40
GT COORDINATOR’S MEETING OCTOBER 9, 2009

GT Coordinator’s Meeting October 9, 2009

  • Upload
    julie

  • View
    29

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

GT Coordinator’s Meeting October 9, 2009. Introductions. Introduce yourself and tell us one good thing that happened this week. Gifted/Talented Standards: 39.236. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: GT Coordinator’s Meeting October 9, 2009

GT COORDINATOR’S

MEETINGOCTOBER 9,

2009

Page 2: GT Coordinator’s Meeting October 9, 2009

INTRODUCTIONS Introduce yourself and tell us one good thing that happened this week.

Page 3: GT Coordinator’s Meeting October 9, 2009

GIFTED/TALENTED STANDARDS: 39.236

The commissioner shall adopt standards to evaluate school district programs for gifted and talented students to determine whether a district operates a program for gifted and talented students in accordance with

the Texas Performance Standards Project; or another program approved by the commissioner

that meets the requirements of the state plan for the education of gifted and talented students under Section 29.123.

Page 4: GT Coordinator’s Meeting October 9, 2009

NEW STATE STANDARDS-HB 3 Regional Focus Groups Hosted at the service centers

How this bill will be implementedTexas Performance StandardsOther approved program

Page 5: GT Coordinator’s Meeting October 9, 2009

WHAT WE NEED TO KNOW How many students participated in the

TPSP program last year…elem, middle, high school.

How many districts participated? What is the cost to implement? How many students identified gt were in

CTE classes last year? How many gt students were enrolled in

Tech Prep?

Page 6: GT Coordinator’s Meeting October 9, 2009

Performance Standards Projects

Admin walk throughPrimary RubricsPursuit of Passion Taskhttp://www.texaspsp.org

Page 7: GT Coordinator’s Meeting October 9, 2009

STATE PLAN REVISION

Page 8: GT Coordinator’s Meeting October 9, 2009

OVERALL CHANGE On section it clearly states that the

board of trustees of a school district or the governing body of an open-enrollment charter school has primary responsibility for ensuring that the district or school complies with all applicable requirments of state educational programs (TEC §7.028)

Page 9: GT Coordinator’s Meeting October 9, 2009

KEY CHANGES--ASSESSMENT Acceptable category change to “In

Compliance” Written policies on students assessment—

given to all parents—attached to student handbook or something that every parent will see.

Provide for ongoing identification—meaning every year—included in board policy

GT committee must meet and review all individual student data. Cut score is not in compliance. Anecdotal information is necessary—preponderance of evidence.

Page 10: GT Coordinator’s Meeting October 9, 2009

KEY CHANGES—PROGRAM DESIGN Gifted/talented students are ensured

opportunities to work together as a group, work with other students, and work independently during the school day as well as the entire school year as a direct result of gifted/talented service options

Page 11: GT Coordinator’s Meeting October 9, 2009

KEY CHANGES--CURRICULUM (In compliance column) A continuum of

learning experiences is provided that leads to the development of advanced-level products and/or performances such as those provided through the Texas Performance Standards Project (TPSP)

Provisions to improve services to gifted/talented students are included in district and campus improvement plans.

Page 12: GT Coordinator’s Meeting October 9, 2009

KEY CHANGES—PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT Gifted/talented teachers receive a

minimum of 6 hours annually of professional development in gifted/talented education that is related to state teacher education standards.

Page 13: GT Coordinator’s Meeting October 9, 2009

STATE PLAN Revised State Plan to debut at TAGT in

December. Copies will go out to

School Board MembersSuperintendentG/T CoordinatorPrincipalsG/T Lead teacher or Counselor

Page 14: GT Coordinator’s Meeting October 9, 2009

RTI/GT Handout information NAGT Proposal

Page 15: GT Coordinator’s Meeting October 9, 2009

PBS AWARENESS Posters 30 second spot on DVD

Page 16: GT Coordinator’s Meeting October 9, 2009

COLLEGE CREDIT REQUIREMENT Advanced Placement International Baccalaureate Dual Credit Early College High School Middle College High School Articulated Technical credit Locally Articulated Credit District may choose to pay part or all of

students’ tuition and/or purchase required textbooks.

Page 17: GT Coordinator’s Meeting October 9, 2009

Dual Credit: Content and method of instruction are defined by the college; high school credit may be awarded if the TEKS are taught; college credit awarded immediately.

