29
HOPI Project Update Rick Summerhill Director, Network Research, Architecture, and Technologies, Internet2 Spring Member Meeting May 4, 2005 Arlington, VA

HOPI Project Update

  • Upload
    shalom

  • View
    85

  • Download
    4

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

HOPI Project Update. Rick Summerhill Director, Network Research, Architecture, and Technologies, Internet2 Spring Member Meeting May 4, 2005 Arlington, VA. Next generation national network. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: HOPI Project Update

HOPI Project UpdateHOPI Project Update

Rick Summerhill

Director, Network Research, Architecture, and Technologies, Internet2

Spring Member Meeting

May 4, 2005

Arlington, VA

Rick Summerhill

Director, Network Research, Architecture, and Technologies, Internet2

Spring Member Meeting

May 4, 2005

Arlington, VA

Page 2: HOPI Project Update

2

Next generation national network Next generation national network

• Internet2 set up to catalyze activities and provide for services that cannot be accomplished/provided by individual organizations• We have leverage if we act together

• Integrate innovation at all levels of topology• National environment• State/regional environment• Scaling and extending capabilities

Page 3: HOPI Project Update

3

Next generation R&E national network infrastructureNext generation R&E national network infrastructure

• Internet2 is focused on integrating and rapidly deploying innovative new capabilities

• In the process of designing the next generation network• Starting with a clean slate• Looking at new models

• Continue to engage the gigapops, state/regional networks and campus environments

• Opportunity for engagement in the design process between now and end of year

Page 4: HOPI Project Update

4

Abilene Network FuturesAbilene Network Futures• October 2007 - End of recent 1-year Abilene transport

MoU extension• Sets next-generation network planning timeline

• Architecture definition: 1/1/2006• Transport selection: 4/1/2006• Equipment selection: 7/1/2006• Backbone deployed: 1/1/2007• Connector transition: 2007

• Concurrently, review overall business plan and management model

• Network design time frame: 2007-2012

• Note that ESnet transport agreement with Qwest Federal is on similar time line - December 2007

• HOPI testbed is expected to be in place for 3 years, to experiment with future protocols• Refine and evolve next generation architecture

Page 5: HOPI Project Update

5

Groups engaged (current and near term)Groups engaged (current and near term)

• Internet2 governance• Board• Advisory Councils (NPPAC, ASC, ISC, NRLC)• Campus Expectations Task Force

• Internet2 technical advisory groups• Abilene TAC (Core IP service)• HOPI Design Team (Hybrid network)• SALSA (Security)• E2E TAG (Performance)• MACE (Middleware)

• National LambdaRail (NLR)• Board

• Community• The Quilt and its membership• Abilene Community (campuses, connectors, partners)• Emerging State and Regional Optical Networks

Page 6: HOPI Project Update

6

Currently planned engagement opportunitiesCurrently planned engagement opportunities

• QUILT Fiber Workshop: 1-3 June• Joint Techs Workshop: 17-21 July• Side workshop for Abilene technical

community

• Fall Member Meeting: 19 – 22 September

• Campus-focused workshop or workshops: October and November

• Other ideas?

Page 7: HOPI Project Update

7

Internet2 Advanced Networking GoalsInternet2 Advanced Networking Goals

• Provide high-performance, cost-effective network infrastructure for the U.S. research universities and the affiliated community

• Advance the state of network capabilities - architecture, end-to-end performance, and innovative services

• Contribute to the concurrent evolution of advanced regional and campus networking

• Facilitate network research through infrastructure access and collaborations with computer scienc e faculty

• Support national and international R&E collaboration

Page 8: HOPI Project Update

8

HOPI Project - SummaryHOPI Project - Summary

•In the near future we will see a richer set of capabilities available to network designers and end users

• Core IP packet switched networks• A set of optically switched waves available for dynamic provisioning

•Fundamental Question: How will the core Internet architecture evolve?

