Upload
venezza-gonzales
View
215
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/7/2019 Information Literacy as a Liberal Art
1/13
Information Literacy as a Liberal Art
Enlightenment proposals for a new curriculum
By Jeremy J. Shapiro and Shelley K. Hughes
Sequence: Volume 31, Number 2Release Date: March/April 1996
What does a person need to know today to be a full-fledged, competent and literate
member of the information society? As we witness not only the saturation of our daily
lives with information organized and transmitted via information technology, but the
way in which public issues and social life increasingly are affected by information-technology issues - from intellectual property to privacy and the structure of work to
entertainment, art and fantasy life - the issue of what it means to be information-
literate becomes more acute for our whole society. Should everyone take a course in
creating a Web page, computer programming, TCP/IP protocols or multimediaauthoring? Or are we looking at a broader and deeper challenge - to rethink our entire
educational curriculum in terms of information?
In responding to these questions, it is useful to return to the 18th-centuryEnlightenment, when thinkers began to confront the relationship between scientific
progress and the emergence of a free society. It is exactly 200 years since the
publication of Condorcet's Sketch for a Historical Picture of the Progress of the
Human Mind, the Enlightenment's greatest philosophy of history manifesto, written
while Condorcet - mathematician, scientist, philosopher, educational reformer,
journalist - was in hiding from the Jacobin terror of the French Revolution. In hisSketch, Condorcet told the story of humanity as a story of progress, in which "nature
has joined together indissolubly the progress of knowledge and that of liberty, virtue,
and respect for the natural rights of man," leading inevitably to humanity's
"perfection" and "happiness." Condorcet is relevant to us today because he was
attempting to project and plan for the future at a historical turning point.
8/7/2019 Information Literacy as a Liberal Art
2/13
According to Condorcet, the spread of knowledge through the improvement and
democratization of education would contribute directly to political freedom andhuman happiness. The Enlightenment's conception of the link between knowledge,
liberty and happiness - a conception that is reflected in the Declaration of
Independence and the U.S. Constitution but is now widely under attack by
postmodernists, technocrats and political conservatives - raises profound questions forthose of us involved and concerned with not only the implementation and uses of
information technology but with providing for knowledge and literacy about this
technology.
Literacy Compared to What?
What sort of "information literacy" - an often-used but dangerously ambiguous
concept - should we be promoting, and what should it accomplish? Is it merely
something that will reduce the number of tech support calls that we have to deal with?
Something that will grease the wheels of the information highway? Something that, asdefined by representatives of the library community, enables people to be "effective
information consumers"?
Or is it, should it be, something broader, something that enables individuals not only
to use information and information technology effectively and adapt to their constantchanges but also to think critically about the entire information enterprise and
information society? Something more akin to a "liberal art" - knowledge that is part of
what it means to be a free person in the present historical context of the dawn of the
information age?
In his projection of the human future - of history "after the revolution" - Condorcet
articulated the Enlightenment view that human progress would continue and lead to
the "abolition of inequality between nations, the progress of equality within each
nation, and the true perfection of mankind." Essential preconditions were, according
to Condorcet, the abolition of inequality in education and the spread of science and
knowledge to the general population. Providing suitable education to each citizen
would produce not only enlightenment but liberty.
Educated citizens would not only be able to manage their lives properly: "They will
be able to govern themselves according to their own knowledge; they will no longerbe limited to a mechanical knowledge of the procedures of the arts or of professionalroutine; they will no longer depend for every trivial piece of business, every
insignificant matter of instruction on clever men who rule over them in virtue of their
necessary superiority." Condorcet believed that this would be made possible not only
by improving and democratizing education but by simplifying conceptual schemes
through the integration and unification of science, and the development of graphical
8/7/2019 Information Literacy as a Liberal Art
3/13
representations of logical and scientific ideas and theories. Thus the average citizen
would be able to master the science of her day (Condorcet was also a firm advocate of
complete equality between the sexes, so the feminine pronoun is in order here).
Two centuries later - ironically at a time when between 40 to 50 percent of the U.S.
population is functionally illiterate in the Gutenberg galaxy of text-based literacy -information, its technologies (hard and soft), and its concepts and structures are
transforming the production, distribution and consumption of knowledge, from
network co-authored texts through databases and data-analysis software to multimedia
network-distributed hypertext. Some, such as the French father of postmodernism
Jean-Francois Lyotard, argue that this both alters the status of knowledge itself as well
as the legitimizing principles of our entire society.
