82
Investment Performance Analysis for the period ending September 30, 2015 December 11, 2015 Allan Martin, Partner Dan LeBeau, Consultant Mike Malchenko, Senior Analyst

Investment Performance Analysis for the period ending ...nmerb.org/pdfs/Q3 2015 New Mexico ERB IPA.pdfInvestment Performance Analysis for the period ending September 30, 2015 December

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    3

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Investment Performance Analysis for the period ending ...nmerb.org/pdfs/Q3 2015 New Mexico ERB IPA.pdfInvestment Performance Analysis for the period ending September 30, 2015 December

Investment Performance Analysis for the period ending September 30, 2015

December 11, 2015

Allan Martin, PartnerDan LeBeau, ConsultantMike Malchenko, Senior Analyst

Page 2: Investment Performance Analysis for the period ending ...nmerb.org/pdfs/Q3 2015 New Mexico ERB IPA.pdfInvestment Performance Analysis for the period ending September 30, 2015 December

Page

Market Environment Update and Outlook 3

Third Party Placement Agent Disclosure 17

Total Fund Performance 19

Total Fund Performance: Net of Fees 43

Appendix: Market Environment 58

ContentsNew Mexico Educational Retirement Board

September 30, 2015

2

Page 3: Investment Performance Analysis for the period ending ...nmerb.org/pdfs/Q3 2015 New Mexico ERB IPA.pdfInvestment Performance Analysis for the period ending September 30, 2015 December

Market Environment Update and Outlook

3

Page 4: Investment Performance Analysis for the period ending ...nmerb.org/pdfs/Q3 2015 New Mexico ERB IPA.pdfInvestment Performance Analysis for the period ending September 30, 2015 December

• Third quarter GDP growth rate (first estimate) printed at a modest +1.5%. – Retail sales (ended August) at +1.3% on a year-over-year growth rate basis. The same period last year YoY growth rate

was 4.6%.– The inventory-to-sales ratio at August, 31 was flat at 1.4 and has remained relatively flat since early 2010. – Corporate profits (ended June) as a percent of GDP declined slightly vs first quarter GDP to 10.4% from 10.7% and remain

elevated relative to historical levels.– The U.S. trade deficit widened in August.

• The unemployment rate fell to 5.1% in Q3 from 5.3% in Q2 2014; U-6, a broader measure of unemployment, fell to 10.0% during the third quarter.

• The Case-Shiller Home Price Index (as of 9/30) increased slightly to 175.1 from second quarter levels (170.0) and is at levels higher than that of pre-financial crisis levels of 150.9.

• Rolling 12-month seasonally adjusted CPI decreased to -0.02% from +0.2% at the end of June; Capacity Utilization decreased slightly to 77.5% in September.

• Fed Funds rate remains at 0.25%, while the 10-year Treasury Yield finished Q3 at 2.2% down 20 basis points from Q2.

• The Fed balance sheet remained flat in Q3 2015, while the European Central Bank balance sheet increased in the same period.– ECB continues asset purchases of €60 billion per month.

• S&P valuations decreased in September remaining above the 10-year and long-term averages– Cyclically adjusted Shiller PE ratio (24.6x) is above the long-term average of 16.4x and above the 10-year average of 22.9x.

• The U.S. Dollar continues its strength against a basket of major currencies as the Fed ends its quantitative easing program and the ECB continues easing. – Currency volatility has seen a sustained uptick since Q1.

Economic Environment

September 30, 2015

New Mexico Educational Retirement Board

4

Page 5: Investment Performance Analysis for the period ending ...nmerb.org/pdfs/Q3 2015 New Mexico ERB IPA.pdfInvestment Performance Analysis for the period ending September 30, 2015 December

Market Environment – Q3 2015 Overview

* As of 6/30/2015

September 30, 2015

Qtr. 1 Yr. 3 Yr. 5 Yr. 10 Yr.

World Equity Benchmarks

MSCI ACWI World -9.4% -6.7% 7.0% 6.8% 4.6%

Qtr. 1 Yr. 3 Yr. 5 Yr. 10 Yr.

Domestic Equity Benchmarks

S&P 500 Large Core -6.4% -0.6% 12.4% 13.3% 6.8%

Russell 1000 Large Core -6.8% -0.6% 12.7% 13.4% 7.0%

Russell 1000 Growth Large Growth -5.3% 3.2% 13.6% 14.5% 8.1%

Russell 1000 Value Large Value -8.4% -4.4% 11.6% 12.3% 5.7%

Russell 2000 Small Core -11.9% 1.2% 11.0% 11.7% 6.5%

Russell 2000 Growth Small Growth -13.1% 4.0% 12.8% 13.3% 7.7%

Russell 2000 Value Small Value -10.7% -1.6% 9.2% 10.2% 5.3%

Qtr. 1 Yr. 3 Yr. 5 Yr. 10 Yr.

International Equity Benchmarks

MSCI ACWI Ex USA World ex-US -12.2% -12.2% 2.3% 1.8% 3.0%

MSCI EAFE Int'l Developed -10.2% -8.7% 5.6% 4.0% 3.0%

S&P EPAC Small Cap Small Cap Int'l -6.9% 1.0% 10.7% 7.8% 5.8%

MSCI EM Emerging Equity -17.9% -19.3% -5.3% -3.6% 4.3%

Qtr. 1 Yr. 3 Yr. 5 Yr. 10 Yr.

Domestic Fixed Income Benchmarks

Barclays Aggregate Core Bonds 1.2% 2.9% 1.7% 3.1% 4.6%

Barclays US High Yield High Yield -4.9% -3.4% 3.5% 6.1% 7.3%

BofA ML US HY BB/B High Yield -4.3% -2.1% 3.7% 6.0% 6.7%

CSFB Levered Loans Bank Loans -1.2% 1.2% 3.8% 4.8% 4.4%

BofA ML US 3-Month T-Bill Cash 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 0.1% 1.3%

Barclays US TIPS 1-10 Yr Inflation -0.9% -0.8% -1.4% 1.8% 3.6%

Qtr. 1 Yr. 3 Yr. 5 Yr. 10 Yr.

Global Fixed Income Benchmarks

Citigroup WGBI World Gov. Bonds 1.7% -3.8% -2.9% -0.2% 3.4%

BC Global Credit Global Bonds -0.2% -2.9% 0.6% 2.6% 4.3%

JPM GBI-EM Glob. Diversified Em. Mkt. Bonds (Local) -10.5% -19.8% -8.7% -3.6% 4.5%

JPM EMBI+ Em. Mkt. Bonds -0.9% -0.9% 0.2% 4.2% 6.7%

Qtr. 1 Yr. 3 Yr. 5 Yr. 10 Yr.

Alternative Benchmarks

Bloomberg Commodity Index Commodity -14.5% -26.0% -16.0% -8.9% -5.7%

Credit Suisse Hedge Fund Index Hedge Fund -2.5% 0.1% 5.0% 4.5% 5.2%

HFRI FoF Conservative Fund of Funds -1.8% 0.6% 4.2% 2.8% 2.1%

Cambridge PE Lagged* Private Equity 4.2% 9.3% 16.0% 15.7% 13.2%

NCREIF ODCE Net Lagged* Real Estate 3.6% 13.4% 12.1% 13.3% 5.9%

Wilshire REIT Index REIT 2.2% 10.9% 9.8% 12.4% 6.7%

CPI + 2% Inflation/Real Assets 0.4% 2.0% 2.9% 3.7% 3.8%

New Mexico Educational Retirement Board

5

Page 6: Investment Performance Analysis for the period ending ...nmerb.org/pdfs/Q3 2015 New Mexico ERB IPA.pdfInvestment Performance Analysis for the period ending September 30, 2015 December

• Divergence in monetary policies signaling different investment environments globally

• US Economy shows strength relative to other developed markets– Low oil prices benefitting consumers

• Global monetary stimulus flowing through to markets– ECB €1.3 trillion in asset purchases in the

Eurozone– Economic conditions in Europe and Japan

responding to QE– China policy response remains stimulative

with more tools available to deploy

• Developed world inflation is low – In US, CPI for all Urban Consumers on a

seasonally adjusted basis was negative in Q3

• Volatility increased across global markets– Financial and geo-political instability in the

Mid-East, Eastern Europe, Greece

• Slowing economic growth in China may have broad implications for many emerging economies– China growth concerns sparked a rapid

decline in commodities and emerging markets

• Fed rate hike uncertainty contributed to volatility in domestic markets– Fed signaled tightening to begin by year-

end; market expecting a slow pace to rate increases

• Valuations remain above 10 year and long term averages– Developed Equity P/Es above median

Third Quarter 2015 Market Review

Positives Negatives

September 30, 2015

New Mexico Educational Retirement Board

6

Page 7: Investment Performance Analysis for the period ending ...nmerb.org/pdfs/Q3 2015 New Mexico ERB IPA.pdfInvestment Performance Analysis for the period ending September 30, 2015 December

Global Equity

• U.S. equities posted sharp losses in the third quarter as global volatility ramped up.

• Small cap stocks underperformed large cap stocks during the quarter, with the Russell 2000 Index returning -11.9% and the Russell 1000 Index returning -6.8%.

• International equities underperformed U.S. markets during the quarter, returning -12.2%, as measured by the MSCI ACWI ex-U.S. Index. – Developed markets returned -10.2% as measured by the MSCI EAFE Index. The Pacific Region led returns down posting a -13.1% with

Singapore leading the group down -19.5%. Europe posted a loss of -8.7%.– Emerging markets returned -17.9% as measured by the MSCI Emerging Markets Index in U.S. dollar terms. Indonesia and China led to

the downside returning -24.2% and -22.7% respectively.

Private Equity

• New private equity commitments totaled $74.6 billion in Q3 2015.– Represents a 25% decline from the $101.5 billion raised in Q2 2015, resulting from public equity market volatility and increased

economic uncertainties

• Buyout and growth equity funds raised $45.3 billion in Q3 2015. – Annual pace is in line with the $180-190 billion that was raised in each of the past two years

• Venture capital raised $10.0 billion ended Q3 2015. – VC fundraising as a percent of total new PE funds is in line with historical post-dot com levels

• Energy funds raised $7.8 billion representing 10% of capital raised in Q3 2015. – Investors are opportunistically approaching the energy market dislocation.

• Asian private equity commitments slowed to total 7% of total funds raised down from 11% in 2014.

• European commitments comprised 23% of all new PE commitments in Q3 2015.– Fifteen pan-European buyout managers with closes on over $1 billion each raised over half of 2015 total

Market Environment

September 30, 2015

New Mexico Educational Retirement Board

7

Page 8: Investment Performance Analysis for the period ending ...nmerb.org/pdfs/Q3 2015 New Mexico ERB IPA.pdfInvestment Performance Analysis for the period ending September 30, 2015 December

Fixed Income

• The yield curve flattened significantly with long duration yields dropping 20-30 basis points.

• The spread between two and 10-year rates decreased to 142 basis points from 176 basis points ended June. Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities, or TIPS, returned -0.9% during the quarter, as measured by the Barclays US TIPS Index.

• The Barclays Long Duration Credit Index gained +0.5% as the long end of the curve ended the quarter 24 basis points lower.

• Long Treasuries gained +5.1% and investment-grade corporate debt gained +3.8%.

• The Barclays 1-3 year Government/ Credit Index returned 0.3% and US high yield bonds lost -4.9%.

• Emerging markets debt continued to slow in local and external currency. – US dollar-denominated debt, as measured by the JP Morgan EMBI Index, fell 90 basis points; local currency debt fell 10.5%,

according to the JP Morgan GBI-EM Index.

Market Environment

September 30, 2015

New Mexico Educational Retirement Board

8

Page 9: Investment Performance Analysis for the period ending ...nmerb.org/pdfs/Q3 2015 New Mexico ERB IPA.pdfInvestment Performance Analysis for the period ending September 30, 2015 December

Real Assets/Inflation-Linked Assets

• Massive energy market dislocation.– Oil prices trending lower.– Private equity and private debt opportunities attractive.– Potential for public stressed/distressed credit, equity and commodity plays.

• OPEC and Saudi Arabia have indicated a willingness to allow lower oil prices to persist in effortsto cement market share and reduce marginal supply.

• Select infrastructure opportunities are attractive.– Target opportunistic strategies in niche sub-sectors to take advantage of market dislocations.

• NEPC continues to believe in the long-term demand drivers in agriculture.– Long-term commodity prices driven by growing emerging market demand.– Softness in commodity prices may provide attractive entry point.

• Timber opportunity set limited but warrants further review– 45% increase in housing starts forecasted; timber prices highly correlated

Market Environment

September 30, 2015

New Mexico Educational Retirement Board

9

Page 10: Investment Performance Analysis for the period ending ...nmerb.org/pdfs/Q3 2015 New Mexico ERB IPA.pdfInvestment Performance Analysis for the period ending September 30, 2015 December

Commodities

• Commodities retracted significantly with the Bloomberg Commodity Index posting a -14.5%.– Energy led the way losing -24% (WTI Oil), while industrial metals, precious metals and agriculture declined.

Real Estate

• NEPC continues to be neutral on core real estate in the US and remains positive on non-core real estate, that is, value-add and opportunistic strategies.

• Within U.S. core real estate, strong fundamentals continue to be the story along with attractive income spreads relative to interest rates. – Real estate fundamentals and debt terms are attractive, however valuations are high and the possibility of rising interest

rates and the impact on cap rates causes concern.

• U.S. REITs posted modest gains with a +2.2% return. – FFO multiples are high, at approximately 15x but are decreasing.– REITs are trading at a discount to NAV.

• Overall, the non-core real estate investment environment in the U.S. is normalizing; however, select areas remain attractive.

• Europe is viewed as the best place for a marginal dollar of non-core real estate investment. – Europe is emerging from multi-year recession, but recovery is slow and uneven with global markets experiencing large

capital inflows.– Banks in EU are still overleveraged and have significant real estate exposure to jettison.

Market Environment

September 30, 2015

New Mexico Educational Retirement Board

10

Page 11: Investment Performance Analysis for the period ending ...nmerb.org/pdfs/Q3 2015 New Mexico ERB IPA.pdfInvestment Performance Analysis for the period ending September 30, 2015 December

Global Risks are Diverse and Unique

Sources: Standard & Poors, The Federal Reserve, ECB, BoJ, Bloomberg Energy, Bloomberg

September 30, 2015

New Mexico Educational Retirement Board

11

Page 12: Investment Performance Analysis for the period ending ...nmerb.org/pdfs/Q3 2015 New Mexico ERB IPA.pdfInvestment Performance Analysis for the period ending September 30, 2015 December

Increase in Global Volatility Finally Caught Up with Equities

Source: Deutsche Borse, Goldman Sachs, CBOE, Bloomberg

September 30, 2015

New Mexico Educational Retirement Board

12

Page 13: Investment Performance Analysis for the period ending ...nmerb.org/pdfs/Q3 2015 New Mexico ERB IPA.pdfInvestment Performance Analysis for the period ending September 30, 2015 December

MSCI EM Index Composition JPM GBI-EM Global Diversified Index Composition

Currency Risks are Not Only Unique by Country but also Vary Across Indices

• MSCI EM Index dominated by Asia– Lots of countries with sensitivity to Chinese growth and competitiveness– Despite possibility for further depreciation, most currencies appear cheap or reasonably

valued

• Debt indices more concentrated in Latin/South America with exposure to balance of payments challenged countries– Currencies of major commodity exporters are sensitive to oil and other commodity price

weakness – but also stand to benefit from a rebound– Structural issues in Turkey and Brazil pose significant challenges but with less contagion risk

September 30, 2015

New Mexico Educational Retirement Board

13

Page 14: Investment Performance Analysis for the period ending ...nmerb.org/pdfs/Q3 2015 New Mexico ERB IPA.pdfInvestment Performance Analysis for the period ending September 30, 2015 December

High Yield Issues Now Yielding >7% in Otherwise Low Yield World

Source: Barclays, Standard & Poors, Bloomberg

September 30, 2015

New Mexico Educational Retirement Board

14

Page 15: Investment Performance Analysis for the period ending ...nmerb.org/pdfs/Q3 2015 New Mexico ERB IPA.pdfInvestment Performance Analysis for the period ending September 30, 2015 December

• Risk-return profile of US high yield is attractive relative to US equities– High yield credit spreads now exceed long-term averages with yields near 2012 levels– Make use of dynamic credit strategies as disruptions in credit markets move rapidly– Dollar strength is a headwind for equity earnings growth and profit margin expansion

• Recommend an overweight exposure to developed market equities– Suggest investors opportunistically exploit potential volatility to add to the overweight– Long-term opportunity remains as earnings improve off cyclical lows in Europe/Japan– Offers a more favorable return outlook with superior valuations relative to US equities

• Recommend at minimum a market weight exposure to EM equities– Reasonable equity valuations, depressed currencies, and the attractiveness of long-

term fundamentals represent a solid investment foundation– Volatility likely to continue as falling commodity prices, trade linkages to China, and

external debt levels pose idiosyncratic country risks– Encourage the use of benchmark agnostic strategies with a bias towards small-cap and

consumer focused strategies

• Inflation expectations at historical lows but value opportunities canbe found in inflation-sensitive assets– Encourage patience as volatility and opportunities evolve in commodity markets– Private strategies are evolving but provide compelling return opportunities

Third Quarter 2015 Market Actions

September 30, 2015

New Mexico Educational Retirement Board

15

Page 16: Investment Performance Analysis for the period ending ...nmerb.org/pdfs/Q3 2015 New Mexico ERB IPA.pdfInvestment Performance Analysis for the period ending September 30, 2015 December

Highlights of Third Quarter Happenings at NEPC

NEPC Updates

September 30, 2015

NEPC ResearchRecent White Papers Best Practices: Managing Risk in Corporate VEBA

and SERP Plans (October 2015) - Mike Valchine, CAIA, CIPM, Senior Consultant

NEPC’s 2015 Defined Contribution Plan & FeeSurvey: What a Difference a Decade Makes (October 2015) – Ross Bremen, CFA, Partner

Market Chatter – Has the China Bubble Burst? (July2015)

Market Chatter – China’s Devaluation of the Yuan(August 2015)

2015 Third Quarter Market Thoughts

NEPC Recognitions Two of NEPC’s Partners were named on the

Chief Investment Officer magazine's (CIO) annual ranking of the world’s most influential investment consultants. NEPC’s Chief Investment Officer, Tim McCusker, was named the most influential general consultant on the 2015 list of Knowledge Brokers. KC Connors, Head of NEPC’s Philanthropic Practice Team, ranked 10th on the 2015 Knowledge Brokers – Specialist list. The lists are CIO’s annual rankings of the most influential investment consultants worldwide1.

