IVES PARK7400 Wi l low Street

Sebastopol Cal i forniaAPL: 004-201-023

Prepared for

The City of Sebastopol

Prepared by

ROYSTON HANAMOTO ALLEY & ABEYLandscape Arch itects and Planners

FEBRUARY 25, 2013

MASTER PLAN REPORT

IVES PARK - 2

IVES PARK - 3

A C K N O W L E D G E M E N T S

COUNCIL MEMBERS Michael Kyes, Mayor Robert Jacob, Vice Mayor John Eder, City Councilmember Sarah Glade Gurney, City Councilmember Patrick Slayter, Councilmember

PLANNING COMMISSION Yvette Williams van Aggelen Michael Jacob Colin Doyle Evert Fernandez Linda Kelley Russ Pinto Scott Stegeman

PLANNING DEPARTMENT Kenyon Webster, Planning Director Jocelyn Drake, Associate Planner Rebecca Mansour, Administrative Assistant

ROYSTON HANAMOTO ALLEY & ABEY

Cordelia Hill, ASLA - Principal Tom Fitzgerald - Project Manager Kirsten Ostberg - Staff

IVES PARK - 4

T A B L E O F C O N T E N T S

SECTION 1 INTRODUCTION P.7

Master Plan Background Master Plan Purpose

SECTION 2 PARK HISTORY & EXISTING CONDITIONS P.11

Site Location & Description Park History Existing Conditions Ives Pool Veteran’s Hall Little League (Polley Field) Playground Calder Creek Picnic Areas Park Entrances Paths & Paving Existing Bridges Wood Stage Concrete Stage Lighting Restroom Landscaping Topography Education Festivals

SECTION 3 MASTER PLAN P.21

Master Plan Intent Master Plan Process Accessibility Improvement Zones Entrance Accessibility Art Entry Zone North Calder Creek Restoration South Calder Creek Restoration Picnic and Passive Play Zone Pool Perimeter Improvements� � � %DOOÀHOG�3HULPHWHU�,PSURYHPHQWV New Restroom New Play Area Performance Zone Corner Capture

IVES PARK - 5

General Park Improvements Site Improvements Off-Site Improvements Park Identity

SECTION 4 FUNDING P.35

Fund-Raising Social Media Community Outreach Private Donations Preparation for Applications Grant Opportunities Land & Water Conservation Funds Additional Resources & Partners

SECTION 5 SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES P.43

Stormwater Regulations Green Building & Construction

SECTION 6 APPENDIX P.47

Existing Conditions Survey Aerial Photo Site Photo Previous Plan Alternatives Master Plan Rendering Zone Diagram Master Plan Cost Estimate Hydrology Study Biological Constraints Cultural Constraints

A. B. C. D. E. F.

G. H. I. J.

IVES PARK - 6

IVES PARK - 7

INTRODUCTION1

IVES PARK - 8

M A S T E R P L A N B A C K G R O U N D

In the last several years, the Sebastopol City Council has received a number of comments from members of the community regarding Ives Park. Issues raised were related to park safety, maintenance, facility upgrades, and creek restoration, among other topics. In OLJKW�RI�UHFHQW�GLVFXVVLRQV�UHJDUGLQJ�WKHVH�LVVXHV��WKH�&LW\�&RXQFLO� LGHQWLÀHG�D�QHHG�IRU�potential improvements to Ives Park. The City Council tasked the Planning Commission with serving as the review body in evaluating Ives Park issues.

The City of Sebastopol hired Royston Hanamoto Alley & Abey to review the existing park condition, conduct public workshops and outreach, prepare a Master Plan and cost estimate based on City direction. The Master Plan for Ives Park was developed by Royston Hanamoto Alley & Abey in close coordination with the City of Sebastopol Planning Department, Public Works Department and members of the Ives Park community.

IVES PARK - 9

M A S T E R P L A N P U R P O S E

The Ives Park Master Plan is a general guide and living document that serves as a long-range vision and blueprint for future park updates and programming. It provides a cohesive framework that will guide decision making when making physical changes to the park and in managing its landscape and structures. The plan is conceptual in nature and is not intended to address detailed issues related to engineered site design or park operations.

The Master Plan is intended to provide a practical, implementation-oriented, schematic plan for park renovation and improvements. The plan is not expected to provide construction-level detail. Due to budget limitation, the Plan will likely be implemented over a number of years as funding permits.

IVES PARK - 10

IVES PARK - 11

HISTORY & EXIST ING CONDITIONS

2

IVES PARK - 12

Vicinity Map - Google.com

IVES PARK

City of SebastopolThe City of Sebastopol is a small town located on the western edge of the Santa Rosa plain, directly adjacent to the Laguna de Santa Rosa. The City’s population of 7,800 belies Sebastopol’s importance as the primary service area for more than 50,000 residents of West Sonoma County. Located approximately 50 miles north of San Francisco, Sebastopol acts as a gateway to the Russian River resorts and the Sonoma County coast. The City provides a transition from the urban environment of Santa Rosa to the rural, agricultural lands of West Sonoma County.

The City of Sebastopol does not have a Park Commission. The Planning Commission has been charged with advisory responsibility for park projects and park policy.

Ives Park Ives Park is located in the downtown area of the City of Sebastopol. The park is situated in a predominantly residential neighborhood adjacent to the downtown commercial district. It is bordered by Willow St to the south, Jewell Ave to the west, and the 6HEDVWRSRO� )LUH�'HSDUWPHQW� � LV�DGMDFHQW� WR� WKH�EDVHEDOO� ÀHOG� LQ� WKH�QRUWKZHVW�FRUQHU�of the park. The southeast corner of the park is occupied by the Veteran’s Hall at the corner of Willow St and South High St. The eastern edge of the park runs along South High St which is lined with a number of commercial and residential properties. The park is one block west of Main St, the city’s downtown commercial district. The terrain inside the park LV�UHODWLYHO\�ÁDW�EXW�KDV�UHODWLYHO\�VWHHS�VORSHV�DORQJ�WKH�VRXWK�DQG�ZHVW�HGJHV�

,YHV� 3DUN� � LQFOXGHV�D� /LWWOH� /HDJXH�EDVHEDOO� ÀHOG� �3ROOH\� )LHOG��� SXEOLF� VZLPPLQJ�SRRO�(Ives Pool), playground, two outdoor stages, and several lawn areas. Calder Creek, the PRVW�SURPLQHQW�IHDWXUH�LQ�WKH�SDUN��ÁRZV�ZHVW�WR�HDVW��ELVHFWLQJ�WKH�SDUN��7KH�PDMRULW\�of the creek was channelized in an open concrete culvert two decades ago, with the exception of a small pond and ‘meadow’ area, located on the western portion of the park. The entire length of the creek within the park, including the pond and meadow area, is fenced off with chain-link fencing. The Veteran’s Hall, owned and operated by the County of Sonoma, borders the park to the east. It has recently been leased to the Sebastopol Center for the Arts.

S I T E L O C A T I O N & D E S C R I P T I O N

SEBASTOPOL

TO SANTA ROSA

IVES PARK - 13

P A R K H I S T O R Y

Ives Park, Sebastopol’s oldest park, was founded in the 1940’s as a bequest by Mrs. Ives of San Francisco who had enjoyed playing in the area as a child. Ives Pool opened in April 1946, and aerial photos from that time show that other than the major remodeling of the pool area, the park had changed little since then.

Before the park was established, George Calder’s grist mill was located nearby, powered by a mill pond on Calder Creek, likely near the current pond site. Later, a tannery was located near the site of the present-day Veterans building. The tannery owners probably FKDQQHOL]HG� WKH�FUHHN�DV�D� ÁRRG�FRQWURO�PHDVXUH�� � 7KH\�SUREDEO\�DOVR�GDPPHG� WKH�creek at the current pond to give themselves a water supply for their operation. Most of the existing fencing was likely installed in the 1970’s.

IVES PARK - 14

E X I S T I N G C O N D I T I O N S

Ives PoolIves Pool was constructed in 1941, with funds donated by Katherine Ives. It is 25 yards long and 16 yards wide and holds 200,000 gallons of water. The original pool house was located in a small building along Willow Street, uphill from the pool. Initially, the pool was operated by the City of Sebastopol during the summer months only. In the 1980’s the present pool house was constructed and the City entered into an agreement with the YMCA to operate

the pool. The YMCA operated the pool for approximately one year. As the year came WR� D� FORVH�� WKH� :HVWHUQ� 6RQRPD� &RXQW\� 6ZLPPHUV� JURXS�� D� QRQ�SURÀW� FRUSRUDWLRQ��formed and began operating the pool. The City has continued to be the owner of the Ives Pool facility; however, the Swimmers group has operated the pool via an agreement with the City. Per the agreement, the Swimmers are responsible for establishing fees and programs for the pool and management of the pool. The pool is open 7 days per week from 6 AM until 9:30 PM. The Swimmers also provide all janitorial services and cleaning of the pool, and pay the utility bills; however the City provides water without cost. In 2004, the City loaned the Swimmers money to install solar panels along the south facing facility roof, which has saved them considerable money over the past 6 years, and will continue to do so. The City provides electrical and plumbing repairs and some other maintenance without cost. The current contract with the Swimmers has been in effect since 2003.

Veteran’s HallThe Veteran’s Hall, bordering the park to the east, was constructed in 1958. The 17,800 square foot building, and the parking area and landscaping surrounding the building, are owned and maintained by the County of Sonoma. The Regional Parks Department has leased the facility to the Sebastopol Center for the Arts, who oversees scheduling of events and maintenance. The building serves as a dedicated Veteran’s memorial. The Veteran’s

Hall is utilized by the Veterans of Foreign Wars Post and Auxiliary group for meetings and events. The Hall is also leased out to various organizations, including the City of Sebastopol, for meetings and events.

The physical location of the Veteran’s Hall poses a challenge to Ives park in regard to visibility to the park. Currently, the entrance to the park and playground on the east side is located behind the Veteran’s Hall, on the west side of the parking lot, through a sliding, locking, chain link gate. There is a secondary side entrance along the northern border of the Veteran’s Hall; a strip of land that the City owns, which runs along the creek and leads into the park via a concrete path.

This entrance to the park is not clearly marked at the street and could be improved upon. There is a fair amount of chain link fencing along both sides of the entrance, as well as along the creek leading up to the entrance.

IVES PARK - 15

Little League (Polley Field)Polley Field was constructed in 1957 and has been the home of Sebastopol Little League ever since. The City RZQV� WKH� ÀHOG�� LQFOXGLQJ� WKH� OLJKW� À[WXUHV�� FRQFHVVLRQ�VWDQG�� EOHDFKHUV�� DQG� IHQFLQJ�� KRZHYHU� WKH� ÀHOG��concession stand, and restrooms are managed and PDLQWDLQHG�E\�WKH�/HDJXH����7KH�ÀHOG�LV�XVHG�E\�WKH�/HDJXH�every day except Sundays, March through November, DQG� IRU� WRXUQDPHQWV� LQ� -XQH�DQG� -XO\�� � 7KH� ÀHOG� LV� XVHG�

WZLFH�ZHHNO\�DQG�6DWXUGD\V��$XJXVW�WKURXJK�1RYHPEHU���,Q�DGGLWLRQ��WKH�ÀHOG�LV�XVHG�IRU�adult softball games on weekday evenings in the summer and fall months.

'XH�WR�WKH�ÀHOG·V�KLJK�FRVW�RI�PDLQWHQDQFH�DQG�SDVW�YDQGDOLVP��WKH�ÀHOG�LV�ORFNHG�GXULQJ�all hours that it is not in use by the Little League, adult league, or other group with prior UHVHUYDWLRQV�IRU�WKH�ÀHOG�WKURXJK�WKH�/LWWOH�/HDJXH���$FFRUGLQJ�WR�/HDJXH�UHSUHVHQWDWLYHV��this arrangement was agreed upon between the League and the former City Manager; however the Lease Agreement was not revised and continues to state that “when not in use by the League, the property shall be available for use by the public.” Groups who ZLVK�WR�XVH�WKH�ÀHOG�DUH�UHTXLUHG�WR�REWDLQ�SHUPLVVLRQ�IURP�WKH�/HDJXH��LQ�DGGLWLRQ�WR�D�Special Event permit from the City of Sebastopol. Field use is restricted prior to 9 AM and after 10 PM.

PlaygroundThe playground is located in the central portion of the park and has been a feature of the park for more than 50 years. It has been replaced several times, most recently in 2003, funded by a donation by the Sebastopol Rotary.

The school age play zone contains a 2-bay swing set, a free standing slide, a balance beam, and three free-standing climbing pieces. The tot age play area contains two single

bay swing sets with two bucket seats each, two post and platform play structures and a square sand play area. The engineered wood play surfacing is enclosed by white plastic PVC tubes. The tot age zone is boarded by a perimeter chain-link fence. Three benches are located inside the tot area, and two picnic tables are located alongside the school age play area. Trees located inside the play area provide shade. One drinking fountain exists in the park, located near the playground.

The playground is heavily used by the Little League children and students of the Sebastopol Charter School. During the summer months, summer camp programs also utilize the play equipment, as do children attending fairs and festivals in the park.

Calder CreekCalder Creek runs inside an open concrete channel, designed to look like stacked stones, through Ives Park. The creek’s journey to the east and west of the park occurs underground, in conduits that carry the water underneath both private and public City properties and on out to the Laguna. A portion of the creek sometimes pools to form a small pond. Until recent years, larger pools were made possible via a weir consisting of boards erected in the

IVES PARK - 16

creek channel during the spring months. The City has not constructed the weir in recent years. The creek is currently fenced along both sides of the channel and around the perimeter of the pond. The creek channel is passable via several bridges crossing over it, connecting to paved paths throughout the park.

7KH�FKDQQHO�LV�GHHS�DQG�QDUURZ��DQG�LW�FDQ�EH�GLIÀFXOW�WR�VHH�WKH�ZDWHU���,W�LV�FXUUHQWO\�inaccessible to park visitors. The creek walls are failing in several areas, in particular at WKH�ZHLU�DUHD�QHDU�WKH�SRQG��ZKHUH�WKH�ZDWHU�DSSHDUV�WR�EH�ÁDQNLQJ�WKH�ZDOO���,QYDVLYH�plants species have been found growing around the pond and along the creek.

Picnic AreasThere are a variety of picnic arrangements scattered throughout Ives Park, including group picnic, single tables, BBQ, a serving table and a variety of table sizes. The picnic tables get good use and are highly used during festivals and events. Generally, the picnic areas are in good shape, with some of the tables being only several years old.

Park EntrancesThe primary entrances to the park are on Jewell Avenue, where there are 3 steps that drop to the park level; the stairway to Ives Pool, located on Willow Street; and behind the Veteran’s Hall, via a chain-link gate. The park can be accessed on the south, west, and east sides by additional small paths through trees, and alongside the Veteran’s Hall to the north. The only accessible entrance is from the Veteran’s hall parking lot near the playground. There are

two crosswalks at Ives Park. One crosswalk exists on South High Street for access to the Veterans Building and another crosswalk located on Willow Street at midpoint of the pool.

Paths & PavingSeveral paved pathways traverse the park, many of which are not accessible due to steepness and condition such as cracking and heaving due to tree roots. Additional paving is located near the western-most bridge, along the pathway leading from the restrooms to the playground, and surrounding the picnic areas along Jewell Avenue. The sidewalk paths along the perimeter of the park and pool entry are concrete and the internal paths are asphalt.

Restrooms2 restrooms exist in Ives Park. One restroom is attached to Ives Pool near Calder Creek. The entry slopes to these restroom exceed recommended accessibility codes. The second UHVWURRP�LV�ORFDWHG�QHDU�WKH�EDOOÀHOG�DQG�FRQWDLQV�DQ�DGGLWLRQDO�URRP�IRU�FRQFHVVLRQV���Both restrooms are in need of upgrades.

IVES PARK - 17

Existing BridgesThree pedestrian bridges exist crossing Calder Creek. They are constructed out of wood, including the railings. All bridges are approximately 7 feet wide. The easternmost and westernmost bridges are 14 feet in length and the central bridge is 16 feet in length.

Wood StageSince 1993, the Sonoma County Repertory Theater produced two outdoor plays per year at Ives Park. An outdoor stage, which was constructed in 2003 as a joint project between the theater and the Sebastopol Rotary Club, is utilized for productions between June and September. The stage is wooden and has begun to show signs of wear. Informal seating is provided on the lawn area in front of the stage and at the adjacent picnic tables.

