mv x H x λ

Here, H = thickness of clay layer below foundation level (m) mv = Coefficient of volume compressibility (m2/ton)

p = Pressure increment (ton/m2) λ =A factor related to the pore pressure parameter (IS-8009 (Part-1)-1976 / table-1)

Type of Clay Value of λ

Very sensitive clays (soft alluvial Estuarine and marineclays)

1.0 to 1.2

Normally consolidated clays 0.7 to 1.0

Over consolidated clays 0.5 to 0.7

Heavily Over consolidated clays 0.2 to 0.5

Immediate Settlement/Elastic settlement

The settlement of the corner of a rectangular base of dimensions B' X L' on the surface of an elastic half-space can be computed from an equation from the Theory of Elasticity [e.g., Timoshenko and Goodier (1951)] as follows-

Where,

qo= intensity of contact pressure in units of Es

B’ = least lateral dimension of contributing base area in units of ΔH

Ii = influence factors, which depend on L'/B’ thickness of stratum H, Poisson's ratio µ, and base embedment depth D

ES& µ = elastic soil parameters

The influence factorsI1 and I2can be computed using equations given by Steinbrenner (1934) as follows:

page:-24 of 102

Annexure C1

Annexure C1

Page 32: Geotech Report Nandannagar 2nd time · The present report the analysis of test results and recommendations regarding type of foundation, allowable bearing capacity. Also, for the

GeotechnicalInvestigationReport

Where, M = L’/B’

N = H/B’

B’ = B/2 for center; = B for Coroner

L’ = L/2 for center; = L for Coroner

m = number of corners contributing to settlement ΔH. Atthe footing center m = 4; and at a corner

m = 1.

Depth factor

Fox depth correction factor for settlement of flexible footing of L x B at a depth of D as per IS: 8009 (Part-I) – 1976 Fig.-12

Rigidity factor

In the case of rigid foundations for example. a heavy beam and slab raft or a massive pier, the total settlement at the center should be reduced by a Rigidity factor. IS: 8009 (Part-I) – 1976 / clause – 9.5.2 Rigidity factor = 0.8

Table 10 : List of Shallow Foundation Bearing Capacity for the Proposed Locations

References BH No.

Depth of Foundation

(m)

Size of Foundation

(m)

Net Safe Bearing Capacity (t/m2)

as per (IS-6403-1981)

Net Safe Bearing Capacity (t/m2) for

permissible settlement of

50.00mm as per (IS-8009 (Part-1)-1976)&Joseph E.

Bowles

BH-1

1.50 1 x 2.00 18.00 18.00

3.00 2 x 4.00 19.00 19.00

4.50 3 x 6.00 18.00 18.00

4.50 6 x 6.00 59.00 59.00

3.00 1 x 10.00 21.00 21.00

BH-4

1.50 1 x 2.00 19.00 19.00

3.00 2 x 4.00 20.00 20.00

4.50 3 x 6.00 20.00 20.00

4.50 6 x 6.00 19.00 19.00

3.00 1 x 10.00 23.00 23.00

As can be seen, bearing characteristics is in-sufficient to sustain the heavy load transfer expected at 1.5m, 3.00m, and 4.50m depth. So, considering site conditions, taking the foundations at shallow depth may not be feasible due to the proposed heavy load structure.

Figure 7: Fox Depth Correction Factor

page:-25 of 102

Annexure C1

Annexure C1

Page 33: Geotech Report Nandannagar 2nd time · The present report the analysis of test results and recommendations regarding type of foundation, allowable bearing capacity. Also, for the

GeotechnicalInvestigationReport

BPCConsultantIndiaPvt.Ltd.

UrbanDevelopmentDepartment,Tripura

Hence, alternatives such as deep foundations may be necessary to ensure the effective load transfer without excessive settlements. Accordingly, alternatives have been considered (i.e.) Bored Cast-in-situ Pile foundations. The following pile capacity can be considered for the pile foundations embedded in very dense/compacted sand layer. While working out capacity, design parameter covering all boreholes /heavy loaded structures has been used and recommendations will be valid accordingly for respective locations. Capacities in Axial & Uplift are based on Geo-technical and Concrete strength considerations assuming M35 Grade of concrete. Lateral Load capacity is based on deflection of 1% of pile diameter at pile head assuming fixed head conditions.

Initial load tests shall be carried out as per IS-2911 guidelines to reconfirm the safe loads recommended below. Specimen Calculations are enclosed in separate Annexure. Decision regarding the opting open/pile foundation and ‘size of footing or diameter and configuration’ of the pile thereof shall be taken by the designer depending upon magnitude of load transfer.

10.2 Pile Foundations

Considering sub-soil characteristics, presence of adjacent facilities Bored Cast-In-Situ appears to be most feasible type of deep foundation compared to driven piles. Pile bearing capacity in axial compression is arrived based on the static approach. Separate evaluation of shaft friction and end bearing forms the basis of this approach. The following design parameters have been adopted

Type: Bored cast‐in‐situ 

Diameter of the pile: 1000&1200mm respectively 

Load transfer: Friction cum end bearing  

Design Pile cut off depth:  Adopted as 1.80m below existing ground level  

Concreted length below cut off: Refer Summary 

Calculations: Are as per Static approach suggested in IS‐2911, revised  

10.2.1.1 MethodologyforAxialLoadfromGeotechnicalCriteria

Safe Axial capacity

Q ultimate = Qskinfriction + Q end bearing (i.e.) Q ultimate = fs As + Fb Ab

Pile Foundation in Granular soils

The ultimate load capacity (Qu) of piles, in granular soils is given by the following formula:

Qu = Ap(1/2DN + PDNq) ni=1 Ki PDitaniAsi

The first term gives end-bearing resistance and the second term given skin friction resistance. In first term, Term involving ½ DNis generally ignored as value is quite small compared to PD Nq Where,

  Ap = cross‐sectional area of pile tip, in m2; 

  D   = diameter of pile shaft, in m: 

= effective unit weight of the soil, in KN/ m3 or t/ m3  

Nand Nq= bearing capacity factors depending upon the angle of internal friction.at pile tip and from curve of IS‐2911, Part 1 ‐Sec 2 

PD= effective overburden pressure at pile tip in KN/m2 or t/ m2 

=Summation for layers 1 ton in which pile is installed and which contribute to positive 

skin friction; 

Ki= coefficient of earth pressure applicable for the ith layer 

page:-26 of 102

Annexure C1

Annexure C1

Page 34: Geotech Report Nandannagar 2nd time · The present report the analysis of test results and recommendations regarding type of foundation, allowable bearing capacity. Also, for the

GeotechnicalInvestigationReport

BPCConsultantIndiaPvt.Ltd.

UrbanDevelopmentDepartment,Tripura

PDi = effective overburden pressure for the ith layer, in KN/m2 or t/ m2 satisfying critical   

depth concept  

= angle of wall friction between pile and soil for the ith layer; and  Asi= surface area of pile shaft in i

th layer, in m2 

Pile Foundation in Cohesive soils

The ultimate load capacity (Qu) of piles, in cohesive soil is given by the following formula:

Qu = Ap Nc Cp+ni=1iciAsi

The first term gives the end the second term gives the skin friction resistance. Where,

Ap = cross‐sectional area of pile tip, in m2; 

Nc = bearing capacity factor, may be taken as 9: 

Cp = average cohesion at pile tip, in kN/m2 or t/ m2 

ni=1= summation for layers 1 ton in which the pile is installed and which contribute to positive skin 

friction; 

i= adhesion factor for the ith layer depending on the consistency of soil, 

Ci= average cohesive for ith layer, in kN/m2; and 

Asi = surface area of pile shaft in the ith layer, 

The recommended factor of safety is 2.50 for safe axial load

10.2.1.2 AxialCapacity‐Concretestrengthcriteria

The axial capacity of a pile is given by the cross-sectional area of pile multiplied by stress in direct compression (cc) which depends on grade of concrete (From IS: 456-2000). For design calculations, grade of concrete is assumed as M35.

10.2.1.3 UpliftCapacity‐GeotechnicalCriteria

The uplift capacity of a pile is given by sum of frictional resistance and the self-weight of the pile (buoyant). The recommended factor of safety is 3.0.

10.2.1.4 UpliftCapacity‐Concretestrengthcriteria

The uplift capacity of a pile is given by cross-sectional area of pile multiplied by stress in tension (t) which depends on grade of concrete (From IS: 456-2000). For design calculations, grade of concrete is assumed as M35.

10.2.1.5 LateralLoadCapacity

Approach recommended in IS-2911, Part-1, Sec 2, is followed. Capacities have been recommended for a deflection of 1% of pile head for fixed Head and assuming M35 grade concrete.

10.2.2 DesignSummary

Safe axial and uplift capacities recommended are the lower of values computed from Geotechnical criteria and concrete strength consideration and additionally based on design consideration of piles embedded minimum 5 times pile diameter in very dense silty sand layer with SPT N value >50 consistently. Based on detailed calculations and analysis, safe loads for bored cast-in-situ pile foundations in Safe axial compression, uplift loading is as under.

Table 11: List of R.C.C Bored Cast-in-Situ Pile Capacity for the Proposed Locations

page:-27 of 102

Annexure C1

Annexure C1

Page 35: Geotech Report Nandannagar 2nd time · The present report the analysis of test results and recommendations regarding type of foundation, allowable bearing capacity. Also, for the

GeotechnicalInvestigationReport

BPCConsultantIndiaPvt.Ltd.

UrbanDevelopmentDepartment,Tripura

Loc

atio

n

Ref

eren

ces

Bor

ehol

e N

o.

Pil

e D

iam

eter

(mm

)

Gro

un

d E

leva

tion

(m)

Pil

e L

engt

h b

elow

Cu

t-of

f L

evel

(m)

Pil

e C

ut o

ff le

vel (

m)

Pil

e T

ip le

vel (

m)

Rec

omm

end

ed V

erti

cal

Pil

e C

apac

ity

(t)

Rec

omm

end

ed U

pli

ft

Pil

e C

apac

ity

(t)

Rec

omm

end

ed L

ater

al

Pil

e C

apac

ity

(t)

Fixe

d E

nd

Mom

ent (

T-m

)

Old

Pin

eap

ple

Gar

den

N

and

an N

agar

BH-1 (HIG)

1.20 31.886 26.700 30.086 3.386 181 36 23 195.84

BH-4 (MIG)

1.20 28.510 26.200 26.710 0.510 180 29 14 146.47

Note:- I) Specimen Calculations are enclosed in separate Annexure. Decision regarding the ‘diameter and configuration’ of the pile there of shall be taken by the designer depending upon magnitude of load transfer.

II) Based on the subsurface profile taking design soil parameters from generalized soil profile and BH-1(HIG) & BH-4(MIG) has been taking into consideration for calculating pile capacity due to weaker soil profile among the four explored boreholes.

10.2.3 IncreaseinPilecapacities

As per clause 6.9 of IS-2911 (Part 1-Sec 2), maximum permissible safe load of a pile as arising out of wind loading is 25%. In case of loads arising out of earthquake effects, the increase of safe load on a single pile shall be limited to the provisions contained in IS 1893 (Part 1). For transient loading arising out of superimposed loads, no increase is permitted.

10.3 Spacing and group action

Decision regarding the ‘configuration of the pile’ shall be taken by the structural designer depending.

10.4 Load test requirements

Initial load tests shall be carried out as per IS-2911 guidelines to reconfirm the safe loads recommended above. Pile load tests shall be carried out as per the guidelines of IS: 2911- Part IV to reconfirm the safe load recommended for axial compression, lateral and uplift capacity in this report.

10.5 Chemical Tests

Chemical tests are conducted on soil sample to determine PH, Sulphate &Chloride. The test results are presented in corresponding Annexure. It is seen that the values are well within the permissible limit as per IS: 456. IS: 456-2000 recommends that precautions should be taken against chemical degradation of concrete if

page:-28 of 102

Annexure C1

Annexure C1

Page 36: Geotech Report Nandannagar 2nd time · The present report the analysis of test results and recommendations regarding type of foundation, allowable bearing capacity. Also, for the

GeotechnicalInvestigationReport

BPCConsultantIndiaPvt.Ltd.

UrbanDevelopmentDepartment,Tripura

The Sulphates content of the soil exceeds 0.2 percent or, The ground water more than 300mg per lit of Sulphates (SO3)

Comparing the test results with these specified limits, the sulphate content of the soil is less than the Specified limit. Reviewing the test results as per IS: 456-2000, the Strata at site may be considered under Class-1 Category as per IS: 456-2000. Either Ordinary Portland Cement or Portland Slag Cement or Portland Pozzolana Cement can be used for the purpose.

CONCLUDING REMARKS

This Geotechnical report is valid for site conditions that prevailed at time of Geo-technical investigations. The entire scope of field work was executed in accordance with soil test locations by the client. Data derived from investigations have been necessarily used to arrive at the necessary design recommendations. There is a possibility that strata variations could occur between test locations. If any variations indicate significant deviations from the findings of this report, same shall be brought to our notice for appropriate design review.

page:-29 of 102

Annexure C1

Annexure C1

Page 37: Geotech Report Nandannagar 2nd time · The present report the analysis of test results and recommendations regarding type of foundation, allowable bearing capacity. Also, for the

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ANNEXURE-A

Calculation Sheet Nandannagar

Annexure C1

Annexure C1

Page 38: Geotech Report Nandannagar 2nd time · The present report the analysis of test results and recommendations regarding type of foundation, allowable bearing capacity. Also, for the

Project Name :

Client Name : Location: Nandannagar Borehole No. BH-1(HIG)Ground Elevation (m):

31.886

Depth Field N Value Clay Content Liquid Limit % Moisture content

% Result from Clay Content % criteria

Result from Liquid Limit % criteria

0.50 - 15 37.00 15.00 Liquefable Non- Liquefable

2.50 - 20 37.00 16.00 Non- Liquefable Non- Liquefable

6.00 51 20 45.00 20.00 Non- Liquefable Non- Liquefable

7.50 30 30 54.00 30.00 Non- Liquefable Non- Liquefable

9.00 27 15 35.00 20.00 Liquefable Liquefable

10.50 27 15 35.00 20.00 Liquefable Liquefable

The Liquefaction can only occur if all Three of the following conditions are met ;

Result from Moisture content % criteria

Non- Liquefable

Non- Liquefable

Non- Liquefable

Non- Liquefable

Result: Hence, Cohesive soil is Non-Liquefable

A) The soil contains fine grained soils with clay contents less than 15%.

B) Liquid limit less than 35% or

C) The natural moisture content is greater than 0.9 times the Liquid Limit.

Executive Engineer - IV Urban Development Department, Tripura

Consultancy Services for preparation of detailed project report (DPR) based on detailed topographical survey, collection of hydrological data, detailed geotechnical sub-soil investigation along with detailed price/cost estimate and other relevant allied works of the project- Proposed Township at UD Land, Kunjaban, Agartala.

Non- Liquefable

Non- Liquefable

page:-30 of 102

Annexure C1

Annexure C1

Page 39: Geotech Report Nandannagar 2nd time · The present report the analysis of test results and recommendations regarding type of foundation, allowable bearing capacity. Also, for the

= =

= =

= ( Assuming at Ground Level ) =

= =

= ( for Conventional Drop Type Hammer ) =

=

= Factor of Safety against Liquefaction = CRR7.5/CSR

= where,

0.00 m

60 %

HEIGHT OF FALL OF THE HAMMER

63.50 Kg

Executive Engineer - IV Urban Development Department, Tripura

HAMMER EFFICIENCY

BOREHOLE DIAMETER

SAMPLING METHOD

amax/g

REFERENCE BORING NUMBER BH-1(HIG)

31.886

Project Name :

Client Name :

Liquefaction Analysis as per - 1996 NCEER AND 1998 NCEER

ELEVATION OF BORING GROUND SURFACE

DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER TABLE

31.886

Sampler without Liners

As per IS-2131:1981

HAMMER TYPE

Consultancy Services for preparation of detailed project report (DPR) based on detailed topographical survey, collection of hydrological data, detailed geotechnical sub-soil investigation along with detailed price/cost estimate and other relevant allied works of the project- Proposed Township at UD Land, Kunjaban, Agartala.

Donut Hammer with rope and pully

WEIGHT OF HAMMER

750 mm

Borehole No. :

150 mm

[ If, FOS < 1 , Soil shall be considered as Liquefiable and FOS > 1 is Non-Liquefiable Soil ]

0.36

7.5EARTHQUAKE MAGNITUDE ( Mw )

CRR = Cyclic Resistane Ratio

CSR = Cyclic Stress Ratio

SEISMIC INTENSITY

SEISMIC ZONE FACTOR ( Z )

Ground Elevation ( m )NandannagarLocation:BH-1(HIG)

V

Very Severe

DepthAverage Depth

Type of soil

Field NƳbulk

(ton/m2)

Fines Content

(%)

Total OVP [ σt ]

(ton/m2)

Effective OVP

[ σ'vo ]

(ton/m2)

(Pa/σ'vo)1/2 CN CE CS CR CB

N1(60)=N x CN

x CE x CB x CR

x CS

α β N1(60)cs amax/g rd CSR CRR7.5 MSF Kα KσFOS=

CRR7.5/CSRResult

1 2 3 4 5 7 8 9 10 11 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29

12.00 12.23 SM 49 1.93 35.00 23.59 11.37 0.94 0.94 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.05 53.08 FALSE FALSE 0.00 0.36 0.85 0.41 0.05 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.12 Liqueafiable

13.50 13.73 SM 52 1.93 40.00 26.49 12.76 0.89 0.89 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.05 53.16 5.00 1.20 68.79 0.36 0.80 0.39 N.A 1.00 1.00 1.00 Greater than 1 Non-Liquefiable

15.00 15.23 SM 62 1.93 33.00 29.38 14.16 0.84 0.84 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.05 60.18 4.88 1.18 75.87 0.36 0.75 0.37 N.A 1.00 1.00 0.86 Greater than 1 Non-Liquefiable

16.50 16.73 SM 80 1.93 33.00 32.28 15.55 0.80 0.80 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.05 74.09 4.88 1.18 92.27 0.36 0.70 0.34 N.A 1.00 1.00 0.81 Greater than 1 Non-Liquefiable

18.00 18.23 SM 94 1.93 33.00 35.17 16.95 0.77 0.77 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.05 83.39 4.88 1.18 103.25 0.36 0.66 0.32 N.A 1.00 1.00 0.76 Greater than 1 Non-Liquefiable

19.50 19.73 SM 105 1.93 33.00 38.07 18.34 0.74 0.74 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.05 89.54 4.88 1.18 110.50 0.36 0.62 0.30 N.A 1.00 1.00 0.72 Greater than 1 Non-Liquefiable

21.00 21.23 SM 62 1.93 34.00 40.96 19.74 0.71 0.71 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.05 50.97 4.93 1.19 65.50 0.36 0.59 0.29 N.A 1.00 1.00 0.74 Greater than 1 Non-Liquefiable

22.50 22.73 SM 56 1.93 34.00 43.86 21.13 0.69 0.69 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.05 44.49 4.93 1.19 57.80 0.36 0.57 0.28 N.A 1.00 1.00 0.72 Greater than 1 Non-Liquefiable

24.00 24.23 SM 58 1.93 34.00 46.75 22.53 0.67 0.67 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.05 44.63 4.93 1.19 57.96 0.36 0.55 0.27 N.A 1.00 1.00 0.70 Greater than 1 Non-Liquefiable

25.50 25.73 SM 71 1.93 34.00 49.65 23.92 0.65 0.65 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.05 53.02 4.93 1.19 67.93 0.36 0.53 0.26 N.A 1.00 1.00 0.67 Greater than 1 Non-Liquefiable

27.00 27.23 SM 104 1.93 22.00 52.54 25.32 0.63 0.63 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.05 75.49 3.93 1.09 86.45 0.36 0.52 0.25 N.A 1.00 1.00 0.61 Greater than 1 Non-Liquefiable

28.50 28.73 SM 95 1.93 22.00 55.44 26.71 0.61 0.61 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.05 67.13 3.93 1.09 77.31 0.36 0.51 0.25 N.A 1.00 1.00 0.60 Greater than 1 Non-Liquefiable

30.00 30.23 SM 100 1.93 28.00 58.33 28.11 0.60 0.60 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.05 68.89 4.56 1.14 82.97 0.36 0.50 0.24 N.A 1.00 1.00 0.58 Greater than 1 Non-Liquefiable

28.50 28.73 SM 100 1.92 19.00 55.42 26.69 0.61 0.61 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.05 70.69 3.43 1.07 79.27 0.36 0.51 0.25 N.A 1.00 1.00 0.60 Greater than 1 Non-Liquefiable

30.00 30.23 SM 100 1.92 19.00 58.29 28.07 0.60 0.60 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.05 68.94 3.43 1.07 77.39 0.36 0.50 0.24 N.A 1.00 1.00 0.58 Greater than 1 Non-Liquefiable

mLiqueafiable Depth =

Evaluation of Liquefaction Potential

BH

-1(H

IG)

0.93

0.93

0.93

0.93

Boring Data

Bor

ehol

e N

o.

0.93

0.92

0.92

Ƴsubmerged

(ton/m2)

0.93

0.93

0.93

0.93

0.93

0.93

SPT Correction Factors

0.93

0.93

6

13.50

page:-31 of 102

Annexure C1

Annexure C1

Page 40: Geotech Report Nandannagar 2nd time · The present report the analysis of test results and recommendations regarding type of foundation, allowable bearing capacity. Also, for the

Project Name :

Client Name : Location: Nandannagar Borehole No. BH-2(HIG)Ground Elevation (m):

31.615

Depth Field N Value Clay Content Liquid Limit % Moisture content

% Result from Clay Content % criteria

Result from Liquid Limit % criteria

2.00 - 18 40.00 18.00 Non- Liquefable Non- Liquefable

3.00 20 20 40.00 18.00 Non- Liquefable Non- Liquefable

6.00 11 20 54.00 29.00 Non- Liquefable Non- Liquefable

7.50 - 17 36.00 15.00 Non- Liquefable Non- Liquefable

The Liquefaction can only occur if all Three of the following conditions are met ;

Result from Moisture content % criteria

Non- Liquefable

Non- Liquefable

Non- Liquefable

Non- Liquefable

Result: Hence, Cohesive soil is Non-Liquefable

A) The soil contains fine grained soils with clay contents less than 15%.

B) Liquid limit less than 35% or

C) The natural moisture content is greater than 0.9 times the Liquid Limit.

Executive Engineer - IV Urban Development Department, Tripura

Consultancy Services for preparation of detailed project report (DPR) based on detailed topographical survey, collection of hydrological data, detailed geotechnical sub-soil investigation along with detailed price/cost estimate and other relevant allied works of the project- Proposed Township at UD Land, Kunjaban, Agartala.

page:-32 of 102

Annexure C1

Annexure C1

Page 41: Geotech Report Nandannagar 2nd time · The present report the analysis of test results and recommendations regarding type of foundation, allowable bearing capacity. Also, for the

= =

= =

= ( Assuming at Ground Level ) =

= =

= ( for Conventional Drop Type Hammer ) =

=

= Factor of Safety against Liquefaction = CRR7.5/CSR

= where,

Executive Engineer - IV Urban Development Department, Tripura

HAMMER EFFICIENCY

BOREHOLE DIAMETER

REFERENCE BORING NUMBER BH-2(HIG)

31.615

As per IS-2131:1981

HAMMER TYPE

0.00 m

60 %

HEIGHT OF FALL OF THE HAMMER

63.50 Kg

Project Name :

Client Name :

Liquefaction Analysis as per - 1996 NCEER AND 1998 NCEER

ELEVATION OF BORING GROUND SURFACE

DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER TABLE

31.615

Sampler without Liners

Consultancy Services for preparation of detailed project report (DPR) based on detailed topographical survey, collection of hydrological data, detailed geotechnical sub-soil investigation along with detailed price/cost estimate and other relevant allied works of the project- Proposed Township at UD Land, Kunjaban, Agartala.

Donut Hammer with rope and pully

WEIGHT OF HAMMER

750 mm

Borehole No. :

SEISMIC INTENSITY

SEISMIC ZONE FACTOR ( Z )

Ground Elevation ( m )

SAMPLING METHOD

150 mm

[ If, FOS < 1 , Soil shall be considered as Liquefiable and FOS > 1 is Non-Liquefiable Soil ]

0.36

7.5EARTHQUAKE MAGNITUDE ( Mw )

CRR = Cyclic Resistane Ratio

CSR = Cyclic Stress Ratio

NandannagarLocation:BH-2(HIG)

V

Very Severe

amax/g

DepthAverage Depth

Type of soil

Field NƳbulk

(ton/m2)

Fines Content

(%)

Total OVP [ σt ]

(ton/m2)

Effective OVP

[ σ'vo ]

(ton/m2)

(Pa/σ'vo)1/2 CN CE CS CR CB

N1(60)=N x CN

x CE x CB x CR

x CS

α β N1(60)cs amax/g rd CSR CRR7.5 MSF Kα KσFOS=

CRR7.5/CSRResult

1 2 3 4 5 7 8 9 10 11 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29

9.00 9.23 SM 27 1.92 32.00 17.71 8.49 1.09 1.09 1.00 1.10 0.95 1.05 20.50 4.83 1.17 28.83 0.36 0.92 0.45 0.40 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.90 Liqueafiable

10.50 10.73 SM 31 1.92 32.00 20.59 9.87 1.01 1.01 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.05 21.30 4.83 1.17 29.77 0.36 0.89 0.48 0.45 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.94 Liqueafiable

12.00 12.23 SM 34 1.92 24.00 23.47 11.25 0.94 0.94 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.05 37.03 4.18 1.11 45.19 0.36 0.85 0.42 N.A 1.00 1.00 1.00 Greater than 1 Non-Liquefiable

13.50 13.73 SM 30 1.92 24.00 26.35 12.63 0.89 0.89 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.05 30.84 4.18 1.11 38.33 0.36 0.80 0.39 N.A 1.00 1.00 1.00 Greater than 1 Non-Liquefiable

15.00 15.23 SM 48 1.92 24.00 29.23 14.01 0.84 0.84 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.05 46.84 4.18 1.11 56.06 0.36 0.75 0.37 N.A 1.00 1.00 0.87 Greater than 1 Non-Liquefiable

16.50 16.73 SM 60 1.92 35.00 32.11 15.39 0.81 0.81 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.05 55.87 4.98 1.20 71.85 0.36 0.70 0.34 N.A 1.00 1.00 0.83 Greater than 1 Non-Liquefiable

18.00 18.23 SM 40 1.92 20.00 34.99 16.77 0.77 0.77 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.05 35.68 3.61 1.08 42.13 0.36 0.66 0.32 N.A 1.00 1.00 0.82 Greater than 1 Non-Liquefiable

19.50 19.73 SM 34 1.92 20.00 37.87 18.15 0.74 0.74 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.05 29.15 3.61 1.08 35.08 0.36 0.62 0.30 N.A 1.00 1.00 0.81 Greater than 1 Non-Liquefiable

21.00 21.23 SM 46 1.92 20.00 40.75 19.53 0.72 0.72 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.05 38.02 3.61 1.08 44.66 0.36 0.59 0.29 N.A 1.00 1.00 0.76 Greater than 1 Non-Liquefiable

22.50 22.73 SM 59 1.92 37.00 43.63 20.91 0.69 0.69 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.05 47.13 5.00 1.20 61.55 0.36 0.57 0.28 N.A 1.00 1.00 0.72 Greater than 1 Non-Liquefiable

24.00 24.23 SM-SP 90 1.92 37.00 46.51 22.29 0.67 0.67 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.05 69.63 5.00 1.20 88.56 0.36 0.55 0.27 N.A 1.00 1.00 0.67 Greater than 1 Non-Liquefiable

25.50 25.73 SM-SP 112 1.92 27.00 49.39 23.67 0.65 0.65 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.05 84.09 4.48 1.13 99.52 0.36 0.53 0.26 N.A 1.00 1.00 0.62 Greater than 1 Non-Liquefiable

27.00 27.23 SM-SP 100 1.92 27.00 52.27 25.05 0.63 0.63 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.05 72.98 4.48 1.13 86.97 0.36 0.52 0.25 N.A 1.00 1.00 0.62 Greater than 1 Non-Liquefiable

28.50 28.73 SM-SP 100 1.92 19.00 55.15 26.43 0.62 0.62 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.05 71.05 3.43 1.07 79.66 0.36 0.51 0.25 N.A 1.00 1.00 0.60 Greater than 1 Non-Liquefiable

30.00 30.23 SM-SP 100 1.92 19.00 58.03 27.81 0.60 0.60 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.05 69.26 3.43 1.07 77.74 0.36 0.50 0.24 N.A 1.00 1.00 0.58 Greater than 1 Non-Liquefiable

m

BH

-2(H

IG)

Evaluation of Liquefaction Potential

0.92

0.92

0.92

Boring Data

Bor

ehol

e N

o.

0.92

0.92

0.92

Ƴsubmerged

(ton/m2)

0.92

0.92

0.92

0.92

0.92

0.92

SPT Correction Factors

0.92

0.92

6

0.92

12.00Liqueafiable Depth =

page:-33 of 102

Annexure C1

Annexure C1

Page 42: Geotech Report Nandannagar 2nd time · The present report the analysis of test results and recommendations regarding type of foundation, allowable bearing capacity. Also, for the

Project Name :

Client Name : Location: Nandannagar Borehole No. BH-3(LIG)Ground Elevation (m):

31.272

Depth Field N Value Clay Content Liquid Limit % Moisture content

% Result from Clay Content % criteria

Result from Liquid Limit % criteria

0.50 - 21 44.00 16.49 Non- Liquefable Non- Liquefable

2.50 - 21 41.00 13.67 Non- Liquefable Non- Liquefable

4.50 - 18 43.00 14.86 Non- Liquefable Non- Liquefable

7.50 - 15 38.00 16.68 Liquefable Non- Liquefable

The Liquefaction can only occur if all Three of the following conditions are met ;

Result from Moisture content % criteria

Non- Liquefable

Non- Liquefable

Non- Liquefable

Non- Liquefable

Result: Hence, Cohesive soil is Non-Liquefable

A) The soil contains fine grained soils with clay contents less than 15%.

B) Liquid limit less than 35% or

C) The natural moisture content is greater than 0.9 times the Liquid Limit.

Executive Engineer - IV Urban Development Department, Tripura

Consultancy Services for preparation of detailed project report (DPR) based on detailed topographical survey, collection of hydrological data, detailed geotechnical sub-soil investigation along with detailed price/cost estimate and other relevant allied works of the project- Proposed Township at UD Land, Kunjaban, Agartala.

page:-34 of 102

Annexure C1

Annexure C1

Page 43: Geotech Report Nandannagar 2nd time · The present report the analysis of test results and recommendations regarding type of foundation, allowable bearing capacity. Also, for the

= =

= =

= ( Assuming at Ground Level ) =

= =

= ( for Conventional Drop Type Hammer ) =

=

= Factor of Safety against Liquefaction = CRR7.5/CSR

= where,

Executive Engineer - IV Urban Development Department, Tripura

HAMMER EFFICIENCY

BOREHOLE DIAMETER

REFERENCE BORING NUMBER BH-3(LIG)

31.272

As per IS-2131:1981

HAMMER TYPE

0.00 m

60 %

HEIGHT OF FALL OF THE HAMMER

63.50 Kg

Project Name :

Client Name :

Liquefaction Analysis as per - 1996 NCEER AND 1998 NCEER

ELEVATION OF BORING GROUND SURFACE

DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER TABLE

31.272

Sampler without Liners

Consultancy Services for preparation of detailed project report (DPR) based on detailed topographical survey, collection of hydrological data, detailed geotechnical sub-soil investigation along with detailed price/cost estimate and other relevant allied works of the project- Proposed Township at UD Land, Kunjaban, Agartala.

Donut Hammer with rope and pully

WEIGHT OF HAMMER

750 mm

Borehole No. :

SEISMIC INTENSITY

SEISMIC ZONE FACTOR ( Z )

Ground Elevation ( m )

SAMPLING METHOD

150 mm

[ If, FOS < 1 , Soil shall be considered as Liquefiable and FOS > 1 is Non-Liquefiable Soil ]

0.36

7.5EARTHQUAKE MAGNITUDE ( Mw )

CRR = Cyclic Resistane Ratio

CSR = Cyclic Stress Ratio

NandannagarLocation:BH-3(LIG)

V

Very Severe

amax/g

DepthAverage Depth

Type of soil

Field NƳbulk

(ton/m2)

Fines Content

(%)

Total OVP [ σt ]

(ton/m2)

Effective OVP

[ σ'vo ]

(ton/m2)

(Pa/σ'vo)1/2 CN CE CS CR CB

N1(60)=N x CN

x CE x CB x CR

x CS

α β N1(60)cs amax/g rd CSR CRR7.5 MSF Kα KσFOS=

CRR7.5/CSRResult

1 2 3 4 5 7 8 9 10 11 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29

9.00 9.23 SC 12 1.90 37.00 17.53 8.30 1.10 1.10 1.00 1.10 0.95 1.05 14.45 5.00 1.20 22.34 0.36 0.92 0.45 0.25 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.54 Liqueafiable

12.00 12.23 SM 36 1.90 30.00 23.23 11.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.05 39.64 4.71 1.15 50.46 0.36 0.85 0.42 N.A 1.00 1.00 1.00 Greater than 1 Non-Liquefiable

13.50 13.73 SM 39 1.90 30.00 26.08 12.35 0.90 0.90 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.05 40.53 4.71 1.15 51.49 0.36 0.80 0.40 N.A 1.00 1.00 1.00 Greater than 1 Non-Liquefiable

15.00 15.23 SM 40 1.90 30.00 28.93 13.70 0.85 0.85 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.05 39.47 4.71 1.15 50.26 0.36 0.75 0.37 N.A 1.00 1.00 0.89 Greater than 1 Non-Liquefiable

16.50 16.73 SM 41 1.91 33.00 31.81 15.09 0.81 0.81 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.05 38.55 4.88 1.18 50.36 0.36 0.70 0.35 N.A 1.00 1.00 0.86 Greater than 1 Non-Liquefiable

18.00 18.23 SM 44 1.91 33.00 34.69 16.46 0.78 0.78 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.05 39.61 4.88 1.18 51.60 0.36 0.66 0.33 N.A 1.00 1.00 0.82 Greater than 1 Non-Liquefiable

19.50 19.73 SM 42 1.91 33.00 37.56 17.84 0.75 0.75 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.05 36.32 4.88 1.18 47.73 0.36 0.62 0.31 N.A 1.00 1.00 0.80 Greater than 1 Non-Liquefiable

21.00 21.23 SM 39 1.91 28.00 40.43 19.21 0.72 0.72 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.05 32.50 4.56 1.14 41.55 0.36 0.59 0.29 N.A 1.00 1.00 0.79 Greater than 1 Non-Liquefiable

22.50 22.73 SM 60 1.91 28.00 43.30 20.58 0.70 0.70 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.05 48.31 4.56 1.14 59.54 0.36 0.57 0.28 N.A 1.00 1.00 0.73 Greater than 1 Non-Liquefiable

24.00 24.23 SM 115 1.91 26.00 46.17 21.95 0.68 0.68 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.05 89.66 4.39 1.12 105.03 0.36 0.55 0.27 N.A 1.00 1.00 0.65 Greater than 1 Non-Liquefiable

25.50 25.73 SM 100 1.91 26.00 49.04 23.32 0.65 0.65 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.05 75.64 4.39 1.12 89.30 0.36 0.53 0.26 N.A 1.00 1.00 0.64 Greater than 1 Non-Liquefiable

27.00 27.23 SM 114 1.91 26.00 51.91 24.68 0.64 0.64 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.05 83.81 4.39 1.12 98.47 0.36 0.52 0.26 N.A 1.00 1.00 0.61 Greater than 1 Non-Liquefiable

28.50 28.73 SM 100 1.93 22.00 54.82 26.10 0.62 0.62 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.05 71.50 3.93 1.09 82.09 0.36 0.51 0.25 N.A 1.00 1.00 0.60 Greater than 1 Non-Liquefiable

30.00 30.23 SM 98 1.93 22.00 57.73 27.50 0.60 0.60 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.05 68.25 3.93 1.09 78.54 0.36 0.50 0.25 N.A 1.00 1.00 0.59 Greater than 1 Non-Liquefiable

m

BH

-3(L

IG)

Evaluation of Liquefaction Potential

0.90

0.91

0.91

Boring Data

Bor

ehol

e N

o.

0.93

0.93

Ƴsubmerged

(ton/m2)

0.91

0.91

0.91

0.91

0.90

0.90

SPT Correction Factors

0.91

0.91

6

0.90

12.00Liqueafiable Depth =

page:-35 of 102

Annexure C1

Annexure C1

Page 44: Geotech Report Nandannagar 2nd time · The present report the analysis of test results and recommendations regarding type of foundation, allowable bearing capacity. Also, for the

Project Name :

Client Name : Location: Nandannagar Borehole No. BH-4(MIG)Ground Elevation (m):

28.510

Depth Field N Value Clay Content Liquid Limit % Moisture content

% Result from Clay Content % criteria

Result from Liquid Limit % criteria

1.00 - 21 38.00 20.38 Non- Liquefable Non- Liquefable

2.20 - 16 38.00 19.03 Non- Liquefable Non- Liquefable

3.00 14 18 38.00 21.80 Non- Liquefable Non- Liquefable

4.50 - 24 41.00 15.65 Non- Liquefable Non- Liquefable

6.00 13 24 57.00 30.33 Non- Liquefable Non- Liquefable

7.50 - 17 39.00 13.91 Non- Liquefable Non- Liquefable

9.00 21 14 39.00 18.40 Liquefable Non- Liquefable

The Liquefaction can only occur if all Three of the following conditions are met ;

Non- Liquefable

Non- Liquefable

Non- Liquefable

Non- Liquefable

Non- Liquefable

Result: Hence, Cohesive soil is Non-Liquefable

A) The soil contains fine grained soils with clay contents less than 15%.

B) Liquid limit less than 35% or

C) The natural moisture content is greater than 0.9 times the Liquid Limit.

Executive Engineer - IV Urban Development Department, Tripura

Consultancy Services for preparation of detailed project report (DPR) based on detailed topographical survey, collection of hydrological data, detailed geotechnical sub-soil investigation along with detailed price/cost estimate and other relevant allied works of the project- Proposed Township at UD Land, Kunjaban, Agartala.

Non- Liquefable

Non- Liquefable

Result from Moisture content % criteria

page:-36 of 102

Annexure C1

Annexure C1

Page 45: Geotech Report Nandannagar 2nd time · The present report the analysis of test results and recommendations regarding type of foundation, allowable bearing capacity. Also, for the

= =

= =

= ( Assuming at Ground Level ) =

= =

= ( for Conventional Drop Type Hammer ) =

=

= Factor of Safety against Liquefaction = CRR7.5/CSR

= where,

BOREHOLE DIAMETER

REFERENCE BORING NUMBER BH-4(MIG)

28.510

HAMMER TYPE

0.00 m

60 %

HEIGHT OF FALL OF THE HAMMER

63.50 Kg

HAMMER EFFICIENCY

Project Name :

Client Name :

Liquefaction Analysis as per - 1996 NCEER AND 1998 NCEER

ELEVATION OF BORING GROUND SURFACE

DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER TABLE

28.510

Sampler without Liners

Executive Engineer - IV Urban Development Department, Tripura

Consultancy Services for preparation of detailed project report (DPR) based on detailed topographical survey, collection of hydrological data, detailed geotechnical sub-soil investigation along with detailed price/cost estimate and other relevant allied works of the project- Proposed Township at UD Land, Kunjaban, Agartala.

