682
1 LESOTHO AND THE STRUGGLE FOR AZANIA The Origins and History of the African National Congress, Pan Africanist Congress, South African Communist Party and Basutoland Congress Party 1780 - 1994 Bernard Leeman 2015

Lesotho and the Struggle for Azania 1780-1994

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

The origins and history of the Basutoland Congress Party of Lesotho, the African National Congress, the South African Communist Party and the Pan Africanist Congess

Citation preview

  • 1

    LESOTHO AND THE

    STRUGGLE FOR AZANIA

    The Origins and History of the African National Congress, Pan Africanist Congress,

    South African Communist Party and Basutoland Congress Party

    1780 - 1994

    Bernard Leeman

    2015

  • 2

    PREFACE This work is a revised and slightly updated edition of my Doctor of

    Philosophy degree in History, awarded magna cum laude at Bremen

    University, Germany, in 1985. Its title was Africanist political movements

    in Lesotho and Azania (South Africa) 1780-1984: The origins and history

    of the Basutoland Congress Party of Lesotho and the Pan Africanist

    Congress of Azania. From 1992 to 2012 I wrote other books and university

    papers in Sesotho and English concentrating on the period 1952-1959 when

    the African National Congress split on class lines and was in state of near

    civil war. Following Nelson Mandelas death in 2013, the South African Communist Party announced that he had been a member of that partys central committee since the 1950s, an admission that now fully explains how the SACP was able to take over the ANC in 1955 and drag the

    liberation movements into the Cold War, thus seriously compromising their

    cause and arguably delaying freedom, probably by decades. Secondly,

    when I wrote my thesis in 1984, I could not believe that Ntsu Mokhehle

    could have been so simple minded to have abandoned the principles and

    friendships of a lifetime to become a pathetic dupe of the South African

    security services. I have therefore updated my work to include both aspects.

    My research was originally inspired by the 1970 coup dtat in Lesotho, which prevented the Basutoland Congress Party (BCP), winners

    of the general election, from becoming the government of Lesotho for

    twenty three years; and wrecking the Basothos admirable ancient democratic tradition. During its years of exile, the BCP was considerably

    assisted by its fellow exiled Africanist ally, the Pan Africanist Congress of

    Azania (South Africa) with which it had a long standing shared origin and

    history. In 1993 the BCP won every parliamentary seat in the Lesotho

    national elections. Conversely, the Pan Africanist Congress (PAC), which

    had eclisped the popularity of the African National Congress (ANC) from

    1960 to 1964 and seriously challenged it up until 1986, received a derisory

    1.2% of the vote in South Africas first truly democratic national elections of 1994, and has had less and less in subsequent elections.

    I am from a Tanzanian settler family of Ulster Scots South African parents. My father came to Tanzania as a soldier in the First World War

    and established the coffee industry around Mbinga. I was raised in Songea

    and Cape Town, studied African History and Afrikaans at the School of

    Oriental and African Studies, London University, and Obafemi Awolowo

    University, Nigeria, before returning to Tanzania in August 1968. I was

    thereafter heavily involved in political and military operations in South

    Africa and (from 1970) Lesotho. I joined the ANC but was expelled in

    1974 by Joe Slovo, the Communist leader, for supporting a non-racial

    constitution in place of the elitist undemocratic race based system foisted

    on the party at Kliptown in 1955. Inevitably I joined the Pan Africanist

  • 3

    Congress, whose raison detre had been the pre 1955 democratic anti race-based constitution.

    I enrolled at Leicester University, England, for a research degree on

    the Basutoland Congress Party. I was unfunded but started a

    correspondence college that enabled me to go to Lusaka, Zambia, in

    February-March 1976 to undertake formal interviews with the exiled BCP

    leaders, Ntsu Mokhehle (1918 1999, the future prime minister of Lesotho), Ntsukunyane Mphanya (future minister of agriculture, BCP

    secretary-general and party leader in 2003), Koenyama Chakela (secretary-

    general, assassinated 1982), and Gauda Khasu (national chairman).

    Correspondence followed with Mokhehle and Mphanya and I was able to

    visit them thereafter without formality, and inspect BCP records. From

    1975 until 1977 I was a member of the reserve of the British Armys Special Air Regiment (21

    st SAS, Artists Rifles) based at Sloane Square,

    London, and also served in the Royal Artillery (Sussex Yeomanry) in

    Brighton. Working undercover for the PAC and BCP, I served as a major

    in the Lesotho Paramilitary Force (LPF) as assistant to Major-General

    Metsing Lekhanya from May to September 1977. I also undertook research

    in the Archives in Maseru and interviewed several prominent members of

    the Basotho National Party (BNP) and LPF. I left Lesotho and interviewed

    several other BCP officials and members, including the high command of

    the Lesotho Liberation Army (LLA), and the Pan Africanist Congress

    (PAC) leader, Potlako Leballo (died 1986) who was also commander of the

    Azanian People's Liberation Army (APLA). From June 1978 until March

    1979 I worked closely with Moses Qhobela Molapo, the BCP London

    representative (died 14 October, 2014), future Lesotho foreign minister,

    deputy prime minister, and BCP president (1997), and Ntsukunyane

    Mphanya when he visited England. In 1979 I financed the escape of the

    Lesotho Liberation Army from Itumbi Camp, Chunya, Tanzania to start the

    guerrilla war in Lesotho.

    From March 1979 until May 1981 I was in Africa, twice staying with

    Mokhehle in Lusaka and interviewing many more BCP personnel in

    Gaborone, Botswana and Harare, Zimbabwe. From October l980 onwards I

    became increasingly involved with the Pan Africanist Congress of Azania

    and then broke off relations with the BCP when I realised they were

    working with the South African security services and former senior

    American CIA operatives. From 1980 onwards I was either housing,

    staying with or in constant touch with Potlako Leballo until his death in

    January 1986, working to encourage a national rising in South Africa to

    mark the 25th anniversary of the Sharpeville Massacre, an episode I

    discussed in my 2010 work Mandela and Sisulu, Equivocation, Treachery

    and the Road to Sharpeville. In 1985 Leballo and I convinced Major-

    General Lekhanya that the only way he could save his career was by

    overthrowing the regime of Leabua Jonathan and restore democracy,

    measures he only half implemented.

  • 4

    After Leballos death in January 1986 until 1994 I worked with PAC activists opposed to the degeneration of the illegally appointed PAC

    leadership clique into venal and eventually psychotic murderous mystical

    fascism, as well as the process of dialogue, dtente and the 1994

    settlement. I refused to return to South Africa and Lesotho but still have homes in Marangu, Tanzania and Mekele, Ethiopia.

    I received no financial assistance of any sort for my research, which

    was severely hampered by my exile by the Pretoria regime. I had therefore

    to use false documents to travel clandestinely in South Africa and Lesotho

    from June 1970 until December 1991 when President De Klerk rescinded

    my exile.

    I presented my PhD thesis in Politics at Leicester University in 1981

    but my supervisor, Professor J. E. Jack Spence, did not read it for over two years. When I finally received a message that he must get round to reading it sometime I resigned from Leicester University and transferred to Bremen University, Germany, in early 1984 where my thesis was

    accepted as a History doctorate. I am eternally grateful to the late Professor

    Imanuel Geiss, whose advice ultimately brought me to Bremen; and my

    other supervisor, the late Professor Michaela von Freyhold. I should also

    like to thank Professor Marlies Krueger, Professor Karl Wohlmut,

    Professor Helmut Bley (of Hannover University), Mrs Frank, Mrs Geiss

    and Wolfgang Proske for the extremely pleasant time I spent in Bremen.

    I hope my work is of some interest, being one of few accounts of long

    involvement in political and military affairs in a militant lower class

    township and rural based movement to the left of the African National

    Congress and South African Communist Party in the final days of the Cold

    War.

    Bernard Leeman

    February 2015

  • 5

    BACKGROUND

    The Kingdom of Lesotho is a rectangular mountainous chunk of

    land, less than 12,000 square miles in area, totally surrounded by the

    Republic of South Africa. Only 13% of the country is fit for

    cultivation and lies mainly in the eastern lowland strip where the bulk

    of Lesotho's population of one million is concentrated. It has

    diamonds, much water and livestock, an invigorating climate and

    spectacular scenery. Land is held communally but, before 1994, sixty

    per cent of Lesotho's labour force was employed in South Africa as

    low paid migrant workers and, like the Scottish highlands two

    hundred years ago, wealthy entrepreneurs still wish to see it

    depopulated so it can be transformed into commercial farmland and

    private playgrounds.

    The people of Lesotho are Basotho and speak Sesotho, a Bantu

    language. Sesotho has two orthographies, developed respectively in

    Lesotho and South Africa by French and English speaking

    missionaries. The English orthography is sometimes used in Lesotho,

    as in the colonial name "Basutoland". Aspects of the French-based

    orthography, used almost exclusively in this thesis, which may cause

    difficulty, are listed below.

    E placed before another vowel as in EA (of) is pronounced Y (ea =

    ya).

    Example:- Kereke ea Moshoeshoe = the Church of Moshoeshoe.

