LEARN LAW_ LAW DOG_ Law Genie Today, I’m going to show how to create court documents and the procedures to follow in preparing for court. Most of us never go to court and would consider it somewhat more dreaded than going to the dentist. It is true that an element of satanic worship is present in the court system today as they are taken over by greedy people bent on lining their pockets with the fruit of our labor. But because of necessity I feel the need to venture forth in that arena.The beginning of the process starts with a ‘controversy’. Two people have to disagree about something and the administrative process will have begun. In the administrative phase, one party sends another party a demand for payment or some form of property that they believe they have a right to. A true demand for payment has to have the words Bill or Invoice on them and anything with a black line creating a box around it does not exist in the eyes of the court. I have never seen government agents or banking related institutions ever send factual verified proof of the alleged ‘debt’. They just make the demand. I have a whole show on administrative remedy and if you have not watched it, now is the time to do so as it is a very important part of your battle, in that is sets the foundation for later. Every action you take will have the purpose of gaining court admissible evidence. All courts recognize the importance of administrative procedure in that it helps remove controversies that need to be adjudicated from being presented and wasting the courts precious time. If one party is in dishonor and refused to participate in the administrative process they are denied the right to cry about it later and are looked down upon by the court for acting in dishonor. This is noted in the maxim of law that says, “ he who slumbers on his rights, loses them”, and “failure to deny, is to admit”, and the concept of “acquiescence1” and “latches”. Let’s move on to the Court procedure. If you are being sued and have gotten a notice or ‘summons to appear’, the clock is ticking and your time will run out on your opportunity to defend your rights and you will lose by default if you “fail to deny” and “slumber on your rights” by not putting a response into the court record in WRITING. The first thing to do is to go down to the ‘clerk of the court’ whether it be the “criminal side” or the “civil side” depending on the suit against you and ask for the true copy of the complaint if it’s civil. If it’s criminal then it’s the traffic ticket or a warrant for your arrest (although they may not have arrested you, yet and just had you sign a ‘promise to appear”). Once you have received the complaint you must file an answer or you will have lost your right to challenge it and receive a “default judgement”..So lets go into the timeline of what’s going to unfold in a court battle and try to acquire a simple understanding of what’s going on.The beginning of all lawsuits starts with a COMPLAINT. So what is a complaint? The Complaint is a signed declaration by the PLAINTIFF, who is the one making the claim, that an injury or loss has occurred, describes the injury or loss, presents facts that support the claim and presents case law, and codes, statutes, or some other form of regulation that shows, when the facts presented are proven to be true, damages are due to the PLAINTIFF for being injured either physically or thru a loss by a breach of contract. Unless you are fairly wealthy and lazy you will not be well represented by an attorney in the document writing stage of the lawsuit as no attorney will be able to properly prepare a case against their own masters, which if you are defending against the government would be the ones who granted the attorney his privilege of making a living thru the license to practice law, and if it’s the bankers then he will well know they are the true self appointed ‘owners’ of the courts. If you get to trial, then an attorney may be able to do a much better job of examining and cross-examining witness’s as the judge and opposing counsel will be merciless with their objections to deny you getting evidence to the jury thru testimony. So you can hire an attorney if you can find one willing to help you, but only on the condition that they are CO-COUNSEL, which is like having a joint bank account where both signatures are required. If they contract to help you as CO-COUNSEL then you have the right to deny their actions in court, without the CO-COUNSEL status they have the right to go against your wishes and speak or act against your wishes because of the contract you gave them to “RE-

