8
Cancer Immunol.Immunother. 7, 7-14 (1979) ancer mmunol9gyand mmunotherapy © Springer-Verlag 1979 Review Interferons as Cell-regulatory Molecules F. R. Balkwill Imperial Cancer Research Fund, Lincoln'sInn Field, London WC2A 3PX, England Summary. This review presents the current evidence for interferons as cell-regulatory molecules. Apart from in- ducing an antiviral state, interferon preparations are powerful inhibitors of cell growth and have selective ef- fects on cellular protein synthesis. In addition, inter- ferons are produced during most immune reactions and can exert positive and negative influences on these reac- tions. Thus interferon molecules are of interest to cell biologists, immunologists, and oncologists. Interferon as a cell regulator offers a unique approach to cancer ther- apy, but for its judicious use, more understanding of basic mechamisms of action is required. Introduction The interferons, first discovered in 1957 [61] are a class of low-molecular-weight glycoproteins produced by many different cell types in response to virus infection and a variety of mitogenic or immunogenic stimuli. They are currently defined by their capacity to inhibit the growth of a wide range of viruses in cells of the same, or closely related, species, but are now also being recognized as an important group of hormone-like cell- regulatory molecules. A series ofinterferons, with differ- ences in antigenicity and physiochemical properties, has been identified (review [5]), and this article will discuss a role for these interferons in cell regulation. lnterferons as Negative Growth Factors As our understanding of the control of cell proliferation has increased, a number of positive growth factors have been discovered (review [35]), which can be extracted from serum or tissues or produced by cells in vitro, and are capable of stimulating cells to synthesize DNA in chemically defined media. Although the importance of cell density and nutrient availability has been recognized in negative control of cell proliferation (review [57]), there is little information concerning substances that could be defined as negative growth factors. Chalones, a mainly theoretical group of noncytotoxic cell line-spe- cific inhibitors, are still largely undefined [59, 93]. How- ever, the interferons are a group of naturally occurring molecules, which are capable of profound growth inhi- bition and probably represent the best characterized negative growth factors to date. Originally when mouse L cell interferon was re- ported to inhibit cell growth in vitro [86], the impurity of the preparations cast doubt on the results [6], but since then interferons have been better purified and their growth-inhibitory capacity has been confirmed and shown to have many physicochemical properties identi- cal with the antiviral activities [14, 71, 102]. Moreover, mouse L cell interferon purified to homogeneity was shown to have cell growth-inhibitory activity [27]. How- ever, purification of the interferons has proved a difficult task, because their high specific activity means that they are produced in very small quantities, and the reader should note that this review will mainly describe work with interferon preparations containing some impuri- ties. In the majority of tissue culture systems, interferon doses equivalent to 0.1 -~ 1 ng/ml purified material are capable of significant growth inhibition of a wide range of cell lines, strains, and primary cell cultures of normal or malignant origin [2, 4, 45, 86, 104]. This inhibition is primarily a reversible cytostatic effect [4, 45, 86]. Re- cent reports have suggested that growth inhibition by the interferons shows a degree of tissue specificity [29, 62], interferons from one tissue source being more inhib- itory to cells of their tissue of origin than cells derived from other tissues. 0340-7004/79/0007/0007/$ 01.60

Interferons as cell-regulatory molecules

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Interferons as cell-regulatory molecules

Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 7, 7-14 (1979) ancer mmunol9gyand mmunotherapy

© Springer-Verlag 1979

Review

Interferons as Cell-regulatory Molecules

F. R. Balkwill

Imperial Cancer Research Fund, Lincoln's Inn Field, London WC2A 3PX, England

Summary. This review presents the current evidence for interferons as cell-regulatory molecules. Apart from in- ducing an antiviral state, interferon preparations are powerful inhibitors of cell growth and have selective ef- fects on cellular protein synthesis. In addition, inter- ferons are produced during most immune reactions and can exert positive and negative influences on these reac- tions. Thus interferon molecules are of interest to cell biologists, immunologists, and oncologists. Interferon as a cell regulator offers a unique approach to cancer ther- apy, but for its judicious use, more understanding of basic mechamisms of action is required.

Introduction

The interferons, first discovered in 1957 [61] are a class of low-molecular-weight glycoproteins produced by many different cell types in response to virus infection and a variety of mitogenic or immunogenic stimuli. They are currently defined by their capacity to inhibit the growth of a wide range of viruses in cells of the same, or closely related, species, but are now also being recognized as an important group of hormone-like cell- regulatory molecules. A series ofinterferons, with differ- ences in antigenicity and physiochemical properties, has been identified (review [5]), and this article will discuss a role for these interferons in cell regulation.

lnterferons as Negative Growth Factors

As our understanding of the control of cell proliferation has increased, a number of positive growth factors have been discovered (review [35]), which can be extracted from serum or tissues or produced by cells in vitro, and

are capable of stimulating cells to synthesize DNA in chemically defined media. Although the importance of cell density and nutrient availability has been recognized in negative control of cell proliferation (review [57]), there is little information concerning substances that could be defined as negative growth factors. Chalones, a mainly theoretical group of noncytotoxic cell line-spe- cific inhibitors, are still largely undefined [59, 93]. How- ever, the interferons are a group of naturally occurring molecules, which are capable of profound growth inhi- bition and probably represent the best characterized negative growth factors to date.

Originally when mouse L cell interferon was re- ported to inhibit cell growth in vitro [86], the impurity of the preparations cast doubt on the results [6], but since then interferons have been better purified and their growth-inhibitory capacity has been confirmed and shown to have many physicochemical properties identi- cal with the antiviral activities [14, 71, 102]. Moreover, mouse L cell interferon purified to homogeneity was shown to have cell growth-inhibitory activity [27]. How- ever, purification of the interferons has proved a difficult task, because their high specific activity means that they are produced in very small quantities, and the reader should note that this review will mainly describe work with interferon preparations containing some impuri- ties.