Articulated Credit: Content is defined by TEKS; college credit is awarded upon the student’s completion of requirements outlined in the articulation agreement

AP course: content is defined by the College Board; use of AP trademark requires specific College Board approval. College credit is dependent of the student’s exam score and the chosen college/university.

Page 18: GT Coordinator’s Meeting October 9, 2009

EXAMPLES Developmental Education courses can never be

offered for Dual Credit. College Entrance requirements apply. Other limitations apply:

11th and 12th graders onlyNo more than 2 courses per semester

Faculty must be appropriately credentialed.

Page 19: GT Coordinator’s Meeting October 9, 2009

OTHER AREAS OF CONCERN Funding: If the student must pay, no ADA.*Class time: Specific requirements exist for college

credit while high school credit is defined purely by the TEKS.

Grades: TEA recommends that they be the same on both transcripts; dual performance scales should not be used.

*Put off by HB 3646 for 2009-2010 and 2011-2012.

Page 20: GT Coordinator’s Meeting October 9, 2009

HB 3646, Section 15 Author: Hochberg Sponsor: Shapiro

Statute Amended or Added: Amends §28.009, Education Code

Summary: This section of the bill adds a provision that states that a school district is not required to pay for a student’s tuition and costs associated with taking a course for college credit as part of the College Credit Program.

Page 21: GT Coordinator’s Meeting October 9, 2009

OTHER AREAS OF CONCERN Funding: If the student must pay, no ADA.*Class time: Specific requirements exist for college

credit while high school credit is defined purely by the TEKS.

Grades: TEA recommends that they be the same on both transcripts; dual performance scales should not be used.

*Put off by HB 3646 for 2009-2010 and 2011-2012.

Page 22: GT Coordinator’s Meeting October 9, 2009

HB 2480 Author: Hochberg Sponsor: Seliger

Statute Amended or Added: Adds §130.008(d) and (d-1), Education Code

Summary: This bill allows an independent school district (ISD) to establish a partnership, for the purposes of offering its students dual credit, with any community college, provided that the community college in whose service area the ISD is located is unable to provide the requested dual credit course to the satisfaction of the ISD.

Page 23: GT Coordinator’s Meeting October 9, 2009

CREDIT BY EXAM-ACCELERATION

A student in any of Grades 1-5 must be accelerated one grade if he or she meets the following requirements:The student scores 90% on a criterion-

referenced test for the grade level he or she wants to skip in each of the following area: language arts, mathematics, science, and social studies.

A school district representative recommends that the student be accelerated, and

The student’s parent or guardian gives written approval for the acceleration.

Page 24: GT Coordinator’s Meeting October 9, 2009

CREDIT BY EXAM A school district may allow a student to

accelerate at a time other than one required in paragraph 1 of this subsection by developing a cost-free option approved by the district board of trustees that allows students to demonstrate academic achievement or proficiency in a subject or grade level.

Page 25: GT Coordinator’s Meeting October 9, 2009

HB 3, Section 25 Author: Eissler Sponsor: Shapiro

Statute Amended or Added: Amends §28.002, Education Code

Summary: This legislation requires the State Board of Education to adopt rules requiring students in grades six, seven, and eight to successfully complete a minimum of one fine arts course during those grade levels as part of a district’s fine arts curriculum.

Page 26: GT Coordinator’s Meeting October 9, 2009

DISTINGUISHED ACHIEVEMENT PROGRAM

Entered Grade 9 before 2007-08

Entered Grade 9 2007-08 or later

English Language Arts 4 credits 4 credits

Mathematics 3 credits 4 credits

Science 3 credits 4 credits

Social Studies 3.5 credits 3.5 credits

Economics with emphasis on the free enterprise system and its benefits

.5 credit .5 credit

Languages other than English 3 credits 3 credits

Physical Education 1.5 credit 1.5 credit

Health Education .5 credit .5 credit

Speech .5 credit .5 credit

Technology Applications 1 credit 1 credit

Fine Arts 1 credit 1 credit

Electives 2.5 credits 2.5 credits

Total 24 26

Page 27: GT Coordinator’s Meeting October 9, 2009

RECOMMENDED HIGH SCHOOL PROGRAM

Entered Grade 9 before 2007-08

Entered Grade 9 2007-08 or later

English Language Arts 4 credits 4 credits

Mathematics 3 credits 4 credits

Science 3 credits 4 credits

Social Studies 3.5 credits 3.5 credits

Economics with emphasis on the free enterprise system and its benefits

.5 credit .5 credit

Languages other than English 2 credits 2 credits

Physical Education 1 credit 1 credit

Speech .5 credit .5 credit

Fine Arts 1 credit 1 credit

Electives 6 credits (includes speech)

