John Simms

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/11/2019 John Simms

    1/47

    Hello Chaz

    As an advocate for good, honest and ethical government, I seek your

    assistance in exposing to the voters of Cooper City the questionable behavior of

    candidate John Sims who seeks re-election on November

    4

    th

    .

    I believe you have

    written about him on different occasions. I recall reading about his abuse

    towards his pregnant wife and more recently about his racist blog postings.

    Perhaps you would like to use

    the

    enclosed information to further educate

    the

    voters about this man s questionable behavior.

    Sadly, there exists no formal system for providing real and accurate

    information on candidates. Candidates have the good

    fortune

    of sharing

    with

    their electorate only the information they wish to convey. It

    is

    unlikely that Mr

    Sims would tell his constituents that he had once pled guilty to assault and

    battery on his pregnant wife. I also

    doubt

    he would volunteer to tell others

    that

    he has failed to pay child support and back pay for daycare and medical bills. The

    list of unethical and illegal activity, as you can tel l by

    the

    enclosed, is extensive.

    I choose to be anonymous for fear of retribution from Sims. He is known to

    be a violent man. Actually, I also think the enclosed includes a call to his house

    when his girlfriend

    felt

    threatened by him.

    Thank you

    A

    concerned Cooper City resident

  • 8/11/2019 John Simms

    2/47

    CKGROU

    ND

    IN

    FORM T

    ION ABOUT JOHN B SIMS

    1 John Sims was arrested and pled guilty to aggravated battery for assaulting his

    former wife, who was pregnant at the time (see Miami-Dade Criminal Case #91-

    5433). Sims then was subsequently found guilty

    of

    violating the terms

    of

    his

    probation.

    2. A Psychological Evaluation Report, and Family Violence Treatment Specialist letter

    were issued regarding John Sims in connection

    wi

    t h

    the

    above-referenced criminal

    case. The

    report

    concluded

    that

    Sims has some

    rather

    chronic personality and

    behavioral problems, that he possesses dif ficult ies with stressful situations, that

    he suffers

    from

    narcissism and

    tends

    to overvalue his

    own

    personal worth to

    compensate

    for

    underlying feelings

    of

    insecurity, and

    that

    he remains

    at

    high risk

    for

    becoming physically violent again in the future. (See Miami-Dade Criminal Case

    #91-5433).

    3.

    John Sims was found

    to

    be in violation

    of the

    terms

    of

    his

    probation

    and was

    then

    ordered

    to serve an additional two years of probations. (See Miami-Dade Court

    Case No. 91-5433).

    4. In 2003,

    BSO

    responded to a domestic disturbance call from the home of John Sims

    and Janet Gill (girlfriend). Both were given domestic violence packets by the

    attending police officer. See

    BSO

    Report, Case #03-04578).

    5. In

    2005

    , a Mtamt=Dade Court determined John Sim t be in arrears if l

    payment

    of

    child support in the amount of $25,647.10 and legal fees in

    the

    amount of

    $15,882.97. (See Miami-Dade Case #91-36013FC24). In Order granting his former

    wife' s

    motion

    to execute and enforce her judgment and to compel payment

    of

    child

    su pp ort,

    Judg

    e Maxine

    Lando expressly

    found

    that

    the former

    wife

    has depleted

    her resources in order to defend against unnecessary litigation

    initiated

    by the

    former

    husband

    ,

    and that the

    former wife

    and child have been placed in a

    financially insecure

    state, and

    that the

    husband's Affidavit filed is incorrect and

    Petitioner/former

    husband is not indigent

    or

    insolvent

    for

    purposes of filing an

    appeal and there are gross misstatements of facts in the Affidavit regarding

    liabilities

    ,

    and

    the Petitioner/former

    husband refused to

    testify

    regarding the

    contents

    of

    said Affidavit and,

    in

    fact, cited his Fifth

    Amendment

    rights against self

    incrimination

    under the

    United States Constitution, and

    further

    refused

    to

    be placed

    under

    oath

    or

    to affirm any statement he might make, and

    that M

    r. Sims has been

    continuously uncooperative

    in

    revealing his employment, assets and liabilities and

    has actively and intentionally attempted to avoid payment and collections of monies

    due and owing to Respondent/f ormer wife.

  • 8/11/2019 John Simms

    3/47

    6. In 05 John Sims t

    hr

    eatened a BSO Deputy while a C

    od

    e Enforcement

    Officer

    t r ied

    to

    serve two code violat ion not ices on a neighbor. Accord ing

    to

    th e po lice report,

    S

    im

    s was very h

    ost

    ile and belligerent,

    an

    d

    the

    a

    t t

    en

    di

    ng

    BSO

    Depu

    ty

    had to re

    qu

    est

    back-up

    as

    he f

    ea

    red fo r his sa f ety . (See

    BSO

    Rep ort,

    Cas

    e #160508-00070).

    7. In 2

    7 Sims w

    as

    found to have p lag iarized more t han 15 articles and wri tin

    gs

    on his

    personal website, JohnBSims.com, and defends him self by stating t hat a ghost

    must have misused his blog. (See Miam i Herald expose, 10/ 24/ 07).

    8. In

    7

    John Sims was appointed by Shahrukh Dhanj i to the Human Relations

    Co uncil of Florida, Inc.

    as

    Director of Government Affairs Ethics. Janet Gill (Sims'

    wi fe ) was also employed

    by

    this local company in an administrative and/

    or

    financial

    capacity. This company was incorporated on 12/

    13/06

    .

    Mr

    . Dhanji and/

    or

    his

    company we re investigated by

    FDLE for

    campaign fraud and a

    warrant

    was issued

    f or Mr. Dhanj

    i'

    s arrest. (See Sun -Sentinel, 3/ 29/ 08)

    9.

    After

    John Sims

    prev

    iously denied a

    ny

    inv

    olvement

    with the

    SaveCooperCity.blog

    spot.com blog (which, in addition to many

    other defamatory

    and hateful entries,

    included an anti-Semitic Nazi and

    Hitler

    posting

    about

    Mayor Eisinger), BSO

    subpoenaed Google records and ascertained that Sims was the registered owner of

    the blog. A BSO investigation also commenced

    as

    a result of a swastika etched into

    the vehicle of Lori Green (

    Mayor Eis

    inger's campaign manager)

    the

    same week

    that

    t he anti-Semitic and hate-crime posting appeared

    on

    Sims' blog. (

    See BSO Case

    Report CC08 -01-0847dated 3/ 31/ 08 and also see

    Miami

    Herald Article dated April

    2 2009)

    10. On November 2

    n

    2010, same day

    as

    his re-election for Cooper City Commissioner, a

    hearing was held in the Circu it Court of the 11th Judicial Circu it of Florida. The

    Respondent, former wi fe of John Sims, requested the

    hear

    ing in an attempt t o

    recov

    er

    monies

    fro

    m Pet it ion

    er

    , John Sims,

    for

    past due and unpaid child s

    upport

    payments and for unpaid daycare and

    med

    ical expenses for the care and well be ing

    of the part ies mi

    nor

    child . The sum total of

    mon

    ies d ue t o

    former wife of

    John Sims

    totaled

    $18,634.00 and final j

    udgment

    requiring

    payment

    was

    entered by

    Judge

    against John Sims for that amount. (Case No. : 91-36013 FC 29)

    11. Th e Greater Fort Lauderdale Board of Rea l

    tors

    revoked John Sims' endorsement f

    or

    Commissioner apparent ly a

    ft

    er

    th

    ey

    di

    scovered t

    hat

    he was not h

    onest

    at his

    in

    terview

    (Oct. 18

    th

    , 2010).

    Si

    ms supposedly cla i

    med in

    his int

    erv

    i

    ew

    that

    he w

    as

    adamantly opposed t o

    pro

    po

    se

    d const i

    tution

    al Amendment 4 in

    order

    to rece ive

    th

    e

    endorsement. It was lat er

    br

    ought to

    th

    e Board ' s attent ion th ro ugh Sims blog

    post ings and his City voting record th at he wa s a vehement supporter of

    Amendment 4. (Verifiable

    thro

    ugh

    cont

    a

    ct with

    Gr

    eater

    Fo

    rt

    La

    ud

    er

    dale Board of

    Rea

    lto

    rs, Adam

    Sa

    nders, Government Relat ions Di

    recto

    r) .

  • 8/11/2019 John Simms

    4/47

    12

    .

    State of Florida Elections Commission {

    Case No

    :

    FEC 12-011

    on

    or

    about January 23

    2013

    foun

    d probable cause

    th

    at John Sims had

    violat

    ed Florida Election Code. He was

    subsequently fined

    1

    ,

    800 for

    these violations.

    13. Having been inves

    tigated

    by the Florida Elections Commission for

    ca

    mpaign viola

    tions

    and having had an opportunity

    to

    amend his campaign statements, it has been

    found

    that at le

    as

    t one check was still not declared on the requ

    ir

    ed campaign expense forms

    as

    a payment. This check, written

    from the

    John Sims Campaign Accoun t, was made

    pa

    yable to Greg

    Ross Tr

    ust. (see attached copy of the chec

    k

    14. John Sims was publicly admonished for a racially insensitive Facebook post on his

    Facebook page posted Nov. th 2012. {Cooper City Commission Workshop, Dec

    11

    th

    2012

    15. John Sims was fined 6,

    380

    for City code violation. In commenting

    on

    the violation, the

    City Magistrate told John Sims that: As a commissioner you should be held to a higher

    standard; you are a person

    who

    sets an example

    for

    the community.

    Sims responded

    by saying he will not pay the fine and will address the issue at a higher level.

    (Sunsentinel, September 17 20

    15

  • 8/11/2019 John Simms

    5/47

    ME G A R C E ~

    FEB

    I : 991

    .

    COMPLAINT/ AhREST AFFIDAVIT

    0 MtSOetnf'Jncw 0 : r a t :>

    * *

    * *

    * * * * * * * ~

    TO

    ANSWER UNTO

    TH

    E STATE OF FLORIDA ON AN I NFORMATIO N OR INDICTMEN T

    FILED

    AGAINST

    HI M OR HER BY THE STAT E AT

    TO

    R

    NEY

    FOR THE

    UPON ORDER OF A

    JUDG

    E IN THE

    ELE

    VENT H J

    UDI

    CIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA FOR

    FAIL URE TO

    APPEAR

    I N COURT

    TO

    AN SWER

    TH

    E PENDING CHARGES

    FOR

    THE

    OF :

    ADER,

    CLER

    K CIHCUIT AND

    COUN

    TY COUR TS

    DEF UTY CLERK

    DA

    TE

    ~

    CASE 0::: ~ ? . 1 1 ~ ~ AGENCY: - - - - - ~ Q ~ Q - - - ..--

    -

    A

    SST.

