28
Competition Sensitive Document Attached Team ZZX IPT 2008 White Paper - TEMPLATE The Attached Document is Competition Sensitive until May 2, 2008 IPT Phase 2 White Paper File naming Convention: Section 01 IPT2008_01_Phase2_TeamX_White_Paper_revXX.doc Section 02 IPT2008_02_Phase2_TeamX_White_Paper_revXX.doc Section 03 IPT2008_03_Phase2_ TeamX_White_Paper_revXX.doc Project Team Baseli ne Alt. 1 Alt. 2 Alt. 3 01 Micro UAV Team A 01-BL 01A-ALT1 01A–ALT2 01A–ALT3 01 Micro UAV Team B 01-BL 01B-ALT1 01B–ALT2 01B–ALT3 01 Micro UAV Team C 01-BL 01C-ALT1 01C–ALT2 01C–ALT3 02 LETS Team D 02-BL 02D-ALT1 02C–ALT2 N/A 02 LETS Team E 02-BL 02E-ALT1 02E–ALT2 N/A 02 LETS Team F 02-BL 02F-ALT1 02F–ALT2 N/A 03 CCLR Team G 03-BL 03G-ALT1 03G–ALT2 03G–ALT3 03 CCLR Team H 03-BL 03H-ALT1 03H–ALT2 03H–ALT3 03 CCLR Team I 03-BL 03I-ALT1 03I–ALT2 03I–ALT3 If you find this document unattended put it in a secure place and notify Dr. Robert A. Frederick, Jr. IPT Project Director Office: 256-824-7203 Cell: 256-503-4909 [email protected] IPT 2008 White Paper Template Page 1 of 28

IPT2003_White_Paper_Template - matthewwturner.commatthewwturner.com/uah/IPT2008_summer/baselines/Cy…  · Web viewThe deliverables for Phase 2 are a White Paper and an Oral Presentation

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Competition Sensitive Document Attached

Team ZZXIPT 2008 White Paper - TEMPLATEThe Attached Document is Competition Sensitive until May 2, 2008

IPT Phase 2 White Paper File naming Convention:Section 01 IPT2008_01_Phase2_TeamX_White_Paper_revXX.docSection 02 IPT2008_02_Phase2_TeamX_White_Paper_revXX.docSection 03 IPT2008_03_Phase2_ TeamX_White_Paper_revXX.doc

Project Team Baseline Alt. 1 Alt. 2 Alt. 301 Micro UAV Team A 01-BL 01A-ALT1 01A–ALT2 01A–ALT301 Micro UAV Team B 01-BL 01B-ALT1 01B–ALT2 01B–ALT301 Micro UAV Team C 01-BL 01C-ALT1 01C–ALT2 01C–ALT302 LETS Team D 02-BL 02D-ALT1 02C–ALT2 N/A02 LETS Team E 02-BL 02E-ALT1 02E–ALT2 N/A02 LETS Team F 02-BL 02F-ALT1 02F–ALT2 N/A03 CCLR Team G 03-BL 03G-ALT1 03G–ALT2 03G–ALT303 CCLR Team H 03-BL 03H-ALT1 03H–ALT2 03H–ALT303 CCLR Team I 03-BL 03I-ALT1 03I–ALT2 03I–ALT3

If you find this document unattended put it in a secure place and notify

Dr. Robert A. Frederick, Jr. IPT Project Director

Office: 256-824-7203Cell: 256-503-4909

[email protected]

IPT 2008 White Paper Template Page 1 of 20

Robert A. Frederick, Jr, 02/07/06,
You can hide the comments on the final version by going to the VIEW menus and clicking on the MARKUP command. You can also use the REVIEWING TOOLBAR and select FINAL to remove comments from view
Robert A. Frederick, Jr, 02/07/06,
For Projects Team Number corresponds to the IPT123 Room Number
Robert A. Frederick, Jr, 02/07/06,
Style Guide Note on Naming Protocol Since we are dealing with 31 different concepts, the table below gives order to the naming conventions that will be used in the White Papers. To give a Global Perspective, each concept in the whole IPT Project will have a unique serial number as shown below.
Robert A. Frederick, Jr, 02/07/06,
TO update the filename of your document in the footer, open the footer, click on the old document name and the press F9. The link should then update to the current filename you are editing.
Robert A. Frederick, Jr, 02/07/06,
Instructions are shown in red font. Remove any red text in the final submission.
Robert A. Frederick, Jr, 02/02/06,
ZZ is the project number e.g., 01, 02, 03, 04; and X is the team letter e.g., A, B, ...I.