In the majority of tissue culture systems, interferon doses equivalent to 0.1 -~ 1 ng/ml purified material are capable of significant growth inhibition of a wide range of cell lines, strains, and primary cell cultures of normal or malignant origin [2, 4, 45, 86, 104]. This inhibition is primarily a reversible cytostatic effect [4, 45, 86]. Re- cent reports have suggested that growth inhibition by the interferons shows a degree of tissue specificity [29, 62], interferons from one tissue source being more inhib- itory to cells of their tissue of origin than cells derived from other tissues.

0340-7004/79/0007/0007/$ 01.60

Page 2: Interferons as cell-regulatory molecules

Mechanisms of Cell Growth Inhibition by the Interferons

Time-lapse cinematography showed that a mouse inter- feron exerted its cytostatic effect on routine EMT6 cells by a progressive increase of the cell cycle time [21] and some information concerning the effects of the inter- ferons on specific phases of the cell cycle is now avail- able. The majority of this evidence seems to indicate that interferons can lengthen all phases of the cell cycle, although the degree to which each is affected depends on the cell type studied: thus, Killander et al. [69] and Balkwill et al. [4] found that all phases of the cell cycle were lengthened in asynchronously dividing mouse leu- kemia and human breast cancer lines, respectively; Balkwill and Taylor-Papadimitriou [31 found G1 and S + G2 to be elongated in quiescent fibroblasts stimulat- ed to divide; Matarese and Rossi [77] found that G1 and G2 were lengthened in interferon-treated Friend leu- kemia cells, while Fuse and Kuwata [34] and Sokawa et al. [98] reported that interferons only affected the G1 phase in human and mouse cells stimulated from quies- cence.

There is little information concerning the effects of the interferons at a molecular level in non-virus-infected cells. In virus-infected cells it appears that they can act at many stages of the virus-replicative cycle, depending on the virus and cell system being investigated. For in- stance interferon treatment can cause inhibition of trans- lation (reviews [90, 96], and transcription (review [85]) of viral mRNA and virus assembly and release [87]. Since 1964 it has been known that transcription and translation of a protein(s) are necessary for the estab- lishment of the antiviral state in interferon-treated cells [106], but this so-called antiviral protein has not yet been identified. Knight and Korant have recently ob- served that four distinct proteins are induced by inter- feron treatment [72], but the relevance of these to cell growth inhibition is unknown.

In cells treated with double-stranded RNA or inter- feron at least two enzyme systems are induced that af- fect translation of proteins in vitro: one is a synthetase, which produces an oligonucleotide with a 2'5' linkage that activates a latent endonuclease and inhibits protein synthesis by breakdown of message [68, 113]; the other is a protein kinase, which phosphorylates and thus inac- tivates the peptide chain initiation factor eIF2 and possi- bly other proteins [32]. However, the role of these two systems in the antiviral and cell growth-inhibitory effect of the interferons has yet to be elucidated.

No overall effect on cellular RNA and protein syn- thesis has been noted in interferon-treated uninfected cells [13, 101], but there are several reports of selective effects of interferons on certain proteins: for instance, Sreevalsan et al. found that mouse L cell interferon se-

F. R. Balkwilh Interferons as Cell-regulatory Molecules

lectively inhibited ornithine decarboxylase- and protein synthesis-dependent phosphate uptake in cells stimulat- ed from quiescence [101]: rat interferon preparations specifically suppressed hormone-induced enzymes in rat hepatoma and glial cells with no overall effect on protein synthesis [7, 60]; chick interferon inhibited glutamine synthetase in chick normal retina cells without affecting other enzymes or total cellular protein synthesis [78]; and murine interferons inhibited transcription and trans- lation of globin during erythroid differentiation of Friend leukemia cells in vitro [92]. The reason for these selective inhibitions by interferons is not known. Beck et al. suggested that proteins that are synthesized at a fast- er rate may be more inhibited by interferon action [71.

Interferons can also cause a variety of growth inhibi- tory effects in vivo: Administration of large doses of mouse sarcoma cell interferon inhibited the regeneration of mouse liver [33], and caused death in newborn mice if given during the first week of development [47]. Once again these effects were species-specific, human inter- feron having no effect in the murine experimental sys- tems [47].

In summary, interferon preparations can inhibit cell growth in vitro by a reversible cytostatic effect that is manifest at concentrations attainable in vivo [80], and this effect is selective, the interferons being species- and possibly tissue-specific. The interferons can have selec- tive inhibitory or enhancing effects on specific cell pro- tein synthesis. Low concentrations of murine interferons stimulated globin synthesis and erythrocyte differentia- tion in Friend leukemia [76], and enhanced the polycy- clic hydrocarbon induction of aryl hydrocarbon hydro- xylase activity in fetal mouse cultures [83]. In addition, murine interferons enhanced the expression of surface antigens [74].

These findings could indicate a regulatory role for the interferons in cell growth and differentiation, but more understanding of the relationship between the dif- ferent types of interferons, and the stimuli that produce them, is required to clarify a role for interferons as nega- tive growth factors in vivo.

Interferons and the Immune System

A role for the interferons in cell regulation is most con- vincingly demonstrated in studies of the immune system. In the course of various immune reactions, interferons are produced (type II or 'immune' interferons) (reviews [30, 114]), and exogenous interferons can have a number of enhancing or inhibitory effects on the immune system in vitro and in vivo (review [37]).

Although by definition they exert an anti-viral effect, type II interferons are produced by lymphocytes in re-

Page 3: Interferons as cell-regulatory molecules

F. R. Balkwill: Interferons as Cell-regulatory Molecules

sponse to mitogenic [30, 66, 70, 111] and antigenic [36, 115, 89] stimulation. Type II interferons possess a va- riety of different physicochemical properties from type I (induced by viruses and double-stranded nucleotides): they are unstable at pH 2 [99, 115], have a higher mo- lecular weight [99], and are antigenically distinct from type I interferons [31, 99, 114]. Data on which cells produce these types of interferon are confusing, and B cells, T cells, macrophages, and combinations of these have all been shown to produce type II interferons [30, 114]. It is possible that the sensitizing antigen may de- termine the producing cell.

