18
L. Wu, MD ; C.P. Allaart, MD, PhD; G.J. de Roest, MD; M.L. Hendriks, MA; A.C. van Rossum, MD, PhD; C.C. de Cock MD, PhD ACC Scientific Sessions, San Francisco, CA 9 March 2013 The influence of right ventricular pacing on response to biventricular stimulation -An acute pressure-volume loop study-

L. Wu, MD; C.P. Allaart, MD, PhD; G.J. de Roest, MD; M.L. Hendriks, MA; A.C. van Rossum, MD, PhD; C.C. de Cock MD, PhD ACC Scientific Sessions, San Francisco,

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • Slide 1

L. Wu, MD; C.P. Allaart, MD, PhD; G.J. de Roest, MD; M.L. Hendriks, MA; A.C. van Rossum, MD, PhD; C.C. de Cock MD, PhD ACC Scientific Sessions, San Francisco, CA 9 March 2013 The influence of right ventricular pacing on response to biventricular stimulation -An acute pressure-volume loop study- Slide 2 Cardiac resynchronization therapy Standard therapy in end-stage heart failure LV only versus biventricular pacing Leclercq et al. JACC 2002Thibault et al., Circ 2011Kass et al., Circ 1999 p=0.001 Slide 3 Cardiac resynchronization therapy Contribution RV only pacing? Detrimental effects on LV In LBBB patients Higher degree of mechanical dyssynchrony Decrease in contractility Thambo et al., Circ 2004Sweeney et al., JACC 2006Auricchio et al., JACC 2002Tops et al., JACC 2009 Slide 4 Aim To investigate the influence of RV pacing on hemodynamic response during biventricular stimulation Slide 5 Methods Patients eligible for CRT Temporary pacing leads Conductance measurements RA lead RV lead PL lead Conductance catheter Slide 6 Pressure-volume loop Baseline RV only LV only Biventricular Slide 7 Results Baseline characteristicsn=59 Age (yrs)6710 Male39 (66%) QRS (ms)15421 Ischaemic, n36 (61%) NYHA, n I / II / III / IV0 / 14 / 45 / 0 NT-pro BNP (ng/L)16371375 LVEDV (ml)294151 LVESV (ml)232142 LVEF (%)2213 Slide 8 Acute effect of pacing on SW p=NS p Clinical consequences Response > 20% SW increase de Roest et al., Eur J HF 2012 Responders 68% Slide 12 Non-responders SW improvement < 20% 52% better SW response 34% responders BivLV only Slide 13 Conclusion Acute SW change during CRT is significantly modulated by RV pacing The amount of modulation is similar to the SW response during RV pacing Addition of RV pacing to LV pacing may positively or negatively affect outcome In CRT non-responders, the effect of switching off RV pacing should be evaluated individually Slide 14 Acknowledgement VU University Medical Center Amsterdam C.P. Allaart, MD, PhD G.J. de Roest, MD M.T. Rijnierse, MD M.L. Hendriks, MA A.C. van Rossum, MD, PhD C.C. de Cock, MD, PhD Thank you! Slide 15 SW response to Biv pacing Responders (n=30)Non-responders (n=29)p-value Age (yrs)671167100.96 Male14 (47%)25 (86%) Non-response Reverse response > 20% SW decrease 17 Reverse responders 21% Slide 18 Correlation dP/dt max 18 SW Biv - SW LV only (%) LV only gives a larger SW improvement than Biv Biv gives a larger SW improvement than LV only SW RV (%)