Upload
dangquynh
View
239
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
KEWENANGAN ABSOLUT PENGADILAN AGAMA
MEMUTUS SENGKETA MILIK DAN KEPERDATAAN LAIN
MENURUT PASAL 50 UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 3 TAHUN 2006
NAMA : SUHARDI
NIM : 12109051
PROGRAM PASCASARJANA MAGISTER ILMU HUKUM
UNIVERSITAS NAROTAMA SURABAYA
2010
ii
KEWENANGAN ABSOLUT PENGADILAN AGAMA
MEMUTUS SENGKETA MILIK DAN KEPERDATAAN LAIN
MENURUT PASAL 50 UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 3 TAHUN 2006
TESIS
Untuk memperoleh Gelar Magister
Dalam Program Studi Magister Ilmu Hukum
Pada Program Pascasarjana Universitas Narotama
OLEH
NAMA : SUHARDI
NIM : 12109051
PROGRAM PASCASARJANA MAGISTER ILMU HUKUM
UNIVERSITAS NAROTAMA SURABAYA
2010
iii
Lembar Pengesahan
TESIS INI TELAH DISETUJUI
Pada tanggal 31 Juli 2010
Oleh :
Pembimbing
Soemali, S.H., M.H.
Mengetahui,
Ketua Program Studi Magister Ilmu Hukum
Universitas Narotama
Dr. Maarten L Souhoka, S.H,MS
iv
LEMBAR PENGESAHAN UJIAN TESIS
Dipertahankan di depan sidang Tim penguji Program Pascasarjana Universitas Narotama
Surabaya dan dinyatakan diterima untuk memenuhi syarat guna memperoleh gelar
Magister Hukum pada tanggal 21 Agustus 2010.
TIM PENGUJI :
1. Ketua : Dr. Habib Adjie, S.H., C.N., M.H.
2. Anggota : Seomali, S.H., M.H.
3. Anggota : Dr.H.Soegeng Hardjowinorto, S.H., C.N., M.H.
ABSTRACT
Absolute competence in the history of Islamic Court existence have ups and downs,
along with the development of political and legal awareness of Indonesian Muslim society. In
the early establishment of Islamic Court authority to hear and decide civil disputes and other
property rights, but because of legal and political developments and the authority to decide
disputed property and civil rights in the pull, and distric court with jurisdiction to adjudicate
these cases, so that the competence of religious courts only includes the case of marriage,
divorce, maintenance, and reconciliation among the people who are Muslims. Crash reform era
in Indonesia also affect the competence of the Religious Courts. Islamic Court based on Article
49 of Law No. 3 Year 2006 regarding changes to the Law Number 7 Year 1989 regarding
Religious Courts, Religious Courts have authority to decide disputed property rights
andothercivil.
From the exposure of problems on the above, the problem is: What is the competence
of the current Islamic Court and how the competence of Islamic Court in the case of property
disputes and other civil? To get the answer to the problem, we have chosen normatip legal
research methods with reference to the relevant library materials. From the legal research
shows that the absolute competence is to examine the Islamic Court, to decide and resolve
cases in the field of marriage, inheritance, wills, grants, endowments, charity, infaq, sodaqoh,
and economic Shariah, and property disputes and other civil dispute that occurs between
people who are Muslims in areas that become the absolute authority of the Religious Court and
/ or proprietary dispute between Muslims and non-Muslims are considered to prostrate
ourselves on Islamiclaw.
Keywords:
Absolute competence;
Property and othercivildisputes;
Islamic Court;
DAFTAR ISI
HALAMAN
Halaman sampul depan ............................................................................................................. i
Halam sampul dalam ................................................................................................................. ii
Halaman persyaratan gelar ....................................................................................................... iii
Halama persetujuan................................................................................................................... iv
Halaman penetapan panitia penguji.......................................................................................... v
Halaman ringkasan..................................................................................................................... vi
Halaman abstraksi...................................................................................................................... ix
Halaman daftar isi...................................................................................................................... x
BAB I : PENDAHULUAN................................................................................................ 1
1.1. Latar Belakang Masalah ......................................................................... 1
1.2. Rumusan Masalah.................................................................................. 8
1.3. Tujuan Penelitian ................................................................................... 8
1.4. Manfaat Penelitian................................................................................. 9
1.5. Tinjauan Pustaka.................................................................................... 9
1.6. Metode Penelitian.................................................................................. 18
1.7. Pertanggungjawaban Sistematika.......................................................... 20
BAB II : KEWENANGAN PENGADILAN AGAMA MENURUT
PERATURAN PERUNDANGAN YANG BERLAKU ................................................ 21
2.1. Kewenangan Relatip Pengadilan Agama................................................ 21
2.2. Kewenangan Absolut Pengadilan Agama............................................... 23
a. Bidang Perkawinan....................................................................... 24
b. Bidang Warisan ............................................................................ 52
x
c. Bidang Wasiat............................................................................... 58
d. Bidah Hibah .................................................................................. 59
e. Bidang Wakaf ............................................................................... 60
f. Bidang Zakat................................................................................. 66
g. Bidang Infaq ................................................................................. 67
h. Bidang Shadaqah.......................................................................... 67
i. Bidang Ekonomi Suari’ah.............................................................. 68
j. Istbat Rukyat Hilal ........................................................................ 68
BAB III : KEWENANGAN PENGADILAN AGAMA DALAM MEMUTUS
SENGKETA HAK MILIK DAN KEPERDATAAN LAIN........................................... 69
3.1. Pengertian Hak Milik.............................................................................. 69
3.2. Cara Mempereolah Hak Milik ................................................................ 73
3.3. Cara Memperoleh Hak Milik di Luar Pasal 584 KUH Perdata ................ 78
3.4. Ciri-Ciri, Cara Hilangnya, dan Sifat Memperoleh Hak Milik ................... 80
3.5. Batasan-Batasan Terhadap Hak Milik .................................................... 81
3.6. Sengketa Hak milik dan Keperdataan Lain menjadi Kompetensi
Peradilan Umum .................................................................................... 85
3.7. Sengketa Hak Milik dan Keperdataan Lain Yang Menjadi
Kompentensi Pengadilan Agama ........................................................... 89
BAB IV : PENUTUP.......................................................................................................... 100