    L before I or U is pronounced D. Examples: Kolisang/Kodisang),

    Libopuoa/Dibopuoa, Liau/Diau, Ramoreboli/Ramorebodi,

    Mofeli/Mofedi, Lifaqane/Difaqane, Mopeli/Mopedi,

    Ramoneheleli/Ramoneheledi, Qaling/Qading/ Lesinlinyana/

    Lesindinyana

    M and N respectively represent MM and NN. The apostrophe

    sometimes causes confusion, making a reader believe a quotation has

    commenced. Examples:- Maseribane, Mantsebo, Mamocha,

    Mota, Makoloi, Neko.

    O in front of another vowel is pronounced W. Examples: Koenyama

    (Kwenyama) Moshoeshoe (Mwshweshwe), Moeletsi oa Basotho

    (Mweletsi wa Basotho), Matooane (Matiwane), Libopuoa

    (Dibopuwa).

  • 6

    PH and TH are both aspirated. Examples:- Mphanya, Thaba, Theko,

    Phuthiatsana

    Q represents a click sound similar to the imitation of a horse's hoof

    beat when trotting. Examples:- Qeme, Qaling, Qhobela, Qacha's

    Nek, Quthing.

    TS - the diacritic represents an aspirated sound. Examples:- Tsiu,

    Pela-tsoeu, Tsitsong.

    NG is pronounced as in singing. Examples:- Ngoana (child),

    Ngwato, Nguni.

    HL and KH are common double consonants in Sesotho. The former

    is pronounced as the Welsh LL (International phonetic symbol ),

    while KH is rendered as ch in loch or the German ach. Examples:

    Mokhehle, Hlenyane Mkhabela, Shakhane, Khaketla, Hlabisa, Khabo,

    Hlubi, Hlakola.

    Some Nguni words appear in this thesis which contain the click

    sounds of C and X. The former - used in Ceteswayo - is a click

    resembling the sound used indicating disapproval or sympathy (tut-

    tut). X, as in Xhosa, is a side click similar to the sound used when

    urging a horse to go faster.

  • 7

    ABBREVIATIONS

    AAPC All-African Peoples' Conference

    AME African Methodist Episcopal Church

    ANC African National Congress of South Africa

    ANC (AN) African National Congress of South Africa (African

    Nationalist)

    APLA Azanian People's Liberation Army

    AZAPO Azanian People's Organisation

    BAC Basutoland African Congress (later BCP)

    BACTU Basutoland Congress of Trade Unions

    BCMA Black Consciousness Movement of Azania

    BCP Basutoland Congress Party (now Basotholand

    Congress Party)

    BFL Basutoland Federation of Labour

    BFP Basutoland Freedom Party

    BNP Basotho National Party

    BOSS Bureau of State Security (South Africa)

    BPC Black People's Convention

    CCM . Chama Cha Mapinduzi (Revolutionary Party of

    Tanzania)

    CDP Christian Democratic Party (Germany and Basutoland)

    CIO Central Intelligence Organisation (Zimbabwe)

    COD Congress of Democrats (South Africa)

    CPSA Communist Party of South Africa (SACP after 1953)

    DONS Department of National Security (South Africa)

    HMSO Her Majesty's Stationary Office (London)

    ICU Industrial and Commercial Workers Union (South

    Africa)

    ILO International Labour Organisation

    LCP Lesotho Communist Party

    LCW Lesotho General Council of Workers

    LEC Lesotho Evangelical Church

    LLA Lesotho Liberation Army

    LNDC Lesotho National Development Corporation

    MFP Marematlou Freedom Party

    MTP Marema Tlou Party

    NUL National University of Lesotho

    OAU-ALC Organisation of African Unity - African Liberation

    Committee

    OMI Order of Mary Immaculate

    PAC Pan Africanist Congress of Azania

  • 8

    PEMS Paris Evangelical Missionary Society

    PMU Police Mobile Unit

    SAC P South African Communist Party

    SACPO South African Coloured People's Organisation

    SACTU South African Congress of Trade Unions

    SAIC South African Indian Congress

    SARYCO South African Revolutionary Youth Council

    SAS Special Air Service Regiment

    SB Secret Intelligence Service (Britain)

    SWAPO South west African People' s Organisation

    UBLS University of Botswana, Lesotho and Swaziland (UBS

    after 1975)

    UDF United Democratic Front (South Africa)

    UMSA Unity Movement of South Africa

    UNIA Universal Negro Improvement Association

    ZANLA Zimbabwe African National Liberation Army

    ZANU (PF) Zimbabwe African National Union (Patriotic Front)

    ZAPU Zimbabwe African People's Union

    ZIPRA Zimbabwe People' s Revolutionary Army

  • 9

    GLOSSARY

    Azania African nationalist name for South Africa

    Boer (A) Afrikaner farmer. The word was and is widely

    used contemptuously by Africans to describe

    Afrikaners generally

    Boss Boy African foreman on the mines

    Commando Afrikaner cavalry militia

    Donga (S) Ravine caused by erosion

    Headman Lowest traditional rank of chief

    Irnpi (N) - Zulu army regiment

    Induna (N) Zulu regimental commander and also an

    African appointed by whites to maintain

    discipline among African miners

    Initiation Lodge Circumcision school

    Kaffir (A) Derogatory word for Africans odopetd from

    Arabic for for infidel/unbeliever

    Kloof (A) Ravine

    Knobkerrie Battle club

    Koeoko) (S) The Unknown (spectre bringing terror ). Name

    used in 1970's and 80's to describe secret

    police activities in Lesotho

    Laager (A) Circle of wagons drawn up for defence

    Lekhotla (S) Court, league, political party, army, association

    Lekker lewe (A) "The good life"

    Lifaqane (S) The period of African civil war circa 1802-

    1830

    Location Reserved area for African workers on edge of

    urban areas

    Maloti/Maluti (S) Mountains of Lesotho

    Mealie Maize

    Mfecane (N) The Nguni word for Lifaqane

    Morgen (A) Afrikaner land measurement

    Morgue Building in which dead bodies are kept for

    identification

    Pitso (S) Traditional meeting convened in order to hear

    all views on any subject

    Rand (A) (1) South African currency (2) alternative name

    for the

    Witwatersrand mining and urban area

    Razzamatazz Euphoric display usually associated with

    American political conventions

  • 10

    Reef English word for the Rand

    Reserve Rural areas for African occupation

    Rondavel (A) Round hut

    Russians A word used to describe anarchistic Basotho

    miners on the Rand

    Swart gevaar (A) The Black Peril

    Trek (A) A migration by Afrikaner farmers in search of

    land

    Tsotsi African township thug

    Veld (A) Wide open rural landscape in the Orange Free

    State and Transvaal that is neither cultivated

    nor true forest

    A = Afrikaans

    S = Sesotho

    N = Nguni

    Names are sometimes spent in two or more ways, for example:-

    Lutuli/Luthuli, Magoti/Magothi, Lekhotla/Legotla, Khama/Kgama,

    Leabua/Leabuoa, Kolisang/Kodisang, Basuto/Basotho,

    Mothopeng/Mothupeng, Moshoeshoe/Moshesh/Mweshweshwe

  • 11

    CHAPTER ONE

    The Kingdom of Lesotho and its Relations with

    European Peoples 1780-1910

    "St Paul adapted and implemented Jesus

    Christ's teaching; likewise, Lenin those of Karl

    Marx. The equivalents for the Basotho were

    Mohlomi and his disciples, Sebetoane and

    Moshoeshoe."

    Ntsu Mokhehle

    Interview, March 1980

    In the first half of the 19th century, the African population in

    Southern Africa made rapid progress in establishing new, larger,

    political units. In the second half of the century, these new

    expansionary states were brought under foreign rule, mostly by

    military conquest. The psychological shock of European occupation

    and settlement convinced a number of African leaders that their

    future lay with identification with the European world and rejection

    of their political heritage, equitable society, and communal culture.

    The African National Congress, founded in 1912, adhered to a

    philosophy of elitism combined with Adam Smiths Christian

    mercantile liberal capitalist dream. The Communist Party of South

    Africa (CPSA), founded in 1921, was also elitist, modelling itself

    slavishly on the Soviet system. In the 1940s, partly in recognition of

    the political bankruptcy of the ANC and CPSA, a new generation of

    African leaders theorised that most of their people preferred to relate

    to the idea of re-establishing their own state, instead of working for a

    place in the inequitable, individualistically acquisitive, white settler

    or British imperial framework. The 1940s generation of Anton

    Lembede, A. P. Mda, Mangaliso Sobukwe, G. Pitje, Ntsu Mokhehle

    and Potlako Leballo followed similar paths, entering the privileged,

    westernised, African elite and then dismissing it to identify with their

    peasant origins, in which they found a wisdom and socio-economic

    framework that seemed superior to that of their European occupiers.

  • 12

    All these men owed their political philosophy to early exposure to

    oral traditions of older men who had participated in the 19th century

    states. In time, they came to view South Africa with the same attitude

    of the older generation-a forced labour system, or Boer slave-labour

    hell, an aberration, a temporary nightmare that had delayed the

    development of the 19th century states into a single nation. Most

    important of all they became convinced that their salvation lay

    through the resurrection of an oppressed, united African nation, rather

    than in participation as fourth-class citizens in white-initiated

    structures. In exile, the belief in the past and Africanist ideology,

    led Leballo to study revolutionary rural activity in Maoist China and

    Mokhehle to delve into Mohlomis life and teaching. In both cases,

    they sought to revitalise the rural dynamism which had launched the

    19th century states and which could still, in their view, bring down

    the external forces that had overwhelmed their society. Ultimately

    they failed, partly because local and international economic pressures

    were too powerful and the African population was quite conservative,

    mostly reconciled to making small gains within South Africas

    growing consumer society than adopting policies that had

    impoverished and divided newly independent African states to the

    north.