NEPC Client Recognitions● Two of our clients were recognized for their work in the

healthcare industry by Institutional Investor on October 7th. Mary O'Reilly, Director, Treasury and Investments at Rochester Health, received the II Investor Intelligence Award for Asset Allocation, and Joshua Rabuck, Executive Director, Investments at Indiana University Health, was accorded the II Investor Intelligence Award for Risk Management.

Upcoming/Recent Events• Healthcare Defined Contribution Fee Survey

Results - Tuesday, November 3, 2015, 3:00 to 4:00 p.m. (EST)

• NEPC's 2015 Defined Benefit PlanTrends Webinar - Wednesday, October 21, 2015,2:00 - 3:00 p.m. (EST)

• NEPC, Newton Capital Management, and the Centrefor Endowment Asset Management are hosting aspecial event that delves into the influence of Britisheconomist John Maynard Keynes on the U.S.Endowment Model on October 15, 2015 in Boston, MA.

1CIO Magazine interviews pension and non-profit CIOs, asset managers and former consultants, to approximate what it calls "the hierarchy of today's institutional consultant industry." The results should not be considered a recommendation of any specific firm or individual consultant. For more information, please visit CIO Magazine's web site at http://www.ai-cio.com/2015-knowledge-brokers/. Past performance is no guarantee of future results

September 30, 2015

New Mexico Educational Retirement Board

16

Page 17: Investment Performance Analysis for the period ending ...nmerb.org/pdfs/Q3 2015 New Mexico ERB IPA.pdfInvestment Performance Analysis for the period ending September 30, 2015 December

Third Party Placement Agent Disclosure

17

Page 18: Investment Performance Analysis for the period ending ...nmerb.org/pdfs/Q3 2015 New Mexico ERB IPA.pdfInvestment Performance Analysis for the period ending September 30, 2015 December

The New Mexico Educational Retirement Board Policy Regarding Placement Agent Disclosures requires that quarterly performance reports to the Board include information regarding any third-party marketers that were used by recipients of investments including any fee, commission or retainer paid by the hired fund to the third-party marketer for services rendered. These fees are not paid by NMERB but are paid by the hired funds for marketing services to the third-party.

The following investments were approved by the NMERB Investment Committee during the quarter, with disclosures made under the policy:

Stonepeak Infrastructure Fund II - was approved for a $50 million commitment plus a $10 million secondary partnership interest on July 23, 2015 as part of the Fund’s allocation to Real Assets.

Stonepeak has provided documentation confirming Campbell Lutyens & Co. was compensated $200,000 for placement agent duties in connection with the NMERB’s investment.

Stonepeak has completed the ERB Campaign Contribution Disclosure and reports no applicable campaign contributions.

ZM Capital Fund II LP .- was approved for a $40 million commitment plus a $10 million secondary partnership interest on September 21, 2015 as part of the Fund’s allocation to Private Equity.

ZM Capital has provided documentation confirming Moravia Capital AG as placement agent for the partnership but such entity was not engaged with respect to NMERB’s proposed investment.

ZM Capital has completed the ERB Campaign Contribution Disclosure and reports no applicable campaign contributions.

Third Party Placement Agent DisclosureNew Mexico Educational Retirement Board

September 30, 2015

18

Page 19: Investment Performance Analysis for the period ending ...nmerb.org/pdfs/Q3 2015 New Mexico ERB IPA.pdfInvestment Performance Analysis for the period ending September 30, 2015 December

Total Fund Performance

19

Page 20: Investment Performance Analysis for the period ending ...nmerb.org/pdfs/Q3 2015 New Mexico ERB IPA.pdfInvestment Performance Analysis for the period ending September 30, 2015 December

Total Fund Performance Summary (Gross of Fees)

September 30, 2015

New Mexico Educational Retirement Board

Over the past five years, the Fund returned 7.6% per annum, outperforming the policy index by 1.0% and ranking in the 56th percentile of the InvestorForce Public Funds > $1 Billion universe. The Fund’s volatility was 6.2%, which ranks in the 8th percentile of its peers over this period. The Fund’s risk-adjusted performance, as measured by the Sharpe Ratio, ranks in the 15th percentile of its peers.

Over the past three years, the Fund returned 7.0% per annum, outperforming the policy index by 1.3% and ranking in the 55th percentile of its peer group. Over the past three years, the Fund has reduced its volatility on both an absolute and relative basis, resulting in a three-year Sharpe Ratio of 1.5, which ranks in the 13th percentile.

For the year ending September 30, 2015, the Fund experienced a net investment gain of $71.5 million, which includes a net investment loss of $375.4 million during the third calendar quarter. Assets decreased from $11.2 billion twelve months ago to $10.9 billion on September 30, 2015, with $331.3 million in net distributions during the year. The Fund returned 0.6%, outperforming the policy index by 1.5% and ranking in the 19th

percentile of its peers.

All asset classes were within policy range as of September 30, 2015.The InvestorForce Public Funds > $1 Billion Universe + contains 95 observations for the period ending September 30, 2015, with total assets of $1.7 trillion.

20

Page 21: Investment Performance Analysis for the period ending ...nmerb.org/pdfs/Q3 2015 New Mexico ERB IPA.pdfInvestment Performance Analysis for the period ending September 30, 2015 December

September 30, 2015

New Mexico Educational Retirement BoardTotal Fund Asset Growth Summary

Sources of Portfolio Growth Last ThreeMonths Fiscal Year-To-Date One Year Three Years Five Years Since

10/1/05_

Beginning Market Value $11,416,629,337 $11,416,629,337 $11,180,255,073 $9,756,733,278 $8,803,894,887 $7,694,652,364Net Additions/Withdrawals -$120,806,345 -$120,806,345 -$331,294,000 -$970,893,217 -$1,575,141,526 -$2,552,732,728Investment Earnings -$375,404,172 -$375,404,172 $71,457,747 $2,134,578,759 $3,691,665,459 $5,778,499,184Ending Market Value $10,920,418,820 $10,920,418,820 $10,920,418,820 $10,920,418,820 $10,920,418,820 $10,920,418,820

_

21

Page 22: Investment Performance Analysis for the period ending ...nmerb.org/pdfs/Q3 2015 New Mexico ERB IPA.pdfInvestment Performance Analysis for the period ending September 30, 2015 December

September 30, 2015

1Long-Term Policy Target approved by the Board in June 2014.Note: Allocations shown here include cash held in separately managed portfolios. Totals may not add to 100% due to rounding. Total Plan included Legacy Assets portfolio totaling $335,893.75

New Mexico Educational Retirement BoardTotal Fund Asset Allocation vs. Policy Targets

22

Page 23: Investment Performance Analysis for the period ending ...nmerb.org/pdfs/Q3 2015 New Mexico ERB IPA.pdfInvestment Performance Analysis for the period ending September 30, 2015 December

September 30, 2015

New Mexico Educational Retirement BoardTotal Fund Asset Allocation History

23

Page 24: Investment Performance Analysis for the period ending ...nmerb.org/pdfs/Q3 2015 New Mexico ERB IPA.pdfInvestment Performance Analysis for the period ending September 30, 2015 December

September 30, 2015

New Mexico Educational Retirement BoardTotal Fund Allocations vs. Peer Universe

24

Page 25: Investment Performance Analysis for the period ending ...nmerb.org/pdfs/Q3 2015 New Mexico ERB IPA.pdfInvestment Performance Analysis for the period ending September 30, 2015 December

September 30, 2015

Note: Ranks are based on gross returns.

New Mexico Educational Retirement BoardTotal Fund Risk/Return

25

Page 26: Investment Performance Analysis for the period ending ...nmerb.org/pdfs/Q3 2015 New Mexico ERB IPA.pdfInvestment Performance Analysis for the period ending September 30, 2015 December

September 30, 2015

Note: Ranks are based on gross returns.

New Mexico Educational Retirement BoardTotal Fund Risk/Return

26

Page 27: Investment Performance Analysis for the period ending ...nmerb.org/pdfs/Q3 2015 New Mexico ERB IPA.pdfInvestment Performance Analysis for the period ending September 30, 2015 December

September 30, 2015

Note: Returns are gross of fees. The graph on the right side shows composite level sharpe ratios.

New Mexico Educational Retirement Board3 Year Risk/Return Profile

27

Page 28: Investment Performance Analysis for the period ending ...nmerb.org/pdfs/Q3 2015 New Mexico ERB IPA.pdfInvestment Performance Analysis for the period ending September 30, 2015 December

September 30, 2015

Note: Returns are gross of fees. The graph on the right side shows composite level sharpe ratios.

New Mexico Educational Retirement Board5 Year Risk/Return Profile

28

Page 29: Investment Performance Analysis for the period ending ...nmerb.org/pdfs/Q3 2015 New Mexico ERB IPA.pdfInvestment Performance Analysis for the period ending September 30, 2015 December

Note: Ranks are based on gross returns. Universe contains 95 observations with total assets of $1.7 trillion.

September 30, 2015

Total Fund vs. IFx Public DB > $1B Gross (USD) (peer)1 Year

New Mexico Educational Retirement BoardTotal Fund Risk Statistics vs. Peer Universe

29

Page 30: Investment Performance Analysis for the period ending ...nmerb.org/pdfs/Q3 2015 New Mexico ERB IPA.pdfInvestment Performance Analysis for the period ending September 30, 2015 December

Note: Ranks are based on gross returns. Universe contains 95 observations with total assets of $1.7 trillion.

September 30, 2015

Total Fund vs. IFx Public DB > $1B Gross (USD) (peer)3 Years

New Mexico Educational Retirement BoardTotal Fund Risk Statistics vs. Peer Universe

30

Page 31: Investment Performance Analysis for the period ending ...nmerb.org/pdfs/Q3 2015 New Mexico ERB IPA.pdfInvestment Performance Analysis for the period ending September 30, 2015 December

Note: Ranks are based on gross returns. Universe contains 95 observations with total assets of $1.7 trillion.

September 30, 2015

Total Fund vs. IFx Public DB > $1B Gross (USD) (peer)5 Years

New Mexico Educational Retirement BoardTotal Fund Risk Statistics vs. Peer Universe

31

Page 32: Investment Performance Analysis for the period ending ...nmerb.org/pdfs/Q3 2015 New Mexico ERB IPA.pdfInvestment Performance Analysis for the period ending September 30, 2015 December

Note: Ranks are based on gross returns. Universe contains 95 observations with total assets of $1.7 trillion.

September 30, 2015

Total Fund vs. IFx Public DB > $1B Gross (USD) (peer)10 Years

New Mexico Educational Retirement BoardTotal Fund Risk Statistics vs. Peer Universe

32

Page 33: Investment Performance Analysis for the period ending ...nmerb.org/pdfs/Q3 2015 New Mexico ERB IPA.pdfInvestment Performance Analysis for the period ending September 30, 2015 December

September 30, 2015

Note: Returns are gross of fees.

New Mexico Educational Retirement BoardTotal Fund Rolling 5-Year Excess Returns

33

Page 34: Investment Performance Analysis for the period ending ...nmerb.org/pdfs/Q3 2015 New Mexico ERB IPA.pdfInvestment Performance Analysis for the period ending September 30, 2015 December

September 30, 2015

Attribution Summary3 Months Ending September 30, 2015

Wtd. ActualReturn

Wtd. IndexReturn

ExcessReturn

SelectionEffect

AllocationEffect

TotalEffects

U.S. Large Cap EquityComposite -6.3% -6.4% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

U.S. Small/Mid Cap EquityComposite -10.7% -10.3% -0.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Non-U.S. Developed MktsEquity Composite -10.1% -10.2% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Non-U.S. Emerging MktsEquity Composite -15.0% -17.9% 2.9% 0.3% 0.0% 0.4%

Core Fixed IncomeComposite 1.0% 1.2% -0.3% 0.0% 0.2% 0.2%

Non-U.S. Emerging MarketDebt Composite -3.2% -10.5% 7.4% 0.1% 0.0% 0.1%

Opportunistic CreditComposite -0.1% -2.8% 2.7% 0.6% 0.0% 0.6%

Absolute Return Composite 2.6% 0.5% 2.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1%Global AssetAllocation/Risk ParityComposite

-6.3% -3.7% -2.6% -0.3% 0.0% -0.3%

Public Real EstateComposite 0.3% 2.9% -2.6% -0.1% -0.1% -0.1%

Private Real EstateComposite 2.9% 3.1% -0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Private Equity Composite 5.4% 3.8% 1.7% 0.1% -0.1% 0.0%Real Assets Composite 1.7% 1.1% 0.6% 0.0% -0.2% -0.2%Cash 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 0.1%Total -3.3% -4.1% 0.8% 0.8% 0.0% 0.8%

Note: Plan attribution calculations are net returns based and the results shown reflect the composites shown. As a result, the total returns shown may vary from the calculated returnshown on the performance summary. May not add due to rounding.

New Mexico Educational Retirement BoardTotal Fund Attribution Analysis

34

Page 35: Investment Performance Analysis for the period ending ...nmerb.org/pdfs/Q3 2015 New Mexico ERB IPA.pdfInvestment Performance Analysis for the period ending September 30, 2015 December

September 30, 2015

Note: Plan attribution calculations are net returns based and the results shown reflect the composites shown. As a result, the total returns shown may vary from the calculated returnshown on the performance summary. May not add due to rounding.

New Mexico Educational Retirement BoardTotal Fund Attribution Analysis

Attribution SummaryFYTD Ending September 30, 2015

Wtd. ActualReturn

Wtd. IndexReturn

ExcessReturn

SelectionEffect

AllocationEffect

TotalEffects

U.S. Large Cap EquityComposite 0.3% 0.4% -0.1% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0%

U.S. Small/Mid Cap EquityComposite -3.3% -4.0% 0.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Non-U.S. Developed MktsEquity Composite -10.2% -11.4% 1.2% 0.1% 0.0% 0.1%

Non-U.S. Emerging MktsEquity Composite -15.7% -18.1% 2.5% 0.3% 0.0% 0.3%

Core Fixed IncomeComposite 2.1% 2.5% -0.3% 0.0% 0.1% 0.1%

Non-U.S. Emerging MarketDebt Composite -11.2% -20.0% 8.7% 0.2% 0.1% 0.2%

Opportunistic CreditComposite 3.7% -1.1% 4.8% 1.0% 0.0% 1.0%

Absolute Return Composite 5.9% 2.0% 3.9% 0.1% 0.0% 0.1%Global AssetAllocation/Risk ParityComposite

-5.9% -3.1% -2.8% -0.3% 0.0% -0.3%

Public Real EstateComposite 2.6% 6.5% -3.9% -0.1% -0.1% -0.3%

Private Real EstateComposite 17.7% 13.0% 4.7% 0.1% 0.1% 0.2%

Private Equity Composite 18.4% 11.6% 6.8% 0.5% -0.1% 0.3%Real Assets Composite 3.5% 5.1% -1.6% 0.0% -0.3% -0.3%Cash 0.3% 0.0% 0.3% 0.0% 0.1% 0.1%Total 0.4% -1.0% 1.4% 1.6% -0.2% 1.4%

35

Page 36: Investment Performance Analysis for the period ending ...nmerb.org/pdfs/Q3 2015 New Mexico ERB IPA.pdfInvestment Performance Analysis for the period ending September 30, 2015 December

September 30, 2015

Note: Plan attribution calculations are net returns based and the results shown reflect the composites shown. As a result, the total returns shown may vary from the calculated returnshown on the performance summary. May not add due to rounding.

