Jon Christian Ryter - The Manchurian Candidate

8/14/2019 Jon Christian Ryter - The Manchurian Candidate

1/25

Jon Christian Ryter The Manchurian Candidate Deceiving America

Page 1 of 25

Author: Jon Chr istian RyterDate: August 2, 2009 (updated 7-12-10)http://www.jonchristianryter.com/2009/090802.html

enyan-born, Indonesian citizen Barack Hussein Obama hoodwinked America.Or rather, his Marxist handlers who found the Frank Mar shall Davis-protgand created the Obama-illusion from a gaunt, determined anti-white, radicalMarxist-Muslim community activist did. They manipulated his meteoric rise to

power. Moreover, using the conquest strategy first elucidated bySaul Alinskyin Rules ForRadicals, they used their wealth and political power to leverage a media blackout so complete

that nothing negative about Obama appeared in print. Not even the fact that although all theempirical evidence says he is not, nor ever was, a constitutional citizen of the United States,he was never challenged nor investigated by any mainstream newspaper or electronic mediaOutlet.

The Certificate of Live Birth which Obama claimed as his original 1961 birth certificate was afacsimile authorized by the far left GOP governor of the State, LindaLingle, as a favor to Obama. The document was issuedw it h o u t h i sp r o v i d in g f a c t u a l e v id e n c e t h a t h i s b i r t h t o o k p la c e in H a w a i i . AState-authorized birth certificate, date-stamped Nov. 6, 2007 on the reverseside of the document (pictured below), began a long string of obfuscations to

conceal the truth not only about who Barack Hussein Obama was andwhere he was born but, more precisely, what the money barons whocoughed up an estimated $900 million to elect him planned to do with thenation they had just purchased. Of course, what they plan to do with thisnation becomes terrifyingly more clear with each passing day. They plan tostrip it of its wealth and use that wealth to finance Utopia, leaving thestaggering debt of a bankrupt Republic in the laps of the working class taxpayers of a gang-raped and economically-defiled nation.


2/25


Page 2 of 25

Even though it is the responsibility of the Congress of the United States, pursuant to Section 3of the 20th Amendment and 3 USC 15, respectively, to fully vet the qualifications ofpresidential candidatesspecifically, that the candidate is a natural born citizen of the UnitedStatesthe Democratically-controlled 110th Congress chose to vet Republican presidentialnominee John Sidney McCain because he was born in the Panama Canal Zone on Aug. 26,1936. The Senate concluded, in Senate Resolution 511, that because Sen. McCain was the

son of a natural born US male, and a naturalized mother, he met the constitutional criteriarequired to be classified as a natural born citizen. McCain qualifies under 8 USC 1401(c) or(d).

When it's finally and conclusively substantiated that Obama was born at the Coast ProvinceGeneral Hospital in Mombasa, Kenya and that he did not arrive in Hawaii until Aug. 8,19614 days after his birth, Obama will claim US natural birth rights under 1401, Chapter12, Subchapter III. However, under subsection (c) both parents must be citizens of the UnitedStates. Barack Hussein Obama, Sr. was a natural-born citizen of Kenya, and thus (c) doesnot applynor does subsection (d). And finally, in addition to being a natural citizen ofKenya, Barack Hussein Obama, Jr. is a naturalized citizen of Indonesia. The only countryhe does not appear to be a citizen of, is the United States since there are no archival records

anywhere showing that Kenyan-Indonesian citizen Obama (of whom thereis a record) applied for citizenship in the United States. It appears he simplyassumed it was his right because his mother was a natural citizen of theUnited States.

When Philip J. Berg, the first lawyer to do so, filed his lawsuit againstObama on July 2, 2008, he produced for the court evidence ofObama 'scitizenship in Indonesia under the name Barry Soetoro. He asked thecourt to force Obama to produce a certified vault copy of a hospital-issuedlong-form affidavit of live birth from Hawaii, a certified copy of hisCertificate of Citizenship (for a naturalized citizen), and a certified copy of

his oath of allegiance to the United States (an oath required beforecitizenship is granted). Berg has appealed the dismissal of his US District Court case beforeJudge R. Barclay Surrickto the US Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia,No. 08-4340. Furthermore, Berg also presented evidence to show that Obama 's mother,Stanley Ann Dunham , never lived at the address she published in a Honolulu newspaper'spaid birth announcement for her offspring, which appeared on or around Aug. 13, 1961.Shehad only been back in the country for five days when the birthannouncement appeared.Dunham went through great effort to make itappear that her son had been born in Hawaii because she had alreadychecked and knew she could not transfer US citizenship rights to him due tothe restrictions in theI m m i g r a t i o n a n d N a t u r a l iz a t i o n A c t o f D e c.

24 , 1952 .

Dunham fell under (h): "...a person born after May 24, 1934 outside thelimits and jurisdiction of the United States of an alien father and a motherwho is a citizen of the United States who, prior to the birth of such person,resided in the United States."(Prior to May 24, 1934 wom en could nottransmit citizenship to their offspring.) The law w as ame nded in1940, 1941, 1946 and 1952. Under the provisions of the 1952 law, a child born toone US citizen parent and one a lien parent,the US citizen parent was re quired


3/25


Page 3 of 25

to have b een ph ysically present in the United States or its outlying possessionsfor 10 year s prior to the child's birth, with at least 5 of those years falling afterthe age of 14.Under that law, Stanley Ann Dunham could not transmitcitizenship to her son, Barack Hu ssein Obama, Jr. since she would had to havebeen 19-years o f age whe n she gave bir th. She was 18-years, 8 months and 5 daysold on Au g. 4, 1961. In 1986, Congress decided the restrictions in the Immigration and

Naturalization Act of Dec. 24. 1952 were too onerous, and amended the law once more. The5-year provision was reduced to two. In 1994 the provision was reduced again. This time,from two years to one. That provision has remained unchanged for the past 15 years.

Howe ver, since Obama was bor n in 1961 and not in 1986 or 1994, he cannotclaim status based on law s that went into effect 25 to 33 years after his birth.Based o n the constitutional restrictions to the definition of being "na tural born"that existed at the time of Bar ack Obam a's birth at 7:24 p.m. on Aug. 4, 1961 inMomb asa, Kenya, and the add itional restrictions placed on w hen the child of theUS citizen mother w ho had to have been bo rn after each change in the law tobenefit from the changes each time the law was am ended, there will never be atime when B arack Obama can be construed to be a natural born citizen of the

United States.Based on that fraudandto maintain the integrity of the Constitutionof the United StatesBarack Hu sseinObama must be removed from office. Hemust also be charged with election fraud,and charged with fraud for seeking an officehe was not qualified, by birth, to hold.

Furthermore, every piece of legislation hesigned into law must be declared null andvoid since he did not have the constitutional

authority to affix his signature to them.Every Executive Order, Presidential Decreeor Proclamation must also be construed tobe null and void. And, any and all politicalappointments made by his Administrationmust also be nullified since an illegal aliencannot make presidential appointments inthe United States of America.

There can be no legal defense accepted byany federal court in the land in which

Congress can reasonably argue that theyacted in good faith, and with clean hands, believing Obama was a natural born citizen. Thus,any laws they enacted, or presidential appointments they confirmed should not be allowed tostand. Their hands are not clean. They are complicit in the crimes committed byObama byswearing to be a natural born citizen and eligible to seek the office President. The moneybarons who filled their campaign war chests with money needed them to turn a blind eye tothe eligibility question. What makes their action criminal is that they properly vetted Sen.John McCain but deliberately chose not to vet Obama even though there was a myriad ofquestions surrounding his birth in Kenya, his mother's age and the question of whether or not


4/25


Page 4 of 25

she could transfer birthright status to her son, or his step-father,Lolo Soetoro, renouncingany claims to citizenship Obama might have to secure his citizenship in Indonesia. Whatmakes not vetting Obama suspicious is the fact that vetting the qualifications of apresidential candidate was not a precedent-setting event. (Below, left, is a photograph of whatis purported by California attorneyOrley Taitz to be a copy ofObama 's long-form Kenyanbirth certificate.)

On behalf of former AmbassadorAlan K eyes ,Taitz filed a new motion in the US District Courtfor the Central District of California to expeditethe authentication of what Taitz claims is a actualcopy ofObama 's original long-form birthcertificate from the Coast Province Hospital inMombasa, Kenya. (It should be noted that afraudulent copy of what was also purported to beObama 's Kenyan birth certificate popped up onthe Internet in July. It was easily proven to be ahoax.)

