Upload
ngocong
View
219
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Key Milestones
30
Key Milestones Begin Dates
Public Outreach and Technical Coordination Ongoing
Begin NEPA – Environmental Assessment January 2016
Begin Transit/TDM Study April 2016
Public Information Meetings April 11 and 13, 2016
Public Hearing October 24 and 26, 2016
Regional Long-Range Plan Decision November 2016
Final NEPA Decision December 2016
Final Transit/TDM Study December 2016
Final Financial Agreement January 2017
Begin Construction (95 Express) Summer 2017
Project Completion (95 Express) Summer 2019
Transform 66 Outside the Beltway
Project Scope
• 2 express lanes in each direction from
I-495 (Capital Beltway) to Gainesville
(University Boulevard)
• 3 general purpose lanes in each
direction
• New transit service and park-and-ride
lots
• Safety and operational improvements
at key interchanges
31
Alternative
Technical Concepts (ATCs)
32
Innovative ATCs sought from Proposers to:
• Reduce cost while preserving quality
• Improve mobility and safety
• Reduce construction impact
• Encourage early completion
• Provide advantage to proposer and value to the owner
• No limit on number of ATCs proposed by each proposer
• Process encouraged by FHWA
Alternative
Technical Concepts (ATCs) Process
Fast-track review process of 21 days for each ATC
• Submittal timeline: ATCs submitted from March 1 through July 15, 2016
• Third-party review: Groups including federal agencies, localities and transit
agencies asked to review ATCs that impact their facilities
• Strict document control: Reviewers required to have pre-approved user ID
and password to access documents.
• Confidential process: Reviewers signed confidentiality agreement and are
prohibited from discussing ATC’s with non-participants.
• After review process, proposer notified if ATC is acceptable, not acceptable,
or acceptable with conditions
33
Agenda
• New Developments
• Smart Scale
• State of Good Repair
• Atlantic Gateway
• Projects Under Development
• Upcoming Procurements
• Local Assistance
• Tracking Development for Smart Scale and
State of Good Repair
47
48
$3.3 B Total Cost
all Projects
$-
$200
$400
$600
HPP and DGP Funds
HPP DPG
Avg Benefit/ SMART SCALE
Cost 10.7
10 11
19
21
23 19
22
20
18
Number of Projects By District
Bristol
Culpeper
Fredericksburg
Hampton Roads
Lynchburg
Northern VA
Richmond
Salem
Staunton
163
Total
0
500
1000
1500
BR CU FR HR LY NO RI SA ST
SmartScale $ vs Other $
Other Cost SmartScale Cost
SMART SCALE: Round 1
SMART SCALE: Round 2
• Expect about half the funding that was available in Round 1 ($1.7B
to $850M)
• Increase in the number of applications and total value compared to
Round 1
• Funding becomes available beginning in FY22 and FY23, efforts will
be made to advance some funding
• Significant changes to scoring/process include:
• Safety (5%) – all crashes instead of only fatal crashes
• IJRs must be completed for every interchange on limited access highways
• After this round, process will occur every other year – next
opportunity will be 2018 for FY2024 and FY2025 funding
49
Round 1 46 Applications $2.1B Value
Round 2 62 Applications +35% $3.28B Value +56%
51
For Northern Virginia
• $38.5M for Structurally Deficient Bridges
6 Projects
• $23.2M for deficient pavement
Rte 50 FY17-18, FY19-22 TBD
• $61.7M total in SYIP FY17-22
• Using state force or on-call consultants
to prepare designs/contract documents
Project
Components • $1.4 Billion
• 100% Committed Funding
o 40% Private
o 44% Federal/State
o 16% USDOT Grants
Advertisement Summary for
Projects in Development
53
Administration
Calendar Year for
Advertisement Projects
Construction
Estimate
Total
Project
Estimate
VDOT
24% Projects
70% Value
Oct-Dec 2016 6 $11.2M $11.5M
Nov 2016 I-66 Widening ITB 1 $108M $125M
2017 8 $10M $15.7M
2018- 31 $713M $1.05B
Total 46 $842M $1.2B
Non VDOT
76% Projects
30% Value
2016 26 $19M $22.7M
2017 62 $139M $191M
2018- 59 $177M $305M
Total 147 $335M $518M
Grand Total 193 $1.17B $1.7B
Most VDOT projects
are in later years
21
12
31
23
56
4
14
4
11
15
1 1
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
AC CM I S B/P Other
LAP
VDOT
$212
$18
$185
$40 $63
$2
$880
$134 $136
$48
$8 $1 $0
$100
$200
$300
$400
$500
$600
$700
$800
$900
$1,000
AC CM I S B/P Other
Millio
ns
LAP
VDOT
Type of Improvements
54 CM – Congestion Mitigation, AC – Added Capacity, I – Infrastructure, S- Safety
B/P – Bike/Ped, Other – Landscaping, etc.
