GONG-GONG ECO-CULTURAL AND HISTORICAL TOURISM … Eco-Cultural and Historical... · basic assessment report 1 gong-gong eco-cultural and historical tourism destination, near barkly

BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT

1

GONG-GONG ECO-CULTURAL AND HISTORICAL TOURISM

DESTINATION, NEAR BARKLY WEST, NORTHERN CAPE

DRAFT BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT

DENC Reference: NC/BA/21/FB/DIK/GON1/2016

Prepared for:

Tshani Consulting

On behalf of:

Frances Baard District Municipality

Prepared by:

EOH Coastal & Environmental Services

EAST LONDON 25 Tecoma Street

East London, 5201 043 726 7809

Also in Grahamstown, Cape Town, Johannesburg, Port Elizabeth and Maputo

www.cesnet.co.za | www.eoh.co.za

August 2016

http://www.cesnet.co.za/


2

Project applicant: Frances Baard District Municipality

Business reg. no. /ID. no.:

Contact person: Mamikie Bogatsu

Postal address: Private Bag X6088, Kimberly, 8300

Telephone: 053 838 0911 Cell:

Fax:

E-mail: [email protected] 053 861 1538

Prepared by:

Environmental Assessment

Practitioner/Firm: EOH Coastal and Environmental Services

Business reg. no. /ID. no.: 2012/151672/07

Contact person: Nande Suka

Postal address: P.O Box 8145, Nahoon, 5210

Telephone: (043) 726 7809 Cell: Fax:

E-mail: [email protected] (043) 726 8352

(For official use only)

File Reference Number:

Application Number:

Date Received:

mailto:[email protected]


3

Basic Assessment Report in terms of the Environmental Impact Assessment Regulations, 2014,

promulgated in terms of the National Environmental Management Act, 1998 (Act No. 107 of 1998), as amended.

Kindly note that: 1. This basic assessment report is a standard report that may be required by a competent authority

in terms of the EIA Regulations, 2014 and is meant to streamline applications. Please make sure that it is the report used by the particular competent authority for the activity that is being applied for.

2. This report format is current as of 08 December 2014. It is the responsibility of the applicant to ascertain whether subsequent versions of the form have been published or produced by the competent authority

3. The report must be typed within the spaces provided in the form. The size of the spaces provided is not necessarily indicative of the amount of information to be provided. The report is in the form of a table that can extend itself as each space is filled with typing.

4. Where applicable tick the boxes that are applicable in the report.

5. An incomplete report may be returned to the applicant for revision.

6. The use of “not applicable” in the report must be done with circumspection because if it is used in respect of material information that is required by the competent authority for assessing the application, it may result in the rejection of the application as provided for in the regulations.

7. This report must be handed in at offices of the relevant competent authority as determined by each authority.

8. No faxed or e-mailed reports will be accepted.

9. The signature of the EAP on the report must be an original signature.

10. The report must be compiled by an independent environmental assessment practitioner.

11. Unless protected by law, all information in the report will become public information on receipt by the competent authority. Any interested and affected party should be provided with the information contained in this report on request, during any stage of the application process.

12. A competent authority may require that for specified types of activities in defined situations only parts of this report need to be completed.

13. Should a specialist report or report on a specialised process be submitted at any stage for any part of this application, the terms of reference for such report must also be submitted.


4

SECTION A: ACTIVITY INFORMATION

Has a specialist been consulted to assist with the completion of this section? YES NO

If YES, please complete the form entitled “Details of specialist and declaration of interest” for the specialist appointed and attach in Appendix I. 1. ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION a) Describe the project associated with the listed activities applied for

The Frances Baard District Municipality (FBDM) proposes the development of the Gong-Gong Eco-Cultural and Historical Tourism Destination, on the banks of the Vaal River near Barkley West, in the Dikgatlong Local Municipality of the Northern Cape Province (Figure1.1).

Figure 1: District locality plan from a regional perspective.


5

Figure 2: Development area in relation to Local Municipalities of the Northern Cape province.

Figure 3: The Gong-Gong Eco-Cultural and Historical Tourism Village development perimeter.


6

The area has a rich cultural and historical heritage coupled with the areas natural beauty and features such as the Vaal River, dancers cave and Gong-Gong falls. The proposed development is located on farms RE/281 (PNIEL), RE/371, Farm 372 (BAD HOPE), Farm 283 (GONG-GONG), Farm 284 and 1/284 and Farm 282. The project is divided into three phases of development (See Appendix C for site layout): Phase 1 activities:

Swing Bridge

Boardwalk along the river front

Multi-purpose Facility

Amphitheatre

Erection of information boards

Braai areas

Cart rides

Heritage sites

Water activities

Figure 4: Indication of the layout of activities relating to phase one developments. Phase 2 activities:

60 bed lodge

Conference facility


7

Restaurant

Additional accommodation units (compact package infrastructure)

Extend the protected area

Figure 5: Indication of the layout of activities relating to phase two developments. Phase 3 activities:

Trail development (represented by the blue dotted line on map 6)

Adventure/teambuilding facility

Backpackers facility


8

Figure 6: Indication of the layout of activities relating to phase three developments.

b) Provide a detailed description of the listed activities associated with the project as

applied for

Listed activity as described in GN 734, 735 and 736

Description of project activity

GN R 983 12(iii): The development of bridges

exceeding 100m2 within 32meters of a

watercourse.

A swing bridge of 300m2 spanning across the Vaal River is proposed.

GN R 983 12(x): The development of buildings

exceeding 100m2 within 32 meters of a

watercourse.

A number of structures are proposed for the first phase of development, including a multi-purpose centre of 200m².

GN R 983 12(xi): The development of structures

exceeding 100m2 within 32 meters of a

watercourse.

Braai areas and other structures are proposed.

GN R 983 12(xii): The development of

boardwalks exceeding 100m2 within 32 meters

of a watercourse.

A boardwalk of 920m² along the river is proposed.

GN R 983 19(i): The infilling or depositing of any Construction of the proposed swing bridge and


9

material of more than 5m³ into a watercourse. boardwalk may cause removal or deposition of material within the watercourse area.

GN R 983 27: The clearance of 1 ha or more of

indigenous vegetation.

The total combined clearance of indigenous vegetation could exceed 1 hectare.

GN R 983 67(i): Regarding phased

developments.

The development will take place in a phased manner.

2. FEASIBLE AND REASONABLE ALTERNATIVES “alternatives”, in relation to a proposed activity, means different means of meeting the general purpose and requirements of the activity, which may include alternatives to— (a) the property on which or location where it is proposed to undertake the activity; (b) the type of activity to be undertaken; (c) the design or layout of the activity; (d) the technology to be used in the activity; (e) the operational aspects of the activity; and (f) the option of not implementing the activity. Describe alternatives that are considered in this application as required by Appendix 1 (3) (h), Regulation 2014.Alternatives should include a consideration of all possible means by which the purpose and need of the proposed activity (NOT PROJECT) could be accomplished in the specific instance taking account of the interest of the applicant in the activity. The no-go alternative must in all cases be included in the assessment phase as the baseline against which the impacts of the other alternatives are assessed. The determination of whether site or activity (including different processes, etc.) or both is appropriate needs to be informed by the specific circumstances of the activity and its environment. After receipt of this report the, competent authority may also request the applicant to assess additional alternatives that could possibly accomplish the purpose and need of the proposed activity if it is clear that realistic alternatives have not been considered to a reasonable extent. Indicate the position of the activity using the latitude and longitude of the centre point of the site for each alternative site. The co-ordinates should be in degrees, minutes and seconds. The projection that must be used in all cases is the WGS84 spheroid in a national or local projection. a) Site alternatives

Alternative 1 (preferred alternative)

Description Lat (DDMMSS) Long (DDMMSS)

The area proposed for the development of the Gong-Gong Eco-Cultural and Historical Tourism Destination is rich in natural beauty and heritage features, boasting the Gong-Gong waterfalls, dancers cave and San rock paintings to name a few. The site is located on land previously degraded by historical alluvial mining activities in the area, and later use for farming of

28°30'45.67"S 24°23'36.11"E


10

grazing animals. The development of the proposed site thus provides the perfect platform from which visitors can enjoy the many attractions of the area, while posing little threat to intact natural areas. The completion of the development will also help to conserve these intact natural areas from possible future degradation by informal mining activities. No other suitable site has been identified, therefore, no site alternatives have been assessed.

Alternative 2


Alternative 3


In the case of linear activities: Alternative: Latitude (S): Longitude (E): Alternative S1 (preferred)

Starting point of the activity

Middle/Additional point of the activity

End point of the activity

Alternative S2 (if any)




Alternative S3 (if any)




For route alternatives that are longer than 500m, please provide an addendum with co-ordinates taken every 250 meters along the route for each alternative alignment. In the case of an area being under application, please provide the co-ordinates of the corners of the site as indicated on the lay-out map provided in Appendix A of this form. b) Lay-out alternatives



The proposed layout of the facility will occur in areas already degraded through historic alluvial mining activities and use as grazing land. No other layout alternatives have been proposed, as the current layout has been informed by environmental factors and constraints.

28°30'45.67"S 24°23'36.11"E

Alternative 2



11

Alternative 3


c) Sanitation technology alternatives

Alternative 1 (preferred alternative) – Biodigester Biogas

Bio-digester: This is the preferred sewage treatment facility. The domestic digester is designed as waste to energy solution that turns organic waste (toilet effluent, kitchen waste etc.) into methane gas. Methane gas can be used to cook, heat water in a gas geyser etc. The facility can be operated with gravity and it is a simple system to operate and maintain, with very low skills required.

Alternative 2 – Reed Beds

This is a proven, environmentally friendly sewage treatment method which uses only natural sustainable ecological processes. Gravity driven systems do not require any energy input and maintenance requirements are low. They are highly effective when properly designed and can be used in combination with ponds and wetlands to produce near river quality water. Vertical flow reed-beds are more effective at nitrifying effluents, converting ammonia into nitrates and nitrites, than most package sewage treatment plants. Operational and maintenance costs are low.

Alternative 3

d) Other alternatives (e.g. scheduling, demand, input, scale and design alternatives)


Alternative 2

Alternative 3

e) No-go alternative

The No-Go alternative assessed the possible impacts which will result if the development does not take place.

Paragraphs 3 – 13 below should be completed for each alternative.


12

3. PHYSICAL SIZE OF THE ACTIVITY a) Indicate the physical size of the preferred activity/technology as well as alternative

activities/technologies (footprints): Alternative: Size of the activity:

Alternative A11 (preferred activity alternative) 980 000 m2

Alternative A2 (if any) m2


or, for linear activities: Alternative: Length of the activity:

Alternative A1 (preferred activity alternative) m

Alternative A2 (if any) m

Alternative A3 (if any) m

b) Indicate the size of the alternative sites or servitudes (within which the above footprints

will occur): Alternative: Size of the site/servitude:

Alternative A1 (preferred activity alternative) 18 000 000 m2



1 “Alternative A..” refer to activity, process, technology or other alternatives.


13

4. SITE ACCESS

Does ready access to the site exist? YES NO

If NO, what is the distance over which a new access road will be built m

Describe the type of access road planned:

Currently there are two existing gravel roads accessing the proposed site of the Gong-Gong Eco-cultural and Historical Tourism Destination. Access Road 1: A surfaced and well maintained 5.4km long double lane gravel road accessing the

proposed site for the Gong-Gong Eco-cultural and Historical Tourism Village. The road is sign posted

from the turnoff on the R31.

Access Road 2: A poorly maintained 7.65km long gravel road accessing the site from the R31.

Figure 7: Map illistrating the positions of the two existing gravel access roads from the R31 to the proposed site of the Gong-Gong Eco-cultural and Historical Tourism Village.

Include the position of the access road on the site plan and required map, as well as an indication of the road in relation to the site.


14

5. LOCALITY MAP

An A3 locality map must be attached to the back of this document, as Appendix A. The scale of the locality map must be relevant to the size of the development (at least 1:50 000. For linear activities of more than 25 kilometres, a smaller scale e.g. 1:250 000 can be used. The scale must be indicated on the map.). The map must indicate the following:

an accurate indication of the project site position as well as the positions of the alternative sites, if any;

indication of all the alternatives identified;

closest town(s;)

road access from all major roads in the area;

road names or numbers of all major roads as well as the roads that provide access to the site(s);

all roads within a 1km radius of the site or alternative sites; and

a north arrow;

a legend; and

locality GPS co-ordinates (Indicate the position of the activity using the latitude and longitude of the centre point of the site for each alternative site. The co-ordinates should be in degrees and decimal minutes. The minutes should have at least three decimals to ensure adequate accuracy. The projection that must be used in all cases is the WGS84 spheroid in a national or local projection).

6. LAYOUT/ROUTE PLAN A detailed site or route plan(s) must be prepared for each alternative site or alternative activity. It must be attached as Appendix A to this document. The site or route plans must indicate the following:

the property boundaries and numbers of all the properties within 50 metres of the site;

the current land use as well as the land use zoning of the site;

the current land use as well as the land use zoning each of the properties adjoining the site or sites;

the exact position of each listed activity applied for (including alternatives);

servitude(s) indicating the purpose of the servitude;

a legend; and

a north arrow. 7. SENSITIVITY MAP The layout/route plan as indicated above must be overlain with a sensitivity map that indicates all the sensitive areas associated with the site, including, but not limited to:

watercourses;

the 1:100 year flood line (where available or where it is required by DWS);

ridges;

cultural and historical features;

areas with indigenous vegetation (even if it is degraded or infested with alien species); and

critical biodiversity areas.