As interferons are produced during the immune re- sponse and can modulate that response, they may be regarded as lymphokines. In the last 10 years, more than 50 soluble mediators of the immune response have been described (review [10]) and many of these lym- phokines have properties similar to those of interferons [100]. However, rigorous purification procedures are re- quired to elucidate the relationship between them. Inves- tigation of type II interferons is still at an early stage and all results with these preparations should be interpreted with caution as other mediators are probably present [18, 70, 115]. In describing the effects of exogenous in- terferons on the immune system we shall be primarily concerned with the better characterized type I inter- ferons.

Interferons and the Humoral Immune System

High doses of type I interferons suppressed the primary and secondary response to a variety of T cell-dependent and -independent antigens in vivo and in vitro in mouse and human systems [11, 12, 64, 99] and prevented pas- sive cutaneous anaphylaxis in vivo by inhibiting Ig E production [84]. Recent reports indicated that partially purified preparations of type II interferons were more actively immunosuppressive than type I [99, 109].

There is some circumstantial evidence for a role for immune interferons in mediation of T cell suppression. T cell mitogens are potent inhibitors of the immune re- sponse, which act by stimulating suppressor cell activ- ity, and these mitogens also stimulate the synthesis of type II interferon [63, 66]. The ability of a variety of these mitogens to inhibit in vitro antibody production was proportional to their ability to stimulate type II in- terferon production [63], and agents that blocked the production of mitogen-induced interferon also blocked the development of the suppressor state in an in vitro murine immune system [66].

Under certain conditions, interferons can have an immunoenhancing effect. Several workers have shown that the induction of interferon or addition of exogenous interferon to spleen cell cultures after the addition of antigen, enhanced the immune response [11, 12, 65], as

did low doses of interferon given in vivo [11]. Type II interferons can also have enhancing effects, depending on the time of administration and the dosage, but this enhancing effect has only been found for T-dependent antigens [109]. Interferon preparations also enhanced IgE-mediated histamine release from human peripheral blood cells in vitro and this enhancement required de novo protein synthesis [53].

Interferons and Cell-mediated Immunity

A temporary decrease in cell-mediated immunity is a common side effect in virus infections, and there is now evidence that this is due to interferon production (review [23]). The most dramatic effects of interferons have been on the development of delayed-type hypersensitiv- ity: De Maeyer et al. found that administration of high doses of interferon prior to sensitization of mice pre- vented the development of an immune response, and that interferon administration to sensitized animals be- fore challenge with the sensitizing antigen prevented the development of hypersensitivity [25, 26]. Type I inter- ferons also suppressed the rejection of allogeneic skin grafts in mice [24] and modified graft-versus-host re- sponses [56]. In vitro, some mitogen-induced lympho- cyte blastogenesis [75, 82] and the mixed lymphocyte reaction [9, 26, 54] were inhibited by the addition of interferons, although enhancement of mitogenesis has also been reported [2, 82].

In contrast to the suppressive effects reported above, interferons can have remarkable enhancing activities on some of the effector cells in the cell-mediated immune system.

Mouse L cell interferon enhanced the specific cyto- toxicity of sensitized murine lymphocytes for allogeneic target cells in vitro [73], and in a human system, al- though the mixed lymphocyte reaction was inhibited by interferon, the resulting sensitized lymphocytes had greatly increased cytotoxic potential [54].

There is increasing evidence that the natural killer (NK) cell is an important component of host-mediated defence against tumours (review [8]). This cell can be activated in vivo and in vitro by a variety of agents [51, 107, 110] that have a common property of being inter- feron inducers. Moreover, exogenous interferons caused a rapid increase in murine spleen NK cell activity in vivo [22, 97] and spleen or peripheral blood NK cells in vitro [52, 55]. Further evidence for a central role for inter- ferons in activating and enhancing NK cells comes from elegant studies by Trinchieri and his colleagues. They showed that lymphocyte cultures produced an interferon during 'recognition' and lysis of human cells, and that this interferon was capable of enhancing NK activity [107, 108]. Herberman et al. have reported that inter-

Page 4: Interferons as cell-regulatory molecules

10

ferons can also enhance antibody-dependent cell killing [52].

Interferons are also known to affect macrophage function: interferon preparations or inducers enhanced the phagocytic activity of murine maerophages in vivo and in vitro [28, 50] and rendered mouse macrophages cytotoxic to a leukemia cell line in vitro [95]. There is some evidence that macrophage-activating 'Factors' in lymphokine preparations have the characteristics of in- terferons [94], suggesting that, as with the NK cell, in- terferons may be a regulator of macrophage activation.

Little is known about the importance of production in vivo, but there are reports of low immune interferon production associated with decreased resistance to in- fection in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia patients [31] and in patients with IgA deficiency [67].

Thus interferon preparations have a bewildering array of modulating effects on the immune system in vivo and in vitro. As a generalization, interferons appear to inhibit the sensitizing and proliferative pathways of the immune response and enhance the effector path- ways, thus moderating the growth of stimulated clones while enhancing the activity of any effector cells pro- duced. Of central importance in clarifying a role for in- terferons in immune regulation is the purification and characterization of the interferon-like lymphokines pro- duced during the immune response.

Interferons and Cancer

Soon after the discovery of interferons, Atanasiu and Chany reported that prior administration of interferon inhibited the development of polyoma induced neo- plasms in newborn hamsters [i]. This work was re- peated with a variety of oncogenic virus systems in ex- perimental animals (review [41]), and interferons were also found to delay the progression of established virus induced neoplasms such as the Friend [42, 112] and Rauscher [43] murine leukemias, and Herpesvirus sai- miri induced leukaemia in owl monkeys [88].

Protective effects of interferons have also been re- ported for a range of 'spontaneous' murine cancers in which a viral aetiology is implicated (review [41]). For example, Gresser et al. [44] reported that long-term treat- ment of newborn AKR mice with mouse brain inter- feron significantly increased their survival time and dim- inished their incidence of leukaemia. These workers also found that interferon treatment commenced after the diagnosis of lymphoma increased the average survival of mice by 100% in a disease where many conventional chemotherapeutic agents had little effect [48]. Came and Moore found that interferons or interferon inducers in- hibited the rate of development of spontaneous murine mammary cancinomas although no decrease of virus production in milk could be found [15].