    Despite the 1994 triumph and continued electroral success of the

    ANC and its clandestine ally, the Communist Party, Africanist

    fundamentalism, associated with the PAC and BCP, remains a

    powerful undercurrent in South Africa, and is a growing, often

    nihilistic, force elsewhere on the continent as marginalised, mostly

    brutal young male militants, often identifying with and funded by

    extreme forms of Christianity, Islam, and criminal cartels, challenge

    the post colonial structure.

    The Early History of the Sotho

    This work argues that much of present South Africas problems

    (particularly the economic emasculation of Lesotho), lie in the second

    half of 19th

    century when several large expansionary southern African

    states were destroyed by European conquest and the former ruling

    class won over to European economic ideology.

    South African history concentrates mostly on interaction between

    the Afrikaners, English, Xhosa and Zulu. Clasic texts such as Eric

    Walkers History of Southern Africa, was a history of Afrikaner-

    British relations. The Oxford History of South Africa was extremely

    vague and uninformative, partly because it was aimed at

  • 13

    circumventing South African censorship. Many later books

    concentrated on the career of Nelson Mandela, totally ignoring the

    class conflicts that split the ANC in the 1950s and bedevilled the

    liberation movement thereafter, issues addressed by Peter Dreyer and

    Richard Gibson but thoroughly suppressed by the anti-apartheid

    cottage industry. Tom Lodges Black Politics in South Africa and

    related writings were purely dreadful, relying on South African police

    records, adulating upper class westernised Africans and displaying

    contempt for those from the lower end of the socio-economic

    spectrum. Fortunately analysts such as Price and Dan Omeara have

    produced convincing works concerning the reasons for eventual rapid

    political change in South Africa, which had little to do with any of the

    political parties discussed here. As for Lesotho, the country is usually

    treated separately from South Africa although until the 1980s it

    played a major role in the liberation struggle. I am probably alone in

    discussing Southern African politics from the viewpoint of Lesotho

    and the Basotho but I hope my work here will justify its importance.

    Lesotho today is usually regarded as an aids-stricken

    impoverished basket case with a dysfunctional political system.

    However, in the 19th

    century it was, numerically, the largest of the

    states of the Sotho, the linguistic name given to the eight million

    members of a Bantu-speaking people who inhabit a crescent-shaped

    territory commencing in south-western Zambia and sweeping down

    through Botswana (encompassing small adjacent areas of the Caprivi

    Strip and Zimbabwe) through South Africa and Lesotho, to areas of

    the Transkei. 1

    Given urbanisation, intermarriage and the reaction to apartheid

    using tribalism to divide the African population, tribal identify in

    southern Africa is weakening but Lesotho itself remains

    overwhelmingly homogenous. In the 19th

    century Lesotho was, with

    the Zulu kingdom, one of the two dominant African states in the area

    south of the Limpopo River and was the only state in Africa to

    repulse white armies and save its heartland from white settlement,

    although ironically and totally against Basotho tradition, from a post

    1994 viewpoint, incorporation may have ultimately been a blessing

    and not led to economic and poluctial maginalisation.

    Like any other people, the Sotho have a diverse ancestry. The

    ancestors of the predominant group, ancestral Sotho, appear to have

    begun their occupation of the high veld in about the 16th century

    AD., absorbing or ousting the various Khoisan and other groups they

    encountered. From about the 8th century AD., African peoples in the

  • 14

    high veld had been engaged in iron-working. The Sotho not only

    continued this practice, but established a reputation as miners,

    innovators and metal-workers. They were also deeply involved in the

    export of hides and skins to the east coast and favoured concentrated,

    permanent settlements, rather than scattered, temporary farmsteads.

    Their political organisation was essentially decentralised,

    communities frequently splitting when disagreement or opportunity

    for expansion occurred.3 Although engaged in trade - especially iron

    goods - the Sotho were an agricultural people and their political

    organisation was developed around the problems encountered in

    farming. Nevertheless, Sotho society was advanced enough to allow

    for considerable and sudden innovation. When faced with

    unparalleled disaster in the first half of the 19th century, society did

    not disintegrate but, instead, united into a larger whole, expanding

    rather than splitting. Executive authority in Sotho society was

    exercised by a chief or chieftainess. The various groups - Basotho,

    Batlokoa, Bapedi, Batswana, Lobedu, Phalaborwa, Birwa, and others

    - have a number of royal families, dating back several centuries, but

    some of them are related. 4

    The Sotho living in the area of modern Lesotho were ruled

    mostly by chiefs of the Bakoena (Bakwena), being the descendants of

    a Sotho leader named Koena (Kwena), who lived eleven generations

    before 1800.5 On the death of a chief, his followers would choose a

    successor from his many relatives and offspring, since polygamous

    marriages had given them a wide choice of candidates. It was usual

    for the late chief's senior son to be chosen, thus preventing succession

    disputes, but often he would be deposed (but not lose his title)

    whereupon he, or unsuccessful, disgruntled candidates would hive off

    to form a new community with a small collection of followers. 6

    Before the Lifaqane (the word used by the Sotho to describe the

    apocalyptic events which overwhelmed a large part of Africa in the

    first years of the 19th century), the role of the chief was to execute, to

    the best of his ability, the wishes of his people. He was, in particular,

    responsible for the allocation of land.7 Land was held communally.

    Private ownership did not exist, nor was it even considered. The

    chief, having consulted his advisers, could grant usufructuary rights,

    but never ownership, to his followers. An individual was only

    accepted in a community if he owed allegiance to a chief. 8

    Before the beginning of the 19th century, political, economic and

    social pressures were negligible9 and the Sotho communities, being

    almost completely self-sufficient in a moderately-populated land, 10

  • 15

    had little need for anything but light political control. A chief's

    powers, therefore, depended entirely on his success as a provider and

    adjudicator for his people. An unsuccessful or unpopular chief would

    soon lose his followers. Several Sotho proverbs summarise

    commoners views of their chiefs in the days before colonial rule

    A chief is a hornless cow and A chief is a chief only through the

    grace of the people. Moshoeshoe, the founder of the Lesotho

    kingdom, once observed that, in his opinion, a chief was like being a

    sack into which any filth could be shovelled,11 because he was forced,

    through custom, to listen to every complaint, however trivial which

    the most objectionable of his subjects might care to present to him.

    This custom was one that ensured that favouritism, self-indulgence

    and other misdeeds of the Sotho chiefs could be checked; its name

    was the pitso. The pitso was a regularly-convened, public gathering,

    where anyone could speak openly, without fear of reprisal on any

    subject. The same process applied in the chief's court (lekhotla),

    where all witnesses would speak without any fear.12 In both cases, the

    chief would have the final word, which wisely should reflect popular

    opinion but could satisfy the people if he gave a convincing argument

    to back his decision. Two Sotho sayings summarise this executive

    rule of the chief Morena ha a fose (The chief is never wrong) and

    Morena ha a tentsoe (The chief cannot be blamed).13

    An essential part of Sotho life was the recognition that an

    individual had no right to anything that might be denied his neighbour

    and, although a chief took his share of trading profits, booty, surplus

    food and fines for his work of dividing the same among his followers,

    it was understood that these should be dispersed among his followers

    during times of hardship.14 The material possessions of the chief were

    the same as theirs. Although capable of striking ruthlessly when

    enraged or whenever necessary,15 the chief was far from being any

    sort of absolute monarch, even during the crises of the Lifaqane when

    only drastic and immediate measures could ensure the survival of a

    people.

    The senior son of a chief did not automatically become chief

    upon his father's death, even if the chief had designated him the

    successor.16 As children, chiefs' sons would be encouraged to attend

    the lekhotla and pitso and would be watched and advised by adults,

    when playing at being chiefs among their fellows.17 Ability, not

    primogeniture, was often a deciding factor when installing a new

    chief.18 In the Sotho view, a chief had to be a good fighter, an

  • 16

    impartial judge, a provider and a person who could inspire communal

    effort, as well as direct it.19

    A chief had to come from one of the Sotho royal houses, such

    as the Bakoena. Within each royal house, there were a number of

    different clans, enjoying varying degrees of respect. It is evident that

    a powerful individual could eclipse, as Moshoeshoe did, the prestige

    and following accumulated by a senior clan, such as the Bamonaheng

    of Mohlomi, substituting his own clan as the dominant one within the

    royal house.20 Moreover, a strong-minded individual, albeit from the

    aristocracy, could overcome, through force of character, any

    disadvantages accruing from any disapproved liaison between his

    parents. In Sotho tradition, a royal widow would be taken in by her

    husbands brothers and any children resulting from this arrangement

    would be regarded as belonging to her late husband. A chiefs heir

    would normally be the eldest son of his great wife, who would not

    necessarily be the first wife he married. Peete, Moshoeshoe's

    grandfather, was not forceful enough to overcome his embarrassing

    parentage, but Moshoeshoe himself (if the Hlubi story below is

    correct) and Shaka Zulu certainly did. 21

    Besides the bonds of chieftaincy, the Sotho were also united by

    their experiences in the centuries old initiation lodges.22 Young men

    and women were respectively drafted into a mophato and a lebollo.