Concrete StageA second stage is located across from the wood stage, adjacent to the western facing Ives Pool facility fence. This stage, which is concrete, was constructed in the 1990’s as a joint project between volunteers and the City. The purpose of the stage is to provide a place for bands to play live music. An electrical outlet is provided adjacent to the stage to accommodate musical equipment. Since its construction, the stage has not been heavily used.

Lighting/LJKW�À[WXUHV�DUH�ORFDWHG�WKURXJKRXW�WKH�SDUN�DQG�SURYLGH�RQO\� VHFXULW\� OLJKWLQJ�� � 7KH� À[WXUHV� DUH� DSSUR[LPDWHO\� ���feet high and are standard industrial aluminum street lights. 7KH� À[WXUHV� DUH� LQ� SRRU� FRQGLWLRQ�ZLWK� UXVW� RQ� WKH� SRVWV���Due to the heavy foliage from the trees and vegetation, many areas of the park remain shaded. Much of the light from neighboring streets and properties are also blocked by vegetation from entering the park.

LandscapingThe majority of the park is comprised of lawn area; however, there are a number of substantial trees planted throughout the park, including redwoods and oaks. A number of the Redwood trees appear to be unhealthy. Dense foliage is planted along the north side of the creek DQG�EDOO�ÀHOG��DQG�WKH�HDVW�VLGH�RI�WKH�SDUN��DEXWWLQJ�WKH�Veteran’s Hall parking lot. The foliage consists of dense brush and small trees. These areas have become attractive to loiterers and posed security problems in the past.

IVES PARK - 18

A small rose garden is located on the park’s northeastern lawn. The garden is currently EHLQJ�PDLQWDLQHG�E\�&LW\� VWDII�EXW� LQWHUHVW�KDV�EHHQ�H[SUHVVHG� LQ� ÀQGLQJ�D�YROXQWHHU�group to maintain the garden.

Pool staff and volunteers have landscaped the southern entrance to the park, along the stairwell leading to the pool.

TopographySeveral aspects of the topography at Ives Park present a challenge when trying to increase accessibility and visibility. The majority of the park is lower in elevation than the adjacent streets to the south and west, and the buildings to the north. The elevation at South High Street is level with the park and provides the most accessible access. At its most extreme, elevations from Willow Street are approximately +/- 19 feet above park elevations. Topography creates intimate spaces that can be desirable but can also separate uses and encourage activities that are not desired.

EducationThe Sebastopol Charter School uses the park on a frequent basis and students are taken there for recreational purposes. Summer camp programs also use the park, playground equipment and pool in the summer months.

FestivalsIves Park is home to a variety of festivals including the Apple Blossom Festival in April, the Roma Festival in May, and the Cajun Festival in September.

The Apple Blossom Festival is hosted and organized by the Sebastopol Area Chamber of Commerce with the support of local businesses. The festival includes a parade, food, wine garden, live music, crafts, art, and activities for

children. The festival has run almost continuously since 1947 and is the Chamber’s biggest community promotion project.

The Annual California Herdeljezi Festival, a traditional Romani (Gypsy) folk arts festival, celebrates the folk art and traditions of the Roma. The festival features traditional music, songs, dances, stories, foods, crafts, and customs of the Roma. It was designed as a means of preserving and sharing the cultural traditions and folk arts of the Romani people in the United States, while building a sense of community among the friends and neighborhoods who help make it happen.

The annual Cajun Zydeco Festival is hosted by the Rotary Club of Sebastopol Sunrise. The festival includes live music, dancing, food, and drinks. Zydeco is the music of Southwestern Louisiana’s Black Creoles, a group of people of mixed African, Afro-Caribbean, Native American and European Descent.

IVES PARK - 19

IVES PARK - 20

IVES PARK - 21

3 MASTER PLAN

IVES PARK - 22

M A S T E R P L A N I N T E N T

Ives Park is one of the most diverse and heavily used parks in Sebastopol. The park provides diverse activities ranging from passive recreation and bird watching to active sports play. Over the years, Ives Park has struggled with balancing its increasing popularity with its site limitations. 7KH�SDUN�KDV�EHHQ�LGHQWLÀHG�E\�WKH�&LW\�RI�6HEDVWRSRO�DV�EHLQJ�LQFRKHVLYH�with physically disjointed park amenities that contribute to a lack of a clear identity. 6LJQLÀFDQW�XSJUDGHV�KDYH�QRW�EHHQ�PDGH�WR�WKH�SDUN�IRU�D�QXPEHU�RI�\HDUV�DQG�PDQ\�aspects of the park are in need of attention.

The goal of the Master Plan for Ives Park is to create a cohesive and beautiful design that PHHWV�WKH�QHHGV�DQG�UHÁHFWV�WKH�YLVLRQ�RI�WKH�FRPPXQLW\��DOORZ�IRU�IXWXUH�SKDVLQJ�DQG�ÁH[LELOLW\��FUHDWH�D�SDUN� LGHQWLW\��DQG�LV�HQYLURQPHQWDOO\�VXVWDLQDEOH��7KH�SODQ�SURSRVHV�to strengthen physical and visual connections, both internally and externally, to increase the overall cohesiveness, improve accessibility, circulation, and safety, and contribute to the ambiance and identity of the park. The redesign of the park will also provide upgrades to park amenities such as restrooms, playgrounds, performance and gathering spaces, and site furnishings improving the overall experience of the park.

Master Plan Goals�� Develop overall park cohesiveness.�� Strengthen physical/visual connections internally and externally.�� Enhance sense of identity.�� Improve ambience.�� Increase sustainability.�� Improve accessibility.�� Update amenities.

IVES PARK - 23

M A S T E R P L A N P R O C E S S

The City of Sebastopol Planning Commission and City Council/Community Development Agency provided a series of recommendations for improvements to Ives Park. These recommendations served as a starting point for identifying overall goals and elements for the development of the park.

The Conceptual Master Plan for Ives Park was developed with input from the City and the community over public meetings and meetings with various organizations.

06/01/12: Meetings held with the Cajun Festival organizers, Creek Stewards and the Ives Park Pool Manager.

06/03/11: Conference call with the Apple Blossom festival organizers.

06/07/11: Conference call with the County Public Facilities Manager.

06/28/11: Planning Commission Presentation with public comment.

10/16/12: Meeting with the Creek Stewards.

10/23/12: Planning Commission Presentation with public comment.

10/10/12: Meeting with the Charter School and the director for the Center for the Arts.

11/12/12: Planning Commission Discussion.

02/06/13: Presentation to City Council with public comment.

Desired components from the public outreach process�� Restore Calder Creek to a more natural state.�� Improve access and circulation.�� Increase visibility and safety.�� Upgrade park amenities - restrooms, playground, stage, bridges, site furniture,

fencing, lighting.�� Include into park the island at Jewell Avenue and Willow Street.�� Improve planting.�� Incorporate sustainable stormwater and irrigation measures.�� Remove fencing around creek.�� Install interpretive/educational signage.

IVES PARK - 24

A C C E S S I B I L I T Y

The guidelines listed in this report are intended to convey to City Staff general information regarding accessibility standards and recommendations for compliance. Guidelines for accessibility design are continually changing as the Federal Access Board incorporates new standards in to the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, creating new guidelines effective March 15, 2012. It should be noted that generally, existing facilities, while subject to certain ADA requirements, are not addressed by ADAAG except where altered. Additional information can be found though the following sources:

�� California Code of Regulations (CCR), Title 24 (T24), part of the California building code (CBC).

�� Americans with Disabilities Act Accessibility “Guidelines for Buildings, Facilities and Outdoor Recreation” (ADAAG) which includes the “Accessibility Guidelines for Recreation Facilities,” June 2003 (03 AG)

�� “Regulatory Negotiation Committee on Accessibility’s Guidelines for Outdoor Developed Areas (99 AG).

ADA Playground GuidelinesAmerican Society for Testing and Materials)���������� � VWDQGDUG� &RQVXPHU� 6DIHW\� 3HUIRUPDQFH� 6SHFLÀFDWLRQ� IRU� 3OD\JURXQG�������������Equipment for Public Use.F-2223-04: Standard Guide for ASTM Standards on Playground Surfacing

Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) Handbook for Public Playground Safety.

United States Access Board Accessibility Guidelines for Play Areas.

United States Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS)

IVES PARK - 25

M A S T E R P L A N I M P R O V E M E N T Z O N E S

For the purpose of project phasing, the proposed park improvements have been broken into 11 separate zones. See the Appendix F for a diagram map of these zones.

1. Entrance Accessibility 2. Art Entry Zone 3. North Creek Restoration 4. South Creek Restoration 5. Picnic & Passive Play Zone 6. Pool Perimeter Improvements� ������%DOOÀHOG�3HULPHWHU�,PSURYHPHQWV 8. New Restroom 9. New Play Area 10. Performance Zone 11. Corner Capture

In addition to zone improvements, general park improvements, which relate to the park as a whole, have been divided out into a separate section.

Zone 1: Entrance AccessibilityThe Entrance Accessibility zone is subdivided into 4 major park entrances. The park’s topography presents accessibility challenges at each entry point that need to be addressed. Entry points along Willow Street have the greatest set of challenges due to the higher grade differential.

GoalTo improve accessibility, safety and park identity.

Entrance Point A ImprovementsEntrance point off of Willow Street north of the pool. This park entry point is also shared with Ives Pool. In order to enter Ives Park at this point, you must currently walk down one ÁLJKW�RI�VWDLUV�WR�WKH�ÀUVW�ODQGLQJ�ZKHUH�WKH�SDWK�LQWHUVHFWV���)URP�KHUH��WKH�SDWK�WUDYHOV�LQ�D�counter clockwise curve to ground level. The slope of this path exceeds recommended accessible grades.

It is recommended that the path connect at the top stair landing to increase accessibility DQG�FLUFXPYHQW�WKH�ÁLJKW�RI�VWDLUV���,W�LV�DOVR�UHFRPPHQGHG�WKDW�WKH�SDWK�EH�UHJUDGHG�WR�include a series of 3 accessible ramps, not exceeding 8.33% in slope. These ramps should include appropriate landings and handrails per code.

Entrance Point B ImprovementsThere are 2 entrances in this stretch located off of Willow Street, south of Ives Pool.

7KH�ÀUVW�HQWUDQFH��FORVHVW�WR�WKH�SRRO��DOVR�VHUYHV�DV�PDLQWHQDQFH�YHKLFXODU�DFFHVV�WR�WKH�park. The path arches clockwise, traveling down to access the picnic tables. The path’s slope currently exceeds recommended accessible grades. It is recommended that the path be regraded to include 1 accessible ramp, not exceeding 8.33% in slope and the remaining path to be graded under 5% slope.

IVES PARK - 26

The second entrance is closer to the intersection of Willow Street and Jewell Avenue. It is a smaller minor park entrance that is used to access the picnic areas from Willow Street. Due to the lack of space and the grade changes from street level to park level, it is recommended that a staircase of 4 stairs be installed.

Entrance Point C ImprovementsEntrance point off of Jewell Avenue near the redwood grove: a staircase of 3 steps exists at this location. The grades of the walk from Jewell Avenue to the staircase and from the staircase into the park exceed recommended accessible grades.

It is recommended that the staircase be replaced with a new staircase consisting of 6 steps. In addition, it is recommended that an accessible switchback ramp be installed in conjunction with the new staircase. The installation of a new staircase and an accessible ramp would provide park users two options to enter the park. The stairs will provide the quickest access, while the ramp will provide an accessible path of travel.

Entrance Point D ImprovementsEntrance point from the Sebastopol Fire Department on Bodega Avenue: this entrance, located behind the baseball backstop, is primarily used by pedestrians from Bodega Avenue. It is not visible from the street. It contains a ramp and 13 stairs leading down to park grade.

It is recommended that a switchback accessible ramp be installed alongside the stairs. The installation of a new staircase and an accessible ramp would provide park users two options to enter the park. The stairs will provide the quickest access while the ramp will provide an accessible path of travel.

Zone 2: Art EntryThis zone is located between the Veterans Memorial parking to the north and an Ives Park walking path that runs parallel to Calder Creek. The area is currently planted with turf grass and is primarily used only during festivals as tent space. This entry zone is often D�YLVLWRU·V�ÀUVW�LPSUHVVLRQ�ZKHQ�ZDONLQJ�RQ�0DLQ�6WUHHW���7KLV�]RQH�SURYLGHV�DQ�RSSRUWXQLW\�to showcase artwork by the Sebastopol Center for the Arts, located in the Veterans Memorial building.

GoalTo better utilize this area as a major park focal and welcoming point and create identity through the use of outdoor public art.

Improvements�� Install sculpture garden along entry walk from High Street – install concrete pads

that can accommodate rotating sculptural art exhibits�� 8SGDWH�ÁDWZRUN�WR�EH�$'$�FRPSOLDQW�DQG�GHYHORS�QHZ�HQWU\�QRGH�DW�+LJK�6WUHHW�

entrance. This includes paving that will differentiate the area as an entry node, decorative planting and a new park entrance sign

�� Plant no mow fescue in order to reduce maintenance costs and water use�� Improve seating and trash receptacles

Calder Creek Restoration (Zone 3 & 4)Calder Creek is the key feature and natural resource of the park, but perimeter chainlink fencing and steep walls make it inaccessible and visually unappealing. The creek bisects

IVES PARK - 27

the major use areas and therefore is also a major contributor to the parks incohesive and fragmented feel.

The proposed creek improvements are divided into two sections, north and south, with the dividing line at the existing central bridge. These sections were divided based on their existing conditions. The south creek section is the most naturalized portion of the creek and the northern section is channelized with walls. Cost estimates for each section were made assuming the sections would be improved independently. In the case that both areas are restored concurrently, the costs related to site preparation would be reduced.

GoalTo naturalize the creek for visual, accessible, environmental and educational purposes. The creek should become the central element, or spine, that links all park features WRJHWKHU�FUHDWLQJ�D�PRUH�XQLÀHG�SDUN�

Zone 3: Calder Creek North Creek RestorationThe restoration of the north section of Calder Creek proposes to remove a large portion of the concrete channel and fencing to restore the channel and improve access. The area designated for the restoration would be expanded beyond the existing channel into the rose garden and requires the relocation of the northern bridge. For safety purposes, it may not be possible to remove all of the fencing as part of the restoration. It is recommended that the remaining fencing be replaced with more aesthetically pleasing fencing.

Improvements�� 5HVWRUH�DQG�UHDOLJQ�FUHHN�FKDQQHO��SURYLGLQJ�QDWXUDOL]HG�FUHHN�SURÀOH�� Remove all chainlink fencing along creek�� Install new decorative guard rail where creek wall is to remain�� Remove hazards/patch and repair creek walls that are to remain�� Install new bridge at north end capable of holding maintenance vehicles�� Replace central bridge�� Add natural creek edge and seating�� Add new accessible entry plaza at entrance from Veteran’s Building parking lot�� Thin vegetation at “onion patch”�� Install interpretive signage about the creek ecology and its history

Zone 4: Calder Creek South Creek Restoration,Q�WKH�´PHDGRZµ�DUHD��WKH�FUHHN�LV�UHOHDVHG�IURP�WKH�FRQÀQHV�RI�LWV�FRQFUHWH�FKDQQHO�DQG�ZDV��DW�RQH� WLPH��ÁRRGHG�WR�FUHDWH�D�SRQG��7KH�SURSRVHG�SODQ�VOLJKWO\�HQODUJHV�WKLV�DUHD�E\�PRYLQJ� WKH�ZDOO�DW� WKH�EDFN�RI� WKH�EDVHEDOO� ÀHOG� WR�FDSWXUH� VSDFH�� 7KH�fence would be removed and the creek channel restored allowing for planting of native riparian species. Accessibility and usage of the area both improve by replacing the central bridge and installing natural seating along the edges.

Improvements�� Remove chain link fencing and guardrails�� Restore creek channel�� Add natural creek edge and seating�� 0RYH�ZDOO�DW�EDFN�RI�EDOO�ÀHOG�WR�FDSWXUH�VSDFH�� Install interpretive signage about the creek ecology and its history

IVES PARK - 28

Zone 5: Picnic and Passive Play ZoneThis turf open space, located between Ives Pool and the Veterans building, provides an informal space for people to gather, picnic, play games, and enjoy passive activities. The master plan relocates the playground from this zone and as a result creates a larger space that is more open and better connected to Calder Creek.

GoalTo provide better park connections, provide better perimeter visibility and to create a large, passive multi-use space.