This set of circumstances forces us to ask, what do citizens need to know about
information and these technologies to "no longer be limited to a mechanical
knowledge of the procedures of the arts or of professional routine," so that "they willno longer depend for every trivial piece of business, every insignificant matter of
instruction on clever men who rule over them in virtue of their necessary superiority?"
- clever men who are likely nowadays to be programmers, systems analysts, networkservice providers, Webmasters, information industry moguls and directors of
academic computing rather than kings and noblemen.
These questions are even more important now that some of the most vital questions
about the emerging phase of our society - some of its most important economic, socialand political issues - are turning out to be about both information itself and about the
information infrastructure:
Who owns information? What's the difference between a piece of information and a
copy of it? Who should have access to it? Is the Internet a public good or a private
one? Should anyone regulate Internet content, and if so who? What are the
responsibilities of an institution toward one of its telecommuters in another country?
What should the property regime of the information economy be? How can wereconcile the international character of the Internet and the emerging global
information society with the laws of individual nations and the moral standards of
individual communities? What are the bounds of privacy in information? Could thegovernment fiscal crises be alleviated by a "bit tax"? Is the vision of a wired,
networked cyberspace perhaps nothing more than (in the words of some recent social
critics) a "cryptoreligious ideal of our society," an ideological front for a new social
class, the "virtual class" that is constructing a world of "data trash"?
At this very moment, such questions - whose answers affect not only information
consumers but the economic, social and cultural life of society as a whole - are being
8/7/2019 Information Literacy as a Liberal Art
4/13
discussed and decided in terms and venues of which many citizens have little if any
knowledge. Can an "effective information consumer" or computer-literate officeworker think critically about them, let alone answer them? And, if not, is not
information literacy a much broader concept? Isn't there a direct connection between
that browser on my screen, the Internet and these policy questions?
Information Literacy as a New Liberal Art
Information and computer literacy, in the conventional sense, are functionallyvaluable technical skills. But information literacy should in fact be conceived more
broadly as a new liberal art that extends from knowing how to use computers and
access information to critical reflection on the nature of information itself, itstechnical infrastructure, and its social, cultural and even philosophical context and
impact - as essential to the mental framework of the educated information-age citizen
as the trivium of basic liberal arts (grammar, logic and rhetoric) was to the educated
person in medieval society.
Indeed, such an extended notion of information literacy is essential to the future ofdemocracy, if citizens are to be intelligent shapers of the information society rather
than its pawns, and to humanistic culture, if information is to be part of a meaningful
existence rather than a routine of production and consumption. If organizations, incomputer-scientist Abbe Mowshowitz's analysis, are becoming virtual, should not an
employee understand something about virtual memory in order to negotiate
organizational life? And if virtual reality is, in philosopher Michael Heim's words, a"metaphysics," may we perhaps need some "metaphysical literacy" in order to cope
with it?
Some will reply that living in a society based on the automobile doesn't require the
population to learn either auto mechanics or the philosophy of the automobile. But the
automobile is only a component of transportation; information is a component of
knowledge, the human mind and human communication. That is why it should be part
of the expanded trivium for the same reason that grammar, logic and rhetoric were
part of it originally: it is something fundamental to our humanness.
Some will assert that it is elitist to worry about information literacy when so much of
the population, according to the new study Literacy, Economy and Society publishedby the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), is stillnon-functional in the areas of "pre-informational" prose literacy, document literacy
and quantitative literacy - and when, as professors know, many college students
cannot even write a passable term paper. But it is equally problematic - and elitist - to
consign textual illiterates to the educational backwaters and reserve information
literacy for those already in the know. As more and more information is in
8/7/2019 Information Literacy as a Liberal Art
5/13
computerized form, even elementary general literacy will be partially defined by an
information-technology component.
Clearly, defining information literacy broadly, so as to constitute both a liberal as wellas a technical art, and turning that definition into a curriculum are major challenges
both intellectually and practically, and deserve extended discussion and collaborationamong both educators and information-systems professionals, humanists, and
computer and information scientists.
An Information Literacy Curriculum
Perhaps a brief sketch of such a curriculum, with emphasis on what is needed in
higher education, will stimulate such discussion. This prototype curriculum attempts
to encompass the old concept of "computer literacy" (remember "everyone should
learn to program in BASIC"?), the librarians' notion of information literacy and a
broader, critical conception of a more humanistic sort. Seven dimensions of literacycan be identified:
Tool literacy, or the ability to understand and use the practical and conceptual tools of
current information technology, including software, hardware and multimedia, that arerelevant to education and the areas of work and professional life that the individual
expects to inhabit. This can be taken to include the basics of computer and network
applications as well as fundamental concepts of algorithms, data structures, and
network topologies and protocols.