    They would remain there for about six months. It is not yet possible

    to learn their exact instruction (although missionaries have recorded

    parts), but the boys received a physically demanding education while,

    at the same time, being instructed in what was expected of them by

    their society and their ancestors as Sotho. The language of the lodges

    was an old form of Sotho and the initiates left the lodges (which were

    fired at their departure) with a sound knowledge of the Sotho ideas of

    how their society should best be protected and preserved.23 For

    example, a boy would learn, "A man is not a man if he lets his

    property be taken from him without a fight." Moreover, irrespective

    of rank within the community, an initiation lodge fellow would never

    hesitate to correct his age-set companion when he felt that he was

    going astray from what a true Sotho should be.24 Moshoeshoe himself

    was under constant pressure from his age-set when giving

    concessions to the missionaries. 25

    The Sotho were very conscious of their ancestors, whom they did

    not worship but held in the highest respect. All Sotho felt they were

    ultimately answerable to their ancestors and would one day stand

    before them and account for their lives. The ancestors provided a link

  • 17

    with the known and unknown worlds, and the Sotho avoided

    activities that might have offended their ancestors during their earthly

    existence. Children would be carefully named and a woman dropping

    a water pot might exclaim "Ramoneheleli!" meaning that she was

    apologising to her deceased ancestor, Ramoneheleli, who would have

    been annoyed by her act in his lifetime. At the deepest level of the

    involvement of the ancestors in Sotho life, the analysis enters

    political and theological argument.

    Nationalists felt an obligation to their ancestors. Leballo, in

    particular, could sway an audience against compromise by reminding

    it of the ancestors, to whom certain policies would have been

    anathema. Sotho also objected to Catholic missionaries replacing

    respect for Sotho ancestors with veneration of Christian saints who,

    naturally, appeared to the Sotho as white people's ancestors. Free

    from Christian meddling and denigration, the role of the more

    prominent ancestors in Sotho society would best be compared to that

    of the prophets in Middle Eastern communities.26

    Southern Africa has always been a fertile area for African

    prophets.27 The power of their visions and teachings have been

    considerably diluted through disparaging European commentaries,28

    the lack of knowledge of writing among their African contemporaries

    and the destruction of much of African society through the myriad of

    political, social, religious and economic pressures of the last two

    centuries. In addition, western and Soviet educated Africans tended

    to despise religious sects of Zion and Ethiopian persuasion, both

    close to traditional African culture. Although attempts are being

    made by historians and others to collect surviving fragments of oral

    traditions concerning the prophets from their descendants and the

    Guardians of the initiation lodges,29 it will never be possible to gain

    anything more than a shadow of the accumulated collective wisdom

    of the Sotho, nor even the teachings of a single prophet.

    Mohlomi and the Mekoatleng kingdom

    Despite the dearth of evidence, it is beyond doubt that one Sotho

    prophet, Mohlomi-Matsie, son of Monyane, a chief of the Bakoena

    ruling house, played an important role in the later establishment of

    the Lesotho kingdom,30 particularly in his innovation of using

    polygyny to extend his influence over a large area.

    Some fragmentary writings exist on Mohlomi's life. Missionary

    writers, surprisingly, gave intimate details of insignificant parts of his

    life, while ignoring those aspects that impressed the Sotho.31 This

  • 18

    can partly be explained by the similarity of his message to that of

    Christ and also to the contemporary European view of Africans -

    paternalistic sympathy for a people who needed to be saved.

    Mohlomi died in about 1815 32 after a long and successful career as

    what has been accepted as the classic example of a Sotho chief. He

    said that when he was about 13 years old and attending the mophato,

    the roof of his hut was lifted off and he was carried into the sky by a

    giant bird. There, strange sky-beings taught him to rule his future

    followers through peace and justice. The story has been dismissed

    unjustly as one which has almost certainly been coloured by

    Christianity,33 but the Paris Evangelical Missionary Society (PEMS)

    missionaries, Casalis and Arbousset, heard the tale in 1833, before

    their ministries began. 34

    Mohlomi was a prophet with supernatural skills. He foretold his

    father's death and had the power to cure leprosy. He ate little and

    drank only water or milk. He also preferred the company of children.

    He succeeded his incapable brother, Nkopane, as chief of the

    Bamonaheng and then became a wanderer, practising his skills as a

    healer, visionary and sage. He was said to have possessed the power

    to travel mysteriously and to make rain. He declared that there must

    be a powerful creator and that conscience is the true guide of man.

    He stayed among the Batswana (ma-na-ntja - the eaters of dogs),

    where he accumulated large packs of dogs and married, leaving a son,

    Moriri. Then he passed to the land of the ma-ya-batho (the eaters of

    men) or the Bamahlabaneng, people of Venda origin, in the northern

    Transvaal.35 As time passed, his persuasive oratory and wisdom

    gained him frequent invitations to act as an arbitrator. He became an

    outstanding judge in the lekhotla, and his impartiality is summarised

    in a saying attributed to him that all were equal in the sight of the law:

    The law does not know a poor man. Capitalising on his reputation,

    Mohlomi extended his political authority through numerous dynastic

    marriages, being the first Sotho leader to practise polygyny on a wide

    scale. By the time of his death, he had visited and married in every

    part of Africa from the Zambezi southwards, and his influence was

    acknowledged throughout that area. His headquarters were at

    Mekoatleng (modern Mopeli's Spruit) near the north-western corner

    of modern Lesotho. His reputation was such that no one questioned

    his authority, despite his lengthy absences. Political organisation in

    his day was locally controlled, non-materialistic, communal and

    largely non-competitive, so it is not an easy task to ascertain the

    dimensions of the area he ruled. Nor, from the Sotho point of view,

  • 19

    is it important, since the criterion of the idea of a great leader among

    the Sotho is at variance with European thinking. While the former is

    again more concerned with the prophet and provider tradition, the

    latter looks for evidence of a centralised bureaucracy, standing

    armies, treaties and other results of pressures that had not at that time

    afflicted the Sotho. Yet, Mohlomi's work is important in that he gave

    the idea of empire to both his disciples, Sebetoane Maselloane (his

    relative) and Moshoeshoe, which gives credence to the widespread

    Sotho belief that Mohlomi, through his polygynous marriages and

    many skills, at the very least commanded high respect throughout the

    area of the present Orange Free State, if not direct control.

    Moshoeshoe, who freely admitted that he was deeply influenced by

    Mohlomi, was thinking in terms of a very large political unit from an

    early age, long before his position as a minor chief was even

    established. His own Lesotho kingdom should really be regarded not

    so much as an expanded Butha-Buthe chieftaincy, but more as a

    successor to the Mekoatleng kingdom of Mohlomi.38

    There is another aspect of Mohlomi's life that has been engulfed by

    Christian missionary teaching and has only been kept alive by the

    initiation lodges and those associated with Lekhotla la Bafo.

    Mohlomi was either philosophically inclined or divinely inspired. On

    his deathbed, he told his wife:

    "'Maliepollo, my wife, the spirits have spoken to

    me who am about to die. Great trouble will come

    upon this land of ours. Therefore, when I am no

    more, and the time of matseliso [mourning] is

    over, go thou hence, and it has been told me that

    the wisdom I have sought in vain will be revealed

    to thee, who art a woman."39

    It is unlikely that this could be anything else but a reference to

    the coming of the Lifaqane and Christianity. None of Mohlomi's

    children carried on his work. Of his senior sons, Monyane and

    Khoyane were killed, while Tlali and Mapheelle (Nkopane) proved to

    be incapable. A missionary report states that Mohlomi killed another

    son, named Nketsi, but traditionalists dispute such a son's existence,

    let alone his death at the hands of Mohlomi.40

    The first missionaries were invited to Lesotho for political, not

    religious reasons. They did not encounter any African religious

    leader interested in serious theological dialogue, for the Basotho

  • 20

    immediately realised that the missionaries would not tolerate any sign

    of syncretism. Moshoeshoe believed that the Prophetess Mantsoupa,

    who was inspired by a supernatural presence she would only identify

    as he or him41 was closer to God than the missionaries. It was not

    until African society began to disintegrate that mass conversions

    began. Although Christianity is now the majority religion in

    Southern Africa, it remains to be seen if the work of the Africanist

    churches will eventually attract Africans from the upper echrelons of

    society. At present few from this class, if any, are attracted to

    traditionalist syncretic semi pagan churches. Lower class believers

    draw inspiration from the prophets and African Zionist and

    Rastafarian interpretions of the Ethiopian Orthodox Churchs

    traditions such as the Kebra Nagast, which have grown out of ancient

    pre-586 BC First Temple Judiasm and an African church established

    long before parts of Europe became Christian. The effect on political

    development - as attested in other parts of the world where lower

    class fundamentalist Christian, Hindu, Muslim and Jewish

    movements have been active - would be considerable.42 but the

    African Christian middle and upper classes that control modern

    political parties remain a major ultra conservative element within the

    Roman Catholic and Anglican faiths.