There are two versions of where the CoastProvince birth certificate came from. The firstversion is that when she filed for divorce fromBarack Hussein Obama, Sr., in Feb., 1964,Stanley Ann Dunham needed to be able toprove she was the mother ofBarack HusseinObama, Jr. and that Obama, Sr . was the father.She secured a copy of his birth certificate from theCoast Hospital in Mombasa. Certified copies of

that document would have been found in two places: her lawyer's files and in the archive of

the Court in Honolulu, Hawaii where her pleading were heard, and the divorce granted.Berg subpeonaed the long-form Kenyan birth certificate from that court. The archived Obama vObama divorce file had been sanitized, and the birth certificate had been removed. Withoffers of rewards for a certified copy ofObama, Jr .'s birth certificate now reaching six digits,those who sanitized the court files may very well have sold the document. Or, the copy now inthe public domain could just as easily have come from the sealed file ofStanley AnnDunham 's Hawaiian divorce lawyer since that certified copy ofObama 's Kenyan birthcertificate would have been gathering dust in a storage warehouse in Honolulu for the past 45years. Anyone who had worked for that attorney or for the storage facility where historicrecords were stored could have had access to those files. Once the asking price for the filesexceeded someone's fear of prison, it was simply a matter of time before the certified copies of

Barack Hussein Obama's Kenyan birth certificate turned up in the public domain. Toauthenticate the document, the chain of custody back to the court files has to be established.

Have any other cand idates been vetted?

Long before the US Senate vetted McCain, they vetted Sen. Lowell Weicker, Jr . ofConnecticut who was born in Paris, France. They also vetted former Michigan Gov.GeorgeRomney, who was born in Mexico. Sen.Barry Goldwater was born in Arizona Territoryin 1909, three years before Arizona became a State. All of these candidates were Republicans.


5/25


Page 5 of 25

Had they been Democrats, the issue of natural born status would likely never have beenraised by the media. So, you can see, this is not a question that never arose beforeBarack Hussein Obama. Obama is simply the first candidate for the White House thattried to obfuscate the truth. Obama is alsothe first candidate who se questionablequalifications we re no t properly vetted

by the US Sen ate.When he filed his civil action, #08-cv-4083against Obama on Aug. 21, 2008, formerPennsylvania Deputy Attorney General PhilipJ. Berg asked US District Court Judge R.Barclay Surrickto force Obama to producehis certificate of live birth. That was the onlydocument requested byBerg that would proveObama was a natural born citizen and, thus, beeligible to seek the office of President of theUnited States. However, Obama does not havea live birth document that was witnessed by thebirthing doctor simply because he was not bornin any of the four hospitals in Honolulu. Whichis whyBerg also sought the evidence whichwould prove the only form of citizenshipObama could possess is that of a naturalizedcitizen. Berg asked for a copy of his certificateof naturalization, and a copy of his Oath ofAllegiance which he would have if he hadapplied for citizenship in the United States.What caused the mainstream media tocompletely ignore the volume of evidence which

supported, as fact, that Barack Hussein Obama was not only not born in the UnitedStates, but that his mother was not old enough to transfer natural born citizenship birthrightsto him? It was a statement to the media byDr. Chiyome Fukino, the Director of theHawaiian Department of Health.

As questions concerning Obama 's birth translated into lawsuits demanding that Obama produce a hospital-issued birth certificate proving he was born at the Kapi'olani Hospital inHonolulu (where he insists he was born), Dr. Fukino stepped into the middle of the fraysaying: "There have been numerous requests for Sen.B a r a c k H u s s e in O b a m a 's officialbirth certificate. State law(Hawaiian revised statute 338-18) prohibits the release of acertified birth certificate of persons who do not have a tangible interest in the vital record.

Therefore, I as Director of Health for the State of Haw aii, along w ith the Registrar of VitalStatistics who have statutory authority to oversee and maintain these type of vital records,have personally seen and verified that the Haw aii State Department of Health hasS e n .O b a m a 's original birth certificate on record in accordance with State policies andprocedures."

Sounds like the matter should have ended, right? No . The fly in the ointment of thatstatement is "...according to State policies and procedures." In most States you secure a birthcertificate when you are born in a hospital, a birthing center or at home with a midwife


6/25


Page 6 of 25

(someone other than family who witnesses the live birth). A long form certificate of live birthis prepared by the doctor, nurse or midwife at the hospital or birthing center that details all ofthe vital statistics of the live birth. In the 48-continuous States, the long form birth documentis filed with the local registrar in the county where the birth occurred, and it is also filed withthe State Registrar. The signatory witness, by law, should be (in order of importance), thedoctor or midwife who delivered the baby; some other person in attendance or witness to the

live birth; or, in the absence of such a person, the father or mother or the person in charge ofthe premises where the birth occurred.

Dr. Fukino 's statement to the media was carefully parsed with legalese that made it soundlike both he and the Registrar had actually seen and/or examinedObama 's long form,handwritten birth certificate (used in 1961), and that such a document not only exists, butconclusively proves that Obama was born in Hawaii. It does not.

In the State of Hawaii you can secure acertificate of live birth four different ways.That, of course, suggests that three of theways do not entail providing demonstrableproof that the live birth actually occurred inHawaii. The first method, under Sec. 57-8&9of the State code concerns the traditionalmanner in which you received your birthcertificate. Your mother gave birth in ahospital. The birth was witnessed andrecorded. A long form birth certificate wasprepared by the doctor and/or hospitalregistrar. It contained all of the vitalstatistics about the parents and the baby. Itproduces the type of birth certificate you and

I possess or, at least, are familiar with. It wasissued based on substantive proof of that livebirth within the United States. Whenever wesee a birth certificate from any US State,logic immediately suggests that the birthcertificate would not exist if the persondescribed on the document was not lawfullyborn in this country. However, as you areabout to see, there are circumstances whenthat may not be true. Particularly in the State of Hawaii.

If the baby was born at home without the benefit of a doctor or midwife, under Sec. 57-8&9,an original Certificate of Live Birth (resembling the first birth certificate, above) would beissued without any of the vital statistics. There is no proof that the live birth took place inHawaii. If the parent brings the affidavit to the local registrar, they are required to produce adrivers' license or, in lieu of that, a utility bill to prove residency. However, if there is not alocal registrar, the parent can simply mail the affidavit to the State Registrar's office, and aCertificate of Life Birth is issued without any evidence that you were even living in Hawaii theday before the affidavit was mailed to the registrar.


7/25


Page 7 of 25

In the third variation, the mother does not immediately register the birth of her child, underSec. 57-8&9, 18, 19 & 20, of the Territorial Public Health Statistics Act in the 1955 RevisedLaws of Hawaii (which was in affect in 1961). The parent or parents can file a summarystatement in a delayed filing up to, but not beyond the child's first birthday. Finally, in 1955State law was amended making the Lt. Governor the de facto Registrar of Births. Under 338-41, if a child was born in Hawaii for whom no physician or midwife filed a certificate of live

birth, and for whom no Delayed Certificate of Live Birth was filed before the child's firstbirthday, then a Certificate of Live Birth could still be issued upon testimony of an adult(usually the subject person in need of proof o f birth). The Lt. Governor (and inObama 's case, Linda Lingle, the governor of the State) has the sole discretion to decidewhat "evidence"if anysatisfied the burden of proof needed to secure a Certificate of LiveBirth. In Obama's case, the "bu rden" was sim ply the asking by a United StatesSenator for a Certificate of Life Birth.Obama 's birth certificate was issued by the Stateof Hawaii on Nov. 6, 2007, and date stamped on the reverse of the document.

Had Obama been a conservative Republican candidate and not a Marxist Democrat, themedia would have not only challenged his right to seek the office of President, but his right torun for the Illinois State Senate and the US Senate as well. Congressand the New YorkTimesdidn't have a problem raising the question about whether or not McCain could run

since he was born in the Panama CanalZone. McCain had a natural born USfather and a naturalized mother.McCain was vetted by the US Senateeven though he qualified as naturalborn under the Immigration andNaturalization Act of 1934.