Improvements�� Provide a new large central green space by relocating playground to area

adjacent to Jewell Ave entrance and new restroom facilities�� Install trellis structure and seating area that could be used as a secondary

performance space�� Remove shrubs separating the park from Veterans’ Hall parking lot�� Install new entrance points from Veterans’ Hall parking lot into park�� ,QVWDOO�VWRUPZDWHU�ÀOWUDWLRQ�JDUGHQ�� Install new picnic areas

Zone 6: Pool Perimeter ImprovementsIves Pool is visually disconnected from the rest of the park. Visitors of the pool can not see out into the park, and visitors of the park can not see into the pool. The proposed plan replaces the existing opaque slat chain-link fencing with one that provides visual access between the pool and the park, creating a greater sense of integration. Additionally, the perimeter planting area outside the fence provides an opportunity for the addition of gardens and bioswales. The plan proposes to install edible gardens in this area that both screen pool infrastructure and provide a garden with which the community can interact.

The Swimmers group is anticipating expanding the women’s locker room by 296 square feet. The addition would be located on the front of the pool house building and extend east toward the Veteran’s Hall. The board is also considering enclosing an alcove located underneath the solar paneled roof on the north side of the facility to create a meeting room. They would also like to potentially construct a storage room at the northwest corner of the facility.

GoalTo increase visibility and integration with the park

Improvements�� Replace existing opaque slat chain-link fence with transparent fencing that is

aesthetically pleasing�� Remove concrete stage at west end of pool�� Install edible gardens�� Screen pool equipment with planting

Zone 7: Baseball Field Perimeter ImprovementsPolley Field is visually separated from the park with a billboard lined chain-link fence. The OLQHDU�VSDFH�RQ�WKH�QRUWK�VLGH�RI�WKH�ÀHOG�EHWZHHQ�WKH�UHVLGHQWLDO�KRXVHV�LV�ODUJHO\�XQXVHG�space. The goal is to activate and utilize this area as parkland.

IVES PARK - 29

GoalTo increase visibility and integration with the park

Improvements�� 5HPRYH�VHOHFWHG�ELOOERDUGV�DW�EDVHEDOO�ÀHOG�WR�LQFUHDVH�YLVLELOLW\�� $GG�SODQWLQJ�DORQJ�RXWÀHOG�SHULPHWHU�WR�VRIWHQ�HGJH�� ,QVWDOO�QHZ�SHULPHWHU�SDWK�EHKLQG�WKH�EDVHEDOO�ÀHOG

Zone 8: Restroom ImprovementsIt is recommended that the park consolidate its two restrooms into one new restroom. The structure should be vandal resistant, ADA compliant, contain an external drinking IRXQWDLQ� DQG� GHVLJQHG� WR� EH� DHVWKHWLFDOO\� ÀWWLQJ� IRU� ,YHV� 3DUN�� � 7KH� ÁRRU� SODQ� VKRXOG�consist of separate women’s and men’s rooms with a minimum of 2 stalls each. It should also include a storage/mechanical room and a concession room able to prepare and heat prepackaged foods and beverages. Floor plans should be reviewed by the City and park users to determine appropriate room sizes based on usage.

GoalProvide a safe and clean restroom and concession facility for park users and nearby DFFHVV�IURP�WKH�QHZ�SOD\JURXQG�DQG�EDOOÀHOG�

Improvements�� Convert existing park restroom at Ives Pool into storage for pool needs�� 5HSODFH� H[LVWLQJ� UHVWURRP� DQG� FRQFHVVLRQ� VWDQG� DW� EDOOÀHOG� ZLWK� D� QHZ�

prefabricated structure. New restroom to include drinking fountain and snack bar area

Zone 9: New Play AreaThe existing location of the playground sits very close the creek and is surrounded by chainlink fencing. It obstructs views and access to the turf open space and impedes the central walk running parallel to the creek. During larger events, this area becomes a pinch point. It is recommended that the playground be relocated next the new re-stroom. This location will provide greater visibility and better access to restrooms. It will also allow a parent who has one child playing ball to have another close by playing on the playground.

New play equipment should focus on themed and imaginative play opportunities with VHQVRU\�DQG�FUHDWLYH�SOD\�IHDWXUHV���7KH�HTXLSPHQW�VKRXOG�EH�DJH�VSHFLÀF��PDGH�from sustainable materials and be accessible. New play structures on the market are providing greater accessibility and play value than the traditional post and platform structures. The theme and materials used in the play equipment should represent and ÀW�ZLWKLQ�WKH�SDUN�FRQWH[W��7KH�OD\RXW�RI�QHZ�SOD\�HTXLSPHQW�VKRXOG�EH�FRRUGLQDWHG�with rubberized safety matting, shade elements, a sand play feature and perimeter seatwalls. Benches should be located throughout the area providing places for par-HQWV�WR�VLW�DQG�ZDWFK�WKHLU�FKLOGUHQ���7KH�SOD\�DUHD�IRRWSULQW�VKRXOG�EH�PRGLÀHG�WR�PHHW�the fall zone requirements. Improvements to the playground should comply with ASTM 6WDQGDUG�6SHFLÀFDWLRQV��WKH�$PHULFDQV�ZLWK�'LVDELOLWLHV�$FW��WKH�8�6��&RQVXPHU�3URGXFW�Safety Commission and the National Playground Safety Institute.

GoalProvide a safe, active, and imaginative play area for kids of all ages and abilities

IVES PARK - 30

Improvements�� Relocate playground as shown on master plan�� Install diverse types of play equipment to encourage a variety of active play as

well as social and creative play�� Separate tot and school age play areas�� Incorporate perimeter seatwalls and interior bench seating�� Install shade structures or trees�� Install resilient matting play surfacing for accessibility �� Install perimeter safety fencing

Zone 10: PerformanceTwo stages exist in Ives Park: a wood stage and a concrete stage. The Sonoma County Repertory Theater utilizes the larger wood stage for productions during the summer months. The wood stage faces three issues: it is not ADA compliant, the location does not provide adequate space for the audience, and there is concern about the longevity of the structure. In response, the plan proposes to create a larger lawn area by covering the creek channel, install a new, larger and accessible stage in the current stage location, and move the central picnic areas to the edges of the space. A perimeter path would provide access to the western side of the area where new picnic areas and edible gardens would be installed. Because the concrete stage is rarely used and its location is undesirable, it is recommend that it be removed.

The recommendation to cover the existing portion of the creek in zone 10 serves as a balance between active and natural spaces. By creating more usable park active space in Zone 10, it allows for the full creek restoration in zones 3 and 4. Returning the creek to a natural state in zone 10 would have resulted in the removal of redwood and oak trees. It would have also required a large amount of space, due to the depth of the creek in this location.

Goals�� Provide a balance of active and passive natural space.�� 3URYLGH�D�ODUJH�ÁDW�RSHQ�VSDFH�IRU�SDUN�HYHQWV�DQG�IHVWLYDOV��� Increase visibility and connectivity.�� Provide a variety of picnicking opportunities.

Improvements�� Cap creek channel from corner to vehicular bridge to form a large central green

space.�� Replace pedestrian bridge�� Re-grade lawn area to a maximum 2% slope.�� Add perimeter path.�� Install new stage with accessible ramp.�� Relocate picnic areas from center to perimeter.�� Remove failing redwoods; plant new trees.�� Remove hedges at edges for increased visibility.�� Plant edible gardens along the western edge of the park adjacent to Jewell Ave. �� Install stormwater treatment areas.

IVES PARK - 31

Zone 11: Corner CaptureThe existing corner of Willow Street and Jewell Avenue contains a separate right turn lane, traveling from Willow to Jewell Avenue. This lane is separated from the intersection by a planted island containing 2 trees. There have been instances of cars speeding around this corner since there is no required stop. This poses a safety concern when pedestrians approach this corner.

The master plan proposes to remove the separate turn lane and capture it, along with the existing island, as park space. This new park space is proposed as an interpretive garden, potentially including native plants and plants used by the Native American peoples.

Goals�� To increase park space by converting underutilized paved street space�� To increase pedestrian safety at street crosswalks

Improvements�� Remove paved turning lane�� Connect new sidewalk with existing sidewalk�� Plant new trees and groundcover�� Install an interpretive garden�� Install decomposed granite paths through interpretive garden

IVES PARK - 32

G E N E R A L P A R K I M P R O V E M E N T S

Site Improvements7KH�&LW\�KDV�LGHQWLÀHG�QXPHURXV�DVSHFWV�RI�WKH�SDUN�WKDW�DUH�LQ�QHHG�RI�DWWHQWLRQ�including pathways and access, site furnishings, play equipment, landscaping and irrigation, fencing, lighting, security, and restrooms. The master plan includes overall circulation system for the park that provides a network of asphalt paths that connect the various activity areas and facilitates passive recreation. The circulation paths vary from 6 to 16 feet in width, with the main circulation path being 12 feet wide. Site furnishings along the paths shall include trash and recycling receptacles, benches and security lighting. The paths will be designed and constructed to accommodate maintenance and/or emergency vehicles. The majority of these improvements are made within the individual zones, however, some improvements such as electrical and irrigation infrastructure need to be addressed on a site-wide basis.

�� Improve electrical infrastructure�� Improve water infrastructure�� Update irrigation system with smart controller�� Incorporate water saving strategies�� Install educational signage about park history and ecology�� Replace park lighting with improved security lights

Entry FeaturesThere are three main access points into Ives Park from the surrounding neighborhoods: one on each of Jewell Ave, Willow St, and S. High St. In order to signify and call attention to these entrances, the plan proposes the addition of an entry feature at all major entrances. The features could consist of decorative overhead structures, sculpture, special paving, planting, or signs. All entry features would work to strengthen the park’s identity and highlight the importance of the major park entrances.

Park SignageTo help community members navigate the park, signage describing and locating indi-YLGXDO�SDUN�DPHQLWLHV�ZLOO�EH�SURYLGHG����6LJQV�ZLOO�EH�ORFDWHG�DW�DOO�HQWU\�DQG�KLJK�WUDIÀF�nodes in and around the site. The signage will be developed to match the overall con-cept and design intent of the site.

�� Install new entrance sign at S. High St entrance

Off-site Improvements7KH�SODQ�LGHQWLÀHV�VHYHUDO�ZD\V�LQ�ZKLFK�VPDOO�DGGLWLRQV�WR�WKH�DUHDV�DGMDFHQW�WR�WKH�park would improve safety and access. Installing crosswalks with bump outs would help VORZ�WUDIÀF�DQG�LQFUHDVH�VDIHW\�IRU�SHGHVWULDQV�FURVVLQJ�LQWR�WKH�SDUN���

�� Improve pedestrian safety by adding bulb outs and crosswalks at major crossings

IVES PARK - 33

Connections Beyond the ParkIves Park occupies a prominent position near the center of Sebastopol, being one block from the South Main St commercial district and several more from the Joe Rodata trailhead. The proximity of the park to these features provides an opportunity to create physical and visual access between them. The plan proposes to provide a framework for establishing these connections in order to increase safety and accessibility for pedestrians moving between the nearby features.

IVES PARK - 34

IVES PARK - 35

4 FUNDING

IVES PARK - 36

F U N D I N G

The primary City source for park improvements has been the Park Impact Fee Fund, which receives revenues from impact fees paid by residential development. The fund is far from adequate to implement the Master Plan. Little residential development is anticipated in the foreseeable future. No funding is currently available for improvements.

,YHV�3DUN�LPSURYHPHQWV�VKRXOG�EH�FRQVLGHUHG�LQ�OLJKW�RI�IXQGLQJ��VWDIÀQJ��DQG�PDLQWHQDQFH�constraints to develop plans or accomplish implementation.

This section provides future grant sources, granting foundations and other fund-raising options related to Ives and is broken down into the following sub-sections:

Fund-Raising, Social Media, Community Outreach and Private Donations

�� Project Preparation for Applications (Community Input, Sustainable Design and CEQA/NEPA Compliance, CCC)

�� Grant and Funding Opportunities �� Additional Funding Sources �� Additional Resources

Those seeking funding for park renovation must be diligent and persistent in seeking out and competing for grant and foundation funds. Despite the variety of federal, state, local and private funding sources, historically and for the foreseeable future, there are more projects than funding available. Typically most granting agencies have annual F\FOHV��6LQFH�GHDGOLQHV�FDQ�EH�H[WHQGHG�DQG�IXQGLQJ�UHQHZHG��WKHVH�LGHQWLÀHG�VRXUF-es should be reviewed on a regular basis for updated information.

Fund-Raising, Social Media, Community Outreach and Private Donations:Creating awareness of any potential project will be critical in raising private donations and having a successful fund-raising campaign. It is expected that a slogan for any Ives Park project would be a highly effective marketing tool. Creating a clear and concise message for potential donors and partners will be critical for ongoing donation re-quests.

A web-site exclusively for Ives Park could also be developed as a fund-raising tool. To DLG�LQ�DQ\�LGHQWLÀHG�IXWXUH�SURMHFW�IXQG�UDLVLQJ��DGGLWLRQDO�LQIRUPDWLRQ�FRXOG�EH�DGGHG�to this page. Creating a compelling story, including the historical uses of the site along with the project funding need, would immediately reach all patrons searching for addi-tional information on the project. A “Donate Now” button on the web-site will also allow for residents and park patrons to give money immediately to the project.

Several options are available to create a “Donate Now” button. Network for the Good �ZZZ�VXSSRUW�QHWZRUNIRUJRRG�RUJ���LV�D�QDWLRQDO�QRQ�SURÀW�WKDW�SURYLGHV�WRROV�IRU�RQ-line fund-raising. Instant donations and up-to-date donation tracking information is all DYDLODEOH�LPPHGLDWHO\�ZLWK�MXVW�RQH�FOLFN���7KLV�LV�D�JRRG�RSWLRQ�IRU�SURMHFW�VSHFLÀF�IXQG�raising, as it eliminates questions of where donations will be going or how much funding has been raised.

The utilization of free and popular social media platforms in conjunction with a project web-site, is recommended. Keeping the public informed is critical in raising awareness

IVES PARK - 37

and making a successful fundraising campaign. Facebook is currently one of the most popular social media platforms and are already used by the city. Social media plat-forms will organically spread the awareness of the funding need for the project. These platforms are also great for keeping residents informed of construction schedules and other project updates.

Project Preparation for Applications (Community Input, Sustainable Design and CEQA/NEPA Compliance, CCC)

5HFHQWO\��WKH�&DOLIRUQLD�2IÀFH�RI�*UDQWV�DQG�/RFDO�6HUYLFHV��2*$/6��FUHDWHG�QHZ�guidelines for many of the grants in which they administer. New guidelines focus on project readiness, sustainable design and community involvement. Nearly all State funding is requiring projects to focus on green or sustainable building. Incorporating green elements where possible will help prepare the project to be competitive for fu-ture funding. In addition, there are other funding opportunities to promote green build-ing that can be explored more fully as the project scope is further developed.

Community input is also very important for successful grant writing. It is recommended WKDW�DW�OHDVW�ÀYH�FRPPXQLW\�PHHWLQJV�WDNH�SODFH�IRU�DQ\�SURMHFW�ZLWKLQ�WKH�SDUN��7KLV�way the project will meet the minimum requirements of several OGALS grant guidelines. Community input may be in the form of a meeting dedicated to the project, presen-tations to local boards or informational booths at local community events. The Master 3ODQ�SURFHVV�FDQ�EH�XVHG�WR�PHHW�WKH�UHTXLUHPHQW�IRU�ÀYH�PHHWLQJV�

Additional key elements to prepare for applications include:

�� CEQA or NEPA compliance. Preparation of these documents will show project readi-ness and are required for State and Federal applications

�� Raising at least a portion of the project costs with local sources. This will demonstrate community commitment and will provide a source of matching funds

�� Incorporation of the California Conservation Corps (CCC) with the project. In many cases grants will award more points for projects that work in conjunction with the CCC or the local chapter of the CCC (Conservation Corps North Bay). Having a let-WHU�RI�FRPPLWPHQW�IURP�WKH�ORFDO�&&&�RIÀFH�ZLOO�HQVXUH�WKHVH�SRLQWV�ZLOO�EH�DZDUG-ed.

�� Grants.gov is used by several granting agencies. If the City is unfamiliar with the Grants.gov application process, it is highly recommended that a DUNS number is requested and a project administer is assigned. These processes may take several weeks and will help with the application process.

�� 3DUWQHUVKLSV�ZLWK�ORFDO�QRQ�SURÀWV�DUH�DOVR�ORRNHG�XSRQ�IDYRUDEO\�E\�VHYHUDO�RI�WKH�granting agencies. Establishing these partnerships early on will demonstrate project readiness, community commitment and additional support.