Total Number Estimate Amount
$44.7M a/o July 15
Now includes Smart
Scale & NVTA-
funded projects
37 a/o
Dec 15
More Local Assistance projects in all categories
Current Procurements
• I-81 Bridge over New River at Exit 105
• ITS Services for Eastern Region Operations
• Statewide MS4 Services
• Statewide Survey, Photogrammetry and SUE Services
• Fredericksburg Bridge Safety Inspection Services
• Hampton Roads Inspection of Support Structures
• Statewide SUE Services
• NOVA Permit and Street Acceptance Services
• NOVA Inspection of Support Structures
• Construction Division Support Services
• ITS/Operations Design Services
55
Upcoming Procurements
• Western Perimeter Road Design Services – Salem
District/Montgomery County
• Anticipated RFP Advertisement – October 2016
• Project Specific
• I-64/I-264 Witchduck Interchange CEI Services
• Anticipated RFP Advertisement – October 2016
• Project Specific
• Hampton Roads District Wide CEI Services
• Anticipated RFP Advertisement – October 2016
• Term Contract – Single Award
• Culpeper District Wide CEI Services
• Anticipated RFP Advertisement – December 2016
• Term Contract – Multiple Award 56
Upcoming Procurements
• Statewide NEPA/Traffic Studies
• Anticipated RFP Advertisement – December 2016
• Term Contract – Multiple Award
• I-64 Southside & High Rise Bridge – CEI and Design Review
Services
• Anticipated RFP Advertisement – January 2017
• Project Specific
• Salem District Wide CEI Services
• Anticipated RFP Advertisement – January 2017
• Term Contract – Single Award
• Staunton District Wide CEI Services
• Anticipated RFP Advertisement – February 2017
• Term Contract – Single Award 57
Local Assistance New Events & Trends
• Updated FHWA/VDOT Stewardship & Oversight Agreement delegates greater responsibility to VDOT for the oversight on most federally-funded LAPs
• Areas of increased FHWA emphasis include fiscal management, work orders, “Buy America”, environmental compliance and civil rights
• SMART SCALE has placed greater responsibility on the localities for accuracy with regards to project scope, estimates and schedule
• Design-Build is more frequently considered as a delivery option
• Where consultants can help
– Plan Quality
– Project Scoping
– LAP Process LAP MAP training Oct 31!
Chief Engineer’s Briefing to VTCA
Consultant Forum
59
Meeting expectations in Delivering the New Program:
• Tracking of Smart Scale projects.
• Early start/early finish for both activities and advertisement.
• More concurrent rather than sequential.
• Teamwork: Good communication regarding project
development, timeframe, and budget.
• Quality of Plans: Provide the best quality plans to minimize
surprises at advertisement and during construction.
Example of Smart Scale Project
Tracking Tool
60
• Interim tool to be used by NOVA while statewide tool is in development
• Will include all locally administered projects as well as VDOT administered
• Likely to include State of Good Repair projects
Chief Engineer
• Tracking of Smart Scale projects.
• Early start/early finish for both activities and advertisement.