1 AQUIESCENCE: Acquiescence and laches are cognate but not equivalent terms. The former is a submission to, or resting satisfied with, an existing state of things, while latches implies a neglect to do that which the party ought to do for his own benefit or protection. Hence laches may be evidence of acquiescence. Laches imports a merely passive assent, while acquiescence implies active assent. In re Wilbur’s Estate, 334 Pa. 45, 5 A.2nd 325,331.”Acquiensence” relates to inaction during performance of an act while “laches” relates to delay after act is done. Bay Newfoundland Co. v Wilson & Co., 24Del.Ch.30, 4 A.2d 668,671, 673. “acquiescence is a species of estoppel.” Bankers’ Trust Co. v. Rood, 211 Iowa, 289,233 N.W.794, 802, 73 A.L.R. 1421 [BlksLaw4thEd.,’68,pg.40]

1

PRESENT” you. You are considered incapable of speaking in court and a ‘ward’ of the court once you get an attorney. No one can know your case better than you. Some can present your case better than you but most likely the court will not allow them to be your constitutionally allowed ‘counsel’ because the courts are private for profit business that only given token lip service to being public places. Can a policeman tell you to put away your cell phone if your on the street? , or tell you, you cant’ nap on the park bench?To get into a position to enforce your rights you will need to first “ANSWER” their suit and then file a COUNTERCLAIM to become the PLAINTIFF in your own complaint against them. The Plaintiff always wins the Defendant always looses. I always write up a Common law, court of record COUNTERCLAIM and note all the defects in their suit against me and claim they are committing fraud and have no jurisdiction and as many other things I can find as possible. As I indicated previously, the first thing to do is to send in a conditional acceptance and make your claims noting no jurisdiction, no corpus delecti or ‘Standing’, no factual evidence supporting a claim upon which relief can be granted, no license to practice law in evidence, no power of attorney to represent the plaintiff, no evidence of a “real party of interest” under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 17 (a), ect.. Have this sent by a Notary ’Proof of service’ and get an affidavit of non-response and send them a NOTICE OF DEFAULT if they don’t respond to this administrative procedure. So lets look at an actual COUNTERCLAIM.In the upper left corner is the name of the presenter of the document. The attorney will show their name, bar card #, address [because you have the right and requirement to send them your documents], usually a telephone # [but it is not a requirement], and the title and status of the presenter. So in this case it is one of the people and the status is “Pro Per” or in ‘proper persona’

IN PROPRIA PERSONA: In one’s own proper person. It is a rule in pleading that pleas to the jurisdiction of the court must be plead in propria persona, because if pleaded by attorney they admit the jurisdiction, as an attorney is an officer of the court, and he is presumed to plead after having obtained leave, which admits the jurisdiction. Lawes, Pl. 91. [BlksLaw4th,’68,pg.900]

Then next is the Caption wherein the name of the court is noted, the Plaintiff is noted, the case # us noted, the title of the document is noted along with any exhibits or attachmentsThen you start in with the body of the writing. Whatever is said in the body of the writing is what controls the paper if there is any conflict between he Caption and the Body. I like the presentation to be very concise and with as few pages as possible as no judge is going to be interested in reading my presentation period, and if it is longer that 15 pages he will have an excuse not to read it as that is conventionally considered the maximum length. I think arraigning it to have a Summary at the beginning that gives an extremely short readers digest description of what you are trying to accomplish. Next you will have to present the Facts that support you claim where all the facts and this will include absolutely no ‘opinion’ of yours or ‘conclusions’ of your, or ‘hearsay evidence’, etc. just facts that you can testify to, someone else can testify to, or papers you have in your possession or you can subpoena that can be presented. Next I want to have my ‘court2’, and it is my court because I present the evidence to support my right to claim my court in my opening statement in the Summary. The first challenge is a challenge to jurisdiction. So what is jurisdiction?