Donut Hammer with rope and pully

WEIGHT OF HAMMER

750 mm

Borehole No. :

SEISMIC INTENSITY

SEISMIC ZONE FACTOR ( Z )

Ground Elevation ( m )

SAMPLING METHOD

150 mm 0.36

7.5

As per IS-2131:1981

EARTHQUAKE MAGNITUDE ( Mw )

CRR = Cyclic Resistane Ratio

CSR = Cyclic Stress Ratio

NandannagarLocation:BH-4(MIG)

V

Very Severe

amax/g

[ If, FOS < 1 , Soil shall be considered as Liquefiable and FOS > 1 is Non-Liquefiable Soil ]

DepthAverage Depth

Type of soil

Field NƳbulk

(ton/m2)

Fines Content

(%)

Total OVP [ σt ]

(ton/m2)

Effective OVP

[ σ'vo ]

(ton/m2)

(Pa/σ'vo)1/2 CN CE CS CR CB

N1(60)=N x CN

x CE x CB x CR

x CS

α β N1(60)cs amax/g rd CSR CRR7.5 MSF Kα KσFOS=

CRR7.5/CSRResult

1 2 3 4 5 7 8 9 10 11 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29

12.00 12.23 SM 100 1.90 32.00 23.23 11.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.05 110.11 4.83 1.17 133.77 0.36 0.85 0.42 N.A 1.00 1.00 1.00 Greater than 1 Non-Liquefiable

13.50 13.73 SM 100 1.90 32.00 26.08 12.35 0.90 0.90 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.05 103.92 4.83 1.17 126.52 0.36 0.80 0.40 N.A 1.00 1.00 1.00 Greater than 1 Non-Liquefiable

15.00 15.23 SM 38 1.90 32.00 28.93 13.70 0.85 0.85 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.05 37.49 4.83 1.17 48.73 0.36 0.75 0.37 N.A 1.00 1.00 0.89 Greater than 1 Non-Liquefiable

15.00 15.23 SM 38 1.90 31.00 28.93 13.70 0.85 0.85 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.05 37.49 4.77 1.16 29.10 0.36 0.75 0.37 0.42 1.00 1.00 0.89 0.99 Liqueafiable

16.50 16.73 SM 33 1.90 31.00 31.78 15.05 0.82 0.82 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.05 31.07 4.77 1.16 40.89 0.36 0.70 0.35 N.A 1.00 1.00 0.87 Greater than 1 Non-Liquefiable

18.00 18.23 SM 34 1.90 31.00 34.63 16.40 0.78 0.78 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.05 30.66 4.77 1.16 40.42 0.36 0.66 0.33 N.A 1.00 1.00 0.84 Greater than 1 Non-Liquefiable

19.50 19.73 SM 30 1.90 31.00 37.48 17.75 0.75 0.75 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.05 26.01 4.77 1.16 35.00 0.36 0.62 0.31 N.A 1.00 1.00 0.83 Greater than 1 Non-Liquefiable

21.00 21.23 SM 29 1.93 27.00 40.41 19.18 0.72 0.72 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.05 24.18 4.48 1.13 31.81 0.36 0.59 0.29 N.A 1.00 1.00 0.81 Greater than 1 Non-Liquefiable

22.50 22.73 SM 35 1.93 27.00 43.33 20.60 0.70 0.70 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.05 28.16 4.48 1.13 36.31 0.36 0.57 0.28 N.A 1.00 1.00 0.78 Greater than 1 Non-Liquefiable

24.00 24.23 SM 45 1.93 27.00 46.25 22.02 0.67 0.67 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.05 35.03 4.48 1.13 44.07 0.36 0.55 0.27 N.A 1.00 1.00 0.73 Greater than 1 Non-Liquefiable

25.50 25.73 SM 51 1.93 22.00 49.16 23.43 0.65 0.65 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.05 38.48 3.93 1.09 45.99 0.36 0.53 0.26 N.A 1.00 1.00 0.70 Greater than 1 Non-Liquefiable

27.00 27.23 SM 58 1.93 30.00 52.07 24.84 0.63 0.63 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.05 42.50 4.71 1.15 53.77 0.36 0.52 0.26 N.A 1.00 1.00 0.67 Greater than 1 Non-Liquefiable

28.50 28.73 SM 62 1.93 30.00 54.98 26.25 0.62 0.62 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.05 44.20 4.71 1.15 55.73 0.36 0.51 0.25 N.A 1.00 1.00 0.65 Greater than 1 Non-Liquefiable

30.00 30.23 SM 77 1.93 18.00 57.88 27.66 0.60 0.60 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.05 53.48 3.23 1.07 60.26 0.36 0.50 0.24 N.A 1.00 1.00 0.61 Greater than 1 Non-Liquefiable

m

BH

-4(M

IG)

0.93

0.90

0.90

0.90

0.90

0.90

Boring Data

Bor

ehol

e N

o.

0.93

0.93

Ƴsubmerged

(ton/m2)

0.90

0.93

0.93

Evaluation of Liquefaction Potential

0.93

0.93

6

0.90

16.50Liqueafiable Depth =

SPT Correction Factors

page:-37 of 102

Annexure C1

Annexure C1

Page 46: Geotech Report Nandannagar 2nd time · The present report the analysis of test results and recommendations regarding type of foundation, allowable bearing capacity. Also, for the

BH-01 Location :Old Pineapple

GardenGround Elevation ( m )

31.886

: BH-01 Shape of the Footing :

Existing Ground Level : 31.886 m Width of the Footing, B : 1.00 m

Founding Level : 30.386 m Length of the Footing, L : 2.00 m

Depth of Influence zone : 2.0 m Foundation Depth D : 1.50 m

Allowable Settlement, d : 50 mm 0.0 m

Eccentricity, exx : 0.0 2.5

Eccentricity, eyy : 0.0 0.71

Load Inclination, a : 0.00 Deg. 0.80

: - m

: - m

: - m

From To Thickness N avg. Ncorr cu Φu Ƴsub σo

m m m Nos. Nos. T/m2 Deg. T/m3 T/m2

1 31.886 27.386 4.50 9 - 5.70 4 0.940 2.12

2 27.386 19.886 7.50 35 - 10.0 0.00 0.950 7.79

3 19.886 18.386 1.50 49 26 0.0 31.3 0.930 12.05

4 18.386 1.426 16.96 78 30 0.0 32 0.930 20.64

Depth of Water Table, Z :

Factor of Safety :

Fox's Depth Factor :

Rigidity Factor :

General Stratifications

DescriptionSl. No.

Cohesive Stratum

Very dense, yellowish brown / whitish grey / yellowish grey, silty fine grained sand with traces

l bi d i ( )

Very stiff to Hard, Brownish grey / yellowish grey / yellowish brown, clayey silt with some sand mixture & traces of mica & gravels. (CI)

Stiff, Brownish grey / yellowish grey / yellowish brown, clayey silt with some sand mixture & traces of mica & gravels. (CI)

Type of Soil

Cohesionless Stratum

Project Name :

Consultancy Services for preparation of detailed project report (DPR) based on detailed topographical survey, collection of hydrological data, detailed geotechnical sub-soil investigation along with detailed price/cost estimate and other relevant allied works of the project- Proposed Township at Govt. Land (Old Pineapple Garden), Behind Fernando Rehabilitation, near Don Bosco School, Nandannagar, Agartala.

Client Name :

Cohesive Stratum

Executive Engineer - IV Urban Development Department, Tripura

Borehole No. :

Dense, yellowish brown / whitish grey / yellowish grey, silty fine grained sand with traces of clay binders & mica. (SM)

Rectangle

1.50mDepth of Foundation

Design Assumptions

Cohesionless Stratum

Reference Bore Hole

Maximum Scouring depth

Highest Flood Level

Scouring level

As per IS-6403:1981 Cl. 5.1.2, Point (a), pp.8, Table-1 pp.8 " Net Ultimate Bearing Capacity "qnet

1

c : Cohesion for General Shear Failure = 5.70 T / m2

ɸ : Angle of Internal Friction for General Shear Failure = 4.00 Deg.

c' : = 3.8 T / m2

ɸ' : = 2.00 Deg.

Ƴ : Submerged Density of Founding stratum Soil = 0.940 T / m3

σo : Effective overburden pressure at founding Level = 1.410 T / m2

Nc' Nq'

5.68 1.23

Sc Sq dc dq dƳ iƳ

1.10 1.10 1.32 1.00 1.00 1.00

1

47.40 ton/m2

18 ton/m2

Inclination Factor

0.5

W'

Failure Type :

ic iq

Local Shear Failure

Factor

Nɸ=tan2(π/4+ɸ/2)

1.15

Water table Factor

q net =

1.000.80

General Shear Failure, qnet : c Nc sc dc ic + Ƴ D ( Nq - 1 ) sq dq iq + 0.5 Ƴ B Ng sg dg ig W'

of clay binders & mica. (SM)Stratum

1.00

NƳ'

0.18

Where,

Rectangle Foundation

Founding Stratum :

Cohesion for Local Shear Failure = ( 2 / 3 c )

Bearing Capacity FactorsFaliure Type

Depth FactorShape Factor

The ultimate net bearing capacity qnet

Local Shear Failure

Net safe bearing capacity q net safe =

Sy

Calculation of Bearing capacity As per IS-6403:1981

Local Shear Failure

Foundation Shape

= 3.8 x 5.68 x 1.10 x 1.32 x 1.00 + 1.41 ( 1.23 - 1 ) x 1.10 x 1.00 x 1.00 + 0.5 x 1 x 0.94 x 0.18 x 0.80 x 1.00 x 1.00 x 0.5

Local Shear Failure, qnet : c' Nc' sc dc ic + Ƴ D ( Nq' - 1 ) sq dq iq + 0.5 Ƴ B Ng' sg dg ig W'

Angle of Internal Friction for Local Shear Failure= tan-1( 2/3 tanɸ )

page:-38 of 102

Annexure C1

Annexure C1

Page 47: Geotech Report Nandannagar 2nd time · The present report the analysis of test results and recommendations regarding type of foundation, allowable bearing capacity. Also, for the

Reference Bore Hole : 1 (HIG) : 1.20 m

Location of the Pile : 1 (HIG) : 26.700 m 2.3

Type of Pile : : 13.500 m

Ground / Bed level : 31.886 m : 18.386 m

: 1.800 m : 15.000 m

: 0.000 m L / D Ratio : 22.25

Pile Cut-off level : 30.086 Factor of Safety : 2.5

Pile Tip level : 3.386 m : 1.13 m2

Depth of water level : 0.00 m (Assumed for the worst condition)

Qu = Qu =

From To cu T/m2 Φu Clay Sand

I 4 500

Total Length of the Pile below cutoff

A p C u N c + a C u A si for Cohesive Soil

>15, so Long elastic Pile

Liquefiable Level

31.886Ground Elevation (m) 1 (HIG)

Cross section Area of pile

Friction Contribution in ( Ton )

Vertical Pile Capacity Calculations as per Annex C of IS:2911 (Part 1/ Section 2) : 2010

Assumed Pile cut off depth

Bored cast-in-situ

Basement Depth below EGL

Generalized Subsurface Profile Type of Soil

m

R.L of Stratum

Thi

ckne

ss(

m )

Rep

rese

ntat

ive

N

End Bearing Factor NƳ

K

N l t d f Li f ti

α

Design Parameter

gsub T/m3

Cor

rect

ed N

'

Average Overburden

Pressure T/m2

Project Name:

Client Name:

Executive Engineer - IV Urban Development Department, Tripura

Overburden pressure at top

T/m2

Overburden Pressure at

bottom of layer

T/m2

Consultancy Services for preparation of detailed project report (DPR) based on detailed topographical survey, collection of hydrological data, detailed geotechnical sub-soil investigation along with detailed price/cost estimate and other relevant allied works of the project- Proposed Township at Govt. Land (Old Pineapple Garden), Behind Fernando Rehabilitation, near Don Bosco School, Nandannagar, Agartala.

Total Length of the Pile Below Liquefiable Depth

Diameter of the pile

BH No.

End Bearing (Ton)

Liquefiable Depth

Location : Old Pineapple Garden, Nandan Nagar

A p (0.5 D g N g + s v N q ) + K tand s v A si [ for Granular Soil ]

Stra

ta N

o.

C h iStiff, Brownish grey / yellowish grey /

ll i h b l ilt ith dI 4.500

II 7.500

1.500

IV 18.386 3.386 15.000 78 30 0.00 31.30 0.95 0.000 7.125 0.00 1.13 0.00 63.77 29.06

IV

III Nc Nq

09 22.008

H c = Critical Depth =

PD = 14.85 T/m2

0.00 Ton

181 Ton

2. Pile Capacity in compression from Concrete strength consideration

Concrete grade = M35

Allowable stress in direct compression scc = 600 t/m2 (IS:456)

Ple cross sectional area = 1.131 m2

Pile capacity from concrete consideration = 679 tons

18.00 m

Cohesionless Stratum Cu at Pile Tip T/m2 ɸ at Pile Tip ( degree)

29.06

Neglected for Liquefaction

Maximum Effective Over burden pressure at the pile tip should corrospond to Critial Depth =

Cohesionless 3.56

Cohesive

Bearing Capacity Factors ( IS-6403:1981)

Neglected for Liquefaction

Neglected for Liquefaction

Ultimate Pile Capacity =

Total Skin Friction Contribution by Clay = Total Skin Friction Contribution by Sand =

Very dense, yellowish brown / whitish grey / yellowish grey, silty fine grained sand with traces of clay binders & mica. (SM)

31.30

63.8 Ton

So Safe Vertical Pile Capacity = 181 Ton (Lower of two values)

452.13 Ton Safe Pile Capacity =

End Bearing Stratum =

0

388.35

III

Cohesive

Dense, yellowish brown / whitish grey / yellowish grey, silty fine grained sand with traces of clay binders & mica. (SM)

Cohesionless

Liquefiable Depth = 13.5 mVery stiff to Hard, Brownish grey / yellowish grey / yellowish brown, clayey silt with some sand mixture & traces of mica & gravels. (CI)

yellowish brown, clayey silt with some sand mixture & traces of mica & gravels. (CI)

page:-39 of 102

Annexure C1

Annexure C1

Page 48: Geotech Report Nandannagar 2nd time · The present report the analysis of test results and recommendations regarding type of foundation, allowable bearing capacity. Also, for the

31.886Ground Elevation (m) 1 (HIG)

Project Name:

Client Name:

Executive Engineer - IV Urban Development Department, Tripura

Consultancy Services for preparation of detailed project report (DPR) based on detailed topographical survey, collection of hydrological data, detailed geotechnical sub-soil investigation along with detailed price/cost estimate and other relevant allied works of the project- Proposed Township at Govt. Land (Old Pineapple Garden), Behind Fernando Rehabilitation, near Don Bosco School, Nandannagar, Agartala.

BH No.Location : Old Pineapple Garden, Nandan Nagar

1 Pile Capacity from Geo-technical consideration

Ultimate Skin Friction, fu : 64 T

Self Weight (submerged) of Pile, W : 45.30 T

Safe Pile Capacity in Uplift, fsafe : 36.35632 T

2. Pile Capacity from Concrete strength consideration

Concrete grade M 35

Allowable stress in direct tension st : 320 t/m2 (IS:456)

Ple cross sectional area : 1.131 m2

Pile capacity from concrete consideration : 362 tons

36 Ton (Lower of two values)So Safe Uplift Pile Capacity =

Pile Capacity in Uplift

page:-40 of 102

Annexure C1

Annexure C1

Page 49: Geotech Report Nandannagar 2nd time · The present report the analysis of test results and recommendations regarding type of foundation, allowable bearing capacity. Also, for the

Reference Bore Hole : 4 (MIG) : 1.20 m

Location of the Pile : 4 (MIG) : 26.200 m 2.3

Type of Pile : : 16.500 m

Ground / Bed level : 28.510 m : 12.010 m

: 1.800 m : 11.500 m

: 0.000 m L / D Ratio : 21.83

Pile Cut-off level : 26.710 Factor of Safety : 2.5

Pile Tip level : 0.510 m : 1.13 m2

Depth of water level : 0.00 m (Assumed for the worst condition)

Qu = Qu =

From To cu T/m2 Φu Clay Sand

I 7.500Medium to stiff, yellowish brown / yellowish grey, silty clay / clayey silt with some sand mixture & traces of gravels & kankars. (CI)

Str

ata

No.

Cohesive

Location : Old Pineapple Garden, Nandan Nagar

A p (0.5 D g N g + s v N q ) + K tand s v A si [ for Granular Soil ]

Overburden pressure at top

T/m2

Overburden Pressure at

bottom of layer

T/m2

Project Name:

Client Name:

Executive Engineer - IV Urban Development Department, Tripura

Consultancy Services for preparation of detailed project report (DPR) based on detailed topographical survey, collection of hydrological data, detailed geotechnical sub-soil investigation along with detailed price/cost estimate and other relevant allied works of the project- Proposed Township at Govt. Land (Old Pineapple Garden), Behind Fernando Rehabilitation, near Don Bosco School, Nandannagar, Agartala.

Total Length of the Pile Below Liquefiable Depth

Diameter of the pile

BH No.

α

Design Parameter

gsub T/m3

Cor

rect

ed N

'

Average Overburden

Pressure T/m2K

Neglected for Liquefaction

Assumed Pile cut off depth

Basement Depth below EGL

Generalized Subsurface Profile Type of Soil

m

28.510Ground Elevation (m) 4 (MIG)

Cross section Area of pile

Friction Contribution in ( Ton )

End Bearing (Ton)

Liquefiable Depth

Vertical Pile Capacity Calculations as per Annex C of IS:2911 (Part 1/ Section 2) : 2010

R.L of Stratum

Total Length of the Pile below cutoff

A p C u N c + a C u A si for Cohesive Soil

>15, so Long elastic Pile

Liquefiable Level

Bored cast-in-situ

Th

ick

nes

s(

m )

Rep

rese

nta

tive

N

End Bearing Factor NƳ

II 3.000

III 3.700

2.300

12.010 3.010 9.000 34 18 0.00 29.24 0.90 0.00 4.050 0.00 1.00 0.00 17.922 -

V 3.010 0.510 2.500 62 25 0.00 31.00 0.92 8.100 9.250 0.00 1.10 0.00 24.94 27.53

V

III Nc Nq

09 21.092

H c = Critical Depth =

PD = 16.32 T/m2

0.00 Ton

180 Ton

2. Pile Capacity in compression from Concrete strength consideration

Concrete grade = M35

Allowable stress in direct compression scc = 600 t/m2 (IS:456)

Ple cross sectional area = 1.131 m2

Pile capacity from concrete consideration = 679 tons

Cohesionless 8.68

2.03

IVMedium dense to dense, brownish yellow / yellowish, silty fine grained sand with traces of mica & clay binders. (SM)

Cohesionless

Liquefiable Depth = 16.5 m

Very stiff, Yellowish grey / brownish, silty clay / clayey silt with little percentage of kankars, gravels & sand mixture. (CI)

-

449.35 Ton Safe Pile Capacity =

End Bearing Stratum =

0

(Lower of two values)

42.9 Ton

So Safe Vertical Pile Capacity = 180 Ton

Ultimate Pile Capacity =

Total Skin Friction Contribution by Clay = Total Skin Friction Contribution by Sand =

Very dense, brownish yellow / yellowish, silty fine grained sand with traces of mica, kankars & clay binders. (SM)

Neglected for Liquefaction

Maximum Effective Over burden pressure at the pile tip should corrospond to Critial Depth =

Very dense, yellowish brown, silty sand with high percentage of kankars, gravels & traces of

clay binders. (Murrum) (SM)

Cohesive

Neglected for Liquefaction

Bearing Capacity Factors ( IS-6403:1981)

31.00

406.49

18.00 m

Cohesionless Stratum Cu at Pile Tip T/m2 ɸ at Pile Tip ( degree)

27.53

Neglected for Liquefaction

Cohesionless

page:-41 of 102

Annexure C1

Annexure C1

Page 50: Geotech Report Nandannagar 2nd time · The present report the analysis of test results and recommendations regarding type of foundation, allowable bearing capacity. Also, for the

Location : Old Pineapple Garden, Nandan Nagar

Project Name:

Client Name:

Executive Engineer - IV Urban Development Department, Tripura

Consultancy Services for preparation of detailed project report (DPR) based on detailed topographical survey, collection of hydrological data, detailed geotechnical sub-soil investigation along with detailed price/cost estimate and other relevant allied works of the project- Proposed Township at Govt. Land (Old Pineapple Garden), Behind Fernando Rehabilitation, near Don Bosco School, Nandannagar, Agartala.

BH No. 28.510Ground Elevation (m) 4 (MIG)

1 Pile Capacity from Geo-technical consideration

Ultimate Skin Friction, fu : 43 T

Self Weight (submerged) of Pile, W : 44.45 T

Safe Pile Capacity in Uplift, fsafe : 29.10368 T

2. Pile Capacity from Concrete strength consideration

Concrete grade M 35

Allowable stress in direct tension st : 320 t/m2 (IS:456)

Ple cross sectional area : 1.131 m2

Pile capacity from concrete consideration : 362 tons

29 Ton

Pile Capacity in Uplift

(Lower of two values)So Safe Uplift Pile Capacity =

page:-42 of 102

Annexure C1

Annexure C1

Page 51: Geotech Report Nandannagar 2nd time · The present report the analysis of test results and recommendations regarding type of foundation, allowable bearing capacity. Also, for the

Borehole No.

1 (HIG)

Stratum No. N-value

Stiffness factor T

(m )

52 3.38

62 3.28

80 3.14

94 3.05

Diameter of Pile = 1.20 m

= 26.700 m

= 0.00 m

Cut-off Depth of Pile = 1.800 m

= 31.886 m

Cut-off Level of Pile = 30.086 m

= 13.500 m

= 18.386 m

Founding Level of Pile = 3.386 m

Cantilever length ( L1 ) = 11.700 m

Project Name:

Client Name:

Determination of Equivalent Stiffness Factor ( T )

Ground Elevation (m)

Consultancy Services for preparation of detailed project report (DPR) based on detailed topographical survey, collection of hydrological data, detailed geotechnical sub-soil investigation along with detailed price/cost estimate and other relevant allied works of the project- Proposed Township at Govt. Land (Old Pineapple Garden), Behind Fernando Rehabilitation, near Don Bosco School, Nandannagar, Agartala.

Old Pineapple Garden, Nandan Nagar

Cohesionless StratumIV

31.886

Calculations as per Annex C of IS:2911 (Part 1/ Section 2) : 2010 & Clause 709.3.5.2 of IRC 78:2014

Executive Engineer - IV Urban Development Department, Tripura

Location :

1.50

1.50

Length of the Pile Below Cut‐off  level

1.50

1.50

Ground Level

Liquefaction Level

Basement depth below EGL

1003.623.21

Type of Stratum

1157.30

Modulus of subgrade Reaction

( ηh - T/m3)( IS-2911_P1:2010)

Liquefaction Depth

Stratum Thickness ( m )below Cantilever length (

L1 ) for Subgrade reaction

Equivalent Stiffness Factor ( T )

696.26

806.03

= 15.000 m 15.000

Subgrade Modulus ( ηh ) = Given in the above table

Now, I = 0.1018 m4

E = 5000 x √fck = 3.02E+06 T/m2 M 35

Hence, T = 3.21

Since (Le/T)= 4.667 > 4

Therefore, L1/T = 3.640

= 1.904 x T = 6.1 m

[Assuming Fixed Head Piles in Sands]

Pile Head deflection, Y = H x (L1+Lf)³/12EI = 1.536 mm deflection at cut-off level for 1 Ton load

So, for 12 mm horizontal deflection (IRC 78-2014) at scour level, deflection at cut-off level

y = (Lf+L1) x 12 / Lf = = 34.94 mm

= 23.00 Ton

Moment = H [(L1+Lf)/2] = 204.00 Ton-m for fixed head pile ….. Eqn-II

The Reduction Factor for computation of Maximum Moment in Pile, m

= 0.96 (from Fig.5B)

= 195.84 Ton-m

Concrete grade =

Stiffness Factor, T = [EI/ηh]1/5

From Graph (Fig.4), Length of fixity Lf below cantilever level =

Embedment Length (Le)

Hence pile is designated as Long (elastic) pile as per Table 5_IS-2911 (part-1/Sec-1)

Required H [From Eqn I]

So, the corrected actual moment, M

page:-43 of 102Annexure C1

Page 52: Geotech Report Nandannagar 2nd time · The present report the analysis of test results and recommendations regarding type of foundation, allowable bearing capacity. Also, for the

Borehole No.

4 (MIG)

Stratum No. N-value

Stiffness factor T

(m )

33 3.64

34 3.62

30 3.71

29 3.74

35 3.60

Diameter of Pile = 1.20 m

= 26.200 m

= 0.00 m

Cut-off Depth of Pile = 1.800 m

= 28.510 m

Cut-off Level of Pile = 26.710 m

= 16.500 m

= 12.010 m

Founding Level of Pile = 0.510 m

Stratum Thickness ( m )below Cantilever length (

L1 ) for Subgrade reaction

Equivalent Stiffness Factor ( T )

480.29

494.97

3.66

Type of Stratum

421.58

509.65

Modulus of subgrade Reaction

( ηh - T/m3)( IS-2911_P1:2010)

Ground Level

Liquefaction Level

Basement depth below EGL

1.50

1.50

436.26

1.50

1.50

Length of the Pile Below Cut‐off  level

1.00

Liquefaction Depth

Cohesionless StratumIV

28.510

Calculations as per Annex C of IS:2911 (Part 1/ Section 2) : 2010 & Clause 709.3.5.2 of IRC 78:2014

Executive Engineer - IV Urban Development Department, Tripura

Location :

Project Name:

Client Name:

Determination of Equivalent Stiffness Factor ( T )

Ground Elevation (m)

Consultancy Services for preparation of detailed project report (DPR) based on detailed topographical survey, collection of hydrological data, detailed geotechnical sub-soil investigation along with detailed price/cost estimate and other relevant allied works of the project- Proposed Township at Govt. Land (Old Pineapple Garden), Behind Fernando Rehabilitation, near Don Bosco School, Nandannagar, Agartala.

Old Pineapple Garden, Nandan Nagar

Cantilever length ( L1 ) = 14.700 m

= 11.500 m 11.500

Subgrade Modulus ( ηh ) = Given in the above table

Now, I = 0.1018 m4

E = 5000 x √fck = 3.02E+06 T/m2 M 35

Hence, T = 3.66

Since (Le/T)= 3.138 < 4

Therefore, L1/T = 4.011

= 1.900 x T = 7.0 m

[Assuming Fixed Head Piles in Sands]

Pile Head deflection, Y = H x (L1+Lf)³/12EI = 2.760 mm deflection at cut-off level for 1 Ton load

So, for 12 mm horizontal deflection (IRC 78-2014) at scour level, deflection at cut-off level

y = (Lf+L1) x 12 / Lf = = 37.33 mm

= 14.00 Ton

Moment = H [(L1+Lf)/2] = 151.00 Ton-m for fixed head pile ….. Eqn-II

The Reduction Factor for computation of Maximum Moment in Pile, m

= 0.97 (from Fig.5B)

= 146.47 Ton-m

Required H [From Eqn I]

So, the corrected actual moment, M

From Graph (Fig.4), Length of fixity Lf below cantilever level =

Embedment Length (Le)

Hence pile is designated as Short (rigid) pile as per Table 5_IS-2911 (part-1/Sec-1)

Concrete grade =

Stiffness Factor, T = [EI/ηh]1/5

page:-44 of 102Annexure C1

Page 53: Geotech Report Nandannagar 2nd time · The present report the analysis of test results and recommendations regarding type of foundation, allowable bearing capacity. Also, for the

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ANNEXURE-B

Bore Log & Lab. Test Results Nandannagar

Annexure C1

Annexure C1

Page 54: Geotech Report Nandannagar 2nd time · The present report the analysis of test results and recommendations regarding type of foundation, allowable bearing capacity. Also, for the

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

B1

Bore Log & Lab. Test Results Nandannagar

BH-1 (HIG)

Annexure C1

Annexure C1

Page 55: Geotech Report Nandannagar 2nd time · The present report the analysis of test results and recommendations regarding type of foundation, allowable bearing capacity. Also, for the

Project Name :

Client Name :

Project Code :

Job Code:

Complex Location

Borehole No.

Ground Elevation (G.L.)

Method of Boring 16.05

Diameter of Hole 30.45

From

To

From

To

Type

15

cm

30

cm

45

cm N

Value

Co

rre

cte

d N

"

DS_1 - - - - - - - - -

DS_2 - - - - - - - - -

30.386

29.936S/D_1 1.50 - 1.95 5 4 5 9 - - - - -

29.386

28.936UDS_1 2.50 - 2.95 - - - - - - - - -

27.386

26.936S/D_2 4.50 - 4.95 8 12 16 28 - - - - -

25.886

25.436S/D_3 6.00 - 6.45 11 24 27 51 - - - - -

24.386

23.936S/D_4 7.50 - 7.95 12 12 18 30 - - - - -

22.886

22.436S/D_5 9.00 - 9.45 6 14 13 27 - - - - -

21.386

20.936S/D_6 10.50 - 10.95 12 18 22 40 - - - - -

Dense, yellowish brown /whitish grey / yellowishgrey, silty fine grainedsand with traces of claybinders & mica. (SM)12.00m to 13.50m

19.886

18.386

19.886

19.436

S/D_7 12.00 - 12.45 19 22 27 49 26 - - - -

18.386

17.936S/D_8 13.50 - 13.95 13 24 28 52 26 - - - -

16.886

16.436S/D_9 15.00 - 15.45 18 27 35 62 28 - - - -

W_1 - - - - - - - - -

15.386

14.936S/D_10 16.50 - 16.95 24 33 47 80 33 - - - -

13.886

13.436S/D_11 18.00 - 18.45 29 39 55 94 36 - - - -

12.386

11.936S/D_12 19.50 - 19.95 35 50 55 105 39 - - - -

10.886

10.436S/D_13 21.00 - 21.45 17 24 38 62 26 - - - -

9.386

8.936S/D_14 22.50 - 22.95 15 22 34 56 24 - - - -

7.886

7.436S/D_15 24.00 - 24.45 16 23 35 58 24 - - - -

6.386

5.936S/D_16 25.50 - 25.95 20 34 37 71 27 - - - -

4.886

4.436S/D_17 27.00 - 27.45 28 39 65 104 36 - - - -

3.386

2.936S/D_18 28.50 - 28.95 27 38 57 95 33 - - - -

1.886

1.436S/D_19 30.00 - 30.45 23 40 60 100 33 - - - -

BGL : AGL :

31.886

19.886

27.386

Very stiff to Hard,Brownish grey / yellowishgrey / yellowish brown,clayey silt with some sandmixture & traces of mica &gravels. (CI)4.50m to 12.00m

-

15.836 16.05

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

31.386 0.50 -

-

-

-

-

-1.00

-

Total Core

Length(cm)

TCR(%)

RQD(%)

Co

lou

rs o

f re

turn

Wa

ter

Wa

ter

Lo

ss

Remarks

Bro

wn

ish

-

Description of Soil Stratum & Rock

Methology

Stratum Elevation as per R.L

(m)HatchingPattern

Elevation as per R.L

(m)Sample / Event

Standard Penetration Test IS-2131

Depth (m)

21 (D-2 & S-19)

1150 mm Termination Depth M BGL No.of Water Sample ( W )

Wash Boring Standing Water Level M BGL No. of Disturbed Sample ( DS )

31.886M Completion Date 30.08.19 No. of Undisturbed Sample ( U )

BORE LOG & CORE LOG DATA SHEET

1 (HIG) Commencement Date 27.08.19 No. of SP Test ( S )

Old Pineapple Garden

Consultancy Services for preparation of detailed project report (DPR) based on detailed topographical survey, collection of hydrological data, detailed geotechnical sub-soil investigation along with detailed price/cost estimate and other relevant allied works of the project- Proposed Township at Govt. Land (Old Pineapple Garden), Behind Fernando Rehabilitation, near Don Bosco School, Nandannagar, Agartala.

BPC Consultant INDIA (P) Ltd.

Concept Building, Prince Park

514/A/1 Kalikapur Road, Kolkata - 700099.

www.bpcipl.com

Executive Engineer - IV Urban Development Department, Tripura

F.4 (2)-UDD/EW(S-XXXVIII) /2055-61 Dated, Agartala, the 14/08/2019

E-327439.0910 N-2641326.1460P0196 Location Nandan Nagar Co-ordinate :

19

1

Bridge No - No. of Core Sample ( C ) 0

R : RunB : Blows Re : Refusal TCR : Total Core Recovery RQD : Rock Quality Designation Below ground Level

UDS* : UDS Could not been Collected (Slipped) S/D : Standard Penetration Test with disturbed sample collected, S : Standard Penetration Test but sample not recovered

Very dense, yellowishbrown / whitish grey /yellowish grey, silty finegrained sand with tracesof clay binders & mica.(SM)13.50m to 30.46

18.386

Above ground Level

30.886

Stiff, Brownish grey /yellowish grey / yellowishbrown, clayey silt withsome sand mixture &traces of mica & gravels.(CI)0.00m to 4.50m

27.386

page:-45 of 102Annexure C1

Page 56: Geotech Report Nandannagar 2nd time · The present report the analysis of test results and recommendations regarding type of foundation, allowable bearing capacity. Also, for the

Wa

ter

Co

nte

nt

(%)

(W)

@ S

am

ple

Wa

ter

Co

nte

nt

(%)

(W)

@

Str

en

gth

Sa

mp

le

Wa

ter

Co

nte

ntt

(%

) (W

) @

C

on

solid

atio

n S

am

ple

Ave

rag

e W

ate

r C

on

ten

t (%

) (W

)

Bu

lk D

en

sity

(g

m/c

c) b

) @

ave

rag

e s

tre

ng

th S

am

ple

Dry

De

nsi

ty (

gm

/cc) d

)

@ a

s p

er

ave

rag

e w

ate

r C

on

ten

t

Gra

vel (

%)

(G)

Sa

nd

(%

) (S

)

Silt

(%

) (M

)

Cla

y (%

) (C

)

Liq

uid

Lim

it (%

) (W

L)

Pla

stic

Lim

it (

%)

(WP

)

Pla

stic

ity I

nd

ex

(%

) (I

P)

Sh

rinka

ge

Lim

it (

%)

(W

s /

Wsu

)

Co

mp

ress

ive

Str

ess

(kg

/cm

2 ) (q

u)

Typ

e o

f T

est

Co

he

sio

n (

kg/c

m2 )

(C)

An

gle

of

Fric

tion

)

Va

ne

Sh

ea

r S

tre

ng

th (

kg/c

m2 )

(S)

Initi

al V

oid

Ra

tio (

eo)

Co

mp

ress

ion

In

de

x (

CC)

27

.08

.19

DS

_1

0.5

0

31

.39

- - CL^^ 14.63 - - 15 - - 2.66 0 48 37 15 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

27

.08

.19

UD

S_

1

2.5

0

29

.39

- - CI 16.76 16.48 16.24 16 1.94 1.67 2.65 0 42 38 20 37 19 18 - - - - - UU 0.57 4 - 0.678 0.138

27

.08

.19

S/D

_3

6.0

0

25

.89

51 - CI 19.61 - - 20 - - - - - - - 45 22 23 - - - - - - - - - - -

27

.08

.19

S/D

_4

7.5

0

24

.39

30 - CH 29.67 - - 30 - - 2.62 2 12 56 30 54 23 31 - - - - - - - - - - -

27

.08

.19

S/D

_5

9.0

0

22

.89

27 - CL^^ 19.97 - - 20 - - 2.68 0 49 36 15 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

27

.08

.19

S/D

_7

12

.00

19

.89

49

26 SM 19.27 - - 19 - - 2.70 1 64 - - - - - - - - - - -

27

.08

.19

S/D

_8

13

.50

18

.39

52

26 SC^^ 20.67 - - 21 - - 2.67 0 60 31 9 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Hard, yellowish brown, siltyclay / clayey silt with somesand mixture, kankars &gravels.

Very stiff, brownish yellow, siltyclay / clayey silt with littlepercentage of sand mixture,kankars.

Dense, whitish grey / yellowishgrey, silty fine grained sandwith traces of clay binders &mica.

very dense, whitish grey /yellowish grey, silty finegrained sand with traces ofclay binders & mica.

35*

Co

rre

cte

d N

" V

alu

e

IS -

21

31

Ob

serv

ed

N V

alu

e

IS -

21

31

Brownish grey, clayey silt withsome sand mixture.

Yellowish brown, clayey siltwith some sand mixture &traces of kankars.

Location: Nandan Nagar Complex Location: Old Pineapple Garden

Da

te o

f S

am

plin

g

Sa

mp

le D

ep

th (

m)

Sa

mp

le E

leva

tion

(m

)

Sa

mp

le N

o.

So

il C

lass

ifica

tion

IS

- 1

49

8

Type of Soil Sample

Project Name :

Client Name :

Project Code :

Laboratory Soil Tests Result Sheet

Consultancy Services for preparation of detailed project report (DPR) based on detailed topographical survey, collection of hydrological data, detailed geotechnical sub-soil investigation along with detailed price/cost estimate and other relevant allied works of the project- Proposed Township at Govt. Land (Old Pineapple Garden), Behind Fernando Rehabilitation, near Don Bosco School, Nandannagar, Agartala.

Executive Engineer - IV Urban Development Department, Tripura

F.4 (2)-UDD/EW(S-XXXVIII) /2055-61 Dated, Agartala, the 14/08/2019

BPC Consultant INDIA (P) Ltd.

Concept Building, Prince Park514/A/1 Kalikapur Road

Kolkata - 700099

www.bpcipl.com

Ground Level (GL) m:

Bore hole No.:

Natural Water Content (%) IS - 2720 Part - 2

Sw

elli

ng

Pre

suu

re (

kg/c

m2 )

IS -

27

20

Pa

rt-

41

Strength ParameterIS - 2720 Part - 10 / 11 / 12 / 13 / 30

Fre

e S

we

ll In

de

x (%

) IS

- 2

72

0 P

art

- 4

0

ConsolidationIS - 2720 Part - 15

Grain Size AnalysisIS - 2720 Part - 4

Sp

. G

ravi

ty (

G)

IS -

27

20

Pa

rt -

3 (

Se

c-1

/2)

Very stiff, brownish yellow,clayey silt with some sandmixture, kankars.

Co-ordinate:

Ha

tch

ing

Pa

tte

rn

M BGL

Pe

rme

ab

ility

Te

st

(KT)

IS -

27

20

Pa

rt-

17

Natural DensityConsistency Limit

IS - 2720 Part - 5 / 6

Non Plastic

31.8861 (HIG)N-2641326.1460

E-327439.0910 Standing Water Level:

16.05Bridge No.: -

page:-46 of 102

Annexure C1

Annexure C1

Page 57: Geotech Report Nandannagar 2nd time · The present report the analysis of test results and recommendations regarding type of foundation, allowable bearing capacity. Also, for the

Wa

ter

Co

nte

nt

(%)

(W)

@ S

am

ple

Wa

ter

Co

nte

nt

(%)

(W)

@

Str

en

gth

Sa

mp

le

Wa

ter

Co

nte

ntt

(%

) (W

) @

C

on

solid

atio

n S

am

ple

Ave

rag

e W

ate

r C

on

ten

t (%

) (W

)

Bu

lk D

en

sity

(g

m/c

c) b

) @

ave

rag

e s

tre

ng

th S

am

ple

Dry

De

nsi

ty (

gm

/cc) d

)

@ a

s p

er

ave

rag

e w

ate

r C

on

ten

t

Gra

vel (

%)

(G)

Sa

nd

(%

) (S

)

Silt

(%

) (M

)

Cla

y (%

) (C

)

Liq

uid

Lim

it (%

) (W

L)

Pla

stic

Lim

it (

%)

(WP

)

Pla

stic

ity I

nd

ex

(%

) (I

P)

Sh

rinka

ge

Lim

it (

%)

(W

s /

Wsu

)

Co

mp

ress

ive

Str

ess

(kg

/cm

2 ) (q

u)

Typ

e o

f T

est

Co

he

sio

n (

kg/c

m2 )

(C)

An

gle

of

Fric

tion

)

Va

ne

Sh

ea

r S

tre

ng

th (

kg/c

m2 )

(S)

Initi

al V

oid

Ra

tio (

eo)

Co

mp

ress

ion

In

de

x (

CC)

Co

rre

cte

d N

" V

alu

e

IS -

21

31

Ob

serv

ed

N V

alu

e

IS -

21

31

Location: Nandan Nagar Complex Location: Old Pineapple Garden

Da

te o

f S

am

plin

g

Sa

mp

le D

ep

th (

m)

Sa

mp

le E

leva

tion

(m

)

Sa

mp

le N

o.

So

il C

lass

ifica

tion

IS

- 1

49

8

Type of Soil Sample

Project Name :

Client Name :

Project Code :

Laboratory Soil Tests Result Sheet

Consultancy Services for preparation of detailed project report (DPR) based on detailed topographical survey, collection of hydrological data, detailed geotechnical sub-soil investigation along with detailed price/cost estimate and other relevant allied works of the project- Proposed Township at Govt. Land (Old Pineapple Garden), Behind Fernando Rehabilitation, near Don Bosco School, Nandannagar, Agartala.

Executive Engineer - IV Urban Development Department, Tripura

F.4 (2)-UDD/EW(S-XXXVIII) /2055-61 Dated, Agartala, the 14/08/2019

BPC Consultant INDIA (P) Ltd.

Concept Building, Prince Park514/A/1 Kalikapur Road

Kolkata - 700099

www.bpcipl.com

Ground Level (GL) m:

Bore hole No.:

Natural Water Content (%) IS - 2720 Part - 2

Sw

elli

ng

Pre

suu

re (

kg/c

m2 )

IS -

27

20

Pa

rt-

41

Strength ParameterIS - 2720 Part - 10 / 11 / 12 / 13 / 30

Fre

e S

we

ll In

de

x (%

) IS

- 2

72

0 P

art

- 4

0

ConsolidationIS - 2720 Part - 15

Grain Size AnalysisIS - 2720 Part - 4

Sp

. G

ravi

ty (

G)

IS -

27

20

Pa

rt -

3 (

Se

c-1

/2)

Co-ordinate:

Ha

tch

ing

Pa

tte

rn

M BGL

Pe

rme

ab

ility

Te

st

(KT)

IS -

27

20

Pa

rt-

17

Natural DensityConsistency Limit

IS - 2720 Part - 5 / 6

31.8861 (HIG)N-2641326.1460

E-327439.0910 Standing Water Level:

16.05Bridge No.: -

27

.08

.19

S/D

_9

15

.00

16

.89

62

28 SM 18.04 - - 18 - - 2.66 0 67 - - - - - - - - - - -

29

.08

.19

S/D

_1

3

21

.00

10

.89

62

26

27

.08

.19

S/D

_1

4

22

.50

9.3

9

56

24

30

.08

.19

S/D

_1

7

27

.00

4.8

9

10

4

36 SM 17.84 - - 18 - - 2.65 3 75 - - - - - - - - - - -

30

.08

.19

S/D

_1

9

30

.00

1.8

9

10

0

33 SM 20.00 - - 20 - - 2.67 0 72 - - - - - - - - - - -

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

^^ : * : NA : DS : # : ** : Np :

D : U : S : CU : CD : UU : BGL : AGL :

Dense to very dense, yellowishbrown / whitish grey / yellowishgrey, silty fine grained sandwith traces of clay binders &mica.

