Upload
mohd-qazar-yusop
View
225
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
LR of coal bottom ash. Fresh properties and chemical and inter relation with specific material where cement.
Citation preview
1
Title Author Year Objective Methodology Outcome/finding/conclusion Future research
1. COAL
COMBUSTIO
N BOTTOM
ASH AS
MICROFILLE
R WITH
POZZOLANIC
PROPERTIES
FOR
TRADITIONA
L CONCRETE
Diana
Bajare
2013 find out the economic
benefit and efficiency
for the partial
replacement of
cement with coal
combustion bottom
ash (CCBA) as well
as if it is possible to
use CCBA as
microfiller like flay
ash with pozzolanic
properties in
production of
concrete
1. CCBA was grinded in
planetary ball mill Retch® PM
400 for 4, 15, 30 and 45
minutes. Various grinding
periods were applied in order
to find out how the
granulometric composition will
impact properties of concrete
and if the grinding period has
an impact on the CCBA
pozzolanic activity. 20% and
40% of cement mass in the
concrete mix was replaced by
the grinded CCBA.
1. The grinded CCBA can effectively replace
cement up to 20% of its total amount without
reducing compressive strength of concrete and its
strength class. By replacing 20% of cement with
CCBA compressive strength class of concrete
C30/37 can be ensured, which is equivalent to the
reference mix of concrete.
2. Comparing concrete where 20% of cement is
replaced with CCBA with the one where 20% of
cement is replaced bydolomite flour, the formed
showed higher compressive strength (by 7–12%),
as well as higher depth of penetration of water and
water absorption rate, indicating that dolomite
flour is more useful as microfiller from the filler
packing point of view.
3. Replacing 40% of cement with CCBA
2
2. In order to determine the
efficiency of CCBA and its
impact on the concrete
structure and its mechanical
properties, several etalon or
reference concrete mixes were
prepared:
1) Mixes without replacing of
cement and 2) mixes where
cement is partially replaced by
inert filler – dolomite flour – in
the same proportions as CCBA
– 20 and 40% respectively. By
comparing the mechanical
properties of reference mix
(with 100% of cement) to the
mix with CCBA (20% and
40% of cement mass) it is
possible to evaluate the CCBA
(regardless of its grinding period) the compressive
strength of concrete reduces significantly. After 28
days of curing compressive strength class of
concrete reduces to C20/25 compared to the
compressive strength class C30/37 for the
reference mix of concrete. Strength indicators are
even lower for the concrete with inert fillers
(dolomite flour) reaching class C16/20.
4. The research results approve that CCBA has
little pozzolanic activity, because comparing
concrete specimens with the equivalent amount of
CCBA (CCP4/20 – 45 MPa) and dolomite flour
(D20 – 40 MPa), properties of the latter are
higher. In addition, this tendency do not change if
amount of fine particles in CCBA increases. It was
approved in the chemical composition research,
which showed that pozzolanic activity of CCBA
increases only slightly if the specific surface area
3
activity and its role in the
concrete strength increase as a
result of long term
curing, By analysing results
obtained from research of
CCBA containing concrete and
concrete with inert filler in
their
turn, it is possible to determine
the role of the CCBA
microfiller in ensuring ideal
filler packing and creation of
dense concrete structure.
3. properties of CCBA were
determined, such as substance
density by Le Chatelier flask,
particle size distribution after
different grinding periods (4,
of particles expands.
5. After 28 days of curing compressive strength
class of concrete with CCBA grinding period of 4
minutes reaches C16/20 and with CCBA grinding
period of 15 minutes reaches C20/25.
Compressive strength of concrete differs by
14.8%. The respective compressive strength
increase do not provide corresponding economic
benefit for additional grinding period (+11 min),
therefore energy and resources can be economized
on the grinding. Partially replacing cement with
the CCBA, the consumption of cement and CO2
emission from the cement production reduces
significantly. In addition to cement economizing,
possibility of environmental pollution with CCBA
is prevented and effective application for CCBA is
found.
4
15, 30 and 45 minutes) (LVS
EN 933-2:1995 un LVS EN
451-2:2001),
CCBA particles were
investigated under scanning
electron microscope (SEM
TESCAN Mira\LMU
Field-Emission-Gun)
and chemical composition was
determined with EDX (energy
dispersive X-ray spectrometry
– EDS, Oxford instruments
7378). The specific surface
area of particles was
deteremined by Porosimeter
NOVA 1200Е (0.35– 200 nm)
“Quantachrome Instruments”.