Alternate Concepts White Paper

IPT ZZX Systems Engineering

Discipline NameDiscipline NameDiscipline NameDiscipline NameDiscipline Name

John Doe; Team Leader; InstitutionJohn Doe; Thee University of Alabama in HuntsvilleJohn Doe; Southern UniversityJohn Doe; ESTACAJohn Doe; Institution

Modeling and SimulationDiscipline NameDiscipline NameDiscipline NameDiscipline NameDiscipline Name

John Doe; Team Leader; InstitutionJohn Doe; Southern UniversityJohn Doe; ESTACAJohn Doe; InstitutionJohn Doe

Manufacturing and TestingDiscipline NameDiscipline NameDiscipline NameDiscipline NameDiscipline Name

John Doe; Team Leader; InstitutionJohn Doe; InstitutionJohn Doe; InstitutionJohn Doe; InstitutionJohn Doe, Institution

Submitted By:

[Insert Company Name Here]

<February xx, 2008>

Submitted To:Mr. Tom Percy and Dr. D. Brian Landrum, or Dr. P.J. Benfield and Dr. Matthew Turner or

Dr. Robert Frederick and Dr. D. Brian LandrumDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering

The University of Alabama in [email protected]

IPT 2008 White Paper Template Page 2 of 20

, 02/12/08,
Keep your instructors’ names and email, and delete the rest.
henderl, 02/02/06,
Insert the appropriate date here.
Robert Frederick, 02/02/06,
Be sure to include ESTACA students in this section
Robert A. Frederick, Jr, 02/02/06,
Discipline Name are Project Specific and
Robert Frederick, 02/12/08,
[ZZ is your Project number, X is your Team Letter

Abstract[Begin typing your abstract here in English]

IPT 2008 White Paper Template Page 3 of 20

Donna Hamby, 02/12/08,
Begin typing your abstract here.. Only the abstracts can appear on this page. No other material can appear on this page. The abstract should give a very short summary of your goals for Phase 2, the alternatives, the selection, and the main reason for the result.

Technical Description [Limited to pages 4 - 5 only]

1.0 Overview of Phase 2For Phase 2, the individual IPTs have worked independently to produce three alternative configurations to a Baseline Design. The deliverables for Phase 2 are a White Paper and an Oral Presentation. The White Paper compares the Baseline Concept, named the Project Specific Name and Serial Number with three alternative concepts. This White Paper summarizes a strategy for selecting alternative systems, qualitative and quantitative information to evaluate each idea, and a logical rationale for down selecting one concept from among the four presented.

1.1 Specification Summary [Begin typing first paragraph here]

1.2 Team X Approach to Phase 2

[Begin typing first paragraph here]

IPT 2008 White Paper Template Page 4 of 20

Robert Frederick, 02/02/06,
Identify the key 2-3 challenges that the baseline and the CDD specification made apparent to your team that you have attempted to resolve in Phase 2.
Robert Frederick, 02/12/08,
[you must use the section title]
Robert Frederick, 02/02/06,
[must use the section title] Summarize very briefly, in your own way, the main customer requirements.
Robert Frederick, 02/07/06,
You may use this paragraph word for word, or rephrase if you like. Insert the project-specific baseline concept name and serial number.

[Begin typing first paragraph here]

Figure 1 shows the outline of the design process used for Phase 2.

1/16/2004 Section 3 - Landrum 4

Project Office

CDD/Customer

Systems Engineer

Guidance/Controls Mechanism

Aerodynamics

Seeker Guidance/Controls

Engineering Analysis

System Simulation

Results

1

8

2

3

45

6

7

Lethality Propulsion

Systems Engineering

Figure 1 – Outline of the Design Methodology1

IPT 2008 White Paper Template Page 5 of 20

Donna Hamby, 02/07/06,
Note the format for Figure caption, these need to be standard throughout the white paper. Figure captions are below the figure, Sentence case, numbered sequentially, no period at the end, dash between figure number and caption. Keep font consistent.
Robert Frederick, 02/12/08,
Make a flow diagram that represents the process that your team used to synthesize, evaluate, and selects a preferred concept for phase 2. This figure is onlu an example.
Donna Hamby, 02/07/06,
Must be referenced BEFORE the figure.
Robert Frederick, 02/07/06,
This is an automatic reference to Figure 1 You can put it at the appropriate point in the text. Figure 1 is an Instructor-Directed figure and must be referenced somewhere in the text.
Robert Frederick, 02/02/06,
The second paragraph should briefly summarize the design method and the codes that were used.