    Moshoeshoe and the Lifaqane

    In the last years of his long life, Mohlomi came into close contact

    with a young, volatile and almost insanely ambitious son of

    Mokhachane, a chief owing allegiance to him. This was Lepoqo,43

    later named Moshoeshoe. A Lekhotla la Bafo tradition states that

    Moshoeshoes mother was a Hlubi girl of great beauty, captured

    during a raid. She had been discovered alone in a forest. Fears that

    she was a spirit prompted some of Mokhachanes men to suggest

    killing her, but other advice prevailed and she became a concubine

    for Mokhachane. Her son was Moshoeshoe and the tradition states

    that Kholu, Mokhachanes senior wife, was presented with the baby

    and told to raise it as her own, since, at that time, she had no sons.

    The Hlubi girl eventually became a junior wife. Professor Leonard

    Thompson, who states that three informants told him Moshoeshoe's

    mother was a coloured (mixed race) girl,44 did not encounter the Hlubi

    story. The song, Kholu refuses to nurse Moshoeshoe, recalls

    Kholu's protests when ordered to raise the boy.

  • 21

    When Moshoeshoe was sent to Mohlomi at Ngoliloe, he was at

    the very least suffering from mental strain. He had killed four of his

    followers for being slow in carrying out his instructions and a fifth for

    milking one of his cows without his permission.45 Moshoeshoe

    stated years later: When I was a young man, I had a great desire to

    become a chief. I longed that my chieftainship should grow and rise

    and, with this wish, I went to Mohlomi whose chieftainship had been

    a great success .......I asked him to advise me how I could become a

    chief. Could it be by a charm?46 Ntsu Mokhehle, Lesotho's prime

    minister and researcher on Mohlomi's life, asserts that it was not so

    much for advice that Moshoeshoe visited Mohlomi but more for

    treatment.47

    Mohlomi took great pains with the young man, being struck by

    his extraordinary intelligence and dynamism, predicting that he would

    become a great leader. My son," he said, "if you could forsake

    everything, I would take you with me wherever I go; but it may not

    be. One day you will rule men; learn then to know them; and, when

    you judge, let your judgements be just.48 He taught him that his

    own power had come through the respect he had gained by excelling

    in professions revered by the Basotho. These skills had brought him

    wealth, which he had used significantly through his numerous

    marriages. He advised Moshoeshoe to despise arbitrary methods of

    judgement, such as witchcraft and divining, and told him to protect

    victims of such practices.49

    Moshoeshoe later developed into a formidable soldier and

    commander and his subjects were terrified of his temper.

    Nevertheless, it is evident that his policies and character were

    governed by Mohlomis advice to use peaceful methods wherever

    possible. By following such advice, it is clear that he was able to

    establish himself as chief among chiefs, partly because he could

    control himself and be magnanimous, but it may have been

    detrimental in his dealings with the Afrikaners. However, it is

    questionable if his authority could have been enforced in

    uncompromising aggression against the white settlers, for he had not

    consolidated his power in Lesotho when they arrived and the

    behaviour of his son, Molapo, and grandson, Jonathan Molapo,

    indicated that the Basotho would not have stood united in 1836, but

    made alliances to prevent Moshoeshoe's emerging supremacy.

    It is probable that Moshoeshoe learned two vital lessons from

    Mohlomi. His relationship with the prophet was that of a dynamic

    young son of a chief desperately looking for answers to questions that

  • 22

    were literally driving him mad. He emerged from his days with

    Mohlomi with an apparently clear vision of how to achieve the power

    he sought. His future military commander, Makoanyane, testified

    that Moshoeshoe was thinking in terms of great power from The Start

    of his career. You are my right-hand man, he told Makoanyane.

    Together we will found a new empire. Let us

    first render ourselves popular by mighty deeds and,

    afterwards, we will speak of peace and clemency. In

    the disputes of others, let us always put ourselves on

    the side of the strongest. If we would become rich in

    men and cattle, we cannot help making enemies; but

    they will not roar forever. 50

    This, therefore, was the first lesson - to found a new empire

    (and this reference may suggest that he regarded Mohlomi's state as

    an empire), he needed wealth, for that was the only way in which he

    could attract followers, since he did not share Mohlomi's power of

    rain-making or skill as a physician. Moshoeshoe gained early pre-

    eminence as a successful cattle-raider. Cattle-raiding and stock theft

    were methods of establishing the fighting and leadership abilities of

    warriors, as well as accumulating wealth. Moshoeshoe's success

    attracted followers and he established his first independent settlement

    in about 1820/21, in the region of Butha-Buthe. Ultimately, he

    consolidated his position by numerous polygynous marriages,

    appointing his sons as administrators. Mohlomi had been unusual,

    for polygyny was not common. Moshoeshoe was responsible for its

    widespread introduction to bolster centralised political authority.

    Before Moshoeshoe had managed to extend his authority to any

    significant degree his and every other Sotho group on the high veld,

    as prophesied by Mohlomi on his deathbed, had been consumed by a

    red cloud that had arisen in the East.51 The Lifaqane swept away

    the world they had known.

    The Lifaqane

    Towards the end of the 18th century, the northern Nguni-

    speaking peoples of the south-east African coastal strip began a series

    of small wars and cattle raids among themselves. The cause appears

    to have been a rapidly-rising population, nourished by maize, finding

    it increasingly difficult to maintain peaceful relations in an area where

    political organisation could best be described as a large number of

  • 23

    expanding circles in a confined space. The Nguni's predilection for

    cattle as a mark of wealth, and their custom of shifting subsistence

    agriculture, had already exacerbated the situation before famine

    finally swept across the country in 1802. Hungry people, driven

    desperate by want, flung themselves upon their more prosperous

    neighbours and full-scale fighting engulfed the land.

    For 16 years, a number of confederations strove for supremacy,

    until 1818, when Shaka Zulu, leader of a section of the broken

    Mthethwa confederation, turned upon his Ndwandwe pursuers at the

    Mhlatuze River and destroyed them. From then onwards, the

    Mfecane (the Nguni word for Lifaqane) developed from a localised

    conflict into a continental war, as landless hordes erupted from

    Nguniland in search of security and sustenance. The next few years

    witnessed unparalleled slaughter, destruction and famine, as refugee

    hosts and invaded peoples fought for supremacy and survival in every

    region from the Cape Frontier to Lake Victoria Nyanza. By the time

    the conflicts had abated the interaction between the invaders and

    invaded had produced large states in areas which had previously

    known only small, disunited political groupings. These states can be

    divided into invader states, based on the Zulu model, and

    coalescent states, formed by peoples afflicted by the invasions. In

    both cases, disparate peoples, even former enemies, were united into

    a single state. The Zulu-type states sought cultural cohesion through

    implementation of the Dingiswayo-Shaka political and military

    innovations, which tended to eliminate conquered royal clans and

    subject conquerors and conquered, male and female, to enlistment

    into a single, united, centralised, national army. Promotion to the

    hierarchy in these militaristic states depended solely on merit not

    birth. The other states, although influenced by the Zulu model, were

    more inclined towards the adaptation of their own institutions to meet

    the changing circumstances. The Basotho state of Moshoeshoe

    belongs to this latter category.52

    Moshoeshoes ambitious Mokoteli Butha-Buthe chieftainship

    was suddenly transformed from an aggressive expansionary state-let

    into a vulnerable hill-top settlement lying close to the Drakensberg

    passes, the only outlet for many of the refugees from Nguniland. At

    first, he attempted to hold his position as the Hlubi, Tlokoa and

    Ngwane refugee hordes fought for domination of his area, while

    keeping an uneasy eye on the Ndebele kingdom of Mzilikazi, an ex-

    Zulu commander, newly established north of the Vaal river.53

  • 24

    Moshoeshoe used diplomacy, alliance and force in order to

    survive but, by June 1824, although he had succeeded in uniting some

    small chieftaincies under his authority, (including his fathers), a

    Batlokoa siege had rendered him destitute.

    A relative, None of the Ntsane, invited the Mokoteli to move

    south to occupy a mountain in his neighbourhood. Mohale,

    Moshoeshoe's brother, reported that the mountain could easily be

    defended and that None was willing to share his peoples good

    harvest. In June 1824, the Mokoteli set out south, hugging the

    mountain edge to escape the attention of the Tlokoa. Peete,

    Moshoeshoes grandfather, was one of several stragglers who were

    lost to cannibals during the march. The refugees reached the

    mountain, which they named Thaba Bosiu The Mountain of the

    Night. It had a deceptive appearance and was not immediately

    recognisable as a strong position. Yet it indeed proved to be just that,

    and also possessed springs on its plateau.54

    Moshoeshoe soon incorporated the Ntsane, after fighting erupted

    over thefts by the destitute Mokoteli. The refugees were now in

    control of a mountain stronghold, backed by the maloti (mountains)

    and facing west to the fertile plains of the present Orange Free State.

    In the south, Moshoeshoe annexed a small Phuthi group under

    Moorosi, who employed San (Bushmen) and lived by cattle raiding.