Resource literacy, or the ability to understand the form, format, location and accessmethods of information resources, especially daily expanding networked information
resources. This is practically identical with librarians' conceptions of informationliteracy, and includes concepts of the classification and organization of such
resources.
Social-structural literacy, or knowing that and how information is socially situated and
produced. This means knowing about how information fits into the life of groups;about the institutions and social networks - such as the universities, libraries,
researcher communities, corporations, government agencies, community groups - that
create and organize information and knowledge; and the social processes throughwhich it is generated - such as the trajectory of publication of scholarly articles (peer
review, etc.), the relationship between a Listserv and a shared interest group, or the
audience served by a specialized library or Web site.
Research literacy, or the ability to understand and use the IT-based tools relevant to
the work of today's researcher and scholar. For those in graduate education, this would
8/7/2019 Information Literacy as a Liberal Art
6/13
include discipline-related computer software for quantitative analysis, qualitative
analysis and simulation, as well as an understanding of the conceptual and analytical
limitations of such software.
Publishing literacy, or the ability to format and publish research and ideas
electronically, in textual and multimedia forms (including via World Wide Web,electronic mail and distribution lists, and CD-ROMs), to introduce them into the
electronic public realm and the electronic community of scholars. Writing is always
shaped by its tools and its audience. Computer tools and network audiences represent
genuine changes in writing itself.
Emerging technology literacy, or the ability to ongoingly adapt to, understand,evaluate and make use of the continually emerging innovations in information
technology so as not to be a prisoner of prior tools and resources, and to make
intelligent decisions about the adoption of new ones. Clearly this includes
understanding of the human, organizational and social context of technologies as wellas criteria for their evaluation.
Critical literacy, or the ability to evaluate critically the intellectual, human and social
strengths and weaknesses, potentials and limits, benefits and costs of information
technologies. This would need to include a historical perspective (e.g. the connectionbetween algorithmic thinking, formalization in mathematics, and the development of
Western science and rationality and their limits); a philosophical perspective (current
debates in the philosophy of technology, the critique of instrumental reason, thepossibility and nature of artificial intelligence); a sociopolitical perspective (e.g. the
impact of information technology on work, public policy issues in the development ofa global information infrastructure); and a cultural perspective (e.g. currentdiscussions of the virtual body and of the definition of human being as an
information-processing machine).
New Goals for a New Society
Once we start to take information literacy seriously in this multi-dimensional sense,
we have left far behind us the world of short courses on "Getting Started withWindows," "Surfing the Net" and "Bibliographic Instruction" (although clearly they
have a role to play). We are really talking about a new curricular framework: one thatequips people not only with a bunch of technical skills but with a broad, integratedand critical perspective on the contemporary world of knowledge and information,
including its origins and developmental trends, its redefinitions of experience and
social life, its philosophical justification, biases and limits, its potential for human
emancipation and human domination, and for growth and destruction.
8/7/2019 Information Literacy as a Liberal Art
7/13
It used to be that, whatever a college graduate had majored in, she or he was supposed
to know some important things about the emergence of modern society, including thescientific revolution of the 17th century and its major scientific, mathematical and
philosophical legacies; the rise of capitalist industrial society and its critics; and the
democratic revolutions. Also, it was hoped, she or he should know something about
its major cultural landmarks: the literary monuments of secular, humanistic culturefrom Shakespeare through the modern novel, and the development of artistic and
literary modernism as a response to the technological and social changes of the late19th- and early 20th-centuries. This learning - the trivium and quadrivium of 20th-
century culture - was supposed to make the individual an educated, autonomous
member of contemporary society, with some context and framework for making
meaning out of personal life and for participating in an informed and reflective way in
public life.
Isn't it time to rethink what this educational goal means at the present juncture of the
information society? Shouldn't understanding of network structures and politics be
part of civics? Shouldn't people learn computer programming as much to becomehumanists as to become computer scientists? Shouldn't Turing's machine take its place
next to Watt's machine in social science courses? Shouldn't algorithmic simulation be
studied as a driving cultural force analogous to that of the scientific method?Shouldn't the dilemmas of existence in cyberspace and the media world be seen as
analogues to those earlier generations confronted in Notes from the Underground, The
Wasteland, The Stranger and Endgame? We are reconstructing our lived-in world.