JURISDICTION: It is the power conferred by the Constitution or by law, Corby v. Dooley, 313 Ill. App. 509, 40 N.E.2nd 581, 584 [BlksLaw4th,’68, pg.991]

2 COURT. An agency of the sovereign created by it directly or indirectly under its authority, consisting of one or more officers, established and maintained for the purpose of hearing and determining issues of law and fact regarding legal rights and alleged violations thereof, and of applying the sanctions of the law, authorized to exercise its powers in the course of law at times and places previously determined by lawful authority. [Isbill v. Stovall, Tex.Civ.App., 92 S.W.2d 1067, 1070; [Blks’Law, 4th Ed.,’68, pg. 425]

2

Jurisdiction is control, or the right to forcibly make someone answer to a controversy. If the King of France comes to this country and gets a speeding ticket does any court in this country have jurisdiction to force the King to come and answer to the charges? No, the rules are made for the ‘subjects’ that are duty bound to obey those rules and not for others. If a citizen of Mexico steals property from someone in the United States cant the Mexican Consulate have him extradited back to Mexico because the U.S. has no jurisdiction over Mexico’s subjects? The two countries or Sovereigns can dispute the control over the man and so can I, as one of the people3, being sovereign, dispute the ‘control’ that a legal fiction, i.e. the State or the BANK have over me. Are they not “foreign” to me as we are dissimilar entities? When the State or Bank claims they have jurisdiction because you have an address in ‘the state’ that is false because it assumes they have control all the time. If they have jurisdiction or control all the time, then you are a slave, because you cannot be free AND under the jurisdiction all the time or there is a master/slave relationship. So I believe jurisdiction is acquired rather than constant. It is acquired when you have violated the common law by trespassing on your neighbor. This is best shown in a Supreme Court decision from 1905:

"The individual may stand upon his constitutional rights as a citizen. He is entitled to carry on his private business in his own way. His power to contract is unlimited. He owes no such duty [to submit his books and papers for an examination] to the State, since he receives nothing therefrom, beyond the protection of his life and property. His rights are such as existed by the law of the land [Common Law] long antecedent to the organization of the State, and can only be taken from him by due process of law, and in accordance with the Constitution. Among his rights are a refusal to incriminate himself, and the immunity of himself and his property from arrest or seizure except under a warrant of the law. He owes nothing to the public so long as he does not trespass upon their rights." Hale v. Henkel, 201 U.S. 43 at 47 (1905). [verified]

The acquisition of jurisdiction in a common law trespass where your neighbor has hit someone as this is a trespass upon the mans’ personal property [his body]. In statutory acts it is expressed as “Corpus Delecti”.So lets see a few examples of case law describing this. Marc Stevens website has a long list of Corpus Delecti case law listed for each states court decisions.

"In every criminal trial, the prosecution must prove the corpus delecti, or the body of the crime itself-i.e., the fact of injury, loss or harm, and the existence of a criminal agency as its cause."  People v. Sapp, 73 P.3d 433, 467 (Cal. 2003) [quoting People v. Alvarez, (2002) 27 Cal.4th 1161, 1168-1169, 119 Cal.Rptr.2d 903, 46 P.3d 372.].

So if you have a criminal case then they has to be a fact of injury, loss or harm presented and some facts supporting that injury to be proven or there is no jurisdiction or right to proceed with a trial as there is no claim upon which relief can be granted that has been presented. The real question is WHO and I mean a man or woman, is claiming that you injured them?, and have they presented any facts that show an injury has occurred? In addition to this challenge to jurisdiction you can find all sorts of violations of their own codes to include as defects in their case, making their accusations false and fraudulent in that when they failed to answer your administrative presentment claiming they don’t have these things

3 "...at the Revolution, the sovereignty devolved on the people; and they are truly the sovereigns of the country, but they are sovereigns without subjects...with none to govern but themselves....". CHISHOLM v. GEORGIA (US) 2 Dall 419, 454, 1 L Ed 440, 455 @DALL (1793) pp471-472.

3

they had “knowledge” that they were proceeding anyway, after failing to provide “proof of claim” or to “Show Cause” why they [the DA] has a right to proceed.