0.08 31 - - -

33*

Non Plastic

Non Plastic

SM 20-

28*

34*

22*

19.5819.95 6422.68-

Assumed Non PlasticSoil Classification in this case is based on average layer properties.

Distureb Sample Undistureb Sample SPT Sample Above Ground Level

Remolded Sample

Consolidated Undrained Consolidated Drained

Not ApplicableNot applied for Hydrometer Test

Below Ground LevelUnconsolidated Undrained

Direct Shear Test

1.93** Non Plastic - - - - -

Non Plastic

DS#

-

-

page:-47 of 102

Annexure C1

Annexure C1

Page 58: Geotech Report Nandannagar 2nd time · The present report the analysis of test results and recommendations regarding type of foundation, allowable bearing capacity. Also, for the

BPC Consultant INDIA (P) Ltd.

Concept Building, Prince Park514/A/1 Kalikapur Road

Kolkata - 700099

www.bpcipl.com

Consultancy Services for preparation of detailed project report (DPR) based on detailed topographical survey, collection of hydrological data, detailed geotechnical sub-soil investigation along with detailed price/cost estimate and other relevant allied works of the project- Proposed Township at Govt. Land (Old Pineapple Garden), Behind Fernando Rehabilitation, near Don Bosco School, Nandannagar, Agartala.

Executive Engineer - IV Urban Development Department, Tripura

F.4 (2)-UDD/EW(S-XXXVIII) /2055-61 Dated, Agartala, the 14/08/2019

Location : Nandan NagarComplex Location :

Pineapple Ga -Bore hole

No. :

Project Name :

Client Name :

Project Code :

1 (HIG)

N value vs Depth Curve

Co-ordinate :

E-327439.0910

N-2641326.1460

Bridge No.:

0.00

5.00

10.00

15.00

20.00

25.00

30.00

35.00

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100 105 110

Dep

th (

m)

N Value

Observed N value BH-1 (HIG) Corrected N value BH-1 (HIG)

page:-48 of 102

Annexure C1

Annexure C1

Page 59: Geotech Report Nandannagar 2nd time · The present report the analysis of test results and recommendations regarding type of foundation, allowable bearing capacity. Also, for the

Project Name :

Client Name :

Project Code :

0.50 0.00 0.00 2.00 45.63 47.63 37.17 15.20 - - - - -

2.50 0.00 0.00 1.68 40.72 42.40 37.70 19.90 37 19 18 - -

7.50 1.75 1.45 1.97 8.21 11.63 56.32 30.30 54 23 31 - -

9.00 0.00 0.20 1.21 47.22 48.63 36.07 15.30 - - - - -

Coefficient of Curveture

(CC)

Uniformity Coefficient (CU)

Medium Sand (%)

2.00 - 0.425 (mm)

Clay (%)< 0.002

(mm)

Fine Sand (%)0.425 - 0.075

(mm)

Total Sand Content (%)

Silt (%) 0.075 - 0.002

(mm)

Plasticity Index

(IP)(%)

Bridge No. :

BPC Consultant INDIA (P) Ltd.

Concept Building, Prince Park514/A/1 Kalikapur Road

Kolkata - 700099www.bpcipl.com

Consultancy Services for preparation of detailed project report (DPR) based on detailed topographical survey, collection of hydrological data, detailed geotechnical sub-soil investigation along with detailed price/cost estimate and other relevant allied works of the project- Proposed Township at Govt. Land (Old Pineapple Garden), Behind Fernando Rehabilitation, near Don Bosco School, Nandannagar, Agartala.

Executive Engineer - IV Urban Development Department, Tripura

F.4 (2)-UDD/EW(S-XXXVIII) /2055-61 Dated, Agartala, the 14/08/2019

E-327439.0910

N-2641326.1460

Coarse Sand (%)

4.75 - 2.00(mm)

Old Pineapple Garden

IS - 2720 PART - 4

Grain size Analysis

Co-ordinate :

-Location :Complex

Location :

Liquid Limit (WL) (%)

Plastic Limit (WP)

%

1 (HIG)

Bore hole No.

Sample Depth (m)

Gravel (%)

> 4.75 (mm)

Nandan Nagar

4.752.000.0750.002 0.425 10.00 20.00

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

0.0010 0.0100 0.1000 1.0000 10.0000 100.0000

(%)

of

fin

er

Grain Size (mm)

GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION GRAPH

0.50 2.50 7.50 9.00

page:-49 of 102

Annexure C1

Annexure C1

Page 60: Geotech Report Nandannagar 2nd time · The present report the analysis of test results and recommendations regarding type of foundation, allowable bearing capacity. Also, for the

Project Name :

Client Name :

Project Code :

12.00 0.68 0.04 0.51 63.41 63.96 - -

13.50 0.00 0.19 1.29 58.65 60.13 31.27 8.60 - - - - -

15.00 0.00 0.00 1.10 66.19 67.29 - -

21.00+22.50 1.69 0.29 0.24 63.64 64.17 - -

Non Plastic

Non Plastic

Nandan Nagar Old Pineapple Garden

Liquid Limit (WL) (%)

E-327439.0910

Total Sand Content (%)

Silt (%) 0.075 - 0.002

(mm)

32.71*

34.13*

Location :Complex

Location :

1 (HIG)

Bore hole No.

Sample Depth (m)

Coarse Sand (%)

4.75 - 2.00(mm)

IS - 2720 PART - 4

Non Plastic

Uniformity Coefficient (CU)

35.36*

Consultancy Services for preparation of detailed project report (DPR) based on detailed topographical survey, collection of hydrological data, detailed geotechnical sub-soil investigation along with detailed price/cost estimate and other relevant allied works of the project- Proposed Township at Govt. Land (Old Pineapple Garden), Behind Fernando Rehabilitation, near Don Bosco School, Nandannagar, Agartala.

Executive Engineer - IV Urban Development Department, Tripura

F.4 (2)-UDD/EW(S-XXXVIII) /2055-61 Dated, Agartala, the 14/08/2019

Gravel (%)

> 4.75 (mm)

Fine Sand (%)0.425 - 0.075

(mm)

Bridge No. :

Medium Sand (%)

2.00 - 0.425 (mm)

Clay (%)< 0.002

(mm)

N-2641326.1460

Plastic Limit (WP)

%

Plasticity Index

(IP)(%)

Coefficient of Curveture

(CC)

-

BPC Consultant INDIA (P) Ltd.

Concept Building, Prince Park514/A/1 Kalikapur Road

Kolkata - 700099www.bpcipl.com

Grain size Analysis

Co-ordinate :

4.752.000.0750.002 0.425 10.00 20.00

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

0.0010 0.0100 0.1000 1.0000 10.0000 100.0000

(%)

of

fin

er

Grain Size (mm)

GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION GRAPH

12.00 13.50 15.00 21.00+22.50

page:-50 of 102

Annexure C1

Annexure C1

Page 61: Geotech Report Nandannagar 2nd time · The present report the analysis of test results and recommendations regarding type of foundation, allowable bearing capacity. Also, for the

Project Name :

Client Name :

Project Code :

27.00 3.14 0.40 0.99 73.36 74.75 - -

30.00 0.00 0.33 3.66 68.11 72.09 - -

- - - - - - - - - - - - -

- - - - - - - - - - - - -

27.91*

Non Plastic

Non Plastic1 (HIG)

Medium Sand (%)

2.00 - 0.425 (mm)

Clay (%)< 0.002

(mm)

Fine Sand (%)0.425 - 0.075

(mm)

Total Sand Content (%)

22.11*

Consultancy Services for preparation of detailed project report (DPR) based on detailed topographical survey, collection of hydrological data, detailed geotechnical sub-soil investigation along with detailed price/cost estimate and other relevant allied works of the project- Proposed Township at Govt. Land (Old Pineapple Garden), Behind Fernando Rehabilitation, near Don Bosco School, Nandannagar, Agartala.

Executive Engineer - IV Urban Development Department, Tripura

F.4 (2)-UDD/EW(S-XXXVIII) /2055-61 Dated, Agartala, the 14/08/2019

-Bridge No. :Location :Complex

Location :

BPC Consultant INDIA (P) Ltd.

Concept Building, Prince Park514/A/1 Kalikapur Road

Kolkata - 700099www.bpcipl.com

E-327439.0910Co-ordinate :

Bore hole No.

Sample Depth (m)

Gravel (%)

> 4.75 (mm)

Silt (%) 0.075 - 0.002

(mm)

Plasticity Index

(IP)(%)

Coefficient of Curveture

(CC)

Uniformity Coefficient (CU)

N-2641326.1460

Plastic Limit (WP)

%

Nandan Nagar Old Pineapple Garden

Liquid Limit (WL) (%)

Coarse Sand (%)

4.75 - 2.00(mm)

IS - 2720 PART - 4

Grain size Analysis

4.752.000.0750.002 0.425 10.00 20.00

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

0.0010 0.0100 0.1000 1.0000 10.0000 100.0000

(%)

of

fin

er

Grain Size (mm)

GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION GRAPH

27.00 30.00

page:-51 of 102

Annexure C1

Annexure C1

Page 62: Geotech Report Nandannagar 2nd time · The present report the analysis of test results and recommendations regarding type of foundation, allowable bearing capacity. Also, for the

Project Name :

Client Name :

Project Code :

UU

38 mm

76 mm

Cell Pressure

(kg/cm2)Proving Ring Dial Reading

Load at Failure(kg)

Deviator

Stress (kg/cm2)

EffectiveNormal

Stress (kg/cm2)

Compression Gauge Reading

Strain at Failure

CohesionC

(kg/cm2)

Angle of Internal Friction

ф (Degree)

Bulk density (gm/cc) @

Triaxial Sample

Moisture Content

(%) @ Triaxial Sample

0.50 58.0 18.27 1.33 1.83 1300 0.171

1.00 61.0 19.22 1.38 2.38 1400 0.184

1.50 66.0 20.79 1.47 2.97 1500 0.197

1.94 16.480.57 4.24

1 (HIG)

Depth of Sample (m)

E‐327439.0910

N‐2641326.1460

BPC Consultant INDIA (P) Ltd.

Concept Building, Prince Park

514/A/1 Kalikapur Road, Kolkata - 700099

www.bpcipl.com

0.01 mm/Div.

Consultancy Services for preparation of detailed project report (DPR) based on detailed topographical survey, collection of hydrological data, detailed geotechnical sub-soil investigation along with detailed price/cost estimate and other relevant allied works of the project- Proposed Township at Govt. Land (Old Pineapple Garden), Behind Fernando Rehabilitation, near Don Bosco School, Nandannagar, Agartala.

Executive Engineer - IV Urban Development Department, Tripura

Co-ordinate : Bridge No. :

TRIAXIAL COMPRESSION TEST (IS - 2720 PART - 11)

Bore hole No.:

TEST RESULTLeast count of Gauge

Old Pineapple Garden

Nandan Nagar

F.4 (2)-UDD/EW(S-XXXVIII) /2055-61 Dated, Agartala, the 14/08/2019

Type of Test

Height of Specimen ( H )

Complex Location :

0.315 kg/Div.

-

3.00

Dia of Specimen ( D )

Proving ring Constant

Location :

0.000

0.500

1.000

1.500

2.000

0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0

She

ar S

tres

s (K

g/sq

cm)

Normal Stress (Kg/sqcm)

page:-52 of 102

Annexure C1

Annexure C1

Page 63: Geotech Report Nandannagar 2nd time · The present report the analysis of test results and recommendations regarding type of foundation, allowable bearing capacity. Also, for the

Project Name :

Client Name :

Project Code :

60 mm

60 mm

24 mm

Normal Stress

(kg/cm2)Proving Ring Dial Reading

Load at failure(kg)

Shear

Stress (kg/cm2)Compression

Gauge ReadingCorrected

Area (cm2)N

Value

Cohesion C

(kg/cm2)

Angle of Friction

ф(Degree)

Bulk Density gm/cc @ Direct

shear sample

Moisture Content

(%) @ Direct shear sample

0.50 35.0 12.15 0.38 700 31.80 -

1.00 64.5 22.38 0.69 600 32.40 0.08 31.30

1.50 89.0 30.88 0.99 800 31.20 -

1.93** 19.58

Height of Specimen ( H )

BPC Consultant INDIA (P) Ltd.

Concept Building, Prince Park514/A/1 Kalikapur Road, Kolkata - 700099

www.bpcipl.com

Bore hole No.:Co-ordinate :

Length of Specimen ( L )

Width of Specimen ( W )

1 (HIG)

Consultancy Services for preparation of detailed project report (DPR) based on detailed topographical survey, collection of hydrological data, detailed geotechnical sub-soil investigation along with detailed price/cost estimate and other relevant allied works of the project- Proposed Township at Govt. Land (Old Pineapple Garden), Behind Fernando Rehabilitation, near Don Bosco School, Nandannagar, Agartala.

Executive Engineer - IV Urban Development Department, Tripura

F.4 (2)-UDD/EW(S-XXXVIII) /2055-61 Dated, Agartala, the 14/08/2019

Least Count of Gauge 0.01 mm/Div.

DIRECT SHEAR TEST (IS - 2720 PART - 13)

Location :Nandan

Nagar N‐2641326.1460-

Proving ring Constant 0.347 kg/Div.

TEST RESULT

Depth of Sample (m) 21.00+22.50

Complex Location :

Old Pineapple Garden

E‐327439.0910Bridge No. :

y = 0.608x + 0.080

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

1.00

1.20

0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.90 1.00 1.10 1.20 1.30 1.40 1.50 1.60

She

ar S

tres

s (k

g/cm

2)

Normal Stress (kg/cm2)

DIRECT SHEAR TEST GRAPH

page:-53 of 102

Annexure C1

Annexure C1

Page 64: Geotech Report Nandannagar 2nd time · The present report the analysis of test results and recommendations regarding type of foundation, allowable bearing capacity. Also, for the

Project Name :

Client Name :

Project Code :

Applied Pressure

(Kg/cm2)

Final Dial Gauge Reading

ChangedDial

Reading (cm)

Total Ht.Changed for Dial

Reading (cm)

VoidHeight

(cm)

Voidratio

Changed in

Void ratio

Coefficient of Com -

pressibility. (av)

Coefficient of Volume

Com -pressibility.

(mv)

Compression Index. (CC)

0.00 2064 2.00 0.808 0.678

0.10 2046 -0.0036 1.996 0.804 0.675 0.003 0.030 0.018

0.25 2015 -0.0062 1.990 0.798 0.669 0.005 0.035 0.021 0.013

0.50 1967 -0.0096 1.981 0.788 0.661 0.008 0.032 0.019 0.027

1.00 1885 -0.0164 1.964 0.772 0.648 0.014 0.028 0.017 0.046

2.00 1767 -0.0236 1.941 0.748 0.628 0.020 0.020 0.012 0.066

4.00 1570 -0.0394 1.901 0.709 0.595 0.033 0.017 0.010 0.110

8.00 1322 -0.0496 1.852 0.659 0.553 0.042 0.010 0.007 0.138

4.00 1366 0.0088 1.860 0.668 0.561 -0.007 0.002 0.001 0.025

0.25 1506 0.0280 1.888 0.696 0.584 -0.023 0.006 0.004 0.020

FIXED TYPE

6

2

CONSOLIDATION TEST (IS : 2720 PART - 15)

Depth of Sample ( m ) 2.50

Condition of Test :-

Wt. of Dry Sample ( Wd ) gm :- 89.28

Consultancy Services for preparation of detailed project report (DPR) based on detailed topographical survey, collection of hydrological data, detailed geotechnical sub-soil investigation along with detailed price/cost estimate and other relevant allied works of the project- Proposed Township at Govt. Land (Old Pineapple Garden), Behind Fernando Rehabilitation, near Don Bosco School, Nandannagar, Agartala.

BPC Consultant INDIA (P) Ltd.

Concept Building, Prince Park514/A/1 Kalikapur Road

Kolkata - 700099www.bpcipl.com

Executive Engineer - IV Urban Development Department, Tripura

F.4 (2)-UDD/EW(S-XXXVIII) /2055-61 Dated, Agartala, the 14/08/2019

1.19Solid Height of Sample ( Hs ) cm :-2.65

Location :Complex Location :

Specific Gravity of Soil ( G ) :-

Dia of Specimen ( D ) cm :-

Height of Specimen ( H ) cm :-

-E-327439.0910

N-2641326.1460

Old Pineapple Garden

Least Count of Gauge

Co-ordinate:

Bridge No.:

1 (HIG)Bore hole No. :

Moisture Content (%) @ Consolidation Sample 16.24

Nandan Nagar

0.002 mm/Div.

0.540

0.560

0.580

0.600

0.620

0.640

0.660

0.680

0.10 1.00 10.00

Vo

id r

atio

Pressure Range (kg/cm2)

e-log p CurveCompression Index (Cc ) ‐ 0.138

page:-54 of 102

Page 65: Geotech Report Nandannagar 2nd time · The present report the analysis of test results and recommendations regarding type of foundation, allowable bearing capacity. Also, for the

Bore hole No.

SampleNo.

Depth (m)WL

(%)

WP

(%)

IP

(%)

UDS_1 2.50 37 19 18

S/D_3 6.00 45 22 23

S/D_4 7.50 54 23 31

- - - - - -

- - - - - -

- - - - - -

- - - - - -

- - - - - -

- - - - - -

X Y

20 0

100 58

0 4

25.48 4

0 7

29.59 7

35 0

35 25

50 0

50 37

-

Complex Location :

Old Pineapple

Garden

BH-1 (HIG)

Co-ordinate:

F.4 (2)-UDD/EW(S-XXXVIII) /2055-61 Dated, Agartala, the 14/08/2019

CI

Client Name  :

Project Code :

E-327439.0910Location :

Soil Classification

-

BPC Consultant INDIA (P) Ltd.

Concept Building, Prince Park514/A/1 Kalikapur Road

Kolkata - 700099

www.bpcipl.com

-

CH

^^ : Soil Classification in this case is based on average layer properties.

-

Project Name :

Consultancy Services for preparation of detailed project report (DPR) based on detailed topographical survey, collection of hydrological data, detailed geotechnical sub-soil investigation along with detailed price/cost estimate and other relevant allied works of the project- Proposed Township at Govt. Land (Old Pineapple Garden), Behind Fernando Rehabilitation, near Don

Executive Engineer - IV Urban Development Department, Tripura

CI

SOIL CLASSIFICATION (IS - 1498)

N-2641326.1460

WL : Liquid limit WP : Plastic Limit Ip : Plasticity Index Np : Non Plastic NA : Not Applicable

-

-

-

Bridge No.:Nandan

Nagar

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

Pla

sti

cit

y In

de

x I

p (%

)

Liquid Limit WL (%)

PLASTICITY CHART

2.50 6.00 7.50

35= LW

50= L W

A - LINE

)20-LW(0.73= PI

CI

CH

MH / OH

MI / OICL- ML

ML / OLML

CL

page:-55 of 102

Annexure C1

Annexure C1

Page 66: Geotech Report Nandannagar 2nd time · The present report the analysis of test results and recommendations regarding type of foundation, allowable bearing capacity. Also, for the

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

B2

Bore Log & Lab. Test Results Nandannagar

BH-2 (HIG)

Annexure C1

Annexure C1

Page 67: Geotech Report Nandannagar 2nd time · The present report the analysis of test results and recommendations regarding type of foundation, allowable bearing capacity. Also, for the

Project Name :

Client Name :

Project Code :

Job Code:

Complex Location

Borehole No.

Ground Elevation (G.L.)

Method of Boring 15.56

Diameter of Hole 30.30

From

To

From

To

Type

15

cm

30

cm

45

cm N

Value

Co

rre

cte

d N

"

DS_1 - - - - - - - - -

DS_2 - - - - - - - - -

30.115

29.665S/D_1 1.50 - 1.95 2 3 5 8 - - - - -

29.615

29.165UDS_1 2.00 - 2.45 - - - - - - - - -

28.615

28.165S/D_2 3.00 - 3.45 5 8 12 20 - - - - -

27.115

26.665*UDS_2 4.50 - 4.95 - - - - - - - - -

25.615

25.165S/D_3 6.00 - 6.45 4 5 6 11 - - - - -

24.115

23.665UDS_3 7.50 - 7.95 - - - - - - - - -

22.615

22.165S/D_4 9.00 - 9.45 8 11 16 27 19 - - - -

21.115

20.665S/D_5 10.50 - 10.95 9 12 19 31 20 - - - -

19.615

19.165S/D_6 12.00 - 12.45 11 12 22 34 20 - - - -

18.115

17.665S/D_7 13.50 - 13.95 8 12 18 30 18 - - - -

16.615

16.165S/D_8 15.00 - 15.45 11 20 28 48 23 - - - -

W_1 - - - - - - - - -

15.115

14.665S/D_9 16.50 - 16.95 14 25 35 60 27 - - - -

13.615

13.165S/D_10 18.00 - 18.45 10 19 21 40 20 - - - -

12.115

11.665S/D_11 19.50 - 19.95 8 17 17 34 18 - - - -

10.615

10.165S/D_12 21.00 - 21.45 9 21 25 46 21 - - - -

9.115

8.665S/D_13 22.50 - 22.95 11 24 35 59 25 - - - -

7.615

7.165S/D_14 24.00 - 24.45 27 37 53 90 33 - - - -

6.115

5.665S/D_15 25.50 - 25.95 21 43 69 112 38 - - - -

4.615

4.315S/D_16 27.00 - 27.30 35

75B/ 15CM

Re >100 - - - - -

3.115

2.845S/D_17 28.50 - 28.77 32

80B/ 12CM

Re >100 - - - - -

1.615

1.315S/D_18 30.00 - 30.30 45

90B/ 15CM

Re >100 - - - - -

BGL : AGL :

1.315

9.115

Very dense, yellowish grey /brownish yellow, silty fine grained sand with traces ofclay binders & mica.(SM)22.50m to 30.30m

9.115

28.615

Medium dense to dense /Very dense, yellowish grey /yellowish brown, silty finegrained sand with traces ofclay binders & mica.(SM)8.50m to 22.50m

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Total Core

Length(cm)

TCR(%)

RQD(%)

Co

lou

rs o

f re

turn

Wa

ter

Wa

ter

Lo

ss

Remarks

Bro

wn

ish

-

Description of Soil Stratum & Rock Methology

Stratum Elevation as per R.L

(m)HatchingPattern

Elevation as per R.L

(m)Sample / Event

Standard Penetration Test IS-2131

Depth (m)

20 (D-2 & S-18)

1150 mm Termination Depth M BGL No.of Water Sample ( W )

Wash Boring Standing Water Level M BGL No. of Disturbed Sample ( DS )

31.615M Completion Date 02.09.19 No. of Undisturbed Sample ( U )

BORE LOG & CORE LOG DATA SHEET

2 (HIG) Commencement Date 30.08.19 No. of SP Test ( S )

Old Pineapple Garden

Consultancy Services for preparation of detailed project report (DPR) based on detailed topographical survey, collection of hydrological data, detailed geotechnical sub-soil investigation along with detailed price/cost estimate and other relevant allied works of the project- Proposed Township at Govt. Land (Old Pineapple Garden), Behind Fernando Rehabilitation, near Don Bosco School, Nandannagar, Agartala.

BPC Consultant INDIA (P) Ltd.

Concept Building, Prince Park

514/A/1 Kalikapur Road, Kolkata - 700099.

www.bpcipl.com

Executive Engineer - IV Urban Development Department, Tripura

F.4 (2)-UDD/EW(S-XXXVIII) /2055-61 Dated, Agartala, the 14/08/2019

E-327428.3320 N-2641408.9700P0196 Location Nandan Nagar Co-ordinate :

18

3

Bridge No - No. of Core Sample ( C ) 0

B : Blows Re : Refusal TCR : Total Core Recovery RQD : Rock Quality Designation Below ground Level

*UDS : UDS Could not been Collected (Slipped) S/D : Standard Penetration Test with disturbed sample collected, S : Standard Penetration Test but sample not recovered

Above ground Level R : Run

-

-

15.5616.055

1.0030.615

-

28.615Very stiff, brownish yellow /yellowish brown, clayey siltwith some sand mixture &traces of kankars & gravels.(CI)3.00m to 8.50m

Note:- Yellowish grey, clayeymurrum observed around4.60 to 5.60m

31.115 0.50Stiff, brownish yellow /yellowish brown, clayey siltwith some sand mixture &traces of kankars & gravels.(CI)0.00m to 3.00m

31.615

28.615

page:-56 of 102Annexure C1

Page 68: Geotech Report Nandannagar 2nd time · The present report the analysis of test results and recommendations regarding type of foundation, allowable bearing capacity. Also, for the

Wa

ter

Co

nte

nt

(%)

(W)

@ S

am

ple

Wa

ter

Co

nte

nt

(%)

(W)

@ S

tre

ng

th

Sa

mp

le

Wa

ter

Co

nte

ntt

(%

) (W

) @

C

on

solid

atio

n S

am

ple

Ave

rag

e W

ate

r C

on

ten

t (%

) (W

)

Bu

lk D

en

sity

(g

m/c

c) b

)

@ a

vera

ge

str

en

gth

Sa

mp

le

Dry

De

nsi

ty (

gm

/cc) d

)

@ a

s p

er

ave

rag

e w

ate

r C

on

ten

t

Gra

vel (

%)

(G)

Sa

nd

(%

) (S

)

Silt

(%

) (M

)

Cla

y (%

) (C

)

Liq

uid

Lim

it (%

) (W

L)

Pla

stic

Lim

it (

%)

(WP

)

Pla

stic

ity I

nd

ex

(%

) (I

P)

Sh

rinka

ge

Lim

it (

%)

(W

s /

Wsu

)

Co

mp

ress

ive

Str

ess

(kg

/cm

2 ) (q

u)

Typ

e o

f T

est

Co

he

sio

n (

kg/c

m2 )

(C)

An

gle

of

Fric

tion

)

Va

ne

Sh

ea

r S

tre

ng

th (

kg/c

m2 )

(S)

Initi

al V

oid

Ra

tio (

eo)

Co

mp

ress

ion

In

de

x (

CC)

30

.08

.19

DS

_1

0.5

0

31

.61

5

- - CI^^ 15.99 - - 16 - - 2.62 0 48 33 19 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

30

.08

.19

UD

S_

1

2.0

0

29

.61

5

- - CI 17.72 18.81 - 18 1.90 1.61 2.61 1 33 48 18 40 23 17 - - - - - UU 0.54 3 - 0.745 0.136

30

.08

.19

S/D

_2

3.0

0

28

.61

5

20 - CI^^ 18.02 - - 18 - - 2.66 0 46 34 20 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

30

.08

.19

S/D

_3

6.0

0

25

.61

5

11 - CH 29.38 - - 29 - - - - - - - 54 28 26 - - - - - - - - - - -

30

.08

.19

UD

S_

3

7.5

0

24

.11

5

- - CI 14.97 15.43 - 15 1.93 1.68 2.66 4 45 34 17 36 20 16 - - - - - UU 0.67 4 - 0.649 -

01

.09

.19

S/D

_4

9.0

0

22

.61

5

27

19 SM 12.43 - - 12 - - 2.67 0 68 - - - - - - - - - - -

01

.09

.19

S/D

_6

12

.00

19

.61

5

34

20 SM 18.77 - - 19 - - 2.68 0 76 - - - - - - - - - - -

Non Plastic

Non Plastic

Co

rre

cte

d N

" V

alu

e

IS -

21

31

Ob

serv

ed

N V

alu

e

IS -

21

31

Natural Water Content (%) IS - 2720 Part - 2

Location: Nandan Nagar Complex Location: Old Pineapple Garden

Da

te o

f S

am

plin

g

Sa

mp

le D

ep

th (

m)

Sa

mp

le E

leva

tion

(m

)

Sa

mp

le N

o.

So

il C

lass

ifica

tion

IS

- 1

49

8

Type of Soil Sample

Project Name :

Client Name :

Project Code :

Laboratory Soil Tests Result Sheet

Consultancy Services for preparation of detailed project report (DPR) based on detailed topographical survey, collection of hydrological data, detailed geotechnical sub-soil investigation along with detailed price/cost estimate and other relevant allied works of the project- Proposed Township at Govt. Land (Old Pineapple Garden), Behind Fernando Rehabilitation, near Don Bosco School, Nandannagar, Agartala.

Executive Engineer - IV Urban Development Department, Tripura

F.4 (2)-UDD/EW(S-XXXVIII) /2055-61 Dated, Agartala, the 14/08/2019

BPC Consultant INDIA (P) Ltd.

Concept Building, Prince Park514/A/1 Kalikapur Road

Kolkata - 700099

www.bpcipl.com

Ground Level (GL) m:

Bore hole No.:

Strength ParameterIS - 2720 Part - 10 / 11 / 12 / 13 / 30

Fre

e S

we

ll In

de

x (%

) IS

- 2

72

0 P

art

- 4

0

ConsolidationIS - 2720 Part - 15

Grain Size AnalysisIS - 2720 Part - 4

Sp

. G

ravi

ty (

G)

IS -

27

20

Pa

rt -

3 (

Se

c-1

/2) Consistency Limit

IS - 2720 Part - 5 / 6

Bridge No.: - Co-ordinate:

Ha

tch

ing

Pa

tte

rn

M BGL

Pe

rme

ab

ility

Te

st

(KT)

IS -

27

20

Pa

rt-

17

Natural Density

31.6152 (HIG)N-2641408.9700

E-327428.3320 Standing Water Level:

15.56

Sw

elli

ng

Pre

suu

re (

kg/c

m2 )

IS -

27

20

Pa

rt-

41

Brownish yellow, clayey silt withsome sand mixture & traces ofkankars.

Yellowish brown, clayey siltwith some sand mixture &traces of kankars & gravels.

Very stiff, yellowish brown,clayey silt with some sandmixture & traces of kankars &gravels.

Stiff, yellowish brown, clayeysilt with some sand mixture &traces of kankars & gravels.

Brownish yellow, clayey silt withsome sand mixture & traces ofkankars & gravels.

Medium dense to dense,yellowish grey / yellowishbrown, silty fine grained sandwith traces of clay binders &mica. 24*

32*

page:-57 of 102

Annexure C1

Annexure C1

Page 69: Geotech Report Nandannagar 2nd time · The present report the analysis of test results and recommendations regarding type of foundation, allowable bearing capacity. Also, for the

Wa

ter

Co

nte

nt

(%)

(W)

@ S

am

ple

Wa

ter

Co

nte

nt

(%)

(W)

@ S

tre

ng

th

Sa

mp

le

Wa

ter

Co

nte

ntt

(%

) (W

) @

C

on

solid

atio

n S

am

ple

Ave

rag

e W

ate

r C

on

ten

t (%

) (W

)

Bu

lk D

en

sity

(g

m/c

c) b

)

@ a

vera

ge

str

en

gth

Sa

mp

le

Dry

De

nsi

ty (

gm

/cc) d

)

@ a

s p

er

ave

rag

e w

ate

r C

on

ten

t

Gra

vel (

%)

(G)

Sa

nd

(%

) (S

)

Silt

(%

) (M

)

Cla

y (%

) (C

)

Liq

uid

Lim

it (%

) (W

L)

Pla

stic

Lim

it (

%)

(WP

)

Pla

stic

ity I

nd

ex

(%

) (I

P)

Sh

rinka

ge

Lim

it (

%)

(W

s /

Wsu

)

Co

mp

ress

ive

Str

ess

(kg

/cm

2 ) (q

u)

Typ

e o

f T

est

Co

he

sio

n (

kg/c

m2 )

(C)

An

gle

of

Fric

tion

)

Va

ne

Sh

ea

r S

tre

ng

th (

kg/c

m2 )

(S)

Initi

al V

oid

Ra

tio (

eo)

Co

mp

ress

ion

In

de

x (

CC)

Co

rre

cte

d N

" V

alu

e

IS -

21

31

Ob

serv

ed

N V

alu

e

IS -

21

31

Natural Water Content (%) IS - 2720 Part - 2

Location: Nandan Nagar Complex Location: Old Pineapple Garden

Da

te o

f S

am

plin

g

Sa

mp

le D

ep

th (

m)

Sa

mp

le E

leva

tion

(m

)

Sa

mp

le N

o.

So

il C

lass

ifica

tion

IS

- 1

49

8

Type of Soil Sample

Project Name :

Client Name :

Project Code :

Laboratory Soil Tests Result Sheet

Consultancy Services for preparation of detailed project report (DPR) based on detailed topographical survey, collection of hydrological data, detailed geotechnical sub-soil investigation along with detailed price/cost estimate and other relevant allied works of the project- Proposed Township at Govt. Land (Old Pineapple Garden), Behind Fernando Rehabilitation, near Don Bosco School, Nandannagar, Agartala.

Executive Engineer - IV Urban Development Department, Tripura

F.4 (2)-UDD/EW(S-XXXVIII) /2055-61 Dated, Agartala, the 14/08/2019

BPC Consultant INDIA (P) Ltd.

Concept Building, Prince Park514/A/1 Kalikapur Road

Kolkata - 700099

www.bpcipl.com

Ground Level (GL) m:

Bore hole No.:

Strength ParameterIS - 2720 Part - 10 / 11 / 12 / 13 / 30

Fre

e S

we

ll In

de

x (%

) IS

- 2

72

0 P

art

- 4

0

ConsolidationIS - 2720 Part - 15

Grain Size AnalysisIS - 2720 Part - 4

Sp

. G

ravi

ty (

G)

IS -

27

20

Pa

rt -

3 (

Se

c-1

/2) Consistency Limit

IS - 2720 Part - 5 / 6

Bridge No.: - Co-ordinate:

Ha

tch

ing

Pa

tte

rn

M BGL

Pe

rme

ab

ility

Te

st

(KT)

IS -

27

20

Pa

rt-

17

Natural Density

31.6152 (HIG)N-2641408.9700

E-327428.3320 Standing Water Level:

15.56

Sw

elli

ng

Pre

suu

re (

kg/c

m2 )

IS -

27

20

Pa

rt-

41

01

.09

.19

S/D

_9

16

.50

15

.11

5

60

27 SM 21.18 - - 21 - - 2.66 0 65 - - - - - - - - - - -

01

.09

.18

S/D

_1

0

18

.00

13

.61

5

40

20

01

.09

.19

S/D

_1

1

19

.50

12

.11

5

34

18

02

.09

.19

S/D

_1

3

22

.50

9.1

15

59

25 SM 21.84 - - 22 - - 2.70 0 63 - - - - - - - - - - -

02

.09

.19

S/D

_1

5

25

.50

6.1

15

11

2

38 SM 21.06 - - 21 - - 2.67 0 73 - - - - - - - - - - -

02

.09

.19

S/D

_1

8

30

.00

1.6

15

>1

00

- SM 15.00 - - 15 - - 2.69 3 78 - - - - - - - - - - -

^^ : * : NA : DS : # : ** : Np :

D : U : S : CU : CD : UU : BGL : AGL :

Non Plastic

Non Plastic --- - - 30- - DS#

Very dense, yellowish grey /brownish yellow, silty finegrained sand with traces of claybinders & mica.

17.00 17-16.75SM

Very dense, yellowish grey /yellowish brown, silty finegrained sand with traces of claybinders & mica.

Distureb Sample Undistureb Sample SPT Sample Above Ground Level

Remolded Sample

Consolidated Undrained Consolidated Drained

Not ApplicableNot applied for Hydrometer Test Assumed

2.68 0 80

Non Plastic

1.92** -

Non Plastic

0.10

Non Plastic

Non Plastic

Below Ground LevelUnconsolidated Undrained

Direct Shear Test

1.64

Soil Classification in this case is based on average layer properties.

19*

27*

37*

20*

35*

page:-58 of 102

Annexure C1

Annexure C1

Page 70: Geotech Report Nandannagar 2nd time · The present report the analysis of test results and recommendations regarding type of foundation, allowable bearing capacity. Also, for the

BPC Consultant INDIA (P) Ltd.

Concept Building, Prince Park514/A/1 Kalikapur Road

Kolkata - 700099

www.bpcipl.com

Consultancy Services for preparation of detailed project report (DPR) based on detailed topographical survey, collection of hydrological data, detailed geotechnical sub-soil investigation along with detailed price/cost estimate and other relevant allied works of the project- Proposed Township at Govt. Land (Old Pineapple Garden), Behind Fernando Rehabilitation, near Don Bosco School, Nandannagar, Agartala.

Executive Engineer - IV Urban Development Department, Tripura

F.4 (2)-UDD/EW(S-XXXVIII) /2055-61 Dated, Agartala, the 14/08/2019

Location : Nandan NagarComplex Location :

Old Pineapple

Garden-

Bore hole No. :

Project Name :

Client Name :

Project Code :

2 (HIG)

N value vs Depth Curve

Co-ordinate :

E-327428.3320

N-2641408.9700

Bridge No.:

0.00

5.00

10.00

15.00

20.00

25.00

30.00

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100 105 110 115

Dep

th (

m)

N Value

Observed N value BH-2 (HIG) Corrected N value BH-2 (HIG)

page:-59 of 102

Annexure C1

Annexure C1

Page 71: Geotech Report Nandannagar 2nd time · The present report the analysis of test results and recommendations regarding type of foundation, allowable bearing capacity. Also, for the

Project Name :

Client Name :

Project Code :

0.50 0.00 0.00 2.24 46.23 48.47 32.83 18.70 - - - - -

2.00 1.24 0.65 3.68 29.03 33.36 47.60 17.80 40 25 15 - -

3.00 0.00 0.18 2.71 43.15 46.04 33.56 20.40 - - - - -

7.50 3.66 0.56 14.13 30.23 44.92 34.32 17.10 36 20 16 - -

Coefficient of Curveture

(CC)

Uniformity Coefficient (CU)

Medium Sand (%)

2.00 - 0.425 (mm)

Clay (%)< 0.002 (mm)

Fine Sand (%)0.425 - 0.075

(mm)

Total Sand Content (%)

Silt (%) 0.075 - 0.002

(mm)

Plasticity Index (IP)(%)

Bridge No. :

BPC Consultant INDIA (P) Ltd.

Concept Building, Prince Park514/A/1 Kalikapur Road

Kolkata - 700099www.bpcipl.com

Consultancy Services for preparation of detailed project report (DPR) based on detailed topographical survey, collection of hydrological data, detailed geotechnical sub-soil investigation along with detailed price/cost estimate and other relevant allied works of the project- Proposed Township at Govt. Land (Old Pineapple Garden), Behind Fernando Rehabilitation, near Don Bosco School, Nandannagar, Agartala.

Executive Engineer - IV Urban Development Department, Tripura

F.4 (2)-UDD/EW(S-XXXVIII) /2055-61 Dated, Agartala, the 14/08/2019

E-327428.3320

N-2641408.9700

Coarse Sand (%)

4.75 - 2.00(mm)

Old Pineapple Garden

IS - 2720 PART - 4

Grain size Analysis

Co-ordinate :

-Location :Complex

Location :

Liquid Limit (WL) (%)

Plastic Limit (WP)

%

2 (HIG)

Bore hole No.

Sample Depth (m)

Gravel (%)

> 4.75 (mm)

Nandan Nagar

4.752.000.0750.002 0.425 10.00 20.00

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

0.0010 0.0100 0.1000 1.0000 10.0000 100.0000

(%)

of

fin

er

Grain Size (mm)

GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION GRAPH

0.50 2.00 3.00 7.50

page:-60 of 102

Annexure C1

Annexure C1

Page 72: Geotech Report Nandannagar 2nd time · The present report the analysis of test results and recommendations regarding type of foundation, allowable bearing capacity. Also, for the

Project Name :

Client Name :

Project Code :

9.00 0.35 0.17 9.22 58.46 67.85 - -

12.00 0.20 0.40 12.00 63.07 75.47 - -

16.50 0.00 0.00 0.19 65.20 65.40 - -

18.00+19.50 0.19 0.09 0.48 78.82 79.39 - -

Nandan Nagar Old Pineapple Garden

Liquid Limit (WL) (%)

E-327428.3320

Total Sand Content (%)

Silt (%) 0.075 - 0.002

(mm)

Non Plastic

Non Plastic

Non Plastic

Location :Complex

Location :

2 (HIG)

Bore hole No.

Sample Depth (m)

Coarse Sand (%)

4.75 - 2.00(mm)

IS - 2720 PART - 4

Grain size Analysis

Co-ordinate :

Medium Sand (%)

2.00 - 0.425 (mm)

Clay (%)< 0.002 (mm)

BPC Consultant INDIA (P) Ltd.