4.1. Kesimpulan............................................................................................. 100
4.2. Saran ................................................................................................ 100
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
DAFTAR LAMPIRANxi
1. Putusan Pengadilan Agama Lamongan nomor : 1525/Pdt.G/2007/PA.Lmg.
xii
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
Literatur
Ahmad Rofiq, Hukum Islam di Indonesia, PT. Raja Grafindo, Jakarta, 2000.
Andi Syamsu Alam, Usia Ideal Memasuki Dunia Perkawinan, Kencanamas, Jakarta, 2005.
Andi Syamsu Alam, M. Fauzan, Hukum Pengangkatan Anak Perspektif Islam, Pena Media,
Jakarta, 2008.
Bahder Johan, Sri Warjiyati, Hukum Perdata Islam, Mandar Maju, Bandung, 1997.
Didin Hafidhuddin, Zakat Dalam Perekonomian Moderen, Gema Insani, Jakarta, 2008.
DIRJENBIMAS ISLAM, DEPARTEMEN AGAMA R.I., Paradigma Baru Wakaf di Indonesia,
Jakarta, 2006.
DIRJENBIMAS ISLAM, DEPARTEMEN AGAMA R.I., Peraturan Perundangan Tentang Wakaf,
Jakarta, 2006.
DIRBINBAPERA, DEPARTEMEN AGAMA R.I., Kompilasi Hukum Islam, 2001.
H.A.R. Gibb, Aliran Moderen dalam Islam, Terj. Machnun Husain, Raja Grafindo Husada,
Jakarta, 1993.
Husein Bahreisy, Himpunan Fatwa, Al-Ikhlash, Surabaya, 1987.
Harahap M. Yahya, Kedudukan Kewenangan dan Acara Peradilan Agama, Pustaka Kartini,
Jakarta, 1990.
_______, Ruang Lingkup Permasalahan Eksekusi Bidang Perdata, Gramedia Pustaka
Utama, Jakarta, 1995.
J.Prins, Tentang Hukum Perkawinan di Indonesia, Ghalia Indonesia, Jakarta, 1982.
Jaenal Aripin, Peradilan Agama dalam Bingkai Reformasi Hukum di Indonesia, Kencana
Prenada Media Group, Jakarta, 2008.
Lili Rosyidi, Hukum Sebagai Suatu Sistem, Mandar Maju, 2003.
Mahkamah Agung, Pedoman Teknis Administrasi dan Teknis Peradilan, Buku II, 2009.
Masjchoen Sofwan, Sri Sudewi, Hukum Benda, Liberty, Yogyakarta, 1975.
Moh. Anwar, Fara’id Hukum Waris Dalam Islam dan Masalah-Masalahnya, Al-Ikhlas,
Surabaya, 2007.
Mukti Arto, Garis Batas Kekuasaan PA dan PN, Varia Peradilan, Tahun ke XXI, Nomor
253, 2006.
Marzuki, Peter Mahmud, Penelitian Hukum, Prenada Media Group, Jakarta, 2009.
Mertokusumo, Sudikno, Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia, Liberty, Yogyakarta, 1988.
Projodikoro, Wiryono, Hukum Perkawinan Indonesia, Cetakan IV, 1974.
Ramolyo, Moh. Idris, Hukum Perkawinan Islam, Bumi Aksara, Jakarta, 1999.
Sayyid Sabiq, Fiqih Sunnah, Jilid 8, Cetakan II, Al-Maarif, Bandung, 1983.
Subekti, Pokok-Pokok Hukum Perdata, PT. Intermasa, Jakarta,1991.
T.M. Hasbi Ash Siddieqy, Tafsir Al –Bayan II, Al-Maarif, Bandung, 1978.
Perundang-undangan
Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945 yang telah
diamandemen.
Undang-Undang Nomor 6 Tahun 1986, tentang Peradilan Umum.
Undang-Undang Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 tentang perubahan kedua atas Undang-
Undang Nomor 6 Tahun 1986 tentang Peradilan Umum.
Undang-Undang Nomor 3 Tahun 2006 Tentang Perubahan terhadap Undang-
Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 1989 tentang Peradilan Agama.
Undang-Undang Nomor 50 Tahun 2009 tentang Perubahan Kedua atas Undang-
Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 1989 tentang Peradilan Agama.
Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata (KUH Perdata).