• Many options being examined

•Examine a hybrid of shared IP packet switching and dynamically provisioned optical lambdas•HOPI Project – Hybrid Optical and Packet Infrastructure

• See http://networks.internet2.edu/hopi/ for documentation.• Immediate Goals

• Implement testbed over the next year• Coordinate and experiment with other similar projects

Page 9: HOPI Project Update

9

HOPI General ProblemHOPI General Problem

Page 10: HOPI Project Update

10

HOPI General ProblemHOPI General Problem

• How would one create a hybrid from these two infrastructures. The Nodes do switching and the links are point-to-point circuit like paths. Each link may have attributes – for example, bandwidth. Attributes may determine the ability to concatenate links. Examples include• Nodes are lambda switches with waves forming circuits –

attributes include colors and bandwidth, etc.• Nodes are SONET switches with paths being SONET links –

attributes include channels, etc. For example, OC-3, OC-12, etc.• Nodes are Ethernet switches with paths being point-to-point

VLANS – attributes include bandwidth, etc. • HOPI will use this environment to examine different architectures

• Nodes are routers on a packet infrastructure and the point-to-point paths are MPLS L2VPNs

Page 11: HOPI Project Update

11

HOPI QuestionsHOPI Questions

•Examine how to build an architecture• A lot is known about how to do various pieces• The main question is how would one put it all together

into a network•Problems to understand

• When does a host use the circuit switched infrastructure and when does it use the packet infrastructure?

• Temporal degree of dynamic provisioning• Temporal duration of dynamic paths and requirement for

scheduling• Topological extent of deterministic provisioning• Examine backbone, RON, campus hierarchy – how will

a RON interface with the core network?• Understand connectivity to other infrastructures – for

example, international or federal networks?• Network operations, management, measurement, and

control plane across administrative domains?

Page 12: HOPI Project Update

12

HOPI Advisory and Management GroupsHOPI Advisory and Management Groups

• HOPI Design Team• Engineers, managers and designers long

associated with Internet2• Have designed HOPI testbed and created a HOPI

whitepaper• HOPI Corporate Advisory Team• Bring the considerable mindshare from the

corporate community into the project.• HOPI CAT is open to all Internet2 Corporate

Members• HOPI Research Advisory Panel• To be announced in near future• Bring research expertise to the project

Page 13: HOPI Project Update

13

HOPI ManagementHOPI Management

• Focus Groups• Applications

• Focus on several applications, examining representatives from different equivalence classes

• Demos• iGrid and SC2005

• Control Plane• Examine different control planes with focus on how the

pieces are put together

• Measurement• How and what do we measure in hybrid networks?

• Security• Examine all security aspects as we develop hybrid ideas

Page 14: HOPI Project Update

14

HOPI ManagementHOPI Management

• HOPI Testbed Support Center• Call for proposals several months ago• Received 4 responses

• All were excellent proposals• Will be a difficult decision

• Soon to be chosen• Will develop an MoU agreement with responding groups

• Advanced engineering and design focus• Implement control plane activities• Coordinate application activities• Manage and engineer the facility

Page 15: HOPI Project Update

15

HOPI Project Design TeamHOPI Project Design Team

• Linda Winkler, Argonne (CoChair)• Rick Summerhill, Internet2 (CoChair)• Cees de Laat, U of Amsterdam• Rene Hatem, CANARIE• Mark Johnson, MCNC• Tom Lehman, USC/ISI• Peter O’Neil, NCAR• Bill Owens, NYSERnet• Philip Papadopoulos, UCSD• Sylvain Ravot, Caltech/CERN• David Richardson, U Washington • Chris Robb, Indiana U• Jerry Sobieski, U Maryland• Steven Wallace, Indiana U• Bill Wing, Oak Ridge• Internet2 Staff – Guy Almes, Heather Boyles, Steve Corbato, Chris

Heermann, Christian Todorov, Matt Zekauskas

Page 16: HOPI Project Update

16

HOPI CATHOPI CAT

• Peter Ashwood-Smith, Nortel Networks • Scott Beaudoin, Wiltel Communications • Javad Boroumond, Cisco Systems• Jeffrey Burgan, Comcast Cable • Dennis Gallant, Meriton Networks• Abdul Kasim, ADVA• Waqar Khan, Qwest Communications • Shiro Ryu - Japan Telecom• Marty Schulman, Juniper Networks • Raju Shah, Force10• Puneet Sharma, HP • Madan Shastri, Global Crossing • Richard Solis, Movaz Networks • Jeff Verrant, Ciena

Page 17: HOPI Project Update

17

Corporate SupportCorporate Support

• Force10 Networks will play a significant role as an Internet2 corporate partner• Strong partnership - Force10’s willingness and enthusiasm in

partnering with Internet2 on the HOPI project and the evolution of the next generation network

• Superb technology - Force10 is a pioneering leader in 10 Gig Ethernet switches

• Shared vision on new technologies - Force10’s technical expertise will play a significant role in the evolution of the HOPI testbed and the understanding of new architectures.

