15
Judging Speech Clash of the Titans, 2012 Speech Tournament Coach: Wendi Brandenburg Centennial High School, Frisco TX

Judging Speech

  • Upload
    idana

  • View
    40

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Judging Speech. Clash of the Titans, 2012 Speech Tournament Coach: Wendi Brandenburg Centennial High School, Frisco TX. Speech/Interp/Debate Events. TFA I.E. events Duo Interp Humorous Interp Dramatic Interp Original Oratory U.S. Extemp Foreign Extemp Prose Poetry CHS events - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Judging Speech

Judging Speech

Clash of the Titans, 2012Speech Tournament

Coach: Wendi BrandenburgCentennial High School, Frisco TX

Page 2: Judging Speech

Speech/Interp/Debate Events• TFA I.E. events

▫ Duo Interp▫ Humorous Interp▫ Dramatic Interp▫ Original Oratory▫ U.S. Extemp▫ Foreign Extemp▫ Prose▫ Poetry

• CHS events▫ Novice Extemp

• TFA Debate events• Lincoln-Douglas • Varsity & Novice• Policy or CX • Varsity & Novice• Public Forum• Congressional Debate

Page 3: Judging Speech

Basic Judging Tips• Be sure you KNOW THE

RULES of each event before you walk into the round

• Be sure you KNOW THE TIME LIMITS and GRACE PERIOD allowed before you walk into the round

• Be sure you know the RULES OF THE TOURNAMENT before you judge▫ Tournaments do not allow

students to enter the room until the judge enters, etc.

• Be sure you KEEP TIME and GIVE TIME SIGNALS to the performers

• Cross-entries (xe) – students will be in several events at the same time

• We will have TWO rounds of PRELIMS, semis, finals

• Be sure you KNOW IF YOU WILL BE ON A PANEL OF JUDGES before you start a round!

• Be sure you are ALWAYS ON TIME to your round, or the entire tournament can run behind

• Be sure you TURN IN YOUR BALLOTS as soon as the round is over, or the tournament will run behind

• Be sure you do not share your ranks with the students OR the other judges in the room after the round

• Don’t be afraid to ASK QUESTIONS!

Page 4: Judging Speech

Basic Judging Tips• Filling out a ballot

▫ Fill out any/all incomplete information (ex. competitor’s name(s) and school code, Round #, Section #, as well as the performer’s TITLE, and their TIME after they have performed (not the time on the clock, but how long their piece ran- ex. 9:26)

▫ You will also RANK the students by circling the number (1st = best in the room, 6th = 6th best in the room)

▫ There cannot be TIES

▫ SIGN the ballot, and provide your affiliation (what school brought you, or who hired you) if required

▫ Give both POSITIVE and NEGATIVE comments (things to fix, work on, decisions that did not make sense to you, etc.)

▫ If you give a student a 5 or 6, be sure to explain your decision (lots of things to work on, tough room, etc.)

• Don’t be afraid to ASK QUESTIONS!

Page 5: Judging Speech
Page 6: Judging Speech

(xe) Name

Page 7: Judging Speech
Page 8: Judging Speech

Judging Interp Events• In the interp events, you are

looking for technique, preparation, and physical attributes, but also for vocal elements: how was their pitch, rate, tone, volume? Did they vary each successfully? Were the choices well-suited for each character? Or was their rate so fast that you could not understand them?

• How was their interpretation of what the AUTHOR meant to get across to the audience? Did they take too much liberty?

• Don’t necessarily go for the craziest or the saddest piece. Go for what you find funny, touching, skillful, etc.

• Things that make a GREAT performance▫ Tight/controlled/sharp blocking▫ Accuracy and fluency of

accents/voices▫ Enunciation & Pronunciation▫ Differentiation of characters and

their movements• Selection preference

▫ Did the piece have a plot line, could you understand the cutting?

▫ Was the piece appropriate (no crude jokes, tasteless language/content just for a laugh)

▫ Did the piece fit the student?▫ Was there a balance of the

number of characters?▫ HI or Duo: Was the selection

funny? Or did the performer make it funny?

▫ DI or Duo: Was the selection dramatic? Or did the performers bring the drama?