The pozzolanic activity of
particles was determined
5
according to the method
created at the
Laboratory of Analytical
Chemistry, Short description of
method:
Fine grinded materials
containing active SiO2 and
Al2O3 (pozzolanic additives or
hydraulic components) are
dissolved in weak hydrochloric
acid. Silica and aluminium
hydroxide are separated from
the solution by determining
their weight fractions followed
by burning of precipitates in
order to obtain active SiO2 and
Al2O3.
4. Cone slump of fresh mortar
6
specimens was determined
according to LVS EN
12350-2:2009. The necessary
amount of water for mortar
preparation was determined
experimentally depending on
the composition of mortar
aiming to maintain class S4
cone slump, which is 160 –
210 mm.
Mortar bulk density was
determined according to LVS
EN 1015-6:2003.
5. Density of hardened
concrete for concrete
specimens was determined
according to standard LVS EN
12390-7.
7
Compressive strength of
specimens was determined
according to standard LVS EN
12390-3/AC. Loading rate was
0.7 MPa/s.
Compressive strength of
specimens was determined
using hydraulic press
CONTROLS 3000kN.
Compressive strength of
concrete was tested for 7, 14,
28 and 90 days old specimens.
Depth of penetration of water
under pressure for concrete
was determined according to
standard LVS EN
12390-8:2009 with the
8
Controls impermeability
apparatus C245 by exposing
one surface of specimens to the
water with pressure of 5
atmospheres.
This experiment continued 72
hours. Water absorption was
determined for 28 days old
concrete specimens.
6. Chemical composition of
visually different CCBA
particles was detected using
EDX
7. Three different reference
mixes were prepared in order
to compare their properties
with those of CCBA containing
9
concrete. In one of the
reference mixes 100% of
cement was used as binder and
in two mixes cement was
partially replaced
by inert filler – dolomite flour
– 20 and 40% from the cement
mass respectively.
8. Four different mixes with
CCBA were prepared – two of
them with CCBA grinded for 4
minutes and other two with
CCBA grinded for 15 minutes,
replacing with it 20 and 40%
from the cement mass.
9. Normal curing regime was
applied to specimens
10
(10x10x10 cm) – demoulded
specimens were kept in the
water with temperature
20±2 °C for 3 days, then
placed in the room with
constant temperature regime
(20±2 °C) and humidity level
(relative humidity 95% ).
Specimens were kept there
until the tests and experiments.
Mortar bulk density for all
specimens ranged from 2358 to
2382 kg/m3
2. USAGE OF
COAL
COMBUSTIO
N BOTTOM
ASH IN
CONCRETE
Haldu
n
Kuram
a
2007 The purpose of the
present study is to
test common methods
(such as sink and
float test, particle size
classification, and
1. In this study, the total carbon
content of generated ash was
determined by employing the
standard loss-on-ignition
analysis (LOI) and the
determined LOI is accepted as
main conclusions can be drawn;
1. Compared to other pre-treatment methods such
as the heavy medium separation and electrostatic
separation methods, the crushing-screening
method was found to be a more useful route for
lowering the carbon content of the considered
11
MIXTURE electrostatic
separation) as an
effective and
economical method
for removing of
unburned carbon
from Tunc¸bilek
Power Station bottom
ash in order to
enhance its
application as a
constituent in
concrete production.
2. The paper also
examines the effects
of pre-treated CBA
additions on the final
concrete properties as
the mass of unburned carbon in
the original sample, which is a
common approach in cement
and concrete applications. size
values were calculated as 2.7
and 1 mm, respectively.
2. The specific gravity of the
sample measured by the
pycnometer method was 2.39
g/cm3.
3. The crystalline mineral
phases in the CBA were
identified by using X-Ray
Diffraction (XRD), model
S5000 diffractometer, with a
nickel filtered Cu Ka.
CBA. By using this method, 57.67% of feed CBA
was beneficiated with an unburned carbon content
of 4.65%.