If it is a civil case where the Bank or Credit Card company is suing you for a breach of contract then the jurisdiction is acquired when they can present facts that support their claim that they have suffered a loss due to your actions. This is expressed as: No party has the RIGHT to sue unless they can show “STANDING” and here are some standing cases, also from Marc Stevens website:

“Over the years, our cases have established that the irreducible constitutional minimum of standing contains three elements: first, the plaintiff must have suffered an "injury in fact" -- an invasion of a legally-protected interest which is (a) concrete and particularized, see id. at GO>756; GO>Warth v. Seldin, 422 U.S. 490, GO>508 (1975); GO>Sierra Club v. Morton, 405 U.S. 727, GO>740-741, n. 16 (1972);{GO>1} and (b) "actual or imminent, not `conjectural' or `hypothetical,'" Whitmore, supra, 495 U.S. at GO>155 (quoting GO>Los Angeles v. Lyons, 461 U.S. 95, GO>102 (1983)). Second, there must be a causal connection between the injury and the conduct complained of -- the injury has to be fairly . . . trace[able] to the challenged action of the defendant, and not . . . th[e] result [of] the independent action of some third party not before the court. GO>Simon v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare [504 U.S. 561] Rights Org., 426 U.S. 26, GO>41-42 (1976). Third, it must be "likely," as opposed to merely "speculative," that the injury will be "redressed by a favorable decision." Id. at GO>38, GO>43. Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife 504 U.S. 555 (1992) verified“Standing represents a jurisdictional requirement which remains open to review at all stages of the litigation. GO>Bender v. Williamsport Area School Dist., 475 U.S. 534, GO>546-547 (1986).” National Organization for Women, Inc. v. Scheidler, 510 U.S. 249 (1994) verified

So when the Bank sues you, do they have jurisdiction by having the Constututionally required element of “Standing” by showing a concrete injury or loss? Never.You will have to watch the show on Foreclosure and other Money related shows to understand that the Banks do not loan anyone MONEY4 and only lend Credit, which they create on computer screens from thin air and your promise to pay or promissory notes and or Credit applications. So how could anyone show evidence that they suffered a loss if a man or woman did not send their labor exchanged for bank deposits of pieces of paper to them? They suffered no loss and cannot prove they did, so they have no “STANDING” to sue. Therefore they have no jurisdiction over you as they have presented no factual evidence to support their claim.We all understand the common law view on money and debt. Money is exchanged for items one wants if the seller agrees to the exchange. Anything we receive for our labor as having value is usually in the form of a paycheck or a private check from the employer. This piece of paper is a negotiable instrument and can be allegedly ‘redeemed’ at the bank for cash or what we accept as ‘money’ ie federal reserve notes. Actually we never can redeem them for money as only gold or silver or some valuable commodity like a can of beans or a piece of furniture has actual intrinsic value. The piece of paper has no intrinsic value and it’s replacement cost is about a penny. Can we ever get gold or silver in exchange for the federal reserve

4 MONEY: In usual and ordinary acceptation it means gold, silver, or paper money used as circulating medium of exchange and does not embrace notes, bonds, evidences of debt, or other personal or real estate. Lane v. Railey, 280 Ky. 319, 133 S.W.2d 74, 79,81. [Blacks Law 4th Ed. pg 1157]

