Upload
dinhkhanh
View
222
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Global
Urban Sprawl: Challenges for European Cities and Countryside
David Ludlow
University of the West England - Bristol
Milan
March 2nd 2012
sources
• European environment agency reports - urban sprawl in Europe and quality-of-life
in Europe (European Environment Agency 2011 - 2014)
• European Topic Centre -- Spatial Information Analysis (ETC- SIA) -- Scientific
support for European Environment Agency urban programme - integrated urban
monitoring in Europe and European landscape planning (European Environment Agency
2011 - 2014)
• urbanApi - urban planning tools and intelligence for integrated urban governance (FP7
DG INFSO, European Commission, 2011 - 2014)
• urban-NEXUS - Furthering Strategic Urban Research Coordination Action (FP7 DG
Research, European Commission, 2011 - 2014)
• SeGi – Services of general Interest - Indicators and Perspectives for Services of
General Interest in Territorial Cohesion and Development (ESPON Applied Research
Project 2010-2013)
• FOCI - Future Orientations for Cities: cities and urban agglomerations -
functionality and opportunities for European competitiveness and cohesion (ESPON
Applied Research Project 2008-2011)
• LUMASEC - Land Use Management for Sustainable European Cities (URBACT II
Operational Programme 2008 – 2010)
overview
• urban development by far the most rapidly expanding land use
change in Europe
• positive effects as a locomotive for economic development
• serious negative social and environmental consequences - urban
sprawl
• better balanced and sustainable development requires more policy
attention at the regional level and on the urban-rural interface
• EU can promote an integrated rural-urban development by targeting
its policies and funding towards peri-urban areas.
definitions
• peri-urban – the space around urban areas which merges into the
rural landscape - larger peri-urban areas can include towns and
villages within an urban agglomeration
• urban area + peri-urban area = Functional Urban Area
• direct impacts of uncontrolled expansion of built development are
focused on urban sprawl – defined by the European
Environment Agency as ‘unplanned incremental urban
development, characterised by a low density mix of land uses on the
urban fringe’
dynamics of change
• Current and projected development trends are likely to bring rapid changes to peri-
urban areas:
• Globalisation and innovation: economic development often takes peri-urban land as
the location for large scale industry, science and business parks, roads and other urban
infrastructure;
• Demographic change: shrinking of some regions, the ageing of others, and one-
sided migration tendencies - challenges to the population stability of peri-urban areas,
lead to Europe-wide restructurings of population, and widen gap between over
and under-populated areas;
• Climate change: impacts combined with urbanisation and fragmentation of peri-urban
areas resulting in flooding, soil erosion and habitat loss. Energy shortages will change
the viability of peri-urban transport – search for renewable sources will claim peri-
urban land use.
• urban expansion: driven by economic growth and restructuring, new
employment opportunities, growth of transport infrastructure, population growth and
household change, as well as a decline of traditional rural economies
Impacts on Natural
& Protected Areas
One, two, three
Drivers of urban land development (1990-2000)
for cities greater than 50.000 inhabitants
pressures
• European areas classified as ‘peri-urban’ have the same amount of
built-up land as urban areas, but are only half as densely populated
• growing rapidly across Europe - built development in peri-urban areas
is growing at four times this rate - risk of increasing urban sprawl
• often fast changing, with complex patterns of land use and
landscape, fragmented between local or regional boundaries - place
of innovation and increasing employment in the service and IT
sectors: 25% of peri-urban regions are classified as ‘highly innovative
• ‘hot spots’ – regions with the largest share of peri-urban land use and
generally the highest rates of peri-urban growth - mainly
concentrated in the central Pentagon area (i.e. between London,
Paris, Milan, Munich and Hamburg), but also in parts of central and
eastern Europe.
impacts and opportunities
• many impacts of rapid expansion - sprawl, with increasing problems of social
segregation, urban decline, wasted land, and dependency on oil for transport
• urbanisation and land fragmentation, loss of habitats and amenity values in
the peri-urban
• even without the expansion of built development, there are urban pressures
on peri-urban areas: housing shortages, transport congestion, decline of
landscape quality, economic restructuring and social change.
• So peri-urban areas suffer from urban pressures
• but - also gain from proximity to urban areas, markets and cultures, work
places, quality of life, and innovation
• opportunities in peri-urban for improved quality of life, green
infrastructure, better linkages between city and countryside, and more
sustainable urban and rural development
Flooding or building in the
floodplain …
… natural
… and developed
The river Rhine has already lost four-fifth of its natural floodplains. Similarly, at the river Elbe only 15% of the natural floodplains remain.
…location of housing development
CO2…..climate is changing….impacts!
policy issues
• Food and farming
• Food security EU priorities – but critical interface between
agriculture and peri-urban land use change.