New Mexico Educational Retirement BoardTotal Fund Attribution Analysis

Attribution Summary1 Year Ending September 30, 2015

Wtd. ActualReturn

Wtd. IndexReturn

ExcessReturn

SelectionEffect

AllocationEffect

TotalEffects

U.S. Large Cap EquityComposite -0.8% -0.6% -0.2% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0%

U.S. Small/Mid Cap EquityComposite 0.2% 0.4% -0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Non-U.S. Developed MktsEquity Composite -7.2% -8.7% 1.4% 0.1% 0.0% 0.1%

Non-U.S. Emerging MktsEquity Composite -17.0% -19.3% 2.3% 0.2% 0.0% 0.3%

Core Fixed IncomeComposite 2.5% 2.9% -0.4% 0.0% 0.1% 0.1%

Non-U.S. Emerging MarketDebt Composite -11.0% -19.8% 8.7% 0.2% 0.1% 0.2%

Opportunistic CreditComposite 3.6% -0.4% 4.0% 0.8% 0.0% 0.8%

Absolute Return Composite 6.0% 2.0% 3.9% 0.1% 0.0% 0.1%Global AssetAllocation/Risk ParityComposite

-4.9% -3.3% -1.6% -0.2% 0.0% -0.2%

Public Real EstateComposite 6.9% 11.6% -4.7% -0.1% -0.2% -0.3%

Private Real EstateComposite 17.2% 13.5% 3.8% 0.1% 0.0% 0.1%

Private Equity Composite 16.8% 8.9% 7.9% 0.6% -0.1% 0.4%Real Assets Composite 2.4% 5.0% -2.6% -0.1% -0.3% -0.3%Cash 0.3% 0.0% 0.3% 0.0% 0.1% 0.1%Total 0.5% -0.9% 1.4% 1.6% -0.2% 1.4%

36

Page 37: Investment Performance Analysis for the period ending ...nmerb.org/pdfs/Q3 2015 New Mexico ERB IPA.pdfInvestment Performance Analysis for the period ending September 30, 2015 December

September 30, 2015

Note: Plan attribution calculations are net returns based and the results shown reflect the composites shown. As a result, the total returns shown may vary from the calculated returnshown on the performance summary. May not add due to rounding.

New Mexico Educational Retirement BoardTotal Fund Attribution Analysis

Attribution Summary3 Years Ending September 30, 2015

Wtd. ActualReturn

Wtd. IndexReturn

ExcessReturn

SelectionEffect

AllocationEffect

TotalEffects

U.S. Large Cap EquityComposite 12.4% 12.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 0.1%

U.S. Small/Mid Cap EquityComposite 13.3% 12.4% 0.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Non-U.S. Developed MktsEquity Composite 5.4% 5.6% -0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Non-U.S. Emerging MktsEquity Composite -5.0% -5.3% 0.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Core Fixed IncomeComposite 2.0% 1.7% 0.3% 0.0% 0.1% 0.1%

Non-U.S. Emerging MarketDebt Composite -4.2% -8.7% 4.5% 0.1% 0.0% 0.1%

Opportunistic CreditComposite 8.8% 3.7% 5.1% 1.0% 0.0% 1.0%

Absolute Return Composite 4.7% 2.0% 2.7% 0.1% 0.0% 0.1%Global AssetAllocation/Risk ParityComposite

-0.2% 4.0% -4.2% -0.3% 0.0% -0.3%

Public Real EstateComposite 9.2% 10.1% -0.8% 0.0% -0.1% -0.1%

Private Real EstateComposite 16.3% 11.9% 4.4% 0.1% 0.0% 0.1%

Private Equity Composite 17.6% 15.9% 1.7% 0.1% 0.0% 0.1%Real Assets Composite 3.7% 6.0% -2.2% 0.0% 0.0% -0.1%Cash 0.5% 0.0% 0.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%Total 6.9% 5.7% 1.1% 1.1% 0.0% 1.1%

37

Page 38: Investment Performance Analysis for the period ending ...nmerb.org/pdfs/Q3 2015 New Mexico ERB IPA.pdfInvestment Performance Analysis for the period ending September 30, 2015 December

September 30, 2015

Note: Plan attribution calculations are net returns based and the results shown reflect the composites shown. As a result, the total returns shown may vary from the calculated returnshown on the performance summary. May not add due to rounding.

New Mexico Educational Retirement BoardTotal Fund Attribution Analysis

Attribution Summary5 Years Ending September 30, 2015

Wtd. ActualReturn

Wtd. IndexReturn

ExcessReturn

SelectionEffect

AllocationEffect

TotalEffects

U.S. Large Cap EquityComposite 13.3% 13.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0%

U.S. Small/Mid Cap EquityComposite 11.9% 12.5% -0.6% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0%

Non-U.S. Developed MktsEquity Composite 3.6% 4.0% -0.3% 0.0% 0.1% 0.1%

Non-U.S. Emerging MktsEquity Composite -4.7% -3.6% -1.1% -0.1% 0.0% -0.2%

Core Fixed IncomeComposite 3.9% 3.1% 0.8% 0.1% -0.1% 0.1%

Non-U.S. Emerging MarketDebt Composite -- -- -- 0.0% 0.0% 0.1%

Opportunistic CreditComposite 8.3% 5.9% 2.4% 0.5% 0.0% 0.5%

Absolute Return Composite 3.3% 2.1% 1.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%Global AssetAllocation/Risk ParityComposite

5.1% 4.9% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Public Real EstateComposite 12.2% 12.5% -0.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Private Real EstateComposite 14.9% 12.5% 2.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Private Equity Composite 15.3% 15.6% -0.3% 0.0% 0.1% 0.1%Real Assets Composite 3.4% 6.8% -3.5% -0.1% 0.0% -0.1%Cash 0.7% 0.0% 0.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%Total 7.4% 6.6% 0.8% 0.6% 0.1% 0.7%

38

Page 39: Investment Performance Analysis for the period ending ...nmerb.org/pdfs/Q3 2015 New Mexico ERB IPA.pdfInvestment Performance Analysis for the period ending September 30, 2015 December

September 30, 2015

*Performance for Equity, Fixed Income, and Emerging Mkt Debt, Opportunistic Credit and GAA/Risk Parity composites are Net of fees.Note: Percent of Total equals 94.1% because Absolute Return and Real Assets Composites are not included.

3 Years Ending September 30, 2015

% of Tot Anlzd Ret Rank Anlzd StdDev Rank Anlzd AJ Rank Tracking

Error Rank Info Ratio Rank Beta Sharpe Ratio_

Opportunistic Credit Composite 22.5% 8.8% -- 2.1% -- 7.1% -- 2.4% -- 2.1 -- 0.4 4.1

50% Credit Suisse Leveraged LoanIndex / 50% BofA ML US HY BB-B RatedConstrained Index

-- 3.7% -- 3.1% -- 0.0% -- 0.0% -- -- -- 1.0 1.2

Global Asset Allocation/Risk ParityComposite 10.0% -0.2% 90 6.6% 38 -3.9% 87 4.6% 59 -1.1 NR 0.8 0.0

GAA/Risk Parity Custom Index -- 4.7% 15 6.5% 33 0.0% 30 0.0% 1 -- -- 1.0 0.7XXXXX

New Mexico Educational Retirement BoardTotal Fund Risk Statistics

3 Years Ending September 30, 2015

% of Tot Anlzd Ret Rank Anlzd StdDev Rank Anlzd AJ Rank Tracking

Error Rank Info Ratio Rank Beta Sharpe Ratio_

U.S. Large Cap Equity Composite 17.5% 12.4% 50 9.7% 19 0.1% 44 0.2% 1 -0.1 NR 1.0 1.3

S&P 500 -- 12.4% 49 9.7% 21 0.0% 44 0.0% 1 -- -- 1.0 1.3

U.S. Small/Mid Cap Equity Composite 2.1% 13.3% 40 12.0% 59 1.3% 46 2.8% 15 0.3 39 1.0 1.1

NMERB Small/Mid Cap Equity BlendedIndex -- 12.4% 63 12.0% 60 0.0% 65 0.0% 1 -- -- 1.0 1.0

Non-U.S. Developed Mkts EquityComposite 4.6% 5.4% 68 11.6% 69 0.0% 70 1.3% 3 -0.2 NR 1.0 0.5

MSCI EAFE -- 5.6% 62 11.9% 81 0.0% 70 0.0% 1 -- -- 1.0 0.5

Non-U.S. Emerging Mkts Equity Composite 9.3% -5.0% 71 12.8% 29 -0.2% 73 3.0% 21 0.1 72 0.9 -0.4

MSCI Emerging Markets -- -5.3% 76 13.7% 59 0.0% 73 0.0% 1 -- -- 1.0 -0.4

Core Fixed Income Composite 9.9% 2.0% 29 3.0% 65 0.3% 41 0.4% 37 0.8 20 1.0 0.7

Barclays Aggregate -- 1.7% 54 2.9% 56 0.0% 60 0.0% 1 -- -- 1.0 0.6

Non-U.S. Emerging Market DebtComposite 1.6% -4.2% 64 6.3% 16 0.9% 76 4.6% 45 1.0 69 0.6 -0.7

JP Morgan GBI - EM Diversified -- -8.7% 82 10.2% 83 0.0% 83 0.0% 1 -- -- 1.0 -0.9

39

Page 40: Investment Performance Analysis for the period ending ...nmerb.org/pdfs/Q3 2015 New Mexico ERB IPA.pdfInvestment Performance Analysis for the period ending September 30, 2015 December

September 30, 2015

*Performance for Equity, Fixed Income, and Emerging Mkt Debt, Opportunistic Credit and GAA/Risk Parity composites are Net of fees.Note: Percent of Total equals 94.1% because Absolute Return and Real Assets Composites are not included.

New Mexico Educational Retirement BoardTotal Fund Risk Statistics

3 Years Ending September 30, 2015

% of Tot Anlzd Ret Rank Anlzd StdDev Rank Anlzd AJ Rank Tracking

Error Rank Info Ratio Rank Beta Sharpe Ratio_

Real Estate Composite 7.0% 12.5% 40 7.4% 90 16.6% 15 9.7% 99 0.1 49 -0.3 1.7

NCREIF Property Index -- 11.9% 48 4.8% 62 0.0% 91 0.0% 1 -- -- 1.0 2.5

Private Equity Composite 9.8% 17.6% 11 4.6% 20 17.5% 18 8.4% 45 0.2 19 0.0 3.8

Cambridge Associates US All PE 1 QtrLag -- 15.9% 24 7.1% 59 0.0% 95 0.0% 1 -- -- 1.0 2.2

Real Assets Composite 3.6% 3.7% 26 3.7% 3 6.2% 17 3.8% 28 -0.6 NR -0.4 1.0

CPI + 5% (Seasonally Adjusted) -- 6.0% 22 0.8% 1 0.0% 43 0.0% 1 -- -- 1.0 7.1XXXXX

40

Page 41: Investment Performance Analysis for the period ending ...nmerb.org/pdfs/Q3 2015 New Mexico ERB IPA.pdfInvestment Performance Analysis for the period ending September 30, 2015 December

September 30, 2015

*Performance for Equity, Fixed Income, and Emerging Mkt Debt, Opportunistic Credit and GAA/Risk Parity composites are Net of fees.Note: Percent of Total equals 94.1% because Absolute Return and Real Assets Composites are not included.

New Mexico Educational Retirement BoardTotal Fund Risk Statistics

5 Years Ending September 30, 2015

% of Tot Anlzd Ret Rank Anlzd StdDev Rank Anlzd AJ Rank Tracking

Error Rank Info Ratio Rank Beta Sharpe Ratio_

Opportunistic Credit Composite 22.5% 8.3% -- 3.9% -- 5.0% -- 3.4% -- 0.8 -- 0.6 2.1

50% Credit Suisse Leveraged LoanIndex / 50% BofA ML US HY BB-B RatedConstrained Index

-- 5.4% -- 4.1% -- 0.0% -- 0.0% -- -- -- 1.0 1.3

Global Asset Allocation/Risk ParityComposite 10.0% 5.1% 22 6.6% 36 2.5% 1 6.7% 92 0.0 21 0.5 0.8

GAA/Risk Parity Custom Index -- 5.3% 19 7.5% 43 0.0% 55 0.0% 1 -- -- 1.0 0.7XXXXX

5 Years Ending September 30, 2015

% of Tot Anlzd Ret Rank Anlzd StdDev Rank Anlzd AJ Rank Tracking

Error Rank Info Ratio Rank Beta Sharpe Ratio_

U.S. Large Cap Equity Composite 17.5% 13.3% 36 11.5% 23 0.0% 32 0.1% 1 -0.3 NR 1.0 1.2

S&P 500 -- 13.3% 35 11.5% 24 0.0% 32 0.0% 1 -- -- 1.0 1.2

U.S. Small/Mid Cap Equity Composite 2.1% 11.9% 69 15.3% 80 -0.5% 78 2.8% 7 -0.2 NR 1.0 0.8

NMERB Small/Mid Cap Equity BlendedIndex -- 12.5% 52 15.1% 80 0.0% 75 0.0% 1 -- -- 1.0 0.8

Non-U.S. Developed Mkts EquityComposite 4.6% 3.6% 80 15.3% 70 -0.3% 82 1.7% 6 -0.2 NR 1.0 0.2

MSCI EAFE -- 4.0% 74 15.2% 67 0.0% 76 0.0% 1 -- -- 1.0 0.3

Non-U.S. Emerging Mkts Equity Composite 9.3% -4.7% 85 17.9% 59 -1.1% 83 2.7% 7 -0.4 NR 1.0 -0.3

MSCI Emerging Markets -- -3.6% 68 17.8% 56 0.0% 67 0.0% 1 -- -- 1.0 -0.2

Core Fixed Income Composite 9.9% 3.9% 21 2.8% 54 0.9% 22 0.7% 50 1.2 10 1.0 1.4

Barclays Aggregate -- 3.1% 67 2.8% 56 0.0% 81 0.0% 1 -- -- 1.0 1.1

Non-U.S. Emerging Market DebtComposite 1.6% -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --

JP Morgan GBI - EM Diversified -- -3.6% 83 11.9% 87 0.0% 83 0.0% 1 -- -- 1.0 -0.3XXXXX

41

Page 42: Investment Performance Analysis for the period ending ...nmerb.org/pdfs/Q3 2015 New Mexico ERB IPA.pdfInvestment Performance Analysis for the period ending September 30, 2015 December

September 30, 2015

*Performance for Equity, Fixed Income, and Emerging Mkt Debt, Opportunistic Credit and GAA/Risk Parity composites are Net of fees.Note: Percent of Total equals 94.1% because Absolute Return and Real Assets Composites are not included.

New Mexico Educational Retirement BoardTotal Fund Risk Statistics

5 Years Ending September 30, 2015

% of Tot Anlzd Ret Rank Anlzd StdDev Rank Anlzd AJ Rank Tracking

Error Rank Info Ratio Rank Beta Sharpe Ratio_

Real Estate Composite 7.0% 13.7% 14 10.5% 85 18.7% 10 12.5% 97 0.1 36 -0.4 1.3

NCREIF Property Index -- 12.5% 56 5.1% 34 0.0% 85 0.0% 1 -- -- 1.0 2.5

Private Equity Composite 9.8% 15.3% 10 4.9% 9 13.4% 18 8.6% 37 0.0 32 0.1 3.1

Cambridge Associates US All PE 1 QtrLag -- 15.6% 9 8.1% 80 0.0% 97 0.0% 1 -- -- 1.0 1.9

Real Assets Composite 3.6% 3.4% 41 5.4% 37 -4.4% 93 5.4% 77 -0.6 NR 1.2 0.6

CPI + 5% (Seasonally Adjusted) -- 6.8% 15 0.8% 1 0.0% 68 0.0% 1 -- -- 1.0 8.2XXXXX

42

Page 43: Investment Performance Analysis for the period ending ...nmerb.org/pdfs/Q3 2015 New Mexico ERB IPA.pdfInvestment Performance Analysis for the period ending September 30, 2015 December

September 30, 2015

1 - U.S. Small/Mid Cap Equity Composite includes the performance history of the U.S. Small Cap Equity Composite through November 2011.2 - NMERB Small/Mid Cap Equity Blended Benchmark is the Russell 2000 Index through November 2011 and the Russell 2500 Index from December 2011 - forward.3 - Total Fund market value includes $335,894 from Legacy Assets.Note: Performance shown is net of fees. Fiscal year ends June 30.

