Upload
june
View
35
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Marshall Breeding Independent Consult, Author, Founder and Publisher, Library Technology Guides http://www.librarytechnology.org/ http://twitter.com/mbreeding. Libraries in the Cloud. October 30, 2013. Internet Librarian 2013. Summary. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
LIBRARIES IN THE CLOUD
Marshall BreedingIndependent Consult, Author, Founder and Publisher, Library Technology Guideshttp://www.librarytechnology.org/http://twitter.com/mbreeding
October 30, 2013Internet Librarian 2013
Summary While cloud-based technologies have an
incredible potential to benefit libraries, it's important to understand the specific architectures and deployment models involved and their specific advantages or disadvantages. Breeding separates the marketing hype from practical realities and explains ways that cloud computing can transform libraries and enable them to achieve their strategic work.
Cloud Computing for Libraries
Volume 11 in The Tech Set
Published by Neal-Schuman / ALA TechSource
ISBN: 781555707859
http://www.neal-schuman.com/ccl
Book Image Publication Info:
Appropriate Automation Infrastructure
Ensure business applications and technology infrastructure in step with current operational and strategic realities
Tools capable to manage all components of library collections Print – electronic – digital
Interfaces capable of delivering access to all material types for library users Discovery – services – fulfillment
Take full advantage of current computing capabilities and architectures
Key Context: Libraries in Transition
Academic Shift from Print > Electronic E-journal transition largely complete Circulation of print collections slowing E-books now in play (consultation > reading)
All libraries: Need better tools for access to complex multi-
format collections Strong emphasis on digitizing local collections Demands for enterprise integration and
interoperability
Key Context: Technologies in transition
Client / Server > Web-based computing Beyond Web 2.0
Integration of social computing into core infrastructure
Local computing shifting to cloud platforms Application Service Provider offerings standard New expectations for multi-tenant software-as-a-
service Full spectrum of devices
full-scale / net book / tablet / mobile Mobile the current focus, but is only one example of
device and interface cycles
Fundamental technology shift Mainframe computing Client/Server Web-based and Cloud Computing
http://www.flickr.com/photos/carrick/61952845/http://soacloudcomputing.blogspot.com/2008/10/cloud-computing.html
http://www.javaworld.com/javaworld/jw-10-2001/jw-1019-jxta.html
Cloud Computing Major trend in Information Technology Term “in the cloud” has devolved into
marketing hype, but cloud computing in the form of multi-tenant software as a service offers libraries opportunities to break out of individual silos of automation and engage in widely shared cooperative systems
Opportunities for libraries to leverage their combined efforts into large-scale systems with more end-user impact and organizational efficiencies
Beyond “Cloudwashing” Cloud as marketing hype Cloud computing used very freely,
tagged to almost any virtualized environment
Any arrangement where the library relies on some kind of remote hosting environment for major automation components
Includes almost any vendor-hosted product offering
Example: ASP now Software-as-a-Service
Cloud computing – characteristics
Web-based Interfaces Externally hosted Pricing: subscription or utility Highly abstracted computing model Provisioned on demand Scaled according to variable needs Elastic – consumption of resources can
contract and expand according to demand
Gartner Hype Cycle 2009
Gartner Hype Cycle 2010
Gartner Hype Cycle 2011
Gartner Hype Cycle 2012
Gartner Hype Cycle 2013
Budget Allocations
Server Purchase Server
Maintenance Application
software license Data Center
overhead Energy costs Facility costs
Annual Subscription Measured
Service? Fixed fees
Factors Hosting Software Licenses Optional modules
Local Computing Cloud Computing
Software as a Service Multi Tennant SaaS is the modern
approach One copy of the code base serves multiple
sites Software functionality delivered entirely
through Web interfaces No workstation clients
Upgrades and fixes deployed universally Usually in small increments