• regions with strong agriculture sectors - conflicts often arise where
urban expansion destabilises rural economies, and land markets.
• great potential, where peri-urban farming provides local or high value
products, in a more sustainable multifunctional landscape.
• Future trends will depend on biotechnology, on climate change,
water and soil, on fertilizers and the possibility of ‘Peak oil’.
• policy agenda aims to turn the conflicts between agriculture and
peri-urban into opportunities – employment and quality of life in
diverse, productive, multifunctional landscapes.
Agricultural activity is displaced…
… to less productive land
policy issues
• Landscape, ecology, recreation, and tourism
• Large parts of the European environment are under pressure from
peri-urban development. This affects many types of ‘ecosystem
services’, including biodiversity, water supply, flood control, soil
quality, landscape aesthetics and the capacity for climate
change adaptation.
• The concept of ‘ecosystem services’ is a key theme for peri-urban
policy. Moreover, many of Europe’s wide variety of landscapes –
places for recreation and regional identity – are endangered
by further urban growth
• policy agenda - multifunctional landscapes, sustainable resource
management, conservation of habitats and cultural landscapes.
• challenges – how to manage and fund ‘ecosystem services’ in a
fast changing peri-urban context?
policy issues
• Economy and employment
• Economic growth and restructuring - ‘pull’ of the global economy -
‘push’ of urban overcrowding and congestion
• strong pressures for the relocation of economic activity to peri-urban
zones
• capital accumulation dynamic - higher profits at lower risk than in
urban areas by landowners and developers, entrepreneurs and
investors, and by house builders and house owners
• rural economic change - decreasing labour intensity of agriculture
combines with the influx of more affluent workers and
retired households to rural areas
• Policy agenda - aim at capacity building for restructuring,
diversification, and better urban-rural linkages, especially for
entrepreneurialism, finance and markets.
policy issues
• Population and migration
• Population changes in peri-urban areas contrasts
• central and eastern EU, many rural areas depopulate, while urban
areas experience modernisation, some with population decline
and others with growth - western EU, many rural areas are re-
populated by urban-based residents
• In both cases, peri-urban change is about social and economic
restructuring, as much as direct urban expansion
• policy agenda - rural development should sustain the rural
social structure and balance - communities balanced in age, class,
ethnicity and occupations
policy issues
• Housing and communities
• Social and cultural preferences for housing location - powerful driver
for spatial segregation and social fragmentation
• Most peri-urban development is due to families and older groups, and
most housing in-migration is due to high income and education groups
- encourages urban sprawl, gated communities and the removal of
local community services from the peri-urban areas.
• Future - key drivers of change: rapid changes in lifestyles and housing
location choices, teleworking, dual career households, as well as
flexible household and retirement arrangements.
• policy agenda - social inclusion, integration and cohesion - Housing
locations should be accessible, environmentally sustainable and
available for all social groups, as well as being integrated into the
surrounding landscape.
policy issues
• Mobility and transport
• low density urban sprawl causes longer commuting distances,
increased infrastructure costs and less viable public transport systems
• Improvements to infrastructure can reduce congestion and
emissions, but often exclude the poor and those without cars, while
encouraging longer distance commuting.
• policy agenda - polycentric settlement pattern - multimodal
and trans-modal systems require larger public investments.
Managing change
• problem of uncontrolled urban sprawl can
be seen as a market failure
• society benefit - coordinating development, but
often lacks the means to do so
• problem not only of urban expansion, but urban
shrinkage (particularly in older industrial areas)
What kind of quality of life ?
What kind impact of land use on ecosystems ?
Who decides?
Who decides?
• Market forces?
• Developers?
• Residents/stakeholders?
• Local authorities?
• Regional authorites?
• National bodies?
• EU impact?
Problems - governance - rural-urban region level
• Problem - fragmentation between government units, and a
‘governance gap’ for decision making and investment - issues
• problems with the capacity of the formal government system
and planning policy regime to control land use changes in most EU
member states - level of organisation, the level of democratic
control, and the level of fragmentation of governance structures
• spatial planning - lack of legal strength and capacity for cross-border
coordination, and lack of influence on infrastructure provision.
• financial and taxation mechanisms often create incentives for urban
sprawl, either directly (e.g. linking public support to
population number) or indirectly (through local tax competition).
Solution - multilevel agenda - local to national and European
• EU policies rarely take the peri-urban sphere into account, and the
peri-urban (often cross-cutting administrative boundaries)
rarely makes the best use of policies and funding.
• Many peri-urban areas qualify for either urban or rural
development funding from various sectoral budgets. But this is rarely
focused on place-specific requirements, and there is a hidden risk of
uncoordinated development and urban sprawl.