15

The sensitivity map must also cover areas within 100m of the site and must be attached in Appendix A. 8. SITE PHOTOGRAPHS Colour photographs from the centre of the site must be taken in at least the eight major compass directions with a description of each photograph. Photographs must be attached under Appendix B to this report. It must be supplemented with additional photographs of relevant features on the site, if applicable. 9. FACILITY ILLUSTRATION A detailed illustration of the activity must be provided at a scale of at least 1:200 as Appendix C for activities that include structures. The illustrations must be to scale and must represent a realistic image of the planned activity. The illustration must give a representative view of the activity. 10. ACTIVITY MOTIVATION Motivate and explain the need and desirability of the activity (including demand for the activity):

1. Is the activity permitted in terms of the property’s existing land use rights?

YES NO Please explain

Currently the area proposed for the resorts development is used as grazing land, with small scale illegal mining occurring along the Vaal River. As such, the development of the Gong-Gong Eco-cultural village agrees with the current land used of the site, and may even have a positive impact as it will protect the area from further degradation.

2. Will the activity be in line with the following?

(a) Provincial Spatial Development Framework (PSDF) YES NO Please explain

The development of this site into an Eco-cultural and Historical tourism facility is in line with the Northern Cape SDF. The SDF calls for the promotion of tourism along the Treasure Route and the development of tourism related facilities along the Barkly West-ULCO development corridor.

(b) Urban edge / Edge of Built environment for the area YES NO Please explain

The development of the Gong-Gong Eco-cultural village is situated outside of any built environment and in no way restricts the future growth of urban areas in the vicinity.

(c) Integrated Development Plan (IDP) and Spatial Development Framework (SDF) of the Local Municipality (e.g. would the approval of this application compromise the integrity of the existing approved and credible municipal IDP and SDF?).


The development of the Gong-Gong Eco-cultural and Historical Tourism Destination is in line with the aims of both the IDP and the SDF of the Dikgatlong Local Municipality, as it has been proposed by the Frances Baard District Municipality (the client) which is bound by the same framework.


16

(d) Approved Structure Plan of the Municipality YES NO Please explain

As per the SDF of Dikgatlong Local Municipality, Gong-Gong is positioned along a primary corridor which is the R31 and runs parallel to the identified activity spine. The notable feature in close proximity to Gong-Gong is that of licensed Diamond Mining.

Although the proposed Eco Hub and Day Visitor development for Gong-Gong holds a strategic position, no specific accommodation or mention thereof has been referred to in the guiding policy frameworks.

(e) An Environmental Management Framework (EMF) adopted by the Department (e.g. Would the approval of this application compromise the integrity of the existing environmental management priorities for the area and if so, can it be justified in terms of sustainability considerations?)


We are not aware of any other existing Environmental Management Plans adopted by the Department for the area. However, this development application will not compromise the integrity of the existing environmental management priorities. It is believed that the development will promote the environmental integrity of the area.

(f) Any other Plans (e.g. Guide Plan) YES NO Please explain

There are currently no other plans pertaining to the site proposed for the Gong-Gong Eco-cultural development.

3. Is the land use (associated with the activity being applied for) considered within the timeframe intended by the existing approved SDF agreed to by the relevant environmental authority (i.e. is the proposed development in line with the projects and programmes identified as priorities within the credible IDP)?


The proposed development is not identified as a priority project in both the SDF and IDP.

4. Does the community/area need the activity and the associated land use concerned (is it a societal priority)? (This refers to the strategic as well as local level (e.g. development is a national priority, but within a specific local context it could be inappropriate.)


The development of the Gong-Gong Eco-cultural and Historical Tourism Destination will benefit the Frances Baard District as a whole, as well as the local community. With the realignment of the Treasure Route to include Gong-Gong, the Frances Baard District may benefit from the increase in the number of tourists visiting the area. The local community will also benefit as developers aim to employ local people for the construction and operation of the resort.

5. Are the necessary services with adequate capacity currently available (at the time of application), or must additional capacity be created to cater for the development? (Confirmation by the relevant Municipality in this regard must be attached to the final Basic Assessment Report as Appendix I.)


Currently the site is not serviced by the municipal water or electricity supply systems.


17

6. Is this development provided for in the infrastructure planning of the municipality, and if not what will the implication be on the infrastructure planning of the municipality (priority and placement of services and opportunity costs)? (Comment by the relevant Municipality in this regard must be attached to the final Basic Assessment Report as Appendix I.)


Water and sanitation services to the Gong-Gong area are highlighted in the Frances Baard DM SDF.

However, there are no dedicated services to the proposed development area.

7. Is this project part of a national programme to address an issue of national concern or importance?


The development of the Gong-Gong Eco-cultural and Historical Tourism Destination does not form

part of any national programme.

8. Do location factors favour this land use (associated with the activity applied for) at this place? (This relates to the contextualisation of the proposed land use on this site within its broader context.)


The current location proposed for the development of the Gong-Gong Eco-cultural and Historical

Tourism Destination is centrally situated between a number of natural, cultural and historical heritage

features making it the perfect platform from which tourists can access these sites.

9. Is the development the best practicable environmental option for this land/site?


The site proposed for the development of the Gong-Gong Eco-cultural and Historical Tourism

Destination has been degraded by historical mining activities and use as grazing land. The Gong-

Gong development is the best practicable environmental option for the area, as it will protect the site

from further degradation while preserving all heritage sites.

10. Will the benefits of the proposed land use/development outweigh the negative impacts of it?


The potential socio-economic benefits associated with the project outweigh any negative impacts, as

the site proposed for the Gong-Gong Eco-cultural development has been previously degraded by

historical mining activities, decreasing the potential significance of impacts on natural areas.The

development of the Gong-Gong Eco-cultural village has the potential to improve the current state of

the environment.

11. Will the proposed land use/development set a precedent for similar activities in the area (local municipality)?


The development of the Gong-Gong Eco-cultural and Historical Tourism Village is not intended to set

a precedent for similar activities in the area, although the success of the project will stimulate the local

economy and increase tourism in the area, which may promote the development of similar projects

indirectly.


18

12. Will any person’s rights be negatively affected by the proposed activity/ies?


The proposed Gong-Gong Eco-cultural development will not negatively affect any person’s rights.

13. Will the proposed activity/ies compromise the “urban edge” as defined by the local municipality?


The site proposed for the development of the Gong-Gong Eco-cultural and Historical Tourism facility

is found outside the boundaries of the urban edge, and the nature of the activity will not compromise

the urban edge.

14. Will the proposed activity/ies contribute to any of the 17 Strategic Integrated Projects (SIPS)?


The proposed development does not directly contribute to any of the 17 listed SIPS.

15. What will the benefits be to society in general and to the local communities?

Please explain

The development will stimulate the local economy both directly and indirectly by attracting visitors and

tourists. It will provide a platform from which people can access the natural, cultural and historical

features of the area. The development will also benefit local communities directly by providing much

needed jobs and skills development.

16. Any other need and desirability considerations related to the proposed activity?

Please explain

The Northern Cape desperately needs the development of tourist attracting developments to

stimulate the economy and create employment opportunities for local peoples.

17. How does the project fit into the National Development Plan for 2030? Please explain

The project fits into the NDP as it has the potential to raise employment opportunities in the area as well as kick-starting economic growth. The project will employ local peoples and provide them with skills development.

18. Please describe how the general objectives of Integrated Environmental Management as set out in section 23 of NEMA have been taken into account.

The following provides an analysis of how the objectives of integrated environmental management (IEM) have been considered in the current Gong-Gong Eco-cultural Development. The general objective of IEM is to:

(a) promote the integration of the principles of environmental management set out in section 2 into the making of all decisions which may have a significant effect on the environment;

Alignment with NEMA principles described below (see Section 19 assessment below).


19

(b) identify, predict and evaluate the actual and potential impacts on the environment, socio-economic conditions and cultural heritage, the risks and consequences and alternatives and options for mitigation of activities, with a view to minimizing negative impacts, maximizing benefits and promoting compliance with the principles of environmental management set out in section 2;

Implicit in the current EIA process.

(c) ensure that the effects of activities on the environment receive adequate consideration before actions are taken in connection with them;

Implicit in the current EIA process.

(d) ensure adequate and appropriate opportunity for public participation in decisions that may affect the environment;

The current EIA process has included a

comprehensive PP process, including:

Publicised the project through visible signage, local press adverts, and identification of local stakeholders through engagement with Dikgatlong Local Municipality, Ward Councillors and other government officials and parastatals.

Engagement with public during public consultation and telephonic, postal and email correspondence.

(e) ensure the consideration of environmental attributes in management and decision-making which may have a significant effect on the environment; and

A comprehensive assessment of the significance of impacts has been conducted as part of the BAR.

(f) identify and employ the modes of environmental management best suited to ensuring that a particular activity is pursued in accordance with the principles of environmental management set out in section 23.

A comprehensive feasibility study, including consideration of environmental issues, was conducted prior to selecting alternatives for inclusion in this EIA assessment.

19. Please describe how the principles of environmental management as set out in section 2 of NEMA have been taken into account.

2. (1) The principles set out in this section apply throughout the Republic to the actions of all organs of state that may significantly affect the environment and;


20

(a) shall apply alongside all other appropriate and relevant considerations, including the State’s responsibility to respect, protect, promote and fulfil the social and economic rights in Chapter 2 of the Constitution and in particular the basic needs of categories of persons disadvantaged by unfair discrimination;

The onus is on the proponent to demonstrate to the authorising agency (DENC) that the State will not be abrogating its responsibility by authorising the proposed development

Complies

The EIA process has been

undertaken in order to provide

the relevant decision-makers

with the required information.

The required EIA should provide sufficient information for the relevant authority to make a defendable and informed decision.

(b) serve as the general framework within which environmental management and implementation plans must be formulated;

The onus is on the proponent to demonstrate to DENC that the NEMA principles will not compromised.

Complies

It is the opinion of this review

that the proposed development

does not conflict with NEMA

principles in such a manner

that it places undue risks on the

natural or socio-economic

environment.

Mitigation measures that have been identified for possible impacts must be effectively implemented.

(c) serve as guidelines by reference to which any organ of state must exercise any function when taking any decision in terms of this Act or any statutory provision concerning the protection of the environment;

The onus is on the proponent to demonstrate to the authorising agency (DENC) that in providing environmental authorisation the principles of NEMA are duly addressed.

Complies

The EIA process has been

undertaken in order to provide

the relevant decision-makers

with the required information.

The required EIA should

provide sufficient information

for the relevant authority to

make a defendable and

informed decision.

(d) serve as principles by reference to which a conciliator appointed under this Act must make recommendations; and

Not Applicable Not Applicable


21

(e) guide the interpretation, administration and implementation of this Act, and any other law concerned with the protection or management of the environment.

Not Applicable Not Applicable

(2) Environmental management must place people and their needs at the forefront of its concern, and serve their physical, psychological, developmental, cultural and social interests equitably

The EIA process must demonstrate that the needs of local people will be adequately addressed and that the development will serve the interests of the public equitably.

Complies

The proposed development will

not result in any undue or

unacceptable impacts on the

local socio-economic

environment. Nor will any

impacts be unfairly distributed.

Recommendations made in the

BAR must be adopted.

(3) Development must be socially, environmentally and economically sustainable.

The EIA process must demonstrate that the development is socially, environmentally and economically sustainable.

Complies

There is currently no indication

that the proposed project would

result in undue or

environmental, social and

economic impacts that would

place the sustainability of local

natural systems or the project at

risk.

Recommendations made in the

BAR must be adopted.

(4) (a) Sustainable development requires the consideration of all relevant factors including the following:

(i) that the disturbance of

ecosystems and loss of

biological diversity are avoided,

or, where they cannot be

altogether avoided, are

minimised and

remedied;

The development should not result in a significant loss of biodiversity. Should any loss occur then the development should seek to minimise or remedy the impact or provide suitable off-sets.

Complies

Disturbance of local

ecosystems must be avoided or

impacts must be mitigated.

A rehabilitation plan will assist

in reducing the impact and

providing benefits in terms of

the re-establishment of natural

vegetation.

The recommendations made in

the Environmental Management

Programme must be adopted.


22

(ii) that pollution and

degradation of the environment

are avoided, or, where they

cannot be altogether avoided,

are minimised and remedied;

Certain activities associated

with the project carry risks in

terms of pollution and

environmental degradation.

This includes: Storm water run-

off.

Complies

The BAR notes that impacts

with regard to pollution and


can be managed and will not

result in an unacceptable

impact on the local

environment.


the BAR must be adopted.

Particular focus must be given

to the Environmental

Management Programme with

regard to:

Monitoring of stormwater;

Alien Vegetation Management; and

Erosion Management.

(iii) that the disturbance of

landscapes and sites that

constitute the nation’s cultural

heritage is avoided, or where it

cannot be altogether avoided,

is minimised and remedied;

The proponent would need to

demonstrate that it would not

impact on sites of valuable

cultural and historical heritage.