Page 9: Judging Speech

Judging Interp Events• Things that make a POOR

performance▫ Sloppy or unclear

blocking (which character am I looking at now?)

▫ No blocking (stagnant characters)

▫ Lines tend to run together

▫ Humor or drama looks forced or unrealistic

▫ Overdramatic performances (crying isn’t real, etc.)

▫ Confusing characters

• Selection preference▫ The Intro didn’t set up

the piece very well▫ Crude jokes, tasteless

language/content just for a laugh

▫ Cutting was hard to follow

▫ The piece was too old, too young, too far reaching, etc. to fit the student

▫ Confusing storyline

Page 10: Judging Speech

Judging Speech Events• Oratory speeches are pre-

written and memorized before the tournament

• Extemp – students draw topics at the tournament and choose one. They have 30 minutes to prepare a 5-7 min. speech. They will come to your room to perform their speech after their time in the prep room. They only have the prep materials they brought with them to the tournament for sources.

• Extemp is divided into two categories, U.S. (Domestic) and Foreign (International).

• We also offer Novice.

Page 11: Judging Speech

Judging Speech Events• All speeches should follow

a basic structure:▫ I. Introduction▫ II. Body▫ III. Conclusion

• Speakers should then elaborate in each section

• The speech should be compelling, interesting and impactful to all audiences.

• Listen for the development of ideas, claims and stances, as well as evidence sources to back up their claims.

• Oratories should be persuasive and inspirational. There is not a limit on what topic may be chosen, but it should be appropriate for the audience.

• Oratory is prepared.

• Extemp should be an analysis of a question posed, and a position taken to answer the question.

• Extemp is unprepared, but should still be polished and organized, as if it were.

Page 12: Judging Speech

Judging Speech Events• Extemp Key criteria: The

speaker should provide an introduction that minimally includes a verbatim reading of the question chosen, establishes the significance of the issue, takes an unambiguous position on the question, and provides a clear preview of the main points in support of the chosen position. Main points should be independent, but interlocking, reasons to support the chosen position. Each main point should have clear analysis and adequate supporting evidence. The conclusion should summarize the main points, restate the question verbatim, reinforce the argued position and tie back to the opening attention getter.

• Oratory Key criteria: The introduction should establish that the topic is a significant one worth of our concern and attention and lay out the structure of the speech. The body of the speech should be clearly organized (typically a problem, cause, solution format). The speech should incorporate both sound reasoning and effective emotional appeals. The delivery of the speech should be fluent and assertive without becoming aggressive or strident. At the end of the speech you should feel that the speaker has presented a well developed speech motivated by clear convictions and an earnest effort to effect positive change.

Page 13: Judging Speech

Judging Speech Events

• When judging speech events, look to structure, but also composure, poise, and vocal & physical delivery style of the speaker.

• Their appearance, confidence and style can play a part in how your rank them, along with their speech structure and content.

• Speaker Style▫ VOCAL – look for good

projection of volume, vocal inflection (a variance in pitch, tone, rate for effect and impact)

▫ PHYSICAL – look for confident stance, smooth, fluid and purposeful movements, blocking and gestures.

Page 14: Judging Speech

Judging Debate Events

• When judging debate events, be sure to take notes (we call this “flowing” the round) so that you can keep track of the arguments and evidence.

• Try to listen for the most persuasive arguments IN YOUR OPINION, rather than allowing the debaters to tell you how to vote.

• Please be sure you are clear as to which debaters are on which side (especially PFD) so that you’re sure you’re vote is what you meant it to be.

• Speaker Style▫ VOCAL – look for good

projection of volume, vocal inflection (a variance in pitch, tone, rate for effect and impact)

▫ PHYSICAL – look for confident stance, smooth, fluid and purposeful movements, blocking and gestures.

• SPECIFIC RULES ARE IN YOUR JUDGING PACKET

Page 15: Judging Speech

Q & A ?????Brandenburg’s cell: 972.979.8312

FOOD & JEANS:There is a Hospitality Lounge for judges and coaches in room B200, just above the Ballot Table- please help yourself. TEACHERS- when you have judged your last round for the day, be sure you get your JEANS STICKER! Enjoy your time here at Clash of the Titans!