4

note? No. What we can do and the only reason we accept the federal reserve notes or checks from others for our labor is they can be exchanged by the grocery store or the lumber store, etc for something of real value. What happens when they refuse to accept the Federal Reserve notes? Their true value will be the heat burning them can produce. The real question is what would life look like without the Banker creating the credit in the form of checks or Federal Reserve notes look like? How much would a house cost if the Bank could not do home loans?, how much would a car cost if the Bank could not do car loans? If every one who loaned money actually had to save it up from their own labor, loans would be few to people other than family members. The prices would plummet and the slavery would cease to exist. When you bought a home or car it would be yours and the state could not lay claim to it as they do now. Because we don’t pay in gold or silver, which is common law money, we can’t claim ownership as we paid with debt instruments and the Strawman/franchisee/government employee is the named ‘tenant’ on the property. This allows the state to treat us like renters and take the property if we don’t pay taxes. You can’t tax private property under the constitutions. Private property is a right, not a privilege. So, why not make the bankers prove they operated according the law and not outside of it. If they don’t recover the money they print from thin air I won’t shed a tear for them. If they break the law shouldn’t we hold them accountable? If they want to work and labor for the money they loan then they deserve to have it repaid to them or to take some form of collateral like a car or home but not otherwise. Next although as one of the people [and sovereign] I am not subject to legislated law, only to Common law but those who are employees of the government, or get their authority to operate thru license’s from the government are bound by it’s legislated acts, stated as codes, statutes, ordinances, etc. and therefore I can introduce the codes, etc. as evidence if they have violated them.Next I will have my “Court” take judicial notice of whatever I want to include to be the “Law of the case”. Since the sovereign decrees the law as long as it does not injure another and only protects my property and rights, I show it as a sort of contract in this case only. The government does exactly the same thing in its lawsuits against you and unless you challenge their authority to decree the law you will lose.

"The very meaning of 'sovereignty' is that the decree of the sovereign makes law." American Banana Co. v. United Fruit Co., 29 S.Ct. 511, 513, 213 U.S. 347, 53 L.Ed. 826, 19 Ann.Cas. 1047.

Then I will present the ‘CONCLUSIONS OF LAW’ or “MEMORANDUM OF LAW”. In this part I can draw conclusions based upon the facts I have presented and the case law or codes, etc that have been alleged to have been violated and pray for a judgment in my favor, sign it, seal it, and then if I have been sued already then I can simply mail it off with a copy of the proof of service [see an example on the disk] to the opposing side and then show the original wet-ink signed proof of service along with the wet-ink signed COUNTERCLAIM to the Clerk of the Court and enter it into the record and also get my copy which would have every page sent to the opposition and to the court file stamped so that I will have evidentiary proof for later. One thing to be clear on is that when you put your facts into the record in the Complaint or COUNTERCLAIM you must list them individually or the opposition can deny your whole statement if only one statement contained in it is deniable by them. So it should be in the form of a Noun, verb, subject, i.e.

1. On or about June 4th, 2010 alleged Officer Dandy issued a citation for Speeding to JOHN DOE . [notice the ticket wasn’t issued to John Doe.]

2. On or about July 16th, The Superior Court of Wonderland sent a Notice to Appear re: Citation number XX#@()#)# to JOHN DOE

So list each item individually so that the opposition has to address each item individually which is how you get information to use against them, from their own statement.Next thing to do in statutory law court is to file any Motions. Motions are a plea to the court to “MOVE” the court to act and to judge whether their suit should be Dismissed, Should be stricken, Should be adjusted or changed, etc. Since the isn’t actually a court and it’s an arena with players

5

rather than the judge it’s a common misconception that the judge IS the court. The true definition of Court is as follows:

COURT. An agency of the sovereign created by it directly or indirectly under its authority, consisting of one or more officers, established and maintained for the purpose of hearing and determining issues of law and fact regarding legal rights and alleged violations thereof, and of applying the sanctions of the law, authorized to exercise its powers in the course of law at times and places previously determined by lawful authority. [Isbill v. Stovall, Tex.Civ.App., 92 S.W.2d 1067, 1070; Black's Law Dictionary, 4th Edition, page 425]