F. R. Balkwill: Interferons as Cell-regulatory Molecules

In all the experiments reported above, it is conceiv- able that the major effect of interferon was mediated by inhibition of oncogenic virus replication and cell trans- formation, but work with transplantable tumours has indicated that other effects of interferons may be impor- tant. In 1970, Gresser reported that repeated adminis- tration of mouse brain interferon significantly increased the survival of mice transplanted with syngeneic tumour cells [38], and later work showed that exogenous inter- feron markedly reduced the growth of the syngeneic mu- rine Lewis lung carcinoma and the development of pul- monary metastases [39].

All the antitumour effects described above have been mediated by type I interferons. One recent report has compared the effect of murine type I and type II inter- ferons on the development of syngeneic transplantable osteogenic sarcoma. Type II interferons were 100-fold more active than type I, and even when given in ex- tremely small doses, could have dramatic effects on tu- mour development [19].

One promising experimental approach has been to combine interferon therapy with standard chemothera- peutic agents. Chirigos and Pearson found that a murine interferon administered after BCNU-induced remission in a murine leukaemia displayed synergism with the drug, significantly increased the 'cure' rate, and doubled the survival time of affected mice [17]. More recently, Gresser et al. have reported that combined therapy with cyclophosphamide and C-243 cell interferon in mice with AKR lymphoma doubled the survival time ob- tained with either agent alone [49].

Therefore, interferon treatment in experimental ani- mal neoplasms, whether of virus, spontaneous, or trans- plantable origin, delayed the progression of the disease but only in very few cases have 'cures' been re- ported.

Extension of these studies to human cancer has proved difficult because of the limited quantities of human interferons available. The major source of human interferon to date has been a type I interferon induced in blood bank leucocytes by Sendai virus [16]. More recently, limited quantities of fibroblast interferon have been made [58]. A promising source soon to be available for clinical trials is an interferon derived from human lymphoblastoid cells, which can be produced commercially in large quantities (N. Finter, personal communication).

In 1971, Strander and his colleagues began to use human leucocyte interferon as postoperative adjuvant therapy in osteogenic sarcoma patients, their survival being compared with concurrent controls treated at other hospitals in Sweden. Results so far [103] indicate that 60% of the 24 interferon-treated patients were free of detectable metastases at 2 years, compared with 25% of 35 control patients. The design of the trial precludes

Page 5: Interferons as cell-regulatory molecules

F. R. Balkwill: Interferons as Cell-regulatory Molecules

conclusive statistical analysis at this time, but the results are encouraging. Pilot studies have been carried out on a small number of patients with easily monitorable dis- ease. Merigan and his colleagues studied the response of six non-Hodgkin's lymphoma patients to human leuco- cyte interferon therapy. While no effect was seen in three patients with previously treated, rapidly advancing histiocytic lymphoma, three patients with previously un- treated, poorly differentiated lymphocytic lymphoma showed regression of the disease, and in two of these the disease was stabilized for 6 months after a 30-day treat- ment [81]. The Swedish workers have recently described human leucocyte interferon therapy of four patients with previously untreated myelomatosis [79]. In all patients progression of the disease was halted and in two patients complete remission was obtained [79]. Other human cancer studies are, in general, anecdotal, with treatment of single patients for short periods of time (review [104]) and results that are variable and difficult to interpret.

It is of interest to note that in these studies the side effects of interferon therapy were not severe. The major effects noted were fever, mild malaise, and leucopoenia [79, 81]. A beneficial side effect noted in the osteogenic sarcoma was that patients showed less evidence of acute viral infections than their immediate family [105].

Properly controlled clinical trials with adequate numbers of patients are now necessary, and with the impending availability of large quantities of human lym- phoblastoid interferon it is hoped this will be possible. Meanwhile, a preliminary approach to selecting suitable cancers for interferon therapy, especially where tumour cells cannot be grown in vitro, is to study the effects of human interferon on the growth of human tumour xeno- grafts in the nude mouse. Two recent reports using human cell lines as xenografts have not been encourag- ing [20, 58]; however, recent work from our laboratory (F. R. Balkwill et al., submitted for publication) has shown that the development and growth of two of three primary human breast carcinomas in nude mice was sig- nificantly inhibited by human lymphoblastoid interferon treatment.

Therefore a role for interferons in the treatment of human cancer is, as yet, uncertain, like the mecha- nism(s) of the turnout inhibitory effect seen in experi- mental animals and the few documented human cases. This review has described several ways in which the in- terferons could act as turnout inhibitors and the pre- dominating mechanism for a particular tumour could depend on its unique neoplastic character.

There is a certain amount of evidence for a role for interferons in enhancing host responses to the tumour. Gresser et al. found that a transplantable L 1210 leu- kaemia that was resistant in vitro to the growth-inhibi- tory effects of a mouse interferon could still be inhibited in vivo, although not to as great an extent as a line that

11

was sensitive in vitro [46]. Secondly, these workers re- ported extensive phagocytosis of tumour cells by macro- phages in interferon-treated mice [38]. In addition, lym- phocytic infiltration of human fibroblast interferon- treated melanoma metastases has been recorded [58]. Another theoretical way in which interferon can favour- ably influence a host reaction to a tumour has been sug- gested by Rosenfeldt to explain the effects of interferon therapy in myelomatosis patients. His theory was that myelomatosis may be caused by defect in a T cell sup- pressor population, allowing abnormal expansion of a B cell clone, and that interferon therapy may correct that defect [29]. It is of interest that the favourable results with interferon therapy in human cancer have been ob- tained in immunocompetent host [79, 81, 103].

However, it is unlikely that enhancement of host reactions are responsible for all the anti-tumour activity of the interferons. For instance, the data demonstrating inhibition of human breast cancer xenografts in nude mice (F. R. Balkwill et al., submitted for publication) seem to indicate that at least in this 'artificial' situation, interferon can have a direct effect on tumour cells, as human interferon would not be expected to affect a mu- fine immune response. In addition, Gresser and Bourali- Maury reported that the antitumour effect of inter- ferons in murine transplantable tumours was not abro- gated by pretreatment with anti-lymphocyte serum (ALS) or X-irradiation, although silica treatment, which destroys macrophages, diminished somewhat interfe- ron's antitumour activity [40].

It is so far apparent that interferon treatment per se rarely cures neoplastic disease, but it delays its progres- sion, and shifts the balance between tumour and host in favour of the host. From the data discussed in this re- view it can be seen that interferons may alter this host- tumour relationship by a variety of mechanisms: not only by inhibition of viral oncogenesis and possible re- cruitment to the transformed clone; but also by enhanc- ing host immune effector cell activity against the tu- mour; enhancing surface antigen expression (and thus host responses); and by acting as a chalone-like negative growth factor.

Much further work is needed to evaluate the impor- tance of the regulatory functions of the interferons to cancer therapy in man. The main priorities are plentiful supplies of interferon and carefully controlled work in patients in which disease and host response can be mon- itored.

References

1. Atanasiu, P., Chany, C.: Action d'un interf6ron provenant de cellules malignes sur l'infection experiemntale du hamster nou- veau-n~ par le virus de polyome. C.R. Aead. Sci. [D] (Paris) 251, 1687 (1960)

Page 6: Interferons as cell-regulatory molecules

12

2. Balkwill, F., Oliver, R. T. D.: Growth inhibitory effects of inter- feron on normal and malignant human haemopoietic ceils. Int. J. Cancer 20, 500 (1977)

3, Balkwill, F., Taylor-Papadimitriou, J.: Interferon affects both G 1 and S + G 2 in cells stimulated from quiescence to growth. Nature 274, 798 (1978)

4. Balkwill, F., Watiing, D., Taylor-Papadimitriou, J.: Inhibition by lymphoblastoid interferon of growth of ceils derived from the human breast. Int. J. Cancer 22, 258 (1978)

5. Baron, S., Dianzani, F.: The interferon system: A current re- view to 1978. Tex. Rep. Biol. Med. 35, 1 (1979)

6. Baron, S., Merigan, T. C., McKerlie, M. L.: Effect of crude and purified interferons on the growth of uninfected cells in culture. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 121, 50 (1966)

7. Beck, G., Poindron, P., Illinger, D., Beck, J.-P., Ebel, J.-P., Falcoff, R.: Inhibition of steroid indieible tyrosine aminotrans- ferase by mouse and rat interferon in hepatoma tissue culture cells. FEBS lett. 48, 297 (1974)

8. Beverly, P., Knight, D.: Killing comes naturally. Nature 278, 119 (1979)

9. Blomgren, H., Strander, H., Cantell, K.: Effect of human leuco- cyte interferon on the response of lymphocytes to mitogenic stimuli in vitro. Scand. J. Immunol. 3, 697 (1974)

10. Bloom, B. R.: Molecular mechanisms of mononuclear cell function. Fed. Proc. 37, 2741 (1978)

11. Braun, W., Levy, H. B.: Interferon preparations as modifiers of immune responses. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 141, 769 (1972)

12. Brodeur, B. R., Merigan, T. C.: Suppressive effect of interferon on the humoral immune responses to sheep red blood cells in mice. J. Immunol. 113, 1319 (1974)

13. Brouty-Boye, D., Macieira-Coelho, A., Fiszman, M., Gresser, I.: Interferon and cell division. VIII. Effect of interferon on macromolecular synthesis in L 1210 cells in vitro. Int. J. Can- cer 12, 250 (1973)

14. Buffet, R. F., Ito, M., Cairo, A. M., Carter, W. A.: Antipro- liferative activity of highly purified mouse interferon. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 60, 243 (1978)

15. Came, P. E., Moore, D. H.: Inhibition of spontaneous mam- mary carcinoma of mice by treatment with interferon and poly 1 :C. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 137, 304 (1970)

16. Cantell, K., Hirvonen, S.: Preparation of human leucocyte in- terferon for clinical use. Tex. Rep. Biol. Med. 35, 138 (1977)

17. Chirigos, M. A., Pearson, J. W.: Cure of murine leukaemia with drug and interferon treatment. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 51, 1367 (1973)

18. Clinton, B. A., Magoc, T. J., Aspinall, R. L., Rapoza, N. P.: The influence upon mitogenic and cellular immunologic reac- tive systems in vitro by poly (1 : C) and BCG routine inter- ferons induced in vivo. Cell. Immunol. 27, 60 (1967)

19. Crane, J. L., Glasgow, L. A., Kern, E. R., Younger, J. S.: Inhibition of murine osteogenie sarcomas by treatment with type I or type II interferon. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 61, 871 (1978)

20. DeClercq, E., Georgiades, J., Edy, V. G., Sobis, H.: Effect of human and mouse interferon and of polyriboinosinic acid, poly ribocytidylic acid on the growth of human fibrosarcoma and melanoma tumors in nude mice. Eur. J. Cancer 14, 1273 (1978)

21. d'Hooghe, M. C., Brouty-Boye, D., Malaise, E. P., Gresser, I.: Interferon and cell division. XII. Prolongation by interferon of the intermitotic time of mouse mammary tumour cells in vitro. Microcinematographic analysis. Exp. Cell Res. 105, 73 (1977)

F. R. Balkwill: Interferons as Cell-regulatory Molecules

22. Djeu, J. Y., Heinbaugh, J. A., Holden, H. T., Herberman, R. B.: Augmentation of mouse natural killer cell activity by inter- feron and interferon inducers. J. Immunol. 122, 175 (1979)

23. De Maeyer, E., De Maeyer-Guignard, J.: Effect of interferon on cell-mediated immunity. Tex. Rep. Bio. Med. 35, 370 (1977)

24. De Maeyer, E., Morbraaten, L., De Maeyer-Gulgnard, J.: Pro- longation par l'interferon de la survive des greffes de peau chez la souris. C.R. Acad. Sci. [D] (Paris) 277, 2101 (1973)

25. De Maeyer, E , De Maeyer-Guignard, J., Vandeputte, M.: In- hibition by interferon of delayed-type hypersensitivity in the mouse. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 72, 1753 (1975)

26. De Maeyer-Guignard, J., Cachard, A., De Maeyer, E.: De- layed-type hypersensitivity to sheep red blood cells: Inhibition of sensitization by interferon. Science 190, 574 (1975)

27. De Maeyer-Guignard, J., Tovey, M., Gresser, I., De Maeyer, E.: Purification of mouse interferon by sequential affinity chro- matography on poly (U) and antibody-agarose columns. Natu- re 271, 622 (1978)

28. Donahoe, R. M., Huang, K-Y.: Interferon preparations en- hance phagocytosis in vivo. Infect. Immun. 13, 1250 (1976)

29. Einhorn, S., Strander, H.: Is interferon tissue specific? Effect of human leucocyte and fibroblast interferons on the growth of lymphoblastoid and osteosarcoma cell lines. J. Gen. Virol. 35, 573 (1977)

30. Epstein, L. B.: Mitogen and antigen induction of interferon in vitro and in vivo. Tex. Rep. Biol. Med. 35, 42 (1977)

31. Epstein, L. B., Cllne, M. L.: Chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. Studies on mitogen-stimulated lymphocyte interferon as a new technique for assessing T lymphocyte effeetor function. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 16, 553 (1974)

32. Farrell, P. J., Sen, G. C., Dubois, M. F., Ratner, L., Slattery, E., Lengyel, P.: Interferon action: Two distinct pathways for inhibition of protein synthesis by double-stranded RNA. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 75, 5893 (1978)

33. Frayssinet, C., Gresser, I., Tovey, M., Lindahl, P.: Inhibitory effect of potent interferon preparations on the regeneration of mouse liver after partial hepatectomy. Nature 245, 146 (1973)

34. Fuse, A., Kuwata, T.: Inhibition of DNA synthesis of syn- chronized RSa cells by human leucocyte interferon. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 58, 891 (1977)

35. Gospodarowicz, D., Moran, J. S.: Growth factors in mamma- llan cell culture. Ann. Rev. Biochem. 45, 531 (1976)

36. Green, J., Copperband, S. R., Kirbrick, S.: Immune specific induction of interferon production in cultures of human blood lymphocytes. Science 164, 1415 (1969)

37. Gresser, I.: On the varied biologic effects of interferon. Cell Immunology 34, 406 (1977)

38. Gresser, I., Bourali, C.: Antitumour effects of interferon prepa- rations in mice. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 45, 365 (1970)

39. Gresser, I., Bourali-Maury, C.: Inhibition by interferon prepa- rations of a solid malignant turnout and pulmonary metastases in mice. Nature New Biol. 236, 78 (1972)

40. Gresser, I., Bourali-Maury, C.: The antitumour effect of inter- feron in lymphocyte- and macrophage-depressed mice. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 144, 896 (1973)

41. Gresser, I., Tovey, M. G.: Antitumour effects of interferon. Biochem. Biophys. Acta 516, 231 (1978)

42. Gresser, I., Falcoff, R., Fontaine-Brouty-Boye, D., Zajdela, F., Coppey, J., Falcoff, E.: Interferon and murine leulaemia. IV. Further studies on the efficacy of interferon preparations ad- ministered after inoculation of Friend virus. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 126, 791 (1967)

Page 7: Interferons as cell-regulatory molecules

F. R. Balkwill: Interferons as Cell-regulatory Molecules

43. Gresser, I., Berman, L., De-Tht, G., Brouty-Boye, D., Coppey, J., Falcoff, E.: Interferon and murine leukaemia. V. Effect of interferon preparations on the evolution of Rauscher disease in mice. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 41, 505 (1968)

44. Gresser, I., Coppey, J., Bourali, C.: Interferon and murine leu- kamia. VI. Effect of interferon preparations on the lymphoid leukaemia of AKR mice. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 43, 1083 (1969)

45. Gresser, I., Brouty-Boye, D., Thomas, M.-I., Macieira-Coelho, A.: Interferon and cell division. I. Inhibition of the multiplica- tion of mouse leukaemia L 1210 cells in vitro by interferon preparations. Proc. Nail. Acad. Sci. USA 66, 1052 (1970)

46. Gresser, I., Maury, C., Brouty-Boye, D.: Mechanism of the antitumour effect of interferon in mice. Nature 239, 167 (1972)

47. Gresser, I., Tovey, M. G., Maury, C., Chouroulinko, I.: Lethal- ity of interferon preparations for newborn mice. Nature 258, 76 (1975)

48. Gresser, I., Maury, C., Tovey, M.: Interferon and murine leu- kaemia. VII. Therapeutic effect of interferon preparations after diagnosis of lymphoma in AKR mice. Int. J. Cancer 17, 647 (1976)

49. Gresser, I., Maury, C., Tovey, M.: Efficacy of combined inter- feron cyclophosphamide therapy after diagnosis of lymphoma in AKR mice. Eur. J. Cancer 14, 97 (1978)

50. Hamburg, S. I., Manejias, R. E., Rabinovitch, M.: Macrophage activation: Increased ingestion of IgG-coated erythrocytes after administration of interferon inducers to mice. J. Exp. Med. 147, 593 (1978)

51. Herberman, R. B., Nunn, M. E., Holden, H. T., Staal, S., Dyeu, J.: Augmentation of natural cytotoxic reactivity of mouse lym- phoid cells against syngeneic and allogeneic target cells. Int, J. Cancer 19, 555 (1977)

52. Herberman, R. B., Ortaldo, J. R., Bonnard, G. D.: Augmenta- tion by interferon of human natural and antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity. Nature 277, 221 (1979)

53. Hernandez-Asensio, M., Hooks, J. J., Ida, S., Siraganian, R., Notkins, A. L.: J. Immunol. 122, 1601 (1979)

54. Heron, I., Berg, K., Cantell, K.: Regulatory effect of interferon on T cells in vitro. J. Immunol. 117, 1370 (1976)

55. Heron, I., Hokland, M., Moller-Larsen, A., Berg, K.: The effect of interferon on lymphocyte-mediated effector cell functions: Selective enhancement of natural killer ceils. Cell. Immunol. 42, 183 (1979)

56. Hirsh, M. S., Ellis, D. A., Proffitt, M. R., Black, P. H., Chiri- gos, M. A.: Effects of interferon on leukaemia virus activation in graft versus host disease. Nature New Biol. 244, 102 (1973)