Complies

A Heritage Impact Assessment

must be conducted, and

recommendations of the

Heritage Specialist must be

adopted.

(iv) that waste is avoided, or

where it cannot be altogether

avoided, minimised and re-

used or recycled where

possible and otherwise

disposed of in a responsible

manner;

Certain activities associated

with the project carry risks in

terms of pollution and

environmental degradation.

Complies

The BAR notes that impacts

with regard to pollution and


can be managed and will not

result in unacceptable impact

on the local environment.


the BAR must be adopted.

Particular focus must be given

to the Environmental

Management Programme.


23

(v) that the use and exploitation

of non-renewable natural

resources is responsible and

equitable, and takes into

account the consequences of

the depletion of the resource;

Not Applicable - the project

does not involve the exploitation

of non-renewable resources.

Not Applicable

(vi) that the development, use

and exploitation of renewable

resources and the ecosystems

of which they are part do not

exceed the level beyond which

their integrity is jeopardised.

The project should not involve

the unsustainable use of

renewable resources and

ecosystems, nor should any

related secondary impacts

result in increased resource

use.

Complies

The proponent does not intend

to and neither will they support

the over-use of groundwater as

a renewable resource.

Mitigation measures must be

effectively implemented,

especially on-going monitoring.

11. APPLICABLE LEGISLATION, POLICIES AND/OR GUIDELINES List all legislation, policies and/or guidelines of any sphere of government that are applicable to the application as contemplated in the EIA regulations, if applicable:

Title of legislation, policy or guideline

Applicability to the project Administering authority

Date

National Environmental Management Act (NEMA) (No. 107 of 1998)

The proposed activities relating to the development trigger a BAR in terms on NEMA listed activities.

DEA, DENC 1998

National Environment Management: Biodiversity Act (No.10 of 2004)

The proposed development will require the clearing of vegetation as well as construction related activities which may potentially pose a threat to the environment.

DEA, DENC 2004

National Heritage Resources Act (No. 25 of 1999)

The proposed location of the development is found near known memorial and grave sites as well as SAN rock paintings.

SAHRA 1999

National Water Act (No. 36 of 1998)

The proposed development will take place on the banks of the Vaal River and may require the abstraction of water.

Department of Water and Sanitation (DWS)

1998


24

12. WASTE, EFFLUENT, EMISSION AND NOISE MANAGEMENT a) Solid waste management

Will the activity produce solid construction waste during the construction/initiation phase?

YES NO

If YES, what estimated quantity will be produced per month? 50 m3

How will the construction solid waste be disposed of (describe)?

Solid waste must be stored in a central, secured location as far as possible from the watercourse and will be stored temporarily until removed to the nearest licensed landfill site.

Where will the construction solid waste be disposed of (describe)?

All solid waste will be collected at a central location and will be stored temporarily until removed to the nearest licensed landfill site which is in either Delportshoop or Barkly West.

Will the activity produce solid waste during its operational phase? YES NO

If YES, what estimated quantity will be produced per month? 50 m3

How will the solid waste be disposed of (describe)?

All solid waste will be collected at a central location and will be stored temporarily until removed to the nearest licensed landfill site which is in either Delportshoop or Barkly West.

If the solid waste will be disposed of into a municipal waste stream, indicate which registered landfill site will be used.

Solid waste will be disposed of into either the Delportshoop or Barkly West licensed municipal landfills.

Where will the solid waste be disposed of if it does not feed into a municipal waste stream (describe)?

N/A

If the solid waste (construction or operational phases) will not be disposed of in a registered landfill site or be taken up in a municipal waste stream, then the applicant should consult with the competent authority to determine whether it is necessary to change to an application for scoping and EIA.

Can any part of the solid waste be classified as hazardous in terms of the NEM:WA? YES NO

If YES, inform the competent authority and request a change to an application for scoping and EIA. An application for a waste permit in terms of the NEM:WA must also be submitted with this application.

Is the activity that is being applied for a solid waste handling or treatment facility? YES NO

If YES, then the applicant should consult with the competent authority to determine whether it is necessary to change to an application for scoping and EIA. An application for a waste permit in terms of the NEM:WA must also be submitted with this application. b) Liquid effluent

Will the activity produce effluent, other than normal sewage, that will be disposed of in a municipal sewage system?

YES NO

If YES, what estimated quantity will be produced per month? m3

Will the activity produce any effluent that will be treated and/or disposed of on site? YES NO


25

If YES, the applicant should consult with the competent authority to determine whether it is necessary to change to an application for scoping and EIA.

Will the activity produce effluent that will be treated and/or disposed of at another facility?

YES NO

If YES, provide the particulars of the facility:

Facility name:

Contact person:

Postal address:

Postal code:

Telephone: Cell:

E-mail: Fax:

Describe the measures that will be taken to ensure the optimal reuse or recycling of waste water, if any:

A natural reed bed soak away system will be implemented to treat the sewage produced by the development, returning near river quality water. Grey water will be pumped from the septic tank to the 250m2 reed bed that will be situated a great distance away from the river. The sludge will be approximately 0.1m3/person/year, and the septic tank will have to be desludged yearly. The water from the reed beds can be used for gardening, while for other requirements, rain water harvesting is recommended.

c) Emissions into the atmosphere

Will the activity release emissions into the atmosphere other that exhaust emissions and dust associated with construction phase activities?

YES NO

If YES, is it controlled by any legislation of any sphere of government? YES NO

If YES, the applicant must consult with the competent authority to determine whether it is necessary to change to an application for scoping and EIA. If NO, describe the emissions in terms of type and concentration:

Small amounts of dust will be generated during the construction phase. This however, will be

mitigated.

d) Waste permit

Will any aspect of the activity produce waste that will require a waste permit in terms of the NEM:WA?

YES NO

If YES, please submit evidence that an application for a waste permit has been submitted to the competent authority e) Generation of noise

Will the activity generate noise? YES NO

If YES, is it controlled by any legislation of any sphere of government? YES NO


26

Describe the noise in terms of type and level:

Noise relating to general construction activities will occur during the construction phase when heavy

equipment and machinery will be used. These noise issues will be mitigated. During the operational

phase, noise may arise from resort users and their vehicles, but these are expected to be of a low

intensity and require no mitigation action.

13. WATER USE Please indicate the source(s) of water that will be used for the activity by ticking the appropriate box(es):

Municipal Water board Groundwater River, stream, dam or lake

Other (rain water harvesting)

The activity will not use water

If water is to be extracted from groundwater, river, stream, dam, lake or any other natural feature, please indicate the volume that will be extracted per month:

651 kilolitres

Does the activity require a water use authorisation (general authorisation or water use license) from the Department of Water Affairs?

YES NO

If YES, please provide proof that the application has been submitted to the Department of Water Affairs. (application not lodged yet)

14. ENERGY EFFICIENCY Describe the design measures, if any, which have been taken to ensure that the activity is energy efficient:

The use of technologies such as solar PV and solar hot water heaters, energy efficient lights, heaters and air

conditioners etc. for Gong-Gong Eco Cultural Village should be promoted.

Describe how alternative energy sources have been taken into account or been built into the design of the activity, if any:

The use of technologies such as solar PV and solar hot water heaters, energy efficient lights, heaters and air

conditioners etc. for the Gong-Gong Eco Cultural Village should be promoted.


27

SECTION B: SITE/AREA/PROPERTY DESCRIPTION Important notes: 1. For linear activities (pipelines, etc) as well as activities that cover very large sites, it may be

necessary to complete this section for each part of the site that has a significantly different environment. In such cases please complete copies of Section B and indicate the area, which is covered by each copy No. on the Site Plan.

Section B Copy No. (e.g. A):

2. Paragraphs 1 - 6 below must be completed for each alternative.

3. Has a specialist been consulted to assist with the completion of this section? YES NO

If YES, please complete the form entitled “Details of specialist and declaration of interest” for each specialist thus appointed and attach it in Appendix I. All specialist reports must be contained in Appendix D. Property description/physical address:

Province Northern Province

District Municipality Frances Baard District Municipality

Local Municipality Dikgatlong Local Municipality

Ward Number(s) Ward 5

Farm name and number

Farm 281 (PNIEL)

Portion number 0-Remaining Extent

SG Code C00700000000028100000






Farm 282,

Portion number 0

SG Code C00700000000028200000


28






Farm 283 (Gong-Gong)

Portion number 2

SG Code C00700000000028300002






Farm 284


SG Code C00700000000028400000






Farm 284

Portion number 1

SG Code C00700000000028400001






Farm 371


SG Code C00700000000037100000






Farm 372 (BAD HOPE)

Portion number 0

SG Code C00700000000037200000

Where a large number of properties are involved (e.g. linear activities), please attach a full list to this application including the same information as indicated above.


29

Current land-use zoning as per local municipality IDP/records:

Current land uses identified in the area are: low density residential use, alluvial mining and the Good Hope Nature Reserve.

In instances where there is more than one current land-use zoning, please attach a list of current land use zonings that also indicate which portions each use pertains to, to this application.

Is a change of land-use or a consent use application required? YES NO


30

1. GRADIENT OF THE SITE Indicate the general gradient of the site.


31

Figure 8 indicating the gradient of the proposed site. Alternative S1:

Flat 1:50 – 1:20 1:20 – 1:15 1:15 – 1:10 1:10 – 1:7,5 1:7,5 – 1:5 Steeper than 1:5

Alternative S2 (if any):


Alternative S3 (if any):


2. LOCATION IN LANDSCAPE

Figure 9 illustrating the location of the proposed Gong-Gong development (indicated by the red square) in relation to landform features. Indicate the landform(s) that best describes the site:

2.1 Ridgeline 2.4 Closed valley 2.7 Undulating plain / low hills X

2.2 Plateau 2.5 Open valley X 2.8 Dune

2.3 Side slope of hill/mountain 2.6 Plain X 2.9 Seafront

2.10 At sea


32

3. GROUNDWATER, SOIL AND GEOLOGICAL STABILITY OF THE SITE

GEOLOGY Kimberlite pipes surface in the eastern part of the District, particularly around Kimberley and Windsorton, in combinations of shale and tilite. In some instances deposits from these pipes have washed down the rivers creating opportunities for alluvial diamond mining. Large deposits of lime stone are found in the junction between the dolomite and sedimentary systems along the Ghaap Escarpment in the Ulco area (FBDM Spatial Development Framework: October 2007).

Figure 10: Map indicating the underlying geology of the Gong-Gong development area and surroundings. SOILS The study area is covered by recent colluvial and alluvial sandy, gravelly, silty and clayey soils overlying residual soils and bedrock belonging to the Karoo, Transvaal and Ventersdorp Supergroups, numerous younger Post-Karoo dolerite dykes and sills are intruded into these formations. The major portion (some 65% of the surface area) of the FBDM is underlain by dolomite and chert bedrock belonging to the Campbell Rand Formation, Ghaap Group, Transvaal Supergroup


33

Figure 11: Map indicating the soil associations in the Gong-Gong Eco-village development area. GROUND WATER


34

Figure 12 indicating the positions of boreholes in the area.

Is the site(s) located on any of the following? Alternative S1: Alternative S2

(if any): Alternative S3

(if any):

Shallow water table (less than 1.5m deep) YES NO YES NO YES NO

Dolomite, sinkhole or doline areas YES NO YES NO YES NO

Seasonally wet soils (often close to water bodies)

YES NO

YES NO

YES NO

Unstable rocky slopes or steep slopes with loose soil

YES NO

YES NO

YES NO

Dispersive soils (soils that dissolve in water) YES NO YES NO YES NO

Soils with high clay content (clay fraction more than 40%)

YES NO

YES NO

YES NO

Any other unstable soil or geological feature YES NO YES NO YES NO

An area sensitive to erosion YES NO YES NO YES NO

If you are unsure about any of the above or if you are concerned that any of the above aspects may be an issue of concern in the application, an appropriate specialist should be appointed to assist in the completion of this section. Information in respect of the above will often be available as part of the project information or at the planning sections of local authorities. Where it exists, the 1:50 000 scale Regional Geotechnical Maps prepared by the Council for Geo Science may also be consulted.

4. GROUNDCOVER Indicate the types of groundcover present on the site. The location of all identified rare or endangered species or other elements should be accurately indicated on the site plan(s).

Natural veld - good conditionE

Natural veld with scattered aliensE

Natural veld with heavy alien infestationE

Veld dominated by alien speciesE

Gardens

Sport field Cultivated land Paved surface Building or other structure

Bare soil

If any of the boxes marked with an “E “is ticked, please consult an appropriate specialist to assist in the completion of this section if the environmental assessment practitioner doesn’t have the necessary expertise.

NOTE: EOH CES has the necessary expertise and specialist knowledge to complete this section.


35

5. SURFACE WATER Indicate the surface water present on and or adjacent to the site and alternative sites?

Perennial River YES NO UNSURE

Non-Perennial River YES NO UNSURE

Permanent Wetland YES NO UNSURE

Seasonal Wetland YES NO UNSURE

Artificial Wetland YES NO UNSURE

Estuarine / Lagoonal wetland YES NO UNSURE

If any of the boxes marked YES or UNSURE is ticked, please provide a description of the relevant watercourse.

The development occurs along the banks of the Vaal River: the largest tributary of the Orange River in South Africa. The river has its source near Breyten in Mpumalanga provinve, wherefrom it flows westward towards its conjunction with the Orange River southwest of Kimberley.