Grant and Funding Opportunities

California Youth Soccer and Recreation Development GrantIntended for the acquisition or development of land and/or facilities to improve the

IVES PARK - 38

communities access and use for youth soccer, baseball, softball and basketball oppor-tunities. This is not a matching program, but those communities willing to match funds will be more competitive in the selection process.http://www.parks.ca.gov/grants

Cal Ripken Sr. Foundation Grants The Cal Ripken, Sr. Foundation provides a variety of grants to community groups and schools that meet their eligibility requirements, in order to support the growth of youth baseball and softball, as well as promote character growth in children. Please visit the title link for information about the grants and downloadable applications. http://www.ripkenfoundation.org/grants/grant/

Baseball Tomorrow FundThe Baseball Tomorrow Fund is intended to provide funding for incremental program-ming and facilities for youth baseball and softball programs, not as a substitute for exist-ing funding or fund-raising activities. Baseball Tomorrow Fund generally considers proj-ects that include capital expenditures for youth baseball and softball programs such as EDVHEDOO�VRIWEDOO�HTXLSPHQW�DQG�XQLIRUPV��EDVLF�EDVHEDOO�VRIWEDOO�ÀHOG�UHQRYDWLRQV�DQG�FRQVWUXFWLRQ��H�J��LQÀHOG�PL[��VRG�VHHGLQJ��EDVHV��GXJRXWV��IHQFLQJ��ÀHOG�OLJKWLQJ��LUULJD-tion system, grading, etc.) KWWS���POE�POE�FRP�POE�RIÀFLDOBLQIR�FRPPXQLW\�EWI�MVS"FRQWHQW DERXW

Nature Education Facilities ProgramThe NEF will fund projects for development of nature education facilities, buildings, structures and exhibit galleries that present collections to inspire and educate the pub-lic and for marine wildlife conservation research equipment and facilities. This grant was offered in 2010. It has not been determined whether it will be available in future years.KWWS���ZZZ�SDUNV�FD�JRY�"3DJHBLG �����

American Academy of Dermatology- Shade Structure Grant ProgramThe American Academy of Dermatology offers a Shade Structure Grant program with grants of $8,000 each to fund permanent outdoor shade structures designed to provide shade and ultraviolet ray protection. The program awards grants on an annual basis. http://www.aad.org/public/sun/grants.html

KaBOOM! Community Partnership Grants .D%220��LV�D�QDWLRQDO�QRQ�SURÀW�WKDW�HQYLVLRQV�D�SODFH�IRU�FKLOGUHQ�WR�SOD\�ZLWKLQ�ZDON-ing distance to local residences in North America. http://www.kaboom.org/

Lowe’s Charitable and Educational FoundationSupport for education and community improvement: Lowe’s Charitable and Educa-tional Foundation awards more than $1.5 million annually to individuals and organiza-tions across the United States. Founded in 1957, the Foundation’s primary philanthropic focus areas include community improvement projects, education scholarships for trade disciplines and environmental initiatives that enhance the natural environment. KWWS���ZZZ�ORZHV�FRP�ORZHV�ONQ"DFWLRQ SJS $ERXW/RZHV�&RPPXQLW\

Urban Park and Recreation Recovery (UPARR) Since 1978, the UPARR program awarded nearly $272 million for 1,461 grants to 380 local jurisdictions in 43 States, the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico. UPARR grants provid-

IVES PARK - 39

ed recreation opportunities for all ages, all ethnic groups, and people with and without disabilities, senior citizens to at-risk youth, latchkey children, and young adults.Types of recreation facilities rehabilitated through the UPARR program include: SOD\JURXQGV���UHFUHDWLRQ�FHQWHUV���EDOO�ÀHOGV���QHLJKERUKRRG�SDUNV�picnic areas - tennis courts & basketball courts - hike/bike/exercise trail KWWS���ZZZ�QSV�JRY�QFUF�SURJUDPV�XSUU�SURJUDPBLQEULHI�KWPO

Tire-Derived Product Grant ProgramThe California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle) offers the Tire-Derived Product (TDP) Grant Program to promote markets for recycled-content products derived from waste tires generated in California and decrease the adverse environmental impacts created by unlawful disposal and stockpiling of waste tires. Only one application per qualifying entity will be accepted. Eligible applicants include public entities which include: California cities, counties, public school districts, public colleges and universities, special districts, park districts, public recreational facilities, and VWDWH�DJHQFLHV��LQFOXGLQJ�RIÀFHV��GHSDUWPHQWV��EXUHDXV��DQG�ERDUGV��http://www.calrecycle.ca.gov/Tires/Grants/Product/

Land and Water Conservation FundThe purposes of the LWCF program is to assist in preserving, developing and assuring accessibility to all citizens of the United States of America of present and future genera-tions a quality and quantity of outdoor recreation resources. LWCF funds can be used for acquisition or development. This source could likely be used for interpretative sig-nage about the Marsh and possibly for dock improvements.

Applicants may not begin construction until a grant contract is fully executed. Projects will not be considered for funding if:

�� The time line indicates that the project is not likely to be completed within the con-tract performance period and/or the applicant does not demonstrate that they, or their Project manager(s), are capable of completing the project within the contract performance period.

There is no minimum or maximum limit on grant request amounts, however it should be noted that in the 2011 cycle of funding there was only about $700,000 available for all of northern California.

�� 50% match is required�� In 2011, $1,740,000 in funding was available, split 60% for southern California and 40%

for northern California.

Ineligible Projects include, but are not limited to the following: �� Combination acquisition and development projects �� Interpretive facilities which go beyond interpreting the project site and its immediate

surrounding area �� Convention facilities �� Commemorative exhibits and monuments

IVES PARK - 40

�� Facilities marginally related to outdoor recreation �� Indoor facilities such as community centers and gymnasiums �� Facilities used primarily for spectator sports �� Acquisition, restoration or preservation of historic structures �� Employee residences

It should be noted, that all projects funded by the LWCF must be retained in perpetu-ity for public outdoor recreational use (Public Law 88-578, 16 U.S.C. 460l-6(f)(3)). At this time funding for the LWCF is limited. However, it is anticipated that new legislation will be signed and additional funding will be made available in the coming funding cycles.

Application guide available at:KWWS���ZZZ�SDUNV�FD�JRY�SDJHV������ÀOHV�OZFIBDSSBJXLGHB������BGUDIW�SGI

Habitat Conservation Fund �� There is no maximum or minimum grant request amount limit.�� There is a required non-state dollar-for-dollar match.

The Habitat Conservation Fund (HCF) Program allocates approximately $2 million per year to the California Department of Parks and Recreation for grants to cities, counties, and districts to provide for nature interpretation and other non-capital outlay programs ZKLFK�EULQJ�XUEDQ�UHVLGHQWV�LQWR�SDUN�DQG�ZLOGOLIH�DUHDV��WR�SURWHFW�ÀVK��ZLOGOLIH�DQG�native plant resources or to acquire or develop wildlife corridors and trails. This grant would apply to marsh restoration for Ives Park.

7KH�+&)�LGHQWLÀHV�VHYHQ�FDWHJRULHV�WKDW�DUH�HOLJLEOH�IRU�IXQGLQJ��$SSOLFDQWV�ZLOO�QHHG�WR�refer to these guides in preparing their application. In addition, the Grant Administration Guide is available for additional information if funding is received.

�� Deer/Mountain Lion Habitat (not applicable)�� Rare, Endangered, Threatened or Fully Protected Species Habitat �� Wetlands - KWWS���ZZZ�SDUNV�FD�JRY�SDJHV������ÀOHV�KFIBZHWODQGVBJXLGH������SGI�� Anadromous Salmonids and Trout Habitat - http://www.parks.ca.gov/pages/1008/

ÀOHV�KFIBDQDGURPRXVBJXLGH������SGI�� Riparian Habitat - KWWS���ZZZ�SDUNV�FD�JRY�SDJHV������ÀOHV�KFIBULSDULDQB

guide-2010.pdf�� Trails - KWWS���ZZZ�SDUNV�FD�JRY�SDJHV������ÀOHV�KFIBWUDLOVBJXLGH������SGI�� Wildlife Area Activities - KWWS���ZZZ�SDUNV�FD�JRY�SDJHV������ÀOHV�KFIBZLOGOLIHB

guide-2010.pdf

Grant Administration Guide - KWWS���ZZZ�SDUNV�FD�JRY�SDJHV������ÀOHV�+&)B*UDQWB$GPLQB*XLGH������SGI

Integrated Regional Water Management (IRWM) Grant program �� 25% match required

The IRWM Grant Program is designed to encourage integrated regional management of water resources and provide funding for projects that support integrated water man-agement planning and implementation. This PSP works in conjunction with the IRWM 3URJUDP�*XLGHOLQHV�WR�GLVEXUVH�WKLV�ÀUVW�URXQG�RI�LPSOHPHQWDWLRQ�JUDQW�IXQGLQJ�XQGHU�

IVES PARK - 41

the Safe Drinking Water, Water Quality and Supply, Flood Control, River and Coastal Protection Bond Act 2006 (Proposition 84). Focus is on storm water management proj-HFWV�RXWVLGH�RI�WKH�VWDWH�SODQ�RI�ÁRRG�FRQWURO�WKDW�UHGXFH�ÁRRG�GDPDJH�

Application guide available at:KWWS���ZZZ�ZDWHU�FD�JRY�LUZP�GRFV�,PSOHPHQWDWLRQ*UDQWV�3URS��B5RXQG��,PSB363B)LQDOB��B��B���SGI

Additional Resources and Potential Partners

Parks and Recreation Funding in California (Trust for Public Land)This article is a good overview of the local, state and federal opportunities for funding related to parks and open space. Additional articles are linked within the document.

Additional information available at:KWWS���ZZZ�WSO�RUJ�FRQWHQWBGRFXPHQWV�KSKF�KSKFB3DUNV5HFUHDWLRQ)XQGLQJ&$�SGI

California State Parks Department The State of California offers many opportunities for park and trail funding through grants on a yearly basis, however these change based on adopted yearly State bud-gets. KWWS���ZZZ�SDUNV�FD�JRY�"SDJHBLG ����

The Foundation CenterEstablished in 1956 and today supported by close to 550 foundations, the Foundation &HQWHU�LV�D�QDWLRQDO�QRQSURÀW�VHUYLFH�RUJDQL]DWLRQ�UHFRJQL]HG�DV�WKH�QDWLRQ·V�OHDGLQJ�DXWKRULW\�RQ�RUJDQL]HG�SKLODQWKURS\��FRQQHFWLQJ�QRQSURÀWV�DQG�WKH�JUDQWPDNHUV�VXS-porting them to tools they can use and information they can trust. Its audiences include grantseekers, grantmakers, researchers, policymakers, the media, and the general pub-lic. The Center maintains the most comprehensive database on U.S. grantmakers and their grants; issues a wide variety of print, electronic, and online information resources; conducts and publishes research on trends in foundation growth, giving, and practice; and offers an array of free and affordable educational programs.

Additional information available at: http://foundationcenter.org/

IVES PARK - 42

IVES PARK - 43

5 SUSTAINABLESTRATEGIES

IVES PARK - 44

S U S T A I N A B L E S T R A T E G I E S

Sebastopol is a small, but progressive minded community that has taken action to reduce its HQYLURQPHQWDO�LPSDFW���7KH�&LW\�KDV�LGHQWLÀHG�VXVWDLQDELOLW\�DV�DQ�LPSRUWDQW�JRDO�RI�WKH�&LW\��ZLWK�the adoption of such elements as the Sustainable Sebastopol Plan, Green Building Standards Code, and a Pest Management Plan based on integrated pest management principles.

The following are sustainable strategies that the City of Sebastopol may need either to legally comply with State and Federal Ordinances or to comply with their sustainability goals.

C.3 Stormwater RegulationsIn 1972, the EPA created the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit pro-JUDP��LQ�DQ�HIIRUW�WR�LPSURYH�ZDWHU�TXDOLW\�WKURXJKRXW�WKH�FRXQWU\���7KHVH�FRQWUROV��DQG�VSHFLÀ-cally an NPDES permit, are intended to regulate point source pollutants that are discharged into U.S. waters. NPDES permits are administered typically by states. C.3 regulations are a provision RI�WKH�13'(6�SHUPLW�DQG�UHODWHV�GLUHFWO\�WR�WKH�FRQWURO�RI�VWRUPZDWHU���VSHFLÀFDOO\�ZLWK�UHJDUG�WR�new development and redevelopment.

For any future park development or redevelopment in Ives Park, it will be required to meet the NPDES C.3 regulations. Prior to any construction, during early design phases, the City can re-duce its impact on water quality by reducing impervious surfacing, use of green roofs, install-ing rain gardens, and creation of vegetated bio-swales. Prior to and during construction, such elements as an erosion control plan noting the BMP’s (Best Management Practices) that will be used on site must be prepared along with implementation of control and treatment measures.

Sebastopol, as part of Sonoma County, must comply with the regulations under the Sonoma County Storm Water Pollution Prevention Program (MCSTOPPP). This program was formed in response to the standards set by the Federal Clean Water Act and Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Region. The requirements of this program apply to both private and municipal capital improvement projects and address such issues as BMP’s treatment measures, control measures (quality and quantity), and site design principles.

Although the City should always keep storm water runoff control and quality as a top priority dur-ing any type of planning and construction, it should pay special attention to those areas of the park adjacent to the marsh. This is a great opportunity to undertake projects which protect this fragile natural resource, while also using the projects as an educational tool to inform the public of the importance of storm water reduction and water resource protection. Green Building and ConstructionThere is great opportunity to use sustainable strategies through thoughtful use of landscape materials and green building practices which will supplement the adopted Green Building Stan-dards Code. National programs such as the LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental De-sign) rating system is a voluntary program that provides guidelines for a wide range of building projects with many “‘points”’ awarded to the use of sustainable materials and practices in the landscape, www.usgbc.org. Another program, the Sustainable Sites Initiative, is more landscape focused and provides “voluntary national guidelines and performance benchmarks for sustain-able land design, construction and maintenance practices.”

Below is a summary of different ways to make Ives Park more sustainable:

�� 8VH�UHVWURRP�IDFLOLWLHV�WKDW�LQFRUSRUDWH�JUHHQ�EXLOGLQJ�GHVLJQV�LQFOXGLQJ�ORZ�ZDWHU�XVH�À[-tures. These buildings should be educational opportunities and also integrate all aspects of green building design.

�� Specify landscape materials and site furnishings which utilize post and pre-consumer recy-cled material, and/or are constructed from materials that are easily recyclable; and/or from

IVES PARK - 45

WKRVH�PDQXIDFWXUHUV�ZKLFK�SUDFWLFH�HQHUJ\�HIÀFLHQF\��PLQLPL]H�UHVRXUFH�FRQVXPSWLRQ�DQG�lessen their overall impact on the environment. Examples of such materials include, but are QRW�OLPLWHG�WR���Á\�DVK��DOXPLQXP��SODVWLF��EDPERR�DQG�VWHHO�

�� Promote the use of regional materials, by incorporating landscape materials extracted, har-vested or recovered as well as manufactured or grown, within 500 miles or less from Sebasto-pol.

�� Include both abundant planting of shade trees and the use of paving that is light in color DQG�RU�SHUYLRXV�ZKHUHYHU�SRVVLEOH���+HDW�LVODQG�(IIHFW�LV�FDXVHG�E\�GDUN��QRQ�UHÁHFWLYH�VXU-faces such as asphalt, which absorb and radiate heat, raising the surrounding temperatures. Planting shade trees in conjunction with any paved area will help to reduce heat island ef-fect.

�� Use lumber that is sustainably harvested. Many of the wood products used today are from trees harvested from around the world. Purchasing products that are Forest Stewardship &RXQFLO��)6&��FHUWLÀHG�KHOSV�WR�JXDUDQWHH�WKDW�WKH�ZRRG�XVHG�ZDV�REWDLQHG�WKURXJK�VXV-tainable methods that help protect and manage forests properly.

�� Select furnishings and materials that do not require intensive maintenance such as painted surfaces or materials that are susceptible to rust and weathering.

�� Use plants and landscape materials that are durable, drought-tolerant and low-mainte-nance. Specify plants that do not produce excessive litter or require excessive pruning. Pur-chase plant materials from vendors who practice sustainable plant production. Use organic soil amendments and organic, slow-release fertilizers (non-petroleum based).

�� Reduce the use of potable water for irrigation.

�� Ensure all maintenance personnel are trained in proper pruning techniques based on spe-FLHV�DQG�RU�PDQDJHG�E\�D�FHUWLÀHG�WUHH�FDUH�SURIHVVLRQDO�

�� Promote composting of on-site materials generated through maintenance practices (wood chips, lawn trimmings) and use in the landscape. Collect and compost excess organic ma-WHULDOV�VXFK�DV�OLPEV�RU�OHDI�OLWWHU�WKDW�PD\�FRQWULEXWH�WR�ÀUH�IXHO�ORDGV�

�� Create a landscape monitoring plan and checklist to detect plant health or potential prob-lems, including introduction and control of invasive species.