    STATE A'lTY.: --- ..

    --

    .. ~ ~ : ~

    EXlRA DITI

    ON

    INFORMA TION

    ANYWHERE EXTRAD

    I TE WI THIN

    1500 MI LE

    S FLORIDA ONLY - - ~

    MAY BE CONFIRMED

    WITH THE

    METRO-DADE POL

    I

    CE

    DEPARlMENT, DADE

    COUNTY

    EVENT, DEFENDANT WILL BE ARRESTED IF FOUND IN THE STATE OF FLORIDA

    SIMS I I I

    JOHN

    BRYANT

    1 r ~ S r

    FIRST MDDLE

    - i i

    i 6

    ~ - ~ I l 7 t h ST . , M I ~ y ~

    ~ t

    - - - - - -

    - - - - - - - - - - - - - - i ~ ~ - ~ - - - - - - - - - - - - -

    ; - 5 r - ; - ~

    - - ~ ~ ~ ~ -

    ~

    = - - ~ ~ -

    ~ H ~ i ~ ~ ~ -

    ~ ~ 3

    - - - ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ E ~ HAIR 1 E ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~

    - ~ ~

    n

    ~ 1 l 1 ~ Q Q ~ METno

    DrDE

    IDA

    FD

    I

    E ~

    FBIA

    . -

    .

    T

    ~ - ~ - ~ - - S

    5 2 ~ ~ 6 ~ 5 8 1 ~ 1 - - - - - - ~ - .

    .T

    FL

    ________

    _

    I ON

    ----

    ----

    ----

    .... _________ . T ;: T

    H

    TE - -

    FEATURES

    - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- __ _

    INFO ___

    ______ ______

    T G ~ - - - - - - STA TE

    INFO wo r k

    addres

    s : 3300 N. W. 32nd

    Avenue

    Mi am i

    FL

    3314 2

    _____________ ,_ ... ____________________ J ______ J ___________

    ..c...

    Defendan t

    o r

    ~ s = f o . r :

    . . . : : . 1 . e _ p ~ _ D

    d

    . .Trans = ~ - ~ ~ - - - ~ ... ~ ~ - - - ....

    -

    -----

  • 8/11/2019 John Simms

    9/47

    IN THE I R ~ u i T COURT 0 ? THE N T H JU

    D:

    C: hL CI RCUI T

    IN ND F

    OR

    ~ . D E COUNTY, FLORIDA SPRING TERM, 19

    91

    S TATE OF, FLOR IDA v.

    C?l 5< f 33

    -

    .

    JOHN BRYANT SIMS, I I I

    D

    efe

    ndant ( e )

    I NFO

    R MA

    TION FOR

    AGGRAVATED BATTERY

    784

    . 045

    1) b) F e l

    . 2D

    ~ NAME AND BY AUTHORITY OF T

    HE

    STATE OF FLORIDA:

    I ;

    MARK A . SMITH ,

    Ass i s t an t

    St a t e

    A tt o rney

    ~ -

    Ci rcu i t

    o f Fl o r ida

    , o n

    the author i ty

    o f J

    ANET

    RENO

    , St a t e

    Atto r

    eventh

    pr

    osecu t ing

    Sta t e

    F ~ o r i d a

    in the County o f Dade,

    under

    oath ,

    JOHN BRYANT S IMS , I I I

    :

    in fo rmat io

    -n

    makes

    t ha t

    the 8 t h day o f

    FEBRUA

    RY

    ,

    19

    91 , in

    t he

    County

    and St a t e

    a fo resa id ,

    u n l

    a

    wfu ll

    y '

    and

    i

    fe

    lo

    n i o u s l y

    co

    mm

    t

    a n

    a g g ra v a t e d

    b a t t e r y upo

    n

    KA

    THARI

    NA

    . POERSCHKE , by a c t u a l ly and i n t e n t i o n a l l y t ouch i ng o r

    str

    ik ing

    t h e

    per son o f KATHARINA F . POERSCHKE ,

    aga

    in st he r w i l l , w h i l e KATHARINA F .

    OERSCHKJ\ .

    was

    p r e g n a n t and

    the

    def,endan t

    knew

    o r

    s h o u l d have

    known

    t h a t

    s h e was ~

    g n in

    v i o l a t i

    on

    o f 78 4 . 0 45 1) b ) F l o r i d a

    S t a t u t e s

    , -

    \

    '...../

    t o

    t he form of the

    Sta tu te

    in such cases made and provided , and

    aga ins t

    t he

    and

    d ign i ty

    o f

    the

    Sta te

    of

    Flor ida .

    ATE

    OF FLORI DA, COU

    NT

    Y OF DADE:

    Persona l ly appeared before me, the Ass i stant State Attorney of the El eventh Ju d

    ic ial Ci

    rcu i t of Florida,

    s i gnat u

    re

    appears

    below

    . and being f i rs t du ly sworn. says that

    the

    a l l egations set forth in

    th is

    io n are

    based

    upon facts w

    hich

    have bee n sw

    orn

    t o as t rue. and wh i

    ch

    i f t rue. would const i

    tute

    hr'e

    therein charged.

    and

    that

    this

    prosecut

    i on is inst i tu ted in good fai th.

    or

    n

    to

    and subscribed before me

    th

    i s

    S :

    ec

    : 5/ 14 / 9 1

    COURT DIRECT

    a

    l

    No . 13741 , Bkd .

    k

    t . - No .

    4 3 3

    / TOBIN (

    ARRESTED

    Assistant State

    Attorney

    Florida

    Bar

    #

    559687

    1A:7 day

    of

    _ _ _ _

    L C ~ : : : . _ ~ 7 y = : : . . _

    _

    -

    19_f..f.

    I

    4/

    the

    Cleric

    o f

  • 8/11/2019 John Simms

    10/47

    BE

    INITIALED BY:

    PROBATIONER

    Defendant

    Case Number

    ___

    SP EC I L CONDITIONS OF PROBATION

    You must undergo psychiatric treatment until such time as the person in charge of such

    treatment and your Probation Supervisor determine that such treatment is no longer

    necessary.

    You must serve

    in

    commencing

    You must not associate in any way with

    the attached order

    J

    You are hereby placed on notice that the Court may at any time rescind or modify any of the conditions

    probation, or may extend the period of probation as authorized by law, or may discharge you from further super-

    and that if you violate any of the conditions of your probation, you may be arrested and the Court may revoke

    probation; adjudicate you guilty if adjudication of guil t was withheld , and impose any sentence which it might have

    placing you on probation

    or require you to serve the balance of said sentence.

    It is further ordered that when you have been instructed as to the conditions of probation , you shall be released

    custody

    if

    you are in custody and if you are at liberty on bond , the sureties thereon shall stand discharged from

    if section 1 or section 2 is checked.)

    It is further ordered that the Clerk of this Court file this order in the clerk's office, and provide certified copies

    to the Officer for use in compliance with the requirements of law.

    DONE AND ORDERED, this the j

    I acknowledge receipt of a certified copy of this order. The conditions have be xplained to me and I agree

    abide

    by

    them.

    :

    tructed By:

    ______________________

    _

    ff _

    RE

    K

    Attorney/ nterpreter

    5243PG

    290 6

  • 8/11/2019 John Simms

    11/47

    LAW

    Of F ICES

    G O L D

    A N D F o x

    A PR O F ESSI O N AL ASSO C I

    ATION

    C O U R T H O U SE

    C EN T

    ER

    SUITE 1 7 2 0

    NORTHWEST

    F IRST A V

    ENUE

    MIAMI

    .

    FLORIDA

    12 8

    1817

    13051 ~ 7 9 0 0 9 0

    f AX 13051

    5 7 7

    6 5 3 7

    Honorable David

    L .

    Tobin

    Metro

    Jus t i ce

    Bui l ding

    Ju ly 20,

    1351

    W

    12 Stree t Room 407

    Miami,

    Flor ida 33125

    :

    St a t e

    v.

    Sims

    Psychological Evalua t ion

    Dear

    Judge

    Tobin :

    1992

    TALLAHASSEE. F L O R I D A 3 2 3 0 1

    1 9 041 6 6 1 - 3 7 3 7

    SOUTHEAS

    T B A N K B UI L D I N G

    SUIT E 1 3 0 0

    5 0 0 SOUTH f "LORIOA AVENU E

    LAKELAND. f "LOR IOA 3 3 8 0 1

    18

    131 6 8 7

    4 3 4 1

    f AX 161 31 6 8 6 - 1 4 1 2

    PLEASE

    RE:P L Y T O

    O MI AMI

    0T AL L AH ' -SSC

    0 L AKEL AN O

    1

  • 8/11/2019 John Simms

    12/47

    0 0

    FORENSIC

    AND

    CLINICAL

    PS

    Y

    CHOLOGY ASSOCIATES

    P.R.

    6601 S.

    W

    80th STREET

    SUITE

    206

    PSYCHOLOGI

    L

    EVALUA

    TION

    Nam

    e : Si

    ms,

    John

    Birthdate: 8/1/58 (33 years)

    Education: 13 years

    Rac e : Whi te

    Sex: Male

    Reason

    fo

    r Refe r ral :

    Case tl 91-5433

    .i

    Judge : David Tobin

    Evaluation

    Date: 7/13/

    Report

    Date:

    7/ 19

    /92

    lERK

    John Sims was refe rred for a p

    sychol

    og i

    cal

    eva l u

    ation by the

    Honorable David

    Tobin of the 11th Judicia l Circuit

    Court,

    Cr imi nal Division, Dade County,

    Flo

    ri

    da.

    Mr.

    Sims

    pled

    guilty

    to

    a

    charge

    of

    aggravated

    battery for

    an

    incident

    which occur red on 2/ 8/91 .

    He

    was accu

    sed

    of pushing his pregnant wife to the

    fl

    oor

    and forcibly removing her wedding

    rings.

    Mr.

    Si

    ms denied

    pushing

    hi s

    wife

    but admitted

    to

    removing

    the rings

    .

    Mr.

    sims was

    placed

    on two yea rs probation .