==============(YouTube URL:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5FlEbBZLzo0)==============

When the evidence suggests there maybe something wrong with thequalifications and/or ethics of a sittingDemocrat, it is no longer politically-correct to challenge them in the publicsquarenot even by their politicalopponents. Yet, the Democrats and thefar left mainstream media will alwaysattack the ethics lapses and political orpersonal philandering of Republicans.For Republicans to have a level playingfield, they need to adopt SaulAlinsky's 1971 playbook: Rules ForRadicals. Rules For Radicals which hasbecome the Democratic Party's game

book to defeat conservatives. And, it has been an effective ploy.


8/25


Page 8 of 25

Alinsky's Rule Fourwhich should have been Rule Onedemands that you make yourenemy live up to his own rules.Alinskyargued that you can destroy your conservativeopponent using this tactic because no human on Earthconservative or liberalcan faithfullylive by the righteous code Christianity established as proper conduct for man withoutfaltering. In a bizarre double standard, liberals don't even have to pretend to live by a moralcode beyond that which they set for themselves. And, when they have moral or ethical lapses,

they are judged by no one.

That's why when the FBI videotaped CongressmanW illiam Jefferson [D-LA] on Aug. 3,2005 in a sting operation taking a $100 thousand bribe from a Northern Virginia investorwearing a wire, he didn't have any trouble getting reelected to his Louisiana 2ndCongressional District seat in 2006. In fact, he won reelection with 57% of the vote eventhough the FBI found $90 thousand in marked $100 bills wrapped in aluminum foil andstored in frozen food containers in the freezer in the basement of his Washington, DC home.Because the Right does not useAlinsky's Rules For Radicals to attack their politicalopponents, there was no public outcry for Jefferson 's resignation. Neither House SpeakerNancy Pelosi [D-CA] nor House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer [D-MD] moved to removehis congressional credentials, his committee assignments nor did they publicly or privatelypressure him to resign.

Jefferson even had the audacity to file a lawsuit against the Justice Department for violatingthe separation of powers between the Executive and Legislative branches of governmentbecause the FBI raided his Congressional officewith a judge-issued search warrantlookingfor records ofJefferson 's dealings in Ghana, Nigeria and Cameroon.Jefferson 's lawsuit, appealing a July, 2006 decision by Chief US DistrictCourt Judge Thomas F. Hogan of the DC District Court which found thesearch legal. Jefferson demanded the return of all of papers seized from hisofficeincluding all of the evidence the FBI found that established his guilt.When the search happened on May 20, 2006, House Speaker Pelosi also

demanded that all of the material seized by the FBI be returned toJefferson until the US District Court could decide whether or not the FBIhad the authority to raid a Congressional office. Pelosi actually thoughtCongress was above the law. Jefferson was not arrested until he lost hisHouse seat to Vietnamese-American CongressmanAng Joseph Cao [R-

LA] in a three-way run-off election in 2008.

The Leftand several establishment members of the GOP who are in bedwith the world's wealthiest bankers and industrialistsare still absolutelypetrified of recently resigned Alaska Governor Sarah Palin. They fear thatPalin will ignite a grassroots Republican take over of the House and Senate

in 2010. Even worse, they fear Palin will do what Reagan did in 1980stymie the plans of the globalists to collapse 178 world currencies andreplace them with an international monetary system controlled by a worldgovernment in the Hague. Unknown to the American people, we were on thebrink of world government in 1979, with the World Bank's SDR currency

poised to replace the US dollar that was authorized byJimmy Carter 's second TreasurySecretary. G. W illiam M iller who replacedW erner Michael Blumenthal in 1979.Reagan changed history. The globalists, both Republican and Democrat, are afraid Palin ,


9/25


Page 9 of 25

whom Michael Reagan called a reincarnation of his father, will do the same. They veryadroitly usedAlinsky's Rules For Radicals against her.

Palin , or her current financial backersor both, realized something that the Christian FarRight, which divorced itself from the Republican Party in 2006 and allowed the Marxist FarLeft, using the Democratic Party and ACORN (which has rebranded its parent organization as

Community Organizations International) to steal Congress that year, still hasn't grasped.The money barons who have controlled the electoral system of America with an iron fist forthe last 100 years refined the structure of the two party system in the 1920s to make sure thatonly a Democrat or a Republican can win a seat in Congress or, more importantly, the WhiteHouse. The money barons have mastered the art of using third party candidates as pawns onthe chessboard to guarantee that the horse they are backing in the race crosses the finish linefirst. The Democrats unleashed their version ofRules For Radicals on Palin while she wasstill McCain 's running mate, accusing hernot the Republican National Committeeofwasting $100 thousand on designer label clothes, transforming herself from a moth to abutterfly at the expense of GOP donors.

And, before the ink on that story was barely dry, the leftwing media reported on a myriad ofethics complaints which had been filed against the Governor, beginning with the firing of thehead of the Alaska State Police, Wa lter Monegan, for refusing to fire her former brother-in-law, Michael Wo oten, an Alaska State Trooper, who abused his power and threatenedPalin 's sister during a nasty divorce.

Palin appointed Kenai, Alaska police chiefChuck Kopp, to replace Monegan . And, beforethe ink was dry on that appointment,Dai lyKos .com attacked Palin 's appointment,claiming she had knowingly appointed a sex offender to head the State Police. Koppadmitted he had been accused by a city employee of sexual harassment. A letter of reprimandfrom the City of Kenai was placed in his employment jacket. Kopp appealed the reprimandand the letter of reprimand was removed from his personnel file. Nevertheless, it ended up on

Dai lyKos .

Kopp declined the appointment to minimize the attacks on Gov. Palin. The Democraticlegislature in Alaska opened their own investigation ofPalin over the Monegan firing and,in the end, had to admit she had done nothing wrong. Fourteen ethics complaints werelaunched against Palin , and she successfully fended off all themat a cost of a half milliondollars.

Unlike Barack Obama who used Attorney General Eric Holder to defend him against thelawsuit brought byBerg, and who is using two US Attorneys to fight the lawsuit broughtagainst him, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, Senate Majority Leader Harr y Reid, and

former Vice President Dick Cheneyby New Jersey attorneyMario Apuzzo on behalf ofCmdr. Charles Kerchner (USNR), Palin hired her own lawyers to fight the attack on hercharacter that was supposed to drive her out of politics. Palin now has a personal legal billtotaling over a half million dollars.

Even after the election was over, the Rules For Radicals flood of complaints against Palin continued. Although they were frivolous, they still required Palin 's lawyer, Thomas VanFlein, who does not work pro bono, to address them. The latest complaint was filed by Alaskaresident Linda Kellen Biegel, who said Palin attended a public function wearing a jacket


10/25


Page 10 of 25

made by a company that sponsored the governor's husband,Todd , who races snowmachines. (How would she know that?) Biegel thought it was an abuse ofPalin 's position.The four times that Palin left her official duties as governor to attend campaign events forSen. Saxby Cham bliss, who was in a tight run-off election to keep his US Senate seat,taxpayers in Alaska filed complaints against her for leaving her post. Each time, the ethicsboard ruled there was no evidence of wrongdoing. And each time Palin owed Van Flein a

few dollars more.

Unlike most politicians who leave office far, far richer than they were the day they took theiroath of office, Sarah Palin is one of only a handful of politicians in the history of thiscountry who actually left office in debt. Why did she resign before her term of office was up?Because theAlinskyites did their jobs very well. Had she remained in office, Sarah Palin would have been bankrupt by the end of her first term of office. Who in their right mindwould want four more years of that? (I think if I was one ofLinda Kellen Biegel'sneighbors, I would have taken up a petition asking her to movemaybe to Chicago.)

By the way, if you're paying attention to the "Rules For Radicals" attacks on Palin that arenot yet targeting any other potential Republican 2012 presidential candidates, it shouldconvince you of one thing. The "New Left" believes of all the Republicans who might benominated in 2012, only one: former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin can beat Obama. Maybethat's why another "patriotic" Democrat in Alaska, Kim Chatman, filed a complaint with theState suggesting that Palin 'sAlaska Fund Trust, initiated to raise the money through privatedonations to pay off the legal bills she's incurred fighting off frivolous charges, might beillegal. (When Bill Clinton came under attack for the Monica Lewinskyaffair, and for thevarious "-Gates" which involved the Clintons , he raised several million dollars throughprivate donations. I wonder ifKim Chatman wrote to US Attorney General Janet Reno atthe time to suggest that private fund raising by the Clintons to pay for their private legal billsmight be illegal?)