    Moshoeshoe gained control of the area in the west, which became

    known after Afrikaner conquest as the granary of the Orange Free

    State, 55 and then used the Phuthi to guide his warriors through to

    Thembuland on cattle raids. The grain and cattle surplus gave him

    the means to attract a large number of followers and acquire more

    wives. Thus, after a perilous trek from Butha-Buthe, Moshoeshoe

    recommenced the process of expanding his chieftaincy towards

    empire.

    The Ngwane, Tlokoa and Ndebele still threatened the stability of

    the new kingdom, as did the powerful but distant Zulu state of Shaka.

    Moshoeshoe paid nyehelo (tribute) to the Zulu and Ngwane but

    eventually clashed with the latter, repulsing them below Thaba Bosiu.

    An Ndebele attack convinced the Ngwane that the area was unsafe.

    They moved to the Transkei, where two British attacks destroyed

    them. Their leader, Matooane (Matiwane) was at first given

    sanctuary by Moshoeshoe, but then returned to his Nguniland home

    where Dingane, the new Zulu leader, murdered him.

    Rivalry continued between Lesotho and the Tlokoa state of

    Sekonyela and was not finally resolved until 1863, when Moshoeshoe

  • 25

    defeated and annexed Sekonyela's people. In the case of the Ndebele,

    based in the Transvaal, they succeeded in reaching the summit of

    Thaba Bosiu in an attack in 1831, before being repulsed.

    Moshoeshoe defused a dangerous situation by placating the infuriated

    besiegers with a gift of cattle.56

    Important innovations were introduced by the Basotho warriors

    following attacks by the Kora, a branch of the Khoi, an African

    people whose pastoral culture had been shattered by Afrikaner

    aggression, alcohol and smallpox between 1652 and 1713.57 The

    Kora, like most of the Khoi, had adopted Afrikaner ways and roved in

    small bands on horseback and with firearms. They lived a life of

    banditry, avoided battles and struck at the weakest, most lucrative

    targets. Nevertheless, they were not always successful and they lost

    horses to the Basotho at Qaling, Maseru. Other losses followed and

    the Basotho also began to collect firearms. Some had been obtained

    from the Cape, where many Basotho had worked for the 1820

    English-speaking settlers. Other weapons were captured from the

    Kora themselves. Moorosi sent a San to instruct the Basotho in

    horsemanship and the process began of transforming the Basotho

    army from a spear and club-carrying infantry into a gun-bearing

    cavalry. More horses and guns were acquired through trade and

    counter raids.58 The Cape settlers set a precedent, later adopted on

    the diamond fields, of paying the Basotho workers in guns. The

    Basotho also developed a new type of horse. The Basuto Pony was

    a nimble but enduring animal, which flourished on poor pasture and

    was suited to both mountain and veld campaigning. 59

    Although individual Basotho gained reputations for

    marksmanship, a dearth of munitions and lack of access to good

    gunpowder severely limited the effectiveness of the Basotho forces

    against European enemies. The Basotho did make gunpowder, but it

    was extremely weak and only effective at close range. For that

    reason, they were unable to challenge Afrikaner firepower in the vital

    years of conflict over land.

    The transformation of the Basotho army severely curtailed Kora

    bandit activities. Knecht, their most dangerous leader, was killed in

    an internal squabble in October 1833. In l836, Moshoeshoe himself

    led the decisive attack that destroyed a hostile Kora-Xhosa alliance

    and terminated the Kora military threat. Despite this, further

    problems had already been caused by the association of the Kora with

    European missionaries, who supported underhand land dealings

    against Moshoeshoe.60

  • 26

    Relations with the Europeans

    Moshoeshoe invited European missionaries to Lesotho in 1832.

    While brooding over the Kora problem, he met an itinerant ex-slave

    and gun-runner named Adam Krotz. Krotz sold Moshoeshoe three

    guns and informed him that missionaries were unusual and could help

    bring peace.

    The idea of having near him permanently wise

    men, friends of peace, disposed to do all in their

    power to aid him in his distress, pleased him

    greatly. He wanted to have some at once. Do

    you know any, said he to me, who would be

    disposed to come? I replied that such men

    sometimes came our way. Oh! I beseech you to

    tell the first you meet to hasten here. I will give

    them the best possible welcome. I will do

    everything they advise me to do.61

    Krotz passed the request to the Philippolis missionary, Kolbe,

    who forwarded it to Dr. John Philip, Superintendent of the London

    Missionary Society (LMS) in South Africa.

    Three French missionaries, sent out by the Paris Evangelical

    Missionary Society (PEMS) but diverted from their original

    Transvaal objective, arrived in Lesotho in June 1833.62 All three men,

    Casalis, Gosselin and Arbousset, left their mark. Gosselin was a

    mason, who had a hand in every construction built by the

    missionaries in Lesotho for the next 40 years; Arbousset was an

    explorer, retracing and recording the Lifaqane journeys; but the most

    influential of the three was Jean-Eugene Casalis, who became

    Moshoeshoe's close adviser and secretary. Until his departure in

    1856, at the age of 44, Casalis stood by the chief whenever

    consultations with whites took place. Agreements supposedly made

    between Moshoeshoe and the whites without Casalis testifying to

    their veracity cannot be counted as correctly negotiated. Casalis tried

    to identify himself with the new kingdom: We become Basutos.

    From today onwards, our destinies and those of the tribe are

    identical. 63 He had enormous respect for Moshoeshoe and his advice

    was taken very seriously. Moshoeshoe's invitation to the missionaries

    had a political motivation. He needed an adviser who knew whites

    but who would give him unbiased information and guidance. In this,

  • 27

    Casalis gave him excellent service. He was young, enthusiastic and

    dedicated and, even when he realised that the apparent fervour of

    interest in his Christian message was not the overriding factor in

    Moshoeshoe's mind, he kept his word and identified with Lesotho's

    interests as best he could.

    In religious matters, Casalis refused to compromise.64 He knew

    of Mohlomi and some aspects of Basotho thought65 but he never

    entertained any notions of syncretism. Whereas, in pagan Europe,

    missionaries had compromised and produced spectacular religious

    and cultural results (such as in pre-Viking Ireland) the missionaries

    never accepted any of the Basotho ideas, informing them that

    adherence to Basotho traditions would lead to eternal damnation, a

    condition which made a powerful impression on Basotho

    imagination. The early missionaries worked in self-confident pagan

    African states and made little headway until society broke up under

    military and economic pressure. Their unflinching adherence to

    orthodoxy may or may not have played a significant part in

    persuading Africans, in the days of disintegration, that their support

    of paganism had caused their downfall. What is certain is that this

    unbending orthodoxy and rejection of African traditional society had

    a crippling effect on the psyche of the thousands of Africans who

    embraced Christianity. Moreover, the missionaries implanted a firm

    belief among Africans that white society was essentially benign and

    that the local settlers were oddities, whose extremes would eventually

    be curbed by the British. The illusion of hope engendered by the

    missionaries and impartial administrators, such as Maitland,

    weakened African responses to the local aggression against them by

    Afrikaner and British settlers.

    Casalis acted honourably throughout his life and his memory is

    today highly respected by African nationalists. In contrast, the

    English Wesleyan missionaries who accompanied a large migration to

    Moshoeshoe's territory later in 1833, are remembered with contempt,

    as they treated Moshoeshoe as a fool and bedevilled the land disputes.

    Moshoeshoe was a leader of a powerful state, and had only reached

    that position through gaining wealth and followers while, at the same

    time, avoiding confrontation until he was powerful enough to deal

    effectively with it.

    At the end of 1833, seven thousand Rolong, a Sotho people led

    by Moroka, arrived at Thaba Nchu, the home of Moseme, a chief who

    owed allegiance to Moshoeshoe. These Rolong were accompanied by

    two groups, numbering about a thousand, of Griqua and Bastards

  • 28

    (people of Afrikaner and Khoi parentage). The leader of the first

    group was Barend Barends. A small group of Kora, led by Jan

    Kaptein, arrived simultaneously at Mekoatleng. All these groups

    were in search of better-watered territory and were all under

    Wesleyan influence. On arrival, Moroka sent representatives to

    Moshoeshoe, asking for permission to settle. A large pitso took place

    and eventually, despite opposition, Moshoeshoe agreed.66 Moroka

    presented Moshoeshoe with the customary peho. Peho was a gift of

    cattle which recognised the right to land of the people whose chief

    ruled it. Moshoeshoe presented one of the beasts to Moseme,

    confirming that he was the Basotho leaders representative at Thaba

    Nchu. The Wesleyan missionaries acknowledged that the territory in

    which Moroka settled was part of Lesotho, and Casalis confirmed that

    Moseme had been instructed by Moshoeshoe to be his ear and eye

    over Moroka.67

    By the time of the missionaries' arrival in 1833, Moshoeshoe was

    about 47 years old. He had spent the previous 12 years fighting and

    outwitting powerful rivals. His state was prosperous, well-armed and

    expansionary. However, land was still held in trust for his people and

    he had never possessed tribal authority to give it to others. From the

    time of the arrival of the English missionaries lost land has

    remained an emotive political issue in Southern Africa. This writer

    was startled when an off-hand remark to the PAC leader, Leballo,

    during a telephone conversation prompted an immediate correction

    concerning the amount of land lost to Lesotho through the Wesleyan

    missionary purchases.68 On 7th December, 1833, the English

    missionaries Archbell, Edwards and Jenkins drew up a document

    stating that they had been sold nearly 2000 square miles around

    Thaba Nchu by Moshoeshoe and Moseme for seven young oxen, one

    heifer, two sheep and one goat.69 A second document, drawn up and

    signed the same day by mark by Moshoeshoe, Moseme and Moroka,

    stated that the same area had been sold to Archbell in his capacity as

    representative of the Wesleyan Conference for nine cattle and

    seventeen sheep and goats.70 Sanders attempts to excuse the

    Wesleyan action, stating that it was Archbell's attempt to impose a

    fixed European settlement on a fluid African situation. He adds that

    the Wesleyans were not, of course, speculators eager for profits or

    farmers greedy for pasture. Their basic concern was the welfare of

    their mission. 71

    More sales followed. Jenkins, the missionary at Mpokane with

    Jan Kaptein, bought about 1000 square miles from Molapo in

  • 29

    February 1834 for two oxen and five cows.72 In 1836 Kaptein was

    killed by a lion and his successor, Gert Taaibosch, moved his

    followers away to Merumetso, without attempting to define the nature

    of his occupation.73 The Griqua moved from Thaba Nchu to

    Lesooane and claimed that they had bought the area for sheep and

    oxen, while the Bastards (now calling themselves Newlanders)