New Mexico Educational Retirement BoardPerformance Detail - Total Fund and U.S. Equity

Market Value($)

% ofPortfolio

3 Mo(%) Rank

FiscalYTD(%)

Rank 1 Yr(%) Rank 3 Yrs

(%) Rank 5 Yrs(%) Rank 10 Yrs

(%) Rank Return(%) Since

_

Total Fund 10,920,418,820 100.0 -3.3 5 -3.3 5 0.5 20 6.8 59 7.4 69 5.9 42 9.0 Jul-83Policy Index -4.1 16 -4.1 16 -0.9 58 5.7 80 6.6 84 5.1 78 -- Jul-83

Over/Under 0.8 0.8 1.4 1.1 0.8 0.8Allocation Index -4.4 27 -4.4 27 -1.2 62 5.7 81 6.8 80 5.9 40 -- Jul-8360% MSCI ACWI (Gross)/40% CITI WGBI -4.4 27 -4.4 27 -4.1 99 4.3 91 5.4 96 4.9 86 -- Jul-83

InvestorForce Public DB > $1B Gross Median -4.9 -4.9 -0.6 7.4 7.8 5.8 9.0 Jul-83U.S. Equity Composite 2,141,599,458 19.6 -6.8 29 -6.8 29 -0.7 57 12.5 47 13.2 39 6.6 65 10.9 Jan-85

Russell 3000 -7.2 34 -7.2 34 -0.5 55 12.5 46 13.3 36 6.9 56 10.8 Jan-85Over/Under 0.4 0.4 -0.2 0.0 -0.1 -0.3 0.1eA All US Equity Net Median -8.4 -8.4 0.0 12.3 12.6 7.1 11.3 Jan-85

U.S. Large Cap Equity Composite 1,912,053,281 17.5 -6.3 33 -6.3 33 -0.8 50 12.4 50 13.3 36 6.6 60 4.9 Aug-99S&P 500 -6.4 35 -6.4 35 -0.6 49 12.4 49 13.3 35 6.8 54 4.3 Aug-99

Over/Under 0.1 0.1 -0.2 0.0 0.0 -0.2 0.6eA US Large Cap Equity Net Median -7.3 -7.3 -0.8 12.3 12.7 6.9 5.9 Aug-99

S&P 500 Index Fund 1,912,053,281 17.5 -6.3 30 -6.3 30 -0.8 55 12.4 46 13.3 37 6.5 69 3.6 Jan-00S&P 500 -6.4 34 -6.4 34 -0.6 53 12.4 46 13.3 36 6.8 58 3.7 Jan-00

Over/Under 0.1 0.1 -0.2 0.0 0.0 -0.3 -0.1eA US Large Cap Core Equity Net Median -7.2 -7.2 -0.5 12.2 12.8 6.9 5.4 Jan-00

U.S. Small/Mid Cap Equity Composite 229,546,177 2.1 -10.7 84 -10.7 84 0.2 70 13.3 40 11.9 69 6.5 86 6.5 Aug-99NMERB Small/Mid Cap Equity Blended Index -10.3 78 -10.3 78 0.4 69 12.4 63 12.5 52 6.9 76 7.4 Aug-99

Over/Under -0.4 -0.4 -0.2 0.9 -0.6 -0.4 -0.9eA US Small-Mid Cap Core Equity Net Median -9.3 -9.3 1.3 12.8 12.6 8.0 8.8 Aug-99

Lord Abbett 117,103,535 1.1 -7.4 16 -7.4 16 3.8 10 13.9 18 11.6 49 -- -- 12.3 Aug-10Russell 2500 Value -9.6 40 -9.6 40 -2.4 57 11.0 58 11.5 51 6.3 71 11.9 Aug-10

Over/Under 2.2 2.2 6.2 2.9 0.1 0.4eA US Small-Mid Cap Value Equity Net Median -10.4 -10.4 -0.7 11.6 11.5 7.0 12.3 Aug-10

Pinnacle 112,442,642 1.0 -13.9 91 -13.9 91 -3.3 88 12.6 35 -- -- -- -- 14.4 Dec-11Russell 2500 Growth -11.0 49 -11.0 49 3.4 34 13.8 18 13.9 27 8.4 35 14.2 Dec-11

Over/Under -2.9 -2.9 -6.7 -1.2 0.2eA US Small-Mid Cap Growth Equity Net Median -11.3 -11.3 1.2 11.7 12.6 7.5 12.4 Dec-11

43

Page 44: Investment Performance Analysis for the period ending ...nmerb.org/pdfs/Q3 2015 New Mexico ERB IPA.pdfInvestment Performance Analysis for the period ending September 30, 2015 December

September 30, 2015

Note: Performance shown is net of fees. Fiscal year ends June 30.

New Mexico Educational Retirement BoardPerformance Detail - Non-U.S. Equity

Market Value($)

% ofPortfolio

3 Mo(%) Rank

FiscalYTD(%)

Rank 1 Yr(%) Rank 3 Yrs

(%) Rank 5 Yrs(%) Rank 10 Yrs

(%) Rank Return(%) Since

_

Non-U.S. Equity Composite 1,513,837,656 13.9 -13.3 91 -13.3 91 -13.8 92 -1.6 99 -1.9 99 2.0 98 5.9 Jul-95MSCI ACWI ex USA -12.2 75 -12.2 75 -12.2 86 2.3 81 1.8 84 3.0 79 -- Jul-95

Over/Under -1.1 -1.1 -1.6 -3.9 -3.7 -1.0eA All ACWI ex-US Equity Net Median -10.4 -10.4 -7.2 5.4 4.4 4.3 7.6 Jul-95

Non-U.S. Developed Mkts Equity Composite 500,084,352 4.6 -10.1 66 -10.1 66 -7.2 63 5.4 68 3.6 80 2.5 87 5.9 Sep-95MSCI EAFE -10.2 69 -10.2 69 -8.7 77 5.6 62 4.0 74 3.0 77 4.5 Sep-95

Over/Under 0.1 0.1 1.5 -0.2 -0.4 -0.5 1.4eA All EAFE Equity Net Median -9.0 -9.0 -5.7 6.4 5.4 3.8 6.5 Sep-95

Pyramis 249,428,674 2.3 -10.0 64 -10.0 64 -6.0 58 6.6 49 5.2 55 3.7 53 7.6 Jun-03MSCI EAFE -10.2 69 -10.2 69 -8.7 77 5.6 62 4.0 74 3.0 77 6.9 Jun-03

Over/Under 0.2 0.2 2.7 1.0 1.2 0.7 0.7eA All EAFE Equity Net Median -9.0 -9.0 -5.7 6.4 5.4 3.8 7.8 Jun-03

BlackRock MSCI EAFE 250,655,678 2.3 -10.2 68 -10.2 68 -8.4 76 -- -- -- -- -- -- 0.7 Aug-13MSCI EAFE -10.2 69 -10.2 69 -8.7 77 5.6 62 4.0 74 3.0 77 0.4 Aug-13

Over/Under 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.3eA All EAFE Equity Net Median -9.0 -9.0 -5.7 6.4 5.4 3.8 1.6 Aug-13

44

Page 45: Investment Performance Analysis for the period ending ...nmerb.org/pdfs/Q3 2015 New Mexico ERB IPA.pdfInvestment Performance Analysis for the period ending September 30, 2015 December

September 30, 2015

1 – Parametric Emerging Markets Equity was funded in May, 2015 with $232.8 M.Note: Performance shown is net of fees. Fiscal year ends June 30.

New Mexico Educational Retirement BoardPerformance Detail - Non-U.S. Emerging Market Equity

Market Value($)

% ofPortfolio

3 Mo(%) Rank

FiscalYTD(%)

Rank 1 Yr(%) Rank 3 Yrs

(%) Rank 5 Yrs(%) Rank 10 Yrs

(%) Rank Return(%) Since

_

Non-U.S. Emerging Mkts Equity Composite 1,013,753,304 9.3 -15.0 28 -15.0 28 -17.0 46 -5.0 71 -4.7 85 3.0 88 5.9 Sep-00MSCI Emerging Markets -17.9 80 -17.9 80 -19.3 70 -5.3 76 -3.6 68 4.3 73 6.8 Sep-00

Over/Under 2.9 2.9 2.3 0.3 -1.1 -1.3 -0.9eA Emg Mkts Equity Net Median -16.4 -16.4 -17.6 -3.2 -2.0 5.2 8.0 Sep-00

Robeco 235,760,595 2.2 -17.3 66 -17.3 66 -18.2 58 -4.8 69 -3.8 71 -- -- 6.9 Nov-08MSCI Emerging Markets -17.9 80 -17.9 80 -19.3 70 -5.3 76 -3.6 68 4.3 73 7.4 Nov-08

Over/Under 0.6 0.6 1.1 0.5 -0.2 -0.5eA Emg Mkts Equity Net Median -16.4 -16.4 -17.6 -3.2 -2.0 5.2 8.4 Nov-08

Neuberger Berman Emerging Markets 280,635,223 2.6 -15.9 37 -15.9 37 -17.9 56 -- -- -- -- -- -- -5.6 Aug-13MSCI Emerging Markets -17.9 80 -17.9 80 -19.3 70 -5.3 76 -3.6 68 4.3 73 -5.7 Aug-13

Over/Under 2.0 2.0 1.4 0.1eA Emg Mkts Equity Net Median -16.4 -16.4 -17.6 -3.2 -2.0 5.2 -4.9 Aug-13

Mondrian Emerging Markets Small Cap 301,393,441 2.8 -12.8 5 -12.8 5 -15.9 67 -- -- -- -- -- -- -1.5 Aug-13MSCI Emerging Markets Small Cap -16.7 79 -16.7 79 -15.2 61 -1.1 61 -2.4 86 6.7 88 -2.4 Aug-13

Over/Under 3.9 3.9 -0.7 0.9eA Emg Mkts Small Cap Equity Net Median -15.1 -15.1 -14.4 0.7 0.4 8.2 -1.8 Aug-13

Parametric Emerging Markets Equity 195,964,045 1.8 -15.0 29 -15.0 29 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -16.8 Jun-15MSCI Emerging Markets -17.9 80 -17.9 80 -19.3 70 -5.3 76 -3.6 68 4.3 73 -20.0 Jun-15

Over/Under 2.9 2.9 3.2eA Emg Mkts Equity Net Median -16.4 -16.4 -17.6 -3.2 -2.0 5.2 -18.6 Jun-15

45

Page 46: Investment Performance Analysis for the period ending ...nmerb.org/pdfs/Q3 2015 New Mexico ERB IPA.pdfInvestment Performance Analysis for the period ending September 30, 2015 December

September 30, 2015

1 - Residual amounts remain in Neuberger Berman, Pyramis, and WAMCO. Assets were transferred to internally managed Core Fixed Income in February 2015.Note: Performance shown is net of fees. Fiscal year ends June 30.

New Mexico Educational Retirement BoardPerformance Detail - Total Fixed Income and Core Fixed Income

Market Value($)

% ofPortfolio

3 Mo(%) Rank

FiscalYTD(%)

Rank 1 Yr(%) Rank 3 Yrs

(%) Rank 5 Yrs(%) Rank 10 Yrs

(%) Rank Return(%) Since

_

Fixed Income Composite 3,710,365,590 34.0 0.1 69 0.1 69 2.5 28 5.5 3 6.2 12 6.5 14 2.8 Jan-85Barclays Aggregate 1.2 18 1.2 18 2.9 14 1.7 55 3.1 57 4.6 50 7.3 Jan-85

Over/Under -1.1 -1.1 -0.4 3.8 3.1 1.9 -4.5eA All US Fixed Inc Net Median 0.5 0.5 1.6 1.8 3.4 4.6 7.6 Jan-85

Core Fixed Income Composite 1,077,736,088 9.9 1.0 59 1.0 59 2.5 56 2.0 29 3.9 21 4.9 42 5.7 Dec-99Barclays Aggregate 1.2 31 1.2 31 2.9 32 1.7 54 3.1 67 4.6 68 5.4 Dec-99

Over/Under -0.2 -0.2 -0.4 0.3 0.8 0.3 0.3eA US Core Fixed Inc Net Median 1.0 1.0 2.7 1.8 3.3 4.8 5.6 Dec-99

Core Fixed Income 1,077,736,088 9.9 1.0 59 1.0 59 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -0.8 Apr-15Barclays Aggregate 1.2 31 1.2 31 2.9 32 1.7 54 3.1 67 4.6 68 -0.5 Apr-15

Over/Under -0.2 -0.2 -0.3eA US Core Fixed Inc Net Median 1.0 1.0 2.7 1.8 3.3 4.8 -0.5 Apr-15

46

Page 47: Investment Performance Analysis for the period ending ...nmerb.org/pdfs/Q3 2015 New Mexico ERB IPA.pdfInvestment Performance Analysis for the period ending September 30, 2015 December

September 30, 2015

Note: Performance shown is net of fees. Fiscal year ends June 30.

New Mexico Educational Retirement BoardPerformance Detail - Emerging Market Debt

Market Value($)

% ofPortfolio

3 Mo(%) Rank

FiscalYTD(%)

Rank 1 Yr(%) Rank 3 Yrs

(%) Rank 5 Yrs(%) Rank 10 Yrs

(%) Rank Return(%) Since

_

Non-U.S. Emerging Market Debt Composite 178,146,200 1.6 -3.2 18 -3.2 18 -11.0 60 -4.2 64 -- -- -- -- -2.4 Sep-11JP Morgan GBI - EM Diversified -10.5 84 -10.5 84 -19.8 85 -8.7 82 -3.6 83 4.5 99 -6.1 Sep-11

Over/Under 7.3 7.3 8.8 4.5 3.7eA All Emg Mkts Fixed Inc Net Median -5.2 -5.2 -8.2 -1.7 2.5 6.3 1.5 Sep-11

Pictet 93,593,447 0.9 -8.9 72 -8.9 72 -18.5 81 -9.0 88 -- -- -- -- -6.2 Sep-11JP Morgan GBI - EM Diversified -10.5 84 -10.5 84 -19.8 85 -8.7 82 -3.6 83 4.5 99 -6.1 Sep-11

Over/Under 1.6 1.6 1.3 -0.3 -0.1eA All Emg Mkts Fixed Inc Net Median -5.2 -5.2 -8.2 -1.7 2.5 6.3 1.5 Sep-11

EMSO 84,552,752 0.8 4.0 1 4.0 1 -1.0 3 2.3 4 -- -- -- -- 3.0 Sep-11JP Morgan GBI - EM Diversified -10.5 84 -10.5 84 -19.8 85 -8.7 82 -3.6 83 4.5 99 -6.1 Sep-11

Over/Under 14.5 14.5 18.8 11.0 9.1eA All Emg Mkts Fixed Inc Net Median -5.2 -5.2 -8.2 -1.7 2.5 6.3 1.5 Sep-11

47

Page 48: Investment Performance Analysis for the period ending ...nmerb.org/pdfs/Q3 2015 New Mexico ERB IPA.pdfInvestment Performance Analysis for the period ending September 30, 2015 December

September 30, 2015

Note: Performance shown is net of fees. Fiscal year ends June 30.

New Mexico Educational Retirement BoardPerformance Detail - Opportunistic Fixed Income

Market Value($)

% ofPortfolio

3 Mo(%) Rank

FiscalYTD(%)

Rank 1 Yr(%) Rank 3 Yrs

(%) Rank 5 Yrs(%) Rank 10 Yrs

(%) Rank Return(%) Since

_

Opportunistic Credit Composite 2,454,483,303 22.5 -0.1 -- -0.1 -- 3.6 -- 8.8 -- 8.3 -- -- -- 9.2 May-0850% Credit Suisse Leveraged Loan Index / 50% BofAML US HY BB-B Rated Constrained Index -2.8 -- -2.8 -- -0.4 -- 3.7 -- 5.4 -- 5.6 -- 6.0 May-08

Over/Under 2.7 2.7 4.0 5.1 2.9 3.2BofA Merrill Lynch US High Yield BB-B RatedConstrained Index -4.3 -- -4.3 -- -2.0 -- 3.7 -- 6.0 -- 6.6 -- 7.0 May-08

Beachpoint Combined 628,476,581 5.8 -2.4 -- -2.4 -- -0.6 -- 6.6 -- 7.2 -- 6.9 -- 6.8 Mar-0450% Credit Suisse Leveraged Loan Index / 50%BofA ML US HY BB-B Rated Constrained Index -2.8 -- -2.8 -- -0.4 -- 3.7 -- 5.4 -- 5.6 -- 5.6 Mar-04

Over/Under 0.4 0.4 -0.2 2.9 1.8 1.3 1.2Beachpoint Total Return 628,476,581 5.8 -2.4 -- -2.4 -- -0.6 -- 6.6 -- 7.2 -- -- -- 7.3 Jun-08

50% Credit Suisse Leveraged Loan Index / 50%BofA ML US HY BB-B Rated Constrained Index -2.8 -- -2.8 -- -0.4 -- 3.7 -- 5.4 -- 5.6 -- 6.0 Jun-08

Over/Under 0.4 0.4 -0.2 2.9 1.8 1.3Pimco Disco Combined 298,113,237 2.7 0.4 -- 0.4 -- 3.2 -- 10.1 -- 10.2 -- -- -- 12.6 Jul-08

50% Credit Suisse Leveraged Loan Index / 50%BofA ML US HY BB-B Rated Constrained Index -2.8 -- -2.8 -- -0.4 -- 3.7 -- 5.4 -- 5.6 -- 6.2 Jul-08

Over/Under 3.2 3.2 3.6 6.4 4.8 6.4Pimco Disco II 298,113,237 2.7 0.4 -- 0.4 -- 3.2 -- 10.1 -- -- -- -- -- 16.0 Oct-11

50% Credit Suisse Leveraged Loan Index / 50%BofA ML US HY BB-B Rated Constrained Index -2.8 -- -2.8 -- -0.4 -- 3.7 -- 5.4 -- 5.6 -- 6.3 Oct-11

Over/Under 3.2 3.2 3.6 6.4 9.7GoldenTree Combined 144,776,971 1.3 -1.6 -- -1.6 -- 4.1 -- 8.5 -- 9.8 -- -- -- 10.6 Oct-09

50% Credit Suisse Leveraged Loan Index / 50%BofA ML US HY BB-B Rated Constrained Index -2.8 -- -2.8 -- -0.4 -- 3.7 -- 5.4 -- 5.6 -- 6.7 Oct-09

Over/Under 1.2 1.2 4.5 4.8 4.4 3.9Goldentree II 144,776,971 1.3 -1.6 -- -1.6 -- 4.1 -- 8.5 -- -- -- -- -- 10.7 Sep-11

50% Credit Suisse Leveraged Loan Index / 50%BofA ML US HY BB-B Rated Constrained Index -2.8 -- -2.8 -- -0.4 -- 3.7 -- 5.4 -- 5.6 -- 5.8 Sep-11

Over/Under 1.2 1.2 4.5 4.8 4.9

48

Page 49: Investment Performance Analysis for the period ending ...nmerb.org/pdfs/Q3 2015 New Mexico ERB IPA.pdfInvestment Performance Analysis for the period ending September 30, 2015 December

September 30, 2015

1 - Marathon European Credit Opportunity II was funded in March 2014.Note: Performance shown is net of fees. Fiscal year ends June 30.

