Upload
siusan
View
41
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Interdisciplinary, Interagency Collaboration for Transition From Adolescence to Adulthood. Panelists. Tony Antosh , Ed.D .; Director, Sherlock Center, Rhode Island College Ilka Riddle, Ph.D ; Associate Director, University of Cincinnati UCEDD Margo Izzo , Ph.D.; Associate Director, - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Interdisciplinary, InteragencyCollaboration for Transition
From Adolescence to Adulthood
Panelists
• Tony Antosh, Ed.D.; Director, Sherlock Center, Rhode Island College
• Ilka Riddle, Ph.D; Associate Director,University of Cincinnati UCEDD
• Margo Izzo, Ph.D.; Associate Director,Nisonger Center, Ohio State University
• Olivia Raynor, Ph.D.; Director.Tarjan Center, UCLA
Agenda
Introduction, Agenda, Objectives, Issue (Antosh)
Perspectives on Transition
Healthcare (Riddle)
Youth and Families (Antosh, videoclips)
Education, Employment, Postsecondary (Izzo)
Community Living (Antosh)
Strategies for Interagency Collaboration (Raynor)
Small Group Discussion
Large Group Discussion
Wrap up and Resources
Transition Listening Session
Sue SwensonDeputy Assistant Secretary – OSERS
US Department of Education
Tuesday, December 4 3:00-4:15Gunston East
Genesis of the Symposium
• AUCD Board of Directors wanted to select one issue and use the breadth and depth of the network to create a national focus on that issue.
• Interdisciplinary Practice is one of the foundation concepts of the AUCD network.
• After significant discussion, the Board focused on applying the concepts of interdisciplinary, interagency collaboration to transition
The Issue
Youth with IDD should be able to expect self-determined transitions with coordinated support from family, community, professionals, and agencies.
But they and their families often experience very little coordination and collaboration from the myriad of systems involved in the transition process
Why
Failure to support self-determination as a central element of the person-centered
process of transition
Why
Insufficient understanding of the role of culture in an individual or family’s
concept or approach to transition
Why
The tendency for professionals within each realm of transition (education, health,
community living, employment, and others) to use language that is not easily
understood by other professionals, youth with IDD, families, or other community
partners
Why
Neglecting to specifically explore how transition in the different realms
could/should be linked for maximizing success
Self Determined Life
Youth and FamilyCulture
Perspectives
EducationHealth
EmploymentPostsecondaryAdult Supports
Providers
Outcomes
CompetenceHealthy LifePlace to LivePaying Job
SocialNetworkCommunity
Goals
• Promote an interdisciplinary, interagency approach to transition
• Understand the language, methodology and practices inherent in the different disciplines and perspectives
• Understand the role of culture in transition• Develop strategies for linking disciplines and
agencies• Increased awareness of network resources
Perspectives on Transition
Youth and Families
“I would like to live with my aunt who has provided me with the care that no one else has been able to do. I plan to find a part-time paying job. I would like to spend the rest of my days going to the gym to keep up my health, doing recreational activities in the community and being part of my social community. I can only do these things if I have wheelchair transportation, a job coach and a nurse to meet my medical needs.” Quote from a letter from a youth with IDD to an
agency administrator
“I expected assistance in planning ways that my daughter could function with support in various adult roles….I expected that the various entities that were involved with her support…would collaborate together to design supports that would help her reach her unique adult goals. I expected to have good, complete and understandable information….I expected that supports would be available in her own community in places of her choosing…. What I needed most was a guide.”
Quote from a mother
“Families want information and planning processes that are clear, simple and individualized. Families and individuals want choice and control – their own voices primary in design of services – rather than decisions made arbitrarily by others….. want what any family wants for their young adult…. looking for the ways and means….”
Quote from a community supports navigator
Two Videos
The Good and the Bad of Transition
Kristen
Michael
Youth and Family Practices
• Good, complete, understandable information
• Focused transition planning
• Person-centered transition planning
• Family/Community Support Navigators
• Self-Determination Curriculum
Healthcare Transition
Ilka Riddle
Health Care Transition is…
• …the purposeful, planned movement of adolescents and young adults with chronic physical and medical conditions from child-centered to adult-oriented health care systems.