�� Properly maintain all gas-powered maintenance equipment. Incorporate non-gas powered technology as it becomes available to minimize both air and noise pollution.

�� Limit the use of high-pressure blower machinery to reduce the removal of natural duff and mulch which plays an important role in weed control, nutrient cycling and soil moisture re-WHQWLRQ��%DODQFH�WKLV�HIIRUW�ZLWK�DOO�ÀUH�VDIHW\�JXLGHOLQHV�

IVES PARK - 46

IVES PARK - 47

6 APPENDIX

IVES PARK - 48

IVES PARK - 49

APPENDIX AAERIAL PHOTO

IVES PARK - 50

PROJECT

Sebastopol, Ca // Royston Hanamoto Alley & Abey Landscape Architects and Planners

Ives Park Renovation Master Plan - Site AerialMONTH DAY YEAR

06 201101

BOBOBOBOBOOBOBOBOOBOBOBOBBBDEDEDEDEDEDEDEDEDEDD

AGAGAGAAGAGAAAAAAGAAAAGAAGAAAAAAA A AAAAAAA AAAAAAAA

VEVVEVEVEEVEVEEEEEEEEVEVEEVEEEEVEEEEVEVEVVVVVNUUNUNUNUNUNUNUNUNNUNUNUUNUNUNUNUNUUNNNUUNUNUNUNUNUNUUNUNUNUNUNUNUNUUNUNUNUUUNUNUNUNNN

EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

JEJEJJJEEEEEEWEWEWEWEWWEWWEWEWEELLLLLLLLLLLLL A A A AAAAAVEVEVEVVVVVVVEVVVEVEVEVVEVEVEVEVEVEVVEVVVEVVEVEVVV NUNUUNUNNUEEEE

BUBUBUBUBUUBUBUBUBUBUUUUBUBUUBUBUBUBUBBUUBUBBUBUUBUBUBUBUBUBBUBUBBUBBBBBB RNRNRNRNRNRNNNNNRNNRNRNRNNRNRNNRNRNNNRNRNRNRNRNNRNRRRR ETEEETETETETETETETETETTETTTETTETTETETETETETETETETETETTTETTTTTEEEETETTEETETTTETETTTTTEE TTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTT TTTT TTT T TTTT T T T TTTTT TTTTT TT TTTTT TT TTTTTT STSTSTTTSTSTSTSTSTSTTTSTTSTSTSTTSTSTSTSTSTSTTSTTTSTSTSTTSTSTSTTSTSTTTTSTSSTSTSSSSSS RERERERERERERERERERERRERERRRERRRRRRRRRERERRRRRRRR ETETETETETETETEETETETTEE

SESESESESSESESESSESESEEESESESESESESESESESSSESESESESESESESESESESESSESESSESESESESEESESESESESEEEESSSSEESESSSSEEESESESESESSSSESSSESESSSSSEEEEESSEEEESSESEEEEBBBBBBBABAAAAABABABABBBAAAABBBBBBABAABBBABAABBBAABBBBBBBBBABBBBAABBABABABBABBBBBBAABABABAABBBABBAABBBBBBBAAAAABBAAASTSTSTSTSTSTTTTTTTSTSTSTTTTTSTSTTTSSTSTTTTSTSTSTSTTTTTTSTTTTSTTSTTTSTSTTTSTSTOOOOOOOPOPOPOOPOPPPPOPPPPPPOOOOOPPOOPPOPOOPPPPPPPPPPPOPPOPPPPPPPPOOOPOOPOOPOOOPPOPOOPOOOPPOPOLOLOLOLOLOLOOOOLOOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOOLOLOLOLOOLOOLOLOLOLOOLOLOLOOOLOLLOLLOOOOOOOOOOOOLLLL CHCHCCHCHCHCHCHCHCCHCHHHHCHCHCHCHHHHHCCHCCHCHCCHHHHCHCHHCHCHCHHCHCHCCHHHHHHHCHCCCHHHHHCHCHCHHCHCHHHHCHHHHHHHHHHAARAARAAAAAARARARAAAARARRRRRRARARRARAARARARAAARARARARARARAARARARAARARRRRRAARRAARARRRRRRAARRAAARAAAAAAAAAARTTTTTTTTETETTTETEEEETETETETEETTTTETEEETEEETTTTETEETETETTETETTEETETETETETTETETTTTTT RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR SSCSCCCCSCSCCSSCCCCCSCSCSCCCCCSCSSSCCCCSSCSSSCSSSSSSSSSSSSSSCHOHHOHHHOHHOOHOHOHOHOOOHOOOOHOOHHHHHHOOOHOHOOOOHOOOHHHHHHOHOOHOHOOOOOOOOHHHOOOHOHHHOOOOHHOOHOOOOOHHOHOHOHOHOOHOOOHHOHOHOHOHOHOOOOHHOOOOHOHOHOHOOOOOOOOOOLOOOOOLOOOOLLLLLOLOLOLOOLOLOOOOLLLLLOLOOOOOOOLOLOLLOLOOOOOOLOOOOLOLOOLOLOLLLLOLOLOOOOOLLOLLOLOLLOLLOLOOOOOOOOOOOLOLOOOOOOOOOOOLOOOOOOOOOLLOOOOOLOLOOOOOLLOOOOLLOLLOOOOLLLLOOOOOOOLLOOLLLOLOOOLLOOOOOOOOOOOO

DODODODODODODOODODODODODODDDOOOODOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOTATATATATATATATATTATATATATTATATATAATATATATAATAATATATAATTATTTATATAAATTTAATAAAAATTAAAAATAAAAAAAAATTTAAAATAAAAATRTRTRTRTRTRTRTRTRRTRRRTRTRTRTRTRTRRRRRTRRRTRRRTRRTTTTTRRTRRTTRTRRAAAAAAAIAIAIAAAIAIAIIAAAAIAAAAAIAIIIAAAAAAAIAIAIAAIIAAIAAIAAIAAAAAAAAAAAIAIAIAAAAAAAAIAAIAIAAIAIAAAIAIAAAAAAAAIIAAAIAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAIAAIAAAAAAAA LLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL

MAMAMAMAMAMMAAAMAMAMAMAMAMAMMMAMMAMAMAMAMMMAMAMMAMAAMMMAMMAMMAMAAMMMMMMMAMMMAAMMMAAMMAAAAAMMAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAIIIINIIIIIIIIINNIINIIIIII SSSSS S SSSS SSSSSSS SSSSSS S SSSSSSSSSS SSSSSSSSSSSSSSTTTTTTTRTRTRTTRTRTRTRRTRRTRTRRTTTTTTTTRTRRTRRRRRRTTTTTRTRRRRRRTTTTTTTTTRTRTRTTTTRRTTTRRTTRTTRRRRRRRRTTTTRTRRTRRTTRRRREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEETTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT

PPPPPPPPPAPAAPAPAAPAPAPAAPAPAAAAPPPPAPAAPPPPAPAAAPPAPAAPAPAPAPPPAPPPAPAAPAAPPAAAPPAPPPPPAAPPPPPPPPPP RRKRKRRKRRKRKRKRKRKKRRRRRRKKKKKRKKKKKKKKRKKKKKKKKKKKKKKRKKKKKKKRKKRRRRKKRKKRKKK SSSSSSSSSS SSSS SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSIIIDDDDIDIDIDIDDIDDIIIII EEEEEEEELELELELELELELELELELELELELLELELELELELLELLLLLLELELLLLLLLLLLEEEEEEEEELEEEEELEELEELEEEEEEEEEEEELEEE EEEEMEMEMEMMMMEMMMEMMEMEMEMEMMEMEMMMMMMEEMMMMMMEMEEMEMEMMMMMEMEEMMMMMMMMMMMMEMMMMMMMEMMMMMMMMMMMEMEMMMMMEEEMMMMEMEMMMMMMMMEEMMMMMEEEMEMMMEEEMMMMMEMEEMMMMMEEMMEEEEEENENEENENEEEEENENEEENEEEEENEEEEEEEEEEEENNTATATATAATATATAAATAATAAATAAAAAAAAATAAAAAAAAAAAAAAATAAATAAATAATATAAATAAAAAATAAAAAAAAAAAAAAATAAAAARYYRYRYRYRYRRYRYRYRYRYRYRRRRRRRYRYYRYRYYYYRYRYRYRRRRYRYYYYYRRYRYRYRRRYRRRYRYYYRYRYRRYRRRRYRYYYRRRYRYRYRRRRYRYRYRRYRYYRRYRYYYRYRYRRYYYRRYYRRRRRRRRRRRYRRYRY S S S S SS SSSS S SSSSS S SSSS S SSSCHCHCHCHCHCHCHCHCCHCHHHCHCCHHCCHCHCHCHCHCHHCCCHHCHCCHHCHCHCCHCHHHHHHCHCHCCHHHCC OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOLLLLLLLLL

IVES POOL

VETERANS BUILDING

CALDER CREEK

SESESESESEESESESEEESEEBABABABABABABABABABABABAAAABABABBABABBABBBAABABABABBBAABABABBBBBBABABAAABABBBABABABABAABABBBABAAABAABAABABABABBABABBBBBABABAABABABAASTSTSTTSTSTSTTTSTSSSTTSTSSSTSSSSTSSSSTTSTTSTSTSSSSSTTTTOPOPOPOPOOPPOPOPOPPPOOOO OLOOLOLOLOLOLLLLLLLLOLOL FFIFIFFIFFIIIFIFIFIFIFFFIIFFFIIFFFIFIIFFIFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFIFIFFFFFFFFFFFF RRRRRRRRRRRRERERERERERERRRRRRRERERRRREERREER D DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPPEPEPEPEPEEPEPPEPEPEPEPEEPEPEPEPEEPEEPEPPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEPEEPEEEPEEEEPPPPPPPEPPPPPPPPARARARARARARARARARARARRRRRRARARARARARARARARARARARRRRARARARARRRRARARRRARARAARARRAARRARARARAARARARARAAAAAAAAARA TMTMTTMTMTMTMTMTMTMMTMTTMTTMTMMTMTMTMTMTMTMTMTMTMTMTTMTTMTMTTMMTMTMTMTTTMTMTTMTMTTTMTTTMMTMMTTMMTMMMTTMENENENEENENENENNNNNENNNENNNNNNNEENNNNNNNENNNNENNENENNENENNNENENEEENENNENEENNNENEENENENEENTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT

CHCHCHHCHCHCHCHCHCHCHCHCHCHCCHCCCHCHCCCCCHCHCHCCCCCHHHCHCCHHCCCCHHHCCHCCHCCHHHCCCHHCCHHCHURURURURURRURCHCHCCCCHCHCCCCCCCCCCCCCHCCCHCCCC

LITTLE LEAGUEPOLLEY FIELD

WIWIWIWIWWWWIWWIWWIWIWIWIWWWWWIWIWWWWWIWIWWWWWWWWWWWWIWWWWWWWWWWIWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWIWWIWWWWWWWWWWWWW LLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLOWWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOWWOOWOWOWOOOWOWOWOOWOOWOWOOOO SSSSSSS SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS S STRTRTRTTTTRTRTRTRTRTRTRRRRTRTTTTRTRTRRRTRTRTRTTTRTRTRTRTTRTRTTTTT EEEEEEEEEEEE

S S S SSSSS SSS HIHIHIHHIHHIHIHIHIHIHIHIIIGHGHGHGHGHGHGHGHGGGGHGHGGHGHGHGHH S SSSSSSSSSSTRTRTRTTRTRTRRTTREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEETTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT

CHCHCHCHCCHCCHCCCHCHCHHHCHHHHHHHHCCHCHCCHCHHHHCHCCCCCHCHHHCHHHHHCCHCHCHHHHHHHCHHCCHHCCCCCHCCHHHHAARARARARARAAAARAAAARRRARARRARARAAARARRAARAAAARRARRRRAARRRRRRARRRRAAAAARRRRRRAAAAARRRRARARARAAAAAAARRRRAARRAARAAA TTTETETETETETTTTTTTETEETETEETETTETTETTTTETETTTETEETTT RRRRRRRRRR RR RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR SCSCSCSCSSCSSCSCSSSCCCCSSCSCSSCCCSSSCSCCCCCSCSSSSSSCCCSCSSSSCCSCCSCSCCS HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

JJOJOJOJOJOOOJOJJJJJOJOJOJJOJJJOOOOJJJOEEEEEEE E EE RORROROOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOROROOOROROROOOOOOOROROOOOOOOROOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOODDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT

CREEK

SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSTRTRTRTRTRTRTRTRTRTRTRTRTRRTRRTRTRTRTRTRTRTRTRTRTRRTTRTRTRTRTTRRRTREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE TTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT

VETERANS BUILDING

IVES POOL

CACALDER CR

LITTLE LEAGUEPOLLEY FIELD

IVES PARK - 53

APPENDIX BEXIST ING CONDITIONS SURVEY

IVES PARK - 54

LEGEND TURF CIRCULATION

STAGE CREEK

PLAYGROUND PICNIC

PLANTED AREAS

PROJECT

Sebastopol, Ca // Royston Hanamoto Alley & Abey Landscape Architects and PlannersIves Park Renovation Master Plan - Existing Conditions Site Survey

MONTH DAY YEAR

06 201128

PLAYGROUND

SHAKESPEARESTAGE

PICNICPADS

PICNICPADS

PICNICPADS

CONCRETESTAGE

LITTLE LEAGUERESTROOM & CONCESSION

IVES POOL

WILLOW STREET

JEW

ELL

AVE

PUBLICRESTROOMS

POOL ENTRANCE

LITTLE LEAGUE POLLEY FIELD

VETERANS BUILDING

ENTRANCE

ENTRANCE

ENTRANCE

ENTRANCEENTRANCE

ENTRANCE

ENTRANCE

S H

IGH

STR

EE

T

“ONION PATCH”

BRIDGE

BRIDGE

BRIDGE

OPEN TURF

ROSE GARDEN

APPENDIX CSITE PHOTOS

IVES PARK - 57

IVES PARK - 58

SEBASTOPOL PIPER PARK - SITE PHOTOS

SEBASTOPOL PIPER PARK - SITE PHOTOS

SEBASTOPOL PIPER PARK - SITE PHOTOS

IVES PARK - 65

APPENDIX DPREVIOUS PLAN ALTERNATIVES

IVES PARK -66

Alternative 1

Alternative 2

Alternative 3

3b

APPENDIX EMASTER PLAN

IVES PARK - 69

IVES PARK -70

PROJECT

Sebastopol, CA// Royston Hanamoto Alley & Abey Landscape Architects and Planners

Ives Park Renovation Master Plan - Proposed Master PlanMONTH DAY YEAR

01 201323

22

22

LITTLE LEAGUE

WILLOW ST

S. H

IGH

ST

IVES POOL

JEW

ELL

AVE

10

11

21

19

20

9

12

13

8

22

16

18

17

171

2

35

5

44

4 6

24

7

21

11

Creek improvements1. Remove chain link fencing & guardrails. Remove safety hazards from creek walls. Patch and repair creek wall as necessary. Restore natural channel in meadow area and rose garden area; underground creek in picnic area. Expand to rose garden area. Remove central bridge and relocate northern bridge. Add natural creek edge and seating.

Site improvements2. Install sculpture garden along entry walk from High Street.

3. Install new ADA ramp and stairs, develop new entry node.

4. Install new ADA ramp.

5. Update fl atwork to be ADA compliant & develop a new entry node.

6. Convert existing park restrooms into storage for pool needs.

7. Remove selected billboards at baseball fi eld to increase visibility and add shrubs .

8. Provide new large central green space by relocating playground (see 14).

9. Cap creek to form a large central green space and relocate picnic areas along a new perimeter walk.

10. Install new stage.

11. Install a new perimeter path behind the baseball fi eld.

12. Relocate pool fencing along Willow Street to allow more space for pedestrians. Install planting to screen chain link fencing. Replace sections of the perimeter pool screen with transparent panels to allow for more visibility and park connection

13. Remove existing baseball restroom structure and install new prefabricated restroom structure with new drinking fountain that accomodates the park and baseball users.

14. Install new trellis/seating/performance area

15. Install new entrance gateway features

Playground improvements16. Relocate new playground adjacent to open turf park area and restrooms. Install diverse types of play equipment to encourage a variety of active play aswell as social and creative play.

Planting improvements17. To improve security and access, reduce or remove areas of perimeter planting along Jewell Ave. and Willow St.