2. In concrete tests, although the compressive and
flexural strengths of specimens cured at 56 day
increase with increasing amount of ash
replacement up to 15%, the maximum substitution
rate of CBA was determined as 10%. When 10%
of CBA is replaced by cement, the compressive
strength of CBA-concrete increases from 42.65
N/mm2 to 45.1 N/mm2. This relatively lower
substitution ratio compared to the common
practice of fly ash usage, can be attributed to the
different phase distributions and higher unburned
carbon contents of CBA.
3. The observed C–S–H fibres or elongated
particles on the
SEM micrograph of BC10 clearly indicate the
12
a replacement
for Portland cement
in cement mixture
4. The scanning electron
micrograph of ash shows
spherical, rounded and
irregularly shaped grains.
Methods
1. Pre-treatment
Particle size separation.
Mechanical means of removing
carbon from siliceous ash is
based on the relative particle
size of the carbon particles and
the siliceous particles in the
ash. In this study, the
representative 500 g of CBA
was subjected to laboratory
impact crusher with and
without using 2 mm separating
sieve.
pozzolanic
effect of CBA substitution on improving the
strength
13
2. Sink and float tests. The sink
and float tests were performed
on crushed samples at various
densities to assess the
suitability of heavy medium
separation. These experiments
were conducted in 250 mL
glass flax with a volume of 100
mL, using an appropriate
mixture of bromoform and
alcohol to adjust the density of
liquid between 1.0– 2.4 g/cm3.
A 50 g of representative ash
sample was introduced in the
liquid of highest density. The
floating product was removed,
washed and then placed into
the next lower density and so
on.
14
3. Electrostatic separation tests.
Electrostatic separation
encompasses a number of
different technologies which
are based on the electrical
properties of the particles to be
separated. The electrostatic
separation tests were carried
out by using a
conductor/non-conductor type
of separator (Boxmag Rapid
Ltd-HT150).
4. Moulding of CBA paste
specimens Representative
cement compositions were
prepared by progressive
incorporation of pre-treated
samples in place of Portland
15
cement (5, 10, 15, and 25 wt%)
to observe the effect of ash
addition in cement bodies.
5. The physical tests of
the cement mixes were
performed according to
Turkish standards TS EN
197–1. The cement–water
mixtures were stirred at a low
speed for 30 s, and then with
the addition of sand, the
mixture was stirred again for 5
min. Three 40x 40 x160 mm
prismatic specimens for
compression tests were
prepared from each mixture.
The moulded specimens were
16
cured at 20 C with 95%
humidity for 24 h, and then
after placed in a tap water and
cured for 7, 28 and 56
days.
3.
POZZOLANIC
PROPERTIES
OF
PULVERIZED
COAL
COMBUSTIO
N BOTTOM
ASH
M.
Cheria
fa
1999 This paper examines
the pozzolanic
activity of a Brazilian
bottom ash and a way
that allows for an
improvement of its
reactivity.
1. Characterization of the
bottom ash
The chemical composition of
the bottom ash is given in
Table 1. The calcium content is
very low (,1%) and the sum
(SiO2b + Al2 O3 + Fe2O3)
reaches 88.5%, which means
that this ash belongs to ASTM
Type F ash.
For this bottom ash, the loss on
ignition (LOI) is mainly due to
Conclusion
1. This particular ash, very poor in CaO (0.8%),
presents a certain similarity to class F fly ash.
2. The pozzolanic activity of bottom ash with lime
is very low till 14 days of hydration. Pozzolanic
activity starts at 28 days and the calcium
hydroxide consumption is very important at 90
days.
3. The strength activity indexes with Portland
cement determined on standard mortars according
to the European standard ENV450 reach 0.88 at
17
carbon The X-ray
diffractogram of the ash .shows
the presence of a glassy phase
with two major crystalline
phases of quartz and mullite.
This low-calcium ash shows
diffused halo maxima at 20–27
82 u (Cu Ka radiation).
The scanning electron
micrograph of the ash, shows
both spherical and rounded
particles, and irregularly
shaped grains.
The specific gravity measured
by the pycnometer method was
2.0.
28 days and 0.97 at 90 days. Such values allow the
use of bottom ash in concrete.
4. An adequate grinding improves the pozzolanic
activity of the bottom ash. The filling role of
ground ash is also interesting and the 28-day
strength index of ash is increased by 27% when it
is ground for 6 h in laboratory ball mill.
18
The particle size distribution of
bottom ash as received was
measured using a laser
granulometer.