2.0 Description of Concepts [Limited to page 6 only]In this section, you are to explain the logic that you used in identifying the attributes of a concept, eliminating possible choices, and configuring the three alternative concepts. Since there will be thousands of possible configurations, and you will only present three, this part of the White Paper briefly describes the logic and strategy for the configurations that you are presenting. It is essential to concentrate on the major attributes necessary to make a configuration decision.

Table 1 summarizes the final configurations of the Baseline plus your three team-specific alternatives. It shows the different categories of configuration choices in the left column. The template has an example for the IPT 2008 class for inspection. The Systems Engineering leads from each team need to reconfigure this table for you project. Within each category, there are several configuration states listed. Teams may add team-specific choices within categories if required without revealing the choice to the entire class. There are four columns in the table that describe configuration state for each concept. Systems engineering for all teams again need to propose the values for the class baseline so that it is presented consistently by both teams.

IPT 2008 White Paper Template Page 6 of 20

Robert A. Frederick, Jr, 02/07/06,
This is an automated cross reference
Robert Frederick, 02/07/06,
Describe the functional differences in the proposed concepts in relation. This is not an assessment of the performance but a description of the attributes and how they logically fit together. Discuss why some of the possible options were taken from consideration. Make sure to refer to the table on the next page at lease one time.

Table 1– BOOST Matrix for [Project Name] [Page 7]

Baseline Alternative Concepts

03-BL 03H-ALT1 03H-ALT2 03H-ALT3CONFIGURATIONCATEGORY

STATE SMURV

1. MUAV Platform [Fixed Wing][Rotary Wing][Compound]

[Other]Rotary Wing

2. Propulsion [Electric][Gas][Other]

Electric

3. Communication Concept of Operations

[Relay][Direct][Combo][Other]

Direct

4. Command & Control

[Tele-Operated][Autonomous]

[Other]

Tele-Operated

5. Power Supply [Solar][Battery][Other]

Battery

6. Power Concept of Operations

[Single Use][Recharge]

[Mid-Mission Recharge]

Recharge

7. Communication [IR][RF]

[Other]Tube

8. Primary Structure / Material

[Composite][Metal][Plastic][Other]

Plastic

9. Guidance Sensor Package

[SLU][COTS] [Other] SLU

10. Number of MUAVs

[Single][Multiple] Single

IPT 2008 White Paper Template Page 7 of 20

Robert A. Frederick, Jr, 02/12/08,
Put Each Project’s Team Specific Serial Number from the Matrix on the cover page in the box above each alterative.. This example is for Project 03 Team H.
Robert A. Frederick, Jr, 02/12/08,
Put Each Project’s Team Specific Serial Number from the Matrix on the cover page in the box above each alterative.. This example is for Project 01 Team A.
Robert A. Frederick, Jr, 02/12/08,
FOR IPT2008 this table will be Project Specific. All three systems engineering leads must propose the categories and states for each project..
Donna Hamby, 02/07/06,
Notice that Tables have TITLES above the actual table. Table must also be referenced before the table in text, Table Title in sentence case, numbered sequentially, dash between number and title, no period at end of title.
, 02/12/08,
Here,Project 02 (LETS) can insert a trade tree and omit the BOOST Matrix, if the team desires.

2.1 Baseline Concept: “Shark 1” [ 01-BL] [page 8][Give a good 1 page description of the overall configuration (Table 2), key subsystems, operations, technical data (Table 2), evaluation of the configuration (Table 3), and others as you see fit. Refer to Figure 2 in section 5.]

IPT 2008 White Paper Template Page 8 of 20

Robert A. Frederick, Jr, 02/07/06,
Example Serial Numbers are illustrated for Project 01 Team A. Adjust Serial Numbers for your Project and Team

2.2 Alternative 1 Concept: “Sword Fish” [01A – ALT1]  Page 9[Give a good 1 page description of the overall configuration (Table 2), key subsystems, operations, technical data (Table 2), evaluation of the configuration (Table 3), and others as you see fit. Refer to Figure 2 in section 5.]

