3
9/16/2014 Hierarchical or Egalitarian? The Advantages of Hierarchy | Ideas for Leaders http://www.ideasforleaders.com/ideas/hierarchical-or-egalitarian-the-advantages-of-hierarchy 1/3 SEARCH tel. +44 (0)203 031 2900 CHALLENGE US PINNED ACCOUNT LOG OUT HOME ABOUT IDEAS LIBRARY IDEAS BY INSTITUTIONS Home Ideas Library Hierarchical or Egalitarian? The Advantages of Hierarchy 10.13007/436 Ideas for Leaders #436 Hierarchical or Egalitarian? The Advantages of Hierarchy Key Concept While hierarchies can be used by people in power to control others, new research indicates hierarchies also help people in lower positions to feel a sense of control and order in their lives. Change agents who are flattening hierarchies to create leaner, more effective organizations must make sure that they don’t unintentionally undermine this sense of order. Idea Summary Hierarchies have been taking a bad rap. The mantra for a number of years has been to ‘flatten’ the organizations. Hierarchies were not only seen as inefficient, but worse: as a mechanism for the out- dated belief that leaders must ‘control from the top down’. In place of hierarchies, flat organization advocates argued for a more egalitarian structure in which, for example, decision-making was distributed throughout the company rather than be hoarded by top management. Through a series of seven empirical studies, a team of researchers have revealed that the prevailing wisdom about hierarchical and egalitarian organizations may not tell the whole story. It’s certainly true that hierarchies fulfil top-echelon leaders’ psychological need for power and status. But hierarchies, the research shows, also serve an important psychology function for those who are not in power: to compensate for a lack of personal control, or the threat of a loss of control, in their surroundings by offering some sense of clear, orderly and predictable structure. When for whatever reason, people feel that they are not in control over the events or situations around them, they take comfort and a sense of control from the hierarchy. Through the hierarchy, they find the logic and order that would be missing otherwise. They also find comfort in the status quo that the hierarchy represents. There are some caveats. The first is that the hierarchy Share Authors Friesen, Justin P. Kay, Aaron C. Eibach, Richard P. Galinsky, Adam D. Institutions York University Duke University Fuqua School of Business University of Waterloo Columbia Business School Source Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Idea conceived April 2014 Idea posted September 2014 DOI number Subject Organizational Structure Delegation Leadership

Hierarchical or Egalitarian? The Advantages of … Hierarchical or Egalitarian? The Advantages of Hierarchy | Ideas for Leaders 3/3 About People IEDP Partner Institutions Terms of

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

9/16/2014 Hierarchical or Egalitarian? The Advantages of Hierarchy | Ideas for Leaders

http://www.ideasforleaders.com/ideas/hierarchical-or-egalitarian-the-advantages-of-hierarchy 1/3

SEARCH

tel. +44 (0)203 031 2900

CHALLENGE US PINNED ACCOUNT LOG OUT

HOME ABOUT IDEAS LIBRARY IDEAS BY INSTITUTIONS

Home Ideas Library Hierarchical or Egalitarian? The Advantages of Hierarchy

10.13007/436

Ideas for Leaders #436

Hierarchical or Egalitarian? The Advantagesof Hierarchy

Key Concept

While hierarchies can be used by people in power tocontrol others, new research indicates hierarchies alsohelp people in lower positions to feel a sense of controland order in their lives. Change agents who areflattening hierarchies to create leaner, more effectiveorganizations must make sure that they don’tunintentionally undermine this sense of order.

Idea Summary

Hierarchies have been taking a bad rap. The mantrafor a number of years has been to ‘flatten’ theorganizations. Hierarchies were not only seen asinefficient, but worse: as a mechanism for the out-dated belief that leaders must ‘control from the topdown’. In place of hierarchies, flat organizationadvocates argued for a more egalitarian structure inwhich, for example, decision-making was distributedthroughout the company rather than be hoarded bytop management.

Through a series of seven empirical studies, a team ofresearchers have revealed that the prevailing wisdomabout hierarchical and egalitarian organizations maynot tell the whole story. It’s certainly true thathierarchies fulfil top-echelon leaders’ psychologicalneed for power and status. But hierarchies, theresearch shows, also serve an important psychologyfunction for those who are not in power: tocompensate for a lack of personal control, or thethreat of a loss of control, in their surroundings byoffering some sense of clear, orderly and predictablestructure.

When for whatever reason, people feel that they arenot in control over the events or situations aroundthem, they take comfort and a sense of control fromthe hierarchy. Through the hierarchy, they find thelogic and order that would be missing otherwise. Theyalso find comfort in the status quo that the hierarchyrepresents.

There are some caveats. The first is that the hierarchy

ShareAuthors

Friesen, Justin P.Kay, Aaron C.Eibach, Richard P.Galinsky, Adam D.

Institutions

York UniversityDuke University Fuqua School of BusinessUniversity of WaterlooColumbia Business School

Source

Journal of Personality and SocialPsychology

Idea conceived

April 2014

Idea posted

September 2014

DOI number

Subject

Organizational StructureDelegationLeadership

9/16/2014 Hierarchical or Egalitarian? The Advantages of Hierarchy | Ideas for Leaders

http://www.ideasforleaders.com/ideas/hierarchical-or-egalitarian-the-advantages-of-hierarchy 2/3

There are some caveats. The first is that the hierarchymust indeed be structured. The compensatory senseof control that people take from hierarchies is lost ifthere is disorder or randomness in the hierarchy.

The second caveat is that the hierarchy must be onethat is fair and just. Hierarchies led by inconsistent,fickle leaders will fail to fulfil a compensatory functionfor those who feel their personal control threatened.

Business Application

While many leadership theorists might assume thatanyone below C-suite level would enthusiasticallywelcome the flattening of hierarchies, the truth ismore complicated. Leaders who are restructuring anorganization into a more ‘egalitarian’ model must notlose sight of the psychological comfort and sense ofcontrol that structure provides. If the hierarchy isgoing to be flattened, the change agents must clearlyhighlight that:

There will still be structure in place, only it will be simplified; and

There was unpredictability and disorderliness in the previoushierarchy that will be eliminated.

Moderation, as always, is more convincing than theextreme. Hierarchies can be an efficient structure forcompleting tasks, but can also be rife with unfairness.The best leaders will recognize the advantages anddisadvantages of both hierarchy and egalitarianismand strive to create the organization that builds on thebest of both.

© Copyright IEDP Ideas for Leaders 2014

About Legal Help Follow

Further Reading

Seeking Structure In Social Organization:Compensatory Control And The PsychologicalAdvantages Of Hierarchy. Justin P. Friesen, AaronKay, Richard Eilbach & Adam D. Galinsky. Journalof Personality and Social Psychology (April 2014).

Further Relevant Resources

Justin Friesen’s personal website

Aaron Kay’s profile at The Fuqua School of Business

Richard Eibach’s profile at University of Waterloo

Adam D. Galinsky’s profile at Columbia Business School

The Fuqua School of Business Executive Education profile atIEDP

Columbia Business School Executive Education profile at IEDP