You could file a Motion to Dismiss re: right to a speedy trial if they have violated the code they are bound to honor, that states if they haven’t started the trial within 30 days following the arraignment the case is dismissed. So you would put the evidence into your Motion showing a summary, the facts, the law, and the conclusion. A Motion can be filed to avoid filing an Answer. The opposition will be keen on dismissing your suit and or not answering the points you will have presented and be bound by their statements so they will immediately issue a “MOTION TO STRIKE” or “MOTION TO DISMISS” and hope their good buddy and co-conspirator in crime, i.e. the judge will squash you and your rights like a bug and protect them from having to be responsible and answer the charges against them. When they put a Motion into the record they have to mail you a copy and you will have 21 days to write a reply to their motion and then have it heard at a motion hearing. You will call you document an “OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO STIKE” or whatever their motion is. In it you will start off the same “Comes now, John Doe, one of the people of the Republic of [Your State] in this court of record to oppose the MOTION TO STRIKE to wit:

1. CHASE MANHATTEN has no jurisdiction nor authority to issue a MOTION as they have not proven any “STANDING” to appear or speak and have not presented a claim upon which relief can be granted..

2. The ATTORNEYS DEWEY CHEATEM AND HOWE who entered the MOTION have not shown any evidence of a ‘power of attorney’ to re-present the alleged Plaintiff CHASE MANHATTEN BANK.

3. The Attorneys have not demonstrated any license to practice law issued by the State of [your state] to re-present a legal entity.

4. The MOTION TO STRIKE does not have any of the required elements under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure5.

So you can use issues they are defective in and also the case law they cite is always worth looking up at “FINDLAW” or Google to see what the case is about, because most of the time it doesn’t even relate to what is going on in your action. Don’t make this a huge effort as no judge will read a long paper and doesn’t care about you anyway. You only have to present the issues and object to the motion, that’s all. I don’t expect the judges to be anything but corrupt when they are ruling against the people in favor of their paycheck; I mean the State and or their true masters, the BANKERS. Now and then you will find an honest judge, god bless him, who believes in equity

5 FRCP III. PLEADINGS AND MOTIONS > Rule 12. (f) Motion To Strike.The court may strike from a pleading an insufficient defense or any redundant, immaterial, impertinent, or scandalous matter. The court may act: (1) on its own; or (2) on motion made by a party either before responding to the pleading or, if a response is not allowed, within 21 days after being served with the pleading.

6

and fairness. He will still have a hard time seeing the truth that there is no MONEY and will not believe the BANKERS are violating the U.S. Constitution Article 1, sections 8, and 10 and that there really is no authority to create money or credit from thin air. When the magistrate rules against you, you can vacate his ruling with a Writ of Error and an order to show cause, which he will hate, as it is work and he really has no legitimate reason for ruling against you.