6 credits (includes speech)

Total 24 26

Page 28: GT Coordinator’s Meeting October 9, 2009

MINIMUM HIGH SCHOOL PROGRAM

Entered Grade 9 before 2009-10

Entered Grade 9 2009-10 or later

English Language Arts 4 credits 4 credits

Mathematics 3 credits 3 credits

Science 2 credits 2 credits

Social Studies 2.5 credits 2.5 credits

Economics with emphasis on the free enterprise system and its benefits

.5 credit .5 credit

Academic Elective 1 credit 1 credit

Physical Education 1.5 credit 1.5 credit

Health Education .5 credit .5 credit

Speech .5 credit .5 credit

Technology Applications 1 credit 1 credit

Fine Arts None 1 credit

Electives 5.5 credits 4.5 credits

Total 22 22

Freshmen 2010-2011

Page 29: GT Coordinator’s Meeting October 9, 2009

MINIMUM HIGH SCHOOL PROGRAM

In order for a student to opt into the minimum high school program, the student must

(1) be at least 16 years of age;(2) have completed two credits required

for graduation in each subject of the foundation curriculum; or

(3) have failed to be promoted to the tenth grade one or more times as determined by the school district.

Page 30: GT Coordinator’s Meeting October 9, 2009

MINIMUM HIGH SCHOOL PROGRAM A student must meet one of the 3

circumstances.

A student has the right to re-enroll in the RHSP at any time.

A student must satisfy all the course requirements listed in 19 TAC Chapter 74 for a total of 22 credits to graduate.

Page 31: GT Coordinator’s Meeting October 9, 2009

HB 3 AMENDS §28.021

HB 3 requires districts to consider all of the following in determining whether a student should be promoted to the next grade:

Page 32: GT Coordinator’s Meeting October 9, 2009

The recommendation of the student’s teacher

The student’s grade in each subject or course

The student’s score on the TAKS (English or Spanish) in grades 3-8 or an alternate assessment under §39.023(b) or (l)

Any other necessary academic information

HB 3 AMENDS §28.021

Page 33: GT Coordinator’s Meeting October 9, 2009

HB 3 AMENDS §28.021 The removal of the SSI grade 3 requirement that

students pass the TAKS reading assessment in order to be eligible for promotion to grade 4

Accelerated instruction in the applicable subject area for any student who fails any TAKS assessment in grades 3 - 8

Students who fail the reading or mathematics TAKS in grade 5 or grade 8 and who are promoted to the next grade level to complete the required accelerated instruction as a condition of promotion

Page 34: GT Coordinator’s Meeting October 9, 2009

HB 3 AMENDS §28.021 A grade 5 or 8 student who is promoted

by a grade placement committee be assigned to a teacher in the next grade who meets all state and federal qualifications to teach the subject in which the student failed the TAKS

School districts to make public the requirements for student advancement by the start of the school year 2009-2010

Page 35: GT Coordinator’s Meeting October 9, 2009

OTHER PROVISIONS OF HB 3 Section 32 Amends §28.0252(b), Education

Code deletes language that would require use of a

method for calculating grade point average established by the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board

Section 41 Amends §29.182(b), Education Code requires the (Perkins) state plan to define CTE as

an option for student learning that provides a rigorous course of study

Page 36: GT Coordinator’s Meeting October 9, 2009

EDUCATOR SUPPORT WEB PORTAL

www.txccrs.org

Page 37: GT Coordinator’s Meeting October 9, 2009

WWW.TXVSN.ORGEmail: [email protected]

Toll Free Phone: 1.866.938.9876

Page 38: GT Coordinator’s Meeting October 9, 2009

BPC LISTSERV AND ONLINE SURVEY Visit BPC at http://www.tea.state.tx.us/bestprac/.

Join the Clearinghouse listserv to receive updates at http://miller.tea.state.tx.us/list/.

Provide feedback via the BPC Online Survey at http://www.tea.state.tx.us/bestprac/.

Contact Ertha Patrick for questions or to submit a best practice at [email protected] or (512) 463-6235.

Page 39: GT Coordinator’s Meeting October 9, 2009

PROGRAM EVALUATIONS Ten Questions

Cisco, Breckenridge, and Rising Star have sent me copies of g/t plans. Yea!!

Page 40: GT Coordinator’s Meeting October 9, 2009

THANK YOU FOR ATTENDING TODAY Questions, comments:

Phyllis Baum [email protected] 325.675.7007