Of the particles, 100% were
smaller than 100 mm and 2%
were smaller than 1mm. The
average diameter of the particle
size distribution was 35 mm.
Evaluation of the pozzolanic
activity of ash and other
pozzolans falls into three
categories: chemical, physical,
and mechanical.
The chemical evaluation,
which is the method of the
International Organization for
19
Standards (ISO)
recommendation R 863-1968,
measures the reduction of
calcium ions when a pozzolan
is suspended in a saturated
lime solution.
The X-ray diffraction
technique has been used to
monitor the progress of the
lime up take in pozzolan-
Portland cement containing fly
ash and rice-husk ash [10].
The results obtained by this
method indicated good
correlation between the lime
combined in the reaction and
the compressive strength of
20
mortars at 6 months and 1 year.
The mechanical methods
assess the strength properties
of concretes containing fly ash
and pozzolans, and ASTM C
311 describes the strength
activity with Portland cement
and with lime. For both, the
compressive strength of the
control mixture is compared
with the strength of
pozzolan-containing mixture at
ages of 7 or 28 days.
In the present study, both
mechanical and chemical
assessments of the pozzolanic
21
activity with lime were
performed.
Plain paste containing 50%
bottom ash (BA) and 50%
calcium hydroxide (CH) was
prepared at standard
consistency.
The water-to-solid ratio was
0.42. The paste was placed into
cylinders (Ø =50 mm, h=100
mm), kept in molds for 6 days,
then cured in water until 13,
27, and 89 days of hydration.
Before testing the samples
were dried at 50C for 1 day.
22
The cylinders were subjected
to compressive strength tests at
7, 14, 28, and 90 days.
At the same ages, the calcium
hydroxide consumption was
measured by the following
method, previously developed
by Ambroise et al [11]
to study the pozzolanic activity
of metakaolin. The
measurement was done by
differential thermal analysis on
600 mg of powder ground to be
smaller than 100mm. The
surface area of the residual
calcium hydroxide peak was
measured and compared to that
23
of a paste containing 50%
calcium hydroxide and 50%
ground silica, which acts as an
inert material.
The ratio between these two
peaks gave the relative calcium
hydroxide consumption of
bottom ash compared to an
inert filler. The microstructure
of the different pastes was also
investigated by scanning
electron microscopy associated
with energy- dispersive X-ray
analysis, using a Philips XL30
microscope (Philips, The
Netherlands). Strength activity
of bottom ash The strength
activity of bottom ash was
24
determined according to the
European standard EN 450.
The strength activity
index is the ratio of the
compressive strength of
standard mortar bars, prepared
with 75% reference cement
plus 25% ash by mass, to the
compressive strength of
standard mortar bars prepared
with reference cement alone,
when tested at the same age. If
these indexes are higher than
0.75 at 28 days and 0.85 at 90
days, the ash is allowed to be
used in concrete.
4.
LIGHTWEIG
A.
Beglar
2015 1. In this
experimental
1. Materials used in this
study are ordinary Portland
CONCLUSIONS
25
HT
BUILDING
BLOCKS
INCORPORAT
ING BOTTOM
ASH
AGGREGATE
UNDER
DIFFERENT
CURING
CONDITIONS
igale research, utilization
of bottom ash of
Dalan Chemical
Company and fly ash
of Soma B power
plant (placed in
Turkey), as a
construction material,
were investigated.
Test results showed
that, high volume
bottom ash and fly
ash can be used in the
production of
lightweight building
blocks as light weight
aggregate and binder,
respectively.
cement (CEM I 42.5 N), fly
ash (FA) of Soma B plant
and bottom ash of Turkey’s
Dalan Chemical Company.
According to ASTM C 618,
FA can be classified as class
C.
2. Bottom ash and pumice
were used as aggregate (0-5
mm).
3. In the first stage, the
effect of bottom ash
aggregate replacement on
mechanical properties was
investigated in three
different curing conditions
(28-day water curing, steam
Applying the bottom ash (BA) and the fly ash in
the production of lightweight building blocks were
investigated in this study. Pumice aggregate was
replaced by bottom ash in high volume. Fly ash
was also replaced with cement in high volume.
Test results indicated that;
- BA replacement level must be limited due to
dimensional stability problem which was observed
especially over 50% of BA replacement ratios in
standard water curing.