After you have challenged jurisdiction and they have failed to show proof of claim of having jurisdiction you file a Writ of Prohibition to stop the inferior court from proceeding. How do you know it’s an inferior court? It is not operating according to the qualities of a court of record proceeding according to common law a requirement in California’s Constitution under Article 6, section 1. The Writ of Prohibition has to be filed prior to a trial and not after.Lets move on to the ANSWER. When you are sued you must file an ANSWER within 21 days of the filing of the COMPLAINT or COUNTERCLAIM. The answer is simple. It is in the form of 3 responses to each and every numbered item in the COMPLAINT or COUNTERCLAIM. It states:I agree, I deny, or I have no knowledge. One easy way to do this is to take their complaint and cover over the attorney info in the upper left corner, the Captions Statement of what the paper is, ie COMPLAINT FOR MONEY and the opening paragraph, ie “Comes now Chase Manhatten,…Blah, blah, blah.” and their signature etc at the end with white paper pieces and scan it and print it. Then take it and hand write in block lettering that is clearly legible and put your name in the upper left corner, rename the document in the caption i.e. ANSWER and the opening paragraph changed to “Comes now, John Doe, etc. to Answer the Complaint in case # XXXXX”and then after each numbered item write in pen in legible block lettering “I agree”, I deny, or I have no knowledge. At the end put ‘without prejudice, By: John Doe” and send a copy of it off proof of service to the opposition, take the original wet-ink ‘proof of service’ and the original answer in wet-ink to the court and bring a copy to get file stamped for your records as evidence you can use later in a complaint evidencing the bad behavior of the judge, to the boss’ of the court personnel, i.e. judicial performance or judicial council. The next thing to be aware of and this should be done right at the beginning of having a case is that you have the right to discovery. To be able to find evidence that vindicates you and/or cements your right to win. There are different ways of getting evidence the first of which is anything in the public record is automatically admissible as evidence. The Banks love this as the Deed of Trust is admissible without having anyone have to testify as to the truth of it. Put a lie into the record and no one can be sent to jail as there is no guilty party only dead estate corporations which cant be incarcerated. If you put a lie into the County recorders office that is a felony, but if they do it, it’s oh, well and you can’t discover it because we’ [the court] will block you. You still have the right however to due process which includes discovery and there is no better tool than a Subpoena Duces Tecum or an order from the court to comply with bringing the requested body, body and paperwork or just paperwork to the court to be entered into the record at trial. You can subpoena the Bank Chief Financial Officer if you have sent him administrative remedy Debt Validation letters and he hasn’t replied. Now he is a party to the case and can be forced to testify and you can ask him relevant questions, he won’t want to answer. You can subpoena the original Promissory Note and Deed of Trust to be brought by the bank president and testified to. You can subpoena the Attorney General to testify to the constitutionality of the Penal Code or Vehicle Code. You can require the other side do a deposition and answer your predetermined list of questions and swear to their answer in front of a notary. This is powerful as most CFO’s or CEO’s of companies and anyone in a position of authority is not going to want to testify in some manner that can later convict them of fraud. They will just refuse, and then you have evidence of their failure to give substantiation to their claims. You

7

should also send a NOTICE of DEMAND for DISCOVERY to the opposition and if they don’t send you everything they are going to present in their court appearance they can not bring any other evidence in as they have refused to let you see it in advance and you can demand the ‘new evidence is barred from being entered into the record. In common law you don’t get to do discovery as everything you know and have evidence of, is what the complaint states. You don’t leave anything out to bring it up latter. But in the current statutory administrative courts the system is different. I would seek to gather information thru subpoenas as soon as I can. You can subpoena the sheriff’s communications and car cam videos, the jails list of personnel by name, any video or audio at booking, and on and on. Finally after the Complaints, Motions, Answers, and Discovery is over with, if it hasn’t been settled by now, a jury trial is started. You have to demand a jury trial early on or you will have your request denied, which is a denial of your U.S. Constitutional rights under the 7th amendment in matters over $20 and also your California Constitutional rights. The experience going to trial is going to be the hardest to get ready and practice for. While we can role play for presenting ourselves in court at hearings and make our points at hearings, I think trial is best done by people who love being actors, are fearless and are good salesmen. I have coached a woman who was scared to death of it and she did quite well to her own surprise. It’s never the end of the world. It is one of a multitude of battles the winning of any of which makes you victorious. After the court case is over, there is still Writ of Errors’ to write, Complaints to the Judicial performance to write and if you want Appeals to the appellate court, and if you lose there, the Supreme Court of your state and finally the Supreme Court of the United States.There are examples of every kind of Court Pleading on the CD rom and lots of verified, i.e. factually witnessed by me, court case cites that are quoted and named, that can be copied and pasted in as footnotes or into the body of your documents. The folder named Case Law-Codes- and Pleadings has most of what I use to assemble documents depending on what type of document I am trying to create. Under Court Pleadings are examples of redacted filings I have created.I am not an attorney and do not have a license to practice law. I am a law researcher and experiment with trying to use the courts to get what I consider justice.

NOTICEEverything I present is my own religious beliefs and political views or factual evidence presented by others that I have come across, and if you use any of my presented information it will be with the knowledge that neither you nor anyone you present it to can sue me for any reason whatsoever related to the free expression of my beliefs acquired by you or anyone you present this information to. I, reserve all my rights and remedies.

8