An Anchorage lawyer, Thoma s M. Danielwas hired by the Alaska State Personnel Board toinvestigate the complaint. Daniel issued a nine-page report detailing his findings, suggestingthere may have been some type of impropriety in howPalin set up the fund because she useda friend, Kristen Cole, as its trustee. The impropriety? Palin had previously appointedCole to positions on the Alaska Board of Agriculture and on the Royalty Oil & GasCommission. How that creates an impropriety for a friend serving as a non-paid trustee of afund to cover Palin 's legal bills is a stretch that only a lawyer could make. Daniel's releasingthat information to the media itself, according to Palin 's lawyer, Tom Van Flein, wasillegal. But, when you're a Democrat, those nuisance laws simply don't apply to you.

Buying America

On the eve of the New Hampshire primary, Jan. 8, 2008, with Hillary Clinton leadingBarack Obama, and poised to win that primary with 39.4% of the vote toObama 's 36.8%,an elated Clinton became instantly dispirited as one of her lieutenants whispered in her ear.At that precise momentas Hillarywas winning the New Hampshire primarytheRockefeller-aligned megabanks had just withdrawn their financial support from Clinton and gave it to Obama. Those banks were Go ld m a n S a c h s , M o r g a n S t a n l e y , Ci tig r o u pa n d J P M o r g a n Ch a s e . Those same banks, in lesser amounts, also financed the campaignof designated loser Sen. John McCain


11/25


Page 11 of 25

(http://www.jonchristianryter.com/2008/080201.html ). If the names of any of those bankssound familiar today, it might be because they, particularlyGoldman Sachs, were majorrecipients of the stimulus funds that our children, grandchildren and great-great-greatgrandchildren will be paying back to the money barons (who actually benefited from thelargess of the public) for the next hundred years or so. The biggest bank backingObama atthat time was Union Bank of Switzerland (SwissBanc, better known today as UBS). UBS is

aligned with George Soros.

On the advice of the president ofSoros ' Open Society Institute,Areyeh Neier, who justhappened to be the founder of the Students for a Democratic Society, George Soros hosteda fund-raiser for US Senate candidate Barack Hussein Obama in the fall of 2004. Thesoiree took place at his New York home where quid pro quo conversations that might not beconstrued as legal could not be seen by prying eyes or overheard by prying ears. Obama, justbreaking into national politics, was the new fish in the stream. Soros was just checking to seeif the new fish was worth the bait. Soros , a naturalized citizen, wanted to control a naturalborn US president. It's unclear ifSoros knew, at that time, that Obama was likely neithernaturalized or natural born. At the moment, Soros was certain of only one thing: Obama was charismatic. Because he was, he was electable. Neier convinced Soros that Obama wassomeone he wanted to "bring along."

The Obama Circle of Influence

Obama 's close ties with radicalism began with ACORN-founderW ade Rathke , 60's radicalcommunist organizer Saul Alinsky, and with cop-killer SDS/Weatherman Bill Ayers.Included in that group was fellowStudents for a Democratic Society[SDS] member CarlDavidson who was an early supporter ofObama. Davidson, like Marxist 60's socialprogressive Hillary Rodha m was an ardent follower of the radical communist philosophy ofSaul Alinsky.

Davidson is an American Marxist who serves on the national steering committee ofUnitedfor Peace and Justice. He was co-chair ofChicagoans Against War and Injustice, and he also

served as an organizer for the Solidarity Economy Network.And, he was also the national secretary of the SDS. Davidson and Jane Fonda 'scommunist ex-husband, TomHayden , formed anorganization called theVenceremos Brigadewhich smuggled

hundreds of radicalAmericans to Cuba towork as sugar canecutters as they werebeing indoctrinated byCuban intelligence

officials, preparing them for the communistoverthrow of the United States. In the mid-1990s Davidson became one of the architects ofwhat was dubbed the New Partya Marxist coalition of Maoists, Trotskyites, Communist


12/25


Page 12 of 25

Party USA membersand ACORN. It was through the New Partythat Davidson met, andjoined forces with, Barack Obama. Throughout Obama 's campaign for the White House,Davidson was one of his fiercest campaigners. Davidson worked with, or for, Obama atleast since 2002 when he and former Chicago mayor Harold Washington-aide, MarilynKatz , organized Obama 's antiwar rally in Chicago. In 2005 Davidson and Katz authoredthe social progressive antiwar book, Stopping War, Seeking Justice. The pair now plays a

dominate role in the Committee of Correspondence for Democracy and Socialism (anoffshoot of the Moscow-controlled Communist Party of the United States [CPUSA].

As you study the backgrounds of the radicals within Obama 's circle of influence, you discoverone thing: they all come from middle class affluence.W ade Rathke , the founder of ACORN,aWilliams College dropout, came from an upper middle class family. Bill Ayers, who callshimself a small "c" communist, came from an upper middle class family as well. His father,Thomas Ayers, had been CEO of Commonwealth Edison.Ayers has out-moneyed hisfather. Today he lives in a lavish home in the upscale Hyde Park neighborhood in Chicago. Helives on a comfortable six-digit income. (And, if you recall, before he moved into the largewhite house at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue in Washington, Obama lived in Hyde Park, too.)Communist instructors in what used to be our best universities and colleges are tenured bygrants from America's wealthiest and most politically-inclined market capitalists who ownand control the Council on Foreign Relations (which was created in 1920 to educate Americaon the need for world government). Funding the CFR, and funding grants for colleges anduniversities are families with names like: Carnegie, DuPont, Ford, Morgan , Pew,Rockefeller and late bloomer George Soros. Their foundations purchase departmentchairs in most major universities. In doing so, they control the educational agenda of those

departments. In a 1944 speech to partyloyalists, six-time Socialist Partycandidate for President of the UnitedStates, Norman Thomas, made thiscomment: "The American people will

never knowingly adopt socialism. But,under the name of Liberalism, they will

==============

YouTube URL:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WLwS7JXTnqs.

==============

adopt every fragment of the socialist

program until one day America w ill be asocialist nation without knowing how ithappened." He then made a veryprofound statement when he said" "I no

longer need to run as a presidential candidate for the Socialist Party. The Democrat Partyhas adopted our platform."

Anyone who doubts that statement need only read the latest Rasmussen Poll on politicalideology. Taken in April, 2009, it suggests that the billions of dollars the foundations have


13/25


Page 13 of 25

spent to brainwash generations of American citizens has not been spent in vain. The pollclearly shows that only 53% of Amer ican adults believe that mar ket capitalism isbetter than so cialism . If you could look at a breakdown of the ages of the respondents whofeel that market capitalism is the better system (which I have not been privy to), you will mostlikely find the majority of that group are 45-years of age or older. The poll did reveal that, byan 11-to-1 margin, Republicans favor capitalism. Twenty percent of the respondents believe

socialism is better. And 27% aren't sure which is the better political system.(And youwondered how Obama got the keys to the White House.)

Adults under the age of 30 who were included in the study were much more evenly divided.Thirty-seven percent believed market capitalism was better. Thirty-three percent said theywould prefer socialism (convinced that the government would supply everything they needand that the rich people would pay for it.) The remaining 30% were unsure. Apparently noneof that 63% studied the histories of the Soviet Union, Nazi Germany, communist China, NorthKorea or, closer to home, communist Cuba. Or, they are simply indifferent to their fate.

The Clowar d-Piven Strategy

In the May 2, 1966 issue of The Nation, two radical Columbia University professors,RichardAndrew Clowar d and Frances Fox Piven offered their strategy for forcing politicalchange in America through orchestrated crisis. (Remember the financial crisis that broughtBarack Obama to the surface like pond scum in a swamp?)That is the political strategy created byCloward and Piven.Their strategy, the Columbia Universityinstructors insisted,would hasten the fall of capitalism and the free enterprisesystem by overloading the government bureaucracy with aflood of impossible demands, pushing society into a crisisthat it can't be solved and collapsing the economy. Cloward,Piven andAlinskywho viewed their philosophy as the

Bible of the radical movementwere convinced thatfomenting political, social and financial chaos wouldultimately result in an armed revolution that would lead to acommunist takeover of the United Statesregardless ofwhich side revolted (although they fully expected the under class to revolt against the upperclass).