Concept Building, Prince Park514/A/1 Kalikapur Road

Kolkata - 700099www.bpcipl.com

N-2641408.9700

Consultancy Services for preparation of detailed project report (DPR) based on detailed topographical survey, collection of hydrological data, detailed geotechnical sub-soil investigation along with detailed price/cost estimate and other relevant allied works of the project- Proposed Township at Govt. Land (Old Pineapple Garden), Behind Fernando Rehabilitation, near Don Bosco School, Nandannagar, Agartala.

Executive Engineer - IV Urban Development Department, Tripura

F.4 (2)-UDD/EW(S-XXXVIII) /2055-61 Dated, Agartala, the 14/08/2019

Gravel (%)

> 4.75 (mm)

Fine Sand (%)0.425 - 0.075

(mm)

Coefficient of Curveture

(CC)

-

Plastic Limit (WP)

%

Bridge No. :

Uniformity Coefficient (CU)

Non Plastic

31.79*

24.33*

34.60*

20.42*

Plasticity Index (IP)(%)

4.752.000.0750.002 0.425 10.00 20.00

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

0.0010 0.0100 0.1000 1.0000 10.0000 100.0000

(%)

of

fin

er

Grain Size (mm)

GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION GRAPH

9.00 12.00 16.50 18.00+19.50

page:-61 of 102

Annexure C1

Annexure C1

Page 73: Geotech Report Nandannagar 2nd time · The present report the analysis of test results and recommendations regarding type of foundation, allowable bearing capacity. Also, for the

Project Name :

Client Name :

Project Code :

22.50 0.00 0.00 0.17 62.86 63.03 - -

25.50 0.00 0.00 0.76 72.08 72.84 - -

30.00 3.25 0.75 3.23 73.50 77.48 - -

- - - - - - - -

Non Plastic

Non Plastic

Non Plastic

-

Medium Sand (%)

2.00 - 0.425 (mm)

Clay (%)< 0.002 (mm)

Fine Sand (%)0.425 - 0.075

(mm)

Total Sand Content (%)

Silt (%) 0.075 - 0.002

(mm)

Uniformity Coefficient (CU)

-Bridge No. :

BPC Consultant INDIA (P) Ltd.

Concept Building, Prince Park514/A/1 Kalikapur Road

Kolkata - 700099www.bpcipl.com

Liquid Limit (WL) (%)

2 (HIG)

Bore hole No.

Sample Depth (m)

Gravel (%)

> 4.75 (mm)

Consultancy Services for preparation of detailed project report (DPR) based on detailed topographical survey, collection of hydrological data, detailed geotechnical sub-soil investigation along with detailed price/cost estimate and other relevant allied works of the project- Proposed Township at Govt. Land (Old Pineapple Garden), Behind Fernando Rehabilitation, near Don Bosco School, Nandannagar, Agartala.

Executive Engineer - IV Urban Development Department, Tripura

F.4 (2)-UDD/EW(S-XXXVIII) /2055-61 Dated, Agartala, the 14/08/2019

Location :Complex

Location :Co-ordinate

:

E-327428.3320

N-2641408.9700

Plastic Limit (WP)

%

Plasticity Index (IP)(%)

Coefficient of Curveture

(CC)

36.97*

27.16*

19.27*

-

Nandan Nagar Old Pineapple Garden

Coarse Sand (%)

4.75 - 2.00(mm)

IS - 2720 PART - 4

Grain size Analysis

4.752.000.0750.002 0.425 10.00 20.00

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

0.0010 0.0100 0.1000 1.0000 10.0000 100.0000

(%)

of

fin

er

Grain Size (mm)

GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION GRAPH

22.50 25.50 30.00

page:-62 of 102

Annexure C1

Annexure C1

Page 74: Geotech Report Nandannagar 2nd time · The present report the analysis of test results and recommendations regarding type of foundation, allowable bearing capacity. Also, for the

Project Name :

Client Name :

Project Code :

UU

38 mm

76 mm

Cell Pressure

(kg/cm2)Proving Ring Dial Reading

Load at Failure(kg)

Deviator

Stress (kg/cm2)

EffectiveNormal

Stress (kg/cm2)

Compression Gauge Reading

Strain at Failure

CohesionC

(kg/cm2)

Angle of Internal Friction

ф (Degree)

Bulk density (gm/cc) @

Triaxial Sample

Moisture Content

(%) @ Triaxial Sample

0.50 53.00 16.70 1.20 1.70 1400 0.184

1.00 57.00 17.96 1.27 2.27 1500 0.197

1.50 59.00 18.59 1.36 2.86 1300 0.171

2 (HIG)

Depth of Sample (m)

E‐327428.3320

N‐2641408.9700

Old Pineapple Garden

Least count of Gauge

1.900 18.240.54 3.39

Proving ring Constant

BPC Consultant INDIA (P) Ltd.

Concept Building, Prince Park

514/A/1 Kalikapur Road, Kolkata - 700099

www.bpcipl.com

0.01 mm/Div.

Consultancy Services for preparation of detailed project report (DPR) based on detailed topographical survey, collection of hydrological data, detailed geotechnical sub-soil investigation along with detailed price/cost estimate and other relevant allied works of the project- Proposed Township at Govt. Land (Old Pineapple Garden), Behind Fernando Rehabilitation, near Don Bosco School, Nandannagar, Agartala.

Executive Engineer - IV Urban Development Department, Tripura

Co-ordinate : Bridge No. :

TRIAXIAL COMPRESSION TEST (IS - 2720 PART - 11)

Bore hole No.:

TEST RESULT

Location : Nandan Nagar

F.4 (2)-UDD/EW(S-XXXVIII) /2055-61 Dated, Agartala, the 14/08/2019

Type of Test

Height of Specimen ( H )

Complex Location :

0.315 kg/Div.

-

2.00

Dia of Specimen ( D )

0.000

0.500

1.000

1.500

2.000

0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0

She

ar S

tres

s (K

g/sq

cm)

Normal Stress (Kg/sqcm)

page:-63 of 102

Annexure C1

Annexure C1

Page 75: Geotech Report Nandannagar 2nd time · The present report the analysis of test results and recommendations regarding type of foundation, allowable bearing capacity. Also, for the

Project Name :

Client Name :

Project Code :

UU

38 mm

76 mm

Cell Pressure

(kg/cm2)Proving Ring Dial Reading

Load at Failure(kg)

Deviator

Stress (kg/cm2)

EffectiveNormal

Stress (kg/cm2)

Compression Gauge Reading

Strain at Failure

CohesionC

(kg/cm2)

Angle of Internal Friction

ф (Degree)

Bulk density (gm/cc) @

Triaxial Sample

Moisture Content

(%) @ Triaxial Sample

0.50 68.0 21.42 1.52 2.02 1500 0.197

1.00 70.5 22.21 -1.65 -0.65 14000 1.842

1.50 74.0 23.31 1.68 3.18 1400 0.184

Consultancy Services for preparation of detailed project report (DPR) based on detailed topographical survey, collection of hydrological data, detailed geotechnical sub-soil investigation along with detailed price/cost estimate and other relevant allied works of the project- Proposed Township at Govt. Land (Old Pineapple Garden), Behind Fernando Rehabilitation, near Don Bosco School, Nandannagar, Agartala.

BPC Consultant INDIA (P) Ltd.

Concept Building, Prince Park

514/A/1 Kalikapur Road, Kolkata - 700099

www.bpcipl.com

Executive Engineer - IV Urban Development Department, Tripura

F.4 (2)-UDD/EW(S-XXXVIII) /2055-61 Dated, Agartala, the 14/08/2019

TRIAXIAL COMPRESSION TEST (IS - 2720 PART - 11)

Bore hole No.:Co-ordinate : 2 (HIG)N‐2641408.9700

0.01 mm/Div. Dia of Specimen ( D )TEST RESULT

-

0.315 kg/Div.

E‐327428.3320Bridge No. :Nandan Nagar

Least count of Gauge

Old Pineapple Garden

Complex Location :

7.50

Location :

0.67 4.19 1.93 15.43

Depth of Sample (m) Type of Test

Height of Specimen ( H )Proving ring Constant

0.000

0.500

1.000

1.500

2.000

0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5

She

ar S

tres

s (K

g/sq

cm)

Normal Stress (Kg/sqcm)

page:-64 of 102

Annexure C1

Annexure C1

Page 76: Geotech Report Nandannagar 2nd time · The present report the analysis of test results and recommendations regarding type of foundation, allowable bearing capacity. Also, for the

Project Name :

Client Name :

Project Code :

60 mm

60 mm

24 mm

Normal Stress

(kg/cm2)Proving Ring Dial Reading

Load at failure(kg)

Shear

Stress (kg/cm2)Compression

Gauge ReadingCorrected

Area (cm2)N

Value

Cohesion C

(kg/cm2)

Angle of Friction ф

(Degree)

Bulk Density gm/cc @ Direct shear sample

Moisture Content

(%) @ Direct shear sample

0.50 35.0 12.15 0.38 700 31.80 -

1.00 61.5 21.34 0.68 800 31.20 - 0.10 30

1.50 88.0 30.54 0.96 700 31.80 -

1.92** 16.75

Height of Specimen ( H )

BPC Consultant INDIA (P) Ltd.

Concept Building, Prince Park514/A/1 Kalikapur Road, Kolkata - 700099

www.bpcipl.com

Bore hole No.:Co-ordinate :

Length of Specimen ( L )

Width of Specimen ( W )

2 (HIG)

Consultancy Services for preparation of detailed project report (DPR) based on detailed topographical survey, collection of hydrological data, detailed geotechnical sub-soil investigation along with detailed price/cost estimate and other relevant allied works of the project- Proposed Township at Govt. Land (Old Pineapple Garden), Behind Fernando Rehabilitation, near Don Bosco School, Nandannagar, Agartala.

Executive Engineer - IV Urban Development Department, Tripura

F.4 (2)-UDD/EW(S-XXXVIII) /2055-61 Dated, Agartala, the 14/08/2019

Least Count of Gauge 0.01 mm/Div.

DIRECT SHEAR TEST (IS - 2720 PART - 13)

Location :Nandan Nagar N‐2641408.9700

-

Proving ring Constant 0.347 kg/Div.

TEST RESULT

Depth of Sample (m) 18.00+19.50

Complex Location :

Old Pineapple Garden

E‐327428.3320Bridge No. :

y = 0.578x + 0.097

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

1.00

1.20

0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.90 1.00 1.10 1.20 1.30 1.40 1.50 1.60

She

ar S

tres

s (k

g/cm

2)

Normal Stress (kg/cm2)

DIRECT SHEAR TEST GRAPH

page:-65 of 102

Annexure C1

Annexure C1

Page 77: Geotech Report Nandannagar 2nd time · The present report the analysis of test results and recommendations regarding type of foundation, allowable bearing capacity. Also, for the

Project Name :

Client Name :

Project Code :

Applied Pressure

(Kg/cm2)

Final Dial Gauge Reading

ChangedDial Reading

(cm)

Total Ht.Changed for Dial Reading

(cm)

VoidHeight (cm)

Voidratio

Changed in

Void ratio

Coefficient of Com -

pressibility. (av)

Coefficient of Volume Com -

pressibility. (mv)

Compression Index. (CC)

0.00 2064 2.00 0.854 0.745

0.10 2043 -0.0042 1.996 0.850 0.741 0.004 0.037 0.021

0.25 2005 -0.0076 1.988 0.842 0.735 0.007 0.044 0.025 0.017

0.50 1953 -0.0104 1.978 0.832 0.726 0.009 0.036 0.021 0.030

1.00 1874 -0.0158 1.962 0.816 0.712 0.014 0.028 0.016 0.046

2.00 1751 -0.0246 1.937 0.791 0.690 0.021 0.021 0.013 0.071

4.00 1561 -0.0380 1.899 0.753 0.657 0.033 0.017 0.010 0.110

8.00 1326 -0.0470 1.852 0.706 0.616 0.041 0.010 0.006 0.136

4.00 1362 0.0072 1.860 0.713 0.622 -0.006 0.002 0.001 0.021

0.25 1502 0.0280 1.888 0.741 0.647 -0.024 0.007 0.004 0.020

FIXED TYPE

6

2

CONSOLIDATION TEST (IS : 2720 PART - 15)

Depth of Sample ( m ) 2.00

Condition of Test :-

Wt. of Dry Sample ( Wd ) gm :- 84.54

Consultancy Services for preparation of detailed project report (DPR) based on detailed topographical survey, collection of hydrological data, detailed geotechnical sub-soil investigation along with detailed price/cost estimate and other relevant allied works of the project- Proposed Township at Govt. Land (Old Pineapple Garden), Behind Fernando Rehabilitation, near Don Bosco School, Nandannagar, Agartala.

BPC Consultant INDIA (P) Ltd.

Concept Building, Prince Park514/A/1 Kalikapur Road

Kolkata - 700099www.bpcipl.com

Executive Engineer - IV Urban Development Department, Tripura

F.4 (2)-UDD/EW(S-XXXVIII) /2055-61 Dated, Agartala, the 14/08/2019

1.15Solid Height of Sample ( Hs ) cm :-2.61

Location :Complex

Location :

Specific Gravity of Soil ( G ) :-

Dia of Specimen ( D ) cm :-

Height of Specimen ( H ) cm :-

-E-327428.3320

N-2641408.9700

Old Pineapple Garden

Least Count of Gauge

Co-ordinate:

Bridge No.:

2 (HIG)Bore hole No. :

Moisture Content (%) @ Consolidation Sample 18.81

Nandan Nagar

0.002 mm/Div.

0.600

0.620

0.640

0.660

0.680

0.700

0.720

0.740

0.760

0.10 1.00 10.00

Vo

id r

atio

Pressure Range (kg/cm2)

e-log p CurveCompression Index (Cc ) ‐ 0.136

page:-66 of 102Annexure C1

Page 78: Geotech Report Nandannagar 2nd time · The present report the analysis of test results and recommendations regarding type of foundation, allowable bearing capacity. Also, for the

Project Name :

Client Name :

Project Code :

Applied Pressure

(Kg/cm2)

Final Dial Gauge Reading

ChangedDial

Reading (cm)

Total Ht.Changed for Dial

Reading (cm)

VoidHeight

(cm)

Voidratio

Changed in

Void ratio

Coefficient of Com -

pressibility. (av)

Coefficient of Volume

Com -pressibility.

(mv)

Compression Index. (CC)

0.00 1958 2.00 0.786 0.648

0.10 1941 -0.0034 1.997 0.783 0.645 0.003 0.028 0.017

0.25 1914 -0.0054 1.991 0.777 0.640 0.004 0.030 0.018 0.011

0.50 1876 -0.0076 1.984 0.770 0.634 0.006 0.025 0.015 0.021

1.00 1807 -0.0138 1.970 0.756 0.623 0.011 0.023 0.014 0.038

2.00 1696 -0.0222 1.948 0.734 0.604 0.018 0.018 0.011 0.061

4.00 1524 -0.0344 1.913 0.699 0.576 0.028 0.014 0.009 0.094

8.00 1298 -0.0452 1.868 0.654 0.539 0.037 0.009 0.006 0.124

4.00 1317 0.0038 1.872 0.658 0.542 -0.003 0.001 0.001 0.010

0.25 1428 0.0222 1.894 0.680 0.560 -0.018 0.005 0.003 0.015

Consultancy Services for preparation of detailed project report (DPR) based on detailed topographical survey, collection of hydrological data, detailed geotechnical sub-soil investigation along with detailed price/cost estimate and other relevant allied works of the project- Proposed Township at Govt. Land (Old Pineapple Garden), Behind Fernando Rehabilitation, near Don Bosco School, Nandannagar, Agartala.

BPC Consultant INDIA (P) Ltd.

Concept Building, Prince Park514/A/1 Kalikapur Road

Kolkata - 700099www.bpcipl.com

Executive Engineer - IV Urban Development Department, Tripura

F.4 (2)-UDD/EW(S-XXXVIII) /2055-61 Dated, Agartala, the 14/08/2019

CONSOLIDATION TEST (IS : 2720 PART - 15)

Location : Nandan NagarComplex Location :

Old Pineapple Garden

Co-ordinate:

E-327428.3320

N-2641408.9700Bridge No.: -

Bore hole No. : 2 (HIG) Condition of Test :- FIXED TYPE

Depth of Sample ( m ) 7.50 Least Count of Gauge 0.002 mm/Div.

Moisture Content (%) @ Consolidation Sample 15.43 Dia of Specimen ( D ) cm :- 6

Wt. of Dry Sample ( Wd ) gm :- 90.56 Height of Specimen ( H ) cm :- 2

Specific Gravity of Soil ( G ) :- 2.64 Solid Height of Sample ( Hs ) cm :- 1.21

0.520

0.540

0.560

0.580

0.600

0.620

0.640

0.660

0.10 1.00 10.00

Vo

id r

atio

Pressure Range (kg/cm2)

e-log p CurveCompression Index (Cc ) ‐ 0.124

page:-67 of 102

Annexure C1

Page 79: Geotech Report Nandannagar 2nd time · The present report the analysis of test results and recommendations regarding type of foundation, allowable bearing capacity. Also, for the

Bore hole No.

SampleNo.

Depth (m)WL

(%)

WP

(%)

IP

(%)

UDS_1 2.00 40 23 17

S/D_3 6.00 54 28 26

UDS_3 7.50 36 20 16

- - - - - -

- - - - - -

- - - - - -

- - - - - -

- - - - - -

- - - - - -

X Y

20 0

100 58

0 4

25.48 4

0 7

29.59 7

35 0

35 25

50 0

50 37

Project Name :

Consultancy Services for preparation of detailed project report (DPR) based on detailed topographical survey, collection of hydrological data, detailed geotechnical sub-soil investigation along with detailed price/cost estimate and other relevant allied works of the project- Proposed Township at Govt. Land (Old Pineapple Garden), Behind Fernando Rehabilitation, near Don Bosco School, Nandannagar, Agartala.

Client Name   :

Project Code :

E-327428.3320

SOIL CLASSIFICATION (IS - 1498)

Nandan Nagar

Complex Location :

Old Pineapple

Garden

Co-ordinate: N-2641408.9700

-

Executive Engineer - IV Urban Development Department, Tripura

F.4 (2)-UDD/EW(S-XXXVIII) /2055-61 Dated, Agartala, the 14/08/2019

CI

Location : Bridge No.:

-

Soil Classification

CHBH-2 (HIG)

BPC Consultant INDIA (P) Ltd.

Concept Building, Prince Park514/A/1 Kalikapur Road

Kolkata - 700099

www.bpcipl.com

WL : Liquid limit WP : Plastic Limit Ip : Plasticity Index Np : Non Plastic NA : Not Applicable

-

-

-

-

^^ : Soil Classification in this case is based on average layer properties.

-

CI

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

Pla

sti

cit

y In

de

x I

p (%

)

Liquid Limit WL (%)

PLASTICITY CHART

2.00 6.00 7.50

35= LW

50= L W

A - LINE

)20-LW(0.73= PI

CI

CH

MH / OH

MI / OICL- ML

ML / OLML

CL

page:-68 of 102

Annexure C1

Annexure C1

Page 80: Geotech Report Nandannagar 2nd time · The present report the analysis of test results and recommendations regarding type of foundation, allowable bearing capacity. Also, for the

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

B3

Bore Log & Lab. Test Results Nandannagar

BH-3 (LIG)

Annexure C1

Annexure C1

Page 81: Geotech Report Nandannagar 2nd time · The present report the analysis of test results and recommendations regarding type of foundation, allowable bearing capacity. Also, for the

Project Name :

Client Name :

Project Code :

Job Code:

Complex Location

Borehole No.

Ground Elevation (G.L.)

Method of Boring 15.23

Diameter of Hole 30.45

From

To

From

To

Type

15

cm

30

cm

45

cm N

Value

Co

rre

cte

d N

"

DS_1 - - - - - - - - -

DS_2 - - - - - - - - -

29.772

29.322S/D_1 1.50 - 1.95 3 7 7 14 - - - - -

28.772

28.322UDS_1 2.50 - 2.95 - - - - - - - - -

28.272

27.822S/D_2 3.00 - 3.45 7 10 16 26 - - - - -

26.772

26.322UDS_2 4.50 - 4.95 - - - - - - - - -

25.272

24.822S/D_3 6.00 - 6.45 6 9 14 23 - - - - -

23.772

23.322UDS_3 7.50 - 7.95 - - - - - - - - -

22.272

21.822

S/D_4 9.00 - 9.45 4 6 6 12 - - - - -

20.772

20.322

UDS_4 10.50 - 10.95 - - - - - - - - -

19.272

18.822S/D_5 12.00 - 12.45 10 16 20 36 21 - - - -

17.772

17.322S/D_6 13.50 - 13.95 11 17 22 39 21 - - - -

16.272

15.822S/D_7 15.00 - 15.45 7 15 25 40 21 - - - -

W_1 - - - - - - - - -

14.772

14.322S/D_8 16.50 - 16.95 15 19 22 41 21 - - - -

13.272

12.822S/D_9 18.00 - 18.45 14 20 24 44 21 - - - -

11.772

11.322S/D_10 19.50 - 19.95 9 19 23 42 20 - - - -

10.272

9.822S/D_11 21.00 - 21.45 6 17 22 39 19 - - - -

8.772

8.322S/D_12 22.50 - 22.95 10 25 35 60 25 - - - -

7.272

6.822S/D_13 24.00 - 24.45 26 50 65 115 40 - - - -

5.772

5.322S/D_14 25.50 - 25.95 25 45 55 100 35 - - - -

4.272

3.822S/D_15 27.00 - 27.45 28 51 63 114 39 - - - -

2.772

2.322S/D_16 28.50 - 28.95 24 45 55 100 34 - - - -

1.272

0.822S/D_17 30.00 - 30.45 27 48 50 98 33 - - - -

BGL : AGL :

20.272

23.272Medium dense, yellowish brown, clayey silty sand /silty fine grained with littlepercentage of clay binder.(SC)8.00m to 11.00m

0.822

8.772

Very dense, Yellowish grey/ brownish grey, silty fine grained sand with traces ofclay binders. (SM)22.50m to 30.45m

20.272

Dense, yellowish brown /brownish, silty fine grainedsand with traces of claybinders & mica. (SM)11.00m to 22.50m

8.772

28.272

31.272

Stiff, Greyish brown /brownish, clayey silt with some sand mixture & tracesof gravels. (CI)0.00m to 3.00m

23.272

28.272

Very stiff, yellowish grey /browish grey, clayey siltwith some sand mixture,traces of kankars and mica.(CI)3.00m to 8.00m

Above ground Level R : RunB : Blows Re : Refusal TCR : Total Core Recovery RQD : Rock Quality Designation Below ground Level

UDS* : UDS Could not been Collected (Slipped) S/D : Standard Penetration Test with disturbed sample collected, S : Standard Penetration Test but sample not recovered

P0196 Location Nandannagar Co-ordinate :

17

4

Bridge No -

Consultancy Services for preparation of detailed project report (DPR) based on detailed topographical survey, collection of hydrological data, detailed geotechnical sub-soil investigation along with detailed price/cost estimate and other relevant allied works of the project- Proposed Township at Govt. Land (Old Pineapple Garden), Behind Fernando Rehabilitation, near Don Bosco School, Nandannagar, Agartala.

BPC Consultant INDIA (P) Ltd.

Concept Building, Prince Park

514/A/1 Kalikapur Road, Kolkata - 700099.

www.bpcipl.com

Executive Engineer - IV Urban Development Department, Tripura

F.4 (2)-UDD/EW(S-XXXVIII) /2055-61 Dated, Agartala, the 14/08/2019

BORE LOG & CORE LOG DATA SHEET

3 (LIG) Commencement Date 06.09.19 No. of SP Test ( S )

Old Pineapple Garden No. of Core Sample ( C ) 0

E-327385.6860 N-2641424.9120

31.272M Completion Date 07.09.19 No. of Undisturbed Sample ( U )

Standing Water Level M BGL No. of Disturbed Sample ( DS )

150 mm Termination Depth M BGL No.of Water Sample ( W )

Sample / EventStandard Penetration Test

IS-2131

Depth (m)

19 (D-2 & S-17)

1

Description of Soil Stratum & Rock Methology

Stratum Elevation as per R.L

(m)HatchingPattern

Elevation as per R.L

(m)

Wash Boring

-

Total Core

Length(cm)

TCR(%)

RQD(%)

Co

lou

rs o

f re

turn

Wa

ter

Wa

ter

Lo

ss

Remarks

Bro

wn

ish

-

-

-

30.772 0.50 -

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

1.00

16.042 15.23

-

-

-

-

30.272

page:-69 of 102

A

Annexure C1

Page 82: Geotech Report Nandannagar 2nd time · The present report the analysis of test results and recommendations regarding type of foundation, allowable bearing capacity. Also, for the

Wa

ter

Co

nte

nt

(%)

(W)

@ S

am

ple

Wa

ter

Co

nte

nt

(%)

(W)

@ S

tre

ng

th

Sa

mp

le

Wa

ter

Co

nte

ntt

(%

) (W

) @

C

on

solid

atio

n S

am

ple

Ave

rag

e W

ate

r C

on

ten

t (%

) (W

)

Bu

lk D

en

sity

(g

m/c

c) b

)

@ a

vera

ge

str

en

gth

Sa

mp

le

Dry

De

nsi

ty (

gm

/cc) d

)

@ a

s p

er

ave

rag

e w

ate

r C

on

ten

t

Gra

vel (

%)

(G)

Sa

nd

(%

) (S

)

Silt

(%

) (M

)

Cla

y (%

) (C

)

Liq

uid

Lim

it (%

) (W

L)

Pla

stic

Lim

it (

%)

(WP

)

Pla

stic

ity I

nd

ex

(%

) (I

P)

Sh

rinka

ge

Lim

it (

%)

(W

s /

Wsu

)

Co

mp

ress

ive

Str

ess

(kg

/cm

2 ) (q

u)

Typ

e o

f T

est

Co

he

sio

n (

kg/c

m2 )

(C)

An

gle

of

Fric

tion

)

Va

ne

Sh

ea

r S

tre

ng

th (

kg/c

m2 )

(S)

Initi

al V

oid

Ra

tio (

eo)

Co

mp

ress

ion

In

de

x (

CC)

06

.09

.19

DS

_1

0.5

0

30

.77

- - CI 16.49 - - 16.49 - - 2.62 - - - - 44 20 24 - - - - - - - - - - -

06

.09

.19

UD

S_

1

2.5

0

28

.77

- - CI 13.89 13.10 14.01 13.67 1.98 1.74 2.59 1 42 36 21 41 21 20 - - - - - UU 0.76 5 - 0.608 0.045

06

.09

.19

UD

S_

2

4.5

0

26

.77

- - CI 15.27 14.89 14.43 14.86 2.00 1.74 2.61 2 40 40 18 43 22 21 - - - - - UU 0.87 3 - 0.577 0.042

06

.09

.19

UD

S_

3

7.5

0

23

.77

- - CI 16.90 16.45 - 16.68 1.99 1.71 2.68 0 48 37 15 38 18 20 - - - - - UU 0.82 4 - - -

06

.09

.19

UD

S_

4

10

.50

20

.77

- - SC 22.92 21.25 - 22.09 1.90 1.56 2.66 1 62 27 10 30 21 9 - - - - - DS 0.11 28 - - -

06

.09

.19

S/D

_5

12

.00

19

.27

36

21 SM 19.26 - - 19.26 - - 2.69 0 70 - - - - - - - - - - -

06

.09

.19

S/D

_8

16

.50

14

.77

41

21

06

.09

.19

S/D

_9

18

.00

13

.27

44

21

06

.09

.19

S/D

_1

1

21

.00

10

.27

39

19 SM 21.73 - - 21.73 - - 2.67 0 72 - - - - - - - - - - -Non Plastic

Greyish brown, clayey silt withsome sand mixture & traces ofgravels.

Brownish, clayey silt with somesand mixture & traces ofgravels.

Yellowish grey, clayey silt withsome sand mixture, traces ofkankars and mica.

Browish grey, clayey silt withsome sand mixture, traces ofkankars and mica.

300 0.08 --20.89 - 67

Consistency LimitIS - 2720 Part - 5 / 6

- - - - -

Non Plastic

Non Plastic

Sw

elli

ng

Pre

suu

re (

kg/c

m2 )

IS -

27

20

Pa

rt-

41

Strength ParameterIS - 2720 Part - 10 / 11 / 12 / 13 / 30

31.2723 (LIG)N-2641424.9120

E-327385.6860 Standing Water Level:

15.23 M BGL

Pe

rme

ab

ility

Te

st

(KT)

IS -

27

20

Pa

rt-

17

30*

33*

Bridge No.: - Co-ordinate:

Natural Water Content (%) IS - 2720 Part - 2

SM - DS#

28*

Client Name :

Project Code :

Laboratory Soil Tests Result Sheet

Consultancy Services for preparation of detailed project report (DPR) based on detailed topographical survey, collection of hydrological data, detailed geotechnical sub-soil investigation along with detailed price/cost estimate and other relevant allied works of the project- Proposed Township at Govt. Land (Old Pineapple Garden), Behind Fernando Rehabilitation, near Don Bosco School, Nandannagar, Agartala.

1.58 2.7021.16 1.91**

So

il C

lass

ifica

tion

IS

- 1

49

8

Fre

e S

we

ll In

de

x (%

) IS

- 2

72

0 P

art

- 4

0

Grain Size AnalysisIS - 2720 Part - 4

Sp

. G

ravi

ty (

G)

IS -

27

20

Pa

rt -

3 (

Se

c-1

/2)Natural Density

21.42

Sa

mp

le N

o.

Co

rre

cte

d N

" V

alu

e

IS -

21

31

Ob

serv

ed

N V

alu

e

IS -

21

31

Executive Engineer - IV Urban Development Department, Tripura

F.4 (2)-UDD/EW(S-XXXVIII) /2055-61 Dated, Agartala, the 14/08/2019

BPC Consultant INDIA (P) Ltd.

Concept Building, Prince Park514/A/1 Kalikapur Road

Kolkata - 700099

www.bpcipl.com

Ground Level (GL) m:

Bore hole No.:

ConsolidationIS - 2720 Part - 15

Project Name :

Ha

tch

ing

Pa

tte

rn

Location: Nandannagar Complex Location: Old Pineapple Garden

Da

te o

f S

am

plin

g

Sa

mp

le D

ep

th (

m)

Sa

mp

le E

leva

tion

(m

)

Type of Soil Sample

Yellowish brown, clayey siltysand / silty fine grained withlittle percentage of clay binder.

Dense, yellowish brown /brownish, silty fine grainedsand with traces of clay binders& mica.

page:-70 of 102

Annexure C1

Annexure C1

Page 83: Geotech Report Nandannagar 2nd time · The present report the analysis of test results and recommendations regarding type of foundation, allowable bearing capacity. Also, for the

Wa

ter

Co

nte

nt

(%)

(W)

@ S

am

ple

Wa

ter

Co

nte

nt

(%)

(W)

@ S

tre

ng

th

Sa

mp

le

Wa

ter

Co

nte

ntt

(%

) (W

) @

C

on

solid

atio

n S

am

ple

Ave

rag

e W

ate

r C

on

ten

t (%

) (W

)

Bu

lk D

en

sity

(g

m/c

c) b

)

@ a

vera

ge

str

en

gth

Sa

mp

le

Dry

De

nsi

ty (

gm

/cc) d

)

@ a

s p

er

ave

rag

e w

ate

r C

on

ten

t

Gra

vel (

%)

(G)

Sa

nd

(%

) (S

)

Silt

(%

) (M

)

Cla

y (%

) (C

)

Liq

uid

Lim

it (%

) (W

L)

Pla

stic

Lim

it (

%)

(WP

)

Pla

stic

ity I

nd

ex

(%

) (I

P)

Sh

rinka

ge

Lim

it (

%)

(W

s /

Wsu

)

Co

mp

ress

ive

Str

ess

(kg

/cm

2 ) (q

u)

Typ

e o

f T

est

Co

he

sio

n (

kg/c

m2 )

(C)

An

gle

of

Fric

tion

)

Va

ne

Sh

ea

r S

tre

ng

th (

kg/c

m2 )

(S)

Initi

al V

oid

Ra

tio (

eo)

Co

mp

ress

ion

In

de

x (

CC)

Consistency LimitIS - 2720 Part - 5 / 6

Sw

elli

ng

Pre

suu

re (

kg/c

m2 )

IS -

27

20

Pa

rt-

41

Strength ParameterIS - 2720 Part - 10 / 11 / 12 / 13 / 30

31.2723 (LIG)N-2641424.9120

E-327385.6860 Standing Water Level:

15.23 M BGL

Pe

rme

ab

ility

Te

st

(KT)

IS -

27

20

Pa

rt-

17

Bridge No.: - Co-ordinate:

Natural Water Content (%) IS - 2720 Part - 2

Client Name :

Project Code :

Laboratory Soil Tests Result Sheet

Consultancy Services for preparation of detailed project report (DPR) based on detailed topographical survey, collection of hydrological data, detailed geotechnical sub-soil investigation along with detailed price/cost estimate and other relevant allied works of the project- Proposed Township at Govt. Land (Old Pineapple Garden), Behind Fernando Rehabilitation, near Don Bosco School, Nandannagar, Agartala.

So

il C

lass

ifica

tion

IS

- 1

49

8

Fre

e S

we

ll In

de

x (%

) IS

- 2

72

0 P

art

- 4

0

Grain Size AnalysisIS - 2720 Part - 4

Sp

. G

ravi

ty (

G)

IS -

27

20

Pa

rt -

3 (

Se

c-1

/2)Natural Density

Sa

mp

le N

o.

Co

rre

cte

d N

" V

alu

e

IS -

21

31

Ob

serv

ed

N V

alu

e

IS -

21

31

Executive Engineer - IV Urban Development Department, Tripura

F.4 (2)-UDD/EW(S-XXXVIII) /2055-61 Dated, Agartala, the 14/08/2019

BPC Consultant INDIA (P) Ltd.

Concept Building, Prince Park514/A/1 Kalikapur Road

Kolkata - 700099

www.bpcipl.com

Ground Level (GL) m:

Bore hole No.:

ConsolidationIS - 2720 Part - 15

Project Name :

Ha

tch

ing

Pa

tte

rn

Location: Nandannagar Complex Location: Old Pineapple Garden

Da

te o

f S

am

plin

g

Sa

mp

le D

ep

th (

m)

Sa

mp

le E

leva

tion

(m

)

Type of Soil Sample

07

.09

.19

S/D

_1

3

24

.00

7.2

7

11

5

40 SM 20.59 - - 20.59 - - 2.66 0 74 - - - - - - - - - - -

07

.09

.19

S/D

_1

6

28

.50

2.7

7

10

0

34

07

.09

.19

S/D

_1

7

30

.00

1.2

7

98

33

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

^^ : * : NA : DS : # : ** : Np :

D : U : S : CU : CD : UU : BGL : AGL :

1.93** - - -- - DS# 0.05780 32

Non Plastic

-

26*

22*18.77 - 19.06 1.60 2.7119.35SM - -Non Plastic

Non Plastic

Above Ground Level

Remolded Sample

Consolidated Undrained Consolidated Drained

Not ApplicableNot applied for Hydrometer Test

Below Ground LevelUnconsolidated Undrained

Direct Shear TestSoil Classification in this case is based on average layer properties.

Distureb Sample Undistureb Sample SPT Sample

Assumed

-

-

-

-

Very dense, Yellowish grey /brownish grey, silty fine grainedsand with traces of claybinders.

page:-71 of 102

Annexure C1

Annexure C1

Page 84: Geotech Report Nandannagar 2nd time · The present report the analysis of test results and recommendations regarding type of foundation, allowable bearing capacity. Also, for the

3 (LIG)

N value vs Depth Curve

Co-ordinate :

E-327385.6860

N-2641424.9120

Bridge No.:

-Bore hole

No. :Complex Location :

Pineapple Ga

BPC Consultant INDIA (P) Ltd.

Concept Building, Prince Park514/A/1 Kalikapur Road

Kolkata - 700099

www.bpcipl.com

Consultancy Services for preparation of detailed project report (DPR) based on detailed topographical survey, collection of hydrological data, detailed geotechnical sub-soil investigation along with detailed price/cost estimate and other relevant allied works of the project- Proposed Township at Govt. Land (Old Pineapple Garden), Behind Fernando Rehabilitation, near Don Bosco School, Nandannagar, Agartala.

Executive Engineer - IV Urban Development Department, Tripura

F.4 (2)-UDD/EW(S-XXXVIII) /2055-61 Dated, Agartala, the 14/08/2019

Project Name :

Client Name :

Project Code :

Location : Nandannagar

0.00

5.00

10.00

15.00

20.00

25.00

30.00

35.00

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100 105 110 115 120

Dep

th (

m)

N Value

Observed N value BH-3 (LIG) Corrected N value BH-3 (LIG)

page:-72 of 102

Annexure C1

Annexure C1

Page 85: Geotech Report Nandannagar 2nd time · The present report the analysis of test results and recommendations regarding type of foundation, allowable bearing capacity. Also, for the

Project Name :

Client Name :

Project Code :

2.50 0.76 0.03 0.89 40.72 41.64 36.60 21.00 41 21 20 - -

4.50 2.22 1.31 4.48 34.48 40.27 39.91 17.60 43 22 21 - -

7.50 0.00 0.20 1.21 46.71 48.12 37.28 14.60 38 18 20 - -

10.50 0.64 0.19 8.92 53.36 62.47 27.29 9.60 30 21 9 - -

Location :Complex

Location :

Medium Sand (%)

2.00 - 0.425 (mm)

Clay (%)< 0.002 (mm)

Nandannagar

3 (LIG)

Bore hole No.

Sample Depth (m)

Gravel (%)

> 4.75 (mm)

E-327385.6860

N-2641424.9120

BPC Consultant INDIA (P) Ltd.

Concept Building, Prince Park514/A/1 Kalikapur Road

Kolkata - 700099www.bpcipl.com

Consultancy Services for preparation of detailed project report (DPR) based on detailed topographical survey, collection of hydrological data, detailed geotechnical sub-soil investigation along with detailed price/cost estimate and other relevant allied works of the project- Proposed Township at Govt. Land (Old Pineapple Garden), Behind Fernando Rehabilitation, near Don Bosco School, Nandannagar, Agartala.

Liquid Limit (WL) (%)

Bridge No. :

IS - 2720 PART - 4

Grain size Analysis

Plastic Limit (WP)

%

Coefficient of Curveture

(CC)

Uniformity Coefficient (CU)

Executive Engineer - IV Urban Development Department, Tripura

F.4 (2)-UDD/EW(S-XXXVIII) /2055-61 Dated, Agartala, the 14/08/2019

Coarse Sand (%)

4.75 - 2.00(mm)

Old Pineapple GardenCo-ordinate

:

Fine Sand (%)0.425 - 0.075

(mm)

Total Sand Content (%)

Silt (%) 0.075 - 0.002

(mm)

Plasticity Index (IP)(%)

-

4.752.000.0750.002 0.425 10.00 20.00

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

0.0010 0.0100 0.1000 1.0000 10.0000 100.0000

(%)

of

fin

er

Grain Size (mm)

GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION GRAPH

2.50 4.50 7.50 10.50

page:-73 of 102

Annexure C1

Annexure C1

Page 86: Geotech Report Nandannagar 2nd time · The present report the analysis of test results and recommendations regarding type of foundation, allowable bearing capacity. Also, for the

Project Name :

Client Name :

Project Code :

12.00 0.00 0.00 2.98 66.75 69.73 - -

16.50+18.00 0.00 0.00 0.10 67.29 67.39 - -

21.00 0.00 0.00 5.81 66.67 72.48 - -

24.00 0.00 0.00 10.20 63.69 73.89 - -

Bridge No. :

Uniformity Coefficient (CU)

Plasticity Index (IP)(%)

26.11*

Non Plastic

Non Plastic

Non Plastic

Non Plastic

Plastic Limit (WP)

%

-

Executive Engineer - IV Urban Development Department, Tripura

F.4 (2)-UDD/EW(S-XXXVIII) /2055-61 Dated, Agartala, the 14/08/2019

N-2641424.9120

Coarse Sand (%)

4.75 - 2.00(mm)

IS - 2720 PART - 4

Grain size Analysis

Co-ordinate :

Medium Sand (%)

2.00 - 0.425 (mm)

Clay (%)< 0.002 (mm)

BPC Consultant INDIA (P) Ltd.

Concept Building, Prince Park514/A/1 Kalikapur Road

Kolkata - 700099www.bpcipl.com

Coefficient of Curveture

(CC)

Consultancy Services for preparation of detailed project report (DPR) based on detailed topographical survey, collection of hydrological data, detailed geotechnical sub-soil investigation along with detailed price/cost estimate and other relevant allied works of the project- Proposed Township at Govt. Land (Old Pineapple Garden), Behind Fernando Rehabilitation, near Don Bosco School, Nandannagar, Agartala.

Location :Complex

Location :

3 (LIG)

Bore hole No.