IPT 2008 White Paper Template Page 9 of 20

2.3 Alternative 2 Concept: “Crab” [01A – ALT2 ]” page 10[Give a good 1 page description of the overall configuration (Table 2), key subsystems, operations, technical data (Table 2), evaluation of the configuration (Table 3), and others as you see fit. Refer to Figure 2 in section 5.]

IPT 2008 White Paper Template Page 10 of 20

2.4 Alternative 3 Concept: “Sting Ray” [01A – ALT1 ] [Give a good 1 page description of the overall configuration (Table 2), key subsystems, operations, technical data (Table 2), evaluation of the configuration (Table 3), and others as you see fit. Refer to Figure 2 in section 5.].

IPT 2008 White Paper Template Page 11 of 20

3.0 Selection of Final Concept [Limited to Page 12][Discuss Table 3. Explain the categories that you used, the weighting factors, and the scoring methods. Summarize the biggest distinction(s) and the reasoning behind your evaluation of them. Declare one concept as your Preferred Concept]. Explain WHY you think that the choice you made is the best potential idea, based on the customer requirements.]

IPT 2008 White Paper Template Page 12 of 20

4.0 Phase 3 Plan [Limited to Page 13]

4.1 Key Issues to Address[Note the major issues that must be addressed in order to deploy the concept by the required date. These could include technology development, clarification of actual operations interfaces with station, testing and verification, availability of funding, etc.]

4.3 Phase 3 Schedule[Outline your plans for refining the selected concept in Phase 3. Describe how you intend to address the developmental issues in Phase 3 using analysis, assumption, or other methods.]

IPT 2008 White Paper Template Page 13 of 20

5.0 Illustrations [Page 14]

Figure 2 – Baseline: “Shark 1” [01-BL]

Figure 3 -:Alternative 1 Concept : “Sword Fish” [01A – ALT1]

IPT 2008 White Paper Template Page 14 of 20

Robert A. Frederick, Jr, 02/07/06,
Example Serial Numbers are illustrated for Project 01 Team A. Adjust Serial Numbers for your Project and Team

[Page 15]

Figure 4 – Alternative 2 Concept: “Crab” [01A – ALT2]

Figure 5 – Alternative 3 Concept : “Sting Ray” [01A – ALT1]

IPT 2008 White Paper Template Page 15 of 20

Table 2 – Engineering Summary (required) [Page 16]

03-BL 03H-ALT1

03H-Alt2

03H-ALT3

SMURV NAME Units1. Micro UAV Data a) Width m b) Length m d) Height m c) Weight g2. Flight Data a) Cruise Speed fps b) Hover Altitude m c) Flight Altitude m d) Minimum Release Altitude m e) Maximum Range m f) Maximum Endurance Minutes3. Video Data a) Frame Rate fps b) Quality (letter height / distance) -4. Other (Team supplied)

IPT 2008 White Paper Template Page 16 of 20

Robert A. Frederick, Jr, 01/14/06,
FOR IPT2006 THE PARAMETERSFOR THIS TABLE will be Project Specific
Donna Hamby, 02/03/06,
This is project specific, the project office and instructor agrees on these.

Table 3 - Concept Evaluation Matrix [Page 17]

Scoring LegendNA

Not Analyzed0

Does Not Meet0

Partially Meets5

Meets10

CDD Attribute Score Wt.