New Mexico Educational Retirement BoardPerformance Detail - Opportunistic Fixed Income

Market Value($)

% ofPortfolio

3 Mo(%) Rank

FiscalYTD(%)

Rank 1 Yr(%) Rank 3 Yrs

(%) Rank 5 Yrs(%) Rank 10 Yrs

(%) Rank Return(%) Since

_

Medley Capital 165,281,584 1.5 2.0 -- 2.0 -- 8.1 -- 9.5 -- -- -- -- -- 8.4 Aug-1150% Credit Suisse Leveraged Loan Index / 50%BofA ML US HY BB-B Rated Constrained Index -2.8 -- -2.8 -- -0.4 -- 3.7 -- 5.4 -- 5.6 -- 4.7 Aug-11

Over/Under 4.8 4.8 8.5 5.8 3.7 GSO Capital 19,316,374 0.2 6.4 -- 6.4 -- 8.2 -- 8.4 -- -- -- -- -- 6.9 Sep-11

50% Credit Suisse Leveraged Loan Index / 50%BofA ML US HY BB-B Rated Constrained Index -2.8 -- -2.8 -- -0.4 -- 3.7 -- 5.4 -- 5.6 -- 5.8 Sep-11

Over/Under 9.2 9.2 8.6 4.7 1.1 Waterfall - Eden 243,028,003 2.2 0.9 -- 0.9 -- 6.3 -- 11.4 -- -- -- -- -- 12.2 Aug-11

50% Credit Suisse Leveraged Loan Index / 50%BofA ML US HY BB-B Rated Constrained Index -2.8 -- -2.8 -- -0.4 -- 3.7 -- 5.4 -- 5.6 -- 4.7 Aug-11

Over/Under 3.7 3.7 6.7 7.7 7.5 Waterfall - Victoria 136,515,635 1.3 2.5 -- 2.5 -- 7.8 -- 10.1 -- -- -- -- -- 9.5 Aug-11

50% Credit Suisse Leveraged Loan Index / 50%BofA ML US HY BB-B Rated Constrained Index -2.8 -- -2.8 -- -0.4 -- 3.7 -- 5.4 -- 5.6 -- 4.7 Aug-11

Over/Under 5.3 5.3 8.2 6.4 4.8 Marathon European Credit Opportunity I 77,508,341 0.7 4.2 -- 4.2 -- 5.3 -- 9.5 -- -- -- -- -- 8.5 Oct-11

50% Credit Suisse Leveraged Loan Index / 50%BofA ML US HY BB-B Rated Constrained Index -2.8 -- -2.8 -- -0.4 -- 3.7 -- 5.4 -- 5.6 -- 6.3 Oct-11

Over/Under 7.0 7.0 5.7 5.8 2.2 Marathon European Credit Opportunity II 138,854,364 1.3 1.4 -- 1.4 -- 7.1 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 4.7 Mar-14

50% Credit Suisse Leveraged Loan Index / 50%BofA ML US HY BB-B Rated Constrained Index -2.8 -- -2.8 -- -0.4 -- 3.7 -- 5.4 -- 5.6 -- 0.6 Mar-14

Over/Under 4.2 4.2 7.5 4.1 Elegantree Fund 153,111,294 1.4 1.2 -- 1.2 -- 7.4 -- 11.1 -- -- -- -- -- 11.4 Mar-12

50% Credit Suisse Leveraged Loan Index / 50%BofA ML US HY BB-B Rated Constrained Index -2.8 -- -2.8 -- -0.4 -- 3.7 -- 5.4 -- 5.6 -- 4.7 Mar-12

Over/Under 4.0 4.0 7.8 7.4 6.7 Gramercy Distressed Opp II 135,401,940 1.2 -2.3 -- -2.3 -- 0.5 -- 7.3 -- -- -- -- -- 6.3 Jul-12

50% Credit Suisse Leveraged Loan Index / 50%BofA ML US HY BB-B Rated Constrained Index -2.8 -- -2.8 -- -0.4 -- 3.7 -- 5.4 -- 5.6 -- 4.6 Jul-12

Over/Under 0.5 0.5 0.9 3.6 1.7

49

Page 50: Investment Performance Analysis for the period ending ...nmerb.org/pdfs/Q3 2015 New Mexico ERB IPA.pdfInvestment Performance Analysis for the period ending September 30, 2015 December

September 30, 2015

1 - Kildare European Partners I LP was funded in May 2014.2 -Black Forest was funded in July 2014.3 - Gramercy Dist Argentina FD II funded in November 2014 with $50 M.4 - Lone Star IX was funded in March 2015 with $1.5 M.Note: Performance shown is net of fees. Fiscal year ends June 30.

New Mexico Educational Retirement BoardPerformance Detail - Opportunistic Fixed Income

Market Value($)

% ofPortfolio

3 Mo(%) Rank

FiscalYTD(%)

Rank 1 Yr(%) Rank 3 Yrs

(%) Rank 5 Yrs(%) Rank 10 Yrs

(%) Rank Return(%) Since

_

ICE Canyon 72,301,327 0.7 -4.6 -- -4.6 -- -13.3 -- -1.3 -- -- -- -- -- -0.9 Jun-1250% Credit Suisse Leveraged Loan Index / 50%BofA ML US HY BB-B Rated Constrained Index -2.8 -- -2.8 -- -0.4 -- 3.7 -- 5.4 -- 5.6 -- 4.9 Jun-12

Over/Under -1.8 -1.8 -12.9 -5.0 -5.8Lone Star VIII 43,094,881 0.4 4.0 -- 4.0 -- 39.5 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 32.2 Oct-13

50% Credit Suisse Leveraged Loan Index / 50%BofA ML US HY BB-B Rated Constrained Index -2.8 -- -2.8 -- -0.4 -- 3.7 -- 5.4 -- 5.6 -- 2.7 Oct-13

Over/Under 6.8 6.8 39.9 29.5Kildare European Partners I LP 53,981,416 0.5 6.1 -- 6.1 -- 9.1 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 3.7 May-14

50% Credit Suisse Leveraged Loan Index / 50%BofA ML US HY BB-B Rated Constrained Index -2.8 -- -2.8 -- -0.4 -- 3.7 -- 5.4 -- 5.6 -- 0.1 May-14

Over/Under 8.9 8.9 9.5 3.6Black Forest 77,908,764 0.7 2.1 -- 2.1 -- 3.6 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 3.1 Aug-14

50% Credit Suisse Leveraged Loan Index / 50%BofA ML US HY BB-B Rated Constrained Index -2.8 -- -2.8 -- -0.4 -- 3.7 -- 5.4 -- 5.6 -- -0.6 Aug-14

Over/Under 4.9 4.9 4.0 3.7Gramercy Dist Argentina FD II 52,542,666 0.5 0.0 -- 0.0 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 5.1 Dec-14

50% Credit Suisse Leveraged Loan Index / 50%BofA ML US HY BB-B Rated Constrained Index -2.8 -- -2.8 -- -0.4 -- 3.7 -- 5.4 -- 5.6 -- -1.2 Dec-14

Over/Under 2.8 2.8 6.3Lone Star IX 14,269,924 0.1

50

Page 51: Investment Performance Analysis for the period ending ...nmerb.org/pdfs/Q3 2015 New Mexico ERB IPA.pdfInvestment Performance Analysis for the period ending September 30, 2015 December

September 30, 2015

1 - Absolute Return Composites, underlying managers and benchmark performance are lagged one month. Absolute Return Composite includes $1,019,224 in a transfer account.2 - ACSHQP Holdings LLC was funded in September 2014.Note: Performance shown is net of fees. Fiscal year ends June 30.

New Mexico Educational Retirement BoardPerformance Detail - Absolute Return

Market Value($)

% ofPortfolio

3 Mo(%) Rank

FiscalYTD(%)

Rank 1 Yr(%) Rank 3 Yrs

(%) Rank 5 Yrs(%) Rank 10 Yrs

(%) Rank Return(%) Since

_

Absolute Return Composite 86,551,318 0.8 2.6 -- 2.6 -- 6.0 -- 4.7 -- 3.3 -- -- -- 1.9 Jan-07HFRI FOF Conservative (1 Mo Lag) -1.2 -- -1.2 -- 1.9 -- 4.8 -- 3.4 -- 2.4 -- 1.5 Jan-07

Over/Under 3.8 3.8 4.1 -0.1 -0.1 0.491 Day T-Bill + 2% (1 Mo Lag) 0.5 -- 0.5 -- 2.0 -- 2.0 -- 2.1 -- 3.3 -- 2.8 Jan-07DB Advisors (in liquidation) 1,614,636 0.0 -0.4 -- -0.4 -- -7.2 -- 0.9 -- 0.2 -- -- -- -0.1 Jan-07Gottex Market Neutral (in liquidation) 397,596 0.0 6.5 -- 6.5 -- 4.9 -- -0.1 -- 0.4 -- -- -- -3.3 Jan-07Absolute Return Composite (ex Liquidating funds) 83,519,862 0.8 2.7 -- 2.7 -- 6.3 -- 5.1 -- 3.6 -- -- -- 1.9 Jan-07

HFRI FOF Conservative (1 Mo Lag) -1.2 -- -1.2 -- 1.9 -- 4.8 -- 3.4 -- 2.4 -- 1.5 Jan-07Over/Under 3.9 3.9 4.4 0.3 0.2 0.4

91 Day T-Bill + 2% (1 Mo Lag) 0.5 -- 0.5 -- 2.0 -- 2.0 -- 2.1 -- 3.3 -- 2.8 Jan-07Benchmark Plus 83,015,603 0.8 2.7 -- 2.7 -- 4.4 -- 5.9 -- 3.6 -- -- -- 3.9 Feb-07

HFRI FOF Conservative (1 Mo Lag) -1.2 -- -1.2 -- 1.9 -- 4.8 -- 3.4 -- 2.4 -- 1.4 Feb-07Over/Under 3.9 3.9 2.5 1.1 0.2 2.5

91 Day T-Bill + 2% (1 Mo Lag) 0.5 -- 0.5 -- 2.0 -- 2.0 -- 2.1 -- 3.3 -- 2.7 Feb-07ACSHQP Holdings LLC 504,259 0.0 6.5 -- 6.5 -- 16.5 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 8.1 Sep-14

HFRI FOF Conservative (1 Mo Lag) -1.2 -- -1.2 -- 1.9 -- 4.8 -- 3.4 -- 2.4 -- 2.1 Sep-14Over/Under 7.7 7.7 14.6 6.0

51

Page 52: Investment Performance Analysis for the period ending ...nmerb.org/pdfs/Q3 2015 New Mexico ERB IPA.pdfInvestment Performance Analysis for the period ending September 30, 2015 December

September 30, 2015

1 - PanAgora was funded in December 2013.Note: Performance shown is net of fees. Fiscal year ends June 30

New Mexico Educational Retirement BoardPerformance Detail - Global Asset Allocation and Risk Parity

Market Value($)

% ofPortfolio

3 Mo(%) Rank

FiscalYTD(%)

Rank 1 Yr(%) Rank 3 Yrs

(%) Rank 5 Yrs(%) Rank 10 Yrs

(%) Rank Return(%) Since

_

Global Asset Allocation/Risk Parity Composite 1,089,277,000 10.0 -6.3 63 -6.3 63 -4.9 62 -0.2 90 5.1 22 -- -- 7.6 Oct-09GAA/Risk Parity Custom Index -4.4 29 -4.4 29 -4.4 55 4.7 15 5.3 19 4.3 62 5.5 Oct-09

Over/Under -1.9 -1.9 -0.5 -4.9 -0.2 2.1eA Global TAA Net Median -5.8 -5.8 -4.3 3.0 4.5 4.8 4.9 Oct-09

Global Asset Allocation Composite 542,981,589 5.0 -7.1 73 -7.1 73 -6.1 68 -- -- -- -- -- -- -0.6 Nov-12Credit Suisse Hedge Global Macro -2.9 18 -2.9 18 -2.3 24 1.9 64 3.9 64 6.7 6 2.2 Nov-12

Over/Under -4.2 -4.2 -3.8 -2.8eA Global TAA Net Median -5.8 -5.8 -4.3 3.0 4.5 4.8 3.2 Nov-12

Bridgewater Pure Alpha 257,587,390 2.4 -3.9 28 -3.9 28 3.3 2 3.0 51 6.2 9 -- -- 8.2 Oct-09Credit Suisse Hedge Global Macro -2.9 18 -2.9 18 -2.3 24 1.9 64 3.9 64 6.7 6 5.1 Oct-09

Over/Under -1.0 -1.0 5.6 1.1 2.3 3.1eA Global TAA Net Median -5.8 -5.8 -4.3 3.0 4.5 4.8 4.9 Oct-09

Bridgewater Pure Alpha Major Markets 13,015,652 0.1 -3.7 28 -3.7 28 3.7 2 4.4 20 -- -- -- -- 6.7 Dec-10Credit Suisse Hedge Global Macro -2.9 18 -2.9 18 -2.3 24 1.9 64 3.9 64 6.7 6 3.8 Dec-10

Over/Under -0.8 -0.8 6.0 2.5 2.9eA Global TAA Net Median -5.8 -5.8 -4.3 3.0 4.5 4.8 4.5 Dec-10

PIMCO All Asset All Authority 272,378,547 2.5 -10.0 93 -10.0 93 -14.7 98 -- -- -- -- -- -- -5.6 Jul-13Credit Suisse Hedge Global Macro -2.9 18 -2.9 18 -2.3 24 1.9 64 3.9 64 6.7 6 1.4 Jul-13

Over/Under -7.1 -7.1 -12.4 -7.0eA Global TAA Net Median -5.8 -5.8 -4.3 3.0 4.5 4.8 2.2 Jul-13

Risk Parity 546,295,411 5.0 -5.6 42 -5.6 42 -3.8 46 -- -- -- -- -- -- 0.9 Nov-12GAA/Risk Parity Custom Index -4.4 29 -4.4 29 -4.4 55 4.7 15 5.3 19 4.3 62 4.9 Nov-12

Over/Under -1.2 -1.2 0.6 -4.0eA Global TAA Net Median -5.8 -5.8 -4.3 3.0 4.5 4.8 3.2 Nov-12

Bridgewater All Weather 372,296,757 3.4 -6.4 64 -6.4 64 -5.8 67 -0.4 91 5.7 17 -- -- 8.2 Oct-0960% MSCI World (Gross) / 40% CITI WGBI -4.4 29 -4.4 29 -4.1 49 4.3 22 5.4 19 4.9 49 5.6 Oct-09

Over/Under -2.0 -2.0 -1.7 -4.7 0.3 2.6eA Global TAA Net Median -5.8 -5.8 -4.3 3.0 4.5 4.8 4.9 Oct-09

PanAgora 173,998,654 1.6 -3.8 -- -3.8 -- 0.6 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 6.7 Dec-13GAA/Risk Parity Custom Index -4.4 -- -4.4 -- -4.4 -- 4.7 -- 5.3 -- 4.3 -- -0.7 Dec-13

Over/Under 0.6 0.6 5.0 7.4

52

Page 53: Investment Performance Analysis for the period ending ...nmerb.org/pdfs/Q3 2015 New Mexico ERB IPA.pdfInvestment Performance Analysis for the period ending September 30, 2015 December

September 30, 2015

Note: Performance shown is net of fees. Fiscal year ends June 30.

New Mexico Educational Retirement BoardPerformance Detail - Real Estate and Private Equity

Market Value($)

% ofPortfolio

3 Mo(%) Rank

FiscalYTD(%)

Rank 1 Yr(%) Rank 3 Yrs

(%) Rank 5 Yrs(%) Rank 10 Yrs

(%) Rank Return(%) Since

_

Real Estate Composite 761,833,795 7.0 1.7 72 1.7 72 12.3 56 12.5 40 13.7 14 7.4 5 10.0 Dec-03NCREIF Property Index 3.1 43 3.1 43 13.5 38 11.9 48 12.5 56 8.0 3 9.4 Dec-03

Over/Under -1.4 -1.4 -1.2 0.6 1.2 -0.6 0.6 Wilshire REIT 2.9 49 2.9 49 11.6 61 10.1 78 12.5 57 6.8 20 9.5 Dec-03

InvestorForce Public DB Real Estate Pub+Priv NetMedian 2.7 2.7 12.8 11.7 12.8 5.1 6.5 Dec-03

Public Real Estate Composite 350,953,739 3.2 0.3 87 0.3 87 6.9 86 9.2 79 12.2 72 6.8 90 9.4 Dec-03Wilshire REIT 2.9 40 2.9 40 11.6 53 10.1 45 12.5 54 6.8 90 9.5 Dec-03

Over/Under -2.6 -2.6 -4.7 -0.9 -0.3 0.0 -0.1 eA US REIT Net Median 2.7 2.7 11.7 9.9 12.7 7.9 10.6 Dec-03

REIT Index Fund 133,237,932 1.2 2.9 40 2.9 40 11.6 53 9.9 55 12.3 60 6.9 86 9.5 Dec-03Wilshire REIT 2.9 40 2.9 40 11.6 53 10.1 45 12.5 54 6.8 90 9.5 Dec-03

Over/Under 0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.2 -0.2 0.1 0.0 eA US REIT Net Median 2.7 2.7 11.7 9.9 12.7 7.9 10.6 Dec-03

Brookfield 217,715,807 2.0 -1.2 89 -1.2 89 4.2 92 9.6 64 -- -- -- -- 10.7 Jul-11MSCI US REIT 1.8 75 1.8 75 8.2 83 8.2 90 10.7 93 5.4 99 8.5 Jul-11

Over/Under -3.0 -3.0 -4.0 1.4 2.2 eA US REIT Net Median 2.7 2.7 11.7 9.9 12.7 7.9 10.2 Jul-11

Private Real Estate Composite 410,880,056 3.8 2.9 -- 2.9 -- 17.2 -- 16.3 -- 14.9 -- -- -- 6.8 Jan-08NCREIF Property Index 3.1 -- 3.1 -- 13.5 -- 11.9 -- 12.5 -- 8.0 -- 5.5 Jan-08

Over/Under -0.2 -0.2 3.7 4.4 2.4 1.3 U.S. Private Real Estate 404,158,711 3.7 2.8 -- 2.8 -- 17.4 -- 16.6 -- 15.2 -- -- -- 7.6 Jan-08

NCREIF Property Index 3.1 -- 3.1 -- 13.5 -- 11.9 -- 12.5 -- 8.0 -- 5.5 Jan-08Over/Under -0.3 -0.3 3.9 4.7 2.7 2.1

Non-U.S. Private Real Estate 6,721,345 0.1 6.0 -- 6.0 -- 8.6 -- 5.8 -- 4.3 -- -- -- -5.7 Aug-08NCREIF Property Index 3.1 -- 3.1 -- 13.5 -- 11.9 -- 12.5 -- 8.0 -- 5.7 Aug-08

Over/Under 2.9 2.9 -4.9 -6.1 -8.2 -11.4

53

Page 54: Investment Performance Analysis for the period ending ...nmerb.org/pdfs/Q3 2015 New Mexico ERB IPA.pdfInvestment Performance Analysis for the period ending September 30, 2015 December

September 30, 2015

New Mexico Educational Retirement BoardPerformance Detail - Real Assets

1 - Energy funded in January 2014.2 - Agriculture Composite contains Halderman Farm Mgmt Services, Hancock Agriculture, and Blue Road Capital L.P. Timber Composite Contains Timber and Brookfield Brazil Timber andETO II Operating Partnership, which was funded in August 2014.3 - Blue Road L.P. was funded in March 2015 with 9.17 M and is included in the Agriculture Composite.Note: Performance shown is net of fees. Fiscal year ends June 30.