6. LAND USE CHARACTER OF SURROUNDING AREA Indicate land uses and/or prominent features that currently occur within a 500m radius of the site and give description of how this influences the application or may be impacted upon by the application:

Natural area Dam or reservoir Polo fields

Low density residential Hospital/medical centre Filling station H

Medium density residential School Landfill or waste treatment site

High density residential Tertiary education facility Plantation

Informal residentialA Church Agriculture

Retail commercial & warehousing Old age home River, stream or wetland

Light industrial Sewage treatment plantA Nature conservation area

Medium industrial AN Train station or shunting yard N Mountain, koppie or ridge

Heavy industrial AN Railway line N Museum

Power station Major road (4 lanes or more) N Historical building

Office/consulting room Airport N Protected Area

Military or police base/station/compound

Harbour Graveyard

Spoil heap or slimes damA Sport facilities Archaeological site

Quarry, sand or borrow pit Golf course Other land uses (describe)

If any of the boxes marked with an “N “are ticked, how this impact will / be impacted upon by the proposed activity? Specify and explain:

N/A


36

If any of the boxes marked with an "An" are ticked, how will this impact / be impacted upon by the proposed activity? Specify and explain:

N/A

If any of the boxes marked with an "H" are ticked, how will this impact / be impacted upon by the proposed activity? Specify and explain:

N/A

Does the proposed site (including any alternative sites) fall within any of the following:

Critical Biodiversity Area (as per provincial conservation plan) YES NO

Core area of a protected area? YES NO

Buffer area of a protected area? YES NO

Planned expansion area of an existing protected area? YES NO

Existing offset area associated with a previous Environmental Authorisation? YES NO

Buffer area of the SKA? YES NO

If the answer to any of these questions was YES, a map indicating the affected area must be included in Appendix A.

7. CULTURAL/HISTORICAL FEATURES

Are there any signs of culturally or historically significant elements, as defined in section 2 of the National Heritage Resources Act, 1999, (Act No. 25 of 1999), including Archaeological or paleontological sites, on or close (within 20m) to the site? If YES, explain:

YES NO

Uncertain


37

There are a number of significant cultural and historical heritage elements found on the site proposed for the Gong-Gong Eco-cultural and Historical Tourism Destination, as the developments concept is based on attracting tourism to the area by making these elements more accessible to the public while protecting them for future generations. These heritage elements include:

Historical building: old miner’s house.

Graveyard found in the proposed development area.


38

Rock paintings believed to be of San origin are found onsite.

Stone packed graves believed to be a memorial site.


39

If uncertain, conduct a specialist investigation by a recognised specialist in the field (archaeology or palaeontology) to establish whether there is such a feature(s) present on or close to the site. Briefly explain the findings of the specialist:

A Heritage Impact Assessment is recommended.

Will any building or structure older than 60 years be affected in any way? YES NO

Is it necessary to apply for a permit in terms of the National Heritage Resources Act, 1999 (Act 25 of 1999)?

YES NO

If YES, please provide proof that this permit application has been submitted to SAHRA or the relevant provincial authority. 8. SOCIO-ECONOMIC CHARACTER a) Local Municipality Please provide details on the socio-economic character of the local municipality in which the proposed site(s) are situated. Level of unemployment:

The unemployment rate in Dikgatlong is 40%, with the youth unemployment rate standing at 49,0%(StatsSA).

Figure 13: The unemployment rate in local municipalities.

Economic profile of local municipality: The Dikgatlong Local Municipalities economy is driven primarily by livestock, irrigation farming and commercial mining.


40

Figure 14: Economic sector distrobution of the DLM population(from DLM SDF).

Figure 15a & 15b: Income statistics for local municipalities.

Level of education:

The main contributing factor to the low levels of employment in Dikgatlong is the high percentage (86,2%) of the labour force that has not obtained a Grade 12 Senior Certificate or higher qualification, resulting in a primarily unskilled labour force(StatsSA).


41

Figure 16: indicating the education level of the Dikgatlong Local Municipalities population (from DLM SDF).

b) Socio-economic value of the activity

What is the expected capital value of the activity on completion? Unknown

What is the expected yearly income that will be generated by or as a result of the activity?

Unknown

Will the activity contribute to service infrastructure? YES NO

Is the activity a public amenity? YES NO

How many new employment opportunities will be created in the development and construction phase of the activity/ies?

Unknown

What is the expected value of the employment opportunities during the development and construction phase?

Unknown

What percentage of this will accrue to previously disadvantaged individuals? Unknown

How many permanent new employment opportunities will be created during the operational phase of the activity?

Unknown

What is the expected current value of the employment opportunities during the first 10 years?

Unknown

What percentage of this will accrue to previously disadvantaged individuals? Unknown

9. BIODIVERSITY Please note: The Department may request specialist input/studies depending on the nature of the biodiversity occurring on the site and potential impact(s) of the proposed activity/ies. To assist with the identification of the biodiversity occurring on site and the ecosystem status consult http://bgis.sanbi.org or [email protected]. Information is also available on compact disc (cd) from the Biodiversity-GIS Unit, Ph (021) 799 8698. This information may be updated from time to time and it is the applicant/ EAP’s responsibility to ensure that the latest version is used. A map of the relevant biodiversity information (including an indication of the habitat conditions as per (b) below) and must be provided as an overlay map to the property/site plan as Appendix D to this report.

http://bgis.sanbi.org/



42

a) Indicate the applicable biodiversity planning categories of all areas on site and indicate

the reason(s) provided in the biodiversity plan for the selection of the specific area as part of the specific category)

Systematic Biodiversity Planning Category If CBA or ESA, indicate the reason(s) for its selection in biodiversity plan

Critical Biodiversity Area (CBA)

Ecological Support

Area (ESA)

Other Natural Area

(ONA)

No Natural Area

Remaining (NNR)

b) Indicate and describe the habitat condition on site

Habitat Condition

Percentage of habitat

condition class (adding up to 100%)

Description and additional Comments and Observations

(Including additional insight into condition, e.g. poor land management practises, presence of quarries,

grazing, harvesting regimes etc).

Natural <10%

Only a very small portion of the proposed area is in its natural state due to historical alluvial mining activities in the area and later use as grazing land. This consists of small patches or clumps of natural vegetation.

Near Natural (includes areas with

low to moderate level of alien invasive

plants)

<15%

Only a very small portion of the proposed area remains in a near natural state as a result of historical alluvial mining activities in the area and later use as grazing land.

Degraded (includes areas

heavily invaded by alien plants)

>65%

A large proportion of the site proposed for the Gong-Gong Eco-cultural village has been degraded in the past through historical alluvial mining practices and use as grazing pasture.

Transformed (includes cultivation,

dams, urban, plantation, roads, etc)

10%

A portion of the proposed area is classified as transformed land, being used as low density residential properties and well as a graveyard in the vicinity.

c) Complete the table to indicate:

(i) the type of vegetation, including its ecosystem status, present on the site; and (ii) whether an aquatic ecosystem is present on site.

Terrestrial Ecosystems Aquatic Ecosystems

Ecosystem threat status as per the

National

Critical Wetland (including rivers, depressions, channelled and unchanneled wetlands, flats,

Estuary Coastline Endangered

Vulnerable


43

Terrestrial Ecosystems Aquatic Ecosystems

Environmental Management:

Biodiversity Act (Act No. 10 of 2004)

Least Threatened

seeps pans, and artificial wetlands)

YES NO UNSURE YES NO YES NO

d) Please provide a description of the vegetation type and/or aquatic ecosystem present on

site, including any important biodiversity features/information identified on site (e.g. threatened species and special habitats)

The site identified for the proposed Gong-Gong Eco-cultural and Historical Tourism Village falls within

the extensive Kimberly Thornveld vegitation type. Kimberly Thornveld is classified as least

threatened and dominated by tree species such as Acacia mellifera, Boscia foetida and Acacia tortillis

and shrub species such as Grewia flava and Aptosimum albomarginatum. There is a moderate

presence of alien vegitation species dominated by Argemone ochroleuca, Laggera decurrens and

Lactuca serriola.

The protected tree species Boscia foetida occurs in this area and special care must be taken not to

desturb these individuals. Special habitat areas inculde the Vaal river and buffer zone where small

amounts of Highveld Alluvial Vegitation may occur.

Figure 17: SANBI vegetation map for the proposed Gong-Gong Eco-cultural and Historical

Tourism Village site and surrounds.


44

SECTION C: PUBLIC PARTICIPATION 1. ADVERTISEMENT AND NOTICE

Publication name Volksblad

Date published 29th August 2016

Site notice position Latitude Longitude

28°28'28.61"S 24°25'9.62"E

28°30'20.91"S 24°27'23.15"E

Date placed 31st May 2016

Include proof of the placement of the relevant advertisements and notices in Appendix E1. 2. DETERMINATION OF APPROPRIATE MEASURES Provide details of the measures taken to include all potential I&APs as required by Regulation 41(2)(e) and 41(6) of GN 733. Key stakeholders (other than organs of state) identified in terms of Regulation 41(2)(b) of GN 733

Title, Name and Surname Affiliation/ key stakeholder status Contact details (tel number or e-mail address)

Jabu Hayes Dikgatlong Tourism Association [email protected]

Corrie Solomans Gong-Gong CPA Chairman [email protected]

G.J Phashe PNIEL CPA Chairman [email protected]

Ms Valerie Drift The Griqua Peoples Heritage NPC [email protected]

Include proof that the key stakeholder received written notification of the proposed activities as Appendix E2. This proof may include any of the following:

e-mail delivery reports;

registered mail receipts;

courier waybills;

signed acknowledgements of receipt; and/or

or any other proof as agreed upon by the competent authority. 3. ISSUES RAISED BY INTERESTED AND AFFECTED PARTIES

Summary of main issues raised by I&APs Summary of response from EAP

Illegal mining currently happening opposite the proposed facility

Noted

Proposed mining by the CPA Noted

The lack of impartiality by the Dikgatlong Noted






45

Municipality

Land ownership Noted

4. COMMENTS AND RESPONSE REPORT The practitioner must record all comments received from I&APs and respond to each comment before the Draft BAR is submitted. The comments and responses must be captured in a comments and response report as prescribed in the EIA regulations and be attached to the Final BAR as Appendix E3. 5. AUTHORITY PARTICIPATION Authorities and organs of state identified as key stakeholders:

Authority/Organ of State

Contact person (Title, Name and Surname)

Tel No Fax No

e-mail Postal address

Northern Cape

Department of

Environment

and Nature

Conservation

(DENC)

Dineo

Moleko

0538077430

N/A [email protected]

N/A

Northern Cape

DWS

Buyisile

July

0538367600 N/A [email protected]

N/A

COGHSTA Joey Botes

0605467557

N/A [email protected]

N/A

Frances Baard

District

Municipality

Mr Lebogang Molefi


N/A

Dikgatlong Local

Municipality

Eddie

Manuel


N/A

Include proof that the Authorities and Organs of State received written notification of the proposed activities as appendix E4. In the case of renewable energy projects, Eskom and the SKA Project Office must be included in the list of Organs of State.







46

6. CONSULTATION WITH OTHER STAKEHOLDERS Note that, for any activities (linear or other) where deviation from the public participation requirements may be appropriate, the person conducting the public participation process may deviate from the requirements of that sub-regulation to the extent and in the manner as may be agreed to by the competent authority. Proof of any such agreement must be provided, where applicable. Application for any deviation from the regulations relating to the public participation process must be submitted prior to the commencement of the public participation process. A list of registered I&APs must be included as appendix E5. Copies of any correspondence and minutes of any meetings held must be included in Appendix E6.


47

SECTION D: IMPACT ASSESSMENT The assessment of impacts must adhere to the minimum requirements in the EIA Regulations, 2014 and should take applicable official guidelines into account. The issues raised by interested and affected parties should also be addressed in the assessment of impacts. 1. IMPACTS THAT MAY RESULT FROM THE PLANNING AND DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION,

OPERATIONAL, DECOMMISSIONING AND CLOSURE PHASES AS WELL AS PROPOSED MANAGEMENT OF IDENTIFIED IMPACTS AND PROPOSED MITIGATION MEASURES

Provide a summary and anticipated significance of the potential direct, indirect and cumulative impacts that are likely to occur as a result of the planning and design phase, construction phase, operational phase, decommissioning and closure phase, including impacts relating to the choice of site/activity/technology alternatives as well as the mitigation measures that may eliminate or reduce the potential impacts listed. This impact assessment must be applied to all the identified alternatives to the activities identified in Section A(2) of this report.

Theme APPLICABILITY TO PHASE

PLANNING & DESIGN CONSTRUCTION OPERATION

ENVIRONMENTAL LEGISLATION AND POLICY COMPLIANCE

YES Failure to adhere to existing policies and obligations.

YES Failure of the contractor to implement mitigation measures included in EA and EMPr.

N/A

ECOLOGICAL IMPACTS

YES Inappropriate layout planning and structural design leading to soil erosion, damage of riparian vegetation, and contamination of surface water.

YES Loss of natural vegetation and erosion of disturbed sites.

YES Loss of natural vegetation and fauna by removal by resort users.