18. To improve security and access, reduce or remove areas of perimeter planting between the Veterans Hall and the park

19. Replace redwood trees that are in declining state. Move to edge of turf to open up area for informal use.

20. Remove and thin out planting at the “onion patch.”

21. Remove and thin out planting between the baseball fi eld and residential lots. Coordinate with home owners.

22. Install edible gardens.

23. Install bio-basin / stormwater fi lter

24. Remove concrete stage at west end of pool.

25. Convert turning lane to parkland and interpretive garden. Off-site improvements26. Look for opportunities to provide direct pedestrian access to South Main Street

27. Improve pedestrian safety by adding bulb outs and crosswalks at major crossings.

General•Update irrigation system and incorporate water savings strategies.•Install educational signage about park history and ecology.•Replace park lighting with improved security lights.•New site furnishings (lighting, benches, trash receptacles,recycling, drinking fountains).•New park planting to be native.•Asphalt & concrete fl atwork to be replaced; install root barriers.

25

1

2727

26

4

3

1222

2227

23

14

15

15

15

IVES PARK -73

APPENDIX FZONE DIAGRAM

IVES PARK - 74

PROJECT

Sebastopol, CA// Royston Hanamoto Alley & Abey Landscape Architects and Planners

Ives Park Renovation Master Plan - Proposed Master PlanMONTH DAY YEAR

1 201323

LITTLE LEAGUE

VETERANS BUILDING

BURNNETT STREET

SEBASTOPOLFIRE DEPARTMENT

WILLOW ST

S. H

IGH

ST

IVES POOL

JEW

ELL

AVE

BODEGA AVENUE

10

11

9

8

1B

2

3

5

4

6

7

1D

1C

Proposed Zoning1. Entrance Accessibility Improvements A. Entrance B. Entrance C. Entrance D. Entrance2. Art Entry Zone3. North Creek Restoration4. South Creek Restoration5. Picnic and Passive Play Zone6. Pool Perimeter Improvements7. Ballfi eld Perimeter Improvements8. New Restroom9. New Play Area10. Performance Zone11. Corner Capture

1A

APPENDIX GMASTER PLAN COST ESTIMATE

IVES PARK -77

IVES PARK - 78

Ives�Park�Master�PlanSebastopol,�CAZone�1�Ͳ�Accessibility�Improvements

preliminary�cost�estimate��11/06/2012

Item Qty. Unit Cost Total Notes

Zone�1AA. Site�Preparation

1. Site�survey�and�layout 1 ls $2,000 $2,0002. Site�clearing,�grubbing�&�demolition 11,650 sf $0.15 $1,7483. Rough�grading 11,650 sf $0.51 $5,9424. Demo�AC�paving 2,626 sf� $3.00 $7,8785. SWPPP_High�risk�site 0.10 ac $20,000.00 $2,000

SubͲTotal $19,567

B. Site�Amenities

1. Receptacles�(trash�&�recycling) 1 ea $2,000.00 $2,000

SubͲTotal $2,000

C. Site�Improvements

1. AC- 2'' over 6" Base- Pedestrian 1,681 sf $4.50 $7,5652. Concrete�ramp�with�railing 157 lf $210.00 $32,9703. Concrete�stairs 230 sf $70.00 $16,1004. Concrete�curb 366 lf $22.00 $8,0525. Railing 38 lf $150.00 $5,700

SubͲTotal $70,387

D. Planting�&�Irrigation1. Irrigation�improvements 8,830 sf $1.00 $8,830

SubͲTotal $8,830

Zone�1A�Construction�subͲtotal $100,784

30%�Design�and�construction�contingencies�and�professional�services $30,235

Zone�1A�Total $131,019

Zone�1BA. Site�Preparation

1. Site�survey�and�layout 1 ls $2,000 $2,0002. Site�clearing,�grubbing�&�demolition 4,032 sf $0.15 $6053. Rough�grading 4,032 sf $0.51 $2,0564. Demo�AC�paving 1,831 sf� $3.00 $5,4935. SWPPP_High�risk�site 0.10 ac $20,000.00 $2,000

SubͲTotal $12,154

B. Site�Amenities

1. Benches 1 ea $1,400.00 $1,4002. Receptacles�(trash�&�recycling) 1 ea $2,000.00 $2,000

SubͲTotal $3,400

C. Site�Improvements

1. AC- 2'' over 6" Base- Pedestrian 1,143 sf $4.50 $5,1442. Concrete�ramp�with�railing 32 lf $210.00 $6,7203. Concrete�stairs 20 sf $70.00 $1,4004. Concrete�curb 64 lf $22.00 $1,408

Item Qty. Unit Cost Total Notes

5. Railing 8 lf $150.00 $1,200

SubͲTotal $15,872

D. Planting�&�Irrigation1. Irrigation�improvements 2,677 sf $2.00 $5,354

SubͲTotal $5,354

Zone�1B�Construction�subͲtotal $36,780

30%�Design�and�construction�contingencies�and�professional�services $11,034

Zone�1B�Total $47,814

Item Qty. Unit Cost Total Notes

Zone�1CA. Site�Preparation

1. Site�survey�and�layout 1 ls $2,000 $2,0002. Site�clearing,�grubbing�&�demolition 1,752 sf $0.15 $2633. Rough�grading 1,752 sf $0.51 $8944. Demo�AC�paving 1,000 sf� $3.00 $3,0005. SWPPP_High�risk�site 0.10 ac $20,000.00 $2,000

SubͲTotal $8,156

B. Site�Amenities

1C

1. Benches 1 ea $1,400.00 $1,4002. Receptacles�(trash�&�recycling) 1 ea $2,000.00 $2,000

SubͲTotal $3,400

C. Site�Improvements

1. AC- 2'' over 6" Base- Pedestrian 930 sf $4.50 $4,1852. Concrete�ramp�with�railing 50 lf $210.00 $10,5003. Concrete�stairs 65 sf $70.00 $4,5504. Concrete�retaining�wall 174 cf $37.00 $6,4384. Concrete�curb 40 lf $22.00 $8805. Railing 12 lf $150.00 $1,800

SubͲTotal $28,353

D. Planting�&�Irrigation1. Irrigation�improvements 424 sf $3.00 $1,272

SubͲTotal $1,272

Zone�1C�Construction�subͲtotal $41,181

30%�Design�and�construction�contingencies�and�professional�services $12,354

Zone�1C�Total $53,536

Zone�1DA. Site�Preparation

1. Site�survey�and�layout 1 ls $2,000 $2,0002. Site�clearing,�grubbing�&�demolition 2,667 sf $0.15 $4003. Rough�grading 2,667 sf $0.51 $1,3604. Demo�AC�paving 1,170 sf� $3.00 $3,5105. SWPPP_High�risk�site 0.10 ac $20,000.00 $2,000

SubͲTotal $9,270

B. Site�Amenities

SubͲTotal $0

C. Site�Improvements

1. AC- 2'' over 6" Base- Pedestrian 1,425 sf $4.50 $6,4132. Concrete�ramp�with�railing 120 lf $210.00 $25,2003. Concrete�retaining�wall 400 cf $37.00 $14,8004. Concrete�curb 112 lf $22.00 $2,464

SubͲTotal $48,877

Item Qty. Unit Cost Total Notes

D. Planting�&�Irrigation1. Irrigation�improvements 545 sf $3.00 $1,635

SubͲTotal $1,635

Zone�1D�Construction�subͲtotal $59,782

30%�Design�and�construction�contingencies�and�professional�services $17,935

Zone�1D�Total $77,716

Ives�Park�Master�PlanSebastopol,�CAZone�2�Ͳ�Art�Entrypreliminary�cost�estimate��11/06/2012

Item Qty. Unit Cost Total Notes

A. Site�Preparation1. Site�survey�and�layout 1 ls $2,000 $2,0002. Site�clearing,�grubbing�&�demolition 7,650 sf $0.15 $1,1483. Rough�grading 7,650 sf $0.51 $3,9024. Demo�AC�paving 212 sf� $3.00 $6365. SWPPP_High�risk�site�(near�creek) 0.20 ac $20,000.00 $4,000

SubͲTotal $11,685

B. Site�Amenities

1. Benches 1 ea $1,400.00 $1,4002. Park�Entrance�Sign 1 ls $8,000.00 $8,0003. Receptacles�(trash�&�recycling) 1 ea $2,000.00 $2,000

SubͲTotal $11,400

C. Site�Improvements

1. Concrete�sculpture�pads 110 sf $10.00 $1,1002. Special�Paving�(entry�plaza) 367 sf $28.00 $10,276

SubͲTotal $11,376

D. Irrigation

1. Lawn�irrigation 6,178 sf $1.25 $7,7231. Drip�irrigation 238 sf $1.50 $357

SubͲTotal $8,080

E. Planting1. NoͲmow�fescue�(sod) 6,178 sf $0.50 $3,0892. Entry�planting 238 sf $4.00 $952

SubͲTotal $4,041

Construction�subͲtotal $46,582

30%�Design�and�construction�contingencies�and�professional�services $13,974

Zone�2�Total $60,556

Ives�Park�Master�PlanSebastopol,�CAZone�3�Ͳ�North�Creek�Restorationpreliminary�cost�estimate��11/06/2012

Item Qty. Unit Cost Total Notes

A. Site�Preparation1. Site�survey�and�layout 1 ls $5,000 $5,0002. Site�clearing�&�grubbing� 33,899 sf� $0.15 $5,0853. Fence�and�guardrail�demo 835 lf $2.50 $2,0884. Channel�demo 1,787 sf� $5.00 $8,9355. Bridge�demo 2 ea $8,000.00 $16,0006. 24"�diameter�tree�removal 12 ea $1,200.00 $14,4007. Demo�AC�paving 7,055 sf� $3.00 $21,1658. Excavate 900 cy $30.00 $27,0009. Rough�grading 33,899 sf� $0.51 $17,288

10. SWPPP_High�risk�site�(near�creek) 0.80 ac $20,000.00 $16,00011. *Dewatering 1 ls $10,000.00 $10,000

SubͲTotal $142,961

B. Site�Amenities

1. Benches 3 ea $1,400.00 $4,2002. Perimeter�fence�surrounding�channel 189 lf� $70.00 $13,2303. Protective�creek�grate 2 ea $8,000.00 $16,0004. Receptacles�(trash�&�recycling) 2 ea $2,000.00 $4,000

SubͲTotal $37,430

C. Site�Improvements

1. AC- 2'' over 8" Base 8,684 sf $5.50 $47,7622. Special�Paving�(entry�plaza) 644 sf $35.00 $22,5403. Concrete�Paving�(creek�area�edge) 640 lf $28.00 $17,9204. Repair�channel�walls 1 ls $5,000.00 $5,0005. New�6'�x�40'�pedestrian�bridge�(south) 1 ea $63,000.00 $63,0006. New�12'�x�14'�pedestrian/vehicular�bridge�(north) 1 ea $60,000.00 $60,0007. Creekside�terrace 1 ls $15,000.00 $15,0008. Boulders�in�creek 20 ea $300.00 $6,0009. Bank�stabilization 18,018 sf $3.00 $54,054

SubͲTotal $291,276

D. Irrigation

1. Drip�irrigation�(creek) 18,018 sf $1.50 $27,0272. Drip�irrigation�(junction�planting) 281 sf $1.50 $422

SubͲTotal $27,449

E. Planting

1. Native�creek�planting,�Incl.�soil�prep�and�fine�grading 18,018 sf $1.00 $18,0182. Trees�24�gal 6 ea $130.00 $7803. Walkway�junction�planting 281 sf $4.00 $1,1244. Bark�mulch�above�bank 6,026 sf $0.90 $5,423

SubͲTotal $25,345

Construction�subͲtotal $524,461

40%�Design�and�construction�contingencies�and�professional�services $209,784

Zone�3�Total $734,245

*Dewatering�if�done�separately�from�zones�4�and�10.�Reduction�if�done�in�a�unit�to�$20,000�total�for�zones�3,�4,�and�10

�

Ives�Park�Master�PlanSebastopol,�CAZone�4�Ͳ�South�Creek�Restorationpreliminary�cost�estimate��11/06/2012

Item Qty. Unit Cost Total Notes

A. Site�Preparation1. Site�survey�and�layout 1 ls $5,000 $5,0002. Site�clearing�&�grubbing 25620 sf $0.15 $3,8433. Fence�and�guardrail�demo 500 lf $2.50 $1,2504. Demo�AC�paving 9900 sf� $3.00 $29,7005. Excavate 84 cy $30.00 $2,5206. Rough�grading 25620 sf $0.51 $13,0667. SWPPP_High�risk�site�(near�creek) 0.60 ac $20,000.00 $12,0008. *Dewatering 1 ls $10,000.00 $10,000

SubͲTotal $67,379

B. Site�Amenities

1. Protective�creek�grate 1 ea $8,000.00 $8,0002. Receptacles�(trash�&�recycling) 1 ea $2,000.00 $2,000

SubͲTotal $10,000

C. Site�Improvements

1. AC- 2'' over 8" Base 7,900 sf $5.50 $43,4502. Concrete�Paving�(creek�area�edge) 520 lf $28.00 $14,5603. Creekside�terrace 1 ls $15,000.00 $15,0004. Boulders�in�creek 20 ea $300.00 $6,0005. Bank�stabilization 2,260 sf $3.00 $6,780

SubͲTotal $79,010

D. Irrigation

1. Drip�irrigation�(creek) 14,486 sf $1.50 $21,7292. Drip�irrigation�(junction�planting) 368 sf $1.50 $552

SubͲTotal $22,281

E. Planting

1. Native�creek�planting 14,486 sf $1.00 $14,4862. Trees�24�gal 6 ea $130.00 $7803. Walkway�junction�planting 368 sf $4.00 $1,472

SubͲTotal $16,738

Construction�subͲtotal $195,408

40%�Design�and�construction�contingencies�and�professional�services $78,163

Zone�4�Total $273,571

*Dewatering�if�done�separately�from�zones�3�and�10.�Reduction�if�done�in�a�unit�to�$20,000�total�for�zones�3,�4,�and�10

Ives�Park�Master�PlanSebastopol,�CAZone�5�Ͳ�Picnic�and�Passive�Playpreliminary�cost�estimate��11/06/2012

Item Qty. Unit Cost Total Notes

A. Site�Preparation1. Site�survey�and�layout 1 ls $5,000 $5,0002. Site�clearing,�grubbing�&�demolition 22092 sf� $0.15 $3,3143. Demo�AC�paving 3950 sf� $3.00 $11,8504. Remove�PVC�Piping�at�edge�Play�Area,�incl.�disposal� 203 sf� $20.00 $4,0605. Remove�and�recycle�play�equipment 1 ls $4,000.00 $4,0006. Perimeter�shrub�removal 1 ls $1,000.00 $1,0007. Rough�grading 22,092 sf� $0.51 $11,2678. SWPPP_High�risk�site 0.50 ac $20,000.00 $10,000

SubͲTotal $50,491

B. Storm�Drainage1. Storm�Drain 1 ls $4,200.00 $4,2001. Bioswale 150 lf $25.00 $3,750

SubͲTotal $7,950

C. Site�Amenities

1. Picnic�Tables 7 ea $1,500.00 $10,5002. Receptacles�(trash�&�recycling) 1 ea $2,000.00 $2,000

SubͲTotal $12,500

E. Site�Improvements

1. AC- 2'' over 8" Base 7,010 sf $5.50 $38,555

SubͲTotal $38,555

F. Irrigation

1. Turf�irrigation 15,750 sf $1.25 $19,6882. Drip�irrigation�(junction�planting) 854 sf $1.50 $1,281

SubͲTotal $20,969

G. Planting

1. Turf�Hydroseed 15,750 sf $0.80 $12,6002. Walkway�junction�planting 854 sf $4.00 $3,4164. Trees�24�gal 4 ea $130.00 $520

SubͲTotal $16,536

Construction�subͲtotal $155,000

30%�Design�and�construction�contingencies�and�professional�services $46,500

Zone�5�Total $201,500

Ives�Park�Master�PlanSebastopol,�CAZone�6�Ͳ�Pool�Perimeter�Improvements

preliminary�cost�estimate��11/06/2012

Item Qty. Unit Cost Total Notes

A. Site�Preparation1. Site�survey�and�layout 1 ls $2,000 $2,0002. Site�clearing,�grubbing�&�demolition 6,670 sf $0.15 $1,0017. Demo�AC�paving 1120 sf� $3.00 $3,3603. Concrete�stage�demo 1 ls $4,000.00 $4,000 480�sf4. Existing�fence�demo 300 lf $2.50 $7505. Rough�grading 6,670 sf $0.51 $3,4025. SWPPP_High�risk�site 0.20 ac $20,000.00 $4,000