In the 1960s, as Cloward and Piven preached their radical gospel of socialunrest, the black community in the urban centers of America were the firstto respond to their message of change. The first disciple they enlisted wasSyracuse University of New York chemistry professor George Alvin Wiley.

Wiley, in turn, enrolled his most activist students as his foot soldiers.Beginning in New Yor k City, Wiley's civil rights foot soldiersstormed w elfare offices in New Y ork and New Jer sey, and slowlyover time, all across the country, deman ded their "right" to aliving at the expen se of the taxpayers.Wileyfounded the NationalWelfare Rights Organization in 1967. On Aug. 8, 1973 the New York Timesreported thatWileywent missing while sailing in Chesapeake Bay. He is

presumed to have died. His body was never recovered.


14/25


Page 14 of 25

In the spring of 2003, a City Journal article appeared on the newsstands with a cover teaserthat said: "The nation's largest left-wing group is trying to make a revolution, one city at atime. And, its getting results." The article began: "If you thought theNew Left was dead in America, think again. Walk through just aboutany of the nation's inner cities and you're likely to find an office ofACORN, bustling w ith young people working 12-hour days to 'organize

the poor' and bring about 'social change'...It's no surprise that ACORNpreaches a New Left inspired gospel since it grew out of one of the NewLeft's silliest and most destructive groups, the National Welfare RightsOrganization. In the mid-1960s (...) W i le y forged an army of tens ofthousands of single minority mothers, whom he sent out to disruptwelfare offices through sit-ins and demonstrations demanding an endto oppressive eligibility restrictions that kept down the welfare rolls.His aim: to flood the welfare system with so many clients that it wouldburst, creating a crisis that would force a radical restructuring ofAmerica's unjust capitalist economy. The flooding succeeded beyondWiley's wildest dreams. From 1965 to 1974, the number of single parent households onwelfare soared from 4.3 million to 10.8 million, despite mostly flush economic times. By theearly 1970s, one person was on the welfare rolls in New York City for every two working inthe city's private economy."

But instead of achieving radical social change, generational welfare only created a culture offamily disintegration and more dependency on government. Crime and drugs becamerampant. Illegitimacy and poverty became the hallmark of the black neighborhoods thatdevolved into the ghettos of the nation's fastest growing underclass. Fathers who couldn't findwork simply moved, leaving behind families for the State to worry about. This becameAmerica's introduction to Lyndon Johnson 's Great Society. Generational welfare and a

dropout culture that saw no need for aneducation since there were no jobs for

the black man. And, since there were nojobs, what sense was there to stay inschool?

==============YouTube URL:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=prSNaUenVw0

==============

Realizing his idea did not work,Wileysimply came up with a new one. Heselected his top lieutenant,WadeRathke and sent him to Little Rock,Arkansas to help US CongressmanDavid Pryor win the Democraticgubernatorial nomination againstsegregationist Orval Faubus andpopular moderate war hero Bob Riley.Pryor won 51% of the primary vote andout-polled his Republican challenger

two-to-one in the general election. The new organization, ACORN (Arkansas Community


15/25


Page 15 of 25

Organizations for Reform Now) eventually evolved into theAssociation of CommunityOrganizations for Reform Nowwhen it began to expand into other States. ACORN's bedrockassumption switched from strangling government to finding the sympathetic radicals ingovernment who believed that the only sane government is one which is agreeable toredistributing the wealth of the "haves" to the "have-nots."

It was precisely that type of redistribution that led to Lyndon Johnson 's squandering theSocial Security Trust Fund, and replacing the money he took with IOUs that do not generate"interest" to the taxpayers. Now, the Social Security Trust Fund is bankrupt and the vault atthe Treasury is filled with IOUs that can't be redeemed because there are no longer enoughtaxpayers to generate the revenue the government needs to meet the day-to-day expenditureslet alone generate enough tax dollars to redeem the IOUs and return the Social Security Fundto some semblance of solvency.

Clearly, ACORN is not just some Johnny-come-lately ad hoc leftist "get out and vote"advocacy group. It's the engine that now drives the Cloward-Piven Strategy. Which is whyObama added a rider to theAmerican Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 givingACORN a gratuity of $5.2 billion in taxpayer dollars The amendment to the stimulus bill wasoffered by then Sen. Barack Obamawho denied he had placed any pork amendments intheAmerican Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 when he actually had two porkamendments in the bill.

According to Sen. David Vitter [R-LA], Obama 's amendment appeared to be a "payoff" forpartisan political efforts. When Congresswoman Michele Bachmann [R-MN] learnedabout the $5.2 billion gratuity to ACORN in theAmerican Recovery and Reinvestment Act of2009, she successfully added a provision in a related mortgage reform bill blocking ACORNfrom getting any of the money. House Ways & Means Chairman Barney Frankordered theprovision stripped from the bill before it went to Joint Conference. In the version of theAmerican Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 signed into law by the White House, the

amount of the gratuity to ACORN was reduced from $5.2 to $3 billion. When the mortgagereform bill came out of joint conference, Bachmann 's provision was nowhere to be found.For an organization that's never had more than $500 million to play with at any one time, $3billion is a lot of money. ACORN, which wants to start a class war in America, now has theammunition to give Cloward-Piven a whole new dimension in order to achieve theirobjective.

Four Manchu rian Candidates

The American people have placed four Manchurian Candidates in the White House. Wesurvived three of them. The question is: will we, as a nation, survive the fourth? The world isbetting against us. So is the clock. And, so is the Bible.

Thomas W oodrow W ilson(1912)

The first Manchurian Candidate who successfully made it into the White House wasDemocrat Thomas Woodrow W ilson, who became the President of Princeton Universityin 1902.Wilson came to the attention of financier J. Pierpont Morgan on the heels of theBank Panic of 1907 when he advocated turning control of the US government over toMorgan and the Money Mafia. Morgan decided that he neededWilson in the White


16/25


Page 16 of 25

House. But, who would vote for a school teacher?Morgan assigned one of his underlings,Col. Edwar d Mandell House, to beWilson 's advisor. With the secret help ofMorgan who pushed a group of conservative Democrats in the State to draft him,Wilson ran forgovernor of New Jersey in 1910, and was elected. During that campaign,Wilson asserted hisindependence from conservatismand the Morgan -controlled political machine that

nominated him (and financed his

campaign)professing to be a progressiveand endorsing a socialist platform. Morganand his globalist underling, EdwardHousewho was given the title "Colonel" byTexas Gov. James S. Hogg when House helped him win that office in 1892engineeredWilson 's election as President ofthe United States in 1912.

Morgan was one of the global leaders of thetransnational clique of money barons formed

byCecil Rhodes in the late 19th century to transform theworld into one large, seamless transnational trade zone controlled by the English-speakingnations: the British Empire and its wayward child, the United States. This was to beaccomplished shortly after the sun rose on the 20th century. The globalists were determinedto erase the borders of the nations of the world and create a global parliament that wouldrewrite the laws of the nation-states to suit thembeginning by erasing the tariffs betweenthe nations.

But first, Morgan and his banker friends needed their own central bank in the United States.It began with the J.P. Morgan-orchestrated bank panic of 1907 whenMorgan started the rumor that the Knickerbocker Bank in New York wasinsolvent, starting a bank-run that spread across the country, destroying the

wealth of millions of working class depositors and reviving talk of the needof a new central bank to protect the country from irresponsible Statebankers. (In the April 25, 1949 issue ofLife magazine was an article by Lifewriter Frederick Allen in which he claimed Morgan interests tookadvantage of the very unsettled conditions that existed in 1907 to",,,precipitate the Panic, guiding it shrewdly as it progressed..." theysupposed, to kill off rival banks and consolidate more holdings under thebanner ofJP Morgan & Company.) Does any of this sound fam iliartoday? Apparently you don't need to teach an old dog new tricks when the old tricks stillwork.