SANITATION

YES Failure to investigate suitable sites for the proposed treatment facility. YES Inadequate planning with regards to storage capacity requirements

YES Inadequate and inappropriate ablution facilities provided for construction workers

YES Failure of the monitoring system and inadequate maintenance.

SURFACE WATER RUNOFF

YES Inadequate planning and provision for storm water.

YES Uncontrolled management of storm water.

YES Failure to maintain storm water drainage system


48



and monitor the effectiveness of storm water management measures.

RIVER CROSSING YES Inappropriate placement of the proposed swing bridge leading to unnecessary damage to the sensitive riverine environment.

YES Inappropriate construction methods used in the riverine area.

N/A

WASTE MANANGEMENT

YES Failure to plan for the storage and disposal of waste.

YES Building construction rubble. Litter management. Storage of hazardous waste.

YES Implementation of waste storage and disposal practices.

SITING OF STRUCTURES YES Inappropriate layout planning for the siting of buildings and sanitation system infrastructure.

N/A N/A

LANDSCAPE AND VISUAL YES Inappropriate architectural design

N/A N/A

STORAGE of HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES

YES Inadequate planning for storage of hazardous substances.

YES Site contamination due to inappropriate storage, usage and spillage of hazardous substances

N/A

CONCRETE BATCHING N/A YES Inappropriate concrete batching methods leading to contamination of surface water.

TRAFFIC AND ACCESS ROUTES

YES Inadequate planning for increased traffic.

YES Increased use of servitude road by construction vehicles.

N/A

TECHNOLOGIES EMPLOYED

YES Inadequate consideration of water

N/A

YES Inadequate monitoring of the


49



and energy consumption reducing technologies.

effectiveness of water and energy consumption reducing technologies.

NOISE POLLUTION N/A N/A N/A

AIR POLLUTION (Dust) N/A N/A N/A

ON STE FIRE RISK N/A YES Fires onsite could pose a threat to the environment and adjacent landowners.

YES

SOCIO-ECONOMIC

YES Planning to maximise local job opportunities.

YES Job creation

YES Job creation, Local economic development

Planning and Design Phase

Activity Impact summary Significance Proposed mitigation


Failure to adhere to relevant environmental regulations and legislation.

Direct impacts: During the planning and design phase, failure to adhere to relevant environmental regulations and legislation could lead to the project conflicting with local, provincial and national policies, legislation etc. This could result in lack of institutional support for the project, overall project failure and undue disturbance to the natural environment.

HIGH NEGATIVE

The planning and design of the proposed Gong-Gong Eco-cultural development must take into account, and comply with all relevant environmental legislation and policy.

In addition, planning for the construction and operation of the proposed Gong-Gong Eco-cultural development must take into account and consider any available best practice guidelines.

Indirect impacts:

Cumulative impacts:

Impacting Ecology

Direct impacts: During the planning and design phase, poor planning and placement of all development and infrastructure may result in unnecessary damage and disturbance to natural

MODERATE NEGATIVE

An Environmental Control Officer must be consulted in the detailed planning and design of infrastructure in order to minimise the disturbance of natural


50


vegetation (Kimberly Thornveld).

vegetation for the development.

All species of special concern, protected or vulnerable must be avoided or transplanted.

Rehabilitation with grasses found on site, in addition to local shade-loving grasses, must be undertaken.

Indirect impacts: During the planning and design phase, poor layout design (i.e. inappropriate utilisation of sensitive systems such as the Vaal River and riparian vegetation) increases the risk of erosion and degradation of watercourses and associated habitats.

HIGH NEGATIVE

The Gong-Gong Eco-cultural development project layout must be designed to ensure that the minimum disturbance of sensitive areas such as the watercourse is achieved as far as is reasonable and practical.

The Lodge and conference venue must not be located within flood prone areas.

A buffer of at least 50m must be maintained around the river and any indigenous riparian vegetation.

Any activity (building of bridges and boardwalks etc.) within 32m of the Vaal River will require a Water Use License.

Cumulative impacts:

Sewage treatment facility

Direct impacts: During the planning and design, poor planning with regards to the resorts’ sanitation requirements may result in a breakdown of the system or overflows of sewage causing contamination of the surrounding environment and water resource.

HIGH NEGATIVE

The sewage treatment system must be situated at least 100m away from the 100 year flood line.

The sewage treatment system must have the capacity to contain overflows.

The system design must be able to easily deal with the facility’s sanitation requirements even during peak season.

Sanitation designs must be


51


submitted to the DWS for approval, and a Water Use Authorisation must be obtained if required.

Indirect impacts:

Cumulative impacts:

Managing surface water runoff

Direct impacts: During the planning and design phase, failure to plan properly for storm water (e.g. inadequate planning for storm water drainage and routing of storm water flow, resulting from increased hard surface area and subsequent increase in quantity and velocity of runoff) could result in uncontrolled storm water runoff which can cause flooding and erosion and also result in contamination of surface water and groundwater resources.

MODERATE NEGATIVE

The proposed Gong-Gong Eco-cultural development must be located at least 50m away from the river and any other watercourses.

A Storm water Management Plan must be designed and implemented to ensure maximum water seepage at the source of water flow. The plan must also include management mitigation measures for water pollution, waste water management and the management of surface erosion e.g. by considering the applicability of contouring, etc.

The Storm water Management Plan must be designed by a qualified engineer.

Indirect impacts: During the planning and design phase, failure to plan properly for storm water (e.g. inadequate planning for storm water drainage and routing of storm water flow, resulting from increased hard surface area and subsequent increase in quantity and velocity of runoff) could result in uncontrolled storm water runoff which can cause flooding and erosion and also result in contamination of surface water and groundwater resources.

MODERATE NEGATIVE

Same as above.

Cumulative impacts:


52


Planning the hang bridge river crossing

Direct impacts: During the planning and design phase, the inappropriate design of the proposed hang bridge across the Vaal River could lead to soil erosion and sedimentation of the watercourse.

HIGH NEGATIVE

The planning and design of the river crossing must be located in an area least prone to erosion, and take into account the ability for bank restoration, re-vegetation and stabilization.

The bridge design should minimize the anchor point area as much as is safely possible.

Indirect impacts:

Cumulative impacts:

Waste management

Direct impacts: During the planning and design phase, inappropriate planning for management and disposal of waste could result in surface and ground water contamination.

MODERATE NEGATIVE

A waste management plan for handling onsite waste must be developed and implemented.

An appropriate area where waste can be stored before disposal must be designated.

Indirect impacts: During the planning and design phase, inappropriate planning for management and disposal of waste could result in surface and ground water contamination.

MODERATE NEGATIVE

Same as above.

Cumulative impacts:

Planning for the siting of structures

Direct impacts: During the

planning and design phase, poor

planning for the siting of the

sewage treatment infrastructure

could result in inadvertent spillage

or run-off of effluent into the river.

MODERATE

NEGATIVE

The sewage treatment infrastructure must be situated at least 50m away from the 100 year flood line.

The system must have adequate capacity to contain overflows.

Indirect impacts:

Cumulative impacts:

Landscape and visual

Direct impacts: During the planning and design phase,

LOW NEGATIVE

Sighting and scale of

structures:


53


considerations inappropriate architectural design or lack of aesthetic considerations may result in aesthetic impacts on the currently open landscape.

An independent Environmental Control Office (ECO) must assist in the sighting of development.

An appropriate environmentally and visually sensitive architectural and aesthetics code must be developed to limit visual intrusion of the built form.

Building heights should preferably be restricted to single storey, and tucked into the landscape.

Architectural guidelines must be formulated with a view to blending buildings into the landscape through selection of specific materials and colours. Natural materials should be adopted if possible (e.g. stone, wood, etc.) and roof and wall colours must be natural (greens, browns and greys).

Screening measures: Appropriate indigenous tree species must be planted to create visual screen for all structures.

Indirect impacts: During the planning and design phase, inappropriate architectural design or lack of aesthetic considerations may result in aesthetic impacts on the currently open landscape.

LOW NEGATIVE

Same as above.

Cumulative impacts: During the planning and design phase, inappropriate architectural design or lack of aesthetic considerations may result in aesthetic impacts on the currently open landscape.

LOW NEGATIVE

Same as above.

Planning for the storage of

Direct impacts: During the planning and design phase,

LOW NEGATIVE

All hazardous substances such as paints, diesel and


54


hazardous substances

inappropriate planning for the storage of hazardous substances such as diesel, paint, pesticides etc., used onsite could lead to surface and ground water pollution (e.g. due to oil leaks, spillage of diesel etc.). In addition, these hazardous substances could be washed off into the nearby watercourse.

cement must be stored in a bunded area with an impermeable surface beneath them.

The developer must designate appropriate areas for the storage of hazardous substances.

Indirect impacts: During the planning and design phase, inappropriate planning for the storage of hazardous substances such as diesel, paint, pesticides etc., used onsite could lead to surface and ground water pollution (e.g. due to oil leaks, spillage of diesel etc.). In addition, these hazardous substances could be washed off into the nearby watercourse.

LOW NEGATIVE

Same as above.

Cumulative impacts:

Traffic and transport consideration

Direct impacts: During the planning and design phase, inappropriate routing of internal roads through or close to watercourses could lead to unnecessary impacts on riparian vegetation.

HIGH NEGATIVE

All internal roads should be located at least 50m away from any watercourse. Where unavoidable, roads must avoid sensitive areas.

If located within 32m of a watercourse, the construction of such a road will require a Water Use License (WUL).

Indirect impacts:

Cumulative impacts:

Failure to employ green technology

Direct impacts: During the planning and design phase, failure to consider technologies that reduce consumption of natural resources (particularly water and electricity) will result in lost opportunity to conserve resources.

MODERATE NEGATIVE

Water:

Rainwater tanks should be considered in the design and planning phase. Tanks will reduce the runoff created by the housing footprint and reduce municipal water usage.

Water piping material and infrastructure must comply with SABS to insure as far


55


as possible pipeline failures and future indirect impacts resulting from burst pipes do not result in water loss.

Energy:

Insulation of houses and use of solar water heaters should be considered.

Use of alternative renewable energy sources such as wind or solar power (PV) should be considered in the design and layout. However, if renewable energy technology is not implemented initially, provisions should be made in design to allow for easier post-construction retrofitting.

Indirect impacts:

Cumulative impacts:

Construction Phase



Failure to comply with the EMPr

Direct impacts:

Indirect impacts: During the construction phase the failure of the contractor to implement mitigation measures can result in non-compliance with the EA and EMPr.

HIGH NEGATIVE

The developer must employ an independent Environmental Control Officer (ECO) for the construction phase to ensure that construction is implemented according to specifications in the EA and EMPr.

Cumulative impacts:

Impacting ecology

Direct impacts: During the construction phase, unnecessary damage and loss of natural and vulnerable vegetation (Kimberly

HIGH NEGATIVE

The final design and layout must reviewed by the appointed ECO to ensure compliance with the


56


Thornveld and riparian vegetation) as well as heritage sites beyond the development footprint my result due to uncontrolled construction activities.

approved layout.

Construction activities and vegetation removal must be limited to the developmental footprint to avoid unnecessary loss of vegetation and soil erosion.

Where vegetation has been cleared, site rehabilitation in terms of soil stabilisation and re-vegetation must be undertaken.

Prior to construction, all sensitive areas (including heritage sites) located near areas where development is planned must be demarcated, and signs erected to ensure these areas are maintained. This must be done with the assistance of the ECO.

Indigenous vegetation that occurs on drainage lines must not be harmed and a ten metre (10 m) buffer zone must be maintained from the forest vegetation.

Direct impacts: During the construction phase, land disturbance can lead to increased spreading of noxious weeds and invasive alien plants.

MODERATE NEGATIVE

Alien plants must be removed from the site through appropriate methods e.g. hand pulling, chemical, cutting, etc., and under the supervision of the ECO.

After construction, exposed areas must be rehabilitated with indigenous vegetation.

Post-construction monitoring of rehabilitation must be implemented.

Direct impacts: During the construction phase, there is the potential risk of poaching of indigenous wild animals by staff employed by the contractor

MODERATE NEGATIVE

All staff employed during construction must undergo environmental induction training.

No construction workers should reside onsite.


57


Direct impacts: During the construction phase, soil exposure due to clearing of land may result in erosion, which in turn may cause sedimentation of the watercourses

MODERATE NEGATIVE

Wind screening and storm water control should be undertaken to prevent soil erosion during construction.

All erosion control mechanisms must be regularly maintained.

Vegetation must be retained where possible to avoid soil erosion.

Construction must be phased in order to minimize the area of exposed soil at any one time.

Re-vegetation of disturbed surfaces must occur immediately after the construction activities are completed with indigenous vegetation.

Indirect impacts:

Cumulative impacts:

Sanitation Direct impacts: During the construction phase, the lack of appropriate sanitation facilities for construction workers could lead to the contamination of ground and ground water.

MODERATE Adequate sanitary and ablutions facilities must be provided for construction workers

The facilities must be regularly serviced to reduce the risk of surface or groundwater pollution.

Portable toilets must not be located within 50 meters of any watercourse.

Indirect impacts:

Cumulative impacts:

Managing surface water runoff

Direct impacts: During the construction phase, runoff of storm water containing contaminants, silt and litter may contaminate the surrounding environment.

MODERATE NEGATIVE

During construction the site must be managed in a manner that prevents pollution of drains, downstream watercourses or groundwater, due to suspended solids, silt or


58


chemical pollutants.

