Click here to load reader
Upload
donga
View
214
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Jurisdictional Approaches to REDD+: International trends and the
FCPF Carbon Fund
Workshop on REDD+ Architecture Design in Indonesia
Bogor, Indonesia 18 April, 2013
Werner Kornexl & André Aquino
Outline
• Introduction to a jurisdictional approach to REDD+?
• International trends on jurisdictional approaches
• FCPF Carbon Fund
Jurisdictional approach to REDD+? • What is the Jurisdictional Approach?
• An option to design the national framework (architecture) for REDD+ at the national level
• Addresses questions such as? • At what level can REDD+ activities take place? • Who leads these activities? • At what level to account for emissions reductions?
• Reaction to multiplication of stand-alone REDD+ projects + uncertainty about how these ‘nest’ into the national REDD+ framework environmental integrity
• Basic elements of the jurisdictional approach • REDD+ activities have a clear boundary: that of a legal jurisdiction (Province / State;
District, etc.) • MRV and REL should be set at an administrative level • Incentives / Performance-based also managed at that level • Multi-sectoral investments to REDD+ • Includes a policy interventions (land use planning, land tenure clarification, etc.)
International Trends • Jurisdictional approaches are gaining traction internationally
Demand-Side (Donors and markets)
• VCS (voluntary markets) • Jurisdictional and Nested
REDD+ guidelines
• California market • Jurisdictions in Brazil and
Mexico
• Germany (REM)
• FCPF Carbon Fund
Supply-side (REDD+ countries)
• Brazil • Acre state
• Costa Rica • DRC • Ethiopia • Mexico
FCPF Carbon Fund: Introduction and Update
• FCPF Carbon Fund aims to pilot large scale performance-based payments against verified emissions reductions • Reward countries’ efforts to reduce deforestation and degradation • Different scales / levels of action (district, province, national), but
always within the national framework for REDD+ • Five Emissions Programs Programs expected
• Each at around US$60-70 million • FCPF Methodological framework under construction
• First draft of Methodological framework by June 2013
• Costa Rica has been selected by the Fund as a first Program
Readiness Fund
Capacity building
Committed: $258 million
Carbon Fund
Emission reductions (2011-2020)
Committed: $390 million
- 36 REDD countries - 18 donors - 6 categories of observers
The FCPF Carbon Fund
Emission Reduction Programs
• Compared with REDD+ projects, ER Programs happen at a jurisdictional level and typically propose multiple activities, policies and investments, as a coordinated set.
• Main elements include: • Institutional arrangements • Strategy to reduce deforestation • REL & MRV • Social and Environmental Safeguards and Co-benefits • Financial structure
FCPF: Link between National and Sub-National Level
8
ER-PIN selection criteria into the FCPF
9
• Signed a Readiness Preparation grant agreement • Reasonable and credible timeline to submit a Readiness Package
Progress towards Readiness
• High-level and cross-sectoral political commitment to the ER Program, and to implementing REDD+ Political commitment
• Consistent with the emerging Methodological Framework Methodological
Framework
• National level or at a significant sub-national scale. Jurisdictional • Generates a large volume of Emission Reductions Scale
• All the sections of the ER-PIN template are adequately addressed Technical soundness
• Generates substantial non-carbon benefits Non-carbon benefits
• Contains innovative features • Adds diversity and generate learning value for the Carbon Fund
Diversity and learning value
THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION