4
This article was downloaded by: [National Pingtung University of Science and Technology] On: 19 December 2014, At: 17:03 Publisher: Routledge Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK Contemporary Security Policy Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/fcsp20 Introduction: Symposium on Devaluing Nuclear Weapons Nick Ritchie Published online: 18 Apr 2013. To cite this article: Nick Ritchie (2013) Introduction: Symposium on Devaluing Nuclear Weapons, Contemporary Security Policy, 34:1, 144-145, DOI: 10.1080/13523260.2013.771038 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2013.771038 PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE Taylor & Francis makes every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information (the “Content”) contained in the publications on our platform. However, Taylor & Francis, our agents, and our licensors make no representations or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability for any purpose of the Content. Any opinions and views expressed in this publication are the opinions and views of the authors, and are not the views of or endorsed by Taylor & Francis. The accuracy of the Content should not be relied upon and should be independently verified with primary sources of information. Taylor and Francis shall not be liable for any losses, actions, claims, proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages, and other liabilities whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with, in relation to or arising out of the use of the Content. This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-

Introduction: Symposium on Devaluing Nuclear Weapons

  • Upload
    nick

  • View
    213

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Introduction: Symposium on Devaluing Nuclear Weapons

This article was downloaded by: [National Pingtung University of Science andTechnology]On: 19 December 2014, At: 17:03Publisher: RoutledgeInforma Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954Registered office: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH,UK

Contemporary Security PolicyPublication details, including instructions for authorsand subscription information:http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/fcsp20

Introduction: Symposium onDevaluing Nuclear WeaponsNick RitchiePublished online: 18 Apr 2013.

To cite this article: Nick Ritchie (2013) Introduction: Symposium on DevaluingNuclear Weapons, Contemporary Security Policy, 34:1, 144-145, DOI:10.1080/13523260.2013.771038

To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2013.771038

PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE

Taylor & Francis makes every effort to ensure the accuracy of all theinformation (the “Content”) contained in the publications on our platform.However, Taylor & Francis, our agents, and our licensors make norepresentations or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness, orsuitability for any purpose of the Content. Any opinions and views expressedin this publication are the opinions and views of the authors, and are not theviews of or endorsed by Taylor & Francis. The accuracy of the Content shouldnot be relied upon and should be independently verified with primary sourcesof information. Taylor and Francis shall not be liable for any losses, actions,claims, proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages, and other liabilitieswhatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connectionwith, in relation to or arising out of the use of the Content.

This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes.Any substantial or systematic reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-

Page 2: Introduction: Symposium on Devaluing Nuclear Weapons

licensing, systematic supply, or distribution in any form to anyone is expresslyforbidden. Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditions

Dow

nloa

ded

by [

Nat

iona

l Pin

gtun

g U

nive

rsity

of

Scie

nce

and

Tec

hnol

ogy]

at 1

7:03

19

Dec

embe

r 20

14

Page 3: Introduction: Symposium on Devaluing Nuclear Weapons

Introduction: Symposium on Devaluing NuclearWeapons

NICK RITCHIE

What are the prospects for devaluing nuclear weapons? Does devaluation offer

opportunities for long-term progress towards a world free of nuclear weapons? The

genesis of the project lies in a White Paper published in 2006 by the United King-

dom’s then-Labour Party government that set out plans to begin replacing the coun-

try’s only nuclear weapons system, the Trident submarine-launched ballistic missile

force, beginning with the procurement of a new class of ballistic missile submarines.

For many, the issue was straightforward: the United Kingdom must remain a nuclear

weapon state. But for many others, perhaps the majority if opinion polls are accurate,

the decision seemed anachronistic.1 Research on Trident replacement led me to a

more holistic exploration of just what exactly nuclear weapons mean in British

nuclear policy discourse, how these meanings constitute nuclear policy choices,

and the implications for significant progress towards nuclear disarmament not just

in the United Kingdom, but globally.

This approach is consistent with William Walker’s argument that nuclear disarma-

ment is unlikely to involve staged reductions to a common minimum and from there to

zero.2 Instead, Walker concludes, nuclear disarmament will be far messier, with differ-

ent states taking different steps at different times for idiosyncratic reasons. This might

involve multilateral, bilateral and national measures as conceptions of minimum deter-

rence, strategic stability in relation to non-nuclear strategic weapons technologies,

nuclear identities, and national interests evolve. Key to this is the fact that nuclear

weapons mean different things to different leaders and societies, meanings assigned

in particular socio-historical contexts of acquisition and consolidation of nuclear tech-

nologies, identities, and doctrines. As Walker notes, ‘[w]hen attention is drawn to

national and regional particularities, it becomes more difficult to believe that the col-

lective managerialist approach to nuclear disarmament can work, certainly on its

own’. Nuclear disarmament will require all nuclear possessors to cross the threshold

to nuclear elimination, but this will ‘be different and feel different for each state and

region . . . In discussions of disarmament, it is important to acknowledge the distinctive-

ness of the individual eight or nine nuclear-armed states’ and ‘the individuality of cir-

cumstances affecting a state’s policies on nuclear weapons’.3

His analysis also raised questions of the values assigned to nuclear weapons and,

by extension, how this related to ever more frequently used terms like ‘devaluing’,

‘marginalizing’, ‘delegitimizing’, and ‘reducing the salience of’ nuclear weapons

in international nuclear policy discourse, notably the Nuclear Non-Proliferation

Treaty, the UN Conference on Disarmament, and international nuclear disarmament

and non-proliferation commissions.

Contemporary Security Policy, Vol.34, No.1, 2013, pp.144–145http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2013.771038 # 2013 Taylor & Francis

Dow

nloa

ded

by [

Nat

iona

l Pin

gtun

g U

nive

rsity

of

Scie

nce

and

Tec

hnol

ogy]

at 1

7:03

19

Dec

embe

r 20

14

Page 4: Introduction: Symposium on Devaluing Nuclear Weapons

This project started from the observation that the emergent concepts of devalua-

tion of nuclear weapons were understudied. What does devaluing or marginalizing

nuclear weapons mean? How did these concepts relate to the values assigned to

nuclear weapons? To ideas of minimum deterrence and nuclear disarmament? The

purpose, then, has been to bring fresh insights to the nuclear disarmament, deterrence,

arms control, and constructivist security studies literatures. The project included a

workshop at the University of York (UK), in March 2012 on valuing and devaluing

nuclear weapons. Three papers prepared from the workshop have been developed into

more substantial articles for this symposium.

My contribution attempts to unpack the concept of devaluing nuclear weapons by

examining how nuclear weapons are valued using the United Kingdom as a case

study. It contextualizes the study with an overview of the lexicon of devaluing and

related terms in global nuclear discourse since the end of the Cold War and a discus-

sion of how we ‘know’ nuclear value and the ‘regime of value’ in which nuclear

weapons are embedded. It concludes by relating the analysis to Walker’s notion of

‘responsible nuclear sovereignty’ and the tensions at the nexus of deterrence/devaluing.

Susan Martin takes issue with two of the project’s core claims: that significant

progress towards nuclear disarmament is a necessary means of safely managing

long-term nuclear risk; and that nuclear weapons are, echoing Alexander Wendt,

‘what states make of them’.4 Her structural realist account insists that the materiality

of nuclear weapons matters enormously and that one cannot escape or reconceptua-

lize a fundamental condition of strategic deterrence intrinsic to the uniquely destruc-

tive effects of nuclear violence. Martin draws on the processes that have outlawed

chemical and biological weapons to highlight the limits of norm-driven change

vis-a-vis national security imperatives and preferences.

Finally, Paul Schulte, a former official with rich experience, discusses the poten-

tially destabilizing and costly consequences that could arise from the deliberate, suc-

cessful, and far-reaching deep devaluation of nuclear weapons and the tensions

between deterrence and devaluing. He provides a typology of competing interpret-

ations of devaluing and possible contributory factors to a process of devaluation

before examining likely preconditions for a sustained devaluation of nuclear

weapons in international politics and the ever-present risks of nuclear revaluation

as geostrategic circumstances change, sometimes abruptly.

The project has been funded by the Economic and Social Research Council and

the Joseph Rowntree Charitable Trust, for which I am grateful.

N O T E S

1. Glen Owen, ‘Here’s £37bn of Cuts to Get You Started, Voters Tell PM’, Daily Mail (London), 13 June2010.

2. William Walker, ‘The UK, Threshold Status and Responsible Nuclear Sovereignty’, InternationalAffairs, Vol. 86, No. 2 (March 2010), pp. 446–63.

3. Ibid., pp. 448, 463.4. Alexander Wendt, ‘Anarchy is What States Make of it: The Social Construction of Power Politics’,

International Organization, Vol. 46, No. 2 (1992), pp. 391–425.

SYMPOSIUM: INTRODUCTION 145

Dow

nloa

ded

by [

Nat

iona

l Pin

gtun

g U

nive

rsity

of

Scie

nce

and

Tec

hnol

ogy]

at 1

7:03

19

Dec

embe

r 20

14