1
1191 ROYAL NAVAL VOLUNTEER RESERVE. John Macintyre to be Honorary Staff Surgeon (dated Oct. 15th, 1903). The undermentioned have been appointed Surgeons :-Peter Paterson, Alexander Laurie Brown, James Paton Boyd, and Ebenezer Snell (dated Oct. 15th, 1903). ROYAL ARMY MEDICAL CORPS. Lieutenant.Colonel A. T. Sloggett, C.M.G., is appointed for duty in the Home District. Captain J. C. B. Statham proceeds to Woolwich for duty. Lieutenant W. F, Tyndale embarks for Bengal and Lieutenant A. B. Smallman for the Punjab early next year. Lieutenant-Colonel W. J. Macnamara is appointed Senior Medical Officer at Jersey. Colonel W. L. Chester takes over the appointment of Administrative Medical Officer, Punjab Command. ARMY MEDICAL RESERVE OF OFFICERS. Lieutenant J. T. K. Thomson, Glasgow Oompanies, Royal Army Medical Corps (Volunteers), to be Surgeon-Lieutenant (dated Oct. 14th, 1903), instead of as notified in the 6’<MC’ of Oct. 13th, 1903, under " Royal Army Medical Corps." IMPERIAL YEOMANRY. East Riding of Yorkshire : Richard Hamilton Ashwin to be Surgeon-Lieutenant (dated Oct. 17th, 1903). QUEEN ALEXANDRA’S IMPERIAL MILITARY NURSING SERVICE. Lady Roberts, accompanied by Lady Aileen Roberts and the matron- in-chief, Miss S. J. Browne, R.R.C., visited the Princess Louise Hospital, Alton, recently for the purpose of presenting the badges to the ladies of the nursing staff of the hospital. Correspondence. "Audi alteram partem." THE LUNG REFLEX OF ABRAMS. To the Editors of THE LANCET. SiRS,&mdash;In his letter on the above subject 1 Dr. A. G. Auld refers to the fact that the lungs can be made to expand-as shown by a diminution in the area of superficial cardiac dulness and a descent of their lower margins-by certain devices-e.g., by briskly rubbing the chest for a minute, by the inhalation of irritating vapours such as ammonia, by plugging the nares with cotton-wool, or finally by vigorous percussion of the epigastrium, and he assumes that the expansion in question is due to a reflex relaxation of the bronchial muscles. May I be permitted to point out that this phenomenon is susceptible of another and simpler explanation. I suggest that all the means referred to tend, independently of any influence on the bronchial muscles, to increase the mean size of the chest and thus to cause pulmonary expansion by exciting the inspiratory muscles ; thus rubbing the chest, pummelling the epigastrium, and blocking the nares all tend by interfering with normal breathing to induce a certain amount of dyspnoea which, as I have pointed out elsewhere, excites the inspiratory muscles and thus leads to an increase in the mean size of the chest for the purpose of facilitating the circulation, notably that through the lungs ; and in regard to the inhalation of ammonia there can, I think, be little doubt that it also tends to promote inspiration rather than expiration, although eve-’y now and then a violent expiration may be induced by it in the shape of sneezing. Dr. Auld does not touch upon the interesting question how bronchial relaxation can cause expansion of the Igtngs in the living body. Assuming the other intrathoracic deIns to remain unaltered in size, it is obvious that the lungs cannot expand without a corresponding increase in thoracic capacity. Now the primary effect of bronchial relaxation must be to cause a relaxation of pulmonary tissue and thus, by diminishing the suction action of the lungs on the thoracic walls and diaphragm, somewhat to increase the size of the chest cavity. The thoracic expansion would not, how- ever, end here. I have in another place sought to show that throughout life the inspiratory muscles are ever busy keeping 1 THE LANCET, Oct. 17th, 1903, p. 1118, the lungs at the requisite degree of stretch so as to maintain pulmonary suction at the norm-how, e.g., it is largely in this way that the expansion of the chest in emphysema is to be explained, the inspiratory muscles coming into extra play in order to tune up, so to speak, the relaxed pulmonary fibres to the requisite pitch. The same thing doubtless happens when the bronchial muscles relax and thus tend to cause relaxation of pulmonary tissue. Any enlargement of the chest that may ensue in these circumstances is, I doubt not, chiefly brought about by the inspiratory muscles. It is noteworthy that pronounced constriction of the bronchi (sufficient to cause dyspnoea, as in asthma) also causes enlargement of the thorax ; and I believe in a precisely similar manner-i.e., through the agency of the inspiratory muscles, in obedience to the law already referred to that dyspnoea favours thoracic expansion. I am, Sirs, yours faithfully, Wimpole-street, W., Oct. 18th, 1903. HARRY CAMPBELL. "IMMEDIATE" AUSCULTATION AND PERCUSSION. :/i9 the 1!.’daetO’l’S of THE LANOET. SIRs,-I read with great interest the letter on "imme- diate" auscultation by Sir Isambard Owen in THE LANCET of Oct. 10th, p. 1049. As one who has made use of this method largely and has demonstrated to students its value in certain circumstances again and again I may be permitted to indorse the opinion of Sir Isambard Owen as to the advisability of a " more systematic attention to the practice of direct auscultation than it obtains at present." In my case also it was by accident that I became acquainted with the value of this method. Since then I have met with many medical men who have never employed it and even with some who imagined that without a stethoscope auscultation is not feasible, whereas the fact is that not seldom the imme- diate is preferable to the mediate method. Very much the same thing applies to percussion. Apart from the fact that the finger is greatly preferable to any other form of plexi- meter for regular use, most delicate and accurate work can be accomplished by direct percussion-i. e., by the use of one or two finger tips as a plessor without the intervention of a pleximeter of any kind. In such a case, of course, it is the sense of resistance rather than the ’’ note " which gives the desired information. I remember a most interesting article on this method which appeared in the Practitioner some years ago but have forgotten the author’s name. To my mind both direct percussion and direct auscultation are deserving of more attention than has been devoted to them by clinical teachers of late years. I am, Sirs, yours faithfully, .& r, n . -,.,. rx_____ T 1t..r C1 A. E. GRANT, Major, I.M.S. Ennore, Boscombe, Oct. 11th, 1903. MATERIA MEDICA AND THE MODERN CURRICULUM. To the Editors of THE LANCET. SIRS,-I was privileged to hear the address which Pro- fessor Schafer delivered at the Yorkshire College, Leeds, on Oct. lst and in the main consider that his very practical suggestions ought to be of great value to the authorities of the forthcoming new university in framing their medical curriculum. I would like, however, to draw attention to his remarks concerning materia medica, and with this I presume is included practical pharmacy. He says, "Materia medica in the strict sense ought not to be part of the curriculum." Now there seems to be a growing tendency in all our medical schools to minimise the value of these subjects in forming a part of medical education, and hence no wonder that so many men receive diplomas and degrees to practise medicine and surgery who possess the barest possible know- ledge of the simplest drugs. I am well aware, of course, that in degree of importance the subjects of physiology, pathology, anatomy, &c., should take priority, but I am confident it would be a retrograde step to remove materia medica from the curriculum. My point is this, that inasmuch as probably nine-tenths of the general practitioners in this country to-day dispense their own medicines it is only fair to the public and to the pro- fession that. they should be properly trained to do so during their curriculum. This seems to me, again, the more necessary