Litter must be controlled on site.

Temporary cut-off drains and berms may be required to capture storm water and promote infiltration.

Hazardous substances must be stored at least 100m away from any water bodies on site to avoid pollution.

Indirect impacts: During the construction phase, runoff of storm water containing contaminants, silt and litter may contaminate the surrounding environment.

MODERATE NEGATIVE

Same as above.

Cumulative impacts:

Construction of hang-bridge water crossing

Direct impacts: During the construction phase the building of a bridge across the watercourse could lead to soil erosion and sedimentation of the watercourse.

HIGH NEGATIVE

The construction of the bridge must take place in the shortest possible time period and during the low rainfall season.

Bank restoration, re-vegetation and stabilization must be implemented once construction is complete and must include the use of gabions for bank stabilization.

Indirect impacts:

Cumulative impacts:

Management of waste

Direct impacts: Construction rubble left onsite may attract vermin and encourage the growth of opportunistic alien vegetation. Pollution potential if construction waste is not adequately disposed of (i.e. left on site).

MODERATE NEGATIVE

An environmental management programme incorporating waste management issues during the construction phase of the project must be developed and implemented.

Refuse from the construction site must be collected on a regular basis and deposited at an


59


appropriate landfill site.

All construction materials must be stored in a central and secure location with controlled access with an appropriate impermeable surface.

Direct impacts: During construction there is the potential risk of littering on and around the site by the contractor, which can become unsightly and in some cases lead to health risks.

MODERATE NEGATIVE

Construction personnel must be educated in appropriate waste management practices.

Collected waste must be separated and stored by type when feasible.

Litter and construction waste must be removed on a regular basis and disposed of in an approved registered landfill.

Potentially hazardous materials must be handled and stored onsite in secure containers and disposed of at an appropriately permitted hazardous waste disposal site

The Contractor should maintain a register of the hazardous materials and should document the use, storage, final destination and method of disposal.

Indirect impacts: Construction rubble left onsite may attract vermin and encourage the growth of opportunistic alien vegetation. Pollution potential if construction waste is not adequately disposed of (i.e. left on site).

MODERATE NEGATIVE

An environmental management programme incorporating waste management issues during the construction phase of the project must be developed and implemented.

Refuse from the construction site must be collected on a regular basis and deposited at an appropriate landfill site.

All construction materials


60


must be stored in a central and secure location with controlled access with an appropriate impermeable surface.

Indirect impacts: During the construction phase there is the potential for the inappropriate disposal of construction material off-site and subsequently polluting the environment.

MODERATE NEGATIVE

Construction material must be removed to an approved, licenced off-site disposal site by the appointment of a reputable waste services provider.

Cumulative impacts:

Management of hazardous substances

Direct impacts: During the construction phase inappropriate storage and disposal of hazardous building material may pollute the soil and ground water.

MODERATE NEGATIVE

The storage of potentially hazardous material must be controlled to reduce the risk of environmental contamination.

Drip trays must be placed under all machinery to avoid soil contamination.

All vehicles and machinery must be regularly maintained and in good working order to reduce the risk of contamination of soil and ground water.

All areas that have been contaminated during the construction phase must be rehabilitated.

Indirect impacts:

Cumulative impacts:

Concrete batching

Direct impacts: During the construction phase inappropriate cement mixing techniques can lead to ground and ground water pollution.

MODERATE NEGATIVE

Cement and concrete must not be mixed directly on the ground, or during rainfall events when the potential for transport of pollutants to watercourses is the greatest. Cement and concrete must only be mixed in the area demarcated for this purpose and on an impermeable substratum.


61


All construction water and contaminated runoff must be directed away from the drainage line.

Indirect impacts:

Cumulative impacts:

Traffic and access routes

Direct impacts: During the construction phase, increased use of access roads by heavy machinery will cause further degradation to the gravel tracks.

MODERATE

NEGATIVE Road maintenance should

take place regularly, especially after heavy rains.

Indirect impacts:

Cumulative impacts:

On-site fires Direct impacts: During the construction phase, fires started at construction camps could result in uncontrolled fires, posing a threat to wild animals, indigenous vegetation and the surrounding landowners.

HIGH NEGATIVE

All onsite fires must be controlled.

The construction personnel must be educated regarding fire and fire management.

Fire extinguishers must be available onsite.

In order to reduce the risk of fires:

o All flammable substances must be stored in dry areas which do not pose an ignition risk to the said substances.

o Smoking must not be permitted near flammable substances.

o All cooking must be done in demarcated areas that are safe in terms of runaway or uncontrolled fires.

Indirect impacts:

Cumulative impacts:


62


Socio-economic stimulation

Direct impacts:

Indirect impacts: During the construction phase, there may be temporary job-creation for members of the community.

MODERATE POSITIVE

No mitigation.

Indirect impacts: During the construction phase increased number of labourers could lead to an increase in security risks in the community.

MODERATE NEGATIVE

Access control to the site must ensure no unauthorised person shall enter.

The site must be secured in order to reduce the opportunity for the criminal activity in the locality of the construction site.

Cumulative impacts:

Operational Phase



Ecological disturbance

Direct impacts: During the operational phase, the inappropriate disturbance of land may increase spreading of noxious weeds, invasive and alien plants in the development open space area and surrounds.

MODERATE NEGATIVE

The facility operator must monitor disturbed sites for erosion and the spread of alien vegetation etc. and implement remedial actions.

Indirect impacts:

Cumulative impacts:

Sewage treatment facility

Direct impacts: During the operational phase, if the sewage treatment facility is not adequately maintained, effluent of poor quality may be released into the environment, contaminating water sources with nutrient and faecal coliforms.

HIGH NEGATIVE

No treated effluent may be discharged into any watercourse.

Ground water monitoring boreholes must be regularly tested for possible contamination of groundwater.

Effluent quality must, as a minimum, be analysed quarterly to confirm the


63


effectiveness of the treatment technology, and effluent samples and results submitted to FBDM Sanitation Department.

Appropriate corrective actions must be taken if contamination is detected or effluent quality does not meet discharge standards.

The approved maintenance plan must be implemented.

Indirect impacts:

Cumulative impacts:

Management of surface water runoff

Direct impacts: During the operational phase the failure to maintain storm water management measures may result in soil erosion and stream sedimentation.

HIGH NEGATIVE

The effectiveness of the flood attenuation and storm water management measures must be monitored.

The effectiveness of attenuation berms that are situated 32 m above the watercourse must be monitored.

If the storm water management measures put in place are deemed insufficient, alternative measures should be drawn up by a qualified engineer and approved by DENC and DWS before being implemented.

Indirect impacts:

Cumulative impacts:

Management of waste

Direct impacts: During the operational phase inappropriate waste storage and disposal practices may lead to litter, pollution, general nuisances and health hazards.

MODERATE NEGATIVE

Waste must be properly managed by separating compostable waste, and providing storage for recyclable waste materials and wastes which must be disposed of into a licensed landfill.

Indirect impacts:


64


Cumulative impacts:

Employing resource saving technologies

Direct impacts: During the operational phase, increased water and energy consumption may lead to a loss in natural resources such as water and energy.

HIGH Measures must be taken to reduce the consumption of natural resources.

Measures should include, but not be limited to, the installation of rainwater tanks to reduce stormwater runoff and the pressure on the municipal water supply, as well as alternative renewable energy sources such as wind or solar (PV) power

Indirect impacts:

Cumulative impacts:

Socio-economic consideration

Direct impacts:

Indirect impacts: During the operational phase there may be increased employment opportunities and stimulation of the local economy.

MODERATE POSITIVE

No mitigation.

Indirect impacts: During the operational phase, there may be potential long-term increases of neighbouring land value.

MODERATE POSITIVE

No mitigation.

Cumulative impacts:

No-go option

Cancelling the proposed development.

Direct impacts: Degradation and misuse of site due to possible mining and poor land use management.

MODERATE NEGATIVE

No mitigation.

Direct impacts: All negative activities from the proposed development will be avoided

MODERATE POSITIVE

No mitigation.

Direct impacts: Construction job losses

MODERATE NEGATIVE

No mitigation.


65

Indirect impacts:

Cumulative impacts:

A complete impact assessment in terms of Regulation 19(3) of GN 733 must be included as Appendix F. 2. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT Taking the assessment of potential impacts into account, please provide an environmental impact statement that summarises the impact that the proposed activity and its alternatives may have on the environment after the management and mitigation of impacts have been taken into account, with specific reference to types of impact, duration of impacts, likelihood of potential impacts actually occurring and the significance of impacts. Alternative A (preferred alternative)

It is the opinion of EOH CES that this Basic Assessment Report contains sufficient information to allow DENC to make an informed decision. EOH CES therefore recommends that the application for Authorisation should be approved on condition that the recommended mitigation measures stated herein are effectively implemented.

Alternative B

Alternative C

No-go alternative (compulsory)

The no-go option for development entails that the Gong-Gong Eco-cultural and Historical Tourism Village development will not go ahead. This would be accompanied by the following impacts:

Loss of employment opportunities associated with the project.

Loss of potential economic opportunities and economic growth.

Eco-tourism opportunities associated with the project would be lost.

Without the development of the Gong-Gong Eco-cultural and Historical Tourism Village, the local

community will not benefit from the direct job opportunities associated with its construction and

operation, while the district will miss out on the economic benefits of increased tourism opportunities

associated with the development. Finally, if the development does not take place, the site will

continue to be mined illegally and used for grazing land, leading to further degradation and ultimate

loss of tourism opportunities associated with the areas natural beauty.


66

SECTION E. RECOMMENDATION OF PRACTITIONER

Is the information contained in this report and the documentation attached hereto sufficient to make a decision in respect of the activity applied for (in the view of the environmental assessment practitioner)?

YES NO

If “NO”, indicate the aspects that should be assessed further as part of a Scoping and EIA process before a decision can be made (list the aspects that require further assessment).

N/A

If “YES”, please list any recommended conditions, including mitigation measures that should be considered for inclusion in any authorisation that may be granted by the competent authority in respect of the application.

All mitigation measures recommended in the document should be considered and included.

Is an EMPr attached? YES NO

The EMPr must be attached as Appendix G. The details of the EAP who compiled the BAR and the expertise of the EAP to perform the Basic Assessment process must be included as Appendix H. If any specialist reports were used during the compilation of this BAR, please attach the declaration of interest for each specialist in Appendix I. Any other information relevant to this application and not previously included must be attached in Appendix J. ________________________________________ NAME OF EAP ________________________________________ _________________ SIGNATURE OF EAP DATE


67

SECTION F: APPENDIXES The following appendixes must be attached:

Cadastral map illustrating the position of the proposed Gong-Gong development.


68

Appendix A: Maps


69


70


71

Appendix B: Photographs As the development is spread out over a large area, the usual method of taking eight pictures in the main compass directions is unsuitable. Below are pictures illustrating the areas proposed for each activity on site. Boardwalk Location

Braai Area Location


72

Hang Bridge

Panoramic Views

Panoramic view 1: Proposed location of the Lodge.

28°30'32.26"S 24°23'40.93"E


73

Panoramic view 1: Proposed location of the conference centre.

28°30'52.12"S 24°23'27.05"E


74

Appendix C: Facility illustration(s)


75

Appendix D: Specialist reports (including terms of reference) None


76

Appendix E 1: Advertisements and Notices

Sign places at the entrance of Access Road 1 Sign places at the entrance of Access Road 2

Figure illustrating the Notice signs places at the entrance to the access roads leading to the proposed site for the Gong-Gong Eco-cultural and Historical Tourism Village.


77

Appendix E 2: Stakeholder Notification

Figure illustrating the email together with attached Background Information Document and Notification letter sent to all I&AP’s.