    He

    was charged with violating a s pec i a l conditi on of his probation by allegedly

    fai

    l i

    ng

    to

    -successfully comp lete the

    Domest ic

    Interven

    t i

    on Pr

    og

    ram (DIP) . Whil e

    he

    atten

    ded

    the

    group

    therapy

    sessions,

    his counse

    lor at the

    prog

    ram,

    Ms. Linda

    Gall, believed he reached

    maximum

    potential in therapy and had not been

    able

    to

    wo

    r k through

    this

    anger as to make progress in

    therapy.

    Ms . Sims consi dered

    him remaining at high

    risk

    fo r becoming

    physica

    l l y vio l ent

    again

    in the f uture .

    The purpose of

    the evaluatio

    n was to ass ess

    Mr.

    Sims' ps ychologica l f unctioning

    as

    i t

    relates to

    treatment

    nee

    ds

    and

    future

    dangerousness

    . The

    psycholog

    i s t

    wa

    s

    in fo

    rmed

    that the

    res

    u

    l t s

    of

    the

    evaluation wo

    uld in i t ia l l

    y be going to Mr.

    Myron Gold,

    Mr

    . Sims' a

    ttorney

    to present before Judge Tobin

    camera.

    The

    assistant s tate

    att

    o rney, Mr. Joe Fernandez would apparentl y

    not

    have access

    to

    t he

    re

    sults of

    the

    evaluation during the heari ng.

    Procedures. dministered :

    C

    lini cal

    Inte rview, House-T

    ree-Pe

    r son Test, Bender Visual Motor Gestalt Test

    Rorschach Inkblot Test, Mnnesota

    Mu

    ltiphasic P

    ers

    onality I nvent or y-2 ( P

    I - 2);

    Incompl ete Sentences Test

    Sources

    of

    Inf

    o rmat i

    on

    :

    Prior

    to

    the evaluation, Dr .

    Frumk

    in spoke

    to Hr

    . Gold and

    to

    Mr .

    Fer

    nandez. I n

    addition,

    the foll owing documents were reviewed :

    a) Mr. Sims' cl

    inical

    record s at

    the

    DIP which

    inc1udes

    Ms. Ga l l s le t ter

    to

    ---Yeda D.alJas, Me p.Lob.ation_o.f_i.cer_

    b) the complaint/arrest

    affidavit 's

    pertain ing to the above cha

    rges

  • 8/11/2019 John Simms

    13/47

    c)

    the

    affidavit

    of violation of probation including the

    report

    form

    d) Mr. Davi d Hudson's

    correspondence to Mr.

    Gold describing Hr . Sims' progress

    in therapy and

    treatment

    needs

    e) various motions and

    petitions

    f i led by

    attorneys

    related to

    both

    the criminal

    case and

    the

    divorce

    case in the

    Family

    Division of

    the court

    f)

    the prenuptial

    agreement between

    Mr.

    Sims and

    Katharina

    Poerschke

    g)

    corres

    pondence between M .

    Sims' divorce

    lawyer,

    Ms

    .

    Roberta Fox

    and

    the

    attorney fo r his wife,

    Mr.

    Russel l

    Spatz

    h) what appe

    ars

    to be M . Sims'

    d w r i t

    t e n ~ n o t e s

    i)

    memorandum f rom Mr . Sims '

    to Ms

    . Fox concerni ng medi ation

    j

    a handwritten note from

    Mr.

    Sims

    to Mr. Go

    l d describing what he bel ieved

    to

    be problems with his defense f rom

    his

    previous defense attorney, Mr . Tom

    Ri savy

    k) a draft of a Memorandum of Law from Mr. Gold with a reply

    fro

    m the

    ass i s

    ta

    nt s ta te

    atto

    rney

    l ) off ense- i nci dent reports

    related to

    Mr . Sims ' f

    i l

    ing

    complaints

    ag

    ainst

    his

    wi fe

    m No

    tes

    re l

    ating

    to M

    otion

    fo r P

    ost

    co nv

    ict i

    on re

    l i ef

    n)

    wha

    t appear s

    to

    be

    informal

    statements

    of

    various witnesses

    to

    some

    of the

    in teract i ons between Mr. Sims and

    his

    wi f e

    o) a transcript

    of the

    proceedings concerning Mr . Sims

    in front of the Honorable

    Arthur Rothenberg on 6/11/91

    p) a transcr

    ipt

    of

    the

    proceedings conce r ning Hr . Sims in f ront of

    the

    Honorable

    Davi d Tobi n on 3/31/92

    q) t he 5/19/92 deposition of Mr . David Hudson

    r)

    the

    4/20/92

    deposition of

    Veda Dal l

    as

    s) the

    8/23/91

    deposition of Katha r ina Poerschke

    Background Information :

    Mr . Sims was seen at

    the

    psychologist's

    private

    office for a

    total

    of almost

    three

    hours .

    This excluded self-administered

    testing time .

    Prior

    to the

    eva l uation, Mr . Sims

    was

    informed that

    the results

    of

    the

    assessment were not

    confidential

    and would be given

    to

    his law

    yer

    to present to thedjudge without

    the

    assistant

    state attorney

    being present . Mr. Sims was told

    that after that

    meeting,

    the

    psychologist would not have any control

    whether the assistant

    state

    attorney would be allowed

    access

    to

    the findings or whethe r

    the

    report may some

    day be used

    in

    his Family Court proce

    edings

    .

    I t

    would have been important

    to interview

    Ms .

    Poerschke, the defendant's

    ex-wife

    and victim

    of the

    aggravated

    battery

    . Although

    the psychologist

    reviewed many

    pertinent documents, the interview was done

    with

    an individual who was expected

    to present his

    side

    most favorably . Nevertheless, Mr . Sims appeared to be a

    reliable

    historian

    as

    far

    as

    proving

    a

    detailed, internally consistent

    accounting

    of events

    . While he portrayed Ms. Poerschke

    in

    negative terms, he said

    positive

    as well as negative

    things

    about himself.

    Mr. Sims described a diff icult childhood . He said he fe l t he was the black

    sheep in the

    family.

    He

    is

    the middle ch ild of two siblings. He said

    that

    he

    was-very-

    hyper

    - afld-ett-t:-going

    ~ s a

    child . A st.:a..ighLA:.:....student at-Hortb Miami

    Senior High School, he was active in school sports and the band. He described

    t

    z

  • 8/11/2019 John Simms

    14/47

    his father beating him and his m

    other

    while

    he was growing up . The beating ceased

    when he was approximately 15 or 16 yea rs of age .

    Mr Sims said that he got suspended from schoo l only

    onc

    e in his l i fe .

    Th

    is

    occurred

    when

    he said he was falsely

    accused of

    shooting the

    principal with

    a

    paper

    clip

    and a

    rubber

    band .

    He described

    himself

    as

    a

    jo

    kest

    er

    ''

    in

    class

    .

    On

    s v r ~ l

    occasions

    he was

    required t o

    go the

    school

    office for

    saying

    something

    loud .

    He

    described having a number of

    friends

    . Hf denied ever having been

    arrested as a juvenile .

    Mr

    Sims

    said

    he

    joined

    to

    the

    Navy at age 17

    after

    graduating high school .

    He

    joined

    to

    get

    spec

    ial training in their electronics school .

    He said

    he was in

    an eli te

    unit

    as a communications specialist in

    tact ica

    l

    operations

    . Afte r

    four

    years he

    lef t

    with an Hon

    orab le

    Discharge.

    He

    then worked

    for

    a couple

    of years

    as a head

    technician

    for an electrical firm in

    Virginia

    .

    He

    subsequentlv moved

    back to

    Miami

    and worked as a

    t ransi t radi

    o repair su

    per

    vi so r f or Dade County .

    He has been doing

    this

    for the

    past

    nine years. He said he has completed one

    year

    of

    college

    at Miami

    Dade Community

    College in

    telecommunications management.

    He

    plans

    on

    transferring

    his

    credits to

    Barry

    University.

    Mr . Sims

    said

    he met

    his

    ex-wife at a

    party. He

    had

    known

    her brother

    for yea

    r s .

    Two

    weeks after they met, she moved in with him

    to

    help

    take

    care of him after

    he was hit by a car when he was ridi ng a bicycle, t

    rain

    ing

    for

    the t r iathalon.

    They married in August, 1987. Mr Sims said that his wife changed once she began

    to go

    the

    police academy . People did not like

    her

    at work and he said she was

    unab

    le to

    accept

    authority

    from

    supervisors

    .

    To

    wards

    the

    end

    of

    their

    marriage,

    he

    said

    she hit him daily, punching him oftentimes for no reason.

    He said

    that

    he found out that

    his

    wife took a large sum of money

    out of the

    bank anq ran up

    all

    of

    the credit cards .

    Mr

    Sims

    described the

    aggravated

    battery

    charge

    as

    resulting

    from

    th

    e

    following

    incident . He said

    that

    his wife came home . He conf ronted

    her

    about taking out

    all

    of the

    money and

    expressed his concern

    abou t being

    able

    to p ~ t h e mortgage.

    He

    sai d that she

    threatened to

    divorce him .

    When she

    refused

    to

    give him

    her

    wedding rings so he could hock them to pay for the mortgage, he said that he

    grabbed her

    lef t wri s t and attempted to

    pull the ring off

    . He

    said tha t she

    cowered do

    wn to the f l

    oor and began

    to

    kick

    at

    his

    groin. He finally

    removed

    the

    r i ng . Mr . Sims said his wife was

    several

    weeks pregnant at

    the

    time .

    He

    denied pushing her or

    throwing

    her to

    the

    ground .

    Mr

    Sims

    said that the only

    reason he

    got

    arrested was because she was an of

    f i

    cer herself . He spent 24 hours

    in ja i l and was released on bail .

    According to Mr

    . Sims, his

    wif

    e decided not

    to press

    charges .

    Shortly thereafter ,

    he and

    his

    wife

    moved

    back

    together

    and he began

    to

    meet

    with

    Mr

    . Hudson

    for

    therapy in

    an

    attempt

    to improve

    the marriage

    .

    He said that his wife refused

    t o

    co

    me for

    the treatment

    herself

    . Mr .

    Si

    ms

    stated that

    their

    arguments

    co

    ntinued

    and

    at

    one

    point, he

    believed

    his

    wi fe

    wa

    s having an affai r with

    her

    boss

    at

    ork .

    He sai

    d that

    on April

    1 , 1991, his wife moved back

    to

    her

    mother's

    home.

    When he tried t o

    visi t

    her several days later , he

    said that

    her mother tele phoned

    tne p6lTce, s t a t

    ing

    he Cr ied

    to breal< the door

    -down .

    Hr.