Sample Depth (m)

Gravel (%)

> 4.75 (mm)

Fine Sand (%)0.425 - 0.075

(mm)

Nandannagar Old Pineapple Garden

Liquid Limit (WL) (%)

E-327385.6860

Total Sand Content (%)

Silt (%) 0.075 - 0.002

(mm)

30.27*

32.61*

27.52*

4.752.000.0750.002 0.425 10.00 20.00

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

0.0010 0.0100 0.1000 1.0000 10.0000 100.0000

(%)

of

fin

er

Grain Size (mm)

GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION GRAPH

12.00 16.50+18.00 21.00 24.00

page:-74 of 102

Annexure C1

Annexure C1

Page 87: Geotech Report Nandannagar 2nd time · The present report the analysis of test results and recommendations regarding type of foundation, allowable bearing capacity. Also, for the

Project Name :

Client Name :

Project Code :

9.00 0.00 0.00 10.20 67.46 77.66 - -

- - - - - - - - - - - - -

- - - - - - - - - - - - -

- - - - - - - - - - - - -

22.34* Non Plastic

Nandannagar Old Pineapple Garden

Liquid Limit (WL) (%)

Coarse Sand (%)

4.75 - 2.00(mm)

IS - 2720 PART - 4

Grain size Analysis

Co-ordinate :

Bore hole No.

Sample Depth (m)

Gravel (%)

> 4.75 (mm)

-

Plastic Limit (WP)

%

Bridge No. :

Plasticity Index (IP)(%)

Uniformity Coefficient (CU)

BPC Consultant INDIA (P) Ltd.

Concept Building, Prince Park514/A/1 Kalikapur Road

Kolkata - 700099www.bpcipl.com

E-327385.6860

N-2641424.9120

Consultancy Services for preparation of detailed project report (DPR) based on detailed topographical survey, collection of hydrological data, detailed geotechnical sub-soil investigation along with detailed price/cost estimate and other relevant allied works of the project- Proposed Township at Govt. Land (Old Pineapple Garden), Behind Fernando Rehabilitation, near Don Bosco School, Nandannagar, Agartala.

Executive Engineer - IV Urban Development Department, Tripura

F.4 (2)-UDD/EW(S-XXXVIII) /2055-61 Dated, Agartala, the 14/08/2019

Location :Complex

Location :

3 (LIG)

Medium Sand (%)

2.00 - 0.425 (mm)

Clay (%)< 0.002 (mm)

Fine Sand (%)0.425 - 0.075

(mm)

Total Sand Content (%)

Silt (%) 0.075 - 0.002

(mm)

Coefficient of Curveture

(CC)

4.752.000.0750.002 0.425 10.00 20.00

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

0.0010 0.0100 0.1000 1.0000 10.0000 100.0000

(%)

of

fin

er

Grain Size (mm)

GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION GRAPH

9.00

page:-75 of 102

Annexure C1

Annexure C1

Page 88: Geotech Report Nandannagar 2nd time · The present report the analysis of test results and recommendations regarding type of foundation, allowable bearing capacity. Also, for the

Project Name :

Client Name :

Project Code :

UU

38 mm

76 mm

Cell Pressure

(kg/cm2)Proving Ring Dial Reading

Load at Failure(kg)

Deviator

Stress (kg/cm2)

EffectiveNormal

Stress (kg/cm2)

Compression Gauge Reading

Strain at Failure

CohesionC

(kg/cm2)

Angle of Internal Friction

ф (Degree)

Bulk density (gm/cc) @

Triaxial Sample

Moisture Content

(%) @ Triaxial Sample

0.50 78.0 24.57 1.80 2.30 1300 0.171

1.00 82.0 25.82 1.86 2.86 1400 0.184

1.50 88.0 27.72 1.96 3.46 1500 0.197

TRIAXIAL COMPRESSION TEST (IS - 2720 PART - 11)

Old Pineapple Garden

E‐327385.6860

2.50

Nandannagar

Depth of Sample (m)

Complex Location :

-

Dia of Specimen ( D )Least count of Gauge

Location :

Proving ring Constant 0.315 kg/Div.

BPC Consultant INDIA (P) Ltd.

Concept Building, Prince Park

514/A/1 Kalikapur Road, Kolkata - 700099

www.bpcipl.com

Height of Specimen ( H )

Executive Engineer - IV Urban Development Department, Tripura

N‐2641424.9120Bore hole No.:Co-ordinate :

0.01 mm/Div.

3 (LIG)

Consultancy Services for preparation of detailed project report (DPR) based on detailed topographical survey, collection of hydrological data, detailed geotechnical sub-soil investigation along with detailed price/cost estimate and other relevant allied works of the project- Proposed Township at Govt. Land (Old Pineapple Garden), Behind Fernando Rehabilitation, near Don Bosco School, Nandannagar, Agartala.

TEST RESULT

F.4 (2)-UDD/EW(S-XXXVIII) /2055-61 Dated, Agartala, the 14/08/2019

Type of Test

Bridge No. :

1.98 13.100.76 5.11

0.000

0.500

1.000

1.500

2.000

0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5

She

ar S

tres

s (K

g/sq

cm)

Normal Stress (Kg/sqcm)

page:-76 of 102

Annexure C1

Annexure C1

Page 89: Geotech Report Nandannagar 2nd time · The present report the analysis of test results and recommendations regarding type of foundation, allowable bearing capacity. Also, for the

Project Name :

Client Name :

Project Code :

UU

38 mm

76 mm

Cell Pressure

(kg/cm2)Proving Ring Dial Reading

Load at Failure(kg)

Deviator

Stress (kg/cm2)

EffectiveNormal

Stress (kg/cm2)

Compression Gauge Reading

Strain at Failure

CohesionC

(kg/cm2)

Angle of Internal Friction

ф (Degree)

Bulk density (gm/cc) @

Triaxial Sample

Moisture Content

(%) @ Triaxial Sample

0.50 86.0 27.09 1.92 2.42 1500 0.197

1.00 88.5 27.88 1.97 2.97 1500 0.197

1.50 90.0 28.35 2.07 3.57 1300 0.171

Least count of Gauge

Old Pineapple Garden

0.87 3.41 2.00 14.89

Depth of Sample (m) Type of Test

Complex Location :

0.01 mm/Div. Dia of Specimen ( D )TEST RESULT

-

Proving ring Constant 0.315 kg/Div. Height of Specimen ( H )

E‐327385.6860Bridge No. :Nandannagar Bore hole No.:Co-ordinate :

4.50

Location : 3 (LIG)N‐2641424.9120

Consultancy Services for preparation of detailed project report (DPR) based on detailed topographical survey, collection of hydrological data, detailed geotechnical sub-soil investigation along with detailed price/cost estimate and other relevant allied works of the project- Proposed Township at Govt. Land (Old Pineapple Garden), Behind Fernando Rehabilitation, near Don Bosco School, Nandannagar, Agartala.

BPC Consultant INDIA (P) Ltd.

Concept Building, Prince Park

514/A/1 Kalikapur Road, Kolkata - 700099

www.bpcipl.com

Executive Engineer - IV Urban Development Department, Tripura

F.4 (2)-UDD/EW(S-XXXVIII) /2055-61 Dated, Agartala, the 14/08/2019

TRIAXIAL COMPRESSION TEST (IS - 2720 PART - 11)

page:-77 of 102

Annexure C1

Annexure C1

Page 90: Geotech Report Nandannagar 2nd time · The present report the analysis of test results and recommendations regarding type of foundation, allowable bearing capacity. Also, for the

Project Name :

Client Name :

Project Code :

UU

38 mm

76 mm

Cell Pressure

(kg/cm2)Proving Ring Dial Reading

Load at Failure(kg)

Deviator

Stress (kg/cm2)

EffectiveNormal

Stress (kg/cm2)

Compression Gauge Reading

Strain at Failure

CohesionC

(kg/cm2)

Angle of Internal Friction

ф (Degree)

Bulk density (gm/cc) @

Triaxial Sample

Moisture Content

(%) @ Triaxial Sample

0.50 82.0 25.83 1.87 2.37 1370 0.180

1.00 86.0 27.09 1.95 2.95 1400 0.184

1.50 89.0 28.04 1.98 3.48 1500 0.197

Least count of Gauge

Old Pineapple Garden

0.82 4.28 1.99 16.45

Depth of Sample (m) Type of Test

Complex Location :

0.01 mm/Div. Dia of Specimen ( D )TEST RESULT

-

Proving ring Constant 0.315 kg/Div. Height of Specimen ( H )

E‐327385.6860Bridge No. :Nandannagar Bore hole No.:Co-ordinate :

7.50

Location : 3 (LIG)N‐2641424.9120

Consultancy Services for preparation of detailed project report (DPR) based on detailed topographical survey, collection of hydrological data, detailed geotechnical sub-soil investigation along with detailed price/cost estimate and other relevant allied works of the project- Proposed Township at Govt. Land (Old Pineapple Garden), Behind Fernando Rehabilitation, near Don Bosco School, Nandannagar, Agartala.

BPC Consultant INDIA (P) Ltd.

Concept Building, Prince Park

514/A/1 Kalikapur Road, Kolkata - 700099

www.bpcipl.com

Executive Engineer - IV Urban Development Department, Tripura

F.4 (2)-UDD/EW(S-XXXVIII) /2055-61 Dated, Agartala, the 14/08/2019

TRIAXIAL COMPRESSION TEST (IS - 2720 PART - 11)

0.000

0.500

1.000

1.500

2.000

2.500

0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0

She

ar S

tres

s (K

g/sq

cm)

Normal Stress (Kg/sqcm)

page:-78 of 102

Annexure C1

Annexure C1

Page 91: Geotech Report Nandannagar 2nd time · The present report the analysis of test results and recommendations regarding type of foundation, allowable bearing capacity. Also, for the

Project Name :

Client Name :

Project Code :

60 mm

60 mm

24 mm

Normal Stress

(kg/cm2)Proving Ring Dial Reading

Load at failure(kg)

Shear

Stress (kg/cm2)Compression

Gauge ReadingCorrected

Area (cm2)N

Value

Cohesion C

(kg/cm2)

Angle of Friction ф

(Degree)

Bulk Density gm/cc @ Direct shear sample

Moisture Content

(%) @ Direct shear sample

0.50 35.5 12.32 0.38 600 32.40 -

1.00 58.0 20.13 0.65 800 31.20 0.11 28.29

1.50 81.0 28.11 0.92 900 30.60 -

Proving ring Constant

Depth of Sample (m) 10.50

1.90

DIRECT SHEAR TEST (IS - 2720 PART - 13)

Old Pineapple Garden

E‐327385.6860Complex Location :

Width of Specimen ( W )

-

BPC Consultant INDIA (P) Ltd.

Concept Building, Prince Park514/A/1 Kalikapur Road, Kolkata - 700099

www.bpcipl.com

Bore hole No.:Co-ordinate :

Length of Specimen ( L )

Consultancy Services for preparation of detailed project report (DPR) based on detailed topographical survey, collection of hydrological data, detailed geotechnical sub-soil investigation along with detailed price/cost estimate and other relevant allied works of the project- Proposed Township at Govt. Land (Old Pineapple Garden), Behind Fernando Rehabilitation, near Don Bosco School, Nandannagar, Agartala.

Executive Engineer - IV Urban Development Department, Tripura

F.4 (2)-UDD/EW(S-XXXVIII) /2055-61 Dated, Agartala, the 14/08/2019

Least Count of Gauge 0.01 mm/Div.

3 (LIG)Location : NandannagarN‐2641424.9120

21.25

Height of Specimen ( H )0.347 kg/Div.

TEST RESULT

Bridge No. :

y = 0.538x + 0.110

0.00

0.10

0.20

0.30

0.40

0.50

0.60

0.70

0.80

0.90

1.00

0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.90 1.00 1.10 1.20 1.30 1.40 1.50 1.60

She

ar S

tres

s (k

g/cm

2)

Normal Stress (kg/cm2)

DIRECT SHEAR TEST GRAPH

page:-79 of 102

Annexure C1

Annexure C1

Page 92: Geotech Report Nandannagar 2nd time · The present report the analysis of test results and recommendations regarding type of foundation, allowable bearing capacity. Also, for the

Project Name :

Client Name :

Project Code :

60 mm

60 mm

24 mm

Normal Stress

(kg/cm2)Proving Ring Dial Reading

Load at failure(kg)

Shear

Stress (kg/cm2)Compression

Gauge ReadingCorrected

Area (cm2)N

Value

Cohesion C

(kg/cm2)

Angle of Friction ф

(Degree)

Bulk Density gm/cc @ Direct shear sample

Moisture Content

(%) @ Direct shear sample

0.50 34.0 11.79 0.37 700 31.80 -

1.00 59.5 20.65 0.66 800 31.20 0.08 30.35

1.50 86.0 29.84 0.96 800 31.20 -

1.91** 20.89

3 (LIG)N‐2641424.9120

TEST RESULT

Bore hole No.:

Depth of Sample (m) 16.50+18.00

Proving ring Constant

NandannagarComnplex Location :

Old Pineapple Garden

0.347 kg/Div. Height of Specimen ( H )

Length of Specimen ( L )

Least Count of Gauge 0.01 mm/Div. Width of Specimen ( W )

Consultancy Services for preparation of detailed project report (DPR) based on detailed topographical survey, collection of hydrological data, detailed geotechnical sub-soil investigation along with detailed price/cost estimate and other relevant allied works of the project- Proposed Township at Govt. Land (Old Pineapple Garden), Behind Fernando Rehabilitation, near Don Bosco School, Nandannagar, Agartala.

Co-ordinate :E‐327385.6860

Bridge No. : -Location :

DIRECT SHEAR TEST (IS - 2720 PART - 13)

F.4 (2)-UDD/EW(S-XXXVIII) /2055-61 Dated, Agartala, the 14/08/2019

Executive Engineer - IV Urban Development Department, Tripura

BPC Consultant INDIA (P) Ltd.

Concept Building, Prince Park514/A/1 Kalikapur Road, Kolkata - 700099

www.bpcipl.com

y = 0.586x + 0.077

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

1.00

1.20

0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.90 1.00 1.10 1.20 1.30 1.40 1.50 1.60

She

ar S

tres

s (k

g/cm

2)

Normal Stress (kg/cm2)

DIRECT SHEAR TEST GRAPH

page:-80 of 102

Annexure C1

Annexure C1

Page 93: Geotech Report Nandannagar 2nd time · The present report the analysis of test results and recommendations regarding type of foundation, allowable bearing capacity. Also, for the

Project Name :

Client Name :

Project Code :

60 mm

60 mm

24 mm

Normal Stress

(kg/cm2)Proving Ring Dial Reading

Load at failure(kg)

Shear

Stress (kg/cm2)Compression

Gauge ReadingCorrected

Area (cm2)N

Value

Cohesion C

(kg/cm2)

Angle of Friction ф

(Degree)

Bulk Density gm/cc @ Direct shear sample

Moisture Content

(%) @ Direct shear sample

0.50 34.0 11.80 0.36 600 32.40 -

1.00 60.5 20.99 0.69 900 30.60 0.05 32.41

1.50 95.0 32.97 1.00 500 33.00 -

1.93** 18.77

Height of Specimen ( H )

BPC Consultant INDIA (P) Ltd.

Concept Building, Prince Park514/A/1 Kalikapur Road, Kolkata - 700099

www.bpcipl.com

Bore hole No.:Co-ordinate :

Length of Specimen ( L )

Width of Specimen ( W )

3 (LIG)

Consultancy Services for preparation of detailed project report (DPR) based on detailed topographical survey, collection of hydrological data, detailed geotechnical sub-soil investigation along with detailed price/cost estimate and other relevant allied works of the project- Proposed Township at Govt. Land (Old Pineapple Garden), Behind Fernando Rehabilitation, near Don Bosco School, Nandannagar, Agartala.

Executive Engineer - IV Urban Development Department, Tripura

F.4 (2)-UDD/EW(S-XXXVIII) /2055-61 Dated, Agartala, the 14/08/2019

Least Count of Gauge 0.01 mm/Div.

DIRECT SHEAR TEST (IS - 2720 PART - 13)

Location : NandannagarN‐2641424.9120

Complex Location :

-

Proving ring Constant 0.347 kg/Div.

TEST RESULT

Depth of Sample (m) 28.50+30.00

Old Pineapple Garden

E‐327385.6860Bridge No. :

y = 0.635x + 0.048

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

1.00

1.20

0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.90 1.00 1.10 1.20 1.30 1.40 1.50 1.60

She

ar S

tres

s (k

g/cm

2)

Normal Stress (kg/cm2)

DIRECT SHEAR TEST GRAPH

page:-81 of 102

Annexure C1

Annexure C1

Page 94: Geotech Report Nandannagar 2nd time · The present report the analysis of test results and recommendations regarding type of foundation, allowable bearing capacity. Also, for the

Project Name :

Client Name :

Project Code :

Applied Pressure

(Kg/cm2)

Final Dial Gauge Reading

ChangedDial Reading

(cm)

Total Ht.Changed for Dial Reading

(cm)

VoidHeight (cm)

Voidratio

Changed in

Void ratio

Coefficient of Com -

pressibility. (av)

Coefficient of Volume Com -

pressibility. (mv)

Compression Index. (CC)

0.00 2349 2.00 0.756 0.608

0.10 2337 -0.0024 1.998 0.754 0.606 0.002 0.019 0.0120

0.25 2318 -0.0038 1.994 0.750 0.603 0.003 0.020 0.0127 0.008

0.50 2287 -0.0062 1.988 0.744 0.598 0.005 0.020 0.0124 0.017

1.00 2243 -0.0088 1.979 0.735 0.591 0.007 0.014 0.0089 0.024

2.00 2190 -0.0106 1.968 0.724 0.582 0.009 0.009 0.0054 0.028

4.00 2116 -0.0148 1.953 0.710 0.570 0.012 0.006 0.0038 0.040

8.00 2031 -0.0170 1.936 0.693 0.557 0.014 0.003 0.0022 0.045

4.00 2040 0.0018 1.938 0.694 0.558 -0.001 0.0004 0.0002 0.005

0.25 2069 0.0058 1.944 0.700 0.563 -0.005 0.0012 0.0008 0.004

Bore hole No. :

Moisture Content (%) @ Consolidation Sample 14.01

NandannagarOld Pineapple

Garden

Least Count of Gauge

Co-ordinate:

2.50

N-2641424.9120

Depth of Sample ( m )

Bridge No.:

3 (LIG)

0.002 mm/Div.

Location :Complex

Location :

Specific Gravity of Soil ( G ) :-

Dia of Specimen ( D ) cm :-

Height of Specimen ( H ) cm :-

1.24Solid Height of Sample ( Hs ) cm :-2.59

6

2Wt. of Dry Sample ( Wd ) gm :- 91.04

Consultancy Services for preparation of detailed project report (DPR) based on detailed topographical survey, collection of hydrological data, detailed geotechnical sub-soil investigation along with detailed price/cost estimate and other relevant allied works of the project- Proposed Township at Govt. Land (Old Pineapple Garden), Behind Fernando Rehabilitation, near Don Bosco School, Nandannagar, Agartala.

BPC Consultant INDIA (P) Ltd.

Concept Building, Prince Park514/A/1 Kalikapur Road

Kolkata - 700099www.bpcipl.com

Executive Engineer - IV Urban Development Department, Tripura

F.4 (2)-UDD/EW(S-XXXVIII) /2055-61 Dated, Agartala, the 14/08/2019

FIXED TYPE

CONSOLIDATION TEST (IS : 2720 PART - 15)

Condition of Test :-

-E-327385.6860

0.550

0.560

0.570

0.580

0.590

0.600

0.610

0.10 1.00 10.00

Vo

id r

atio

Pressure Range (kg/cm2)

e-log p CurveCompression Index (Cc ) ‐ 0.045

page:-82 of 102Annexure C1

Page 95: Geotech Report Nandannagar 2nd time · The present report the analysis of test results and recommendations regarding type of foundation, allowable bearing capacity. Also, for the

Project Name :

Client Name :

Project Code :

Applied Pressure

(Kg/cm2)

Final Dial Gauge Reading

ChangedDial Reading

(cm)

Total Ht.Changed for Dial Reading

(cm)

VoidHeight (cm)

Voidratio

Changed in

Void ratio

Coefficient of Com -

pressibility. (av)

Coefficient of Volume Com -

pressibility. (mv)

Compression Index. (CC)

0.00 2278 2.00 0.732 0.577

0.10 2270 -0.0016 1.998 0.730 0.576 0.001 0.013 0.0080

0.25 2256 -0.0028 1.996 0.727 0.574 0.002 0.015 0.0093 0.006

0.50 2234 -0.0044 1.991 0.723 0.570 0.003 0.014 0.0088 0.012

1.00 2199 -0.0070 1.984 0.716 0.565 0.006 0.011 0.0070 0.018

2.00 2151 -0.0096 1.975 0.706 0.557 0.008 0.008 0.0048 0.025

4.00 2080 -0.0142 1.960 0.692 0.546 0.011 0.006 0.0036 0.037

8.00 1999 -0.0162 1.944 0.676 0.533 0.013 0.003 0.0021 0.042

4.00 2005 0.0012 1.945 0.677 0.534 -0.001 0.000 0.0002 0.003

0.25 2031 0.0052 1.951 0.682 0.538 -0.004 0.001 0.0007 0.003

FIXED TYPE

6

2

CONSOLIDATION TEST (IS : 2720 PART - 15)

Depth of Sample ( m ) 6.00

Condition of Test :-

Wt. of Dry Sample ( Wd ) gm :- 93.54

Consultancy Services for preparation of detailed project report (DPR) based on detailed topographical survey, collection of hydrological data, detailed geotechnical sub-soil investigation along with detailed price/cost estimate and other relevant allied works of the project- Proposed Township at Govt. Land (Old Pineapple Garden), Behind Fernando Rehabilitation, near Don Bosco School, Nandannagar, Agartala.

BPC Consultant INDIA (P) Ltd.

Concept Building, Prince Park514/A/1 Kalikapur Road

Kolkata - 700099www.bpcipl.com

Executive Engineer - IV Urban Development Department, Tripura

F.4 (2)-UDD/EW(S-XXXVIII) /2055-61 Dated, Agartala, the 14/08/2019

Specific Gravity of Soil ( G ) :-

Dia of Specimen ( D ) cm :-

Height of Specimen ( H ) cm :-

1.27Solid Height of Sample ( Hs ) cm :-2.61

Least Count of Gauge

Co-ordinate:

Bridge No.:

3 (LIG)

0.002 mm/Div.

-E-327385.6860

N-2641424.9120

Bore hole No. :

Moisture Content (%) @ Consolidation Sample 14.43

NandannagarOld Pineapple

GardenLocation :

Complex Location :

0.530

0.540

0.550

0.560

0.570

0.580

0.10 1.00 10.00

Vo

id r

atio

Pressure Range (kg/cm2)

e-log p CurveCompression Index (Cc ) ‐ 0.042

page:-83 of 102Annexure C1

Page 96: Geotech Report Nandannagar 2nd time · The present report the analysis of test results and recommendations regarding type of foundation, allowable bearing capacity. Also, for the

Bore hole No.

SampleNo.

Depth (m)WL

(%)

WP

(%)

IP

(%)

DS_1 0.50 44 20 24

UDS_1 2.50 41 21 20

UDS_2 4.50 43 22 21

UDS_3 7.50 38 18 20

UDS_4 10.50 30 21 9

- - - - - -

- - - - - -

- - - - - -

- - - - - -

X Y

20 0

100 58

0 4

25.48 4

0 7

29.59 7

35 0

35 25

50 0

50 37

CI

-

Co-ordinate:

^^ : Soil Classification in this case is based on average layer properties.

CL

BH-3 (LIG)

Bridge No.: -Location :

CI

Soil Classification

SOIL CLASSIFICATION (IS - 1498)

CI

Client Name :

E-327385.6860Nandannagar

WL : Liquid limit WP : Plastic Limit Ip : Plasticity Index Np : Non Plastic NA : Not Applicable

-

-

-

BPC Consultant INDIA (P) Ltd.

Concept Building, Prince Park514/A/1 Kalikapur Road

Kolkata - 700099

www.bpcipl.com

CI

Project Code :

Complex Location :

Old Pineapple

Garden

Project Name :

N-2641424.9120

Consultancy Services for preparation of detailed project report (DPR) based on detailed topographical survey, collection of hydrological data, detailed geotechnical sub-soil investigation along with detailed price/cost estimate and other relevant allied works of the project- Proposed Township at Govt. Land (Old Pineapple Garden), Behind Fernando Rehabilitation, near Don

Executive Engineer - IV Urban Development Department, Tripura

F.4 (2)-UDD/EW(S-XXXVIII) /2055-61 Dated, Agartala, the 14/08/2019

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

Pla

sti

cit

y In

de

x I

p (%

)

Liquid Limit WL (%)

PLASTICITY CHART

0.50 2.50 4.50 7.50 10.50

35= LW

50= L W

A - LINE

)20-LW(0.73= PI

CI

CH

MH / OH

MI / OICL- ML

ML / OLML

CL

page:-84 of 102

Annexure C1

Annexure C1

Page 97: Geotech Report Nandannagar 2nd time · The present report the analysis of test results and recommendations regarding type of foundation, allowable bearing capacity. Also, for the

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

B4

Bore Log & Lab. Test Results Nandannagar

BH-4 (MIG)

Annexure C1

Annexure C1

Page 98: Geotech Report Nandannagar 2nd time · The present report the analysis of test results and recommendations regarding type of foundation, allowable bearing capacity. Also, for the

Project Name :

Client Name :

Project Code :

Job Code:

Complex Location

Borehole No.

Ground Elevation (G.L.)

Method of Boring 12.50

Diameter of Hole 30.45

From

To

From

To

Type

15

cm

30

cm

45

cm N

Value

Co

rre

cte

d N

"

DS_1 - - - - - - - - -

DS_2 - - - - - - - - -

27.010

26.560S/D_1 1.50 - 1.95 3 3 4 7 - - - - -

26.310

25.860UDS_1 2.20 - 2.65 - - - - - - - - -

25.510

25.060S/D_2 3.00 - 3.45 5 6 8 14 - - - - -

24.010

23.560UDS_2 4.50 - 4.95 - - - - - - - - -

22.510

22.060S/D_3 6.00 - 6.45 4 5 8 13 - - - - -

21.010

20.560

UDS_3 7.50 - 7.95 - - - - - - - - -

19.510

19.060

S/D_4 9.00 - 9.45 6 10 11 21 - - - - -

18.010

17.560UDS_4 10.50 - 10.95 - - - - - - - - -

16.510

16.230S/D_5 12.00 - 12.28 34

54B/ 13CM

Re >100 - - - - -

W_1 - - - - - - - - -

15.010

14.710S/D_6 13.50 - 13.80 32

60B/ 15CM

Re >100 - - - - -

13.510

13.060S/D_7 15.00 - 15.45 8 18 20 38 21 - - - -

13.510

13.060S/D_7 15.00 - 15.45 8 18 20 38 21 - - - -

12.010

11.560S/D_8 16.50 - 16.95 9 15 18 33 19 - - - -

10.510

10.060S/D_9 18.00 - 18.45 12 16 18 34 19 - - - -

9.010

8.560S/D_10 19.50 - 19.95 9 12 18 30 17 - - - -

7.510

7.060S/D_11 21.00 - 21.45 6 11 18 29 17 - - - -

6.010

5.560S/D_12 22.50 - 22.95 9 15 20 35 18 - - - -

4.510

4.060S/D_13 24.00 - 24.45 12 15 30 45 21 - - - -

3.010

2.560S/D_14 25.50 - 25.95 10 19 32 51 22 - - - -

1.510

1.060S/D_15 27.00 - 27.45 11 26 32 58 24 - - - -

0.010

-0.440S/D_16 28.50 - 28.95 14 27 35 62 25 - - - -

-1.490

-1.940S/D_17 30.00 - 30.45 17 32 45 77 29 - - - -

BGL : AGL :

21.010Very stiff, Yellowish grey /brownish, silty clay / clayeysilt with little percentage ofkankars, gravels & sandmixture. (CI)7.50m to 10.50m

28.510

Medium to stiff, yellowishbrown / yellowish grey, siltyclay / clayey silt with somesand mixture & traces ofgravels & kankars. (CI)0.00m to 7.50m

Above ground Level R : RunB : Blows Re : Refusal TCR : Total Core Recovery RQD : Rock Quality Designation Below ground Level

UDS* : UDS Could not been Collected (Slipped) S/D : Standard Penetration Test with disturbed sample collected, S : Standard Penetration Test but sample not recovered

P0196 Location Nandannagar Co-ordinate :

17

4

Bridge No - No. of Core Sample ( C ) 0

Consultancy Services for preparation of detailed project report (DPR) based on detailed topographical survey, collection of hydrological data, detailed geotechnical sub-soil investigation along with detailed price/cost estimate and other relevant allied works of the project- Proposed Township at Govt. Land (Old Pineapple Garden), Behind Fernando Rehabilitation, near Don Bosco School, Nandannagar, Agartala.

BPC Consultant INDIA (P) Ltd.

Concept Building, Prince Park

514/A/1 Kalikapur Road, Kolkata - 700099.

www.bpcipl.com

Executive Engineer - IV Urban Development Department, Tripura

F.4 (2)-UDD/EW(S-XXXVIII) /2055-61 Dated, Agartala, the 14/08/2019

E-327387.7490 N-2641350.1210

BORE LOG & CORE LOG DATA SHEET

Old Pineapple Garden

28.510M Completion Date 02.09.19 No. of Undisturbed Sample ( U )

4 (MIG) Commencement Date 31.08.19 No. of SP Test ( S )

19 (D-2 & S-17)

1150 mm Termination Depth M BGL No.of Water Sample ( W )

Wash Boring Standing Water Level M BGL No. of Disturbed Sample ( DS )

Total Core

Length(cm)

TCR(%)

RQD(%)

Co

lou

rs o

f re

turn

Wa

ter

Wa

ter

Lo

ss

RemarksDescription of Soil Stratum

& Rock Methology

Stratum Elevation as per R.L

(m)HatchingPattern

Elevation as per R.L

(m)Sample / Event

Standard Penetration Test IS-2131

Depth (m)

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

28.010 0.50 -

-

27.510 -1.00

-

Bro

wn

ish

-

12.5016.010

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

21.010

18.010

14.310

-1.940

3.010

Very dense, brownish yellow/ yellowish, silty fine grainedsand with traces of mica,kankars & clay binders. (SM)25.50m to 30.45m

18.010

Very dense, yellowish brown,silty sand with highpercentage of kankars,gravels & traces of claybinders. (Murrum) (SM)10.50m to 14.20m

3.010

14.310

Medium dense to dense, brownish yellow / yellowish,silty fine grained sand withtraces of mica & clay binders. (SM)14.20m to 25.50m

page:-85 of 102Annexure C1

Page 99: Geotech Report Nandannagar 2nd time · The present report the analysis of test results and recommendations regarding type of foundation, allowable bearing capacity. Also, for the

Wa

ter

Co

nte

nt

(%)

(W)

@ S

am

ple

Wa

ter

Co

nte

nt

(%)

(W)

@

Str

en

gth

Sa

mp

le

Wa

ter

Co

nte

ntt

(%

) (W

) @

C

on

solid

atio

n S

am

ple

Ave

rag

e W

ate

r C

on

ten

t (%

) (W

)

Bu

lk D

en

sity

(g

m/c

c) b

) @

ave

rag

e s

tre

ng

th S

am

ple

Dry

De

nsi

ty (

gm

/cc) d

)

@ a

s p

er

ave

rag

e w

ate

r C

on

ten

t

Gra

vel (

%)

(G)

Sa

nd

(%

) (S

)

Silt

(%

) (M

)

Cla

y (%

) (C

)

Liq

uid

Lim

it (%

) (W

L)

Pla

stic

Lim

it (

%)

(WP

)

Pla

stic

ity I

nd

ex

(%

) (I

P)

Sh

rinka

ge

Lim

it (

%)

(W

s /

Wsu

)

Co

mp

ress

ive

Str

ess

(kg

/cm

2 ) (q

u)

Typ

e o

f T

est

Co

he

sio

n (

kg/c

m2 )

(C)

An

gle

of

Fric

tion

)

Va

ne

Sh

ea

r S

tre

ng

th (

kg/c

m2 )

(S)

Initi

al V

oid

Ra

tio (

eo)

Co

mp

ress

ion

In

de

x (

CC)

26

.11

.20

DS

_2

1.0

0

27

.51

- - CI^^ 20.38 - - 20 - - 2.64 0 47 32 21 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

31

.08

.19

UD

S_

1

2.2

0

26

.31

- - CI 18.55 19.46 19.07 19 1.90 1.60 2.64 0 41 43 16 38 22 16 - - - - - UU 0.50 2 - 0.761 0.143

31

.08

.19

S/D

_2

3.0

0

25

.51

14 - CI^^ 21.80 - - 22 - - 2.72 10 25 47 18 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

31

.08

.19

UD

S_

2

4.5

0

24

.01

- - CI 16.07 15.28 15.60 16 1.94 1.68 2.62 1 29 46 24 41 19 22 - - - - - UU 0.70 6 - 0.623 0.105

31

.08

.19

S/D

_3

6.0

0

22

.51

13 - CH 30.33 - - 30 - - - - - - - 57 28 29 - - - - - - - - - - -

31

.08

.19

UD

S_

3

7.5

0

21

.01

- - CI 14.01 13.34 14.38 14 1.96 1.72 2.60 0 44 39 17 39 22 17 - - - - - UU 0.74 4 - 0.617 0.092

31

.08

.19

S/D

_4

9.0

0

19

.51

21 - CI^^ 18.40 - - 18 - - 2.65 3 45 38 14 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

E-327387.7490 Standing Water Level:

12.50

Strength ParameterIS - 2720 Part - 10 / 11 / 12 / 13 / 30

Natural Water Content (%) IS - 2720 Part - 2

Sw

elli

ng

Pre

suu

re (

kg/c

m2 )

IS -

27

20

Pa

rt-

41

M BGL

Pe

rme

ab

ility

Te

st

(KT)

IS -

27

20

Pa

rt-

17

Natural Density

28.5104 (MIG)N-2641350.1210

Fre

e S

we

ll In

de

x (%

) IS

- 2

72

0 P

art

- 4

0

ConsolidationIS - 2720 Part - 15

Ha

tch

ing

Pa

tte

rn

So

il C

lass

ifica

tion

IS

- 1

49

8

Stiff, yellowish brown, clayeysilt with some sand mixture &traces of gravels & kankars.

Yellowish grey, clayey silt withsome sand mixture & traces ofkankars.

Stiff, yellowish brown, silty clay/ clayey silt with some sandmixture & traces of kankars.

Grain Size AnalysisIS - 2720 Part - 4

Sp

. G

ravi

ty (

G)

IS -

27

20

Pa

rt -

3 (

Se

c-1

/2) Consistency Limit

IS - 2720 Part - 5 / 6

Laboratory Soil Tests Result Sheet

Consultancy Services for preparation of detailed project report (DPR) based on detailed topographical survey, collection of hydrological data, detailed geotechnical sub-soil investigation along with detailed price/cost estimate and other relevant allied works of the project- Proposed Township at Govt. Land (Old Pineapple Garden), Behind Fernando Rehabilitation, near Don Bosco School, Nandannagar, Agartala.

Executive Engineer - IV Urban Development Department, Tripura

F.4 (2)-UDD/EW(S-XXXVIII) /2055-61 Dated, Agartala, the 14/08/2019

BPC Consultant INDIA (P) Ltd.

Concept Building, Prince Park514/A/1 Kalikapur Road

Kolkata - 700099

www.bpcipl.com

Ground Level (GL) m:

Bore hole No.:

Bridge No.: - Co-ordinate:

Project Name :

Client Name :

Project Code :

Type of Soil Sample

Co

rre

cte

d N

" V

alu

e

IS -

21

31

Ob

serv

ed

N V

alu

e

IS -

21

31

Location: Nandannagar Complex Location: Old Pineapple Garden

Da

te o

f S

am

plin

g

Sa

mp

le D

ep

th (

m)

Sa

mp

le E

leva

tion

(m

)

Sa

mp

le N

o.

Yellowish brown, clayey siltwith some sand mixture.

Yellowish grey, clayey silt withsome sand mixture.

Yellowish grey, silty clay /clayey silt with some sandmixture.

Very stiff, brownish, silty clay /clayey silt with some sandmixture & traces of kankars,gravels.

page:-86 of 102

Annexure C1

Annexure C1

Page 100: Geotech Report Nandannagar 2nd time · The present report the analysis of test results and recommendations regarding type of foundation, allowable bearing capacity. Also, for the

Wa

ter

Co

nte

nt

(%)

(W)

@ S

am

ple

Wa

ter

Co

nte

nt

(%)

(W)

@

Str

en

gth

Sa

mp

le

Wa

ter

Co

nte

ntt

(%

) (W

) @

C

on

solid

atio

n S

am

ple

Ave

rag

e W

ate

r C

on

ten

t (%

) (W

)

Bu

lk D

en

sity

(g

m/c

c) b

) @

ave

rag

e s

tre

ng

th S

am

ple

Dry

De

nsi

ty (

gm

/cc) d

)

@ a

s p

er

ave

rag

e w

ate

r C

on

ten

t

Gra

vel (

%)

(G)

Sa

nd

(%

) (S

)

Silt

(%

) (M

)

Cla

y (%

) (C

)

Liq

uid

Lim

it (%

) (W

L)

Pla

stic

Lim

it (

%)

(WP

)

Pla

stic

ity I

nd

ex

(%

) (I

P)

Sh

rinka

ge

Lim

it (

%)

(W

s /

Wsu

)

Co

mp

ress

ive

Str

ess

(kg

/cm

2 ) (q

u)

Typ

e o

f T

est

Co

he

sio

n (

kg/c

m2 )

(C)

An

gle

of

Fric

tion

)

Va

ne

Sh

ea

r S

tre

ng

th (

kg/c

m2 )

(S)

Initi

al V

oid

Ra

tio (

eo)

Co

mp

ress

ion

In

de

x (

CC)

E-327387.7490 Standing Water Level:

12.50

Strength ParameterIS - 2720 Part - 10 / 11 / 12 / 13 / 30

Natural Water Content (%) IS - 2720 Part - 2

Sw

elli

ng

Pre

suu

re (

kg/c

m2 )

IS -

27

20

Pa

rt-

41

M BGL

Pe

rme

ab

ility

Te

st

(KT)

IS -

27

20

Pa

rt-

17

Natural Density

28.5104 (MIG)N-2641350.1210

Fre

e S

we

ll In

de

x (%

) IS

- 2

72

0 P

art

- 4

0

ConsolidationIS - 2720 Part - 15

Ha

tch

ing

Pa

tte

rn

So

il C

lass

ifica

tion

IS

- 1

49

8

Grain Size AnalysisIS - 2720 Part - 4

Sp

. G

ravi

ty (

G)

IS -

27

20

Pa

rt -

3 (

Se

c-1

/2) Consistency Limit

IS - 2720 Part - 5 / 6

Laboratory Soil Tests Result Sheet

Consultancy Services for preparation of detailed project report (DPR) based on detailed topographical survey, collection of hydrological data, detailed geotechnical sub-soil investigation along with detailed price/cost estimate and other relevant allied works of the project- Proposed Township at Govt. Land (Old Pineapple Garden), Behind Fernando Rehabilitation, near Don Bosco School, Nandannagar, Agartala.

Executive Engineer - IV Urban Development Department, Tripura

F.4 (2)-UDD/EW(S-XXXVIII) /2055-61 Dated, Agartala, the 14/08/2019

BPC Consultant INDIA (P) Ltd.

Concept Building, Prince Park514/A/1 Kalikapur Road

Kolkata - 700099

www.bpcipl.com

Ground Level (GL) m:

Bore hole No.:

Bridge No.: - Co-ordinate:

Project Name :

Client Name :

Project Code :

Type of Soil Sample

Co

rre

cte

d N

" V

alu

e

IS -

21

31

Ob

serv

ed

N V

alu

e

IS -

21

31

Location: Nandannagar Complex Location: Old Pineapple Garden

Da

te o

f S

am

plin

g

Sa

mp

le D

ep

th (

m)

Sa

mp

le E

leva

tion

(m

)

Sa

mp

le N

o.

31

.08

.19

UD

S_

4

10

.50

18

.01

- - SM 15.69 16.04 - 16 1.90 1.64 2.68 11 62 27* - - - - - DS 0.08 29 - - -

31

.08

.19

S/D

_5

12

.00

16

.51

>1

00

- SM 19.13 - - 19 - - 2.63 8 60 24 8 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

01

.09

.19

S/D

_7

15

.00

13

.51

38

21 SM 21.24 - - 21 - - 3 1 68 31* - - - - - - - - - - -

02

.09

.19

S/D

_1

1

21

.00

7.5

1

29

17

02

.09

.19

S/D

_1

2

22

.50

6.0

1

35

18

02

.09

.20

S/D

_1

4

25

.50

3.0

1

51

22 SM 17.46 - - 17 - - 2.68 1 77 22* - - - - - - - - - - -

02

.09

.19

S/D

_1

5

27

.00

1.5

1

58

24 SM 20.37 - - 20 - - 2.70 0 70 30* - - - - - - - - - - -

02

.09

.19

S/D

_1

7

30

.00

-1.4

9

77

29 SM 18.25 - - 18 - - 2.69 2 80 18* - - - - - - - - - - -

^^ : * : NA : DS : # : ** : Np :

D : U : S : CU : CD : UU : BGL : AGL :

2.65- - - -

Non Plastic

- - - -27*730 - 310.05DS#

Very dense, brownish yellow /yellowish, silty fine grainedsand with traces of mica,kankars & clay binders.