Market Value($)

% ofPortfolio

3 Mo(%) Rank

FiscalYTD(%)

Rank 1 Yr(%) Rank 3 Yrs

(%) Rank 5 Yrs(%) Rank 10 Yrs

(%) Rank Return(%) Since

_

Private Equity Composite 1,072,254,985 9.8 5.4 9 5.4 9 16.8 12 17.6 11 15.3 10 -- -- 5.6 Jun-06Cambridge Associates US All PE 1 Qtr Lag 3.8 27 3.8 27 8.9 70 15.9 24 15.6 9 13.2 8 12.4 Jun-06

Over/Under 1.6 1.6 7.9 1.7 -0.3 -6.8 InvestorForce Public DB Private Eq Net Median 2.4 2.4 11.1 13.0 12.3 10.5 9.4 Jun-06

Real Assets Composite 389,397,168 3.6 1.7 4 1.7 4 2.4 13 3.7 26 3.4 41 -- -- -0.1 Jul-08CPI + 5% (Seasonally Adjusted) 1.1 5 1.1 5 5.0 10 6.0 22 6.8 15 6.9 1 6.3 Jul-08

Over/Under 0.6 0.6 -2.6 -2.3 -3.4 -6.4 InvestorForce Public DB Real Assets/CommoditiesNet Median -6.8 -6.8 -12.6 -5.9 1.6 4.5 3.7 Jul-08

Infrastructure Composite 178,543,948 1.6 2.4 -- 2.4 -- 4.1 -- 4.1 -- 3.5 -- -- -- 0.7 Jul-08Infrastructure 160,020,971 1.5 1.4 -- 1.4 -- 4.9 -- 4.8 -- 3.9 -- -- -- 1.0 Jul-08

CPI + 6% (Seasonally Adjusted) 1.4 -- 1.4 -- 6.0 -- 7.0 -- 7.8 -- 7.9 -- 7.3 Jul-08Over/Under 0.0 0.0 -1.1 -2.2 -3.9 -6.3

International Infrastructure 18,522,976 0.2 10.9 -- 10.9 -- -8.9 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -35.5 Jan-13CPI + 6% (Seasonally Adjusted) 1.4 -- 1.4 -- 6.0 -- 7.0 -- 7.8 -- 7.9 -- 7.1 Jan-13

Over/Under 9.5 9.5 -14.9 -42.6 Natural Resources 210,853,221 1.9 1.1 -- 1.1 -- 0.9 -- 4.1 -- 3.8 -- -- -- 1.8 Mar-09

Energy 23,543,690 0.2 -2.6 -- -2.6 -- -31.7 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -22.4 Jan-14Timber Composite 82,885,388 0.8 2.0 -- 2.0 -- 9.1 -- 7.1 -- 6.0 -- -- -- 3.4 Mar-09

NCREIF Timberland 0.8 -- 0.8 -- 9.3 -- 9.8 -- 6.3 -- 7.9 -- 4.1 Mar-09Over/Under 1.2 1.2 -0.2 -2.7 -0.3 -0.7

Agriculture Composite 58,134,434 0.5 1.5 -- 1.5 -- 1.8 -- 4.0 -- -- -- -- -- 3.8 Aug-12NCREIF Farmland 2.5 -- 2.5 -- 12.7 -- 16.4 -- 15.8 -- 16.4 -- 16.2 Aug-12

Over/Under -1.0 -1.0 -10.9 -12.4 -12.4 Water Property Investor, L.P. 20,664,769 0.2 -1.8 -- -1.8 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 14.1 Jan-15

CPI + 6% (Seasonally Adjusted) 1.4 -- 1.4 -- 6.0 -- 7.0 -- 7.8 -- 7.9 -- 5.0 Jan-15Over/Under -3.2 -3.2 9.1

Mitigation Banking 25,624,941 0.2 3.0 -- 3.0 -- 14.7 -- 10.4 -- -- -- -- -- -4.6 Mar-1191 Day T-Bills 0.0 -- 0.0 -- 0.0 -- 0.0 -- 0.0 -- 1.2 -- 0.0 Mar-11

Over/Under 3.0 3.0 14.7 10.4 -4.6

54

Page 55: Investment Performance Analysis for the period ending ...nmerb.org/pdfs/Q3 2015 New Mexico ERB IPA.pdfInvestment Performance Analysis for the period ending September 30, 2015 December

September 30, 2015

1 – Local Government Investment Pool was funded in June, 2015 with $100 M.Note: Performance shown is net of fees. Fiscal year ends June 30.

New Mexico Educational Retirement BoardPerformance Detail - Cash

Market Value($)

% ofPortfolio

3 Mo(%) Rank

FiscalYTD(%)

Rank 1 Yr(%) Rank 3 Yrs

(%) Rank 5 Yrs(%) Rank 10 Yrs

(%) Rank Return(%) Since

_

Cash 154,965,956 1.4Cash 77,261,992 0.7 0.1 -- 0.1 -- 0.4 -- 0.3 -- 0.7 -- 1.7 -- 1.1 Dec-99

91 Day T-Bills 0.0 -- 0.0 -- 0.0 -- 0.0 -- 0.0 -- 1.2 -- 1.8 Dec-99Over/Under 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.3 0.7 0.5 -0.7

NM ERB Cash 2,657,437 0.0 0.0 -- 0.0 -- 0.0 -- 1.3 -- 0.8 -- 1.7 -- 1.1 Jun-0091 Day T-Bills 0.0 -- 0.0 -- 0.0 -- 0.0 -- 0.0 -- 1.2 -- 1.6 Jun-00

Over/Under 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.3 0.8 0.5 -0.5Local Government Investment Pool (LGIP) at STO 75,046,528 0.7 0.0 -- 0.0 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 0.0 Jul-15

XXXXX

55

Page 56: Investment Performance Analysis for the period ending ...nmerb.org/pdfs/Q3 2015 New Mexico ERB IPA.pdfInvestment Performance Analysis for the period ending September 30, 2015 December

September 30, 2015

Note: Ranks are based on gross returns.

New Mexico Educational Retirement BoardTotal Fund Return Summary vs. Peer Universe

56

Page 57: Investment Performance Analysis for the period ending ...nmerb.org/pdfs/Q3 2015 New Mexico ERB IPA.pdfInvestment Performance Analysis for the period ending September 30, 2015 December

September 30, 2015

Note: Ranks are based on gross returns.

New Mexico Educational Retirement BoardTotal Fund Return Summary vs. Peer Universe

57

Page 58: Investment Performance Analysis for the period ending ...nmerb.org/pdfs/Q3 2015 New Mexico ERB IPA.pdfInvestment Performance Analysis for the period ending September 30, 2015 December

Appendix: Market Environment

58

Page 59: Investment Performance Analysis for the period ending ...nmerb.org/pdfs/Q3 2015 New Mexico ERB IPA.pdfInvestment Performance Analysis for the period ending September 30, 2015 December

Inflation has stayed low Unemployment steadily improving

Corporate profits at secular highs Manufacturing above average but trending lower

US Economic Indicators

Source: Bloomberg, Federal Reserve, Bureau of Labor Statistics Source: Bloomberg, Bureau of Labor Statistics

Source: Bloomberg, Institute for Supply ManagementSource: Bloomberg, Bureau of Economic Analysis

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%

90%

‐3%‐2%‐1%0%1%2%3%4%5%6%

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

CPI (LHS)Capacity Utilization (RHS)

0%2%4%6%8%

10%12%14%16%18%

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

US UnemploymentU‐6 Unemployment

6%

7%

8%

9%

10%

11%

12%

13%

1965

1967

1969

1971

1973

1975

1977

1979

1981

1983

1985

1987

1989

1991

1993

1995

1997

1999

2001

2003

2005

2007

2009

2011

2013

Corporate Profits (% of GDP)

35

40

45

50

55

60

65

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

US ISM PMI

September 30, 2015

New Mexico Educational Retirement Board

59

Page 60: Investment Performance Analysis for the period ending ...nmerb.org/pdfs/Q3 2015 New Mexico ERB IPA.pdfInvestment Performance Analysis for the period ending September 30, 2015 December

Inflation remains muted Europe employment recovery lagging

Manufacturing in developed economies has lagged Leading indicators mostly neutral

International Economic Indicators

Source: Bloomberg, Japan Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications, Eurostat Source: Bloomberg, Japan Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications, Eurostat

Source: Bloomberg, OECDSource: Bloomberg, OECD, Eurostat

‐3%

‐2%

‐1%

0%

1%

2%

3%

4%

5%

Jan‐04

Sep‐04

May‐05

Jan‐06

Sep‐06

May‐07

Jan‐08

Sep‐08

May‐09

Jan‐10

Sep‐10

May‐11

Jan‐12

Sep‐12

May‐13

Jan‐14

Sep‐14

May‐15

Japan CPI

Euro CPI0%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

12%

14%

Sep‐00

Jul‐0

1May‐02

Mar‐03

Jan‐04

Nov‐04

Sep‐05

Jul‐0

6May‐07

Mar‐08

Jan‐09

Nov‐09

Sep‐10

Jul‐1

1May‐12

Mar‐13

Jan‐14

Nov‐14

Europe UnemploymentJapan Unemployment

‐10%‐8%‐6%‐4%‐2%0%2%4%6%8%

10%

Sep‐05

May‐06

Jan‐07

Sep‐07

May‐08

Jan‐09

Sep‐09

May‐10

Jan‐11

Sep‐11

May‐12

Jan‐13

Sep‐13

May‐14

Jan‐15

YoY % Cha

nge in M

anufacturin

g

GermanyFranceItalyJapan

97.0

98.0

99.0

100.0

101.0

102.0

103.0

Aug‐05

Apr‐06

Dec‐06

Aug‐07

Apr‐08

Dec‐08

Aug‐09

Apr‐10

Dec‐10

Aug‐11

Apr‐12

Dec‐12

Aug‐13

Apr‐14

Dec‐14

OECD Lead

ing Indicator S

A

Euro AreaJapanUKCanada

September 30, 2015

New Mexico Educational Retirement Board

60

Page 61: Investment Performance Analysis for the period ending ...nmerb.org/pdfs/Q3 2015 New Mexico ERB IPA.pdfInvestment Performance Analysis for the period ending September 30, 2015 December

EM inflation is varied by country Relatively healthy Debt/GDP ratios

Some improvement in account balance challenged countries

Emerging economies make up >50% of global output

Emerging Market Economic Indicators

Source: Bloomberg Source: Bloomberg, IMF

Source: Bloomberg, IMFSource: Bloomberg

‐2.0%

0.0%

2.0%

4.0%

6.0%

8.0%

10.0%

12.0%

Brazil China Mexico SouthAfrica

SouthKorea

Taiwan Turkey

CPI

Most Recent

1 Yr Previous

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

120%

Gross Gov

't Deb

t as %

 of G

DP

‐20%

‐15%

‐10%

‐5%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

Dec‐05

Jul‐0

6Feb‐07

Sep‐07

Apr‐08

Nov

‐08

Jun‐09

Jan‐10

Aug‐10

Mar‐11

Oct‐11

May‐12

Dec‐12

Jul‐1

3Feb‐14

Sep‐14

Apr‐15

Accoun

t Balan

ce (%

 of G

DP)

Mexico Brazil South AfricaTurkey Malaysia Indonesia

0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

100%

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

GDP PP

P as % of W

orld

Developed

Emerging

September 30, 2015

New Mexico Educational Retirement Board

61

Page 62: Investment Performance Analysis for the period ending ...nmerb.org/pdfs/Q3 2015 New Mexico ERB IPA.pdfInvestment Performance Analysis for the period ending September 30, 2015 December

Equity volatility has seen recent spike Treasury rates experiencing periods of higher volatility

Sustained uptick in currency volatilities Commodity pricing volatility has increased

Volatility

Source: Bloomberg, CBOE Source: Bloomberg, Merrill Lynch

Source: Bloomberg, Merrill LynchSource: Bloomberg, Deutsche Bank

05

101520253035404550

Oct‐10

Jan‐11

Apr‐11

Jul‐1

1Oct‐11

Jan‐12

Apr‐12

Jul‐1

2Oct‐12

Jan‐13

Apr‐13

Jul‐1

3Oct‐13

Jan‐14

Apr‐14

Jul‐1

4Oct‐14

Jan‐15

Apr‐15

Jul‐1

5

VIX Index

405060708090

100110120130

Oct‐10

Jan‐11

Apr‐11

Jul‐1

1Oct‐11

Jan‐12

Apr‐12

Jul‐1

2Oct‐12

Jan‐13

Apr‐13

Jul‐1

3Oct‐13

Jan‐14

Apr‐14

Jul‐1

4Oct‐14

Jan‐15

Apr‐15

Jul‐1

5

MOVE Index

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

Sep‐10

Dec‐10

Mar‐11

Jun‐11

Sep‐11

Dec‐11

Mar‐12

Jun‐12

Sep‐12

Dec‐12

Mar‐13

Jun‐13

Sep‐13

Dec‐13

Mar‐14

Jun‐14

Sep‐14

Dec‐14

Mar‐15

Jun‐15

Sep‐15

CVIX Index

5

10

15

20

25

30

Sep‐10

Dec‐10

Mar‐11

Jun‐11

Sep‐11

Dec‐11

Mar‐12

Jun‐12

Sep‐12

Dec‐12

Mar‐13

Jun‐13

Sep‐13

Dec‐13

Mar‐14

Jun‐14

Sep‐14

Dec‐14

Mar‐15

Jun‐15

Sep‐15

ML Commodity 3‐Month Vol

September 30, 2015

New Mexico Educational Retirement Board

62

Page 63: Investment Performance Analysis for the period ending ...nmerb.org/pdfs/Q3 2015 New Mexico ERB IPA.pdfInvestment Performance Analysis for the period ending September 30, 2015 December

Major central bank policy divergence Fed’s ideal rate of policy firming above market expectations

Many developed central banks have maintained low interest rates

EM central bank policies have varied by circumstance

Central Banks

Source: Bloomberg, Federal Reserve, Bank of Japan, ECB, NEPC Source: Bloomberg, Federal Reserve, NEPC

Source: BloombergSource: Bloomberg

$0.00$0.50$1.00$1.50$2.00$2.50$3.00$3.50$4.00$4.50$5.00

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Trillions (b

alan

ce she

et assets) Fed

ECB

BoJ

‐0.5%0.0%0.5%1.0%1.5%2.0%2.5%3.0%3.5%4.0%4.5%

2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

FOMC ParticipantsFOMC MedianFed Funds Futures

Long Term

‐1.0% 0.0% 1.0% 2.0% 3.0% 4.0%

AustraliaCanada

ECBJapan

New ZealandNorway

SingaporeSwitzerland

UKUS

Target central bank rate

1 Yr Previous

Current

0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% 10.0% 12.0% 14.0% 16.0%

BrazilChinaIndia

IndonesiaMalaysiaMexicoPolandRussia

South AfricaSouth Korea

Turkey

Target central bank rate

1 Yr Previous

Current

September 30, 2015

New Mexico Educational Retirement Board

63

Page 64: Investment Performance Analysis for the period ending ...nmerb.org/pdfs/Q3 2015 New Mexico ERB IPA.pdfInvestment Performance Analysis for the period ending September 30, 2015 December