Data as a service SaaS provides opportunity for highly shared
data models Bibliographic knowledgebase: one globally
shared copy that serves all libraries Discovery indexes: article and object-level index
for resource discovery E-resource knowledge bases: shared
authoritative repository of e-journal holdings General opportunity to move away from library-
by-library metadata management to globally shared workflows
Reconceptualization of Automation Current organization of functionality based on
past assumptions Possible new organizing principles
Fulfillment = Circulation + ILL + DCB + e-commerce
Resource management = Cataloging + Acquisitions + Serials + ERM
Customer Relationship Management = Reference + Circulation + ILL (public services)
Enterprise Resource Planning = Acquisitions + Collection Development
Open Systems Achieving openness has risen as the key
driver behind library technology strategies Libraries need to do more with their data Ability to improve customer experience and
operational efficiencies Demand for Interoperability Open source – full access to internal
program of the application Open API’s – expose programmatic
interfaces to data and functionality
Impact of Cloud technologies on Resource Discovery
Challenge: More integrated approach to information and service delivery Library Web sites offer a menu of unconnected silos:
Books: Library OPAC (ILS online catalog module) Search the Web site Articles: Aggregated content products, e-journal collections OpenURL linking services E-journal finding aids (Often managed by link resolver) Subject guides (e.g. Springshare LibGuides) Local digital collections
ETDs, photos, rich media collections Metasearch engines Discovery Services – often just another choice among many
All searched separately
Discovery from Local to Web-scale Initial products focused on technology
AquaBrowser, Endeca, Primo, Encore, VuFind, LIBERO Uno, Civica Sorcer, Axiell Arena Mostly locally-installed software
Current phase is focused on pre-populated indexes that aim to deliver Web-scale discovery Primo Central (Ex Libris) Summon (Serials Solutions) WorldCat Local (OCLC) EBSCO Discovery Service (EBSCO) Encore Synergy (no index, though)
Populating Web-scale index with full text
Citations or structured metadata provide key data to power search & retrieval and faceted navigation
Indexing full text of content amplifies access Every title, phrase, term becomes an
access point Important to understand depth indexing
Currency, dates covered, full-text or citation Many other factors
Web-scale Index-based DiscoverySearch:
Digital Collections
Web Site Content
Institutional
Repositories
…E-Journals
Reference Sources
Search Results
Pre-built harvesting and indexing
Consolidated Index
ILS Data
Aggregated Content packages
(2009- present)
Usage-generate
dData
Customer
Profile
Open Access
Impact of cloud technologies on Resource Sharing
BibliographicDatabase
Library System
Branch 1
Branch 2
Branch 3
Branch 4
Branch 5
Branch 6
Branch 7
Branch 8
Holdings
Main Facility
Search:
Integrated Library System
Patrons useCirculation featuresto request itemsfrom other branches
Floating Collectionsmay reduce workload forInter-branchtransfers
Model:Multi-branchIndependentLibrary System
BibliographicDatabase
Library System A
Branch 1
Branch 2
Branch 3
Branch 4
Branch 5
Branch 6
Branch 7
Branch 8
HoldingsMain Facility
BibliographicDatabase
Library System B
Branch 1
Branch 2
Branch 3
Branch 4
Branch 5
Branch 6
Branch 7
Branch 8
HoldingsMain Facility
BibliographicDatabase
Library System C
Branch 1
Branch 2
Branch 3
Branch 4
Branch 5
Branch 6
Branch 7
Branch 8
HoldingsMain Facility
BibliographicDatabase
Library System D
Branch 1
Branch 2
Branch 3
Branch 4
Branch 5
Branch 6
Branch 7
Branch 8
HoldingsMain Facility
BibliographicDatabase
Library System F
Branch 1
Branch 2
Branch 3
Branch 4
Branch 5
Branch 6
Branch 7
Branch 8
HoldingsMain Facility
BibliographicDatabase
Library System E
Branch 1
Branch 2
Branch 3
Branch 4
Branch 5
Branch 6
Branch 7
Branch 8
HoldingsMain Facility
Resource Sharing Application
BibliographicDatabase
Discovery and Request Management Routines
Staff Fulfillment Tools
Inter-System Communications
NCIP SIP ISO
ILLZ39.50
NCIP
NCIP
NCIP
NCIP
NCIP
NCIP
Search:
Consortial Resource Sharing System
BibliographicDatabase
Shared Consortia System
Library 2
Library 3
Library 4