03-BL 03H-Alt1 03H-Alt2 03H-Alt3CDD Requirement

SMURV Sword Fish Crab Sting

Ray

Weight2 Bofors

L70

Bofors

L70

Bofors

L70

Bofors

L70

Threshold: 500 gObjective: 250 g

Maximum Height/ Width Dimension 3

212.9

212.9

212.9

212.9Threshold: 0.46 mObjective: 0.30 m

Hover/Flight Altitude 3 140

140

140

140

Threshold: 1 to 15 mObjective: 0.5 to 100 m

Collision Avoidance3

20 10Threshold: DesiredObjective: Required

Return to Platform after Mission Complete 2 NA Threshold: Desired

Objective: RequiredRecharge Capability 3 NA Threshold: Desired

Objective: RequiredTime of Flight

2 7.5

Threshold: 30 minObjective: 60 min

Range of Flight2

10-15Threshold: 150 mObjective: 1000 m

Loss of Signal Correction 1 NA Threshold: Desired

Objective: RequiredGCS Receipt of Video 2 NA Threshold: Desired

Objective: RequiredVideo Frame Rate 1 Threshold: 5 to 10 fps

Objective: 15 fpsVideo Quality 3 Identify 2.54 cm

lettering at 6.096 m User Supplied

3 User Selected

3 User Selected

1 User Selected

Total ScoreBest Concept = 100

IPT 2008 White Paper Template Page 17 of 20

Robert A. Frederick, Jr, 02/07/06,
Example Names are shown for Project 01 Team A
Donna Hamby, 02/07/06,
The Project Office and Instructors must agree on Common Categories and scoring system for each team in the project to use.
Donna Hamby, 02/03/06,
Recommended attributes and scoring, they can be changed as long as they are consistent.
Robert A. Frederick, Jr, 02/07/06,
I any item is NA, its weighting function will default to “0” or the scoring will be biased based on the number of assessments. Alternatively, you can force yourself to make an assessment of all concepts for items reported. The usual situation is however that you know more about the Baseline than the alternatives. The strategy is then to score only the items that are evaluated for all four configurations.
Robert A. Frederick, Jr, 14/01/06,
FOR IPT2006 THE CDD ATTRIBUTES AND CDD REQUIREMENTS FOR THIS TABLE will be Project Specific.
Donna Hamby, 03/02/06,
This table will be used for the poster presentation.

6.0 References [Page 18]1Fleeman, Eugene L, “Tactical Missile Design,” AIAA Education Series, 2001, ISBN: I-56347-494-8

IPT 2008 White Paper Template Page 18 of 20

Robert Frederick, 02/03/06,
You need to have at least 10 references, 5 of those from non-internet sources.
Robert Frederick, 02/09/05,
Insert References at the point of Citation in the Text. Use INSERT => REFERENCE => FOOTNOTE=>ENDNOTE Command with the at “End of Section” option. This will automatically number the references and put them at the end here after the section break.

References: References must be limited to easily accessible documents, i.e., those available from libraries, databases, or other public sources. They are to be numbered in the order in which they are cited and grouped at the end of the manuscript in the following form (not listed alphabetically). Use the INSERT REFERENCE FOOTNONE [ENDNOTE] Command at the point in the text where the reference is cited. This will automatically put you to the end of the report where you can type your reference. The examples below are to show the proper format of different sources.

1) Journals: Walker, R. E., Stone, A. R., and Shandor, M., "Secondary Gas Injection in a Conical Rocket Nozzle," AIAA Journal, Vol. 1, No. 2, 1963, pp. 334-338.

2) Books: Turner, M. J., Martin, H. C., and Leible, R. C., "Further Development and Applications of Stiffness Method," Matrix Methods of Structural Analysis, 1st ed., Vol. 1, Wiley, New York, 1963, pp. 6-10.

3) AIAA Book Series: Sutton, K., "Air Radiation Revisited," Thermal Design of Aeroassisted Orbital Transfer Vehicles, edited by H. F. Nelson, Vol. 96, Progress in Astronautics and Aeronautics, AIAA, New York, 1985, pp. 419-441.

4) Reports: Book, E., and Bratman, H., "Using Compilers to Build Compilers," Systems Development Corp., SP-176, Santa Monica, CA, Aug. 1960.

5) Transactions/Proceedings: Soo, S. L., "Boundary-Layer Motion of a Gas-Solid Suspension," Proceedings of the Symposium on Interaction Between Fluids and Particles, Vol. 1, Inst. of Chemical Engineers, New York, 1962, pp. 50-63.

6) AIAA Meeting Papers: Bhutta, V. A., and Lewis, C. H., "Aerothermodynamic Performance of 3-D and Bent-Nose RVs under Hypersonic Conditions," AIAA Paper 90-3068, Aug. 1990.

7) Web Page: http://www.place.com, UAH Home Page, Assessed February 20, 2005.Classified or export-restricted references, personal/private communications, and personal Web sites are not permitted. Give inclusive page numbers for references to journal articles and a page or chapter for books. Cite references in numerical order in the text.

IPT 2008 White Paper Template Page 19 of 20

Appendix A – Instructor Directed Reporting Items[This appendix documents any other instructor directed team reporting items that are not critical to the Phase 2 White Paper, These could be copies of telephone reports with Southern University and ESTACA, revised letters of intent, or other tasks that can be documented in the appendix of the White Paper.]

1

IPT 2008 White Paper Template Page 20 of 20