    Sims sa id tha t fo r the

    next

    month, he

    wrote

    a number

    of

    let ters

    to his

    wife, some

    50 to 60 pages long,

    whereby he spilled (his) guts and stated how much he loved her. Mr Sims

    said

  • 8/11/2019 John Simms

    15/47

    that

    his wife refi led the aggravated battery charge towards the end of April,

    1991 and he spent

    another

    two

    days in ja i l .

    Soon

    afterwards,

    Hr. Sims

    voluntarily

    entered

    the Domestic

    Intervent

    i on Program and s

    topped

    . seeing Hr. Hudson.

    Hr. Sims apparent ly went to

    court

    on or about

    October

    , 1991.

    He

    said that

    one

    of

    the

    conditions of

    his

    two

    year

    pro

    bation,

    after

    pleading

    guilty

    to the

    agg

    ravat

    ed battery cha rge, was that he cont inue with his weekly group counseling

    at DIP. Hr . Sim s

    said that

    in January, 1992, he was informed

    by

    his group

    counsel or that he was being

    ter

    minated from the program. Hr. Sqms said that since

    he believed he st i l l needed help, he began

    to

    see Mr . Hudson again for

    individual

    counse ling sessions. Mr Sims had also previously been in pasto ral counseling

    with

    a pastor Ted Place .

    There was

    no way of

    independently

    validating

    Mr Sims' s t

    atement

    that prior to

    his separation

    from

    his wife, i t was

    Hs. Poer schke who would hit him

    elmost daily

    and threaten him with her gun. In

    the DIP

    Psychosocial Assessment completed on

    5/6/90 , M . Sims acknowledges emotional and

    verbal

    abuse, has cursed at her,

    also threatened

    to divorce her. There

    is no men

    tion in

    any records

    of Mr

    Sims

    s t

    ating

    he

    has

    ever

    hit

    his

    wife.

    He

    told

    Dr. Frumkin

    that

    he once

    hit

    her on

    the shoulder.

    Apart

    from that

    in c

    ident, he denied

    ever hitting

    or pushing her.

    There is no

    indication

    from any

    of the reco

    rds

    that Mr

    S

    im

    s

    has ever been

    involved in any other fights or altercations with others.

    Hr. Sims denied ever having had other arrests . He denied

    being

    vio lent or hitt ing

    or abusing

    others . He currently

    has

    a

    girlfriend

    who

    is

    a

    comptroller for

    a

    maga zine publisher i n Coral Gables.

    He

    has known her for one

    year

    . Hr . Sims ha s

    a

    six-month

    o

    ld

    daughter . He

    sa id

    that he

    has

    not sought vi si ta t ion with

    her for

    fea r that his wife to attempt would allege abuse complai nts agai11st him.

    Interestingly,

    Hr . Sims

    s tate

    d he

    was not

    certain

    of his

    daughter s name.

    He

    stated that he fe l t badly that tle could not- vts i t is

    eaugt-lte-r

    at tRis time .

    e

    is

    pr

    o

    viding

    financial

    support

    for

    her

    though

    .

    Drug/Alcohol History:

    Hr. Sims said

    that

    he used cocaine once or twice prior

    to

    mee

    ting with

    his wife

    and

    also

    did

    i t several times with her.

    He s

    aid

    he last used cocaine

    four

    years

    ago. He

    said

    he ex

    perimented

    with marijuana

    only

    once

    or

    twice . The

    las t

    time

    was

    five

    years

    ago. Hr. Sims described

    drinking

    approximately three beers weekly

    when

    he

    was

    married.

    He

    described drinking rather

    infrequently

    now

    He sa

    i d

    he

    last

    had an

    alcoholic beverage

    a month ago

    when

    he dra

    nk one beer.

    Apart from

    some heavy

    dri

    nking

    when

    he was in

    the Navy

    ,

    Mr

    . Sims denied

    ever having much

    to drink

    at

    one

    t i me

    .

    Behavioral

    Observations:

    Mr . Sims

    is

    a ta l l , white male of

    averag

    e weight who came to

    the

    session casually

    dressed and

    neatly

    groomed . He was

    quite

    art iculate, s pontaneously volunteered

    informat ion, and had no difficulty easily

    establish ing

    rapport with

    the

    psychol ogist . His immediate, short-term, and long- termmemory were wi thin norma l

    - - 1m

    f t s

    -. -

    R1s

    vocabula r y s l< i l l s-

    r q

    u f te

    gooCI-;-Tie

    has gooa -

    abst :ract

    -

    re a

    -

    sonlng

    abi l i t ie s . His judgment and common

    sense

    are

    fa ir

    . Overall, he came across as

    an individual of at least high average intelligence .

  • 8/11/2019 John Simms

    16/47

    Hr. Sims somewhat in

    appr

    opr i atel y began to add ress Dr. Fru

    mk

    i n by hi s

    f irs t

    name.

    He began the session by stat i ng that he i ni t ia lly had a problem with denial and

    blaming

    a

    lot

    of this on my

    wife a t f i r

    s

    t .

    While

    i t

    .

    is

    not

    kn

    own

    i f

    Hr. Sims

    has really internali zed thi s, he has s eemingl y learned

    to sa

    y what he be l i

    eves

    others want

    to hear

    .

    Mr . Sims' motor

    activity

    was within normal l i mi t s . His eye

    cont

    act was good . His

    speech was clear,

    coherent,

    and

    relevant

    .

    He

    had

    no loosening

    of a s s ~ c i a t i o n s

    While Hr. Sims was not

    defensive

    as

    far

    as what he

    told

    the psychologi s t

    about

    himself,

    he

    was

    careful not to

    show much emotion.

    He

    t r ied

    to

    keep

    his feelings

    under a Jot of

    controJ

    . His affect was constricted and he d i scussed many

    s tressful events with l i t t le change in

    hi

    s tone of speech . He came across

    neither

    anx ious or depressed .

    Mr.

    Sims' impulse control was good

    during

    the s

    ession

    but based upon his history,

    is generally poor . He denied ever experiencing any auditory or visual

    ha

    l lucinat

    ions .

    He

    did not exhibit any

    delusional

    thinking. While he denied

    c

    urrently

    having any

    suicidal ideations,

    he

    said that

    he thought of suicide

    when

    his

    wife

    was

    planning

    to

    leave

    him.

    He said

    that

    he

    fe l t

    that

    i f she

    left , he

    would have

    nothing. He said that

    on

    several

    occasions, he told his wife of his

    suicidal thoughts as a last

    resort.

    He said he did not have any speci

    f ic

    plans

    though

    . Mr . Sims denied

    ever

    having had any

    homicidal

    t houghts and he

    denied

    having a problem with anger,

    apart

    from what

    has

    happened to him assoc iate9 with

    this crimina l case .

    Test Res

    ults:

    Test results show that Mr . Sims' t r ied to pres

    ent himself

    in an honest and

    s t

    r

    aightforward

    fashi on. He

    is

    an

    individual

    who

    wants

    t o

    come

    across in an

    extremefy masculine

    Tashi

    on.

    l1e

    gene-ra+ ly--p;efers

    ac---tioo

    t

    Uw.u.g.l t aru:l is not

    v

    ery

    c

    omfortable

    dea

    1

    i

    ng

    with

    his feelings.

    He

    makes

    unreal ist

    i c

    assessments

    about his own abil i t ie s and

    sel

    f - worth. Currently he is very

    cautious

    and feels

    persecuted and misused .

    Mr.

    Sims i s a man who needs and requires a lot of structure. He has diff ic ulties

    dealing with ambiguous or stressfu l situations. Rather than showing impulsiveness

    dur i ng the sess i on, he demonstrated a concern for making absolutely certain he

    was

    doing

    what

    was

    expected.

    Paradoxically, although

    he

    has

    a need

    to control,

    he

    generally feel

    s he never

    has

    enough

    control. This

    makes

    him feel

    very an

    xious

    and depressed .

    He

    feels

    helpless

    and inadequate and

    has

    difficul ty dealing with

    any rejection . Mr. Sims has

    impulse

    control problems although there

    is

    nothing

    i n the tes t data to s ugges t he is generally vi ol ent . He i s curren

    t ly

    experiencing

    a lot

    of s i t uational-related

    stress

    . The more anxious he f ee

    ls

    ,

    the

    wor.

    se

    he

    f e

    el

    s

    about

    himself as

    a

    pers

    on. Y

    et

    he

    holds in

    these

    bad

    feelings

    about

    himself

    and

    has

    di fficulty expr es s in g these feelings t o others .

    Mos t cent

    ral to

    Hr . Sims pers

    onali t

    y i s

    his

    na

    rc

    i

    ssis

    m, hi s tendency t o

    ove r va

    lue

    hi s own personal wort h. Th is is to

    com

    pe ns

    ate

    for

    his

    underl yi ng

    f ee l ings

    of

    i nsecuri

    ty

    . He

    has

    some

    dif fic

    u

    l ty

    inte rac t

    ing

    w

    i th

    t he environment.

    t 1mesfh-i s can

    transcena

    , nto tne1nter=personalarena . HisreTat ;-or1snips-wi t h_____

    oth

    ers may oftent i mes be less mature than mi

    gh

    t be

    expected

    of someone hi s age .

    He compe nsa te s aga in by coming ac ros s overly

    authori

    t arian.

    /

    G

  • 8/11/2019 John Simms

    17/47

    Testing

    does

    not

    indjcate

    that

    Mr.

    Sims

    has

    any problems

    with

    r

    eali ty

    testing.

    He

    tends

    to

    be

    lackadaisical

    or hasty in his thinking . Sometimes this causes him

    to

    misinterpret what

    others may

    be saying or doing.

    Forensic

    Considerations and Recommendations:

    Mr.

    Sims

    has some rather

    c

    hronic personality

    and

    behavioral problems. He

    has

    deep-seated

    feelings of

    inferiori ty

    which he compensates by

    trying to

    always

    ~

    in control . He has difficul ty handling

    stressful situations.

    He may come

    acrogs

    impulsive without giving

    much

    thought to his

    actions.

    Never t he l ess,

    there is

    nothing to suggest in

    the tes t

    data

    that

    he is currently a violent or

    dangerous

    person.

    f

    he exhibit

    ed

    v iolent behavior

    in

    the

    past, he has learned to

    bette

    r

    control his anger .

    Mr . Sims does need psychotherapy on a weekly basis. While

    Mr.

    Hudson has worked

    with

    Mr.