Library 5
Library 7
Library 8
Library 9
Library 10
Holdings
Library 1 Library 6
Shared Consortial ILS
Search:
Model:Multipleindependentlibraries in aConsortiumShare an ILS
ILS configuredTo supportDirect consortialBorrowing throughCirculation Module
Strategic Cooperation and Resource sharing
Efforts on many fronts to cooperate and consolidate
Many regional consortia merging (Example: Illinois Heartland Library System)
State-wide or national implementations New Zealand: Kōtui, Te Puna
Software-as-a-service or “cloud” based implementations Many libraries share computing
infrastructure and data resources
Iceland Libraries
South AustraliaSA Public Library Network
140 Public Libraries
Chile
Georgia PINES 275 Libraries 140 Counties 9.6 million books Single Library
Card
43% of population in Georgia
Northern Ireland Recently consolidated from 4 regional
networks into one 96 branch libraries 18 mobile libraries Collections managed through single
Axiell OpenGalaxy LMS
http://www.ni-libraries.net/
Illinois Heartland Library Consortium
LargestConsortiumin US by Number of Members
Denmark
Denmark Shared LMS Common Tender for joint library system
February 2013 88 municipalities: 90 percent of Danish
population Public + School libraries
Process managed by Kombit: non-profit organization owned by Danish Local Authorities
Dantek awarded contract June 2013 [contested by Axiell]
Orbis Cascade Alliance 37 Academic Libraries Combined enrollment of 258,000 9 million titles 1997: implemented dual INN-Reach systems Orbis and Cascade consortia merged in 2003 Moved from INN-Reach to OCLC Navigator /
VDX in 2008 Current strategy to move to shared LMS
based on Ex Libris Alma
2CUL
Shared Services:Collection DevelopmentTechnical Services
Shared Infrastructure?:
2013: The current state of discovery
Online Catalogs of ILS modules in decline Increasing numbers of academic libraries offer
discovery services Index-based search emerges
Summon, Primo/Primo Central, EBSCO Discovery Service, WorldCat Local
Indexes growing in comprehensiveness and depth. Relevancy algorithms gaining sophistication Increasing numbers of publishers and providers
cooperate with library discovery services Open Discovery Initiative launched October 2011
New-generation Library Management
Fragmented Library Management LMS for management of (mostly) print Duplicative financial systems between library and local
government or other parent organization E-book lending platform (multiple?) Interlibrary loan (borrowing and lending) Self-service and AMH infrastructure Electronic Resource Management PC Scheduling and print management Event scheduling Digital Collections Management platforms (CONTENTdm, DigiTool,
etc.) Discovery-layer services for broader access to library collections No effective integration services / interoperability among
disconnected systems, non-aligned metadata schemes
Is the status quo sustainable? ILS for management of (mostly) print Duplicative financial systems between library and campus Electronic Resource Management (non-integrated with ILS) OpenURL Link Resolver w/ knowledge base for access to
full-text electronic articles Digital Collections Management platforms (CONTENTdm,
DigiTool, etc.) Institutional Repositories (DSpace, Fedora, etc.) Discovery-layer services for broader access to library
collections No effective integration services / interoperability among
disconnected systems, non-aligned metadata schemes
Integrated (for print) Library System
Circulation
BIB
Staff Interfaces:
Holding / Items
CircTransact User Vendor Policies$$$
Funds
Cataloging Acquisitions Serials OnlineCatalog
Public Interfaces:
Interfaces
BusinessLogic
DataStores
LMS / ERM: Fragmented Model
Circulation
BIB
Staff Interfaces:
Holding / Items
CircTransactUserVendor Policies$$$
Funds
CatalogingAcquisitionsSerials OnlineCatalog
Public Interfaces:
Application Programming Interfaces`
LicenseManagement
LicenseTerms
E-resourceProcurement
VendorsE-JournalTitles
Protocols: CORE
Common approach for ERM
Circulation
BIB
Staff Interfaces:
Holding / Items
CircTransactUserVendor Policies$$$
Funds
CatalogingAcquisitionsSerials OnlineCatalog
Public Interfaces:
Application Programming Interfaces
Budget License Terms
Titles / Holdings
Vendors
Access Details
Gaps in Automation Almost no systematic automation
support for references and research services Customer Relationship Management?