57. Holley, R. W.: Control of growth of mammalian cells in cell culture. Nature 258, 487 (1975)

58. Horoszewicz, J. S., Leong, S. S., Ito, M., Buffet, R. F., Kara- kousis, C., Holyoke, E., Job, L., Dflen, J. G., Cater, W. A.: Human fibroblast interferon in human neoplasia: clinical and laboratory study. Cancer Treat. Rep. 62, 1899 (1978)

59. Houck, J. C., Kanagalingham, K., Hunt, C., Attallah, A., Chung, A.: Lymphocyte and fibroblast ehalones: Some Chemi- cal Properties. Science 196, 896 (1977)

60. Illinger, D., Coupin, G., Richards, M., Poindron, P.: Rat inter- feron inhibits steroid-inducible glycerol 3-phosphate dehydro- genase synthesis in a rat glial cell line. FEBS Lett. 64, 391 (•976)

61. Isaacs, A., Lindenmann, J.: Virus interference. I. The inter- feron. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. [Biol.] 147, 258 (1975)

62. Job, L., Horoszewicz, J. S., Arya, S. K., Carter, W. A.: Differ- ential effects of interferon on human prostatic fibroblasts and epithelial cells. Proc. Am. Assoc. Cancer Res. 18, 205 (1977)

13

63. Johnson, H. M.: Cyclic AMP regulation of mitogen-induced interferon production and mitogen suppression of immune re- sponse. Nature 265, 154 (1977)

64. Johnson, H. M.: Effect of interferon on antibody formation. Tex. Rep. Biol. Med. 35, 357 (1977)

65. Johnson, H. M., Smith, B. G., Baron, S.: Inhibition of primary in vitro antibody response by interferon preparations. J. Immu- nol. 114, 403 (1975)

66. Johnson, H. M., Stanton, G. J., Baron, S.: Relative ability of mitogens to stimulate production of interferon by lymphoid and to induce suppression of the in vitro immune response. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 154, 138 (1977)

67. Juhlin, L., Cantell, K.: Interferon response of lymphocytes and resistance to infections. Lancet 1978 I, 667 (1978)

68. Kerr, I. A., Brown, R. E.: pppA2'p5'A2'p5'A: An inhibitor of protein synthesis synthesized with an enzyme fraction from interferon-treated cells. Proc. Natl. Acad, Sci. USA 75, 256 (1978)

69. Killander, D., Lindahl, P., Lundin, L., Leary, P., Gresser, I.: Relationship between the enhanced expression of histocom- patibility antigens on interferon-treated L 1210 cells and their position in the cell cycle. Eur. J. Immunol. 6, 56 (1976)

70. Klimpel, G. R., Dean, J. H., Day, K. H., Chen, P. B., Lucas, D. O.: Lymphotoxin and interferon production by rosette-sepa- rated human peripheral blood leukocytes. Cell. Immunol. 32, 293 (1977)

71. Knight, E.: Antiviral and cell growth inhibitory activities reside in the same glycoprotein of human fibroblast interferon. Na- ture 262, 302 (1976)

72. Knight, E., Korant, B. D.: Fibroblast interferon induces sythe- sis of four proteins in human fibrohlast cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sd. USA 76, 1824 (1979)

73. Lindahl, P., Leary, P., Gresser, I.: Enhancement by interferon of the specific cytotoxicity of sensitized lymphocytes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 69, 721 (1972)

74. Lindahl, P., Leary, P., Gresser, I.: Enhancement by interferon of the expression of surface antigens on murine leukaemia L 1210 cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 70, 2785 (1973)

75. Lindahl-Magnusson, P., Leary, P., Gresser, I.: Interferon inhib- its DNA synthesis induced in mouse lymphocyte suspensions by phytohaemagglutinin or by allogeneic cells. Nature New Biol. 237, 120 (1972)

76. Luftig, R. B., Conscience, J.-F., Skoultchi, A., McMillan, P., Revel, M., Ruddle, F. H.: Effect of interferon on dimethyl sul- foxide-stimulated Friend erythro-leukaemic cells: Ultrastruc- tural and biochemical study. J. Virol. 23, 799 (1977)

77. Matarese, G. P., Rossi, G. B.: Effect of interferon on growth and division cycle of Friend erythroleukaemic murine cells in vitro. J. Cell Biol. 75, 344 (1977)

78. Matsuno, T., Shirasawa, N., Kohno, S.: Interferon suppresses glutamine synthetase induction in chick embryonal neural reti- na. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 70, 310 (1976)

79. Mellstedt, H., Ahre, A., Bjorkholm, M., Holm, G., Johansson, B., Strander, H.: Interferon therapy in myelomatosis. Lancet 1979 I, 245

80. Merigan, T. C.: Pharmacokinetics and side effects of interferon in man. Tex. Rep. Biol. Med. 35, 541 (1977)

81. Merigan, T. C., Sikora, K., Breeden, J. H., Levy, R., Rosen- berg, S. A.: Preliminary observations on the effect of human leucocyte interferon in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 299, 1449 (1978)

82. Miorner, H., Landstrom, L. E., Larner, E., Larsson, I., Lund- gren, E., Stannengard, O.: Regulation of mitogen-induced lym- phocyte DNA synthesis by human interferon of different ori- gins. Cell. Immunol. 35, 15 (1978)

Page 8: Interferons as cell-regulatory molecules

14

83. Nebert, D. W., Friedman, R. M.: Stimulation of aryl hydrocar- bon hydroxylase induction in cell cultures by interferon. J. Virol. 11, 193 (1973)

84. Ngan, J., Lee, S. H. S., Kind, L. S.: The suppressive effect of interferon on the ability of mouse spleen cells synthesizing IgE to sensitize rat skin for heterologous adoptive cutaneous ana- phylaxis. J. Immunol. 117, 1063 (1976)

85. Oxman, M. N.: Molecular mechanisms of the antiviral action of interferon: effects of interferon on the transcription of viral messenger RNA. Tex. Rep. Biol. Med. 35, 230 (1977)

