42
Leadership Styles Governments around the world

Leadership Styles

  • Upload
    race

  • View
    20

  • Download
    1

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Leadership Styles. Governments around the world. Totalitarianism. absolute control by a political party - often communist, socialist or fascist ideology all economic activity is controlled by the party - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Leadership Styles

Leadership StylesGovernments around the world

Page 2: Leadership Styles

Totalitarianism

absolute control by a political party - often communist, socialist or fascist ideology

all economic activity is controlled by the party

Totalitarian governments are often led by a dictator who has complete power. These countries are often also aggressive and racist.

Page 3: Leadership Styles

Totalitarianism

when a goal must be accomplished in a set time period

when all citizens agree to policies/goals set by the leader(s)

if the leader abides by the same rules as the citizens

Totalitarian governments are effective:

Page 4: Leadership Styles

Totalitarianism

if citizens do not agree to the rules/policies set by the leader

if the leader does not follow the same rules as the citizens

if there is no time limit for a goal

Totalitarian governments are not effective:

Page 5: Leadership Styles

Totalitarianism

U.S.S.R. 1922 - Joseph Stalin

Page 6: Leadership Styles

Totalitarianism

Italy 1922 - Benito Mussolini

Page 7: Leadership Styles

Totalitarianism

Germany 1933 - Adolf Hitler

Page 8: Leadership Styles

Totalitarianism

Spain 1936 - Francisco Franco

Page 9: Leadership Styles

Totalitarianism

North Korea 1948 - Kim Il-sung

Page 10: Leadership Styles

Totalitarianism

China 1949 - Mao Zedong

Page 11: Leadership Styles

Totalitarianism

Cuba 1959 - Fidel Castro

Page 12: Leadership Styles

Autocracy

leader has absolute power, and tells others what to do

limited discussion on ideas

leader can be elected into power

decisions may be made by a monarch (hereditary leadership) or a dictator (non-hereditary leadership)

only an absolute monarchy has total control. constitutional monarchies (Great Britain, Canada) do not, and are not considered autocratic

Page 13: Leadership Styles

Autocracy

Yes, they can and most often do. Totalitarianism is the presence of total government control, whereas an autocracy indicates the presence of a dictator or a monarch

Can a Totalitarian Government have an autocratic leader?

Page 14: Leadership Styles

Autocracy

when time is limited in decision making

individuals/groups lack skill and knowledge

citizens do not get along or are unable to co-operate

citizens and government staff do not respond to leadership styles

Autocracies are effective:

Page 15: Leadership Styles

Autocracy

when developing a strong sense of teamwork is a goal

citizens have some degree of skill or knowledge

when citizens want their opinion to be heard

Autocracies are not effective:

Page 16: Leadership Styles

Autocratic Leaders

King Louis XIV of France reigned for 72 years

Page 17: Leadership Styles

Autocratic Leaders

Joseph Stalin - U.S.S.R. 30 years in power

Page 18: Leadership Styles

Autocratic Leaders

Adolf Hitler - Germany 12 years in power

Page 19: Leadership Styles

Autocratic Leaders

Muammar Gaddafi - Libya 32 years in power

Page 20: Leadership Styles

Autocratic Leaders

Bashar al-Assad - Syria in power since 2000

Page 21: Leadership Styles

Oligarchy

an oligarchy is similar to an autocratic government except that power rests in a small group rather than one person

Page 22: Leadership Styles

Democracy

decisions are made by the majority

power rests in the body of citizens, and the head of government is not a monarch

some democratic countries have a monarch, but still elect a government to make decisions. The monarch has little power. This situation is called a constitutional monarchy.

Page 23: Leadership Styles

Democracy

when there is a high degree of skill and/or motivation among citizens

a sense of teamwork exists

routines are familiar to citizens

Democratic governments are effective:

Page 24: Leadership Styles

Democracy

when there is a low degree of skill or knowledge among citizens

when a low sense of teamwork/interdependence exists

citizens expect to be told what to do

Democratic governments are not effective:

Page 25: Leadership Styles

Democracy

Canada

Page 26: Leadership Styles

Democracy

United States of America

Page 27: Leadership Styles

Democracy

Japan

Page 28: Leadership Styles

Democracy

India

Page 29: Leadership Styles

Democracy

England

Page 30: Leadership Styles

Laissez-Faire

no group leader or system of government

a state of social disorder due to lack of government

laissez-faire is also known as anarchy

Page 31: Leadership Styles

Laissez-Faire

when time is available

group is motivated and/or a sense of team exists

members of the group have some degree of skill or knowledge

Laissez-faire is effective:

Page 32: Leadership Styles

Laissez-Faire

high degree of conflict is present

group is unmotivated

members of the group have little skill or knowledge

Laissez-faire is not effective:

Page 33: Leadership Styles

Laissez-Faire

high degree of conflict is present

group is unmotivated

members of the group have little skill or knowledge

Laissez-faire is not effective:

Page 34: Leadership Styles

Laissez-Faire

Somalia

Page 35: Leadership Styles

Theocracy

leadership by religion

Page 36: Leadership Styles

Theocracy

when all citizens possess the same understanding of the religion

when values/morals/ethics are the same for all citizens

Theocracy is effective:

Page 37: Leadership Styles

Theocracy

when religious rules are interpreted differently among citizens

when values/morals/ethics are different among citizens

Theocracy is not effective:

Page 38: Leadership Styles

Theocracy

Vatican City - Pope Benedict XVI

Page 39: Leadership Styles

Theocracy

Iran - Sayyed Ali Khamenei

Page 40: Leadership Styles

Aristocracy

decisions made by those considered to be superior through wealth or education

people in charge considered “naturally better” or “high born”

Page 41: Leadership Styles

Aristocracy

when the aristocracy is interested in the welfare well-being of the citizens

Aristocracy is effective:

when the aristocracy becomes self-interested and greedy

Aristocracy is not effective:

Page 42: Leadership Styles

French Estates System

First Estate (Clergy) Bishops - 139Monks - 25 000Nuns - 40 000

Lower Clergy - 50 000

Second Estate(Nobility) 350 000

Third Estate(Everyone else)

24 500 000