Morgan 's immediate problem was PresidentWilliam How ard Taft. Taft was anextremely popular Republican who was a shoo-in for reelection in 1912.Taft was an ardentfoe of the proponents attempting to create a new privately-owned central bank in the UnitedStates. He assured Sen. Nelson Aldrich (John D. Rocke feller, Jr .'s father-in-law) thatthe pro-central bank legislators would need a veto-proof majority when they sent their bill tothe Oval Office, because he was going to veto it. Polls of likely voters paid for byMorgan saidthe worst Taft would do in a head-to-head race againstWilson was win reelection with 55%of the vote. (That was the same percentage by which George H.W. Bush was projected towin by in 1992 in a head-to-head race against New Democrat Progressive Bill Clinton before


17/25


Page 17 of 25

Ross Perot was added to the equation by the money barons.) Morgan 's political advisorssuggested getting former GOP President Teddy Roosevelt to run as a third party candidate.Morgan convinced Roosevelt that neither Taft norWilson was capable of solving theproblems facing the nation and Roosevelt, whose ego got the best of him, agreed to run.

ForWilson to win in 1912 (and, for Clinton to win in 1992) the third party candidate had to

successfully pull 20% of the vote. In Roosevelt's case, the polls indicated he was popularenough to actually win to win a third term. For that reason, Morgan used the ProgressiveParty label to launch his race for the Rose Garden. Roosevelt, who actually thoughtMorgan wanted him to win, nicknamed the Progressive Partythe Bullmoose Partysinceprogressivism suggested European-style socialism that would not fly well with US voters.Morgan needed Roosevelt to take enough votes from Taft for Wilson to win, but notenough to upset the race and take back the White House with a historic third term. In theend, Roosevelt split the Republican vote.Wilson won the White House with 41.9% of thevote. (Clinton won in 1992 with 42.9% of the vote.) Taft, the shoo-in for reelection, took23.2% of the vote. Teddy Roosevelt, the spoiler, took 27.5% of the vote. Not only didWilson keep his promise to Morgan and give him his privately central bank (you know it asthe Federal Reserve System) for Christmas in 1913, his Secretary of State,WilliamJennings Bryan, made sure the fraudulently ratified 16th and 17th Amendments could passlegal muster by asking the 48 States for a vote of unity to prevent both amendments frombeing overturned on a court challenge. (See:http://www.jonchristianryter.com/2007/070228.html )

In mybook, W h a t e v er H a p p e n e d T o A m e r ica ? (still available throughN e w s W i th V i ew s .c o m at: http://www.newswithviews.com/HNB/Hot_New_books3.htm )the entire story of howJP Morgan and Rockefeller money bought the votes in Congressnot only for the Federal Reserve legislation, but the 16th and 17th Amendments, and later,howWilson was told he would become the first President of the World if he could sellCongress on the notion of world government.Wilson tried to force the Treaty of Versailles,

which contain the League of Nations charter that obligated all signatory nations to surrendertheir external sovereignty to the World Government in the Hague.Wilson went on a whistlestop train tour across the nation, trying to convince the American people that theLeague ofNations was a good thing for America. In 1920, tired of Europe and European Wars, theAmerican people said "no." In 1946, when FDA's New Deal Congress under Harry S.Truman officially transitioned the League of Nations into the United Nations, nobody askedthe American people. They simply disguised the failed League in a red, white and blue suit ofclothes, planted the UN Building in New York, sang the Star Spangled Banner and called it anAmerican idea that would bring freedom to the world.

Frank lin Delano Roosevelt(1932)

When Herbert Hoover was sworn in as the 31st President of the United States on March 4,1929, the dye was already cast. While America's bluebloods and blue collar workers wereenjoying bountiful prosperity in America, the stock market was being primed to crash thatfall. By summer, the traders were quietly selling off their shares. There were ample buyersbecause working class Americans who used to play the ponies at the race track were nowamateur day traders in the stock marketit was a safer bet. Everyone was getting rich in themarket and everyone was convinced the prosperity would never end. How could it? This was,after all, how the rich got richer.


18/25


Page 18 of 25

Hoover 's inauguration had just concluded. In their walnut-veneer offices, the bankers werealready busy picking the man who would defeat him in 1932even though that election wasstill 45 months away. There was, after all, a lot of work to do. The American people were goingto have to experience a lot of economic adversity over the next four years because there were alot of changes coming, and men are never willing to surrender liberty until they are forced towatch their children go to bed hungry; and their wives are forced go to sleep afraid of

tomorrow.

The planned winner of the Election of 1932 was going tobe New York Gov. Franklin D. Roosevelta manwith impeccable banking credentials. Rooseveltwas apartner in Roosevelt & O'Connor as well as Marvin,Hooker & Roosevelt. He was also chairman ofGeneralTrust Company. And, he was a partner in the FederalInternational Investment Trust. He was also thepresident of a transnational investment company,United European Investors, Ltd. and a he sat on theboard ofInternational Germanic Trust, Inc. Althoughhe lambasted the bankers as thieves in bed withHoover during the Campaign of 1932, Roosevelt wasa consummate Wall Street insider. And, to make surethat New Yorkthe State with the nation's biggestbankslanded on its feet during the crisis that wasgoing to happen in eight months, the Money Baronsknew FDR needed a savvy banker as his lieutenant governor, ready to take over when FDRwon the Election of 1932. The man he picked for that task was Herbert H. Lehman.Lehman was a successful investment banker in the family concern, Lehman Brothers. Doesthat name have a familiar ring?

In 1928, when Herbert Hoover was elected as the nation's 31st President,the Democrats held 167 House seats and 46 out of 96 Senate seats. In 1930,in response to the stock market crash, the left picked up 49 House seats andeight Senate seats. The Democrats controlled the US Senate and were threevotes shy of controlling the House. With the deaths of six Congressmenbetween 1930 and the Election in 1932 and with seven other specialelections, the Democrats gained 11 seatsand control of the Housebeforethe first vote was cast in the national election of 1932. In March, 1933Roosevelt controlled the voting of 313 House seats and 59 Senate seats.With one independent voting with the Democrats, FDR had a solid 63% ofthe vote. That meant he could enact any piece of legislation he wanted. And,

he did. One of the very first things he did as Pr esident of the United States was todeclare the People o f the United States to be ene mies of the S tate. (Doing that iswhat gave Roosevelt his authority to force Americans to surrender their gold and silver andaccept fiat scrip worth only the promise that all businesses in America would accept this scripas legal tender.)

FDR was a Manchurian Candidate hand-picked by the money barons to complete the taskbegun byWoodrow Wilson in 1913sever the tethers of the Republic, dilute the Bill ofRights and fashion a European-style socialist democracy that could be seamlessly merged into


19/25


Page 19 of 25

the global system of governance that was planned by the money barons in 1900, but whichthey failed to achieve in 1920 when the Republican-controlled US Senate rejected the Treatyof Versailles. As a member of the banking establishment, Roosevelt was an integral part ofthe plot to collapse the economy of the United States in order to exchange America's gold andsilver-backed currency for an elastic fiat scrip, and to steal the real wealth of the peoplethrough decree, replacing their gold and silver certificates with bank notes collateralized with

debt.

Proclamation 2039 declared a bank holiday that wasostensibly designed to stop the flight of gold from US banksthat began in the aftermath of the 1929 Stock Market Crash.Foreign investors, many of whom invested fiat currency in theUS economy, withdrew some $114 billion gold bullion. Thefinancial crisis that theoretically caused the nationalemergency that led to the bank closures in America washandcrafted by the transnational bankers and investors andnot an accident of "market forces." In other words, thebankers were not concerned about the $114 billion in goldwithdrawn by the money barons of Europe. They wereconcerned about the $150 billion in gold on deposit that wasowned by America's working class depositors. They were theintended victims of this looming crisisRoosevelt's"national emergency." It was their wealth the money barons,the White House and the 72nd Congress intended to steal. What was needed was to fan thefires of fear into a national emergency so severe that only the complete remodeling ofAmerica, from the Constitution of the United States to Main Street America could save thecountry.

At noon on March 9, 1933 when the members of Congress filed into their respective chambers

they were greeted by the weightyEmergency Banking Relief Act of 1933. The Democraticleadership told the rank and file members of Congress that due of the national emergency,there was not time to read the bill and debate the legislation over days or weeks. It had to bepassed immediately. (Does this sound familiar?) Each side would be allowed 40 minutes todebate the merits of the bill (which, if you recall from 5 seconds ago, nobody had read, or evenknew it existed prior to walking into the chamber). Those 40 minutes, by both sides, werespent arguing what was in the bill that the leadership did not want its members to see.Congressman Louis McFadden, the head of the House Banking Committee had never seennor heard of the legislation before that morning (Congressional Record; March 9, 1933, page80). After a very heated and very partisan exchange, the most controversial banking bill in thehistory of the United States was enactedin less than one day.

When the Fed bankers and FDR tried to trickHoover into issuing a Proclamation to closethe nations banks in order to stop what the money barons called "gold flight" and "hoarding,"he refused, telling one of the Fed governors, Eugene Meyers, that there was no law thatgave him the authority to do it. Meyers argued that Sec. 5(b) of the Trading With the EnemyAct of 1917 did. The main reason FDR did not want anyone looking too closely at theEmergency Banking Relief Actwas, first, it restructured the banking system of the UnitedStates and placed even more monetary control in the hands of the Fed bankerswhichMcFadden was trying hard to audit. (Does this sound familiar?)


20/25


Page 20 of 25

Second, it gave Rooseveltwar powers control over the United States during peacetime. But,most of all, it incorporated Sec. 5(b) into the Banking Relief bill, effectively changing thelanguage of 5(b) by classifying the citizens of the United States as enemies of the government.By doing that, it allowed Roosevelt to legally redefine the ownership of private property,giving him the right to seize the private property of US citizens without due process. This

"right" by government, previously allowed only against foreign enemies of the United States,has been greatly enhanced today by simply erasing the protection afforded US citizens underthe 4th Amendment. Five-B is now the paramount weapon used by local, county, State andfederal governments to seize any asset or property of any American citizen without dueprocess.

Incorporating Section 5(b) into the Emergency Banking Relief Act of 1933 was necessary tolegalize what Roosevelt did moments after becoming President on March 6. There had to bea law on the books at the time FDR closed the banks which legally authorized that actionorRoosevelt could have been impeached for acting outside of the authority of the President ofthe United States within minutes of becoming the nation's chief executive. For that reason,the Trading With the Enemy Act had to be retrofitted to give Roosevelt the authority he hadalready used. He unconstitutionally closed every bank and savings and loan company in thecountry with Presidential Proclamation 2039 at around 12:01:30 a.m. on March 6, 1933. FDRthen seized the $150 billion in gold that was lawfully owned by, and in the possession of, thePeople of the United States in a unprecedented move that criminalized the private ownershipof gold by common citizens. Since gold and silver were specie, Roosevelt criminalized thepossession of what was still the lawful money of the realm. The penalty for ordinary citizenspossessing gold coins or gold bank notes, was a fine of up to $10 thousand, imprisonment forten years, or both.

Just as Barack Obama resorted to the use of non-elected "czars" (with more power than theExecutive Branch department heads who are vetted and confirmed by the US Senate) who are

accountable to no one except the White House to implement facets ofObama 's agendawithout congressional authorization, FDR created the unconstitutional, non-elected fourthbranch of governmentthe bureaucracywhich answers only to the Oval Office throughSecretaries who oversee the bureaucracy although, theoretically, Congress oversees thebureaucracy through its various committees. The bureaucracy, which legally answers to noone except another unelected bureaucrat, actually writes the rules and regulations of the lawswithin the legislation enacted by Congress. Many times the language of the regulations is incomplete opposition of the purpose of the laws when they were enacted. Thus, ExecutiveBranch officials actually writing the regulations that become codified as law, a taskconstitutionally reserved for the Legislative Branch.

Every piece of legislation enacted byRoosevelt's New Deal Congress abrogated either theseparation of power between the branches of government or States rights as Rooseveltattempted to consolidate power from all venues under the umbrella of the White House.Roosevelt assume for himselfand the Executive Branch departments he created byExecutive Orderthe power to legislate, the power to adjudicate guilt, and the power to arrestthose who violated his regulations. And, finally, Roosevelt also gave himself the authority toassess fines and incarcerate those found guilty of violating his edicts.Roosevelt came theclosest of any United States President to becoming an elected dictator.


21/25


Page 21 of 25

Every important piece of "New Deal" legislation signed into law between 1933 and 1935 wasruled unconstitutional by the Supreme Court. When Roosevelt decided to use his Congressto force the justices to retire, the justices sacrificed the Constitution to keep their jobs byrevisiting most of the New Deal laws they threw out and found that, maybe they weren't quiteas unconstitutional as they originally thought they were.

Jam es Earl Carter (1976)

The third Manchurian Candidate, James Earl Carter , the peanut farmer Governor ofGeorgia, was actually the first presidential wanabee for which evidence exists to suggest thathe actually interviewed for the job of President of the United States. Carter , a Georgia peanutfarmer who doubled as a State senator when thelegislature was in session, wanted to get into nationalpolitics. At that time David Rockefeller and the manwho would become Carter 's "Edward MandellHouse"Zbigniew Brzezinskibroached thesubject of creating what Brzezinski called theTrilateral Commission to address the larger concernsof mankind through dialogue between the UnitedStates, western Europe and Japan at the Bilderbergermeeting in Knokke, Belgium in the spring of 1972. InJuly, 1972, an exploratory meeting of the TrilateralCommission was launched at Rockefeller 's veryprivate Pocantico Hills estate in New York's HudsonValley. Two hundred fifty industrialists and bankers,most with interlocking Bilderberger memberships,attended the first gathering.

Between that meeting and the official launching of the Trilateral Commission in 1973,

Carter became a founding member, it appears, due to his association with Brzezinski through the Council on Foreign Relations. Brzezinki arranged the interview withRockefeller. At the conclusion of that meeting Rockefeller decided he had found the manwho was going to become the 39th President of the United States. Carter would become theCFR's first official US President.

The job ofCarter 's handlers was to make the peanut farmer governor a household name.And, that was not going to be an easy task. In early 1973,Cartera sitting governorappeared on the popular TV show, "What's My Line?" and stumped the panel. It appearedthat no one outside of Georgia ever heard ofJimmy Carter . On March 5, DNC ChairmanRobert Strauss named Carter as the Chairman of the National Democratic Party

Campaign Committee. The party needed to get Carter some exposure. In September of thatyear, Sen. Edward Kennedy, who was expected to throw his hat in the ring for the WhiteHouse job, unexpectedly announced he would not run. AHarris Poll listed 35 prominentDemocrats who could win the 1976 Democratic nomination. Carter was not on the list.Among those the media projected could win wereMorr is Udall [D-AZ], Birch Bayh [D-IN], Sargeant Shriver [D-MA], George Wa llace [D-AL], Fred Harris [D-OK] andHenry "Scoop" Jackson [D-WA]. The man no one knew beat all of them in the 1976primaries. Scoop Jackson won Massachusetts.


22/25


Page 22 of 25

Carter , the man who stumped the "What's My Line" panel a yearearlier, won the presidential election with 50.8% of the vote. GeraldFord , a man who was recognized and respected worldwide, lost with48%. The Democrats put up moderate Eugene McCarthyas a thirdparty spoiler to siphon conservative Democratic votesthat would havegone to Gerald Fordin order to guarantee the election ofCarter .

McCarthytook just under 3% of the vote. But, in a photo finish race forthe White House, eight-tenths of one percent was enough. DavidRockefeller and the CFR had their puppet president. (In 2002 DavidRockefeller wrote his autobiography entitled "Dav i d R ocke f e l le r :M e m o i r s . In it, on page 406 in Chapter 27, entitled"ProudInternationalist," Rockefeller says: "...Some even believe we are partof a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States,characterizing my family and me as "internationalists," and conspiringwith others around the world to build a more integrated global politicaland economic structureone world, if you will. If that's the charge, I

stand guilty. And, I'm proud of it.")

Carter was the first president in the history of the United States who was completelycontrolled by the CFR. The most important decisions of his Administrationthose whichbranded him as political idiotwere actually made by his CFR handler, MadeleineAlbright. (Albright is a Czech Jew whose father, Josef Korbel, converted to Catholicismto escape Jewish persecution in Europe. Korbel was a member of the Czech diplomaticservice.)Albright's official title in 1977 was Congressional Liaison to the National SecurityCouncil (which was headed byAlbrigh t's former professor at Columbia University,Brzezinski). In reality, she was the CFR liaison to the White House.