What are we creating? And is anyone paying attention?
If the information society is to be a free and humane one - especially if we share the
Enlightenment goals of abolishing unnecessary inequality and creating a society of
liberty - then let us take up the challenge of Condorcet's vision. Let us contribute toliberty through advancing citizens' knowledge, through democratizing education. Let
us design a comprehensive, multi-dimensional and thoughtful information literacy
curriculum.
Jeremy J. Shapiro is a senior consultant with Academic Information Projects at theFielding Institute, as well as on the faculty of its Human and Organization
Development Program. Shelley K. Hughes is an information specialist in the Fielding
Institute's Learning Resources Department. [email protected] and
http://www.ithaca.edu/library/training/think.html
8/7/2019 Information Literacy as a Liberal Art
8/13
ICYouSee:
T is
for Thinking
A Guide to Critical Thinking About
What You See on the Web
Forfunandgamesandprettypictures, the Web is fine.
But is the Web a good research tool?
The answer is a qualified yes, and only if you are careful.
Using the Web well takes more than just knowing how to google. To use the Web
wisely and efficiently, I offer for your consideration the following six suggestionswhen examining Web pages:
1) Make sure you are in the right place.
2) When in doubt, doubt.
3) Consider the source.
4) Know what's happening.
5) Look at details.
6) Distinguish Web pages from pages found on the Web.
In addition to these six suggestions about evaluating sources, here are some
criteria that are commonly used.
y Authority: Who are the authors of the Web page, or who isresponsible for it? What gives them their authority orexpertise to write?
y Accuracy: Do you have good reason to believe that theinformation on the site is accurate? Are the factsdocumented?
y Objectivity: What is the author's point of view? What is thepurpose of the site?
y Currency: When was the information on the pageoriginally written? Has the site been kept up-to-date?
8/7/2019 Information Literacy as a Liberal Art
9/13
y Coverage: Does this site address the topic you areresearching? Is the information basic and cursory ordetailed and scholarly? However complex the languagemight be, is the information substantial?
y Value: Was the page worth visiting? Does the site offer
anything informative, unique, or insightful? Is the site freeof careless errors, misspelled words, and poor grammar?
rightplace.
Make sure you are in the right place.
Ask yourself why you are using the Web. Don't use the Web because it is fun and
easy or because it is what you are used to. Websites you find through Google (oranother search engine) may not be the appropriate sources to provide the
information you are seeking. An hour searching the Web may not get you to an
answer that you could find within two minutes of picking up an old-fashioned
book.
Not everything is available on the Web. Let me repeat: Not everything is
available on the Web.
Because of copyright, cost, and demand issues (to name only a few reasons), some materials justwon't be found on the Web. Although some reallyoldstuffdoes show up on the Web, most
materials written before you were born have not migrated to the Web and might not ever. Morerecent stuff, often the most valuable resources for research, may only be available online if
someone (such as a school or library) pays for it.
Questions to think about:
Arethe sites youare findingdirectlyaddressingthetopicyouareresearching? Werethepages
worth visiting?
doubt.
When in doubt, doubt.
Almost anyone can put up almost anything on the Web for almost any purpose.
Look for ambiguity, manipulative reasoning, and bias. Examine assumptions,
8/7/2019 Information Literacy as a Liberal Art
10/13
including and perhaps especially, your own.
Accuracy is not easy to confirm. As with any research, you must test one source
against another.
WhocoinedthephraseQuestion Authority!? Lookat fiveor sixdifferent Web sites andyoumightget
sixoreightdifferentanswers.
y Several sites attributethe quotetoTimothy Leary. However,a Webpagewiththeclaim
thatTimothy Learywas a CIA agentindicates that Dr. Learywas quotingSocrates.
y Many Webpages creditthebumpersticker,but fromthesixtiesortheseventies? Perhaps it's a
bumper sticker summationofSocrates'idea.
y Tocompletethecircle,this pagehas beenused (butnotcited)as anauthorityontheorigins of
the slogan. Itrepeats thephrase "bumper sticker summationofSocrates'idea" without
attribution.
My advice: question the authority of all Web sources.
Questions to think about:
Doyouhavegoodreasontobelievethattheinformationonthe siteis accurate? Doauthors
provideany supportiveevidence fortheirconclusions?
source.