- There is no significant difference in compressive
strength of 50% BA containing and 100% pumice
containing mixtures. Furthermore, autoclave
curing is the most effective curing method among
the others from the point of early and ultimate
compressive strength development.
26
curing, and autoclave
curing).
4. Five different mixtures
were prepared. These
mixtures are BA0, BA25,
BA50, BA75 and BA100,
which indicates bottom ash
replacement level by weight.
5. In the second stage,
selected bottom ash mixture
(BA) and control pumice
mixture (P) were prepared.
6. The mixtures were
prepared in a Hobart mixer.
Test specimens were cast
- Porosity of BA mixture is slightly higher than
pumice mixture. Both dry bulk density and
specific gravity of BA mixture are lower than P
mixture due to lower unit of weight and porous
structure of bottom ash. Therefore, BA mixture is
suitable to produce lightweight elements.
- Thermal conductivity value of BA mixture is
lower than P mixture. The results of both mixtures
are lower than the conventional cement mortar
and in turn comparable with burn clay bricks.
- Porous structure of P and BA particles which
was observed in microstructural investigation
leads to an increase in the porosity of mixtures.
- Compressive strength of building blocks
produced from BA mix is approximately 25 % less
than P one. However, utilization of bottom ash
27
from the same batch into
steel molds. Physical and
mechanical properties were
determined after different
curing regimes.
7. After the curing period,
three cube specimens (50
mm x 50 mm 50 mm) from
each mixture were subjected
to compressive strength test.
8. Physical properties of
specimens were also
determined. Prismatic
specimens (40 mm x 40 mm
x 160 mm) were used in
thermal conductivity and
capillary suction tests.
(BA) and fly ash are definitely suitable for the
production of lightweight building blocks.
These mixtures are very environment-friendly due
to the utilization of solid wastes in high volume
and lack of burn process compared to the clay
bricks.
28
Bottom surface of the
prismatic specimens up to a
height of 3–4 mm is in
contact with water inside a
steel tray
9. Specimens were removed
from the steel tray at the
intervals of 4, 8, 12, 16, 20,
and 24 min and weighed
carefully .Furthermore, in
order to determine the
volume stability of mixtures,
prismatic (width: 25 mm,
height: 25 mm, length: 285
mm) specimens were used.
Building blocks and hallow
blocks were prepared by
29
using the selected mixtures.
5.
POTENTIAL
USE OF
MALAYSIAN
THERMAL
POWER
PLANTS
COAL
BOTTOM
ASH IN
CONSTRUCTI
ON
Abdul
hamee
d
2012 1. a critical review
of the strength
characteristics of
concrete and mortar
as influenced by CBA
as partial replacement
of fine aggregate is
presented based on
the available
information in the
published literatures.
2. Diverse physical
and chemical
properties of CBA
from different power
plants in Malaysia are
also presented.
1. Physical properties.
Bottom ash is sand sized,
usually 50-90% passing
a4.75mm (No. 4) sieve. It also
has 10 - 60% passing a
0.42mm (No. 40) sieve, 0 -
10% passing a 0.075mm (No.
200) sieve, and a top size
usually above 19mm.
For categorization given in BS
882: 1992 based on percentage
passing the 600μm sieve,
between 55% to 100% would
defined it as fine sand.
The grading requirements for
ADVANTAGES OF USING COAL BOTTOM
ASH.
1. It is possible to produce lightweight concrete
with a density in the range of 1560-
1960 kg/m3 and a 28 day compressive strength in
the range of 20-40 N/mm2 [30]. Though, the
strength development is slow at the beginning but
with extended curing days, maximum strength can
be achieved.
2. Bottom ash may be used as a partial
replacement of natural aggregates, with finer
bottom ash used as sand. The percentage of
bottom ash that can be used in a mixture
composition depends upon its quality and required
strength of the product [34].
Future research on the use
of coal bottom ash in
construction should focus
on the following:
1. An established set of
standards that spells out
guidelines on its usage
and regulates it if need be.
2. Long-term study on the
effect of durability and
strength properties of
concrete and mortar using
coal bottom ash is
required.
30
3. The influence
of different types,
amounts and sources
of CBA on the
strength and bulk
density of concrete
is discussed.