Resource sharing / Interlibrary loan management
Collection development support
Comprehensive Resource Management No longer sensible to use different software
platforms for managing different types of library materials
ILS + ERM + OpenURL Resolver + Digital Asset management, etc. very inefficient model
Flexible platform capable of managing multiple type of library materials, multiple metadata formats, with appropriate workflows
Support for management of metadata in bulk Continuous lifecycle chain initiated before
publication
Academic Libraries need a new model of library management
Not an Integrated Library System or Library Management System
The ILS/LMS was designed to help libraries manage print collections
Generally did not evolve to manage electronic collections
Other library automation products evolved: Electronic Resource Management Systems –
OpenURL Link Resolvers – Digital Library Management Systems -- Institutional Repositories
Library Services Platform Library-specific software. Designed to help libraries
automate their internal operations, manage collections, fulfillment requests, and deliver services
Services Service oriented architecture Exposes Web services and other API’s Facilitates the services libraries offer to their users
Platform General infrastructure for library automation Consistent with the concept of Platform as a Service Library programmers address the APIs of the platform to
extend functionality, create connections with other systems, dynamically interact with data
Library Services Platform Characteristics
Highly Shared data models Knowledgebase architecture Some may take hybrid approach to accommodate local
data stores Delivered through software as a service
Multi-tenant Unified workflows across formats and media Flexible metadata management
MARC – Dublin Core – VRA – MODS – ONIX Bibframe New structures not yet invented
Open APIs for extensibility and interoperability
Library Services PlatformsCategory WorldShare
Management Services
Alma Intota Sierra Services Platform
Kuali OLE
Responsible Organization
OCLC. Ex Libris Serials Solutions
Innovative Interfaces, Inc
Kuali Foundation
Key precepts Global network-level approach to management and discovery.
Consolidate workflows, unified management: print, electronic, digital; Hybrid data model
Knowledgebase driven. Pure multi-tenant SaaS
Service-oriented architectureTechnology uplift for Millennium ILS. More open source components, consolidated modules and workflows
Manage library resources in a format agnostic approach. Integration into the broader academic enterprise infrastructure
Software model
Proprietary Proprietary
Proprietary Proprietary Open Source
Consolidated indexUnified Presentation LayerSearch:
Digital Coll
ProQuest
EBSCO…
JSTOR
Other Resour
ces
New Library Management Model
`API Layer
Library Services Platform
LearningManageme
nt
Enterprise ResourcePlanning
StockManageme
nt
Self-Check /
Automated Return
Authentication
Service
Smart Cad /
Payment systems
Discovery
Service
Development / Deployment perspective
Beginning of a new cycle of transition Over the course of the next decade,
academic libraries will replace their current legacy products with new platforms
Not just a change of technology but a substantial change in the ways that libraries manage their resources and deliver their services
Product consolidation Example: Alma for resource management
Eventual transition of Voyager and Aleph
Immediate transition of Verde SFX DigiTool for digital collections
Convergence Discovery and Management solutions will
increasingly be implemented as matched sets Ex Libris: Primo / Alma Serials Solutions: Summon / Intota OCLC: WorldCat Local / WorldShare Platform Except: Kuali OLE, EBSCO Discovery Service
Both depend on an ecosystem of interrelated knowledge bases
API’s exposed to mix and match, but efficiencies and synergies are lost
Public Libraries: Traditional Proprietary Commercial ILS
Polaris, Symphony, Library.Solution, Sierra Open Source ILS
Evergreen, Koha Academic Libraries:
New generation Library Services Platforms Ex Libris Alma Kuali OLE (Enterprise, not cloud) OCLC WorldShare Management Services Serials Solutions Intota Innovative Interfaces Sierra
Competing Models of Library Automation
Library Automation in the Cloud Almost all library automation vendors offer
some form of “cloud-based” services Server management moves from library to
Vendor Subscription-based business model Comprehensive annual subscription
payment Offsets local server purchase and maintenance Offsets some local technology support
Leveraging the Cloud Moving legacy systems to hosted
services provides some savings to individual institutions but does not result in dramatic transformation
Globally shared data and metadata models have the potential to achieve new levels of operational efficiencies and more powerful discovery and automation scenarios that improve the position of libraries overall.
Development / Deployment perspective
Beginning of a new cycle of transition Over the course of the next decade,
academic libraries will replace their current legacy products with new platforms
Not just a change of technology but a substantial change in the ways that libraries manage their resources and deliver their services
Progressive consolidation of library services
Centralization of technical infrastructure of multiple libraries within a campus
Resource sharing support Direct borrowing among partner institutions
Shared infrastructure between institutions Examples: 2CUL (Columbia University /
Cornell University) Orbis Cascade Alliance (37 independent
colleges and universities to merge into shared LSP)
Open source and Open Access Open source development of platform
services Open source infrastructure components Open APIs to expose platform services Knowledge base components
Open access Community maintained Adequately resourced
Reassess workflow and organizational options
ILS model shaped library organizations New Library Services Platforms may
enable new ways to organize how resource management and service delivery are performed
New technologies more able to support strategic priorities and initiatives
Concluding thoughts Urgency to align technology with library
missions Innovate locally Collaborate aggressively collectively Drive strategic development
Questions and discussion