    Sims intensi vely for two different time periods, I might suggest that

    Mr. Sims could

    benefit

    from seeing a

    licenced

    psychologist who could use a

    combination of rational-emotive and

    behavioral

    approach

    to

    help

    him feel better

    about

    himself. He

    can

    also

    be

    taught

    relaxation

    techniques.

    I

    am

    not

    certain

    that

    he can benefit, at this particular point of time, from any form of group

    counseling, either from a psychologist or

    social worker,

    or from a program such

    as

    Domestic Interventi on or the Advocates. While Mr . Sims is a

    bright,

    motivated

    indiv idual,

    the treatment is not going to

    be effective because of the

    nature

    of

    his problem.

    After

    reviewing his

    clinical record,

    I have serious concerns about Mr. Sims'

    treatment

    a t

    the

    Domestic Intervention Program.

    First ,

    his group treatment consisted of three different therapists over an eight

    month period.

    There appears to be

    no

    m-tstency

    n the t-A

    e-rfrj}y- based

    upoo s .

    t.aff

    turnover

    .

    One

    would

    find

    i t

    diff icul t

    for

    individuals

    to

    make

    much

    improvement

    with so many different

    therapists.

    econd,

    Mr

    . Sims stated that on a number of o c c a ~ i o n s , group members showed for

    treatment, man y missi

    ng

    work to attend, yet the therapist did not show. He said

    no

    attempt was made to

    contact

    individuals to te l l them

    that

    the group session

    was not going to take

    place

    . This gives the clients a bad message as to the

    importance of the group or how the therapist feels about them .

    Third, based upon the records, Hr . Sims appeared to have excellent attendance.

    He f i r s t sought

    treatment

    volunta r i ly. t was not court-ordered until

    he had

    already

    been attending a

    numbe

    r of

    group sessions.

    Fourth,

    Ms.

    Gall

    stated

    that

    he has been _

    unable

    to

    work

    through

    his

    anger

    and

    that he blames his wife for his abusive behavior . DIP's Psychosocial

    Assessment

    states that he acknowledges emotional and verbal abuse. While

    progress

    notes

    of the

    sessions

    indicate at

    times

    that

    Mr.

    Sims blames others (wife courts

    etc . ) for his problems,

    oth

    er progress notes (such as

    8/21/91)

    sta te

    that

    he

    takes o\:{nership of

    abusive/non-assertive behavior

    in past

    relations.

    Progress

    n -Ol::es a Iso

    r e n e c r ' E n a t l l r ~

    1ms nas

    cor\s

    -i

    st:ent

    I been very veroa:Tana express we

    in the group sessions . He

    expresses how

    he

    feels

    and provides at time feedback

    to other

    group

    members .

    e

  • 8/11/2019 John Simms

    18/47

    Fifth,

    even

    i f

    Hr. Sims has not verbalized remorse or responsibility for his

    actions, the purpose of

    the

    treatment

    is

    to

    belp him understand his actions and

    ultimately bring about

    behavioral change . If Mr . Sims

    said

    what

    the counselors

    wanted to

    hear, there

    would have been

    no

    need

    for him

    to be

    in

    therapy

    in the

    f i rs t place. His i n p p r o p r i t ~ statements show his need for

    help,

    not that he

    can no

    longer

    benefit

    from

    treatment

    .

    DIP

    needs

    to

    work

    with

    individual

    s

    who

    have

    problems, not ones who say all of the right things.

    Sixth,

    Mr . Sims

    was

    probably one

    of

    the brightest and most

    articulate

    members

    of the group . He learned in his individual therapy that i t was imp o

    r t

    ant to

    express

    how

    he

    feels.

    This

    is

    what he did in

    the

    group. Somehow i t appears he

    was penalized

    for this.

    Progress

    notes

    ref lect a man

    who was

    trying hard to

    cooperate and express

    things

    .

    Seventh, interestingly,

    there

    were progress notes

    for

    every one of

    Mr. Sims'

    group sessions except

    the

    one (1/ 1S

    /g2) immediately

    preceding

    the

    one in which

    he was informed

    that

    he

    was being terminated. What transpired du ri

    ng

    thi

    s

    session? I f Mr.

    Sims'

    behavior was so inappropriate, why was i t

    not

    recorded in

    the progress

    notes?

    There

    was no

    record

    which

    s ta t

    ed what

    specifically

    Mr.

    Sims

    needed to do

    to

    comply with treatment. There was no

    record

    which

    sta

    t ed how

    DIP

    measures progress

    in

    therapy.

    While I have gener

    all

    y

    heard

    good

    thi ng

    s about

    the

    Domestic

    Intervention

    Pr9gram,

    in Mr

    .

    Sims' case

    , any deficiencies

    in

    his

    progress

    appears

    to

    be re lated more

    to his treatment than his behav i or in the group session. M . Ga l l s s ta tes in

    her le t ter

    to

    Ms.

    Dal l as that he remains at

    high

    risk for becoming physically

    vio lent

    again

    in

    the

    future. The protection and well-be ing of his wife and

    new

    baby

    should

    be the utmost priority of

    the

    Court

    at

    this

    time

    .

    The

    best

    predictor

    ef

    vi6Hent behavior is previous

    e ~ i s o e s

    of violent behavior .

    There is l i t t l e in

    Mr.

    Sims' record which documents a long history

    of

    violent

    behavior.

    He does

    not appear

    to

    take

    drugs

    or

    drink alcohol.

    He

    seems

    to

    have

    a good work history. There is

    l i t t le

    in

    the

    test data to sugge$t

    that

    he has

    violent or

    aggressive tendencies.

    Thank you for

    the

    opportunity to assist the court with this case. I f t he

    court

    has additional

    information

    which

    may

    be useful, I

    will

    happily

    incorporate

    that

    data into

    the

    above recommendations .

    As

    mentioned

    previously,

    I had no

    opportunity

    to

    evaluate Mr. Sims'

    ex-wife .

    f

    I can

    provide

    any further

    information , please le t me know.

    Respectfully,

    [

    ~ ~ ~ _ _ _

    I . Bruce Frumkin, Ph.D.,ABPP

    Clinical Psychologi s t

    Diplomate

    in

    Forensic Psychology

    American Boar d of P ~ ~ f e s s i ~ n a l Psychol ogy

  • 8/11/2019 John Simms

    19/47

    STATE OF FLORIDA,

    Pla in t i f f /Appe l lee ,

    vs .

    JOHN B. SIMS I I I ,

    Defendant /Appe l lan t

    .

    ________________________

    TO : THE BELOW LISTED ADRESSEES

    IN

    THE

    CIRCUIT

    COURT

    OF

    JUDICIAL

    CIRCUIT

    IN

    AND

    COUNTY FLORIDA

    CRIMINAL

    DIVISION

    CASE

    NO

    . 91-

    05433

    ..:.

    :.:;._.,

    ; > .. .....

    NOTI

    CE

    OF BEARING

    ::::::r::

    r.G

    Spec ia l

    Appointment=:f

    THE

    11TH

    FOR DADE

    : ...

    -

    --:;

    -i

    -:

    J

    - -

    YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT the

    undersigned

    wi l l

    ca l l

    upon

    for

    hear ing:

    BEFORE :

    HONORABLE

    DAVID L . TOBIN

    PLACE : METROPOLITAN JUSTICE BUILDING

    1351 N.W . 12 STREET

    MIAMI, FLORIDA 33 125

    TIME : 9 :

    00

    A.M.

    DATE : DECEMBER 23 , 1992

    MATTER

    : MOTION TO UNSEAL

    AND

    TRANSMIT FORENS IC EVALUATION

    PLEASE GOVERN YOURSELF ACCORDINGLY .

    I

    HEREBY

    CERTIFY

    t ha t

    a t r ue and

    cor rec t

    copy of t he foregoing

    was

    mailed

    to the Sta te

    Atto rney ' s Off ice ,

    1351 N. W.

    12

    St ree t

    Miami, Flor ida

    33125 , Myron

    Gold

    , Esq . , 175 N.

    W.

    1s t Avenue,

    Sui t e

    1720, Miami

    , F lor ida

    33128-1817,

    Off ice of th e Attorney

    General

    , 401 N. W. 2 Ave . ,

    Miami,

    Flor ida 33131 , Third Dis t r i c t

    Court o f

    Appeals ,

    20001 s.w . 117 Ave,

    Miami,

    FL 33177

    on

    t h i s

    __17

    ___

    day of DECEMBER 1992.

    t i c e . frm

    JOHN B. SIMS I I I

    7436 S.W . 117 AVE

    SUITE 214

    MIAMI, FLORIDA

    33183

    305) 637-3737

    81-6275

    9

  • 8/11/2019 John Simms

    20/47

    STATE OF FLORIDA,

    Pla in t i f f /Apel l ee ,

    vs.

    JOHN B. SIMS I I I ,

    Defen

    dan

    t /Appe

    ant ,

    IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 11TH

    JUDICIAL CIRCUIT

    IN

    AND FOR

    DADE

    COUNTY FLORIDA

    CRIMINAL DIVISION

    CASE NO

    . 9 1 ~ 5 4 3 3

    MOTION

    TO

    UNSEAL

    AND

    TRAN

    SMIT

    FORENSIC EV

    ALUAT-I ON

    COMES W

    ,

    the

    unders igned Defendant /Appel lant ,

    JO

    HN

    B.

    SI

    MS

    I I I ,

    and

    re spec t fu l ly moves th i s Honorable

    Court

    pursuant to

    Fl .

    R.

    Crim

    . P . 924 . 31, 3 . 220 . ( l ) , (m) , (n ) ( l ) , (o ) ; 90 . 503 ,

    (3) (a)

    ,

    (b)

    ,

    (c)

    ; 9 0 .

    50

    7 ; F

    1 .

    R .

    App

    . P . 9 . 14 0 (d) ; 9 . 2 0 0 ,

    (e)

    ; 9 . 3 0 0 ,

    to

    Unseal and

    Transmit

    to the 3rd D i s t r i c t Court of Appeals t he

    record which conta ins a Forensic Evalua t ion by t he cour t

    appointed

    exper t wi tness ,

    Dr

    . I .

    Bruce Frumkin

    ,

    performed and

    dated

    June

    30 ,

    1992,

    which was

    sealed by t h i

    s

    Honorable Court

    and

    s t a t e s as follow s :

    1.

    Forensic

    Evalua t ion was ordered by t h i s Honorable Court to

    determine t he

    innocence of t he Defendant

    .

    2 .

    Dr

    . I .