• HP has provided servers and will provide support for development of applications, measurement, and control functions• HOPI will utilize HP’s high performance servers in the HOPI

nodes

Page 18: HOPI Project Update

18

HOPI ParticipationHOPI Participation

• Plan to create an open testbed for experimenting with new ideas• Start with Optical and Ethernet Devices in

an initial configuration• Corporate community can locate additional

devices to experiment with basic ideas and further the goals of the project

• Will put out a call for participation in the near future

Page 19: HOPI Project Update

19

HOPI Testbed ResourcesHOPI Testbed Resources

• The Abilene Network – MPLS tunnels and the packet switched network

• The Internet2 Wave on the NLR footprint• MAN LAN Exchange Facility

• TYCO/IEEAF 10 Gbps lambda NYC – Amsterdam• Nortel and Cisco optical and Ethernet equipment

• Collaborations with Regional Optical Networks (RONs) and other related efforts (GLIF, DRAGON, etc.)

• A 10 Gbps circuit between NYC and London• Provides experimental capabilities between Internet2 and

GEANT

• Other facilities as they become available

Page 20: HOPI Project Update

20

Abilene/NLR MapAbilene/NLR Map

Page 21: HOPI Project Update

21

HOPI NodeHOPI Node

• A fiber cross-connect switch (a white light switch)• Ability to switch the entire NLR wave to Abilene, to a

RON, or to pass through the wave• Two Glimmerglass switches being installed

• An Ethernet switch device to partition the wave into 1 GigE or to use the entire wave• Force10 Ethernet switches deployed

• Control devices• Ad hoc control plane computer• Measurement computer• Experimental computer

• Control and data planes are disjoint• Out of band access

Page 22: HOPI Project Update

22

HOPI NodeHOPI Node

Page 23: HOPI Project Update

23

HOPI DeploymentHOPI Deployment

• Node locations• Los Angeles Equinix Facility – Support for CalTech and the

HENP connection - installed• Washington, DC MAX/Dragon facility - installed• StarLight in Chicago - end of May, 2005• The Pacific Northwest GigaPoP in Seattle - end of June,

2005• New York City – NYSERNet area in 32 AoA (Same location

as MAN LAN, same building as Abilene Node) - end of July, 2005• Many thanks to NYSERNet for donating rack space and power

to support the HOPI project

• Circuit from NYC to London• End of July, 2005

Page 24: HOPI Project Update

24

HOPI TopologyHOPI Topology

Page 25: HOPI Project Update

25

Control PlaneControl Plane

• Phase 1 – Manual Configuration• Control of devices that don’t support control plane protocols

- current phase• Understand control plane ideas

• Phase 2 – Intra-domain Configuration• Automate software control of setup• Examine control plane ideas and possibilities - UCLP,

GMPLS, ASON, etc.

• Phase 3 – Inter-domain Configuration• Examination of protocols such as GMPLS and ASON• Extensions to standards based protocols• Try to create implementations in the near future

Page 26: HOPI Project Update

26

ExperimentsExperiments

• Planned Experiments – 15 to 20 initial experiments• Dynamic Provisioning• Deterministic Paths• Applications Based• Miscellaneous

• Encourage use by the community for experimentation – both operational and research communities

• Can start in near future by using MPLS tunnels from Abilene

Page 27: HOPI Project Update

27

Connector Interface and Basic ServiceConnector Interface and Basic Service

• Basic Service• 1 or 10 GigE channels• May add to this in the future

• Connector Interface• A 1 or 10 GigE connection to the fiber cross

connect, either dark fiber or a provisioned service• An MPLS L2VPN service through Abilene to the

Ethernet switch• Provides immediate connection to the Internet2 NLR

wave from Abilene

• Will use these basic services to model more general optical capabilities

Page 28: HOPI Project Update

28

QuestionQuestion

• Isn’t this just an Ethernet testbed? Are we simply creating an Ethernet network?

• Not really, although Ethernet comes into play. Two features distinguish the testbed from an Ethernet network, however:• Dynamic provisioning aspect of the project• The hybrid nature of the project

Page 29: HOPI Project Update

29

ReferencesReferences

• Request for Comment – We would like your feedback on the HOPI testbed• [email protected]

• More Information• http://abilene.internet2.edu• http://www.nationallambdarail.org• http://hopi.internet2.edu• [email protected]