    bought about 800 square miles for eight head of cattle, 34 sheep

    and five goats, after the Wesleyan missionaries had obtained the

    marks of Moshoeshoe and Sekonyela in July 1834. A further sale

    took place in 1836, when Platberg was taken over by Coloureds. 74

    The Wesleyans did not attempt to make serious use of the

    documents recording these sales when the British eventually

    intervened in escalating land disputes.75 James Cameron, the

    missionary at Platberg in 1840 who became Wesleyan District

    chairman in 1843, wrote to his superior, William Shaw, saying,

    Look at the price given for the country and reflect on the opinion,

    which the Wesleyan Missionary Committee and the religious public

    at home are likely to form respecting it.76 Nevertheless, the action of

    the missionaries set a precedent across the Orange. The Wesleyans

    may have believed that Moshoeshoe did not fully understand what he

    was agreeing to and they also knew that the land they had bought

    had been acquired for a mere trifle.77 But, most of all, they thought

    they had got away with it. As soon as Moshoeshoe's mark was on the

    sale, they believed that they were de jure owners of the land. When

    Cameron and others realised that the missionary sales were dubious

    transactions, they were still unable to admit they were part of Lesotho

    and therefore answerable to Moshoeshoe. Taking advantage of

    Lesothos disputes with the Afrikaners of the Great Trek who used

    similar, if not identical, methods to acquire land, the Wesleyans

    fought for what they thought were their rights, even though from a

    purely legal or ethical aspect they had no case.

  • 30

    Whites at the Cape and the Great Trek

    The Great Trek was the second of the two population movements

    that radically altered the nature of Southern African society. By

    1836, the year of the trek, Moshoeshoe had created a state larger than

    modern Lesotho, having appeased the Ndebele, outlasted the Ngwane

    and reached a modus vivendi with Sekonyela of the Tlokoa, who

    never managed to rival Moshoeshoes wealth and was eventually

    overcome and his people incorporated. Moshoeshoe had assembled

    under his authority several groups, large and small, of Nguni, Sotho

    and other refugees. In return for allegiance, they were granted land,

    cattle and protection. Smaller units were absorbed into his direct

    following, while larger units retained their own chiefs. Moshoeshoe

    conducted internal affairs in the commonly accepted way by frequent

    consultation with vassal rulers and the mass of commoners at

    regularly convened national and local pitsos. This frequent

    consultation, though complicating every major political decision,

    strengthened Moshoeshoes position as a chief through the grace of

    the people, his own place in the Bakoena royal genealogy being

    singularly insignificant. As time went by, he strengthened the

    position of his own Mokoteli by polygyny and placing. The Griqua

    and Kora threat had been neutralised and, if the sales to the

    Wesleyans were unknown to him, the situation would certainly have

    been speedily resolved, once it had become an issue.

    In 1652, the Dutch East India Company had established a

    refreshment station at the Cape, under Commander Jan van Riebeeck,

    in order to service its fleet passing to and from the East. By the time

    of the landing, western European business interests had already

    evolved and adopted the concept of achieving rapid and spectacular

    economic growth through the utilisation on a massive scale of poorly-

    paid or slave African labour. This system had been inspired by the

    desire by western Europeans to acquire further super profits78 after the

    discovery and plunder of the New World Aztec and Inca Empires.

    The New World possessed immense agricultural resources,

    particularly in the tropical area where plantations eventually

    flourished. Unable to get the required labour from European and

    American Indian sources, the Spanish Government launched the

    trans-Atlantic slave trade in 1517, to bring African labour to the

    plantations and mines of the New World. Other nations, including

    the Dutch, fought for control, not only in the Americas, but also in the

    East Indies, India and the Far East, when the Cape route was

    discovered at the end of the 15th century. When the Dutch founded

  • 31

    their refreshment station at the Cape, they had already been engaged

    in fifty years of fighting the Portuguese to wrest control of the Spice

    Islands, establish the Dutch East Indies Company as the major carrier

    between Japan and Arabia and link up with other Dutch commercial

    companies which had seized the major slaving stations in west

    Africa, as well as an area of north-east Brazil. The Dutch were, by

    the 1640s, offering French and English-held areas of the Caribbean a

    package that included technical assistance in setting up sugar estates,

    a supply of slaves from Africa, and carrying services to take off the

    sugar that might be produced.79

    The Company personnel at the Cape station, therefore, had a

    background in which slavery, disadvantageous trade agreements

    backed by cynicism, and frequent violence, were commonplace.

    Their trading practices were alien to a continent where external trade

    was hardly new. From the Guinea coast in Phoenician times, to

    Sofala in Islamic, pre-Portuguese days, trade had been mutually

    beneficial.80 It lacked the rapacity and contempt the Dutch brought in

    their dealings with the Khoisan, after the departure of van Riebeeck

    in 1662. Van Riebeeck had failed to maintain good trading relations

    with the Khoi, partly because of the activities of his interpreter, a

    Gorinhaikona who had been banished from the people with whom the

    Dutch wished to trade, but more because the Khoi discovered that the

    Dutch were paying them with very low value, although initially

    attractive, trade goods.81 The result was the establishment of

    freeburghers (ex-employees of the Company) as market gardeners

    subject to suffocating restrictions. Naturally, they quickly rejected

    Company control and moved into the Cape interior, adopting cattle

    ranching as a way of life and using enslaved Khoi to work the

    enormous farms they acquired through force, dishonest treaties and

    the destruction of the Khoi, through smallpox and alcohol.82 Their

    way of life was feudalism in its most degenerate form, but was not

    based on any inherited, medieval, European notions of social and

    political organisation, but on the slave-master relationship established

    in the commercial agricultural enterprises in the New World. By

    1707, there were 1,623 freeburghers of German, Dutch, French and

    Khoi origin. No significant white immigration occurred again until

    1820.83 This small settler group evolved into the Afrikaner people

    and their basic economic strategy remained that of the late 17th

    century - the establishment of large farms, owned by single families,

    who used slaves to work them.84

  • 32

    After breaking away from company control in the Cape, the

    Afrikaners had become cattle farmers on a large scale. The Company

    theoretically leased land to them, but found it difficult to collect the

    annual quit-rent on each holding, let alone control the size of the

    farms. Soon, a society developed in which Afrikaners regarded their

    males as men at the age of sixteen, entitled to individual holdings of

    at least six thousand acres.85 Their farming was inefficient and

    manual work was accomplished by slaves, the Afrikaners acting as

    overseers. Their concept of a state could best be described as a

    society of landlords in which membership was exclusively confined

    to Afrikaners, whose theology included the belief that they, though

    not their Coloured children, were the Elect of God, the Chosen

    People.86

    The British annexation of the Cape in 1814/15 led to conflict

    between the new administration and the Afrikaners, mainly over the

    issue of equality before the law of all peoples resident in the Cape.

    Missionary activity and the abolition of slavery in 1833 exacerbated

    relations, but it is likely that the Great Trek of 1836 would have

    occurred anyway, since the advancing Xhosa in the Eastern Cape

    barred expansion in that direction. Initial probes revealed that there

    was apparently vacant land for Afrikaner settlement north of the

    Orange River, north of the Vaal River and in Natal. Between

    November 1835 and 1837, about 14,000 Afrikaners left the Cape,

    against British instructions, in search of land in the South African

    interior.87 The coalescing political process that Moshoeshoe was

    encouraging through alliance, persuasion, marriage and occasional

    force was, therefore, presented with a gigantic, indigestible lump of

    Afrikaner Christian Nationalism, a creed and way of life which drew

    strength from exclusiveness, whereas the strength of the Lifaqane

    states had come through innovation, adaptation and intermarriage.

    The options open to Africans in contact with the full force of

    Afrikaner expansion were stark, although none realised the threat

    immediately. The Afrikaner way of life, often cited erroneously as

    some sort of unique development, was basically a slave-master

    society, based on the plantations of the New World and even mirrored

    in the establishment of European settlement in Australia from 1788

    onwards with convict labour to service wealthy landlords.