    Bruce Frumkin

    was

    recommended

    by t h i s

    Hono

    rab

    l e

    Court

    a f t e r

    lengthy disagreement between

    oppos1ng

    counsel and t he

    \.

    defense counsel , Mr .

    Myron

    Gold .

    3 .

    This Honorable

    Court

    reviewed th e

    sa id document in camera

    and subsequent ly

    author ized

    t he S ta t e Attorney

    and

    suppor t ing

    counsel ,

    inc luding

    the s t a t e ' s

    witness

    to examine sa id document .

  • 8/11/2019 John Simms

    21/47

    4 .

    The

    Forens ic Evalua t ion

    i s

    in favor

    o f

    t he

    Defendant/ Appel lant and

    the

    same

    wishes to

    waive pr ive lege due

    t o the

    preceeding

    fac t s and

    a l so by

    volunta ry d i sc losu re to the

    Appel la te

    Court of

    t he 3 rd D is t r i c t .

    WHEREFORE the unders igned Defenda n t

    A

    ppe l l an t

    prays

    fo r

    and

    r e sp e c t f

    u l l y reque s t s

    t h i s

    Honorable

    Court

    t o g ran t the motion

    with in

    and to grant any

    and / o r a l l

    r e l i e f t h a t

    t h i s

    Honorable

    Court d eems appropr ia te .

    RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED

    DONE AND ORDERED

    t so _3

    day

    i n the Ci rc u i t

    Court

    of

    the 11th

    Jud i c i a l Circui t in and

    fo r

    Dade

    County

    Flor ida a t Miami Flor ida .

    ~

    Ci rcu i t

    Court Judge

    1 l

  • 8/11/2019 John Simms

    22/47

    I

    HEREBY

    CERTIFY t h a t a t r ue and

    cor rec t

    copy of

    the

    fo regoing

    was mailed to the Sta te At to rney s Off ice ,

    1351

    N. W. 12 S t r e e t

    Miami,

    Flor ida

    33125,

    Myron

    Gold,

    Esq. ,

    175

    N. W.

    1s t

    Avenue,

    Sui te 1720,

    Miami Flor ida

    33128-1817,

    Off ice

    of the Attorney

    General 401 N.W. 2 Ave . , Miami, Flor ida 33131, Thi rd D is t r i c t

    Court of Appeals 20001 s .w. 117 Ave, Miami, FL

    33177

    on t h i s

    l 7______

    day

    of

    ______

    DECEMBER_______________________________ 19 92 .

    c o u r t\ motion .

    record

    - -

    JOHN B.

    SIMS

    I I I

    7436 S . W.

    117 VE

    SUITE

    214

    MIAMI FLORIDA

    33183

    305)

    637-373 881

    -6275

    -----------

    i 2

  • 8/11/2019 John Simms

    23/47

    IN THE CIRCUI T COU

    RT

    OF

    THE

    11TH

    JUDICIAL

    CIRCUI T IN AND FOR DADE

    COUNTY FLORID A

    STATE OF

    FL

    O

    RI

    DA,

    CRIMINAL

    DIVI

    S I ON

    CASE

    NO. 91-

    05

    4

    33

    P l a i n t i f f / Appellee ,

    THIRD DISTRICT CO

    URT

    OF APPEALS

    CASE

    NO

    .

    92-01976

    vs .

    _;

    c:

    >

    JOHN

    B . SIMS

    I I I ,

    DIRECTIONS TO THE

    CLERK

    Defendant /Appel lant .

    COMES NOW t he undersigned D e f e n d a n t A p p e l l ~ ~ ~ G H N .

    B.

    0 tft have sut'fered paSt petSOnal attacks by

    ther

    foes

    and

    by political bloggers.

    I retraced

    the

    whereabouts

    of

    Mrs..

    Green

    's ca r,

    prior to

    the incident,

    and found

    that

    Mrs.

    Green s

    car is mainly used by her daughter, Heather

    Green.

    According

    to

    Heather, on Friday January ~

    at

    2:00pm

    she drove the car

    to Pi:>neer

    Middle

    School where a

    blood drive was

    being held.

    Heather parked the car in the teacher s parking lot on the

    south

    side of the school and remained at

    such location for approximately

    te

    n minutes

    .

    I

    drew

    to

    the

    school

    and

    observed

    that

    the

    parking

    is

    not

    equipped with

    surveiDance cameras. I met with school personnel who

    verified

    that they

    are

    not

    equipped with outside surveillance

    equipment

    In

    adcfltion,

    I spoke with school resource deputy,

    Robert Wallace, who acknowledged

    1hat

    there are no

    cameras

    at the south side

    teacher s

    parking

    lot

    and

    that the only cameras are

    located

    in the passageways and

    do

    not have a

    view of

    the

    parking area

    .

    At

    p p r o x i m a t e l y ~

    Heathef returned

    home and .parlced

    .the

    car

    in her driveway. Heather

    told

    me

    that she

    did

    not

    observe

    any

    marks, scratches or anything suspicious wTth the vehicle.

    Shortly thereafter, Heather left her home and drove

    to

    the

    Sports Authority

    , at the comer of Pines

    Btvd. and Hiatus Rd . and parked in the front parking tot Heather remained

    at

    such location for

    approximately ten

    minutes

    and

    upon

    exiting the

    store

    she did

    not

    observe anything suspicious with

    her

    car.

    I

    drove to the above

    location

    and noticed that the

    Sports Authority is equipped with an

    o

    utside

    surveillance camera.

    but

    according to

    the store manager Damian

    Chin.

    the camera

    is

    aimed at

    the store and

    not

    the

    parking area

    At appr

    ox

    imately 3 :15pm Heather

    drove

    to the Barnes and Nobles as well as the UJta Sh op

    located on the

    co

    m er of Pi

    nes

    Btvd. and Flamingo Rd., within the

    Pembroke

    Crossing Shopping

    Center.

    CASE STATUS:

    CIA EXJ

    UNF

    P-C/A

    PJACTJVE

    f

    Pit

    Detective

    CCN 10027

    Date:

    SUpeMsor N I

    03131108

    Sign:

    Sign.

    "

    rint

    .L

    e A.

    Av

    a

    los

    Print

    R

    BAKER

    1210

    Page2 of6

    ISO

    ltP.,

    REVISED D05J

    OI

    STRIBUTJON: ORIGINA

    l.

    -RECORDS O ~ I O N

  • 8/11/2019 John Simms

    32/47

    SHERIFPS

    OFACE -

    BROWARO COUNTY

    ,

    FLORIDA

    Investiga

    tiv

    e Action Report

    C

    ase:

    C C ~ 1 0 8 4 7

    Zona;1606

    Off

    ense:

    Ha1B

    Crime

    Howev

    er,

    the

    www

    savecoopercity .bloqspot.com

    was

    the site

    responsibie

    for

    referring

    to

    the

    mayor as a Nazi-bitch and introducing a photo of the mayor

    with

    a Hitter mustache drawn

    on

    her

    up

    per

    rrp

    01/21/07, Clime stoppers flyers

    were

    obtained and handed to

    Copper

    City's Sergeant Brown for

    distribution throughout the neighborhood_

    01/2

    3107. I contacted

    Sergeant

    W

    eller

    with

    the

    BS O's

    SID and

    obtarned

    an

    IP address for

    the

    {savecoopercity} website and found

    that

    the website belonged

    to

    Google

    _

    01/24107. I forwarded Google a

    s.lbpoena

    for s t o r y and 6 elL as the

    name-address

    a n c t ~ ~ n g

    to

    the

    subscriber_

    02/1 9108

    , I

    received

    infonnation

    from Goog1e

    that

    the

    subscriber

    information requested

    belongs

    to

    s v e c

    o o p e r c r t y o m com and

    that

    the IP connection was a-eated on 12107/2007 at

    01:53:47.1 222_

    02120/0S, I

    foiwaided

    Google a subpoena requesting

    the

    IP address for the

    savecoopercrty@gamaiJ

    com_

    03/18/08_ I received information,

    from

    Google, that the IP

    address

    for savecoopercity@qmail.

    com

    is 65.13.44.186 and a

    chedc of

    the IP address revealed that it be ongs to AT T Southeast

    03120108, I forwarded AT T Southeast a subpoena and they provided

    me

    witti documentation

    th

    e listed

    IP

    address is registered to

    John

    Sims.

    Note

    :

    John

    SUns

    is

    a

    ooper

    ity

    Commissioner.

    03126/08, I called Commissioner Sims

    and

    explained to him that I was investigating a case

    involving a hate crime that was

    perpetrated

    against

    the

    Cooper GitY Mayor's campaign

    L

    ori

    Green.

    Commissioner

    Sims tokf me that

    he

    was aware

    of

    the incident

    and

    said

    deplore that ldnd of activity, I

    actually

    believe

    that.

    reaJJy, I

    th

    ink that it

    was

    done by themselves,.

    t.:

    be honest wit

    you_

    I in f

    ormed

    Commissioner Sims,

    that

    my tnvestigation had led

    me to

    site

    0 fv-.w

    savecoopercrty.

    blogspotcom) and

    1hat

    the

    investigation revei.rled

    that

    he

    (

    SCls

    )

    is r .e

    subscriber

    of

    the site_ Commissloner

    Sims

    admrtted

    to

    owning the blog-site and assured me

    he had nothing to do with

    th

    e hate crime against the Mayor's

    campaig

    n manager

    _

    CASE STAl'US: CI

    EXIC

    UNF

    CCN 10027 Date:

    31311 8

    Print Detective A. Avcdos

    Page4of6

    SlJpeMsor

    Sign:

    PIACTIVE

    Print

    ~ ~ ~

    f?AKER 1

    210

    ~ ~

  • 8/11/2019 John Simms

    33/47

    SHERJFF'S OFFICE -

    BRO

    ARD

    COUNlY

    , FLORIDA

    Investigative Action RepQ rt

    Case

    : CCOB-01-0347

    Zone

    :

    1606

    Offense

    :

    Hate Crime

    Comm issioner Sims

    said

    that

    he

    cfJd

    not

    COI1 UJ1it

    the

    crime and advised that

    he could acco

    unt for.

    every

    minute of my

    time,

    and

    has

    alibis

    that

    can prove

    where he

    was

    ,

    during

    the time

    of

    the

    in

    cident

    C

    ommiss

    ion

    er

    Sims was questiOned regarding the anti-Semitic messages

    on

    his blog-site and

    he

    r

    esponded that he is

    not

    the

    only

    pefSOO

    with

    access

    to the web-site,

    that

    he does not have control

    as to

    who

    posts such messages

    and that

    he does not condone that type

    of

    behavior.