"IMMEDIATE" AUSCULTATION AND PERCUSSION

  • Upload
    ae

  • View
    217

  • Download
    3

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: "IMMEDIATE" AUSCULTATION AND PERCUSSION

1191

ROYAL NAVAL VOLUNTEER RESERVE.John Macintyre to be Honorary Staff Surgeon (dated

Oct. 15th, 1903). The undermentioned have been appointedSurgeons :-Peter Paterson, Alexander Laurie Brown, JamesPaton Boyd, and Ebenezer Snell (dated Oct. 15th, 1903).

ROYAL ARMY MEDICAL CORPS.

Lieutenant.Colonel A. T. Sloggett, C.M.G., is appointedfor duty in the Home District. Captain J. C. B. Statham

proceeds to Woolwich for duty. Lieutenant W. F, Tyndaleembarks for Bengal and Lieutenant A. B. Smallmanfor the Punjab early next year. Lieutenant-Colonel W. J.Macnamara is appointed Senior Medical Officer at Jersey.Colonel W. L. Chester takes over the appointment ofAdministrative Medical Officer, Punjab Command.

ARMY MEDICAL RESERVE OF OFFICERS.Lieutenant J. T. K. Thomson, Glasgow Oompanies, Royal

Army Medical Corps (Volunteers), to be Surgeon-Lieutenant(dated Oct. 14th, 1903), instead of as notified in the 6’<MC’of Oct. 13th, 1903, under " Royal Army Medical Corps."

IMPERIAL YEOMANRY.East Riding of Yorkshire : Richard Hamilton Ashwin to be

Surgeon-Lieutenant (dated Oct. 17th, 1903).QUEEN ALEXANDRA’S IMPERIAL MILITARY NURSING

SERVICE.

Lady Roberts, accompanied by Lady Aileen Roberts andthe matron- in-chief, Miss S. J. Browne, R.R.C., visited thePrincess Louise Hospital, Alton, recently for the purposeof presenting the badges to the ladies of the nursing staffof the hospital.

Correspondence."Audi alteram partem."

THE LUNG REFLEX OF ABRAMS.

To the Editors of THE LANCET.

SiRS,&mdash;In his letter on the above subject 1 Dr. A. G. Auldrefers to the fact that the lungs can be made to expand-asshown by a diminution in the area of superficial cardiacdulness and a descent of their lower margins-by certaindevices-e.g., by briskly rubbing the chest for a minute, bythe inhalation of irritating vapours such as ammonia, byplugging the nares with cotton-wool, or finally by vigorouspercussion of the epigastrium, and he assumes that theexpansion in question is due to a reflex relaxation of thebronchial muscles. May I be permitted to point out thatthis phenomenon is susceptible of another and simplerexplanation. I suggest that all the means referred to tend,independently of any influence on the bronchial muscles, toincrease the mean size of the chest and thus to cause

pulmonary expansion by exciting the inspiratory muscles ;thus rubbing the chest, pummelling the epigastrium, andblocking the nares all tend by interfering with normal

breathing to induce a certain amount of dyspnoea which,as I have pointed out elsewhere, excites the inspiratorymuscles and thus leads to an increase in the mean size of thechest for the purpose of facilitating the circulation, notablythat through the lungs ; and in regard to the inhalation ofammonia there can, I think, be little doubt that it also tendsto promote inspiration rather than expiration, although eve-’ynow and then a violent expiration may be induced by itin the shape of sneezing.