Global valuations are mixed Earnings growth trending lower

Margins elevated, but largely a US story Global equity returns mostly negative

Global Equity

Source: Bloomberg, Standard and Poors, MSCI *MSCI EAFE is ex UK Telecom Source: Bloomberg, Standard and Poors, MSCI

Source: Bloomberg, MSCISource: Bloomberg, MSCI

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

MSCI ACWI MSCI EAFE MSCI EM S&P 500

PE Ratio

+1 Std Dev ‐1 St Dev9/30/2014 9/30/2015

‐50%‐40%‐30%‐20%‐10%0%

10%20%30%40%50%

Oct‐05

Jun‐06

Feb‐07

Oct‐07

Jun‐08

Feb‐09

Oct‐09

Jun‐10

Feb‐11

Oct‐11

Jun‐12

Feb‐13

Oct‐13

Jun‐14

Feb‐15

Rolling

 12‐Mo Ch

ange

 in EBIT

S&P 500MSCI EAFEMSCI EM

0%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

12%

14%

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

Profit Margins

MSCI ACWIMSCI EAFEMSCI EMS&P 500

‐25%

‐20%

‐15%

‐10%

‐5%

0%

MSCI ACWI MSCI ACWIIMI

MSCI EAFE MSCI EM SP 500

3 Month Return

1 Yr Return

September 30, 2015

New Mexico Educational Retirement Board

64

Page 65: Investment Performance Analysis for the period ending ...nmerb.org/pdfs/Q3 2015 New Mexico ERB IPA.pdfInvestment Performance Analysis for the period ending September 30, 2015 December

Valuations near or above historical norms Growth recovery marked by inconsistency

Profit margins remain elevated Trailing performance is negative in near term

US Equity

Source: Bloomberg, Standard and Poors, Russell *Russell 2000 PE is index adjusted positive Source: Bloomberg, Bureau of Economic Analysis

Source: Bloomberg, Standard and Poors, RussellSource: Bloomberg, Standard and Poors, Russell

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

S&P 500 Russell 2000 Russell 1000Growth

Russell 1000Value

PE Ratio

+1 Std Dev ‐1 St Dev9/30/2014 9/30/2015

‐10%

‐8%

‐6%

‐4%

‐2%

0%

2%

4%

6%

20152014201320122011201020092008200720062005

US Real GDP Growth

‐8%‐6%‐4%‐2%0%2%4%6%8%

10%12%

1991

1993

1995

1997

1999

2001

2003

2005

2007

2009

2011

2013

2015

Profit Margins

S&P 500Russell 2000

‐14%‐12%‐10%‐8%‐6%‐4%‐2%0%2%4%

SP 500 Russell 2500 Russell 2000 Russell 1000Growth

Russell 1000Value

3 Month Return

1 Yr Return

September 30, 2015

New Mexico Educational Retirement Board

65

Page 66: Investment Performance Analysis for the period ending ...nmerb.org/pdfs/Q3 2015 New Mexico ERB IPA.pdfInvestment Performance Analysis for the period ending September 30, 2015 December

PEs near historical medians Slow Global Growth

Margins elevated but not at extremes Returns pulled lower by dollar strength

International Equity

Source: Bloomberg, MSCI, FTSE *UK represented by FTSE 100 Index Source: Bloomberg

Source: Bloomberg, MSCISource: Bloomberg, MSCI

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

Europe Japan United Kingdom

PE Ratio

+1 Std Dev ‐1 St Dev9/30/2014 9/30/2015

‐15%

‐10%

‐5%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20152014201320122011201020092008200720062005

Eurozone

Japan

UK

0%1%2%3%4%5%6%7%8%9%

10%

Profit Margins

MSCI EAFE

‐15%

‐10%

‐5%

0%

5%

10%

15%

MSCI EAFE EAFE (Local) EAFE Small Cap EAFE SC (Local)

3 Month Return1 Yr Return

September 30, 2015

New Mexico Educational Retirement Board

66

Page 67: Investment Performance Analysis for the period ending ...nmerb.org/pdfs/Q3 2015 New Mexico ERB IPA.pdfInvestment Performance Analysis for the period ending September 30, 2015 December

Regional valuations show divergence Slowing growth in major economies

Profit margins in line with history EM returns especially negative

Emerging Markets Equity

Source: Bloomberg, MSCI Source: Bloomberg

Source: Bloomberg, MSCISource: Bloomberg, MSCI

0

5

10

15

20

25

China Brazil South Africa India Russia South Korea

PE Ratio

+1 Std Dev ‐1 St Dev9/30/2014 9/30/2015

‐15%

‐10%

‐5%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

20152014201320122011201020092008200720062005

Brazil RussiaIndia China

0%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

12%

14%

Profit Margins

MSCI EM‐30%‐25%‐20%‐15%‐10%‐5%0%5%

10%15%20%

MSCI EM EM (Local) EM SmallCap

EM SC(Local)

Frontier

3 Month Return1 Yr Return

September 30, 2015

New Mexico Educational Retirement Board

67

Page 68: Investment Performance Analysis for the period ending ...nmerb.org/pdfs/Q3 2015 New Mexico ERB IPA.pdfInvestment Performance Analysis for the period ending September 30, 2015 December

Energy returns sharply negative Divergence among S&P 500 sectors

Energy sensitivity especially pronounced in EM Global energy sector weight has fallen

Global Equity by Sector

Source: Bloomberg, MSCI Source: Bloomberg, Standard and Poors

Source: Bloomberg, MSCISource: Bloomberg, MSCI

‐35%‐30%‐25%‐20%‐15%‐10%‐5%0%5%

10%

3‐Mo Return1 Yr Return

‐35%‐30%‐25%‐20%‐15%‐10%‐5%0%5%

10%15%20%

3‐Mo Return1 Yr Return

‐40%‐35%‐30%‐25%‐20%‐15%‐10%‐5%0%

3‐Mo Return1 Yr Return

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

Sector W

eigh

t of A

CWI

9/30/2015

9/30/2014

September 30, 2015

New Mexico Educational Retirement Board

68

Page 69: Investment Performance Analysis for the period ending ...nmerb.org/pdfs/Q3 2015 New Mexico ERB IPA.pdfInvestment Performance Analysis for the period ending September 30, 2015 December

Developed currencies mostly negative versus the dollar

EM currencies have suffered in unique fashions

Yen and GBP expected to decline versus USD Recent dollar strength pronounced

Currencies

Source: Bloomberg Source: Bloomberg

Source: Bloomberg, Federal ReserveSource: Bloomberg

60

70

80

90

100

110

120

1990

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

USD Trade Weighted Index

‐25%

‐20%

‐15%

‐10%

‐5%

0%

5%

JapaneseYen

PoundSterling

Euro SwissFranc

CanadianDollar

AustralianDollar

3 Month Spot Change1 Yr Spot Change

‐40%‐35%‐30%‐25%‐20%‐15%‐10%‐5%0%

3 Month Spot Change1 Yr Spot Change

‐2.0%

‐1.0%

0.0%

1.0%

2.0%

3.0%

4.0%

Euro Yen BritishPound

SwissFranc

Aus Dollar Yuan(O/S)

Chan

ge versus U

SD

3M Currency Fwd12M Currency Fwd

September 30, 2015

New Mexico Educational Retirement Board

69

Page 70: Investment Performance Analysis for the period ending ...nmerb.org/pdfs/Q3 2015 New Mexico ERB IPA.pdfInvestment Performance Analysis for the period ending September 30, 2015 December

Spread levels drifting above historical medians High yield spreads have increased

Similar yield/duration tradeoff among major US indices

Negative high yield returns driven by energy distress

US Fixed Income

Source: Bloomberg, Barclays Source: Bloomberg, Barclays

Source: Bloomberg, BarclaysSource: Bloomberg, Barclays

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

1800

Aaa Aa A Baa Ba B Caa

Spread

 (bps)

+2 Std Dev+1 Std Dev‐1 St Dev9/30/20149/30/2015

0%1%2%3%4%5%6%7%8%9%

Month End Yield3‐Mo Previous Yield

0%1%

2%3%4%5%

6%7%8%

9%

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Yield

Duration

BC AggBC US TreasuryBC CreditBC MBSBC High YieldBC MunicipalBC TIPS

‐7.0%

‐5.0%

‐3.0%

‐1.0%

1.0%

3.0%

5.0%

3 Month Return1 Yr Return

September 30, 2015

New Mexico Educational Retirement Board

70

Page 71: Investment Performance Analysis for the period ending ...nmerb.org/pdfs/Q3 2015 New Mexico ERB IPA.pdfInvestment Performance Analysis for the period ending September 30, 2015 December

European periphery yields at small premium relative to Germany

Global yields are at or near historic lows despite recent uptick

Low global yields relative to duration Global bonds negative over one year in USD terms

International Developed Fixed Income

Source: Barclays, Bloomberg, *European periphery spreads are over equivalent German Bund Source: Bloomberg

Source: Bloomberg, Citigroup, BarclaysSource: Bloomberg, Citigroup, Barclays

0

100

200

300400

500

600

700

OAS

 or E

quivalen

t (bp

s)

9/30/2015

9/30/2014

0.0%

0.5%

1.0%

1.5%

2.0%

2.5%

3.0%

3.5%

4.0%

10 Yr G

ovt Y

ield

Month End Yield 3‐Mo Previous Yield1 Yr Previous Yield

‐1.0%

0.0%

1.0%

2.0%

3.0%

4.0%

5.0%

6.0%

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

Yield

Duration

WGBIBC MultiverseBC Glob Infl‐LinkedBC EuroAggBC Pan‐Euro HY

‐8%

‐6%

‐4%

‐2%

0%

2%

4%

6%

WGBI(Local)

WGBI(USD)

WGBI exUS (Local)

WGBI exUS (USD)

BCMultiverse

BC GlobInfl‐Linked

3 Month Return1 Yr Return

September 30, 2015

New Mexico Educational Retirement Board

71

Page 72: Investment Performance Analysis for the period ending ...nmerb.org/pdfs/Q3 2015 New Mexico ERB IPA.pdfInvestment Performance Analysis for the period ending September 30, 2015 December

Spreads have widened slightly, still in line with history

Emerging market bond yield changes have varied directionally

EM yields higher versus global counterparts Currency effect pronounced in EMD returns

Emerging Markets Fixed Income

Source: Bloomberg, JP Morgan Source: Bloomberg

Source: Bloomberg, JP MorganSource: Bloomberg, JP Morgan

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400Sep‐05

May‐06

Jan‐07

Sep‐07

May‐08

Jan‐09

Sep‐09

May‐10

Jan‐11

Sep‐11

May‐12

Jan‐13

Sep‐13

May‐14

Jan‐15

Sep‐15

Spread

 in bps

EMBI Glob Div EMBI Glob Div IGEMBI Glob Div HY CEMBI Div Broad IGCEMBI Div Broad HY

0%2%4%6%8%

10%12%14%16%18%

10 Yr L

ocal Gov

t Yield

Month End Yield3‐Mo Previous Yield1 Yr Previous Yield

0%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

12%

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Yield

Duration

JPM EMBI CompositeJPM GBI‐EM Glob DivCEMBI IGCEMBI HYEMBI HYEMBI IG ‐25%

‐20%

‐15%

‐10%

‐5%

0%

5%

10%

JPM EMBIGlob Div

JPM GBI‐EMGlob Div

CEMBI IG CEMBI HY ELMI+ Comp

3 Month Return1 Yr Return

September 30, 2015

New Mexico Educational Retirement Board

72

Page 73: Investment Performance Analysis for the period ending ...nmerb.org/pdfs/Q3 2015 New Mexico ERB IPA.pdfInvestment Performance Analysis for the period ending September 30, 2015 December

Treasury yield curve moderately lower versus Q2

German and UK curves have shifted downwards

Global yield curves have flattened Global yields have trended lower over long term

Rates

Source: Bloomberg Source: Bloomberg

Source: BloombergSource: Bloomberg

0.0%

0.5%

1.0%

1.5%

2.0%

2.5%

3.0%

3.5%

4.0%

1Y 3Y 5Y 7Y 10Y

15Y

20Y

25Y

30Y

9/30/20156/30/20159/30/20149/30/2013

‐1.0%‐0.5%0.0%0.5%1.0%1.5%2.0%2.5%3.0%3.5%4.0%

1Y 3Y 5Y 7Y 10Y

15Y

20Y

25Y

30Y

UK Month End UK 3M PreviousJapan Month End Japan 3M PreviousGerm Month End Germ 3M Previous

‐0.5%

0.0%

0.5%

1.0%

1.5%

2.0%

2.5%

3.0%

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

US 10 Yr ‐ 2 YrJapan 10 Yr ‐ 2 YrGermany 10 Yr ‐ 2 Yr

‐1%

0%

1%

2%

3%

4%

5%

6%

7%

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

Japan 10 YrJapan 2 YrGermany 10 YrGermany 2 Year

September 30, 2015

New Mexico Educational Retirement Board

73

Page 74: Investment Performance Analysis for the period ending ...nmerb.org/pdfs/Q3 2015 New Mexico ERB IPA.pdfInvestment Performance Analysis for the period ending September 30, 2015 December

Long duration yields have fallen over last few years even with recent uptick

Lower yields driven by low inflation expectations and real rates

Yields are low but spreads slightly above historic averages

Recent compression in rates has lead to positive returns

Long Rates and Liability

Source: Bloomberg, Citigroup, Barclays Source: Bloomberg, US Treasury, Barclays, NEPC

Source: Bloomberg, BarclaysSource: Bloomberg, BofA Merrill Lynch, Barclays *No index for 20+ year corporate

1%

2%

3%

4%

5%

6%

7%

Dec‐09

Apr‐10

Aug‐10

Dec‐10

Apr‐11

Aug‐11

Dec‐11

Apr‐12

Aug‐12

Dec‐12

Apr‐13

Aug‐13

Dec‐13

Apr‐14

Aug‐14

Dec‐14

Citigroup Pension Liability IndexBC Long CreditBC 20‐30 Yr STRIPS

‐1%0%1%2%3%4%5%6%7%8%9%

10%

Long

 credit y

ield (b

y compo

nent) Spread (BC Long Cred OAS)

Inflation (LT Yield ‐ LT Real Yield)Real Rate (LT Real Yield)

0.0%0.5%1.0%1.5%2.0%2.5%3.0%3.5%4.0%4.5%5.0%

0‐5 Years 5‐10 Years 10‐15 Years 15+ Years 20+ Years

US Corp Spread

US Gov't Yield

‐2%

0%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

12%

14%

20‐30 YrSTRIPS

US AggLong Treas

US LongCredit

US LongGovt/Credit

US LongCredit A+

Long CorpA+

3‐Month Return

1 Year Return

September 30, 2015

New Mexico Educational Retirement Board

74

Page 75: Investment Performance Analysis for the period ending ...nmerb.org/pdfs/Q3 2015 New Mexico ERB IPA.pdfInvestment Performance Analysis for the period ending September 30, 2015 December

US real yields have risen slightly Global real yields are flat to negative

US inflation expectations on downward trend

Global inflation expectations remain subdued

Inflation and Real Rates

Source: Bloomberg Source: Bloomberg

Source: BloombergSource: Bloomberg

‐0.4%

‐0.2%

0.0%

0.2%

0.4%

0.6%

0.8%

1.0%

1.2%

US 5 Yr US 10 Yr

Real Yields

3M Previous Month End3M Forward 1 Yr Fwd ‐1.6%

‐1.4%‐1.2%‐1.0%‐0.8%‐0.6%‐0.4%‐0.2%0.0%0.2%0.4%0.6%

US 5 Yr Germany 5Yr

Britain 5 Yr France 5 Yr Australia 5Yr

Month End3‐Mo Previous

1.50%1.70%1.90%2.10%2.30%2.50%2.70%2.90%3.10%3.30%

5y5y US Breakeven

0.0%

0.5%

1.0%

1.5%

2.0%

2.5%

3.0%

3.5%

4.0%

Sep‐10

Jan‐11

May‐11

Sep‐11

Jan‐12

May‐12

Sep‐12

Jan‐13

May‐13

Sep‐13

Jan‐14

May‐14

Sep‐14

Jan‐15

May‐15

Infla

tion Breakeven

US 10 Yr UK 10 YrGermany 10 Yr France 10 YrAustralia 10 Yr

September 30, 2015

New Mexico Educational Retirement Board

75

Page 76: Investment Performance Analysis for the period ending ...nmerb.org/pdfs/Q3 2015 New Mexico ERB IPA.pdfInvestment Performance Analysis for the period ending September 30, 2015 December

Yields slightly higher relative to last year Gradual recovery in occupancy rates

PE Ratios near or above averages Recent REIT selloff has cut into long rally

Inflation Sensitive Growth Assets

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

1985

1986

1988

1990

1992

1994

1996

1997

1999

2001

2003

2005

2007

2008

2010

2012

2014

Thou

sand

s

US Housing Starts SA

Source: Bloomberg, Alerian, Nareit, Standard and Poors Source: Bloomberg, CB Richard Ellis

Source: Bloomberg, US Census Bureau Source: Bloomberg, Alerian, Nareit, Standard and Poors

0%1%2%3%4%5%6%7%8%9%

Alerian MLP NAREIT Global NAREIT US S&P Glob NatRes

Dividen

d Yield

Month End Yield

1 Yr Previous Yield

75%

80%

85%

90%

95%

100%

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

US Occup

ancy Rate

Office IndustrialRetail Multi‐Family

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

PE Ratio

Alerian MLPNAREIT GlobalNAREIT USS&P Glob Nat Res

‐50%

‐40%

‐30%

‐20%

‐10%

0%

10%

20%

Alerian MLP NAREIT Glob NAREIT US NCREIFProperty

S&P GlobNat Res

3 Mo Return1 Yr Return

September 30, 2015

New Mexico Educational Retirement Board

76

Page 77: Investment Performance Analysis for the period ending ...nmerb.org/pdfs/Q3 2015 New Mexico ERB IPA.pdfInvestment Performance Analysis for the period ending September 30, 2015 December

Negative roll yields in major commodity futures Precipitous fall in oil prices

US fuel production closing gap with consumption

Commodity indices negative after oil-induced decline

Commodities

Source: Bloomberg Source: Bloomberg

Source: Bloomberg, Standard and PoorsSource: Bloomberg, US Department of Energy *Crude oil and liquid fuels

‐3% ‐2% ‐1% 0% 1% 2% 3%

Copper

Corn

Gold

Natural Gas

Oil

Soybeans

3‐Mo Future Roll Yield

0200400600800100012001400160018002000

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

$/Troy

 Oun

ce

$/Ba

rrel

Crude Oil Spot (LHS)Gold Spot (RHS)

75

80

85

90

95

100

0

5

10

15

20

25

US ProductionUS ConsumptionWorld Production (RHS)World Consumption (RHS)

Crude oil and liquid fuels

‐45%‐40%‐35%‐30%‐25%‐20%‐15%‐10%‐5%0%

BloombergCommodity

GSCI GSCI Non‐Energy

3‐Month Return

1 Yr Return

September 30, 2015

New Mexico Educational Retirement Board

77

Page 78: Investment Performance Analysis for the period ending ...nmerb.org/pdfs/Q3 2015 New Mexico ERB IPA.pdfInvestment Performance Analysis for the period ending September 30, 2015 December

�Glossary of Investment Terminology—Risk Statistics

Alpha - Measures the relationship between the fund performance and the per-formance of another fund or benchmark index and equals the excess return while the other fund or benchmark index is zero.