78

I&AP database

Organisation Name Email Tel Cell Postal Address

Northern Cape Department of Environment and Nature Conservation (DENC) Ms Dineo Moleko [email protected] 0538077430

Northern Cape DWS Mr Buyisile July [email protected] 053 836 7600 0828975114 Private Bag X 6101 / KIMBERLEY / 8300

Dikgatlong Tourism Association Mr Jabu Hayes [email protected] 0820551818

COGHSTA Ms Joey Botes [email protected] 0605467557

Frances Baard District Municipality Ms Joh-ne Jansen [email protected] 0538380911

Frances Baard District Municipality Mr Lebogang Molefi [email protected] 0538380911

Frances Baard District Municipality Mr N. Thompson [email protected] 0538380911

Frances Baard District Municipality Mr Mc Donald Booysen [email protected] 0723703716

Frances Baard District Municipality Mr Basil Louw [email protected] 0538380939

Frances Baard District Municipality Ms Samantha Alfonse [email protected] 0538380911

McGregor Museum Mr David Morris [email protected] 0538311761 0822224777

Dikgatlong Ward 5 Councelor Mr Martin Hendricks [email protected] 0828229272

Dikgatlong Ward Committee Ms Maureen Mgoma [email protected] 0727892838

Dikgatlong Ward Committee Ms Mary Scheepers 0737308654

Dikgatlong Local Municipality Ms Claudia Letsie [email protected] 0535310671 0827161085

Dikgatlong Local Municipality Mr Eddie Manuel [email protected] 0535316500 0825213149

Gong-Gong CPA Chairman Mr Corrie Solomans [email protected] 053-8731885 0823150215

PNIEL CPA Chairman Mr G.J Phashe [email protected] 0823315297

Gong-Gong Community Ms Wendy Carvel NO EMAIL ADDRESS 0795813171 PO Box 183, Gong-Gong, Barkly West, 8376

Gong-Gong Community Mr John Carvel NO EMAIL ADDRESS 0795813171 PO Box 183, Gong-Gong, Barkly West, 8376

Gong-Gong Community Ms Elizabeth Malan [email protected] 0783135607

Gong-Gong Community Mr Derek Oliphant NO EMAIL ADDRESS 0768883760 PO Box 183, Gong-Gong, Barkly West, 8375

Gong-Gong Community Mr Xavier Jood [email protected] 0848508536

Gong-Gong Community Mr Willian Chabalala 0844444473

Gong-Gong CDC Mr H.U Drift 0720481810

Gong-Gong Community Ms Val Drift [email protected] 0726684117

One Fountain B&B Ms Telana van Zyl [email protected] 0827943126

Gong-Gong Community Mr Edward Snyders 0723422587

Farm Number Farm Name/Nr Name Email Tel Cell Postal Address Title Deed

Landowners

Farm 282 KIESER, JACOBUS FRANCOIS P O BOX 1416, SABIE, 1260 T1084/1967

Farm 282 Roos, Mabel T1084/1967

Farm 282 H.J Kock [email protected] 0722891955

283 portion 2 Gong-Gong DIKGATLONG [email protected] 0726040009 Private Bag X5, Barkly West, 8375 T909/2003

PLAAS 284 DIKGATLONG [email protected] 0726040009 Private Bag X5, Barkly West, 8375 T909/2003

PLAAS 284 Portion 1 BERLIN MISSION SOC ORANGE SYNOD [email protected] 0538731885 0823150215 T11512/1910

Farm 372 Bad Hope GONG GONG COMMUNAL PROP [email protected] 0823315297 T1952/2012

Farm 1/281 PNIEL (Portion 1) COMMITTEE OF BERLIN MISSION [email protected] 0538731885 0823150215 T1118/1970

Farm 371 Gong-Gong (portion 0-remaining extent) DIKGATLONG [email protected] 0726040009 Private Bag X5, Barkly West, 8375 T909/2003

Farm Number Name Email Tel Cell Postal Address

Surrounding Landowners

Farm 280 THAN (Portion 0-remaining extent) COSGROVE, DAVID DAWSON P O BOX 72020, PARKVIEW,2122 T1360/1997

Farm 280 THAN (Portion 0-remaining extent) HOLMES, ALISTAIR GORDON DEAN P O BOX 121, DELPORTSHOOP, 8377 T1360/1997

Farm 280 THAN (portion 1) REPUBLIEK VAN SUID-AFRIKA T2079/1989

Farm 281 PNIEL (portion 0-remaining extent) NATIONAL GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA T432/2008

Farm 371 Gong-Gong (portion 1) TRANSNET LTD [email protected]/[email protected] PO Box 876, Keimoes, 8860 T3817/1992

I &APS

Stakeholders


79

Appendix E 3: Comments and Response DRAFT BAR not yet released for public comment.


80

Appendix E 4: Authority Participation

Completed as part of Appendix E2.


81

Appendix E 5: Registered I&AP’s DRAFT BAR not yet released for public comment.


82

Appendix E 6: Meetings A feasibility study focus group meeting was held at Barkly West library on 17th March 2016


83


84

Appendix F: Impact Assessment ISSUES AND IMPACTS DURING THE PLANNING AND DESIGN PHASE OF THE PROPOSED GONG-GONG ECO-CULTURAL AND HISTORICAL TOURISM VILLAGE DEVELOPMENT.

PLANNING AND DESIGN PHASE

Impact Description Nature of

impact

Duration Spatial

extent

Likelihood Severity Significance

Pre-mitigation

Mitigation Significance

Post-

mitigation

Environmental Legal and Policy compliance

During the planning and design phase,

failure to adhere to relevant

environmental regulations and

legislation could lead to the project

conflicting with local, provincial and

national policies, legislation etc. This

could result in lack of institutional

support for the project, overall project

failure and undue disturbance to the

natural environment

Direct Long term Localised Probable Severe HIGH

NEGATIVE

The planning and design of the proposed Gong-Gong Eco-cultural development must take into account, and comply with all relevant environmental legislation and policy.

In addition, planning for the construction and operation of the proposed Gong-Gong Eco-cultural development must take into account and consider any available best practice guidelines.

LOW

NEGATIVE

Ecological Impacts

Permanent loss of indigenous

vegetation


poor planning and placement of all

development and infrastructure may

result in unnecessary damage and

disturbance to natural vegetation

Direct Permanen

t

Localised Definite Moderatel

y severe

MODERATE

NEGATIVE

An Environmental Control Officer must be consulted in the detailed planning and design of infrastructure in order to minimise the disturbance of natural vegetation for the development.

All species of special concern, protected or vulnerable must be avoided or transplanted.

Rehabilitation with grasses found on site, in addition to local shade-loving

LOW

NEGATIVE


85



impact

Duration Spatial

extent


Pre-mitigation


Post-

mitigation

(Kimberly Thornveld) grasses, must be undertaken.

Disturbance of sensitive areas


poor layout design (i.e. inappropriate

utilisation of sensitive systems such as

the Vaal River and riparian vegetation)

increases the risk of erosion and

degradation of watercourses and

associated habitats.

Direct/Indire

ct

Long term Study area Possible Moderatel

y severe

HIGH

NEGATIVE

The Gong-Gong Eco-cultural development project layout must be designed to ensure that the minimum disturbance of sensitive areas such as the watercourse is achieved as far as is reasonable and practical.

The Lodge and concerence venue must not be located within flood prone areas.

A buffer of at least 50m must be maintained around the river and any indigenous riparian vegetation.

Any activity (building of bridges and boardwalks etc) within 32m of the Vaal River will require a Water Use License.

LOW

NEGATIVE

Sanitation

During the planning and design, poor

planning with regards to the resorts’

sanitation requirements may result in a

breakdown of the system or overflows

of sewage causing contamination of the

surrounding environment and water

resource.

Direct Long term Localised Possible Severe HIGH

NEGATIVE

The sewage treatment system must be situated at least 100m away from the 100 year flood line.

The sewage treatment system must have the capacity to contain overflows.

The system design must be able to easily deal with the facility’s sanitation requirements even during peak season.

Sanitation designs must be submitted to the DWS for approval, and a Water Use Authorisation must be obtained if required.

LOW

NEGATIVE

Surface water runoff


86



impact

Duration Spatial

extent


Pre-mitigation


Post-

mitigation

Storm water management


failure to plan properly for storm water

(e.g. inadequate planning for storm

water drainage and routing of storm

water flow, resulting from increased

hard surface area and subsequent

increase in quantity and velocity of

runoff) could result in uncontrolled

storm water runoff which can cause

flooding and erosion and also result in

contamination of surface water and

groundwater resources.

Direct/Indire

ct

Long term Localised/

nearby

watercourse

Possible Slightly

severe

MODERATE

NEGATIVE

The proposed Gong-Gong Eco-cultural development must be located at least 50m away from the river and any other watercourses.

A Storm water Management Plan must be designed and implemented to ensure maximum water seepage at the source of water flow. The plan must also include management mitigation measures for water pollution, waste water management and the management of surface erosion e.g. by considering the applicability of contouring, etc.

The Storm water Management Plan must be designed by a qualified engineer.

LOW

NEGATIVE

River crossing

During the planning and design phase, the inappropriate design of the proposed hang bridge across the Vaal River could lead to soil erosion and sedimentation of the watercourse.

Direct Medium-Term

Water catchment

Probable Moderately Severe

HIGH NEGATIVE

The planning and design of the river crossing must be located in an area least prone to erosion, and take into account the ability for bank restoration, re-vegetation and stabilization.

The bridge design should minimize the anchor point area as much as is safely possible.

MODERATE NEGATIVE

Management of waste


inappropriate planning for management

and disposal of waste could result in

Direct/

Indirect

Short

term

Localised Possible Moderatel

y severe

MODERATE

NEGATIVE A waste management plan for handling

onsite waste must be developed and implemented.

LOW

NEGATIVE


87



impact

Duration Spatial

extent


Pre-mitigation


Post-

mitigation

surface and ground water

contamination. An appropriate area where waste can be

stored before disposal must be designated.

Siting of structures


poor planning for the siting of the

sewage treatment infrastructure could

result in inadvertent spillage or run-off

of effluent into the river.

Direct Long term Localised Possible Severe HIGH

NEGATIVE The sewage treatment infrastructure

must be situated at least 50m away from the 100 year flood line.

The system must have adequate capacity to contain overflows.

LOW

NEGATIVE

Landscape and visual


inappropriate architectural design or

lack of aesthetic considerations may

result in aesthetic impacts on the

currently open landscape.

Direct/

Indirect/

Cumulative

Long term Localised Probable Moderate

to slight

LOW

NEGATIVE

Sighting and scale of structures:

An independent Environmental Control Office (ECO) must assist in the sighting of development.

An appropriate environmentally and visually sensitive architectural and aesthetics code must be developed to limit visual intrusion of the built form.

Building heights should preferably be restricted to single storey, and tucked into the landscape.

Architectural guidelines must be formulated with a view to blending buildings into the landscape through selection of specific materials and colours. Natural materials should be adopted if possible (e.g. stone, wood, etc.) and roof and wall colours must be natural (greens, browns and greys).

LOW

NEGATIVE


88



impact

Duration Spatial

extent


Pre-mitigation


Post-

mitigation

Screening measures: Appropriate indigenous tree species must be planted to create visual screen for all structures.

Storage of hazardous substances


inappropriate planning for the storage

of hazardous substances such as

diesel, paint, pesticides etc., used

onsite could lead to surface and ground

water pollution (e.g. due to oil leaks,

spillage of diesel etc.). In addition,

these hazardous substances could be

washed off into the nearby

watercourse.

Direct/Indire

ct

Short

term

Localised/

nearby

watercourse

Possible Slight LOW

NEGATIVE All hazardous substances such as

paints, diesel and cement must be stored in a bunded area with an impermeable surface beneath them.

The developer must designate appropriate areas for the storage of hazardous substances.

LOW

NEGATIVE

Traffic and Transport

During the planning and design phase, inappropriate routing of internal roads through or close to watercourses could lead to unnecessary impacts on riparian vegetation.

Direct Long-Term

Localised Probable Moderately Severe

MODERATE NEGATIVE

All internal roads should be located at least 50m away from any watercourse. Where unavoidable, roads must avoid sensitive areas.

If located within 32m of a watercourse, the construction of such a road will require a Water Use License (WUL).

LOW NEGATIVE

Technology employed

During the planning and design phase, failure to consider technologies that reduce consumption of natural

Direct Long-term Surrounding areas and

downstream

Possible Moderate MODERATE NEGATIVE

Water:

Rainwater tanks should be considered in the design and planning phase. Tanks

LOW NEGATIVE


89



impact

Duration Spatial

extent


Pre-mitigation


Post-

mitigation

resources (particularly water and electricity) will result in lost opportunity to conserve resources.

will reduce the runoff created by the housing footprint and reduce municipal water usage.

Water piping material and infrastructure must comply with SABS to insure as far as possible pipeline failures and future indirect impacts resulting from burst pipes do not result in water loss.

Energy:

Insulation of houses and use of solar water heaters should be considered.

Use of alternative renewable energy sources such as wind or solar power (PV) should be considered in the design and layout. However, if renewable energy technology is not implemented initially, provisions should be made in design to allow for easier post-construction retrofitting.

ISSUES AND IMPACTS DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PHASE OF THE PROPOSED GONG-GONG ECO-CULTURAL AND HISTORICAL TOURISM VILLAGE DEVELOPMENT.

CONSTRUCTION PHASE


impact

Duration Spatial

extent

Likelihood Severity Significance Pre-

mitigation

Mitigation Significan

ce Post-

mitigation


90

CONSTRUCTION PHASE


impact

Duration Spatial

extent


mitigation


ce Post-

mitigation

Environmental Legal and Policy compliance

During the construction phase the failure of the contractor to implement mitigation measures can result in non-compliance with the EA and EMPr.

Indirect Short-Term Provincial Possible Severe HIGH NEGATIVE The developer must employ an independent Environmental Control Officer (ECO) for the construction phase to ensure that construction is implemented according to specifications in the EA and EMPr.

MODERATE

NEGATIVE

Ecological Impacts

Loss of indigenous vegetation during

construction

During the construction phase,

unnecessary damage and loss of

natural and vulnerable vegetation

(Kimberly Thornveld and riparian

vegetation) as well as heritage sites

beyond the development footprint my

result due to uncontrolled construction

activities.

Direct Short term Localised Probable Severe HIGH NEGATIVE The final design and layout must reviewed by the appointed ECO to ensure compliance with the approved layout.

Construction activities and vegetation removal must be limited to the developmental footprint to avoid unnecessary loss of vegetation and soil erosion.

Where vegetation has been cleared, site rehabilitation in terms of soil stabilisation and re-vegetation must be undertaken.

Prior to construction, all sensitive areas (including heritage sites) located near areas where development is planned must be demarcated, and signs erected to ensure these areas are maintained. This must be done with the assistance of the ECO.