SubͲTotal $18,512

B. Site�Amenities

1. Perimeter�Fence 300 lf $120.00 $36,0002. Benches 2 ea $1,400.00 $2,800

SubͲTotal $38,800

C. Site�Improvements

1. AC- 2'' over 6" Base- Pedestrian 496 sf $4.50 $2,2322. Concrete�ramp�with�railing 16 lf� $210.00 $3,3604. Concrete�curb 24 lf� $22.00 $528.003. Crosswalk 1 ls $3,000.00 $3,000

SubͲTotal $9,120

D. Irrigation

1. Drip�irrigation 5,810 sf $1.50 $8,715

SubͲTotal $8,715

E. Planting

1. Screen�planting 518 sf $5.00 $2,5902. Edible�garden 4,962 sf $4.00 $19,848

SubͲTotal $22,438

Construction�subͲtotal $97,585

30%�Design�and�construction�contingencies�and�professional�services $29,276

Zone�6�Total $126,861

Ives�Park�Master�PlanSebastopol,�CAZone�7�Ͳ�Ballfield�Perimeter�Improvements

preliminary�cost�estimate��11/06/2012

Item Qty. Unit Cost Total Notes

A. Site�Preparation1. Site�survey�and�layout 1 ls $2,000 $2,0002. Site�clearing,�grubbing�&�demolition 12050 sf $0.15 $1,8083. Rough�grading 12050 sf $0.51 $6,1464. SWPPP_High�risk�site�(near�creek) 0.30 ac $20,000.00 $6,000

SubͲTotal $9,953

B. Site�Improvements

1. AC- 2'' over 6" Base- Pedestrian 3,153 sf $4.50 $14,189

SubͲTotal $14,189

C. Irrigation

1. Drip�irrigation 5,810 sf $1.50 $8,7152. Turf�irrigation 5,058 sf $1.25 $6,323

SubͲTotal $15,038

D. Planting1. NoͲmow�fescue�(sod) 1,865 sf $0.50 $9332. Shrubs,�grasses�&�groundcover 3,920 sf $5.00 $19,6003. Screen�planting 1,138 sf $5.00 $5,6904. Bark�mulch 1,976 ea $0.90 $1,778

SubͲTotal $28,001

Construction�subͲtotal $67,180

30%�Design�and�construction�contingencies�and�professional�services $20,154

Zone�7�Total $87,334

Ives�Park�Master�PlanSebastopol,�CAZone�8�Ͳ�New�Restroompreliminary�cost�estimate��11/06/2012

Item Qty. Unit Cost Total Notes

A. Site�Preparation1. Site�survey�and�layout 1 ls $2,000.00 $2,0002. Site�clearing�&�grubbing 2600 sf $0.15 $3903. Existing�restroom�demo 1 ls $7,000.00 $7,0004. AC�paving�demo 1485 sf $3.00 $4,4555. Rough�grading 2600 sf $0.51 $1,3266. SWPPP_High�risk�site 0.10 ac $20,000.00 $2,000

SubͲTotal $17,171

B. Storm�Drainage1. Storm�Drain 1 ls $2,320.00 $2,320

SubͲTotal $2,320

C. Site�Amenities

1. PreͲfab�restroom�facility 1 ls $250,000.00 $250,000assumed�reuse�of�existing�utilities

2. Receptacles�(trash�&�recycling) 1 ea $2,000.00 $2,000SubͲTotal $252,000

D. Site�Improvements

1. AC- 2'' over 8" Base 1,720 sf $5.50 $9,460SubͲTotal $9,460

Construction�subͲtotal $280,951

30%�Design�and�construction�contingencies�and�professional�services $84,285

Zone�8�Total $365,236

Ives�Park�Master�PlanSebastopol,�CAZone�9�Ͳ�New�Play�Areapreliminary�cost�estimate��11/06/2012

Item Qty. Unit Cost Total Notes

A. Site�Preparation1. Site�survey�and�layout 1 ls $2,000 $2,0002. Site�clearing,�grubbing�&�demolition 8,725 sf $0.15 $1,3093. Rough�grading 8,725 sf $0.51 $4,4504. AC�paving�demo 1090 sf $3.00 $3,270.005. SWPPP_High�risk�site� 0.20 ac $20,000.00 $4,000

SubͲTotal $11,029

B. Storm�Drainage1. Storm�Drain 1 ls $8,400.00 $8,400

SubͲTotal $8,400

C. School�Age�Play�Area1. Resilient�Matting�(includes�4"�agg�sub�base) 4,166 sf $25.00 $104,1502. School�age�play�equipment 1 ls $65,000.00 $65,000

SubͲTotal $169,150

D. Tot�Play�Area1. Resilient�Matting�(includes�4"�agg�sub�base) 1,278 sf $25.00 $31,9502. Tot�play�equipment 1 ls $45,000.00 $45,000

SubͲTotal $76,950

E. Site�Amenities

1. Concrete�seatwall�with�texture 196 lf $280.00 $54,8802. Benches 4 ea $1,400.00 $5,6003. Shade�structure 1 ea $70,000.00 $70,0004. Perimeter�play�area�fencing�(4'�high�metal�picket) 90 lf $80.00 $7,2005. Play�entry�gates�(metal�locking) 1 ea $3,000.00 $3,0006. Receptacles�(trash�&�recycling) 1 ea $2,000.00 $2,000

SubͲTotal $142,680

F. Site�Improvements

1. AC- 2'' over 6" Base- Pedestrian 1,148 sf $4.50 $5,1662. AC- 2'' over 8" Base 1,164 sf $5.50 $6,402

SubͲTotal $11,568

G. Irrigation

1. Drip�irrigation�(walkway�junction) 130 sf $1.50 $195

SubͲTotal $195

H. Planting

1. Walkway�junction�planting 130 sf $4.00 $520

SubͲTotal $520

Construction�subͲtotal $420,492

30%�Design�and�construction�contingencies�and�professional�services $126,147

Zone�9�Total $546,639

Ives�Park�Master�PlanSebastopol,�CAZone�10�Ͳ�Performance�Zonepreliminary�cost�estimate��11/06/2012

Item Qty. Unit Cost Total Notes

A. Site�Preparation1. Site�survey�and�layout 1 ls $5,000.00 $5,0002. Site�clearing,�grubbing�&�demolition 35,930 sf $0.15 $5,3903. Demo�AC�paving,�including�base�rock 7,225 sf $3.00 $21,6754. Perimeter�shrub�removal 1 ls $3,000.00 $3,0005. Rough�grading 7,225 sf $0.51 $3,6856. SWPPP_High�risk�site�(near�creek) 0.85 ac $20,000.00 $17,000

7.Environmental�Fees�for�mitigation�(could�be�offset�by�creek�expansion�and�restoration�in�zones�3�and�4)

1 allow $100,000.00 $100,000

SubͲTotal $155,749

B. Pipe�BurialSite�Demolition

1. tree�removal48"�diameter 8 ea $1,500.00 $12,00024"�diameter 2 ea $1,000.00 $2,000

2. Earthwork 250 cy $10.00 $2,5004. Channel�walls 2,100 sf $5.00 $10,5003. Fence�and�guardrail�demo 350 lf $2.50 $8755. *Dewatering 1 ea $10,000.00 $10,000

Site�Improvements

1. Pipe�for�channel� 170 lf $570.00 $96,900

SubͲTotal $134,775

C. Storm�Drainage1. Bioswale 110 lf $25.00 $2,750

SubͲTotal $2,750

D. Site�Electrical1. Electrical�for�stage 1 ls $8,000.00 $8,000

SubͲTotal $8,000

E. Site�Amenities

1. Benches 2 ea $1,400.00 $2,8002. Receptacles�(trash�&�recycling) 1 ea $2,000.00 $2,0003. Stage 1 ls� $20,000.00 $20,000

SubͲTotal $24,800

F. Site�Improvements

1. AC- 2'' over 8" Base 1,656 sf $5.50 $9,1082. AC- 2'' over 6" Base- Pedestrian 4,259 sf $4.50 $19,1663. Concrete�mow�band�(in�landscape) 150 lf $24.00 $3,6004. Concrete�retaining�wall 260 cf $37.00 $9,620.005. Bark�mulch 9,345 sf $0.90 $8,410.506. Fine�grading�Ͳ�lawn 15,116 sf $0.30 $4,534.807. Relocate�picnic�tables 12 ea $200.00 $2,400.00

SubͲTotal $56,839G. Planting

Item Qty. Unit Cost Total Notes

1. Turf�Hydroseed�(inc.�soil�preparation�&�fine�grading) 15,116 sf $0.80 $12,0932. Planting�improvements 9,345 sf $4.00 $37,3803. Edible�garden�planting 4,404 sf $4.00 $17,6164. Trees�24�gal 9 ea $130.00 $1,170

SubͲTotal $68,259

Construction�subͲtotal $440,422

40%Design�and�construction�contingencies�and�professional�services $176,169

Zone�10�Total $616,591

*Dewatering�if�done�separately�from�zones�3�and�4.�Reduction�if�done�in�a�unit�to�$20,000�total�for�zones�3,�4,�and�10

Ives�Park�Master�PlanSebastopol,�CAZone�11�Ͳ�Corner�Capturepreliminary�cost�estimate��11/06/2012

Item Qty. Unit Cost Total Notes

A. Site�Preparation1. Site�survey�and�layout 1 ls $2,000.00 $2,0002. Site�clearing�&�grubbing 7,375 sf $0.15 $1,1063. Curb�and�gutter�demo 250 lf $3.50 $8754. Excavation� 665 cy $10.00 $6,6505. Demo�AC�Paving,�including�base�rock 5,300 sf $3.00 $15,9006. Rough�grading 6,743 sf $0.51 $3,4397. SWPPP_High�risk�site 0.20 ac $20,000.00 $4,000

SubͲTotal $33,970

B. Storm�Drainage1. Storm�Drain/bioswale 1 allow $7,000.00 $7,000

SubͲTotal $7,000C. Site�Amenities

1. Receptacles�(trash�&�recycling) 1 ea $2,000.00 $2,000

SubͲTotal $2,000

D. Site�Improvements

1. Concrete�street�sidewalk 1,765 sf $3.25 $5,7362. Curb�and�gutter 353 lf $12.10 $4,2713. Decomposed�Granite,�stabilized 1,270 sf $6.50 $8,2553. Crosswalk 1 ls $3,000.00 $3,000

SubͲTotal $21,263

E. Irrigation

1. Drip�irrigation, 7,375 sf $1.50 $11,063

SubͲTotal $11,063

F. Planting

1. Interpretive�garden�planting 1,768 sf $4.00 $7,0722. Shrub/�groundcover 4,975 sf $2.25 $11,1943. Trees 2 ea $200.00 $400

SubͲTotal $18,666

Construction�subͲtotal $93,961

30%�Design�and�construction�contingencies�and�professional�services $28,188

Zone�11�Total $122,149

Ives�Park�Master�PlanSebastopol,�CAGeneral�Site�Improvements

preliminary�cost�estimate��11/06/2012

Item Qty. Unit Cost Total Notes

A. Site�Electrical1. Pole�lights 14 ea $6,000.00 $84,0002. Electrical�service 1 ls $28,000.00 $28,0003. Conduit,�wiring,�boxes�pedestals�and�hardware 1 ls $30,000.00 $30,000

SubͲTotal $142,000

B. Irrigation

1. Controller 1 ea $9,000.00 $9,0002. Master�valve,�flow�meter 1 ea $1,500.00 $1,5003. Dedicated�water�meter 1 ea $20,000.00 $20,0004. Backflow�assembly�&�cage 1 ea $2,000.00 $2,0005. Main�Line�&�Sleeves 2,200 lf $13.00 $28,600

SubͲTotal $61,100

C. Optional�Site�Amenities

1. Benches ea $1,400.00 $02. Picnic�Tables ea $1,500.00 $03. Bike�Racks ea $800.00 $04. Receptacles�(trash�&�recycling) ea $2,000.00 $05. Dog�Bag�Dispensers ea $600.00 $02. Park�Entrance�Sign ea $8,000.00 $0

SubͲTotal $0

Construction�subͲtotal $203,100

30%�Design�and�construction�contingencies�and�professional�services $60,930

Site�Improvements�Total $264,030

Ives�Park�Master�PlanSebastopol,�CAtotals

preliminary�cost�estimate��11/06/2012

Zone Area Total

1 Accessibility�Improvements1A $131,0191B $47,8141C $53,5361D $77,716

2 Art�Entry $60,5563 North�Creek�Restoration $734,2454 South�Creek�Restoration $273,5715 Picnic�and�Passive�Play $201,5006 Pool�Perimeter�Improvements $126,8617 Ballfield�Perimeter�Improvements $87,3348 New�Restroom $365,2369 New�Play�Area $546,63910 Performance�Zone $616,59111 Corner�Capture $122,149

Site�Improvements $264,030

Note:��Costs�reflects�each�zone�constructed�seperately

IVES PARK - 97

APPENDIX HHYDROLOGY STUDY

IVES PARK - 98

COPYRIGHT © CARLENZOLICOPYRIGHT COPYRIGHT ©© CARLENZOLICARLENZOLI C

APPENDIX IBIOLOGICAL CONSTRAINTS

IVES PARK -131

IVES PARK - 132

1/30/13 (\\Ptr09\projects\RHA1101\Ives Park Bio Constraints Memo.doc)

L S A A S S O C I A T E S , I N C . 1 5 7 P A R K P L A C E P T . R I C H M O N D , C A L I F O R N I A 9 4 8 0 1

5 1 0 . 2 3 6 . 6 8 1 0 T E L 5 1 0 . 2 3 6 . 3 4 8 0 F A X

B E R K E L E Y C A R L S B A D F O R T C O L L I N S

F R E S N O I R V I N E P A L M S P R I N G S

R I V E R S I D E R O C K L I N S A N L U I S O B I S P O

M E M O R A N D U M

DATE: January 30, 2013

TO: Tom Fitzgerald Royston Hanamoto Alley & Abey

FROM: Laura Lafler

SUBJECT: Biological Constraints for the Ives Park Project, City of Sebastopol, Sonoma County

LSA Associates, Inc. (LSA) submits this memorandum describing the results of the reconnaissance-level biological assessment conducted for the above-referenced project. This assessment has been prepared to provide an evaluation of the potential presence of special-status species and/or sensitive habitats on and in the immediate vicinity of the site, as well as to identify potential biological resource constraints associated with project implementation. METHODS LSA searched the California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB; CDFG 2012) for records of special-status species occurrences within 5 miles of the site. The California Native Plant Society (CNPS) On-line Inventory of Rare and Endangered Plants (CNPS 2013) was also reviewed for species in the Sebastopol, Guerneville, Healdsburg, Santa Rosa, Cotati, Mark West Springs, Camp Meeker, Valley Ford, and Two Rock U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) 7.5-minute quadrangles. Using these database sources, special-status plants and animals were evaluated to determine their potential to occur on or in the vicinity of the site. LSA biologist Dan Sidle visited the site on January 25, 2013, to assess current habitat conditions and evaluate the site’s potential to support special-status plant and animal species. The survey involved walking throughout the project site to ensure that all habitat types and features on the site were identified. All plants and animals observed were recorded in field notes Plant taxonomy and nomenclature in this report follow Baldwin et al. (2012). Common and scientific names for animals are based on Crother (2012) for amphibians and reptiles, the American Ornithologists’ Union (AOU) Check-list of North American Birds (AOU 1998) and supplements for birds, and Baker et al. (2003) for mammals. EXISTING CONDITIONS The project site is located within the City of Sebastopol, Sonoma County, California. The site is surrounded by urban development and is bordered to the south by Willow Street, to the north by Bodega Avenue, and to the east by South High Street, and to the west by Jewell Avenue and Bodega Avenue. The project site is occupied by Ives Park, which includes a little league ballpark, a swimming pool, a playground, picnic areas, a performance stage, turf grass, landscaped trees and shrubs, and a portion of the Calder Creek channel.

1/30/13 (\\Ptr09\projects\RHA1101\Ives Park Bio Constraints Memo.doc) 2

L S A A S S O C I A T E S , I N C .