Consider the source.
The Web may have been originally designed as a medium to exchange scientific
data, but it has become a commercial playground. That makes it all the more
important to find out who created a Web page -- not just names, but something
that might indicate they are "good sources." Sometimes pages will generously
provide information about the author, but usually you will have to dig around.
It is easy to think that an author wouldnt be writing unless he or she was some
kind of expert on the topic, but that is not always true.
Consider this report on the Bay of Pigs. Although the report is found on a university website, theonly source cited is a dead link to a study done by Jared Weiner. A google search reveals that
Jared Weiner's work, now no longer available, has been cited by more than a hundred Web sites.Who is Jared Weiner? I happen to have some inside information. He is a graduate of Ithaca
College who is now a production associate at ABC News. However, when he was in one of myclasses several years ago, he told me that he wrote his Bay of Pigs report when he was in the
8/7/2019 Information Literacy as a Liberal Art
11/13
eighth grade. Although being an industrious eighth grader does not qualify him to be a renownedKennedy-era scholar, he told me that he did get an A- on the report.
Questions to think about:
Whois responsible forthe site? Dotheauthors haveanyauthorityorexpertise? Dothey
provideyouameans tocontactthem? Is this acommercial,governmental,personal,or
academic Web site?
happening
Know what's happening.
Try to identify the reason the Web page was created in the first place. Try to
determine the site's intended audience. See if you can detect if the main purpose
is to inform, to persuade, or to sell you something. Keep in mind that marketing
and opinion can both be disguised. If you know the motive behind the page's
creation, you can better judge its content.
Even if a page is simply trying to just provide the facts, simplification can distort them, and
information presented in too technical or jargon-ridden language can keep the meaning frombeing easily understood.
An important, if difficult, question to ask is "What is not being said?"
Political, religious, and social advocacy groups are notorious for selectively presenting just thefacts that support their cause.
Questions to think about:
Whatis thepurposeofthe site? Is themainpurposetoinform,topersuade,orto sellyou
something? Doyouunderstandwhatis being said? Arethe facts documented? Whatdoyou
thinkhas notbeen saidthat shouldbeaddressed?
details.
Lookatdetails.
8/7/2019 Information Literacy as a Liberal Art
12/13
Internal clues can tell you much about a Web page. Check for the obvious things,
such as good grammar and correct spelling. Is the language simple or technical
and demanding? Has the page been recently updated?
Graphicsmayhelpa Webpagelookmoreinteresting,butdothey serveanypurposeotherthan
decoration?Magazines and Websitewithmanycolorfulads andillustrations generallyhaveadifferent
purposethan scholarly journals and Websites withlots oftextandnoillustrations beyondcharts and
graphs.
ay attention both to how well the links work and what kind of sources are being linked. In
addition, check to see who has links to the page and what they have to say about it.
If a Web site is presenting statistics or quoting a person, there should be documentation. Acitation or a link should be provided. Check out online sources as you would (or should) for
any other research material.
Questions to think about:
Is the sitewellorganized? Aretheremisspelledwords orexamples ofpoorgrammar? Dothe
links work? Dothey sendyoubeyondthe sitetootherreliable sources ofinformation? Does the
siteofferanythinguniqueordoes ittellyoulittlemorethanyoucould findinanencyclopedia?
Arethegraphics onthepageclearandhelpfulordistractingandconfusing? Whatopinions do
others haveaboutthe Webpage?
Web pages
Distinguish Web pages from pages found on the Web.
When people speak ofWeb pages, they usually don't mean books and research
articles, but books, government documents, research reports, and periodical
articles are all accessible through the Web, and they can be quite different inscope, focus, and reliability than pages originally designed for the web. That
makes it important for you to recognize what you are looking at.
What can be confusing is how publishing has been changing. Some research materials may onlybe available online. Many libraries no longer subscribe to the paper version of some periodicals,
but subscribe instead to the online version of the journal or rely on full text access through Web-
8/7/2019 Information Literacy as a Liberal Art
13/13
based periodical databases. It is still important, however, to distinguish among magazines, tradejournals, and peer reviewed journals.
To get an idea of the difference between "regular" Web pages and articles found on the Web,
compare the results between a regularGoogle search for "flirting" with those resulting from asearch using Google Scholar.
Questions to think about:
Doyouthinkthis pagewas designed forthe Web,ordoyouthinkitwas originally something
else? Ifitwas originally somethingelse,what somethingelsewas it?