    Commi

    ssioner

    Sims advised me that he does not

    see

    what one

    incident

    has to

    do with

    the other.

    However, Comm

    issioner

    Sims stated that

    he

    will fuDy cooperate

    with

    my investigation

    advising me

    that

    he wiD ask

    around and

    attempt to gather information as to the identity of the

    person

    responsible for the hate crme. Commissioner

    Sims

    added

    that

    he would follow with me in a

    coupteofdays:-

    _____________ _ - --

    03131/08, Commissioner Sims

    did

    not

    ca

    Q baclt a

    nd

    did

    not

    follow up with me regarOlflQ

    this

    matt

    er.

    (yesJno . 1 expiUn

    whJ

    or why not)

    1. Has

    the-identity

    of he offender been dear1y estabtished? NIA

    2

    Has adequate information

    to

    support

    an

    arrest, charge.

    and proseortion of the oi'Jender been

    obtained?

    NlA

    3. Is

    tne exact location

    of

    the

    offender known so that he/she can be taken into cuslody immeOiateiy?

    NIA

    4. Are

    tm re

    reasons

    beyond

    Law

    Enfotcement's

    oonlrol that prevellt

    the

    arrest charging. and prosecution

    of the

    offender? NIA,

    the

    victim

    decfines ID

    prosecute_

    5 H

    as

    all physral

    evidenceltatent

    print

    evidence been

    analyzed

    and

    evaluated

    i1

    an

    effort

    kl

    develop

    an

    independent

    ldenlffication

    of

    the

    offender? NIA

    6.

    Have

    al potential witnesses bee

    n

    re-interviewed in

    M

    effort to

    reaffirm

    the identity of the offender1 Hl

    7 Has there been a check of

    the

    suspect's custody

    s1atus

    utilizing all da:taba ses to

    indude

    BSO

    JMS

    ,

    Aorida

    Department of Corrections,

    Department d

    Juver.ae Justice,

    and

    NCJCJFac

    kl

    determine whether the suspect

    was in custody

    dwing

    the times of the listed offense(s)?

    NIA

    8.

    What is the primary o.4fense

    and case mmbe '? NIA

    -

    ASE

    ST

    ATUS:

    CIA

    EXIC

    UHF P-c/A P/ACTJVE

    l Pn

    Detective

    /.

    C

    CN

    10027

    Da1e: Supervisor

    I : ;CN

    03131108

    I

    Sign.

    Print Detective

    A.

    A

    valos

    l

    mt

    ~ B A K E R 1 2 1

    age5of6

    f

  • 8/11/2019 John Simms

    34/47

  • 8/11/2019 John Simms

    35/47

    4/5/2011 10:31 AM FILED FOR RECORD

    CFN. 20110216634 BOOK 27641 PAGE 155

    Return To:

    Richard J. Stone, Esq.

    Richard J. Stone, P.A.

    Tw

    o Datran Center, Penthouse

    1 A

    9130 S. Dadeland Blvd.

    Miami, FL 33156

    IN RE:

    Tiffi MARRIAGE OF

    JOHN

    SIMS, III,

    Petitioner/Former Husband,

    and

    KATHARINA POERSCHKE,

    Respondent/Former Wife.

    DATE.04/05/2011

    1 46

    .

    25

    AM

    HARVEY RUVIN CLERK OF COURT MIA-DADE

    IN TIIE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE

    11

    TI-I

    niDICI L CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA,

    IN

    AND FOR DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA

    FAMJL Y DIVISION

    CASE NO.:

    91

    -36013 FC 29

    ~ /

    GREED FINAL JUD

    GMENT

    THIS C USE came on for hearing before the Court on November 2, 2010 before The

    Honorable Alejandro Gamboa, designated hearing officer who thereupon, based upon the

    testimony, evidence, admissions and agreements reached between the parties entered his Agreed

    Recommended Order on the terms

    of

    the settlement agreed by the parties that was thereafter

    ratified and approved by this Court s Counsel Order and Order on the Agreed Recomrnended

    Order of hearing officer Gamboa on the terms of the settlement reached and agreed to between

    the parties and based thereon and the Court being otherwise duly advised in the premises, it is

    thereupon,

  • 8/11/2019 John Simms

    36/47

    CFN 20110216634 BOOK 27641 PAGE 156

    MIAMI-DADE CIRCUIT COURT

    FAMILY

    DIVI

    SION

    CASE NO

    .:

    91-36013

    FC

    29

    CONS

    IDERED,

    ORDERED

    and

    ADJUDGED:

    I The Respondent/Former

    Wife

    , KATHARINA POERSCHKE ' S Verified Motion

    as previous ly filed with this Court is granted as to the following. Respondent/Former Wife,

    KATHARINA POERSCHKE, 8325 S.W. 97th Street, Miami, FL 33156, do have and recover of

    and from the Petitioner/Former

    Husband

    JOHN SIMS,

    III

    8708

    S.W

    . 55 Street,

    Cooper

    City,

    FL

    33328-4324, the sum of Five-Thousand Seven-Hundred Fifty and 001100 ($5,750.00) Dollars

    representing past due and unpaid child support payments from November 2008,

    plus

    the sum of

    Twelve-Thousand Eight-Hundred Eighty-Four and 00/ 100 ( 12,884.00) Dollars for unpaid

    daycare and medical expenses for the care and well being

    of

    the

    pa

    rtie

    s '

    minor child, for a total

    due Respendent F-Ormer

    Wif e

    KATHARINA

    POERS HKE

    from

    Defendant/Petitioner/Former Husband, JOHN SIMS, III of Eighteen-Thousand Six-Hundred

    Thirty-Four and 00/ 100 ($18,634.00) Dollars, all total amounts are hereby found by the Coun to

    be due in the nature

    of

    support and which total sum shall bear in ter

    es

    t

    at

    the rate

    of 6%

    pe r

    annum until satisfied and for all of which let execution issue.

    2. It is further ordered and adjudged that the judgment Defendant/Petitioner/Former

    Husband,

    JOHN

    SIMS, III shall complete under oath Florida Rule

    of

    Civil Procedure Form. 1977

    (Fact Information Sheet), including all required attadunents. and serve it on the judgment creditor's

    attorney, Richard

    1

    Stone, Esq. at his address listed below within 45 days from

    the

    date

    of

    this Final

    Judgment, unless the Final Judgment is satisfied

    or

    post-judgment discovery is stayed. The

    2

  • 8/11/2019 John Simms

    37/47

    CFN. 20110216634 BOOK27641 PAGE 157

    MIAMI-DADE CIRCUIT COURT

    FAMILY DIVISION

    CASE

    NO.: 91-36013

    FC

    29

    Judgment Defendant/Petitioner/Former Husband, JOHN SIMS, III shall also timely file a Notice

    with the Clerk

    of

    the Coun,

    with

    a copy being sent to the Judgment Creditor Plaintiff s Attorney,

    certifying compliance with having timely completed and mailed the

    Fa

    ct

    Inf

    ormation Sheet.

    NOTICE AND WARNING is hereby given

    to

    the Defendant/Petitioner/Former Husband, JOHN

    SIMS, that the failure to comply with the fo regoing shall be grounds for the Court to hold the

    Judgment Defendant/Petitioner/Form

    er

    Husband,

    JOHN

    SIMS.

    in

    contempt

    of

    Co

    urt. The

    original

    of

    said Fact Information Sheet is hereby being mailed

    to

    the Defendant/Petitioner/Former

    Husband, JOHN SIMS, at the address listed below, in conjunction with the mailing of the copy

    of

    this Final Judgment.

    3 The Court hereby specifically reserves and retains jurisdiction

    of

    this case to enter

    any further orders based upon either a Motion For Contempt, or any other Motion seeking

    appropriate relief, in the event it

    s

    necessary to compel and order the judgr neRt

    Defendant/Petitioner/Former Husband, JOHN

    SIMS

    ,

    III

    to complete form

    1.977,

    including the

    submission

    of

    all required attachments, and have it mailed and served on the judgment

    creditors/P laintiff s attorney.

    APR 04 2 11

    DONE AND ORDERED at Miami, Dade County, Florida, on 011.

    IR

    liJTcOURTJUDGE

    Copies furnished t

    o: ltebert N.

    Scola

    The Honorable Alejandro Gamboa, Hearing Officer, Lawson E Thomas o u r t o u s dl n

    t

    n

    N.

    W

    First Avenue,

    Miami,

    FL 33128

    Respondent/Former Wife, KATHARINA POERSHKE, 8325 S.W. 97

    t

    Street, Miami,

    FL

    33156

    Richard J Stone, Esq., Richard

    J

    Stone, P.A., Two Datran Center, Penthouse 1 A, 9130

    S

    Dadeland Blvd., Miami, FL 33156

    Petitioner/Former Husband JOHN SIMS, III, 8708 S.W. 55 treet. Cooper City, FL 33328-4324

    Russell Spatz, Esq. , 14707 s. Dixie Hwy, Suite 302. Miami, FL 33176

    3

  • 8/11/2019 John Simms

    38/47

    ,.

    \

    STATE OF FLORIDA

    FLORIDA ELECTIO

    NS

    COMMISSION

    In

    Re

    :

    John

    B. Sims l l

    Case ro.:

    FEC

    12-011

    F.O. No.: FOFEC

    CONSENT

    FINAL ORDER

    The Respondent, John B Sims l l ( R

    es

    pondent''), and the Florida Elections Commission

    (Commission) agree that this Consent Order resolves

    all

    of the issues between the parties in this

    case. The parties jointly stipulate to the following facts, conclusions of aw, and order:

    FINDINGS OF

    FACT

    1

    On

    January

    23,

    2012, a complaint was filed with the Commission alleging that

    Respondent violated Floridas election laws

    2

    n

    or about January 23, 2013, Commission staff issued a Staff Recommendation,

    recommending to the Commission that there was probable cause to believe that Respondent

    violated the Florida Election Code

    3 The Respondent has exp1essed a desire to enter into negotiations directed toward

    reaching a consent agreement

    4 The parties stipulate to the following facts:

    a Respondent was elected to the Cooper City Commission, District One, in

    the 20 0 election

    b

    As

    a candidate for public office, Respondent was required

    to

    file periodic

    reports of all contributions received and expenditmes made

    in

    connection with his

    campaign Respondent was also required to certify that each campaign report was true,

    correct and complete.