Blum et al.,1993
Health Care Transition is:
• patient-centered• flexible• responsive• continuous• comprehensive• coordinated
AAP, AAFP, ACP, 2002
Guidelines & Best Practices
• AAP, AAFP and ACP 2002 Consensus Statement: 6 First Steps to Successful Transition
• AAP, AAFP and ACP 2011 Clinical Report: Health Care Transition Planning Algorithm
Best Practice: Learning Collaboratives Pilots
• Got Transition Learning Collaboratives (www.gottransition.org)
• Transition Collaborations of Pediatric and Adult Practices/Systems
Shared Management Approach to Transition
• Team/Partnership Approach
• Active Participation
• Empowerment
• Self-Determination
Stage Professional ParentChild/
Young Adult
1 (Child6-11)
Lead responsibility
Participates & Provides care
Receives care
2(Young
Adolescent12-14)
Partner gives
guidance & support
Partner guides & manages
Participates in care & decision making
3(Adolescent
15-17)Consultant
Supervisorshared decision making
Managershared
decision making
4(Young Adult
18+)Resource Consultant
Lead manages & supervises
Data tell us that…
• 40.0 % of all youth 12-17 years with special health care needs receive the services necessary to make appropriate transition to health care, work, independence
National Survey of Children with Special Health Care Needs, 2009/2010 Data
Considerations
• People involved:
• Youth/Young Adults
• Family Members/Guardians
• Pediatric care provider & specialists
• Adult care provider & specialists
• (Others)
Considerations
• Systems involved:
• Pediatric health care system
• Adult health care system
• (Others (e.g. service system, education system, etc.))
Barriers/Issues: Youth/Young Adult
• Little involvement in transition process
• Little knowledge about condition, health, health issues, health management
• Late start to transition planning
Barriers/Issues: Family Members
• Late start to transition preparation
• Little knowledge about how to navigate the adult health care system
• Little information about changes regarding eligibility for services, changes to health care coverage and guardianship issues
Barriers/Issues: Pediatric Providers
• Little time for transition care/coordination
• Lack of reimbursement for transition support
• Difficulty “letting go”
• Difficulty identifying adult care providers and specialists
• Little knowledge about community resources
Barriers/Issues: Adult Providers
• Lack of training in congenital and childhood onset medical conditions
• Lack of training in working with patients with disabilities
• Lack of communication from pediatric provider
• Low reimbursement rates for comprehensive care/ care coordination
Strategies: Youth/Young Adult
• Active participation in health care and transition preparation
• Making use of transition resources and tools specific to youth
• Active participation in finding adult health care provider and specialists
Strategies: Family Members
• Early transition planning
• Encourage/empower youth to participate
• Utilize transition resources, tools and information specific to families
• Initiate identification of adult providers
• Ask for portable and accessible medical summary
Strategies: Pediatric Providers
• Transition Policies & Processes
• Transition Plan at age 12-14 and updates
• Provide transition resources
• Initiate contact with adult providers
• Communicate with adult providers
• Provide medical summary
Strategies: Adult Providers
• Engage in transition process
• Learn from young adult & family members
• Learn about congenital & childhood onset medical conditions
• Communicate with pediatric providers
Recommendations
• Improved Health Care Provider Training
• Inclusion of disability training in medical school curricula
• Education about congenital/childhood onset medical conditions
• Inclusion of practical experience/ transition care rotations, etc.
Recommendations
• Improved Collaboration and Dissemination of Information
• Inter-agency/multi-agency/integrated collaborative transition approach
• One comprehensive transition resource guide that addresses all types of transition, distributed in all systems
Recommendations
• Increased evidence-base for successful health care transition:
• Health outcomes data
Resources
• Got Transition National Health Care Transition Center www.gottransition.org
• Florida HATS www.floridahats.org
Transition to College and Careers
Margo Vreeburg Izzo, PhDProgram Director of Transition
Services
Ohio State University Nisonger Center
College & Career Ready
• Higher expectations of all stakeholders
• 21st Century Skills (CCS leading to CCR)– Grades 8 – 12: Transition-focused Curricula– Grades 13 – 16: PSE Programs– Technology utilization
• Continue evidence-based policies/practices– National Secondary Transition TA Center– Think College– What Works Clearinghouse
44
Transition RequiresInteragency Collaboration
IDEA of 2004 requires schools to coordinate with other service systems (i.e. VR, DD):
• IEP must include AATA, measurable postsecondary goals, projected date for services (i.e. travel training, work experience)
• If participating agencies fail to provide transition services, LEA shall reconvene the IEP team to identify strategies to meet the transition objectives
(IDEA of 2004, (D)(1 - 6)
Transition RequiresInterdisciplinary
Approaches • Age Appropriate Transition Assessments
(AATA)
• Transition to Career/Employment• Transition to College/Postsecondary
Education• Focus Common Core Standards on
College and Career Readiness
Transition RequiresInterdisciplinary
ApproachesSpecial Ed, Voc Ed, Gen Ed & Rehab/DD
counselors collaborate to provide:
• Career development & exploration
• Soft skills and employability development
• Self-determination/self advocacy training
• Summer work experiences
• Job training and placement• Carter, Austin & Trainer, 2011, Predictor of Postschool Employment Outcomes for Young Adults with Severe
Disabilities, Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 1-14.