--19.83SM 1.93**20

Non Plastic

Below Ground LevelUnconsolidated Undrained

Direct Shear Test AssumedSoil Classification in this case is based on average layer properties.

Distureb Sample Undistureb Sample SPT Sample

Very dense, yellowish brown,silty sand with high percentageof kankars, gravels & traces ofclay binders. (Murrum)

Above Ground Level

Remolded Sample

Consolidated Undrained Consolidated Drained

Not ApplicableNot applied for Hydrometer Test

Non Plastic

Non Plastic

Non Plastic

Non Plastic

Non Plastic

Medium dense to dense,brownish yellow / yellowish,silty fine grained sand withtraces of mica & clay binders

page:-87 of 102

Annexure C1

Annexure C1

Page 101: Geotech Report Nandannagar 2nd time · The present report the analysis of test results and recommendations regarding type of foundation, allowable bearing capacity. Also, for the

Project Name :

Client Name :

Project Code :

N value vs Depth Curve

Co-ordinate :

E-327387.7490

N-2641350.1210

Bridge No.:

Location :Bore hole

No. :

BPC Consultant INDIA (P) Ltd.

Concept Building, Prince Park514/A/1 Kalikapur Road

Kolkata - 700099

www.bpcipl.com

Consultancy Services for preparation of detailed project report (DPR) based on detailed topographical survey, collection of hydrological data, detailed geotechnical sub-soil investigation along with detailed price/cost estimate and other relevant allied works of the project- Proposed Township at Govt. Land (Old Pineapple Garden), Behind Fernando Rehabilitation, near Don Bosco School, Nandannagar, Agartala.

Executive Engineer - IV Urban Development Department, Tripura

F.4 (2)-UDD/EW(S-XXXVIII) /2055-61 Dated, Agartala, the 14/08/2019

4 (MIG)NandannagarComplex Location :

Old Pineapple

Garden-

0.00

5.00

10.00

15.00

20.00

25.00

30.00

35.00

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80

Dep

th (

m)

N Value

Observed N value BH-4 (MIG) Corrected N value BH-4 (MIG)

page:-88 of 102

Annexure C1

Annexure C1

Page 102: Geotech Report Nandannagar 2nd time · The present report the analysis of test results and recommendations regarding type of foundation, allowable bearing capacity. Also, for the

Project Name :

Client Name :

Project Code :

1.00 0.00 0.00 1.68 44.83 46.51 32.19 21.30 - - - - -

2.20 0.22 1.53 3.49 35.85 40.87 43.31 15.60 38 22 16 - -

3.00 9.77 4.43 4.02 16.87 25.32 46.51 18.40 - - - - -

4.50 1.13 0.67 4.73 24.01 29.41 45.56 23.90 41 19 22 - -

Nandannagar

Coarse Sand (%)

4.75 - 2.00(mm)

Old Pineapple Garden

IS - 2720 PART - 4

BPC Consultant INDIA (P) Ltd.

Concept Building, Prince Park514/A/1 Kalikapur Road

Kolkata - 700099www.bpcipl.com

N-2641350.1210

4 (MIG)

Bore hole No.

Sample Depth (m)

Gravel (%)

> 4.75 (mm)

E-327387.7490

Total Sand Content (%)

Silt (%) 0.075 - 0.002

(mm)

Liquid Limit (WL) (%)

Plastic Limit (WP)

%

Grain size Analysis

Co-ordinate :

-Location :Complex

Location :

Consultancy Services for preparation of detailed project report (DPR) based on detailed topographical survey, collection of hydrological data, detailed geotechnical sub-soil investigation along with detailed price/cost estimate and other relevant allied works of the project- Proposed Township at Govt. Land (Old Pineapple Garden), Behind Fernando Rehabilitation, near Don Bosco School, Nandannagar, Agartala.

Executive Engineer - IV Urban Development Department, Tripura

F.4 (2)-UDD/EW(S-XXXVIII) /2055-61 Dated, Agartala, the 14/08/2019

Coefficient of Curveture

(CC)

Uniformity Coefficient (CU)

Bridge No. :

Plasticity Index

(IP)(%)

Medium Sand (%)

2.00 - 0.425 (mm)

Clay (%)< 0.002

(mm)

Fine Sand (%)0.425 - 0.075

(mm)

4.752.000.0750.002 0.425 10.00 20.00

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

0.0010 0.0100 0.1000 1.0000 10.0000 100.0000

(%)

of

fin

er

Grain Size (mm)

GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION GRAPH

1.00 2.20 3.00 4.50

page:-89 of 102

Annexure C1

Annexure C1

Page 103: Geotech Report Nandannagar 2nd time · The present report the analysis of test results and recommendations regarding type of foundation, allowable bearing capacity. Also, for the

Project Name :

Client Name :

Project Code :

7.50 0.20 0.63 5.39 37.89 43.91 38.59 17.30 39 22 17 - -

9.00 2.62 0.12 2.82 41.92 44.86 38.12 14.40 - - - - -

10.50 8.77 0.27 5.86 58.32 64.45 - -

12.00 7.36 0.85 4.56 55.05 60.46 23.98 8.20 - - - - -

Non Plastic

Coefficient of Curveture

(CC)

-

Uniformity Coefficient (CU)

BPC Consultant INDIA (P) Ltd.

Concept Building, Prince Park514/A/1 Kalikapur Road

Kolkata - 700099www.bpcipl.com

N-2641350.1210

Consultancy Services for preparation of detailed project report (DPR) based on detailed topographical survey, collection of hydrological data, detailed geotechnical sub-soil investigation along with detailed price/cost estimate and other relevant allied works of the project- Proposed Township at Govt. Land (Old Pineapple Garden), Behind Fernando Rehabilitation, near Don Bosco School, Nandannagar, Agartala.

Executive Engineer - IV Urban Development Department, Tripura

Plastic Limit (WP)

%

Bridge No. :

Plasticity Index

(IP)(%)

Location :Complex

Location :

F.4 (2)-UDD/EW(S-XXXVIII) /2055-61 Dated, Agartala, the 14/08/2019

4 (MIG)

Bore hole No.

Sample Depth (m)

Coarse Sand (%)

4.75 - 2.00(mm)

IS - 2720 PART - 4

Grain size Analysis

Co-ordinate :

Gravel (%)

> 4.75 (mm)

Fine Sand (%)0.425 - 0.075

(mm)

Nandannagar Old Pineapple Garden

Liquid Limit (WL) (%)

E-327387.7490

Total Sand Content (%)

Silt (%) 0.075 - 0.002

(mm)

Medium Sand (%)

2.00 - 0.425 (mm)

Clay (%)< 0.002

(mm)

26.78*

4.752.000.0750.002 0.425 10.00 20.00

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

0.0010 0.0100 0.1000 1.0000 10.0000 100.0000

(%)

of

fin

er

Grain Size (mm)

GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION GRAPH

7.50 9.00 10.50 12.00

page:-90 of 102

Annexure C1

Annexure C1

Page 104: Geotech Report Nandannagar 2nd time · The present report the analysis of test results and recommendations regarding type of foundation, allowable bearing capacity. Also, for the

Project Name :

Client Name :

Project Code :

15.00 0.99 0.54 14.94 52.20 67.68 - -

21.00+22.50 0.00 0.00 9.33 64.11 73.45 - -

25.50 0.82 0.16 7.96 68.99 77.11 - -

27.00 0.00 0.00 8.73 61.49 70.22 - -

22.07*

29.78*

Non Plastic

Non Plastic

Non Plastic

Non Plastic

Location : Nandannagar

Coarse Sand (%)

4.75 - 2.00(mm)

IS - 2720 PART - 4

Grain size Analysis

Co-ordinate :

E-327387.7490

N-2641350.1210

Plasticity Index

(IP)(%)

4 (MIG)

Bore hole No.

Sample Depth (m)

Gravel (%)

> 4.75 (mm)

Uniformity Coefficient (CU)

Total Sand Content (%)

Silt (%) 0.075 - 0.002

(mm)

Coefficient of Curveture

(CC)

31.33*

26.55*

Consultancy Services for preparation of detailed project report (DPR) based on detailed topographical survey, collection of hydrological data, detailed geotechnical sub-soil investigation along with detailed price/cost estimate and other relevant allied works of the project- Proposed Township at Govt. Land (Old Pineapple Garden), Behind Fernando Rehabilitation, near Don Bosco School, Nandannagar, Agartala.

Executive Engineer - IV Urban Development Department, Tripura

F.4 (2)-UDD/EW(S-XXXVIII) /2055-61 Dated, Agartala, the 14/08/2019

Plastic Limit (WP)

%

-Complex

Location :

BPC Consultant INDIA (P) Ltd.

Concept Building, Prince Park514/A/1 Kalikapur Road

Kolkata - 700099www.bpcipl.com

Medium Sand (%)

2.00 - 0.425 (mm)

Clay (%)< 0.002

(mm)

Old Pineapple Garden

Liquid Limit (WL) (%)

Fine Sand (%)0.425 - 0.075

(mm)

Bridge No. :

4.752.000.0750.002 0.425 10.00 20.00

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

0.0010 0.0100 0.1000 1.0000 10.0000 100.0000

(%)

of

fin

er

Grain Size (mm)

GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION GRAPH

15.00 21.00+22.50 25.50 27.00

page:-91 of 102

Annexure C1

Annexure C1

Page 105: Geotech Report Nandannagar 2nd time · The present report the analysis of test results and recommendations regarding type of foundation, allowable bearing capacity. Also, for the

Project Name :

Client Name :

Project Code :

4 (MIG) 30.00 1.74 0.18 7.02 72.79 79.99 - -

- - - - - - - - - - - - - -

- - - - - - - - - - - - - -

- - - - - - - - - - - - - -

-

Non Plastic18.27*

Fine Sand (%)0.425 - 0.075

(mm)

Total Sand Content (%)

Silt (%) 0.075 - 0.002

(mm)

Coefficient of Curveture

(CC)

Liquid Limit (WL) (%)

Plastic Limit (WP)

%

Plasticity Index

(IP)(%)

Nandannagar Old Pineapple Garden

Consultancy Services for preparation of detailed project report (DPR) based on detailed topographical survey, collection of hydrological data, detailed geotechnical sub-soil investigation along with detailed price/cost estimate and other relevant allied works of the project- Proposed Township at Govt. Land (Old Pineapple Garden), Behind Fernando Rehabilitation, near Don Bosco School, Nandannagar, Agartala.

Executive Engineer - IV Urban Development Department, Tripura

F.4 (2)-UDD/EW(S-XXXVIII) /2055-61 Dated, Agartala, the 14/08/2019

BPC Consultant INDIA (P) Ltd.

Concept Building, Prince Park514/A/1 Kalikapur Road

Kolkata - 700099www.bpcipl.com

Location :Complex

Location :Co-

ordinate :

E-327387.7490

N-2641350.1210Bridge No. :

Coarse Sand (%)

4.75 - 2.00(mm)

IS - 2720 PART - 4

Grain size Analysis

Medium Sand (%)

2.00 - 0.425 (mm)

Uniformity Coefficient (CU)

Bore hole No.

Sample Depth (m)

Gravel (%)

> 4.75 (mm)

Clay (%)< 0.002

(mm)

4.752.000.0750.002 0.425 10.00 20.00

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

0.0010 0.0100 0.1000 1.0000 10.0000 100.0000

(%)

of

fin

er

Grain Size (mm)

GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION GRAPH

30.00

page:-92 of 102

Annexure C1

Annexure C1

Page 106: Geotech Report Nandannagar 2nd time · The present report the analysis of test results and recommendations regarding type of foundation, allowable bearing capacity. Also, for the

Project Name :

Client Name :

Project Code :

UU

38 mm

76 mm

Cell Pressure

(kg/cm2)Proving Ring Dial Reading

Load at Failure(kg)

Deviator

Stress (kg/cm2)

EffectiveNormal

Stress (kg/cm2)

Compression Gauge Reading

Strain at Failure

CohesionC

(kg/cm2)

Angle of Internal Friction

ф (Degree)

Bulk density (gm/cc) @

Triaxial Sample

Moisture Content

(%) @ Triaxial Sample

0.50 47.0 14.81 1.08 1.58 1300 0.171

1.00 49.0 15.44 1.11 2.11 1400 0.184

1.50 51.0 16.07 1.14 2.64 1500 0.197

Old Pineapple Garden

0.315 kg/Div.

E‐327387.7490

BPC Consultant INDIA (P) Ltd.

Concept Building, Prince Park

514/A/1 Kalikapur Road, Kolkata - 700099

www.bpcipl.com

Executive Engineer - IV Urban Development Department, Tripura

N‐2641350.1210Bore hole No.:Co-ordinate :

Consultancy Services for preparation of detailed project report (DPR) based on detailed topographical survey, collection of hydrological data, detailed geotechnical sub-soil investigation along with detailed price/cost estimate and other relevant allied works of the project- Proposed Township at Govt. Land (Old Pineapple Garden), Behind Fernando Rehabilitation, near Don Bosco School, Nandannagar, Agartala.

TRIAXIAL COMPRESSION TEST (IS - 2720 PART - 11)

F.4 (2)-UDD/EW(S-XXXVIII) /2055-61 Dated, Agartala, the 14/08/2019

Complex Location :

4 (MIG)

1.90 19.460.50 2.16

Type of Test

Proving ring Constant Height of Specimen ( H )

TEST RESULT0.01 mm/Div.

Depth of Sample (m)

Bridge No. :

Dia of Specimen ( D )Least count of Gauge

Location : Nandannagar

2.20

-

0.000

0.500

1.000

1.500

2.000

0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0

She

ar S

tres

s (K

g/sq

cm)

Normal Stress (Kg/sqcm)

page:-93 of 102

Annexure C1

Annexure C1

Page 107: Geotech Report Nandannagar 2nd time · The present report the analysis of test results and recommendations regarding type of foundation, allowable bearing capacity. Also, for the

Project Name :

Client Name :

Project Code :

UU

38 mm

76 mm

Cell Pressure

(kg/cm2)Proving Ring Dial Reading

Load at Failure(kg)

Deviator

Stress (kg/cm2)

EffectiveNormal

Stress (kg/cm2)

Compression Gauge Reading

Strain at Failure

CohesionC

(kg/cm2)

Angle of Internal Friction

ф (Degree)

Bulk density (gm/cc) @

Triaxial Sample

Moisture Content

(%) @ Triaxial Sample

0.50 75.5 23.78 1.72 2.22 1370 0.180

1.00 80.0 25.20 1.81 2.81 1400 0.184

1.50 86.5 27.25 1.93 3.43 1500 0.197

-

TEST RESULTProving ring Constant

Depth of Sample (m) 4.50

4 (MIG)

BPC Consultant INDIA (P) Ltd.

Concept Building, Prince Park

514/A/1 Kalikapur Road, Kolkata - 700099

www.bpcipl.com

Executive Engineer - IV Urban Development Department, Tripura

Dia of Specimen ( D )0.01 mm/Div.

E‐327387.7490Co-ordinate :Location : Nandannagar

1.94 15.280.70 6.24

Height of Specimen ( H )0.315 kg/Div.

Consultancy Services for preparation of detailed project report (DPR) based on detailed topographical survey, collection of hydrological data, detailed geotechnical sub-soil investigation along with detailed price/cost estimate and other relevant allied works of the project- Proposed Township at Govt. Land (Old Pineapple Garden), Behind Fernando Rehabilitation, near Don Bosco School, Nandannagar, Agartala.

Least count of Gauge

Bridge No. :

TRIAXIAL COMPRESSION TEST (IS - 2720 PART - 11)

F.4 (2)-UDD/EW(S-XXXVIII) /2055-61 Dated, Agartala, the 14/08/2019

Old Pineapple Garden N‐2641350.1210

Complex Location :

Type of Test

Bore hole No.:

0.000

0.500

1.000

1.500

2.000

0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5

She

ar S

tres

s (K

g/sq

cm)

Normal Stress (Kg/sqcm)

page:-94 of 102

Annexure C1

Annexure C1

Page 108: Geotech Report Nandannagar 2nd time · The present report the analysis of test results and recommendations regarding type of foundation, allowable bearing capacity. Also, for the

Project Name :

Client Name :

Project Code :

UU

38 mm

76 mm

Cell Pressure

(kg/cm2)Proving Ring Dial Reading

Load at Failure(kg)

Deviator

Stress (kg/cm2)

EffectiveNormal

Stress (kg/cm2)

Compression Gauge Reading

Strain at Failure

CohesionC

(kg/cm2)

Angle of Internal Friction

ф (Degree)

Bulk density (gm/cc) @

Triaxial Sample

Moisture Content

(%) @ Triaxial Sample

0.50 75.0 23.63 1.67 2.17 1500 0.197

1.00 77.5 24.41 1.81 2.81 1200 0.158

1.50 81.0 25.52 1.83 3.33 1400 0.184

Old Pineapple Garden

0.315 kg/Div.

E‐327387.7490

BPC Consultant INDIA (P) Ltd.

Concept Building, Prince Park

514/A/1 Kalikapur Road, Kolkata - 700099

www.bpcipl.com

Executive Engineer - IV Urban Development Department, Tripura

N‐2641350.1210Bore hole No.:Co-ordinate :

Consultancy Services for preparation of detailed project report (DPR) based on detailed topographical survey, collection of hydrological data, detailed geotechnical sub-soil investigation along with detailed price/cost estimate and other relevant allied works of the project- Proposed Township at Govt. Land (Old Pineapple Garden), Behind Fernando Rehabilitation, near Don Bosco School, Nandannagar, Agartala.

TRIAXIAL COMPRESSION TEST (IS - 2720 PART - 11)

F.4 (2)-UDD/EW(S-XXXVIII) /2055-61 Dated, Agartala, the 14/08/2019

Complex Location :

4 (MIG)

1.96 13.340.74 4.29

Type of Test

Proving ring Constant Height of Specimen ( H )

TEST RESULT0.01 mm/Div.

Depth of Sample (m)

Bridge No. :

Dia of Specimen ( D )Least count of Gauge

Location : Nandannagar

7.50

-

0.000

0.500

1.000

1.500

2.000

0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5

She

ar S

tres

s (K

g/sq

cm)

Normal Stress (Kg/sqcm)

page:-95 of 102

Annexure C1

Annexure C1

Page 109: Geotech Report Nandannagar 2nd time · The present report the analysis of test results and recommendations regarding type of foundation, allowable bearing capacity. Also, for the

Project Name :

Client Name :

Project Code :

60 mm

60 mm

24 mm

Normal Stress

(kg/cm2)Proving Ring Dial Reading

Load at failure(kg)

Shear

Stress (kg/cm2)Compression

Gauge ReadingCorrected

Area (cm2)N

Value

Cohesion C

(kg/cm2)

Angle of Friction

ф(Degree)

Bulk Density gm/cc @ Direct

shear sample

Moisture Content

(%) @ Direct shear sample

0.50 33.5 11.62 0.36 600 32.40 -

1.00 58.5 20.30 0.64 700 31.80 - 0.08 29.24

1.50 81.0 28.11 0.92 900 30.60 -

-Old Pineapple

Garden

E‐327387.7490Bridge No. :

Proving ring Constant 0.347 kg/Div.

TEST RESULT

Depth of Sample (m) 10.50

Consultancy Services for preparation of detailed project report (DPR) based on detailed topographical survey, collection of hydrological data, detailed geotechnical sub-soil investigation along with detailed price/cost estimate and other relevant allied works of the project- Proposed Township at Govt. Land (Old Pineapple Garden), Behind Fernando Rehabilitation, near Don Bosco School, Nandannagar, Agartala.

Executive Engineer - IV Urban Development Department, Tripura

F.4 (2)-UDD/EW(S-XXXVIII) /2055-61 Dated, Agartala, the 14/08/2019

Least Count of Gauge 0.01 mm/Div.

DIRECT SHEAR TEST (IS - 2720 PART - 13)

Location : NandannagarN‐2641350.1210

Complex Location :

1.90 16.04

Height of Specimen ( H )

BPC Consultant INDIA (P) Ltd.

Concept Building, Prince Park514/A/1 Kalikapur Road, Kolkata - 700099

www.bpcipl.com

Bore hole No.:Co-ordinate :

Length of Specimen ( L )

Width of Specimen ( W )

4 (MIG)

y = 0.560x + 0.079

0.00

0.10

0.20

0.30

0.40

0.50

0.60

0.70

0.80

0.90

1.00

0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.90 1.00 1.10 1.20 1.30 1.40 1.50 1.60

She

ar S

tres

s (k

g/cm

2)

Normal Stress (kg/cm2)

DIRECT SHEAR TEST GRAPH

page:-96 of 102

Annexure C1

Annexure C1

Page 110: Geotech Report Nandannagar 2nd time · The present report the analysis of test results and recommendations regarding type of foundation, allowable bearing capacity. Also, for the

Project Name :

Client Name :

Project Code :

60 mm

60 mm

24 mm

Normal Stress

(kg/cm2)Proving Ring Dial Reading

Load at failure(kg)

Shear

Stress (kg/cm2)Compression

Gauge ReadingCorrected

Area (cm2)N

Value

Cohesion C

(kg/cm2)

Angle of Friction

ф(Degree)

Bulk Density gm/cc @ Direct

shear sample

Moisture Content

(%) @ Direct shear sample

0.50 32.0 11.10 0.35 700 31.80 -

1.00 61.0 21.17 0.65 600 32.40 - 0.05 31.27

1.50 86.0 29.84 0.96 800 31.20 -

1.93** 18.46

Height of Specimen ( H )

BPC Consultant INDIA (P) Ltd.

Concept Building, Prince Park514/A/1 Kalikapur Road, Kolkata - 700099

www.bpcipl.com

Bore hole No.:Co-ordinate :

Length of Specimen ( L )

Width of Specimen ( W )

4 (MIG)

Consultancy Services for preparation of detailed project report (DPR) based on detailed topographical survey, collection of hydrological data, detailed geotechnical sub-soil investigation along with detailed price/cost estimate and other relevant allied works of the project- Proposed Township at Govt. Land (Old Pineapple Garden), Behind Fernando Rehabilitation, near Don Bosco School, Nandannagar, Agartala.

Executive Engineer - IV Urban Development Department, Tripura

F.4 (2)-UDD/EW(S-XXXVIII) /2055-61 Dated, Agartala, the 14/08/2019

Least Count of Gauge 0.01 mm/Div.

DIRECT SHEAR TEST (IS - 2720 PART - 13)

Location : NandannagarN‐2641350.1210

Complex Location :

-Old Pineapple

Garden

E‐327387.7490Bridge No. :

Proving ring Constant 0.347 kg/Div.

TEST RESULT

Depth of Sample (m) 21.00+22.50

y = 0.607x + 0.046

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

1.00

1.20

0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.90 1.00 1.10 1.20 1.30 1.40 1.50 1.60

She

ar S

tres

s (k

g/cm

2)

Normal Stress (kg/cm2)

DIRECT SHEAR TEST GRAPH

page:-97 of 102

Annexure C1

Annexure C1

Page 111: Geotech Report Nandannagar 2nd time · The present report the analysis of test results and recommendations regarding type of foundation, allowable bearing capacity. Also, for the

Project Name :

Client Name :

Project Code :

Applied Pressure

(Kg/cm2)

Final Dial Gauge Reading

ChangedDial

Reading (cm)

Total Ht.Changed for Dial

Reading (cm)

VoidHeight

(cm)

Voidratio

Changed in

Void ratio

Coefficient of Com -

pressibility. (av)

Coefficient of Volume

Com -pressibility.

(mv)

Compression Index. (CC)

0.00 1873 2.00 0.864 0.761

0.10 1850 -0.0046 1.995 0.859 0.757 0.004 0.040 0.023

0.25 1809 -0.0082 1.987 0.851 0.749 0.007 0.048 0.027 0.018

0.50 1748 -0.0122 1.975 0.839 0.739 0.011 0.043 0.025 0.036

1.00 1666 -0.0164 1.959 0.823 0.724 0.014 0.029 0.017 0.048

2.00 1533 -0.0266 1.932 0.796 0.701 0.023 0.023 0.014 0.078

4.00 1367 -0.0332 1.899 0.763 0.672 0.029 0.015 0.009 0.097

8.00 1122 -0.0490 1.850 0.714 0.628 0.043 0.011 0.006 0.143

4.00 1146 0.0048 1.855 0.719 0.633 -0.004 0.001 0.001 0.014

0.25 1243 0.0194 1.874 0.738 0.650 -0.017 0.005 0.003 0.014

19.07

Bridge No.:

4 (MIG)Bore hole No. :

Complex Location :

NandannagarOld Pineapple

Garden

Least Count of Gauge

Location :Co-

ordinate:

Consultancy Services for preparation of detailed project report (DPR) based on detailed topographical survey, collection of hydrological data, detailed geotechnical sub-soil investigation along with detailed price/cost estimate and other relevant allied works of the project- Proposed Township at Govt. Land (Old Pineapple Garden), Behind Fernando Rehabilitation, near Don Bosco School, Nandannagar, Agartala.

BPC Consultant INDIA (P) Ltd.

Concept Building, Prince Park514/A/1 Kalikapur Road

Kolkata - 700099www.bpcipl.com

Executive Engineer - IV Urban Development Department, Tripura

F.4 (2)-UDD/EW(S-XXXVIII) /2055-61 Dated, Agartala, the 14/08/2019

0.002 mm/Div.

-E-327387.7490

N-2641350.1210

Specific Gravity of Soil ( G ) :-

Dia of Specimen ( D ) cm :-

Height of Specimen ( H ) cm :-

1.14Solid Height of Sample ( Hs ) cm :-2.64

Moisture Content (%) @ Consolidation Sample

FIXED TYPE

6

2

CONSOLIDATION TEST (IS : 2720 PART - 15)

Depth of Sample ( m ) 2.20

Condition of Test :-

Wt. of Dry Sample ( Wd ) gm :- 84.75

0.620

0.640

0.660

0.680

0.700

0.720

0.740

0.760

0.780

0.10 1.00 10.00

Vo

id r

atio

Pressure Range (kg/cm2)

e-log p CurveCompression Index (Cc ) ‐ 0.143

page:-98 of 102Annexure C1

Page 112: Geotech Report Nandannagar 2nd time · The present report the analysis of test results and recommendations regarding type of foundation, allowable bearing capacity. Also, for the

Project Name:

Client Name :

Project Code :

Applied Pressure

(Kg/cm2)

Final Dial Gauge Reading

ChangedDial

Reading (cm)

Total Ht.Changed for Dial

Reading (cm)

VoidHeight

(cm)

Voidratio

Changed in

Void ratio

Coefficient of Com -

pressibility. (av)

Coefficient of Volume

Com -pressibility.

(mv)

Compression Index. (CC)

0.00 1798 2.00 0.768 0.623

0.10 1782 -0.0032 1.997 0.764 0.620 0.003 0.026 0.016

0.25 1760 -0.0044 1.992 0.760 0.617 0.004 0.024 0.015 0.009

0.50 1728 -0.0064 1.986 0.754 0.611 0.005 0.021 0.013 0.017

1.00 1672 -0.0112 1.975 0.742 0.602 0.009 0.018 0.011 0.030

2.00 1582 -0.0180 1.957 0.724 0.588 0.015 0.015 0.009 0.049

4.00 1459 -0.0246 1.932 0.700 0.568 0.020 0.010 0.006 0.066

8.00 1264 -0.0390 1.893 0.661 0.536 0.032 0.008 0.005 0.105

4.00 1290 0.0052 1.898 0.666 0.540 -0.004 0.001 0.001 0.014

0.25 1345 0.0110 1.909 0.677 0.549 -0.009 0.002 0.002 0.007

Consultancy Services for preparation of detailed project report (DPR) based on detailed topographical survey, collection of hydrological data, detailed geotechnical sub-soil investigation along with detailed price/cost estimate and other relevant allied works of the project- Proposed Township at Govt. Land (Old Pineapple Garden), Behind Fernando Rehabilitation, near Don Bosco School, Nandannagar, Agartala.

BPC Consultant INDIA (P) Ltd.

Concept Building, Prince Park514/A/1 Kalikapur Road

Kolkata - 700099www.bpcipl.com

Executive Engineer - IV Urban Development Department, Tripura

F.4 (2)-UDD/EW(S-XXXVIII) /2055-61 Dated, Agartala, the 14/08/2019

2

CONSOLIDATION TEST (IS : 2720 PART - 15)

Depth of Sample ( m ) 4.50

Condition of Test :-

Wt. of Dry Sample ( Wd ) gm :-

Nandannagar

0.002 mm/Div.

-E-327387.7490

N-2641350.1210

91.26

Old Pineapple Garden

15.60 6

FIXED TYPE

Least Count of Gauge

Location :Co-

ordinate:Bridge No.:

1.23Solid Height of Sample ( Hs ) cm :-

4 (MIG)Bore hole No. :

Complex Location :

Specific Gravity of Soil ( G ) :-

Dia of Specimen ( D ) cm :-

Height of Specimen ( H ) cm :-

2.62

Moisture Content (%) @ Consolidation Sample

0.520

0.540

0.560

0.580

0.600

0.620

0.640

0.10 1.00 10.00

Vo

id r

atio

Pressure Range (kg/cm2)

e-log p CurveCompression Index (Cc ) ‐ 0.105

page:-99 of 102Annexure C1

Page 113: Geotech Report Nandannagar 2nd time · The present report the analysis of test results and recommendations regarding type of foundation, allowable bearing capacity. Also, for the

Project Name :

Client Name :

Project Code :

Applied Pressure

(Kg/cm2)

Final Dial Gauge Reading

ChangedDial

Reading (cm)

Total Ht.Changed for Dial

Reading (cm)

VoidHeight

(cm)

Voidratio

Changed in

Void ratio

Coefficient of Com -

pressibility. (av)

Coefficient of Volume

Com -pressibility.

(mv)

Compression Index. (CC)

0.00 1872 2.00 0.763 0.617

0.10 1862 -0.0020 1.998 0.761 0.616 0.002 0.016 0.010

0.25 1844 -0.0036 1.994 0.758 0.613 0.003 0.019 0.012 0.007

0.50 1816 -0.0056 1.989 0.752 0.608 0.005 0.018 0.011 0.015

1.00 1772 -0.0088 1.980 0.743 0.601 0.007 0.014 0.009 0.024

2.00 1701 -0.0142 1.966 0.729 0.590 0.011 0.011 0.007 0.038

4.00 1582 -0.0238 1.942 0.705 0.570 0.019 0.010 0.006 0.064

8.00 1410 -0.0344 1.908 0.671 0.542 0.028 0.007 0.004 0.092

4.00 1422 0.0024 1.910 0.673 0.544 -0.002 0.000 0.000 0.006

0.25 1471 0.0098 1.920 0.683 0.552 -0.008 0.002 0.001 0.007

14.38

Bridge No.:

4 (MIG)Bore hole No. :

Complex Location :

NandannagarOld Pineapple

Garden

Least Count of Gauge

Location :Co-

ordinate:

Consultancy Services for preparation of detailed project report (DPR) based on detailed topographical survey, collection of hydrological data, detailed geotechnical sub-soil investigation along with detailed price/cost estimate and other relevant allied works of the project- Proposed Township at Govt. Land (Old Pineapple Garden), Behind Fernando Rehabilitation, near Don Bosco School, Nandannagar, Agartala.

BPC Consultant INDIA (P) Ltd.

Concept Building, Prince Park514/A/1 Kalikapur Road

Kolkata - 700099www.bpcipl.com

Executive Engineer - IV Urban Development Department, Tripura

F.4 (2)-UDD/EW(S-XXXVIII) /2055-61 Dated, Agartala, the 14/08/2019

0.002 mm/Div.

-E-327387.7490

N-2641350.1210

Specific Gravity of Soil ( G ) :-

Dia of Specimen ( D ) cm :-

Height of Specimen ( H ) cm :-

1.24Solid Height of Sample ( Hs ) cm :-2.60

Moisture Content (%) @ Consolidation Sample

FIXED TYPE

6

2

CONSOLIDATION TEST (IS : 2720 PART - 15)

Depth of Sample ( m ) 7.50

Condition of Test :-

Wt. of Dry Sample ( Wd ) gm :- 90.87

0.530

0.550

0.570

0.590

0.610

0.630

0.10 1.00 10.00

Vo

id r

atio

Pressure Range (kg/cm2)

e-log p CurveCompression Index (Cc ) ‐ 0.092

page:-100 of 102Annexure C1

Page 114: Geotech Report Nandannagar 2nd time · The present report the analysis of test results and recommendations regarding type of foundation, allowable bearing capacity. Also, for the

Bore hole No.

SampleNo.

Depth (m)WL

(%)

WP

(%)

IP

(%)

UDS_1 2.20 38 22 16

UDS_2 4.50 41 19 22

S/D_3 6.00 57 28 29

UDS_3 7.50 39 22 17

- - - - -

- - - - -

- - - - -

- - - - -

- - - - -

X Y

20 0

100 58

0 4

25.48 4

0 7

29.59 7

35 0

35 25

50 0

50 37

BH-4 (MIG)

Client Name :

Project Code :

NandannagarN-2641350.1210

Old Pineapple

Garden

CH

CI

Location :

Soil Classification

CI

Consultancy Services for preparation of detailed project report (DPR) based on detailed topographical survey, collection of hydrological data, detailed geotechnical sub-soil investigation along with detailed price/cost estimate and other relevant allied works of the project- Proposed Township at Govt. Land (Old Pineapple Garden), Behind Fernando Rehabilitation, near Don Bosco School, Nandannagar, Agartala.

Executive Engineer - IV Urban Development Department, Tripura

Co-ordinate:

E-327387.7490

Project Name :

Bridge No.:

F.4 (2)-UDD/EW(S-XXXVIII) /2055-61 Dated, Agartala, the 14/08/2019

SOIL CLASSIFICATION (IS - 1498)

BPC Consultant INDIA (P) Ltd.

Concept Building, Prince Park514/A/1 Kalikapur Road

Kolkata - 700099

www.bpcipl.com

-Complex

Location :

WL : Liquid limit WP : Plastic Limit Ip : Plasticity Index Np : Non Plastic NA : Not Applicable

-

-

-

-

^^ : Soil Classification in this case is based on average layer properties.

-

CI

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

Pla

sti

cit

y In

de

x I

p (%

)

Liquid Limit WL (%)

PLASTICITY CHART

2.20 4.50 6.00 7.50

35= LW

50= L W

A - LINE

)20-LW(0.73= PI

CI

CH

MH / OH

MI / OICL- ML

ML / OLML

CL

page:-101 of 102

Annexure C1

Annexure C1

Page 115: Geotech Report Nandannagar 2nd time · The present report the analysis of test results and recommendations regarding type of foundation, allowable bearing capacity. Also, for the

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ANNEXURE-C

Chemical Test Result Nandannagar

Annexure C1

Annexure C1

Page 116: Geotech Report Nandannagar 2nd time · The present report the analysis of test results and recommendations regarding type of foundation, allowable bearing capacity. Also, for the

ChemicalAnalysisofCollectedSoilSamples

BH No. Depth (m) pH Value Total Soluble

Sulphate as SO3=

(% by mass)

Total Chloride Content as Cl-

(water extract)

(% by mass)

BH-1 2.50 to 2.95 6.52 0.049 0.009

BH-2 2.50 to 2.45 7.02 0.062 0.006

BH-3 7.50 to 7.95 6.38 0.057 0.007

BH-4 4.50 to 4.95 6.24 0.041 0.008

Test Specification: - IS:2720 (Relevant Part) & BS: 1377(P-3)

Remarks: The above specific sample was duly tested as per relevant test method.

CONCLUSION

From the above chemical test results, it can be seen clearly that all the three parameters (i.e.) pH, chlorides and sulphates are well within permissible limits in soil samples. To conclude Ordinary Portland cement Portland Slag Cement or Portland Pozzolana Cement can be used for the purpose. No Special measures are necessary.

page:-102 of 102

Annexure C1

Annexure C1

Page 117: Geotech Report Nandannagar 2nd time · The present report the analysis of test results and recommendations regarding type of foundation, allowable bearing capacity. Also, for the

S

E

C

U

R

IT

Y

R

O

O

M

W

IT

H

C

C

T

V

S

E

R

V

E

L

A

N

C

E

R

O

A

D

5.5M

. W

ID

E

406.17 sq. m

t A

RE

A

W

AT

ER

R

ES

ER

VE

R

257.42 sq. m

t A

RE

A

W

AT

ER

T

RE

AT

M

EN

T P

LA

NT

M

A

IN

E

N

T

R

A

N

C

E

R

O

A

D

5.5M

. W

ID

E

TO

T LO

T

GR

OU

ND

4

N

O

S

1

6

3

K

v

A

T

F

R

O

A

D

3.75M

. W

ID

E

R

O

A

D

3.75M

. W

ID

E

KA

LI

T

EM

PLE

FU

TU

RE

E

XT

EN

SIO

N

FU

TU

RE

EX

TE

NS

IO

N

R A I N W A T E R H A R V E S T I N G

B

E

N

C

H

E

S

FU

RN

IS

HE

D

AP

RO

N

FU

RN

IS

HE

D

AP

RO

N

S

O

L

I

D

W

A

S

T

E

M

A

N

A

G

E

M

E

N

T

SE

PT

IC

T

AN

K

SO

CK

P

IT

SEPTIC TANK

SO

CK

P

IT

SE

PT

IC

T

AN

K

SO

CK

P

IT

SEPTIC TANK

SOCK PIT

S

E

P

T

IC

T

A

N

K

SO

CK

P

IT

S

E

P

T

I

C

T

A

N

K

S

O

C

K

P

I

T

E

X

IT

S

E

C

U

R

IT

Y

R

O

O

M

W

IT

H

C

C

T

V

S

E

R

V

E

L

A

N

C

E

M

IG

HIG

1

HIG

2

LIG

T

O

W

A

R

D

S

G

B

C

O

N

N

E

C

T

S

T

O

G

B

-

K

H

A

Y

E

R

P

U

R

R

O

A

D

NG

Z

ON

E

HIG

3

CONSULTANT : Concept Building, Prince Park,

Ph: +9133-24847526, 24847527514/A/1 Kalikapur Road, Kolkata - 700099, W. B.

mail : [email protected]

CORPORATE OFFICE:

web : www.bpcipl.com

TRIPURA URBAN PLANNING AND

DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

DRAWN BY: P.PAUL

CHECKED BY: G.PAUL

DATE :- SEPTEMBER' 2019

Site Layout is subjected to minor

modifications

D I S C L A I M E R

NOTES

LAND AREA = 5.79 Acre (Approx.)

TOTAL BUILT UP AREA = 37855.95

SQM (407478.10 SQFT) (Approx.)