Indigenous vegetation that occurs on drainage lines must not be harmed and a ten metre (10 m) buffer zone must be

LOW

NEGATIVE


91

CONSTRUCTION PHASE


impact

Duration Spatial

extent


mitigation


ce Post-

mitigation

maintained from the forest vegetation.

During the construction phase, land disturbance can lead to increased spreading of noxious weeds and invasive alien plants.

Direct Medium-Term

Localised Possible Moderately severe

MODERATE NEGATIVE

Alien plants must be removed from the site through appropriate methods e.g. hand pulling, chemical, cutting, etc., and under the supervision of the ECO.

After construction, exposed areas must be rehabilitated with indigenous vegetation.

Post-construction monitoring of rehabilitation must be implemented.

LOW NEGATIVE

During the construction phase, there is the potential risk of poaching of indigenous wild animals by staff employed by the contractor

Direct Short-Term Localised Possible Moderately severe

MODERATE NEGATIVE

All staff employed during construction must undergo environmental induction training.

No construction workers should reside onsite.

LOW NEGATIVE

During the construction phase, soil exposure due to clearing of land may result in erosion, which in turn may cause sedimentation of the watercourses

Direct Medium-Term

Localised and water catchment


Wind screening and storm water control should be undertaken to prevent soil erosion during construction.

All erosion control mechanisms must be regularly maintained.

Vegetation must be retained where possible to avoid soil erosion.

Construction must be phased in order to minimize the area of exposed soil at any one time.

Re-vegetation of disturbed surfaces must occur immediately after the construction activities are completed with indigenous vegetation.

LOW NEGATIVE

Sanitation


92

CONSTRUCTION PHASE


impact

Duration Spatial

extent


mitigation


ce Post-

mitigation

During the construction phase, the lack of appropriate sanitation facilities for construction workers could lead to the contamination of ground and ground water.

Direct Short-Term Localised and water catchment


Adequate sanitary and ablutions facilities must be provided for construction workers

The facilities must be regularly serviced to reduce the risk of surface or groundwater pollution.

Portable toilets must not be located within 50 meters of any watercourse.

LOW NEGATIVE


During the construction phase, runoff of

storm water containing contaminants,

silt and litter may contaminate the

surrounding environment.

Direct/Indi

rect

Short term Watercourse Possible Moderately

severe

MODERATE

NEGATIVE During construction the site must be

managed in a manner that prevents pollution of drains, downstream watercourses or groundwater, due to suspended solids, silt or chemical pollutants.

Litter must be controlled on site.

Temporary cut-off drains and berms may be required to capture storm water and promote infiltration.

Hazardous substances must be stored at least 100m away from any water bodies on site to avoid pollution.

LOW

NEGATIVE

Stream crossing

During the construction phase, the building of a bridge across the watercourse could lead to soil erosion and downstream sedimentation of the watercourse.

Direct Medium-Term

Localised and water catchment

Probable Moderately Severe

HIGH NEGATIVE The construction of the bridge must take place in the shortest possible time period and during the low rainfall season.

Bank restoration, re-vegetation and stabilization must be implemented once construction is complete and must

MODERATE

NEGATIVE


93

CONSTRUCTION PHASE


impact

Duration Spatial

extent


mitigation


ce Post-

mitigation

include the use of gabions for bank stabilization.

Management of waste

Construction rubble left onsite may

attract vermin and encourage the

growth of opportunistic alien vegetation.

Pollution potential if construction waste

is not adequately disposed of (i.e. left

on site).

Direct/Indi

rect

Short term Localised Possible Moderately

severe

MODERATE

NEGATIVE An environmental management

programme incorporating waste management issues during the construction phase of the project must be developed and implemented.

Refuse from the construction site must be collected on a regular basis and deposited at an appropriate landfill site.

All construction materials must be stored in a central and secure location with controlled access with an appropriate impermeable surface.

LOW

NEGATIVE

During construction there is the potential risk of littering on and around the site by the contractor, which can become unsightly and in some cases lead to health risks.

Direct Short-Term Localised and water catchment

Probable Moderately severe

MODERATE NEGATIVE

Construction personnel must be educated in appropriate waste management practices.

Collected waste must be separated and stored by type when feasible.

Litter and construction waste must be removed on a regular basis and disposed of in an approved registered landfill.

Potentially hazardous materials must be handled and stored onsite in secure containers and disposed of at an appropriately permitted hazardous waste disposal site

The Contractor should maintain a register of the hazardous materials and

LOW NEGATIVE


94

CONSTRUCTION PHASE


impact

Duration Spatial

extent


mitigation


ce Post-

mitigation

should document the use, storage, final destination and method of disposal.

During the construction phase there is the potential for the inappropriate disposal of construction material off-site and subsequently polluting the environment.

Indirect Medium-Term

Community Probable Moderate MODERATE NEGATIVE

Construction material must be removed to an approved, licenced off-site disposal site by the appointment of a reputable waste services provider.

LOW NEGATIVE

Management of hazardous substances

During the construction phase inappropriate storage and disposal of hazardous building material may pollute the soil and ground water.


MODERATE NEGATIVE

The storage of potentially hazardous material must be controlled to reduce the risk of environmental contamination.

Drip trays must be placed under all machinery to avoid soil contamination.

All vehicles and machinery must be regularly maintained and in good working order to reduce the risk of contamination of soil and ground water.

All areas that have been contaminated during the construction phase must be rehabilitated.

LOW NEGATIVE

Concrete Batching

During the construction phase inappropriate cement mixing techniques can lead to ground and ground water pollution


MODERATE NEGATIVE

Cement and concrete must not be mixed directly on the ground, or during rainfall events when the potential for transport of pollutants to watercourses is the greatest. Cement and concrete must only be mixed in the area demarcated for this purpose and on an impermeable substratum.

LOW NEGATIVE


95

CONSTRUCTION PHASE


impact

Duration Spatial

extent


mitigation


ce Post-

mitigation

All construction water and contaminated runoff must be directed away from the drainage line.

Traffic and Access Routes

During the construction phase, increased use of access roads by heavy machinery will cause further degradation to the gravel tracks.

Direct Medium-Term

Along road Probable Moderately severe

MODERATE NEGATIVE

Road maintenance should take place regularly, especially after heavy rains.

LOW NEGATIVE

On-site Fires

During the construction phase, fires started at construction camps could result in uncontrolled fires, posing a threat to wild animals, indigenous vegetation and the surrounding landowners.

Direct Short-Term Community Possible Severe HIGH NEGATIVE All onsite fires must be controlled.

The construction personnel must be educated regarding fire and fire management.

Fire extinguishers must be available onsite.

In order to reduce the risk of fires: o All flammable substances must

be stored in dry areas which do not pose an ignition risk to the said substances.

o Smoking must not be permitted near flammable substances.

o All cooking must be done in demarcated areas that are safe in terms of runaway or uncontrolled fires.

LOW NEGATIVE

Socio-economic impacts

During the construction phase, there may be temporary job-creation for members of the community.

Indirect Short-Term

Localised Probable Beneficial MODERATE POSITIVE

No mitigation provided MODERATE POSITIVE


96

CONSTRUCTION PHASE


impact

Duration Spatial

extent


mitigation


ce Post-

mitigation

During the construction phase increased number of labourers could lead to an increase in security risks in the community.

Indirect Short-Term

Community Possible Moderately severe

MODERATE NEGATIVE

Access control to the site must ensure no unauthorised person shall enter.

The site must be secured in order to reduce the opportunity for the criminal activity in the locality of the construction site.

LOW NEGATIVE

ISSUES AND IMPACTS DURING THE OPERATIONAL PHASE OF THE PROPOSED GONG-GONG ECO-CULTURAL AND HISTORICAL TOURISM VILLAGE DEVELOPMENT.

OPERATIONAL PHASE


impact

Duration Spatial

extent


Pre-mitigation


ce Post-

mitigation

Ecological Impacts

During the operational phase, the inappropriate disturbance of land may increase spreading of noxious weeds, invasive and alien plants in the development open space area and surrounds.

Direct Medium-Term

Localised Possible Moderately severe

MODERATE NEGATIVE

The facility operator must monitor disturbed sites for erosion and the spread of alien vegetation etc. and implement remedial actions.

LOW NEGATIVE

Sanitation

During the operational phase, if the

sewage treatment facility is not

adequately maintained, effluent of poor

quality may be released into the

Direct Medium-

Term

Localised Possible Severe HIGH

NEGATIVE

No treated effluent may be discharged into any watercourse.

Ground water monitoring boreholes must be regularly tested for possible contamination of groundwater.

LOW

NEGATIVE


97

OPERATIONAL PHASE


impact

Duration Spatial

extent


Pre-mitigation


ce Post-

mitigation

environment, contaminating water

sources with nutrient and faecal

coliforms.

Effluent quality must, as a minimum, be analysed quarterly to confirm the effectiveness of the treatment technology, and effluent samples and results submitted to FBDM Sanitation Department.

Appropriate corrective actions must be taken if contamination is detected or effluent quality does not meet discharge standards.

The approved maintenance plan must be implemented.


During the operational phase the failure to maintain storm water management measures may result in soil erosion and stream sedimentation.

Direct Long-Term Localised and water catchment

Probable Severe HIGH NEGATIVE

The effectiveness of the flood attenuation and storm water management measures must be monitored.

The effectiveness of attenuation berms that are situated 32 m above the watercourse must be monitored.

If the storm water management measures put in place are deemed insufficient, alternative measures should be drawn up by a qualified engineer and approved by DENC and DWS before being implemented.

MODERATE

NEGATIVE

Management of waste

During the operational phase inappropriate waste storage and disposal practices may lead to litter,

Direct Short-Term Localised Possible Severe MODERATE NEGATIVE

Waste must be properly managed by separating compostable waste, and providing storage for recyclable waste

LOW NEGATIVE


98

OPERATIONAL PHASE


impact

Duration Spatial

extent


Pre-mitigation


ce Post-

mitigation

pollution, general nuisances and health hazards.

materials and wastes which must be disposed of into a licensed landfill.

Technology employed

During the operational phase, increased water and energy consumption may lead to a loss in natural resources such as water and energy.

Direct Long-Term Provincial Definite Severe HIGH NEGATIVE

Measures must be taken to reduce the consumption of natural resources.

These measures should include, but not be limited to, the installation of rainwater tanks to reduce storm water runoff and the pressure on the municipal water supply, as well as alternative renewable energy sources such as wind or solar (PV) power.

MODERATE

NEGATIVE

Socio-economic impacts

During the operational phase there may be increased employment opportunities and stimulation of the local economy.

Indirect Long-Term Community Probable Beneficial MODERATE POSITIVE

No mitigation provided. MODERATE POSITIVE

During the operational phase, there may be potential long-term increases of neighbouring land value.

Indirect Medium-Term

Community Possible UNKNOWN

MODERATE POSITIVE


ISSUES AND IMPACTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE “NO-GO” ALTERNATIVE

“NO-GO” ALTERNATIVE

Impact Description Nature of Impact

Duration Spatial extent

Likelihood Severity Significance Pre-mitigation


Post-mitigation


99

Degradation and misuse of site due to possible mining and poor land use management.

Direct Medium-Term Community Probable Moderate MODERATE NEGATIVE

No mitigation provided. MODERATE

NEGATIVE

All negative activities from the proposed development will be avoided

Direct Long-Term Community Probable Moderate MODERATE POSITIVE


Construction job losses Direct Short-Term Localised Definite Moderate MODERATE NEGATIVE

No mitigation provided. MODERATE

NEGATIVE


100

Appendix G: Environmental Management Programme (EMPr)


101

Appendix H: Details of EAP and expertise 1.1 Details of the EAP

Dr Alan Carter

Alan is the executive of the EOH East London Office. He holds a PhD in Marine Biology and is a

certified Public Accountant, with extensive training and experience in both financial accounting and

environmental science disciplines with international accounting firms in South Africa and the USA. He

has 25 years’ experience in environmental management and has specialist skills in sanitation, coastal

environments and industrial waste. Dr Carter is registered as a Professional Natural Scientist under the

South African Council for Natural Scientific Professions (SACNASP). He is also registered as an EAP

by the Environmental Assessment Practitioners of South Africa (EAPSA).


102

1.2 Expertise of the study team

EOH Coastal and Environmental Services (EOH) was established in 1990 as a specialist environmental

consulting company and has considerable experience in terrestrial, marine and freshwater ecology, the

Social Impact Assessment (SIA) process, State of Environment Reporting (SOER), Integrated Waste

Management Plans (IWMP), Environmental Management Programme (EMPr), Spatial Development

Frameworks (SDF), public participation, as well as the management and co-ordination of all aspects of

the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) and Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA)

processes. EOH has been active in all of the above fields, and in so doing have made a positive

contribution towards environmental management and sustainable development in the Eastern Cape,

South Africa and many other African countries. We believe that a balance between development and

environmental protection can be achieved by skilful, considerate and careful planning.


103

Appendix I: Specialist’s declaration of interest No specialist studies were conducted


104

Appendix J: Additional Information

N/A

Documents

GONG-GONG ECO-CULTURAL AND HISTORICAL TOURISM … Eco-Cultural and Historical... · basic assessment report 1 gong-gong eco-cultural and historical tourism destination, near barkly