86. Paucker, K., Cantell, K., Henle, W.: Quantitative studies on viral interference in suspended L cells. III. Effect of interfering viruses and interferon on the growth rate of cells. Virology 17, 324 (1962)

87. Pitha, P. M., Wivel, N. A., Fernie, B. F., Harper, H. P.: Effect of interferon on murine leukaemia virus infection. IV. Forma- tion of non-infectious virus in chronically infected cells. J. Gen. Virol. 42, 467 (1979)

88. Rabin, H., Adamson, R. H., Neubauer, R. H., Ciemanec, J. L., Wallen, W. C.: Pilot studies with human interferon in Herpes virus saimiri-induced lymphoma in owl monkeys. Cancer Res. 36, 715 (1976)

89. Rasmussen, L., Mefigan, T. C.: Role ofT lymphocytes in cellu- lar immune responses during herpes simplex virus infection in humans. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 75, 3957 (1978)

90. Revel, M.: Interferon-induced translation regulation. Tex. Rep. Med. 35, 212 (1977)

91. Rosenfelt, F.: Interferon therapy in myelomatosis. Lancet 1979 I, 674

92. Rossi, G. B., Dolei, A., Cioe, L., Benedetto A., Matarese, G. P., Belardelli, F.: Inhibition of transcription and translation of globin messenger RNA in dimethyl sulfoxide-stimulated Friend erythroleukemic cells treated with interferon. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 74, 2036 (1977)

93. Rytomaa, T., Toivonen, H.: Chalones: Concepts and results. Mech. Ageing Dev. 9, 471 (1979)

94. Schultz, R. M., Chirigos, M. A.: Similarities among factors that render macrophages tumoricidal in lymphokine and interferon preparations. Cancer Res. 38, 1003 (1978)

95. Schultz, R. M., Papamatheakis, J. D., Chirigos, M. A.: Inter- feron: An inducer of macrophage activation by polyanions. Science 197, 674 (1977)

96. Sen, G. C., Desrosiers, R., Rather, L., Shaila, S., Brown, G. E., Lebleu, B., Slattery, E., Kawakita, M., Cabrer, B., Taira, H., Lengyel, P.: Messenger RNA methylation, translation, and de- gradation in extracts of interferon-treated cells. Tex. Rep. Biol. Med. 35, 221 (1977)

97. Senik, A., Gresser, I., Maury, C., Gidlund, M., Orn, A., Wig- zell, H.: Enhancement by interferon of natural killer cell activ- ity in mice. Cell. Immunol. 44, 186 (1979)

98. Sokawa, Y., Watanabe, Y., Watanabe, Y., Kawade, Y.: Inter- feron suppresses the transition of quiescent 3T3 cells to a grow- ing state. Nature 268, 236 (1977)

99. Sonnenfeld, G., Mandel, A. D., Merigan, T. C.: The immuno- suppressive effect of Type II mouse interferon preparations on antibody production. Cell. Immunol. 34, 193 (1977)

100. Sorg, C., Klinkert, W.: Chemical characterization of products of activated lymphocytes. Fed. Proc. 37, 2748 (1978)

F. R. Balkwill: Interferons as Cell-regulatory Molecules

101. Sreevalsan, T., Taylor-Papadimitriou, J., Rozengurt, E.: Selec- tive inhibition by interferon of serum-stimulated biochemical events in 3T3 cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 87, 679 (1979)

102. Stewart, W. E., Gresser, I., Tovey, M. G., Bandu, M. T., Le Goff, S.: Identification of the cell multiplication inhibitory fac- tors in interferon preparations as interferons. Nature 262, 300 (1976)

103. Strander, H.: Anti-tumour effects of interferon and its possible use as an anti-neoplastic agent in man. Tex. Rep. Biol. Med. 35, 429 (1977)

104. Strander, H., Einhorn, S.: Effect of human leucocyte interferon on the growth of human osteosarcoma cells in tissue culture. Int. J. Cancer 19, 468 (1977)

105. Strander, H., Cantell, K., Carlstrom, G,, Ingimarsson, S., Ja- kobsson, P., Nilsonne, U.: Acute infections in interferon- treated patients with osteosarcoma: a preliminary report of a comparative study. J. Infect. Dis. 133, Suppl. A., 245 (1976)

106. Taylor, J.: Inhibition of interferon action by actinomycin. Bio- chem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 14, 447 (1964)

107. Tinchieri, G., Santoli, D.: Anti-virus transformed cells. En- hancement of human natural killer cell activity by interferon and antagonistic inhibition of susceptibility of target cells to lysis. J. Exp. Med. 147, 1314 (1978)

108. Tinchieri, G., Santoli, D., Dee, R. R., Knowles, B. B.: Anti- viral activity induced by culturing lymphocytes with tumor- derived or virus-transformed cells. Identification of the anti- viral activity as interferon and characterization of the human effector lymphocyte subpopulation. J. Exp. Med. 147, 1299 (1978)

109. Virelizier, J. L., Chan, E. L., Allison, A. C.: Immunosuppres- sive effects of lymphocyte (type II) and leucocyte (type I) inter- feron on primary antibody responses in vivo and in vitro. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 30, 299 (1977)

110. Welsch, R. M., Zinkernagel, R. M.: Heterospecific cytotoxic cell activity induced during the first three days of acute lym- phocytic choriomeningitis virus infection in mice. Nature 268, 646 (1977)

111. Wheelock, E. F.: Interferon-like virus-inhibitor induced in human leukocytes by phytohaemagglutinin. Science 149, 310 (1965)

112. Wheelock, E. F., Larke, R. P. B.: Efficacy of interferon in the treatment of mice with estabfished Friend virus. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 127, 230 (1968)

113. Williams, B. R. G., Kerr, I. M.: Inhibition of protein synthesis by 2 ' -5 ' linked adenine oligonucleotides in intact cells. Nature 276, 88 (1978)

114. Younger, J. S.: Properties of interferon induced by specific an- tigens. Tex. Rep. Biol. Med. 35, 17 (1977)

115. Younger, J. S., Salvin, S. B.: Production and properties of mi- gration inhibitor factor and interferon in the circulation of mice with delayed hypersensitivity. Immunology 111, 1914 (1973)

Received July 10, 1979