• So need to refocus policy to address this:
• At the EU level, this applies particularly to the Structural and
Cohesion Funds, as well as the CAP and various
transport/ environment policies.
• Around 20% of the total Structural Funds in the Programming period
2007 – 2013 will be spent in rural areas, and around 32% in urban
areas. The Structural Funds and associated programmes have an
indirect but powerful effect on peri-urban development
Integrated approach to challenges
• Challenges cannot be addressed individually;
interrelations and contradictions need to be properly understood
• Challenges do not respect administrative borders
need to be formulated to concur with overall objective of sustainable territorial development with liveable cities across Europe
Source: Alessandro Balducci
=> Governance is the key challenge
government and governance for integrated development
• A strong and democratic government is the precondition for the management of
market forces for public benefit.
• In peri-urban areas - government at the local and rural-urban region level needs to
focus on its effectiveness and outcomes:
• local government financing system and source of revenue - should avoid fiscal
incentives that lead to wasteful competition for houses or investments;
• local taxation system - should encourage balanced development for business
and households, and avoid tax incentives for urban sprawl;
• Sectoral policies and subsidies for infrastructure, transport, housing or agriculture -
should aim at diverse and resilient patterns of development, for instance, with multi-
modal transport planning;
• Spatial planning and regulatory coordination of development, land use change - aiming
for restrictions and positive enabling of polycentric diversified activities;
• agenda for more responsive ‘bottom-up’ forms of governance – to work alongside, not
replace formal policies - ‘new institutional’ partnership models for collaboration
between public, private and community sectors - ‘ecosystem services’ and social
reinvestment.
government and governance for integrated development
• The agenda for managing the peri-urban is multilevel: from the local
to the rural-urban region, to the national and European levels.
• Policies and programmes at the European level – move from being
part of the problem to being part of the solution.
• new agenda for EU policies and funds with any kind of linkage to
spatial development and territorial cohesion - refocus and retarget
EU policy and investment to include for its effects on peri-
urban change.
• core objectives of EU policies and funding programmes should include
support for territorial ‘integrated development models for peri-
urban regions’
New flexible action space (software policies: governance)
Metropolitan areas
Administrative cities
Central states
Provinces
European Union
Neighbourhoods
Transborder & macro-regions
Old fixed action space (hardware policies:
government)
Adapted from Jacquier, 2010
From government to
flexible multi-scalar governance
Example - Defining the case
• the cities of Dresden and Prague
• Problems and processes: • Metropolitan and regional development
• New development axis – motorway Dresden-Prague
• Elbe River basin – flood risk and growing exposure
• the Transport Corridor
Example - Development scenarios
“Business as
usual”
scenario
Built-up
expansion
scenario
Motorway
impact
scenario
Residential
land demands
Same trend as
for the end of
90’s
Demand
Increases by
50%
Demand
increases over
50%
Industrial,
commerce and
services
Industrial area
remain the
same,
commercial &
service area
trend is the
same as for the
end of 90’s
Industrial area
grows slightly
Demand for
commercial and
services’ land
use doubles
Industrial area
grows slightly
Demand for
commercial and
services’ land
use doubles
Importance of
motorways
Low Medium High
DRESDEN-PRAGUE SIMULATION RESULTS
Legend
arable land
pasture
agricultural mosaic
forest
shrub and grass
sparce vegetation
wetland
abandoned
residential I
residential II
residential III
residential IV
residential blocks
industrial
commerce
services
construction
restricted area
road, rails
port
airport
mine
urban green
water
managing peri-urban - integrated development models
• Spatial strategy – policy framework at the level of the rural-urban
region to coordinate peri-urban development and low-impact
infrastructure, and to set up controls and incentives to avoid sprawl.
Focus on the potential for zoning, such as green belts, to be positive
catalysts more than restrictions;
• Economic strategy – peri-urban diversification and resilience of local
economies and employment involving rural diversification and
multifunctional land-based activity, as well as urban regeneration
with improved urban-rural links. Focus on the social economy in the
peri-urban, and on mobilising hidden resources;
• Social strategy – housing and service provision to encourage
balanced, inclusive and resilient communities. Focus on the needs
and opportunities in different settlement types, and on social
functions and values provided by peri-urban areas;
managing peri - urban integrated development models
• Environmental strategy – ecosystem services policy and
investment system involving climate change mitigation
and adaptation, landscape and habitat conservation, and
multilevel greenblue- infrastructure. Focus on diversified,
resilient, multifunctional agriculture and forestry;
• Governance strategy – strong and democratic municipal
government focusing on healthy finances and fiscal
policy, a capacity for investment in infrastructure,
playing an active role in the local economy, and
transparency with public and stakeholder participation.
Focus on the capacity for strategic and cross-border
coordination at the level of the rural-urban region.
•
•