    Page 1 of 4

    FEC

    1

    2 01

    1C

    onsen

    t

    Orclc:r

  • 8/11/2019 John Simms

    39/47

    c Respondent filed several reports that were incomplete and falsely reported

    information required to

    be

    reported in

    accordance

    with Chapter 106, Florida Statutes

    d

    During

    his campaign, Respondent

    accepted

    a cash contribution

    in

    excess

    ofthe legal limits

    e After

    being elected, Respondent made a contribution to

    his own

    campaign

    for 140

    f When Respondent filed his termination report on January 31, 2011, the

    Swnmary Page reflected that Respondent received 27 7 more n contributions

    than

    be

    made

    expenditures

    Respondent filed

    his

    amended Termination Report

    n

    May

    , 2013

    CONCLUSIONS

    OF LAW

    5 The Commission has jurisdiction over the parties

    to

    and subject matter

    of

    this

    cause, pursuant to Section

    106

    26, Florida Statutes

    6 Section 106 25(4Xi

    )3,

    Florida Statutes, allows the Commission

    to

    approve a

    consent agreement with a Respondent pri 1

    to

    the Commission finding probable cause that a

    violation of

    the election laws occurred The

    consent

    agieement has the same force and effect as

    a

    consent agreement reached

    after the

    Commission

    finds

    probable

    cause

    7 The Commission staff and the Respondent stipulate

    that

    the

    staff

    could

    pro

    ve the

    facts in paragraph 4 above and to the Commission's ability to impose a civil penalty

    n these

    cases

    ORDER

    8 The Respondent and the staff of

    the

    Commission have entered into this Consent

    OrdeJ:

    voltmtarily and upon

    advice

    of counsel

    9 The parties shall each bear

    its own

    attorney fees and costs

    that

    are in any

    way

    Pagel of 4

    FEC

    1

    2 0

    Consent Order

  • 8/11/2019 John Simms

    40/47

    _ .

    associated

    with

    this case

    10 The Commission will consider

    the

    Consent Ordei at its next available meeting

    1he

    Respondent voluntarily

    waiv

    es

    the

    right

    to any

    further proceedings Wldei

    Chapters 104, 106, and 120, Florida Statutes,

    and

    the right to appeal the Consent Order

    12

    This

    Consent Order is enforceable tmder Sections 106 265

    and 120

    69, Flmida

    Statutes The Respondent expressly waiv

    es

    any venue privileges and agrees that if enforcement

    of this Consent Order

    is

    necessary, v

    enue

    shall

    be

    in Leon County, Florida, and Respondent shall

    be responsible for all fees and costs associated with enforcement

    13

    f

    the

    Commission does

    not

    receive

    the

    signed Consent by June

    2

    ,

    2013,

    the

    staff withdraws this offet of settlement

    and

    will proceed

    with

    the case

    14

    Payment of the civil penalty

    must

    be

    made

    by cashier ' s check,

    mone

    y order, or

    attorney trust

    accoun

    t

    check

    and

    is

    a condition precedent

    to

    the Commission s consideration of

    the Consent Ordet 1he certified ftmds must be good for

    120

    days

    N LTY

    WH R OR

    based upon the foregoing facts

    and

    conclusions

    of

    law, the

    Commission

    finds

    that the

    Respondent

    has

    violated Sections

    106

    01 5),

    106 09(1), 106 141(1), and

    106 19(1Xc), Florida Statutes, and is fined $1 ,800 for the violations

    Therefore it is

    OR ERE that

    the

    Respondent shall remit to the Commission a civil

    penal

    ty in

    the

    amount of $1,800 inclusive of fees and costs The ci

    vil

    penalty shall be

    paid

    by c s h i e i check,

    money

    order, or attorney trust account check The certified funds must be good for 120 days

    The civil

    penalty should

    be made payable

    to

    the

    Florida

    Elections Commission, and sent

    to

    107

    W Gaines Street, Collins Building. Suite 224, I allahassee, Florida,

    32399-1050

    Page 3

    of

    4

    FEC 12. )11 ConsentOrder

  • 8/11/2019 John Simms

    41/47

    John B Sims Ill

    8708

    SW 55

    Street

    t

    Cooper City Florida 33328

    /

    \

    Kevin

    P Tynan

    Richardson

    y n ~ P L C

    8142 North University Drive

    Tamarac Florida 33321

    The ommi ion staff he1eby

    agrees

    and

    consents

    to the

    terms

    of this

    Consent

    Order on

    -

    - - - ----- 2013

    Eric Lipman

    General Counsel

    Florida Elections

    Commission

    107 W. Gaines Stzeets

    Collins Building Suite 224

    Tallahassee F L 32399-1 5

    Approved

    by

    the Florida Elections Commission

    at its

    regulru:ly scheduled meeting held

    on

    August 13-14 2013

    in

    I allahassee Florida

    Copies furnished to:

    Eric Lipman General Counsel

    Kevin

    P 1 ynan. Attorney for Respondent

    FEC

    onsent rder

    Tim Holladay Chairman

    Florida Elections Commission

    Date

    Page of

  • 8/11/2019 John Simms

    42/47

    65/ 89/ 2813 13:31

    9547214742

    /

    I

    '

    VERIFIED

    FINANCIAL STATEMENT

    PAGE 62/ 85

    JOHN SIMS, under penalty

    of

    per

    jUly

    verifies and says that the following information is

    true and correct according to hls

    best

    knowledge and belief:

    EMPLOYMENT

    AJ\ D

    INCOME

    OCCUPATION:

    EMPLOYED

    BY:

    ADDRESS:

    SOC

    SE

    C

    DATE

    OF

    BIRTH

    :

    PAY PER IOD:

    RArE

    OF

    PAY

    :

    UNEMPLOYED

    NA

    NA

    NA

    LAST YEAR'S INCOME

    1

    2

    4

    JTOss earned income last calendar

    ye;u

    (2012)

    ll

    othe1 income (same

    yeax

    )

    Total income taxes paid on above income

    (m

    el. Fed., FICA)

    Net Income

    AVERAGE GROSS MONTHLY

    INCOME

    FROM EMPLOYMENT

    Present gross income from emt:Jleymtmt City Commission

    Bonuses, commissions, allowances, overtime, tips,

    and similar payments

    Business income from

    SOW'CeS

    such

    as

    self-employment,

    partnership. clo

    se

    corporations, and/or

    independent contracts (gross receipts minus

    ordinaty and necessary expenses required

    to produce income)

    Disability benefits

    Workers' Compensation

    Une mp

    loyment Compensation

    Pension, retirement, or annuity payments

    Social Security benefits

    Spousal support receiv

    ed

    from previous marriage

    Interest and dividends

    Rental income (gross receipts minus ordinary and

    necessary

    expenses requiied to produce

    in

    rome

    Inco

    me

    from

    royalties,

    trust

    or

    estates

    Reimbursed expenses and

    in

    kind payments to the

    extent that they reduce personal living expens os

    Gains derived fi:om deaHng in pl'Operty (not

    including nonrecurring gains)

    Itemize any other income

    of

    a recurring

    nature

    26

    ,623

    00

    0

    5,.312.00

    21,31 1.00

    500

    0

    0

    0

    0

    600

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

  • 8/11/2019 John Simms

    43/47

    J

    OHN

    SIMS

    Ill

    CAM.l'AIGNFUND

    708 SW 55 Street / n O

    CooperCity, FL 333 8 v

    1028

    _.. DATE

    ~ ~ ~ f t y

    ~ s

    j

    $

    f O

    c '

    T f l

    DoUARS

    G l g?_

    I I

    REQUES

    :

    000051

    00303000000 100

    00

    ROlL ECIA 201 011 02 000005552850620

    JOBECIA P AC

    CT

    EQUES:

    OR

    A9Q73(;1J

    4050378 06'21

    201

    2

    Subpoena Processing East

    Y13 2-l l

    Philadelphia PA 19101

    \

  • 8/11/2019 John Simms

    44/47

    1

    4120

    14

    Facebook

    postmg

    under fire

    Coope

    r Crty Commissioner Sims comment caDed racst Archrves Sun-Sentme'

    Facebook posting

    un

    der fire ooper ity ommissioner Sims

    comm

    ent

    called racist

    South Ronda Sun - Sentinel - Fort Lauderdale Fla.

    Author: Ca

    rn

    ey, Heather

    Date Dec 6, 2012

    Start Page: B.1

    Section: Loca l

    Document

    Text

    - A racially charged Facebook comment posted by a city commissioner IS sparking controversy among residents and

    fom1er officials.

    "Just wanted to let you know ... today

    I

    received my

    13

    Social Security Stimulus Package. It contained

    two

    tomato

    seeds, cornbread mix, two discount coupons

    to KFC

    , an 'Obama Hope Change' bumper sticker, a prayer rug , a

    machine to blow smoke up

    my

    ass and a 'Blame it on Bush' poster for the front yard. The directions were in Spanish.

    Yours should arrive soon," read Commissioner John S

    ims

    '

    comm

    ent posted Friday.

    Sims did not return

    pho

    ne and email messages from the Sun Sentinel on Wednesday.

    The post received

    19

    "likes" and six comments supporting the statement before it was removed from the Facebook

    page about noon Wednesday.

    Cooper City resident James Jones, who is the Hollywood assistant police chi

    ef

    , said the state

    ment

    is demeaning and

    racist toward African-Americans, Hispanics and Muslims.

    Jones, who is white, wrote an email to the mayor and commissioners asking them to denounce S

    im

    s and request s

    resignation from the commi

    ss

    ion.

    "He is entrusted with a lot of power ... power to enact laws, ordinances, rules. and regulations. He 's entrusted with the

    power to spend tax dollars," said Jones. "He's entrusted

    with

    too much

    pub

    lic power to harbor such feelings

    of

    racism

    and anger."

    Sims, who is known in the community for his conservative views, replied to Jones' email Wednesday

    with,

    I hope you

    enjoyed it"

    Gl

    ad

    ys

    VVil

    son, who has defended Sims before, said the commissioner has a great sense

    of

    h

    umor

    and wouldn't aim

    insults specifically at any ethnic group. She called the

    Fa

    cebook post a "light-hearted

    jok

    e."

    "There's always someone like James who wants

    to

    pick apart

    what

    someone says ... A d

    umb

    James Jones who sticks

    his head up out

    of

    the mole hole,"

    VVil

    son

    sa

    id. I

    wo

    n't say [the comment] was appropriate

    but

    I won't say that

    it

    was

    inappropriate.

    But

    fom1

    er Cooper City Mayor Debby Eisinger,

    who

    often clashed

    with

    Sims, called the

    comm