Transition RequiresInterdisciplinary
ApproachesSpecial educators, OT & VR provide:
• Transition assessments
• Assistive technology assessment/training
• Worksite analysis & job match
• Job development & placement
• Worksite Jigs, Ergonomic assessments, etc.
Teach SD Transition Planning*
The Model has 3 phases & supports AATA
Phase 1. What is my goal?What career do I want?
Phase 2. What is my plan?What action can I do today to prepare for
chosen career?
Phase 3. What have I learned?Revise goals & plans, as needed
Model Developed by M. Wehmeyer & Palmer, 2003
50
Age Appropriate Transition Assessment
• Interdisciplinary IEP teams use AATA to:– Develop realistic and meaningful goals– Provide information for present levels of academic
achievement and functional performance– Learn about the individual student, his/her strengths,
needs, interests, preferences (SPIN)– Connect IEP with future plans– Inform the Summary of Performance
Curriculum-based AATA
• Begins in the classroom
• Facilitated by special, general & CTE teachers
• Integrate AATA into core courses - ELA
• Examples:– Self-determination assessments/curricula– EnvisionIT 21st century curriculum
52
21st Century Curricula
EnvisionIT teaches students:• Common Core Standards (CCS)
• Information Tech Literacy
• How to build a self-directed Transition Portfolio by matching their interests,
abilities, and personality to career goals. Izzo, M.V., Yurick, A, Nagaraja, H.N. & Novak, J.A. (2010). Effects of a 21st century
curriculum on students’ information technology and transition skills. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 33(2), 95-105
53
Online Assessments
• The VARK Questionnaire • http://www.vark-learn.com/english/page.asp
• The Myers-Briggs Personality Test• http://www.personalitypathways.com/
type_inventory.html
• The Princeton Review• http://princetonreview.com/Careers.aspx
Common Core Standards (CCS) & Transition Assessment
Princeton Review: After completing the Princeton Review students will be able to analyze their Interest Color and list 4 occupations to explore
Core Standard: • Reading Strand: Cite strong and thorough textual
evidence to support analysis of what the text says explicitly as well as inferences drawn from the text, including determining where the text leaves matters uncertain
CCS and Transition Planning
EnvisionIT ActivitiesStudents develop and present their assessment results
and transition plans Students write an essay to describe their Princeton
Review, personality and VARK assessment results
Common Core Standards (CCS)• Writing Strand 4 Produce clear and coherent writing
in which the development, organization, and style are appropriate to task, purpose, and audience.
• Speaking and Listening Strand 2 & 5 Integrate multiple sources of information presented in diverse formats and media.
Transition Knowledge (TK) Gains
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
TK PRE TK POST
EXPCONT
Conclusion: Students in the experimental group increased their performance significantly on the Transition Knowledge test, as compared to the control group.
56
Recommendations
• Plan self-directed PCP meetings (IEP, IPE, ISP) that include college and career goals
• Raise expectations of service providers & parents through cross-agency trainings
• Coordinate variety of work experiences from age 14 (or earlier) until paid employment is achieved
RecommendationRecommendation
Using the Self-Directed IEP
Research-to-Practice Lesson Plan Starters To teach the Self-Directed IEP to
students with cognitive disabilities http://www.nsttac.org/LessonPlanLibrary/1_and_8.pdf
Recommendation
TEACH SELF-ADVOCACY SKILLS
Self-advocacy is letting people (professors, teachers, employers) know what you need to be successful
Important skill for anybody (especially those with disabilities)
Critical for college and career success
Recommendations
• Jointly plan with education, rehab and DD personnel
• Establish paid integrated job and community activities during the last years of school services
• Adopt “Employment First Policies”
Washington State Legislature passed “Jobs by 21 Partnership Project” in 2007
Winsor, Burrterworth & Boone, 2011, Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 49, 274-284.
State Success in Integrated Employment
National Survey of State IDD Agency Day and Employment Services 2010
Transition to College
27 Projects implement:• Interdisciplinary approaches • VR and DD coordination• Enrollment in college classes• Employment experiences• Self-determination• Inclusive age-appropriate settings• Go to www.ThinkCollege.net
Who Should Go To College?