Dr. Auld does not touch upon the interesting questionhow bronchial relaxation can cause expansion of the Igtngs inthe living body. Assuming the other intrathoracic deIns toremain unaltered in size, it is obvious that the lungs cannotexpand without a corresponding increase in thoraciccapacity. Now the primary effect of bronchial relaxationmust be to cause a relaxation of pulmonary tissue and thus,by diminishing the suction action of the lungs on thethoracic walls and diaphragm, somewhat to increase the sizeof the chest cavity. The thoracic expansion would not, how-ever, end here. I have in another place sought to show thatthroughout life the inspiratory muscles are ever busy keeping

1 THE LANCET, Oct. 17th, 1903, p. 1118,

the lungs at the requisite degree of stretch so as to maintainpulmonary suction at the norm-how, e.g., it is largely inthis way that the expansion of the chest in emphysema is tobe explained, the inspiratory muscles coming into extra

play in order to tune up, so to speak, the relaxed pulmonaryfibres to the requisite pitch. The same thing doubtless

happens when the bronchial muscles relax and thus tend tocause relaxation of pulmonary tissue. Any enlargement ofthe chest that may ensue in these circumstances is, Idoubt not, chiefly brought about by the inspiratory muscles.It is noteworthy that pronounced constriction of the bronchi(sufficient to cause dyspnoea, as in asthma) also causes

enlargement of the thorax ; and I believe in a preciselysimilar manner-i.e., through the agency of the inspiratorymuscles, in obedience to the law already referred to that

dyspnoea favours thoracic expansion.I am, Sirs, yours faithfully,

Wimpole-street, W., Oct. 18th, 1903. HARRY CAMPBELL.

"IMMEDIATE" AUSCULTATION ANDPERCUSSION.

:/i9 the 1!.’daetO’l’S of THE LANOET.

SIRs,-I read with great interest the letter on "imme-diate" auscultation by Sir Isambard Owen in THE LANCET ofOct. 10th, p. 1049. As one who has made use of this methodlargely and has demonstrated to students its value in certaincircumstances again and again I may be permitted toindorse the opinion of Sir Isambard Owen as to the

advisability of a " more systematic attention to the practiceof direct auscultation than it obtains at present." In mycase also it was by accident that I became acquainted withthe value of this method. Since then I have met with manymedical men who have never employed it and even withsome who imagined that without a stethoscope auscultationis not feasible, whereas the fact is that not seldom the imme-diate is preferable to the mediate method. Very much thesame thing applies to percussion. Apart from the fact thatthe finger is greatly preferable to any other form of plexi-meter for regular use, most delicate and accurate work canbe accomplished by direct percussion-i. e., by the use of oneor two finger tips as a plessor without the intervention of apleximeter of any kind. In such a case, of course, it is thesense of resistance rather than the ’’ note " which gives thedesired information. I remember a most interesting articleon this method which appeared in the Practitioner someyears ago but have forgotten the author’s name. To mymind both direct percussion and direct auscultation are

deserving of more attention than has been devoted to themby clinical teachers of late years.

I am, Sirs, yours faithfully,.& r, n . -,.,. rx_____ T 1t..r C1A. E. GRANT, Major, I.M.S.

Ennore, Boscombe, Oct. 11th, 1903.

MATERIA MEDICA AND THE MODERNCURRICULUM.

To the Editors of THE LANCET.

SIRS,-I was privileged to hear the address which Pro-fessor Schafer delivered at the Yorkshire College, Leeds,on Oct. lst and in the main consider that his very practicalsuggestions ought to be of great value to the authorities ofthe forthcoming new university in framing their medicalcurriculum. I would like, however, to draw attention to hisremarks concerning materia medica, and with this I presumeis included practical pharmacy. He says, "Materia medicain the strict sense ought not to be part of the curriculum."Now there seems to be a growing tendency in all our

medical schools to minimise the value of these subjects informing a part of medical education, and hence no wonderthat so many men receive diplomas and degrees to practisemedicine and surgery who possess the barest possible know-ledge of the simplest drugs. I am well aware, of course,that in degree of importance the subjects of physiology,pathology, anatomy, &c., should take priority, but I amconfident it would be a retrograde step to remove materiamedica from the curriculum.

My point is this, that inasmuch as probably nine-tenths ofthe general practitioners in this country to-day dispense theirown medicines it is only fair to the public and to the pro-fession that. they should be properly trained to do so duringtheir curriculum. This seems to me, again, the more necessary