- AMENITIES LIST -

· OFFICE

· GYM

· OPEN PARKING

· COVERED PARKING

· SHOPPING COMPLEX

· COMMUNITY HALL

· PARK

· WALKWAYS

· SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT

· TOT-LOT GROUND

· CC-TV SURVEILLANCE

· SECURITY ROOM

ANNEXURE C2 - LAYOUT PLAN OF NANDANNAGAR

SITE

PAGE - 1 OF 2

TITLE - LAYOUT PLAN FOR NANDANNAGAR SITE

AutoCAD SHX Text
HOUSE
AutoCAD SHX Text
HOUSE
AutoCAD SHX Text
HOUSE
AutoCAD SHX Text
3.5M ROAD WIDTH
AutoCAD SHX Text
PARKING ZONE
Page 118: Geotech Report Nandannagar 2nd time · The present report the analysis of test results and recommendations regarding type of foundation, allowable bearing capacity. Also, for the

288.46 s

q ft a

rea

HIG

2

31 N

O

S C

O

VE

RE

D C

AR

P

AR

KE

D

S

E

C

U

R

IT

Y

R

O

O

M

W

IT

H

C

C

T

V

S

E

R

V

E

L

A

N

C

E

R

O

A

D

5.5M

. W

ID

E

406.17 sq. m

t A

RE

A

W

AT

ER

R

ES

ER

VE

R

257.42 sq. m

t A

RE

A

W

AT

ER

T

RE

AT

M

EN

T P

LA

NT

M

A

IN

E

N

T

R

A

N

C

E

R

O

A

D

5.5M

. W

ID

E

TO

T LO

T

GR

OU

ND

4

N

O

S

1

6

3

K

v

A

T

F

R

O

A

D

3.75M

. W

ID

E

R

O

A

D

3.75M

. W

ID

E

KA

LI

T

EM

PLE

24 N

OS

C

OV

ER

ED

C

AR

P

AR

KE

D

2

2

N

O

S

O

P

E

N

P

A

R

K

IN

G

26 N

OS

P

AR

KIN

G

20 N

O

S P

AR

KIN

G

42 N

O

S

P

A

R

K

IN

G

40N

OS

P

AR

KIN

G

35 N

OS

O

PE

N

PA

RK

IN

G

FU

TU

RE

E

XT

EN

SIO

N

FU

TU

RE

EX

TE

NS

IO

N

R A I N W A T E R H A R V E S T I N G

B

E

N

C

H

E

S

FU

RN

IS

HE

D

AP

RO

N

FU

RN

IS

HE

D

AP

RO

N

S

O

L

I

D

W

A

S

T

E

M

A

N

A

G

E

M

E

N

T

SE

PT

IC

T

AN

K

SO

CK

P

IT

SEPTIC TANK

SO

CK

P

IT

SE

PT

IC

T

AN

K

SO

CK

P

IT

SEPTIC TANK

SOCK PIT

S

E

P

T

IC

T

A

N

K

SO

CK

P

IT

S

E

P

T

I

C

T

A

N

K

S

O

C

K

P

I

T

E

X

IT

S

E

C

U

R

IT

Y

R

O

O

M

W

IT

H

C

C

T

V

S

E

R

V

E

L

A

N

C

E

M

IG

75 N

OS

C

OV

ER

ED

C

AR

P

AR

KE

D

6 N

OS

O

PE

N P

AR

KIN

G

S

H

O

P

2

4

8

.5

0

s

q

ft a

r

e

a

SH

OP

28

8.4

6 sq

ft area

SH

OP

20

8.97 sq

ft area

SH

OP

20

8.97 sq

ft area

SH

OP

20

8.97 sq

ft area

SH

OP

417.93 sq ft area

SH

OP

417.93sq ft area

C

1

C2

C

3

C

4

C

5

C

6

C7

C8

C9

C

10

C11

C12

C

13

C14

C15

C16

C

17

C

18

C

19

C

20

C

21

C

22

C23

C24

C

25

C26

C27

C

28

C

29

C

30

C31

C32

C

33

C

34

C

35

C36

C

37

C

38

C

39

C

40

C

41

C

42

C

43

C

44

C

45

C

46

C

47

C

48

C

49

C

50

C

51

C52

C

53

C54

C

55

C56

C

57

C

58

C

59

C60

C61

C

62

C

63

C

64

C

65

C

66

C

67

C

68

C

69

C

70

C

71

C

72

C

73

C

74

C

75

C76

C77

C

78

C79

C80

C81

C

82

C

83

C

84

C

85

C86

C

87

C

88

C

89

C90

C

91

C

92

C

93

C

94

C95

C

96

C

97

C

98

C

99

C

100

C

101

C102

C

103

C

104

C

105

C

106

C07

C

08

C

09

C

110

C

111

C

112

C

113

C

114

C

115

C

116

C

117

C118

C

119

C

120

C

121

C

122

C123

C

124

C

125

C126

C127

C128

C

134

C135

C

131

C132

C

133

C

129

C130

C

136

C

137

C

138

C

139

C

140

C

141

C

142

C

143

C

144

C

145

C

146

C

147

C

148

C

149

C

150

C

151

C

152

C

153

C

154

C

155

C

156

C

157

C158

C

159

C

160

C

161

C

162

C163

C

164

C

165

C

166

C

167

C

168

C

169

C

170

C

171

C

172

C

173

C

174

C

175

C

176

C

177

C

178

C

179

C

180

C

181

C

183

C

184

C

185

C

186

C

187

C

188

C189

C

190

C

191

C

192

C

202

C

203

C

204

C

205

C

206

C

207

C

208

C

209

C

210

C

211

C

212

C

213

C

214

C

215

C

216

C

217

C

218

C

219

C

220

C221

C222

C223

C

224

C

225

C

226

C227

C

228

C

229

C

230

C

231

C232

C

233

C

234

C

235

C

236

C237

C238

C239

C

240

C241

C

242

C

243

C244

C

255

C

256

C

245

C

246

C247

C

248

C

249

C250

C

251

C

258

C

259

C

260

C

257

C

261

C

262

C

263

C

264

C

265

C

274

C

275

C

276

C

277

C278

C279

C

266

C

267

C

268

C

269

C270

C

271

C

272

C273

C

252

C

253

C

254

C

280

C

281

C

282

C

283

C

284

C

285

C

292

C

293

C

286

C

287

C

288

C

289

C290

C

291

C

298

C

299

C

305

C

306

C

307

C

308

C

300

C

301

C

302

C

309

C

310

C

313

C

314

C

315

C

316

C

317

C

318

C

323

C

324

C

325

C

326

C

327

C

328

C

329

C

330

C

331

C332

C333

C

182

C

193

C

194

C195

C

196

C

197

C

198

C

199

C

200

C

201

T

O

W

A

R

D

S

G

B

C

O

N

N

E

C

T

S

T

O

G

B

-

K

H

A

Y

E

R

P

U

R

R

O

A

D

S

H

O

P

2

4

8

.5

0

s

q

ft a

r

e

a

S

H

O

P

2

4

8

.5

0

s

q

ft a

r

e

a

S

H

O

P

2

4

8

.5

0

s

q

ft a

r

e

a

LA

DIE

S - G

YM

GE

NTS

- G

YM

O

F

F

IC

E

C

O

M

M

U

IN

IT

Y

H

A

L

L

O

F

F

IC

E

S

H

O

P

HIG

1

HIG

2

LIG

HIG

3

CONSULTANT : Concept Building, Prince Park,

Ph: +9133-24847526, 24847527514/A/1 Kalikapur Road, Kolkata - 700099, W. B.

mail : [email protected]

CORPORATE OFFICE:

web : www.bpcipl.com

TRIPURA URBAN PLANNING AND

DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

ANNEXURE C2 - LAYOUT PLAN OF NANDANNAGAR

SITE

PAGE - 2 OF 2

DRAWN BY: P.PAUL

CHECKED BY: G.PAUL

DATE :- SEPTEMBER' 2019

Parking Layout is subjected to minor

modifications

TITLE - LAYOUT PLAN FOR NANDANNAGAR SITE (PARKING AND COMMERCIAL)

D I S C L A I M E R

NOTES

OPEN PARKING = 191 NOS. (Approx.)

COVERED PARKING = 130

NOS.(Approx.)

TOTAL PARKING = 321 NOS.

COMMERCIAL AREA = 12000 SQFT

(Approx.)

COMMERCIAL AREA

SHADED CAR PARKING

AutoCAD SHX Text
HOUSE
AutoCAD SHX Text
HOUSE
AutoCAD SHX Text
HOUSE
AutoCAD SHX Text
3.5M ROAD WIDTH
Page 119: Geotech Report Nandannagar 2nd time · The present report the analysis of test results and recommendations regarding type of foundation, allowable bearing capacity. Also, for the

KITCHEN

2050 X 2350

E

1385 1700

0.9

M

W

ID

E B

AL

CO

NY

E

1200 1700

KITCHEN

2050 X 2350

E

1385 1700

0.9

M

W

ID

E B

AL

CO

NY

E

1200 1700

KITCHEN

2050 X 2350

E

1385 1700

0.9

M

W

ID

E B

AL

CO

NY

E

1200 1700

KIT

CH

EN

20

50

X

2

35

0

E

13

85

1

70

0

0.9 M WIDE BALCONY

E

12

00

1

70

0

KIT

CH

EN

20

50

X

2

35

0

E

13

85

1

70

0

0.9 M WIDE BALCONY

E

12

00

1

70

0

KITCHEN

2050 X 2350

E

1385 1700

0.9

M

W

ID

E B

AL

CO

NY

E

1200 1700

KITCHEN

2050 X 2350

E

1385 1700

0.9

M

W

ID

E B

AL

CO

NY

E

1200 1700

KIT

CH

EN

20

50

X

2

35

0

E

13

85

1

70

0

0.9 M WIDE BALCONY

E

12

00

1

70

0

KIT

CH

EN

20

50

X

2

35

0

E

13

85

1

70

0

0.9 M WIDE BALCONY

E

12

00

1

70

0

CONSULTANT : Concept Building, Prince Park,

Ph: +9133-24847526, 24847527514/A/1 Kalikapur Road, Kolkata - 700099, W. B.

mail : [email protected]

CORPORATE OFFICE:

web : www.bpcipl.com

TRIPURA URBAN PLANNING AND

DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

ANNEXURE C3 - INDIVIDUAL UNIT PLAN OF LIG AND

LAYOUT OF LIG TOWER OF NANDANNAGAR SITE

PAGE - 1 OF 2

DRAWN BY: P.PAUL

CHECKED BY: G.PAUL

DATE :- SEPTEMBER' 2019

Typical Unit Plan is subjected to minor

modifications

NOTES

CARPET AREA OF ONE UNIT =

500.16 SQ FT

CARPET AREA PER

FLOOR=500.16X8=4001.28 SQ FT

BUILT UP AREA OF GROUND FLOOR

(PLINTH AREA) = 5430.69 SQ FT

BUILT UP AREA OF EACH FLOOR

(ABOVE GROUND FLOOR) = 5661.33

SQ FT

TOTAL BUILT UP AREA OF BUILDING

= 5430.69+(5661.33 X 14) = 84689.31

SQ FT

TOTAL CARPET AREA = 4001.28 X 14

= 56017.92 SQ FT

CIRCULATION AREA PER FLOOR =

1257.53 SQ FT

TITLE - INDIVIDUAL UNIT PLAN OF LIG TOWER (NANDANNAGAR SITE)

D I S C L A I M E R

AutoCAD SHX Text
BED ROOM 3000 X 3000
AutoCAD SHX Text
BED ROOM 3000 X 3000
AutoCAD SHX Text
LIVING CUM DINING 3252 X 3550
AutoCAD SHX Text
TOILET T X1700
AutoCAD SHX Text
TOILET T X1700
AutoCAD SHX Text
BED ROOM 3000 X 3000
AutoCAD SHX Text
BED ROOM 3000 X 3000
AutoCAD SHX Text
LIVING CUM DINING 3252 X 3550
AutoCAD SHX Text
TOILET T X1700
AutoCAD SHX Text
TOILET T X1700
AutoCAD SHX Text
BED ROOM 3000 X 3000
AutoCAD SHX Text
BED ROOM 3000 X 3000
AutoCAD SHX Text
LIVING CUM DINING 3252 X 3550
AutoCAD SHX Text
TOILET T X1700
AutoCAD SHX Text
TOILET T X1700
AutoCAD SHX Text
BED ROOM 3000 X 3000
AutoCAD SHX Text
BED ROOM 3000 X 3000
AutoCAD SHX Text
LIVING CUM DINING 3252 X 3550
AutoCAD SHX Text
TOILET T X1700
AutoCAD SHX Text
TOILET T X1700
AutoCAD SHX Text
BED ROOM 3000 X 3000
AutoCAD SHX Text
BED ROOM 3000 X 3000
AutoCAD SHX Text
LIVING CUM DINING 3252 X 3550
AutoCAD SHX Text
TOILET T X1700
AutoCAD SHX Text
TOILET T X1700
AutoCAD SHX Text
BED ROOM 3000 X 3000
AutoCAD SHX Text
BED ROOM 3000 X 3000
AutoCAD SHX Text
LIVING CUM DINING 3252 X 3550
AutoCAD SHX Text
TOILET T X1700
AutoCAD SHX Text
TOILET T X1700
AutoCAD SHX Text
BED ROOM 3000 X 3000
AutoCAD SHX Text
BED ROOM 3000 X 3000
AutoCAD SHX Text
LIVING CUM DINING 3252 X 3550
AutoCAD SHX Text
TOILET T X1700
AutoCAD SHX Text
TOILET T X1700
AutoCAD SHX Text
BED ROOM 3000 X 3000
AutoCAD SHX Text
BED ROOM 3000 X 3000
AutoCAD SHX Text
LIVING CUM DINING 3252 X 3550
AutoCAD SHX Text
TOILET T X1700
AutoCAD SHX Text
TOILET T X1700
AutoCAD SHX Text
BED ROOM 3000 X 3000
AutoCAD SHX Text
BED ROOM 3000 X 3000
AutoCAD SHX Text
LIVING CUM DINING 3252 X 3550
AutoCAD SHX Text
TOILET T X1700
AutoCAD SHX Text
TOILET T X1700
Page 120: Geotech Report Nandannagar 2nd time · The present report the analysis of test results and recommendations regarding type of foundation, allowable bearing capacity. Also, for the

KIT

CH

EN

2050 X

2350

E

1385

1700

0.9 M WIDE BALCONY

E

1200

1700

KIT

CH

EN

2050 X

2350

E

1385

1700

0.9 M WIDE BALCONY

E

1200

1700

KITCHEN

2050 X 2350

E

1385 1700

0.9 M

W

ID

E B

ALC

ON

Y

E

1200 1700

KITCHEN

2050 X 2350

E

1385 1700

0.9 M

W

ID

E B

ALC

ON

Y

E

1200 1700

KIT

CH

EN

2050 X

2350

E

1385

1700

0.9 M WIDE BALCONY

E

1200

1700

KIT

CH

EN

2050 X

2350

E

1385

1700

0.9 M WIDE BALCONY

E

1200

1700

KITCHEN

2050 X 2350

E

1385 1700

0.9 M

W

ID

E B

ALC

ON

Y

E

1200 1700

KITCHEN

2050 X 2350

E

1385 1700

0.9 M

W

ID

E B

ALC

ON

Y

E

1200 1700

CONSULTANT : Concept Building, Prince Park,

Ph: +9133-24847526, 24847527514/A/1 Kalikapur Road, Kolkata - 700099, W. B.

mail : [email protected]

CORPORATE OFFICE:

web : www.bpcipl.com

TRIPURA URBAN PLANNING AND

DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

ANNEXURE C3 - INDIVIDUAL UNIT PLAN OF LIG AND

LAYOUT OF LIG TOWER OF NANDANNAGAR SITE

PAGE - 2 OF 2

DRAWN BY: P.PAUL

CHECKED BY: G.PAUL

DATE :- SEPTEMBER' 2019

Typical Floor Plan is subjected to minor

modifications

NOTES

CARPET AREA OF ONE UNIT =

500.16 SQ FT

CARPET AREA PER

FLOOR=500.16X8=4001.28 SQ FT

BUILT UP AREA OF GROUND FLOOR

(PLINTH AREA) = 5430.69 SQ FT

BUILT UP AREA OF EACH FLOOR

(ABOVE GROUND FLOOR) = 5661.33

SQ FT

TOTAL BUILT UP AREA OF BUILDING

= 5430.69+(5661.33 X 14) = 84689.31

SQ FT

TOTAL CARPET AREA = 4001.28 X 14

= 56017.92 SQ FT

CIRCULATION AREA PER FLOOR =

1257.53 SQ FT

TITLE - FLOOR PLAN OF LIG TOWER (NANDANNAGAR SITE)

D I S C L A I M E R

AutoCAD SHX Text
BED ROOM 3000 X 3000
AutoCAD SHX Text
BED ROOM 3000 X 3000
AutoCAD SHX Text
LIVING CUM DINING 3252 X 3550
AutoCAD SHX Text
TOILET T X1700
AutoCAD SHX Text
TOILET T X1700
AutoCAD SHX Text
BED ROOM 3000 X 3000
AutoCAD SHX Text
BED ROOM 3000 X 3000
AutoCAD SHX Text
LIVING CUM DINING 3252 X 3550
AutoCAD SHX Text
TOILET T X1700
AutoCAD SHX Text
TOILET T X1700
AutoCAD SHX Text
BED ROOM 3000 X 3000
AutoCAD SHX Text
BED ROOM 3000 X 3000
AutoCAD SHX Text
LIVING CUM DINING 3252 X 3550
AutoCAD SHX Text
TOILET T X1700
AutoCAD SHX Text
TOILET T X1700
AutoCAD SHX Text
BED ROOM 3000 X 3000
AutoCAD SHX Text
BED ROOM 3000 X 3000
AutoCAD SHX Text
LIVING CUM DINING 3252 X 3550
AutoCAD SHX Text
TOILET T X1700
AutoCAD SHX Text
TOILET T X1700
AutoCAD SHX Text
BED ROOM 3000 X 3000
AutoCAD SHX Text
BED ROOM 3000 X 3000
AutoCAD SHX Text
LIVING CUM DINING 3252 X 3550
AutoCAD SHX Text
TOILET T X1700
AutoCAD SHX Text
TOILET T X1700
AutoCAD SHX Text
BED ROOM 3000 X 3000
AutoCAD SHX Text
BED ROOM 3000 X 3000
AutoCAD SHX Text
LIVING CUM DINING 3252 X 3550
AutoCAD SHX Text
TOILET T X1700
AutoCAD SHX Text
TOILET T X1700
AutoCAD SHX Text
BED ROOM 3000 X 3000
AutoCAD SHX Text
BED ROOM 3000 X 3000
AutoCAD SHX Text
LIVING CUM DINING 3252 X 3550
AutoCAD SHX Text
TOILET T X1700
AutoCAD SHX Text
TOILET T X1700
AutoCAD SHX Text
BED ROOM 3000 X 3000
AutoCAD SHX Text
BED ROOM 3000 X 3000
AutoCAD SHX Text
LIVING CUM DINING 3252 X 3550
AutoCAD SHX Text
TOILET T X1700
AutoCAD SHX Text
TOILET T X1700
Page 121: Geotech Report Nandannagar 2nd time · The present report the analysis of test results and recommendations regarding type of foundation, allowable bearing capacity. Also, for the

CONSULTANT : Concept Building, Prince Park,

Ph: +9133-24847526, 24847527514/A/1 Kalikapur Road, Kolkata - 700099, W. B.

mail : [email protected]

CORPORATE OFFICE:

web : www.bpcipl.com

TRIPURA URBAN PLANNING AND

DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

ANNEXURE C4 - INDIVIDUAL UNIT PLAN OF MIG AND

LAYOUT OF MIG TOWER OF NANDANNAGAR SITE

PAGE - 1 OF 2

DRAWN BY: P.PAUL

CHECKED BY: G.PAUL

DATE :- SEPTEMBER' 2019

Typical Unit Plan is subjected to minor

modifications

TITLE - INDIVIDUAL UNIT PLAN OF MIG TOWER (NANDANNAGAR SITE)

D I S C L A I M E R

NOTES

AutoCAD SHX Text
LIVING/DINING
AutoCAD SHX Text
3435X4375
AutoCAD SHX Text
KITCHEN
AutoCAD SHX Text
3560X2225
AutoCAD SHX Text
BED ROOM
AutoCAD SHX Text
3100X3350
AutoCAD SHX Text
TOILET
AutoCAD SHX Text
2250X1850
AutoCAD SHX Text
BED ROOM
AutoCAD SHX Text
3050X3600
AutoCAD SHX Text
TOILET
AutoCAD SHX Text
2550X1850
AutoCAD SHX Text
1 M WIDE BALCONY
AutoCAD SHX Text
LIVING/DINING
AutoCAD SHX Text
3435X4375
AutoCAD SHX Text
KITCHEN
AutoCAD SHX Text
3560X2225
AutoCAD SHX Text
BED ROOM
AutoCAD SHX Text
3100X3350
AutoCAD SHX Text
TOILET
AutoCAD SHX Text
2250X1850
AutoCAD SHX Text
BED ROOM
AutoCAD SHX Text
3050X3600
AutoCAD SHX Text
TOILET
AutoCAD SHX Text
2550X1850
AutoCAD SHX Text
1 M WIDE BALCONY
AutoCAD SHX Text
LIVING/DINING
AutoCAD SHX Text
3435X4375
AutoCAD SHX Text
KITCHEN
AutoCAD SHX Text
3560X2225
AutoCAD SHX Text
BED ROOM
AutoCAD SHX Text
3100X3350
AutoCAD SHX Text
TOILET
AutoCAD SHX Text
2250X1850
AutoCAD SHX Text
BED ROOM
AutoCAD SHX Text
3050X3600
AutoCAD SHX Text
TOILET
AutoCAD SHX Text
2550X1850
AutoCAD SHX Text
1 M WIDE BALCONY
AutoCAD SHX Text
LIVING/DINING
AutoCAD SHX Text
3435X4375
AutoCAD SHX Text
KITCHEN
AutoCAD SHX Text
3560X2225
AutoCAD SHX Text
BED ROOM
AutoCAD SHX Text
3100X3350
AutoCAD SHX Text
TOILET
AutoCAD SHX Text
2250X1850
AutoCAD SHX Text
BED ROOM
AutoCAD SHX Text
3050X3600
AutoCAD SHX Text
TOILET
AutoCAD SHX Text
2550X1850
AutoCAD SHX Text
1 M WIDE BALCONY
AutoCAD SHX Text
LIVING/DINING
AutoCAD SHX Text
3435X4375
AutoCAD SHX Text
KITCHEN
AutoCAD SHX Text
3560X2225
AutoCAD SHX Text
BED ROOM
AutoCAD SHX Text
3100X3350
AutoCAD SHX Text
TOILET
AutoCAD SHX Text
2250X1850
AutoCAD SHX Text
BED ROOM
AutoCAD SHX Text
3050X3600
AutoCAD SHX Text
TOILET
AutoCAD SHX Text
2550X1850
AutoCAD SHX Text
1 M WIDE BALCONY
AutoCAD SHX Text
LIVING/DINING
AutoCAD SHX Text
3435X4375
AutoCAD SHX Text
KITCHEN
AutoCAD SHX Text
3560X2225
AutoCAD SHX Text
BED ROOM
AutoCAD SHX Text
3100X3350
AutoCAD SHX Text
TOILET
AutoCAD SHX Text
2250X1850
AutoCAD SHX Text
BED ROOM
AutoCAD SHX Text
3050X3600
AutoCAD SHX Text
TOILET
AutoCAD SHX Text
2550X1850
AutoCAD SHX Text
1 M WIDE BALCONY
AutoCAD SHX Text
LIVING/DINING
AutoCAD SHX Text
3435X4375
AutoCAD SHX Text
KITCHEN
AutoCAD SHX Text
3560X2225
AutoCAD SHX Text
BED ROOM
AutoCAD SHX Text
3100X3350
AutoCAD SHX Text
TOILET
AutoCAD SHX Text
2250X1850
AutoCAD SHX Text
BED ROOM
AutoCAD SHX Text
3050X3600
AutoCAD SHX Text
TOILET
AutoCAD SHX Text
2550X1850
AutoCAD SHX Text
1 M WIDE BALCONY
AutoCAD SHX Text
LIVING/DINING
AutoCAD SHX Text
3435X4375
AutoCAD SHX Text
KITCHEN
AutoCAD SHX Text
3560X2225
AutoCAD SHX Text
BED ROOM
AutoCAD SHX Text
3100X3350
AutoCAD SHX Text
TOILET
AutoCAD SHX Text
2250X1850
AutoCAD SHX Text
3050X3600
AutoCAD SHX Text
BED ROOM
AutoCAD SHX Text
TOILET
AutoCAD SHX Text
2550X1850
AutoCAD SHX Text
1 M WIDE BALCONY
AutoCAD SHX Text
LIVING/DINING
AutoCAD SHX Text
3435X4375
AutoCAD SHX Text
KITCHEN
AutoCAD SHX Text
3560X2225
AutoCAD SHX Text
BED ROOM
AutoCAD SHX Text
3100X3350
AutoCAD SHX Text
TOILET
AutoCAD SHX Text
2250X1850
AutoCAD SHX Text
BED ROOM
AutoCAD SHX Text
3050X3600
AutoCAD SHX Text
TOILET
AutoCAD SHX Text
2550X1850
AutoCAD SHX Text
1 M WIDE BALCONY
AutoCAD SHX Text
CARPET AREA OF ONE UNIT = 690.11 SQFT CARPET AREA PER FLOOR = 690.11 X 8 = 5520.88 SQFT BUILT UP AREA OF GROUND FLOOR (PLINTH AREA) = 8884.08 SQFT BUILT UP AREA OF EACH FLOOR (ABOVE GROUND FLOOR)= 7687.41 SQFT TOTAL BUILT UP AREA OF BUILDING = 8884.08 + (7687.41X14) = 116507.82 SQFT TOTAL CARPET AREA = 5520.88 X 14 = 77292.32 SQFT CIRCULATION AREA PER FLOOR = 1568.87 SQFT
Page 122: Geotech Report Nandannagar 2nd time · The present report the analysis of test results and recommendations regarding type of foundation, allowable bearing capacity. Also, for the

CONSULTANT : Concept Building, Prince Park,

Ph: +9133-24847526, 24847527514/A/1 Kalikapur Road, Kolkata - 700099, W. B.

mail : [email protected]

CORPORATE OFFICE:

web : www.bpcipl.com

TRIPURA URBAN PLANNING AND

DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

ANNEXURE C4 - INDIVIDUAL UNIT PLAN OF MIG AND

LAYOUT OF MIG TOWER OF NANDANNAGAR SITE

PAGE - 2 OF 2

DRAWN BY: P.PAUL

CHECKED BY: G.PAUL

DATE :- SEPTEMBER' 2019

Typical Floor Plan is subjected to minor

modifications

NOTES

TITLE - FLOOR PLAN OF MIG TOWER (NANDANNAGAR SITE)

D I S C L A I M E R

AutoCAD SHX Text
LIVING/DINING
AutoCAD SHX Text
3435X4375
AutoCAD SHX Text
KITCHEN
AutoCAD SHX Text
3560X2225
AutoCAD SHX Text
BED ROOM
AutoCAD SHX Text
3100X3350
AutoCAD SHX Text
TOILET
AutoCAD SHX Text
2250X1850
AutoCAD SHX Text
BED ROOM
AutoCAD SHX Text
3050X3600
AutoCAD SHX Text
TOILET
AutoCAD SHX Text
2550X1850
AutoCAD SHX Text
1 M WIDE BALCONY
AutoCAD SHX Text
LIVING/DINING
AutoCAD SHX Text
3435X4375
AutoCAD SHX Text
KITCHEN
AutoCAD SHX Text
3560X2225
AutoCAD SHX Text
BED ROOM
AutoCAD SHX Text
3100X3350
AutoCAD SHX Text
TOILET
AutoCAD SHX Text
2250X1850
AutoCAD SHX Text
BED ROOM
AutoCAD SHX Text
3050X3600
AutoCAD SHX Text
TOILET
AutoCAD SHX Text
2550X1850
AutoCAD SHX Text
1 M WIDE BALCONY
AutoCAD SHX Text
LIVING/DINING
AutoCAD SHX Text
3435X4375
AutoCAD SHX Text
KITCHEN
AutoCAD SHX Text
3560X2225
AutoCAD SHX Text
BED ROOM
AutoCAD SHX Text
3100X3350
AutoCAD SHX Text
TOILET
AutoCAD SHX Text
2250X1850
AutoCAD SHX Text
BED ROOM
AutoCAD SHX Text
3050X3600
AutoCAD SHX Text
TOILET
AutoCAD SHX Text
2550X1850
AutoCAD SHX Text
1 M WIDE BALCONY
AutoCAD SHX Text
LIVING/DINING
AutoCAD SHX Text
3435X4375
AutoCAD SHX Text
KITCHEN
AutoCAD SHX Text
3560X2225
AutoCAD SHX Text
BED ROOM
AutoCAD SHX Text
3100X3350
AutoCAD SHX Text
TOILET
AutoCAD SHX Text
2250X1850
AutoCAD SHX Text
BED ROOM
AutoCAD SHX Text
3050X3600
AutoCAD SHX Text
TOILET
AutoCAD SHX Text
2550X1850
AutoCAD SHX Text
1 M WIDE BALCONY
AutoCAD SHX Text
LIVING/DINING
AutoCAD SHX Text
3435X4375
AutoCAD SHX Text
KITCHEN
AutoCAD SHX Text
3560X2225
AutoCAD SHX Text
BED ROOM
AutoCAD SHX Text
3100X3350
AutoCAD SHX Text
TOILET
AutoCAD SHX Text
2250X1850
AutoCAD SHX Text
BED ROOM
AutoCAD SHX Text
3050X3600
AutoCAD SHX Text
TOILET
AutoCAD SHX Text
2550X1850
AutoCAD SHX Text
1 M WIDE BALCONY
AutoCAD SHX Text
LIVING/DINING
AutoCAD SHX Text
3435X4375
AutoCAD SHX Text
KITCHEN
AutoCAD SHX Text
3560X2225
AutoCAD SHX Text
BED ROOM
AutoCAD SHX Text
3100X3350
AutoCAD SHX Text
TOILET
AutoCAD SHX Text
2250X1850
AutoCAD SHX Text
BED ROOM
AutoCAD SHX Text
3050X3600
AutoCAD SHX Text
TOILET
AutoCAD SHX Text
2550X1850
AutoCAD SHX Text
1 M WIDE BALCONY
AutoCAD SHX Text
LIVING/DINING
AutoCAD SHX Text
3435X4375
AutoCAD SHX Text
KITCHEN
AutoCAD SHX Text
3560X2225
AutoCAD SHX Text
BED ROOM
AutoCAD SHX Text
3100X3350
AutoCAD SHX Text
TOILET
AutoCAD SHX Text
2250X1850
AutoCAD SHX Text
3050X3600
AutoCAD SHX Text
BED ROOM
AutoCAD SHX Text
TOILET
AutoCAD SHX Text
2550X1850
AutoCAD SHX Text
1 M WIDE BALCONY
AutoCAD SHX Text
LIVING/DINING
AutoCAD SHX Text
3435X4375
AutoCAD SHX Text
KITCHEN
AutoCAD SHX Text
3560X2225
AutoCAD SHX Text
BED ROOM
AutoCAD SHX Text
3100X3350
AutoCAD SHX Text
TOILET
AutoCAD SHX Text
2250X1850
AutoCAD SHX Text
BED ROOM
AutoCAD SHX Text
3050X3600
AutoCAD SHX Text
TOILET
AutoCAD SHX Text
2550X1850
AutoCAD SHX Text
1 M WIDE BALCONY
AutoCAD SHX Text
CARPET AREA OF ONE UNIT = 690.11 SQFT CARPET AREA PER FLOOR = 690.11 X 8 = 5520.88 SQFT BUILT UP AREA OF GROUND FLOOR (PLINTH AREA) = 8884.08 SQFT BUILT UP AREA OF EACH FLOOR (ABOVE GROUND FLOOR)= 7687.41 SQFT TOTAL BUILT UP AREA OF BUILDING = 8884.08 + (7687.41X14) = 116507.82 SQFT TOTAL CARPET AREA = 5520.88 X 14 = 77292.32 SQFT CIRCULATION AREA PER FLOOR = 1568.87 SQFT
Page 123: Geotech Report Nandannagar 2nd time · The present report the analysis of test results and recommendations regarding type of foundation, allowable bearing capacity. Also, for the

BED ROOM

3400 x 3050

BED ROOM

3000 x 3800

TOILET

2500 x 1700

LIVING

4842 x 3073

DINNING

2615X 2927

KITCHEN

2100 x 2800

MASTER BED ROOM

3200 x 3900

TOILET

1500 x 2400

BALCONY

1 M WIDE

BALCONY

1 M WIDE

BED ROOM

3400 x 3050

BED ROOM

3000 x 3800

TOILET

2500 x 1700

LIVING

4842 x 3073

DINNING

2615X 2927

KITCHEN

2100 x 2800

MASTER BED ROOM

3200 x 3900

TOILET

1500 x 2400

BALCONY

1 M WIDE

BALCONY

1 M WIDE

BED ROOM

3400 x 3050

BED ROOM

3000 x 3800

TOILET

2500 x 1700

LIVING

4842 x 3073

DINNING

2615X 2927

KITCHEN

2100 x 2800

MASTER BED ROOM

3200 x 3900

TOILET

1500 x 2400

BALCONY

1 M WIDE

BALCONY

1 M WIDE

BED ROOM

3400 x 3050

BED ROOM

3000 x 3800

TOILET

2500 x 1700

LIVING

4842 x 3073

DINNING

2615X 2927

KITCHEN

2100 x 2800

MASTER BED ROOM

3200 x 3900

TOILET

1500 x 2400

BALCONY

1 M WIDE

BALCONY

1 M WIDE

BED ROOM

3400 x 3050

BED ROOM

3000 x 3800

TOILET

2500 x 1700

LIVING

4842 x 3073

DINNING

2615X 2927

KITCHEN

2100 x 2800

MASTER BED ROOM

3200 x 3900

TOILET

1500 x 2400

BALCONY

1 M WIDE

BALCONY

1 M WIDE

CONSULTANT : Concept Building, Prince Park,

Ph: +9133-24847526, 24847527514/A/1 Kalikapur Road, Kolkata - 700099, W. B.

mail : [email protected]

CORPORATE OFFICE:

web : www.bpcipl.com

TRIPURA URBAN PLANNING AND

DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

ANNEXURE C5 - INDIVIDUAL UNIT PLAN OF HIG AND

LAYOUT OF HIG TOWER OF NANDANNAGAR SITE

PAGE - 1 OF 2

DRAWN BY: P.PAUL

CHECKED BY: G.PAUL

DATE :- SEPTEMBER' 2019

Typical Unit Plan is subjected to minor

modifications

NOTES

TITLE - INDIVIDUAL UNIT PLAN OF HIG TOWER (NANDANNAGAR SITE)

D I S C L A I M E R

AutoCAD SHX Text
CARPET AREA OF ONE UNIT = 880.02 SQFT CARPET AREA PER FLOOR = 880.02 X 4 = 3520.08 SQFT BUILT UP AREA OF GROUND FLOOR (PLINTH AREA) = 4505.95 SQFT BUILT UP AREA OF EACH FLOOR (ABOVE GROUND FLOOR) = 4589.59 SQFT TOTAL BUILT UP AREA OF BUILDING = 4505.95 + (4589.59X14) = 68760.21 SQFT TOTAL CARPET AREA = 3520.08 X 14 = 49281.12 SQFT CIRCULATION AREA PER FLOOR = 663.10 SQFT
Page 124: Geotech Report Nandannagar 2nd time · The present report the analysis of test results and recommendations regarding type of foundation, allowable bearing capacity. Also, for the

BED ROOM

3400 x 3050

BED ROOM

3000 x 3800

TOILET

2500 x 1700

LIVING

4842 x 3073

DINNING

2615X 2927

KITCHEN

2100 x 2800

MASTER BED ROOM

3200 x 3900

TOILET

1500 x 2400

BALCONY

1 M WIDE

BALCONY

1 M WIDE

BED ROOM

3400 x 3050

BED ROOM

3000 x 3800

TOILET

2500 x 1700

LIVING

4842 x 3073

DINNING

2615X 2927

KITCHEN

2100 x 2800

MASTER BED ROOM

3200 x 3900

TOILET

1500 x 2400

BALCONY

1 M WIDE

BALCONY

1 M WIDE

BED ROOM

3400 x 3050

BED ROOM

3000 x 3800

TOILET

2500 x 1700

LIVING

4842 x 3073

DINNING

2615X 2927

KITCHEN

2100 x 2800

MASTER BED ROOM

3200 x 3900

TOILET

1500 x 2400

BALCONY

1 M WIDE

BALCONY

1 M WIDE

BED ROOM

3400 x 3050

BED ROOM

3000 x 3800

TOILET

2500 x 1700

LIVING

4842 x 3073

DINNING

2615X 2927

KITCHEN

2100 x 2800

MASTER BED ROOM

3200 x 3900

TOILET

1500 x 2400

BALCONY

1 M WIDE

BALCONY

1 M WIDE

CONSULTANT : Concept Building, Prince Park,

Ph: +9133-24847526, 24847527514/A/1 Kalikapur Road, Kolkata - 700099, W. B.

mail : [email protected]

CORPORATE OFFICE:

web : www.bpcipl.com

TRIPURA URBAN PLANNING AND

DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

ANNEXURE C5 - INDIVIDUAL UNIT PLAN OF HIG AND

LAYOUT OF HIG TOWER OF NANDANNAGAR SITE

PAGE - 2 OF 2

DRAWN BY: P.PAUL

CHECKED BY: G.PAUL

DATE :- SEPTEMBER' 2019

Typical Floor Plan is subjected to minor

modifications

TITLE - FLOOR PLAN OF HIG TOWER (NANDANNAGAR SITE)

D I S C L A I M E R

NOTES

AutoCAD SHX Text
CARPET AREA OF ONE UNIT = 880.02 SQFT CARPET AREA PER FLOOR = 880.02 X 4 = 3520.08 SQFT BUILT UP AREA OF GROUND FLOOR (PLINTH AREA) = 4505.95 SQFT BUILT UP AREA OF EACH FLOOR (ABOVE GROUND FLOOR) = 4589.59 SQFT TOTAL BUILT UP AREA OF BUILDING = 4505.95 + (4589.59X14) = 68760.21 SQFT TOTAL CARPET AREA = 3520.08 X 14 = 49281.12 SQFT CIRCULATION AREA PER FLOOR = 663.10 SQFT
Page 125: Geotech Report Nandannagar 2nd time · The present report the analysis of test results and recommendations regarding type of foundation, allowable bearing capacity. Also, for the

CONSULTANT : Concept Building, Prince Park,

Ph: +9133-24847526, 24847527514/A/1 Kalikapur Road, Kolkata - 700099, W. B.

mail : [email protected]

CORPORATE OFFICE:

web : www.bpcipl.com

TRIPURA URBAN PLANNING AND

DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

ANNEXURE C6 - SURVEY DETAILS OF

NANDANNAGAR SITE

PAGE - 1 OF 13

DRAWN BY: P.PAUL

CHECKED BY: G.PAUL

DATE :- SEPTEMBER' 2019

TITLE - SURVEY DETAILS (NANDANNAGAR SITE)

NOTE :- 1. ALL DIMENSION AND LEVEL ARE IN METER.

REV. DESCRIPTION

DATE

LEGEND

SL. NO

LayerLegend / color

1 CENTRE LINE

2 BITUMEN ROAD

3 EARTHEN ROAD

4 SHOP

5 TREE

6 BUILDNIG

7 PACCA DRAIN

8

9 TEMPLE

10

11

WATER PIPE LINE

12

13

14

FENCING

15

16

DISPLAY BOARD

17

19

UNDER CONS.