• http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=auIYOb_rptQ
• Over 200 colleges in over 30 states are enrolling students with IDD
• See www.thinkcollege.net for more info
OSU’s TOPS Model
Interdisciplinary TeamSpecial Educators, Occupational Therapists, Physical Therapists, Rehab Counselors, Speech Language Therapists, Social Workers, Assistive Tech. Specialist
Pilot Sites
Ohio State University University of Toledo Three Replication Sites
Services Planned Through
Transition Assessment Person-Centered Planning Academic Advising
TOPS: Student Experiences
Inclusive Postsecondary Campus Experience
Self-Determination
Health, Wellness
Independent Living skills
Enroll/Audit College Courses
Project SEARCH Internships
Residential Campus
Experiences
Individualized Supports
Peer Support Mentoring Family Support Educational/Job
Coaching
E-Portfolio
Each student exits the program with an e-portfolio that documents academic
employment and independent living skills through digital pictures, video and
documents.
Project SEARCH Internships
• Provides internships leading to employment• Engages employers, community partners,
employment service providers to meet workforce needs of businesses and job seekers
• Youth learn job tasks at no expense to employer
Goal is EMPLOYMENT!For more information: http://www.projectsearch.us/
66
Dental Clinic Assistant
Mentoring on OSU’s Campus
Technology Recommendations
• Promotes age appropriate supports– Navigation around work/college setting– Organization and schedule prompts– Provides a means to express interests/skills
using digital resumes and application materials
– Promotes access to academic and work content
– Sample digital story
Transition: A Bridge to…Inclusion in Society
Community Living
A Place to Live• 599,152 (58%) people with ID/DD received publicly
funded supports while living in the home of a family member
• 122,088 (12%) while living in homes of their own• 40,967 (4) while living in host family or foster care
setting • 276,460 (26%) people with ID/DD lived in congregate
care settings • 57% of those lived with six or fewer people. Most of the growth in services in the last half century
has been to support people living in their own or a family home.
Family and Individual Needs for Disability Supports
A Place to Live
A Place to Live
More than half of the family caregivers thought the ideal residential setting was
somewhere other than these family home
Family and Individual Needs for Disability Supports
Time in the Community
• 80-90% have participated in community activities in the past month
• 50% have exercised
• 50% participated in a religious service, 40% usually feel lonely
• 30% have ever gone to a self-advocacy meeting
NCI Consumer Report
Time with Others
How Time Was Spent During Three Days
•Individual Only 56.0%•Housemate 21.2%•Agency Staff 19.5%•Day/Workmate 2.4%•Family Community Friend 0.8%•Someone else 0.1%•Community Acquaintance 0.1%
Getting There
Getting There
Transportation Resources
http://www.projectaction.org/Initiatives/YouthTransportation.aspx
• Mobility Options in Your Community. A resource mapping tool to help you analyze the accessible transportation resources in your community
• Building a Transportation Education Continuum. An activity to assist educators to build transportation education activities across multiple tiers.
• Building Awareness in Accessible Transportation: Transit Assessment Guide for Students, Families and Educators. A tool for students, families, and educators who would like to increase their understanding of transit systems and how people with disabilities use public transportation.
Initiating Activities
Who Initiated Activities During Three Days
•Individual 71.6%
•Agency Staff 27.4%
•Family Community Friend 0.4%
•Housemate 0.4%
•Someone else 0.1%
•Day/Workmate 0.1%
Making Decisions
Making Decisions
Summary
Transition Planning should include:• Where to Live• How to Get There• Community Activity• Leisure and Recreation• Building a Social Network• Making Decisions
Interagency Collaboration and Coordination Interagency Collaboration
and Coordination
IDEA Transition Planning
The IEP must include for each student beginning at age 16 (or younger, if determined appropriate by the IEP team) a statement of needed transition services for the student, including, if appropriate a statement of interagency responsibilities or any needed linkages.– 34 CFR 300.347(b)(2)
Transition Barriers for Students and Families
• Accessing needed services • Navigating adult services• No coordination amongst multiple
agencies • Lack of sufficient information/awareness • Insufficient preparation of students for
work
US Government Accountability Office (2012), Better federal coordination could lessen challenges in the transition from high school
Interagency Teams
Three groups typically served by interagency teams that vary by setting, roles and responsibilities
– (State level agencies) Developing cross-agency policies to facilitate transition
– (Regional/local district personnel)Developing procedures and guidelines at district level
– (Individual level) Working with individual students at IEP meeting or other interagency meetings
The CA Postsecondary Education Interagency
Workgroup
The Tarjan Center, a University Center for Excellence in Developmental Disabilities established a workgroup consisting of public agencies representing rehabilitation, developmental disabilities services, education, and community colleges in partnership with the State Council on Developmental Disabilities and the California Health Incentives Improvement Project to address needed changes to improve access and participation in postsecondary education.