The Carter decision to cede part of the Stewart Island group, taken from Japan by the USduring World War II: Washington Island, Fanning Island, Makin Island and Makin Atoll to

Kiribati (which was quickly claimed as a possession of the People's Republic of China) was aCFR "anti-empire" decision. So was the decision to surrender the Panama Canal to Panama in1979. Panama needed a source of future revenue that Panama could use to repay its debts toseveral large US banks. (Once aga in, China rushed in and leased the canal from Panama,giving America's second deadliest enemy a legal foothold on the American land mass in1999.A Chinese sub base now exists on the Pacific side of the Isthmus of Panama. Anotherone strategically sits on the Atlantic side, in Cuba. Americans appear to be oblivious to thefact that, thanks to Jimm y Carter , Red China now has the ability to hit virtually any city inthe United States with a submarine launched nuclear missile or land-based missiles that arewithin striking distance of every major military installation or major city in the southernUnited States moments after hostilities with China begin.

The CFR had a good year in 1979. First, due to the loss of support of the US government andunder pressure from Carter himself, a seriously ill Shah Muhamm ed Riza Pahlavi ofIran, who was dying of cancer, was forced to abdicate in favor of anti-American Shi'ite holymanAyatollah Ru hollah Kho meini in Jan., 1979. Seeking medical attention in the west,the Shah was forced into exile. No industrialized nation would give him an entry visaincluding Carter's State Dept. The Shah died in Cairo, Egypt on July 27, 1980. You might saythe Iranian hostage crisis resulted from a deliberate provocation byJimm y Carter on Jan. 1,1979. Carter made a televised New Year's Day toast to the Shah. Knowing how ethereal the


23/25


Page 23 of 25

political situation was in Iran, Carter very deliberately chose to provoke the Shah'sdetractors by declaring Pahlavi to be "...most-loved by all of his people." Within days ofCarter 's toast, the Shah was forced to flee. The revolution was on. Two weeks later,Khomeini returned to Iran. On Feb. 11, 1979 the Shah's government collapsed. Iranianstudents, led byEhrahim Asgharzadeh and Mahmoud Ahm adinejad, seized the USEmbassy on Nov. 4, 1979, they claimed, to settle a debt awarded against the United States by

Iranian businessman Hossein Alikhani.Alikhani sued in a Tehran court in 1975, claimingthat he spent 105 days in a US jail for violating US sanctions against Libya.Alikhani said hehad been abducted by US operatives and brought to the United States where he was charged.He argued before the Iranian court that US sanctions do not apply to non-Americans outsidethe United States. In awarding judgment, the Iranian court sent an order to Carterdemanding payment or a list of US assets in Iran that could be seized by the plaintiff in lieu ofpayment. When the Carter Adm inistration failed to respond to the court order, Alikhanisupplied the court with the address of the US Embassy, which he said was the only asset inTehran which had any value. In its case, he placed the value of the building at $200 millionand asked either for the deed or to have the building sold at auction and the proceeds given tohim. The students seized the Embassy in payment of the lien. They initially planned to holdthe hostages only briefly to embarrass Jimmy Carter , but according to the ringleaders,"Carter blinked," resulting in 52 hostages being held until 12 noon, Jan. 20, 1981. Iranreleased them the moment Carter left office.

Second, was the communist coup in Nicaragua. Socialist Jesuits in Nicaragua, the CFR andthe Carter White House decided to back the communist Sandistias in their revolutionagainst the nation's constitutional government. Carter successfully undermined NicaraguanPresidentAnastasio Som oza , a military dictator who was politically-aligned with theUnited States. He was deposed in July, 1979. Somoza escaped to Paraguay where he wrotean anti-Carter book, N i ca r a g u a B e t r a y e d . Somoza did a book tour in the UnitedStates that undermined Carter and raised questions with the voters whyCarter would sidewith the enemies of the United States against America's allies in Central America and in the

Mideast? In September, 1980, as Carter 's approval rating plummeted to 25%, Somozawho had just completed a book tour in the United Stateswas assassinated in Paraguay. Hisassassination was blamed on Argentine rebels but questions were raised byCarter detractorswhether Somoza may have been killed to silence his criticism ofCarter and the policies ofthe CFR in Central America.

Barack Hussein Obama(2008)

The opening days of the administration of the last Manchurian Candidate,Barack HusseinObama, dovetails with the final days of the reign of the third Manchurian Candidate. It'salmost like Obama is determined to complete the nightmare of how a second Carter term

would have devastated the economy of the United States. Carter 's final coup d' etat againstthe interests of the People of the United States to benefit the globalists in the CFR would havecome from his inept handling of the United States economy. Today, Marxist revisions areblaming Carter 's ineptness on Reagan. (That's because the consumer rate of interest whenCarter left office on Jan. 20, 1981, was 14.03, and it rose to 20.31% in December of that yearbefore beginning to spiral downward. When Reagan ran for reelection in the summer of1984, the consumer rate of interest had dropped to 11.84%. When George H.W. Bush ranfor office in 1988, the consumer rate of interest had fallen to 8.61%.)


24/25


Page 24 of 25

The US economy crumbled under Carter , and the prime rate (the rate banks chargethemselves, soared to 15.5% just before the election.The consumer interest rate on October 1, 1980 was18.22%. That does not translate into votes. High riskcredit card holders, if they could still get credit, werepaying 25% to 30% interest. Carter 's economic woes

actually began during the Nixon years when OPEC (theOrganization of Petroleum Exporting Countries)decided to test the "economic weapon value" of oil byflexing their oil muscle in 1973.

Carter 's problem was that because he knew he wasthe final word on everything he believed thattranslated into that he knew best by virtue of the factthat no one could overrule him. Carter's biggest foeswere his ego and his arrogance about who he thoughthe was. That will also prove to be Obama 'sAchillesHeel as well.

Carterlike Obamagot a free pass from themainstream media and from the liberal academicianswho have chronicled their version of his life.Wa lter Cronkite called Jimmy Carter thesmartest president he'd ever met. Carter was, and still is, a vindictive man who remainstethered to the CFR. He is a dangerous busybody who acts like a decrepit old man withAlzheimer's who interferes with the politics of sitting president's like its his rite of passage,sending mixed signals to the world as he coddled dictators and bad-mouthed the UnitedStates. In his 2004 book, The Real Jimmy Carter, author Stephen Hayward said it bestwhen he commented that "...J i m m y Ca r t e r ' s laundry list of failures aren't just accidents ofhistory. They are rooted in Car t er 's deeply flawed character and ideologya smugly pious

arroga nce matched with a profound distrust of America."

The words that so aptly describe Carter also sum up the persona ofBarack Hu sseinObama. Obama is not even imaginative enough to have originated his own politicalcharacter. He borrowed the embodiment of his personality from the pages of history, mostlyfrom Franklin D. Roosevelt, because FDR plays well on center stage. But even more, thedark thoughts that shape his ideological agenda are the fascist views ofAdolph Hitler andsocialist attributes ofKarl Marx mixed together in a mental mishap that becomes uniquelyObama. This is why some of Obama's rhetoric is pure fascism, some unadulterated Marxistand some the plagiarized thoughts of FDR.

What makes Obama a Manchurian Candidate is that the paradigms that played in thenominations and elections ofWilson , Roosevelt and Carter played in the Election of2008. Only in Obama 's case, a new elementGeorge Soros factored into the equation,suggesting that a compromise has finally been reached between the free enterprise capitalistsand the socialist capitalists because both the sides backed the same horse in that race.Sen.McCain played the role ofW illiam How ard Taft from the election of 1912, and in 1940,the role ofW endell W ilkie in the shadow of World War II. While Taft andWilkie seemednot to realize they were the designated losers in 1912 and 1940, John McCain knew that washis role in the Election of 2008.


25/25


Obama 's role in the greater scheme of things is to complete the failed work ofWilson , FDR,and Carter . As the Manchurian Candidate of the global elite, Obama 's job is to collapse theeconomy of the United States, destroy the value of its currency, surrender our externalsovereignty to the New World Order in the Hague, submit this nation to the rule of law asdefined by the World Court and, of course, provide a setting where the working class can

enjoy life in a world without borders where sameness is extolled as virtue. Welcome to Utopiawhere the Lords and Serfs of the 12th century will live once again in a 21st century worldwhere the demand for productively is God. Welcome to George Orwell's 1984 its only aquarter century late.

###

Documents

Jon Christian Ryter - The Manchurian Candidate