ELECTRIC POST

TBM

STN

TRANSFORMER

BUILDING

TEMPORARY

STRUCTURE (RTS)

RIVER/NALA/DITCH

18

AutoCAD SHX Text
002
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.926
AutoCAD SHX Text
1
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.926
AutoCAD SHX Text
BW
AutoCAD SHX Text
2
AutoCAD SHX Text
33.218
AutoCAD SHX Text
BW
AutoCAD SHX Text
3
AutoCAD SHX Text
33.250
AutoCAD SHX Text
BW
AutoCAD SHX Text
4
AutoCAD SHX Text
33.448
AutoCAD SHX Text
BW
AutoCAD SHX Text
5
AutoCAD SHX Text
33.322
AutoCAD SHX Text
BW
AutoCAD SHX Text
6
AutoCAD SHX Text
33.946
AutoCAD SHX Text
BW
AutoCAD SHX Text
7
AutoCAD SHX Text
33.950
AutoCAD SHX Text
BW
AutoCAD SHX Text
8
AutoCAD SHX Text
32.896
AutoCAD SHX Text
BW
AutoCAD SHX Text
9
AutoCAD SHX Text
32.404
AutoCAD SHX Text
BW
AutoCAD SHX Text
10
AutoCAD SHX Text
31.582
AutoCAD SHX Text
BW
AutoCAD SHX Text
11
AutoCAD SHX Text
31.622
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
12
AutoCAD SHX Text
32.835
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
13
AutoCAD SHX Text
32.765
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
14
AutoCAD SHX Text
32.692
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
15
AutoCAD SHX Text
32.222
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
16
AutoCAD SHX Text
32.093
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
17
AutoCAD SHX Text
33.408
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
18
AutoCAD SHX Text
32.145
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
19
AutoCAD SHX Text
32.524
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
20
AutoCAD SHX Text
32.523
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
21
AutoCAD SHX Text
33.310
AutoCAD SHX Text
TBM1
AutoCAD SHX Text
22
AutoCAD SHX Text
34.139
AutoCAD SHX Text
EP
AutoCAD SHX Text
23
AutoCAD SHX Text
33.159
AutoCAD SHX Text
EP
AutoCAD SHX Text
24
AutoCAD SHX Text
33.659
AutoCAD SHX Text
EP
AutoCAD SHX Text
25
AutoCAD SHX Text
33.785
AutoCAD SHX Text
EP
AutoCAD SHX Text
26
AutoCAD SHX Text
32.597
AutoCAD SHX Text
EP
AutoCAD SHX Text
27
AutoCAD SHX Text
32.272
AutoCAD SHX Text
ROAD
AutoCAD SHX Text
28
AutoCAD SHX Text
32.585
AutoCAD SHX Text
ROAD
AutoCAD SHX Text
29
AutoCAD SHX Text
32.543
AutoCAD SHX Text
STN
AutoCAD SHX Text
30
AutoCAD SHX Text
31.991
AutoCAD SHX Text
ROAD
AutoCAD SHX Text
31
AutoCAD SHX Text
32.592
AutoCAD SHX Text
FEN
AutoCAD SHX Text
32
AutoCAD SHX Text
32.675
AutoCAD SHX Text
ROAD
AutoCAD SHX Text
33
AutoCAD SHX Text
32.305
AutoCAD SHX Text
ROAD
AutoCAD SHX Text
34
AutoCAD SHX Text
32.330
AutoCAD SHX Text
ROAD
AutoCAD SHX Text
35
AutoCAD SHX Text
32.004
AutoCAD SHX Text
ROAD
AutoCAD SHX Text
36
AutoCAD SHX Text
32.020
AutoCAD SHX Text
ROAD
AutoCAD SHX Text
37
AutoCAD SHX Text
31.552
AutoCAD SHX Text
ROAD
AutoCAD SHX Text
38
AutoCAD SHX Text
31.577
AutoCAD SHX Text
EP
AutoCAD SHX Text
39
AutoCAD SHX Text
31.568
AutoCAD SHX Text
EP
AutoCAD SHX Text
40
AutoCAD SHX Text
31.280
AutoCAD SHX Text
ROAD
AutoCAD SHX Text
41
AutoCAD SHX Text
31.281
AutoCAD SHX Text
ROAD
AutoCAD SHX Text
42
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.951
AutoCAD SHX Text
ROAD
AutoCAD SHX Text
43
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.372
AutoCAD SHX Text
ROAD
AutoCAD SHX Text
44
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.252
AutoCAD SHX Text
EP
AutoCAD SHX Text
45
AutoCAD SHX Text
29.943
AutoCAD SHX Text
ROAD
AutoCAD SHX Text
46
AutoCAD SHX Text
29.528
AutoCAD SHX Text
BW
AutoCAD SHX Text
47
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.397
AutoCAD SHX Text
FEN
AutoCAD SHX Text
48
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.407
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
49
AutoCAD SHX Text
33.459
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
50
AutoCAD SHX Text
33.877
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
51
AutoCAD SHX Text
32.662
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
52
AutoCAD SHX Text
32.237
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
53
AutoCAD SHX Text
32.155
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
54
AutoCAD SHX Text
31.367
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
55
AutoCAD SHX Text
32.280
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
56
AutoCAD SHX Text
32.399
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
57
AutoCAD SHX Text
33.527
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
58
AutoCAD SHX Text
33.683
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
59
AutoCAD SHX Text
33.323
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
60
AutoCAD SHX Text
32.869
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
61
AutoCAD SHX Text
32.741
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
62
AutoCAD SHX Text
32.666
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
63
AutoCAD SHX Text
32.799
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
64
AutoCAD SHX Text
32.546
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
65
AutoCAD SHX Text
32.300
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
66
AutoCAD SHX Text
31.901
AutoCAD SHX Text
ROAD
AutoCAD SHX Text
67
AutoCAD SHX Text
32.448
AutoCAD SHX Text
ROAD
AutoCAD SHX Text
68
AutoCAD SHX Text
32.461
AutoCAD SHX Text
ROAD
AutoCAD SHX Text
69
AutoCAD SHX Text
32.370
AutoCAD SHX Text
ROAD
AutoCAD SHX Text
70
AutoCAD SHX Text
32.670
AutoCAD SHX Text
ROAD
AutoCAD SHX Text
71
AutoCAD SHX Text
32.746
AutoCAD SHX Text
ROAD
AutoCAD SHX Text
72
AutoCAD SHX Text
32.729
AutoCAD SHX Text
ROAD
AutoCAD SHX Text
73
AutoCAD SHX Text
33.007
AutoCAD SHX Text
ROAD
AutoCAD SHX Text
74
AutoCAD SHX Text
33.032
AutoCAD SHX Text
ROAD
AutoCAD SHX Text
75
AutoCAD SHX Text
33.028
AutoCAD SHX Text
ROAD
AutoCAD SHX Text
76
AutoCAD SHX Text
33.602
AutoCAD SHX Text
ROAD
AutoCAD SHX Text
77
AutoCAD SHX Text
33.625
AutoCAD SHX Text
ROAD
AutoCAD SHX Text
78
AutoCAD SHX Text
33.678
AutoCAD SHX Text
ROAD
AutoCAD SHX Text
79
AutoCAD SHX Text
33.582
AutoCAD SHX Text
ROAD
AutoCAD SHX Text
80
AutoCAD SHX Text
33.585
AutoCAD SHX Text
ROAD
AutoCAD SHX Text
81
AutoCAD SHX Text
33.568
AutoCAD SHX Text
ROAD
AutoCAD SHX Text
82
AutoCAD SHX Text
33.375
AutoCAD SHX Text
ROAD
AutoCAD SHX Text
83
AutoCAD SHX Text
33.380
AutoCAD SHX Text
ROAD
AutoCAD SHX Text
84
AutoCAD SHX Text
33.354
AutoCAD SHX Text
EP
AutoCAD SHX Text
85
AutoCAD SHX Text
32.947
AutoCAD SHX Text
ROAD
AutoCAD SHX Text
86
AutoCAD SHX Text
32.882
AutoCAD SHX Text
ROAD
AutoCAD SHX Text
87
AutoCAD SHX Text
32.848
AutoCAD SHX Text
ROAD
AutoCAD SHX Text
88
AutoCAD SHX Text
32.841
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
89
AutoCAD SHX Text
33.202
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
90
AutoCAD SHX Text
33.029
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
91
AutoCAD SHX Text
32.541
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
92
AutoCAD SHX Text
32.757
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
93
AutoCAD SHX Text
32.785
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
94
AutoCAD SHX Text
32.129
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
95
AutoCAD SHX Text
33.431
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
96
AutoCAD SHX Text
32.280
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
97
AutoCAD SHX Text
32.523
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
98
AutoCAD SHX Text
31.498
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
99
AutoCAD SHX Text
31.425
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
100
AutoCAD SHX Text
31.327
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
101
AutoCAD SHX Text
32.465
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
102
AutoCAD SHX Text
32.672
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
103
AutoCAD SHX Text
32.992
AutoCAD SHX Text
S
AutoCAD SHX Text
104
AutoCAD SHX Text
29.530
AutoCAD SHX Text
001
AutoCAD SHX Text
33.094
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
105
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.115
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
106
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.732
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
107
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.195
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
108
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.857
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
109
AutoCAD SHX Text
31.576
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
110
AutoCAD SHX Text
31.167
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
111
AutoCAD SHX Text
29.807
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
112
AutoCAD SHX Text
29.490
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
113
AutoCAD SHX Text
29.000
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
114
AutoCAD SHX Text
27.968
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
115
AutoCAD SHX Text
26.246
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
116
AutoCAD SHX Text
26.574
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
117
AutoCAD SHX Text
27.934
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
118
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.236
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
119
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.607
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
120
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.887
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
121
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.806
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
122
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.929
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
123
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.810
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
124
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.727
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
125
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.824
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
126
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.946
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
127
AutoCAD SHX Text
32.109
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
128
AutoCAD SHX Text
31.967
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
129
AutoCAD SHX Text
32.570
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
130
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.411
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
131
AutoCAD SHX Text
31.246
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
132
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.313
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
133
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.597
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
134
AutoCAD SHX Text
31.090
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
135
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.975
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
136
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.775
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
137
AutoCAD SHX Text
31.202
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
138
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.770
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
139
AutoCAD SHX Text
25.999
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
140
AutoCAD SHX Text
28.266
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
141
AutoCAD SHX Text
24.780
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
142
AutoCAD SHX Text
24.925
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
143
AutoCAD SHX Text
24.548
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
144
AutoCAD SHX Text
24.851
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
145
AutoCAD SHX Text
26.603
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
146
AutoCAD SHX Text
26.650
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
147
AutoCAD SHX Text
27.667
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
148
AutoCAD SHX Text
28.375
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
149
AutoCAD SHX Text
29.044
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
150
AutoCAD SHX Text
29.838
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
151
AutoCAD SHX Text
29.578
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
152
AutoCAD SHX Text
29.475
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
153
AutoCAD SHX Text
29.904
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
154
AutoCAD SHX Text
29.724
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
155
AutoCAD SHX Text
29.102
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
156
AutoCAD SHX Text
28.887
AutoCAD SHX Text
BW
AutoCAD SHX Text
157
AutoCAD SHX Text
29.639
AutoCAD SHX Text
BW
AutoCAD SHX Text
158
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.567
AutoCAD SHX Text
BW
AutoCAD SHX Text
159
AutoCAD SHX Text
28.608
AutoCAD SHX Text
BW
AutoCAD SHX Text
160
AutoCAD SHX Text
28.005
AutoCAD SHX Text
BW
AutoCAD SHX Text
161
AutoCAD SHX Text
27.243
AutoCAD SHX Text
BW
AutoCAD SHX Text
162
AutoCAD SHX Text
26.532
AutoCAD SHX Text
BW
AutoCAD SHX Text
163
AutoCAD SHX Text
25.551
AutoCAD SHX Text
BW
AutoCAD SHX Text
164
AutoCAD SHX Text
24.946
AutoCAD SHX Text
BW
AutoCAD SHX Text
165
AutoCAD SHX Text
24.304
AutoCAD SHX Text
BW
AutoCAD SHX Text
166
AutoCAD SHX Text
24.135
AutoCAD SHX Text
BW
AutoCAD SHX Text
167
AutoCAD SHX Text
24.387
AutoCAD SHX Text
BW
AutoCAD SHX Text
168
AutoCAD SHX Text
25.000
AutoCAD SHX Text
BW
AutoCAD SHX Text
169
AutoCAD SHX Text
25.449
AutoCAD SHX Text
BW
AutoCAD SHX Text
170
AutoCAD SHX Text
26.072
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
171
AutoCAD SHX Text
28.920
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
172
AutoCAD SHX Text
29.225
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
173
AutoCAD SHX Text
28.766
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
174
AutoCAD SHX Text
28.872
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
175
AutoCAD SHX Text
28.928
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
176
AutoCAD SHX Text
29.033
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
177
AutoCAD SHX Text
29.155
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
178
AutoCAD SHX Text
29.396
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
179
AutoCAD SHX Text
29.361
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
180
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.081
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
181
AutoCAD SHX Text
29.870
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
182
AutoCAD SHX Text
28.353
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
183
AutoCAD SHX Text
27.529
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
184
AutoCAD SHX Text
26.178
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
185
AutoCAD SHX Text
26.737
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
186
AutoCAD SHX Text
26.335
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
187
AutoCAD SHX Text
28.067
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
188
AutoCAD SHX Text
25.343
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
189
AutoCAD SHX Text
24.982
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
190
AutoCAD SHX Text
24.728
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
191
AutoCAD SHX Text
25.161
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
192
AutoCAD SHX Text
27.333
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
193
AutoCAD SHX Text
27.406
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
194
AutoCAD SHX Text
29.969
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
195
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.434
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
196
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.467
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
197
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.375
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
198
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.438
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
199
AutoCAD SHX Text
29.684
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
200
AutoCAD SHX Text
29.796
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
201
AutoCAD SHX Text
29.567
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
202
AutoCAD SHX Text
29.152
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
203
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.373
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
204
AutoCAD SHX Text
29.289
AutoCAD SHX Text
ROAD
AutoCAD SHX Text
205
AutoCAD SHX Text
28.555
AutoCAD SHX Text
ROAD
AutoCAD SHX Text
206
AutoCAD SHX Text
28.709
AutoCAD SHX Text
ROAD
AutoCAD SHX Text
207
AutoCAD SHX Text
25.617
AutoCAD SHX Text
ROAD
AutoCAD SHX Text
208
AutoCAD SHX Text
25.617
AutoCAD SHX Text
ROAD
AutoCAD SHX Text
209
AutoCAD SHX Text
25.631
AutoCAD SHX Text
ROAD
AutoCAD SHX Text
210
AutoCAD SHX Text
24.240
AutoCAD SHX Text
ROAD
AutoCAD SHX Text
211
AutoCAD SHX Text
26.574
AutoCAD SHX Text
ROAD
AutoCAD SHX Text
212
AutoCAD SHX Text
25.502
AutoCAD SHX Text
ROAD
AutoCAD SHX Text
213
AutoCAD SHX Text
27.408
AutoCAD SHX Text
FEN
AutoCAD SHX Text
214
AutoCAD SHX Text
24.855
AutoCAD SHX Text
EP
AutoCAD SHX Text
215
AutoCAD SHX Text
26.966
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
216
AutoCAD SHX Text
23.838
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
217
AutoCAD SHX Text
24.028
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
218
AutoCAD SHX Text
23.728
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
219
AutoCAD SHX Text
24.255
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
220
AutoCAD SHX Text
24.360
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
221
AutoCAD SHX Text
24.079
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
222
AutoCAD SHX Text
24.465
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
223
AutoCAD SHX Text
23.817
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
224
AutoCAD SHX Text
28.064
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
225
AutoCAD SHX Text
29.088
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
226
AutoCAD SHX Text
28.605
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
227
AutoCAD SHX Text
28.265
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
228
AutoCAD SHX Text
29.439
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
229
AutoCAD SHX Text
29.344
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
230
AutoCAD SHX Text
29.290
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
231
AutoCAD SHX Text
29.258
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
232
AutoCAD SHX Text
29.220
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
233
AutoCAD SHX Text
28.944
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
234
AutoCAD SHX Text
27.931
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
235
AutoCAD SHX Text
26.763
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
236
AutoCAD SHX Text
26.576
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
237
AutoCAD SHX Text
27.347
AutoCAD SHX Text
001
AutoCAD SHX Text
33.191
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
238
AutoCAD SHX Text
31.001
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
239
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.929
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
240
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.773
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
241
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.773
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
242
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.712
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
243
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.545
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
244
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.574
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
245
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.491
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
246
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.094
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
247
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.403
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
248
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.489
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
249
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.668
AutoCAD SHX Text
BAMBOO
AutoCAD SHX Text
250
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.062
AutoCAD SHX Text
BAMBOO
AutoCAD SHX Text
251
AutoCAD SHX Text
28.348
AutoCAD SHX Text
BAMBOO
AutoCAD SHX Text
252
AutoCAD SHX Text
28.214
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
253
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.412
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
254
AutoCAD SHX Text
28.602
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
255
AutoCAD SHX Text
28.732
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
256
AutoCAD SHX Text
29.960
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
257
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.319
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
258
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.898
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
259
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.299
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
260
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.708
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
261
AutoCAD SHX Text
31.063
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
262
AutoCAD SHX Text
31.514
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
263
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.979
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
264
AutoCAD SHX Text
32.369
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
265
AutoCAD SHX Text
31.362
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
266
AutoCAD SHX Text
31.098
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
267
AutoCAD SHX Text
31.158
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
268
AutoCAD SHX Text
31.048
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
269
AutoCAD SHX Text
31.151
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
270
AutoCAD SHX Text
31.287
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
271
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.642
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
272
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.857
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
273
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.348
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
274
AutoCAD SHX Text
29.213
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
275
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.716
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
276
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.535
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
277
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.779
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
278
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.881
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
279
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.858
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
280
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.950
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
281
AutoCAD SHX Text
31.070
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
282
AutoCAD SHX Text
32.011
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
283
AutoCAD SHX Text
31.920
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
284
AutoCAD SHX Text
32.603
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
285
AutoCAD SHX Text
32.682
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
286
AutoCAD SHX Text
33.432
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
287
AutoCAD SHX Text
33.201
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
288
AutoCAD SHX Text
33.887
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
289
AutoCAD SHX Text
31.723
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
290
AutoCAD SHX Text
31.880
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
291
AutoCAD SHX Text
31.100
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
292
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.939
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
293
AutoCAD SHX Text
31.181
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
294
AutoCAD SHX Text
31.358
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
295
AutoCAD SHX Text
32.147
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
296
AutoCAD SHX Text
31.915
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
297
AutoCAD SHX Text
31.961
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
298
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.886
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
299
AutoCAD SHX Text
31.665
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
300
AutoCAD SHX Text
32.137
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
301
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.988
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
302
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.739
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
303
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.577
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
304
AutoCAD SHX Text
29.771
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
305
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.504
AutoCAD SHX Text
BW
AutoCAD SHX Text
306
AutoCAD SHX Text
24.591
AutoCAD SHX Text
BW
AutoCAD SHX Text
307
AutoCAD SHX Text
25.214
AutoCAD SHX Text
BW
AutoCAD SHX Text
308
AutoCAD SHX Text
26.096
AutoCAD SHX Text
BW
AutoCAD SHX Text
309
AutoCAD SHX Text
24.773
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
310
AutoCAD SHX Text
24.991
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
311
AutoCAD SHX Text
26.330
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
312
AutoCAD SHX Text
26.963
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
313
AutoCAD SHX Text
27.166
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
314
AutoCAD SHX Text
29.831
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
315
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.231
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
316
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.680
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
317
AutoCAD SHX Text
31.037
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
318
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.597
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
319
AutoCAD SHX Text
29.984
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
320
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.076
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
321
AutoCAD SHX Text
29.335
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
322
AutoCAD SHX Text
29.358
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
323
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.067
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
324
AutoCAD SHX Text
31.406
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
325
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.621
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
326
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.710
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
327
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.711
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
328
AutoCAD SHX Text
31.023
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
329
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.624
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
330
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.950
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
331
AutoCAD SHX Text
31.013
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
332
AutoCAD SHX Text
31.302
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
333
AutoCAD SHX Text
31.138
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
334
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.947
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
335
AutoCAD SHX Text
32.131
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
336
AutoCAD SHX Text
31.453
AutoCAD SHX Text
S
AutoCAD SHX Text
337
AutoCAD SHX Text
28.807
AutoCAD SHX Text
002
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.997
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
338
AutoCAD SHX Text
26.911
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
339
AutoCAD SHX Text
26.817
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
340
AutoCAD SHX Text
26.515
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
341
AutoCAD SHX Text
26.368
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
342
AutoCAD SHX Text
26.673
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
343
AutoCAD SHX Text
27.809
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
344
AutoCAD SHX Text
28.095
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
345
AutoCAD SHX Text
26.679
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
346
AutoCAD SHX Text
25.489
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
347
AutoCAD SHX Text
25.134
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
348
AutoCAD SHX Text
25.369
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
349
AutoCAD SHX Text
26.281
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
350
AutoCAD SHX Text
28.153
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
351
AutoCAD SHX Text
28.387
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
352
AutoCAD SHX Text
28.330
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
353
AutoCAD SHX Text
27.898
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
354
AutoCAD SHX Text
27.306
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
355
AutoCAD SHX Text
27.956
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
356
AutoCAD SHX Text
28.090
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
357
AutoCAD SHX Text
25.079
AutoCAD SHX Text
TBM2
AutoCAD SHX Text
358
AutoCAD SHX Text
25.785
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
359
AutoCAD SHX Text
28.372
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
360
AutoCAD SHX Text
28.677
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
361
AutoCAD SHX Text
29.570
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
362
AutoCAD SHX Text
29.217
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
363
AutoCAD SHX Text
28.996
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
364
AutoCAD SHX Text
29.299
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
365
AutoCAD SHX Text
29.182
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
366
AutoCAD SHX Text
29.032
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
367
AutoCAD SHX Text
29.654
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
368
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.006
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
369
AutoCAD SHX Text
29.871
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
370
AutoCAD SHX Text
29.558
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
371
AutoCAD SHX Text
29.110
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
372
AutoCAD SHX Text
29.390
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
373
AutoCAD SHX Text
29.804
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
374
AutoCAD SHX Text
29.847
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
375
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.295
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
376
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.321
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
377
AutoCAD SHX Text
29.642
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
378
AutoCAD SHX Text
28.215
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
379
AutoCAD SHX Text
29.797
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
380
AutoCAD SHX Text
28.509
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
381
AutoCAD SHX Text
29.999
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
382
AutoCAD SHX Text
29.678
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
383
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.362
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
384
AutoCAD SHX Text
28.977
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
385
AutoCAD SHX Text
29.131
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
386
AutoCAD SHX Text
28.471
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
387
AutoCAD SHX Text
27.853
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
388
AutoCAD SHX Text
27.784
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
389
AutoCAD SHX Text
28.093
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
390
AutoCAD SHX Text
26.779
AutoCAD SHX Text
BW
AutoCAD SHX Text
391
AutoCAD SHX Text
26.108
AutoCAD SHX Text
BW
AutoCAD SHX Text
392
AutoCAD SHX Text
26.643
AutoCAD SHX Text
BW
AutoCAD SHX Text
393
AutoCAD SHX Text
26.931
AutoCAD SHX Text
BW
AutoCAD SHX Text
394
AutoCAD SHX Text
29.902
AutoCAD SHX Text
BW
AutoCAD SHX Text
395
AutoCAD SHX Text
29.986
AutoCAD SHX Text
BW
AutoCAD SHX Text
396
AutoCAD SHX Text
29.829
AutoCAD SHX Text
BW
AutoCAD SHX Text
397
AutoCAD SHX Text
29.836
AutoCAD SHX Text
BW
AutoCAD SHX Text
398
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.134
AutoCAD SHX Text
BW
AutoCAD SHX Text
399
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.641
AutoCAD SHX Text
BC7
AutoCAD SHX Text
400
AutoCAD SHX Text
29.975
AutoCAD SHX Text
BC7
AutoCAD SHX Text
401
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.226
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
402
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.538
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
403
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.453
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
404
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.484
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
405
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.959
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
406
AutoCAD SHX Text
31.102
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
407
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.561
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
408
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.353
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
409
AutoCAD SHX Text
29.850
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
410
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.281
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
411
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.320
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
412
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.584
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
413
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.649
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
414
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.703
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
415
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.648
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
416
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.959
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
417
AutoCAD SHX Text
31.151
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
418
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.782
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
419
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.586
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
420
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.463
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
421
AutoCAD SHX Text
29.113
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
422
AutoCAD SHX Text
28.092
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
423
AutoCAD SHX Text
28.072
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
424
AutoCAD SHX Text
28.303
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
425
AutoCAD SHX Text
28.703
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
426
AutoCAD SHX Text
28.944
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
427
AutoCAD SHX Text
28.145
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
428
AutoCAD SHX Text
27.789
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
429
AutoCAD SHX Text
29.092
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
430
AutoCAD SHX Text
28.799
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
431
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.021
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
432
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.356
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
433
AutoCAD SHX Text
29.639
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
434
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.144
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
435
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.867
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
436
AutoCAD SHX Text
28.747
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
437
AutoCAD SHX Text
29.334
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
438
AutoCAD SHX Text
29.607
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
439
AutoCAD SHX Text
29.467
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
440
AutoCAD SHX Text
28.459
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
441
AutoCAD SHX Text
28.043
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
442
AutoCAD SHX Text
29.362
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
443
AutoCAD SHX Text
29.345
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
444
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.273
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
445
AutoCAD SHX Text
31.016
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
446
AutoCAD SHX Text
29.926
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
447
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.367
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
448
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.774
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
449
AutoCAD SHX Text
31.000
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
450
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.118
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
451
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.098
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
452
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.105
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
453
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.075
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
454
AutoCAD SHX Text
29.920
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
455
AutoCAD SHX Text
29.947
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
456
AutoCAD SHX Text
29.802
AutoCAD SHX Text
S
AutoCAD SHX Text
457
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.552
AutoCAD SHX Text
337
AutoCAD SHX Text
28.840
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
458
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.623
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
459
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.710
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
460
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.759
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
461
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.836
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
462
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.731
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
463
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.869
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
464
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.866
AutoCAD SHX Text
BW
AutoCAD SHX Text
465
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.284
AutoCAD SHX Text
BW
AutoCAD SHX Text
466
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.624
AutoCAD SHX Text
BW
AutoCAD SHX Text
467
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.414
AutoCAD SHX Text
BW
AutoCAD SHX Text
468
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.496
AutoCAD SHX Text
BW
AutoCAD SHX Text
469
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.812
AutoCAD SHX Text
BW
AutoCAD SHX Text
470
AutoCAD SHX Text
29.057
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
471
AutoCAD SHX Text
26.180
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
472
AutoCAD SHX Text
25.135
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
473
AutoCAD SHX Text
24.189
AutoCAD SHX Text
BW
AutoCAD SHX Text
474
AutoCAD SHX Text
24.396
AutoCAD SHX Text
BW
AutoCAD SHX Text
475
AutoCAD SHX Text
24.212
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
476
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.492
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
477
AutoCAD SHX Text
29.984
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
478
AutoCAD SHX Text
29.874
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
479
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.056
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
480
AutoCAD SHX Text
29.699
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
481
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.486
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
482
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.676
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
483
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.943
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
484
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.714
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
485
AutoCAD SHX Text
28.766
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
486
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.606
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
487
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.523
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
488
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.754
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
489
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.714
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
490
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.613
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
491
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.783
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
492
AutoCAD SHX Text
25.569
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
493
AutoCAD SHX Text
26.666
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
494
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.948
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
495
AutoCAD SHX Text
31.173
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
496
AutoCAD SHX Text
31.523
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
497
AutoCAD SHX Text
31.509
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
498
AutoCAD SHX Text
31.910
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
499
AutoCAD SHX Text
31.172
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
500
AutoCAD SHX Text
31.103
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
501
AutoCAD SHX Text
31.252
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
502
AutoCAD SHX Text
31.293
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
503
AutoCAD SHX Text
31.280
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
504
AutoCAD SHX Text
31.400
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
505
AutoCAD SHX Text
31.813
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
506
AutoCAD SHX Text
31.067
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
507
AutoCAD SHX Text
31.219
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
508
AutoCAD SHX Text
31.183
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
509
AutoCAD SHX Text
31.142
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
510
AutoCAD SHX Text
31.413
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
511
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.984
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
512
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.885
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
513
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.664
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
514
AutoCAD SHX Text
31.145
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
515
AutoCAD SHX Text
29.184
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
516
AutoCAD SHX Text
29.531
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
517
AutoCAD SHX Text
29.778
AutoCAD SHX Text
BAMBOO
AutoCAD SHX Text
518
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.850
AutoCAD SHX Text
BAMBOO
AutoCAD SHX Text
519
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.916
AutoCAD SHX Text
S
AutoCAD SHX Text
520
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.751
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
521
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.640
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
522
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.969
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
523
AutoCAD SHX Text
31.018
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
524
AutoCAD SHX Text
31.097
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
525
AutoCAD SHX Text
31.433
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
526
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.201
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
527
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.268
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
528
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.372
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
529
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.621
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
530
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.637
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
531
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.607
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
532
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.648
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
533
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.651
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
534
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.902
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
535
AutoCAD SHX Text
31.198
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
536
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.516
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
537
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.446
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
538
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.048
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
539
AutoCAD SHX Text
27.975
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
540
AutoCAD SHX Text
29.380
AutoCAD SHX Text
457
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.523
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
541
AutoCAD SHX Text
28.984
AutoCAD SHX Text
BW
AutoCAD SHX Text
542
AutoCAD SHX Text
25.578
AutoCAD SHX Text
BW
AutoCAD SHX Text
543
AutoCAD SHX Text
26.123
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
544
AutoCAD SHX Text
29.286
AutoCAD SHX Text
BW
AutoCAD SHX Text
545
AutoCAD SHX Text
28.938
AutoCAD SHX Text
BW
AutoCAD SHX Text
546
AutoCAD SHX Text
29.669
AutoCAD SHX Text
BW
AutoCAD SHX Text
547
AutoCAD SHX Text
31.624
AutoCAD SHX Text
BC
AutoCAD SHX Text
548
AutoCAD SHX Text
31.462
AutoCAD SHX Text
BC
AutoCAD SHX Text
549
AutoCAD SHX Text
31.617
AutoCAD SHX Text
BC
AutoCAD SHX Text
550
AutoCAD SHX Text
32.235
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
551
AutoCAD SHX Text
31.187
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
552
AutoCAD SHX Text
31.401
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
553
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.108
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
554
AutoCAD SHX Text
29.702
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
555
AutoCAD SHX Text
29.791
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
556
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.004
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
557
AutoCAD SHX Text
29.843
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
558
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.160
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
559
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.498
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
560
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.856
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
561
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.153
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
562
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.198
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
563
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.968
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
564
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.974
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
565
AutoCAD SHX Text
31.315
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
566
AutoCAD SHX Text
31.518
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
567
AutoCAD SHX Text
31.540
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
568
AutoCAD SHX Text
31.686
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
569
AutoCAD SHX Text
31.890
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
570
AutoCAD SHX Text
31.352
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
571
AutoCAD SHX Text
31.050
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
572
AutoCAD SHX Text
31.075
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
573
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.502
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
574
AutoCAD SHX Text
29.945
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
575
AutoCAD SHX Text
31.469
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
576
AutoCAD SHX Text
31.540
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
577
AutoCAD SHX Text
31.667
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
578
AutoCAD SHX Text
31.959
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
579
AutoCAD SHX Text
31.762
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
580
AutoCAD SHX Text
32.029
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
581
AutoCAD SHX Text
31.602
AutoCAD SHX Text
BAMBOO
AutoCAD SHX Text
582
AutoCAD SHX Text
29.358
AutoCAD SHX Text
BAMBOO
AutoCAD SHX Text
583
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.522
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
584
AutoCAD SHX Text
31.290
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
585
AutoCAD SHX Text
31.346
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
586
AutoCAD SHX Text
31.706
AutoCAD SHX Text
S
AutoCAD SHX Text
587
AutoCAD SHX Text
32.262
AutoCAD SHX Text
520
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.736
AutoCAD SHX Text
BC
AutoCAD SHX Text
588
AutoCAD SHX Text
32.462
AutoCAD SHX Text
ROAD
AutoCAD SHX Text
589
AutoCAD SHX Text
32.540
AutoCAD SHX Text
ROAD
AutoCAD SHX Text
590
AutoCAD SHX Text
32.455
AutoCAD SHX Text
ROAD
AutoCAD SHX Text
591
AutoCAD SHX Text
32.359
AutoCAD SHX Text
ROAD
AutoCAD SHX Text
592
AutoCAD SHX Text
32.395
AutoCAD SHX Text
ROAD
AutoCAD SHX Text
593
AutoCAD SHX Text
32.473
AutoCAD SHX Text
ROAD
AutoCAD SHX Text
594
AutoCAD SHX Text
32.585
AutoCAD SHX Text
ROAD
AutoCAD SHX Text
595
AutoCAD SHX Text
32.476
AutoCAD SHX Text
ROAD
AutoCAD SHX Text
596
AutoCAD SHX Text
32.617
AutoCAD SHX Text
ROAD
AutoCAD SHX Text
597
AutoCAD SHX Text
32.644
AutoCAD SHX Text
ROAD
AutoCAD SHX Text
598
AutoCAD SHX Text
32.676
AutoCAD SHX Text
ROAD
AutoCAD SHX Text
599
AutoCAD SHX Text
32.677
AutoCAD SHX Text
ROAD
AutoCAD SHX Text
600
AutoCAD SHX Text
32.757
AutoCAD SHX Text
FEN
AutoCAD SHX Text
601
AutoCAD SHX Text
32.835
AutoCAD SHX Text
FEN
AutoCAD SHX Text
602
AutoCAD SHX Text
32.614
AutoCAD SHX Text
FEN
AutoCAD SHX Text
603
AutoCAD SHX Text
32.680
AutoCAD SHX Text
FEN
AutoCAD SHX Text
604
AutoCAD SHX Text
32.472
AutoCAD SHX Text
FEN
AutoCAD SHX Text
605
AutoCAD SHX Text
32.464
AutoCAD SHX Text
FEN
AutoCAD SHX Text
606
AutoCAD SHX Text
32.309
AutoCAD SHX Text
EP
AutoCAD SHX Text
607
AutoCAD SHX Text
32.705
AutoCAD SHX Text
BW
AutoCAD SHX Text
608
AutoCAD SHX Text
32.552
AutoCAD SHX Text
BW
AutoCAD SHX Text
609
AutoCAD SHX Text
32.372
AutoCAD SHX Text
ROAD
AutoCAD SHX Text
610
AutoCAD SHX Text
32.277
AutoCAD SHX Text
ROAD
AutoCAD SHX Text
611
AutoCAD SHX Text
32.333
AutoCAD SHX Text
ROAD
AutoCAD SHX Text
612
AutoCAD SHX Text
32.256
AutoCAD SHX Text
EP
AutoCAD SHX Text
613
AutoCAD SHX Text
32.102
AutoCAD SHX Text
TAP
AutoCAD SHX Text
614
AutoCAD SHX Text
32.394
AutoCAD SHX Text
EP
AutoCAD SHX Text
615
AutoCAD SHX Text
32.235
AutoCAD SHX Text
ROAD
AutoCAD SHX Text
616
AutoCAD SHX Text
32.374
AutoCAD SHX Text
ROAD
AutoCAD SHX Text
617
AutoCAD SHX Text
32.314
AutoCAD SHX Text
ROAD
AutoCAD SHX Text
618
AutoCAD SHX Text
32.282
AutoCAD SHX Text
ROAD
AutoCAD SHX Text
619
AutoCAD SHX Text
32.416
AutoCAD SHX Text
ROAD
AutoCAD SHX Text
620
AutoCAD SHX Text
32.395
AutoCAD SHX Text
ROAD
AutoCAD SHX Text
621
AutoCAD SHX Text
32.317
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
622
AutoCAD SHX Text
32.180
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
623
AutoCAD SHX Text
32.199
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
624
AutoCAD SHX Text
32.136
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
625
AutoCAD SHX Text
32.191
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
626
AutoCAD SHX Text
32.155
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
627
AutoCAD SHX Text
32.080
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
628
AutoCAD SHX Text
32.176
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
629
AutoCAD SHX Text
32.147
AutoCAD SHX Text
RTS
AutoCAD SHX Text
630
AutoCAD SHX Text
32.224
AutoCAD SHX Text
RTS
AutoCAD SHX Text
631
AutoCAD SHX Text
32.017
AutoCAD SHX Text
RTS
AutoCAD SHX Text
632
AutoCAD SHX Text
32.112
AutoCAD SHX Text
RTS
AutoCAD SHX Text
633
AutoCAD SHX Text
32.079
AutoCAD SHX Text
RTS
AutoCAD SHX Text
634
AutoCAD SHX Text
32.253
AutoCAD SHX Text
RTS
AutoCAD SHX Text
635
AutoCAD SHX Text
32.235
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
636
AutoCAD SHX Text
32.119
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
637
AutoCAD SHX Text
32.106
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
638
AutoCAD SHX Text
32.164
AutoCAD SHX Text
TF
AutoCAD SHX Text
639
AutoCAD SHX Text
32.648
AutoCAD SHX Text
S
AutoCAD SHX Text
640
AutoCAD SHX Text
32.410
AutoCAD SHX Text
EP
AutoCAD SHX Text
641
AutoCAD SHX Text
32.359
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
642
AutoCAD SHX Text
31.834
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
643
AutoCAD SHX Text
31.699
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
644
AutoCAD SHX Text
31.807
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
645
AutoCAD SHX Text
31.556
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
646
AutoCAD SHX Text
31.512
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
647
AutoCAD SHX Text
31.214
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
648
AutoCAD SHX Text
31.214
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
649
AutoCAD SHX Text
31.073
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
650
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.894
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
651
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.682
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
652
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.334
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
653
AutoCAD SHX Text
30.335
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
654
AutoCAD SHX Text
32.019
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
655
AutoCAD SHX Text
32.041
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
656
AutoCAD SHX Text
31.944
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
657
AutoCAD SHX Text
31.569
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
658
AutoCAD SHX Text
31.791
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
659
AutoCAD SHX Text
31.926
AutoCAD SHX Text
587
AutoCAD SHX Text
32.258
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
660
AutoCAD SHX Text
31.864
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
661
AutoCAD SHX Text
31.781
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
662
AutoCAD SHX Text
31.805
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
663
AutoCAD SHX Text
32.073
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
664
AutoCAD SHX Text
32.058
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
665
AutoCAD SHX Text
31.852
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
666
AutoCAD SHX Text
31.901
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
667
AutoCAD SHX Text
32.599
AutoCAD SHX Text
BW
AutoCAD SHX Text
668
AutoCAD SHX Text
32.093
AutoCAD SHX Text
ROAD
AutoCAD SHX Text
669
AutoCAD SHX Text
32.260
AutoCAD SHX Text
ROAD
AutoCAD SHX Text
670
AutoCAD SHX Text
32.312
AutoCAD SHX Text
ROAD
AutoCAD SHX Text
671
AutoCAD SHX Text
32.289
AutoCAD SHX Text
TBM3
AutoCAD SHX Text
672
AutoCAD SHX Text
31.976
AutoCAD SHX Text
BW
AutoCAD SHX Text
673
AutoCAD SHX Text
31.934
AutoCAD SHX Text
BW
AutoCAD SHX Text
674
AutoCAD SHX Text
31.991
AutoCAD SHX Text
ROAD
AutoCAD SHX Text
675
AutoCAD SHX Text
32.661
AutoCAD SHX Text
ROAD
AutoCAD SHX Text
676
AutoCAD SHX Text
32.616
AutoCAD SHX Text
ROAD
AutoCAD SHX Text
677
AutoCAD SHX Text
32.580
AutoCAD SHX Text
BW
AutoCAD SHX Text
678
AutoCAD SHX Text
32.802
AutoCAD SHX Text
BW
AutoCAD SHX Text
679
AutoCAD SHX Text
33.004
AutoCAD SHX Text
ROAD
AutoCAD SHX Text
680
AutoCAD SHX Text
33.061
AutoCAD SHX Text
ROAD
AutoCAD SHX Text
681
AutoCAD SHX Text
33.044
AutoCAD SHX Text
ROAD
AutoCAD SHX Text
682
AutoCAD SHX Text
32.989
AutoCAD SHX Text
EP
AutoCAD SHX Text
683
AutoCAD SHX Text
33.032
AutoCAD SHX Text
BW
AutoCAD SHX Text
684
AutoCAD SHX Text
33.505
AutoCAD SHX Text
EP
AutoCAD SHX Text
685
AutoCAD SHX Text
32.742
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
686
AutoCAD SHX Text
32.720
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
687
AutoCAD SHX Text
32.149
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
688
AutoCAD SHX Text
32.264
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
689
AutoCAD SHX Text
32.067
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
690
AutoCAD SHX Text
32.448
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
691
AutoCAD SHX Text
32.834
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
692
AutoCAD SHX Text
32.669
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
693
AutoCAD SHX Text
32.487
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
694
AutoCAD SHX Text
32.013
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
695
AutoCAD SHX Text
31.960
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
696
AutoCAD SHX Text
32.269
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
697
AutoCAD SHX Text
32.365
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
698
AutoCAD SHX Text
32.029
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
699
AutoCAD SHX Text
32.516
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
700
AutoCAD SHX Text
32.572
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
701
AutoCAD SHX Text
32.576
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
702
AutoCAD SHX Text
31.825
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
703
AutoCAD SHX Text
31.969
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
704
AutoCAD SHX Text
32.096
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
705
AutoCAD SHX Text
31.884
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
706
AutoCAD SHX Text
31.839
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
707
AutoCAD SHX Text
31.725
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
708
AutoCAD SHX Text
31.767
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
709
AutoCAD SHX Text
31.815
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
710
AutoCAD SHX Text
31.539
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
711
AutoCAD SHX Text
31.137
AutoCAD SHX Text
TREE
AutoCAD SHX Text
712
AutoCAD SHX Text
31.406
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
713
AutoCAD SHX Text
32.139
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
714
AutoCAD SHX Text
31.975
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
715
AutoCAD SHX Text
31.713
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
716
AutoCAD SHX Text
31.729
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
717
AutoCAD SHX Text
31.577
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
718
AutoCAD SHX Text
31.510
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
719
AutoCAD SHX Text
31.846
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
720
AutoCAD SHX Text
31.803
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
721
AutoCAD SHX Text
31.589
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
722
AutoCAD SHX Text
31.521
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
723
AutoCAD SHX Text
33.268
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
724
AutoCAD SHX Text
33.195
AutoCAD SHX Text
GL
AutoCAD SHX Text
725
AutoCAD SHX Text
33.450
AutoCAD SHX Text
001
AutoCAD SHX Text
33.087
AutoCAD SHX Text
FEN
AutoCAD SHX Text
726
AutoCAD SHX Text
31.394
AutoCAD SHX Text
ROAD
AutoCAD SHX Text
727
AutoCAD SHX Text
31.061
AutoCAD SHX Text
ROAD
AutoCAD SHX Text
728
AutoCAD SHX Text
31.099
AutoCAD SHX Text
ROAD
AutoCAD SHX Text
729
AutoCAD SHX Text
31.035
AutoCAD SHX Text
TBM4
AutoCAD SHX Text
742
AutoCAD SHX Text
32.387
AutoCAD SHX Text
EP
AutoCAD SHX Text
EP
AutoCAD SHX Text
EP
AutoCAD SHX Text
EP
AutoCAD SHX Text
EP
AutoCAD SHX Text
EP
AutoCAD SHX Text
EP
AutoCAD SHX Text
EP
AutoCAD SHX Text
EP
AutoCAD SHX Text
EP
AutoCAD SHX Text
EP
AutoCAD SHX Text
EP
AutoCAD SHX Text
EP
AutoCAD SHX Text
EP
AutoCAD SHX Text
EP
AutoCAD SHX Text
TBM-4
AutoCAD SHX Text
TBM-1
AutoCAD SHX Text
TBM-2
AutoCAD SHX Text
TBM-3
AutoCAD SHX Text
BAMBOO JHAR
AutoCAD SHX Text
BAMBOO JHAR
AutoCAD SHX Text
BAMBOO JHAR
AutoCAD SHX Text
KALI TEMPLE
AutoCAD SHX Text
RTS
AutoCAD SHX Text
TRANSFORMER
AutoCAD SHX Text
HOUSE
AutoCAD SHX Text
HOUSE
AutoCAD SHX Text
BOUNDARY WALL
AutoCAD SHX Text
HOUSE
AutoCAD SHX Text
B.T ROAD
AutoCAD SHX Text
B.T ROAD
AutoCAD SHX Text
EARTHEN ROAD
AutoCAD SHX Text
EARTHEN ROAD
AutoCAD SHX Text
HOUSE
AutoCAD SHX Text
HOUSE
AutoCAD SHX Text
EP