    In Southern Africa, Africans - Khoisan or Bantu - absorbed by

    the Afrikaner community were used as labourers with no rights, while

    those who were not absorbed were tolerated so long as they did not

    constitute a military or economic threat or argue over the possession

  • 33

    of land. It was a creed of such obduracy that every political process

    of coalescence engendered by the Lifaqane was rejected (if it was

    even considered) on the principle that the perpetrators were not only

    inferior and not the Elect of God, but probably because the Afrikaners

    questioned whether Africans were fully human.

    The full force of the Great Trek by-passed Lesotho, as the

    Afrikaners headed for the relatively deserted areas of Natal and the

    Transvaal, which marked the borderlands of the militaristic Zulu and

    Ndebele states. However, subsequent reinforcements from the Cape

    had already created friction with the Basotho by the time most

    Afrikaners had returned to the Trans-Orange, after their abandonment

    of the Natal settlement in 1843. Moshoeshoe had been deeply

    impressed by Afrikaner military successes against Mzilikazis

    Ndebele and Dingane's Zulu and had even discussed military

    assistance for the advance against the Ndebele before land disputes

    broke out.88 He had been told by Casalis that the Afrikaners had left

    the Cape over the issue of slaves,89 whom they had not wished to

    emancipate, but he also knew that belligerence might be disastrous.

    These frightening newcomers had retrieved Dingane's cattle from

    Sekonyela by a simple trick with handcuffs; they had fought off the

    Ndebele with a mere 40 guns and then routed them with 135 men.

    Most alarming of all, a force of only 4,000 Afrikaners had broken

    Zulu power, killing over 3,000 warriors. 90

    It was, therefore, understandable that Moshoeshoe exercised

    caution when he was confronted with land disputes with the

    Afrikaners. Afrikaners were given permission to use land on a

    temporary basis, as they had in the past. However, the Afrikaners

    were attracted to the extremely fertile area around the Caledon

    Valley, which was also free from horse-sickness.91 Control of this

    area gave Moshoeshoe his grain surplus. Blatantly ignoring

    Moshoeshoes warnings, verbal and written, that he regarded their

    stay as temporary, Afrikaners began treating Basotho territory as their

    own, erecting permanent buildings and unanimously declaring, when

    pressed, that Moshoeshoe had granted them the land for themselves.

    Since the Basotho held land communally, this right of private

    ownership was impossible to grant. Casalis, without whom

    Moshoeshoe refused to conduct any business with whites,

    summarised the Afrikaner attitude thus: They had humbly asked for

    temporary rights while they were still few in number. They only

    denied this when they thought themselves strong enough to throw off

    the mask.92

  • 34

    Infinitely wiser than his panic-stricken contemporary, Dingane,

    who had butchered Retiefs party and then seen his army destroyed at

    Blood (Ncome) River ten months later, Moshoeshoe decided against

    using force as his primary weapon.93 Employing the strategy he is

    reputed to have used against the Ngwane, whereby he allied himself

    with the remoter but more formidable power of Shaka Zulu,

    Moshoeshoe sought a British alliance to settle the land dispute.

    This move was founded on the premise that the British, by

    claiming that the migrant Afrikaners were still their subjects94, would

    soon extend their jurisdiction and restraint over them. Moshoeshoe

    regarded the Afrikaners as children running away from their father95

    and so he negotiated with father to resolve the problem of

    Afrikaner incursions on his territory. Some space for manoeuvre was

    apparent, due to the division among the trekkers into loyalist and

    republican groups, reflecting respectively pre-Trek and Great

    Trekkers. What Moshoeshoe at first failed to comprehend was that

    British annexations were usually actuated by evidence of tangible

    profit or pressing strategic considerations,96 not by a duty to control

    their subjects or an overriding zest to acquire territory wherever

    possible.

    The chief British interest was India, where lay their most

    important commercial concerns. South Africa was attractive for its

    strategic Cape harbours, not for its cantankerous Afrikaner

    population. The Great Trek had been undertaken in defiance of

    British instructions but, because of financial considerations and

    disinterest in the apparently poor interior, the British were at first

    most reluctant to do anything more than declare the Afrikaners still

    answerable to British law.97 When the Afrikaners emerged on the

    Natal coast, the British, fearful that their route to India would be

    endangered through Afrikaner alliances with rivals, acted swiftly,

    annexing the area in 1843. 98 Then, fearing that the turmoil caused by

    the Trek in the interior would spill over to affect the coast, they

    granted Moshoeshoe's request for an alliance in order to stabilise the

    interior. The Trans-Orange was not of sufficient economic or

    strategic importance to warrant annexation, but the British were

    determined to make a lasting settlement between the disputing

    Afrikaner-Basotho factions. Regrettably, their intentions were

    compromised by an unwillingness to commit more than a minimal

    expenditure to this task. 99

    Lesotho and the British 1843-1854

  • 35

    Between 1843 and 1854, the year of the Bloemfontein

    Convention, which gave independence to the Afrikaner Orange Free

    State Republic, Moshoeshoe dealt directly or indirectly with a number

    of British officials, some of them peripatetic, namely: two residents,

    seven governors, six colonial secretaries, one special commissioner

    and two assistant commissioners.100 His own terms were

    straightforward. He would be the Queens ally if the British would

    speedily settle the land dispute with their intruding Afrikaner subjects

    and accord protection against them.101 The British response was of

    such a perfidious nature that the frequent British observation of

    Moshoeshoe's deviousness102 can only be rejected as pure hypocrisy.

    One major factor plagued the settlement. This was British reluctance

    to establish a presence north of the Orange River independent of

    either loyalist or republican goodwill.

    A haphazard attempt to make a settlement in 1843 failed, but was

    followed by the Maitland Treaty of 1845, which Moshoeshoe

    regarded as the final agreement on the problem. A small triangle of

    land west of modern Lady Grey was allocated to white farmers in

    return for quit rents to be divided between Moshoeshoe and a British

    Resident. Unknown to Moshoeshoe, the Treaty was never sent to Sir

    Peregrine Maitland for ratification, because of the interference of the

    first British resident in the Trans-Orange, Major Henry Warden.103

    Further problems, caused by Warden, led to intervention by Sir Harry

    Smith, the new South African commissioner. The Basotho were

    preoccupied with Tlokoa-Kora aggression and were forced to accept

    the Warden Line boundary when Warden threatened war. Smith

    then appointed Moroka, the Thaba Nchu Wesleyan as Great Chief

    of the Basotho in place of Moshoeshoe, since he suspected justifiably

    that Moshoeshoe was aiding the Xhosa uprising in the Eastern Cape.

    Warden attacked Moshoeshoe but was defeated at Viervoet in June

    1841.104

    The British home government, disturbed by the financial

    demands of the Xhosa war, accepted the recommendations of two

    assistant commissioners who reasoned that if the Afrikaners in the

    Transvaal could be won over by British recognition of their

    independence, a major destabilising influence would then be removed

    from the affairs of the Orange River Sovereignty (ORS). In addition,

    it was possible that such a move would strengthen the Afrikaner

    loyalist elements in the ORS and isolate the Winburg-based

    republicans.105 In January 1852, the Sand River Convention

    recognised the Afrikaner South African Republic (ZAR) of the

  • 36

    Transvaal, but did nothing to solve affairs in the ORS. Warden,

    exacerbating a volatile situation, armed Moshoeshoes Griqua

    enemies before assistant commissioner Owen dismissed him. Green,

    Warden's successor, enriched himself through land speculation.106

    By 1852, Moshoeshoe evidently had no illusions left about white

    intentions at local level, whatever the policy of the Home

    Government. He had at last realised that the disputes over land were

    part of a far wider struggle in which black and white were engaged

    for dominance over the whole sub-continent. The realisation that

    whites did not just steal cattle, but entire countries proved to be a

    turning point in Moshoeshoe's dealings with his African neighbours.

    Since he was anxious to avoid conflict with whites, it is impossible to

    gauge the extent of his involvement with Xhosa resistance, but he

    was in contact with African leaders all over Southern Africa and had

    begun advocating common cause against white encroachment.107 To

    Sekonyela, leader of the Batlokoa, his old enemy, he said:

    "We are both black and of one nation-it is our

    duty and interest to sympathise with each other-to

    lay aside all hostile feeling and henceforth be

    united, and only keep a jealous eye on enemies of

    another colour." 108

    When Sekonyela refused to unite through persuasion (being

    either short-sighted or plainly cynical), Moshoeshoe attacked, only to

    incur the hostility of Pretorius, who crossed the Vaal to be hailed by

    the Afrikaners as the man who would teach the Basotho a lesson.109

    Fighting was averted, but Sir George Cathcart, Smith's successor,

    having snuffed out the last embers of Xhosa resistance, attacked

    Moshoeshoe before the Basotho could comply with an ultimatum to

    hand over a large amount of livestock. The Basotho checked

    Cathcart at the Battle of Berea on 20th December, 1852, but lost

    much of their stock. The more realistic among them felt that, once

    the imperial troops were in correct formation, the Basotho would not

    be able to repel them.110 There was fear that the Basotho would have

    to take to th