Alpha Jensen - The average return on a portfolio over and above that predict-ed by the capital asset pricing model (CAPM), given the portfolio's beta and the average market return. Also known as the abnormal return or the risk adjusted excess return.

Annualized Excess Return over Benchmark - Annualized fund return minus the annualized benchmark return for the calculated return.

Annualized Return - A statistical technique whereby returns covering periods greater than one year are converted to cover a 12 month time span.

Beta - Measures the volatility or systematic risk and is equal to the change in the fund’s performance in relation to the change in the assigned index’s perfor-mance.

Information Ratio - A measure of the risk adjusted return of a financial security, asset, or portfolio.

Formula: (Annualized Return of Portfolio - Annualized Return of Benchmark)/Annualized Standard Deviation(Period Portfolio Return – Period Benchmark Return). To an-nualize standard deviation, multiply the deviation by the square root of the number of periods per year where monthly returns per year equals 12 and quar-terly returns is four periods per year.

R-Squared – Represents the percentage of a fund’s movements that can be explained by movements in an index. R-Squared values range from 0 to 100. An R-Squared of 100 denotes that all movements of a fund are completely ex-plained by movements in the index.

Sharpe Ratio - A measure of the excess return or risk premium per unit of risk in an investment asset or trading strategy.

Sortino Ratio - A method to differentiate between good and bad volatility in the Sharpe Ratio. The differentiation of up and down volatility allows the calcu-lation to provide a risk adjusted measure of a security or fund's performance without upward price change penalties.

Formula: Calculation Average (X-Y)/Downside Deviation (X-Y) * 2 Where X=Return Series X Y = Return Series Y which is the risk free return (91 day T-bills)

Data Source: InvestorForce

Standard Deviation - The standard deviation is a statistical term that de-scribes the distribution of results. It is a commonly used measure of volatility of returns of a portfolio, asset class, or security. The higher the standard deviation the more volatile the returns are.

Formula: (Annualized Return of Portfolio – Annualized Return of Risk Free) / Annualized Standard Deviation (Portfolio Returns)

Tracking Error - Tracking error, also known as residual risk, is a measure of the degree to which a portfolio tracks its benchmark. It is also a measure of consistency of excess returns. Tracking error is computed as the annualized standard deviation of the difference between a portfolio's return and that of its benchmark.

Formula: Tracking Error = Standard Deviation (X-Y) * �( # of periods per year) Where X = periods portfolio return and Y = the period’s benchmark return For monthly returns, the periods per year = 12 For quarterly returns, the periods per year = 4

Treynor Ratio - A risk-adjusted measure of return based on systematic risk. Similar to the Sharpe ratio with the difference being the Treynor ratio uses beta as the measurement of volatility.

Formula: (Portfolio Average Return - Average Return of Risk-Free Rate)/Portfolio Beta

Up/Down Capture Ratio - A measure of what percentage of a market's re-turns is "captured" by a portfolio. For example, if the market declines 10% over some period, and the manager declines only 9%, then his or her capture ratio is 90%. In down markets, it is advantageous for a manager to have as low a cap-ture ratio as possible. For up markets, the higher the capture ratio the better. Looking at capture ratios can provide insight into how a manager achieves ex-cess returns. A value manager might typically have a lower capture ratio in both up and down markets, achieving excess returns by protecting on the downside, whereas a growth manager might fall more than the overall market in down markets, but achieve above-market returns in a rising market.

UpsideCapture = TotalReturn(FundReturns)/TotalReturns(BMReturn) when Peri-od Benchmark Return is > = 0

DownsideCapture = TotalReturn(FundReturns)/TotalReturns(BMReturn) when Benchmark <0 �

78

Page 79: Investment Performance Analysis for the period ending ...nmerb.org/pdfs/Q3 2015 New Mexico ERB IPA.pdfInvestment Performance Analysis for the period ending September 30, 2015 December

�Glossary of Investment Terminology

# Of Portfolios/Observations1 – The total number of data points that make up a specified universe

Allocation Index3 - The allocation index measures the value added (or sub-tracted) to each portfolio by active management. It is calculated monthly: The portfolio asset allocation to each category from the prior month-end is multi-plied by a specified market index.

Asset Allocation Effect2 - Measures an investment manager’s ability to effec-tively allocate their portfolio’s assets to various sectors. The allocation effect determines whether the overweighting or underweighting of sectors relative to a benchmark contributes positively or negatively to the overall portfolio return. Positive allocation occurs when the portfolio is over weighted in a sector that outperforms the benchmark and underweighted in a sector that underperforms the benchmark. Negative allocation occurs when the portfolio is over weighted in a sector that underperforms the benchmark and under weighted in a sector that outperforms the benchmark.

Agency Bonds (Agencies)3 - The full faith and credit of the United States gov-ernment is normally not pledged to payment of principal and interest on the majority of government agencies issuing these bonds, with maturities of up to ten years. Their yields, therefore, are normally higher than government and their marketability is good, thereby qualifying them as a low risk-high liquidity type of investment. They are eligible as security for advances to the member banks by the Federal Reserve, which attests to their standing.

Asset Backed Securities (ABS)3 - Bonds which are similar to mortgage-backed securities but are collateralized by assets other than mortgages; com-monly backed by credit card receivables, auto loans, or other types of consumer financing.

Attribution3 - Attribution is an analytical technique that allows us to evaluate the performance of the portfolio relative to the benchmark. A proper attribution tells us where value was added or subtracted as a result of the manager’s deci-sions.

Data Source: 1InvestorForce, 2Interaction Effect Performance Attribution, 3NEPC, LLC, 4Investopedia, 5Hedgeco.net

Average Effective Maturity4 - For a single bond, it is a measure of maturity that takes into account the possibility that a bond might be called back to the issuer.

For a portfolio of bonds, average effective maturity is the weighted average of the maturities of the underlying bonds. The measure is computed by weighing each bond's maturity by its market value with respect to the portfolio and the likelihood of any of the bonds being called. In a pool of mortgages, this would also account for the likelihood of prepayments on the mortgages.

Batting Average1 - A measurement representing an investment manager's ability to meet or beat an index.

Formula: Divide the number of days (or months, quarters, etc.) in which the manager beats or matches the index by the total number of days (or months, quarters, etc.) in the period of question and multiply that factor by 100.

Brinson Fachler (BF) Attribution1 - The BF methodology is a highly accepted industry standard for calculating the allocation, selection, and interaction effects within a portfolio that collectively explains a portfolio’s underlying performance. The main advantage of the BF methodology is that rather than using the overall return of the benchmark, it goes a level deeper than BHB and measures wheth-er the benchmark sector, country, etc. outperformed/or underperformed the overall benchmark.

Brinson Hood Beebower (BHB) Attribution1 - The BHB methodology shows that excess return must be equal to the sum of all other factors (i.e., allocation effect, selection effect, interaction effect, etc.). The advantage to using the BHB methodology is that it is a highly accepted industry standard for calculating the allocation, selection, and interaction effects within a portfolio that collectively explains a portfolio’s underlying performance.

Corporate Bond (Corp) 4 - A debt security issued by a corporation and sold to investors. The backing for the bond is usually the payment ability of the compa-ny, which is typically money to be earned from future operations. In some cas-es, the company's physical assets may be used as collateral for bonds.

Correlation1 - A range of statistical relationships between two or more random variables or observed data values. A correlation is a single number that de-scribes the degree of relationship between variables.

79

Page 80: Investment Performance Analysis for the period ending ...nmerb.org/pdfs/Q3 2015 New Mexico ERB IPA.pdfInvestment Performance Analysis for the period ending September 30, 2015 December

�Glossary of Investment Terminology

Coupon4 – The interest rate stated on a bond when it is issued. The coupon is typically paid semiannually. This is also referred to as the "coupon rate" or "coupon percent rate."

Currency Effect1 - Is the effect that changes in currency exchange rates over time affect excess performance.

Derivative Instrument3 - A financial obligation that derives its precise value from the value of one or more other instruments (or assets) at the same point of time. For example, the relationship between the value of an S&P 500 futures contract (the derivative instrument in this case) is determined by the value of the S&P 500 Index and the value of a U.S. Treasury bill that matures at the expiration of the futures contract.

Downside Deviation1 - Equals the standard deviation of negative return or the measure of downside risk focusing on the standard deviation of negative re-turns.

Formula: Annualized Standard Deviation (Fund Return - Average Fund Return) where average fund return is greater than individual fund returns, monthly or quarter-ly.

Duration3 - Duration is a measure of interest rate risk. The greater the dura-tion of a bond, or a portfolio of bonds, the greater its price volatility will be in response to a change in interest rates. A bond’s duration is inversely related to interest rates and directly related to time to maturity.

Equity/Debt/Cash Ratio1 – The percentage of an investment or portfolio that is in Equity, Debt, and/or Cash (i.e. A 7/89/4 ratio represents an investment that is made up of 7% Equity, 89% Debt, and 4% Cash).

Foreign Bond3 - A bond that is issued in a domestic market by a foreign entity, in the domestic market's currency. A foreign bond is most often issued by a foreign firm to raise capital in a domestic market that would be most interested in purchasing the firm's debt. For foreign firms doing a large amount of business in the domestic market, issuing foreign bonds is a common practice.

Hard Hurdle5 – is a hurdle rate that once beaten allows a fund manager to charge a performance fee on only the funds above the specified hurdle rate.

Data Source: 1InvestorForce, 2Interaction Effect Performance Attribution, 3NEPC, LLC, 4Investopedia, 5Hedgeco.net

High-Water Mark4 - The highest peak in value that an investment fund/account has reached. This term is often used in the context of fund manager compensation, which is performance based. Some performance-based fees only get paid when fund performance exceeds the high-water mark. The high-water mark ensures that the manager does not get paid large sums for poor perfor-mance.

Hurdle Rate4 - The minimum rate of return on an investment required, in order for a manager to collect incentive fees from the investor, which is usually tied to a benchmark.

Interaction Effects2 - The interaction effect measures the combined impact of an investment manager’s selection and allocation decisions within a sector. For example, if an investment manager had superior selection and over weighted that particular sector, the interaction effect is positive. If an investment manag-er had superior selection, but underweighted that sector, the interaction effect is negative. In this case, the investment manager did not take advantage of the superior selection by allocating more assets to that sector. Since many invest-ment managers consider the interaction effect to be part of the selection or the allocation, it is often combined with the either effect.

Median3 - The value (rate of return, market sensitivity, etc.) that exceeds one-half of the values in the population and that is exceeded by one-half of the val-ues. The median has a percentile rank of 50.

Modified Duration3 - The percentage change in the price of a fixed income security that results from a change in yield.

Mortgage Backed Securities (MBS)3 - Bonds which are a general obligation of the issuing institution but are also collateralized by a pool of mortgages.

Municipal Bond (Muni) 4 - A debt security issued by a state, municipality or county to finance its capital expenditures.

Net Investment Change1 – Is the change in an investment after accounting for all Net Cash Flows.

Performance Fee4 - A payment made to a fund manager for generating posi-tive returns. The performance fee is generally calculated as a percentage of investment profits, often both realized and unrealized.

80

Page 81: Investment Performance Analysis for the period ending ...nmerb.org/pdfs/Q3 2015 New Mexico ERB IPA.pdfInvestment Performance Analysis for the period ending September 30, 2015 December

�Glossary of Investment Terminology

Policy Index3 - A custom benchmark designed to indicate the returns that a passive investor would earn by consistently following the asset allocation targets set forth in this investment policy statement.

Price to Book (P/B)4 - A ratio used to compare a stock's market value to its book value. It is calculated by dividing the current closing price of the stock by the latest quarter's book value per share, also known as the "price-equity ratio".

Price to Earnings (P/E)3 - The weighted equity P/E is based on current price and trailing 12 months earnings per share (EPS).

Price to Sales (P/S)4 - A ratio for valuing a stock relative to its own past per-formance, other companies, or the market itself. Price to sales is calculated by dividing a stock's current price by its revenue per share for the trailing 12 months.

Return on Equity (ROE)4 - The amount of net income returned as a percent-age of shareholders equity. Return on equity measures a corporation's profita-bility by revealing how much profit a company generates with the money share-holders have invested.

Selection (or Manager) Effect2 - Measures the investment manager’s ability to select securities within a given sector relative to a benchmark. The over or underperformance of the portfolio is weighted by the benchmark weight, there-fore, selection is not affected by the manager’s allocation to the sector. The weight of the sector in the portfolio determines the size of the effect—the larger the sector, the larger the effect is, positive or negative.

Soft Hurdle rate5 – is a hurdle rate that once beaten allows a fund manager to charge a performance fee based on the entire annualized return.

Tiered Fee1 – A fee structure that is paid to fund managers based on the size of the investment (i.e. 1.00% fee on the first $10M invested, 0.90% on the next $10M, and 0.80% on the remaining balance).

Total Effects2 - The active management (total) effect is the sum of the selec-tion, allocation, and interaction effects. It is also the difference between the total portfolio return and the total benchmark return. You can use the active management effect to determine the amount the investment manager has add-ed to a portfolio’s return.

Data Source: 1InvestorForce, 2Interaction Effect Performance Attribution, 3NEPC, LLC, 4Investopedia, 5Hedgeco.net

Total Return1 - The actual rate of return of an investment over a specified time period. Total return includes interest, capital gains, dividends, and distributions realized over a defined time period.

Universe3 - The list of all assets eligible for inclusion in a portfolio.

Upside Deviation1 – Standard Deviation of Positive Returns

Weighted Avg. Market Cap.4 - A stock market index weighted by the market capitalization of each stock in the index. In such a weighting scheme, larger companies account for a greater portion of the index. Most indexes are con-structed in this manner, with the best example being the S&P 500.

Yield (%)3 - The current yield of a security is the current indicated annual divi-dend rate divided by current price. Yield to Maturity3 -The discount rate that equates the present value of cash flows, both principal and interest, to market price.

81

Page 82: Investment Performance Analysis for the period ending ...nmerb.org/pdfs/Q3 2015 New Mexico ERB IPA.pdfInvestment Performance Analysis for the period ending September 30, 2015 December

Information Disclaimer

• Past performance is no guarantee of future results.

• All investments carry some level of risk. Diversification and other asset allocation techniques are not guaranteed to ensure profit or protect against losses.

• NEPC’s source for portfolio pricing, calculation of accruals, and transaction information is the plan’s custodian bank. Information on market indices and security characteristics is received from other sources external to NEPC. While NEPC has exercised reasonable professional care in preparing this report, we cannot guarantee the accuracy of all source information contained within.

• Some index returns displayed in this report or used in calculation of a policy, allocation or custom benchmark may be preliminary and subject to change.

• This report is provided as a management aid for the client’s internal use only. Information contained in this report does not constitute a recommendation by NEPC.

• This report may contain confidential or proprietary information and may not be copied or redistributed to any party not legally entitled to receive it.

Reporting Methodology

• The client’s custodian bank is NEPC’s preferred data source unless otherwise directed. NEPC generally reconciles custodian data to manager data. If the custodian cannot provide accurate data, manager data may be used.

• Trailing time period returns are determined by geometrically linking the holding period returns, from the first full month after inception to the report date. Rates of return are annualized when the time period is longer than a year. Performance is presented gross and/or net of manager fees as indicated on each page.

• For managers funded in the middle of a month, the “since inception” return will start with the first full month, although actual inception dates and cash flows are taken into account in all Composite calculations.

• This report may contain forward-looking statements that are based on NEPC’s estimates, opinions and beliefs, but NEPC cannot guarantee that any plan will achieve its targeted return or meet other goals.

Information Disclaimer and Reporting Methodology

82