CA Postsecondary Education Interagency Workgroup
Participants• John Kimura, Jeff Reil and Susan Mathers, California Department
of Rehabilitation• Denyse Curtright, Don Braeger, Rick Ingram, Victoria King,
Department of Developmental Services• Carol Risley, State Council on Developmental Disabilities• Scott Berenson,& Scott Valverde, California Community Colleges
Chancellor’s Office• Dr. Catherine Campisi & Rachel Stewart, California Health
Incentives and Improvement Project*• Jill Larson, Dr. Dan Boomer, California Department of Education• Carolyn Nunes, Director of Special Education, San Diego Office of
Education• Dr. Olivia Raynor & Wilbert Francis, Tarjan Center at UCLA• Dr. Kathleen Rice, Facilitator
*Funder
How We Created an Engaged and Committed
Group • Developed relationships, mutual understanding
and trust among diverse partners;• Assessed the environment for change;• Attended to the priorities and context under which
each agency operated• Identified assets and barriers and developed an
actionable plan for our work• Affirmed individual and agency’s commitment to
improve outcomes for youth with developmental disabilities
• Built a sense of purpose, hopefulness and commitment to the work
Step 1: Map Each Agency’s Initiatives that Support Students with ID and ASD
Raynor, O., Campisi, C & Francis, W. (2012), Pathways to PSE for Students with ID & Autism
Raynor et al., 2012
Step 2: Create an Interagency Matrix
( Raynor et al, 2012)
Step 3: Utilize Case Studies to Identify Supports, Strengths & Gaps
• Identified key issues and unmet needs• Services each agency provided in response
to student needs• Regulations policies or local practices that
created available services, prevented them from being provided or could have been employed but were not
• Who else needed to be involved?• If the system worked well, what would have
happened?
Example: Reflection Discussions
• What are you pleased to see? What is most surprising? What is concerning to you?
• What else is possible? For your agency? For collaboration between agencies? What is the collective meaning of this work for students with intellectual disabilities or autism?
• What needs to happen with this information? What does this mean for this group
• What needs to happen next? Who else needs to be involved? How?
Step 4: Deepen the Learning of Each Agency About One Another
• What are the top 3 priorities of your agency? What receives the most attention, resources, etc.? What is your agency held accountable for? Where does this accountability originate (e.g. legislation, funding sources)?
• Where does attention to people with ID and ASD in pursuing PSE fit in with those priorities and accountability expectations?
• Which of your agency’s programmatic efforts or initiatives are truly working to specifically support people with ID and ASD in pursuing PSE? How many people with ID and ASD are utilizing these services? Are these numbers representative of the ID and ASD population? How do you know they are successful?
• Looking at the Chart mapping the current legislative authority and core functions (Step 1 above) or the Agency Interaction Matrix (Step 2 above), what other questions would help you learn about the work of this agency?
Reviewing the Steps
• Deciding to Collaborate – The Invitation• Creating a Shared Understanding of Each of the
Partners, their Individual Roles and Responsibilities
• Creating a Shared Understanding of How Each Agency Might Work Together
• Utilize Case Examples to Surface Barriers and Unmet Needs
• Deepening Understanding of Systems Barriers through Learning Conversations
Pathways to PSE for Students with ID and Autism: An
Interagency Guide
23 +
16-22
6-15
Birth - 5
Knowledge and Skills Required
Information Provided to or by Individuals with ID & Families
Primary Actions
Primary Role
Agency Plans
Youth Ages 6-15
Raynor et al., 2012
Key Learning
• It is critical to start early to lay the foundation (life experiences, role models, mentors, examples of success) for college and a career.
• There is a need to raise expectations across the board –i.e., parents, self advocates, agencies, and schools, that individuals with ID/ASD will achieve success in their lives and careers.
• Perceived authority and decision making influences the interpretation of policies, planning and service provision at a state and local level.
• Context is critical. During the course of our work, new barriers and opportunities for collaboration emerged.
Group Exercise
Question to Consider:If the system worked well, what could/should happen to support this student’s self-determination and success?•What could education do?•What could the DD system do?•What could VR do?•Which agency is responsible for coordinating the health care needs? What could they do?•Who else needed to be involved?
Discuss the Following – Record Your Best Ideas:•What are the key transition issues?•In your experience with transition, what needs are typically not met? What are the barriers to meeting those needs? •What surprised you about your discussion? What was new information?•What recommendations would you suggest to make transition a more collaborative process? What strategies would you use?
Discussion
Questions