Soils The soil units on the site are mapped as Sebastopol sandy loam, 2-9 and 9-15 percent slopes (U.C. Davis Soil Resource Laboratory 2013). The Sebastopol sandy loam soil type is listed as a well-drained, non-hydric soil. Vegetation Vegetation within the project site consists of landscaped native and ornamental trees and shrubs, ruderal and non-native annual grassland vegetation within a meadow area of the Calder Creek enclosure, and turf grass. Trees include coast redwood (Sequoia sempervirens), oak (Quercus agrifolia and Quercus sp.), liquidamber (Liquidambar styraciflua), cypress (Cupressus sp.), juniper (Juniperus sp,), pine (Pinus sp.), date palm (Phoenix sp.), and weeping willow (Salix sp.). Ground cover beneath the trees is mostly bare dirt and leaf litter, but some of the trees had periwinkle (Vinca sp.) and English ivy (Hedera helix) growing at the base of their trunks. Shrubs observed include the native toyon (Heteromeles arbutifolia) and various non-native ornamental species. A meadow area along Calder Creek supports mostly ruderal forbs and non-native annual grass species, including Himalayan blackberry (Rubus armeniacus), tall flatsedge (Cyperus eragrostis), wild radish (Raphanus sativus), dandelion (Taraxacum officinale), filaree (Erodium sp.), and pampas grass (Cortaderia selloana). Oak seedlings and a California buckeye (Aesculus californica) sapling were also observed in the meadow area. Animals The disturbed condition of the site reduces the site’s suitability for many native animals, but several animal species that have adapted to urban settings could be present. Animal species observed on or near the site during the reconnaissance-level survey consist of Sierran treefrog (Pseudacris sierra), cattle egret (Bubulcus ibis), American crow (Corvus brachyrhynchos), black phoebe (Sayornis nigricans), yellow-rumped warbler (Setophaga coronate), bushtit (Psaltriparus minimus), American robin (Turdus migratorius), white-crowned sparrow (Zonotrichia leucophrys), and fox squirrel (Sciurus niger). SENSITIVE BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES Waters of the United States/State

Potentially jurisdictional features observed on the site consist of Calder Creek and an associated seasonal wetland in the meadow area immediately south of the creek. Calder Creek flows east-west within an open concrete channel through the park. A portion of the creek is released from the confines of its concrete channel and was, at one time, flooded to create a small pond that was made possible via a weir consisting of board erected in the creek channel during the spring months (RHA 2013). A potential seasonal wetland, which contained tall flatsedge, a wetland plant species, was observed in the meadow area of the creek, likely in a location where the pond may have previously pooled water. Calder Creek and the associated seasonal wetland are likely subject to regulation by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps), the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), and/or California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW).

1/30/13 (\\Ptr09\projects\RHA1101\Ives Park Bio Constraints Memo.doc) 3

L S A A S S O C I A T E S , I N C .

Special-Status Species

Special-Status Plants. Disturbance at the project site and the site’s location within an urban setting make the site unsuitable for special-status plant species. Although a number of special-status plant species are known to occur in grasslands and wet meadows within the region based on records from the CNDDB (CDFW 2012) and the CNPS On-line Inventory of Rare and Endangered Plants (2013), such species would not occur in the park setting where the all the habitats are disturbed and dominated by ornamental and ruderal species. Even the creek channel and meadow area are highly modified by grading, mowing, and the introduction of non-native plants, thereby precluding the presence of special-status plants. Special-Status Animals. The project site’s location within an urban park surrounded by urban development with no connection to natural open space limits the site’s potential for special-status animal species. Special-status animal species that have potential to occur on or in the general vicinity of the site include of the following:

x California tiger salamander (Ambystoma californiense) is known to occur east of the site on the Santa Rosa Plain, but the location of the park outside the geographic range of the species, lack of suitable breeding and upland habitat at the park, and the isolation of the park from occupied habitat by urban development, prohibits this species from occurring on the site.

x California red-legged frog (Rana draytonii) is not known to occur in Calder Creek or on the Santa Rosa Plain. The closest CNDDB records are sensitive locations suppressed by CDFW (CDFW 2012). The constructed Calder Creek channel is shallow and appears to flow very rapidly during rain events making it unsuitable as breeding habitat for this species. The urban setting of Calder Creek, lack of emergent vegetation to provide cover for the frogs, and the creek’s isolated location from occupied natural habitat prevents this species from occurring on the site. Likewise, the unlined channel section was not ponded during the winter breeding season and therefore does not provide suitable breeding habitat for California red-legged frogs (not deep enough or with a sufficient period of ponding).

x Western pond turtle (Actinemys marmorata) is known to occur approximately 0.75 mile northeast of the park in the Laguna de Santa Rosa (CDFW 2012). Although the Laguna de Santa Rosa has a hydrological connection to Calder Creek, it is separated from Calder Creek by several underground culverts. It is unlikely that pond turtles make regular movements through the culverts and the inhospitable urban habitat that separates the site from the Laguna. If turtles were to reach the site, there is no suitable breeding, basking, or nesting habitat in the park for this species.

x White-tailed kite (Elanus leucurus) could nest in the trees within or adjacent to the park, but the park’s urban location and lack of suitable foraging habitat on or immediately adjacent to the park likely precludes their presence.

x Bats such as the Townsend=s western big-eared bat (Corynorhinus townsendii townsendii), pallid bat (Antrozous pallidus), and other non-special-status bat species could forage over the park, but are unlikely to have day or maternity roosts on the park due to the lack of suitable roosting habitat such as caves and abandoned buildings.

1/30/13 (\\Ptr09\projects\RHA1101\Ives Park Bio Constraints Memo.doc) 4

L S A A S S O C I A T E S , I N C .

POTENTIAL BIOLOGICAL CONSTRAINTS Based on the reconnaissance-level survey and review of the database searches, LSA identified the following potential biological resource constraints for the proposed project:

x Presence of Jurisdictional Areas. A formal wetland delineation and regulatory permits from the Corps, RWQCB, and CDFW would likely be required if Calder Creek and the adjacent areas exhibiting seasonal wetland vegetation are impacted by the project. Removing portions of the concrete channel, realigning the creek channel, and planting native riparian vegetation within the channel banks would require permits from the Corps, RWQCB, and CDFW.

x Nesting Birds. Pre-construction surveys for nesting birds would likely be required if construction occurs during the nesting season (February 1 through August 31).

x Tree Removal. Removal or pruning of more than one-third of trees larger than 10 inches diameter at breast height (dbh), except for acacia, wattle, eucalyptus, plume albizia, poplar, tamarisk, and salt cedar, may require a permit from the City of Sebastopol.

REFERENCES American Ornithologists’ Union (AOU). 1998. Check-list of North American birds. 7th edition.

American Ornithologists’ Union, Washington, D.C. Baker, R.J., L.C. Bradley, R .D. Bradley, J.W. Dragoo, M.D. Engstrom, R.S. Hoffmann, C.A. Jones,

F. Reid, D.W. Rice, and C. Jones. 2003. Revised checklist of North American mammals north of Mexico, 2003. Museum of Texas Tech University Occasional Papers 229.

Baldwin, B. G., D. H. Goldman, D. J. Keil, R. Patterson, T. J. Rosatti, and D. H. Wilken, editors.

2012. The Jepson Manual: Vascular Plants of California, Second Edition. University of California Press, Berkeley.

California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW). 2012. Query of the California Natural Diversity

Database for special-status species occurrences within 5 miles of the project site. Biogeographic Data Branch, California Department of Fish and Game, Sacramento. December 1, 2012.

California Native Plant Society (CNPS). 2001. Inventory of Rare and Endangered Vascular Plants of

California. California Native Plant Society, Sacramento, California. _____. 2013. On-line Inventory of Rare and Endangered plants version 7-10a. Sebastopol,

Guerneville, Healdsburg, Santa Rosa, Cotati, Mark West Springs, Camp Meeker, Valley Ford, and Two Rock USGS quadrangles. Accessed at <http://cnps.web.aplus.net/cgi-bin/inv/inventory.cgi> on January 28, 2013.

Crother, B.I. (ed). 2012. Scientific and Standard English Names of Amphibians and Reptiles of North

America North of Mexico, pp. 1-92. SSAR Herpetological Circular 39.

1/30/13 (\\Ptr09\projects\RHA1101\Ives Park Bio Constraints Memo.doc) 5

L S A A S S O C I A T E S , I N C .

University of California, Davis Soil Resource Laboratory. 2013. Online Soil Survey, California Soil Resource Laboratory. Accessed at <http://casoilresource.lawr.ucdavis.edu/drupal/node/27> on January 25, 2013.

APPENDIX JCULTURAL CONSTRAINTS

IVES PARK -139

2/6/13 (P:\RHA1101\Cultural\Ives_Park_Cultural_Constraints_memo.doc)

L S A A S S O C I A T E S , I N C . 1 5 7 P A R K P L A C E P T . R I C H M O N D , C A L I F O R N I A 9 4 8 0 1

5 1 0 . 2 3 6 . 6 8 1 0 T E L 5 1 0 . 2 3 6 . 3 4 8 0 F A X

B E R K E L E Y C A R L S B A D F O R T C O L L I N S

F R E S N O I R V I N E P A L M S P R I N G S

R I V E R S I D E R O C K L I N S A N L U I S O B I S P O

M E M O R A N D U M

DATE: February 6, 2013

TO: Cordy Hull and Tom Fitzgerald, RHAA

FROM: Michael Hibma, Cultural Resources Manager, LSA Associates, Inc.

SUBJECT: Cultural Resources Constraints Summary for the Ives Park Renovation Master Plan, Sebastopol, Sonoma County, California (LSA #RHA1101)

This memorandum presents the results of background research and a brief pedestrian field review conducted by LSA Associates, Inc. (LSA), to identify potential cultural resource constraints for the Ives Park Renovation Master Plan. The study area for this summary includes the approximately 8-acre Ives Park site at 7400 Willow Street in Sebastopol, Sonoma County, California. The summary was prepared by LSA Architectural Historian Michael Hibma, M.A., RPH #603. This summary does not include an evaluation of the eligibility of Ives Park for inclusion in the California Register of Historical Resources, nor an assessment of potential impacts to historical resources pursuant to CEQA Guidelines §15064.5. It is based on archival research and qualitative observations. BACKGROUND RESEARCH Background research consisted of a records search and a review of materials provided by the City of Sebastopol (City). Each step is described below. On January 29, 2013, LSA conducted a records search (File #12-0759) of the study area and adjacent properties at the Northwest Information Center (NWIC) of the California Historical Resources Information System, Sonoma State University, Rohnert Park. The NWIC is the official state repository of cultural resource records and reports for Sonoma County. As part of the records search, the following federal and State of California inventories were reviewed:

x California Inventory of Historic Resources (California Department of Parks and Recreation 1976);

x Five Views: An Ethnic Historic Site Survey for California (California Office of Historic Preservation 1988);

x California Points of Historical Interest (California Office of Historic Preservation 1992);

x California Historical Landmarks (California Office of Historic Preservation 1996);

x Directory of Properties in the Historic Property Data File (California Office of Historic Preservation, April 5, 2012). The directory, updated quarterly, includes the listings of the National Register of Historic Places, National Historic Landmarks, the California Register of Historical Resources, California Historical Landmarks, and California Points of Historical Interest.

2/6/13 (P:\RHA1101\Cultural\Ives_Park_Cultural_Constraints_memo.doc) 2

L S A A S S O C I A T E S , I N C .

Background Research Results The records search did not identify any previously recorded cultural resources in or adjacent to the study area (California Office of Historic Preservation 2012). A copy of a property deed dated March 3, 1941, indicates that the land that eventually contained Ives Park was conveyed to the City by the estate of Mrs. Katherine Ives on the condition that the park be used for children’s sporting activities, such as Little League baseball and swimming. Background information provided in a 2010 City Planning Commission Staff Report states that Ives Park opened in April of 1946. The Little League field (built in 1957 and known as Irene “Grandma” Polley Field), Ives Pool (since demolished and rebuilt in 1981), and playground area were built “shortly thereafter.” The portion of Ives Park dedicated to a children’s playground has been a feature of the park “for more than 50 years,” and contemporary aerial photographs show that, other than a major remodeling of Ives Pool in 1981, “. . . the park has changed little since then” (City of Sebastopol 2010). FIELD REVIEW On January 29, 2013, LSA Architectural Historian Michael Hibma, M.A., RPH #603 conducted a pedestrian field review of the entire study area to identify landscape and built environment elements that are integral to the park’s original design and aesthetic, as well as its current use. The review was documented with field notes and photographs. POTENTIAL CONSTRAINTS Ives Park contains natural and built environment features that appear to date from the early years of its inception. These features, as observed during the field review, define the spatial and functional characteristics of the park, determine how visitors use and enjoy the facilities, and convey some aspects of the design intent of the park’s architect. As such, these features could be considered “character defining” and central to the present appearance and function of the landscape, as well as visitor experience and perception. Changes to these elements would alter the function and presentation of the park as they have evolved since its construction. The guidance provided in National Register Bulletin 18: How to Evaluate and Nominate Designed Historic Landscapes (National Park Service n.d.) was reviewed to identify the conceptual components that comprise the landscape, its elements, and potential sources of functional continuity through time. The following categories reflect the elements that traditionally convey a sense of order, design, and spatial organization to designed landscapes such as Ives Park. Existing Topography and Grading

x Gently sloping down from south to north, central area mostly flat, bisected by channelized Calder Creek

Natural Features

x Calder Creek x Meadow-like area in an enclosed area on the north bank of along Calder Creek.

2/6/13 (P:\RHA1101\Cultural\Ives_Park_Cultural_Constraints_memo.doc) 3

L S A A S S O C I A T E S , I N C .

Land Uses

x Picnic areas x Playground x Little League baseball field x Open grassy areas for recreation, repose, open space x BBQ areas x Community pool

Circulation

x Asphalt paths x Entry points at the eastern, southern, and western edges of the park x Main path follows channelized Calder Creek, which is spanned by several pedestrian bridges

Views and Vistas

x Calder Creek and grassy areas beyond x Oak groves x Surrounding neighborhood context

Vegetation

x Native and ornamental trees and shrubs x Turf lawn x Coast redwood x Oak (mature and seedlings) x Liquidambar x Cypress x Juniper x Pine x Date palm -- likely over 75 years old based on comparable size and condition of similar trees

of known age x Weeping willow x California buckeye

Landscape Dividers

x Channelized Calder Creek with chain link fence enclosure x Fence around Polley Field x Raised area with curved concrete retaining wall beyond Polley Field outfield fence x Fence enclosure around Playground area x Concrete dam in Calder Creek east of the meadow area

Site Furnishings

x Benches x Picnic tables x BBQ pits

2/6/13 (P:\RHA1101\Cultural\Ives_Park_Cultural_Constraints_memo.doc) 4

L S A A S S O C I A T E S , I N C .

x Playground equipment (swing sets, slides, sandboxes, etc.) x Little League baseball backstop, dugouts, aluminum bleacher seats x Masonry stone drinking fountain (non-operational) x Two wood stages

Lighting

x Standard galvanized lampposts

Buildings

x Ives Community Pool and Bathhouse x Polley Field equipment storage and concession stand

Signs

x Conventional park signage regarding rules and regulations x Irene “Grandma” Polley Field x Various ads from local boosters at Polley Field x BBQ pit plaques and playground plaque

Bodies of Water

x Channelized Calder Creek

Sculpture and Other Art

x Rotary International “Service Above Self” art piece. Dedicated June 2005 (west of Polley Field)

SUMMARY Ives Park has not been previously identified as a historical resource as defined at California Public Resources Code Section 21084.1. The landscape elements identified above were observed during the field review and appear to comprise the public space, facilities, and appurtenances that define the form, function, and appearance of Ives Park. The destruction or displacement of these elements would result in a change to the character of Ives Park, the way it is perceived by its visitors, and the means by which it is utilized as a recreational amenity.

2/6/13 (P:\RHA1101\Cultural\Ives_Park_Cultural_Constraints_memo.doc) 5

L S A A S S O C I A T E S , I N C .

REFERNECES CITED California Office of Historic Preservation 1976 California Inventory of Historic Resources. California Department of Parks and Recreation,

Sacramento.

1988 Five Views: An Ethnic Historic Site Survey for California. California Department of Parks and Recreation, Sacramento.

1992 California Points of Historic Interest. California Department of Parks and Recreation, Sacramento.

1996 California Historical Landmarks. California Department of Parks and Recreation, Sacramento.

2009 Directory of Properties in the Historic Property Data File, April 5, 2012. California Department of Parks and Recreation, Sacramento.

City of Sebastopol 2010 Staff Report – Planning Commission. Community Forum and Public Hearing – Ives Park

Improvements. May 25, 2010. On file at City of Sebastopol Planning Commission, Sebastopol, California.

National Park Service n.d. National Register Bulletin 18: How to Evaluate and Nominate Designed Historic

Landscapes. National Park Service, Washington D.C. Electronic document, http://www.nps.gov/nr/publications/bulletins/pdfs/nrb18.pdf, accessed February 6, 2013.

Sonoma County Recorder 1941 Deed. Volume 533 of Official Records, Page 147, Sonoma County Recorder. 3 March 1941.

On file at Sonoma County Recorder’s Office, Santa Rosa, California.