4. The setting time,
workability and
consistency as well as
the advantages and
disadvantages of
using CBA in
construction
materials are also
highlighted.
fine aggregates has been
described into four zones in BS
882: 1973 and it was done
based on the percentage
passing the 600μm (No. 30
ASTM) sieve.
2. Specific gravity of bottom
ash is a function of chemical
composition, with higher
carbon content resulting in
lower specific gravity.
Coal Bottom ash with a low
specific gravity, has a porous
or vesicular texture, a
characteristics of popcorn
particles that readily degrade
under loading or compaction
[13].
3. Inclusion of bottom ash has a more pronounced
influence on tensile resistance than on
compressive strength, reduction of splitting tensile
strength is hardly noticed, as long as a minimum
cement content of 365 kg/m3 is utilized [28].
4. Drying shrinkage decreased with an increase in
bottom ash content. Concrete made from bottom
ash exhibits a reduced drying shrinkage in
comparison with that of the control samples [28].
5. Due to increased demand for mixing water,
bottom ash mixture displayed a much higher
degree of bleeding than the control concrete [28].
6. High fire resistance: for protection against fire,
those materials that retain large quantity of water
are more desirable, since when they are exposed
to a fire, part of this water evaporates and is
3. The influence of
constituent materials on
the water absorption [19].
4. Chloride transport and
Corrosion effect of coal
bottom ash concrete.
31
5. An effective
utilization of CBA in
construction
materials will
significantly reduce
the accumulation of
the by-products in
landfills and thus
reduce environmental
pollution.
Bottom ash with a porous or
hollow ash may present a
specific gravity as low as or
even lower than 1.6 [14].
The range of the specific
gravity of this bottom ash
might be different depending
on coal type, origin, size,
handling, processing technique,
boiler size, disposal and
storage methods or other
criteria [15].
All these factors mentioned
have a commanding influence
on the specific gravity property
of bottom ash, as reported by
[16],
transported from the fire exposed surface to the
interior of the material, where the water cools and
condenses again [35].
7. Fly and bottom ashes increase the fire
resistance of blocks, and are principally due to the
wide evaporation plateau that those ashes incur as
a result of increase water intake of the porous
aggregates [21]
DISADVANTAGES OF USING COAL
BOTTOM ASH.
1. The early strength development of coal bottom
ash has been shown to be very slow at the
beginning, but as the curing period is extended
beyond 28 days, a dramatic increase in strength is
noticed [6].
32
When they investigated the
physical properties of bottom
ash specimen taken from
different disposal points in a
disposal pond. “There is a
difference of Gs between the
sample taken from nearest to
slurry disposal point and one
taken farther away”
3. CHEMICAL PROPERTIES
The chemical analysis of CBA
either using X-ray energy
dispersive spectrometry (EDS)
or X-ray fluorescence (XRF)
will reveal that the main
chemical compounds include
2. Bottom ash mixtures display a lower modulus
of elasticity than the control mixes. The empirical
relationship between static modulus of elasticity,
unit weight and compressive strength is slightly
lower than that suggested by the American
Concrete Institute (a=31.2) [28].
3. Due to high water absorption rate, angular
shape and very porous surface of the bottom ash,
higher water content is required to achieve the
degree of lubrication needed for a workable mix.
The increase water demand has a moderate effect
on early-age characteristics of bottom ash
concretes [28].
4. The inclusion of bottom ash has been shown to
delay the setting time of the mixture with increase
in percentage of bottom ash, the initial setting
time is further delayed. This can be attributed to
33
Silicates (SiO3), Aluminates
(Al2O3) & Iron oxide (Fe2O3)
with a host of other compounds
in smaller percentages.
4. INFLUENCE OF COAL
BOTTOM ASH ON THE
MECHANICAL
PROPERTIES OF
CONCRETE & MORTAR.
According to [6],
“Bottom ash has a large
particle size and a high porous
surface, resulting in higher
water requirement and lower
compressive strength”. The
water retention capacity of
bottom ash has also
the reduction in the quantity of C3S as a result of
adding bottom ash and the amount of mixing
water required to maintain a workable mix.
34
been highlighted by [21] &
[22] that “additions increase
the capacity of aerated block to
retain water since Bottom ash
is a porous material, thereby
improving the moisture
transport behavior
within the block during fire”
Method Standard Onjective Type of
sample
Day testing No of
sample/
cubes/slabs
35